Skip to main content
FEMS Microbiology Ecology logoLink to FEMS Microbiology Ecology
. 2024 Mar 18;100(4):fiae024. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiae024

Rhizoctonia solani disease suppression: addition of keratin-rich soil amendment leads to functional shifts in soil microbial communities

Lina Russ 1,, Beatriz Andreo Jimenez 2, Els Nijhuis 3, Joeke Postma 4
PMCID: PMC10959553  PMID: 38499445

Abstract

Promoting soil suppressiveness against soil borne pathogens could be a promising strategy to manage crop diseases. One way to increase the suppression potential in agricultural soils is via the addition of organic amendments. This microbe-mediated phenomenon, although not fully understood, prompted our study to explore the microbial taxa and functional properties associated with Rhizoctonia solani disease suppression in sugar beet seedlings after amending soil with a keratin-rich waste stream. Soil samples were analyzed using shotgun metagenomics sequencing. Results showed that both amended soils were enriched in bacterial families found in disease suppressive soils before, indicating that the amendment of keratin-rich material can support the transformation into a suppressive soil. On a functional level, genes encoding keratinolytic enzymes were found to be abundant in the keratin-amended samples. Proteins enriched in amended soils were those potentially involved in the production of secondary metabolites/antibiotics, motility, keratin-degradation, and contractile secretion system proteins. We hypothesize these taxa contribute to the amendment-induced suppression effect due to their genomic potential to produce antibiotics, secrete effectors via the contractile secretion system, and degrade oxalate—a potential virulence factor of R. solani—while simultaneously possessing the ability to metabolize keratin.

Keywords: disease suppression, keratin, microbiome, Rhizoctonia solani, soil


Deciphering mechanisms of amendment-induced suppressiveness in agricultural soils using metagenomics.

Introduction

Food security is threatened by a combination of increasing disease incidence in crops and the target to reduce the application of pesticides in 2030 by 50% following the new European Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategies (Proposal on the sustainable use of plant protection products and amending Regulation (EU) 2021/2115). Enhancing soil suppressiveness against soil borne pathogens is a promising strategy to control diseases and crop losses caused by those pathogens. Rhizoctonia solani is the main causal agent of black scurf disease in potato and crown rot in sugar beet, among other arable crops.

Disease suppression of Rhizoctonia solani in soils can be induced by two entirely different strategies. The first approach requires the successive planting of host crops in the presence of their pathogen resulting in reduced disease incidence over time. This phenomenon of disease decline by monocropping has first been described for take-all (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) in barley and wheat (Gerlagh 1968, Sarniguet et al. 1992, Raaijmakers and Weller 1998). Take-all decline is defined as the spontaneous reduction in the incidence and severity of the disease and increase in yield occurring with continuous monoculture of the host crop following a severe attack of the disease (Schlatter et al. 2017). Also, for R. solani-induced diseases a decline has been reported in both field and pot experiments for several crops, i.e. wheat (Lucas et al. 1993, Roget 1995, Wiseman et al. 1996, Mazzola and Gu 2002), sugar beet (Hyakumachi et al. 1990, Sayama et al. 2001, Gómez Expósito 2017), radish (Henis et al. 1978, Chet and Baker 1980, Chern and Ko 1989), potato (Velvis et al. 1989, Jager and Velvis 1995) and cauliflower (Davik and Sundheim 1984, Postma et al. 2010).

The second approach to stimulate disease suppression requires the addition of organic amendments into soils. These amendments can be side streams from industrial food processing, farming, and agricultural activities. The re-use of such materials in agriculture aligns with the increasing interest in circularity, reducing the environmental impact and promoting valorization of waste products (Alvarenga et al. 2017, Abbott et al. 2018, De Corato 2020). A large variety of organic products, residual streams from plant and animal production, food industry or society have been tested for their potential to suppress soilborne diseases. The effects are product- and disease dependent and therefore difficult to translate into practical applications so far (Bonanomi et al. 2010). The addition of compost (Tuitert et al. 1998, Pérez-Piqueres et al. 2006, Termorshuizen et al. 2006) and cellulose-containing products (Kundu and Nandi 1985, Clocchiatti et al. 2021) have been studied extensively, but effects were often unpredictable.

Against R. solani particularly, the addition of chitin- and keratin-rich products have been shown to decrease disease (Postma and Schilder 2015, Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021). Disregarding the approach to induce Rhizoctonia suppressiveness in soils, several organisms or combinations thereof were commonly found to correlate with lower disease incidence in different crops and soils. These include members of the bacterial families Oxalobacteriaceae, Comamonadaceae and Burkholderiaceae, Pseudomonadaceae as well as members of the orders Hyphomicrobiales and Sphingobacteriales (notably Flavobacterium, Chryseobacteria and Chitinophaga) and the fungal family Mortierellaceae (Bonanomi et al. 2010, Chapelle et al. 2016, Gómez Expósito 2017, Gómez Expósito et al. 2017, Carrión et al. 2018, Carrión et al. 2019, Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021, Yin et al. 2021).

A universal pattern of the responsible microorganisms and especially the underlying mechanisms for Rhizoctonia suppressive soils is still lacking, although several potential mechanisms of disease suppression have been proposed. One model attributes disease suppression to the expression of a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase of Pseudomonadaceae family members (Mendes et al. 2011). Another mechanism points to the role of oxalic and phenylacetic acid as the main driver of suppression. R. solani, extending hyphae towards the plant root, releases oxalic and phenylacetic acid, activating certain rhizobacterial families. This induces oxidative stress, triggering survival responses via the ppGpp pathway, including enhanced motility, biofilm formation, and secondary metabolite production (Chapelle et al. 2016). These hypotheses have been proposed based on experimental set up in natural or agricultural soils without amendments. The disease suppression mechanisms via organic amendments remain unexplored.

The objective of the present work is to gain a deeper insight on how microbial communities and their molecular functions can be linked to Rhizoctonia disease suppression after the amendment with a keratin-rich side stream from the farming industry. We propose that the addition of keratinaceous compounds leads to an enrichment of specific genes in the microbial community that each by themselves have been shown to play a role in disease suppression.

Material and methods

Selected samples and sequencing

Soil samples were collected as large batches from the top 20 cm of two different experimental fields in the Netherlands in 2017: The alluvial sandy soil with a low organic matter content (1.5%) and neutral pH (7.2) was collected from Lisse (N 52.2552, E 4.5477) and the sandy soil with a higher organic matter content (4.0 to 4.3%) and a slightly acidic pH (5.5) was obtained from Vredepeel (N 51.5417, E 5.8730). Additional parameters measured can be found in the publication of Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021. A volume of 1.3l soil per replicate and soil was used. Half of them was amended with a pig hair meal product (1.4 g/kg soil) (Darling Ingredients), hereafter referred to as keratin-rich amendment. As control treatment the same amount of soil was amended with 1.2 g calcium nitrate (Ca(NO3)2 /kg soil to ensure the same nitrogen equivalents added as in the keratin-rich treatment (i.e. 0.2 g N/kg soil). All treatments were performed with 4 replicates and incubated in open plastic bags for three weeks at room temperature (∼20ºC). Soils in combination with the treatment were then tested for their disease suppression potential in bioassays with sugar beet seedlings by evaluating the disease spread (plants with damping off or brown–grey lesions on the stem) previously. The keratin-rich amendment with pig hair (referred to as Keratin-3) showed a significant (P < 0.01) decrease in disease spread compared to the control (Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021).

The total of 16 samples was then sampled for DNA extraction to perform shotgun metagenomics sequencing and stored at −20ºC until use. DNA was extracted using the MoBio PowerMag soil DNA isolation KF kit (MoBio Laboratories, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), with the manufacturer's protocol adjusted for a 4-fold input weight of 1 g soil per sample. Lysis occurred in 5-ml MoBio PowerWater DNA bead tubes supplemented with 1 g of 0.1-mm glass beads. For King Fisher DNA processing, a 96-well format and two technical replicates per sample were employed, incorporating a double binding step in the protocol to utilize all available lysate per sample. The resulting DNA eluates were combined per sample and stored at −20 °C. DNA concentration was determined using a Pico Green assay on a Tecan Infinite M200Pro.

Sheared DNA extracts were used for library preparation (Next Generation Sequencing Facilities, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands) and those were paired-end sequenced (2×150 nt) on a Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (BaseClear B.V., Leiden, the Netherlands). The raw sequencing data used for this study are available on the NCBI sequence read archive (SRA) under BioProject number PRJNA966095 (reviewer link: https://dataview.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/object/PRJNA966095?reviewer=seaasdqnmti48epii65f2qfrm4.)

Both soils were tested for damping off disease suppression caused by Rhizoctonia solani AG2-2IIIB in a sugar beet assay and were found to lead to a significant decrease in disease incidence (Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021).

Bioinformatics workflow

Raw reads were subjected to an all-in-one preprocessing using FASTP (Chen et al. 2018) with default settings for paired-end data. The remaining reads were passed to Kraken2 (Wood et al. 2019, Lu et al. 2022) for detection of taxa using a custom database using the following kraken standard databases as basis: complete bacteria (70813 genomes), complete archaea (739 genomes), complete fungi (1678 genomes), complete viral (14744 genomes) and complete protozoan (11151 genomes) databases (https://benlangmead.github.io/aws-indexes/k2). After building the database, a collection of soil microbes that have been identified as important players in this ecosystem previously (Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021) and were either absent or underrepresented in the built database, were added to the library (Supplementary Table S1). Kraken2 was run in –paired mode on individual samples using the kraken2 standard output to be visualized with PAVIAN (Breitwieser and Salzberg 2019). The absolute number of hits were extracted per family and genus level entry. These results were then used to investigate differential abundance distributions of microbial families and genera per soil with DESeq2 (Love et al. 2014) separately, using treatment (keratin vs control) as design input. Results were then visualized using ENHANCEDVOLCANO (Blighe et al. 2019). In addition bracken was run for abundance estimation (Lu et al. 2017). Using the relative abundances the impact of keratin-rich soil amendments on taxonomic composition was assessed using PERMANOVA tests, applying Bray-Curtis dissimilarity on family and genus level. The Wilcoxon test was applied to identify significant differences in taxon abundance between treatment groups. Multiple testing correction (Benjamini-Hochberg) was performed, and only taxa with adjusted p-values < 0.01 were considered significant. Differences in variability were calculated between keratin-amended and control treatments and the Top 50 taxa on genus and family level were plotted using ggplot2 (Supplementary Figs S1 and S2).

Functional annotation and statistical analysis

Reads were assembled into proteins directly using the protein-level assembly tool PLASS (Steinegger et al. 2019) in paired-end mode to assemble QC-passed reads directly into proteins.

Pfam enrichment analysis

For the enrichment analysis of protein domains in the dataset, the most recent Pfam annotations of Pfam-A and Pfam-N (15–11–2021 version) were downloaded from the EMBL-EBI FTP server (http://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/databases/Pfam/) and converted into a mmseqs profile database (Steinegger and Söding 2017). Using the protein assemblies of each sample separately as query, mmseqs easy-search was used to find Pfam profile hits for each sequence, choosing the best hits greedily (–greedy-best-hits). The hits per Pfam domain were counted and the resulting count matrix per sample was analyzed for differential abundance with DeSeq2 using “treatment” and “soil” as parameters in the design after prefiltering out low counts (< 50). Acquired p-values were corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini and Hochberg method. PCA plots were created using log-ratio transformed output from the DESeq analysis. Pfam domains with a Log2Fold change of > 1 and Padj < 0.01 were subset (Supplementary Table S2). Differentially abundant domains were plotted using EnhancedVolcano (FCCutoff= 1.0, P-Cutoff= 10e-6). To evaluate the significance of Pfam composition differences among keratin-rich amendments, we generated a Bray–Curtis dissimilarity matrix. Subsequently, an adonis test was conducted to assess the influence of the keratin amendment on dissimilarity. Following this, Two-Way ANOVA was performed for each numeric response variable in the dataset, extracting P-values. In cases where variables showed significance in ANOVA (P<0.05), post-hoc tests (Tukey's HSD) were carried out. The outcomes, comprising P-values, significant variables, and ANOVA summaries, were consolidated into Tables S3 and S4.

Detection and classification of keratinases

The Peptidase Full-length Sequences were downloaded from the MEROPS peptidase database version 12.1 (Rawlings et al. 2017) and converted into a DIAMOND database (Buchfink et al. 2015, Buchfink et al. 2021). Assembled proteins of keratin-amended soils from Lisse and Vredepeel were searched against the peptidase database with a DIAMOND blastp run with a block size value of 12 and only showing the single best hit and further default settings. Protein sequences of the positives hits were extracted, and taxonomic information was added by running mmseqs taxonomy using the UniRef100 database as a reference with default settings. Information on the MEROPS family, the taxonomic lineage, the soil, and the sum of hits of each family per MEROPS family was combined using custom scripts in python and R and visualized using ggplot2. For the sake of visibility, a subset was taken containing known keratinases (Qiu et al. 2020) and microbial families that were shown to be more abundant in amended soils. These data were also visualized using ggplot2.

Untargeted approach using protein clustering

Due to the extremely high number of reads that could not be assigned to any taxonomic group, we also performed an untargeted approach to be able to classify proteins unique to the treatment independent from homologies with entries in available databases. To this end, protein assemblies were combined into treated and control samples per soil. The data load was downsized by clustering proteins and only keeping the representative sequences: We first converted the protein assemblies into mmseqs databases and used linclust of the mmseqs2 package on the pooled assemblies of the control and the treated samples in bidirectional coverage mode with sequence identity threshold and an alignment coverage of 80% (–min-seq-id 0.8 –cov-mode 0 -c 0.8) to preserve the multi domain structure of proteins. Representative proteins per cluster were then extracted from the clustering results (mmseqs createsubdb inDB_clu inDB inDB_clu_rep) and converted into a fasta flat file (mmseqs convert2fasta inDB_clu_rep inDB_clu_rep.fasta). The representative proteins of the control per soil were converted into a DIAMOND database and used as query against the representative proteins of the keratin-treated samples in a diamond blastp run with a block size value of 12 and only showing the single best hit and further default settings. Unaligned proteins were stored and used to create an mmseqs2 database to identify taxonomy and functions of proteins present using the mmseqs taxonomy against the Uniref100 database. The result of the functional characterization of proteins was exported into a .tsv file also containing the taxonomic lineage. Next to that we performed a functional annotation using the standalone version of KofamScan (version 1.3.0) with the standard database (KO profiles (release 24-Apr-2023) KO list (release 26-Apr-2023) (Aramaki et al. 2019). The data sets were then merged into a single file per soil containing functions and taxonomy in different columns. The table was parsed and families with a total of more than 200 protein hits were extracted. From those we used the top 100 most abundant KO identifiers and plotted the data using ggplot2.

Results

Sequencing results, annotation, and community profile

A summary of the samples and sequenced reads per sample is available in Table 1. Samples from Lisse soil were sequenced much deeper than Vredepeel soil samples. The amount of reads that could be classified using the customized Kraken database was low and depended on the soil and the treatment it received (Table 1). Interestingly, the percentage of classified reads in Lisse soils that had been supplemented with the keratin-rich amendment increased from 24.70±0.46 to 36.92±0.89, whereas classified reads in Vredepeel soil dropped after having received keratin-rich treatment (from 26.98±0.40 to 21.01±0.35). Most of all classified reads disregarding soil and treatment could be attributed to bacteria (96.81%–98.59%), followed by fungi (0.16%–0.31%). Viral and protozoan contribution to the metagenome was less than 0.01% of the total classified reads.

Table 1.

Sample description of Vredepeel and Lisse soils as well as sequencing, assembly, classification, and clustering statistics per treatment and soil.

sample ID Year Location Treatment # reads # Plass-assembled proteins Representative Protein clusters Kraken2 classified (%) Proteins with Pfam hits (%)
5_2_1 2017 Lisse control 142 978 580 32 591 140 25.06 53.97
6_2_2 2017 Lisse control 97 003 942 19 979 950 24.44 62.80
7_2_3 2017 Lisse control 145 297 988 33 944 258 25.26 39.06
8_2_4 2017 Lisse control 123 152 180 28 018 812 24.05 38.78
Total 114 534 160 64 109 105
45_12_1 2017 Lisse keratin-rich 330 315 422 103 987 098 35.42 42.41
46_12_2 2017 Lisse keratin-rich 87 596 756 19 973 315 37.01 43.13
47_12_3 2017 Lisse keratin-rich 209 939 806 60 993 464 38.61 43.91
48_12_4 2017 Lisse keratin-rich 160 000 448 41 729 783 36.64 30.07
Total 226 683 660 112 892 232
53_14_1 2017 Vredepeel control 105 381 712 22 595 511 27.29 37.32
54_14_2 2017 Vredepeel control 102 527 114 21 888 491 26.18 38.01
55_14_3 2017 Vredepeel control 177 871 500 46 720 927 27.41 38.42
56_14_4 2017 Vredepeel control 82 682 438 16 963 125 27.02 38.54
Total 108 168 054 78 028 651
93_24_1 2017 Vredepeel keratin-rich 71 538 528 14 684 057 21.38 19.77
94_24_2 2017 Vredepeel keratin-rich 104 520 536 23 365 019 21.32 19.86
95_24_3 2017 Vredepeel keratin-rich 141 049 098 36 036 176 20.36 39.36
96_24_4 2017 Vredepeel keratin-rich 120 677 294 29 756 912 20.96 19.81
Total 103 842 164 72 610 580

Taxonomic shifts after keratin-rich amendment in soil

As bacterial and fungal taxa represented the largest groups in the identifiable fraction, we focused our further analysis on these. The PERMANOVA analyses revealed significant differences in microbial community dissimilarity based on both the ‘treatment’ (keratin-rich amendment or control) and ‘soil’ (Vredepeel or Lisse) factors. At the genus level, the addition of a keratin-rich product had a substantial influence, explaining 63.21% of the dissimilarity (F = 24.055, P < 0.001), while the soil type had a marginal effect (R² = 20.08%, P = 0.067). This pattern persisted at the family level, with treatment significantly contributing to 67.13% of dissimilarity (P < 0.001), and soil type showing a less robust impact (R² = 18.35%, P = 0.063).

Differential abundance analysis of classified taxa on family level showed a similar shift in both soils upon the addition of the keratin-rich product. Both soils increased in Flavobacteriaceae and Sphingobacteriaceae (Bacteroidota), Boseaceae, Phyllobacteriaceae and Caulobacteraceae (Alphaproteobacteria), Oxalobacteraceae and Comamonadaceae (Betaproteobacteria), Rhodanobacteraceae and Steroidobacteraceae (Gammaproteobacteria), as well as one (Vredepeel; Bacteriovoraceae) or even three (Lisse; Bacteriovoraceae, Bdellovibrionceae, Halobacteriovoraceae) families of the bacterial phylum Bdellovibrionota, containing obligate predatory bacteria (Fig. 1A and B; Fig. S1). The only fungal group that increased significantly was the zygote fungal family of Mortierellaceae (Fig. 1B). Differences between the two soils were represented by Nitrosomanadaceae, Rhizobiaceae and Bdellovibrionaceae which did show a significant increase after keratin-rich amendment in Lisse soil, but not in Vredepeel soil. Furthermore, Micrococcaceae and Caulobacteraceae were more abundant in Lisse soil and did show a steeper increase after keratin amendment (Fig. 1A).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Differentially abundant microbial families after keratin-rich amendment. Volcano plots represent bacteria and fungi, which are differentially abundant within keratin-rich product treatment compared with the calcium nitrate control, in Lisse (A) and Vredepeel (B) soils (FDR=1×10−6, Log2FC=0.75). Based on normalized reads obtained after the Kraken2 workflow. Bubble size depicts the abundance of the family as the total number of reads.

On genus level the Massilia group (Massilia, Duganella, Pseudoduganella; Oxalobacteraceae), Paeniglutamicibacter, Arthrobacter and Pseudoarthrobacter (Micrococcaceae), Rhodanobacter (Rhodanobacteraceae), Steroidobacter (Steroidobacteraceae), Bosea, Aminobacter and Mesorhizobium (all belonging to the order of Hyphomicrobiales), as well as Brevundimonas (Caulobacteraceae) and Flavobacterium (Flavobacteriaceae) showed the steepest increase after the addition of the keratin-rich amendment (Fig. S2).

Keratinolytic potential of abundant taxa

Amending both soils with a keratin-rich compound compared to an inorganic source of nitrogen (Ca(NO3)2) led to similar changes in the taxonomic composition of the identifiable microbial fraction after an incubation time of three weeks. It was therefore expected that the potential to degrade keratinaceous compounds could play a role in the enrichment of certain taxa. The taxonomic families shown to be more abundant after the incubation with keratin showed a high occurrence of proteases belonging to MEROPS families of known keratinases (Fig. 2). Lisse soil did contain a much higher number of protease matches. However, differences between Lisse and Vredepeel soil response are difficult to interpret due to the uneven read depth of both samples. The absence of a certain protein family could also be caused by insufficient depth, especially of organisms with a lower abundance. In Lisse soil proteases of all known keratinase families could be recovered for Steroidobacteraceae, Solirubrobacteraceae, Rhodanobacteraceae, Pseudomonadaceae, Oxalobacteriaceae, Nocardioidaceae, Nitrosomonadaceae, Comamonadaceae and Chitinophagaceae. The MEROPS families with the highest number of hits were S09 (24.4% of subset hits), M04 (15.9%), M38 (14.1%), and S01 (10.4%). Much less common in frequency as well as in taxonomic distribution were the metalloprotease families M36 (0.14%) and M32 (0.13%).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Counts of hits on MEROPS protein families with known keratinolytic representatives within microbial families more abundant in soils having received a keratin-rich amendment.

Specific protein domains were enriched after keratin-rich amendment

Next to the taxonomic classification of reads and keratinase-like protease families, a classification on Pfam domains of assembled proteins was used as a proxy for functional changes in the microbiome upon the soil amendment with a keratin-rich product. The fraction of proteins carrying a Pfam domain found in the database differed between the control and the keratin-amended soils. If soils had received a keratin-rich amendment the number of proteins that could be assigned to a Pfam domain dropped in both soils (Table 1) (Lisse 39.88±5.69% with keratin-rich amendment, 48.65±10.22% in control; Vredepeel 24.70±8.46% with keratin-rich amendment, 38.07±0.48% in control) although standard deviation was high. The biological replicates of each treatment category per soil did show similar Pfam patterns and formed distinct clusters in a Principal component analysis (PCA) (Fig. 3). The keratin-rich amendment did have an influence on the protein domain abundances, resulting in a shift along PC1 that was visible in both soils (Fig. 3). The analysis indicates that the keratin amendment did not have a significant explanatory effect on the changes observed in the Pfam pattern for either soil. In Vredepeel soil, the R2 value is 0.1619 with a non-significant P-value of 0.842, while in Lisse soil, the R2 value is 3.2785 with a P-value of 0.104. The majority of the dissimilarity in both cases is attributed to residual variation within the dataset. Therefore, based on this analysis, the impact of the keratin amendment on Pfam pattern changes does not appear to be statistically significant in either soil.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Principal component analysis (PCA) of Pfam domain composition of keratin-rich and control treatment in Lisse and Vredepeel soil.

However, when ANOVA is performed for each Pfam domain individually and reveals significant differences between the keratin-amended and control groups, it suggests that the presence of keratin amendment has a statistically significant impact on the abundance or distribution of those specific Pfam domains. In Vredepeel soil, 9350 Pfam domains were detected that had a nonzero total read count, 2209 of them having a P-adjusted value of < 0.01. In Lisse soil, 10 133 different protein domains could be detected, of which 4248 had a P-adjusted < 0.01. To identify which domains were enriched if the keratin-rich product was added to the soil, a cutoff of Log2FC > 1.0 was chosen in addition to a P-adjusted < 0.01 (Table S2). Results showed that 480 protein domains were enriched in both Lisse and Vredepeel soils after having received an amendment with keratin. An additional 1227 and 179 Pfam domains were exclusively enriched in Lisse and Vredepeel soil, respectively. Of the 480 Pfam domains enriched in both types of soil after keratin-rich amendment, 168 were associated with domains of unknown functions (DUFs) and could not be characterized further. Potential domains of interest included a domain related to chitinase C (PF06483), several components of the type VI secretion system (T6SS) (PF18443, PF18426, PF13296, PF06744), domains related to the proteins involved in the biogenesis of bacterial cell appendages (PF00419, PF02753, PF06864, PF09977, PF10671, PF13681, PF15976, PF16823, PF16970) and flagella (PF08345, PF02108, PF03646, PF03961, PF05247, PF05400, PF06490, PF07196, PF07317, PF10768), peptidases with a domain similar to the M9 family (PF01752, PF08453), enhancin-like metallopeptidase domains of family M60 (PF17291, PF13402), microbial collagenases (PF01752, PF08453) and a number of phage(-like) proteins (PF00959, PF03374, PF04233, PF04466, PF05065, PF05133, PF05367, PF05954, PF06761, PF06892, PF09306, PF09669, PF13876, PF14395, PF16083, PF16510, PF18013, PF18352).

Functional shifts in disease suppressive soils

To identify proteins unique to keratin-enriched amendments irrespective of the soil, we conducted protein clustering for each soil and treatment. This resulted in 64109105 and 78028651 clusters for Lisse and Vredepeel soils under the control treatment, and 112892232 and 72610580 clusters for soils amended with a keratin-rich substrate, respectively (Table 1). Subsequently, aligning the clustered protein representatives from the control to the keratin-rich treatment using DIAMOND and retaining only the single best hit, 554610 proteins remained unaligned. These were considered unique to keratin-rich amendment. As downstream processing required the functional annotation of those proteins, KofamScan was used to assign KEGG orthologies. Of all unique proteins only 53435 (3.44%) could be assigned. Overall, there was a strong overlap in functional groups with Pfam enrichment analysis despite the different approach (Fig. 4). This included proteins potentially involved in the production of secondary metabolites/antibiotics such as 4′-demethylrebeccamycin synthase (K19888) found in representatives of the Burkholderiales, Sphingomonadaceae and several Actinomycetes, as well as gramicidin S synthase 2 (K16097) predominantly found in Bacteroidota. Proteins that could play a role in keratin degradation, such as serine protease (K14645) present in many organisms and the collagenase kumamolisin (K08677) found in Oxalobacteraceae, Rhodanobacteraceae, Bacillaceae, Micrococcaceae and Intersporangiaceae as well as several transporters potentially involved in transport of keratin derivatives such as a basic amino acid/polyamine antiporter (K03294). Interesting were also several enzyme families that degrade more complex substrates such as hyaluronate lyase (K011727), alpha-L-rhamnosidase (K05989) and arabidan endo-1,5-alpha-L-arabinosidase (K06113), 2,6-dioxo-6-phenylhexa-3-enoate/TCOA hydrolase (K22677) or exo-acting protein-alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (K25767) and corresponding transporters like cholesterol transport system auxiliary component (K18480). In addition, several major facilitator superfamily transporters and multidrug resistance proteins were recovered from soils amended with keratin-rich amendments (K03762, K05519, K08166, K18353, K18555, K18904, K18926), a trait shared among a wider range of microorganisms. The presence of a hemoglobin/transferrin/lactoferrin receptor protein (K16087) seems to be a trait of Pseudomonadota. Several genes involved in the acquisition of iron could be identified such as a ferric enterobactin receptor (K19611) with the highest number of hits found in Bacteriodota, Caulobacteraceae, Sphingomondaceae and Oxalobacteraceae and an iron−siderophore transport system substrate−binding protein (K25109), which seems to be more widely distributed. An interesting candidate protein is an uncharacterized protein (K07126) especially enriched among Oxalobacteraceae, Phyllobacteriaceae, Comanomadaceae, Pseudomonadaceae and the only protein found in the fungal family of Mortierellaceae at the set cut-off. Other interesting features include proteins involved in motility (K02416, K02397, K10564) and the type VI secretion system secreted protein VgrG (K11904) and type VI secretion system protein ImpH (K11895).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Abundance of the top 100 most abundant KEGG orthologies in microbial families with a total of ≥200 protein hits. The number of protein hits was Log-transformed Log10(n+1) and families grouped by a higher taxonomic order (Phylum; Pseudomonadota split on the level of class).

Discussion

It has been shown previously that the keratin-rich amendment in the form of pig hair to both Vredepeel and Lisse soils studied here was able to induce disease suppression against R. solani and affected the abundance of specific bacterial and fungal families as was shown by metataxonomic profiling (Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021). In the presented study, we aimed to identify functional traits of the microbial community in disease-suppressive soils that could potentially contribute to this mechanism. We hypothesized that amendment-induced disease suppression should lead to similar functional changes in different soil types.

To explore this hypothesis, we employed shotgun metagenomics, comparing taxonomic and functional profiles between soil types through comprehensive data mining. Our findings underscore the substantial role of the keratin-rich amendment in shaping microbial community composition, particularly at the family taxonomic level, while acknowledging a discernible influence of soil type. Microbial families that changed most significantly three weeks after the amendment of a keratin-rich substrate were Flavobacteriaceae and Sphingobacteriaceae (Bacteriodetes), Boseaceae, Phyllobacteriaceae and Caulobacteraceae (Alphaproteobacteria), Oxalobacteraceae and Comamonadaceae (Betaproteobacteria), Rhodanobacteraceae and Steroidobacteraceae (Gammaproteobacteria), as well the family of obligate bacterial predators Bacteriovoraceae. Within the fungal kingdom only the Mortierellaceae increased upon the addition of keratin. Previous work using metabarcoding analysis on the same soil samples revealed also Oxalobacteraceae, Flavobacteraceae and Mortierellaceae as the microbial families that were associated with the most pathogen-suppressive treatments i.e. keratin and chitin-rich amendments (Andreo-Jimenez et al. 2021).

The initial enrichment of taxa and functions is attributed to the addition of the keratin-rich amendment, with microorganisms capable of degrading keratin or metabolizing its degradation products thriving. Notably, the increased abundance of potential keratinolytic enzymes in taxa responding to the amendment supports this hypothesis. Despite the different nature of keratin (polypeptide) and chitin (polysaccharide) molecules, their amendment to soil seems to result in a comparable shift in the soil microbiome as was shown by Andreo-Jimenez et al. (2021). Wieczorek et al. (2019) confirmed that members of the Oxalobacteraceae and several Bacteroidetes families were the initial chitin degraders in agricultural soils using stable isotope probing. Interestingly, they could also show an increased labelling in bacterial predators, suggesting that microorganisms that degrade chitin are prey of Bacteriovoraceae and Bdellovibrionaceae. The increase of these two families in our experiment could have the same reason. Keratin-rich and chitin-rich amendment stimulate similar degraders and therefore also similar predators.

As the complete degradation of keratin, similar to chitin and cellulose, requires the synergistic action of several enzymes, it is impossible to deduce how the breakdown of keratin is orchestrated in the group of microorganisms (Qiu et al. 2020). Questions such as the succession pattern or whether some community members can independently execute the complete degradation pathway remain unanswered with the available data.

Comparing enriched taxa in amendment-induced R. solani suppressive soils from this study and Andreo-Jimenez et al. (2021) with those from successive monocropping strategies resulted in comparable microbiome patterns. This includes a higher abundance of Pseudomonadaceae, Sphingomonadaceae, Burkholderiaceae, Xanthomonadales, Oxalobacteraceae, Caulobacteraceae, Sphingobacteriaceae, Chitinophagaceae and Flavobacteriaceae in disease suppressive soils (Mendes et al. 2011, Cordovez et al. 2015, Chapelle et al. 2016, Gómez Expósito 2017, Yin et al. 2021).

It seems that selected organic amendments can stimulate the same groups that are associated with disease suppression without the addition of an amendment. This implies that the ability of a microorganism to degrade keratin, chitin and/or their derivates indirectly contributes to the transformation of a conducive into a Rhizoctonia-suppressive soil. Knowledge on the functional mechanism behind this phenomenon however remains patchy, mostly restricted to certain single taxa.

Carrión et al. (2018) could show that the production of sulfurous volatile compounds with antifungal activity by Burkholderiaceae lead to disease suppression of R. solani in situ. They could also show that members of the Chitinophagaceae and Flavobacteriaceae in the root endosphere were enriched in disease-tolerant plants (Carrión et al. 2019). These families encoded enzymes with enhanced enzymatic activities associated with fungal cell-wall degradation and secondary metabolite biosynthesis being a direct or indirect protective trait.

Mendes et al. attributed disease suppression to the expression of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase of Pseudomonadaceae (Mendes et al. 2011). Chapelle et al. (2016) propose a vital role for oxalic and phenylacetic acid which, during hyphal growth of R. solani, induce a stress response of specific rhizobacterial families leading to the onset of survival strategies including motility, biofilm formation and the production of secondary metabolites.

We hypothesize that certain groups of microorganisms that are increasing in abundance after the addition of the keratin-rich amendment, due to their ability to metabolize the substrate (as was shown on their repertoire of relevant proteases), also encode versatile functions that are commonly associated with disease suppression.

Among these are the contractile injection systems, such as the type VI secretion system (T6SS) or the extracellular contractile injection system (eCIS). Both are nanomachines resembling the bacteriophage puncturing structure, to secrete a variety of effectors that play a significant role in competition. These effectors can be injected into neighboring bacterial or eukaryotic cells or the environment causing arrest of their growth or even cell death, scavenging of nutrients or are being used for cell to cell signaling (Coulthurst 2019, Gallegos-Monterrosa and Coulthurst 2021, Geller et al. 2021). Several effectors secreted via this system have even been described to have a direct antifungal effect (Trunk et al. 2018, Trunk et al. 2019). It is a common feature in Pseudomonadota, where more than 25% of sequenced genomes are estimated to carry at least one T6SS (Boyer et al. 2009) and it is especially abundant in plant-associated microbes (Bernal et al. 2018). Our findings showed that proteins belonging to contractile injection systems are enriched in the metagenome after keratin-rich amendment, especially in β- and γ-Proteobacteria.

The ability to produce antibiotics or bacteriocins is a feature often associated with disease suppression. Although it was not possible to identify complete biosynthetic gene clusters from the data available, due to the lack of genetic context because of protein-level assembly, we could identify a few proteins that might play a role in antibiosis, such as 4′-demethylrebeccamycin synthase or gramicidin S synthetase 2. From literature it is known that many representatives of enriched taxa have been described for their ability to produce antimicrobial compounds: Several members of the Oxalobacteraceae, among which Massilia, Duganella, Pseudoduganella and Janthinobacterium are able to produce several different antimicrobial compounds. The best studied being the purple pigment violacein, a bisindole with antimicrobial activity among other biological functions (Choi et al. 2015a,b, Dahal et al. 2021). The phylum of Actinomycetota is known as a group harboring a wealth of gene clusters encoding antimicrobial agents. Most antibiotics in clinical use are originally isolated from these microbes (Genilloud 2017, van der Meij et al. 2017). And within the Bacteroidota a recently published study has identified a high density of biosynthetic gene clusters per genome, with the genus Chitinophaga as the most interesting in terms of abundance and diversity (Brinkmann et al. 2022). This aligns with the discovery of Carrion et al. who found a consortium of endophytic Chitinophaga and Flavobacterium to consistently suppress fungal root disease, by the expression of chitinases, nonribosomal peptide synthases and polyketide synthases (Carrión et al. 2019).

Oxalotrophy, the ability to use oxalic acid as a carbon source, is a rare trait in bacteria, restricted to a few representatives of the phyla Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and Pseudomonadota. It is however often found in microorganisms that are associated with plants (Hervé et al. 2016). A study on Burkholderia strains in the rhizosphere of white lupin showed that 98% of the strains were able to grow on plant-secreted oxalate as a carbon source compared to only 2% of other strains isolated from the same environment. Oxalic acid is therefore suggested to stimulate the recruitment of plant-beneficial members from the soil microbiome (Kost et al. 2014). Rhizoctonia solani, like many other pathogenic fungi, is also able to produce oxalic acid to acidify host tissue and sequester calcium from host cell walls (Yang et al. 1993, Dutton and Evans 1996, Palmieri et al. 2019). Increased virulence of R. solani has been shown to coincide with elevated levels of oxalic acid being excreted (Nagarajkumar et al. 2005). This leads Chapelle et al. (2016) to propose that the stress response activated under attack by the oxalic and phenylacetic acid produced either by R. solani itself or released from plant roots shifts leads to a Rhizoctonia-suppressive microbiome. Taxa that are also found to be enriched after keratin-rich amendment, especially members of the Oxalobacteraceae are known to metabolize oxalate and could thereby influence the invasion success of R. solani or detoxify oxalate for other community members.

We realize that many questions remain, such as the role of the major fraction of unknown proteins and/or organisms that were increased upon keratin-rich amendment. That it is currently not possible to consider that ‘microbial dark matter’ is a problem, because it could have significant implications on the mechanism of disease suppression of soils. Also, the pathogen was not quantified in the soil or plant tissue. Pathogen molecular quantification needs to be considered in future experiments where the disease suppressive mechanism of such organic materials will be tested. In addition, the role of Mortierella and its relatives remains elusive for now. It has been shown for several fungal species that the ability to degrade keratin often co-occurs with the ability to break down other recalcitrant substrates such as cellulose and chitin via lytic polysaccharide monoxygenases (Lange et al. 2016). That this fungal group is enriched after keratin-rich amendment is due to its ability to degrade complex compounds therefore suggests itself. Interestingly, it has been shown recently that Mortierella species harbor bacterial endophytes of the Burkholderiaceae family (Takashima et al. 2018), some of which even protect the fungal host from nematode attack by the production of a biosurfactant (symbiosin) with antibiotic properties (Büttner et al. 2021, Büttner et al. 2023).

Taken together we propose that the amendment of a keratin-rich side stream product from the farming industry (but probably also chitin and cellulose) stimulates the enrichment of taxa that have been associated with Rhizoctonia disease suppression previously. Many of these taxa can metabolize the substrate or its derivatives and are well equipped for a life in the rhizosphere that could explain their contribution to disease suppression. This includes, among others, the ability to produce a wide array of secondary metabolites and effectors that can be secreted via contractile injection systems and the ability to use oxalic acid.

Supplementary Material

fiae024_Supplemental_Files

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Stefan Aanstoot, Carin Lombaers, and Mirjam Schilder for technical assistance. This research was funded by the Dutch Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality (Knowledge Base projects in the KB21 and KB34 program) and Top Sector Agri & Food (TKI-AF-15261).

Contributor Information

Lina Russ, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Beatriz Andreo Jimenez, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Els Nijhuis, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Joeke Postma, Wageningen Plant Research, Wageningen University & Research, Droevendaalsesteeg 1, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Author contributions

Lina Russ (Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft), Beatriz Andreo Jimenez (Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing), Els Nijhuis (Project administration, Visualization, Writing – review & editing), and Joeke Postma (Supervision, Writing – review & editing).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

References

  1. Abbott  L, Macdonald  L, Wong  M  et al.  Potential roles of biological amendments for profitable grain production–a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2018;256:34–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarenga  P, Palma  P, Mourinha  C  et al.  Recycling organic wastes to agricultural land as a way to improve its quality: a field study to evaluate benefits and risks. Waste Manage. 2017;61:582–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreo-Jimenez  B, Schilder  MT, Nijhuis  EH  et al.  Chitin-and keratin-rich soil amendments suppress rhizoctonia solani disease via changes to the soil microbial community. Appl Environ Microb. 2021;87:e00318–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Aramaki  T, Blanc-Mathieu  R, Endo  H  et al.  KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinform. 2019;36:2251–2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernal  P, Llamas  MA, Filloux  A.  Type VI secretion systems in plant-associated bacteria. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blighe  K, Rana  S, Lewis  M.  EnhancedVolcano: publication-ready volcano plots with enhanced colouring and labeling. R package version 1.2. 0: GitHub, 2019. https://github.com/kevinblighe/EnhancedVolcano
  7. Bonanomi  G, Antignani  V, Capodilupo  M  et al.  Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:136–44. [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyer  F, Fichant  G, Berthod  J  et al.  Dissecting the bacterial type VI secretion system by a genome wide in silico analysis: what can be learned from available microbial genomic resources?. BMC Genom. 2009;10:1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Breitwieser  FP, Salzberg  SL.  Pavian: interactive analysis of metagenomics data for microbiome studies and pathogen identification. Bioinform. 2019;36:1303–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Brinkmann  S, Kurz  M, Patras  MA  et al.  Genomic and chemical decryption of the bacteroidetes phylum for its potential to biosynthesize natural products. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e02479–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchfink  B, Reuter  K, Drost  H-G.  Sensitive protein alignments at tree-of-life scale using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2021;18:366–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Buchfink  B, Xie  C, Huson  DH.  Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2015;12:59–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Büttner  H, Niehs  SP, Vandelannoote  K  et al.  Bacterial endosymbionts protect beneficial soil fungus from nematode attack. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118:e2110669118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Büttner  H, Pidot  SJ, Scherlach  K  et al.  Endofungal bacteria boost anthelminthic host protection with the biosurfactant symbiosin. Chem Sci. 2023;14:103–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Carrión  VJ, Cordovez  V, Tyc  O  et al.  Involvement of burkholderiaceae and sulfurous volatiles in disease-suppressive soils. ISME J. 2018;12:2307–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carrión  VJ, Perez-Jaramillo  J, Cordovez  V  et al.  Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science. 2019;366:606–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chapelle  E, Mendes  R, Bakker  PAH  et al.  Fungal invasion of the rhizosphere microbiome. ISME J. 2016;10:265–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen  S, Zhou  Y, Chen  Y  et al.  fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinform. 2018;34:i884–i90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chern  L, Ko  W.  Characteristics of inhibition of suppressive soil created by monoculture with radish in the presence of Rhizoctonia solani. J Phytopathol. 1989;126:237–45. [Google Scholar]
  20. Chet  I, Baker  R.  Induction of suppressiveness to rhizoctonia solani in soil. Phytopathology. 1980;70:994–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Choi  SY, Kim  S, Lyuck  S  et al.  High-level production of violacein by the newly isolated Duganella violaceinigra str. NI28 and its impact on Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep. 2015b;5:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Choi  SY, Yoon  KH, Lee  JI  et al.  Violacein: properties and production of a versatile bacterial pigment. Biomed Res Int. 2015a;2015:465056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Clocchiatti  A, Hannula  SE, Rizaludin  MS  et al.  Impact of cellulose-rich organic soil amendments on growth dynamics and pathogenicity of rhizoctonia solani. Microorganisms. 2021;9:1285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Cordovez  V, Carrion  VJ, Etalo  DW  et al.  Diversity and functions of volatile organic compounds produced by Streptomyces from a disease-suppressive soil. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Coulthurst  S.  The Type VI secretion system: a versatile bacterial weapon. Microbiology. 2019;165:503–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dahal  RH, Chaudhary  DK, Kim  J.  Genome insight and description of antibiotic producing massilia antibiotica sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Sci Rep. 2021;11:1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Davik  J, Sundheim  L.  Induced suppression of rhizoctonia solani in Norwegian soils. Scientific Reports of the Agricultural University of Norway. 1984. [Google Scholar]
  28. De Corato  U.  Agricultural waste recycling in horticultural intensive farming systems by on-farm composting and compost-based tea application improves soil quality and plant health: a review under the perspective of a circular economy. Sci Total Environ. 2020;738:139840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Dutton  MV, Evans  CS.  Oxalate production by fungi: its role in pathogenicity and ecology in the soil environment. Can J Microbiol. 1996;42:881–95. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gallegos-Monterrosa  R, Coulthurst  SJ.  The ecological impact of a bacterial weapon: microbial interactions and the type VI secretion system. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2021;45:fuab033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Geller  AM, Pollin  I, Zlotkin  D  et al.  The extracellular contractile injection system is enriched in environmental microbes and associates with numerous toxins. Nat Comm. 2021;12:3743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Genilloud  O.  Actinomycetes: still a source of novel antibiotics. Nat Prod Rep. 2017;34:1203–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gerlagh  M.  Introduction of Ophiobolus graminis into new polders and its decline. Neth J Plant Pathol. 1968;74:1–97. [Google Scholar]
  34. Gómez Expósito R.  Microbiome Dynamics of Disease Suppresive Soils: Wageningen University, 2017. PhD thesis. [Google Scholar]
  35. Gómez Expósito R, de Bruijn  I, Postma  J  et al.  Current insights into the role of rhizosphere bacteria in disease suppressive soils. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Henis  Y, Ghaffar  A, Baker  R.  Integrated control of Rhizoctonia solani damping-off of radish: effect of successive plantings, PCNB, and trichoderma harzianum on pathogen and disease. Phytopathology. 1978;68:900–7. [Google Scholar]
  37. Hervé  V, Junier  T, Bindschedler  S  et al.  Diversity and ecology of oxalotrophic bacteria. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;32:28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Hyakumachi  M, Kanzawa  K, Ui  T. Rhizoctonia root rot decline in sugarbeet monoculture. In: Hornby  D, Cook  RJ, Henis  Y  et al. (eds.), Biological Control of Soil-Borne Plant Pathogens. Wallingford: CAB International, 1990, 227–47. [Google Scholar]
  39. Jager  G, Velvis  H.  Dynamics of rhizoctonia solani (black scurf) in successive potato crops. Eur J Plant Pathol. 1995;101:467–78. [Google Scholar]
  40. Kost  T, Stopnisek  N, Agnoli  K  et al.  Oxalotrophy, a widespread trait of plant-associated Burkholderia species, is involved in successful root colonization of lupin and maize by Burkholderia phytofirmans. Front Microbiol. 2014;4:421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kundu  P, Nandi  B.  Control of rhizoctonia disease of cauliflower by competitive inhibition of the pathogen using organic amendments in soil. Plant Soil. 1985;83:357–62. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lange  L, Huang  Y, Busk  PK.  Microbial decomposition of keratin in nature—a new hypothesis of industrial relevance. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:2083–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Love  MI, Huber  W, Anders  S.  Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Lu  J, Breitwieser  FP, Thielen  P  et al.  Bracken: estimating species abundance in metagenomics data. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2017;3:e104. [Google Scholar]
  45. Lu  J, Rincon  N, Wood  DE  et al.  Metagenome analysis using the Kraken software suite. Nat Protoc. 2022;17:2815–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lucas  P, Smiley  R, Collins  H.  Decline of Rhizoctonia root rot on wheat in soils infested with rhizoctonia solani AG-8. Phytopathology. 1993;83:260–5. [Google Scholar]
  47. Mazzola  M, Gu  Y-H.  Wheat genotype-specific induction of soil microbial communities suppressive to disease incited by Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group AG-5 and AG-8. Phytopathology. 2002;92:1300–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mendes  R, Kruijt  M, De Bruijn  I  et al.  Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science. 2011;332:1097–100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Nagarajkumar  M, Jayaraj  J, Muthukrishnan  S  et al.  Detoxification of oxalic acid by Pseudomonas fluorescens strain PfMDU2: implications for the biological control of rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Microbiol Res. 2005;160:291–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Palmieri  F, Estoppey  A, House  GL  et al.  Chapter two—Oxalic acid, a molecule at the crossroads of bacterial-fungal interactions. Sariaslani  S (eds). Adv in Appl Microbiol. 2019;106:49–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Pérez-Piqueres  A, Edel-Hermann  V, Alabouvette  C  et al.  Response of soil microbial communities to compost amendments. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:460–70. [Google Scholar]
  52. Postma  J, Scheper  R, Schilder  M.  Effect of successive cauliflower plantings and rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 inoculations on disease suppressiveness of a suppressive and a conducive soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 2010;42:804–12. [Google Scholar]
  53. Postma  J, Schilder  MT.  Enhancement of soil suppressiveness against rhizoctonia solani in sugar beet by organic amendments. Appl Soil Ecol. 2015;94:72–9. [Google Scholar]
  54. Qiu  J, Wilkens  C, Barrett  K  et al.  Microbial enzymes catalyzing keratin degradation: classification, structure, function. Biotechnol Adv. 2020;44:107607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Raaijmakers  JM, Weller  DM.  Natural plant protection by 2, 4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing Pseudomonas spp. in take-all decline soils. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998;11:144–52. [Google Scholar]
  56. Rawlings  ND, Barrett  AJ, Thomas  PD  et al.  The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;46:D624–D32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Roget  D.  Decline in root rot (Rhizoctonia solani AG-8) in wheat in a tillage and rotation experiment at Avon, South Australia. Aust J Exp Agric. 1995;35:1009–13. [Google Scholar]
  58. Sarniguet  A, Lucas  P, Lucas  M  et al.  Soil conduciveness to take-all of wheat: influence of the nitrogen fertilizers on the structure of populations of fluorescent pseudomonads. Plant Soil. 1992;145:29–36. [Google Scholar]
  59. Sayama  M, Homma  Y, Furuya  H  et al.  Some microbial properties of suppressive soil induced by successive inoculations of Rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 2-2. Soil Microorgan. 2001;55:37–44. [Google Scholar]
  60. Schlatter  D, Kinkel  L, Thomashow  L  et al.  Disease suppressive soils: new insights from the soil microbiome. Phytopathology. 2017;107:1284–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Steinegger  M, Mirdita  M, Söding  J.  Protein-level assembly increases protein sequence recovery from metagenomic samples manyfold. Nature Meth. 2019;16:603–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Steinegger  M, Söding  J.  MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nature Biotechnol. 2017;35:1026–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Takashima  Y, Seto  K, Degawa  Y  et al.  Prevalence and intra-family phylogenetic divergence of Burkholderiaceae-related endobacteria associated with species of Mortierella. Microbes Environ. 2018;33:417–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Termorshuizen  A, Van Rijn  E, Van Der Gaag  D  et al.  Suppressiveness of 18 composts against 7 pathosystems: variability in pathogen response. Soil Biol Biochem. 2006;38:2461–77. [Google Scholar]
  65. Trunk  K, Coulthurst  SJ, Quinn  J.  A new front in microbial warfare—Delivery of antifungal effectors by the type VI secretion system. J Fungi. 2019;5:50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Trunk  K, Peltier  J, Liu  Y-C  et al.  The type VI secretion system deploys antifungal effectors against microbial competitors. Nature Microbiol. 2018;3:920–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Tuitert  G, Szczech  M, Bollen  GJ.  Suppression of rhizoctonia solani in potting mixtures amended with compost made from organic household waste. Phytopathology. 1998;88:764–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. van der Meij  A, Worsley  SF, Hutchings  MI  et al.  Chemical ecology of antibiotic production by actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2017;41:392–416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Velvis  H, Van Den Boogert  P, Jager  G.  Role of antagonism in the decline of Rhizoctonia solani inoculum in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1989;21:125–9. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wieczorek  AS, Schmidt  O, Chatzinotas  A  et al.  Ecological functions of agricultural soil bacteria and microeukaryotes in chitin degradation: a case study. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Wiseman  BM, Neate  S, Keller  KO  et al.  Suppression of rhizoctonia solani anastomosis group 8 in Australia and its biological nature. Soil Biol Biochem. 1996;28:727–32. [Google Scholar]
  72. Wood  DE, Lu  J, Langmead  B.  Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 2019;20:257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yang  J, Tewari  J, Verma  P.  Calcium oxalate crystal formation in rhizoctonia solani AG 2-1 culture and infected crucifer tissue: relationship between host calcium and resistance. Mycol Res. 1993;97:1516–22. [Google Scholar]
  74. Yin  C, Casa Vargas  JM, Schlatter  DC  et al.  Rhizosphere community selection reveals bacteria associated with reduced root disease. Microbiome. 2021;9:86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

fiae024_Supplemental_Files

Articles from FEMS Microbiology Ecology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES