Skip to main content
Parasitology logoLink to Parasitology
. 2021 Jan 7;148(5):598–611. doi: 10.1017/S0031182020002449

Setaria cervi (Filarioidea, Onchocercidae) undressing in ungulates: altered morphology of developmental stages, their molecular detection and complete sequence cox1 gene

Sylva Lanková 1,, Pavel Vejl 2, Martina Melounová 2, Daniela Čílová 2, Jaroslav Vadlejch 1, Dana Miklisová 3, Ivana Jankovská 1, Iva Langrová 1
PMCID: PMC10950381  PMID: 33407959

Abstract

This work introduces new morphological and molecular information on the filaroid nematode Setaria cervi (Rudolphi, 1819) obtained from 13 infected game ungulates out of 96 dissected. The hosts comprised the following: a single moose (Alces alces), ten red deer (Cervus elaphus) and two sika deer (Cervus nippon) originating from the western and northern regions of the Czech Republic. Based on the complete sequences of the gene encoding mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1), all 20 females and four males belonged to the species S. cervi. We detected three developmental female stages (adult fertile females, juvenile L5 females and L4 female larvae) differing in size and some morphological traits as the subtle structure of peribuccal crown and shape and features of tail knob. Such differences were described in detail for the first time. The phylogenetic relationships within the family Onchocercidae have been evaluated using new information on the cox1 sequence of S. cervi (maximum likelihood method, GTR + I + G model). In accordance with the latest phylogenetic studies, the present analysis confirmed the ancient separation of the subclass Setariinae from the remaining two onchocercid lineages Dirofilariinae and Onchocerinae.

Key words: Game ruminants, morphology, nematode, phylogenetic analysis, Setaria cervi larval stages, setariinae

Introduction

Forest game management has a long history in Europe. However, ongoing overabundance of some game animals as wild boars and wild ruminants is evident, and the negative relationship between the abundance of wildlife populations and their health status has often been shown (Gortázar et al., 2007; Macháček et al., 2014; Zbořil, 2017). Moreover, wild animals often enter cattle pastures and thus spread parasite germs to livestock. Therefore, wildlife disease surveillance and control is currently gaining importance (Nechybová et al., 2018).

Filarial nematodes of the genus Setaria Viborg, 1795 (Filarioidea, Onchocercidae) are mosquito-borne parasites of many artiodactyls, equines and even African hyraxes, and the nematodes reside in the host's abdominal cavity (Anderson, 2000). In Europe, four valid Setaria species are currently recognized according to the database Fauna Europaea (https://fauna-eu.org): S. cervi (Rudolphi, 1819), S. tundra (Isaichikov et Rajewskaja, 1928), S. labiatopapillosa (Alessandrini, 1848) and S. equina (Abildgaard, 1789) (Gibson et al., 2014; Gibson, 2017). This database also mentions two other congeners, namely S. transcaucasica (Assadov, 1952) in Estonia, Poland and Ukraine and S. digitata (Linstow, 1906) in Italy. However, the first species is currently considered a younger synonym of S. tundra (Laaksonen et al., 2010; Enemark et al., 2017) while the data of S. digitata are uncertain and its real natural occurrence in Italy has never been confirmed molecularly. In summary, S. cervi, S. tundra and S. labiatopapillosa are found in European hoofed game (Pietrobelli, 2008; Alasaad et al., 2012; Karbowiak et al., 2014; Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2015; Čurlík et al., 2019; Oloś et al., 2019) while S. equina is a parasite of horses, mules and donkeys (Hornok et al., 2007; Regnier et al., 2019)

Setaria infection is usually non-pathogenic but may cause mild chronic peritonitis in mammalian hosts (Anderson, 2000). The number of nematodes in individual host animals is usually low; however, there are known cases of epidemic disease causing serofibrinous peritonitis with severe morbidity and mortality in reindeer and moose (Jayasinghe and Wijesundera, 2003; Enemark et al., 2017). Moreover, individuals of several Setaria species are capable of entering the central nervous system and migrating through the brain and spinal cord. The infection can then cause serious neurological disease, lumbar paralysis or cerebrospinal nematodiasis, which can be fatal, especially in aberrant host animals such as goats, sheep and horses (Innes et al., 1952; Blažek et al., 1968; Tung et al., 2003). In certain case, nematodes were associated with ocular setariasis in mammalian hosts (Anderson, 2000; Tung et al., 2003; Nabie et al., 2017). Indeed, it has been shown that various Setaria species have zoonotic potential, and S. labiatopapillosa and S. equina have served as aetiological agents of human subconjunctival infections (Panaitescu et al., 1999; Nabie et al., 2017).

The indirect life-cycle of Setaria nematodes requires the participation of blood-sucking insects as vectors. These insects would comprise various mosquito species (Culicidae) or flies from the families Simuliidae and Muscidae (Czajka et al., 2012; Kemenesi et al., 2015; Čurlík et al., 2019; Rydzanicz et al., 2019). The insects become infected by first-stage larvae L1 (microfilariae) after sucking blood from an infected animal host (Bain and Babayan, 2003). Within the insect individual, the larvae undergo two moults from L1 to second L2 and third-stage larvae L3. The ability and speed of this development depend, for instance, on the outdoor temperature; the L1–L3 development lasts 14 days at temperatures above 21°C, but is inactivated at 14.1°C (Laaksonen et al., 2009). The cycle continues as soon as L3 larvae are injected into the mammal during the time the infected mosquito/fly sucks on the animal.

Within the final hosts, the larvae initially gather in the connective or aponeurotic tissue and then migrate to various parts of the abdominal cavity. There they undergo two moults, the first to L4 larvae and the next to juvenile nematodes that are sometimes referred to as L5 stage (Tung et al., 2003). The fifth-stage juveniles mature into adult females and males during approximately one year, and their bodies grow much in that period (Sommerville, 1960; Wilson, 1976; Sonin, 1977; Anderson, 2000). In fact, little is known about the behaviour of Setaria nematodes in the final hosts. The larval stages and juvenile females were morphologically determined only partially in Setaria marshalli (Boulenger, 1921) and S. digitata (Tung et al., 2003). In S. cervi, only body size of the larvae was roughly published (Sonin, 1977).

Female and male Setaria nematodes reside naturally in the abdominal and peritoneal cavity for up to 1.5 years (Anderson, 2000). Every day, fertile viviparous females produce thousands of microfilariae (L1 larvae) that migrate into the mammal host bloodstream (Nelson, 1962), and the cycle is completed after the L1 larvae are transmitted via blood-sucking insect vectors into the new intermediate host, survive there and are capable of further development.

Adult Setaria nematodes range in size from medium to large. The genus is characterized by compound cephalic structures (mouth opening surrounded by lateral lips in the peribuccal crown, amphids, submedian papillae and externolabial papillae) and smooth or finely transversely striated cuticle (Sonin, 1977; Almeida et al., 1991). The caudal parts differ between females and males; a female has a typical caudal knob and lateral appendages, while a male possesses two different spicules and a species-specific set of papillae (Nakano et al., 2007; Kowal et al., 2013; Sundar and D´Souza, 2015; Kumar and Kumar, 2016; Enemark et al., 2017).

Setaria cervi is a typical parasite of the families Cervidae and Bovidae, which occur throughout Europe and Asia (Anderson, 2000). It is capable of infecting several further atypical, aberrant hosts such as sheep and goats. In Europe, the first evidence of S. cervi occurring in red deer was revealed in Germany (Schwangart, 1940). Later, this parasite was found in red deer, sika deer and roe deer in many countries of Southern and Central Europe, including the Czech Republic (e.g. Blažek et al., 1968; Sugár, 1978; Shimalov and Shimalov, 2002; Rehbein and Visser, 2007; Kuzmina et al., 2010; Alasaad et al., 2012; Angelone-Alasaad et al., 2016; Oloś et al., 2019).

