Skip to main content
Interventional Radiology logoLink to Interventional Radiology
. 2024 Feb 8;9(1):13–19. doi: 10.22575/interventionalradiology.2023-0022

Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction among Interventional Radiologists in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study

Miyuki Sone 1, Hideo Yasunaga 2, Marie Osawa 3, Yuko Takeguchi 4, Alisa Han 5, Naoko Akiyama 6, Mika Kamiya 7, Reiko Woodhams 8, Rika Yoshimatsu 9, Atsuhiro Nakatsuka 10, Shingo Kakeda 11, Kei Takase 12, Hidefumi Mimura 13, Koichiro Yamakado 14
PMCID: PMC10955479  PMID: 38524998

Abstract

Purpose:

This study aims to measure job satisfaction among interventional radiology physicians in Japan and analyze the factors affecting job satisfaction.

Material and Methods:

A web-based survey was conducted among the members of the Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology between October and December 2021. Participants were questioned regarding their job satisfaction, workplace, work status, and demographic information. Principal component analysis was applied to 15 reasons related to job satisfaction, and the factors affecting job satisfaction were analyzed.

Results:

Valid responses were obtained from 901 (31.9%) of the 2,824 interventional radiology physicians invited to participate. Job satisfaction was reported as "very satisfied" in 79 (8.8%), "moderately satisfied" in 426 (47.3%), "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied" in 230 (25.5%), "moderately dissatisfied" in 133 (14.8%), and "very dissatisfied" in 33 (3.7%) respondents. Thus, there were 505 (56.0%) satisfied physicians. Three principal components were extracted from the reasons for job satisfaction. Job satisfaction tended to be higher among those who reported performing a higher number of interventional radiology procedures and was positively associated with a higher rate of work time dedicated to interventional radiology and the first principal component (the environment of clinical practice, research, and interventional radiology education). The third principal component (salary and work environment) and the absence of an "IkuBoss" [a boss who takes initiative in creating a work environment supportive of the work-life balance of colleagues] were associated with lower job satisfaction.

Conclusions:

More than half the participants reported high job satisfaction. Job satisfaction of interventional radiology physicians in Japan was positively associated with a favorable clinical, research, and educational environment and negatively associated with the absence of an "IkuBoss," noninterventional radiology work, overtime work, and salary.

Keywords: job satisfaction, interventional radiology, work environment

Introduction

Interventional radiology (IR) has been increasingly used worldwide in recent years because of advances in technology and the demand for minimally invasive treatments [1, 2]. In Japan, there are 1,209 board-certified interventional radiologists [3] as of 2023, which may not be sufficient to meet the demand for IR. Thus, the recruitment and retention of IR physicians are urgent concerns for providing adequate access to IR for the benefit of the patients.

Job satisfaction may affect the workforce of IR physicians in several ways [4-6]. First, job satisfaction is an important factor in physicians' well-being [5]. Dissatisfied IR physicians are likely to discontinue their specialties. Second, job satisfaction may influence medical students' motivation to pursue their careers as IR physicians. Moreover, a previous study showed that physicians' job satisfaction was correlated with good quality patient care [6]. In a survey involving radiologists in Japan, including IR physicians, 67.7% of the respondents (n = 3,986) reported that they were very or moderately satisfied with their job [7]. However, the job satisfaction of IR physicians in Japan has not yet been fully clarified. This study aims to identify the job satisfaction of IR physicians in Japan and analyze its contributing factors.

Material and Methods

Study design

A cross-sectional web-based questionnaire survey of IR physicians in Japan was conducted. The study protocol and questionnaire were developed by the Diversity and Inclusion Working Group (D&I WG) of the Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology (JSIR) and were approved by the appropriate ethics committee.

Study population and survey methods

A total of 2,824 JSIR physicians were invited to participate in the questionnaire survey. Electronic links to the questionnaire were emailed between October 2021 and December 2021. To avoid duplicate answers, membership numbers and email addresses were obtained when logging into the questionnaire website. Two electronic reminders were issued before the survey was completed. Participation was voluntary, and completion of the questionnaire implied consent to participate in this study. The survey responses were anonymous, and the respondents were assured of confidentiality. No incentives were provided to the respondents.

