Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Mar 21;14:6748. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57305-6

Clinical and histopathological characteristics of primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in Turkish adults

Ilhan Kurultak 1,, Ozkan Gungor 2, Savas Ozturk 3, Ahmet Burak Dirim 3, Necmi Eren 4, Ezgi Yenigün 5, Elbis Ahbab Dal 6, Mevlut Tamer Dincer 7, Feyza Bora 8, Suat Akgur 9, Abdullah Sumnu 10, Belda Dursun 11, Savas Sipahi 12, Hakki Cetinkaya 13, Idris Sahin 14, Garip Sahin 15, Murvet Yilmaz 16, Bulent Vatansever 17, Emre Aydın 18, Memnune Sena Ulu 19, Ali Gundogdu 20, Sedat Ustundag 1, Hayriye Sayarlioglu 21, Gizem Kumru 22, Omer C Elcioglu 23, Zeki Aydın 24, Nedim Yılmaz Selcuk 25, Ceren Onal Guclu 26, Meric Oruc 27, Mehmet Kucuk 28, Nimet Aktas 29, Ulver Derici 30, Gultekin Suleymanlar 8
PMCID: PMC10957996  PMID: 38514826

Abstract

The data regarding primary FSGS (pFSGS) from different parts of the world differ. While the prevalence of pFSGS has been increasing in Western countries like the USA, it follows an inconsistent trend in Europe and Asia and a decreasing trend in Far Eastern countries such as China in the last two decades. There are undetermined factors to explain those national and geographic discrepancies. Herein, we aimed to reveal the current prevalence with clinical and histopathological characteristics of pFSGS in Turkish adults. This study includes the biopsy-proven pFSGS patients data recorded between 2009 and 2019, obtained from the national multicenter primary glomerulonephritis registry system of the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases (TSN-GOLD) database. 850 of the 3875 primer glomerulonephritis patients(21.9%) have pFSGS. The mean age is 40.5 ± 14.2 and 435 (51.2%) of patients are male. Nephrotic syndrome is the most common biopsy indication (59.2%). 32.6% of patients have hematuria, 15.2% have leukocyturia and 7.8% have both. Serum creatinine, albumin, and proteinuria are 1.0 mg/dL (IQR = 0.7–1.4) mg/dl, 3.4 ± 0.9 g/dl, 3400 mg/day(IQR, 1774–5740), respectively. Females have lower mean arterial pressure (− 2.2 mmHg), higher eGFR (+ 10.0 mL/min/1.73 m2), and BMI (+ 1.6 kg/m2) than males. Thickened basal membrane(76.6%) and mesangial proliferation (53.5%) on light microscopy are the major findings after segmental sclerosis. IgM (32.7%) and C3 (32.9%) depositions are the most common findings on immunofluorescence microscopy. IgM positivity is related to lower eGFR, serum albumin, and higher proteinuria. The prevalence of pFSGS is stable although slightly increasing in Turkish adults. The characteristics of the patients are similar to those seen in Western countries.

Keywords: FSGS, Histopathological features, Nephrotic syndrome, Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, Turkish adults

Subject terms: Nephrology, Kidney diseases

Introduction

Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis is the most common cause of the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among all primary glomerular diseases. The glomerulosclerosis affecting only a part of capillary tuft (segmental), at least one glomerulus (focal) in the glomeruli on light microscopy is the major pathological lesion. Etiopathogenetic approach to FSGS can be classified as primary, genetic and secondary forms1. The incidence of pFSGS has been increasing especially in Western countries over the past years2. However, there are inconsistent data about the other countries from Europe, Asia, and Africa3,4. In addition, the immigrant Asian and Hispanic populations, resident in south-western of USA, have a higher frequency of pFSGS than the people who have been living in their country5. These data indicate that the pathogenesis of pFSGS may be influenced not only by age, race, and genetic but also environmental factors such as dietary habits, socio-cultural, socio-economic, and geographic features. In this manner, the determination of every nation’s characteristics may provide a valuable contribution for understanding the pFSGS pathogenesis and its accurate epidemiology. Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases Group (TSN-GOLD) published the prevalence of biopsy-proven primary glomerular diseases(PGDs) in 2014, in Turkey for the first time and, current data has also been published recently6,7. However, detailed information, dynamics of pFSGS, and trends have not been known deeply in Turkey yet. This study aimed to focus on the clinical, laboratory and histopathological characteristics of pFSGS and its trends in Turkish adults.

Results

Demographic, clinical and laboratory data

Of the 3875 patients enrolled in the TSN-GOLD PGDs database, 21.9% (850/3875) had pFSGS. The mean age of pFSGS patients at the time of kidney biopsy was 40.5 ± 14.2. Male gender was 51.2 (435/850) percent. 281 of patients (34.1%) had hypertension, 93 (11.5%) had diabetes, 64 (7.8%) had both. The mean value of BMI was 27.5 ± 5.5 kg/m2 for all patients. In total, 26.0% (115/442) had obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2). The laboratory findings of the patients on following; serum creatinine 1.0 mg/dL, (IQR = 0.7–1.4), albumin 3.4 ± 0.9 g/dL, and 24 h urinary protein 3400 mg/day, (IQR;1774–5740). In addition to proteinuria, the urinalysis revealed 32.6% of patients had hematuria, 15.2% had leukocyturia and 7.8% had both. The most common indication of kidney biopsy was nephrotic syndrome, accounting for 59.2% (504 of 850) in all patients, followed by AUA 18.5%, nephritic syndrome 11.2%, mixed nephrotic syndrome 5.3% (45/850) and others 5.8% (48/850) (Table 1). The majority of cases were in the age-period of 31–65 years (77.5%, n = 659) and 8.4% (n = 71) of patients were over 65 year-old (Fig. 1a). MAP and eGFR, which are known parameters related to age, were evaluated and found statistically different in age-groups(Fig. 1b,c). Biopsy indications were similar in all age groups(Fig. 1d). Female gender was more frequent in AUA group (Fig. 1e). The most frequently used antihypertensive drugs were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEi) and/or angiotensin receptor blockers(ARB) with a usage rate of 88.6%, at the time of biopsy (Fig. 1f).

Table 1.

Demographical, clinical and laboratory findings of all patients.

n/n’ n Patients
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Age, year 850/0 850 40.5 ± 14.2
 Gender 850/0
  Male 435 51.2
  Female 425 48.8
 Smoking 444/406
  Never smoked 230 51.8
  Ex-smoker 90 20.3
  Active smoker 124 27.9
 Diabetes mellitus 850/0 93 11.5
 Hypertension 817/33 281 34.4
 DM and HT 817/33 64 7.8
 Obesity 442/408 119 26.7
 Pretibial edema 762/88 362 47.5
 Biopsy indications 850/0
  Asymptomatic urine abnormalties 157 18.5
  Nephritic syndrome 95 11.2
  Nephrotic syndrome 504 59.2
  Mixed Nephritic-Nephrotic 45 5.3
  Others 49 5.8
 BMI, kg/m2 442/418 442 27.5 ± 5.5
 BMI categories  < 18.5 10 2.2
18.5–24.9 141 31.9
25–29.9 172 38.9
30–34.9 72 16.3
35–39.9 31 7.0
 > 39.9 12 2.7
 SBP, mm Hg 747/103 747 130.8 ± 18.6
 DBP, mm Hg 746/104 746 81.4 ± 11.4
 MAP, mm Hg 746/104 746 106.0 ± 13.8
 PP, mm Hg 746/104 746 49.3 ± 12.9
 Hematuria 849/1 277 32.6
 Leukocyturia 742/108 113 15.2
 Hematuria and leucocyturia 741/109 58 7.8
Laboratory results
 Glucose, (mg/dL) 754/96 754 96,9 ± 32.9
 BUN, (mg/dL) 808/42 808 21,1 ± 14.1
 Creatinine, (mg/dL) 812/38 812 1.0 (0.7–1.4)
 eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2) 812/38 812 82.1 ± 36.6
 Albumin, (g/dL) 777/73 777 3.4 ± 0.9
 Cholesterol, total (mg/dL) 647/203 647 264 ± 107.4
 Triglyceride (mg/dL) 652/198 652 218.4 ± 135.2
 HDL (mg/dL) 607/243 607 53.3 ± 22.3
 LDL (mg/dL) 642/208 642 166.3 ± 87.3
 Uric acid, (mg/dl) 707/143 707 6.3 ± 1.9
 Hemoglobin (g/dL) 775/75 775 13,2 ± 2.0
 ESR (mm/hour) 530/320 530 37.3 ± 28.0
 Proteinuria (mg/day) (median, IQR) 759/101 759 3400 (1774–5740)
 C3 complement, serum 584/266 584 31.3
  Decreased 9 1.5
 C4 complement, serum 573/277 573 32.6
  Decreased 8 1.4

The data were presented as mean ± standard deviation, median (IQR, interquartile range), n’(missing data), n(%). BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, PP pulse pressure, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Age groups in all patients ((a); p > 0.10), means of the mean arterial pressure(MAP) ((b); p = 0.001, post hoc analysis showed 16–30 age-group was different from the other groups), eGFR ((c); p < 0.001, post hoc analysis showed 51–65 and > 65 age-group were similar statistically, while the other groups differed significantly from each other) in age groups, the distribution of age groups in biopsy indication groups ((d); p > 0.10), the gender in biopsy indication groups ((e); p < 0.05, Female sex was different in AUA group), and the frequencies of anti-hypertensive drug usage at the time of biopsy (f). (“others” means dihydropyridine group(DHP) of Ca++ channel blockers; other drugs means alpha receptor blockers-most of them- and the other antihypertensive dugs). Red lines show the mean of the parameters in all patients. The white chambers mean mild outliers, asterisks mean extreme outliers. ACEi/ARB angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blocker, NDHP non-dihydroprydine group of Ca++ channel blockers. The one-way ANOVA test with Bonferroni post hoc analysis was used to obtain p values in (b) and (c), Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests were used to obtain the p values in (d) and (e). The frequencies of patients were shown used by pie graph and % in (a) and (f).

Histopathological data

The majority of renal biopsies were performed in nephrology clinics(68.9%), subsequently the interventional radiology clinics (27.2%), and unknown (outer center 3.9%) origin. The count of total glomeruli on biopsy were similar statistically (median, IQR; 14, 9–22; 14, 9–22 and 20, 11–28, respectively; p = 0.601). In histopathological examination, findings of LM, thickened basal membrane (TBM) (76.6%), mesangial proliferation (MP) (53.5%), global sclerosis (GS) (77.4%), tubular atrophy (TA) (67.5%), interstitial fibrosis (IF) (65.6%) and vascular changes(VC)(47.5%) were evaluated. The crescentic lesion described in 30 biopsy (4.5%). On IFM, IgG (7.2%), IgM (32.7%), IgA (9.1), C3 (32.9%) C1q (8.7%), fibrinogen(4.0%), κ(6.8%), and λ (7.3%) light chain staining positivity were included statistical analysis. The remaining parameter of C4 exclude from analysis because of the insufficient count of positivity. 23 (2.7%) of all patients had electron microscopic evaluation. The findings of LM and IFM were summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Histopathological findings of kidney biopsies, light and immunfluorescence microscopy.

n Patients
Light microscopy
 Total glomeruli in biopsy samples 850 14 (9–22)
 Mesengial proliferation, (MP) 796 426 (53.5)
 Endocapillary proliferation 561 27 (4.8)
 Exudative glomerular changes 550 41 (7.4)
 Thickened basal membrane, (TBM) 792 607 (76.6)
 Subendothelial immuncomplex deposition 686 8 (1.2)
 Subepithelial immuncomplex deposition 682 16 (2.3)
 Global sclerotic (GS)/total glomeruli 800
  Negative 181 (22.6)
   < 25% 371 (46.4)
  25–50% 183 (22.9
  50–75% 55/(6.9)
   > 75% 10 (1.2)
 Segmental sclerotic (SS)/total glomeruli 850
  Undetermined 133 (15.6)
   < 25% 581 (68.4)
  25–50% 116 (13.6)
  50–75% 17 (2.0)
   > 75% 3 (0.4)
 Crescentic 688 30 (4.5)
 Cellular 11 (1.6)
 Fibrocellular 10 (1.4)
 Fibrous 9 (1.3)
 Tubulary atrophy (TA) 799
  Negative 260 (32.5)
  Grade 1 (< 25%) 405 (50.7)
  Grade 2 (25–50%) 101 (12.7)
  Grade 3 (> 50%) 33 (4.1)
 Intersitial inflamation 850 519 (61.0)
 Interstitial fibrosis (IF) 809
  Negative 278 (34.4)
  Grade 1 (< 25%) 378 (46.7)
  Grade 2 (25–50%) 118 (14.6)
  Grade 3 (> 50%) 35 (4.3)
 Vasculary changes (VC) 795 378 (47.5)
 Electron microscopy 567 23 (2.7)
Immunofluorescence microscopy
 Ig G  +  789 48 (6.1)
 +  +  9 (1.1)
 +  +  +  0 (0.0)
Negative 732 (92.8)
 Ig M  +  789 168 (21.3)
 +  +  70 (8.9)
 +  +  +  20 (2.5)
Negative 531 (67.3)
 Ig A  +  788 58 (7.4)
 +  +  13 (1.6)
 +  +  +  1 (0.1)
Negative 716 (90.9)
 C3  +  788 147 (18.6)
 +  +  84 (10.7)
 +  +  +  28 (3.6)
Negative 529 (67.1)
 C1q  +  715 47 (6.6)
 +  +  12 (1.7)
 +  +  +  3 (0.4)
Negative 653 (91.3)
 Kappa  +  463 27 (5.8)
 +  +  3 (0.6)
 +  +  +  2 (0.4)
Negative 431 (93.1)
 Lambda  +  459 25 (5.4)
 +  +  6 (1.3)
 +  +  +  3 (0.6)
Negative 425 (92.6)
 Fibrinogen  +  629 23 (3.5)
 +  +  1 (0.2)
 +  +  +  2 (0.3)
Negative 603 (95.9)

Data were presented as mean(± SD), median(IQR), and n(%) accordingly.

Evaluation of the patients according to age

The patients were grouped as older than 40 year-old (427; 50.2%) and younger ones. Biopsy indications were similar in both groups.The frequency of active smokers was higher and comorbidities such as obesity, HT and DM were more common in older age group patients. Hemodynamic parameters like SBP, MAP, PP were also significantly higher than younger ones in those. On laboratory data, older age group patients had higher glucose, haemoglobin, and ESR; lower eGFR (75.7 ml/min/1.73m2). On LM, The MP and VC lesions were more seen and the rate of global sclerotic/total glomeruli in each biopsy speaceman was significantly higher in older patients. On IFM, C3 deposition trends to be higher in older patients (Table 3). This trend became statistically significant in over 65 year-old patients (35 positivity in 71 patients; p = 0.004).

Table 3.

Comparison of the parameters between the patients below and over 40 years.

Parameters n  < 40 years (n = 427) n  ≥ 40 years (n = 423) p value
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Smoking 226 218 0.005*
  Never smoked 135 (0.60) 95 (0.44)
  Ex-smoker 34 (15.0) 56 (25.7)
  Active smoker 57 (25.2) 67 (30.7)
 Obesity 208 44 (21.2) 223 71 (31.8)  < 0.001*
 Diabetes mellitus 427 16 (3.7) 423 77 (18.2)  < 0.001*
 Hypertension 411 92 (22.4) 406 189 (44.6)  < 0.001*
 SBP, mm Hg 371 127.8 (± 18.4) 375 133.7 (± 18.3)  < 0.001
 MAP, mm Hg 371 96.5 (± 12.7) 375 99.1 (± 12.5) 0.005
 PP, mm Hg 371 47.0 (± 12.9) 375 51.6 (± 12.6)  < 0.001
 BMI, kg/m2 214 26.5 (± 5.6) 228 28.6 (± 5.6)  < 0.001
Laboratory analysis
 Glucose, (mg/dL) 383 92.0 (± 23.2) 371 102.1 (± 35.9)  < 0.001
 BUN, (mg/dL) 410 18.5 (± 15.0) 398 23.8 (± 16.2)  < 0.001
 Creatinine, (mg/dL) 365 0.9 (0.6–1.3) 408 1.1 (0.8–1.6) 0.020**
 eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2) 365 82.4 (± 37.6) 408 75.7 (± 32.5)  < 0.001
 Hemoglobin, (g/dL) 399 12.8 (± 2.1) 355 13.6 (± 1.9) 0.009
 ESR (mm/hour) 256 32.3 (± 24.5)) 274 42.0 (± 30.2)  < 0.001
Light microscopy findings
 Mesengial proliferation 398 198 (49.7) 398 228 (57.3) 0.033*
 Vasculary changes 399 150 (37.6) 396 228 (57.6)  < 0.001*
 Global sclerotic/total glomeruli 399 401 0.003ð
  Negative 111 (27.8) 70 (17.5)
   < 25% 182 (45.6) 189 ( (47.1)
  25–50% 77 (19.3) 106 (26.4)
  50–75% 23 (5.8) 32 (8.0)
   > 75% 6 (1.5) 4 (1.0)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 C3 deposition 393 117 (29.8) 395 142 (35.9) 0.065*

Independent samples t test; *Chi-squared test; **Mann-Whithney U test; ðFisher’s exact test. Post hoc analysis were used if p < 0.05 in more than two groups. The data were presented as mean(± SD), median(IQR), and n(%). p < 0.05 is considered significant and presented in bold.

SBP systolic blood pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, PP pulse pressure, BMI body mass index, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate), ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Evaluation of the patients according to gender

Almost one half of the patients (415 of the 850 patients, 48.8%) was female and had higher BMI (+ 1.6 kg/m2; p = 0.006), eGFR (+ 10.0 mL/min/1.73m2; p < 0.001) levels, lower active smoking rate, slightly lower SBP, DBP, MAP (− 2.2 mm Hg; p = 0.02). Females were more frequent in the AUA group (p = 0.046). The proteinuria was predominant (66.7%; 104/157) finding in patients with AUA indication. On laboratory serum creatinine, uric acid and 24-h urine protein were lower while eGFR, Hb, serum HDL, ALT and ESR levels were higher in females than males. On LM, there was no parameter that reached statistically significant but MP and the rate of segmental sclerotic/total glomeruli on biopsy speaceman had the trend to be higher than males. On IFM, IgM deposition was more common in females while IgG were in males (Table 4).

Table 4.

Comparison of the parameters between males and females in study cohort.

Parameters n Male (n = 435) n Female (n = 415) p value
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Smoking 223 221  < 0.001Δ
  Never smoked 76 (34.1) 154 (69.7)
  Ex-smoker 76 (34.1) 14 (6.3)
  Active smoker 71 (31.8) 53 (24.0)
 Hematuria 435 126 (29.0) 414 150 (36.2) 0.024*
 Obesity 230 47 (20.4) 212 68 (32.1) 0.005*
 SBP, mm Hg 381 132.2 (± 18.6) 366 129.3 (± 18.5) 0.032
 DBP, mm Hg 380 82.3 (± 11.9) 366 80.5 (± 10.7) 0.026
 MAP, mm Hg 380 98.9 (± 12.9) 366 96.7 (± 12.3) 0.022
 BMI, kg/m2 230 26.8 (± 4.7) 212 28.4 (± 6.6) 0.006
Laboratory analysis
 BUN, (mg/dL) 408 23.5.6 (± 15.6) 394 18.6 (± 14.0)  < 0.001
 Creatinine, (mg/dL) 412 1.2 (0.9–1.7) 400 0.8 (0.6–1.2)  < 0.001**
 eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2) 412 73.9 (± 34.0) 400 83.9 (± 35.4)  < 0.001
 Uric acid, mg/dL 361 6.8 (± 1.8) 346 5.8 (± 1.8)  < 0.001
 HDL, mg/dL 309 47.8 (± 17.6) 298 59.0 (± 25.0)  < 0.001
 ALT, IU/L 368 22.8 (± 17.6) 354 19.2 (± 11.8) 0.002
 Hemoglobin, (g/dL) 388 14.0 (± 2.0) 387 12.4 (± 1.7)  < 0.001
 ESR (mm/hour) 277 33.0 (± 28.5) 253 41.8 (± 26.9)  < 0.001
 Proteinuria, mg/day 383 3570 (1918–6975) 374 3200 (1627–5226) 0.002
Light microscopy findings
 Mesengial proliferation 409 206 (49.6) 387 220 (56.8) 0.067*
 Segmental sclerotic/total glomeruli 407 386 0.084ð
  Undetermined 27 (6.6) 30 (7.7)
   < 25% 320 (78.6) 323 (83.7)
  25–50% 71 (17.4) 58 (15.0)
  50–75% 14 (3.4) 4 (1.0)
   > 75% 2 (0.5) 1 (0.3)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 IgM 409 120 (29.3) 380 138 (36.3) 0.037*
 IgG 410 37 (9.0) 379 20 (5.3) 0.042*

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, PP pulse pressure, BMI body mass index, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Independent samples t test *Chi-squared test; **Mann-Whithney U test, ðFisher’s exact test. The data were presented as mean(± SD), median(IQR), n(%).

Significant values are in bold.

Evaluation of the patients according to BMI

In total, 442 patients had BMI data and the analysis was performed in those 115 of 442 (26%) patients had obesity and they were older than non-obese patients (43.6 years to 39.5 years). HT and DM were more common and SBP, MAP, PP also significantly higher in obese patients. There was no difference in terms of biopsy indications in those. On laboratory data, obese patients had higher glucose, ALT levels. On LM, there was a trend to be higher frequency of TBM, TA and to be higher rate of global sclerotic glomeruli. On IFM, C3 deposition was more frequent finding in obese patients (Table 5).

Table 5.

Comparison of the parameters between the patients with and without obesity (according to BMI).

Parameters n BMI < 30 kg/m2 (n = 327) n BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (n = 115) p value
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Age, year 327 39.5 (± 14.6) 115 43.6 (± 11.5) 0.003
 Gender 327 115 0.001*
  Male 183 (56.0) 47 (40.9)
  Female 144 (44.0) 68 (59.1)
 Diabetes mellitus 327 30 (9.2) 115 24 (20.1) 0.001*
 Hypertension 324 78 (24.1) 115 42 (36.5) 0.010*
 Pretibial edema 324 160 (49.4) 115 68 (59.1) 0.072*
 SBP, mm Hg 324 130.2 (± 17.8) 115 136.4 (± 17.0) 0.001
 DBP, mm Hg 324 81.0 (± 11.7) 115 83.4 (± 10.4) 0.059
 MAP, mm Hg 324 97.4 (± 12.9) 115 101.0 (± 11.5) 0.008
 PP, mm Hg 324 49.2 (± 12.0) 115 53.0 (± 13.1) 0.004
 BMI, kg/m2 327 25.0 (± 3.2) 115 34.8 (± 5.0)  < 0.001
Laboratory analysis
 Glucose, (mg/dL) 319 95.5 (± 31.2) 111 105.7 (± 35.0) 0.005
 Creatinine, (mg/dL) 325 1.0 (0.7–1.2) 114 0.9 (0.7–1.2) 0.055**
 Uric acid, mg/dL 307 6.2 (± 1.9) 104 6.6 (± 1.8) 0.052
 Albumin, (g/dL) 321 3.3 (± 1.0) 111 3.5 (± 0.8) 0.089
 ALT, IU/L 308 19.3 (± 11.4) 106 24.1 (± 16.5) 0.006
Light microscopy findings
 Thickened basal membrane 319 75 (23.5) 110 15 (13.6) 0.070*
 Global sclerotic/total glomeruli 317 112 0.058ð
  Negative 76 (24.0) 17 (15.2)
   < 25% 139 (43.8) 65 (58.0)
  25–50% 71 (22.5) 23 (20.5)
  50–75% 28 (8.8) 5 (4.5)
   > 75% 3 (0.9) 2 (1.8)
 Tubulary atrophy 317 111 0.068ð
  Negative 105 (33.1) 42 (37.8)
  Grade 1 (< 25%) 153 (48.3) 59 (53.2)
  Grade 2 (25–50%) 48 (15.1) 6 (5.4)
  Grade 3 (> 50%) 11(3.5) 4 (3.6)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 C3 297 107 (28.5) 41 18 (43.9) 0.042*

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, MAP mean arterial pressure, PP pulse pressure, BMI body mass index.

Independent samples t test *Chi-squared test; **Mann-Whithney U test; ðFisher’s exact test. The data were presented as mean(± SD), median(IQR), and n(%).

Significant values are in bold.

Evaluation of the patients according to presence of HT

In total, 817 patients had blood pressure measurement correctly and 34.4% (n = 281) of those had HT, 23.1% (n = 65) were diabetic. Hypertensive patients had older age, higher BMI, serum glucose, creatinine, uric acid, albumin levels and lower eGFR, serum total cholesterol, LDL, HDL levels. On LM, VC, TA, IF were more frequent lesions. The frequency of global sclerotic glomerulus was significantly higher in hipertansive patients. On IFM, there was no significant difference statistically (Table 6).

Table 6.

Comparison of the parameters between the patients with or without HT.

Parameters n HT ( +), (n = 281) n HT (–), (n = 536) p value
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Age, year 281 46.0 (± 13.6) 536 37.4 (± 13.5)  < 0.001
 Diabetes mellitus 281 65 (23.1) 536 26 (4.9)  < 0.001*
 Biopsy indications 281 536 0.019Δ
  Asymptomatic urine abnormalties 151 68 (45.0) 151 83 (55.0)
  Nephritic syndrome 92 31 (33.7) 92 61 (66.3)
  Nephrotic syndrome 486 148 (30.5) 486 338 (69.5)
  Mixed nephritic-nephrotic 41 15 (36.6) 41 26 (63.4)
  Others 47 19 (40.4) 47 28 (59.6)
 SBP, mm Hg 244 137.0 (± 19.7) 479 127.5 (± 17.2)  < 0.001
 DBP, mm Hg 243 84.3 (± 10.9) 479 79.8 (± 11.3)  < 0.001
 BMI, kg/m2 146 28.4 (± 5.1) 288 27.1 (± 5.9) 0.020
Laboratory analysis
 Glucose, (mg/dL) 245 102.8 (± 38.2) 488 94.5 (± 26.0) 0.002
 BUN, (mg/dL) 267 48.8 (± 29.4) 512 41.2 (± 31.5) 0.001
 Creatinine, (mg/dL) 267 1.2 (0.8–1.6) 516 0.9 (0.7–1.3)  < 0.001**
 eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2) 267 66.5 (± 31.3) 516 85.3 (± 35.4)  < 0.001
 Uric acid, mg/dL 235 6.7 (± 1.8) 451 6.1 (± 1.8)  < 0.001
 Cholesterol, total (mg/dL) 215 245.1 (± 83.2) 413 305.8 (± 116.6)  < 0.001
 HDL, mg/dL 205 49.0 (± 16.4) 385 55.8 (± 24.8)  < 0.001
 LDL (mg/dL) 213 152.0 (± 66.2) 410 173.0 (± 94.7) 0.001
 Albumin, (g/dL) 239 3.6 (± 0.8) 496 3.3 (± 1.0)  < 0.001
 Hemoglobin, (g/dL) 255 13.0 (± 2.0) 387 13.3 (± 2.0) 0.097
Light microscopy findings
 Vasculary changes 266 164 (61.7) 503 228 (40.4)  < 0.001*
 Thickened basal membrane 281 74 (26.3) 536 102 (19.0) 0.051*
 Global sclerotic/total glomeruli 267 510  < 0.001ð
  Negative 32 (12.0) 145 (28.4)
   < 25% 118 (44.2) 246 (48.2)
  25–50% 83 (31.1) 90 (17.6)
  50–75% 28 (10.5) 25 (4.9)
   > 75% 6 (2.2) 4 (0.8)
 Tubulary atrophy 267 507  < 0.001Δ
  Negative 67 (25.1) 189 (37.3)
  Grade 1 (< 25%) 136 (50.9) 253 (49.9)
  Grade 2 (25–50%) 45 (16.9) 52 (10.3)
  Grade 3 (> 50%) 19 (7.1) 13 (2.6)
 Interstitial fibrosis 265 504  < 0.001Δ
  Negative 75 (28.3) 180 (35.7)
  Grade 1 (< 25%) 113 (42.6) 254 (50.4)
  Grade 2 (25–50%) 57 (21.5) 56 (11.1)
  Grade 3 (> 50%) 20 (7.5) 14 (2.8)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 IgM 189 77 (28.9) 327 170 (34.2) 0.081*
 C1q 233 17 (6.8) 402 45 (10.1) 0.093*

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BMI body mass index, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Independent samples t test; *Chi-squared test; **Mann-Whithney U test; ðFisher’s exact test; Kruskal Wallis testΔ. The data were presented as mean(± SD), median(IQR), and n(%). Post hoc analysis were used if p < 0.05) in more than two groups.

Significant values are in bold.

Evaluation of the patients according to eGFR

The patients were grouped according to eGFR as above and below 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Lower eGFR group (46.3 years) was older than higher one (38.8 years) with male gender predominancy (60.2%). SBP and PP were significantly higher in this group. On laboratory, BUN, creatinine, uric acid levels were higher and hb levels were lower as expected. On LM, TA, VC and global sclerotic glomeruli were more seen. On IFM IgM deposition was more common in higher eGFR group than the lower one (Table 7).

Table 7.

Comparison of the parameters between the patients with eGFR < 45 and eGFR ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Parameters n eGFR < 45 (n = 166) n eGFR ≥ 45 (n = 646) p value
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Age, year 166 46.3 (± 14.4) 646 38.8 (± 13.7)  < 0.001
 Gender 812 812 0.006*
  Male 412 100 (60.2) 412 312 (48.3)
  Female 400 66(39.8) 400 334 (51.7)
 SBP, mm Hg 154 134.5 (± 19.1) 588 129.9 (± 18.3) 0.006
 MAP, mm Hg 153 99.6 (± 12.9) 588 96.8 (± 12.3) 0.064
 PP, mm Hg 153 51.6 (± 13.0) 588 48.7 (± 12.9) 0.015
Laboratory analysis
 BUN, (mg/dL) 164 38.2 (± 21.6) 636 16.7 (± 8.3)  < 0.001
 Creatinine, (mg/dL) 166 2.1 (1.8–3.0) 646 0.9 (0.7–1.2)  < 0.001**
 eGFR, (mL/min/1.73 m2) 166 29.9 (± 11.3) 646 91.4 (± 27.2)  < 0.001
 Uric acid, mg/dL 141 7.4 (± 2.0) 565 6.0 (± 1.7)  < 0.001
 HDL, mg/dL 129 50.0 (± 26.0) 476 54.2 (± 21.1) 0.096
 ALT, IU/L 147 18.4 (± 12.7) 573 21.8 (± 15.6) 0.015
 Hemoglobin, (g/dL) 157 12.2 (± 2.0) 615 13.5 (± 1.9)  < 0.001
 ESR (mm/hour) 114 45.0 (± 32.4) 415 35.1 (± 26.2) 0.003
Light microscopy findings
 Tubular atrophy 156 610  < 0.001*
  Negative 25 (16.0) 222 (36.4)
   < 25% 67 (42.9) 322 (52.8)
  25–50% 45 (28.8) 53 (8.7)
   > 50% 19 (12.2) 13 (3.3)
 Vasculary Changes 159 51 (42.1) 604 350 (57.9)  < 0.001*
 Segmental sclerotic/total glomeruli 160 606 0.093ð
  Negative 0 (00.0) 0 (00.0)
   < 25% 123 (76.69) 502 (82.8)
  25–50% 30 (18.8) 92 (15.2)
  50–75% 5 (3.1) 11 (1.8)
   > 75% 2 (1.3) 1 (0.2)
 Global sclerotic/total glomeruli 158 612  < 0.001ð
  Negative 21 (13.3) 151 (24.7)
   < 25% 51 (32.3) 310 (50.7)
  25–50% 55 (34.8) 119 (19.4)
  50–75% 24 (15.3) 29 (4.7)
   > 75% 7 4.4) 3 (0.5)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 IgM 150 35 (23.3) 611 213 (34.9) 0.007*

SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, BUN blood urea nitrogen, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Independent samples t-test; *Chi-squared test; **Mann-Whithney U test; ðFisher’s exact test. The data were presented as mean(± SD), median(IQR), and n(%).

Significant values are in bold.

