Abstract
Background
DNA repair mechanisms are essential for tumorigenesis and disruption of HR mechanism is an important predisposing factor of human breast cancers (BC). PALB2 is an important part of the HR. There are similarities between canine mammary tumours (CMT) and BCs. As its human counterpart, PALB2 mutations could be a predisposing factor of CMT.
Objectives
In this study, we aimed to investigate the impacts of PALB2 variants on tumorigenesis and canine mammary tumor (CMT) malignancy.
Methods
We performed Sanger sequencing to detect germline mutations in the WD40 domain of the canine PALB2 gene in CMT patients. We conducted in silico analysis to investigate the variants, and compared the germline PALB2 mutations in humans that cause breast cancer (BC) with the variants detected in dogs with CMT.
Results
We identified an intronic (c.3096+8C>G) variant, two exonic (p.A1050V and p.R1354R) variants, and a 3′ UTR variant (c.4071T>C). Of these, p.R1354R and c.4071T>C novel variants were identified for the first time in this study. We found that the p.A1050V mutation had a significant effect. However, we could not determine sufficient similarity due to the differences in nucleotide/amino acid sequences between two species. Nonetheless, possible variants of human sequences in the exact location as their dog counterparts are associated with several cancer types, implying that the variants could be crucial for tumorigenesis in dogs. Our results did not show any effect of the variants on tumor malignancy.
Conclusions
The current project is the first study investigating the relationship between the PALB2 gene WD40 domain and CMTs. Our findings will contribute to a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of the PALB2 gene in CMTs. In humans, variant positions in canines have been linked to cancer‐related phenotypes such as familial BC, endometrial tumor, and hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome. The results of bioinformatics analyses should be investigated through functional tests or case‐control studies.
Keywords: canine mammary tumour, partner and localizer of BRCA2, PALB2, WD40 domain
We investigated and found four substitutions in the canine PALB2 gene WD40 domain by Sanger sequencing and predicted their impacts on tumourigenesis by in silico analyses. Strikingly, we found that variant positions are associated with four different cancer types in humans when we compared the variant sites between two species. Functional experiments of the canine variants will show their effects in the future.

Abbreviations
- 3′UTR
3′ untranslated region
- AIRE
autoimmun regulator
- BC
breast cancer
- CMT
canine mammary tumour
- HR
homologous recombination
- miRNA
microRNA
- PALB2
partner and localizer of BRCA2
- PAS
polyadenylation signal
- PCR
polymerase chain reaction
- SNP
single nucleotide polymorphism
- TBE
tris boric acid EDTA
- TF
transcription factor
1. INTRODUCTION
Breast cancers (BC) are the most common tumours in women and dogs (Ferlay et al., 2015; Sleeckx et al., 2011), both of which share anatomical and physiological similarities in terms of their mammary glands. Their shared malignancies and spontaneous occurrence in both BC and canine mammary tumours (CMT) make dogs a valuable model for comparative oncology (Kwon et al., 2023). Researchers have reported orthologous germline mutations between two species in several genes (Goebel & Merner, 2017).
Disruption of DNA repair mechanisms is critical for tumourigenesis (Bhattacharjee & Nandi, 2016). Homologous recombination (HR) provides an error‐free repair of damaged DNA chains in DNA double‐strand breaks (Sun et al., 2020). Failure of the proteins involved in the HR mechanism to fulfill their function can trigger cancer development by causing the accumulation of a series of mutations such as deletions, insertions and translocations in DNA and changes in the function and expression of damaged genes (Abass et al., 2016; Hodgson & Turashvili, 2020; O'kane et al., 2017; Trenner & Sartori, 2019,). Partner and Localizer of BRCA2 (PALB2) is a tumour suppressor in HR, interstrand cross‐link repair and replication fork collapse (Nepomuceno et al., 2017; Park, Zhang et al., 2014). RAD51 recombinase mediates strand invasion, strand exchange and D‐loop formation to repair the disrupted DNA chain in the HR mechanism. RAD51 must interact with BRCA2 for D‐loop formation to occur. PALB2 protein provides this interaction between BRCA2 and RAD51 proteins (Sun et al., 2020). The germline truncating mutations of the PALB2 gene identified in Finnish, Australian, Chinese, German, Italian, Dutch, North American, Polish, Russian, South African and Spanish populations and associated with inherited BC predispositions (Erkko et al., 2007; Southey et al., 2013). PALB2 has two significant domains that interact with BRCA2 or/and RAD51 proteins for its tumour suppressor function. The coiled‐coil region maintains the association of PALB2 with BRCA1 and RAD51 proteins, while the WD40 domain regulates the interaction between the PALB2 and BRCA2 and RAD51 proteins (Sun et al., 2020). Mutations in the WD40 domain are associated with BC, pancreatic cancer and ovarian cancer susceptibilities in humans (Nepomuceno et al., 2021). There are several damaging variants reported in the human PALB2 gene WD40 domain ( Boonen et al., 2019; Nepomuceno et al., 2021; Park, Singh et al., 2014). Moreover, variants of uncertain significance of the region impact the PALB2 stability (Boonen et al., 2020). The WD40 domain of the canine PALB2 protein is between the 1018th and 1355th residues (Ensembl 2021, The Uniprot Consortium 2021a).
In this study, we hypothesize the potential impact of germline mutations in the PALB2 gene WD40 domain on CMT development and malignancy as well as their similarities to its human homolog on BC development. Therefore, we investigated the nucleotide polymorphisms of the PALB2 gene WD40 domain in CMT patients, and their association with CMT development, comparing them with BCs.
2. MATERIAL AND METHODS
We used DNA extracts from blood samples of benign (n = 7) and malignant (n = 13) CMT patients and a healthy dog. The blood samples were collected for a previous project and authorized for reuse of the blood and DNA samples for the current project (Ankara University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee‐Date: 17 July 2018; Decision number: 2018‐15‐94). We extracted DNAs from the blood samples using a commercial kit (Qiagen, Blood and Tissue DNA extraction kit, Germany), as per the manufacturer's instructions. We measured DNA concentrations and purity with Nanodrop 2000 (ThermoFisher, Germany) spectrophotometry and visualized DNA integrities by SYBRTM Safe Gel Stain (Thermo Fisher) stained 1% agarose gel electrophoresis in TBE (tris boric acid EDTA) solution. We loaded 1μL 2× loading dye and 2 μL DNA for all samples in the agarose gel and used a 1 kb ladder. Duration and voltage conditions were 25–30 min and 80 V, respectively.
We designed specific primer sets (Table 1) and used standard Taq DNA polymerase (recombinant (5U/μL) 500 units, Thermo Fisher) for polymerase chain reactions (PCR). The PCRs were performed using a Mastercycler Epgradient (Eppendorf) thermal cycler. The PCR mastermix and thermal cycler conditions are presented in Tables S1 and S2 in the Supporting Information, respectively. The PCR products were visualized by SYBRTM Safe Gel Stain (Thermo Fisher) stained with 2% agarose gel electrophoresis in the TBE solution. We loaded 2 μL 2× loading dye and 2 μL PCR products for all samples in the agarose gel and used a 100 bp ladder. Duration and voltage conditions were 20 min and 120 V, respectively. Before cycle sequencing reactions, we performed isopropanol precipitation (Table S3 in the Supporting Information).
TABLE 1.
Specific primer sets for PCR and cycle sequencing reactions.
| Primer | Sequence (5′−3′) | Region; length |
|---|---|---|
| WD40D1_F | GATGATGAATGAGCAATGCAGGA | Exon 6 (partial), intron 6 (partial); 257 bp |
| WD40D1_R | AGAATGAGGGGAACGCCTG | |
| WD40D2_F | GAAACAGATCCCAAGTATGGCTTT | Intron 6 (partial), exon 7, intron 7 (partial); 280 bp |
| WD40D2_R | TGCCCAGCGACATTACCAT | |
| WD40D3_F | AGAGGATGCTGAACTTTCTCA | Intron 7 (partial), exon 8, intron 8 (partial); 319 bp |
| WD40D3_R | AAACCTACTTTACAACTTGCACT | |
| WD40D4_F | TGAAAAGGCTTACTCCTGAT | Intron 8 (partial), exon 9, intron 9 (partial); 302 bp |
| WD40D4_R | CCTAAAGCCCAGAAAAACAA | |
| WD40D5_F | AAGGCAAGGGCTGCTTAGAA | Intron 9 (partial), exon 10, intron 10 (partial); 289 bp |
| WD40D5_R | CCCCCAAACAGTCATATTTACAGTC | |
| WD40D6_F | TTCTCCCTTGGTCACTTCCT | Intron 10 (partial), exon 11, intron 11 (partial); 259 bp |
| WD40D6_R | CAGTGGGACCATTAGCAACA | |
| WD40D7_F | ACCCTTTGTTTTCCCCACCG | Intron 11 (partial), exon 12, intron 12 (partial); 269 bp |
| WD40D7_R | TTTGCACACGTGCCTTCCA | |
| WD40D8_F | CAGGGACTGGACACATGATTGC | Intron 12 (partial), exon 13 (partial); 550 bp |
| WD40D8_R | TGGTGCCACTACCATCAGAA | |
| WD8_SeqF | GATCATTTTGCAGCCGCAGT | Exon 13 (partial), only for cycle sequencing reactions |
| WD8_SeqR | GCTGTGTTTTCATATCAGTAGCGG |
Abbreviation: bp, base pairs.
The PCR products were sequenced using a BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit. Amplification primers and additional primers for sequencing (Table 1) were used. BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit was used as per the manufacturer's protocol. ZR DNA sequencing clean‐up kit (Zymo Research, USA) was used for the clean‐up procedure. ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) was used for capillary electrophoresis. Electropherograms were controlled and aligned to PALB2 reference sequences (ENSCAFG00000030772 and ENSCAFT00000049192.1) using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor version 7.2.5 (BioEdit, Carlsbad, USA).
We visualized the general effects of variants using the Ensembl variant effect predictor (VEP) (Mclaren et al., 2016). We examined conservation scores of coding region variants using the ConSurf server (Ashkenazy et al., 2016). The effects of the missense variant were examined by sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT) (Kumar et al., 2009), PolyPhen‐2 (Adzhubei et al., 2010), PROVEAN (Choi & Chan, 2015), MutPred2 (Pejaver et al., 2020) and SNPEffect4.0 (De Baets et al., 2012). The protein structure was modelled by SWISS‐MODEL (Waterhouse et al., 2018). Changes in ligand binding were controlled by FTSite binding site prediction (Kozakov et al., 2015) and FunFOLD2 (Roche et al., 2013). Transcription factors (TF) were detected by AnimalTFDB 3.0 (Hu, Miao et al., 2019). Micro RNAs (miRNA) were checked using miRWalk (Sticht et al., 2018), splice mechanisms by EX‐SKIP (Raponi et al., 2011) and human splicing finder (HSF) (Desmet et al., 2009), and alternative polyadenylation by Animal‐APAdb (Jin et al., 2021). The synonymous mutation was examined using the dbDSM v2.0 (Wen et al., 2016). DnaSP ver. 6.12.13 (Rozas et al., 2019) software was used to detect haplotype groups. We compared the canine variants with their human counterparts using the Ensembl comparative genomics‐genomic alignments tool and Ensembl VEP (Mclaren et al., 2016). For further information about in silico analyses, see Tables S4 and S5 in the Supporting Information.