Species-specific traits of S. cervi are apparent from a comparison of three most frequent European congeners occurring in hoofed game (S. cervi, S. labiatopapillosa and S. tundra) made by Lanková et al. (2019). Setaria cervi females (males) are up to 142 (76) mm long, their cuticle is smooth, their cuticular peribuccal crown with four dentate elevations has an almost square shape, lateral lips have a crescentic shape; S. cervi adult males have horn-like lateral appendages, characteristically striated bands on the ventral side of the tail, four pairs precloacal papillae, one mediate papilla near the cloaca, four pairs postcloacal papillae and one pair small lateral papillae. Setaria labiatopapillosa may reach up to 150 (80) mm in length. Peribuccal crown is oblong, the lateral lips are rectangular. On the ventral side of the caudal body end are three pairs of precloacal and four pairs of postcloacal papillae, respectively, as well as an additional one pair of ad-cloacal papillae. However, the problems in the morphological differentiation of these species are illustrated by the fact that the description of S. cervi from cattle in Wisconsin by Williams (1955) de facto corresponds to the characteristics of S. labiatopapillosa. The third congener, S. tundra, is shorter up to 80 (37) mm in length and the cuticle is covered by numerous small papillae on each side. The lateral lips are non-cuticularized, and on the ventral side of the tail are three pairs of precloacal, one pair of ad-cloacal papillae and three pairs of postcloacal papillae (see Lanková et al., 2019). The morphology of younger developmental stages may slightly differ; however, literature data are scarce.

It is now clear that the comprehensive approach to identifying Setaria that combines light and scanning electron microscopy with molecular data is currently the only reliable method. Regarding molecular taxonomy, one of the most commonly used tools is the sequencing of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (cox1); five European Setaria species, including S. cervi, have repeatedly been subjected to this procedure (for review, see Lanková et al., 2019). Two studies of S. cervi by Alasaad et al. (2012) and Oloś et al. (2019) used the partial sequence of the cox1 gene; however, the complete cox1 gene has been already sequenced in other two congeners: S. digitata (Yatawara et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2017) and S. labiatopapillosa (Gao et al., 2019). This study will supplement corresponding information regarding S. cervi.

Despite the veterinary importance and wide occurrence of S. cervi, its development within a mammalian host has not been thoroughly studied, and published morphological studies are rare and sometimes confusing. In this study, we focus on the detailed investigation of the outer body structure of various developmental stages of females and even of males obtained from the body cavity of ungulate hosts, and uncovering detailed characteristics of their larval and adult stages. The study was conditioned by finding out the unambiguous species identity of all individuals by the application of molecular characteristics, and the phylogenetic analysis made it possible to evaluate the broader phylogenetic position of the Setariinae lineage within the family Onchocercidae.

Material and methods

Origin of the host animals and nematode collection

Entrails dissected from the body cavities of 96 hunting game ruminants were transported to the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague and parasitologically examined from 2016 to 2018. A total of 26 red deer (Cervus elaphus L.), 44 sika deer (Cervus nippon Temminck), 22 roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) and three fallow deer (Dama dama L.) were caught in official hunts in three mountain regions of western and northern Bohemia (Šumava – area of Srní; Český les – area of Rozvadov; Doupovské hory – area of Valeč), while one moose (Alces alces L.) was killed by vehicle collision in the area of Šumava Mountains (Fig. 1). All infected hosts were adult, 2–8 years old (Table 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Map of three hunting grounds in mountains of the western and northern Bohemia (Czech Republic) from which the game under investigation came. Individual host animals are identified in accordance with Table 1.

Table 1.

Complex characteristics of Setaria cervi nematodes with regard to sex, developmental stages, morphology, hosts, localities and NCBI numbers

Specimen No. Sex Developmental stage Eggs and microfilariae Body length [mm] Body width [μm] Peribuccal crown Caudal end Host Host age [year] Locality cox1 gene – NCBI accession number
SC1 Adult Yes 141 1125 Protruded Round knob M 1 5 49.0872453N, 13.4557319E MT977050
SC2 Adult Yes 135 1077 Protruded Round knob M 1 5 49.0872453N, 13.4557319E MT977049
SC3 Adult Yes 125 1014 Protruded Round knob M 1 5 49.0872453N, 13.4557319E MT977058
SC4 Adult Yes 125 1017 Protruded Round knob RD 1 3 50.1811000N, 13.2559772E MT977051
SC5 Adult Yes 124 1012 Protruded Round knob RD 1 3 50.1811000N, 13.2559772E MT977056
SC6 Adult Yes 124 1013 Protruded Round knob RD 2 5 50.1837383N, 13.2514281E MT977059
SC7 Adult Yes 123 981 Protruded Round knob RD 3 2–3 49.6367406N, 12.5702967E MT977057
SC8 Adult Yes 111 965 Protruded Round knob RD 3 2–3 49.6367406N, 12.5702967E MT977060
SC9 Adult Yes 109 904 Protruded Round knob RD 4 4 50.1746689N, 13.2402703E MT977053
SC10 L5 No 56 630 Protruded Disc knob RD 4 4 50.1746689N, 13.2402703E MT977055
SC11 L5 No 55 617 Protruded Disc knob RD 5 8 49.0979453N, 13.4721256E MT977054
SC12 L5 No 55 595 Protruded Disc knob RD 5 8 49.0979453N, 13.4721256E MT977052
SC13 L5 No 53 588 Protruded Disc knob RD 6 2–3 49.1003553N, 13.4366775E MT977062
SC14 L5 No 53 579 Protruded Disc knob SD 1 6 50.1849064N, 13.2440467E MT977061
SC15 L5 No 51 550 Protruded Disc knob SD 1 6 50.1849064N, 13.2440467E MT977065
SC16 L4 No 29 215 Retracted Knob-like papilla RD 7 2–3 50.1862531N, 13.2376522E MT977066
SC17 L4 No 28 209 Retracted Knob-like papilla RD 2 5 50.1837383N, 13.2514281E MT977071
SC18 L4 No 28 210 Retracted Knob-like papilla RD 5 8 49.0979453N, 13.4721256E MT977068
SC19 L4 No 28 210 Retracted Knob-like papilla RD 8 4 49.1027961N, 13.4587950E MT977073
SC20 L4 No 27 206 Retracted Knob-like papilla SD 2 3 50.1800969N, 13.2443472E MT977072
SC21 Not specified 42 444 Protruded 19 papillae RD 9 4 49.1042572N, 13.4651467E MT977067
SC22 Not specified 40 420 Protruded 19 papillae RD 10 4 49.1001864N, 13.4594442E MT977064
SC23 Not specified 41 421 Protruded 19 papillae RD 10 4 49.1001864N, 13.4594442E MT977070
SC24 Not specified 38 395 Protruded 19 papillae RD 1 3 50.1849064N, 13.2440467E MT977063

L5, juvenile fifth-stage female; L4, fourth-stage female larva; M, moose; RD, red deer; SD, sika deer.

All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with Czech legislation (section 29 of Act No. 246/1992 Coll. on the protection of animals against cruelty, as amended by Act No. 77/2004 Coll.). All experimental protocols were approved by the Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources of the Czech Republic and Institutional and National Committees.

The Setaria nematodes which were found within the infected host animals were located on the surface of the intestines, liver and, in some cases, on the surface of the pericardium of the heart. Other parts of the animal (spinal cord, brain) were not dissected. The nematodes were rinsed in a saline solution, fixed in 70% ethanol, and measured. Measurement of the body length and width and morphology of the cephalic and caudal parts was studied using an Olympus BX51 Light Microscope (LM). Some samples were cleared within the lacto-phenol solution (Hoffman, 1999) and later photographed using QuickPHOTO MICRO 3.0 software (PROMICRA, s.r.o., Prague, Czech Republic). Each specimen was numbered and divided into three parts: cephalic (head), middle and caudal (tail). Middle body part of each nematode was used for molecular analysis. The material was then placed back in 70% ethanol. Frontal and caudal morphology was also documented with the use of a scanning electron microscope (SEM).

For SEM microscopy, cephalic and caudal segments of nematodes were incubated for 24 h in 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2). Fixed samples were then dehydrated through an ascending ethanol series and placed in a CO2 Bal-Tec CPD 030 (BAL-TEC AG) critical point dryer. Samples were coated with a 2 nm layer of gold in a Bal-Tec SCD 050 ion sputter coater (BALTEC AG) and observed with a 6380 LV microscope (JEOL Ltd.).

Species affiliation

Setaria cervi species affiliation was determined based on the structure of the peribuccal crown on the cephalic part of the body as well as on the morphology of the caudal end. The gross morphology was determined under light microscope; details were defined using SEM microscopy as described above. The proximal body end of both females and males has the same species-specific characteristics, males are shorter and their caudal body part is sharp and coiled. Larger female has a blunt tail with a caudal knob and two lateral appendages (Blažek et al., 1968; Sonin, 1977; Almeida et al., 1991; Oloś et al., 2019). Moreover, each specimen was subjected to molecular analysis, which confirmed species determination (see below).

Based on the evaluation using body size, LM and SEM, the females were divided into three categories: adult fertile females, L5 juvenile females and L4 larval females. Mutual differences of the body size (body length and body width) among these female developmental categories were statistically analysed using a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test and a subsequent post-hoc Test of Multiple Comparisons (Dell Inc., 2015). Fourth category comprised males that were not tested. Prevalence and intensity of infection were assessed for each host species.

Molecular study and analysis of cox 1 gene haplotypes

Central body parts of S. cervi specimens used for molecular analysis were preserved in 70% ethanol. Before DNA extraction, they were dried in a freeze-dryer (Alpha 1–4 Christ) for 60 min. Genomic DNA was extracted from all 24 individuals presented in Table 1 using a NucleoSpin® Tissue Kit. An animal tissue support protocol was utilized.

A consensus sequence containing ND4, cox1, tRNA-Trp and ND6 genes was created based on complete mitochondrial genome sequences of species from genera Setaria, Brugia, Dirofilaria, Loa, Onchocerca and Wucheria (Table 2). Program BioEdit version 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999) was used for consensus sequence creation. A Primer3 Input 0.4.0 Program (Rozen and Skaletsky, 2000) was utilized to design primer pairs (Table 3) located in the conserved regions of the mitochondrial genes. A fertile SC1 female from the moose was used for primary sequence analyses.

Table 2.

Sequences of cox1 gene used for haplotype and phylogenetic analyses

Haplotype NCBI Position Species Author Host Origin
BrM1 NC_004298.1 2254–3900 Brugia malayi Ghedin et al. (2007) Human Not specified
BrM1 AF538716.1 2254–3900 Brugia malayi Ghedin et al. (2007) Human Not specified
BrP1 AP017680.1 7–1653 Brugia pahangi Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
BrT1 AP017686.1 11952–13598 Brugia timori Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
DiH1 KX265050.1 2265–3911 Dirofilaria sp. ‘hongkongensis’ Yilmaz et al. (2016) Human India
DiH1 NC_031365.1 2265–3911 Dirofilaria sp. ‘hongkongensis’ Yilmaz et al. (2016) Human India
DiI1 AJ537512.1 2268–3914 Dirofilaria immitis Hu et al. (2003) Dog Australia
DiI1 NC_005305.1 2268–3914 Dirofilaria immitis Hu et al. (2003) Dog Australia
DiR1 NC_029975.1 2262–3908 Dirofilaria repens Lorenzen et al. (2016) Not specified Not specified
DiR2 KX265049.1 2262–3908 Dirofilaria repens Yilmaz et al. (2016) Human Croatia
DiR3 KX265048.1 2262–3908 Dirofilaria repens Yilmaz et al. (2016) Human Italy
DiR4 KX265047.1 2262–3908 Dirofilaria repens Yilmaz et al. (2016) Human Italy
LoL1 NC_016199.1 2244–3890 Loa loa McNulty et al. (2012) Human Cameroon
LoL2 HQ186250.1 2244–3890 Loa loa McNulty et al. (2012) Human Cameroon
OnF1 AP017692.1 5454–7100 Onchocerca flexuosa Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
OnF2 HQ214004.1 2264–3910 Onchocerca flexuosa McNulty et al. (2012) Red deer Germany
OnO1 KX181289.2 1–1647 Onchocerca ochengi Jaleta et al. (2018) Cattle Cameroon
OnO1 AP017693.1 5484–7130 Onchocerca ochengi Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
OnO2 AP017694.1 5484–7130 Onchocerca ochengi Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
OnO3 KX181290.2 1–1647 Onchocerca ochengi Jaleta et al. (2018) Cattle Cameroon
OnV1 AF015193.1 2266–3912 Onchocerca volvulus Keddie et al. (1998) Human Sub-Saharan Africa
OnV1 NC_001861.1 2266–3912 Onchocerca volvulus Keddie et al. (1998) Not specified Not specified
OnV2 AP017695.1 2278–3924 Onchocerca volvulus Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
OnV3 KT599912.1 2266–3912 Onchocerca volvulus Crainey et al. (2016) Human Brazilia
SeC1 See Table 1 1–1647 Setaria cervi Current result Moose Czech Republic
SeC1 See Table 1 1–1647 Setaria cervi Current result Red deer Czech Republic
SeC1 See Table 1 1–1647 Setaria cervi Current result Sika deer Czech Republic
SeD1 GU138699.1 2258–3904 Setaria digitata Yatawara et al. (2010) Cattle × buffalo Sri Lanka
SeD2 KY284626.1 7–1653 Setaria digitata Liu et al. (2017) Buffalo China
SeL1 NC_044071.1 2262–3908 Setaria labiatopapillosa Gao et al. (2019) Sheep China
ThC1 NC_018363.1 1–1647 Thelazia callipaeda Liu et al. (2013) Dog China
ThC2 KY908320.1 1–1647 Thelazia callipaeda Zhang et al. (2017) Not specified China
ThC3 KY908318.1 1–1647 Thelazia callipaeda Zhang et al. (2017) Not specified China
ThC4 AP017700.1 9432–11078 Thelazia callipaeda Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
ThC5 KY908319.1 1–1647 Thelazia callipaeda Zhang et al. (2017) Not specified China
WuB1 NC_016186.1 2252–3898 Wuchereria bancrofti McNulty et al. (2012) Human Papua New Guinea
WuB1 JN367461.1 2252–3898 Wuchereria bancrofti Ramesh et al. (2012) Human Mali
WuB1 HQ184469.1 2252–3898 Wuchereria bancrofti McNulty et al. (2012) Human Papua New Guinea
WuB2 AP017705.1 2277–3923 Wuchereria bancrofti Kikuchi et al. (2019) Not specified Not specified
WuB3 JF775522.1 2250–3896 Wuchereria bancrofti Ramesh et al. (2012) Human Papua New Guinea

Table 3.

Primer pairs used for primary sequencing of Setaria cervi cox1 gene including flanking regions located in the conserved regions of the mitochondrial genes

Forward primer Reverse primer Estimated PCR product size [bp] Primer Sequence (5´–3´)
F1 R1 651 F1 TTTTTGTGGAATGACGTATCG
F1 R2 1163 F3 TGCTGTTAAGATTTTTAATTGACTG
F1 R3 1631 F4 TTGGTAATTGGATGTTGCCTGT
F1 R4 913 F5 TGATGTTGGCTCATGGTTATACTTC
F3 R3 656 F6 ATTTTGGGATATTGGGCTGGATT
F4 R1 388 F7 GATGGCTTTCCCTCGTGTTAATG
F4 R2 900 F8 ATCTGTTCCTGTGTTGGCTGGTT
F5 R5 814 F9 CGTTAAGTTTGGGTGCTGTTTATG
F5 R6 1450 F10 TTCAGATTGTTTCATCTTTGGGTTC
F5 R7 1752 F13 TGATGTCTAATTTTGGTTTTCCAAG
F6 R6 952
F6 R8 1484 R1 AACAACAAAGAACCAGCCAACA
F7 R6 734 R2 AATGAAAATGAGCCACAACAT
F7 R7 1036 R3 AACCATAACCAACACGACGAT
F7 R8 1266 R4 AGCAGTATACATATGATGACCCCAAA
F7 R9 1492 R5 TACCAGGACCACCACCAATAAAA
F8 R6 419 R6 GAGGCTGAATCTTTTGACTTGATCC
F8 R7 721 R7 AGGCATACCCTGTATTCCAGCAA
F8 R8 951 R8 AAACCCAACCTCAAAGCCTCTTC
F9 R8 403 R9 CAACTCTTTAAAGGATCCCAATCCA
F10 R10 811 R10 CCACGTATAAMCCCACCACCATTA
F10 R11 1141 R11 GCAAAAGCCAACCAAAATTAACCT
F10 R12 1549 R12 CATAATCACCATGACAAAACAAAC
F13 R13 676 R13 AACTACTACCAGGACCACCACCAA

The PCR mix (12.5 μL) consisted of the following: 20 ng of genomic DNA, 5 ng BSA, 0.4 μm of each primer, 1.5 mm of MgCl2, 0.2 mm of dNTP, 2 mm of TMA oxalate (Top Bio) and 0.7 U of Taq polymerase (Roche). The amplification was performed in a C1000™ Thermal Cycler (BioRad) under the following conditions: 1× (94°C – 180 s), 35× (94°C – 60 s, 62°C – 60 s, 72°C – 60 s) and 1× (72°C – 600 s). Samples were analysed by electrophoresis through 1.5% agarose gels and visualized using ethidium bromide, and later extracted from the gel using a MiniElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). A BigDye® Terminator v 3.1 Kit (Life Technologies) and an ABI 3730xl DNA Analyser (LifeTechnologies) were used for rDNA region sequencing. Three replicates of each PCR amplicon were sequenced.

Based on the sequences of the 24 amplicons (Table 3), the sequence of the part of the mitochondrial genome carrying the part of the ND4 gene, the complete coxI and tRNA-Trp genes and part of the ND6 gene was assembled. This sequence was used to design three pairs of specific sequencing primers (Table 4). The design of specific primers, amplification, purification of PCR products and final sequencing were performed under the same conditions as for the primary sequencing. Partial amplicons were assembled for all 24 Setaria specimens using the program BioEdit version 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999).

Table 4.

Sequencing primer pairs specific for Setaria cervi mtDNA

Primer Sequence (5´–3´) PCR product size [bp]
SEQAR TGATGTCTAATTTTGGTTTTCCAAG 918
SEQAF CAGCAACAGATCGCATATTCTGAG
SEQBF TGGTTTTGGTAATTGGATGTTGC 834
SEQBR AAGCTGTAAGTTCAACATCAAAGAGG
SEQCF GATAAGGATCGTTTGTTTGGTCAGA 859
SEQCR AAGTTTAAAAATTAACCTAAATCTACCACT

Haplotypes (Table 2) derived from the complete sequences of the mitochondrial genomes of the six above-mentioned onchocercid genera were used for phylogenetic analyses. Specifically, cox1 information from GenBank was used for the onchocercid species Onchocerca flexuosa (OnF), O. ochengi (OnO), O. volvulus (OnV), Dirofilaria sp.‘honkonensis’ (DiH), D. immitis (DiI), D. repens (DiR), Loa loa (LoL), Wuchereria bancrofti (WuB), Brugia malayi (BrM), B. pahangi (BrP), B. timori (BrT), Setaria digitata (SeD) and S. labiatopapillosa (SeL). As an outgroup, five sequence samples of Thelazia callipaeda (ThC) belonging to Thelazioidea were used. The new S. cervi sequences were marked as SeC.

Cox1 gene haplotypes were identified by the DNA Sequence Polymorphism program (Rozas et al., 2017). MAFFT version 7 software (Katoh and Toh, 2008) was used for multiple sequence alignment (G-INS-i iterative refinement method). The jModelTest 2.1.10 program v20160303 (Darriba et al., 2012) was used as an optimal substitution. The Nearest-Neighbor-method (NNI) was used as a tree topology search operation. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted using PHYML 3.0 program (Guindon and Gascuel, 2003). The evolutionary history of the family Onchocercidae was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on the General Time Reversible model GTR + I + G (Nei and Kumar, 2000). Discrete γ distribution was used to model evolutionary rate differences between sites. The bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 replicates.

Results

From a total of 96 dissected wild ungulate individuals, only 13 tested were positive for the genus Setaria and the hosts consisted of a single moose, ten red deer and two sika deer (Table 5). A total of 24 filarial nematodes S. cervi were found in low numbers within the abdominal outcasts of the host ungulates. Specifically, one nematode was found in each of the five hosts, two in another five hosts and three worms were in each of the three remaining hosts (Table 5). Regarding sex, 20 ♀ and 4 ♂ were obtained. The only moose included in the study was infected with 3 ♀ of S. cervi, while ten infected red deer (prevalence 38.5%) had a total of 10 ♀ + 3 ♂ of S. cervi. The two sika deer were parasitized less often (prevalence 4.5%; 3 ♀ + 1 ♂ of S. cervi in total) (Table 5).

Table 5.

Quantitative data on the occurrence of Setaria cervi in host animals including information regarding sex and developmental stages

Host animals Moose (M) Red deer (RD) Sika deer(SD) Roe deer Fallow deer
No. of examined hosts 1 26 44 22 3
No. of infected hosts 1 10 2 0 0
Prevalence (%) 100.0 38.5 4.5 0 0
Mean intensity of infection (min-max) 3.0 1.7 (1–3) 2.0 (1–3) 0 0
Numbers of Setaria cervi females and males dissected from each of 24 host animals including nematode localization in the host organism
Adult females (three hosts) 3AD♀ M1/I 2AD♀ RD1/L
2AD♀ RD3/I
Adult and juvenile or larval females only (two hosts) 1AD♀ + 1L5♀ RD4/L
1AD♀ + 1L4♀ RD2/P+L
Juvenile females and a male (one host) 2L5♀ + 1♂ SD1/I
Juvenile or larval females only (five hosts) 2L5♀ + 1L4♀ RD5/I 1L4♀ SD2/L
1L5♀ RD6/P
1L4♀ RD7/L
1L4♀ RD8/L
Males only (two hosts) 1♂ RD9/L
2♂ RD10/L

AD♀, adult female; L5♀, fifth-stage juvenile female; L4♀, fourth-stage female larva; ♂, male; I, surface of intestines; L, surface of liver; P, surface of pericardium.

The length and width of each of the 20 females and four males were measured (Table 1). All 24 worms were divided into four groups according to size, with the males in one group (4 ♂, 38–42 mm long and 0.395–0.444 mm wide) and females in the remaining three (small: 5 ♀, 27–29 mm long and 0.206–0.215 mm wide; medium: 6 ♀, 51–56 mm long and 0.550–0.630 mm wide; and large: 9 ♀, 109–135 mm long and 0.904–1.125 mm wide, see Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Body length and width of 24 examined individuals of Setaria cervi from various host ungulates.

A statistical comparison by Kruskal–Wallis test of the body length [H(2, N=20) = 16.5124, P = 0.0003] and body width [H(2, N = 20) = 16.6000, P = 0.0002] showed significant differences among the three female groups. In actuality, the body length and width of adult fertile females (AF) significantly differed (post-hoc Test of Multiple Comparisons) from those of both the L4 larval females (P = 0.0002) as well as the L5 juvenile females (P = 0.0485). On the contrary, no statistically significant differences were found between body length and width of the L4 larval females and L5 juvenile females (P = 0.3741). Males were not included in this comparison.

Moreover, all five smallest females differed morphologically in several characteristics (see below: Figs 3 and 4). Therefore, these females were in the fourth larval stage (L4) which took place before the last moult (Tables 1 and 4). Six females in the medium group were unfertile and appeared to be in the fifth juvenile stage (L5), while nine largest fertile females contained eggs in their uterine canal and microfilaria in the ovejector (Fig. 5). All four males were comparable in length and morphology, indicating that they were in the juvenile to adult stage (Table 1, Figs 2, 5 and 6). Interestingly, two red deer were infected exclusively with males (one deer with one individual and the other with two) (Table 5).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Structure of the peribuccal crown in Setaria cervi females. Larval stage L4 (A, B) and adult fertile female (C, D) visualized by SEM (A, C) and LM (B, D). dp, dorsal projections; vp, ventral projections; mo, mouth opening; ep, externolabial papilla; cp, cephalic papilla; am, amphid.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Development of caudal end of Setaria cervi females (SEM). Knob-like papilla with a maul-like structure forming in the centre of the cuticularized ring in the L4 larval stage (A–C). Disc knob in L5 juvenile female (D, E). Thimble-shaped knob in adult fertile female (F). kn, knob; cr, cuticularized ring; la, lateral appendages.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Important features of Setaria cervi. Striated bands on the ventral side of male caudal end visualized by SEM (A) and LM (B). Eggs released from the uterine canal (C, D) and microfilaria released from the ovejector (E) of fertile females visualized by LM.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Caudal part of Setaria cervi. Adult female (A, B) and male (C, D) tail visualized by SEM (A, C) and LM (C, D). kn, knob; la, lateral appendages; cl, cloaca; precloacal papilla; po, postcloacal papilla; me, mediate papilla; sl, small lateral papilla; sp, spicule.

The morphology of the cephalic and caudal ends of all individuals was examined using LM and SEM.

Using LM to observe the cephalic body part, we were able to identify the presence of dorsal and ventral projections and cephalic papillae in both sexes; however, the shape and distribution of the dorsal and ventral projections as well as the shape of the lips and mouth opening were defined only using SEM (Fig. 3). The same techniques were used to study caudal body end, which was rounded (with a knob) in females and sharper (with cloaca, spicules and papillae) in males (Figs 4–6).

The peribuccal crown of the males, fertile females and juvenile L5 females had a protruding character and was located on the rounded cephalic body end. The dorsal and ventral projections were sharp and slightly curved, and the distances between these projections were identical (Fig. 3). The mouth opening was round in shape, with a pair of crescentic lateral lips. Observation of the fertile females using SEM revealed the presence of two amphids, four cephalic papillae and four externolabial papillae (Fig. 3C). The structure of the peribuccal crown in the four males was identical to that of the fertile females. However, the structure of the peribuccal crown of the smallest L4 larvae slightly differed from two aforementioned groups (Fig. 3A and B); here, the cephalic part was less rounded without obvious cephalic papillae and amphids. On the other hand, the dorsal and ventral projections of the peribuccal crown had the same shape as those of the fertile females (Fig. 3C and D).

The caudal ends of the larval L4 females, juvenile L5 females and fertile adult females differed in shape (Fig. 4). The structure of the caudal end of the smallest L4 larvae presented with a small maul-shaped knob. The lower part of this knob was slightly retracted into the ring caudal body end and its surface indicated a number of small protrusions. The caudo-lateral appendages were relatively pointed and situated in close proximity to the forming knob (Fig. 4A–C).

The caudal knob of juvenile L5 females was a slightly cuticularized disc-shaped ring structure without protrusions, and the knob was separated from the body end by a distinct constriction or ring groove (Fig. 4D and E). This disc-shaped knob apparently changed its shape during maturation of females. Adult fertile females had a thimble-shaped knob with a blunt end and finely porous surface structure; the knob was not separated from the rest of the female. The two caudolateral appendages of adult females had the rounded ends and were located at a significant distance from the knob (Figs 4F, 6A and B); these appendages of juvenile L5 females and L4 larvae had more pointed ends and were located closer to the body end (Fig. 4A–E).

The caudal body part of the males is presented in Fig. 6C and D. The males had four pairs of precloacal papillae and four pairs of postcloacal papillae in addition to an unpaired mediate central papilla close to the cloaca and a pair of small lateral papilla behind the lateral appendages. On the ventral side of the spiral body termination, there are apparent transverse ridges (Fig. 5A and B).

This study is the first to represent the complete sequence of the cox1 gene including flanking regions (ND4, ND6, tRNA-Trp). New nucleotide sequences have been deposited in the GenBank NCBI with the following accession numbers (see Table 1). All 24 specimens (20 females and four males) were identified as S. cervi on the basis SeC1 haplotypes. The alignment of the complete cox1 gene sequence indicated that an identical SeC1 haplotype was presented in all specimens and partial sequences indicated 100% identity with the haplotype described by Alasaad et al. (2012) and Oloś et al. (2019).

jModelTest 2.1.10 v20160303 (Darriba et al., 2012) software revealed 1624 candidate models. Criterions AIC and AICc identified the GTR + I + G model (Nei and Kumar, 2000) as the most suitable (-lnL = 9006.71179; AICc = 18155.370348). We observed γ distribution with a shape parameter and a parameter p-inv of 1.1230 and 0.5160, respectively. The percentages of replicate trees, in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates), are shown next to the nodes of a phylogenetic tree presented in Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis (maximum likelihood) of the family Onchocercidae rooted by outgroup Thelazia callipaeda, inferred from mitochondrial cox1 nucleotide sequences (SeC 1 haplotype of Setaria cervi originates from Alces alces from the Czech Republic). Scale bar indicates the proportion of sites changing along each branch. Numbers above and below nodes represent bootstrap values (%).

Discussion

In the 2-year period during which game ungulates were monitored for parasites in western and northern Bohemia, relatively low numbers of S. cervi nematodes were detected in three host species – red deer (ten out of 26 examined deer, prevalence 38.5%), sika deer (two out of 44 examined deer, prevalence 4.5%) and one moose. However, 22 roe deer and three fallow deer originating from the same regions were not infected by this nematode species. Much more nematode parasites were detected in the dissected ungulates like the species of dorylaimid nematodes Trichuris and Capillaria (Trichocephalida), and several rhabditid genera Haemonchus, Ashwortius, Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus and Chabertia (Strongylida). Some analyses have been already published (Magdálek et al., 2017; Nechybová et al., 2018; Vadlejch et al., 2018). Throughout Europe, red deer commonly act as hosts to this filarial nematode (e.g. Alasaad et al., 2012; Oloś et al., 2019). In fact, the classical taxonomy of S. cervi has been problematic since its original description as Filaria cervi by Rudolphi (1819) and plenty of synonyms have appeared (Sonin, 1977). Therefore, data concerning the European distribution of S. cervi may be inaccurate. Classification of the Setaria species demonstrates how classical morphology based exclusively on light microscopy may not be sufficient for clear species identification (Yeh, 1959; Sonin, 1977). Unambiguous determination of these species most likely requires the contribution of scanning microscopy and molecular taxonomy (Alasaad et al., 2012; Oloś et al., 2019, this study).

The recent prevalence of S. cervi in red deer in the Czech Republic corresponds more or less to previously published data, even though these are scarce. For instance, out of 11 red deer examined by Oloś et al. (2019) in southwestern Poland, eight deer were infected by S. cervi (together with two S. tundra in one deer, P = 27.3%). Similarly to the present study, the numbers of nematodes within individual hosts were low (range 1–3) and there were only one male and eight females of S. cervi in total (Oloś et al., 2019).

The sika deer appears to be the second most suitable cervid host of S. cervi; however, the prevalence of this mosquito-borne nematode tends to be lower than this in red deer. The difference is likely related to specifics in the aetiology and ecological preferences of the non-native, originally East Asian sika deer, and European red deer. Sika deer favours open land habitats that are more likely to have lower mosquito populations (Honda et al., 2014; Macháček et al., 2014). Setaria cervi has rarely been reported in sika deer from Europe (Rehbein and Visser, 2007). However, no information concerning the prevalence of S. cervi in sika deer in the Czech Republic is currently available.

The last infected host, European moose, was killed due to collision with a motor vehicle in the region of the Šumava Mountains, where a small local population of this game has existed for a long time (Homolka, 1998). To date, only S. tundra has been reported in European moose, and those observations took place in Finnish Lapland (Laaksonen, 2010; Laaksonen et al., 2010) and Poland (Demiaszkiewicz et al., 2015); however, Anderson (2000) did suggest the broad possibility of S. cervi infection in this host. The current study confirms that assumption. A hypothetical reason may be the fact that a partially farmed elk population in Šumava lives here stably, the animals do not migrate and have no contacts with moose in Poland or elsewhere in Europe. Their infection is therefore affected by parasites that dominate the surrounding large game. However, it should be borne in mind that also the species S. tundra may occur in other, as yet unexplored, regions of the Czech Republic.

As we have already mentioned, the only reliable way to identify specimens of the Setaria species is now through the concurrence of complex morphological and molecular analyses. In our study, both approaches were applied to all 24 Setaria individuals. Correct identification of all Setaria nematodes as S. cervi was ensured through DNA analysis of the complete mitochondrial cox1 gene sequence, which has been obtained here for the first time. The already known complete sequences of the cox1 gene in two congeneric Setaria species (S. digitata and S. labiatopapillosa) facilitated our task. Our partial SeC1 haplotypes clustered well with information on S. cervi cox1 sequences published by Alasaad et al. (2012) and Oloś et al. (2019). Both authors also used the primer pair according to Casiraghi et al. (2001) and subsequently sequenced a 690 bp PCR amplicon. Alasaad et al. (2012) analysed the partial sequence of the cox1 gene in two males taken from red deer in Italy (JF800924.1), while Oloś et al. (2019) evaluated six females and one male from red deer in Poland (MK360913.1). The present study, which evaluated 20 females and four males, is more robust.

