Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 22.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2023 Jun 15;62(30):e202303916. doi: 10.1002/anie.202303916

Ethene-1,1-disulfonyl Difluoride (EDSF) for SuFEx Click Chemistry: Synthesis of SuFExable 1,1-Bissulfonylfluoride Substituted Cyclobutene Hubs

Christopher J Smedley [b],[c],*, Marie-Claire Giel [c], Thomas Fallon [d], John E Moses [a],*
PMCID: PMC10958772  NIHMSID: NIHMS1977303  PMID: 37224463

Abstract

We present the synthesis of 1,1-bis(fluorosulfonyl)-2-(pyridin-1-ium-1-yl)ethan-1-ide, a bench-stable precursor to ethene-1,1-disulfonyl difluoride (EDSF). The novel SuFEx reagent, EDSF, is demonstrated in the preparation of 26 unique 1,1-bissulfonylfluoride substituted cyclobutenes via a cycloaddition reaction. The regioselective click cycloaddition reaction is rapid, straightforward, and highly efficient, enabling the generation of highly functionalized 4-membered ring (4MR) carbocycles. These carbocycles are both valuable structural motifs found in numerous bioactive natural products and pharmaceutically relevant small molecules. Additionally, we showcase diversification of the novel cyclobutene cores through selective Cs2CO3-activated SuFEx click chemistry between a single S–F group and aryl alcohol, yielding the corresponding sulfonate ester products with high efficiency. Finally, density functional theory calculations offer mechanistic insights about the reaction pathway.

Keywords: Sulfur-Fluoride Exchange, SuFEx, Cycloaddition, Cyclobutenes, Click Chemistry


Sulfur-Fluoride Exchange (SuFEx) is a highly versatile and powerful click transformation, with extensive scope, first reported by Sharpless and colleagues in 2014[13]. SuFEx adheres to many of the original click chemistry principles (e.g., atom economy, high yield, simple purification, and selectivity for a single product) necessary to achieve click-status and is one of the few “true” click reactions compatible with biological systems[46]. SuFEx leverages a delicate balance between the stability and reactivity of high oxidation S–F compounds, which, in contrast to their S–Cl counterparts, are resistant to reductive collapse, permitting a clear pathway for nucleophilic exchange.

Traditional SuFEx reactions typically involve aryl silyl ethers and aryl sulfonyl fluorides or fluorosulfates. These reactions are catalyzed by Lewis basic tertiary amines or phosphazenes[1], although bifluoride salts and Cs2CO3 activation routes are also feasible[79]. Additionally, silica-free SuFEx protocols have been developed[10], including Accelerated SuFEx Click Chemistry (ASCC), which utilizes a synergistic hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS)-BTMG (Barton’s base) catalytic system to generate stable S–O linkages directly from aryl and alkyl alcohol nucleophiles[1113].

SuFEx has profoundly influenced various disciplines, encompassing drug discovery and materials science[2,7,8,1423]. This success is, in part, attributed to the development of versatile connective hubs that facilitate new sulfur-centered linkages for the swift synthesis of complex molecules. The family of S–F connective hubs can be categorized into two groups: i) inorganic high oxidation sulfur compounds, which include connective gases such as sulfuryl fluoride (SO2F2) and thionyl tetrafluoride (SOF4), both possessing multiple exchangeable S–F bonds; and ii) carbon-based high oxidation state S–F bond-containing hubs, including Michael acceptors and dipolarophiles such as ethene sulfonyl fluoride (ESF) [1,20,24,25], 1-bromoethene-1-sulfonyl fluoride (BESF)[2628], and the versatile 2-substituted-alkynyl-1-sulfonyl fluorides (SASFs) [2931].

The fluorosulfuryl isocyanate (FSI) and methanedisulfonyl fluoride (MDSF) reagents represent the latest additions to the SuFEx family, facilitating the synthesis of fluorosulfuryl carbamates (and ureas) and unsaturated 1,1-disulfonyl fluorides, respectively[32,33]. Building on our previous work in developing α,β-unsaturated SuFEx hubs (BESF, SASF), we present ethene-1,1-disulfonyl difluoride (EDSF), an unprecedented SuFEx reagent for the synthesis of SuFExable 1,1-bissulfonylfluoride substituted cyclobutene hubs.

4-Membered ring (4MR) carbocycles are important, albeit underexploited motifs in bioactive natural products and pharmaceutically relevant small molecules (Fig. 1D). Examples include the natural product cyclomegistine (6) and the cyclobutene analog (7) of combretastatin A-4, both of which have potent cytotoxic activity against several cancer cell lines[3436]. The strained carbocycle can favorably contribute to drug properties of small molecules, such as reduced planarity, increased metabolic stability, and conformation restriction

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

A) Examples of SuFEx hubs; B) Work by Alcaide; C) This work: in situ generation and application of ethene-1,1-disulfonyl difluoride; D) 4-Membered carbocycles in bioactive small molecules and natural products.

Additionally, 4MR systems offer versatile cores for accessing more complex structures. However, achieving regioselective synthesis of functional cyclobutenes presents a significant challenge. Therefore, we sought to develop a clickable cyclobutene that would serve as a connective hub, allowing for derivatization of the 4MR core. Alcaide et al. demonstrated that 2-(pyridinium-1-yl)-1,1-bis(triflyl)ethanides (1) are efficient 1,2-dipole precursors in [2+2] cycloaddition reactions with alkynes, resulting in the formation of 1,1-bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)-substituted cyclobutenes (2)[37,38]. Our vision was to use EDSF (4), a reagent that replaces the trifyl unit with sulfonyl fluorides, to produce sulfonyl fluoride functionalized cyclobutenes that can be further diversified through late-stage SuFEx click chemistry.

In light of the expected instability of EDSF, we aimed to synthesize a bench-stable zwitterionic precursor. Our approach involved heating methanedisulfonyl fluoride (MDSF) with paraformaldehyde and a range of 2-substituted pyridines, such as 2,4-dimethyl-, 2-acetyl-, 2-fluoro-, 2-chloro-, and 2-bromopyridine, along with pyridine in anhydrous DCE[39]. While the reactions involving 2-substituted pyridines resulted in complex product mixtures[40], the reaction with pyridine successfully yielded 1,1-bis(fluorosulfonyl)-2-(pyridin-1-ium-1-yl)ethan-1-ide (3) as a bench-stable precursor. This precursor was obtained in gram-scale quantities (2.4 g) within a short reaction time of 1 h (Scheme 1A)[41,42].

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

A) Synthesis of 1,1-bis(fluorosulfonyl)-2-(pyridin-1-ium-1-yl)ethan-1-ide (3) and its reaction with terminal alkynes. A) Synthetic procedure. B) Substrate scope. C) Representative NOESY spectrum for 11e. Reactions were conducted on a 100 μmol scale unless stated otherwise in the Supplementary Information. Isolated yields are reported.

We subsequently investigated the in situ generation of EDSF and its ensuing 1,2-dipolar cycloaddition with alkynes, employing the readily accessible electron-rich aryl acetylene, 4- methoxyphenylacetylene, as a model substrate. Our findings revealed that the addition of 2.0 equivalents of H2SO4 to a 1:2 mixture of 4-methoxyphenylacetylene and 3 at −10 °C in MeCN/H2O, followed by warming to room temperature and stirring for 1 hour, resulted in the formation of cyclobutene 11a as a single regioisomer with an 84% yield[43]. The reaction exhibited favorable performance with a range of aryl acetylenes and enynes 10a–10q (Scheme 1A), yielding 17 novel 1,2-disubstituted cyclobutene products 11a–11q in good to excellent yields (56–97%). Notably, the aryl enynes 10m and 10n reacted with 3 via the triple bond, while non-conjugated alkyne substituents remained unaffected, showcasing remarkable chemoselectivity.

The syn-regiochemistry of the cyclobutene products was elucidated by NOESY NMR. A strong NOE correlation between protons HA and HB of cyclobutene 11e supports aryl substitution in the 2-position of the cyclobutene carbocycle relative to the 1,1-disulfonyl fluoride substituted carbon (Scheme 1B).

Our assignment was substantiated through the use of HMBC NMR analyses, which demonstrated a robust correlation between the methine proton and the methylene carbon within the carbocyclic framework (refer to Supporting Information, Fig. S2). Moreover, the 1H chemical shifts exhibited a notable correspondence with the analogous trifluoromethyl derivative, as synthesized by Alcaide et al[37].

The reaction involving compound 3 and a variety of non-terminal aryl acetylenes and enynes (12a–12i) was subsequently investigated. By employing slightly modified conditions [1.0 eq. of alkyne, 2.0 eq. of compound 3, and 2.0 eq. of H2SO4 stirred in MeCN at −10 °C, followed by stirring at room temperature for 1 h], a series of highly substituted cyclobutenes (13a–13i) were obtained with yields up to 90% (Scheme 2A). The regiochemistry of the products was verified through NOESY NMR analysis, exemplified by compound 13e in Scheme 2B. The observed NOE correlation between proton HA in the carbocyclic structure and proton HB of the cyclohexyl ring implies aryl substitution at the 2-position of the cyclobutene carbocycle relative to the 1,1-disulfonyl fluoride substituted carbon.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Reaction of non-terminal alkynes with 1,1-bis(fluorosulfonyl)-2-(pyridin-1-ium-1-yl)ethan-1-ide. A) Substrate scope. B) Representative NOESY spectrum for 13e. Reactions were conducted on a 100 μmol scale unless stated otherwise in the Supplementary Information. Isolated yields are reported.

Next, we delved into the late-stage SuFEx diversification of the newly developed cyclobutene hubs, a direction unexplored in previous studies. Upon conducting the reaction between the representative substrate 11a and an aryl silyl ether (4-OMePhOTBS) using 20 mol% DBU in MeCN, no discernible reaction occurred. This could potentially be attributed to the diminished reactivity of alkyl sulfonyl fluorides compared to their analogous aryl substrates.

Upon screening reaction conditions, we found that Cs2CO3 could facilitate the SuFEx reaction between the S–F and the corresponding aryl alcohol, presumably through the phenolate formation[9]. Consequently, under optimized conditions [1.0 eq. of cyclobutene 11a, 1.1 eq. of phenol 14a, and 1.1 eq. of Cs2CO3 stirred at room temperature for 3 h in MeCN], compound 15a was exclusively produced with an 80% yield. Employing the modified protocol, we successfully synthesized 10 diverse sulfonate products (15a-15j), including alkynyl- (15b), nitro- (15c), ester- (15d), dimethylamino- (15f), trifluoromethyl(thio)- (15g), and nitrile- (15h), achieving good to excellent yields ranging from 72–88% (Scheme 3)[44].

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Reaction of phenols with cyclobutenes and substrate scope. Reactions were conducted on a 250 μmol scale unless stated otherwise in the Supplementary Information. Isolated yields are reported.

Mechanistically, we hypothesize a stepwise [2+2] cycloaddition for ethene-1,1-disulfonyl difluoride, as corroborated by density functional theory (DFT) calculations at the ωB97XD/Def2-TZVP level (Scheme 4). This computational approach facilitates an in-depth examination of the reaction mechanism, elucidating key factors that contribute to the observed outcomes. Consequently, the addition of H2SO4 to 1,1-bis(fluorosulfonyl)-2-(pyridin-1-ium-1-yl)ethan-1-ide facilitates the dissociation, yielding the highly reactive EDSF, which undergoes stepwise cycloaddition with the alkyne through two competing pathways. Pathway 1 is the distal addition of the alkyne (TS1distal), which has a ΔG value of +68 kJ/mol and leads to the zwitterionic intermediate (INTdistal, ΔG = −4 kJ/mol), pathway 2 is the proximal addition (TS1prox) with a ΔG of +71 kJ/mol leading to the zwitterionic intermediate (INTprox, ΔG = −10 kJ/mol). Although only pathway 2 is proposed in the analogous calculations by Alcaide et al.[37], we note close competition between these two addition pathways, and both zwitterionic intermediates ultimately converge to reach the very low energy TS2 (ΔG = 16 kJ/mol) after INtdistal undergoes conformational reorganization. Finally, the favorable cyclobutene product is formed (ΔG = −98 kJ/mol) in a concerted fashion. The outstanding regioselectivity observed in our experimental findings is further supported by our analysis of the alternative regioisomeric pathway. This pathway, which involves the addition of the alkyne via the internal carbon, was determined to have a significantly higher activation barrier (TSB, ΔG = 151 kJ/mol). The substantial energy barrier renders this pathway unfeasible, providing a strong rationale for the exceptional regioselectivity observed experimentally.

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

DFT calculations at: ωB97XD/Def2TZVP//ωB97XD/Def2SVP (SMD=MeCN), relative ΔG in kJ/mol at 298K

In summary, we have developed a practical approach for the regioselective synthesis of 26 unprecedented sulfonyl fluoride functionalized cyclobutenes with up to 97% yield from ethene-1,1-disulfonyl difluoride (EDSF). EDSF is conveniently generated in situ from the novel bench-stable precursor, 1,1-bis(fluorosulfonyl)-2-(pyridin-1-ium-1-yl)ethan-1-ide. Moreover, we demonstrate the capacity of the cyclobutene products to be rapidly diversified through late-stage SuFEx modification under specific conditions, selectively exchanging just one S–F group with a library of phenols to isolate 10 mono-sulfonate products. Lastly, a plausible reaction mechanism supported by molecular modeling studies is provided, in which we propose a stepwise [2+2] cycloaddition between ethene-1,1-disulfonyl difluoride and the alkyne starting materials.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

Acknowledgements

J.E.M. acknowledges the NCI Cancer Center Support Grant 5P30CA045508, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Northwell Health Affiliation, the F. M. Kirby Foundation, the Sunshine Foundation, S. J. Edwards, The Starr Foundation, The Wasily Family Foundation, La Trobe University and Australian Research Council (Future Fellowship; FT170100156) for funding. We thank Dr. K. B. Sharpless, Dr. J. A. Homer and R. A. Koelln for helpful discussions.

References

  • [1].Dong J, Krasnova L, Finn MG, Sharpless KB, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2014, 53, 9430–9448; Angew. Chem. 2014,126, 9584–9603. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [2].Barrow AS, Smedley CJ, Zheng Q, Li S, Dong J, Moses JE, Chem. Soc. Rev 2019, 48, 4731–4758. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [3].Giel M-C, Smedley CJ, Moses JE, Sulfur Fluoride Exchange (SuFEx) in Science of Synthesis: Click Chemistry (Eds. Rutjes FPJT), Thieme Chemistry, 2021, pp 435–484. [Google Scholar]
  • [4].Kolb HC, Finn MG, Sharpless KB, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2001, 40, 2004–2021; Angew. Chem. 2001,113, 2056–2075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [5].Moses JE, Moorhouse AD, Chem. Soc. Rev 2007, 36, 1249–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [6].Moorhouse AD, Moses JE, ChemMedChem 2008, 3, 715–723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [7].Gao B, Zhang L, Zheng Q, Zhou F, Klivansky LM, Lu J, Liu Y, Dong J, Wu P, Sharpless KB, Nat. Chem 2017, 9, 1083–1088. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [8].Smedley CJ, Zheng Q, Gao B, Li S, Molino A, Duivenvoorden HM, Parker BS, Wilson DJD, Sharpless KB, Moses JE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58, 4552–4556; Angew. Chem. 2019, 131, 4600–4604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [9].Zhang X, Moku B, Leng J, Rakesh KP, Qin H-L, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2019, 1763–1769. [Google Scholar]
  • [10].Liang D-D, Streefkerk DE, Jordaan D, Wagemakers J, Baggerman J, Zuilhof H, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 7494–7500; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 7564–7570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [11].Smedley CJ, Homer JA, Gialelis TL, Barrow AS, Koelln RA, Moses JE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2022, 61, e202112375; Angew. Chem. 2022, 134, e202112375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [12].See also:; Liu C, Yang C, Hwang S, Ferraro SL, Flynn JP, Niu J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 18435–18441; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 18593–18599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [13].The ASCC condition aided the development of Phosphorus Fluoride Exchange (PFEx), the latest development in connective click technology. See:; Sun S, Smedley CJ, Homer JA, Cheng Q-Q, Sharpless KB, Moses JE, ChemRxiv 2022, DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-nc91f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [14].Zheng Q, Woehl JL, Kitamura S, Santos-Martins D, Smedley CJ, Li G, Forli S, Moses JE, Wolan DW, Sharpless KB, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2019, 116, 18808–18814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [15].Mortenson DE, Brighty GJ, Plate L, Bare G, Chen W, Li S, Wang H, Cravatt BF, Forli S, Powers ET, Sharpless KB, Wilson IA, Kelly JW, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 200–210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [16].Kitamura S, Zheng Q, Woehl JL, Solania A, Chen E, Dillon N, Hull MV, Kotaniguchi M, Cappiello JR, Kitamura S, Nizet V, Sharpless KB, Wolan DW, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2020, 142, 10899–10904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [17].Zhang J, Zhao X, Cappiello JR, Yang Y, Cheng Y, Liu G, Fang W, Luo Y, Zhang Y, Dong J, Zhang L, Sharpless KB, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2021, 118, e2103513118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [18].Yatvin J, Brooks K, Locklin J, Chem. Eur. J 2016, 22, 16348–16354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [19].Brooks K, Yatvin J, Kovaliov M, Crane GH, Horn J, Averick S, Locklin J, Macromolecules 2018, 51, 297–305. [Google Scholar]
  • [20].Giel M-C, Smedley CJ, Mackie ERR, Guo T, Dong J, Soares da Costa TP, Moses JE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 1181–1186; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 1197–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [21].Giel M-C, Zhang S, Hu Q, Ding D, Tang Y, Hong Y, ACS Appl. Bio Mater 2022, 5, 4321–4326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [22].Li H, Chang BS, Kim H, Xie Z, Lainé A, Ma L, Xu T, Yang C, Kwon J, Shelton SW, Klivansky LM, Altoé V, Gao B, Schwartzberg AM, Peng Z, Ritchie RO, Xu T, Salmeron M, Ruiz R, Sharpless KB, Wu P, Liu Y, Joule 2023, 7, 95–111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [23].Gialelis TL, Wang Z, Homer JA, Yang W-H, Chung T, Hu Q, Smedley CJ, Pawar NJ, Upadhyay NS, Tuveson DA, Lyons SK, Lukey MJ, Moses JE, RSC Med. Chem accepted, DOI: 10.1039/D3MD00049D. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [24].Krutak JJ, Burpitt RD, Moore WH, Hyatt JA, J. Org. Chem 1979, 44, 3847–3858. [Google Scholar]
  • [25].Qin H-L, Zheng Q, Bare GAL, Wu P, Sharpless KB, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 14155–14158; Angew. Chem. 2016, 128, 14361–14364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [26].Smedley CJ, Giel M-C, Molino A, Barrow AS, Wilson DJD, Moses JE, Chem. Commun 2018, 54, 6020–6023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [27].Leng J, Qin H-L, Chem. Commun 2018, 54, 4477–4480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [28].Thomas J, V Fokin V, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 3749–3752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [29].Smedley CJ, Li G, Barrow AS, Gialelis TL, Giel M-C, Ottonello A, Cheng Y, Kitamura S, Wolan DW, Sharpless KB, Moses JE, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 12460–12469; Angew. Chem. 2020, 132, 12560–12569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [30].Cheng Y, Li G, Smedley CJ, Giel M-C, Kitamura S, Woehl JL, Bianco G, Forli S, Homer JA, Cappiello JR, Wolan DW, Moses JE, Sharpless KB, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 2022, 119, e2208540119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [31].Smedley CJ, Chem. Commun 2022, 58, 11316–11319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [32].Sun S, Gao B, Chen J, Sharpless KB, Dong J, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2021, 60, 21195–21199; Angew. Chem. 2021, 133, 21365–21369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [33].Tryniszewski M, Basiak D, Barbasiewicz M, Org. Lett 2022, 24, 4270–4274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [34].Parsutkar MM, Pagar VV, V RajanBabu T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 15367–15377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [35].van der Kolk MR, Janssen MACH, Rutjes FPJT, Blanco-Ania D, ChemMedChem 2022, 17, e202200020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [36].Nowikow C, Fuerst R, Kauderer M, Dank C, Schmid W, Hajduch M, Rehulka J, Gurska S, Mokshyna O, Polishchuk P, Zupkó I, Dzubak P, Rinner U, Bioorg. Med. Chem 2019, 27, 115032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [37].Alcaide B, Almendros P, Fernández I, Lázaro-Milla C, Chem. Commun 2015, 51, 3395–3398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [38].The in situ generation of 1,1-bistrifluoromethyl bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)ethene from bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)methane and paraformaldehyde has previously been reported, see:; Yanai H, Fujita M, Taguchi T, Chem. Commun 2011, 47, 7245–7247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [39].For related work on trifluoromethylsulfonyl reagents, see:; a) Yanai H, Takahashi Y, Fukaya H, Dobashi Y, Matsumoto T, Chem. Commun 2013, 49, 10091–10093; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Yanai H, Takahashi R, Takahashi Y, Kotani A, Hakamata H, Matsumoto T, Chem. Eur. J 2017, 23, 8203–8211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • [40].The difference between the electronic properties of triflones and sulfonyl fluorides may have altered the requirements for a bench stable precursor, see:; Kotani A, Yanai H, Matsumoto T, and Hakamata H, Electrochemistry 2021, 89, 121–124. [Google Scholar]
  • [41].Longer reaction times led to the degradation of the product.
  • [42].For structurally similar non-substituted pyridinium reagents see:; a) Zia-Ebrahimi AM and Huffman GW, Synthesis 1996, 215–218; [Google Scholar]; b) Kuhn N, Al-Sheikh A, Schwarz S, Steimann M Z. Naturforsch. B 2005, 6, 398–402; [Google Scholar]; c). Sweidan K, AlDamen MA, Maichle-Mößmer C, Mubarak MS, J. Chem. Crystallogr 2012, 42, 427–431. [Google Scholar]
  • [43].Barber and Koshar previously prepared 1,1-bis((trifluoromethyl)sulfonyl)ethene from 2-(pyridinium-1-yl)-1,1-bis(triflyl)-ethanide using H2SO4. However, the protocol delivered low yields and as a mixture with the corresponding alkane, see:; Barber L Jr., Koshar RJ, US Pat. 3962346, 1976.
  • [44].The remaining sulfonyl fluoride group in the monosulfonate products displayed inertness under the examined SuFEx conditions, which involved using 1.1 equivalents of Cs2CO3 and agitation at either ambient temperature or 50°C for a duration of 3 hours in acetonitrile

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

RESOURCES