Questionnaire items (Appendix)

The questionnaire included 19 questions on four domains: (i) the demographics of the workplace (practice location, practice type, number of IR procedures performed per year, and the type of the Added fee for Radiological Managements on Imaging-studies [ARMI]), (ii) workload and work environment (weekly number of interpretations [computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear imaging], weekly work time dedicated to IR, number of IR procedures performed as the first operator, number of IR procedures performed as the second operator, paid days-off, childcare/nursing care leave, and "IkuBoss" [a boss who takes initiative in creating a work environment supportive of the work-life balance of colleagues]), (iii) level of job satisfaction (classified as very satisfied, moderately satisfied, neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, moderately dissatisfied, and very dissatisfied) and its reasons, and (iv) the demographics of the participants (age, sex, working condition, experience in IR, affiliating department, partner, and children). Fourteen IR physicians (members of the D&I WG) underwent the pilot tests to assess the comprehensiveness, clarity, and accessibility of the questionnaire. The mean time required to complete the questionnaire was 7 min.

Data analysis

A cross-tabulation table was constructed to show the distribution of the five-level job satisfaction for each respondent characteristic.

Principal component analysis was applied to the 15 items regarding reasons for job satisfaction, creating three comprehensive principal components. The eigenvalues and factor loadings of the three principal components are presented.

The five levels of job satisfaction were recategorized into the following binary variables: 1, "very satisfied" and "moderately satisfied," and 2, "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied," "moderately dissatisfied," and "very dissatisfied." A multivariate logistic regression analysis for binary job satisfaction was performed using the three principal components and other covariates as independent variables. Odds ratios, 95% confidence intervals, and p-values were shown for each independent variable. P-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the Stata software (version 17.0; StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA).

Results

Of the 2,824 IR physicians invited to participate in the questionnaire, 1,004 (35.6%) responded, and the valid responses (the respondents completed the questions regarding job satisfaction) were obtained from 901 (31.9%) respondents.

Job satisfaction was reported as "very satisfied" by 79 (8.8%), "moderately satisfied" by 426 (47.3%), "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied" by 230 (25.5%), "moderately dissatisfied" by 133 (14.8%), and "very dissatisfied" by 33 (3.7%) participants. Thus, satisfied physicians (including "very satisfied" and "moderately satisfied") accounted for 505 (56.0%) practitioners.

The participants' characteristics are listed in Table 1. Cross-tabulation of job satisfaction in IR related to the demographics is listed in Table 2. The variables related to "very satisfied" in more than 25% of the participants were the following: weekly number of interpretations (CT, MRI, and RI), <10 (28.8%); weekly work time dedicated to IR, >75% (25.5%); weekly number of IR procedures performed as the first operator, >10 (27.2%); weekly number of IR procedures performed as the second operator, >10 (32.5%); and support system for childcare and nursing care (31.0%). The variables related to "very satisfied" and "moderately satisfied" in more than 70% of the participants were the following: annual number of IR procedures at the institution, >1000 (72.1%); weekly number of interpretations, <10 (75.6%); weekly work time dedicated to IR, 50%-74% (74.6%) or >75% (82.5%); weekly number of IR procedures performed as the first operator, >10 (76.3%); weekly number of IR procedures performed as the second operator, 5-9 (78.5%) or >10 (84.3%); opportunities of conference presentation and writing papers (77.3%); relationship with other departments (80.0%); ease to take paid days-off (75.1%); and interpersonal relationships at workplace (79.6%).

Table 1.

Respondent Demographics and Practice Characteristics (N = 901).

Characteristic No. (%)
Gender
Male 820 (91.0)
Female 73 (8.1)
No answer 8 (0.9)
Age, years
<30 24 (2.7)
30-39 263 (29.2)
40-49 301 (33.4)
50-59 219 (24.3)
60≤ 94 (10.4)
Experience in IR
Less than 5 years 88 (9.8)
5 years or more, board-certified 671 (74.5)
5 years or more, not board-certified 142 (15.8)
Affiliating department
Radiology 818 (90.8)
Emergency medicine 39 (4.3)
Others 44 (4.9)
Work schedule N = 900
Full-time 857 (95.2)
Part-time 43 (4.8)
Practice location N = 899
Hokkaido, Tohoku 92 (10.2)
Kanto 274 (30.5)
Chubu 114 (12.7)
Kansai 212 (23.6)
Chugoku, Shikoku 103 (11.5)
Kyusyu, Okinawa 104 (11.6)
Practice type
University hospital 368 (40.8)
General hospital 451 (50.1)
Others 82 (9.1)
The number of IR procedures per year
0-49 83 (9.2)
50-199 214 (23.8)
200-499 308 (34.2)
500-999 185 (20.5)
1000≤ 111 (12.3)

Table 2.