The gross morphology of four males and most of the females corresponded to the species characteristics of S. cervi adults (Durette-Desset, 1966; Sonin, 1977; Almeida et al., 1991; Sundar and D´Souza, 2015; Oloś et al., 2019). However, the five smallest females slightly differed morphologically in details of both cephalic and caudal body parts; they were larvae of the fourth stage (L4). The remaining 15 longer females were divided into two groups according to length and distinct caudal body part; of these, six were medium-sized juvenile females without eggs or microfilariae (fifth-stage stadium L5), and nine were larger fertile adults. The body lengths and widths of the females in these three groups showed discontinuous increases, and the differences between groups were significant (see Fig. 2). Sudden changes in body size and slight changes in morphology are very likely related to the moulting of the smallest L4 larvae to the longer L5 juveniles that later grow and sexually mature into adult females producing microfilariae. A similar analysis of female development in S. cervi has not yet to be made available, although Sonin (1977) reported L3 larvae of S. cervi in a mammalian host that reached 5 mm in length and L4 larvae that ranged to 22.8 mm. It is in good agreement with the current measurements of L4 larvae reaching a maximum body length of 29 mm.

Tung et al. (2003) described the morphology of larval and adult females of two Setaria species S. marshalli and S. digitata from cattle in Taiwan. Concerning fourth-stage larvae morphology, the authors considered these larvae unsuitable for species differentiation because the morphology of either peribuccal crown or the caudal knob was indistinct in both species. However, juvenile L5 and adult females of these species were easily distinguishable. Our findings concerning the morphology of larvae, juveniles and adults of S. cervi were similar but not identical. All five molecularly determined L4 female larvae were distinguishable not only from other longer/older S. cervi nematodes by their retracted and simpler peribuccal crowns, which did not present any papillae or amphids (Fig. 3C and D). Interestingly, the gross morphology of peribuccal crown clearly corresponded to the characteristics of S. cervi; however, we recognized that verification of species identification by DNA was required. The peribuccal crowns of juvenile L5 females, adult females and males showed clear and very similar characteristics; they were protruded and had a species-specific system of lips, projections, papillae and amphids.

The structure of the caudal body ends differed obviously between males and females, but also between each developmental stage of females (Fig. 4). Female L4 larvae had a small maul-shaped knob, while L5 juveniles are characterized by a flat knob distinguishable from the body by a groove, and adult fertile females had a distinct thimble-shaped, blunt-ended knob that was not separated from the body end (Figs 4F, 6A and B). This information was unknown until recently.

In summary, changes in morphology, including body size, clearly indicate the presence of ontogenetic development in S. cervi. Moreover, it should be noted that many of the authors who observed these rare nematodes did not take into account their developmental stages. In fact, S. cervi has become a sophisticated laboratory model for molecular analyses and antifilarial drug development (e.g. Anwar et al., 1977; Rathaur et al., 2009; Nayak et al., 2011; Roy et al., 2019); however, the morphological characteristics of this model nematode have often gone unnoticed.

New information regarding the complete mitochondrial cox1 gene sequence was utilized in an updated phylogenetic study focusing on the family Onchocercidae as well as on the position of the subfamily Setariinae. The family Onchocercidae is generally considered monophyletic (e.g. Lefoulon et al., 2015). Phylogeny based on morphological characteristics indicated a relatively early separation of Setaria spp. from other subfamilies of the Onchoceridae family (Bain and Chabaud, 1986), which was later confirmed on the basis of a molecular phylogenetic study analysing the sequences of several mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Lefoulon et al., 2015; Yilmaz et al., 2016; Mirzaei et al., 2018). Setariinae can therefore also be considered a separated clade.

Our phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 7) fully supports this hypothesis. Subclade B1, which contains the genus Setaria (97% bootstrap replicates), was clearly separated from subclade B2 (98% bootstrap replicates), which includes the subfamilies Onchocercinae and Dirofilariinae. However, some phylogenetic studies based on partial sequences of the cox1 gene provided different results (Bain, 2002; Alasaad et al., 2012). In any case, our analysis is in good agreement with the latest studies looking at relationships within the family Onchoceridae (Lefoulon et al., 2015; Yilmaz et al., 2016; Mirzaei et al., 2018); it is confirming the relationship of the genera Dirofilaria and Onchocerca (B2-2 subclade), and the close position of the sister genera Wuchereria and Brugia (B2-1-1) with the genus Loa (B2-1-2). The present analysis confirms also a clear separation of the Setariinae from all other subfamilies and provides much needed information regarding this subclass.

Conclusions

This is the first extensive review of the occurrence of the filaroid nematode S. cervi in game ungulates in the Czech Republic. Sika deer and moose were first registered in the Czech Republic as hosts of S. cervi. All 20 nematode females and four males were assigned to the species S. cervi through the identification of both traditionally morphological and newly acquired molecular features. This study was the first to detect different morphological characters in the developmental stages of S. cervi females (larvae of fourth-stage, fifth-stage juvenile females, adult females) using light and especially scanning electron microscopy. Detailed morphology of cephalic peribuccal crown, papillae and amphids, as well as the structure of female caudal body end provided with a knob, was shown. The complete structure of the mitochondrial cox1 gene was originally determined and a clear distinction of a Setariinae subfamily within the family Onchocercidae has been confirmed.

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr Miroslav Hyliš, Ph.D. of the Laboratory of Electron Microscopy of the Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, for providing technical assistance and SEM micrographs. We also thank Ing. Stanislava Nechybová, Ph.D. for her support in obtaining material. The authors are grateful to Brian Kavalir (Ontario, Canada) for his proofreading.

Financial support

This study was financially supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports INTER-EXCELLENCE project (INTER-COST LTC 19018).

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

We confirm that informed consent has been obtained from all authors in order to publish the article.

Conflict of interest

None.

References

  1. Alasaad S, Pascucci I, Jowers MJ, Soriguer RC, Zhu XQ and Rossi L (2012) Phylogenetic study of Setaria cervi based on mitochondrial cox1 gene sequences. Parasitology Research 110, 281–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida AJ, Deobhankar KP, Bhopale MK, Zaman V and Renapurkar DM (1991) Scanning electron microscopy of Setaria cervi adult male worms. International Journal for Parasitology 21, 119–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson RC (2000) Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission, 2nd Edn., Wallingford, UK: CABI. [Google Scholar]
  4. Angelone-Alasaad S, Jowers MJ, Panadero R, Pérez-Creo A, Pajares G, Díez-Baños P, Soriguer RC and Morrondo P (2016) First report of Setaria tundra in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) from the Iberian Peninsula inferred from molecular data: epidemiological implications. Parasites & Vectors 9, 521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Anwar N, Ansari AA, Ghatak S and Murti CRK (1977) Setaria cervi: enzymes of glycolysis and PEP-succinate pathway. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 51, 275–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bain O (2002) Evolutionary relationships among filarial nematodes. In Klei TN and Rajan TV (eds), The Filaria. World Class Parasites, vol. 5. Boston, MA: Springer, pp. 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bain O and Babayan S (2003) Behaviour of filariae: morphological and anatomical signatures of their life style within the arthropod and vertebrate hosts. Filaria Journal 2, 16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bain O and Chabaud AG (1986) Atlas des larves infestantes de filaires. Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 37, 301–340. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Blažek K, Dyková I and Páv J (1968) The occurrence and pathogenicity of Setaria cervi Rud., in the central nervous system of deer. Folia Parasitologica 15, 123–130. Available at https://folia.paru.cas.cz/pdfs/fol/1968/02/04.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  10. Casiraghi M, Anderson TJC, Bandi C, Bazzocchi C and Genchi CA (2001) Phylogenetic analysis of filarial nematodes: comparison with the phylogeny of Wolbachia endosymbionts. Parasitology 122, 93–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Crainey JL, da Silva TR, Encinas F, Marín MA, Vicente ACP and Luz SL (2016) The mitogenome of Onchocerca volvulus from the Brazilian Amazonia focus. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 111, 79–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Čurlík J, Konjević D, Bujanić M, Sabol Ž, Martinković F and Sindičić M (2019) The first description of Setaria tundra (Issaitshikoff & Rajewskaya, 1928) in roe deer from Croatia. Helminthologia 56, 252–525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Czajka C, Becker N, Poppert S, Jöst H, Schmidt-Chanasit J and Krüger A (2012) Molecular detection of Setaria tundra (Nematoda: Filarioidea) and an unidentified filarial species in mosquitoes in Germany. Parasites & Vectors 5, 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R and Posada D (2012) Jmodeltest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9, 772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dell, Inc (2015) Dell Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13. Available at https://software.dell.com/ (Accessed 9 August 2020).
  16. Demiaszkiewicz AW, Kuligowska I, Pyziel AM and Lachowicz J (2015) First cases of nematodes Setaria tundra invasion in elk (Alces alces) in Poland. Medycyna Weterynaryjna 71, 510–512. [Google Scholar]
  17. Durette-Desset M-C (1966)Contribution à la Systématique des Filaires du Genre Setaria; Valeur des Diérides. Mémoires du Muséum National D'histoire Naturelle: Zoologie. Paris, France: Éditions du Muséum. [Google Scholar]
  18. Enemark HL, Oksanen A, Chriél M, Harslund JF, Woolsey ID and Al-Sabi MNS (2017) Detection and molecular characterization of the mosquito-borne filarial nematode Setaria tundra in Danish roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 6, 16–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gao JF, Hou MR, Cui YC and Shi TR (2019) The complete mitochondrial genome of Setaria labiatopapillosa (Spirurida: Setariidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 4, 1632–1633. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghedin E, Wang S, Spiro D, Caler E, Zhao Q, Crabtree J, Allen JE, Delcher AL, Guiliano DB, Miranda-Saavedra D, Angiuoli SV, Creasy T, Amedeo P, Haas B, El-Sayed NM, Wortman JR, Feldblyum T, Tallon L, Schatz M, Shumway M, Koo H, Salzberg SL, Schobel S, Pertea M, Pop M, White O, Barton GJ, Carlow CKS, Crawford MJ, Daub J, Dimmic MW, Estes CF, Foster JM, Ganatra M, Gregory WF, Johnson NM, Jin J, Komuniecki R, Korf T, Kumar S, Laney S, Li BW, Li W, Lindblom TH, Lustigman S, Ma D, Maina CV, Martin DMA, McCarter JP, McReynolds L, Mitreva M, Nutman TB, Parkinson J, Peregrín-Alvarez JM, Poole C, Ren Q, Saunders L, Sluder AE, Smith K, Stanke M, Unnasch TR, Ware J, Wei AD, Weil G, Williams DJ, Zhang Y, Williams SA, Fraser-Liggett C, Slatko B, Blaxter ML and Scott AL (2007) Draft genome of the filarial nematode parasite Brugia malayi. Science (New York, N.Y.) 317, 1756–1760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson, D (2017) Fauna Europaea: Setaria. Fauna Europaea, version 2017.06. Available at https://fauna-eu.org (Accessed 5 July 2020).
  22. Gibson D, Bray R, Hunt D, Georgiev B, Scholz T, Harris P, Bakke T, Pojmanska T, Niewiadomska K, Kostadinova A, Tkach V, Bain O, Durette-Desset M-C, Gibbons L, Moravec F, Petter A, Dimitrova Z, Buchmann K, Valtonen E and de Jong Y (2014) Fauna Europaea: helminths (animal parasitic). Biodiversity Data Journal 2, e1060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gortázar CH, Ferroglio E, Höfle U, Frölich K and Vicente J (2007) Diseases shared between wildlife and livestock: a European perspective. European Journal of Wildlife Research 53, 241. [Google Scholar]
  24. Guindon S and Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 5, 696–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hall TA (1999) Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41, 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoffman GL (1999) Parasites of North American Freshwater Fishes, 2nd Edn. New York, USA. Cornell University, p.335. [Google Scholar]
  27. Homolka M (1998) Moose (Alces alces) in the Czech Republic: chances for survival in the man-made landscape. Folia Zoologica Monographs 1, 1–46. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/47094581_Moose_Alces_alces_in_the_Czech_Republic_Chances_for_survival_in_the_man-made_landscape. [Google Scholar]
  28. Honda T, Miyagawa Y, Kuwata H, Yamasaki S and Iijima H (2014) Behavioral traits of damage-causing sika deer: open land preference. Mammal Study 39, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hornok S, Genchi C, Bazzocchi C, Fok É and Farkas R (2007) Prevalence of Setaria equina microfilaraemia in horses in Hungary. Veterinary Record 161, 814–816. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hu M, Gasser RB, El-Osta YGA and Chilton NB (2003) Structure and organization of the mitochondrial genome of the canine heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis. Parasitology 127, 37–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Innes JRM, Shoho C and Pillai CP (1952) Epizootic cerebrospinal nematodiasis or setariasis. Focal encephalomyelomalacia in animals in the orient caused by immature Setaria digitata, a disease which may occur in animals in other parts of the world. British Veterinary Journal 108, 71–80. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jaleta TG, Rödelsperger C, Abanda B, Eisenbarth A, Achukwi MD, Renz A and Streit A (2018) Full mitochondrial and nuclear genome comparison confirms that Onchocerca sp. ‘Siisa’ is Onchocerca ochengi. Parasitology Research 117, 1069–1077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Jayasinghe DR and Wijesundera WSS (2003) Differentiation of Setaria digitata and Setaria labiatopapillosa using molecular markers. The Veterinary Journal 165, 136–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Karbowiak G, Demiaszkiewicz A, Pyziel A, Wita I, Moskwa B, Werszko J, Bien J, Goździk K, Lachowicz J and Cabaj W (2014) The parasitic fauna of the European bison (Bison bonasus) (Linnaeus, 1758) and their impact on the conservation. Part 1: the summarising list of parasites noted. Acta Parasitologica 59, 363–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Katoh K and Toh H (2008) Recent developments in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. Briefings in Bioinformatics 9, 286–298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Keddie EM, Higazi T and Unnasch TR (1998) The mitochondrial genome of Onchocerca volvulus: sequence, structure and phylogenetic analysis. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 95, 111–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kemenesi G, Kurucz K, Kepner A, Dallos B, Oldal M, Herczeg R, Vajdovicz P, Bányai K and Jakab F (2015) Circulation of Dirofilaria repens, Setaria tundra, and Onchocercidae species in Hungary during the period 2011–2013. Veterinary Parasitology 214, 108–113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kikuchi T, Holroyd N and Berriman M (2019) Complete mitochondrial genomes of 50 helminths species. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/AP017680.1; AP017686.1; AP017692.1; AP017693.1; AP017694.1; AP017695.1; AP017700.1; AP017705.1 (Accessed 23 July 2019).
  39. Kowal J, Kornas S, Nosal P, Basiaga M and Lesiak M (2013) Setaria tundra in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) new findings in Poland. Annals of Parasitology 59, 179–182. Available at https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24791344/. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kumar R and Kumar U (2016) Ultrastructural studies on Setaria digitata by scanning electron microscopy. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 40, 1199–1203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuzmina T, Kharchenko V and Malega A (2010) Helminth fauna of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Ukraine: biodiversity and parasite community. Vestnik Zoologii 44, 15–22. [Google Scholar]
  42. Laaksonen S (2010) Setaria tundra, an emerging parasite of reindeer, and an outbreak it caused in Finland in 2003–2006 (PhD thesis). University of Helsinki, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Helsinki, Finland. Available at https://www.ruokavirasto.fi/globalassets/yhteisot/tieteellinen-tutkimus/vaitoskirjat/2010-laaksonen.pdf (Accessed 12 February 2010). [Google Scholar]
  43. Laaksonen S, Solismaa M, Kortet R, Kuusela J and Oksanen A (2009) Vectors and transmission dynamics for Setaria tundra (Filarioidea; Onchocercidae), a parasite of reindeer in Finland. Parasites & Vectors 2, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Laaksonen S, Pusenius J, Kumpula J, Venäläinen A, Kortet R, Oksanen A and Hoberg E (2010) Climate change promotes the emergence of serious disease outbreaks of filarioid nematodes. EcoHealth 7, 7–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lanková S, Vejl P, Melounová M and Langrová I (2019) Interspecific variability of filarioid nematodes of the genus Setaria Viborg, 1795 occurring in wild ruminants in Europe: a review. Sciencia Agriculturae Bohemica 50, 29–39. [Google Scholar]
  46. Lefoulon E, Bain O, Bourret J, Junker K, Guerrero R, Cañizales I, Kuzmin Y, Satoto TBT, Cardenas-Callirgos JM, de Souza Lima S, Raccurt C, Mutafchiev Y, Gavotte L and Martin C (2015) Shaking the tree: multi-locus sequence typing usurps current onchocercid (filarial nematode) phylogeny. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, 1–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu GH, Gasser RB, Otranto D, Xu MJ, Shen JL, Mohandas N, Zhou DH and Zhu XQ (2013) Mitochondrial genome of the eyeworm, Thelazia callipaeda (Nematoda: Spirurida), as the first representative from the family Thelaziidae. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 7, e2029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu G, Li J and Zhu X (2017) Characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome of Setaria digitata (Nematoda: Setariidae) from China. Journal of Helminthology 91, 772–776. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lorenzen S, Muntau B, Schuldt K and Tannich E (2016) Variations in the mitochondrial DNA sequence of clinical Dirofilaria repens samples. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_029975.1 (Accessed 27 April 2016).
  50. Macháček Z, Dvořák S, Ježek M and Zahradník D (2014) Impact of interspecific relations between native red deer (Cervus elaphus) and introduced sika deer (Cervus nippon) on their rutting season in the Doupovské hory Mts. Journal of Forest Science 60, 272–280. [Google Scholar]
  51. Magdálek J, Kyriánová IA and Vadlejch J (2017) Ashworthius sidemi in wild cervids in the Czech Republic. In Kubík Š and Barták M (eds), 9th Workshop on Biodiversity, Jevany, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. Prague, Czech Republic, pp. 66–71.
  52. McNulty SN, Mullin AS, Vaughan JA, Tkach VV, Weil GJ and Fischer PU (2012) Comparing the mitochondrial genomes of Wolbachia-dependent and independent filarial nematode species. BMC Genomics 13, 145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Mirzaei M, Ghahvei Y, Lefoulon E, Lia RP, Otranto D, Martin C and Sazmand A (2018) Morphological and molecular characterization of Onchocerca fasciata (Nematoda, Onchocercidae) from dromedary camels (Camelus dromedarius) in Iran. Parasite 25, 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Nabie R, Spotin A and Rouhani S (2017) Subconjunctival setariasis due to Setaria equina infection; a case report and a literature review. Parasitology International 66, 930–932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Nakano H, Tozuka M, Ikadai H, Ishida H, Goto R, Kudo N, Katayama Y, Muranaka M, Anzai T and Oyamada T (2007) Morphological survey of bovine Setaria in the abdominal cavities of cattle in Aomori and Kumamoto prefectures, Japan. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 69, 413–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Nayak A, Gayen P, Saini P, Maitra S and Sinha Babu SP (2011) Albendazole induces apoptosis in adults and microfilariae of Setaria cervi. 128, 236–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nechybová S, Vejl P, Hart V, Melounová M, Čílová D, Vašek J, Jankovská I, Vadlejch J and Langrová I (2018) Long-term occurrence of Trichuris species in wild ruminants in the Czech Republic. Parasitology Research 117, 1699–1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nei M and Kumar S (2000) Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press. [Google Scholar]
  59. Nelson G (1962) Observations on the development of Setaria labiatopapillosa using new techniques for infecting Aedes aegypti with this nematode. Journal of Helminthology 36, 281–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Oloś G, Nowakowska J, Rojewska S and Welc-Falęciak R (2019) New findings of Setaria tundra and Setaria cervi in the red deer (Cervus elaphus) in Poland. Parasitology 146, 1333–1337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Panaitescu D, Preda A, Bain O and Vasile-Bugarin AC (1999) Four cases of human filariosis due to Setaria labiatopapillosa found in Bucharest, Romania. Roumanian Archives of Microbiology and Immunology 58, 203–207. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Pietrobelli M (2008) Importance of Aedes albopictus in veterinary medicine. Parassitologia 50, 113–115, PMID: 18693573. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ramesh A, Small ST, Kloos ZA, Kazura JW, Nutman TB, Serre D and Zimmerman PA (2012) The complete mitochondrial genome sequence of the filarial nematode Wuchereria bancrofti from three geographic isolates provides evidence of complex demographic history. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 183, 32–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Rathaur R, Rai R, Srikanth E and Srivastava S (2009) Setaria cervi dual specific phosphatase: characterization and its effect on eosinophil degranulation. Parasitology 136, 895–904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Regnier A, Martin C, Semin MO, Lienard E, Geffre A, Douet JY and Raymond-Letron I (2019) Subconjunctival nodule due to Setaria equina erratic migration in a horse: first case report. Veterinary Ophthalmology 22, 921–927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Rehbein S and Visser M (2007) Die Endoparasiten des Sikawildes (Cervus nippon) in Österreich. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 119, 96–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Roy P, Sengupta A, Joardar N, Bhattacharyya A, Saha NC, Misra AK and Babu SPS (2019) Influence of autophagy, apoptosis and their interplay in filaricidal activity of C-cinnamoyl glycosides. Parasitology 1, 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE and Sánchez-Gracia A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34, 3299–3302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rozen S and Skaletsky H (2000) Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. In Misener S and Krawetz SA (eds), Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology™, vol. 132. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, pp. 365–386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Rudolphi CA (1819) Entozoorum Synopsis Cui Accedunt Mantissa Duplex Et Indices Locupletissimi. Beroline: Sumtibus A. Rücker. Holding Institution: MBLWHOI Library. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.9157. [DOI]
  71. Rydzanicz K, Golab E, Rozej-Bielicka W and Masny A (2019) Screening of mosquitoes for filarioid helminths in urban areas in south western Poland – common patterns in European Setaria tundra xenomonitoring studies. Parasitology Research 118, 127–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Schwangart F (1940) Über die endemische Parese des Rotwildes und Tuberkulose beim Reh. Die Berliner und Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschrift 6, 61–66. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shimalov VV and Shimalov VT (2002) Helminth fauna of cervids in Belorussian Polesie. Parasitology Research 89, 75–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sommerville RI (1960) The growth of Cooperia curticei (Giles, 1892), a nematode parasite of sheep. Parasitology 50, 261–267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sonin MD (1977) Filariata of animals and man and the diseases caused by them. In Ryzhikov KM (ed.), Osnovy Nematodologii, vol. 28. Moscow, Russia: Nauka, pp. 1–219. [Google Scholar]
  76. Sugár L (1978) On the nematode infestation of wild ruminants in Hungary I. Parasitologia Hungarica 11, 146–148. Available at http://publication.nhmus.hu/pdf/parhung/Parasit_Hung_1978_Vol_11_146.pdf (Accessed 25 November 1977). [Google Scholar]
  77. Sundar SB and D'Souza PE (2015) Morphological characterization of Setaria worms collected from cattle. Journal of Parasitic Diseases 39, 572–576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tung KC, Lai CH, Ooi HK, Yang CH and Wang JS (2003) Cerebrospinal setariosis with Setaria marshalli and Setaria digitata infection in cattle. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science 65, 977–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Vadlejch J, Magdálek J, Rylková K, Forejtek P and Čadková Z (2018) Seasonal dynamics of an invasive nematode Ashworthius sidemi in wild ruminants in the Czech Republic. Veterinářství 68, 869–875. [Google Scholar]
  80. Williams HE (1955) Studies on the bovine filariid Setaria cervi (Rudolphi, 1819). Parasitology 45, 56–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wilson PAG (1976) Nematode growth patterns and the moulting cycle: the population growth profile. Journal of Zoology 179, 135–151. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yatawara L, Wickramasinghe S, Rajapakse RP and Agatsuma T (2010) The complete mitochondrial genome of Setaria digitata (Nematoda: Filarioidea): mitochondrial gene content, arrangement and composition compared with other nematodes. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 173, 32–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Yeh LS (1959) A revision of the genus Setaria Viborg, 1795, its host-parasite relationship, speciation and evolution. Journal of Helminthology 23, 1–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Yilmaz E, Fritzenwanker M, Pantchev N, Lendner M, Wongkamchai S, Otranto D, Kroidl I, Dennebaum M, Hoa Le T, Anh Le T, Ramünke S, Schaper R, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Poppert S and Krücken J (2016) The mitochondrial genomes of the zoonotic canine filarial parasites Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) repens and Candidatus Dirofilaria (Nochtiella) honkongensis provide evidence for presence of cryptic species. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14, e0005028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Zbořil J (2017) Myslivecká statistika za rok 2016. Available at http://myslivost.cz/Pro-myslivce/Aktuality/Myslivecka-statistika-za-rok-2016 (Accessed September 2017).
  86. Zhang X, Shi YL, Wang ZQ, Duan JY, Jiang P, Liu RD and Cui J (2017) Morphological and mitochondrial genomic characterization of eyeworms (Thelazia callipaeda) from clinical cases in central China. Frontiers in Microbiology 8, 1335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES