Abstract
Background
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a cytokine produced in response to endothelial damage. Higher levels correlate with cardiovascular risk factors, including hypertension and diabetes.
Objectives
We hypothesized that HGF is associated with stroke.
Methods
The Reasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study enrolled 30,239 Black and White Americans aged ≥45 years from 2003 to 2007. In this case-cohort study, after 5.5 years of follow-up, circulating baseline HGF was measured in 557 participants with incident ischemic stroke and in a cohort random sample of 964 participants. Hazard ratios (HRs) per SD log-transformed HGF and by HGF quintile were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for stroke risk factors and other correlates of HGF. Differences by race and sex were tested using interaction terms.
Results
Median HGF was 295 (IQR, 209-402) pg/mL. HGF was higher with older age, male sex, prevalent cardiovascular disease, smoking, and warfarin use, but did not differ by race. The adjusted HR of incident ischemic stroke per SD higher baseline HGF (145 pg/mL) was 1.30 (CI, 1.00-1.70), with no difference by sex or race. HGF in the highest (>434 pg/mL) vs lowest quintile (<135 pg/mL) was associated with an adjusted HR of incident stroke of 2.12 (CI, 1.31-3.41).
Conclusion
In the REGARDS study, higher HGF was associated with increased risk of incident ischemic stroke in Black and White adults, with a doubling in risk of HGF in the top quintile compared with the lowest quintile after adjusting for other stroke risk factors.
Keywords: biomarker, hepatocyte growth factor, ischemic stroke, longitudinal studies, risk factors
Essentials
-
•
Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is produced in response to blood vessel damage.
-
•
We studied whether higher baseline HGF is associated with incident stroke in a large cohort study.
-
•
Higher HGF was strongly associated with stroke independent of other stroke risk factors.
-
•
Participants in the highest quintile HGF had double risk of stroke compared with the lowest.
1. Introduction
Stroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the United States, with Black Americans having increased risk (relative to White Americans), especially between ages 45 and 65 years [1]. Vascular remodeling and endothelial dysfunction may precede overt stroke for decades [2], so identifying biomarkers may provide the opportunity for early detection and prevention through development of new preventive interventions. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) is a mitogenic cytokine produced in response to tissue injury and endothelial dysfunction [3]. It is active in cell growth/embryonic development, motility, wound healing, and angiogenesis [4] and may play a role in response to atherosclerotic disease through proangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic mechanisms [5]. HGF is a tyrosine kinase receptor agonist and signals through the MET pathway, making it a possible target for clinical therapeutics [6,7].
Plasma HGF is elevated in individuals with established cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, including hypertension [8], obesity [9], diabetes [10], and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) [11], but whether it is a causal risk factor is unknown. It was previously studied as a marker of disease severity in heart failure [12,13] and stroke [14] (especially in those with dyslipidemia [15]) and is associated with progression of atherosclerosis [16]. HGF has also been studied as a possible contributor to racial disparities in cardiovascular disease. In the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA), investigators found higher HGF was associated with more coronary calcium, and this association was strongest in Black participants [17], suggesting that HGF may account for some racial disparities in cardiovascular disease. They also identified genetic differences in expression of HGF across race and ethnicity (26), which could potentially explain differences in cardiovascular disease.
Two prospective studies reported associations of higher HGF with incident stroke, the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) and MESA. WHI included only postmenopausal women [18], limiting its generalizability. In MESA, the association of HGF with stroke risk did not differ by race [19], but this important analysis was limited by low power.
In this study, to further elucidate mechanisms of stroke, we examined the association of HGF with stroke in a case/cohort study in the prospective Reasons for Geographical and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study, a large longitudinal cohort study of Black and White Americans seeking to elucidate reasons for the racial disparity in stroke mortality. We tested whether racial disparities in stroke could be partially explained by differences in HGF level and if there was effect modification of HGF’s association with stroke by race.
2. Methods
2.1. REGARDS study design
The REGARDS study has been described in detail previously [20]. In brief, the study sought to elucidate reasons for regional and racial differences in stroke risk and enrolled 30,239 Black (42%) and White (58%) Americans aged 45 years and older from 2003 to 2007. Participants were 45% male and 55% female, 56% from the 8 states in the Stroke Belt region, and 44% from the other 40 contiguous states. Following verbal consent, medical history, including cardiovascular risk factors, was collected by computer-assisted telephone interview. Thereafter, subjects participated in an in-home examination that included height, weight, and blood pressure (BP) measurements, a resting electrocardiogram (ECG), medication inventory, collection of fasting blood and urine samples, and retrieval of written informed consent. Methods were approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions.
2.2. Covariate definitions
Prevalent stroke was based on a self-report of a physician’s diagnosis. BP was the average of 2 seated BP measurements. Hypertension was defined as systolic BP ≥ 140 mm Hg, diastolic BP ≥ 90 mm Hg, or self-reported physician diagnosis of hypertension with antihypertensive use. Diabetes was defined as fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dL (or glucose ≥ 200 mg/dL among those not fasting or self-reported use of diabetes medications). LVH was defined by ECG criteria [21]. Atrial fibrillation was defined by self-reporting of a physician’s diagnosis or presence on ECG. Prebaseline cardiovascular disease was classified as a self-reported physician diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease, myocardial infarction (MI), bypass, angiography, or stenting, or as evidence of prior MI on ECG. Income, education level, warfarin, aspirin, antihypertensive medication, and statin use were based on self-report. Body mass index was calculated from height and weight.
2.3. Stroke ascertainment
The outcome was the first ischemic stroke through September 1, 2011, with a mean follow-up of 5.2 years (median, 5.5; IQR, 4.0-6.9). Participants were contacted every 6 months via telephone to obtain vital and stroke-free status. Medical records were obtained in the case of death, reported or suspected stroke, or hospitalization for stroke symptoms identified using the Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke-Free Status [22]. Stroke events were defined as acute, persistent (>24 hours) focal symptoms attributable to obstruction or rupture of the arterial system or stroke evident on brain imaging. Stroke events were adjudicated by blinded independent review using a committee of physicians and based on medical records and imaging review [20]. Strokes were classified as ischemic or hemorrhagic, with further classification of ischemic strokes into subtypes (small vessel, large vessel, cardioembolic, and unclassified)
2.4. Case-cohort study design
We used a case-cohort study design. Cases were 576 participants stroke-free at baseline with incident ischemic stroke during follow-up. The cohort random sample was selected using stratified random sampling across 20 strata based on age (45-54, 55-64, 65-74, 75-84, and ≥85 years), race, and sex. To ensure sufficient representation of high-risk groups [23], sampling fulfilled the desired distribution: 50% Black, 50% women, and age groups 45 to 54 (20%), 55 to 64 (20%), 65 to 74 (25%), 75 to 84 (25%), and ≥85 (10%) years. Statistical analyses were then weighted to account for stratified sampling. Of 1104 participants in the cohort random sample, we excluded 87 with prebaseline stroke.
2.5. Laboratory methods
Laboratory methods were described in detail [24]. Briefly, fasting baseline blood samples were drawn in the morning using standardized methods, centrifuged to separate plasma and serum, and shipped overnight on ice to the University of Vermont, where they were processed further and stored at −80 °C. HGF was measured in retrieved plasma of the cases of ischemic stroke and the cohort random sample using a Multiplex Immunoassay (Millipore/Luminex); the interassay coefficient of variation (CV) was 2.98% to 9.54%. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP) was measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Elecsys 2010; Roche Diagnostics; CV < 5%). D-dimer was measured using an immunoturbidometric assay on the STAR analyzer (Diagnostica Stago); the CV was 5% to 17%. C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured using a high-sensitivity particle-enhanced immunonephelometric assay on the BNII nephelometer (N High Sensitivity CRP, Dade Behring Inc); the CV was 2% to 6%. Total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides were measured by colorimetric reflectance spectrophotometry using the Ortho Vitros Clinical Chemistry System 950IRC instrument (Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics). Interleukin (IL)-6 was measured by ultrasensitive ELISA (Quantikine HS Human IL-6 Immunoassay) with a CV of 6.3%.
2.6. Statistical analysis
All analyses were completed using SAS software (SAS Institute). As there is little knowledge on the correlates of HGF, for hypothesis formation, baseline characteristics of participants across HGF quintiles were compared using analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-squared tests for categorical variables. We then determined independent correlates of HGF in the cohort random sample using a weighted multivariable linear regression model including age, race, sex, and age∗race interaction term. Variables from Table 1 were retained in the model if they were significantly associated with HGF. The adjusted mean difference in HGF level by each correlate was calculated.
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics by hepatocyte growth factor level in the cohort random sample.
| Characteristic HGF (pg/dL) | Quintile 1, %a 13-191 |
Quintile 2, %a 192-257 |
Quintile 3, %a 258-333 |
Quintile 4, %a 334-435 |
Quintile 5, %a 435-10,347 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male gender | 41 | 47 | 46 | 57 | 59 |
| Black race | 53 | 48 | 50 | 49 | 47 |
| Stroke Belt region | 36 | 34 | 33 | 38 | 35 |
| Age (y) | 65 (12) | 66 (12) | 67 (11) | 68 (12) | 72 (12) |
| Using antihypertensive medications | 55 | 52 | 65 | 60 | 69 |
| Current smoking | 11 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 18 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 14 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 24 |
| Cardiovascular disease | 19 | 14 | 23 | 27 | 35 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 5 | 7 | 11 | 8 | 13 |
| Left ventricular hypertrophy | 13 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 11 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) mean (SD) | 127 (17) | 126 (16) | 128 (16) | 130 (18) | 130(17) |
| Income, per y | |||||
| 0-75,000 | 71 | 66 | 72 | 69 | 70 |
| >75,000 | 21 | 15 | 16 | 14 | 7 |
| Refused | 13 | 13 | 10 | 12 | 21 |
| Education, % college or above | 36 | 36 | 38 | 32 | 33 |
| Aspirin use | 37 | 39 | 51 | 44 | 41 |
| Warfarin use | <1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Statin use | 27 | 30 | 31 | 34 | 33 |
| Body mass index > 30 | 34 | 36 | 36 | 37 | 33 |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL), mean (SD) | |||||
| Total | 192 (34.8) | 189 (39.6) | 189 (40.8) | 188 (42.4) | 184 (36.3) |
| LDL | 115 (31.0) | 109 (32.1) | 112 (36.4) | 113 (35.9) | 107 (32.4) |
| HDL | 53 (16.6) | 53 (18.1) | 53 (16.0) | 50 (14.9) | 51 (17.4) |
| NT pro-BNP (pg/mL), median (IQR) | 73 (34-169) | 67(33-135) | 75(33-174) | 79 (39-224) | 129 (52-303) |
| D-dimer (μg/mL), mean (SD) | 3.5 (2.6) | 3.4 (2.3) | 3.8 (2.8) | 4.0 (2.5) | 5.1 (3.3) |
| C-reactive protein (mg/L), mean (IQR) | 2.08 (0.92-4.70) | 1.66 (0.79-3.83) | 1.94 (0.88-4.59) | 2.52 (1.20-5.25) | 2.60 (1.02-6.48) |
| IL-6, mean (SD) | 3.52 (2.58) | 3.36 (2.29) | 3.79 (2.84) | 3.99 (2.47) | 5.09 (3.34) |
HDL, high-density lipoprotein; HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; IL, interleukin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NT pro-BNP, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide.
Unless otherwise specified.
Hazard ratios (HRs) of stroke by HGF quintile were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models for case-cohort studies with weighting to account for study design using an alpha value of .05. Both linear and quintile analyses were planned a priori; HGF quintile was calculated using the cohort random sample distribution. Participants without stroke were censored at death or last follow-up before September 11, 2011. Four successive models were built: (1) model 1 included age, race, sex, and age∗race interaction term to account for the larger racial disparity in stroke at a younger age [25]; (2) model 2 added Framingham stroke risk factors (systolic BP, presence or absence of antihypertensive medication use, diabetes mellitus, current smoking, cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and LVH) [26]; (3) model 3 added other baseline characteristics individually associated with HGF (income, aspirin use, and warfarin use); and (4) model 4 added other biomarkers previously associated with stroke in REGARDS (CRP, D-dimer, NT pro-BNP, and IL-6). Interaction terms using log-transformed HGF for HGF∗race and HGF∗sex were tested in each successive model. Analysis of HGF in relation to ischemic stroke subtypes was evaluated separately using model 2. Subgroup analyses assessing the association of HGF with stroke incidence in White men, White women, Black men, and Black women were performed. Attenuation analysis of the racial disparity in stroke by HGF was planned but was not performed as HGF did not differ by race.
3. Results
There were 576 incident ischemic strokes over a mean follow-up time of 5.2 (1.9) years (median, 5.5; IQR, 4.0-6.9), and 557 had HGF measured; 23 of the strokes occurred within the randomly sampled subcohort. In the subcohort (N = 1017), 964 had HGF measured. Baseline characteristics of the cohort random sample by HGF quintile are listed in Table 1. The distribution of HGF was positively skewed in both stroke cases and the cohort random sample. Median HGF was 295 (IQR, 209-402) pg/mL in the cohort random sample. Higher HGF was associated with male sex, older age, lower income, presence of atrial fibrillation, cardiovascular disease, self-reported use of warfarin, aspirin, and antihypertensive medication use. Notably, there was no association of HGF with race. Accounting simultaneously for all observed correlates of HGF, only older age, male sex, current smoking, and warfarin use were independently associated with higher HGF concentration (Table 2). In this model, HGF concentration was 56 pg/mL lower in Black than White participants, but this difference was not statistically significant (95% CI, −156 to 112).
Table 2.
Difference in hepatocyte growth factor by baseline characteristics in a multivariable model.
| Baseline characteristic | Difference in HGF (pg/mL) | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Age, per 10 y | 26 | 9-44 |
| Male sex | 60 | 29-94 |
| Black race | −56 | −156 to 112 |
| Cardiovascular disease | 27 | −7 to 64 |
| Atrial fibrillation | −3 | −54 to 51 |
| Systolic blood pressure, per 10 mm Hg | −5 | −43 to 38 |
| Antihypertensive medication use | 32 | 0-66 |
| Diabetes | 38 | 5-73 |
| Current smoking | 76 | 29-131 |
| LVH | −4 | −45 to 43 |
| Aspirin use | −19 | −45 to 8 |
| Warfarin use | 109 | 10-236 |
| Income > $75,000/y | −49 | −89 to −3 |
The multivariable model includes race, Framingham stroke risk factors, and additional Table 1 variables associated with HGF (analysis of variance P < .05).
For reference, the median HGF was 294.7 (IQR, 208.7-401.7) pg/mL.
HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy.
Almost 30% of the strokes occurred among participants in the highest quintile of HGF compared with about 15% in the lowest quintile. In Cox proportional hazard models, each SD increment of log-transformed HGF increased risk of stroke by 30% (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.00-1.70) after adjusting for other stroke risk factors (Table 3). Participants with HGF in the highest quintile had more than a doubling of incident stroke risk (HR, 2.12; OR, 1.31-3.41) compared with those in the lowest quintile. Neither adding other baseline characteristics associated with HGF to the model (model 3) nor adding other stroke biomarkers (model 4: CRP, D-dimer, NT pro-BNP, and IL-6) meaningfully altered the association of HGF with stroke. We assessed for influential outliers by removing participants within the top and bottom 2.5% of HGF, which did not materially affect the HR (data not shown).
Table 3.
Hazard ratio (95% CI) of incident stroke by baseline hepatocyte growth factor quintile.
| Model | Quintile 2 vs 1 | Quintile 3 vs 1 | Quintile 4 vs 1 | Quintile 5 vs 1 | P value for trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | 1.11 (0.74-1.66) | 1.30 (0.88-1.93) | 1.19 (0.79-1.78) | 1.94 (1.31-2.88) | .008 |
| Model 2 | 1.47 (0.71-2.38) | 1.55 (0.98-2.46) | 1.37 (0.85-2.23) | 2.12 (1.31-3.41) | .04 |
| Model 3 | 1.48 (0.91-2.41) | 1.49 (0.93-2.38) | 1.34 (0.82-2.18) | 2.00 (1.22-3.26) | .09 |
| Model 4 | 1.68 (1.02-2.77) | 1.65 (1.02-2.68) | 1.23 (0.74-2.05) | 2.12 (1.30-3.47) | .02 |
Model 1: adjusted for age, sex, race, and age∗race interaction.
Model 2: model 1 + Framingham stroke risk factors (use of antihypertensive medication, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and smoking).
Model 3: model 2 + income, aspirin use, and warfarin use.
Model 4: model 3 + D-dimer, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6.
Hepatocyte growth factor quintiles: 13-191, 191-257, 257-333, 333-435, and 435-10,347 pg/mL.
HRs of stroke for log-transformed HGF are shown in Figure. The HRs were similar across Black and White men and women.
Figure.
Hazard ratio (HR) (blue line) and 95% CI (gray shading) of stroke by baseline hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) level in (A) the entire cohort, (B) Black women, (C) Black men, (D) White women, and (E) White men. HR is anchored around the median value of HGF and log-transformed.
In the evaluation of ischemic stroke subtypes (Table 4), there were relatively small numbers of participants with each stroke subtype. There was no statistically significant trend across quintiles for any stroke subtype. HGF in the fifth quintile purported the highest risk of stroke across all stroke subtypes, with small vessel and unclassified strokes showing a doubling of stroke risk in the fifth vs first quintile.
Table 4.
Hazard ratio (95% CI) of incident stroke subtypes by baseline hepatocyte growth factor quintile.
| Stroke subtype | Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All strokes | N = 85 | N = 95 | N = 114 | N = 99 | N = 164 |
| Reference | 1.47 (0.71-2.38) | 1.55 (0.98-2.46) | 1.37 (0.85-2.23) | 2.12 (1.31-3.41) | |
| Cardioembolic | N = 18 | N = 20 | N = 14 | N = 20 | N = 37 |
| Reference | 1.29 (0.51-3.24) | 0.79 (0.31-2.03) | 1.18 (0.47-2.97) | 1.50 (0.63-3.59) | |
| Large vessel | N = 14 | N = 14 | N = 11 | N = 15 | N = 16 |
| Reference | 1.26 (0.62-0.57) | 0.88 (0.42-1.83) | 1.19 (0.57-2.46) | 1.45 (0.72-2.92) | |
| Small vessel | N = 8 | N = 13 | N = 19 | N = 18 | N = 29 |
| Reference | 1.53 (0.77-3.07) | 1.27 (0.64-2.52) | 1.53 (0.77-3.05) | 2.17 (1.12-4.19) | |
| Unclassified/ | N = 36 | N = 40 | N = 58 | N = 42 | N = 71 |
| other | Reference | 1.46 (0.85-2.52) | 1.53 (0.91-2.57) | 1.26 (0.73-2.17) | 2.08 (1.23-3.53) |
Adjusted for age, sex, race, race∗age interaction term, and Framingham stroke risk factors (use of antihypertensive medication, systolic blood pressure, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, and smoking).
N indicates the number of strokes in each group.
P value for trend > .10 for all stroke subtypes.
4. Discussion
In this large population study of Black and White people residing in the United States, incident ischemic stroke risk increased with higher baseline HGF, with a doubling of risk in participants with higher HGF that was minimally impacted by adjustment for other stroke risk factors, including novel biomarkers. Results were robust across race and sex subgroups. This considerable effect size is comparable with the effect of smoking or hypertension for incident stroke. It is notable that there was little to no change in the association after adjusting for other stroke risk factors, including traditional and nontraditional risk factors. Though obesity and dyslipidemia are known correlates of HGF [9,15], neither were related to stroke (unpublished data) or HGF level in REGARDS. HGF might represent a unique biology from these risk factors that are relevant to stroke. Despite being a significant risk marker for the development of stroke, HGF concentration did not differ by race and its association with incident stroke did not differ by race, so it does not represent pathways related to race disparities affecting Black individuals.
These findings support prior results of 2 other prospective studies examining HGF and stroke. In the WHI, there was an increased risk of stroke in postmenopausal women with HGF in the highest quartile (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.04-1.85 in a multivariable model) [18] and no difference in HGF by race. In MESA, higher HGF was associated with incident ischemic stroke (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31 per each SD increase of HGF in a multivariable model), also showing no difference by race [19] despite identifying some ethnicity-specific gene mutations, which may influence HGF levels [27]. Though these prior studies lacked power to study Black participants separately, our study extends these findings to both Black and White individuals and men and women in a large nationally representative cohort.
There are several potential mechanisms for an association between higher HGF levels and incident stroke. HGF level increases in response to tissue injury and exerts proangiogenic, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic effects on endothelial and smooth muscle cells. It may be that preclinical stroke and vascular damage cause upregulation of HGF in response. Other previous work suggested higher levels predict a poor prognosis after ischemic stroke [14], suggesting a correlation between stroke severity/extent of vascular damage and higher HGF. A recent study of vascular biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging markers of small vessel disease in middle-aged stroke-free individuals supports this hypothesis, showing that HGF was associated with larger cerebrospinal fluid volumes [28], a marker of brain atrophy, even in the absence of overt stroke.
Previous work suggested that HGF may play a more direct role in some subtypes of stroke. HGF increases in response to noncerebral atherosclerosis, and HGF is associated with heart failure severity and mortality [12,13]. Increased circulating levels of HGF and increased HGF expression in atherosclerotic carotid plaques suggest that HGF may also have deleterious effects on the plaque microenvironment, destabilizing and leading to increased symptoms in patients with carotid artery atherosclerosis [29]. Though based on very small numbers, our analyses suggest that higher baseline HGF may be especially associated with small vessel strokes. This preliminary finding supports a hypothesis that HGF is a marker for small vessel disease as a causative pathway rather than cardiac dysfunction. This is also supported by the lack of confounding by NT pro-BNP, a biomarker of heart failure. We did not observe an association with large vessel stroke subtypes in this study; however, the small number of strokes in this subtype limited the power to detect such an association if it exists.
Interestingly, biomarkers previously associated with stroke (CRP [30,31], D-dimer [32], NT pro-BNP [23], and IL-6 [33]) were all positively correlated with HGF, but adjustment for these did not significantly attenuate the association of HGF with stroke. The lack of confounding by these traditional and nontraditional stroke biomarkers suggests these biomarkers represent different biology in the pathogenesis of stroke, and addition of HGF may have utility to better classify stroke risk.
Prior animal model research showing improved cardiac outcomes with higher HGF levels after MI [6] and treatment of animals with HGF [34] following induced MI suggested HGF had potential therapeutic effect immediately following MI. HGF level at the time of stroke is associated with worse stroke severity and outcome after stroke [14,15], which may be due to a greater degree of endothelial damage in these patients, resulting in a surge of HGF in response. HGF could have therapeutic value in stroke as well. However, given possible implications in pathogenesis in carotid plaque destabilization and HGF’s pleiotropic nature with many other target tissues (antagonism of HGF has shown some promise in cancer therapeutics [7]), more basic research into the mechanism of the association of HGF with stroke is needed. Though our results are compelling for a strong association of HGF with incident stroke, the clinical potential of measuring HGF levels remains unknown.
Strengths of this study include its prospective design, well-defined baseline variables, outcome ascertainment, large numbers of ischemic stroke events, and power to detect differences in associations between Black and White participants. Limitations include relatively few strokes in specific subtypes, limiting power to detect differences. Stroke subtyping was also not always possible due to variability in clinical evaluation at the large number of hospitals where participants were seen. However, even with this limitation, we are confident in the classifications made and have identified suggestive differences in the association among subtypes, helping to suggest the driving mechanism for the overall association of HGF with stroke. Additionally, HGF was measured only once at baseline, in some cases years before development of incident stroke. This indicates that the observed association might underestimate the strength of the true association and that serial measurement might reveal this. Other limitations are the reliance on patient self-reporting baseline conditions and lack of time-varying medication use, including other antiplatelet medication use. It is also possible that secular trends might impact findings if enrollment was more recent.
5. Conclusion
Higher HGF was associated with incident stroke in REGARDS, a nationally representative cohort of Black and White Americans. Baseline HGF did not differ by race, and there was no interaction between race and HGF on incident stroke. Therefore, HGF did not mediate the excess stroke risk in Black Americans. The association of HGF with stroke may be strongest in small vessel strokes, but we lacked power in stroke subgroups to explore this fully. Further study of the mechanisms of this association is of high priority.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the other investigators, staff, and participants of the REGARDS study for their contributions. A full list of investigators and institutions can be found at regardsstudy.org.
Funding
This research project was supported by cooperative agreement U01 NS041588, cofunded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Service. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NINDS or the National Institute on Aging. Representatives of the NINDS were involved in the review of the manuscript but were not directly involved in the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data. Additional funding was from P20 GM135007.
Author contributions
S.G., N.Z., and M.C. contributed to the concept and design of the study, analysis and/or interpretation of data, and critical writing or revising the intellectual content. I.K. contributed to the analysis and/or interpretation of data. S.J. contributed to the concept and design of the study and analysis and/or interpretation of data. T.P. contributed to the analysis and/or interpretation of data and critical writing or revising the intellectual content. G.H. contributed to the concept and design of the study, interpretation of data, and critical writing or revising the intellectual content. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Relationship Disclosure
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Footnotes
Handling Editor: Prof Cihan Ay
References
- 1.Virani S.S., Alonso A., Benjamin E.J., Bittencourt M.S., Callaway C.W., Carson A.P., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141:e139–e596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Versari D., Daghini E., Virdis A., Ghiadoni L., Taddei S. Endothelial dysfunction as a target for prevention of cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:S314–S321. doi: 10.2337/dc09-S330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Morishita R., Aoki M., Yo Y., Ogihara T. Hepatocyte growth factor as cardiovascular hormone: role of HGF in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Endocr J. 2002;49:273–284. doi: 10.1507/endocrj.49.273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mungunsukh O., McCart E.A., Day R.M. Hepatocyte growth factor isoforms in tissue repair, cancer, and fibrotic remodeling. Biomedicines. 2014;2:301–326. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines2040301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gallo S., Sala V., Gatti S., Crepaldi T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of HGF/Met in the cardiovascular system. Clin Sci (Lond) 2015;129:1173–1193. doi: 10.1042/CS20150502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Jin H., Wyss J.M., Yang R., Schwall R. The therapeutic potential of hepatocyte growth factor for myocardial infarction and heart failure. Curr Pharm Des. 2004;10:2525–2533. doi: 10.2174/1381612043383863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Matsumoto K., Umitsu M., De Silva D.M., Roy A., Bottaro D.P. Hepatocyte growth factor/MET in cancer progression and biomarker discovery. Cancer Sci. 2017;108:296–307. doi: 10.1111/cas.13156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Morishita R., Moriguchi A., Higaki J., Ogihara T. Hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) as a potential index of severity of hypertension. Hypertens Res. 1999;22:161–167. doi: 10.1291/hypres.22.161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rehman J., Considine R.V., Bovenkerk J.E., Li J., Slavens C.A., Jones R.M., et al. Obesity is associated with increased levels of circulating hepatocyte growth factor. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41:1408–1413. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00231-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Bancks M.P., Bielinski S.J., Decker P.A., Hanson N.Q., Larson N.B., Sicotte H., et al. Circulating level of hepatocyte growth factor predicts incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Metabolism. 2016;65:64–72. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Malatino L.S., Cataliotti A., Benedetto F.A., Stancanelli B., Bellanuova I., Belluardo P., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor and left ventricular geometry in end-stage renal disease. Hypertension. 2003;41:88–92. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.0000046919.41112.4b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lamblin N., Susen S., Dagorn J., Mouquet F., Jude B., Van Belle E., et al. Prognostic significance of circulating levels of angiogenic cytokines in patients with congestive heart failure. Am Heart J. 2005;150:137–143. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Rychli K., Richter B., Hohensinner P.J., Kariem Mahdy A., Neuhold S., Zorn G., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is a strong predictor of mortality in patients with advanced heart failure. Heart. 2011;97:1158–1163. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2010.220228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhu Z., Xu T., Guo D., Huangfu X., Zhong C., Yang J., et al. Serum hepatocyte growth factor is probably associated with 3-month prognosis of acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2018;49:377–383. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhu Z., Wang A., Guo D., Bu X., Xu T., Zhong C., et al. Association between serum hepatocyte growth factor and prognosis of ischemic stroke: the role of blood lipid status. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2020;30:492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2019.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bell E.J., Decker P.A., Tsai M.Y., Pankow J.S., Hanson N.Q., Wassel C.L., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is associated with progression of atherosclerosis: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Atherosclerosis. 2018;272:162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.03.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bielinski S.J., Berardi C., Decker P.A., Larson N.B., Bell E.J., Pankow J.S., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor demonstrates racial heterogeneity as a biomarker for coronary heart disease. Heart. 2017;103:1185–1193. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rajpathak S.N., Wang T., Wassertheil-Smoller S., Strickler H.D., Kaplan R.C., McGinn A.P., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor and the risk of ischemic stroke developing among postmenopausal women: results from the Women's Health Initiative. Stroke. 2010;41:857–862. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.567719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bell E.J., Larson N.B., Decker P.A., Pankow J.S., Tsai M.Y., Hanson N.Q., et al. Hepatocyte growth factor is positively associated with risk of stroke: the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) Stroke. 2016;47:2689–2694. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Howard V.J., Cushman M., Pulley L., Gomez C.R., Go R.C., Prineas R.J., et al. The reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25:135–143. doi: 10.1159/000086678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sokolow M., Lyon T.P. The ventricular complex in left ventricular hypertrophy as obtained by unipolar precordial and limb leads. Am Heart J. 1949;37:161–186. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(49)90562-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Jones W.J., Williams L.S., Meschia J.F. Validating the Questionnaire for Verifying Stroke-Free Status (QVSFS) by neurological history and examination. Stroke. 2001;32:2232–2236. doi: 10.1161/hs1001.096191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Cushman M., Judd S.E., Howard V.J., Kissela B., Gutierrez O.M., Jenny N.S., et al. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and stroke risk: the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke cohort. Stroke. 2014;45:1646–1650. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gillett S.R., Boyle R.H., Zakai N.A., McClure L.A., Jenny N.S., Cushman M. Validating laboratory results in a national observational cohort study without field centers: the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke cohort. Clin Biochem. 2014;47:243–246. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Howard G., Cushman M., Kissela B.M., Kleindorfer D.O., McClure L.A., Safford M.M., et al. Traditional risk factors as the underlying cause of racial disparities in stroke: lessons from the half-full (empty?) glass. Stroke. 2011;42:3369–3375. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.625277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wolf P.A., D'Agostino R.B., Belanger A.J., Kannel W.B. Probability of stroke: a risk profile from the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22:312–318. doi: 10.1161/01.str.22.3.312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Larson N.B., Berardi C., Decker P.A., Wassel C.L., Kirsch P.S., Pankow J.S., et al. Trans-ethnic meta-analysis identifies common and rare variants associated with hepatocyte growth factor levels in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Ann Hum Genet. 2015;79:264–274. doi: 10.1111/ahg.12119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Raman M.R., Himali J.J., Conner S.C., DeCarli C., Vasan R.S., Beiser A.S., et al. Circulating vascular growth factors and magnetic resonance imaging markers of small vessel disease and atrophy in middle-aged adults. Stroke. 2018;49:2227–2229. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Chowdhury M., Ghosh J., Slevin M., Smyth J.V., Alexander M.Y., Serracino-Inglott F. A comparative study of carotid atherosclerotic plaque microvessel density and angiogenic growth factor expression in symptomatic versus asymptomatic patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;39:388–395. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Evans C.R., Long D.L., Howard G., McClure L.A., Zakai N.A., Jenny N.S., et al. C-reactive protein and stroke risk in blacks and whites: the REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke cohort. Am Heart J. 2019;217:94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kaptoge S., Di Angelantonio E., Lowe G., Pepys M.B., Thompson S.G., Collins R., et al. C-reactive protein concentration and risk of coronary heart disease, stroke, and mortality: an individual participant meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375:132–140. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61717-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zakai N.A., McClure L.A., Judd S.E., Kissela B., Howard G., Safford M., et al. D-dimer and the risk of stroke and coronary heart disease. The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117:618–624. doi: 10.1160/TH16-07-0519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jenny N.S., Callas P.W., Judd S.E., McClure L.A., Kissela B., Zakai N.A., et al. Inflammatory cytokines and ischemic stroke risk. The REGARDS cohort. Neurology. 2019;92:e2375–e2384. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jin H., Yang R., Li W., Ogasawara A.K., Schwall R., Eberhard D.A., et al. Early treatment with hepatocyte growth factor improves cardiac function in experimental heart failure induced by myocardial infarction. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;304:654–660. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.041772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

