Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Mar 11;26(11):2223–2227. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.4c00383

Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed Defluorinative Bisarylation of Monofluorodienes with Boronic Acids

Min Li , Gavin Chit Tsui †,*
PMCID: PMC10964235  PMID: 38465893

Abstract

graphic file with name ol4c00383_0008.jpg

We herein describe a Rh(I)-catalyzed bisarylation reaction of monofluorodienes using arylboronic acids. Two aryl groups are installed in the trisubstituted (E)-alkene products in one step with excellent diastereoselectivities. An intriguing reaction sequence of Rh(I)-catalyzed 1,6-addition followed by defluorinative coupling is proposed for product formation.


Rhodium(I)-catalyzed addition reaction of organometallic reagents to alkenes is a powerful strategy for the construction of carbon–carbon bonds.1 The use of organoboron reagents, especially boronic acids,2 is highly attractive in such transformations due to their commercial availability, stability, and low toxicity. It has been well-established that α,β-unsaturated carbonyl compounds and styrene derivatives can undergo Rh(I)-catalyzed conjugate addition with organoboron reagents.3 On the other hand, much less is known about the reactions of fluoroalkenes under Rh(I) conditions.4

We have recently reported stereoselective Rh(I)-catalyzed arylation reactions of β-fluoroacrylate derivatives with arylboronic acids.5 For instance, Rh(I)-catalyzed defluorinative coupling of (E)-monofluoroalkenes could generate trisubstituted (Z)-alkene products with inversion of double bond geometry (Scheme 1a).5a Also, Rh(I)-catalyzed C–F bond arylation of gem-difluoroalkenes could give access to tetrasubstituted (E)-monofluoroalkene products (Scheme 1b).5b In this work, we describe an unprecedented Rh(I)-catalyzed defluorinative bisarylation reaction of (E)-monofluorodienes1, which led to the synthesis of a new class of trisubstituted (E)-alkene products 2 with the cleavage of a C–F bond and formation of two C–C bonds (Scheme 1c).

Scheme 1. Rh(I)-Catalyzed Coupling Reactions of Fluoroalkenes with Boronic Acids.

Scheme 1

Monofluorinated 1,3-diene substrate (E)-1a was prepared from the corresponding β,β-difluoroacrylate via our Pd-catalyzed stereoselective C–F bond vinylation (Stille coupling) protocol.6 On closer inspection, 1a is also a special type of α,β,γ,δ-diunsaturated ester with α-phenyl and β-fluoro substituent groups and well-defined tetrasubstituted alkene geometry. While Rh(I)-catalyzed 1,4-addition of organoboron reagents to α,β-unsaturated esters has been reported,7,1 the corresponding 1,6-addition to 2,4-dienoate esters is less studied.8 In the literature, Rh(I)-catalyzed reactions of arylboronic acids with 2,4-dienoate esters could lead to a mixture of 1,4- and 1,6-addition products.9 To the best of our knowledge, no example of addition reactions to monofluorinated dienoate ester is known.

When reacting 1a with PhB(OH)2 under previously developed Rh(I)-catalyzed coupling conditions,5a the 1,6-addition product 3a was only observed in trace amounts. To our surprise, a bisphenylated product (E)-2a was obtained in excellent yield (94%) and dr (>99:1) (Table 1, entry 1). The effects of various reaction parameters on the formation of 2a were subsequently investigated.10 The reaction yield dropped dramatically without the ligand BINAP, and no reaction took place without the Rh(I) catalyst (entries 2–3). Replacing [Rh(COD)(OH)]2 with [Rh(COD)Cl]2 or Rh(COD)2OTf led to lower yields (entries 4–5). Boronic acid gave higher yields than trifluoroborate or boronic ester (entries 6–7). Reactions run in DMF or toluene led to lower yields (entries 8–9). Compound 3a was detected as a major side product under these conditions. At 25 °C, 3a was formed exclusively (entry 10).

Table 1. Effects of Reaction Parameters on the Formation of 2aa.

graphic file with name ol4c00383_0007.jpg

entry deviation from standard conditions yield of 2a (%)b
1 none 94 (90)c
2 no BINAP 23
3 no [Rh(COD)(OH)]2 0
4 [Rh(COD)Cl]2, instead of [Rh(COD)(OH)]2 15
5 Rh(COD)2OTf (3.0 mol %), instead of [Rh(COD)(OH)]2 44
6 PhBF3K, instead of PhB(OH)2 34
7 PhBpin, instead of PhB(OH)2 <5
8 DMF, instead of 1,4-dioxane 23
9 toluene, instead of 1,4-dioxane 54
10 25 °C 0d
a

Unless specified otherwise, reactions were carried out using (E)-1a (0.1 mmol) under argon.

b

Yield was determined by GC-MS.

c

Isolated yield at 0.2 mmol scale. Diastereomeric ratio of 2a (dr >99:1) was determined by GC-MS and 1H NMR analyses.

d

Isolated 3a in 93% yield as a mixture of E/Z isomers.