Evaluation of the patients according to proteinuria

Pretibial edema was more frequent in nephrotic proteinuric patients while hematuria was in nephritic proteinuric ones as expected. Nearly one third of patients was hematuric in nephrotic proteinuric group. Serum albumin was lower while lipids, and ESR were significantly higher in those. Hemodynamic parameters and eGFR with serum creatinine were similar in both groups. On LM, TBM, the frequency of global sclerotic glomerulus were significantly higher in nephritic proteinuric patients. On IFM, kappa cummulation were frequent in nephrotic proteinuric group. There was also a trend to be higher of C1q depositon (Table 8).

Table 8.

Comparison of the parameters between the patients with nephritic and nephrotic proteinuria.

Parameters n  < 3.5gr/day, (n = 396) n  ≥ 3.5 gr/day, (n = 363) p value
Demographic/clinical characteristics
 Pretibial edema 364 109 (29.9) 351 229 (65.2)  < 0.001*
 Hematuria 396 152 (38.4) 362 105 (29.0) 0.006*
Laboratory analysis
 Albumin, (g/dL) 375 3.8 (± 0.7) 353 2.9 (± 0.9)  < 0.001
 Cholesterol, total (mg/dL) 310 225.3 (± 65.9) 297 305.8 (± 122.9)  < 0.001
 Triglyceride (mg/dL) 304 193.3 (± 112.8) 307 249.0 (± 147.2)  < 0.001
 HDL, mg/dL 283 50.1 (± 19.8) 288 56.1 (± 24.5) 0.001
 LDL (mg/dL) 305 135.3 (± 48.1) 299 197 (± 104.0)  < 0.001
 ESR (mm/hour) 250 29.3 (± 24.1) 256 44.1 (± 29.1)  < 0.001
Light microscopy findings
 Thickened basal membrane 396 70 (17.7) 363 89 (24.5) 0.007*
 Segmental sclerotic/total glomeruli 429 421 0.051ð
  Undetermined 67 (15.6) 66 (15.7)
   < 25% 310 (72.3) 277 (65.8)
  25–50% 43 (10.0) 68 (16.1)
  50–75% 8 (1.9) 8 (1.9)
   > 75% 1 (0.2) 2 (0.5)
 Global sclerotic/total glomeruli 368 352  < 0.001ð
  Negative 65 (17.7) 95 (27.0)
   < 25% 185 (50.3) 153 (43.5)
  25–50% 89 (24.3) 74 (21.0)
  50–75% 24 (6.5) 26 (7.4)
   > 75% 5 (1.4) 4 (1.1)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 C1q 335 23 (6.9) 320 34 (10.6) 0.088*
 Kappa 230 10 (4.3) 233 22 (9.4) 0.031*

ESR erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

Independent samples t test; *Chi-squared test; ðFisher’s exact test. The data were presented as mean(± SD) and n(%).

Significant values are in bold.

Correlations of histopathologic findings with clinicodemographic data

In LM findings both TA and IF were more frequent among men. The patients with VC and/or MP have older age than negative controls. All parameters regarding arterial blood pressure were significantly higher in GS and VC positive patients. In laboratory analysis, serum creatinine levels were significantly different and correlated positively with positivities of TBM, GS, TA, IF, and VC. Serum uric acid(sUA) levels were higher in the patients with GS, TA, IF, and VC and positively correlated with the severity of the lesions. Serum hemoglobin levels trend to be lower in patients with TA and negatively weak correlated with its severity. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate(ESR) was higher in patients with SS and positively correlated with its frequency. Proteinuria was higher in the patients who have TBM, GS, SS and was correlated with the percentage of involved glomeruli (Table 1Supp). Hematuria was observed more frequent in patients with at least one positive staining of IgG, IgM, IgA, and C1q in their biopsy specimens. Leukocyturia was higher only in patients with IgA positivity. IgM positivity was correlated with lower eGFR, serum albumin, and higher serum total cholesterol, LDL, UA, and proteinuria (Table 2Supp).

Trends of pFSGS patients’ characteristics

The FSGS patients in the 2012–2019 period had older age, less pyuria, more bodyweight, higher serum glucose, and albumin levels, lower HDL and ESR levels when compared with the patients in 1994–2012. On LM, MP and TBM were more frequent in former group while the frequency and severity of interstitial fibrosis was significantly higher in latter. On IFM, IgG and C3 depositions were more common in former group (Table 9).

Table 9.

The comparison of 1994–2019 and 2012–2019 cohorts.

Parameters n 1994–2012, data n = 481 n 2012–2019, data n = 615 P
Demographics n (%)
 Age, year 481 36.1 (± 13.3) 615 42.1 (± 14.1)  < 0.001
 Leukocyturia 167 35 (21.0) 575 78 (13.6) 0.019*
Clinical characteristics (mean ± SD)
 Weight, kg 100 73.9 (± 17.1) 342 78,2 (± 16.1) 0.014
 BMI, kg/m2 100 26.6 (± 5.6) 342 27.8 (± 5.5) 0.059
 Hypertension 203 56 (27.6) 614 255 (36.6) 0.018*
 Diabetes mellitus 210 5 (2.4) 614 88 (13.5)  < 0.001*
Laboratory analysis (mean ± SD)
 Glucose, (mg/dL) 174 90.3 (± 19.0) 580 99.0 (± 33.0)  < 0.001
 Albumin, (g/dL) 385 3.3 (± 0.9) 592 3.4 (± 0.9) 0.049
 Triglyceride (mg/dL) 156 203.3 (± 126.7) 496 223 (± 137.5) 0.096
 HDL (mg/dL) 138 56.6 (± 22.1) 469 52.3 (± 22.2) 0.047
 ESR (mm/hour) 117 43.2 (± 33.2) 413 37 (± 26.1) 0.026
 Biopsy indications 232 608 0.073Δ
  Asymptomatic urine abnormalties 33 (14.2) 124 (20.4)
  Nephritic syndrome 31 (13.4) 64 (10.5)
  Nephrotic syndrome 143 (61.6) 361 (59.4)
  Mixed nephritic-nephrotic 18 (7.8) 27 (4.4)
  Others 7 (3.0) 32 (5.3)
Light microscopy findings
 Vasculary changes 399 150 (37.6) 396 228 (57.6) 0.097*
 Mesengial proliferation 210 134 (63.8) 586 292 (49.8)  < 0.001*
 Thickened basal membrane 207 56 (27.0) 585 129 (22.0) 0.001*
 Interstitial fibrosis 213 582 0.003Δ
  Negative 87 (40.8) 177 (30.4)
   < 25% 87 (40.8) 291 (50.0)
  25–50% 27 (12.7) 91 (15.6)
   > 50% 12 (5.6) 23 (4.0)
Immunfluorescence microscopy findings
 IgG deposition 416 180 (43.4) 585 170 (29.0)  < 0.001*
 C3 deposition 420 183 (43.6) 577 204 (35.4) 0.030*

BMI body mass index, BUN blood urea nitrogen.

Independent t-test. *Chi-square test, Kruskal Wallis testΔ. Post hoc analysis were used if p < 0.05) in more than two groups.

Significant values are in bold.

Discussion

Here we report that the prevalence of pFSGS is 21.9% with the relatively similar sex rates (M/F; 51.2%/48.8%) and nephrotic syndrome (59.5%) is the most frequent clinical presentation of pFSGS in Turkey. The epidemiology of pFSGS has interesting survey in the different part of the world in last two decades. Some studies reported that the incidence of pFSGS has been increasing in particularly USA3,4,8. Its prevelance is almost 15–30% in adults between 15 and 60 years of age, and increases to 30–35% over 60 years of age. When diabetic glomerular diseases are excluded, pFSGS was found to be the most common cause of ESRD in both white and black4,8. However, there are inconsistent data about the other countries from Europe (14.9%), Asia (6.9%), and Latin America (15.8%)9. Similarly, in China, the prevalence of pFSGS has shown a decreasing trend in the last decade, according to a recent study10. This higher prevelance and slight increase from 19.3 to 21.9% indicate that Turkish adults have different characteristics from the Asian population in terms of pFSGS dynamics.

The frequency of hematuria, leukocyturia and both are 32.6%, 15.2%,and 7.8%, respectively. These findings are consistent with the majority of the FSGS studies. It has been known for four decades that nephrotic presentation of pFSGS is common in adults, and more common in children11. Additionally, hematuria is frequently (approximately 40%) associated with the finding in adulthood nephrotic syndrome. Although the clinical significance of leukocyturia is unclear, hematuria in FSGS may be associated with poor renal outcome12. Some studies implicated that hematuria regarding FSGS may be related to GBM abnormality and/or MP on the biopsy13,14. In the present study, MP and TBM are not related to hematuria. But it is more frequent in patients with GS lesions. Similarly, immunologic depositions in the kidney such as Ig G, M, A, and C1q positivity on IFM are associated with hematuria.

Sex and age seem to be important parameters in FSGS prognosis according to the literature. Many studies emphasized that male FSGS patients have a worse outcome than females although some studies have inconsistent conclusions. The Canadian study consistedthe follow-up of 370 patients with FSGS revealed a worse clinical course in men than women, even in as shorter as 12 months follow-up period, in Toronto Glomerulonephritis registry15. Both gender groups were similar statistically in terms of BMI, MAP and age at baseline. Conversely, another study, had 15 years follow-up period, showed that gender, age, and BMI have no effect on these parameters16. A recent study from Japan showed that age is positively correlated with SBP, BMI; negatively with eGFR17. Although the design of the present study has no follow-up period, females have higher BMI, eGFR and lower MAP statistically at biopsy period. Age is also correlated with these clinical parameters (positively with BMI, SBP, MAP, PP and negatively with eGFR) consistent to Canadian and Japanese studies.

The mean BMI is 27.5 ± 5.5 kg/m2 in the present cohort and the majority of cases are in the age group of 31–65 years (77%). The relationship between obesity and FSGS was first described in 1974 and this fenomenon has been considered as a secondary cause of FSGS for several decades18. In the present study, biopsy specimens are carefully evaluated with clinical data by the pathologist and nephrologist to distinguish primer forms from the secondary ones. Supportively, when the present and the TURDEP-2 study, conducted in the general population aged over 18 years in Turkey in 2010, compared interms of the obesity rates and BMI data, it is observed that pFSGS patients in the present study have lower results (31.9%, 28.6 kg/m2; 26.0%, 27.5 kg/m2, respectively) than the normal population. The rates of class II (35–40 kg/m2) and class III(> 40 kg/m2) obesity were also lower in pFSGS patients than in thoseTURDEP-2 cohort (7.0%, 8.8%; 2.7%, 7.2% respectively)19.

Hypertension (HT) is one of the important factor alone for a worse prognosis and rapid progression of kidney disease in all glomerulonephritis and also pFSGS. In the present cohort, approximately one-third (34.4%) of patients is hypertensive. This rate is higher than the prevelance of HT (30.3%) found in PATENT-2 study conducted in theTurkish adult population20. However, it is lower than in many FSGS studies in the literature. The study in the Japanese population showed that the prevelance of HT was 56.2% in pFSGS patients(n = 996). However, the mean age was 58 years in those and significantly higher than present cohort (40.5 years)17. In furtherance, the HT prevelance was increased to 45.9% in 50–65 year-old group and to 60.3% in older than 65 year-old group in the present study. The age looks like the major contributor for developing HT in the both study populations. Additionally, there are significantly decreased eGFR, increased serum creatinine, glucose, uric acid and DM frequency in hypertensive patients in present cohort. On LM, chronic lesions like VC, TBM, TA, and IF were also more seen. Beside the HT, cumulation of diseases with aging and increasing metabolic load may be cause of these findings.

The patients in decreased eGFR (< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2) group had high levels of SBP and PP compared the  ≥ 45 mL/min/1.73 m2 ones. They had also older age, higher serum uric acid, ESR and lower haemoglobin levels. On LM, TA, VC and GS were the more frequent findings. Global sclerosis and VC were positively correlated with the components of arterial blood pressure in this group. The study from China showed that tubule-interstitial and vascular lesions are more common pathologic lesions in the patients with higher glomerulosclerosis score and pFSGS is on the third rank after DM and IgA nephropathy in terms of the frequency of tubulointerstitial lesions. The authors concluded that the clinical significance of these lesions in those patients should be elucidated in the progression of CKD21. Some studies support this conclusion with the hypothesis of a decreased area of the effective capillary network due to arteriolar lesions that is correlated with tubule-interstitial lesions and interstitial fibrosis with the possible hypoxia mechanism22,23. Indeed, a more recent clinical study revealed that IF, TA, and interstitial inflammation at diagnosis were related to worse long-term renal survival in FSGS patients16. These data implicate that not only glomerular but also tubulointerstitial-vascular lesions might have significance clinically in FSGS. Consistent with the China study mentioned above, TA and IF were more frequent with the higher severity index in male gender in the present study. Over the last decade, the need for new strategies beyond older classifications based solely on glomerular lesions has been expressed in the growing body of evidence. Recent study support this conclusion in the patients with minimal change disease and FSGS24.

Typical lesion of pFSGS is SS and typical clinical presentation is abrupt edema, hypoalbunemia and nephrotic proteinuria according to literature. Interestingly, in the present study, only SS, specific lesion of pFSGS, had a correlation with ESR. High ESR level is a nonspecific finding and can be seen not only in variety of disease condition but also in healthy females and elderly adults. However some of findings in the present study implicate that there may be a different clinical meaning of ESR in pFSGS. For instance, nephrotic proteinuric group which was similar with nephritic one according to age, gender, and eGFR also had higher ESR in the present study. The summation effects that belongs to different components like coagulation factors, alfa-2 macroglobulin, plasminogen, and especially fibrinogen in plasma may cause this entity25. Unlikely, sUA level is only correlated with GS which is a nonspecific lesion of glomerular diseases. It is well known that the sUA level could be affected both by decreased kidney function and by many factors such as genetic, metabolic, and environmental manner. According to some studies sUA is also a risk factor for the development of CKD via HT, DM, obesity, etc. that also causes of secondary FSGS26. In this study, sUA was positively correlated with serum creatinine levels, thus it could be unabled to conclude whether a cause or consequence for CKD.

In IFM findings, IgM positivity is positively correlated with lower eGFR, serum albumin and higher serum total cholesterol, LDL,and proteinuria. In the adriamycin-induced FSGS animal model, it is shown that IgM could activate the complement cascade and contribute to the CKD progression in FSGS27,28. Recently, Zhang et al. have shown that IgM accumulation in kidney is associated with a worse prognosis in Chinese pFSGS patients, especially with the presence of accompanying C3 deposits29. Similarly, Miroğlu et al. revealed the worse outcome of the pFSGS patients who had co-depositon of IgM and C3 on their biopsy speaceman in Turkey30. Findings of the present study were consistent with these studies in terms of IgM depositions at first admission. In our cohort the IgM positivity was 32.7% and lower from both aformantioned Chinese (54.7%) and Turkish (51.1%) studies. More recently the frequency of Ig M deposition was reported lower in Pakistanip FSGS patients (15.5%)31. The mean ages of depositions positive patients in aforementioned studies were also different (26 in Chinese, 36 in Turkish, ~ 30 in Pakistani and 42 years in the present cohort). These findings implicate that ethnicity and age may affect the IFM findings. Considering the study by Miroğlu et al. the presence of significant differences in IFM findings even two samples from Turkey demonstrates the socio-cultural-economic status, enviremental and other local factors may be a modifier to accumulate of immune markers in the kidney in pFSGS patients. A study also showed that low serum C3 levels are associated with C3 deposition in the kidney and C3 deposition alone leads worse renal survival in pFSGS patients32. However, the presence of C3 deposition alone is not related to any laboratory or histopathological results in our study. Interestingly, there is only a weak positive correlation of C3 deposition with DBP and MAP. There is no data in the literature, according to our knowledge, about the relationship between C3 deposition and arterial blood pressure in pFSGS. But in a study, it is found that C3 deposits were correlated with SBP in IgA nephropathy, though the mechanism is unclear33.

We found that the metabolic markers such as serum fastig glucose levels and BMI had been increasing when compared 1994–2012 and 2012–2019 gorups in the present study. Supportingly, according to the results of TURDEP study mentioned above, the metabolic parameters (DM, obesity, impaired glucose tolearance rate) are getting worse through 1997 to 2010 in Turkish adult population19. In addition, the 2012–2019 cohort has higher HT rate, and older age than the former. This observation brings to mind the likelihood of the misdiagnosis of secondary FSGS cases in the study cohort. However, most studies are retrospective like present one and have higher heterogeneity in terms of including criteria, biopsy policies, methodologies, population characteristics such as age, race, ethnicity, socio-economic conditions, etc. In light of these data, we thought that the high prevalence of pFSGS in some studies might be due to a limited analysis of the secondary forms.

Despite having a large population, its retrospective and cross-sectional nature were the limitations of this study. In addition, only a limited number of biopsies is evaluated with EM and the pFSGS diagnosis were confirmed only by a local pathologist alone. The Colombia classification could not be used to evaluate the biopsies, although detailed histopathological data were presented. This may be a consequence of the different approaches of pathologists of the centers participating in this study and the absence of acceptable standardization for evaluating glomerulonephritis across our country yet. However, as mentioned above, in this period when the importance of extraglomerular histopathological findings of pFSGS is better understood, the value of such data will increase for novel classifications.

Briefly, this study shows the status of pFSGS in terms of epidemiologic, clinicodemographic and histopathological features of adult patients in Turkey. The prevalence of pFSGS in Turkish adults over the past decade seems in steady state with a slight increase. Although there are some differencies, the characteristics of pFSGS patients in Turkey, show parallelism with those seen in Western countries.

Materials and methods

It is a retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional cohort study. The data were obtained from the National Primary Glomerular Diseases registry system. The web-based software of the registry system was constituted by the Turkish Society of Nephrology for surveillance and improving the outcome of PGDs in Turkey. The registration process has been going on since 1994 and today 47 nephrology centers from seven geographical regions of Turkey have joined to the registry system. During this pocess, the data at the time of admission resulted with kidney biopsy, were recorded according to the relevant investigator’s declaration. Since each patient was from different centers, hematologic/biochemical(glucose, BUN, creatinine, albumin, triglyceride, HDL/LDL cholesterol, uric acid, calcium, hemoglobin, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, proteinuria), immunological (ANA, ANCA, C3, C4) and serological(hepatitis B and C and HIV Ab) analysis were studied in the different laboratories. 4399 of PGDs records were scanned between May 2009 and June 2019 and 524 of those were excluded because of insufficient data. Of the remaining 3875 PGDs records, patients whose kidney biopsies were reported as FSGS by the nephropathologist were evaluated in-depth by the study team. Having the one of following features such as positive genetic test results with family history of kidney disease, determined viral infection like HIV, parvo virus, etc., medication with drugs that could be related the FSGS and prior kidney disease (obesity-related kidney disease, reflux nephropathy, an operation or a disease that could be cause of renal mass reduction etc.) before FSGS diagnosis considered as exclusion criteria. If a diabetic patient had typical diabetic-related lesion like nodular or diffuse mesangial sclerosis with proliferative retinopathic findings and a hypertensive patient had typical findings of grade 3 (hemorrhagic and/or exudative) 4 (pupil eudema) retinopathy were also excluded. Following these exclusions, 850 patients (2009–2012) were considered to have pFSGS and were taken the further evaluation. The data of pFSGS patients obtained in 1994–20,012 (n = 481) and 2012–2019 (n = 615) were also compared to determine the trends,.

Data collection and definitions

The demographic and clinical data of 850 patients were obtained from database. The presence of hematuria was described as erythrocyte ≥ 5/HPF and leukocyturia was diagnosed as leukocyte ≥ 5/HPF in the urine sediment. Indications of kidney biopsy were categorized clinically as follows; nephrotic syndrome, nephritic syndrome including rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis(RPGN), mixed nephrotic syndrome, asymptomatic urinary abnormalities(AUA), and others6,7. Nephrotic syndrome was defined by the presence of proteinuria (protein excretion greater than 3.5 g/day) associated with hypoalbuminemia (< 3.5 gr/dL). The nephritic syndrome was proteinuria less than 3.5 g/day associated with hematuria, hypertension (defined as an arterial blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or higher and/or existence of antihypertensive drug usage), and renal failure (defined as an increase of serum creatinine permanent and/or at least 50% of baseline in sequential laboratory analysis). Mixed nephrotic syndrome was defined as nephrotic syndrome coexisting with findings of HT, hematuria and renal failure. Proteinuria less than 3.5 g/day and/or isolated microscopic hematuria without clinical and laboratory signs were recorded as AUA. RPGN was defined as a doubling of serum creatinine in days and/or weeks, recorded in the hospitalization period. ‘Others’ group includes the remaining clinical presentations such as elevated serum creatinine and macroscopic or sustained hematuria without significant proteinuria. The chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration(CKD-EPI) equation was used to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate34. The clinic(nephrology or radiology) where the kidney biopsy was performed, was also recorded.

The findings of LM were classified as glomerular lesions sclerosis, classified as global(GS) or segmental (SS) and graded 0 to 4 by percentage of involved glomeruli on biopsy as absent,  < 25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, > 75%. Cases in which segmental sclerosis were defined but the glomeruli count were not given were presented as ‘Undetermined’. Thickened basal membrane(TBM) and mesengial proliferation (MP), were scaled as absent, 0 or present, 1; crescent, graded 0 to 4 by the percentage of glomeruli as absent, < 25%, 25–50%, 50–75%, > 75%, and type of crescent as cellular, fibro-cellular and fibrous; tubular lesion, atrophy was recorded using the scale of 0 to 3; normal;  < 25%; 25–50%; > 50%; interstitial lesions, inflammation, as absent, 0 or present, 1; and fibrosis, like tubular atrophy); vascular lesions vascular changing (VC), as absent or present of arteriosclerosis or/and arteriolosclerosis). In histopathological examination, findings of LM, thickened basal membrane (TBM), mesangial proliferation (MP), tubular atrophy (TA), interstitial fibrosis (IF) and vascular changes (VC) were evaluated. Histopathological definitions and the scorring data are tabulated and presented in Table 3Supp35.

Immunofluorescent microscopy was performed using fluoresceinated antibodies to immunoglobulin(Ig) IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, C4, C1q, fibrin, and both κ and λ light chains. The semi-quantitative scale of absent; ( +)mild; (+ +)moderate; (+ + +)severe was used to categorize the intensity of IFM findings. Only C4 was excluded from statistical analysis because of the insufficient count of positivity.

The study protocol was approved by ITF Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Istanbul University (no: 1131-614). In accordance with local regulations, written consent of the patients was obtained at the admission. Additional informed consent was waived by the same Ethics Committee due to the retrospective design of the study. We confirm that all resarchers were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and all procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

The statistical evaluation were performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0(IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). We analyzed the normality of distribution of all parameters with Kolmogrov Smirnov test and histogram curves. The data were reported as mean value ± standard deviation(SD) for continuous numerical variables while reported as median value and percentages/inter quartiles range(IQR) for categorical ones. The possible differences between the two groups were analyzed with independent t-test for numerical variables if the normal distribution was determined; if not, Mann Whitney U test was used. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test was used more than two groups accordingly. Crosstabulation with Chi-Square and Fischer Exact test were used in the comparison of the categorical variables. Correlation analyses were performed with Pearson’s or Spearman’s correlation tests accordingly. Statistical significance is considered when p value was detected as < 0.05.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Tables. (23.5KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our endless thanks to the Turkish Society of Nephrology, who organized the background of the study, and to the pathologists in each centre for their contributions to patient care and their help in providing these data. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work. There is no funding granted for the present study. The abstract of this paper was presented at 57th ERA-EDTA congress in 2020.

Author contributions

S.O., O.G. and I.K. designed the study; I.K., O.G. and S.O analyzed the data; A.B.D., N.E., E.Y., E.A.D., M.T.D., F.B., S.A., A.S., B.D., S.S., H.C., I.S., G.S., M.Y., B.V., E.A., M.S.U.,A.G., S.U., H.S., G.K., O.C.E., Z.A., N.Y.S, C.O., M.O., M.K., N.A., U.D., G.S. contributed to registration of patients data, I.K. drafted the manuscript, O.G., S.O, and U.D. revised and finalized the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the submitted version.

Data availability

We obtained the information about FSGS from the nationwide database of primary glomerular diseases that constituted by Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases working group (TSN-GOLD) in 2008. The can be reached at the following address: https://gold.nefroloji.org.tr/. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-57305-6.

References

  • 1.De Vriese AS, Sethi S, Nath KA, Glassock RJ, Fervenza FC. Differentiating primary, genetic, and secondary FSGS in adults: A clinicopathologic approach. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2018;29(3):759–774. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2017090958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McGrogan A, Franssen CF, de Vries CS. The incidence of primary glomerulonephritis worldwide: A systematic review of the literature. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2011;26(2):414–430. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sim JJ, Batech M, Hever A, et al. Distribution of biopsy-proven presumed primary Glomerulonephropathies in 2000–2011 among a racially and ethnically diverse US population. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2016;64:533–544. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.03.416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Woo KT, Chan CM, Chin YM, et al. Global evolutionary trend of the prevalence of primary glomerulonephritis over the past three decades. Nephron Clin. Pract. 2010;116(4):c337–c346. doi: 10.1159/000319594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.O'Shaughnessy MM, Hogan SL. Distinguishing the signals from the noise: Can epidemiologic studies inform our understanding of glomerular disease? Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2016;68(4):503–507. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ozturk S, Sumnu A, Seyahi N, et al. Demographic and clinical characteristics of primary glomerular diseases in Turkey. Int. Urol. Nephrol. 2014;46(12):2347–2355. doi: 10.1007/s11255-014-0838-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Turkmen A, Sumnu A, Cebeci E, et al. Epidemiological features of primary glomerular disease in Turkey: A multicenter study by the Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases Working Group. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):481. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-02134-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Haas M, Meehan SM, Karrison TG, Spargo BH. Changing etiologies of unexplained adult nephrotic syndrome: A comparison of renal biopsy findings from 1976–1979 and 1995–1997. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1997;30(5):621–631. doi: 10.1016/S0272-6386(97)90485-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.O'Shaughnessy MM, Hogan SL, Thompson BD, Coppo R, Fogo AB, Jennette JC. Glomerular disease frequencies by race, sex and region: Results from the International Kidney Biopsy Survey. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2018;33(4):661–669. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfx189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu R, Quan S, Wang Y, et al. Spectrum of biopsy proven renal diseases in Central China: A 10-year retrospective study based on 34,630 cases. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):10994. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-67910-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cattran DC, Rao P. Long-term outcome in children and adults with classic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 1998;32(1):72–79. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v32.pm9669427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Abrantes MM, Cardoso LS, Lima EM, et al. Predictive factors of chronic kidney disease in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Pediatr. Nephrol. 2006;21:1003–1012. doi: 10.1007/s00467-006-0138-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Moreno JA, Martín-Cleary C, Gutiérrez E, et al. Haematuria: The forgotten CKD factor? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2012;27:28–34. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jalalah SM, Alzahrani IH, Furness PN. Glomerular changes in microscopic haematuria, studied by quantitative immunoelectron microscopy and in situ zymography. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2002;17:1586–1593. doi: 10.1093/ndt/17.9.1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Cattran DC, Reich HN, Beanlands HJ, For the Genes, Gender and Glomerulonephritis Group et al. The impact of sex in primary glomerulonephritis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2008;2(37):2247–2253. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfm919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Forster BM, Nee R, Little DJ, et al. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, risk factors for end stage kidney disease, and response to immunosuppression. Kidney 360. 2021;2(1):105–113. doi: 10.34067/KID.0006172020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ozeki T, Maruyama S, Imasawa T, et al. Clinical manifestations of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in Japan from the Japan Renal Biopsy Registry: Age stratification and comparison with minimal change disease. Sci. Rep. 2021;11(1):2602. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80931-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Weisinger JR, Kempson RL, Eldridge FL, Swenson RS. The nephrotic syndrome: A complication of massive obesity. Ann. Intern. Med. 1974;81(4):440–447. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-81-4-440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Satman I, Omer B, Tutuncu Y, TURDEP-II Study Group et al. Twelve-year trends in the prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and prediabetes in Turkish adults. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 2013;28(2):169–80. doi: 10.1007/s10654-013-9771-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sengul S, Akpolat T, Erdem Y, Derici U, Arici M, Sindel S, Karatan O, Turgan C, Hasanoglu E, Caglar S, Erturk S, Turkish Society of Hypertension and Renal Diseases Changes in hypertension prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control rates in Turkey from 2003 to 2012. J. Hypertens. 2016;34(6):1208–17. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dong J, Li Y, Yue S, et al. The profiles of biopsy-proven renal tubulointerstitial lesions in patients with glomerular disease. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8(17):1066. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bohle A, Müller GA, Wehrmann M, Mackensen-Haen S, Xiao JC. Pathogenesis of chronic renal failure in the primary glomerulopathies, renal vasculopathies, and chronicinterstitial nephritides. Kidney Int. Suppl. 1996;54:S2–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Matsumoto M, Tanaka T, Yamamoto T, et al. Hypoperfusion of peritubular capillaries induces chronic hypoxia before progression of tubulointerstitial injury in a progressive model of rat glomerulonephritis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2004;15(6):1574–1581. doi: 10.1097/01.ASN.0000128047.13396.48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zee J, Liu Q, Smith AR, Hodgin JB, Rosenberg A, Gillespie BW, Holzman LB, Barisoni L, Mariani LH, Nephrotic Syndrome Study Network (NEPTUNE) NEPTUNE Members Kidney biopsy features most predictive of clinical outcomes in the spectrum of minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2022;33(7):1411–1426. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021101396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liverman PC, Tucker FL, Bolton WK. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate in glomerular disease: Association with urinary protein. Am. J. Nephrol. 1988;8(5):363–367. doi: 10.1159/000167618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Johnson RJ, Bakris GL, Borghi C, et al. Hyperuricemia, acute and chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease: Report of a Scientific Workshop Organized by the National Kidney Foundation. Am. J. KidneyDis. 2018;71(6):851–865. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.12.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Turnberg D, Lewis M, Moss J, Xu Y, Botto M, Cook HT. Complement activation contributes to both glomerular and tubulointerstitial damage in adriamycin nephropathy in mice. J. Immunol. 2006;177(6):4094–4102. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.4094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lenderink AM, Liegel K, Ljubanović D, et al. The alternative pathway of complement is activated in the glomeruli and tubulointerstitium of mice with adriamycin nephropathy. Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol. 2007;293(2):F555–F564. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00403.2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhang YM, Gu QH, Huang J, et al. Clinical significance of IgM and C3 glomerular deposition in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016;11(9):1582–1589. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01190216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mirioglu S, Caliskan Y, Ozluk Y, Dirim AB, Istemihan Z, Akyildiz A, Yazici H, Turkmen A, Kilicaslan I, Sever MS. Co-deposition of IgM and C3 may indicate unfavorable renal outcomes in adult patients with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2019;44(5):961–972. doi: 10.1159/000501827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Amer F, Syed M, Afzal A, Hussain M, Hassan U, Bashir S, Hameed M, Ishtiaq S. IgM and C3 deposition in primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS): A clinical and histopathological spectrum. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37346. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Liu J, Xie J, Zhang X, et al. Serum C3 and renal outcome in patients with primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:4095. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-03344-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu L, Liu D, Xia M, et al. Immunofluorescence deposits in the mesangial area and glomerularcapillary loops did not affect the prognosis of immunoglobulin A nephropathy except C1q: A single-center retrospective study. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12882-021-02237-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.CKD-EPI A. Tufts Medical Center. https://www.tuftsmedicalcenter.org/Research-Clinical-Trials/Institutes-Centers-Labs/Chronic-Kidney-Disease-Epidemiology-Collaboration/Calculators (Accessed 4 August 2022).
  • 35.Hoshino J, Furuichi K, Yamanouchi M, Mise K, Sekine A, Kawada M, Sumida K, Hiramatsu R, Hasegawa E, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Sawa N, Hara S, Fujii T, Ohashi K, Kitagawa K, Toyama T, Shimizu M, Takaichi K, Ubara Y, Wada T. A new pathological scoring system by the Japanese classification to predict renal outcome in diabetic nephropathy. PLoS One. 2018;13(2):e0190923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Tables. (23.5KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

We obtained the information about FSGS from the nationwide database of primary glomerular diseases that constituted by Turkish Society of Nephrology Glomerular Diseases working group (TSN-GOLD) in 2008. The can be reached at the following address: https://gold.nefroloji.org.tr/. The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES