Skip to main content
Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy logoLink to Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy
. 2024 Mar 11;14:100430. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100430

Evaluation of the participation of community pharmacists in family planning services: A nonrandomized controlled trial

Folukemi Bosede Aladenola a, Kanayo Patrick Osemene b, Romanus Maduabuchi Ihekoronye b,
PMCID: PMC10958471  PMID: 38523832

Abstract

Background: Community pharmacists (CPs) are increasingly participating in family planning services (FPS) in different health systems but the underpinnings of effectiveness in these services remain poorly understood and rarely documented.

Objectives This study examined knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of FPS among CPs and assessed the impact of an intervention on these indices.

Methods: A nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted using two equivalent groups (n = 61 each) of randomly-selected CPs in Southwestern Nigeria. Intervention comprised a training package for the intervention group followed by a 2-month monitoring of participants' practices. Pre- and post-intervention data were collected using validated questionnaire and analyzed using appropriate descriptive (frequency, percentages, mean) and inferential statistics including chi-square test to examine association between categorical variables, and t-test to compare differences between means at alpha level of 0.05 for all statistical tests.

Results: Pre-intervention knowledge of FPS in both groups was poor with no significant difference in their mean scores [t (120) = 0.34; p = 0.74]. Post-intervention, 79% of intervention group demonstrated good knowledge (controls remained poor), with significant difference in mean knowledge scores across the groups [t (120) = −33.59; p < 0.05*]. Pre-intervention attitude in both control (97%) and intervention group (95%) were negative. Post-intervention, 93% of intervention group exhibited positive attitude (controls remained negative), Mean difference 72.8 [t (120) = −77.21; p < 0.05*]. Preintervention practice scores were poor in control (92%) and intervention (90%) groups. Post-intervention, 83.6% of intervention group had good practice scores (controls remained poor), Mean difference 48.9 [t (120) = −31.0; p < 0.05*].

Conclusion: Pre-intervention scores for KAP of FPS were poor among respondents. All the indices were significantly improved by the study intervention. Policy reforms are recommended to train CPs in the provision of FPS for enhanced reproductive health services.

1. Introduction

Family planning (FP) refers to the use of contraceptive methods by couples in a deliberate effort to limit or space the number of children they want to have.1 It empowers individuals and couples to plan and attain how many children they want to have, when to have them, how much time interval between their births, and in some cases the choice to have no children at all.2,3 Many scholars do not consider abortion as an element of FP, but having access to contraception significantly reduces the perceived need for abortion.4 Family planning services (FPS) encompass a comprehensive set of activities in fertility management including prevention of unplanned pregnancies with its negative health and economic consequences.5 The prevalence of unplanned pregnancies in Nigeria is about 10.8%.6 Unmarried teenagers and young married couples building a career while delaying childbearing may use contraception but are not necessarily planning a family.7 Beyond contraception, FPS include sex education, pre-conception counselling and management, prevention and management of sexually transmitted infections, and infertility management.

The projected population figure for Nigeria in 2022 was 216,783,381 with 108,432,971 (50%) as females, whose average age at marriage was 21.2 years.8 In Nigeria as at 2020, about 1047 women died out of every 100,000 live births due to pregnancy-related causes, while by 2021, 102 out of every 1000 girls aged 15–19 gave birth9 Nigeria's contraceptive prevalence rate (CPR) at 17% stands among the lowest in Africa.10 The country has a total fertility rate (TFR- representing live births per woman) of 5.24. This TFR is the second highest in the world (Angola (5.35) being the highest) as at 2021.11 Despite the prevalence of modern contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa, accessibility of most contraception methods among the Nigerian populace is still limited.12 Low CPR has long been associated with high rate of unintended pregnancies,13 and illegal / unsafe abortions.14 A recent study found a one-year abortion incidence of 29.0 per 1000 women (aged 15–49) in Nigeria, with highest incidence among women in their 20s, women with secondary education or higher, and women living in urban areas.15 Evidence suggests that 56% of unintended pregnancies in Nigeria were resolved through abortions with 212,000 women treated for complications of unsafe abortion while 285,000 experienced complications but did not receive the treatments they needed.16 In 2014, the Nigeria Federal Ministry of Health reported that lack of awareness of the types, side effects of FP methods, misperceptions about unwanted and desired effects and a lack of understanding of the health and economic advantages of using FP methods were factors negatively impacting FP service delivery.17 This scenario underscores the need for more trained experts such as community-based pharmacists to be involved in the delivery of FPS in Nigeria.

Community pharmacists (CPs) are perceived as the most accessible healthcare providers due to the easy access by clients including women of reproductive age in under-served communities.18 As their roles evolve from medicines dispensing to more-engaging patient-focused services, it is important that they demonstrate adequate knowledge and the right attitude towards expanding the range of FPS accessible to their clients.19 There is evidence in many health systems that CPs provide various FPSs but the underpinnings of effectiveness in these services remain poorly understood and rarely documented.20 With fast-changing demographic configurations, it is essential to understand how CPs can contribute more effectively to improved reproductive health in their communities. However, there is limited information on the current stock of knowledge, attitude and skills of CPs in this regard.20,21 Such information will help pharmacy educators enhance the training curriculum of pharmacy undergraduates as well as the content of the mandatory professional development programmes for practicing pharmacists.22 It will also provide guide for regulators to ensure reliable and high quality FPS to clients via community pharmacies.23

Evidence shows that CPs provide over-the-counter FP supplies such as emergency contraceptives, oral pills, and condoms.24 However, the FP needs of most clients include a wide range of professional services beyond these products. A recent scoping review established the feasibility, high user-acceptability, and wide reach of CP-led FPS but identified insufficient data on the participation of the CPs in services such as long-lasting reversible contraception, prescription and education on reproductive health, integration into multidisciplinary teams and coordination of care.25 There is also a dearth of information in most developing health systems regarding product availability and accessibility, non-stigmatizing spaces and services, accuracy of information, and availability of clinical services in community pharmacy settings.20,26

This study examined the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) of FPS and assessed the impact of a hands-on training intervention and follow-up on these indices among CPs in Nigeria.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study design

This study adopted a trial design involving two equivalent (control and intervention) groups of CPs whose knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were measured and compared pre- and post-intervention. The study was conducted in four (4) stages (Table 1):

Table 1.

Stages of the study implementation with activity timelines.

Stage Activities

Stage 1: Baseline Assessment
Pre-intervention assessment of current knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning services among participants using validated, structured questionnaires for data collection. Selected, consenting participants were surveyed at the side-lines of their technical group's monthly meetings (being the last Wednesdays of every month) at Osogbo (Osun State) and Akure (Ondo State)
Stage 2: Intervention Development and delivery of training modules to participants aimed at improving participants' knowledge and effectiveness in delivery of FPS to clients. Specifically, participants were trained on administration of Depot Medroxyprogesterone Acetate - Subcutaneous (DMPA-SC™); a low-dose, easy-to-use, long-term injectable female contraceptive requiring limited/no hospital visits, taken every 13 weeks and with reported 99% effectiveness rate (PATH, 2017). DMPA-SC™ combines the drug and needle in the prefilled BD Uniject™ injection system.
The four major focus areas of the training (deemed appropriate for the study objectives) include:
Knowledge of FPS: Training about FP methods and how to determine and recommend appropriate methods to clients.
Counselling Capability: Improving CPs' capability for giving instructions (to clients) for use, special warnings and precautions for use, possible side effects, what to do when discontinuation is desired and steps to staying on track.
Referral System: Improving CPs' capacity for knowing when and how to refer patients
Documentation: Improving CP's documentation skills; provision of logistics management information system (LMIS) tools for documentation.
The one-day intensive group training was delivered at Akure Ondo State (on Wednesday 29th June 2022), by family planning experts from the Department of Family Health, Ministry of Health, Ondo State, and Family Planning Unit, Ondo State Primary Health Care Development Agency. The training modules comprised in-person talks, audio-visual displays, mock demonstrations, and graphic inscriptions on banners, followed by role-play sessions.
Stage 3: Follow-up Supply of adequate stock of DMPA-SC™) and LMIS forms; A 2-month long monitoring of participants' service provision by the researchers to ensure adherence to instructions and possible referrals of clients to appropriate healthcare facilities. Weekly telephone calls (by researchers) and online submission of scanned copies of filled LMIS forms (by participants) were key aspects of the follow-up.
Stage 4: Endline Assessment Post-intervention evaluation of the CPs' knowledge, attitude and practice of family planning services using the same validated questionnaires originally administered pre-intervention (on Wednesday 31st August 2022)

2.2. Study area and setting

The study was conducted in Osun and Ondo States in Southwestern Nigeria, a geopolitical zone with a total population of about 47 million according to National Population Commission figs.8 Community pharmacists in these two contiguous States were recruited for the study. These States were purposively selected in view of their common cultural, linguistic, and socio-economic indices as these have been shown to minimize selection bias in community-based studies.27 Recruiting participants from these States was also beneficial in terms of enhanced feasibility of data collection. Community Pharmacies in the selected States constituted the study sites. Given the low CPR of 17.7% in Ondo State (the lowest in the zone, while Osun State has CPR of 27%),2,28 Ondo State was used for the intervention (treatment) group while Osun State was used as the control State. Only registered, full-time, consenting pharmacists were recruited. Interns and part-time pharmacists were excluded (as they may not be available for the entire duration of the study). Same number of participants was selected per State to improve statistical efficiency of the study.

2.3. Sample size and sampling techniques

Out of a population of 65 and 93 registered CPs in Ondo and Osun States respectively (as at December 31, 2021) giving a total of 158, the Kirkwood and Sterne29 formula for independent samples comparing two proportions was used to calculate the sample size of 102. A 20% overage was added for possible attritions, making 122 (Appendix 1). Simple random sampling technique was employed using computer-generated random numbers to select actual participants.

2.4. Study variables

Variables of interest were respondents' scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice of FPS while impact of the training intervention was assessed by comparing mean scores of these variables pre- and post- intervention.

2.5. Development and validation of survey instrument

The structured questionnaire used for primary data collection was adapted from the World Health Organisation template30 which has been used in a related study by the Society for Family Health.31 The instrument was designed in four sections:

Section A comprised 10 items that sought information ranging from demographic variables, employment status to previous training on FPS.

Section B contained 14 items presented in multiple choice format (with only one correct option) that sought information on respondents' knowledge of FPS generally and DMPA-SC specifically.

Section C comprised 10 attitude items measured on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from “Strongly Agree” (Agree to every extent) to “Strongly Disagree” (disagree completely). Some of the statements under the attitude section of the questionnaire were negatively worded such that agreements to them were indicative of negative attitude while disagreement meant positive attitude.

Section D comprised 18 items presented in a “Yes” or “No” format that sought information on the current practice of FPS by respondents.

The draft questionnaire was scrutinized by the research supervisor and another senior faculty member whose expert contributions improved appropriateness of content, comprehensibility, clarity and identified omissions in a bid to ensure face and content validity. Then a test- retest validation survey was conducted 14 days apart, using 12 CPs from Oyo State, outside the study area. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was computed from their responses. All sections of the questionnaire were found to have high reliability coefficients (α >0.70) implying sufficient consistency and reproducibility of results.

2.6. Ethical considerations

Ethical clearance for the study was obtained from the Research and Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Health, Ondo State OSHREC (19/4/2021/318). All respondents gave their written informed consent before participation in the study.

2.7. Data collection and analysis

The same trained research assistants were used to administer questionnaires on selected CPs in the two States both pre- and post-intervention. The researchers worked with the resource persons (experts) to deliver the training intervention at a central location where all selected participants were invited. The research team conducted both the pre- and post-intervention surveys and the follow-up data collection. This eliminated likely cases of missing data and loss to follow up.

Data from filled questionnaires were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 26.0 for Windows software at 5% level of significance. A normality test was conducted which showed that KAP scores of respondents were normally distributed (Appendix 2). The categorization of the scores was adapted from the original Bloom's cut-off points for Likert scales32 as earlier used in a similar report.33 Frequencies and percentages were used to summarize sociodemographic data of respondents. Each correct response to knowledge and practice items was scored 1 while wrong answers were scored 0. Attitude items were sequentially scored 1 to 4 corresponding to “strongly disagree” to “strongly agree” with a cut-off score “70% and above” as indicative of positive attitude while <70% indicates negative attitude to FPS. Agreement with a correct statement (same as disagreement with an incorrect statement) was taken as depicting a positive attitude, and vice versa. Knowledge scores were categorized as good (70% and above), fair (50%–69%), or poor (< 50%); while practice scores were categorized as either good (70% and above) or poor (<70%).

Chi-square test was used to examine association of demographic characteristics of the 2 groups. Paired t-test and independent sample t-test were used to compare means within and across groups respectively in order to ascertain the effect of the training intervention on CPs' knowledge, attitude, and practice scores at p < 0.05.

3. Results

All 122 CPs (n = 61 per group) who were selected for this study actually participated in pre-intervention, follow-up, and post-intervention activities giving a response rate of 100%.

3.1. Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents

Table 2 contains demographic characteristics of respondents and shows that there were more males in both controls (56%) and intervention (71%) cohorts with a significant association (p < 0.050) between ages of respondents in control and intervention groups. Most respondents in both control (84%) and intervention (79%) had no postgraduate qualifications. All the controls were married as was 85% of the intervention group. As at the time of the survey, 33% of the controls and 57% of the intervention group were not using family planning products themselves. A fairly equal proportion of controls (33%) and intervention group (34%) had previous training on FPS but none within the 8 weeks prior to the study.

Table 2.

Groups equivalent test of socio-demographic characteristics of CPs in both groups.

Characteristics Control
N (%)
Intervention
N (%)
χ2 p-value
Gender Male
Female
34(55.7)
27(44.3)
43(70.5)
18(29.5)
1.76 0.19
Age <35
35–44
45–54
55+
2(3.3)
15(24.6)
29(47.5)
15(24.6)
9 (14.8)
19(31.1)
21(34.4)
12(19.7)
8.30 0.04
Education Background Graduate
Postgraduate
51(83.6)
10(16.4)
48(78.7)
13(21.3)
0.48 0.49
Religion Christian
Islam
20(32.8)
41(67.2)
14(23.0)
47(77.0)
1.47 0.23
Marital Status Single
Married
Widowed
0(0.0)
61(100.0)
0(0.0)
8(13.1)
52(85.2)
1(1.6)
9.72 0.08
Number of children ever born None
1–3
4+
3(4.90)
28(45.9)
30(49.2)
10(16.5)
28(45.9)
23(37.7)
4.69 0.10
Do you currently use FP Yes
No
41(67.2)
20(32.8)
26(42.6)
35(57.4)
3.32 0.07
What is your position at your pharmacy Decline to indicate
Superintendent
Locum
Working fulltime but not superintendent
0(0.0)
55(90.2)
2(3.3)
4(6.6)
0(0.0)
51(83.6)
6(9.8)
4(6.6)
2.15 0.34
Other healthcare professional in your pharmacy Nurse
Pharmacy technician
Community Health Worker
None
7(11.5)
12(19.7)
7(11.5)

35(57.4)
6(9.8)
21(34.3)
7(11.5)

27(44.3)
4.82 0.08
Year of work experience <5
6–10
11–20
21–30
Above 30
0(0.0)
12(19.7)
24(39.3)
20(32.8)
5(8.2)
9(14.5)
12(19.7)
16(26.2)
17(27.9)
7(11.5)
5.86 0.07
Have you ever been trained on FPS Yes
No
20(32.8)
41(67.2)
21(34.4)
40(65.6)
0.32 0.57

Significant at p < 0.05 level.

3.2. Comparison of pre- and post- intervention knowledge of FPS by respondents

Pre-intervention knowledge scores among controls were 80%, 13%, and 7% respectively for poor, fair, and good knowledge of FPS; while intervention group had 85%, 8%, and 7% respectively. However post-intervention, the controls had 80%, 15%, and 5% respectively of poor, fair and good knowledge which were not significantly different from pre-intervention scores. Among the intervention group, the post-intervention knowledge scores were 3%, 18%, and 79% respectively for poor, fair and good knowledge, showing significant improvements.

Table 3 presents the comparison of means of pre- and post-intervention knowledge scores within and across the two groups. Pre-intervention, the control and intervention groups did not differ significantly in mean knowledge scores. However, post-intervention, there was a significant difference in the mean knowledge scores across the groups [t (120) = −33.59; p < 0.05*] showing the effectiveness of the intervention. Within the groups, the controls did not achieve significant improvements in knowledge scores pre- and post- intervention; means difference = 5.4 [t (60) = −1.44; p = 0. 502], unlike the intervention group with mean difference of 53.2 [t (60) = −40.60; p < 0.05*]. The improved post-intervention knowledge score of the intervention group was driven by majority of them correctly acknowledging that the client seeking contraceptive method was the most appropriate person to select a contraceptive method (95.1%); that effectiveness was the most important characteristic of any FPS for clients (88.5%); that clients should be permitted to handle FP samples; that DMPS-SC was administered only subcutaneously (97.7%); 13 weeks apart (85.2%); only to clients 18 years and above (85.2%); and even during breastfeeding (86.9%).

Table 3.

Comparison of pre- and post-intervention knowledge of FPS within and across groups of respondents.


Groups

Intervention
Paired t-test Comparing Means Within Groups
Independent t-test Comparing Means Across Groups
Mean SD t df p Mean SD t df p
Control Pre 37.60 8.76 −1.44 60 0.50 34.60 8.76 0.34 120 0.74
Post 40.03 9.89 34.02 10.26
Intervention Pre 34.02 10.26 −40.60 60 0.00 37.60 9.89 −33.59 120 0.00
Post 87.22 4.75 87.22 4.75

Significant at p < 0.05 level.

3.3. Comparison of pre- and post- intervention attitude of respondents towards FPS

Table 4 shows the comparison of mean pre- and post-intervention attitude scores of respondents measured using 10-item statements on a 4-point Likert scale. Pre-intervention, most respondents in both control (97%) and intervention (95%) had overall negative attitudes towards FPS (Mean = 24.2, S·D. = 7.9; Mean = 22.9, S·D. =5.7 respectively) [t (120) = 0.96; p = 0.338]. Post-intervention, there was no significant change in attitude among the controls while 93% of intervention group exhibited a positive attitude (Mean = 23.5.0; S·D = 7.1; Mean = 96.3; S·D = 1.9, respectively) with mean difference of 72.8 [t (120) = −77.21; p < 0.05*]. Within the intervention group, the training improved attitudes with a mean difference of 73.4 [t (60) = −94.2; p < 0.05*]. (See Table 5.)

Table 4.

Comparison of pre- and post-intervention attitude towards FPS within and across groups of respondents.


Groups

Intervention
Paired t-test Comparing Means Within Groups
Independent t-test Comparing Means Across Groups
Mean SD t df p Mean SD t df p
Control Pre 24.17 7.91 0.51 60 0.61 24.17 7.91 0.96 120 0.34
Post 23.47 7.10 22.97 5.67
Intervention Pre 22.97 5.70 −94.20 60 0.00 23.47 7.10 −77.22 120 0.00
Post 96.33 1.98 96.33 1.98

Significant at p < 0.05 level.

Table 5.

Comparison of pre- and post-intervention practice of FPS within and across groups of respondents.


Groups

Intervention
Paired t-test Comparing Means Within Groups
Independent t-test Comparing Means Across Groups
Mean SD t df p Mean SD t df p
Control Pre 33.98 8.76 2.05 60 0.06 30.66 8.77 1.46 120 0.15
Post 37.98 11.16 28.46 7.89
Intervention Pre 28.46 7.89 −47.38 60 0.00 33.98 11.12 −31.04 120 0.00
Post 86.99 5.34 86.99 5.34

Significant at p < 0.05 level.

3.4. Comparison of pre- and post- intervention practice of FPS by respondents

Table 4 presents a comparison of mean pre- and post- intervention practice scores of respondents. Pre-intervention, majority of respondents in both control (92%) and intervention (90%) groups had poor practice of FPS (Mean = 30.7, S.D. = 8.7; Mean = 28.5; S.D. =7.9 respectively) [t (120) = 0.1.46; p = 0.15]. Post-intervention, there was no significant improvement in practice among the controls while 83.6% of the intervention group had good practice (Mean = 38.0, S.D. = 11.1; Mean = 86.9, S.D. = 5.3, respectively) with mean difference of 48.9 [t (120) = −31.0; p < 0.05*]. Within the intervention group, the training improved practice scores with a mean difference of 58.4 [t (60) = −47.4; p < 0.05*].

4. Discussion

As CPs embrace more patient-centred roles in their professional practice, this study revealed that the knowledge, attitude and practice of FPS are currently inadequate to meet the reproductive health needs of the communities. The effectiveness of the training intervention in significantly improving respondents' scores in all three dimensions of interest demonstrates the feasibility of improving access to FPS through the community pharmacy conduit. The 100% response rate achieved in this study shows the readiness of CPs to play more central roles in the provision of FPS. This high response rate may be understood in terms of the social exchange theory given the favorable cost-reward balance as the pharmacists perceived participation in the study as beneficial to their practice and were willing to invest their times and efforts to participate.34 The zero loss to follow-up strengthens the validity of the findings.

This study found that over 65% of the respondents in both groups had no prior training in FPS. The impact of this lack of relevant training was apparent in their overall poor knowledge of FPS. This trend strengthens evidence from previous local studies in both public35 and private34 sectors of Nigeria health system. Additional findings from other studies have shown that health workers generally require oriented training in order to improve both the quality and uptake of family planning services, with those in the private sector (including CPs) less likely to have opportunities to be trained on new developments in family planning provision compared to their counterparts in public service.36

The World Health Organisation (WHO) considers knowledge and attitude of health workers a critical component of the framework to ensure safe and effective provision of FPS to communities. The WHO published a set of recommendations on which categories of health workers can provide FPS and recommended a framework for their training and education to improve service delivery.37 Community-based pharmacists are among those who can safely provide FPS and the training on DMPA-SC is clearly indicated in the WHO framework. However, if the pharmacist has poor knowledge and negative attitude towards FPS as seen in the baseline survey, it becomes difficult to promote widespread acceptance and use of these services among the population. This finding is not different from those seen in similar studies in Ethiopia39 and Pakistan38 and represents important setback to attaining the global target of reducing maternal mortality ratio to <70 per 100,000 live births.37

Socio-cultural norms and religious beliefs have long been identified as major barriers to uptake of FPs in developing countries and this has significantly limited progress towards achieving targets for maternal and child health globally.6,14 Community pharmacists, just like the general population, live within the established socio-cultural systems. Despite their training as pharmacists, this study found predominantly negative attitudinal biases among participants in both control and intervention groups. With all the pharmacists subscribing to either Islam or Christianity it may be interesting to further explore the possibilities of a nexus between their religious beliefs and their attitudes and practice of FPS. Negative attitudes towards uptake of FPS by adolescents and unmarried respondents may be connected with the social belief that adolescent and young persons are immature to have sex. As a cultural norm in the study area, unmarried women seeking FP services may be socially stigmatized as being promiscuous and morally irresponsible, while CPs who provide FPS may be perceived as encouraging promiscuity.39,40 Even in Saudi Arabia, where CPs were permitted as a matter of national policy to provide FP services, cultural acceptability remained a significant barrier, besides the fact that one-fifth of CPs themselves were not favourably disposed to providing counselling to their clients.40,41 Understandably, religion and culture are strong predictors of acceptance of FP in the general population; the level of attitudinal inhibition among CPs in this study at pre-intervention was a major concern. However, post intervention response among the community pharmacists was reassuring because results from the study showed that correct knowledge transfer dispelled negative attitudes towards FPS provision.

Practice remains the most objectively verifiable means of validating knowledge gains and translation. This study assessed and compared the CPs' pre- and post-intervention practice of FPS through improvements in counselling skills, adherence to standards through appropriate case referrals and ability to administer an advanced short term contraceptive (hormonal injectable). As earlier reported for Nigeria and Kenya,42 the pre-intervention practice was poor with community pharmacists merely dispensing over-the-counter emergency contraceptives, combined oral contraceptives and condoms. The report found the only 41% of Nigeria CPs and <50% of their Kenyan counterparts had ever been trained on FPS, while only 33% (Nigeria) and 50% (Kenya) had promotional materials as job aids leading to poor practice. Meanwhile, knowledge, job aids, and hands-on- practical training have been established as critical success factors for effective FP practice among CPs, as seen in a recent pilot study in three counties in Kenya which was implemented as an innovative public-private partnership intervention.19 However, this study's intervention improved practice scores in all three dimensions of counselling, referrals, and providing the specified short term contraceptive method. This finding suggests a potential for significant improvements in overall reproductive health and family planning outcomes if CPs are trained, equipped and incentivized to provide FPS, given their widespread availability, convenient location and easy accessibility by members of the community.

Further interrogation of the effects of this study's intervention within the intervention group reveals that the size of increase in scores, though significant, was relatively least in knowledge (mean 53.2) and highest in attitude (mean 73.4). This seems to suggest that a one-off training may succeed in improving knowledge base of providers but a more systematic, curriculum-based approach will be required to drive sustainable improvement in the knowledge-base of pharmacists in specific clinical skills areas needed to practice (mean increase 58.4) as seen in other health systems.7 The enthusiasm to benefit from a robust training opportunity without paying a fee may have contributed to the relatively higher increase in respondents' attitude scores but it is not known how much this scenario can be sustained if respondents were to pay for such training.

Until recently, the role of CPs had been limited to dispensing of drugs. This role is fast changing as health system managers identify the increasing need for greater inclusion of CPs and other relevant healthcare workers in health care delivery to under-served populations in rural or difficult to reach areas.12,37 The effectiveness of this study's intervention affirms earlier reports that optimizing the expanded roles of CPs will require efforts to improve their knowledge, skills, mental attitude, and competence in treatment guidelines and drug pharmacology.10,17,42 The recent transition of the protocols for undergraduate training of pharmacists to the Doctor of Pharmacy (Pharm.D.) curriculum in Nigeria holds significant promise for improved clinical skills of pharmacists and signals better days ahead for participation of CPs in FPS. This study's training intervention significantly improved participants' knowledge, attitude and practice of FPS which demonstrates that pharmacists are lifelong learners who can be leveraged to improve access to quality reproductive health services. While CPs are easily accessible and conveniently located, empowering them to provide a variety of FPS without requisite training carries a high risk to the community, hence the need for targeted training, provision of support tools and enabling policy environment.

Adherence to treatment standards is fundamental to improving quality of care. This study trained CPs on key indicators for referral of FP cases using national guideline for FP service provision, in addition to providing tools for practice at pharmacies. The inclusion of injectable hormonal contraceptives in the practice of CPs in this study is an advancement over what is obtainable in some other studies,10 where FP roles for CPs had been limited to counselling of clients, over-the-counter dispensing or prescription of emergency contraceptives, oral contraceptive and condoms.43 With inadequate numbers of trained workforce, the health systems of many low- and- medium- income countries will benefit significantly from training, equipping, and authorizing CPs to participate more effectively in patient-centred services such as FPS.

4.1. Limitations of the study and suggestions for further studies

The effectiveness of FPS by CPs will be better assessed from the perspective of recipients of FPS (customers). The inability to examine customer perspectives in this study is considered an important limitation. Moreover, in this study, the absence of random assignment of participants to the two arms means that unknown confounders may be present with the risk of potential bias which may affect the generalizability of our findings. This study did not explore the factors affecting knowledge, attitude and practice of FPS among community pharmacists. This would have enabled evidence-based recommendations on possible practice reforms. Moreover, the sample size drawn (equally) from both States presents limitations in the generalizability of the findings.

5. Conclusion

Respondents' pre-intervention scores of knowledge, attitude and practice of FPS were poor, though the community pharmacists were ready and willing to be trained and to participate in FPS. The training intervention significantly improved all three dimensions of interest. Pharmacists' training curriculum should be reviewed, while policy reforms should be put in place to empower CPs to participate more effectively in FPS. This will help fill capacity gaps and improve overall reproductive health in the study area.

Disclosures

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Folukemi Bosede Aladenola: Methodology, Investigation, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Kanayo Patrick Osemene: Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Romanus Maduabuchi Ihekoronye: Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft.

Declaration of competing interest

All three authors declare no competing interests in this study.

Funding statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge with thanks the efforts of the leaderships of Association of Community Pharmacists of Nigeria (ACPN) in the States of Ondo and Osun, for helping to mobilize selected participants for effective participation in this study.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100430.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

Supplementary material 1

mmc1.docx (15.9KB, docx)

Supplementary material 2

mmc2.docx (16.6KB, docx)

Supplementary material 3

mmc3.docx (18.8KB, docx)

Data availability

Relevant data and protocols for this study may be accessed upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  • 1.Mulatu T., Sintayehu Y., Dessie Y., Dheresa M. Male involvement in family planning use and associated factors among currently married men in rural eastern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2022;10:1–7. doi: 10.1177/20503121221094178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF International. NPC and ICF International; Abuja, Nigeria, and Rockville, Maryland, USA: 2018. Key indicators; pp. 17–23. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Haakenstad A., Angelino O., Irvine C.M., et al. Measuring contraceptive method mix, prevalence, and demand satisfied by age and marital status in 204 countries and territories, 1970–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2022;400(10348):295–327. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00936-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ihekoronye M.R., Osemene K.P. Evaluation of the participation of community pharmacists in primary healthcare services in Nigeria: a mixed-method survey. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022;11(6):829–839. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2020.224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sully E.A., Shiferaw S., Seme A., Bell S.O., Giorgio M. Impact of the trump Administration’s expanded global gag rule policy on family planning service provision in Ethiopia. Stud Fam Plann. 2022;53(2):339–359. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ameyaw E.K., Budu E., Sambah F., et al. Prevalence and determinants of unintended pregnancy in sub-Saharan Africa: A multi-country analysis of demographic and health surveys. R Kabir, editor. PloS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220970. e0220970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qato D.M., Alexander G.C., Guadamuz J.S., Choi S., Trotzky-Sirr R., Lindau S.T. Pharmacist-prescribed and over-the-counter hormonal contraception in Los Angeles County retail pharmacies: study examines access to preventive and emergency hormonal contraception for women and girls without a physician’s prescription at Los Angeles retail pharmacies. Health Aff. 2020;39(7):1219–1228. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Bureau of Statistics: Demographic Statistics Bulletin 2022. https://www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/pdfuploads/DEMOGRAPHIC_BULLETIN_2022_FINAL.pdf Available at. accessed 10th August, 2023.
  • 9.World Bank Gender Data Portal. 2022. https://genderdata.worldbank.org/countries/nigeria/#:∼:text=1%2C047%20women%20die%20per%20100%2C000,pregnancy%2Drelated%20causes%20in%20Nigeria Available at. Accessed 23rd November.
  • 10.Statistica Research Department Contraceptive Prevalence Rate among Women in Nigeria 2022, by Civil Status. 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1268145/contraceptive-prevalence-rate-among-women-in-nigeria/ Available at. Accessed 10th August, 2023.
  • 11.United Nation Population Division: World Population Prospects: The 2022 Revision. 2023. https://data.un.org/Data.aspx?q=nigeria&d=PopDiv&f=variableID%3A54%3BcrID%3A566 Available at. Accessed 10th August.
  • 12.Baruwa S., Tobey E., Okafor E., et al. The role of job aids in supporting task sharing family planning services to community pharmacists and patent proprietary medicine vendors in Kaduna and Lagos, Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:981. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08360-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Yin J., Wang Y., Xu X., Liu Y., Yao L., Sun Q. The Progress of global antimicrobial resistance governance and its implication to China: a review. Antibiotics. 2021;10(11):1356. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10111356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miller L.E., Zamudio-Haas S., Otieno B., et al. “We Don’t Fear HIV. We Just Fear Walking around Pregnant.”: a qualitative analysis of adolescent sexuality and pregnancy stigma in informal settlements in Kisumu, Kenya. Stud Fam Plann. 2021;52(4):557–570. doi: 10.1111/sifp.12178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bell S.O., Omoluabi E., OlaOlorun F., Shankar M., Moreau C. Inequities in the incidence and safety of abortion in Nigeria. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Jan 7;5(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001814. PMID: 32133166; PMCID: PMC7042592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bankole A., Adewole I.F., Hussain R., Awolude O., Singh S., Akinyemi J.O. The incidence of abortion in Nigeria. Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015 Dec;41(4):170–181. doi: 10.1363/4117015. PMID: 26871725; PMCID: PMC4970740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Federal Ministry of Health (FMoH) Nigeria family planning blueprint (scale-up plan) Abuja: Fed Min Health. 2014;2014:1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Berenbrok L.A., Tang S., Gabriel N., et al. Access to community pharmacies: A nationwide geographic information systems cross-sectional analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2003;62(6) doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.07.003. 1816–1822.e2. 2022 Nov-Dec. Epub 2022 Jul 15. PMID: 35965233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Aloo N., Nyachae P., Mbugua N., et al. Improving access to family planning services through community pharmacies: experience from the challenge initiative in three counties in Kenya. Front Glob Womens Health. 2023:4. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2023.1060832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rafie S., Kim G.Y., Lau L.M., Tang C., Brown C., Maderas N.M. Assessment of family planning Services at Community Pharmacies in San Diego, California. Pharmacy. 2013;1(2):153–159. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy1020153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rehman A., Malkani A. brief. Population Center Pakistan; Islamabad: 2020. Best bets for accelerating family planning in Pakistan: The case for engaging family physicians and the for-profit private sector. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Harrington R.B., Harvey N., Larkins S., Redman-MacLaren M. Family planning in Pacific Island countries and territories (PICTs): a scoping review. PloS One. 2021;16(8) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Puri M.C., Moroni M., Pearson E., et al. Investigating the quality of family planning counselling as part of routine antenatal care and its effect on intended postpartum contraceptive method choice among women in Nepal. BMC Womens Health. 2020;20:29. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-00904-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Afolabi M.O., Osemene K.P. Assessment of consumer satisfaction with health Care Services in Community Pharmacies in sierra-Leone. Br J Pharm. 2021;5(1) doi: 10.5920/bjpharm.748. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Navarrete J., Yuksel N., Schindel T.J., Hughes C.A. Sexual and reproductive health services provided by community pharmacists: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 26;11(7) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047034. PMID: 34312200; PMCID: PMC8314704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pfaff A., Rafie S. Expanding pharmacy capacity for patient-centered reproductive health services. Pharmacy (Basel) 2020 Dec 9;8(4):236. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8040236. PMID: 33316908; PMCID: PMC7768349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fairbanks E., Shah S., Wilde M.H., McDonald M.V., Brasch J., McMahon J.M. Successful recruitment methods in the community for a two-site clinical trial. Appl Nurs Res. 2014 Nov;27(4):254–257. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2014.04.002. [Epub 2014 Apr 18. PMID: 24852451; PMCID: PMC4201883] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Obalase S.B., Joseph U.E. Knowledge, attitude and acceptance of modern family planning method AMONG women attending post-Natal Clinic in Ayeka Basic Health Centre in Okitipupa local government area, Ondo state, Nigeria. Biomed J Sci Technol Res. 2017;1:1037–1044. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.2017.01.000361. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kirkwood B.R., Sterne J.A. Essential Medical Statistics. 2nd ed. Blackwell Science; Oxford: 2003. Calculation of required sample size; pp. 420–421. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.World Health Organization (WHO) WHO; Geneva: 2016. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use. Third edition 2016.http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/family_planning/SPR-3/en/ Available at. Accessed 14th April, 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Society for Family Health Leveraging Digital Platforms to Train Family Planning Service Providers. 2023. https://nigeriahealthwatch.medium.com/society-for-family-health-leveraging-digital-platforms-to-train-family-planning-service-providers-86244a2ba648 Available at. accessed 10th August.
  • 32.Bloom B.S. Learning for mastery. Instruction and curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinaa and Virginia, topical papers and reprints, number 1. Eval Comm. 1968;1(2):12. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Osemene K.P., Ihekoronye M.R., Lamikanra A. Knowledge, attitudes, perceptions and practices of community pharmacists about generic medicine in Nigeria. J Gene Med. 2021;17(2):84–96. doi: 10.1177/1741134320962843. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cook K.S., Cheshire C., Rice E.R.W., Nakagawa S. In: Handbook of Social Psychology. Serpe R.T., editor. Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht; 2013. Social exchange theory in. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Federal Ministry of Health [Nigeria] The IntegratE project; Nigeria: 2020. Quality of Care Received for Family Planning from Community Pharmacists and Patent and Proprietary Medicine Vendors in Lagos and Kaduna.https://www.popcouncil.org/uploads/pdfs/2020RH_IntegratE_QoC_brief.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 36.OlaOlorun F.M., Jain A., Olalere E., et al. Nigerian stakeholders’ perceptions of a pilot tier accreditation system for patent and proprietary medicine vendors to expand access to family planning services. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22:1119. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08503-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.WHO Family Planning Global Handbook [cited 2023 Oct- 04] 2018. https://www.fphandbook.org/sites/default/files/global-handbook-2018-full-web.pdf Available from:
  • 38.Semachew K.A., Tarekegn M., Embiale N. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards family planning among reproductive age women in a resource limited settings of Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11:577. doi: 10.1186/s13104-018-3689-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wani R.T., Rashid I., Nabi S.S., Dar H. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of family planning services among healthcare workers in Kashmir - a cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Apr;8(4):1319–1325. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_96_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Idris I.B., Syed Soffian S.S., Baharom M., Baharuddin U.M., Hashim S., Nawi A.M. Influence of sociocultural beliefs and practices on contraception: a systematic review. Women Health. 2022;62(8):688–699. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2022.2117764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Alshahrani A.M., Alsheikh M.Y. Community Pharmacists’ perceptions, barriers, and willingness for offering sexual and reproductive health services. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(20):10735. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Corroon M., Kebede E., Spektor G., Speizer I. Key role of drug shops and pharmacies for family planning in urban Nigeria and Kenya. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2016;4(4):594–609. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.O’Sullivan T.A., Sy E., Bacci J.L. Essential attributes for the community pharmacist as care provider. Am J Pharm Educ. 2020;84(1):7125. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary material 1

mmc1.docx (15.9KB, docx)

Supplementary material 2

mmc2.docx (16.6KB, docx)

Supplementary material 3

mmc3.docx (18.8KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

Relevant data and protocols for this study may be accessed upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.


Articles from Exploratory Research in Clinical and Social Pharmacy are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES