Skip to main content
Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine logoLink to Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine
. 2023 Jan 13;1:e13. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1

Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision medicine for sub-Saharan Africa

Clara Chamba 1,, Sam M Mbulaiteye 2, Emmanuel Balandya 3, Anna Schuh 1,4, the AI-REAL Consortium
PMCID: PMC10953760  PMID: 38550928

graphic file with name S2752614323000017_figAb.jpg

Keywords: liquid biopsy

Abstract

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) has a cure rate of around 95% when treated with chemo-immunotherapy that is standard of care in high-income countries (Minard-Colin et al., 2020, New England Journal of Medicine 382, 2207–2219), but currently, more than 50% of children and young adults with endemic BL (Epstein Barr virus driven BL) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) do not survive. Treatment for BL is largely free of charge, but there is limited access to reliable diagnostic services leading to significant delays and misdiagnoses. Innovations in histopathology such as whole slide imaging and the use of novel diagnostic approaches, in particular using circulating cell-free viral and/or lymphoma DNA (liquid biopsy), could increase access to timely and reliable diagnosis and improve outcomes in SSA.

Impact statement

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is a highly aggressive but curable cancer that commonly affects children. The current diagnostic pathway for BL is tissue biopsy. This is an invasive procedure that requires highly skilled personnel and specialised equipment, both of which are in short supply in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This results in diagnostic delays which can be as long as 2 months from the time the patient present to hospital. As a result of the highly aggressive nature of this cancer, late presentation and the diagnostic delays with tissue biopsy, the majority of children die before receiving a diagnosis. Clinicians are at times compelled to treat children based on clinical suspicion, or the less recommended method of fine needle aspiration cytology, which usually results in misdiagnosis and initiation of the wrong treatment. In our article, we highlight the need to look beyond the traditional/common methods that are used in routine clinical practice to diagnose BL and leapfrog into the advanced alternative method of ‘liquid biopsy’, which may be potentially faster and more precise and curb the existing diagnostic challenges. We discuss the possible implementation of this technology in SSA in view of the existing technical and infrastructural challenges that need to be considered.

Introduction

Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive B-cell malignancy that is more common during childhood. Historically, BL has been grouped into three clinical-epidemiological variants; endemic BL (eBL), which is found in areas with intense transmission of both Epstein Barr virus (EBV) and Plasmodium falciparum malaria, sporadic BL (sBL), which occurs elsewhere, and immunodeficiency BL (iBL) in immunosuppressed persons. The 2022 edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid Neoplasms recommends, based on careful assessment of molecular data, that BL should be classified into EBV-positive and EBV-negative BL, based on the EBV status of the tumour, regardless of the clinical-epidemiological subgroup (Alaggio et al., 2022).

The key molecular feature of all subtypes of BL is the c-MYC translocation that juxtaposes the c-MYC gene to any of the three immunoglobulin (Ig) genes (IGH, IGK or IGL). In 80% of cases, c-MYC is translocated to IGH, and in the remaining 20%, it is translocated to one of the light chain genes, either IGL (15%) or IGK (5%). In addition to viral DNA, the presence of c-MYC is therefore theoretically an ideal target for the diagnosis of BL from ctDNA (God and Haque, 2010).

Endemic BL (which is reported to be ~95% EBV-positive) accounts for approximately 25–50% of childhood cancers in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), with frequency as high as 70% in regions of SSA which are holo-endemic for malaria (Parkin et al., 2008). It is also the most common lymphoma in children worldwide (Hämmerl et al., 2019). In SSA, the incidence is highly variable from 0.5 per million in Ethiopia to 19.3 in Malawi (Hämmerl et al., 2019). In 2018, the estimated number of new cases in SSA was approximately 3,900 with the highest rate reported in males in Eastern Africa (Malawi and Uganda) and Middle Africa (Cameroon). However, due to the lack of capacity in histopathology services there remains significant uncertainty around these numbers (Hämmerl et al., 2019; Mbulaiteye and Devesa, 2022).

BL is fatal without treatment, but is routinely cured in more than 90% of cases diagnosed in high-income countries (HICs) (Minard-Colin et al., 2020), whereas cure rates are significantly lower around 30–50% for cases diagnosed in SSA (McGoldrick et al., 2019; Ozuah et al., 2020). Considering that the majority of children do not get a diagnosis, cure rates are probably lower as this number is representative of only those who received a diagnosis. The reasons for this poor outcome are poorly understood and likely to be multifactorial, but presentation with advanced-stage disease due to diagnostic delays is certainly a major contributing factor. Root causes for delays in diagnosis are thought to be a lack of awareness in the population, delays in referral to tertiary centres and lack of tertiary capacity for conventional invasive tissue diagnosis.

The latter is because the conventional diagnosis of lymphoma is by histopathology which requires an invasive excisional tissue biopsy performed by surgeons or core biopsy to be obtained by interventional radiologists followed by histopathology examination that includes formalin fixation, paraffin embedding, haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry. Specialist services to achieve these at consistently high quality are limited. For example, there is less than one anatomical pathologist for every 1,000,000 people in SSA (Sayed et al., 2015; Wilson et al., 2018) leading to delays in tissue-based diagnostics to 71 days compared to the 2 days it takes to obtain results in the USA (Patel et al., 2012; Masamba et al., 2017; Fleming, 2019).

Where services are available, there is a problem with quality control. This might be due to high workload, particularly at tertiary-level care facilities, or lack of high-quality well-maintained equipment at peripheral-level care centres. Finally, automated systems, such as those routinely used to obtain reproducible immunohistochemistry are mostly lacking. These deficiencies result in delays in diagnosis, misdiagnosis and lead to incorrect treatment choices and unnecessary morbidity and mortality (Tomoka et al., 2018).

As a result, clinicians in SSA often have to make a difficult choice to wait for conventional pathology or initiate treatment on clinical suspicion, which in one series from Malawi was not confirmed by histopathology in nearly two-thirds of patients (El-Mallawany et al., 2017).

Recent innovations such as plasma genotyping of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) promise to revolutionise the genetic diagnosis of solid tumours by enabling fast and non-invasive testing. For example, detection of EGFR-sensitising mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer directs targeted therapy choice without the need for lung biopsy at a turn-around time of 3 days (Sacher et al., 2016). For patients with stage 2 colorectal cancer, analysis of cfDNA post-surgery has recently been shown to inform adjuvant treatment (Tie et al., 2022). Similarly, cfDNA could represents an attractive option to speed up the diagnosis of aggressive lymphomas in SSA, particularly eBL, and also for subsequent monitoring of minimal residual disease.

Here, we summarise the relevant literature of innovations in the field of cfDNA and their potential clinical applications for lymphoma diagnosis. We discuss these in the context of eBL and provide our perspective on the feasibility and future utility of this technology for eBL in SSA.

Clinical application of cfDNA

cfDNA has potential utility in the diagnosis, prognostication and monitoring of lymphoma patients on treatment. These can be achieved via quantification of cfDNA, detection of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) and viral DNA (cvDNA) and quantification of these for minimal residual disease monitoring following treatment.

Concentration of cfDNA, ctDNA mutation detection and quantification

cfDNA is composed of DNA fragments that have been released from apoptotic or necrotic cells. In healthy individuals, the normal range of cfDNA is between 1 and 10 ng/ml and is mostly derived from haematopoietic tissue. It has been established that cfDNA levels are higher and the fragment size differs in cancer patients compared to healthy controls (Marzese et al., 2013; Table 1). In individuals with cancer, these increased levels come mostly from dead tumour cells and are higher with an average of 30 ng/ml, which varies depending on the aggressiveness and size of the tumour, and whether the tumour is responding to treatment (Hohaus et al., 2013). Although identified in plasma more than 70 years ago, cfDNA has gained increasing clinical relevance only recently owing to advancements in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques that have enabled tumour mutation identification in cfDNA (Heitzer et al., 2019). From cfDNA, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can be detected and quantified using known tumour mutation profiles and specifically for B and T-cell malignancies also the lymphoma-specific immunoglobulin gene re-arrangement. The diagnostic applications of ctDNA have been studied in a variety of cancer types (Bettegowda et al., 2014). For lymphomas with heterogeneous mutation profiles, a broad mutations cover would be required to sensitively and accurately distinguish different lymphomas (Rossi et al., 2019).

Table 1.

Mean/Median cfDNA concentration comparison between cancer patients and healthy controls (measured by qPCR) (Yoon et al., 2009; Skrypkina et al., 2016; Bedin et al., 2017; Miao et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2019; Ma et al., 2020)

Tumour type (reference) cfDNA concentration (ng/ml) p-value
Tumour Healthy controla
Hepatocellular (Ma et al., 2020) 19.76 ± 2.68 (n = 84) 5.93 ± 2.11 (n = 55) <0.05
Renal (Skrypkina et al., 2016) 80.97, range 23.3–117.6 (n = 27) 35.1, range 3.0–146.78 (n = 15) <0.001
Colorectal (Bedin et al., 2017) 17.58, range 9.96–35.59 (n = 114) 7.5, range 4.25–15.28 (n = 56) <0.0001
Lung (Yoon et al., 2009) 22.6, range 3.1–730.5 (n = 102) 10.4, range 1.6–89.8 (n = 105) <0.0001
Breast (Miao et al., 2019) 11.97 ± 10.67 (n = 110) 3.7 ± 1.24 (n = 95) <0.01
Lymphomab (Wu et al., 2019) 36.85 ± 46.73 (n = 60) 6.67 ± 3.75 (n = 93) <0.05
a

Different control groups were used for the different tumour types.

b

Lymphoma types included Hodgkin lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, natural killer T-cell lymphoma, mucosal-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma.

Pre-treatment levels of ctDNA show variation across the different lymphoma subtypes, with higher levels in the more aggressive subtypes, compared to the indolent subtypes. With respect to minimal residual disease, for DLBCL, a 2.5 log HGE/ml reduction in ctDNA values post two cycles of treatment is thought to be predictive of event free survival (EFS) at 24 months (Kurtz et al., 2018). Similarly, changes in ctDNA levels during therapy have also been shown to predict prognosis in patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL; Spina et al., 2018).

For BL, historically, the gold standard method for the detection of the c-MYC translocation has been by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In BL, this is usually done on tissue samples. However, in addition to challenges relating to obtaining tissue samples due to the invasive nature of the procedure, it has been observed that this method can have a false negative rate (King et al., 2019) and is also not available in SSA.

Polymerase chain reaction and amplicon-based targeted NGS have been evaluated as potential alternatives to FISH for the detection of translocations. For example, for the c-MYC translocation, long-distance PCR (LD PCR) using specific DNA polymerases to amplify long DNA fragments, was able to detect the translocation from frozen tissue in 87% of sporadic BL cases (Basso et al., 1999). Moreover, when a sequencing-based approach for the detection of translocations using ctDNA from plasma of patients with DLBCL was assessed against conventional FISH of paired Formalin Fixed Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) samples, translocations were detected in 79% of cases (10/12 BCL2, 4/7 BCL6 and 5/5 c-MYC) including somewhere the translocation was missed by FISH. The translocation detection rate increased to 95% in cases with high tumour burden (ctDNA > 16 pg./ml) (Kurtz et al., 2016). An important caveat is that the genomic regions affected by the translocation breakpoints have been shown to vary significantly in size between DLBCL, sporadic (mostly EBV-negative) BL and endemic (mostly EBV-positive) BL, the latter showing by far the largest region (Joos et al., 1992).

In addition to the c-MYC translocation, recurrent somatic mutations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of eBL, including single nucleotide variant (SNV) and insertion/deletion (indel) mutations in c-MYC, BCL7A, BCL6, DNMT1, SNTB2, CTCF, ID3, SMARCA4, KMT2D, TCF3, TP53, DDX3X, ARID1A, CCNF and RHOA (Abate et al., 2015; Grande et al., 2019; Panea et al., 2019; Burkhardt et al., 2022). For example, somatic mutations in the coding region of c-MYC occurred in 50% of 20 samples, DDX3X in 35% of 20 samples and ID3 in 30% of 20 samples (Abate et al., 2015). More studies are needed to identify additional recurrent mutations and to understand the differences in mutation profiles between EBV-positive and EBV-negative BL.

The standard means of assessing early treatment response and monitoring for relapse in lymphoma is computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) scans. These are costly and in limited supply in SSA; as a result, response is often assessed based on clinical examination. Measuring ctDNA holds the promise for clinicians to recognise relapse (or primary refractory disease) before it can be detected through clinical symptoms or imaging scans – this has been evidenced in DLBCL and in follicular lymphoma through the detection of ctDNA encoding for clonally rearranged variable-diversity-joining (VDJ) region receptor genes (Kwok et al., 2016; Pott et al., 2017). Studies in cHL have shown that ctDNA may represent a biomarker for monitoring MRD in cHL through the detection of lymphoma-specific immunoglobulin gene segments (Condoluci and Rossi, 2019). More recently, the use of phased variants from ctDNA (PhasED-Seq), further improved the technical performance of ctDNA in monitoring for MRD for lymphoma (Kurtz et al., 2021).

Baseline plasma ctDNA levels have been found to correlate with clinical features and PET-CT scan features related to tumour volume/burden in DLBCL and cHL (Camus et al., 2021). In follicular lymphoma, ctDNA correlates with total metabolic tumour volume (TMTV) and adds to the prognostic value of PET-CT in identifying high-risk patients (Delfau-Larue et al., 2018). In some cancers (such as melanoma), the total ctDNA levels measured at different time points have been used to provide information on changes in tumour volume after treatment (Valpione et al., 2018). Quantification of ctDNA levels from a simple blood draw may potentially serve as an alternative measurement of tumour burden that can be used to monitor response to treatment in SSA, where PET scans are expensive and in short supply.

Studies are urgently needed to evaluate the potential role of ctDNA quantification in diagnosis and response monitoring of eBL.

Detection and clinical application of EBV DNA

EBV infects peripheral blood mononuclear cells during the acute infection called infectious mononucleosis or glandular fever. EBV-DNA is primarily present in the cytoplasm of these cells as episomal DNA, but can also be detected in the plasma or saliva. Integration of EBV-DNA into the host genome can occur and is causally linked to the development of various EBV-associated malignancies. DNA that originates from EBV, but was integrated into host DNA can be detected in plasma of patients with EBV-related tumours.

For example, recent studies performed in patients with gastric adenocarcinomas have used cfDNA in plasma to detect EBV-DNA with results suggesting a possible role in the identification of EBV-associated gastric adenocarcinomas, predicting recurrence and response to chemotherapy (Qiu et al., 2020). Studies on EBV-positive Hodgkin’s Lymphoma have demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity of plasma EBV-DNA as a non-invasive biomarker for diagnosis (Gandhi et al., 2006).

However, the use of EBV-DNA as a biomarker for diagnosis, prognostication and screening has been most extensively evaluated in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (Lo et al., 1999; Chan et al., 2017; Tan et al., 2020).

In the landmark analysis, detection of EBV-DNA in plasma was through real-time (RT)-PCR, targeting the BamHI-W fragment and the EBNA-1 region of the EBV genome (Chan et al., 2017). The use of RT-PCR with BamHI-W as the target region, for screening the general population for NPC had a high sensitivity but a low positive predictive value (PPV) for presence of NPC when tested on only a single occasion. There was therefore significant overlap between participants with detectable EBV-DNA in plasma and NPC, and healthy participants with detectable EBV-DNA in plasma. To improve the PPV, repeat testing with the same assay after 4 weeks, to detect persistent plasma EBV-DNA was required (Chan et al., 2017). More recently, Lam et al. demonstrated that paired-end, massively parallel sequencing-based quantification and size profiling of plasma EBV-DNA had a higher specificity and PPV compared to a single time-point RT-PCR. The study used a count-based and size-based bioinformatics approach. For a sample to be considered positive for NPC, it had to pass both the count and size-based cut-offs (Lam et al., 2018). In contrast to RT-PCR, which can only quantify EBV-DNA molecules where the amplicon region is intact, with sequencing, any EBV-DNA fragment could be analysed and counted (Lam et al., 2018). Favourable outcomes have been achieved with the employment of plasma EBV-DNA for screening and prognostication in NPC (Tan et al., 2020).

Only two studies have so far examined the role of EBV-DNA quantification for screening of eBL (Westmoreland et al., 2017; Xian et al., 2021). Both studies made use of RT-PCR to quantify EBV-DNA and found good correlation between high levels of EBV and the presence of eBL. Several confounding factors were also noted that negatively impacted on the PPV, in particular concurrent symptomatic or asymptomatic malaria parasitaemia that also led to an increase in circulating EBV-DNA. Besides, there is increasing evidence that not all eBL is EBV-driven and that spontaneous BL might be more common than previously thought in SSA (Geser et al., 1983; Alaggio et al., 2022).

Despite the scarcity of literature on the clinical application of plasma EBV-DNA in eBL, the extensive literature on plasma EBV in NPC suggests a possible clinical application for eBL. Combining specific lymphoma DNA parameters including but not limited to the c-MYC translocation with EBV-DNA characteristics such as sequencing-based quantification and fragment size profiling may further strengthen the possibility of early detection of EBV-driven BL through cfDNA.

Feasibility of applying this technology in SSA

The analysis of cfDNA from a simple blood draw might be a suitable solution for SSA because the capacity building of surgical and pathological interventions poses significant challenges and will take time due to limitations in highly trained human resources (surgeons and pathologists) and infrastructure (theatres), whereas potential alternatives such as liquid biopsy -although seemingly complex and expensive- are less onerous by comparison (phlebotomy, laboratory technicians and automated sequencers).

To achieve early diagnosis of eBL in SSA using cfDNA, a diagnostic prediction model will have to be developed that employs different cfDNA parameters as shown in the graphical abstract. Before adopting cfDNA in routine diagnosis, studies need to be undertaken to technically and clinically validate this approach, to assess its health-economic impact and to evaluate its utility for eBL. To ensure long-term sustainability of cfDNA methods and affirm their clinical utility in SSA, it is paramount to conduct these studies in SSA building additional capacity in regional centres of excellence and in collaboration with national authorities.

The potential of cfDNA technology for Africa in delivering cancer diagnostics, the challenges of implementation and possible mitigating solutions have been previously highlighted (Temilola et al., 2019). However, so far, studies involving cfDNA analysis in SSA are limited. To have the necessary clinical impact, these studies will need to be conducted in SSA by researchers from SSA who can learn while doing. This approach would ensure that the technology is available to patients while it is being translated from bench to bedside and that the clinicians and technicians who will use it, develop appropriate experience before the technology is introduced for routine use.

More specifically, the use case of ctDNA in the diagnosis of eBL presents a suitable opportunity to emphasise and stress the role of genomics in cancer management, including in SSA. In SSA, despite the inclusion of genomic medicine in the curriculum for medical school training, and availability of postgraduate courses on genomic medicine, training is mostly theoretical due to lack of appropriate infrastructure to support practical training. Genomic research involving NGS, therefore, remains limited in SSA and largely restricted to collaborations at institutions of higher learning and relies on shipping samples to a well-established laboratory in a HIC, because that is where the capacity is available. We note that this practice has a counterproductive impact on local collaborators, who believe such research is esoteric, not immediately applicable to local needs, and inadvertently dampens enthusiasm to develop local capacity.

We argue that researchers in SSA should be trained to implement high-quality, reliable sample-handling processes and to conduct NGS tests locally using best practices. We also stress that south-to-south collaborations should be strengthened to build regional skills. Finally, because interaction with more established centres in HICs is critical, we recommend training for laboratory scientists through short courses to introduce specific technical skills and fellowships for more long-term mentoring with experts in centres of excellence situated in HICs. We acknowledge that achieving these goals goes beyond science and public health because it involves political aspects such as fair visa policies to access training and fair remuneration to reduce the loss of trained individuals through brain drain, as well as creation of new regional research funding streams. We believe these practical suggestions should be implemented hand-in-hand with ensuring that the necessary infrastructure, supply chains and equipment maintenance contracts are established locally to maximise the impact of the technology and the likelihood of achieving sustainability.

Considering the genetic differences that exist between EBV-positive and EBV-negative cases, diagnosis of eBL by NGS will require designing and developing bespoke targeted sequencing panels best suited to capture the genomic alterations common in eBL. Prior to implementation in routine diagnostics, the panel would need robust validation in a laboratory that is clinically accredited to ISO 15189 (quality assurance that the laboratory meets internationally recognised standards in terms of technical competence and expertise) or equivalent, based in SSA and could serve as a ‘core’ reference lab to future efforts. This would bridge the gap in clinical application as the clinical utility of this test is established locally.

Following a successful sequencing run, the sequencing reads generated require analysis via a specific bio-informatics pipeline. This needs advanced analytical and computational skills of highly-specialised bio-informaticians and interpretation by highly skilled individuals with both clinical knowledge and histopathological expertise. The recently established Pan-African bio-informatics network known as H3ABionet offers training programs with the aim of building capacity in bio-informatics across the African continent to enable African scientists to analyse their own data (Mulder et al., 2018). It is a first step to address the severe lack of technical expertise in this domain across the continent. The infrastructure that has been put in place and collaborative efforts made by H3ABionet over the past few years is likely to see more institutions offering postgraduate programs in bio-informatics leading to an increase in the number of research data scientists. However, currently, most training programs are focusing on constitutional genetics and infectious disease. Our review identifies an urgent need to build capacity for analysing the cancer genomes as a logical next step.

In conclusion, cfDNA promises earlier and more precise diagnosis of eBL in SSA. The UK’s National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) has funded a multicentre study in Uganda and Tanzania that evaluates this promise with initial results expected to be published in 2024 (Legason et al., 2022). In addition to a technical and clinical validation, the study addresses the need for regional multi-disciplinary diagnostic capacity building, laboratory quality control and health-economic evidence to achieve long-term sustainability and patient benefit that will ultimately catalyse multi-cancer early detection more generally.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful for the constructive comments and discussion from the members of the AI-REAL Consortium.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/pcm.2023.1.

Author contributions

C.C. drafted the first version of the manuscript which was initially reviewed by members of the AI-REAL Consortium and final senior review by S.M.M., E.B. and A.S.

Financial support

The AI-REAL consortium is supported by a Global Health grant NIHR200133 from the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). S.M.M. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the NIHR or the NIH Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products or organisations imply endorsement by the US Government. The content of this manuscript is the sole responsibility of the authors.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no relevant conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abate F, Ambrosio MR, Mundo L, Laginestra MA, Fuligni F, Rossi M, Zairis S, Gazaneo S, De Falco G and Lazzi S (2015) Distinct viral and mutational spectrum of endemic Burkitt lymphoma. PLoS Pathogens 11(10), e1005158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alaggio R, Amador C, Anagnostopoulos I, Attygalle AD, Araujo IB, de O, Berti E, Bhagat G, Borges AM, Boyer D, Calaminici M, Chadburn A, Chan JKC, Cheuk W, Chng W-J, Choi JK, Chuang S-S, Coupland SE, Czader M, Dave SS, de J, Du M-Q, Elenitoba-Johnson KS, Geyer J, Gratzinger D, Guitart J, Gujral S, Harris M, Harrison CJ, Hartmann S, Hochhaus A, Jansen PM, Karube K, Kempf W, Khoury J, Kimura H, Klapper W, Kovach AE, Kumar S, Lazar AJ, Lazzi S, Leoncini L, Leung N, Leventaki V, Li X-Q, Lim MS, Liu W-P, Jr. AL, Marcogliese A, Medeiros LJ, Michal M, Miranda RN, Mitteldorf C, Montes-Moreno S, Morice W, Nardi V, Naresh KN, Natkunam Y, Ng S-B, Oschlies I, Ott G, Parrens M, Pulitzer M, Rajkumar SV, Rawstron AC, Rech K, Rosenwald A, Said J, Sarkozy C, Sayed S, Saygin C, Schuh A, Sewell W, Siebert R, Sohani AR, Tooze R, Traverse-Glehen A, Vega F, Vergier B, Wechalekar AD, Wood B, Xerri L and Xiao W (2022) The 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours: Lymphoid neoplasms. Leukemia 36(7), 1720–1748. 10.1038/s41375-022-01620-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Basso K, Frascella E, Zanesco L and Rosolen A (1999) Improved long-distance polymerase chain reaction for the detection of t(8;14)(q24;q32) in Burkitt’s lymphomas. The American Journal of Pathology 155(5), 1479–1485. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65463-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bedin C, Enzo MV, Del Bianco P, Pucciarelli S, Nitti D and Agostini M (2017) Diagnostic and prognostic role of cell-free DNA testing for colorectal cancer patients. International Journal of Cancer 140(8), 1888–1898. 10.1002/ijc.30565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bettegowda C, Sausen M, Leary RJ, Kinde I, Wang Y, Agrawal N, Bartlett BR, Wang H, Luber B, Alani RM, Antonarakis ES, Azad NS, Bardelli A, Brem H, Cameron JL, Lee CC, Fecher LA, Gallia GL, Gibbs P, Le D, Giuntoli RL, Goggins M, Hogarty MD, Holdhoff M, Hong S-M, Jiao Y, Juhl HH, Kim JJ, Siravegna G, Laheru DA, Lauricella C, Lim M, Lipson EJ, Marie SKN, Netto GJ, Oliner KS, Olivi A, Olsson L, Riggins GJ, Sartore-Bianchi A, Schmidt K, Shih L-M, Oba-Shinjo SM, Siena S, Theodorescu D, Tie J, Harkins TT, Veronese S, Wang T-L, Weingart JD, Wolfgang CL, Wood LD, Xing D, Hruban RH, Wu J, Allen PJ, Schmidt CM, Choti MA, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Papadopoulos N and Diaz LA (2014) Detection of circulating tumor DNA in early- and late-stage human malignancies. Science Translational Medicine 6(224), 224ra24. 10.1126/scitranslmed.3007094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burkhardt B, Michgehl U, Rohde J, Erdmann T, Berning P, Reutter K, Rohde M, Borkhardt A, Burmeister T, Dave S, Tzankov A, Dugas M, Sandmann S, Fend F, Finger J, Mueller S, Gökbuget N, Haferlach T, Kern W, Hartmann W, Klapper W, Oschlies I, Richter J, Kontny U, Lutz M, Maecker-Kolhoff B, Ott G, Rosenwald A, Siebert R, Stackelberg A, Strahm B, Woessmann W, Zimmermann M, Zapukhlyak M, Grau M and Lenz G (2022) Clinical relevance of molecular characteristics in Burkitt lymphoma differs according to age. Nature Communications 13(1), 3881. 10.1038/s41467-022-31355-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Camus V, Viennot M, Lequesne J, Viailly P-J, Bohers E, Bessi L, Marcq B, Etancelin P, Dubois S and Picquenot JM (2021) Targeted genotyping of circulating tumor DNA for classical Hodgkin lymphoma monitoring: A prospective study. Haematologica 106(1), 154–162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chan KCA, Woo JKS, King A, Zee BCY, Lam WKJ, Chan SL, Chu SWI, Mak C, Tse IOL, Leung SYM, Chan G, Hui EP, Ma BBY, Chiu RWK, Leung SF, Van Hasselt AC, Chan ATC and Lo YMD (2017) Analysis of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA to screen for nasopharyngeal cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 377(6), 513–522. 10.1056/NEJMoa1701717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Condoluci A and Rossi D (2019) The future of cell-free DNA testing to guide therapeutic decisions in B-cell lymphomas. Current Opinion in Hematology 26(4), 281–287. July 2019. | DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000516 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Delfau-Larue M-H, van der Gucht A, Dupuis J, Jais J-P, Nel I, Beldi-Ferchiou A, Hamdane S, Benmaad I, Laboure G, Verret B, Haioun C, Copie-Bergman C, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Robert P, Casasnovas R-O and Itti E (2018) Total metabolic tumor volume, circulating tumor cells, cell-free DNA: Distinct prognostic value in follicular lymphoma. Blood Advances 2(7), 807–816. 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017015164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. El-Mallawany NK, Mutai M, Mtete I, Gopal S, Stanley CC, Wasswa P, Mtunda M, Chasela M, Kamiyango W and Villiera J (2017) Beyond endemic Burkitt lymphoma: Navigating challenges of differentiating childhood lymphoma diagnoses amid limitations in pathology resources in Lilongwe, Malawi. Global Pediatric Health 4, 2333794X17715831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fleming K (2019) Pathology and cancer in Africa. Ecancermedicalscience 13, 945. 10.3332/ecancer.2019.945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gandhi MK, Lambley E, Burrows J, Dua U, Elliott S, Shaw PJ, Prince HM, Wolf M, Clarke K, Underhill C, Mills T, Mollee P, Gill D, Marlton P, Seymour JF and Khanna R (2006) Plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA is a biomarker for EBV-positive Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Clinical Cancer Research 12(2), 460–464. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geser A, Lenoir GM, Anvret M, Bornkamm G, Klein G, Williams EH, Wright DH and De-The G (1983) Epstein-Barr virus markers in a series of Burkitt’s lymphomas from the West Nile District, Uganda. European Journal of Cancer & Clinical Oncology 19(10), 1393–1404. 10.1016/0277-5379(93)90009-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. God JM and Haque A (2010) Burkitt lymphoma: Pathogenesis and immune evasion. Journal of Oncology, 2010, 516047. 10.1155/2010/516047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grande BM, Gerhard DS, Jiang A, Griner NB, Abramson JS, Alexander TB, Allen H, Ayers LW, Bethony JM, Bhatia K, Bowen J, Casper C, Choi JK, Culibrk L, Davidsen TM, Dyer MA, Gastier-Foster JM, Gesuwan P, Greiner TC, Gross TG, Hanf B, Harris NL, He Y, Irvin JD, Jaffe ES, Jones SJM, Kerchan P, Knoetze P, Leal FE, Lichtenberg TM, Ma Y, Martin JP, Martin M-R, Mbulaiteye SM, Mullighan CG, Mungall AJ, Namirembe C, Novik K, Noy A, Ogwang MD, Omoding A, Orem J, Reynolds SJ, Rushton CK, Sandlund JT, Schmitz R, Taylor C, Wilson WH, Wright GW, Zhao EY, Marra MA, Morin RD and Staudt LM (2019) Genome-wide discovery of somatic coding and noncoding mutations in pediatric endemic and sporadic Burkitt lymphoma. Blood 133(12), 1313–1324. 10.1182/blood-2018-09-871418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hämmerl L, Colombet M, Rochford R, Ogwang DM and Parkin DM (2019) The burden of Burkitt lymphoma in Africa. Infectious Agents and Cancer 14, 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heitzer E, Haque IS, Roberts CES and Speicher MR (2019) Current and future perspectives of liquid biopsies in genomics-driven oncology. Nature Reviews Genetics 20(2), 71–88. 10.1038/s41576-018-0071-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hohaus S, Giachelia M, Cupelli E, Cuccaro A, Massini G, Bartolomei F, D’Alò F, Voso MT and Leone G (2013) Quantitative and Qualtitative evaluation of circulating cell-free DNA as a prognostic biomarker in Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 122(21), 4242. 10.1182/blood.V122.21.4242.4242. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Joos S, Falk MH, Lichter P, Haluska FG, Henglein B, Lenoir GM and Bornkamm GW (1992) Variable breakpoints in Burkitt lymphoma cells with chromosomal t (8; 14) translocation separate c-myc and the IgH locus up to several hundred kb. Human Molecular Genetics 1(8), 625–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. King RL, McPhail ED, Meyer RG, Vasmatzis G, Pearce K, Smadbeck JB, Ketterling RP, Smoley SA, Greipp PT, Hoppman NL, Peterson JF and Baughn LB (2019) False-negative rates for MYC fluorescence in situ hybridization probes in B-cell neoplasms. Haematologica 104(6), e248–e251. 10.3324/haematol.2018.207290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kurtz DM, Scherer F, Jin MC, Soo J, Craig AFM, Esfahani MS, Chabon JJ, Stehr H, Liu CL, Tibshirani R, Maeda LS, Gupta NK, Khodadoust MS, Advani RH, Levy R, Newman AM, Dührsen U, Hüttmann A, Meignan M, Casasnovas R-O, Westin JR, Roschewski M, Wilson WH,Gaidano G, Rossi D, Diehn M and Alizadeh AA (2018) Circulating tumor DNA measurements as early outcome predictors in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology: Official Journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 36(28), 2845–2853. 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.5246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kurtz DM, Scherer F, Newman AM, Craig A, Jin M, Stehr H, Chabon JJ, Esfahani M, Liu CL, Zhou L, Glover C, Visser BC, Poultsides G, Advani RH, Maeda LS, Gupta NK, Levy R, Ohgami RS, Davis RE, Kunder CA, Westin JR, Diehn M and Alizadeh AA (2016) Noninvasive detection of BCL2, BCL6, and MYC translocations in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 128(22), 2930. 10.1182/blood.V128.22.2930.2930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kurtz DM, Soo J, Co Ting Keh L, Alig S, Chabon JJ, Sworder BJ, Schultz A, Jin MC, Scherer F, Garofalo A, Macaulay CW, Hamilton EG, Chen B, Olsen M, Schroers-Martin JG, Craig AFM, Moding EJ, Esfahani MS, Liu CL, Dührsen U, Hüttmann A, Casasnovas R-O, Westin JR, Roschewski M, Wilson WH, Gaidano G, Rossi D, Diehn M and Alizadeh AA (2021) Enhanced detection of minimal residual disease by targeted sequencing of phased variants in circulating tumor DNA. Nature Biotechnology 39(12), 1537–1547. 10.1038/s41587-021-00981-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kwok M, Wu SP, Mo C, Summers T and Roschewski M (2016) Circulating tumor DNA to monitor therapy for aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Current Treatment Options in Oncology 17(9), 47. 10.1007/s11864-016-0425-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lam WKJ, Jiang P, Chan KCA, Cheng SH, Zhang H, Peng W, Tse OYO, Tong YK, Gai W, Zee BCY, Ma BBY, Hui EP, Chan ATC, Woo JKS, Chiu RWK and Lo YMD (2018) Sequencing-based counting and size profiling of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA enhance population screening of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(22), E5115–E5124. 10.1073/pnas.1804184115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Legason ID, Ogwang MD, Chamba C, Mkwizu E, El Mouden C, Mwinula H, Chirande L, Schuh A and Chiwanga F (2022) A protocol to clinically evaluate liquid biopsies as a tool to speed up diagnosis of children and young adults with aggressive infection-related lymphoma in East Africa “(AI-REAL)”. BMC Cancer 22(1), 484. 10.1186/s12885-022-09553-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lo YMD, Chan LYS, Lo K-W, Leung S-F, Zhang J, Chan ATC, Lee JCK, Hjelm NM, Johnson PJ and Huang DP (1999) Quantitative analysis of cell-free Epstein-Barr virus DNA in plasma of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Research 59(6), 1188–1191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ma K, Liu J, Wang Y, Zhong Y, Wu Z, Fan R and Guo S (2020) Relationship between plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and prognosis of TACE for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology 11(6), 1350–1363. 10.21037/jgo-20-509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Marzese DM, Hirose H and Hoon DSB (2013) Diagnostic and prognostic value of circulating tumor-related DNA in cancer patients. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics 13(8), 827–844. 10.1586/14737159.2013.845088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Masamba LPL, Mtonga PE, Phiri LK and Bychkovsky BL (2017) Cancer pathology turnaround time at queen Elizabeth central hospital, the largest referral center in Malawi for oncology patients. Journal of Global Oncology 3(6), 734–739. 10.1200/JGO.2015.000257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mbulaiteye SM and Devesa SS (2022) Burkitt lymphoma incidence in five continents. Hemato 3(3), 434–453. 10.3390/hemato3030030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. McGoldrick SM, Mutyaba I, Adams SV, Larsen A, Krantz EM, Namirembe C, Mooka P, Nabakooza S, Ndagire M, Mubiru K, Nabwana M, Nankinga R, Gerdts S, Gordon-Maclean C, Geriga F, Omoding A, Sessle E, Kambugu J, Uldrick TS, Orem J and Casper C (2019) Survival of children with endemic Burkitt lymphoma in a prospective clinical care project in Uganda. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 66(9), 1–10. 10.1002/pbc.27813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Miao Y, Fan Y, Zhang L, Ma T and Li R (2019) Clinical value of plasma cfDNA concentration and integrity in breast cancer patients. Cellular and Molecular Biology 65(6), 64–72. 10.14715/cmb/2019.65.6.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Minard-Colin V, Aupérin A, Pillon M, Burke GAA, Barkauskas DA, Wheatley K, Delgado RF, Alexander S, Uyttebroeck A, Bollard CM, Zsiros J, Csoka M, Kazanowska B, Chiang AK, Miles RR, Wotherspoon A, Adamson PC, Vassal G, Patte C and Gross TG (2020) Rituximab for high-risk, mature B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in children. New England Journal of Medicine 382(23), 2207–2219. 10.1056/NEJMoa1915315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mulder N, Abimiku A, Adebamowo SN, de Vries J, Matimba A, Olowoyo P, Ramsay M, Skelton M and Stein DJ (2018) H3Africa: Current perspectives. Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine 11, 59–66. 10.2147/PGPM.S141546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Ozuah NW, Lubega J, Allen CE and El-Mallawany NK (2020) Five decades of low intensity and low survival: Adapting intensified regimens to cure pediatric Burkitt lymphoma in Africa. Blood Advances 4(16), 4007–4019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Panea RI, Love CL, Shingleton JR, Reddy A, Bailey JA, Moormann AM, Otieno JA, Ong’echa JM, Oduor CI, Schroeder KMS, Masalu N, Chao NJ, Agajanian M, Major MB, Fedoriw Y, Richards KL, Rymkiewicz G, Miles RR, Alobeid B, Bhagat G, Flowers CR, Ondrejka SL, Hsi ED, Choi WWL, Au-Yeung RKH, Hartmann W, Lenz G, Meyerson H, Lin Y-Y, Zhuang Y, Luftig MA, Waldrop A, Dave T, Thakkar D, Sahay H, Li G, Palus BC, Seshadri V, Kim SY, Gascoyne RD, Levy S, Mukhopadyay M, Dunson DB and Dave SS (2019) The whole-genome landscape of Burkitt lymphoma subtypes. Blood 134(19), 1598–1607. 10.1182/blood.2019001880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Parkin DM, Sitas F, Chirenje M, Stein L, Abratt R and Wabinga H (2008) Part I: Cancer in indigenous Africans—Burden, distribution, and trends. The Lancet Oncology 9(7), 683–692. 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70175-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Patel S, Smith JB, Kurbatova E and Guarner J (2012) Factors that impact turnaround time of surgical pathology specimens in an academic institution. Human Pathology 43(9), 1501–1505. 10.1016/j.humpath.2011.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pott C, Knecht H, Herzog A, Genuardi E, Unterhalt M, Mantoan B, Dogliotti I, Hiddemann W, Boccadoro M, Herrmann D, Kneba M, Langerak AW, Darzentas N, Groenen P, Brüggemann M, Hoster E, Ladetto M and Ferrero S (2017) Standardized IGH-based next-generation sequencing for MRD detection in follicular lymphoma. Blood 130(Suppl. 1), 1491. 10.1182/blood.V130.Suppl_1.1491.1491.28784599 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Qiu MZ, He CY, Lu SX, Guan WL, Wang F, Wang XJ, Jin Y, Wang FH, Li YH, Shao JY, Zhou ZW, Yun JP and Xu RH (2020) Prospective observation: Clinical utility of plasma Epstein–Barr virus DNA load in EBV-associated gastric carcinoma patients. International Journal of Cancer 146(1), 272–280. 10.1002/ijc.32490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rossi D, Spina V, Bruscaggin A and Gaidano G (2019) Liquid biopsy in lymphoma. Haematologica 104(4), 648–652. 10.3324/haematol.2018.206177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sacher AG, Paweletz C, Dahlberg SE, Alden RS, O’Connell A, Feeney N, Mach SL, Jänne PA and Oxnard GR (2016) Prospective validation of rapid plasma genotyping for the detection of EGFR and KRAS mutations in advanced lung cancer. JAMA Oncology 2(8), 1014–1022. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sayed S, Lukande R and Fleming KA (2015) Providing pathology support in low-income countries. Journal of Global Oncology 1(1), 3–6. 10.1200/JGO.2015.000943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Skrypkina I, Tsyba L, Onyshchenko K, Morderer D, Kashparova O, Nikolaienko O, Panasenko G, Vozianov S, Romanenko A and Rynditch A (2016) Concentration and methylation of cell-free DNA from blood plasma as diagnostic markers of renal cancer. Disease Markers 2016, 3693096. 10.1155/2016/3693096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Spina V, Bruscaggin A, Cuccaro A, Martini M, Di Trani M, Forestieri G, Manzoni M, Condoluci A, Arribas A, Terzi-Di-Bergamo L, Locatelli SL, Cupelli E, Ceriani L, Moccia AA, Stathis A, Nassi L, Deambrogi C, Diop F, Guidetti F, Cocomazzi A, Annunziata S, Rufini V, Giordano A, Neri A, Boldorini R, Gerber B, Bertoni F, Ghielmini M, Stüssi G, Santoro A, Cavalli F, Zucca E, Larocca LM, Gaidano G, Hohaus S, Carlo-Stella C and Rossi D (2018) Circulating tumor DNA reveals genetics, clonal evolution, and residual disease in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 131(22), 2413–2425. 10.1182/blood-2017-11-812073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Tan R, Phua SKA, Soong YL, Oon LLE, Chan KS, Lucky SS, Mong J, Tan MH and Lim CM (2020) Clinical utility of Epstein‐Barr virus DNA and other liquid biopsy markers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Communications 40(11), 564–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Temilola DO, Wium M, Coulidiati TH, Adeola HA, Carbone GM, Catapano CV and Zerbini LF (2019) The prospect and challenges to the flow of liquid biopsy in Africa. Cells 8(8), 862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tie J, Cohen JD, Lahouel K, Lo SN, Wang Y, Kosmider S, Wong R, Shapiro J, Lee M and Harris S (2022) Circulating tumor DNA analysis guiding adjuvant therapy in stage II colon cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 386, 2261–2272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tomoka T, Montgomery ND, Powers E, Dhungel BM, Morgan EA, Mulenga M, Gopal S and Fedoriw Y (2018) Lymphoma and pathology in sub-Saharan Africa: Current approaches and future directions. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 38(1), 91–100. 10.1016/j.cll.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Valpione S, Gremel G, Mundra P, Middlehurst P, Galvani E, Girotti MR, Lee RJ, Garner G, Dhomen N, Lorigan PC and Marais R (2018) Plasma total cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a surrogate biomarker for tumour burden and a prognostic biomarker for survival in metastatic melanoma patients. European Journal of Cancer 88, 1–9. 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.10.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Westmoreland KD, Montgomery ND, Stanley CC, El-Mallawany NK, Wasswa P, van der Gronde T, Mtete I, Butia M, Itimu S, Chasela M, Mtunda M, Kampani C, Liomba NG, Tomoka T, Dhungel BM, Sanders MK, Krysiak R, Kazembe P, Dittmer DP, … Gopal S (2017) Plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA for pediatric Burkitt lymphoma diagnosis, prognosis and response assessment in Malawi. International Journal of Cancer 140(11), 2509–2516. 10.1002/ijc.30682. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Wilson ML, Fleming KA, Kuti MA, Looi LM, Lago N and Ru K (2018) Access to pathology and laboratory medicine services: A crucial gap. The Lancet 391(10133), 1927–1938. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30458-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Wu J, Tang W, Huang L, Hou N, Wu J, Cheng X, Ma D, Qian P, Shen Q, Guo W, Peng W, Liu Y, Jiang C and Feng J (2019) The analysis of cell-free DNA concentrations and integrity in serum of initial and treated of lymphoma patients. Clinical Biochemistry 63, 59–65. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Xian RR, Kinyera T, Otim I, Sampson JN, Nabalende H, Legason ID, Stone J, Ogwang MD, Reynolds SJ, Kerchan P, Bhatia K, Goedert JJ, Mbulaiteye SM and Ambinder RF (2021) Plasma EBV DNA: A promising diagnostic marker for endemic Burkitt lymphoma. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, 804083. 10.3389/fonc.2021.804083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Yoon K-A, Park S, Lee SH, Kim JH and Lee JS (2009) Comparison of circulating plasma DNA levels between lung cancer patients and healthy controls. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 11(3), 182–185. 10.2353/jmoldx.2009.080098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr2

Review: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R0/PR2

Joseph Lubega 1

Comments to Author: The idea of using cell-free DNA for diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma is a very attractive one IF the technical challenges of detecting the highly variable immunoglobulin/myc translocations can be overcome. That is a big if. The authors present a well written synopsis of the rationale for this approach to diagnosis and monitoring Burkitt lymphoma. I am not sure why they are presenting this synopsis rather than the preliminary or final data since it seems they are already doing lab studies on this issue. It seems rather redundant to me but I leave this to the discretion of the journal.

Other than that, in terms of the content of the manuscript, there are several statements that the authors make that are rather controversial (or used to be controversial) largely because of scarcity of quality data from Africa. I strongly suggest they tone down these statements: (1) Burkitt lymphoma accounts for 50% - 75% of childhood cancers in Africa. Many experiences from pediatric cancer centers show 10 - 15%, with acute leukemia being the most common cancer ~30%. I appreciate that many of these are unpublished and are not population studies, but there is enough to suggest 50% - 75% is way off the mark. (2) Cure rate 40% - 50%: The actual cure rate is probably lower. I refer the authors to a recent review of published studies from Africa (Nmazuo W. Ozuah, Joseph Lubega, Carl E. Allen, Nader Kim El-Mallawany. Five Decades of Low Intensity and Low Survival: Adapting Intensified Regimens is Essential to Cure Children with Burkitt Lymphoma in sub-Saharan Africa. Blood Adv. 2020 4(16): 4007 – 4019). Also, I suggest the authors indicate that this cure rate is for about 20 - 30% of children that ever get a diagnosis and treatment; the majority of children with cancer and Burkitt lymphoma in Africa don't even get a diagnosis, which supports the rationale of their proposed diagnostic alternative.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr3

Review: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R0/PR3

Matthew S Painschab 1

Comments to Author: Thank you for this extremely well written review. This is an important contribution to the field and, I hope, will inspire ongoing investigation in this arena. it also provides a focused look at the barriers needed to overcome and the time it will take but I agree that this is an important "leapfrog" technology. I really do not see major missing literature in this review and suggest no revisions.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr4

Recommendation: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R0/PR4

Editor: Harper VanSteenhouse1

Comments to Author: Reviewer Lubega puts forth an argument to modify a couple of numbers, which I believe the authors should take under consideration and make their own decision on (although I’m unable to determine validity, the case sounds plausible). Pending this decision and slight revision if necessary, the article is ready for acceptance. The article is a very nice review, covers the topic comprehensively, in an important disease area, and I am particularly happy that it provides for an ideal exemplar for a broader discussion of the relevance of PM in underserved/under-resourced geographies.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr5

Decision: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R0/PR5

Editor: Anna Dominiczak1

No accompanying comment.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr7

Review: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R1/PR7

Joseph Lubega 1

Comments to Author: The authors have reasonably addressed the issues raised in the prior version of the manuscript.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr8

Review: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R1/PR8

Matthew S Painschab 1

Comments to Author: Useful, important review of a very important topic that is highly relevant for sub-Saharan Africa and does a great job of putting it into context of the infrastructure and human resource needs that should be paramount to make this happen.

Only a few minor revisions that I see that could strenghten the manuscript in my opinion.

1. In the Impact Statement, you note that fine needle aspiration is worse than other biopsy methods and "usually results in misdiagnosis and initiation of the wrong treatment." This may well be true but it is not comented on in the body of the article and would need references to accompany this statement. Either remove or provide evidence in the body of the manuscript.

2. On page 3, you comment that interventional radiologists are needed for core needle biopsies. This is not entirely true, especially if core needle biopsies are being done of peripheral lymph nodes. These procedures are frequently done at bedside by medical officers and clinical officers in our care.

3. In Table 1, I would relabel the second column "Cancer Patient" or something as "Tumour" is a bit misleading or at least confusing/distracting perhaps leading me to believe the measure comes directly from the tumour and not from the blood of a cancer patient.

4. On page 5, final paragraph, you being discussing ctDNA and DLBCL. There is more data in the interim years that could be included here to strengthen your argument as well. For example, https://ashpublications.org/blood/article/140/Supplement%201/1297/490222 (Herrera et al Blood 2022) and https://ashpublications.org/bloodadvances/article/6/6/1651/483728/Risk-profiling-of-patients-with-relapsed (Herrera et al Blood 2022). The literature on log change in ctDNA in many lymphoma types is rapidly evolving and promising as you say in SSA.

6. End of first paragraph on page 6, you say FISH is not available in SSA. I belive FISH is occassionally available in select centers so perhaps "routinely available" would be more approriate?

7. A figure or table demonstrating the differences in EBV measurement and testing characteristics in NPC (page 8) that could help guide similar appropriation in lymphomas would be very valuable to readers if this could be added. This is not absolutely necessary for publication but would strengthen the manuscript and broaden appeal, especially for those less familiar with the techniques who may be interested in adding to the literature in this field.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr9

Recommendation: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R1/PR9

Editor: Harper VanSteenhouse1

Comments to Author: I believe this manuscript can now be accepted. The reviewer has added some additional comments which I believe can be attended by the authors post acceptance but should not delay acceptance of this article.

Camb Prism Precis Med. doi: 10.1017/pcm.2023.1.pr10

Decision: Clinical application of circulating cell-free lymphoma DNA for fast and precise diagnosis of Burkitt lymphoma: Precision Medicine for Sub Saharan Africa — R1/PR10

Editor: Anna Dominiczak1

No accompanying comment.


Articles from Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine are provided here courtesy of Cambridge University Press

RESOURCES