Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are soft tissue sarcomas that originate from the mesenchymal cells of the gastrointestinal tract. Extra-GISTs (EGISTs) are caused by sites outside the gastrointestinal tract. We reported a case of EGIST of the pancreas in a 51-year-old woman. Enhanced CT scan showed a rounded, slightly hypointense focus in the head of the pancreas and the right pars compacta of the descending duodenum. Routine laboratory and endocrine tests were unremarkable. The patient underwent laparoscopic surgery. The diagnosis of EGIST was confirmed through histopathological and immunohistochemical examination. The tumor was found to be CD117+, CD34+, and DOG+ with a high risk of malignancy. No recurrence was observed during the nine-month postoperative follow-up.
Keywords: complementary therapy, spindle cell, pancreatic extragastrointestinal stromal tumor (egist), pancreas, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (gist)
Introduction
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal tumors that can develop anywhere in the gastrointestinal tract. They account for less than 1% of all gastrointestinal tumors [1-3]. They can occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract from the esophagus to the anus. GISTs usually affect older patients and are most frequently found in the stomach (60%-70%), small intestine (20%-25%), colon and rectum (5%), and esophagus (<5%) [4,5]. Gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors are referred to as extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (EGISTs) when they arise outside of the gastrointestinal tract and account for approximately 5%-10% of all GISTs [6]. EGISTs arising from the pancreas are much rarer, with approximately 30 cases reported in the literature to date [7].
Case presentation
A 51-year-old woman presented with edematous erythema of the cheeks in March 2023. Following her hospitalization, she requested a full-body examination. An abdominal ultrasound unexpectedly revealed a hypoechoic mass over the right kidney. She did not report any discomfort such as abdominal pain, bloating, jaundice, nausea and vomiting, or wasting. Routine laboratory tests, serum tumor markers, and hormone levels were all within normal limits. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen revealed round, slightly hypodense foci in the head of the pancreas and the right parasternal aspect of the descending duodenum, measuring approximately 57 × 46 mm (Figure 1A). The enhancement scan showed inhomogeneous marked enhancement with poor local delineation from the pancreatic head and descending duodenum (Figure 1B).
Figure 1. The imaging features of the mass on computerized tomography scan and enhanced scan.
(A) A round, slightly less dense lesion. (B) Enhanced scan indicates inhomogeneous enhancement.
Subsequently, she underwent a magnetic resonance (MR) enhanced scan of the abdominal mass. On MR imaging (MRI), the mass showed hypointensity on T1-weighted images (Figure 2A) and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images (Figure 2B), with patchy fluid signal shadows seen internally. The mass showed high intensity on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) images (Figure 2C), and the enhanced scan of the lesion after injection of gadolinium contrast agent showed marked inhomogeneous enhancement (Figure 2D).
Figure 2. The imaging features of this mass on magnetic resonance imaging.
(A) Low signal intensity lesion on T1-weighted image. (B) High signal intensity lesions on T2-weighted images. (C) High signal intensity lesion on DWI image. (D) Coronal T1-weighted enhancement scan with marked inhomogeneous enhancement.
In March 2023, the patient underwent laparoscopic surgery, during which an exophytic mass of approximately 6*5 cm was found in the head of the pancreas. The mass was meticulously separated from the surrounding tissue and found to occupy the entire head of the pancreas without invading the duodenum. And the tumor was removed intact. The postoperative course was uneventful. The histopathological examination revealed a mixed cell type tumor, primarily composed of spindle and epithelioid cells with focal atypia (Figures 3A, 3B). The mitotic count was 3/50 high-power fields (HPF). The immunohistochemical examination indicated that the tumor cells were positive for CD117, CD34, and DOG-1 antibodies.
Figure 3. Microscopic findings of the mass.
(A, B) The tumor is mainly composed of spindle cells and epithelioid cells.
Based on the site of growth of the mass and the margins of the surgical specimen, the final diagnosis of pancreatic GIST was made. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) 2008 Modified Chinese Consensus 2017 revision, pancreatic GIST was diagnosed as a high risk. The patient was started on imatinib mesylate after surgery, and no radiographic evidence of recurrence was observed during the nine-month follow-up period.
Discussion
We report a rare case of primary pancreatic GIST. EGISTs are GISTs that are reported as primary tumors outside of the gastrointestinal tract [4,5]. The incidence of EGIST has been reported to be approximately 5%-10% of all GISTs [8]. The median age at diagnosis was 55 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.04 [9].
Symptoms of EGIST are mainly related to tumor growth and can lead to acute abdomen with bowel obstruction, abdominal distension or rupture, and bleeding [10,11]. Most small EGISTs, which are less than 5 cm in size, are asymptomatic and are typically discovered incidentally through imaging or palpation [9]. EGISTs should be considered potentially malignant due to the high risk of recurrence and metastasis [9]. EGIST diagnosis is based on cytomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular genetic testing. Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining results differentiate three types of GIST: fusiform, epithelioid, or mixed. Fusiform is the most prevalent type [10]. On immunostaining, CD117 (>95%) and CD34 (70%) were strongly present and positive, while smooth muscle actin (30%), S-100 (5%), junctional proteins (2%), and cytokeratins (2%) were also reported [8,12-14]. Furthermore, DOG-1 is a protein expressed in nearly all GISTs and can serve as a biomarker for this type of tumor [10]. Molecular genetic testing, such as mutations in genes like CD117 (KIT, a type III receptor tyrosine kinase), can predict a tumor's sensitivity to molecularly targeted therapies. This testing may be used for initial screening.