3. RESULTS
DNA extractions, PCR and sequencing reactions were performed. We identified an intronic variant (c.3096+8C>G) in intron 6, and a missense variant (c.3149C>T/p.A1050V) in exon 7. Additionally, we identified a synonymous variant (c.4062C>T/p.R1354R) and a 3′ UTR variant (c.4071T>C) in exon 13 for the first time in this study. Information regarding the samples and variant distribution can be found in the Supporting Information. Figure 1 depicts electropherograms of wild‐type, mutant and heterozygous samples.
FIGURE 1.

Electropherograms of wild‐type, mutant and heterozygous samples. (a) g.22220063C>G splice region variant in intron 6; (b) c.3149C>T missense variant in exon 7; (c) c.4062C>T synonymous variant in exon 13; (d) c.4071T>C 3′ UTR variant in exon 13. Forward, electropherograms of forward sequences; reverse complement, electropherograms of reverse sequences (their reverse complements). Reverse readings of the electropherograms of exon 13 regions could not be performed due to thymine nucleotide repeats.
The identified variants were subjected to in silico analysis. The c.3096+8C>G is a splice region variant with low effect, previously recorded (rs24292038 SNP ID) in the Ensembl VEP. The position of the c.3096+8C>G intronic variant is c.2586+8G in the human PALB2 nucleotide sequence, as determined by the Ensembl Comparative Genomics alignments tool. The HSF revealed that all possible variants cause cryptic acceptor site activation and changes in splice mechanisms (Supporting Information).
The c.3149C>T (p.A1050V) is a missense variant with a medium effect. It has been previously recorded (rs853188656 SNP ID) in the Ensembl VEP database. 1050th residue (alanine) of the PALB2 protein sequence is highly conserved, buried and structural between species, as demonstrated by Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. The effects of the p.A1050V variant are summarized in Table 2. The protein structures of the wild‐type and the mutant sequences are depicted in Figure 2. Results of the FTSite Binding Site Prediction tool and the FunFOLD2 server can be found in Figure 3 and Figure 4, respectively. The miRWalk database revealed that cfa‐miR‐222, cfa‐miR‐8842, cfa‐miR‐8821 and cfa‐miR‐8846 miRNAs can bind to the variant region (Supporting Information). ELF1, EZH2, RELA, RUNX1, SP1 and TRIM28 can bind to the wild‐type nucleotide sequence of the variant. Autoimmun regulator (AIRE), EGR3 and SETDB1 can bind to the mutant‐type nucleotide sequence of the variant position. SPI1 and TCF4 can bind to both nucleotide sequences (Supporting Information). The mutant allele has a higher chance of exon skipping than the wild‐type allele as determined by EX‐SKIP (Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). The c.2639C>T variant (human position of the canine c.3149C>T) has a significant difference in ratios of exonic splicing enhancer (ESE) and exonic splicing silencer (ESS) motifs (−2), and there is a cryptic donor site activation and a potential change in splice mechanisms as revealed by HSF (Supporting Information).
TABLE 2.
The structural and functional effects of the canine p.A1050V/human p.A880V missense variant.
| Tool | Method | Threshold | Canine results | Human results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIFT | SIFT Sequence | 0.05 | 0 (Deleterious) | 0 (Deleterious) |
| PROVEAN | ‐ | −2.5 | −2.450 (Neutral) | −2.612 (Deleterious) |
| PolyPhen‐2 | Hum‐Div | 0.5 | 0.991 (Probably damaging) | 0.997 (Probably damaging) |
| Hum‐Var | 0.5 | 0.986 (Probably damaging) | 0.881 (Possibly damaging) | |
| MutPred2 | ‐ | 0.05 | 0.348 | 0.179 |
| SNPEffect 4.0 | TANGO | 3.89 (No impact) | N/A | |
| WALTZ | 23.83 (No impact) | N/A | ||
| LIMBO | 0.00 (No impact) | N/A |
Note: TANGO predicts the aggregation‐prone regions in a protein sequence. WALTZ is an algorithm that accurately and specifically predicts amyloid‐forming regions in protein sequences. LIMBO is a chaperone binding site predictor for the Hsp70 chaperones, trained from peptide binding data and structural modelling.
Abbreviations: N/A, not available; PROVEAN, Protein variation effect analyzer; PolyPhen‐2, Polymorphism Phenotyping v2; SIFT, sorting intolerant from tolerant.
FIGURE 2.

WD40 domain models of wild‐type and mutant sequences. Made by SWISS‐model (Waterhouse et al., 2018). Blue arrows, variant sites.
FIGURE 3.

FTSite Binding site prediction (Kozakov et al., 2015) results of wild‐type and mutant sequences. White arrows, variant sites (between red dots). No difference has been found between wild‐type and mutant proteins for ligand‐binding regions.
FIGURE 4.

The FunFOLD2 server (Roche et al., 2013) results of wild‐type and mutant sequences. White arrows, ligand‐binding sites; red arrows, variant sites; red lines, ligand‐binding site amino acids; green lines, the 1050th amino acid position. Residues 1216 and 1268 are ligand‐binding regions of the wild‐type of protein sequence; however, residues 1009, 1216, 1268; 1047, 1048, 1049, 1050, 1051, 1052, 1053, 1054; 1014, 1015, 1016, 1017 and 1236 are ligand‐binding regions for the mutant protein sequence. On the mutant sequence, the 1050th amino acid is inside the ligand‐binding region.
The c.4062C>T (p.R1354R) is a synonymous variant with low effect in the Ensembl VEP database. The current study is the first to determine the presence of this synonymous variant. The p.R1354R position is not conserved (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information), and the arginine residue of the canine PALB2 protein is histidine in humans (The UniProt Consortium 2021b). The dbDSM v2.0 database has no records for the 1184th residue of the human PALB2 protein (human location of the canine p.R1354R). EP300, ESR1, KDM1A and TCF12 can bind to only the wild‐type sequences of c.4062C>T and c.4071T>C regions together (Supporting Information). EX‐SKIP shows that the chance of exon skipping in mutant alleles in exon 13 is higher than in wild‐type alleles (Figure S3 in the Supporting Information). HSF shows that the c.3552C>T and the c.3552C>A substitutions (human position of the canine c.4062C>T) change the ESE/ESS ratios significantly (−4 and −2, respectively). The c.3552C>G variant results in significant changes in ESE/ESS ratios (−4), cryptic acceptor site activation and changes in the splicing mechanism (Supporting Information). Animal‐APAdb shows that the variant position is a polyadenylation signal sequence (Supporting Information).
The c.4071T>C is a novel variant with a modifying effect in the Ensembl VEP database. FOXO3, FOXP2 and TCF7L2 can bind to only the wild‐type allele of the variant position. However, FOXP1 can bind to both the wild‐type and the mutant allele. EP300, ESR1, KDM1A and TCF12 can bind to only wild‐type sequences of the c.4062C>T and the c.4071T>C regions together (Supporting Information). According to HSF, c.*13T>A substitution (human position of the canine c.4071T>C) causes cryptic acceptor site activation and changes in the splicing mechanism. The c.*13T>G and the c.*13T>C substitutions cause significant changes in the ratios of ESE/ESS motifs (−5 and −3, respectively) (Supporting Information).
Haplotypes and sample distribution obtained by DnaSP results are presented in Tables S6 and S7, respectively, in the Supporting Information. Variants were compared between the canine and human species. The wild‐type nucleotide sequences differ between the two species for the c.3096+8C>G variant. According to the Ensembl VEP database, all potential substitutions of the c.3096+8C>G in humans are splice region variants with low impact.
The wild‐type nucleotides of the c.3149C>T variant in the human and canine PALB2 genes are the same. According to the Ensembl VEP database, all potential substitutions for the human PALB2 gene are missense variants with low impact in primer and alternate transcripts, and they are associated with at least a phenotype or disease. The SIFT scores of variants are 0 in the primer transcript, although the SIFT score of the c.2639C>G variant (human cDNA position of canine c.3149C>T) is 0.01. The PolyPhen scores are 0.956 for the c.2639C>A, 0.935 for the c.2639C>G, and 0.881 for the c.2639C>T, respectively. There are no phenotype or disease records for the c.2639C>T (p.A880V) variant in the Ensembl VEP database. However, SIFT, PolyPhen‐2, PROVEAN and MutPred2 results of the human p.A880V variant are shown in Table 2.
The wild‐type nucleotides of the c.4062C>T in the human and canine PALB2 genes are the same. The c.3552C>A and the c.3552C>G variants (human cDNA position of canine c.4062C>T) are missense mutations in all transcripts with medium impact in the Ensembl VEP database. The c.3552C>T variant is a synonymous mutation with low effect.
The wild‐type nucleotides of the c.4071T>C are the same in both species. According to the Ensembl VEP database, all potential substitutions have a modifier effect upon protein in this region in humans. All the human phenotype or disease records for the variant positions are listed in Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Human phenotype/disease records of the homolog nucleotide positions of the canine variants in the Ensembl database.
| Canine region | Human variant | Amino acid change | Record | Phenotype/Disease | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intron 6 | c.2586+8G>A | rs1060504708 |
Familial cancer of the breast Hereditary cancer‐predisposing syndrome |
Low significance/ likely benign | |
| Exon 7 | c.2639C>A | p.A880D | rs1597085237 | Familial cancer of the breast | Low significance |
| c.2639C>N | COSV55166669 | Endometrium tumour | ‐ | ||
| c.2640C>A/T | p.A880A | rs752928633 |
Familial cancer of the breast Hereditary cancer‐predisposing syndrome |
Low significance/ likely benign | |
| Exon 13 | c.3550C>T | p.H1184Y | rs770692850 | Hereditary cancer‐predisposing syndrome | Low significance |
| c.3550C>N | COSV55168966 | Lung tumour | ‐ | ||
| c.3551del | p.H1184fs | rs1597061743 |
Familial cancer of the breast Hereditary cancer‐predisposing syndrome |
Low significance | |
| 3′ UTR | c.*6_*13delinsAATTTGTATACCACTATTCA | rs1567204889 | Hereditary cancer‐predisposing syndrome | Low significance/ likely benign |
4. DISCUSSION
Researchers have reported that disruptions in the tumour suppressor effect of the BRCA2, RAD51 and PALB2 complex cause cancers, particularly BCs (Deveryshetty et al., 2019; Hodgson & Turashvili, 2020; Nepomuceno et al., 2017; Park, Zhang et al., 2014; Prakash et al., 2015). HR is essential for DNA double‐strand break repair and cancer prevention (Hodgson & Turashvili, 2020; O'kane et al., 2017; Trenner & Sartori, 2019). Studies have shown a relationship between mutations in the BRCA2 (Borge et al., 2011; Enginler et al., 2014; Kaszak et al., 2018; Lüder Ripoli et al., 2016; Ozmen et al., 2017a) and RAD51 genes and CMT (Canadas et al., 2018; Ozmen et al., 2017b; Uemura et al., 2019). The significance of PALB2 mutations in BCs is well known and is routinely monitored (Cock‐Rada et al., 2018; Schroeder et al., 2015; Slavin et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2020). Additionally, the PALB2 gene WD40 domain interacts with the BRCA2 and RAD51 proteins (Ducy et al., 2019; Oliver et al., 2009; Siaud et al., 2011; F. Zhang et al., 2009). This study is the first investigation of the relationship between the canine PALB2 gene WD40 domain and CMTs. Within the project's scope, we detected an intronic variant, two exonic variants and a 3′ UTR variant in CMT cases.
We used the most common CMT histopathology for our investigation (Atalay Vural & Aydin, 2001; Erer & Kıran, 1993; Gülçubuk & Gürel, 2003). There was no significant association between malignancy and variations in the current project. Because of the low genetic heterogeneity of dogs, breed predispositions are crucial in tumourigenesis (Sargan, 2012). A larger sample size is necessary to investigate breed predispositions further.
The functions of proteins can be affected by several steps and impacts in their journey from genetic information to degradation. Genetic and epigenetic variations could affect a protein's abundance, activity, specificity and affinity. Substitutions, deletions, insertions and indels change the primary structure. Moreover, transcription, mRNA processing and translation could be affected by nucleotide variants (Vihinen, 2021). The results of in silico analysis are significant. The intronic variant is a splice region variant. Splice region variants could change the splicing mechanism and cause alternative transcripts (Desmet et al., 2010). The HSF tool results of its human homolog support that it can cause a cryptic acceptor site activation and change the splicing mechanism. Although the reference genome has only one PALB2 transcript, the Great Dane genome (ENSCAFG00040003287) has three transcripts in the Ensembl VEP database (ENSCAFT00040006272.1, ENSCAFT00040006296.1, ENSCAFT00040006272.1). The intronic variant can create an alternate transcript by changing the splicing mechanism and so further investigation is needed. The rs1060504708 SNP of the human PALB2 gene is associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome, so it is possible that similar impacts exist between the two species.
Changes in the primary structures of proteins determine the secondary and tertiary structures and the three‐dimensional folding (Selzer et al., 2019). In transient protein–protein interactions, even the state of the folding structure of the protein in different physiological conditions and environments affects the protein's function through binding dynamics (Nooren, 2003). Therefore, alterations in the primary structure can significantly affect protein function. The p.A1050V substitution is the only variant that changes amino acid sequence occurs in a highly conserved, buried and structural residue. Residues that are conserved among species may have a critical function, and a possible mutation can harm the organism. Despite the neutral PROVEAN score for the canine variant, the PROVEAN tool is designed for the human variations (Choi & Chan, 2015) and the result of the human homolog is deleterious. SIFT, PolyPhen‐2 and MutPred2 results are similar for both species and noteworthy. The FTSite Binding Site Prediction and the FunFOLD2 have inconsistencies in their ligand‐binding analysis. According to the FunFOLD2 server, the substitution alters the ligand‐binding sites. The Ensembl VEP database does not contain any phenotype or disease information about the human p.A880V (the human homolog of the canine p.A1050V). However, data on p.A880D and the variant position related to familial BC, endometrial tumour and hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome are interesting. Additionally, the lack of information about the relationship between the p.A880V variant and tumour phenotype in humans does not preclude its appearance in humans. To clearly understand the impacts on the CMTs, case–control studies or functional tests are advised. The p.A1050V variant is also noteworthy because it can bind microRNAs to its position.
MicroRNAs (miRNA) are non‐coding RNA molecules that play a crucial role in post‐transcriptional gene regulation. miRNAs exhibit oncogenic or tumour‐suppressive effects on tumour progression, invasion and metastasis in humans. Therefore, they are significant in terms of early diagnosis, prognosis and identification of risks, and as targets that have the potential to be used clinically in personalized cancer treatments and preventive medicine (Asiaf et al., 2018; Sethi, 2014). In CMT cases, miRNAs also exhibit similar effects (Boggs et al., 2008; Cullen & Breen, 2016; Fish et al., 2018; Kaszak et al., 2018). In miRNA–mRNA interactions, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) occurring in nucleotide sequences may cause stronger or weaker binding due to changes in transcript and miRNA affinity at binding sites (Ying, 2008). The nucleotide sequence of cfa‐miR‐222 is conserved with hsa‐miR‐222‐3p (MIMAT0000279) in humans (Kozomara et al., 2019). Although hsa‐miR‐222‐3p can bind to human PALB2 transcripts, it binds to different regions of the transcripts compared to cfa‐miR‐222 (Sticht et al., 2018). It is an oncomiR associated with drug resistance (Rinnerthaler et al., 2016; S. Zhang et al., 2020), poor prognosis and metastasis in lymph nodes. Treatment with miR‐222‐3p antagonists can be strengthened as support in chemotherapy (Mavrogiannis et al., 2018). miR‐222‐3p has the potential as a biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of BC, and it can be targeted to control malignancy (Amini et al., 2018; Y. Wang et al., 2018). Therefore, it is speculated that cfa‐miR‐222 might have similar effects on human BC cases. However, cfa‐miR‐8842, cfa‐miR‐8821 and cfa‐miR‐8846 do not have homologs in humans, and no studies on these miRNAs in dogs exist.
Splice region variants are not the only variants that can affect the splicing mechanism (Desmet et al., 2010). The EX‐SKIP tool reported a higher probability of exon skipping in mutant sequences. In the HSF tool, only the c.2639C>T change was found to cause alterations in the splice enhancer and silencer motif ratios and it may also activate a cryptic donor site at that position. Remarkably, the c.2639C>T variant in humans is substituted by a thymine nucleotide in the dog transcript in exon 7, creating a new donor site and altering auxiliary signals. The p.A1050V variant may also affect the alternative splicing mechanism.
Changes in the activity of several genes and proteins play a role in transforming normal cells in the breast tissue into malignant ones, and various hormones acting as TFs have essential effects in this process (Mester & Redeuilh, 2012). SNPs occurring in TF‐binding sites can change the affinity of regulatory proteins to these sites, cause new TF‐binding sites or adversely affect TF binding, leading to complex diseases and pathological conditions (Degtyareva et al., 2021).
In exon 7, ELF1, EZH2, RELA, RUNX1, SP1 and TRIM28 can only bind to the wild‐type nucleotide sequence. ELF1 is substantial for BC treatment and prognosis (Dittmer, 2011; Scott et al., 1994) and is associated with BRCA2 (Davis et al., 1999). Changes in EZH2 can have both tumour‐suppressive and tumourigenic effects depending on the situation (Anwar et al., 2021) owing to its roles in chromatin remodelling and DNA methylation (Chase & Cross, 2011; Simon & Lange, 2008; Zeidler & Kleer, 2006). It also targets the RAD51 gene and BRCA1, which have an aggressive character and poor prognosis, increasing its expression in triple‐negative BCs (Bae & Hennighausen, 2014). RELA (p65) regulates the expression of many genes involved in the control of cellular proliferation, neoplastic transformation and apoptosis, causing an increase in the expression of oncogenes and stimulating gene expressions that will trigger metastasis (Biswas et al., 2019; Bouchal et al., 2015; Kim et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2011; Lerebours et al., 2008; Liu et al., 2012; Ricca et al., 2001). RUNX1 can act as an oncogene or a tumour‐suppressor (Chimge & Frenkel, 2013; Groner et al., 2017; Janes, 2011) and its regulation may be impaired in tumour formations (Chimge & Frenkel, 2013; Janes, 2011). SP1 regulates several oncogenes in BC (Duan et al., 1998; Khan et al., 2003; Maor et al., 2006; Petz & Nardulli, 2000; Petz et al., 2004; Qin et al., 1999; Schultz et al., 2003; Sisci et al., 2010; Stoner et al., 2004; Xie, 1999) and is also involved in BRCA1 transactivation (Maor et al., 2007). TRIM28 expression inhibits cell proliferation in breast and lung tumour cell cultures by suppressing TFs in the E2F family (L. Chen et al., 2012).
On the other hand, AIRE, EGR3 and SETDB1 can bind to the mutant sequence. There is a significant correlation between AIRE expression and good prognosis in estrogen receptor positive (ER +) BC cases, and AIRE expression in luminal BC cell lines is associated with a decrease in tumour aggression (Bianchi et al., 2016). EGR3 is associated with BC progression, metastasis, recurrence and invasion (Hayashi & Yamaguchi, 2008; Inoue et al., 2004, Suzuki et al., 2007). SETDB1 is associated with the induction of epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT), cancer stem cell formation, cancer cell motility, invasion, metastasis and sensitivity to some cancer drugs (H. Du et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2014). On the other hand, SETDB1 deficiency suppresses cell migration and invasion, and its downregulation reduces lung metastasis in vivo. Moreover, increased overexpression of SETDB1 stimulates EMT through SNAIL in the MCF7 cell line (Yang et al., 2019). The missense variant is essential for protein structure and function changes. The possibility of exon skipping and changes in miRNA‐binding affinity and TF‐binding potential could have cumulative impacts on the protein expression and function. The impact of missense or truncating mutations in genes that are active in the HR mechanism was studied by functional tests in dogs. The protein–protein interactions between RAD51 and BRCA2 were investigated using a mammalian two‐hybrid assay (Ochiai et al., 2015, 2011) and a competitive ELISA test (Yoshikawa et al., 2012) for BRCA2 mutations. Another study focused on the determination of the functional impact of the highly conserved residue of BRCA2 on the relationship between RAD51 and BRCA2 proteins by co‐immunoprecipitation and mammalian two‐hybrid assays (Zhu et al., 2023). As the same, RAD51 mutations' effects on RAD51 and PALB2 interactions were investigated using mammalian two‐hybrid assay and pull‐down (PD) assays (Uemura et al., 2019). Our aim was the detection of PALB2 polymorphisms in the study, and we did not conduct any functional experiments for further analysis. However, we advise similar strategies for the p.A1050V variant to determine its functional impacts.
The synonymous variant and the 3′ UTR variant were together; they could be a haplotype, but we did not use plasmids for sequencing and have yet to get any information about it. Synonymous mutations do not change the amino acid sequence. However, they can change the secondary structure and stability of mRNA, the interaction of mRNA with specific ligands and the alteration of codons read by tRNAs with different cellular availability, which can affect translation kinetics and protein folding (Fernández‐Calero et al., 2016). Moreover, splice accuracy and efficiency are associated with changes in translation speed depending on codon matching (Cartegni et al., 2002; Fernández‐Calero et al., 2016; Li et al., 2021; Pagani et al., 2005). Synonymous mutations can cause several pathological conditions in humans (Kimchi‐Sarfaty et al., 2007; Li et al., 2021; Pagani et al., 2005; Rauscher & Ignatova, 2018). The p.R1354R variant is not a highly conserved residue. The human species has a histidine instead of an arginine residue at this position (The Uniprot Consortium 2021c). The Animal‐APAdb indicates the nucleotide position of the variant is in a polyadenylation site cluster.
The variant can affect mRNA processing via the alternative polyadenylation (APA) mechanism. APA is the last process in the formation of mature mRNA and has several effects on the translation efficiency, stability and localization of mRNA, causing differences in protein activities (W. Chen et al., 2017). Studies show that differences exist between cancerous and healthy tissues with respect to APAs, making the APA mechanism significant (Yuan et al., 2021).
The EX‐SKIP tool result shows a higher probability of exon skipping in the mutant sequences for both the exon 13 and the 3′ UTR variants. According to HSF, ratios of auxiliary motifs differed for all possible variants. Additionally, cryptic acceptor region activation was reported for the c.3552C>G. In the exon 13 region, proportional changes have only been reported in the helper motifs of the c.3552C>T human variant (canine homolog). TFs that can bind to the region covering the positions of both variants in exon 13 and the 3′ UTR region were detected. EP300, ESR1, KDM1A and TCF12 can only bind to the wild‐type sequence. EP300 is a tumour suppressor in cell proliferation and differentiation and is also involved in the cell cycle (Wirtenberger et al., 2006). It is responsible for regulating BRCA1 expression (Q. Wang et al., 2013), and it increases the expression of genes that affect metastasis by participating in cell migration (He et al., 2015). ESR1, also known as Erα, is affected by steroid hormones that can influence the growth, proliferation and metastasis of BC cells (Bettuzzi et al., 1992; Hansen & Fuqua, 1999). Estrogens exert their proliferative effects through the ER (Hansen & Fuqua, 1999). In BCs, loss of ER is associated with aggressive characteristics (Degraffenried et al., 2002), endocrine resistance (Freitag et al., 2021), recurrence and poor prognosis (Stossi et al., 2012). In the absence of a functional BRCA1, the expression of ESR1 mRNA decreased, and Oct‐1 and BRCA1 should interact with the promoter region of ESR1 for ESR1 expression (Hosey et al., 2007). KDM1A (LSD1) has histone demethylase activity (Perillo et al., 2020) and acts as a tumour suppressor by suppressing invasion, cell migration and metastasis in luminal BCs (Bennesch et al., 2016; Hu et al., 2019; Tu et al., 2020; Zheng et al., 2018). TCF12 expression in the stroma of invasive BC tissues is higher than in normal breast tissues, and in ER‐BC tissues, it is higher than in ER+ cases, which is associated with a poor prognosis (Tang et al., 2016). Although it is not a conserved region, potential human variants which occur at the nucleotide position of the synonymous variant are associated with familial BC, hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome and lung tumours in the Ensembl VEP (Mclaren et al., 2016).
The 3′ UTR variant present in the transcript but not involved in protein structure was analysed to investigate the splicing mechanism and TF binding. With the result of EX‐SKIP, HSF detected changes in splice enhancer and silencer motif ratios in the c.*13T>G and c.*13T>C possible variants (human) and reported cryptic acceptor region activation in the c.*13T>A variant. The c.4071T>C variant may also affect the splicing mechanism. According to the analysis results for TF‐binding sites, FOXO3, FOXP2 and TCF7L2 bind to the wild‐type sequence of the c.4071T>C position but not to the mutant sequence. FOXO3 has a tumour suppressor function and interacts with Erα and Erb, inhibiting cell growth (Zou et al., 2008). Its high expression is associated with a good prognosis, survival time and a period without distant metastasis (Habashy et al., 2011). Researchers have defined FOXO3 as a prognostic marker (Jiang et al., 2013). Although there is a suppression of invasion and metastasis in ER+ cases, these characteristics increase in ER cases (Sisci et al., 2013). On the other hand, FOXO3 expression stimulates the expression of miR‐29b‐2 and miR‐338 and suppresses EMT, cell migration, invasion and metastasis through these miRNAs (Song et al., 2021). FOXP2 may be a tumour suppressor (Cuiffo et al., 2014). A decrease in FOXP2 expression stimulates invasion and cell migration in BC (M. T. Chen et al., 2018). Moreover, FOXP2 interacts with FOXA2 in BC cells and inhibits EMT (Liu et al., 2021). TCF7L2 has oncogenic effects of abnormal gene expression. Its expression decreases in BC cases compared to normal breast tissue (El‐Tanani et al., 2008). Several studies and meta‐analyses reported that the polymorphisms of TCF7L2 are associated with BC predisposition (Burwinkel et al., 2006; J. Chen et al., 2013; Connor et al., 2012; Goode et al., 2009; Lu et al., 2015; Min et al., 2016; Naidu et al., 2012; F. Wang et al., 2015; Y. Wang et al., 2021; M. Zhang et al., 2018). TCF7L2 can cause effects such as proliferation and invasion in cancer cells by stimulating the transcription of miRNAs through the miR‐21 (Kang, 2011). According to the Ensembl VEP, an indel mutation occurs at the nucleotide position of the 3′ UTR region variant in humans associated with hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome (Mclaren et al., 2016). This indicates that the variant may be significant for CMT.
The current project is the first study investigating the relationship between the PALB2 gene WD40 domain and CMTs. We identified four variants and assessed their impacts on CMTs through in silico analyses. The synonymous and the 3′ UTR variants are novel variants in the exon 13 region. The most significant variant detected through in silico analysis was the p.A1050V in exon 7. We observed that these variants did not affect the tumour malignancy. In humans, variant positions in canines have been linked to cancer‐related phenotypes such as familial BC, endometrial tumour and hereditary cancer predisposition syndrome. However, there are limitations in the similarity between the two species concerning the PALB2 sequence, and further research is necessary. The results of bioinformatics analyses should be investigated through functional tests or case–control studies.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
ÖŞÇ: DNA extractions; PCR; Sanger sequencing; bioinformatics and in silico analysis. ÖÖ: Hypothesis; experimental design; bioinformatics and in silico analysis. SK: Hypothesis and experimental design. AR: Hypothesis; experimental design and sample collection. GÖ: Hypothesis; experimental design and sample collection. AS: Hypothesis; experimental design and sample collection. OK: Hypothesis; experimental design and histopathologic analyses.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
ETHICS STATEMENT
The blood and DNA samples are authorized for reuse for the current project (Ankara University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee‐Date: 17.07.2018; Decision number: 2018‐15‐94).
‐ Approval of the research protocol by an Institutional Reviewer Board: Ankara University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee approved the research protocol.
‐ Informed Consent: N/A
‐ Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: Ankara University, The Scientific Research Projects Coordinator, Project number: 19L0239005. Ankara University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee, Approval date: 17.07.2018, Decision number: 2018‐15‐94.
‐ Animal Studies: N/A
Supporting information
Genbank accesion numbers: OQ721107, OQ721108, OQ721109, OQ721110, OQ721111, OQ721112 (identical sequences of different objects) for novel mutations in the current research.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was supported by a Ph.D. dissertation project grant from Ankara University, The Scientific Research Projects Coordinator (Project number: 19L0239005). The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey supported the corresponding author in her dissertation phase by 2211‐C National Ph.D. Scholarship Program in the Priority Fields in Science and Technology funds.
Çıldır, Ö. Ş. , Özmen, Ö. , Kul, S. , Rişvanlı, A. , Özalp, G. , Sabuncu, A. , & Kul, O. (2024). Genetic analysis of PALB2 gene WD40 domain in canine mammary tumour patients. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 10, e1366. 10.1002/vms3.1366
REFERENCES
- Abass, S. , Fatima, W. , & Mahmood, S. (2016). Homologous DNA repair: Safeguarding genome territories from knives. Current Science, 111(8), 1335–1339. 10.18520/cs/v111/i8/1335-1339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Adzhubei, I. A. , Schmidt, S. , Peshkin, L. , Ramensky, V. E. , Gerasimova, A. , Bork, P. , Kondrashov, A. S. , & Sunyaev, S. R. (2010). A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nature Methods, 7(4), 248–249. 10.1038/nmeth0410-248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Amini, S. , Abak, A. , Estiar, M. A. , Montazeri, V. , Abhari, A. , & Sakhinia, E. (2018). Expression analysis of MicroRNA‐222 in breast cancer. Clinical Laboratory, 64(4), 491–496. 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2017.171002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Anwar, T. , Gonzalez, M. E. , & Kleer, C. G. (2021). Noncanonical functions of the polycomb group protein EZH2 in breast cancer. American Journal of Pathology, 191(5), 774–783. 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.01.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ashkenazy, H. , Abadi, S. , Martz, E. , Chay, O. , Mayrose, I. , Pupko, T. , & Ben‐Tal, N. (2016). ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(W1), W344–W350. 10.1093/nar/gkw408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Asiaf, A. , Ahmad, S. T. , Arjumand, W. , & Zargar, M. A. (2018) MicroRNAs in breast cancer: Diagnostic and therapeutic potential. In Wu W (Ed.). MicroRNA and cancer. (2nd ed., pp. 23–44). Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 1699. Springer. 10.1007/978-1-4939-7435-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Atalay Vural, S. , & Aydin, Y. (2001). Ankara'da 1973–1998 Yılları Arasında İncelenen Köpek Meme Tümörleri. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences, 25, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
- Bae, W. K. , & Hennighausen, L. (2014). Canonical and non‐canonical roles of the histone methyltransferase EZH2 in mammary development and cancer. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 382(1), 593–597. 10.1016/j.mce.2013.05.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bennesch, M. A. , Segala, G. , Wider, D. , & Picard, D. (2016). LSD1 engages a corepressor complex for the activation of the estrogen receptor α by estrogen and cAMP. Nucleic Acids Research, 44(18), 8655–8670. 10.1093/nar/gkw522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bettuzzi, S. , Robinson, A. , Fuchs‐Young, R. , & Greene, G. L. (1992). Estrogen and progesterone receptor structure and action in breast cancer cells. In Dickson RB, Lippman ME (Ed.) Genes, oncogenes, and hormones (pp. 301–307) Cancer Treatment and Research,Vol. 61. Springer US. 10.1007/978-1-4615-3500-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bhattacharjee, S. , & Nandi, S. (2016). Choices have consequences: The nexus between DNA repair pathways and genomic instability in cancer. Clinical and Translational Medicine, 5(1), 1–8. 10.1186/s40169-016-0128-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bianchi, F. , Sommariva, M. , De Cecco, L. , Triulzi, T. , Romero‐Cordoba, S. , Tagliabue, E. , Sfondrini, L. , & Balsari, A. (2016). Expression and prognostic significance of the autoimmune regulator gene in breast cancer cells. Cell Cycle, 15(23), 3220–3229. 10.1080/15384101.2016.1241918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Biswas, S. , Roy Chowdhury, S. , Mandal, G. , Purohit, S. , Gupta, A. , & Bhattacharyya, A. (2019). RelA driven co‐expression of CXCL13 and CXCR5 is governed by a multifaceted transcriptional program regulating breast cancer progression. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease, 1865(2), 502–511. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boggs, R. M. , Wright, Z. M. , Stickney, M. J. , Porter, W. W. , & Murphy, K. E. (2008). MicroRNA expression in canine mammary cancer. Mammalian Genome, 19(7–8), 561–569. 10.1007/s00335-008-9128-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boonen, R. , Rodrigue, A. , Stoepker, C. , Wiegant, W. W. , Vroling, B. , Sharma, M. , Rother, M. B. , Celosse, N. , Vreeswijk, M. P. G. , Couch, F. , Simard, J. , Devilee, P. , Masson, J.‐Y. , & Van Attikum, H. (2019). Functional analysis of genetic variants in the high‐risk breast cancer susceptibility gene PALB2. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1–15. 10.1038/s41467-019-13194-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boonen, R. , Vreeswijk, M. P. G. , & Van Attikum, H. (2020). Functional characterization of PALB2 variants of uncertain significance: Toward cancer risk and therapy response prediction. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 7, 1–20. 10.3389/fmolb.2020.00169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borge, K. S. , Børresen‐Dale, A. L. , & Lingaas, F. (2011). Identification of genetic variation in 11 candidate genes of canine mammary tumour. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology, 9(4), 241–250. 10.1111/j.1476-5829.2010.00250.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bouchal, P. , Dvořáková, M. , Roumeliotis, T. , Bortlíček, Z. , Ihnatová, I. , Procházková, I. , Ho, J. T. , Maryáš, J. , Imrichová, H. , Budinská, E. , Vyzula, R. , Garbis, S. D. , Vojtěšek, B. , & Nenutil, R. (2015). Combined proteomics and transcriptomics identifies carboxypeptidase B1 and nuclear factor κB (NF‐κB) associated proteins as putative biomarkers of metastasis in low grade breast cancer. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 14(7), 1814–1830. 10.1074/mcp.M114.041335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Burwinkel, B. , Shanmugam, K. S. , Hemminki, K. , Meindl, A. , Schmutzler, R. K. , Sutter, C. , Wappenschmidt, B. , Kiechle, M. , Bartram, C. R. , & Frank, B. (2006). Transcription factor 7‐like 2 (TCF7L2) variant is associated with familial breast cancer risk: A case–control study. BMC Cancer, 6(1), 268. 10.1186/1471-2407-6-268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Canadas, A. , Santos, M. , Nogueira, A. , Assis, J. , Gomes, M. , Lemos, C. , Medeiros, R. , & Dias‐Pereira, P. (2018). Canine mammary tumor risk is associated with polymorphisms in RAD51 and STK11 genes. The Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 30(5), 733–738. 10.1177/1040638718789231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cartegni, L. , Chew, S. L. , & Krainer, A. R. (2002). Listening to silence and understanding nonsense: Exonic mutations that affect splicing. Nature Reviews Genetics, 3(4), 285–298. 10.1038/nrg775 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chase, A. , & Cross, N. C. P. (2011). Aberrations of EZH2 in cancer. Clinical Cancer Research, 17(9), 2613–2618. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2156 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, J. , Yuan, T. , Liu, M. , & Chen, P. (2013). Association between TCF7L2 gene polymorphism and cancer risk: A meta‐analysis. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e71730. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, L. , Chen, D.‐T. , Kurtyka, C. , Rawal, B. , Fulp, W. J. , Haura, E. B. , & Cress, W. D. (2012). Tripartite motif containing 28 (Trim28) can regulate cell proliferation by bridging HDAC1/E2F interactions. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 287(48), 40106–40118. 10.1074/jbc.M112.380865 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, M.‐T. , Sun, H.‐F. , Li, L.‐D. , Zhao, Y. , Yang, L.‐P. , Gao, S.‐P. , & Jin, W. (2018). Downregulation of FOXP2 promotes breast cancer migration and invasion through TGFβ/SMAD signaling pathway. Oncology Letters, 15(6), 8582–8588. 10.3892/ol.2018.8402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W. , Jia, Q. , Song, Y. , Fu, H. , Wei, G. , & Ni, T. (2017). Alternative polyadenylation: Methods, findings, and impacts. Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics, 15(5), 287–300. 10.1016/j.gpb.2017.06.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chimge, N.‐O. , & Frenkel, B. (2013). The RUNX family in breast cancer: Relationships with estrogen signaling. Oncogene, 32(17), 2121–2130. 10.1038/onc.2012.328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Choi, Y. , & Chan, A. P. (2015). PROVEAN web server: A tool to predict the functional effect of amino acid substitutions and indels. Bioinformatics, 31(16), 2745–2747. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cock‐Rada, A. M. , Ossa, C. A. , Garcia, H. I. , & Gomez, L. R. (2018). A multi‐gene panel study in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in Colombia. Familial Cancer, 17(1), 23–30. 10.1007/s10689-017-0004-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Connor, A. E. , Baumgartner, R. N. , Baumgartner, K. B. , Kerber, R. A. , Pinkston, C. , John, E. M. , Torres‐Mejia, G. , Hines, L. , Giuliano, A. , Wolff, R. K. , & Slattery, M. L. (2012). Associations between TCF7L2 polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer among Hispanic and non‐hispanic white women: The breast cancer health disparities study. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 136(2), 593–602. 10.1007/s10549-012-2299-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cuiffo, B. G. , Campagne, A. , Bell, G. W. , Lembo, A. , Orso, F. , Lien, E. C. , Bhasin, M. K. , Raimo, M. , Hanson, S. E. , Marusyk, A. , El‐Ashry, D. , Hematti, P. , Polyak, K. , Mechta‐Grigoriou, F. , Mariani, O. , Volinia, S. , Vincent‐Salomon, A. , Taverna, D. , & Karnoub, A. E. (2014). MSC‐regulated microRNAs converge on the transcription factor FOXP2 and promote breast cancer metastasis. Cell Stem Cell, 15(6), 762–774. 10.1016/j.stem.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cullen, J. M. , & Breen, M. (2016). An overview of molecular cancer pathogenesis, prognosis, and diagnosis. In Meuten D. J. (Ed.), Tumors in domestic animals (pp. 1–26) Wiley. 10.1002/9781119181200.ch1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Davis, P. L. , Miron, A. , Andersen, L. M. , Iglehart, J. D. , & Marks, J. R. (1999). Isolation and initial characterization of the BRCA2 promoter. Oncogene, 18(44), 6000–6012. 10.1038/sj.onc.1202990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- De Baets, G. , Van Durme, J. , Reumers, J. , Maurer‐Stroh, S. , Vanhee, P. , Dopazo, J. , Schymkowitz, J. , & Rousseau, F. (2012). SNPeffect 4.0: On‐line prediction of molecular and structural effects of protein‐coding variants. Nucleic Acids Research, 40(D1), D935–D939. 10.1093/nar/gkr996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degraffenried, L. A. , Hilsenbeck, S. G. , & Fuqua, S. A. W. (2002). Sp1 is essential for estrogen receptor α gene transcription. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 82(1), 7–18. 10.1016/S0960-0760(02)00151-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Degtyareva, A. O. , Antontseva, E. V. , & Merkulova, T. I. (2021). Regulatory SNPs: Altered transcription factor binding sites implicated in complex traits and diseases. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 22(12), 6454. 10.3390/ijms22126454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Desmet, F. O. , Hamroun, D. , Collod‐Bëroud, G. , Claustres, M. , & Beroud, C. (2010). Bioinformatics identification of splice site signals and prediction of mutation effects. In Mohan R. M. (Ed.), Research advances in nucleic acids research, (pp. 1–14). Global Research Network Publishers. http://www.umd.be/HSF/Desmet_2010.pdf https://hal.archives‐ouvertes.fr/hal‐01671042 [Google Scholar]
- Desmet, F.‐O. , Hamroun, D. , Lalande, M. , Collod‐Béroud, G. , Claustres, M. , & Béroud, C. (2009). Human splicing finder: An online bioinformatics tool to predict splicing signals. Nucleic Acids Research., 37(9), e67–e67. 10.1093/nar/gkp215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Deveryshetty, J. , Peterlini, T. , Ryzhikov, M. , Brahiti, N. , Dellaire, G. , Masson, J.‐Y. , & Korolev, S. (2019). Novel RNA and DNA strand exchange activity of the PALB2 DNA binding domain and its critical role for DNA repair in cells. Elife, 8, 1–25. 10.7554/eLife.44063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dittmer, J. R. (2011). Protein expression of the Ets transcription factor Elf‐1 in breast cancer cells is negatively correlated with histological grading, but not with clinical outcome. Oncology Reports, 26(5), 1121–1125. 10.3892/or.2011.1409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Du, D. , Katsuno, Y. , Meyer, D. , Budi, E. H. , Chen, S.‐H. , Koeppen, H. , Wang, H. , Akhurst, R. J. , & Derynck, R. (2018). Smad3‐mediated recruitment of the methyltransferase SETDB1/ESET controls Snail1 expression andepithelial–mesenchymal transition. EMBO Reports, 19(1), 135–155. 10.15252/embr.201744250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duan, R. , Porter, W. , & Safe, S. (1998). Estrogen‐induced c‐fos protooncogene expression in MCF‐7 human breast cancer cells: Role of estrogen receptor Sp1 complex formation. Endocrinology, 139(4), 1981–1990. 10.1210/endo.139.4.5870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ducy, M. , Sesma‐Sanz, L. , Guitton‐Sert, L. , Lashgari, A. , Gao, Y. , Brahiti, N. , Rodrigue, A. , Margaillan, G. , Caron, M.‐C. , Côté, J. , Simard, J. , & Masson, J.‐Y. (2019). The tumor suppressor PALB2: Inside out. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 44(3), 226–240. 10.1016/j.tibs.2018.10.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El‐Tanani, M. , Ravindranath, A. , O'Connell, A. , & Johnston, P. (2008). The role of LEF/TCF factors in neoplastic transformation. Current Molecular Medicine, 8(1), 38–50. 10.2174/156652408783565559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Enginler, S. O. , Akış, I. , Toydemir, T. S. F. , Oztabak, K. , Haktanir, D. , Gündüz, M. C. , Kırşan, I. , & Fırat, I. (2014). Genetic variations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in dogs with mammary tumours. Veterinary Research Communications, 38(1), 21–27. 10.1007/s11259-013-9577-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ensembl . (2021). Gene: PALB2 ENSCAFG00000030772. https://www.ensembl.org/Canis_lupus_familiarisboxer/Gene/Summary?db=core;g=ENSCAFG00000030772;r=6:23776643‐23804524;t=ENSCAFT00000049192
- Erer, H. , & Kıran, M. M. (1993). Konya'da 1985–1992 yılları arasında köpeklerde görülen tümörler. Selçuk Üniversitesi Vet Fakültesi Derg, 9(2), 87–89. [Google Scholar]
- Erkko, H. , Xia, B. , Nikkilä, J. , Schleutker, J. , Syrjäkoski, K. , Mannermaa, A. , Kallioniemi, A. , Pylkäs, K. , Karppinen, S.‐M. , Rapakko, K. , Miron, A. , Sheng, Q. , Li, G. , Mattila, H. , Bell, D. W. , Haber, D. A. , Grip, M. , Reiman, M. , Jukkola‐Vuorinen, & Winqvist, R. (2007). A recurrent mutation in PALB2 in Finnish cancer families. Nature, 446(7133), 316–319. 10.1038/nature05609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferlay, J. , Soerjomataram, I. , Dikshit, R. , Eser, S. , Mathers, C. , Rebelo, M. , Parkin, D. M. , Forman, D. , & Bray, F. (2015). Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal of Cancer, 136(5), E359–386. 10.1002/ijc.29210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fernández‐Calero, T. , Cabrera‐Cabrera, F. , Ehrlich, R. , & Marín, M. (2016). Silent polymorphisms: Can the tRNA population explain changes in protein properties? Life, 6(1), 1–17. 10.3390/life6010009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fish, E. J. , Irizarry, K. J. , Deinnocentes, P. , Ellis, C. J. , Prasad, N. , Moss, A. G. , & Curt Bird, R. (2018). Malignant canine mammary epithelial cells shed exosomes containing differentially expressed microRNA that regulate oncogenic networks. BMC Cancer, 18(1), 1–20. 10.1186/s12885-018-4750-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Freitag, C. E. , Mei, P. , Wei, L. , Parwani, A. V. , & Li, Z. (2021). ESR1 genetic alterations and their association with clinicopathologic characteristics in advanced breast cancer: A single academic institution experience. Human Pathology, 107, 80–86. 10.1016/j.humpath.2020.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goebel, K. , & Merner, N. D. (2017). A monograph proposing the use of canine mammary tumours as a model for the study of hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes in humans. Veterinary Medicine and Science, 3(2), 51–62. 10.1002/vms3.61 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Goode, E. L. , Szabo, C. , Prokunina‐Olsson, L. , Vierkant, R. A. , Fredericksen, Z. S. , Collins, F. S. , White, K. L. , Schmidt, M. , Fridley, B. L. , & Couch, F. J. (2009). No association between a candidate TCF7L2 variant and risk of breast or ovarian cancer. BMC Cancer, 9(1), 312. 10.1186/1471-2407-9-312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Groner, Y. , Ito, Y. , Liu, P. , Neil, J. C. , Speck, N. A. , & van Wijnen, A. (Eds.), (2017). RUNX proteins in development and cancer Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, Vol. 962. Springer. 10.1007/978-981-10-3233-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Gülçubuk, A. , & Gürel, A. (2003). 1995–2000 yillari arasinda istanbul'da saptanan köpek tümörleri. İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakultesi Dergisi, 29(1), 83–91. [Google Scholar]
- Habashy, H. O. , Rakha, E. A. , Aleskandarany, M. , Ahmed, M. A. , Green, A. R. , Ellis, I. O. , & Powe, D. G. (2011). FOXO3a nuclear localisation is associated with good prognosis in luminal‐like breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 129(1), 11–21. 10.1007/s10549-010-1161-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hansen, R. K. , & Fuqua, S. (1999). The estrogen receptor and breast cancer. In Bowcock AM., (Ed.). Breast cancer molecular genetics, pathogenesis, and therapeutics: Contemporary Cancer Research, Vol. 1. Humana Press. 10.1007/978-1-59259-456-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hayashi, S.‐I. , & Yamaguchi, Y. (2008). Estrogen signaling in cancer microenvironment and prediction of response to hormonal therapy. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 109(3–5), 201–206. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.03.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- He, H. , Wang, D. , Yao, H. , Wei, Z. , Lai, Y. , Hu, J. , Liu, X. , Wang, Y. , Zhou, H. , Wang, N. , Luo, X.‐G. , & Zhang, T.‐C. (2015). Transcriptional factors p300 and MRTF‐A synergistically enhance the expression of migration‐related genes in MCF‐7 breast cancer cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 467(4), 813–820. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hodgson, A. , & Turashvili, G. (2020). Pathology of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 10, 1–11. 10.3389/fonc.2020.531790 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hosey, A. M. , Gorski, J. J. , Murray, M. M. , Quinn, J. E. , Chung, W. Y. , Stewart, G. E. , James, C. R. , Farragher, S. M. , Mulligan, J. M. , Scott, A. N. , Dervan, P. A. , Johnston, P. G. , Couch, F. J. , Daly, P. A. , Kay, E. , Mccann, A. , Mullan, P. B. , & Harkin, D. P. (2007). Molecular basis for estrogen receptor α deficiency in BRCA1‐linked breast cancer. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 99(22), 1683–1694. 10.1093/jnci/djm207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, H. , Miao, Y.‐R. , Jia, L.‐H. , Yu, Q.‐Y. , Zhang, Q. , & Guo, A.‐Y. (2019). AnimalTFDB 3.0: A comprehensive resource for annotation and prediction of animal transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D33–D38. 10.1093/nar/gky822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu, X. , Xiang, D. , Xie, Y. , Tao, L. , Zhang, Y. , Jin, Y. , Pinello, L. , Wan, Y. , Yuan, G.‐C. , & Li, Z. (2019). LSD1 suppresses invasion, migration and metastasis of luminal breast cancer cells via activation of GATA3 and repression of TRIM37 expression. Oncogene, 38(44), 7017–7034. 10.1038/s41388-019-0923-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inoue, A. , Omoto, Y. , Yamaguchi, Y. , Kiyama, R. , & Hayashi, S. (2004). Transcription factor EGR3 is involved in the estrogen‐signaling pathway in breast cancer cells. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology, 32(3), 649–661. 10.1677/jme.0.0320649 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Janes, K. A. (2011). RUNX1 and its understudied role in breast cancer. Cell Cycle, 10(20), 3461–3465. 10.4161/cc.10.20.18029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Y. , Zou, L. , Lu, W.‐Q. , Zhang, Y. , & Shen, A.‐G. (2013). Foxo3a expression is a prognostic marker in breast cancer. PLoS ONE, 8(8), e70746. 10.1371/journal.pone.0070746 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jin, W. , Zhu, Q. , Yang, Y. , Yang, W. , Wang, D. , Yang, J. , Niu, X. , Yu, D. , & Gong, J. (2021). Animal‐APAdb: A comprehensive animal alternative polyadenylation database. Nucleic Acids Research, 49(D1), D47–D54. 10.1093/nar/gkaa778 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang, C. (2011). Genome‐wide identification of TCF7L2/TCF4 target miRNAs reveals a role for miR‐21 in Wnt‐driven epithelial cancer. International Journal of Oncology, 40(2), 519–526. 10.3892/ijo.2011.1215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaszak, I. , Ruszczak, A. , Kanafa, S. , Kacprzak, K. , Król, M. , & Jurka, P. (2018). Current biomarkers of canine mammary tumors. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 60(1), 1–13. 10.1186/s13028-018-0417-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khan, S. , Abdelrahim, M. , Samudio, I. , & Safe, S. (2003). Estrogen receptor/Sp1 complexes are required for induction of Cad gene expression by 17β‐estradiol in breast cancer cells. Endocrinology, 144(6), 2325–2335. 10.1210/en.2002-0149 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim, G.‐C. , Kwon, H.‐K. , Lee, C.‐G. , Verma, R. , Rudra, D. , Kim, T. , Kang, K. , Nam, J. H. , Kim, Y. , & Im, S.‐H. (2018). Upregulation of Ets1 expression by NFATc2 and NFKB1/RELA promotes breast cancer cell invasiveness. Oncogenesis, 7(11), 91. 10.1038/s41389-018-0101-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimchi‐Sarfaty, C. , Oh, J. M. , Kim, I.‐W. , Sauna, Z. E. , Calcagno, A. M. , Ambudkar, S. V. , & Gottesman, M. M. (2007). A “silent” polymorphism in the MDR1 gene changes substrate specificity. Science (80‐), 315(5811), 525–528. 10.1126/science.1135308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozakov, D. , Grove, L. E. , Hall, D. R. , Bohnuud, T. , Mottarella, S. E. , Luo, L. , Xia, B. , Beglov, D. , & Vajda, S. (2015). The FTMap family of web servers for determining and characterizing ligand‐binding hot spots of proteins. Nature Protocols, 10(5), 733–755. 10.1038/nprot.2015.043 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozomara, A. , Birgaoanu, M. , & Griffiths‐Jones, S. (2019). MiRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Research, 47(D1), D155–D162. 10.1093/nar/gky1141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, P. , Henikoff, S. , & Ng, P. C. (2009). Predicting the effects of coding non‐synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nature Protocols, 4(7), 1073–1081. 10.1038/nprot.2009.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, J. Y. , Moskwa, N. , Kang, W. , Fan, T. M. , & Lee, C. (2023). Canine as a comparative and translational model for human mammary tumor. Journal of Breast Cancer, 26(1), 1–13. 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee, S. T. , Li, Z. , Wu, Z. , Aau, M. , Guan, P. , Karuturi, R. K. M. , Liou, Y. C. , & Yu, Q. (2011). Context‐specific regulation of NF‐κB target gene expression by EZH2 in breast cancers. Molecular Cell, 43(5), 798–810. 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.08.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lerebours, F. , Vacher, S. , Andrieu, C. , Espie, M. , Marty, M. , Lidereau, R. , & Bieche, I. (2008). NF‐kappa B genes have a major role in inflammatory breast cancer. BMC Cancer, 8(1), 41. 10.1186/1471-2407-8-41 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q. , Li, J. , Yu, C.‐P. , Chang, S. , Xie, L.‐L. , & Wang, S. (2021). Synonymous mutations that regulate translation speed might play a non‐negligible role in liver cancer development. BMC Cancer, 21(1), 1–13. 10.1186/s12885-021-08131-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y. , Chen, T. , Guo, M. , Li, Y. , Zhang, Q. , Tan, G. , Yu, L. , & Tan, Y. (2021). FOXA2‐interacting FOXP2 prevents epithelial‐mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells by stimulating E‐Cadherin and PHF2 transcription. Frontiers in Oncology, 11, 1–15. 10.3389/fonc.2021.605025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liu, Y. , Mayo, M. W. , Nagji, A. S. , Smith, P. W. , Ramsey, C. S. , Li, D. , & Jones, D. R. (2012). Phosphorylation of RelA/p65 promotes DNMT‐1 recruitment to chromatin and represses transcription of the tumor metastasis suppressor gene BRMS1. Oncogene, 31(9), 1143–1154. 10.1038/onc.2011.308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu, X. P. , Hu, G. N. , Du, J. Q. , & Li, H. Q. (2015). TCF7L2 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to breast cancer: A meta‐analysis. Genetics and Molecular Research [Electronic Resource], 14(1), 2860–2867. 10.4238/2015.March.31.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lüder Ripoli, F. , Conradine Hammer, S. , Mohr, A. , Willenbrock, S. , Hewicker‐Trautwein, M. , Brenig, B. , Murua Escobar, H. , & Nolte, I. (2016). Multiplex gene expression profiling of 16 target genes in neoplastic and non‐neoplastic canine mammary tissues using branched‐DNA assay. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(9), 1589. 10.3390/ijms17091589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maor, S. , Mayer, D. , Yarden, R. I. , Lee, A. V. , Sarfstein, R. , Werner, H. , & Papa, M. Z. (2006). Estrogen receptor regulates insulin‐like growth factor‐I receptor gene expression in breast tumor cells: Involvement of transcription factor Sp1. Journal of Endocrinology, 191(3), 605–612. 10.1677/joe.1.07016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maor, S. , Papa, M. , Yarden, R. , Friedman, E. , Lerenthal, Y. , Lee, S. , Mayer, D. , & Werner, H. (2007). Insulin‐like growth factor‐I controls BRCA1 gene expression through activation of transcription factor Sp1. Hormone and Metabolic Research, 39(3), 179–185. 10.1055/s-2007-970415 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mavrogiannis, A. V. , Kokkinopoulou, I. , Kontos, C. K. , & Sideris, D. C. (2018). Effect of Vinca alkaloids on the expression levels of microRNAs targeting apoptosis‐related genes in breast cancer cell lines. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, 19(13), 1076–1086. 10.2174/1389201019666181112103204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mclaren, W. , Gil, L. , Hunt, S. E. , Riat, H. S. , Ritchie, G. R. S. , Thormann, A. , Flicek, P. , & Cunningham, F. (2016). The Ensembl variant effect predictor. Genome Biology, 17(1), 122. 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mester, J. , & Redeuilh, G. (2012). Proliferation of breast cancer cells: Regulation, mediators, targets for therapy. Anti‐cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 8(8), 872–885. 10.2174/187152008786847747 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Min, W. , Liu, X. , Lu, Y. , Gong, Z. , Wang, M. , Lin, S. , Kang, H. , Jin, T. , Wang, X. , Ma, X. , Liu, K. , Dai, C. , Zheng, Y. , Li, S. , Ma, Q. , & Dai, Z. (2016). Association of transcription factor 7‐like 2 gene polymorphisms with breast cancer risk in northwest Chinese women. Oncotarget, 7(47), 77175–77182. 10.18632/oncotarget.12591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naidu, R. , Yip, C. H. , & Taib, N. A. M. (2012). Genetic variations in transcription factor 7‐like 2 (TCF7L2) gene: association of TCF7L2 rs12255372(G/T) or rs7903146(C/T) with breast cancer risk and clinico‐pathological parameters. Medical Oncology, 29(2), 411–417. 10.1007/s12032-011-9837-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nepomuceno, T. , De Gregoriis, G. , De Oliveira, F. M. B. , Suarez‐Kurtz, G. , Monteiro, A. , & Carvalho, M. (2017). The role of PALB2 in the DNA damage response and cancer predisposition. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(9), 1–20. 10.3390/ijms18091886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nepomuceno, T. C. , Carvalho, M. A. , Rodrigue, A. , Simard, J. , Masson, J.‐Y. , & Monteiro, A. N. A. (2021). PALB2 variants: Protein domains and cancer susceptibility. Trends in Cancer, 7(3), 188–197. 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nooren, I. M. A. (2003). Diversity of protein–protein interactions. EMBO Journal, 22(14), 3486–3492. 10.1093/emboj/cdg359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ochiai, K. , Ishiguro‐Oonuma, T. , Yoshikawa, Y. , Udagawa, C. , Kato, Y. , Watanabe, M. , Bonkobara, M. , Morimatsu, M. , & Omi, T. (2015). Polymorphisms of canine BRCA2 BRC repeats affecting interaction with RAD51. Biomedical Research, 36(2), 155–158. 10.2220/biomedres.36.155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ochiai, K. , Yoshikawa, Y. , Oonuma, T. , Tomioka, Y. , Hashizume, K. , & Morimatsu, M. (2011). Interactions between canine RAD51 and full length or truncated BRCA2 BRC repeats. Veterinary Journal, 190(2), 293–295. 10.1016/j.tvjl.2010.11.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- O'kane, G. M. , Connor, A. A. , & Gallinger, S. (2017). Characterization, detection, and treatment approaches for homologous recombination deficiency in cancer. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 23(12), 1121–1137. 10.1016/j.molmed.2017.10.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oliver, A. W. , Swift, S. , Lord, C. J. , Ashworth, A. , & Pearl, L. H. (2009). Structural basis for recruitment of BRCA2 by PALB2. EMBO Reports, 10(9), 990–996. 10.1038/embor.2009.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozmen, O. , Kul, S. , Risvanli, A. , Ozalp, G. , Sabuncu, A. , & Kul, O. (2017a). Somatic SNPs of the BRCA2 gene at the fragments encoding RAD51 binding sites of canine mammary tumors. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology, 15(4), 1479–1486. 10.1111/vco.12293 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ozmen, O. , Kul, S. , Risvanli, A. , Ozalp, G. , Sabuncu, A. , & Kul, O. (2017b). Single nucleotide variations of the canine RAD51 domains, which directly binds PALB2 and BRCA2. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Research, 65(2), 75–82. 10.14943/jjvr.65.2.75 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pagani, F. , Raponi, M. , & Baralle, F. E. (2005). Synonymous mutations in CFTR exon 12 affect splicing and are not neutral in evolution. PNAS, 102(18), 6368–6372. 10.1073/pnas.0502288102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.‐Y. , Singh, T. R. , Nassar, N. , Zhang, F. , Freund, M. , Hanenberg, H. , Meetei, A. R. , & Andreassen, P. R. (2014). Breast cancer‐associated missense mutants of the PALB2 WD40 domain, which directly binds RAD51C, RAD51 and BRCA2, disrupt DNA repair. Oncogene, 33(40), 4803–4812. 10.1038/onc.2013.421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.‐Y. , Zhang, F. , & Andreassen, P. R. (2014). PALB2: The hub of a network of tumor suppressors involved in DNA damage responses. Biochim Biophys Acta—Rev Cancer, 1846(1), 263–275. 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pejaver, V. , Urresti, J. , Lugo‐Martinez, J. , Pagel, K. A. , Lin, G. N. , Nam, H.‐J. , Mort, M. , Cooper, D. N. , Sebat, J. , Iakoucheva, L. M. , Mooney, S. D. , & Radivojac, P. (2020). Inferring the molecular and phenotypic impact of amino acid variants with MutPred2. Nature Communications, 11(1), 5918. 10.1038/s41467-020-19669-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Perillo, B. , Tramontano, A. , Pezone, A. , & Migliaccio, A. (2020). LSD1: More than demethylation of histone lysine residues. Experimental & Molecular Medicine, 52(12), 1936–1947. 10.1038/s12276-020-00542-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petz, L. N. , & Nardulli, A. M. (2000). Sp1 binding sites and an estrogen response element half‐site are involved in regulation of the human progesterone receptor A promoter. Molecular Endocrinology, 14(7), 972–985. 10.1210/mend.14.7.0493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Petz, L. N. , Ziegler, Y. S. , Schultz, J. R. , Kim, H. , Kemper, J. K. , & Nardulli, A. M. (2004). Differential regulation of the human progesterone receptor gene through an estrogen response element half site and Sp1 sites. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 88(2), 113–122. 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2003.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prakash, R. , Zhang, Y. , Feng, W. , & Jasin, M. (2015). Homologous Recombination and Human Health: The roles of BRCA1, BRCA2, and Associated Proteins. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 7(4), a016600. 10.1101/cshperspect.a016600 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qin, C. , Singh, P. , & Safe, S. (1999). Transcriptional activation of insulin‐like growth factor‐binding protein‐4 by 17β‐estradiol in MCF‐7 cells: Role of estrogen receptor‐sp1 complexes. Endocrinology, 140(6), 2501–2508. 10.1210/endo.140.6.6751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Raponi, M. , Kralovicova, J. , Copson, E. , Divina, P. , Eccles, D. , Johnson, P. , Baralle, D. , & Vorechovsky, I. (2011). Prediction of single‐nucleotide substitutions that result in exon skipping: Identification of a splicing silencer in BRCA1 exon 6. Human Mutation, 32(4), 436–444. 10.1002/humu.21458 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rauscher, R. , & Ignatova, Z. (2018). Timing during translation matters: Synonymous mutations in human pathologies influence protein folding and function. Biochemical Society Transactions, 46(4), 937–944. 10.1042/BST20170422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ricca, A. , Biroccio, A. , Trisciuoglio, D. , Cippitelli, M. , Zupi, G. , & Bufalo, D. D. (2001). relA over‐expression reduces tumorigenicity and activates apoptosis in human cancer cells. British Journal of Cancer, 85(12), 1914–1921. 10.1054/bjoc.2001.2174 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rinnerthaler, G. , Hackl, H. , Gampenrieder, S. , Hamacher, F. , Hufnagl, C. , Hauser‐Kronberger, C. , Zehentmayr, F. , Fastner, G. , Sedlmayer, F. , Mlineritsch, B. , & Greil, R. (2016). miR‐16‐5p Is a stably‐expressed housekeeping microRNA in breast cancer tissues from primary tumors and from metastatic sites. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 17(2), 156. 10.3390/ijms17020156 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Roche, D. B. , Buenavista, M. T. , & Mcguffin, L. J. (2013). The FunFOLD2 server for the prediction of protein–ligand interactions. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(W1), W303–W307. 10.1093/nar/gkt498 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rozas, J. , Ferrer‐Mata, A. , Sánchez‐DelBarrio, J. C. , Guirao‐Rico, S. , Librado, P. , Ramos‐Onsins, S. , & Sánchez‐Gracia, A. (2019). DnaSP . http://www.ub.edu/dnasp/ [DOI] [PubMed]
- Sargan, D. R. (2012). Genetics of cancer in dogs. In Ostrander E. & Ruvinsky A. (Eds.), The genetics of the dog (2nd ed., pp. 161–181). CABI. [Google Scholar]
- Schroeder, C. , Faust, U. , Sturm, M. , Hackmann, K. , Grundmann, K. , Harmuth, F. , Bosse, K. , Kehrer, M. , Benkert, T. , Klink, B. , Mackenroth, L. , Betcheva‐Krajcir, E. , Wimberger, P. , Kast, K. , Heilig, M. , Nguyen, H. P. , Riess, O. , Schröck, E. , Bauer, P. , & Rump, A. (2015). HBOC multi‐gene panel testing: comparison of two sequencing centers. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 152(1), 129–136. 10.1007/s10549-015-3429-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schultz, J. R. , Petz, L. N. , & Nardulli, A. M. (2003). Estrogen receptor α and Sp1 regulate progesterone receptor gene expression. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 201(1–2), 165–175. 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00415-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Scott, G. K. , Daniel, J. C. , Xiong, X. , Maki, R. A. , Kabat, D. , & Benz, C. C. (1994). Binding of an ETS‐related protein within the DNase I hypersensitive site of the HER2/neu promoter in human breast cancer cells. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 269(31), 19848–19858. 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)32098-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Selzer, P. M. , Marhöfen, R. J. , & Koch, O. (2019). In Tunçer M., Ay H. (Translation Eds.), Uygulamalı Biyoinformatik (2nd ed., pp. 7–11) Palme Yayinevi. [Google Scholar]
- Sethi, S. (Ed.). (2014). miRNAs and target genes in breast cancer metastasis (1st ed.). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-08162-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Siaud, N. , Barbera, M. A. , Egashira, A. , Lam, I. , Christ, N. , Schlacher, K. , Xia, B. , & Jasin, M. (2011). Plasticity of BRCA2 function in homologous recombination: Genetic interactions of the PALB2 and DNA binding domains. PLoS Genetics, 7(12), e1002409. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Simon, J. A. , & Lange, C. A. (2008). Roles of the EZH2 histone methyltransferase in cancer epigenetics. Mutation Research. Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis, 647(1–2), 21–29. 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sisci, D. , Maris, P. , Grazia Cesario, M. , Anselmo, W. , Coroniti, R. , Elvi Trombino, G. , Romeo, F. , Ferraro, A. , Lanzino, M. , Aquila, S. , Maggiolini, M. , Mauro, L. , Morelli, C. , & Andò, S. (2013). The estrogen receptor α is the key regulator of the bifunctional role of FoxO3a transcription factor in breast cancer motility and invasiveness. Cell Cycle, 12(21), 3405–3420. 10.4161/cc.26421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sisci, D. , Middea, E. , Morelli, C. , Lanzino, M. , Aquila, S. , Rizza, P. , Catalano, S. , Casaburi, I. , Maggiolini, M. , & Andò, S. (2010). 17β‐Estradiol enhances α5 integrin subunit gene expression through ERα‐Sp1 interaction and reduces cell motility and invasion of ERα‐positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 124(1), 63–77. 10.1007/s10549-009-0713-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slavin, T. P. , Niell‐Swiller, M. , Solomon, I. , Nehoray, B. , Rybak, C. , Blazer, K. R. , & Weitzel, J. N. (2015). Clinical application of multigene panels: Challenges of next‐generation counseling and cancer risk management. Frontiers in Oncology, 5, 1–13. 10.3389/fonc.2015.00208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sleeckx, N. , De Rooster, H. , Veldhuis Kroeze, E. , Van Ginneken, C. , & Van Brantegem, L. (2011). Canine mammary tumours, an Overview. Reproduction in Domestic Animals = Zuchthygiene, 46(6), 1112–1131. 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2011.01816.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song, Y. , Zeng, S. , Zheng, G. , Chen, D. , Li, P. , Yang, M. , Luo, K. , Yin, J. , Gu, Y. , Zhang, Z. , Jia, X. , Qiu, N. , He, Z. , Li, H. , & Liu, H. (2021). FOXO3a‐driven miRNA signatures suppress VEGF‐A/NRP1 signaling and breast cancer metastasis. Oncogene, 40(4), 777–790. 10.1038/s41388-020-01562-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Southey, M. , Teo, Z. L. , & Winship, I. (2013). PALB2 and breast cancer: Ready for clinical translation!. The Application of Clinical Genetics, 6, 43–52. 10.2147/TACG.S34116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sticht, C. , De La Torre, C. , Parveen, A. , & Gretz, N. (2018). Mirwalk: An online resource for prediction of microRNA binding sites. PLoS ONE, 13(10), 1–6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0206239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stoner, M. , Wormke, M. , Saville, B. , Samudio, I. , Qin, C. , Abdelrahim, M. , & Safe, S. (2004). Estrogen regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression in ZR‐75 breast cancer cells through interaction of estrogen receptor α and SP proteins. Oncogene, 23(5), 1052–1063. 10.1038/sj.onc.1207201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stossi, F. , Madak‐Erdoğan, Z. , & Katzenellenbogen, B. S. (2012). Macrophage‐elicited loss of estrogen receptor‐α in breast cancer cells via involvement of MAPK and c‐Jun at the ESR1 genomic locus. Oncogene, 31(14), 1825–1834. 10.1038/onc.2011.370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun, Y. , Mccorvie, T. J. , Yates, L. A. , & Zhang, X. (2020). Structural basis of homologous recombination. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 77(1), 3–18. 10.1007/s00018-019-03365-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki, T. , Inoue, A. , Miki, Y. , Moriya, T. , Akahira, J.‐I. , Ishida, T. , Hirakawa, H. , Yamaguchi, Y. , Hayashi, S.‐I. , & Sasano, H. (2007). Early growth responsive gene 3 in human breast carcinoma: A regulator of estrogen‐meditated invasion and a potent prognostic factor. Endocrine‐Related Cancer, 14(2), 279–292. 10.1677/ERC-06-0005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tang, X. , Hou, Y. , Yang, G. , Wang, X. , Tang, S. , Du, Y.‐E. , Yang, L. , Yu, T. , Zhang, H. , Zhou, M. , Wen, S. , Xu, L. , & Liu, M. (2016). Stromal miR‐200s contribute to breast cancer cell invasion through CAF activation and ECM remodeling. Cell Death and Differentiation, 23(1), 132–145. 10.1038/cdd.2015.78 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The Uniprot Consortium . (2021a). UniProtKB—J9NVL4 (J9NVL4_CANLF). Published 2021. https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/J9NVL4#family_and_domains
- The Uniprot Consortium . (2021b). UniProtKB‐J9NVL4‐A0A5S9I5Z8 alignment . Accessed April 26, 2021. https://www.uniprot.org/align/A20210426E5A08BB0B2D1C45B0C7BC3B55FD2655600E630P
- The Uniprot Consortium . (2021c). UniProtKB—Q86YC2 (PALB2_HUMAN). https://www.uniprot.org/uniprot/Q86YC2
- Trenner, A. , & Sartori, A. A. (2019). Harnessing DNA double‐strand break repair for cancer treatment. Frontiers in Oncology, 9, 1–10. 10.3389/fonc.2019.01388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tu, W. J. , Mccuaig, R. D. , Tan, A. H. Y. , Hardy, K. , Seddiki, N. , Ali, S. , Dahlstrom, J. E. , Bean, E. G. , Dunn, J. , Forwood, J. , Tsimbalyuk, S. , Smith, K. , Yip, D. , Malik, L. , Prasanna, T. , Milburn, P. , & Rao, S. (2020). Targeting nuclear LSD1 to reprogram cancer cells and reinvigorate exhausted T Cells via a novel LSD1‐EOMES switch. Frontiers in Immunology, 11, 1–23. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01228 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Uemura, M. , Ochiai, K. , Morimatsu, M. , Michishita, M. , Onozawa, E. , Azakami, D. , Uno, Y. , Yoshikawa, Y. , Sasaki, T. , Watanabe, M. , & Omi, T. (2019). The canine RAD51 mutation leads to the attenuation of interaction with PALB2. Veterinary and Comparative Oncology, 18(2), 247–255. 10.1111/vco.12542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vihinen, M. (2021). Functional effects of protein variants. Biochimie, 180, 104–120. 10.1016/j.biochi.2020.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F. , Jiang, L. , Li, J. , Yu, X. , Li, M. , Wu, G. , Yu, Z. , Zhou, K. , Chu, H. , & Zhai, H. (2015). Association between TCF7L2 polymorphisms and breast cancer susceptibility: A meta‐analysis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 8(6), 9355–9361. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Q. , Li, J. , Yang, X. , Sun, H. , Gao, S. , Zhu, H. , Wu, J. , & Jin, W. (2013). Nrf2 is associated with the regulation of basal transcription activity of the BRCA1 gene. Acta Biochimica Biophysica Sinica (Shanghai), 45(3), 179–187. 10.1093/abbs/gmt001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y. , Men, X. , Gu, Y. , Wang, H. , & Xu, Z. (2021). Haplotype analysis on correlation between transcription factor 7‐like 2 gene polymorphism and breast cancer risk. BMC Cancer, 21(1), 885. 10.1186/s12885-021-08571-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Wang, Y. , Yin, W. , Lin, Y. , Yin, K. , Zhou, L. , Du, Y. , Yan, T. , & Lu, J. (2018). Downregulated circulating microRNAs after surgery: Potential noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of early breast cancer. Cell Death Discovery, 4(1), 87. 10.1038/s41420-018-0089-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Waterhouse, A. , Bertoni, M. , Bienert, S. , Studer, G. , Tauriello, G. , Gumienny, R. , Heer, F. T. , De Beer, T. A. P. , Rempfer, C. , Bordoli, L. , Lepore, R. , & Schwede, T. (2018). SWISS‐MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Research, 46(W1), W296–W303. 10.1093/nar/gky427 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wen, P. , Xiao, P. , & Xia, J. (2016). DbDSM: A manually curated database for deleterious synonymous mutations. Bioinformatics, 32(12), 1914–1916. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wirtenberger, M. , Tchatchou, S. , Hemminki, K. , Schmutzhard, J. , Sutter, C. , Schmutzler, R. K. , Meindl, A. , Wappenschmidt, B. , Kiechle, M. , Arnold, N. , Weber, B. H. F. , Niederacher, D. , Bartram, C. R. , & Burwinkel, B. (2006). Associations of genetic variants in the estrogen receptor coactivators PPARGC1A, PPARGC1B and EP300 with familial breast cancer. Carcinogenesis, 27(11), 2201–2208. 10.1093/carcin/bgl067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Xie, W. (1999). Estrogen induces adenosine deaminase gene expression in MCF‐7 human breast cancer cells: Role of estrogen receptor‐Sp1 interactions. Endocrinology, 140(1), 219–227. 10.1210/en.140.1.219 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang, W. , Su, Y. , Hou, C. , Chen, L. , Zhou, D. , Ren, K. , Zhou, Z. , Zhang, R. , & Liu, X. (2019). SETDB1 induces epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in breast carcinoma by directly binding with snail promoter. Oncology Reports, 41(2), 1284–1292. 10.3892/or.2018.6871 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao K, K. A. , Clifford, J. , Li, S. , Laduca, H. , Hulick, P. , Gutierrez, S. , & Black, M. H. (2020). Prevalence of germline pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants in patients with second breast cancers. JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 4(6), 1–9. 10.1093/JNCICS/PKAA094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ying, S. (Ed.). (2008) Current perspectives in microRNAs (miRNA) (1st ed.). Springer. [Google Scholar]
- Yoshikawa, Y. , Ochiai, K. , Morimatsu, M. , Suzuki, Y. , Wada, S. , Taoda, T. , Iwai, S. , Chikazawa, S. , Orino, K. , & Watanabe, K. (2012). Effects of the missense mutations in canine BRCA2 on BRC repeat 3 functions and comparative analyses between canine and human BRC repeat 3. PLoS ONE, 7(10), 1–9. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yuan, F. , Hankey, W. , Wagner, E. J. , Li, W. , & Wang, Q. (2021). Alternative polyadenylation of mRNA and its role in cancer. Genes Discovery, 8(1), 61–72. 10.1016/j.gendis.2019.10.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeidler, M. , & Kleer, C. G. (2006). The polycomb group protein enhancer of zeste 2: Its links to DNA repair and breast cancer. Journal of Molecular Histology, 37(5–7), 219–223. 10.1007/s10735-006-9042-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, F. , Fan, Q. , Ren, K. , & Andreassen, P. R. (2009). PALB2 functionally connects the breast cancer susceptibility proteins BRCA1 and BRCA2. Molecular Cancer Research, 7(7), 1110–1118. 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H. , Cai, K. , Wang, J. , Wang, X. , Cheng, K. , Shi, F. , Jiang, L. , Zhang, Y. , & Dou, J. (2014). MiR‐7, inhibited indirectly by lincRNA HOTAIR, directly inhibits SETDB1 and reverses the EMT of breast cancer stem cells by downregulating the STAT3 pathway. Stem Cells, 32(11), 2858–2868. 10.1002/stem.1795 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, M. , Tang, M. , Fang, Y. , Cui, H. , Chen, S. , Li, J. , Xiong, H. , Lu, J. , Gu, D. , & Zhang, B. (2018). Cumulative evidence for relationships between multiple variants in the VTI1A and TCF7L2 genes and cancer incidence. International Journal of Cancer, 142(3), 498–513. 10.1002/ijc.31074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, S. , Wang, Y. , Wang, Y. , Peng, J. , Yuan, C. , Zhou, L. , Xu, S. , Lin, Y. , Du, Y. , Yang, F. , Zhang, J. , Dai, H. , Yin, W. , & Lu, J. (2020). Serum miR‐222‐3p as a double‐edged sword in predicting efficacy and trastuzumab‐induced cardiotoxicity for HER2‐positive breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant target therapy. Frontiers in Oncology, 10, 1–9. 10.3389/fonc.2020.00631 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Y. , Zeng, Y. , Qiu, R. , Liu, R. , Huang, W. , Hou, Y. , Wang, S. , Leng, S. , Feng, D. , Yang, Y. , & Wang, Y. (2018). The homeotic protein SIX3 suppresses carcinogenesis and metastasis through recruiting the LSD1/NuRD(MTA3) complex. Theranostics, 8(4), 972–989. 10.7150/thno.22328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu, Z. , Kitano, T. , Morimatsu, M. , Ochiai, K. , Ishiguro‐Oonuma, T. , Oosumi, K. , Lin, X. , Orino, K. , & Yoshikawa, Y. (2023). A highly conserved region in BRCA2 suppresses the RAD51‐interaction activity of BRC repeats. Veternary Science, 10(2), 145. 10.3390/vetsci10020145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou, Y. , Tsai, W.‐B. , Cheng, C.‐J. , Hsu, C. , Chung, Y. M. , Li, P.‐C. , Lin, S.‐H. , & Hu, M. C. T. (2008). Forkhead box transcription factor FOXO3a suppresses estrogen‐dependent breast cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenesis. Breast Cancer Research, 10(1), 1–13. 10.1186/bcr1872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Genbank accesion numbers: OQ721107, OQ721108, OQ721109, OQ721110, OQ721111, OQ721112 (identical sequences of different objects) for novel mutations in the current research.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material