The generality of the bisarylation reaction was subsequently studied by varying the boronic acids and monofluorodienes 1 (Scheme 2). The wide commercial availability of aryl and heteroaryl boronic acids was advantageous for diverse functionalization. For instance, aromatic rings containing electron-poor (2b), electron-rich (2c), halogen (2df), cyano (2g), nitro (2i), aldehyde (2k), and ester (2l) substituents were tolerated. Heteroaromatic groups such as thiophene (2m) and furan (2n) were also compatible. The reaction could be performed at a 1.0 mmol scale in good yield (86%, 2a). The E-alkene geometry was established by NOESY NMR experiments through 2c.10 The α-substituent R1 of monofluorodiene 1 could be varied including arenes containing electron-poor (2o)/electron-rich (2p)/halogen (2qr) groups, naphthalene (2t), and thiophene (2u). The ester substituent group R2 could also be changed including isopropyl (2v) and benzyl (2w) groups. These variations did not affect the diastereoselectivity of the reaction, affording only one diastereomer (E)-2. Furthermore, a modular approach by choosing different combinations of boronic acids and substrates allowed us to synthesize various polyaromatic compounds 2x2aa with unique structural features.

Scheme 2. Rh(I)-Catalyzed Bisarylation of Monofluorodienes 1.

Scheme 2

Unless specified otherwise, reactions were carried out using 1 (0.2 mmol) under argon. Isolated yields. Diastereomeric ratios of 2 (dr >99:1) were determined by GC-MS and 1H NMR analyses.

At 1.0 mmol scale.

During the optimization studies, the 1,6-addition product 3a was found to be a side product in the reaction (cf. Table 1).10 We subsequently learned that using the catalyst [Rh(COD)(OH)]2 without BINAP at 25 °C could generate 3a (80% iso. yield) exclusively from 1a (Scheme 3a). Other boronic acids were also effective in the 1,6-addition providing products 3be in good yields. However, the diastereoselectivities of 3 were rather low, ranging from ∼1:1 to 7:1. Intriguingly, by resubmitting 3a (dr = 1.2:1) to the standard conditions, the bisarylated product 2a was obtained in >99:1 dr (Scheme 3b), which indicated that the 1,6-addition product was a potential intermediate for the bisarylation product.

Scheme 3. Rh(I)-Catalyzed 1,6-Addition of Monofluorodienes 1 and Application in Modular Synthesis.

Scheme 3

Based on this observation, we devised a modular synthesis of a triaryl compound 5 where each aryl substituent group was different (Scheme 3c). Monofluorodiene 1d containing a 4-fluorobenzene unit was reacted with 4-(trifluoromethyl)phenylboronic acid in Rh(I)-catalyzed 1,6-addition to give intermediate 4 (dr = 2.3:1). Arylation of 4 using 4-methoxyphenylboronic acid under the standard conditions gave the final product (E)-5 in excellent dr (>99:1). Thus, each of the three aromatic rings of 5 could be tuned for desirable electronic and steric properties, which should be attractive to medicinal chemists for lead compound screening.

The bisarylation reaction was not limited to dienoate esters. Monofluorodiene 6 containing an amide moiety was prepared and subjected to the standard conditions (eq 1). The bisarylated product (E)-7 could be isolated in excellent dr (>99:1).

graphic file with name ol4c00383_0001.jpg 1

Further experiments were conducted to understand the reaction mechanisms (Scheme 4). Monofluorodiene 8 without the ester group or 9 without the terminal alkene did not react under the standard conditions (Scheme 4a). Using a chiral ligand (R)-BINAP gave the product (E)-2a in 24% ee (Scheme 4b). We have also screened a variety of other chiral ligands under the standard conditions, the highest ee (34%) was obtained from (R)-DTBM-SEGPHOS.10 Moreover, switching the substrate to (Z)-1a under identical conditions provided the same product (E)-2a in excellent dr (>99:1) and yield, with 15% ee (Scheme 4c). Thus, the E/Z configuration of monofluorodiene 1 does not influence the diastereomeric outcome of product 2. By subjecting the 1,6-addition product 3a as a diastereomeric mixture (dr = 1.4:1) to the Rh-catalyzed conditions without the boronic acid, we observed an isomerization process favoring the (Z)-product in excellent dr (>99:1) (Scheme 4d). The same trend was also observed for analogues 3be. Resubmitting (Z)-3a to the standard conditions led to the bisphenylated product (E)-2a in good yield and excellent dr (>99:1) (Scheme 4e).

Scheme 4. Further Experiments To Gain Mechanistic Insights.

Scheme 4

Based on the above studies and known literature reports, we proposed the following plausible reaction mechanism for the stereoselective Rh(I)-catalyzed defluorinative bisarylation of monofluorodiene 1 (Scheme 5). Transmetalation between the Rh(I) catalyst and arylboronic acid generates the Rh(I)-Ar species.1 Regioselective migratory insertion of Rh(I)-Ar to the terminal double bond of 1 gives the alkyl-Rh(I) intermediate A. Isomerization of A leads to the oxo-π-pentadienyl-Rh(I) complex B.9 Protonolysis of B with water forms the 1,6-addition product 3 and regenerates the Rh(I) catalyst.11 There are two possibilities for the outcome of the alkene geometry of 3. (1) The isomerization of B favors (Z)-3 at 75 °C.12 (2) Both (E)- and (Z)-3 were formed; however, under the reaction conditions (E)-3 can isomerize to (Z)-3. We have experimental evidence for such isomerization (cf. Scheme 4d) although the exact mechanism is unclear at the moment. The acidic α-proton under the basic reaction conditions likely facilitates the isomerization.

Scheme 5. Proposed Mechanism.

Scheme 5

Monofluoroalkene (Z)-3 undergoes migratory insertion with another 1 equiv of Rh(I)-Ar to generate alkyl-Rh(I) C. Bond rotation leads to conformer D, which is set up for syn-β-F elimination. Final product 2 is therefore formed in the E-alkene configuration, and Rh(I)-F is eliminated to re-enter the catalytic cycle. Control experiment showed (Z)-3a can generate (E)-2a in good yield and excellent dr (cf. Scheme 4e). Overall, there is an inversion of alkene geometry from (Z)-3 to (E)-2, which is consistent with our previous Rh(I)-catalyzed defluorinative coupling of monofluoroalkenes.5a This could be a situation of dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) in the case where both (E)- and (Z)-3 are present but only (Z)-3 continues to react and (E)-3 isomerizes to (Z)-3.13 This explains why the E/Z mixtures of monofluoroalkenes 3/4 only gave the (E)-products (cf. Scheme 3b-c). Also, substrates (E)- and (Z)-1a can give the same product (E)-2a (cf. Scheme 4b-c) because they converge to the same intermediate (Z)-3a.

In conclusion, we have discovered a novel Rh(I)-catalyzed bisarylation reaction of monofluorodienes 1 using arylboronic acids. The method allowed the synthesis of an array of trisubstituted alkene products (E)-2 containing two newly installed aryl groups with excellent diastereoselectivities. The reaction mechanism presumably involves the combination of two Rh(I)-catalyzed sequences: (1) 1,6-addition of monofluorodiene 1 to generate the monofluoroalkene 3; (2) defluorinative arylation of monofluoroalkene 3 to form product 2. The enantioselective version of this reaction is ongoing in our laboratories.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (CUHK 14303823) and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (Faculty of Science - Direct Grant for Research). We also thank the Key Laboratory of Organofluorine Chemistry, Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences for funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.orglett.4c00383.

  • Experimental procedures, optimization data, characterization data, and spectral data (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ol4c00383_si_001.pdf (9.2MB, pdf)

References

  1. Selected reviews:; a Tanaka K.Rhodium Catalysis in Organic Synthesis: Methods and Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]; b Evans P. A.Modern Rhodium-Catalyzed Organic Reactions; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]; c Fagnou K.; Lautens M. Rhodium-Catalyzed Carbon-Carbon Bond Forming Reactions of Organometallic Compounds. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 169–196. 10.1021/cr020007u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Hayashi T.; Yamasaki K. Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition and Its Related Asymmetric Reactions. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 2829–2844. 10.1021/cr020022z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. A review: Hall D. G.Structure, Properties, and Preparation of Boronic Acid Derivatives; Wiley-VCH Verlag: 2011. [Google Scholar]
  3. Pioneering work:; a Sakai M.; Hayashi H.; Miyaura N. Rhodium-Catalyzed Conjugate Addition of Aryl- or 1-Alkenylboronic Acids to Enones. Organometallics 1997, 16, 4229–4231. 10.1021/om9705113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Takaya Y.; Ogasawara M.; Hayashi T.; Sakai M.; Miyaura N. Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition of Aryl- and Alkenylboronic Acids to Enones. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5579–5580. 10.1021/ja980666h. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; c Lautens M.; Roy A.; Fukuoka K.; Fagnou K.; Martín-Matute B. Rhodium-Catalyzed Coupling Reactions of Arylboronic Acids to Olefins in Aqueous Media. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5358–5359. 10.1021/ja010402m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Hayashi T.; Takahashi M.; Takaya Y.; Ogasawara M. Catalytic Cycle of Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition of Organoboronic Acids. Arylrhodium, Oxa-π-allylrhodium, and Hydroxorhodium Intermediates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 5052–5058. 10.1021/ja012711i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. For Rh(I)-catalyzed arylation of trifluoromethylated alkenes, see:; a Miura T.; Ito Y.; Murakami M. Synthesis of gem-Difluoroalkenes via β-Fluoride Elimination of Organorhodium(I). Chem. Lett. 2008, 37, 1006–1007. 10.1246/cl.2008.1006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Huang Y.; Hayashi T. Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric Arylation/Defluorination of 1-(Trifluoromethyl)alkenes Forming Enantioenriched 1,1-Difluoroalkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 12340–12343. 10.1021/jacs.6b07844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. a Zong Y.; Tang Y.; Tsui G. C. Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed Defluorinative Coupling of Boronic Acids with Monofluoroalkenes. Org. Lett. 2022, 24, 6380–6385. 10.1021/acs.orglett.2c02294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Tan H.; Zong Y.; Tang Y.; Tsui G. C. Stereoselective Rhodium(I)-Catalyzed C–F Bond Arylation of Tri- and Tetrasubstituted gem-Difluoroalkenes with Boronic Acids. Org. Lett. 2023, 25, 877–882. 10.1021/acs.orglett.3c00108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Li M.; Wang Y.; Tsui G. C. Palladium-Catalyzed Stereoselective C–F Bond Vinylation and Allylation of Tetrasubstituted gem-Difluoroalkenes via Stille Coupling: Synthesis of Monofluorinated 1,3- and 1,4-Dienes. Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 8072–8076. 10.1021/acs.orglett.1c03096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Seminal reports:; a Takaya Y.; Senda T.; Kurushima H.; Ogasawara M.; Hayashi T. Rhodium-Catalyzed Asymmetric 1,4-Addition of Arylboron Reagents to α, β-Unsaturated Esters. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10, 4047–4056. 10.1016/S0957-4166(99)00417-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Sakuma S.; Sakai M.; Itooka R.; Miyaura N. Asymmetric Conjugate 1,4-Addition of Arylboronic Acids to α,β-Unsaturated Esters Catalyzed by Rhodium(I)/(S)-binap. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 65, 5951–5955. 10.1021/jo0002184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. A review:Silva E.; Silva A. 1,6-Conjugate Addition of Nucleophiles to α,β,γ,δ -Diunsaturated Systems. Synthesis 2012, 44, 3109–3128. 10.1055/s-0032-1316778. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. de la Herran G.; Murcia C.; Csaky A. G. Rhodium-Catalyzed Reaction of Aryl- and Alkenylboronic Acids with 2,4-Dienoate Esters: Conjugate Addition and Heck Reaction Products. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 5629–5632. 10.1021/ol0522485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. See the Supporting Information (SI) for details.
  11. In this isomerization/protonolysis sequence (from intermediate A to 3), a certain level of enantiocontrol of the α-stereocenter was observed using (R)-BINAP as a chiral ligand (cf. Scheme 4b).
  12. The 1,6-addition products 3 were obtained from 1a only at 25 °C (cf. Table 1, entry 10 and Scheme 3a). Higher temperature (75 °C) favored the formation of bisarylated products 2. At 25 °C, 3 were obtained as a mixture of E/Z isomers (cf. Scheme 3a).
  13. Majhi J.; Turnbull B. W. H.; Ryu H.; Park J.; Baik M. H.; Evans P. A. Dynamic Kinetic Resolution of Alkenyl Cyanohydrins Derived from α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes: Stereoselective Synthesis of E-Tetrasubstituted Olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 11770–11774. 10.1021/jacs.9b04384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ol4c00383_si_001.pdf (9.2MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data underlying this study are available in the published article and its Supporting Information.


Articles from Organic Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES