Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Aug 14;71(11):3644–3647. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18523

Social Strain and Conflict Among Older Community-Dwelling Adults Serving as Caregivers: Findings from a National Sample

Akua Nyarko-Odoom a, Ashwin Kotwal b,c, Nadra E Lisha b, Veronica Yank b, Alison J Huang b
PMCID: PMC10954345  NIHMSID: NIHMS1971375  PMID: 37578382

Introduction

Although many adults develop care needs as they age, some older community-dwelling adults find themselves serving as caregivers for spouses, adult children, and other relatives. Caregiving can bring personal rewards, but it can also have a negative impact on the social well-being of older adults,1 with recent research suggesting that older caregiving adults experience higher rates of elder mistreatment than those without caregiving responsibilities.2 One possible explanation is that caregiving responsibilities may increase strain on relationships that exist outside of the caregiving relationship.3 Although the family caregiver literature has examined aspects of social negativity, family conflict, and other forms of role strain,4 it has not focused on how older adults serving in caregiving roles compare directly to others on measures of social strain. We examine experiences of social strain and conflict among older caregivers, compared to older adults without caregiving responsibilities. Our goal is to provide additional insight into the potentially unique social burdens of older caregivers, as an underrecognized component of the informal caregiving workforce in need of more social support resources.

Methods

We used a nationally-representative cohort of older community-dwelling US adults drawn from the 2015–16 National Social Health and Aging Project (NSHAP).5 Caregiving was assessed by asking if participants were “currently assisting an adult who needs help with day-to-day activities due to age or disability.” Care-receiving was assessed by asking participants if they were experiencing difficulty with standard activities of daily living (ADLs) or instrumental ADLs (IADLs) and, if so, whether they were receiving help for those ADLs/IADLs.

Social strain was assessed using a previously published scale3,68. Separate questions assessed social strain with participants’ spouse/partner, family members, or friends, including how frequently those persons “criticized” them, “made too many demands” on them, or would “get on [their] nerves,” ranging from “never” to “often.” Participants were considered to have significant strain with a partner, family member, or friend if they reported “often” experiencing any of the above types of strained experiences.3

The prevalence of each type of social strain was examined among adults aged 60 years and older, stratified by self-reported caregiving and care-receiving status. Multivariable logistic regression models examined associations between caregiving and each type of social strain, adjusting for participant demographics (age, ethnicity, gender, marital status, education), overall self-reported mental health, overall self-reported physical health, cognitive function assessed using a survey-adapted version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment9 (MOCA-SA), and any overlapping care-receiving.

Results

Of the 2617 participants aged 60 and older, 54% were women and 46% were men, and 68% were married or living with a partner (Supplementary Table S1). Approximately 18% indicated they were caregivers, and 22% were receiving care/assistance for ADLs or IADLs. Twenty-one percent reported some significant form of social strain or conflict, including 10% reporting strain with family, 3% with friends, and 12% with a partner.

In analyses stratified by caregiving and care-receiving status, social conflict or strain was reported by 34% of older adults who were caregiving, 22% who were receiving but not giving care, and 17% who were neither giving nor receiving care (Figure 1, P < .001). Older adults who were caregiving were more likely to report strain or conflict with family members and with intimate partners, compared to older adults without caregiving responsibilities (Figure 1). In multivariable-adjusted models, caregiving was associated with experiencing at least one type of social strain/conflict (AOR 1.89, 95% CI 1.35–2.64), including strain with a partner (AOR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15–2.70) and strain with a family member (AOR 2.17, 95% CI 1.52–3.10) (Table 1).

Figure 1. Self-Reported Prevalence of Social Strain Among Community-Dwelling Participants Aged 60 Years or Older, by Caregiving and Care-receiving Status.

Figure 1.

p <.001 for heterogeneity in the prevalence of any social strain by caregiving/care-receiving status. p <.001 for social strain with partner by caregiving/care-receiving status. p < .001 for social strain with family. p > .05 for social stain with friends.

Table 1.

Adjusted Odds of Social Strain or Conflict Associated with Caregiving Status Among Older Community-Dwelling Adults

  Unadjusted ORa (95% CIb) Multivariable-Adjustedc OR (95% CI)
Strain/Conflict with Anyone 2.29 (1.70, 3.09) 1.89 (1.35, 2.64)
Strain/Conflict with Partnerd 1.81 (1.22, 2.68) 1.76 (1.15, 2.70)
Strain/Conflict with Family 2.61 (1.88, 3.61) 2.17 (1.52, 3.10)
Strain/Conflict with Friends 1.60 (0.85, 3.01) 1.52 (0.77, 3.00)
a

OR = Odds Ratio

b

95%C I = 95% Confidence Interval

c

Adjusted for age, self-reported ethnicity, gender, educational attainment, marital status, self-reported overall physical health, self-reported overall mental health, cognitive function (assessed by Montreal Cognitive Assessment-Survey Adaptation score), caregiving status, and overlapping care-receiving status

d

Analyses of strain/conflict with partners were confined to older adults who indicated that they had a spouse or co-habitating partner

Discussion

In this national sample of older community-dwelling adults, one in three older adults who were caregiving reported significant strain or conflict in one of their key social relationships; twice the prevalence of older adults who were neither providing nor receiving care. Caregiving was associated with a nearly two-fold greater odds of reporting strain or conflict with partners, relatives, or friends, independent of demographic background and underlying physical, mental, and cognitive functional status. These findings highlight the potential underrecognized toll of caregiving on surrounding social support systems of older adults.10 Caregiving may deplete the social reserve of older adults and result in conflict within non-discretionary, core relationships, including partners and family. This strain may raise older adults’ immediate risk of loneliness and psychological distress,10 as well as precipitate long-term reductions in the quality and number of core relationships leading to social isolation. Consequently, future studies should investigate the role of interdisciplinary clinical teams in identifying social strain among older adult caregivers and how to best provide resources to cope with the social burdens of caregiving.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Tables

Sponsor’s Role:

The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project was funded by National Institute of Aging and National Institute of Health grants R01AG043538, R01AG048511 and R37AG030481. Ms. Akua Nyarko-Odoom was supported by the American Federation on Aging Research’s Medical Student Training in Aging Research Program (5T35AG026736-14). Dr. Ashwin Kotwal’s effort was supported by grants from the National Institute on Aging (K23AG065438) and the NIA Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30AG044281). Drs. Alison Huang and Nadra Lisha were supported by NIA grant K24AG068601.

Funding sources:

The National Social Life, Health and Aging Project was funded by National Institute of Health (NIH) grants R01AG043538, R01AG048511 and R37AG030481. Ms. Akua Nyarko-Odoom was supported by the American Federation on Aging Research’s Medical Student Training in Aging Research Program (5T35AG026736-14). Dr. Ashwin Kotwal’s effort was supported by NIH grant K23AG065438, the NIA Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center (P30AG044281), the National Palliative Care Research Center Kornfield Scholar’s Award, and the Hellman Foundation Award for Early-Career Faculty. Drs. Alison Huang and Nadra Lisha were supported by NIH grant K24AG068601.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Works Cited

  • 1.Riffin C, Van Ness PH, Wolff JL, Fried T. A Multifactorial Examination of Caregiver Burden in a National Sample of Family and Unpaid Caregivers. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019;67(2):277–283. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nyarko-Odoom A, Lisha NE, Yank V, Kotwal A, Balogun S, Huang AJ. Elder Mistreatment Experienced by Older Caregiving Adults: Results from a National Community-Based Sample. J Gen Intern Med Published online January 30, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07981-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 3.Waite LJ, Duvoisin R, Kotwal AA. Social Health in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2021;76(Suppl 3):S251–S265. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pearlin LI, Mullan JT, Semple SJ, Skaff MM. Caregiving and the Stress Process: An Overview of Concepts and Their Measures1. The Gerontologist 1990;30(5):583–594. doi: 10.1093/geront/30.5.583 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.O’Muircheartaigh C, English N, Pedlow S, Schumm LP. Sample Design and Estimation in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project: Round 3 (2015–2016). J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 2021;76(Suppl 3):S207–S214. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbab182 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Walen HR, Lachman ME. Social Support and Strain from Partner, Family, and Friends: Costs and Benefits for Men and Women in Adulthood. J Soc Pers Relatsh 2000;17(1):5–30. doi: 10.1177/0265407500171001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kotwal AA, Kim J, Waite L, Dale W. Social Function and Cognitive Status: Results from a US Nationally Representative Survey of Older Adults. J Gen Intern Med 2016;31(8):854–862. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3696-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chen Y, Feeley TH. Social support, social strain, loneliness, and well-being among older adults: An analysis of the Health and Retirement Study*. J Soc Pers Relatsh 2014;31(2):141–161. doi: 10.1177/0265407513488728 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kotwal AA, Schumm LP, Kern DW, et al. Evaluation of a brief survey instrument for assessing subtle differences in cognitive function among older adults. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 2015;29(4):317–324. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Offer S They Drive Me Crazy: Difficult Social Ties and Subjective Well-Being. J Health Soc Behav 2020;61(4):418–436. doi: 10.1177/0022146520952767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Tables

RESOURCES