Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023 Dec 6;90(4):839–841. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2023.11.051

TRBC1 immunohistochemistry distinguishes cutaneous T-cell lymphoma from inflammatory dermatitis: a retrospective analysis of 39 cases

Sarah E Nocco 1, Mark D Ewalt 2, Andrea P Moy 2, Natasha E Lewis 2, Menglei Zhu 2, Cecilia Lezcano 2, Klaus Busam 2, Melissa Pulitzer 2
PMCID: PMC10960695  NIHMSID: NIHMS1950814  PMID: 38061444

To the Editor:

In cutaneous T-cell lymphomas/lymphoproliferative disorders (CTLs) the T-cells are usually monoclonal, whereas in reactive infiltrates they are most often polyclonal.1 Analysis of the T-cell receptor (TCR) using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is standard for clonality testing, however this method is time-consuming, expensive, and technically limited.2

A monoclonal antibody (mAb) against the C1 constant region of the TCRβ chain (TRBC1) has advanced clonality testing in flow cytometric analysis of αβ T-cell lymphomas3 including CTLs.4 During TCR gene rearrangement, one of two mutually exclusive TCR constant β chains (TRBC1 or TRBC2) is randomly selected. Normal αβ T-cells comprise a mixture of TRBC1-positive and TRBC1-negative (presumptively TRBC2-positive) cells, whereas neoplastic T-cell populations arise from a single clone and exclusively express either TRBC1 or TRBC2. Restricted expression of TRBC1 can thus serve as a marker for clonality.5 Here, we report our results using a TRBC1 mAB in immunohistochemistry (IHC) on FFPE specimens from 30 αβCTLs and 9 rashes as a surrogate for molecular testing.

We performed a retrospective review of clinicopathologic data from patients biopsied for possible CTL in 2022. Cases needed to have warranted IHC and molecular analysis for diagnosis and were TCRαβ+. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections and CD3 IHC were reviewed by light microscopy (blinded to diagnosis) for atypical lymphoid infiltrates. >/=90% of morphologically atypical cells needed to show CD3 for baseline T-cell distribution. TRBC1 (E6Z3S; 1:600; 79485, Cell Signaling Technology) immunostaining was assessed as a percentage of total atypical CD3+ T-cell infiltrates. Cases were assigned a predictive category of monoclonal (PM) or polyclonal (PP) based on percent atypical T-cells labeled by TRBC1 with percentages of ≥70% or ≤25% indicating TRBC1-restriction/predicted monoclonal. We then compared TRBC1 predictions to clonality interpretations by PCR and clinical data.

Twenty-six (68%) samples were PM and twelve (32%) were PP by TRBC1. Overall concordance with PCR was observed in 21/26 (81%) PM and 9/12 (75%) PP, with TRBC1 PM showing 88% agreement for monoclonality with fragment analysis (21/24 PCR-clonal cases). Agreement improved to 23/26 when PCR results were re-evaluated, resulting in changed interpretation as monoclonal in two cases.

TRBC1 PM was more sensitive for CTLs (24/29, 83%) vs. PCR (22/29, 76%), although the specificity was lower with PM rendering a PPD of 89% compared to 96% with PCR. Both techniques showed clonality in all high grade CTLs. Neither technique was strong at confirming reactive disease (NPD 50% for TRBC1, and 53% for PCR). Qualitatively, TRBC1, when restricted positive, aided in diagnosis of strictly intraepidermal CTL.

Our findings indicate that using a single anti-TRBC1 antibody with an appropriate pan-T-cell marker allows rapid and low-cost assessment of clonality in archival tissues. Problems with visual “gating” by morphology and emphasis on CD3+ αβCTLs limit the generalizability of the results. Inflamed or polymorphous infiltrates are challenging with single IHC techniques. The small sample size and few reactive cases warrant caution in attributing statistical significance to comparisons with PCR. Cutoff values for TRBC1 monotypia require more stringent analysis. As with PCR, false positives are possible due to oligoclonal reactive processes.

Supplementary Material

1

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Skin biopsy specimen from a patient with mycosis fungoides which shows an atypical lymphocytic infiltrate predominantly located in the epidermis. The atypical lymphocytes are diffusely positive for CD3 (A, x400) and negative for TRBC1 (B, x400), consistent with a monotypic-negative TRBC1 expression pattern. The underlying dermal reactive immune infiltrate shows a TRBC1 polytypic expression pattern.

Funding Sources:

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the Cancer Center Support Grant of the National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA008748.

ABBREVIATIONS & ACRONYMS:

CTL

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma/lymphoproliferative disorder

TRBC1

T-cell receptor β constant region 1

TCR

T-cell receptor

IHC

immunohistochemistry

FFPE

formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded

PCR

polymerase chain reaction

mAb

monoclonal antibody

H&E

hematoxylin and eosin

NGS

next generation sequencing

PM

predicted monoclonal

PP

predicted polyclonal

PPD

positive predictive value

NPD

negative predictive value

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have disclosed that they have no significant relationships with, or financial interest in, any commercial companies pertaining to this article.

IRB Approval Status: Reviewed and approved by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Derm 16–1613)

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Pulitzer M Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Lab Med. 2017;37(3):527–546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wang HW, Raffeld M. Molecular assessments of clonality in lymphoid neoplasms. Semin Hematol. 2019;56(1):37–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Berg H, Otteson GE, Corley H, et al. Flow cytometric evaluation of TRBC1 expression in tissue specimens and body fluids is a novel and specific method for assessment of T-cell clonality and diagnosis of T-cell neoplasms. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2021;100(3):361–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Horna P, Shi M, Jevremovic D, et al. Utility of TRBC1 expression in the diagnosis of peripheral blood involvement by cutaneous t-cell lymphoma. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(4):821–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maciocia PM, Wawrzyniecka PA, Philip B, et al. Targeting the T cell receptor B-chain constant region for immunotherapy of T cell malignancies. Nat Med. 2017;23(12):1416–1423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1

RESOURCES