Abstract
Rotary motors play key roles in energy transduction, from macroscale windmills to nanoscale turbines such as ATP synthase in cells. Despite our abilities to construct engines at many scales, developing functional synthetic turbines at the nanoscale has remained challenging. Here, we experimentally demonstrate rationally designed nanoscale DNA origami turbines with three chiral blades. These DNA nanoturbines are 24–27 nm in height and diameter and can utilize transmembrane electrochemical potentials across nanopores to drive DNA bundles into sustained unidirectional rotations of up to 10 revolutions s−1. The rotation direction is set by the designed chirality of the turbine. All-atom molecular dynamics simulations show how hydrodynamic flows drive this turbine. At high salt concentrations, the rotation direction of turbines with the same chirality is reversed, which is explained by a change in the anisotropy of the electrophoretic mobility. Our artificial turbines operate autonomously in physiological conditions, converting energy from naturally abundant electrochemical potentials into mechanical work. The results open new possibilities for engineering active robotics at the nanoscale.
Subject terms: Nanopores, DNA nanomachines
A nanoscale DNA origami turbine is shown to perform mechanical rotation by directly harvesting transmembrane potential energy from an ion-concentration gradient across a solid-state nanopore. The direction of rotation is set by the designed chiral twist in the turbine’s blades.
Main
At the heart of any active mechanical system is an engine, which converts one type of energy, typically chemical or electrical, into mechanical work. In biological systems, such work is done by motor proteins such as kinesin1, the bacterial flagella motor2 and FoF1-ATP synthase3,4. In the latter, electrochemical potential energy from a concentration gradient of ions is converted into mechanical rotary motion of the Fo motor, which drives the F1 rotary complex to catalyse the synthesis of ATP, the molecule that provides free energy for many cellular processes. Despite the extensive knowledge and success of building rotary engines of sizes spanning many orders of magnitude on the macroscale, designing, building and demonstrating functioning artificial nanoscale counterparts of these sophisticated biological motors has proven challenging.
The critical step of building such nanoscale rotary engines is to demonstrate their ability to transduce local free energy continuously and autonomously into designed mechanical motion and useful work. Previous work led to multiple designs of rotary assemblies5–8, and established a certain level of directed motion as an external operator manually cycled environmental conditions9 such as light and temperature10,11, chemical compounds12,13 or alternate macroscale electric fields14. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations have shown the conceptual feasibility of using a DNA helix to convert electric field into torque15; however, experimental demonstration of a rotary mechanism programmed for sustained conversion of a transmembrane electric potential into the mechanical rotation had not been achieved.
Here, we demonstrate a bottom-up designed DNA nanoturbine that is powered by a nanoscale hydrodynamic flow inside a nanopore. It contains a central axle decorated with three blades arranged in a chiral configuration, either left or right handed. The turbine has a height of 24 or 27 nm, comparable to the 20-nm-tall ATP synthase. The turbine’s stator is provided by a solid-state nanopore in a 20-nm-thickness silicon nitride membrane. Using single-molecule fluorescence, we monitor the rotation of the nanoturbine driven by either a direct current (DC) voltage or a transmembrane ion gradient, which mimics the working environment of rotary motors in biological cells. As we demonstrate below, the nanoturbine can drive a long DNA bundle as a hydrodynamic load into sustained rotary motion of up to 10 revolutions s−1, equivalent to delivering tens of piconewton nanometres of torque, which compares well with the ~50 pN nm torque that can be generated by natural ATP synthase16,17.
Design of DNA nanoturbines
Our DNA nanoturbine is a multilayer DNA origami structure containing an intentionally designed chiral twist (Fig. 1a,b). The structure consists of 30 double-stranded DNA helices, each 72 base pairs (bp) in length on average, where the six parallel central helices form an axle, and the three eight-helix blades are obliquely attached to the axle and symmetrically spaced at 120° angles across the circumference. The chiral twist in the blades of the turbine is induced by adjusting the number of base pairs between each staple crossover away from the one-per-7 bp value required for an achiral structure18, yielding a strongly right-handed twisted structure for an 8 bp crossover density and a left-handed twisted turbine for 6.5 bp spacings on average, while maintaining a good folding yield of the structures (Supplementary Figs. 1–5). The objects were self-assembled as described previously19 (for details, see Methods). We used single-particle cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) to determine three-dimensional (3D) electron density maps of the right-handed and left-handed turbine structures (Fig. 1c,e and Supplementary Figs. 6–9). The cryo-EM reconstructions showed the desired structural features such as the three blades and the axle, and revealed the twisted orientation of the blades. The twist and the blade angles were measured from the cryo-EM data, yielding a −1.1° bp−1 twist density and a blade angle with respect to the turbine axis of −36° for the right-handed structure, and +0.69° bp−1 and +24° for the left-handed structure (Fig. 1d,f; for details see Methods and Supplementary Fig. 10). The turbine structures were 27 nm and 24 nm tall (right and left handed, respectively) and had diameters of 27 nm and 25 nm, respectively.
Unidirectional rotation of DNA turbines driven by a salinity gradient or transmembrane voltage
To demonstrate that the turbines can generate torque and work, we docked the structure into a nanopore, and optically monitored rotations at the single-molecule level. To create a hydrodynamic load as well as to hold the turbine in the nanopore and to facilitate optical tracking using super-resolution microscopy, we attached a 300-nm-long DNA six-helix bundle as a crossbar featuring a reinforced 220-nm-long central 16-helix bundle segment (Supplementary Fig. 12) to the top part of the turbine axle as one continuous rigid body (Fig. 1g). One end of the DNA bundle was labelled with ten Cy3 fluorophores to allow continuous monitoring of its motion by fluorescence microscopy at 5 ms temporal resolution and sub-diffraction-limit localization precision (Methods). A 900-nm-long loop of nicked double-stranded DNA was engineered to extend from the bottom of the axle and act as a leash guiding the insertion of the turbine into the nanopore during the docking process (Fig. 1g). Coarse-grained simulations (SNUPI20) were used to analyse the structural rigidity of the integrated design (Fig. 1h). Proper folding of the entire assembly was verified by negative-stained transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1i; for details see Methods). An array of 50-nm-diameter nanopores was fabricated in 20-nm-thickness silicon nitride membranes using electron-beam lithography and reactive ion etching (Methods) and characterized with transmission electron microscopy (Supplementary Fig. 13).
Our single-molecule observations show that the DNA turbine can drive a unidirectional rotation of the load under a transmembrane gradient of ion concentration. Initially, both compartments of the flow cell were filled with 50 mM NaCl buffer, and the DNA turbines were added to the cis compartment. Subsequently, a higher concentration of NaCl (0.5–3 M) was flushed into the trans compartment (Fig. 2a), causing the DNA turbines to move towards the nanopores by diffusiophoresis, which led to the insertion of the turbines into the nanopores. As the leash guided the initial insertion of the large structure21, the turbine oriented itself upon docking in the designed orientation, where the extended crossbar bundle prevented the turbine from translocating through the nanopore. After docking, we tracked the rotary motion of the DNA bundle by monitoring the position of the fluorophores, which were located at one end of the bundle (Supplementary Fig. 14).
As shown in Fig. 2, we observed clear, directed rotation of the turbine particles. Figure 2b shows the rotary motion of the bundle end, which can be traced to follow a circular path over time. Figure 2c shows the cumulative angular displacement corresponding to the example in Fig. 2b, which continues over 200 clockwise rotations over the full period of observation (40 s in this case). Figure 2d,e shows typical data for 228 turbines, where right- and left-handed turbines led to, respectively, upwards and downwards linear angular rotation curves. The linearity of these curves (and the corresponding superlinear mean-square angular rotation curves; Supplementary Fig. 15) is direct evidence of a driven motion. The data show that the DNA turbines can exert a substantial torque on the DNA load bundle and drive it into sustained unidirectional rotary motion.
Importantly, we find that the designed chirality sets the rotation direction. The turbine variant with left-handed turbine blades displayed preferentially anticlockwise rotations (as viewed from the cis side). In contrast, the turbines with right-handed turbine blades showed almost exclusively clockwise rotations. These data indicate that the designed chirality controls the rotation direction. We determined the average angular velocity in different salt-gradient conditions (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Fig. 16). The velocity directions corresponded well to the designed chiralities of the structures, and the angular velocities were distributed with noticeable spread, with maximum values as high as ~10 revolutions s−1. We attribute the spread in the velocity distribution to heterogeneity in the local interactions between the DNA structure and the silicon nitride surface and to potential deformations in the DNA turbine crossbar that can modulate the rotation speed22.
Subsequently, we operated the DNA turbines under a transmembrane voltage that was applied across the compartments at an equal 50 mM NaCl concentration. Immediately after applying the transmembrane voltage (100 mV, Fig. 3a,b), docking and rotary motion of DNA turbines was observed—see Fig. 3b,h for typical traces of a left-handed and a right-handed DNA turbine, respectively. Clear circular trajectories were obtained, indicating a sustained and constant rotary motion over time, very similar to the trajectories observed in the ion-gradient-driven experiments. The extracted rotational velocities of the DNA load bundle showed driven rotary motion, with again predominantly the same rotation direction depending on the chirality of the turbine variant under study, as can be seen in Fig. 3c,i. From the rotational speed of the DNA beam, we estimated the torque of our DNA turbine (Supplementary Section 1 and Supplementary Fig. 20) as tens of piconewton nanometres. As a control, we also tested an approximately non-chiral, straight version of the turbine with the same crossbar load (Supplementary Fig. 18), which was assembled by removing the residual twist in the blades18. For this variant, no preferred rotational directionality was observed, while some residual rotation without preferred directionality was observed due to the self-organization of the DNA crossbar21 (Supplementary Fig. 18).
Direction reversal under a transmembrane voltage
To our surprise, we found that we can control the rotational direction of the DNA turbines by the ionic strength of the buffer. When the voltage-driven experiments were performed in a high-salt buffer containing 3 M NaCl instead of dilute 50 mM, the directionality of the rotary motion reversed for the same turbine. This phenomenon occurred for both turbine chiralities, as shown in Fig. 3d,e,j,k (and corresponding mean square displacement, MSD, plots in Supplementary Fig. 19). By titrating the salt concentration from 50 mM to 3 M, we observed that the average rotation speed changed from positive to negative values for the left-handed turbines, that is, rotations changed from anticlockwise to clockwise (and a reverse crossover occurred for right-handed turbines), with a crossover at ~0.5–1 M for both chiralities—see Fig. 3g,m (and corresponding histograms for the speed distribution in Supplementary Figs. 21 and 22). These observations point to the appearance of strong ionic effects on the water flow when the turbine operates in a high-ionic-strength environment.
To understand this rotational reversal induced by different ionic strengths, we first sought insights from continuum theory. As a model for the turbine blade, we consider a rigid cylindrical DNA rod that is held in a fixed vertical position in a wide nanopore, oriented at an angle of θ with respect to the z axis (cf. Supplementary Section 1). This rod has a hydrodynamic mobility Mh that is anisotropic, as a rod moves twice as fast through a liquid along its length as perpendicular to it23. Similarly, the electrophoretic mobility Mel of the rod, which describes its freely suspended motion in an applied electric field E, is anisotropic23. Notably, Mel is controlled by the electrical double layer, which changes with the ionic strength of the solution24,25. The combination of Mh and Mel determines the in-plane force on a turbine blade in a nanopore, which will drive the rotation. We can derive an expression for the in-plane velocity component vx (Supplementary Section 2) as follows:
This equation indicates that the sign of vx, that is, the rotation direction, is determined by the difference between the hydrodynamic and electrophoretic anisotropy ratios. While the hydrodynamic anisotropy ratio Mh,⟂/Mh,∥ is constant at a value of 0.5, the electrophoretic anisotropy ratio Mel,⟂/Mel,∥ can adopt values between 0 and 1, depending on ion concentration and DNA surface charge25; for example, Mel,⟂/Mel,∥ decreases from 1 to 0.5 with decreasing ion concentration for moderate surface charges, and adopts even smaller values for high surface charges25. Continuum theory thus indicates that a sign reversal of the rotations may occur due to a change in the electrophoretic anisotropy ratio with salt concentration.
To elucidate the microscopic mechanism of the torque generation, we performed all-atom MD simulations of the DNA origami turbine submerged in a low-salt electrolyte solution (Fig. 4a). The application of a 100 mV nm−1 axial electric field was observed to rotate the turbine by ~120° in 56 ns in the expected direction (left handed about the applied field axis, Fig. 4b and Supplementary Fig. 24, see Methods for details). A water flow induced by a pressure gradient was observed to rotate the turbine in the expected direction, whereas reversing the direction of the electric field or the pressure gradient reversed the rotation direction. The turbine’s rotation speed was found to be determined by the velocity of water molecules moving past the blades of the turbine (Supplementary Fig. 25b)—all indicating a rotation mechanism similar to that of a macroscopic turbine. However, in equivalent simulations of the same DNA turbine carried out in 3 M NaCl, the direction of rotation reversed, while the overall rotation speed decreased (Fig. 4d,e). Furthermore, the average effective torque produced by the turbine under high salt was seen to change sign when compared with the torque under low salt (Fig. 4f). These MD simulation results thus present a striking qualitative resemblance to the experimental results.
To understand the ion-concentration-dependent reversal of the effective torque, we simulated a DNA duplex that was oriented parallel or perpendicular (Supplementary Fig. 26a) to an applied electric field. The observed Mel,⟂/Mel,∥ did indeed change with the measured salt concentration, from about 1 at 2.6 M NaCl to 0.38 at 4 mM NaCl (Fig. 4h and Supplementary Fig. 26b)—a very notable change that would reverse the direction of rotation according to the continuum model. To determine the microscopic mechanism of the rotation reversal, we simulated a DNA duplex that was tilted by 35° relative to the vertically applied field (Fig. 4g), which approximates the inclination of the blades in our turbines. While the duplex’s centre of mass and the spinning angle were harmonically restrained, we measured the effective in-plane force Fx acting on the duplex (Fig. 4i). At low salt a negative force was measured, as expected, whereas at high salt the average in-plane force was reversed to a positive value. As the flow profile around the DNA (Fig. 4j) is driven by the distribution of charges in the solvent, we calculated a 3D map of the solvent forces—the position-dependent average force on solvent voxels applied by the electric field (Methods). The map revealed a slight overcharging of the DNA in the 3 M condition (Fig. 4k), which was nevertheless sufficient to substantially alter the flow of solvent near the DNA (Fig. 4j). To prove the causal role of the ion distribution, we applied the high-/low-salt solvent force on the low-/high-salt systems which, gratifyingly, swapped the effective force distributions (Fig. 4l).
Conclusions
In summary, we have demonstrated a new type of autonomous active nanomachine, a DNA nanoturbine. We have shown its functionality from the observation of a sustained rotation of a DNA load bundle when the turbines were driven by an electrophoretic or hydrodynamic flow of solvent through a nanoscale pore. Building from our previous work22,26, the direction of rotation is now controlled by the designed chirality of the turbine blades as well as by the ionic strength of the buffer. The latter revealed, strikingly, that ionic interactions can even reverse the rotation direction, as the electrophoretic mobility anisotropy changes with buffer salt concentration. Up to tens of piconewton nanometres of torque can be generated by these merely ~25-nm-tall turbines (an order of magnitude smaller than previously reported DNA origami rotors)22, numbers that are comparable to those of the Fo motor of ATP synthase17. The DNA turbines could operate autonomously on physiologically and biologically compatible energy sources (electrochemical potentials) and work at a scale comparable to nature’s own motor proteins, without requiring manual cyclic intervention.
Our work demonstrates a practical approach to designing nanoscale active engines, that is, by using chiral nanoscale structures to leverage transmembrane potential differences through nanoscale hydrodynamic interactions15. We believe this to be a powerful new approach to building active nanoscale systems, in particular because of the extensible design with DNA nanotechnology, its flexibility and potential for integration with various biocompatible membrane systems, and its potential compatibility with physiological environments. As in ATP synthase, microscopic reversibility may be exploited in future variants of such turbines to couple this mechanical rotation to uphill chemical synthesis. Nanoscale hydrodynamic turbines constitute biocompatible engines that may serve as a step towards building self-powered nanorobotic systems in environments relevant to molecular biology. Current limitations of our approach include the non-specific interaction between the turbine and the solid surface, the wide variance of the rotational speed and the finite power efficiency. Further work can be done to demonstrate nanorobotic systems based on the turbine concept, specifically the integration of nanoscale motors into biocompatible membranes, improving their efficiency in utilizing ion gradients and integrating them with other passive functional nanomachines to perform more complex tasks.
Methods
Nanopore array fabrication
Nanopore arrays are fabricated as reported before27. In brief, a 100-nm-thick layer of poly(methyl methacrylate) electron-sensitive resist (molecular weight 950,000, 3% dissolved in anisole, MicroChem Corp) was spin-coated on 20 nm free-standing silicon nitride membranes supported by silicon. Subsequently, the resist was exposed and patterned by an electron-beam pattern generator (EBPG5200, Raith) with 100 keV electron beams. The pattern is developed in a mixture of methyl-isobutyl-ketone and isopropanol with a ratio of 1:3 for 1 min, then stopped in isopropanol for 30 s. The exposed substrates were then etched using reactive-ion etching with fluoroform and argon (200 s, 50 W, 50 sccm of CHF3, 25 sccm of Ar, 10 μbar, SENTECH SI 200 plasma system). Finally, the resist was removed in oxygen plasma for 1 min (200 cm3 min−1 O2, 100 W, PVA TePla 300) followed by an acetone bath for 5 min.
Design, folding and purification of DNA origami structures
All structures were designed using caDNAno v.0.228. For the cryo-EM reconstruction of the turbine part, all structures were designed with a compact beam on top of each turbine structure (Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7) and designed only using a 7,560-base-long scaffold. The folding reaction mixtures contained a final scaffold concentration of 50 nM and oligonucleotide strands (IDT) of 500 nM. The folding reaction buffer contained 5 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM NaCl and 20 mM MgCl2. The folding solutions were thermally annealed using TETRAD (MJ Research, now Bio-Rad) thermal cycling devices. The reactions were left at 65 °C for 15 min and then subsequently subjected to a thermal annealing ramp from 60 °C to 20 °C (1 °C h−1). The folded structures were purified from excess oligonucleotides by physical extraction from agarose gels and stored at room temperature until further usage. The list of oligonucleotides can be found in Supplementary Information.
The turbine structure with a long DNA bundle as load was designed using a scaffold of 8,064 bases and a scaffold of 9,072 bases. The folding reaction mixtures contained a final scaffold concentration of 10 nM plus oligonucleotide strands (IDT) of 100 nM each. The folding reaction buffer contained 5 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM NaCl and 15 mM MgCl2 for the left-handed and right-handed versions or 20 mM MgCl2 for the achiral version of the turbine. The folding reaction mixtures were thermally annealed using TETRAD (MJ Research) thermal cycling devices. The reactions were left at 65 °C for 15 min and then subjected to a thermal annealing ramp from 60 °C to 20 °C (1 °C h−1). The folded structures were purified from excess oligonucleotides by polyethylene glycol precipitation and stored at room temperature until further usage. Details of all the procedures can be found in ref. 29.
Cryo-EM sample preparation, image acquisition and processing
Grid preparation, image acquisition and data processing were largely performed as reported previously30. The sample was applied to a glow-discharged C-Flat 1.2/1.3 4C thick grid (Protochips) and vitrified using a Vitrobot mark IV (FEI, now Thermo Scientific) at a temperature of 22 °C, a humidity of 100%, 0 s wait time, 2 s blot time, −1 blot force (arbitrary device units) and 0 s drain time. Micrograph videos with 10 frames were collected for the right-handed and left-handed versions (3,427 and 5,997 respectively) at a magnified pixel size of 2.28 Å and an accumulated dose of ~60 e Å−2 using the EPU software and a Falcon 3 detector (FEI) on a Cs-corrected (CEOS) 300 kV Titan Krios electron microscope (FEI). For the left-handed version, acquisition with a stage tilt of 20° was used to reduce the orientation bias of the particles.
Motion correction and contrast transfer function estimation of the micrographs were performed using the implementation in RELION 4.0 beta31,32 and CTFFIND4, respectively33. Particles were autopicked using TOPAZ34 and subjected to a selection process consisting of multiple rounds of 2D and 3D classification in RELION to remove falsely picked particles and damaged particles. Using an ab initio initial model, a refined 3D map was reconstructed from 97,054 and 71,992 particles for the right-handed and left-handed versions, respectively, followed by per-particle motion correction and dose weighting and 3D refinement (Supplementary Figs. 6 and 7). For a focused reconstruction of the turbine, multibody refinement35 was performed. The consensus map was divided into two parts containing the lever and the turbine using the eraser tool in UCSF Chimera36, and low-pass-filtered soft masks of the respective regions were created in RELION (Supplementary Figs. 8 and 9). After multibody refinement, a set of particles with the subtracted signal of the lever arm was calculated and subjected to another round of 3D refinement. The final maps were masked, sharpened and low-pass filtered using the estimated resolution based on the 0.143 Fourier shell correlation criterion. Atomic models were constructed using a cascaded relaxation protocol as described previously30 (Supplementary Fig. 11).
The dimensions of the turbines were measured in Fiji37 using orthographic projections of the maps created with ChimeraX38. For the twist measurement of the turbine versions, slices from the well resolved central parts were extracted from the cryo-EM density maps using atomic model fits at base-pair positions that are on the same plane in the design, with a spacing of 33 bp and 34 bp for the right- and the left-handed version, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 10). For each version, the slices were fitted into each other on the basis of maximum overlay using ChimeraX38 to determine the rotation angle. From the twist density, the diameter and the length of the helices, the outer blade angle with respect to the helical axes was calculated.
Single-particle fluorescence imaging
Solid-state nanopore chips were oxygen-plasma cleaned before all the fluorescence experiments (100 W for 1 min, Plasma Prep III, SPI Supplies). Coverslips (VWR, no. 1.5) were cleaned by ultrasonication sequentially in acetone, isopropanol, water, 1 M KOH solution and deionized water (Milli-Q) for 30 min each. The cleaned coverslips were then blow-dried thoroughly with compressed nitrogen. The nanopore chip was glued into the PDMS (SYLGARD 184 silicone elastomer) flow cell using a two-component silicone rubber (Ecoflex 5, Smooth-ON), then the PDMS flow cell was bonded to the cleaned coverslip after oxygen-plasma treatment (50 W, 50 mbar for 30 s) and post-bake at 120 °C for 30 min. After assembly, the whole device was again treated with oxygen plasma (50 W, 50 mbar) for 4 min before embedding a pair of Ag/AgCl electrodes, one in each side of the reservoir, and flushing in deionized water to wet the channels. This is essential for increasing the hydrophilicity of the membrane and ensuring a negatively charged silicon nitride surface. The PDMS nanopore devices were always assembled shortly before each experiment and never reused.
The nanopore chip was then imaged using an epifluorescence microscope with a ×60 water immersion objective (Olympus UPlanSApo, numerical aperture 1.20) and a fast scientific complementary metal–oxide–semiconductor camera (Prime BSI, Teledmy Photometrics). The camera field of view was reduced as needed to achieve high frame rates (typically around 200 pixels × 200 pixels). To image Cy3-labelled DNA turbines, a 561 nm laser (Stradus, Vortran Laser Technology) was used to excite the fluorophores. The typical exposure time of the experiments was 5 ms, which led to a frame rate of around 190–200 fps. To simplify the data analysis, a fixed frame rate value (200 fps) is used. Before imaging, the imaging buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5; 50 mM NaCl unless otherwise stated, 5 mM MgCl2; 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5% (w/v) d-dextrose, 2 mM Trolox, 40 μg ml−1 glucose oxidase, 17 μg ml−1 catalase; 0.05% TWEEN 20) was placed into the reservoirs on either side of the silicon nitride membrane.
Driving DNA turbines using transmembrane ion gradients
An imaging buffer with the same salt concentration (50 mM NaCl) was flushed into the flow cell first, with DNA turbines on the cis side of the membrane. Subsequently, an imaging buffer containing a higher NaCl concentration was flushed into the trans side of the membrane. With single-particle fluorescence microscopy, the docking and rotation of the DNA turbines could be observed and recorded. To release the turbines from the nanopore, we either inserted a pair of temporary electrodes into the inlet and outlet of the flow channels and released the turbines electrically, or we flushed in the same (lower-concentration) buffer as the cis side. Because of the photobleaching and accumulation of the DNA turbines near nanopore arrays, we chose 40 s as a typical observation duration. Examples of longer recordings are shown in Supplementary Fig. 23.
Driving DNA turbines using transmembrane voltages
In contrast to the salt-gradient-driven mode, a pair of electrodes was embedded into the flow cells. We used a custom-built circuit to apply voltages39. The output voltage was controlled by a custom LabVIEW program. The electrodes embedded in the two reservoirs were connected to the circuit. The DNA origami turbines were placed into the electrically grounded side (cis side) of the flow cell with a typical concentration of 1 pM. After applying the voltage, the DNA turbines were docked onto the nanopores under a 100 mV bias voltage (unless otherwise stated) across the membrane. The turbines could be easily released from the nanopore array by flipping the voltage polarity and then setting it to 0 mV for several seconds to allow the imaged turbines to diffuse away from the capture region. To avoid overcrowding of DNA turbines near the nanopore array, which increased the fluorescence background fluctuation, we typically imaged the turbines before the array was fully filled, and subsequently released them from the nanopore. Then a new group of turbines could be captured and docked again by applying a positive bias.
Fluorescence microscopy data analysis
For image processing, first a single-molecule localization was carried out using Fiji (ImageJ37) with the ThunderSTORM plugin40 for all frames in the acquired image sequences. A wavelet filter (B-spline) and an integrated Gaussian method were used for the localizations. Then the results were filtered on the basis of their quality (uncertainty < 50 nm) and the local density (filter of 15 particles in every 50 nm among all localized data points in the sequence) to rule out free-diffusing (non-captured) turbines. Next, the single-molecule localization results were analysed using a custom MATLAB script (Code availability). In brief, all coordinates of localized particle positions were clustered on the basis of their Euclidean distance for each turbine. When localized particle positions were deduced in a video, a circle was fitted to the data to obtain the centre and a radius, which subsequently was used for calculating the angular position of the fluorophores in each frame. Next, we determined if the fluorophores occupy spatial states that can be fitted to a circular path. We did this by comparing the point density of the coordinates within an annulus around the fitted circular perimeter (±1 nm) with the density of points around the centre (with a radius r, so that the area of this central circle is equal to that of the ring region). If the point density within the annulus was higher, then this data group would be kept in the statistics, else it would be considered an invalid trajectory and discarded. Finally, the script calculated all necessary motion properties of the turbine, including its cumulative angular displacements, MSD, angular velocity and torque. The angular velocity ωd was determined by fitting MSD = ωd2t2 + 2Drt to the MSD curve of each turbine, where t is the lag time and Dr is the rotational diffusion coefficient (also as a fitting parameter). The estimation of the torque is discussed in Supplementary Section 1.
MD simulations
All MD simulations were performed using the NAMD program41, CHARMM36 parameters for DNA, water and ions42 with CUFIX43 corrections, periodic boundary conditions and the TIP3P model of water44. The long-range electrostatic interactions were computed using the particle-mesh Ewald scheme over a grid with 1 Å spacing45. Van der Waals and short-range electrostatic forces were evaluated using the 10–12 Å smooth cutoff scheme. Hydrogen mass repartitioning46 and the SHAKE47 and SETTLE48 algorithms were used, enabling a 4 fs integration time step. The full electrostatics were calculated every two-time step. Except where specified, a Langevin thermostat with a 0.1 ps−1 damping coefficient maintained a temperature of 295 K in all simulations. Coordinates were recorded every 2,500 steps.
Atomistic models of the entire turbine were assembled from the caDNAno28 design file using a custom mrdna script49. In addition to neutralizing Mg2+, 10 mM Mg2+ hexahydrate was placed adjacent to the DNA according to a previously described protocol43. Water and monovalent ions were added to the system using the solvate and autoionize plugins for VMD50, with the solvent box cut to form a hexagonal prism. For each salt condition, a 4 ns simulation was performed with a Nosé–Hoover Langevin piston barostat51,52 set to maintain a target pressure of 1 bar, allowing the equilibrium volume of the system to be determined. The resulting system dimensions were used in constant-volume simulations to equilibrate the turbine with harmonic position restraints holding the phosphorus atoms to their initial coordinates during the first 7 ns of the simulation (kspring = 1 kcal mol–1 Å–2 for t < 5 ns; 0.1 for 5 ns < t < 7 ns). After 30 ns of equilibration for the 50 mM and 75 ns for the 3 M system, a snapshot of the configuration was used to initialize subsequent simulations with either an electric field or pressure gradient applied to drive the turbine. Additional equilibration was performed for the 50 mM NaCl system for another 128 ns to initialize the ‘Alternate conf.’ system (Supplementary Fig. 24).
The conformation of the turbine at the end of equilibration was used to determine the rest positions of several harmonic collective variable (colvar)53 potentials, including a spring restraining the centre of mass of every third phosphorus atom (kspring = 500 kcal mol–1 Å–2); a spring restraining the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) of these phosphorus atoms with respect to the post-equilibration configuration (kspring = 1,000 kcal mol–1 Å–2; resting RMSD = 0), after optimal rigid body transformations so that the potential does not apply a net torque or force; and a pair of centre of mass harmonic restraints applied to 16-bp-long sections of the central six-helix bundle (kspring = 50 kcal mol–1 Å–2), placed near either the end of the shaft to prevent the turbine from tilting. With these colvars preventing translation, conformational fluctuations, or tilting of the turbine, an electric field was applied by placing a constant force on each atom with a magnitude proportional to the charge of the atom. Similarly, a pressure gradient was achieved by placing a small force on every water molecule of the system. Finally, in simulations where the torque was measured, an additional spin angle colvar (kspring = 100 kcal mol–1 °–2) prevented rotation of the turbine and reported the torque.
Simulation systems were prepared to study the forces on and flows around a DNA helix mimicking the DNA in the turbine blade. The 21 bp helix was made effectively infinite by connecting the ends of each strand across the periodic boundary. Solvent (neutralizing Na+, 100 mM and 3 M NaCl; no Mg2+) was added around the helix. Systems were equilibrated for 5–50 ns with the DNA phosphorus atoms harmonically restrained (kspring = 0.2 kcal mol–1 Å–2). Mobility measurements were performed using a field of 5 mV nm−1 or a hydrostatic pressure of ~1.3 bar nm−1 parallel or transverse to the helical axis, with each condition employing four replicate simulations lasting a total of 400 (neutralizing Na+) to 4,000 ns (3 M). Except where otherwise specified, a 100 mV nm−1 electric field was applied to the system at a 35° angle with respect to the DNA while a centre of mass colvar restrained the DNA (kspring = 500 kcal mol–1 Å–2), an RMSD colvar retained an idealized DNA configuration (kspring = 100 kcal mol–1 Å–2) and a spin angle colvar (kspring = 100 kcal mol–1 °–2) prevented rotation of the DNA and reported on the torque. Eight replicate systems were employed during simulations lasting a total of 1,040 ns (100 mM) or 2,055 ns (3 M). The flow and concentration of ions and water oxygen atoms were analysed by binning the system into ~1 Å voxels, counting the flux through and concentration in each voxel using a centred finite-difference approximation for the flux. The difference in concentration between sodium and chloride ions provided the net local charge density of the fluid around the DNA in each case. Multiplying this charge by the electric field provided the solvent force. In subsequent simulations, the 3D map of the solvent force was used to apply a position-dependent force to each water oxygen atom using the TclBC feature of NAMD and employing the approximation that the density of water oxygen atoms is uniformly 33 nm−3. Again, eight replicate systems were employed for simulations lasting a total of 480 and 570 ns for 100 mM and 3 M conditions, respectively.
Statistics and reproducibility
No statistical method was used to predetermine the sample size.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Portfolio reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41565-023-01527-8.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank M. Tišma for help with fluorescence microscopy imaging and P. Ketterer for initial turbine designs. We acknowledge funding support by the ERC Advanced Grant no. 883684 and the NanoFront and BaSyC programmes (to C.D.). This work was further supported by an ERC Consolidator Grant to H.D. (GA no. 724261), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft via the Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz Programme (to H.D.) and the SFB863 Project ID 111166240 TPA9 (to H.D.). A.A. and C.M. acknowledge support through the National Science Foundation (USA) under grant DMR-1827346 (to A.A.). This work has received support from the Max Planck School Matter to Life and the MaxSynBio Consortium, which are jointly funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of Germany, and the Max Planck Society (to R.G.). Supercomputer time was provided through Leadership Resource Allocation MCB20012 on Frontera and through ACCESS allocation MCA05S028.
Author contributions
H.D. and C.D. conceived the concept of DNA turbines in nanopores and nanopore arrays. A.-K.P. and X.S. co-designed the geometries of the turbines. A.-K.P. designed and prepared the DNA origami structures. X.S. designed the nanopore experiment and fabricated nanopore devices, supported by D.V. X.S. and W.Z. conducted nanopore experiments. F.K. performed cryo-EM measurements; E.F. performed EM data analysis and the atomic model construction. X.S. and D.V. wrote the data analysis scripts and analysed data. R.G. constructed the continuum model. C.M. and A.A. designed and conducted MD simulations. All authors discussed the findings and co-wrote the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Nanotechnology thanks Luca Piantanida and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
The electron density maps of the left- and right-handed turbines are available in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) as entries EMD-17600 and EMD-17606, respectively. Fluorescence microscopy and nanopore experimental data are available at 10.5281/zenodo.8091178. Simulation trajectory data are available at 10.13012/B2IDB-3458097_V1. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The corresponding MATLAB scripts for data processing and producing the final figures are available at 10.5281/zenodo.8091178. Scripts related to simulation set-up and analysis are available at 10.13012/B2IDB-3458097_V1.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Aleksei Aksimentiev, Email: aksiment@illinois.edu.
Hendrik Dietz, Email: dietz@tum.de.
Cees Dekker, Email: c.dekker@tudelft.nl.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41565-023-01527-8.
References
- 1.Carter NJ, Cross R. Mechanics of the kinesin step. Nature. 2005;435:308–312. doi: 10.1038/nature03528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Berg HC. The rotary motor of bacterial flagella. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2003;72:19–54. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.72.121801.161737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hahn A, Vonck J, Mills DJ, Meier T, Kühlbrandt W. Structure, mechanism, and regulation of the chloroplast ATP synthase. Science. 2018;360:eaat4318. doi: 10.1126/science.aat4318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Srivastava AP, et al. High-resolution cryo-EM analysis of the yeast ATP synthase in a lipid membrane. Science. 2018;360:eaas9699. doi: 10.1126/science.aas9699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ketterer P, Willner EM, Dietz H. Nanoscale rotary apparatus formed from tight-fitting 3D DNA components. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1501209. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bertosin E, et al. A nanoscale reciprocating rotary mechanism with coordinated mobility control. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:7138. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27230-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Courbet A, et al. Computational design of mechanically coupled axle–rotor protein assemblies. Science. 2022;376:383–390. doi: 10.1126/science.abm1183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ahmadi Y, et al. The Brownian and flow‐driven rotational dynamics of a multicomponent DNA origami‐based rotor. Small. 2020;16:2001855. doi: 10.1002/smll.202001855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Erbas-Cakmak S, Leigh DA, McTernan CT, Nussbaumer AL. Artificial molecular machines. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:10081–10206. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Van Delden RA, et al. Unidirectional molecular motor on a gold surface. Nature. 2005;437:1337–1340. doi: 10.1038/nature04127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Roke D, Wezenberg SJ, Feringa BL. Molecular rotary motors: unidirectional motion around double bonds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:9423–9431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712784115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Qiu Y, Feng Y, Guo Q-H, Astumian RD, Stoddart JF. Pumps through the ages. Chem. 2020;6:1952–1977. doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2020.07.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Borsley S, Kreidt E, Leigh DA, Roberts BM. Autonomous fuelled directional rotation about a covalent single bond. Nature. 2022;604:80–85. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04450-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kopperger E, et al. A self-assembled nanoscale robotic arm controlled by electric fields. Science. 2018;359:296–301. doi: 10.1126/science.aao4284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maffeo C, Quednau L, Wilson J, Aksimentiev A. DNA double helix, a tiny electromotor. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2023;18:238–242. doi: 10.1038/s41565-022-01285-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Klusch N, Murphy BJ, Mills DJ, Yildiz Ö, Kühlbrandt W. Structural basis of proton translocation and force generation in mitochondrial ATP synthase. eLife. 2017;6:e33274. doi: 10.7554/eLife.33274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Junge W, Sielaff H, Engelbrecht S. Torque generation and elastic power transmission in the rotary FOF1-ATPase. Nature. 2009;459:364–370. doi: 10.1038/nature08145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Dietz H, Douglas SM, Shih WM. Folding DNA into twisted and curved nanoscale shapes. Science. 2009;325:725–730. doi: 10.1126/science.1174251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Castro CE, et al. A primer to scaffolded DNA origami. Nat. Methods. 2011;8:221–229. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lee JY, et al. Rapid computational analysis of DNA origami assemblies at near-atomic resolution. ACS Nano. 2021;15:1002–1015. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c07717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ermann N, et al. Promoting single-file DNA translocations through nanopores using electro-osmotic flow. J. Chem. Phys. 2018;149:163311. doi: 10.1063/1.5031010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Shi X, et al. Sustained unidirectional rotation of a self-organized DNA rotor on a nanopore. Nat. Phys. 2022;18:1105–1111. doi: 10.1038/s41567-022-01683-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Van den Heuvel M, De Graaff M, Lemay S, Dekker C. Electrophoresis of individual microtubules in microchannels. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:7770–7775. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0608316104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van Der Drift W, De Keizer A, Overbeek JTG. Electrophoretic mobility of a cylinder with high surface charge density. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1979;71:67–78. doi: 10.1016/0021-9797(79)90222-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yariv E, Schnitzer O. The electrophoretic mobility of rod-like particles. J. Fluid Mech. 2013;719:R3. doi: 10.1017/jfm.2013.43. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pumm A-K, et al. A DNA origami rotary ratchet motor. Nature. 2022;607:492–498. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04910-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Verschueren DV, Yang W, Dekker C. Lithography-based fabrication of nanopore arrays in freestanding SiN and graphene membranes. Nanotechnology. 2018;29:145302. doi: 10.1088/1361-6528/aaabce. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Douglas SM, et al. Rapid prototyping of 3D DNA-origami shapes with caDNAno. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:5001–5006. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Wagenbauer KF, et al. How we make DNA origami. ChemBioChem. 2017;18:1873–1885. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201700377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kube M, et al. Revealing the structures of megadalton-scale DNA complexes with nucleotide resolution. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:6229. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20020-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Scheres SH. A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol. 2012;415:406–418. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2011.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kimanius D, Dong L, Sharov G, Nakane T, Scheres SH. New tools for automated cryo-EM single-particle analysis in RELION-4.0. Biochem. J. 2021;478:4169–4185. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20210708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Rohou A, Grigorieff N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 2015;192:216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bepler T, et al. Positive-unlabeled convolutional neural networks for particle picking in cryo-electron micrographs. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:1153–1160. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0575-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Nakane T, Kimanius D, Lindahl E, Scheres SH. Characterisation of molecular motions in cryo-EM single-particle data by multi-body refinement in RELION. eLife. 2018;7:e36861. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 2004;25:1605–1612. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schindelin J, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:676–682. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pettersen EF, et al. UCSF ChimeraX: structure visualization for researchers, educators, and developers. Protein Sci. 2021;30:70–82. doi: 10.1002/pro.3943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pud S, et al. Self-aligned plasmonic nanopores by optically controlled dielectric breakdown. Nano Lett. 2015;15:7112–7117. doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ovesný M, Křížek P, Borkovec J, Švindrych Z, Hagen GM. ThunderSTORM: a comprehensive ImageJ plug-in for PALM and STORM data analysis and super-resolution imaging. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2389–2390. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Phillips JC, et al. Scalable molecular dynamics on CPU and GPU architectures with NAMD. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;153:044130. doi: 10.1063/5.0014475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hart K, et al. Optimization of the CHARMM additive force field for DNA: improved treatment of the BI/BII conformational equilibrium. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012;8:348–362. doi: 10.1021/ct200723y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yoo J, Aksimentiev A. Improved parametrization of Li+, Na+, K+, and Mg2+ ions for all-atom molecular dynamics simulations of nucleic acid systems. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:45–50. doi: 10.1021/jz201501a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J. Chem. Phys. 1983;79:926–935. doi: 10.1063/1.445869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: an N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:10089–10092. doi: 10.1063/1.464397. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Balusek C, et al. Accelerating membrane simulations with hydrogen mass repartitioning. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019;15:4673–4686. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ryckaert J-P, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJ. Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J. Comput. Phys. 1977;23:327–341. doi: 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. SETTLE: an analytical version of the SHAKE and RATTLE algorithm for rigid water models. J. Comput. Chem. 1992;13:952–962. doi: 10.1002/jcc.540130805. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maffeo C, Aksimentiev A. MrDNA: a multi-resolution model for predicting the structure and dynamics of DNA systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48:5135–5146. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K. VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graph. 1996;14:33–38. doi: 10.1016/0263-7855(96)00018-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Martyna GJ, Tobias DJ, Klein ML. Constant pressure molecular dynamics algorithms. J. Chem. Phys. 1994;101:4177–4189. doi: 10.1063/1.467468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR. Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: the Langevin piston method. J. Chem. Phys. 1995;103:4613–4621. doi: 10.1063/1.470648. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Fiorin G, Klein ML, Hénin J. Using collective variables to drive molecular dynamics simulations. Mol. Phys. 2013;111:3345–3362. doi: 10.1080/00268976.2013.813594. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The electron density maps of the left- and right-handed turbines are available in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB) as entries EMD-17600 and EMD-17606, respectively. Fluorescence microscopy and nanopore experimental data are available at 10.5281/zenodo.8091178. Simulation trajectory data are available at 10.13012/B2IDB-3458097_V1. Source data are provided with this paper.
The corresponding MATLAB scripts for data processing and producing the final figures are available at 10.5281/zenodo.8091178. Scripts related to simulation set-up and analysis are available at 10.13012/B2IDB-3458097_V1.