Demographics of Participants and Cross-tabulation of Job Satisfaction in IR.

Job satisfaction (%)
Total Very satisfied Moderately satisfied Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied Moderately dissatisfied Very dissatisfied
N = 901 n = 79 n = 426 n = 230 n = 133 n = 33
Practice location Hokkaido, Tohoku 92 3.2 49.1 28.3 16.3 3.3
Kanto 274 10.4 43.8 25.5 14.9 5.1
Chubu 114 5.2 49.0 23.6 19.3 2.6
Kansai 212 13.0 43.4 26.9 13.2 3.8
Chugoku, Shikoku 103 6.7 54.2 18.5 17.4 2.9
Kyusyu, Okinawa 104 4.7 54.9 29.9 8.7 1.9
Practice type University hospital 368 8.2 49.8 25.6 14.7 1.9
General hospital 451 7.3 45.1 26.4 16.4 4.9
Others 82 19.6 48.8 20.5 6.2 4.8
The number of IR procedures per year 0-49 83 1.2 24.1 44.6 20.5 9.6
50-199 214 7.5 44.4 26.1 17.8 4.2
200-499 308 4.9 48.4 28.9 14.3 3.6
500-999 185 13.0 56.6 16.2 12.4 1.6
1000≤ 111 20.7 51.4 16.2 9.9 1.8
Type of ARMI* (Radiologists) ARMI 3 202 9.4 48.9 27.7 13.4 0.5
ARMI 2 459 9.4 47.7 25.9 13.1 3.9
ARMI 1 131 6.1 48.1 22.1 21.4 2.3
No claim of ARMI 45 11.1 36.0 29.1 11.2 13.4
The average number of image interpretations in a week (Radiologists) <10 45 28.8 46.8 22.2 2.1 0.0
10-99 232 12.9 52.5 23.7 9.9 0.9
100-199 313 6.1 48.2 26.8 16.3 2.6
200≤ 247 5.3 41.6 27.5 18.2 7.3
The rate of work time dedicated to IR <25% 510 5.7 38.6 31.6 19.4 4.7
25-49% 203 7.4 57.7 22.2 10.8 2.0
50-74% 102 12.8 61.8 15.8 7.8 2.0
75%≤ 86 25.5 57.0 9.4 4.6 3.5
The number of IR procedures as the first operator in a week 0 92 5.4 25.0 44.5 19.5 5.5
1-4 628 7.0 48.4 25.0 15.4 4.1
5-9 122 11.5 57.3 18.9 12.3 0.0
10≤ 59 27.2 49.1 15.2 5.2 3.4
The number of IR procedures as the second operator in a week 0 245 6.9 37.9 35.1 15.9 4.1
1-4 522 6.9 48.3 24.9 16.1 3.8
5-9 97 14.4 64.1 13.5 7.3 1.0
10≤ 37 32.5 51.8 2.5 8.3 5.4
The number of paid days-off in the last fiscal year 0 44 6.8 54.2 27.2 7.0 4.6
1-4 190 5.3 48.0 24.2 17.9 4.7
5-9 497 9.5 47.5 26.7 13.9 2.4
10-19 155 11.0 45.1 23.3 15.4 5.2
20≤ 15 13.2 34.1 19.9 20.4 13.4
The mean overtime work hours in a month 0-9 127 8.6 40.9 28.4 15.7 6.3
10-19 167 7.2 52.8 24.5 13.8 1.8
20-39 270 10.4 50.0 22.2 14.4 3.0
40-59 189 7.4 44.0 29.6 13.7 5.3
60-79 89 5.6 49.3 26.9 14.6 3.4
80≤ 59 15.3 40.4 22.2 20.3 1.7
Taking childcare/nursing care leave in the work environment Easy for both men and women 336 14.3 49.4 22.6 11.9 1.8
Not easy for men but easy for women 349 5.2 50.2 25.2 16.6 2.9
Not easy for women but easy for men 7 0.0 54.7 29.6 15.1 0.0
Not easy for both women and men 209 6.2 38.7 30.6 16.3 8.1
Existence of IkuBoss in your department Yes 385 14.0 48.8 20.0 14.5 2.6
No 211 4.8 40.8 29.4 17.5 7.6
Don't know 305 4.9 49.9 29.9 13.1 2.3
The reasons for the answer on job satisfaction (multiple selections allowed) Number of IR cases at the institution 539 11.5 48.4 21.3 14.9 3.9
Types and contents of IR procedures 594 11.8 55.7 18.0 12.4 2.0
Number of IR cases performed as the first operator 424 10.6 56.4 15.8 13.7 3.5
Educational environment of IR 290 16.6 48.3 16.2 15.5 3.4
Opportunities for conference presentations and paper writings 168 18.4 58.8 12.5 7.1 3.0
NonIR work 210 8.6 24.7 39.5 20.0 7.2
Relationships with other departments 315 15.2 64.8 9.5 6.3 4.1
Salary 126 7.2 33.5 33.4 21.4 4.8
Overtime work and on-call duties 270 11.5 48.1 26.7 11.5 2.2
Telework at home 17 11.6 47.6 29.8 11.8 0.0
Paid day-offs 137 21.9 53.2 17.5 6.6 0.7
Support system for maternity, childcare, and nursing care 42 31.0 35.5 21.4 9.5 2.4
Interpersonal relationships at workplace 207 19.3 60.3 9.2 8.2 2.9
Harassment 18 5.7 4.7 28.1 28.1 33.4
IR is not the job I wanted 21 0.0 10.1 47.1 28.5 14.3
Age, years <30 24 20.8 37.3 21.1 21.0 0.0
30-39 263 9.9 43.7 24.0 19.0 3.4
40-49 301 7.0 52.8 21.9 13.6 4.6
50-59 219 8.2 46.1 30.1 12.8 2.7
60≤ 94 9.6 44.9 31.8 9.6 4.2
Gender Male 820 8.8 48.4 24.3 15.1 3.4
Female 73 8.2 35.6 38.4 10.9 6.9
No answer 8 12.9 37.3 37.4 13.3 0.0
Work schedule Full-time 857 8.9 47.7 25.2 14.4 3.9
Part-time 43 7.0 39.6 32.6 21.0 0.0
Experience in IR Less than 5 years 88 15.9 33.9 27.2 20.4 2.3
5 years or more, board-certified 671 7.5 50.3 24.3 14.0 3.9
5 years or more, not board-certified 142 10.6 40.8 30.3 14.8 3.5
Affiliating department Radiology 818 8.9 47.2 25.9 14.6 3.4
Emergency medicine 39 10.3 41.5 10.0 25.6 12.9
Others 44 4.5 55.2 31.9 9.4 0.0
Partner and children No partner, no children 99 10.1 47.3 24.2 16.1 2.0
Have a partner, no children 101 7.9 37.5 31.7 17.8 5.0
No partner, have children 24 4.3 49.7 12.5 21.0 12.5
Have a partner, have children 677 8.9 48.6 25.2 13.9 3.4

ARMI: Added fee for Radiological Managements on Imaging-studies

Three principal components were extracted from the 15 reasons for rating job satisfaction with eigenvalues of 2.409, 1.861, and 1.096 (Table 3). Component 1 mainly corresponded to "environment of clinical practice, research, and education of IR." Component 2 was mainly associated with "environment for family care." Component 3 was mainly related to "salary and work environment."

Table 3.

The Results of the Principal Component Analysis.

Component 1 Component 2 Component 3
Eigenvalue 2.409 1.861 1.096
Factor loadings
Number of IR cases at the institution 0.232 −0.386 0.165
Types and contents of IR procedures 0.293 −0.410 0.044
Number of IR cases performed as a first operator 0.267 −0.315 0.154
Educational environment of IR 0.358 −0.094 0.055
Opportunities for conference presentations and paper writing 0.394 −0.041 0.023
NonIR work, such as image interpretation and in-hospital meetings 0.083 0.276 0.264
Relationships with other departments 0.281 −0.085 −0.303
Salary 0.155 0.294 0.227
Overtime work hours and the number of on-call duties 0.199 0.315 0.378
Telework at home 0.166 0.130 0.120
Opportunities to take paid days-off 0.361 0.297 0.005
Support system for maternity, childcare, and nursing care 0.274 0.253 −0.107
Interpersonal relationships at workplace 0.326 0.208 −0.384
Harassment at the work place 0.024 0.158 −0.624
IR is not the job I wanted. −0.130 0.258 0.156

The results of the logistic regression analysis are presented in Table 4. A higher number of IR procedures per year in the primary workplace were significantly associated with higher job satisfaction. The odds ratios (95% CI) of "50-199," "200-499," "500-999," and "≥1000" with reference to "0-49" in the number of IR procedures were 2.30 (1.13-4.70), 2.09 (1.01-4.33), 3.81 (1.63-8.88), and 5.42 (2.07-14.21), respectively. A higher amount of work time dedicated to IR was associated with higher job satisfaction. The odds ratios (95% CI) of "50%-74%" and "≥75%" with reference to "<25%" were 2.14 (1.02-4.48) and 3.12 (1.22-8.01), respectively. The absence of "IkuBoss" in the workplace was significantly associated with lower job satisfaction compared to that with the presence of "IkuBoss" (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.33-0.85). Principal component 1 was significantly associated with higher job satisfaction (odds ratio, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.56-2.08). Principal component 2 (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.57-0.75) and principal component 3 (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.55-0.77) were significantly associated with lower job satisfaction.

Table 4.

Logistic Regression Analysis of Variables Associated with Job Satisfaction.

Odds ratio 95% confidence interval P
Practice location Hokkaido, Tohoku 1.00
Kanto 0.83 0.43 1.59 0.572
Chubu 1.34 0.65 2.77 0.422
Kansai 0.76 0.39 1.47 0.418
Chugoku, Shikoku 1.19 0.57 2.50 0.645
Kyusyu, Okinawa 1.56 0.74 3.30 0.244
Practice type University hospital 1.00
General hospital 1.60 0.95 2.72 0.079
Others 1.26 0.42 3.83 0.683
Number of IR procedures per year 0-49 1.00
50-199 2.30 1.13 4.70 0.022
200-499 2.09 1.01 4.33 0.048
500-999 3.81 1.63 8.88 0.002
1000≤ 5.42 2.07 14.21 0.001
Type of ARMI (Radiologists) ARMI 3 1.00
ARMI 2 1.16 0.66 2.04 0.610
ARMI 1 1.01 0.52 1.97 0.979
No claim of ARMI 0.53 0.20 1.39 0.197
The average number of image interpretations in a week (Radiologists) <10 1.00
10-99 0.87 0.32 2.33 0.775
100-199 0.75 0.27 2.09 0.581
200≤ 0.74 0.26 2.14 0.582
The rate of total work time dedicated to IR <25% 1.00
25-49% 1.59 1.00 2.52 0.051
50-74% 2.14 1.02 4.48 0.044
75%≤ 3.12 1.22 8.01 0.018
The number of IR procedures as the first operator in a week 0 1.00
1-4 1.53 0.83 2.83 0.177
5-9 1.10 0.48 2.51 0.829
10≤ 0.58 0.18 1.87 0.360
The number of IR procedures as the second operator in a week 0 1.00
1-4 0.92 0.60 1.41 0.698
5-9 1.32 0.61 2.84 0.484
10≤ 2.05 0.54 7.75 0.291
Paid days-off in the last fiscal year 0 1.00
1-4 1.05 0.41 2.67 0.927
5-9 0.97 0.40 2.37 0.951
10-19 0.72 0.28 1.89 0.508
20≤ 0.52 0.10 2.62 0.427
The mean overtime work hours in a month 0-9 1.00
10-19 0.93 0.51 1.71 0.819
20-39 0.92 0.52 1.62 0.767
40-59 0.49 0.26 0.92 0.026
60-79 0.77 0.36 1.66 0.506
80≤ 0.76 0.31 1.86 0.552
Taking childcare/nursing care leave in the work environment Easy for both men and women 1.00
Not easy for men but easy for women 0.83 0.55 1.26 0.392
Not easy for women but easy for men 1.36 0.07 27.16 0.840
Not easy for both women and men 0.72 0.44 1.15 0.170
Existence of IkuBoss in your department Yes 1.00
No 0.53 0.33 0.85 0.009
Don't know 0.92 0.61 1.39 0.686
The reasons for job satisfaction Principal component 1 (Clinical, research, and educational environment) 1.80 1.56 2.08 <0.001
Principal component 2 (Environment of family care) 0.65 0.57 0.75 <0.001
Principal component 3 (Salary and work environment) 0.65 0.55 0.77 <0.001
Age, years <30 1.00
30-39 0.99 0.30 3.25 0.983
40-49 0.98 0.27 3.60 0.977
50-59 0.90 0.24 3.41 0.878
60≤ 0.85 0.21 3.45 0.825
Gender Male 1.00
Female 0.64 0.33 1.24 0.188
No answer 0.90 0.10 8.42 0.926
Work schedule Full-time 1.00
Part-time 0.94 0.41 2.13 0.879
Experience in IR Less than 5 years 1.00
5 years or more, board-certified 1.20 0.55 2.63 0.653
5 years or more, not board-certified 1.65 0.71 3.86 0.247
Affiliating department Radiology 1.00
Emergency medicine 2.70 0.17 42.23 0.478
Others 1.72 0.10 29.74 0.711
Partner and children No partner, no children 1.00
Have a partner, no children 0.64 0.30 1.37 0.253
No partner, have children 1.25 0.34 4.63 0.737
Have a partner, have children 0.76 0.40 1.42 0.382

Discussion

This study demonstrated that 56.0% of the participants in the Japanese IR physicians' survey were either "very satisfied" or "moderately satisfied" with their jobs. Several factors were associated with job satisfaction, including the number of IR procedures per year, the rate of work time dedicated to IR, and the absence of a supervisor called "IkuBoss." Principal component analysis identified three factors associated with job satisfaction: the environment for clinical practice, research, and education in IR; environment for family care; and salary and work environment.

The job satisfaction of IR physicians in Japan in this study was more than half of all valid responses, which was neither high nor low. In a previous study, the job satisfaction of radiologists in Japan in 2008 was 67.7% [7]. This study showed that the job satisfaction of diagnostic radiologists and radiation oncologists was significantly higher than that of IR physicians [7]. Previous studies on job satisfaction of surgeons showed varying results, ranging from 30% to 90% [8-10]. In the present study, 18.5% of the respondents answered that they were moderately dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their jobs. Thus, measures are required to improve job satisfaction among Japanese IRs.

The factors associated with a high level of job satisfaction in this study included fewer reading duties, longer time engaged in IR, a greater number of IR procedures, research opportunities, support systems for child and nursing care, and relationships in the workplace. The absence of an "IkuBoss," nonIR work, overtime work, and salary were associated with a low level of job satisfaction. These results indicate that the factors that enhance IR job satisfaction, namely, high number of IR procedures, opportunities of career advancement, and fewer reading duties, can be emphasized in IR facilities. However, given that 79.9% (720/901) of the respondents performed <5 procedures per week as the first operator and 29.5% (247/837) of radiology IRs performed more than 200 reading duties per week, achieving such a work environment may be difficult at this time. Increasing the number of IRs by raising awareness in the medical community and general public, and improving the work environment are important and urgent issues to address.

Principal component analysis clarified that factors such as opportunities for IR research and education, work-life balance, and salary were potential common factors that affect job satisfaction. These results suggest that job satisfaction is influenced not only by optimizing work-life integration but also by opportunities for career advancement. The absence of an "IkuBoss" was associated with lower job satisfaction, and the results indicate that leaders who understand and manage the diversity of individual work styles and work-life balance are needed.

In previous studies, the factors affecting job satisfaction have been diverse. In a survey of Japanese radiologists, job satisfaction was linked to a higher annual income and working in larger hospitals whereas dissatisfaction was associated with older age and night shifts [7]. A study evaluating career satisfaction among men and women cancer surgeons in the United States found that both sexes reported similar factors associated with career satisfaction, including stronger support from colleagues, balance in work and personal life, and increasing age [8]. This study also found that insufficient family time due to work and household chores is associated with lower satisfaction, especially for women [8]. In another study on surgeons in the United States, job satisfaction was lower for women surgeons and surgeons under the age of 60 whereas most job-related characteristics (such as surgical specialty, years of experience, academic career, practice size, and payment model) did not significantly affect job satisfaction [10]. In our study, age and sex were not significant factors affecting job satisfaction. Nevertheless, career development and work-life balance are concerns for young and women IR physicians, and these issues need to be addressed if young physicians choose IR as a subspecialty.

Our study had several limitations. First, because this was a cross-sectional study, the results provided insight into only a single point of time. Second, the surveys carried an inherent risk of response bias. In addition, our cohort may not represent all IR specialists in Japan because of a nonresponse bias. The valid response was low at 31.9%, suggesting that highly motivated IRs may have been among the respondents, which may have led to the result that a higher number of IR procedures were associated with a higher level of satisfaction. Finally, we did not fully examine physicians' wellness and burnout, which may have contributed to job satisfaction.

In conclusion, more than half of the participants reported high job satisfaction. Job satisfaction of IR physicians in Japan was positively associated with a favorable clinical, research, and educational environment and negatively associated with the absence of an "IkuBoss," nonIR work, overtime work, and salary.

Conflict of Interest

None

Author Contribution

All authors contributed to the study design, development of the questionnaire, and acquisition of data. H.Y. performed analysis of data. M.S. and H.Y. prepared the draft of the manuscript. All authors participated in revising the manuscript.

Disclaimer

Hidefumi Mimura is one of the Editorial Board members of Interventional Radiology. This author was not involved in the peer-review or decision-making process for this paper.

Supplementary Material

Appendix
Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction among Interventional Radiologists in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study (graphical abstract)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the JSIR members who participated in this study. We would like to thank Dr. Miyuki Maruno for her involvement in the development of the questionnaire. In addition, we would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

References

  • 1.Garg T, Bajaj S, Dayan MJ, et al. Temporal and geospatial variations among the interventional radiology physician workforce in the United States. Clin Imaging. 2021; 78: 105-109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Charalel RA, McGinty G, Brant-Zawadzki M, et al. Interventional radiology delivers high-value health care and is an imaging 3.0 vanguard. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015; 12: 501-506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology. List of board certified interventional radiologists. 2023 [cited 2023 Apr 1]. Available from: https://www.jsir.or.jp/about/senmonitiran/ [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bovier PA, Perneger TV. Predictors of work satisfaction among physicians. Eur J Public Health. 2003; 13: 299-305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Burns KEA, Fox-Robichaud A, Lorens E, Martin CM, Canadian Critical Care Society. Gender differences in career satisfaction, moral distress, and incivility: a national, cross-sectional survey of Canadian critical care physicians. Can J Anaesth. 2019; 66: 503-511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sundquist J, Johansson SE. High demand, low control, and impaired general health: working conditions in a sample of Swedish general practitioners. Scand J Public Health. 2000; 28: 123-131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sone M, Mizunuma K, Nakajima Y, Yasunaga H, Ohtomo K. Job satisfaction, income, workload, workplace, and demographics of Japanese radiologists in the 2008 survey. Jpn J Radiol. 2013; 31: 364-370. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Johnson HM, Irish W, Strassle PD, et al. Associations between career satisfaction, personal life factors, and work-life integration practices among US surgeons by gender. JAMA Surg. 2020; 155: 742-750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kawase K, Yorozuya K, Hashimoto H, Nagata Y, Tomizawa Y, Teramoto T. [Current status of Japanese surgeons. A gender comparison: results from a survey of Japan Surgical Society. Part 1. Regular members]. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 2009; 110: 37-44. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jackson TN, Pearcy CP, Khorgami Z, Agrawal V, Taubman KE, Truitt MS. The physician attrition crisis: a cross-sectional survey of the risk factors for reduced job satisfaction among US surgeons. World J Surg. 2018; 42: 1285-1292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Appendix
Impact of Work Environment on Job Satisfaction among Interventional Radiologists in Japan: A Cross-sectional Study (graphical abstract)

Articles from Interventional Radiology are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology (JSIR)

RESOURCES