For preoperative staging of EGIST, contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen and pelvis and contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the chest are the tests of choice [15]. Medical imaging data is crucial in determining the size and location of the tumor, identifying distant metastases, and detecting invasion of adjacent anatomic structures [16]. Surgery remains the most viable option for the treatment of EGIST, and the primary goal of EGIST treatment is complete resection of the tumor with clear margins. Lymph node dissection is necessary when preoperative imaging indicates lymph node infiltration. For patients with large tumors, open surgery is the preferred surgical approach due to the risk of tumor rupture and peritoneal spread associated with laparoscopic surgery [15].
About 20%-30% of GISTs are high-risk or malignant. Postoperative adjuvant therapy is indicated based on tumor size, mitotic count, location, and whether the tumor is ruptured or not [17,18]. In high-risk patients, in addition to surgery and targeted therapy, follow-up with serial CT scans approximately 10 years after imatinib initiation is recommended [19]. A younger age at diagnosis is typically associated with a worse prognosis and larger tumor size. Therefore, clinicians need to consider EGIST in the differential diagnosis of abdominal tumors outside the gastrointestinal tract to improve diagnosis rates and increase patients' chances of survival.
Conclusions
GISTs are rare, with the majority originating in the stomach. In rare cases, they may be located in the pancreas, where they have a higher risk of recurrence and poorer prognosis. Surgical resection is required for pancreatic GIST, and postoperative adjuvant therapy is determined by the patient's level of risk. Lifelong follow-up is usually necessary for patients. Further research is needed for the diagnosis and treatment of pancreatic GIST.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Author Contributions
Concept and design: Tianyu Song, Yulian Wu, Qiang Hong
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Tianyu Song
Drafting of the manuscript: Tianyu Song
Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yulian Wu, Qiang Hong
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Human Research Ethics Committee, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China issued approval K2024011. Approval to conduct the clinical study was granted after review by the Ethics Committee.
References
- 1.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a multidisciplinary challenge. Sanchez-Hidalgo JM, Duran-Martinez M, Molero-Payan R, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24:1925–1941. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i18.1925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Global epidemiology of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST): a systematic review of population-based cohort studies. Søreide K, Sandvik OM, Søreide JA, Giljaca V, Jureckova A, Bulusu VR. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;40:39–46. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2015.10.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: the incidence, prevalence, clinical course, and prognostication in the preimatinib mesylate era--a population-based study in western Sweden. Nilsson B, Bümming P, Meis-Kindblom JM, et al. Cancer. 2005;103:821–829. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20862. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors--definition, clinical, histological, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features and differential diagnosis. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Virchows Arch. 2001;438:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s004280000338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Miettinen M, Lasota J. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2013;42:399–415. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2013.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.The analysis of status and clinical implication of KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) Du CY, Shi YQ, Zhou Y, Fu H, Zhao G. J Surg Oncol. 2008;98:175–178. doi: 10.1002/jso.21104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Pancreatic extragastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report and comprehensive literature review. Akbulut S, Yavuz R, Otan E, Hatipoglu S. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;6:175–182. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i9.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Subclassification of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on evaluation by electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Erlandson RA, Klimstra DS, Woodruff JM. Ultrastruct Pathol. 1996;20:373–393. doi: 10.3109/01913129609016340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Extragastrointestinal (soft tissue) stromal tumors: an analysis of 48 cases with emphasis on histologic predictors of outcome. Reith JD, Goldblum JR, Lyles RH, Weiss SW. Mod Pathol. 2000;13:577–585. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3880099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Retrospective analysis of extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Yi JH, Park BB, Kang JH, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1845–1850. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Gist manifesting as a retroperitoneal tumor: clinicopathologic immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 112 cases. Miettinen M, Felisiak-Golabek A, Wang Z, Inaguma S, Lasota J. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017;41:577–585. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the omentum: a rare case report and review of the literature. Fagkrezos D, Touloumis Z, Giannila M, Penlidis C, Papaparaskeva K, Triantopoulou C. Rare Tumors. 2012;4:0. doi: 10.4081/rt.2012.e44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Malignant extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the mesentery. Sasmal PK, Sharma R, Patra S, Mishra TS, Mishra P, Rout B. Surg J (N Y) 2019;5:0–8. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Extragastrointestinal Stromal tumor presenting as omental cyst. Monabati A, Safavi M, Solhjoo F. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1275–1277. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3098-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Imaging in gynecological disease (19): clinical and ultrasound features of extragastrointestinal stromal tumors (eGIST) Ambrosio M, Testa AC, Moro F, et al. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:749–758. doi: 10.1002/uog.21968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pancreatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report. Elgeidie A, El-Magd EA, El-Maaty SR, El-Hawary AK. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;29:67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Primary extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (EGIST) of the mesentery: case report and review of literature. Arellano-Gutiérrez G, Martínez-Aldrete LF, Pérez-Fabián A, Maldonado-García EL. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2020;60:480–483. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.11.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Brierley JD, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 2017. TNM classification of malignant tumours. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Follow-up strategies for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumour treated with or without adjuvant imatinib after surgery. Joensuu H, Martin-Broto J, Nishida T, Reichardt P, Schöffski P, Maki RG. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1611–1617. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



