Abstract
Calvarial haemangiomas are benign, vascular tumours of the skull involving parietal and frontal bones. Mostly these lesions remain asymptomatic, and present with cosmetic deformity, headache, uncommon neurological symptoms and reported as case reports and case series. The radiological appearance can range from sessile growing intradiploically to globular and the lesions may extend outwards or inwards after eroding the outer and inner tables of the skull. “Sunburst appearance” and “Wagon-wheel sign” are classical radiological findings but the lesions may present simply as a lytic expansile or even sclerotic calvarial mass. Because of varied clinical presentation and atypical radiological characteristics, the final diagnosis can be clinched by histology only. In selected cases where these lesions are not cosmetically acceptable, en bloc resection with tumour free margins followed by cranioplasty is the treatment of choice. Most reports of calvarial haemangiomas in literature are in the form of case reports.
Keywords: Calvarial haemangioma, Intra diploic, En bloc resection, Cranioplasty, Skull tumours
Key message
Haemangiomas must be kept in mind while operating on calvarial lesions even if the radiological appearance is not classical. En bloc resections with tumour free margins results in both less operative haemorrhage and surgical cure.
1. Introduction
Calvarial haemangiomas (CHs) are rare, benign, slow growing tumours that account for 2%–10% of calvarial tumours and 0.2% of all bony neoplasms.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 They are commoner in women,1,3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 in the 2nd to 4th decades1,5, 6, 7,9 and in the parietal and frontal bones.1,3,6, 7, 8, 9, 10 Osseous haemangiomas have been variously described as being tumours of blood vessels in bones6 or as vascular hamartomas of the skeletal system1 and after vertebrae the skull is the commonest location of these tumours.4 The majority of these lesions are small and incidentally diagnosed on radiological imaging [7,10] but some may reach extremely large sizes at presentation.5,7, 8, 9 Though there is no consensus on what constitutes a giant CH, Jha et al11 have proposed that tumours above 6 cms in size be classified as giant CHs. We present here a series of 6 operated cases of calvarial haemangiomas and review the existing literature on these uncommon tumours.
1.1. Illustrative cases
We had operated 6 cases of CHs in our centre in the last 8 years [Table 1, Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4, Fig. 5, Fig. 6]. An equal proportion of these (3 each) were in males and females. Three patients were in the paediatric age group (<18 years of age) while the rest were in adults. History of trauma was present in 2 cases and the commonest presenting complaints were local site pain and cosmetic disfigurement. Not all patients of our series had a full complement of preoperative neuroimaging, and a preoperative suspicion of a CH was present in only 2 of these cases. All patients underwent en bloc resection of the lesion wide of the tumour margins with cranioplasty in the same sitting (polymethyl methacrylate cement in 4 and titanium mesh in 2 cases). A globular mass was found in 3 cases (one of which was necrotic and suckable) while in remaining 3 the bone was grossly normal and sectioning it with a craniotome revealed a mass with clear margins from the surrounding bone. In all cases the histopathology confirmed the diagnosis.
Table 1.
Details of patients in present series.
| Age/Sex | Presenting complaints | Imaging findings | Provisional preoperative diagnosis | Surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 76/F | Memory loss, vertigo of 1 year duration | Expansion of the inner table of the skull with classical, well demarcated, spiculated, T1 hyperintense mass | Calvarial hemangioma | Craniotomy and excision with cranioplasty using PMMA bone cement |
| 17/M | Pain over right parietal region for 4 months. Progressively increasing swelling on the right parietal region for 1 year. |
Erosion of outer and inner tables of the skull by a T1 and T2 mixed intensity mass that showed non homogenous enhancement | Unsure | Craniotomy and excision with cranioplasty using PMMA bone cement |
| 45/F | Diffuse dull aching pain over the left side of the head for 3 years with history of trauma to frontal bone several years ago | T1 and T2 isointense mass expanding the diploic space and not causing any cortical breech involving the left parietal bone with extension into the left temporal bone as well | Fibrous dysplasia | Craniotomy and excision with cranioplasty using titanium mesh |
| 12/F | Swelling and pain over right parietal region for 6 months | CT scan shows an expansile lytic mass with erosion of inner cortex | Eosinophilic granuloma | Craniotomy and excision with cranioplasty using PMMA bone cement |
| 14/M | Progressive swelling on the vertex for last 1 year and itching and ulcerations following topical treatment (scarification) by an unqualified village practitioner | Sclerotic thickened calvarium involving both parietal bones (right more than left) | Fibrous dysplasia | Craniotomy and excision with cranioplasty using titanium mesh |
| 61/M | Swelling and headache on the right parietal region for 5 years | Lytic expansile lesion on the right parietal bone with intact inner and outer cortices with specs of calcification inside | Calvarial hemangioma | Craniotomy and excision with cranioplasty using PMMA bone cement |
PMMA –polymethyl methacrylate.
Fig. 1.
T2 weighted axial (a) and coronal (b) sections showing expansion of the inner table of the skull by a right sided calvarial lesion with spiculated maxed intensity appearance. The T1 axial image (d) shows hyperintensity in the lesion suggestive of fat. Operative image showing the mass attached to the inner table of the skull with impression of feeding vessels on the latter.
Fig. 2.
T2 weighted axial (a) and coronal (b) sections showing a mixed intensity mass eroding through inner and outer tables of the calvarium that is enhancing non homogenously on T weighted axial (c) and sagittal (d) contrast images with no violation of the intact pericranium (green arrows). Clinical photographs showing the lesion causing a scalp swelling (e) preoperatively and (f) intraoperatively. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 3.
T2 axial (a) and T1 axial (b) images showing isointense intradiploic mass involving the left parietal bone. T1 contrast axial (c) images show enhancement and T1 sagittal (d) showing lesion stopping short of the coronal suture (yellow arrow) and T2 coronal image (e) showing involvement of the temporal bone (orange arrow). Postoperative 3D reconstructed CT scan (f) showing cranioplasty mesh in situ. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 4.
Axial CT scan image (a) showing an expansile intradiploic lesion with erosion of the inner cortex of the right parietal bone and (b) bone windows showing a punched-out lesion with extracalvarial swelling as well. Intraoperative photographs (c) showing necrotic tumour destroying bone that was partially removed piecemeal during craniotomy and (d) cranioplasty done using bone cement.
Fig. 5.
Clinical photograph (a) showing a patient with a discoloured swelling in the vertex who had been subject to scarification as a form of treatment and (b,c,d) CT images showing thickened sclerotic calvarium. Operative images section of the bone after craniotomy (e) showing a yellowish white mass with intact inner and outer cortices and (f) cranioplasty done with a titanium mesh.
Fig. 6.
CT images axial (a) showing a lytic expansile mass in the right parietal bone. Bone windows (b,c,d) in axial, coronal and sagittal planes showing perilesional sclerotic bone with intralesional calcifications and intact outer and inner tables. Intraoperative photographs of the bone sectioned following craniotomy (e) showing a yellowish red well marginated mass and (f) cranioplasty with bone cement. Postoperative CT bone windows in axial (g) and sagittal (h) planes showing complete removal. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
2. Discussion
A PubMed search using the terms “Calvarial”, and “Haemangiomas” yielded 96 results. Excluding the papers that deal with radiological approach to diagnosis of calvarial lesions, skull base haemangiomas, other lesions mimicking these like haemangioendothelioma, angiosarcomas, epithelial hyperplasia's, subgaleal haemangiomas, intraosseous venous malformations, aneurysmal bone cysts and those not in the English language we collected a total of 49 reports of 61 cases that are enumerated in Table 2.1, 2, 3,5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 The classical radiological appearance of CHs consists of an expansile lytic lesion on computed tomography (CT) scans.3,5,13, 14, 15,17 However, there are reports of finding sclerotic lesions mimicking an osteoma as well and also lesions that expand the diploic space with a central sclerosis resembling osteoblastoma.21 We found expansile lytic lesions in two of our 3 patients who had preoperative CT imaging done. Large lesions have radiating spicules of bony trabeculae giving it the classical sunray (or sunburst) appearance on CT scans and plain radiography of skull.3, 4, 5,51 Sunburst appearance of CHs have been reported by2, 3, 4,17, 18, 19,27,28,33,36,39,41,42,44 authors on imaging either in x rays or CT scans. While several authors state that the inner table is usually not violated and that growth occurs by erosion of the outer table,3,5,9 there are reports describing not only breech of the inner table of the skull[5] but also the dura10,15,16,27,40,51 In 2 of our cases we encountered inner table violation on preoperative CT imaging and in one another on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) but there was no intradural extension of the tumour in any of our cases. Calcification is found in CT scans within CHs11,35 and 3 types of the same have been described35 – a nonspecific amorphous variant, phleboliths (which are more common) and rarely metaplastic ossification. The last was found in one of our patients on CT scan where we had not considered a CH preoperatively.
Table 2.
Summary of cases of Calvarial Hemangiomas described in literature.
| Author/Year | No of Cases | Age/Sex of patient | Location | Presentation | Imaging | Treatment and Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider et al40 (1973) | 1 | 13/F | Frontal involving sphenoid | Progressive swelling with headaches, dizziness, and temper tantrums | No CT or MR findings. Angiogram showed feeders from MMA. X rays showed a globular bony tumour involving both trabeculae with no stalk. | First operation partial removal due to torrential intraoperative haemorrhage. Re-operated 1 year later after ECA control in neck was taken |
| Peterson et al35 (1992) | 1 | 64/M | 2 lesions – left frontal and left occipital | Frontal and occipital headaches | Radiolucent skull lesions on X rays | NA |
| Kumar et al27 (1996) | 1 | 45/F | 2 lesions - left temporal and occipital | Swelling for 20 years with headache, loss of sensation on right side of the face, ataxia, decreased visual acuity for 4 months | X rays - expansile osteolytic mass in occiput with inner and outer table erosion and soft tissue calcification with sunburst pattern in left temporal lesion. CT showed expansion of diploic space with cortical breech and heterogenous contrast enhancement |
Total excision of both lesions with removal of involved thinned out dura and duroplasty |
| Pastore et al33 (1999) | 1 | 20/M | Left frontoparietal | Painless swelling for 4 weeks | X rays/CT – intradiploic lesion with “honeycomb” pattern with breech of inner table of skull | Total excision with CP No recurrence at 2 years |
| Yoshida et al47 (1999) | 1 | 4months/M | Left parietal | Palpable mass since birth | CT - expansile mass with breech of inner table. MRI – heterogeneous hyperintensity on T1 and T2 sequences |
Total excision with no recurrence at 6 months |
| Corr et al19 (2000) | 1 | 28/F | 2 lesions – right occipital and right frontal | Painless progressive swelling for 7 years | CT - spiculated sunburst appearance. MRI – T1 heterogenous and T2 hyperintense. Angiogram – fed by MMA and OA. | Biopsy confirmed lesion. Outcomes NA |
| Khanam et al25 (2001) | 2 | 30/F 51/M |
Right greater wing of sphenoid extending to right frontal Right occipital and incidental left parietal |
Headaches for 1 month Palpable right occipital mass with mild pain for 12 years |
CT scan - partially calcified lesion MRI - T1 isointense and T2 and FLAIR hyperintense lesion with homogeneous contrast enhancement with some dural enhancement X rays - radiolucent lesion with a radiating trabecular pattern in the right occipital bone CT scan – well defined lesion with mixed lytic and sclerotic patterns with bicortical breech. Incidental right parietal lesion also seen with similar appearance MRI - mixed intensity expansile lesion on T1- and T2-sequences with heterogeneous enhancement and no dural involvement |
Total excision Excision of outer cortex of occipital lesion with curettage of material. Inner cortex was intact. Parietal not operated. |
| Ajja et al12 (2005) | 1 | 31/F | Left parietal | Painless progressive swelling over 1 year | X ray/CT – osteolytic lesion in left parietal bone with destruction of outer table | Total resection and CP |
| Namaa et al6 (2008) | 2 | 30/F 51/M |
Right sphenoid wing Right occipital Incidental right parietal |
Headache for 1 month Mild occipital pain for 1 month |
CT – partially calcified bony lesion MRI – T1 isointense and T2 hyperintense with contrast enhancement X rays - radiolucent lesion with sunburst appearance CT - well defined mixed lytic - sclerotic lesion with cortical breech. MRI - mixed intensity lesion on T1- and T2-sequences with contrast enhancement. |
Total excision Total excision of occipital lesion |
| Gordhan22 et al (2009) | 1 | 49/F | Left frontal | Intermittent left frontal headaches | CT – expansile, intradiploic, circumscribed mass with internal trabeculations. MRI – isointense on T1 and T2 with contrast enhancement. Scintigraphy - delayed radiotracer uptake |
Total excision |
| Sasagawa38 et al (2009) | 1 | 55/F | Right frontal | Painless progressively growing swelling for 6 years | X rays/CT – osteolytic skull lesion MRI – T1 iso and T2 hyperintense lesion with contrast enhancement |
Total excision with CP |
| Kang et al24 (2009) | 1 | 46/M | Left parietal at site of old CP for depressed fracture | Painless progressive swelling for several months | X-rays - radiolucent, circumscribed lesion CT - partially enhancing mass with mixed osteolytic and sclerotic patterns MRI – CP plate lifted up by a mass that showed heterogenous enhancement on contrast with no dural involvement |
Total excision with re-CP |
| Satoh et al39 (2009) | 5 | 40/M 36/F 39/M 38/M 38/F |
Left frontal (all cases) | Painless progressive swelling in all cases | X rays - honeycomb appearance 3 cases, sunburst pattern 1 case CT – expansile lesion with inner table breech in 2 cases and sunburst pattern in 2 cases |
Total excision with CP using split calvarial graft |
| Nasrallah et al31 (2009) | 1 | 17/F | Left frontal | Palpable skull mass for 6–7 years | CT – expansile intradiploic mass with well-defined margins and coarse trabeculations MRI - No extraosseous extension and heterogeneous hyperintensity on T1 and T2 sequences with heterogenous enhancement on contrast MRA enlargement of the left MMA |
DSA and embolization of the MMA followed by craniotomy surrounding the lesion, de-bulking of the bone flap leaving only outer table intact and replacing it. No recurrence at 38 months |
| Vural et al45 (2009) | 1 | 6 months/M | Right parietal | Palpable skull mass since birth | X rays - asymmetric enlargement of the calvarium on right with nonspecific increased radio-opacity CT – diploic expansion with increased thickness of both tables with some defect in inner table MRI - T1 iso and T2 hyperintense mass with contrast enhancement |
Total excision and CP |
| Hong et al23 (2010) | 5 | 34/F 50/F 52/F 72/M 9/M |
Temporal Parietal Parietal Frontal Parietal |
Incidental Dx Incidental Dx Incidental Dx Incidental Dx Painful progressively increasing mass |
NA but all had osteolytic lesions of the skull | NA |
| Nair et al7 (2011) | 1 | 20/F | Left occipital | Headache, gait instability, visual blurring of 2 months duration | CT- hyperdense calcified lesion in left posterior fossa involving occipital bone. MRI - extra-axial T1 isointense and T2 hyperintense lesion with contrast enhancement with occlusion of left transverse sinus on MRV |
Complete excision with postoperative right hemiparesis and cerebellar signs that resolved in 6 months |
| Tyagi et al43 (2011) | 1 | 28/F | Right parietal | Non tender swelling increasing over 15 years | CT – uniformly hyperdense lesion with erosion of both the inner and outer tables | Total excision with CP after 6 months. No recurrence at 3 years |
| Yucel et al48 (2011) | 1 | 4 months/F | Right parietal | Progressively increasing swelling | CT - -soft tissue mass with expansion of diploic space and inner cortical breech | Total excision |
| Patnaik et al34 (2012) | 1 | 27/M | Left frontal | Progressively increasing swelling | CT - expansile lesion with intratumoral calcification destroying both tables of the skull. MRI- Contrast enhancement with adjacent dural enhancement. |
Excision |
| Zhong et al49 (2012) | 1 | 16/M | Left temporal | Progressive swelling in left temple of 3 months duration | CT - expansile intradiploic lesion with well-defined margins with destruction of both inner and outer tables MRI – T1 hyper and T2 mixed intensity with mild heterogenous enhancement with mass effect on the brain | Total excision with removal of involved dura and CP followed by neurological deterioration due to operative site bleed and needed removal of bone flap and clot evacuation |
| Atci et al1 (2013) | 1 | 38/M | Left parietal | Intermittent localized headache and palpable mass for 2 years | CT - increase in the left parietal diploic space MRI – well defined expansile lesion |
Total excision |
| Park et al32 (2013) | 1 | 39/F | Left frontal | Progressive enlargement of swelling for 1 year | X-ray - radiolucent lesion in the frontal bone CT - intradiploic osteolytic mass |
En bloc resection with CP using split calvarial graft |
| Uemura et al44 (2014) | 2 | 34/F 51/F |
Right frontal Right frontal |
Progressive swelling in the right side of forehead for 2 years Progressive swelling in the right side of forehead for 1 years |
CT – expansile, well demarcated lesion with honeycomb appearance X ray – punched out lesion CT – expansile lesion with intact inner table |
En bloc resection with CP using split thickness calvarium En bloc resection with CP using calcium phosphate bone cement |
| Dutta et al2 (2015) | 1 | 40/F | Left frontal | Painless progressive swelling of left forehead for 2 years, proptosis for 7 months with dimness of vision and diplopia | CT -well-demarcated, contrast-enhancing, expansile osteolytic lesion involving both tables with sunburst pattern | Excision details NA |
| Verma et al9 (2015) | 1 | 9/F | Left temporal | Progressively increasing swelling for 2 years duration | CT- mixed density contrast enhancing extra-axial lesion with bony destruction MRI – T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense lesion with areas of intratumoral haemorrhage and heterogenous contrast enhancement |
Near total excision in 2 stages with stereotactic radiosurgery for small residue |
| Davern et al21 (2015) | 2 | 13/F 19/F |
Right parietal Left parietal |
Painless swelling growing under observation over 6 years Painless progressively enlarging swelling |
CT - hyperdense mass involving the outer table of skull but not the inner CT - well demarcated expansile lesion with a central area of bony sclerosis |
Outer table and diploe resected with preservation of inner cortex No recurrence at 1 year Total excision with delayed CP after 6 months |
| Kirmani et al3 (2016) | 1 | 40/F | Right parietal | Painless progressively increasing swelling for 2 years | X ray – AP/lat lytic lesion with honeycomb appearance CT - hypodense lesion with sharp, sclerotic margins 99mTechnitium (Tc) labelled bone scan showed only mild increase in tumour |
Total excision with curettage of surrounding margins with CP |
| Nasi D30 (2016) | 1 | 60/M | Left frontal | Progressively increasing skull mass for 6 months Increasing headache, nausea, right sided weakness for 2 weeks |
MRI – T1 iso and T2 hyperintense lesion destroying both tables with heterogeneous enhancement on contrast | Total excision of involved bone with removal of subgaleal and intradural component and CP |
| Mohindra et al28 (2016) | 1 | 50/M | Midline occipital | Progressively increasing swelling over 10 years | CT - intra-diploic tumour expanding both inner and outer tables with sunburst pattern MRI – T1 iso-intense and T2 hyper-intense with contrast enhancement | Total excision No recurrence at 6 months follows up |
| Sharma et al41 (2016) | 1 | 8/F | Midline frontal | Pain and swelling on forehead for 4 months | X-ray - lytic expansile lesion with sunburst pattern MRI – well circumscribed lesion eroding both tables, T2 heterointense with contrast enhancement with mass effect and edema in right frontal lobes |
En bloc resection |
| Yang et al46 (2016) | 1 | 17/F | Left frontal | Progressively enlarging swelling for 2 years | X-rays - radiolucent skull mass CT - osteolytic intradiploic lesion |
Total excision with no recurrence at 1 year |
| Srinivasan et al42 (2016) | 1 | 35/F | Midline parieto-occipital | Occipital headaches, visual blurring 1-month Fundoscopy - bilateral optic disc edema | CT - well-circumscribed mass with thickened trabeculae expanding the diploic space in a “starburst” pattern MRI - expansile midline mass with parietooccipital calvarium with mass effect on the occipital lobe, cerebellum, and torcula - T1 hyper and hypointense with enhancement on contrast MRV - compression of the torcula and narrowing of the distal SSS |
Total excision with delayed CP |
| Prasad et al5 (2017) | 1 | 12/F | Left parietal | Painless hard progressively increasing swelling for 6 years | X rays/CT- expansile lytic lesion with bony trabeculae radiating from the centre of the mass MRI – T1 iso to hyper, T2 hyperintense with contrast enhancement indenting underlying brain with mass effect and midline shift |
NA |
| Saenz et al37 (2018) | 1 | 57 | Left frontal | Painless progressive enlargement of swelling for 4.5 years | X-ray - radiolucent lesion in the frontal bone CT - osteolytic mass with preserved inner table |
Total resection with PMMA CP |
| Brichacek et al18 (2018) | 1 | 2/M | Right parietal | Progressively increasing swelling for 1 year | X rays - focal thickening of bone with sunburst appearance CT - bone thickening with coarsening of the bony trabeculae, minor irregularity of the outer table and unaffected inner table MRI – well circumscribed intradiploic mass enhancing on contrast |
Diagnostic biopsy to confirm haemangioma followed by propranolol therapy for 3 years and 4 months Post-treatment MRI showed decrease in lesion size |
| Ilyas et al50 (2018) | 1 | 50/F | Occipital | Progressively increasing occipital swelling with tenderness | X rays - well-circumscribed, lytic lesion with sunburst appearance CT - mixed lytic and sclerotic expansile lesion, with destruction of both tables MRI – T2 hyperintense enhancing lesion with hypointense centre and multiple serpentine vessels on MRA |
NA |
| Prasad et al36 (2018) | 1 | 12/F | Left parietal | Painless progressive swelling | X rays – well demarcated lytic lesion with honeycomb pattern CT – lytic lesion with destruction of both tables MRI – T1 iso to hypo and T2 hyperintense with contrast enhancement |
Total excision and CP with PMMA |
| Ryu et al10 (2018) | 1 | 56/M | Right frontal | Increasing headache for 1 month | X rays – radiolucent skull defect MRI T1 iso and T2 hyperintense lesion destroying both tables and enhancing on contrast |
Total excision with removal of intradural component, duroplasty and CP |
| Prasanna8 et al (2019) | 1 | 32/F | Right parietal | Progressively increasing non-tender swelling | CT - hyperdense osteolytic lesion with a characteristic spoke-wheel pattern MRI -hyperintense on T1and T2 sequences with contrast enhancement |
Total excision |
| Akhter et al13 (2019) | 1 | 68/F | Frontal | Forehead discomfort with proptosis and diplopia | CT- well circumscribed, expansile mass with internal trabeculations and sclerotic margins MRI showed enhancing mass with dural involvement |
Gross total removal with CP Asymptomatic at 4 months follow up |
| Kim et al26 (2019) | 1 | 60/M | Left frontal and left parietal | Painless mass left forehead expanding for 2 years | USG -well-defined hypoechoic lesion in subgaleal layer with internal septations and focal cortical discontinuity with intact inner cortex with normal doppler study Postop CT – another lesion incidental in left parietal bone |
Partial excision of left frontal lesion |
| Bravo-Martinez et al17 (2019) | 1 | 58/F | Midline frontal | Painless mass of long duration progressively increasing for 1 year following trauma | X rays - expansile lytic lesion CT - well-demarcated, trabeculated mass with a sunburst pattern MRI - T1 mixed intensity and T2 hyperintense |
Embolization of feeders followed by total resection and CP |
| Jha et al11 (2021) | 1 | 35/F | Right parietotemporal | Headaches and recurrent seizures for 2 years | CT - hyperdense, spiculated lesion breaching both tables MRI – T1 hyperintense with contrast enhancement Tumour blush on DSA |
Total excision with delayed CP |
| Cui et al20 (2021) | 1 | 6/M | Left temporal | Hallucinations for ½ year | CT - circumscribed hyperdense mass with wagon wheel appearance MRI - T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense with contrast enhancement CTA/DSA - abundant blood supply from ECA |
Embolization followed by Total excision with CP |
| Nagamine et al29 (2021) | 1 | 5 month/F | Left occipital | Progressively increasing swelling | CT - Hyperdense lesion eroding calvarium MRI - T1 mixed and T2 hypointense lesion not enhancing |
Completely excised with no recurrence at 1 year follow up |
| Bantan et al15 (2021) | 1 | 29/M | Left occipital and bilateral parietal | Left occipital progressively increasing mass since childhood with recurrent seizures and recent onset headache, vomiting and decreased sensorium for 1 day | CT - parietal and occipital expansile lytic bony lesions involving both tables with internal trabeculations and spiculated pattern MRI - T1 and T2 hyperintense enhancing on contrast and showing haemorrhage on GRE sequences Left parietal lesion invaded the SSS Left occipital erosion of both tables with mass effect on occipital lobe MRV absence of flow in distal SSS and left transverse sinus Empty sella and distended optic nerve sheaths seen |
DSA and embolization of left occipital and left MMA followed by total excision of occipital and left parietal lesions with removal of dura and intradural part and titanium mesh CP |
| Bird et al16 (2022) | 1 | 38/F | Midline frontal | Painless progressive swelling for 7 months | CT – well -circumscribed mass with sunburst pattern expanding through the inner and outer tables MRI – T2 hyperintense heterogeneously enhancing lesion with mass effect on brain DSA - tumour supplied by STA and anterior falcine artery |
Total excision of lesion with involved dura and intradural component with duroplasty and titanium mesh CP No recurrence at 6 months |
| Anagnostou et al14 (2022) | 1 | 59/F | Left frontoparietal | Palpable mass, personality changes, emotional and cognitive dysfunction | CT - expansile lytic mass with contrast enhancement eroding both tables of skull MRI - T1 hypointense and T2 hyperintense lesion DSA tumour blush |
Embolization followed by total excision Satisfactory at 6 months |
Abbreviations AP- Anteroposterior, Lat –lateral, CP- Cranioplasty, CT – Computed tomography, CTA – CT angiography, DSA – Digital Subtraction Angiography, ECA – External carotid artery, FLAIR – Fluid attenuation inversion recovery, GRE – gradient echo, MMA – Middle meningeal artery, MRA – Magnetic resonance angiography, MRI – Magnetic Resonance Imaging, MRV – Magnetic resonance venography, NA-not available, PMMA- Polymethyl methacrylate, OA-occipital artery, STA – superficial temporal artery, SSS – superior sagittal sinus, USG -ultrasonography.
On MRI scans the lesions are sharply demarcated, hyperintense on T1 and T2 weighted sequences and enhance on contrast.5 Hyperintensity on T1 sequences is related to the presence of fat in the lesion and is considered to be characteristic of CHs.4 It may also be because of haemorrhage in the lesion as has been described by Zhong et al.49 Nair et al7 state that loss of T1 hyperintensity is associated with more aggressive tumor behaviour and have also described a CH with dural enhancement akin to a meningioma. We encountered only 1 patient of CH with the characteristic findings on MRI while in another there was intradiploic spread along the parietal bone and in a third there was a mixed density mass eroding both tables of the skull and in the last 2 cases no preoperative provisional diagnosis was reached.
The differential diagnosis of calvarial lesions includes metastatic deposits, eosinophilic granulomas, fibrous dysplasia, osteomas, Paget disease, intraosseous meningiomas, aneurysmal bone cysts and dermoid and epidermoid cysts.6,8 While radiology can often differentiate between these lesions, atypical and small CH may be difficult diagnose on imaging alone6 and only histological diagnosis should be considered to be conclusive.7 In 2 of our cases, we had suspected CHs preoperatively. In the rest we suspected fibrous dysplasia (in 2 cases), eosinophilic granuloma (in 1 case) while in 1 case we could not even reach a presumptive diagnosis.
The commonest bones involved are the frontal and parietal respectively. However, calvarial haemangiomas crossing sutural lines and involving more than one bone have also been described.11,14,25,33,42 In 2 of our cases the lesion was involving more than one bone.
In all our 6 cases the lesion was a solitary one, but discrete multifocal haemangiomas have been described. 3, 6, 9Several authors hold that these tumours are congenital in origin1,8 but due to slow indolent growth9 and lack of symptoms may present late in life.6 A number of authors have described paediatric calvarial haemangiomas5,9,18,20,21,23,29,31,36,40,41,45, 46, 47, 48, 49 some as young as 4 months of age47,48 who had a skull swelling since birth. 3 of our 6 patients were adults and 3 were less than 18 years of age.
Trauma has also been postulated as a cause3,8 with the injury leading to the release of growth factors [4] that may result in proliferation of primitive mesenchymal cells within bone.8 Two of our patients had history of head injury in the past but neither was at the location where the lesion was found. There is a case report in literature of growth of the tumour at the site of a cranioplasty24 while other authors to document history of trauma as reported by the patients17 though they do not attribute this to be causal in the formation of the tumour.
Two types of CH are described – the commoner sessile type with expansion of the diploic space and a globular type that extends out of the confines of the bones into the surrounding space.4,8,9 Our series had 3 cases of each type.
While smaller asymptomatic lesions with classical imaging findings may be kept under observation, indications for surgery include cosmetic deformity, pain, diagnostic dilemma and mass effect on the brain. Pain was present in 4 of our patients and progressively increasing scalp swelling in 4. Progressively increasing painless swelling with or without local tenderness or mild pain is the commonest presentation reported in literature too.6,12,19,22,24,25,33,38,39,45 However, there are reports of patients presenting with features of raised intracranial pressure7,15,27,42,51 as well as emotional disturbances,14,20,40 ataxia,27 diplopia and proptosis2,13 and seizures.11,15 In our series one patient had no symptoms related to the CH nor any history of progression of the lesion but after an initial period of conservative treatment for 2 years her relatives wished that the lesion be removed.
When the decision is taken to proceed with surgery, complete resection3, 4, 5,7,8 is the treatment of choice. Curettage of the lesion alone results in greater blood loss and a propensity for recurrence.4, 5, 6 Hence most authors have mentioned complete resection as the procedure that they carried out but there are reports of curettage alone along with removal of the outer table21,25,26 particularly in cases where the inner table was preserved and also craniotomy followed by debulking of the diploe and replacement of the outer layer.31 Atci et al1 have recommended taking margins of the adjacent non-involved bones during surgery while Namaa et al6 advocate resection with a 1 cm margin of normal bone to prevent recurrence and decrease intraoperative haemorrhage as the sinusoids in the tumour are not disturbed. As all our patients with CHs were excised with tumour free margins, we did not face troublesome bleeding in any of them. We performed immediate cranioplasty (CP) following tumour excision in all our patients. In 4 cases we used polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) bone cement while in 2 cases titanium mesh fixed with screws was employed to cover the skull defect. Materials for CP mentioned in literature vary from split calvarial graft32,39,44 to titanium mesh15,16 and bone cement36,37,44 Most authors describe resection and CP at the same sitting.12,14,15,20,33,39,45 However, there are reports of staged cranioplasty too11,21,42 usually due to torrential haemorrhage or doubt regarding the nature of the lesion.
Though we did not embolize any of our patients preoperatively, this has been described as a useful adjunct to minimize blood loss in various studies3,5,8,14,15,17,20 and they have been reported to be fed by the branches of the superficial temporal artery, middle meningeal artery, occipital artery or anterior falcine artery.9,11,16,19,31,40 Radiotherapy has a role in incomplete resections3,4 and may arrest further growth without decreasing size6,8 but was not required in any of our cases as all of these were exclusively in the calvarium and amenable to total resection.
3. Conclusion
CHs are uncommon skull tumours that are usually asymptomatic, commonly presenting with scalp swelling and occasionally with pain. Rarely they may present with neurological deficits. Classical radiological findings include sunburst sign and honeycombing appearance, but this may not be found in all cases and the final diagnosis is then clinched only by histological examination. Both CT scan and MRI are mandatory to define extent of spread when planning for surgery. Angiography and embolization of vascular or large lesions may aid in minimizing blood loss during excision. Wide local excision and cranioplasty is easy to perform in the cranial vault (unlike in the skull base) and is curative.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Prasad Krishnan: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. Rajesh Bhosle: Conceptualization, Data curation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Shamshuddin Patel: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Dimble Raju: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Rafael Cincu: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar: Conceptualization, Data curation, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Amit Gupta: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing. Amit Agrawal: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Contributor Information
Prasad Krishnan, Email: prasad.krishnan@rediffmail.com.
Rajesh Bhosle, Email: rajyash1738@gmail.com.
Shamshuddin Patel, Email: drshamspatel@gmail.com.
Dimble Raju, Email: dimbleraju7613@gmail.com.
Rafael Cincu, Email: rafael.cincu@gmail.com.
Luis Rafael Moscote-Salazar, Email: rafaelmoscote21@gmail.com.
Amit Agrawal, Email: dramitagrawal@gmail.com.
Abbreviations
- AP
anteroposterior
- Lat
lateral
- CP
Cranioplasty
- CT
Computed tomography
- CTA
CT angiography
- DSA
Digital Subtraction Angiography
- ECA
External carotid artery
- FLAIR
Fluid attenuation inversion recovery
- GRE
gradient echo
- MMA
Middle meningeal artery
- MRA
Magnetic resonance angiography
- MRI
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
- MRV
Magnetic resonance venography
- NA
not available
- PMMA
Polymethyl methacrylate
- OA
occipital artery
- STA
superficial temporal artery
- SSS
superior sagittal sinus
- USG
ultrasonography
References
- 1.Atcı I.B., Albayrak S., Yılmaz N., et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the parietal bone. Am J Case Rep. 2013;14:401–404. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.889388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Dutta M., Jotdar A., Kundu S., Mukhopadhyay S. Primary cavernous haemangioma of the frontal bone: computed tomography features. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(12):MJ01–2. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/15999.6915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kirmani A.R., Sarmast A.H., Bhat A.R. A unique case of calvarial hemangioma. Surg Neurol Int. 2016;7(Suppl 14):S398–S401. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.183498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Krishnan P., Ghosh N., Das S. “Sun burst” appearance and “wagon wheel” signs-classical imaging in calvarial hemangioma. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2020;11(4):667. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1715542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Prasad S.N., Chaudhary U., Kumari M., Lal H. Giant calvarial haemangioma with classical radiological features. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017 doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-223029. bcr2017223029,-bcr-2017222017-2017223029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Naama O., Gazzaz M., Akhaddar A., et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the skull: 3 case reports. Surg Neurol. 2008;70(6):654–659. doi: 10.1016/j.surneu.2007.05.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nair P., Srivastava A.K., Kumar R., et al. Giant primary intraosseous calvarial hemangioma of the occipital bone. Neurol India. 2011;59(5):775–776. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.86568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Prasanna G.V., Katari U.K., Vandanapu S.K., Reddy M.S., Adusumilli H.B. Giant calvarial cavernous hemangioma: a rare case report and review of literature. Asian J Neurosurg. 2019;14(2):578–580. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_260_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Verma S.K., Singh P.K., Garg K., et al. Giant calvarial cavernous hemangioma. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2015;10(1):41–44. doi: 10.4103/1817-1745.154337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ryu H.-S., Moon K.-S., Lee K.-H., Kim I.-Y., Jung S. Dural penetration of cavernous hemangioma on skull: uncommon clinical presentation. World Neurosurg. 2018;110:39–42. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jha V.C., Abhijit V., Jha N., Rewatkar S., Sinha V.S., Alam M.S. Giant calcified cavernous hemangioma managed with modified double concentric craniotomy. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2021;12(3):592–595. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ajja A., Oukacha N., Gazzaz M., et al. Cavernous hemangioma of the parietal bone. A case report. J Neurosurg Sci. 2005;49(4):159–162. ; discussion 162. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Akhter A.S., El Tecle N., Alexopoulos G., Espinoza G., Coppens J. Intraosseous orbital cavernous hemangioma with frontal extension and dural involvement. Cureus. 2019;11(6) doi: 10.7759/cureus.4823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Anagnostou E., Lagos P., Plakas S., Mitsos A., Samelis A. Two-step treatment of a giant skull vault hemangioma: a rare case report and literature review. Neurocirugia (Astur : Engl Ed). 2021:S1130–S1473. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2020.12.005. 1121. 00007-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bantan N.A.A., Abouissa A.H., Saeed M., et al. A unique case of multiple calvarial hemangiomas with one large symplastic hemangioma. BMC Neurol. 2021;21(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02053-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bird C.E., Traylor J.I., Johnson Z.D., et al. Surgical management of a massive frontal bone hemangioma: case report. J Neurol Surg Rep. 2022;83(3):e72–e76. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1750366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bravo-Martinez A., Marrero-Gonzalez A.P., Suleiman-Suleiman M.N., Vicenty-Padilla J.C., Trullenque-Martinez E. Radiologic features with pathologic correlation of an unusual large intraosseous skull cavernous hemangioma. Am J Case Rep. 2019;20:525–530. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.913414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brichacek M., Naeem A., Filler G., Hammond R., Yazdani A., Ranger A. Congenital calvarial hemangioma. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(6):1625–1628. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Corr P. Multiple calvarial haemangiomas. Australas Radiol. 2000;44(1):118–120. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00756.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Cui L., Yin Y., Ma W., et al. A giant primary intraosseous calvarial hemangioma of the temporal bone. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(8):2914–2915. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Davern M.S., Lovell M.A., Wilkinson C.C. Cavernous hemangiomas of the pediatric calvaria. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2015;50(6):321–324. doi: 10.1159/000439281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gordhan A., Soliman J., Malpani A., Peg E. Symptomatic calvarial cavernous hemangioma: presurgical confirmation by scintigraphy. J Radiol Case Rep. 2009;3(8):25–29. doi: 10.3941/jrcr.v3i8.278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hong B., Hermann E.J., Klein R., Krauss J.K., Nakamura M. Surgical resection of osteolytic calvarial lesions: clinicopathological features. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(10):865–869. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2010.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kang D.W., Choi C.H. A case of calvarial hemangioma in cranioplasty site. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009;46(5):484–487. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.5.484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Khanam H., Lipper M.H., Wolff C.L., Lopes M.B. Calvarial hemangiomas: report of two cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2001;55(1):63–67. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00268-8. ; discussion 67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kim J.-H., Ahn C.H., Kim K.-H., Oh S.-H. Multifocal intraosseous calvarial hemangioma misdiagnosed as subgaleal lipoma. Arch Craniofac Surg. 2019;20(3):181–185. doi: 10.7181/acfs.2019.00143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kumar N.A., Ranganadham P., Bhaskar G., Chowdhury A.R. Multiple calvarial cavernous haemangiomas: case report and review of the literature. Neuroradiology. 1996;38(Suppl 1):S83–S85. doi: 10.1007/BF02278128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mohindra S., Kapoor A., Mitra S., Nahar U. Giant primary calvarial hemangioma over torcula: radiological features and operative nuances. Surg Neurol Int. 2016;7(Suppl 15):S440–S443. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.183544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Nagamine K., Kanaya K., Miyairi Y., Ogiso Y., Shigeta H. Aggressive growing of the infantile cavernous hemangioma of the calvaria: a case report and review of literature. Childs Nerv Syst. 2021;37(1):319–323. doi: 10.1007/s00381-020-04678-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nasi D., Somma Ld, Iacoangeli M., et al. Calvarial bone cavernous hemangioma with intradural invasion: an unusual aggressive course-Case report and literature review. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;22:79–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.03.041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nasrallah I.M., Hayek R., Duhaime A.-C., Stotland M.A., Mamourian A.C. Cavernous hemangioma of the skull: surgical treatment without craniectomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4(6):575–579. doi: 10.3171/2009.7.PEDS09105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park B.H., Hwang E., Kim C.H. Primary intraosseous hemangioma in the frontal bone. Arch Plast Surg. 2013;40(3):283–285. doi: 10.5999/aps.2013.40.3.283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Pastore F.S., De Caro G.M., Faiola A., Mauriello A., Giuffrè R. Cavernous hemangioma of the parietal bone. Case report and review of the literature. Neurochirurgie. 1999;45(4):312–315. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Patnaik A., Mishra S.S., Mishra S., Deo R.C. Intradiploic ossified giant cavernous hemangioma of skull with a dural tail sign mimicking primary calvarial meningioma. Neurol India. 2012;60(2):250–252. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.96431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Peterson D.L., Murk S.E., Story J.L. Multifocal cavernous hemangioma of the skull: report of a case and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1992;30(5):778–781. ; discussion 782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Prasad G.L., Pai K. Pediatric cranial intraosseous hemangiomas: a review. Neurosurg Rev. 2018;41(1):109–117. doi: 10.1007/s10143-016-0779-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sáenz A.A., Porto N.F., Sánchez M.P. Intraosseous cavernous hemangioma: presentation of a clinical case. Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2018;33(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s41984-018-0018-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sasagawa Y., Akai T., Yamamoto K., et al. Multiple cavernous hemangiomas of the skull associated with hepatic lesions. Case report. Neurol Med -Chir. 2009;49(4):162–166. doi: 10.2176/nmc.49.162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Satoh K., Ohtsuka T., Abe T., Yokota K., Kunii K. Haemangioma of the forehead: radiographic diagnosis and definitive surgical treatment in a Japanese series. Scand J Plast ReConstr Surg Hand Surg. 2009;43(2):75–81. doi: 10.1080/02844310802602358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schneider R.C., Gabrielsen T.O., Hicks S.P. Calvarial hemangioma. The value of selective external carotid angiography in surgical excision of the lesion. Neurology. 1973;23(4):352–356. doi: 10.1212/wnl.23.4.352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Sharma A., Singh U.R., Sihag P. Frontal bone hemangioma in an 8-year-old female: a common tumor in a rare location. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(Suppl 1):S91–S93. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.196455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Srinivasan V.M., Karas P.J., Sen A.N., Fridley J.S., Gopinath S.P. Intracranial hypertension caused by occipital calvarial hemangioma: case report. World Neurosurg. 2016;91 doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.009. 672.e671-673. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tyagi D.K., Balasubramaniam S., Sawant H.V. Giant primary ossified cavernous hemangioma of the skull in an adult: a rare calvarial tumor. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2011;2(2):174–177. doi: 10.4103/0976-3147.83587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Uemura T., Sawai K., Kikuchi M., Masuoka J., Matsushima T. Technical strategies for en bloc resection and immediate reconstruction in hemangioma of the frontal bone. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25(4):e402–e403. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31829ad605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vural M., Acikalin M.F., Adapinar B., Atasoy M.A. Congenital cavernous hemangioma of the calvaria. Case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;3(1):41–45. doi: 10.3171/2008.10.PEDS08161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang Y., Guan J., Ma W., et al. Primary intraosseous cavernous hemangioma in the skull. Medicine (Baltim) 2016;95(11) doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000003069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yoshida D., Sugisaki Y., Shimura T., Teramoto A. Cavernous hemangioma of the skull in a neonate. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15(6–7):351–353. doi: 10.1007/s003810050410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yucel E., Akkaya H., Gürkanlar D., Ergun T. Congenital cavernous hemangioma of the skull. Turk Neurosurg. 2011;21(4):645–647. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhong W., Li G., Huang S., Chen H., You C. Intradiploic hemangioma with repeated hemorrhage in a child with hemophilia. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;10(1):56–59. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.PEDS11423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ilyas M., Shah S.A., Gojwari T., Rafiq S., Ellahi I., Ganaie K.H. Classic imaging features of calvarial hemangioma-a case report. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine. 2018;49(3):663–665. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrnm.2018.04.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Nasi-Kordhishti I., Hempel J.-M., Ebner F.H., Tatagiba M. Calvarial lesions: overview of imaging features and neurosurgical management. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(6):3459–3469. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01521-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






