Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2024 Feb 20;9(3):e00785-23. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23

The role of the C. albicans transcriptional repressor NRG1 during filamentation and disseminated candidiasis is strain dependent

Rohan S Wakade 1, Melanie Wellington 1, Damian J Krysan 1,2,
Editor: J Andrew Alspaugh3
PMCID: PMC10964420  PMID: 38376205

ABSTRACT

Candida albicans is one of the most common causes of superficial and invasive fungal diseases in humans. Its ability to cause disease is closely linked to its ability to undergo a morphological transition from budding yeast to filamentous forms (hyphae and pseudohyphae). The extent to which C. albicans strains isolated from patients undergo filamentation varies significantly. In addition, the filamentation phenotypes of mutants involving transcription factors that positively regulate hyphal morphogenesis can also vary from strain to strain. Here, we characterized the virulence, in vitro and in vivo filamentation, and in vitro and in vivo hypha-associated gene expression profiles for four poorly filamenting C. albicans isolates and their corresponding deletion mutants of the repressor of filamentation NRG1. The two most virulent strains, 57055 and 78048, show robust in vivo filamentation but are predominately yeast phase under in vitro hypha induction; the two low-virulence strains (94015 and 78042) do not undergo filamentation well under either condition. In vitro, deletion of NRG1 increases hyphae formation in the SC5314 derivative SN250, but only pseudohyphae are formed in the clinical isolates. Deletion of NRG1 modestly increased the virulence of 78042, which was accompanied by increased expression of hypha-associated genes without an increase in filamentation. Strikingly, deletion of NRG1 in 78048 reduced filamentation in vivo, expression of candidalysin (ECE1), and virulence without dramatically altering establishment of infection. Thus, the function of the conserved repressor NRG1 in C. albicans shows strain-based heterogeneity during infection.

IMPORTANCE

Clinical isolates of the human fungal pathogen Candida albicans show significant variation in their ability to undergo in vitro filamentation and in the function of well-characterized transcriptional regulators of filamentation. Here, we show that Nrg1, a key repressor of filamentation and filament specific gene expression in standard reference strains, has strain-dependent functions, particularly during infection. Most strikingly, loss of NRG1 function can reduce filamentation, hypha-specific gene expression such as the toxin candidalysin, and virulence in some strains. Our data emphasize that the functions of seemingly fundamental and well-conserved transcriptional regulators such as Nrg1 are contextual with respect to both environment and genetic backgrounds.

KEYWORDS: Candida albicans, hyphae, fungal pathogenesis

INTRODUCTION

Candida albicans is a component of the human mycobiome and one of the most common causes of human fungal infections in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised people (1). The ability of C. albicans to undergo morphological transitions between round, budding yeast forms and the filamentous morphologies of pseudohyphae and hyphae has been strongly correlated with the ability of C. albicans to cause disease (2). Accordingly, this virulence trait has been studied extensively, leading to the identification of a large number of genes that affect C. albicans filamentous morphogenesis (3). The majority of these genes were identified by experimentation with a single strain background, SC5314, either directly or through work with its auxotrophic derivatives.

In recent years, interest in the characterization of clinical isolates of C. albicans has increased (46). Through this work, varying degrees of phenotypic heterogeneity have been identified particularly with respect to in vitro filamentation and biofilm formation. Studies of a set of 20 clinical isolates predominantly from bloodstream infections (7) have found that in vitro filamentation does not correlate well with virulence phenotypes in mouse models of invasive disease (4). A large study of commensal isolates of the GI tract also found a large amount of in vitro phenotypic diversity, whereas virulence phenotypes in an invertebrate model were quite consistent, regardless of in vitro phenotype (8). Furthermore, in vitro studies of the function of transcription factors have also revealed that the strain background can have profound effects on the function of factors such as BCR1 and NRG1 (6, 9). Here, we describe our investigation of the effect of strain background on the role of the transcriptional repressor Nrg1 during in vitro filamentation, in vivo filamentation, and disseminated candidiasis in a mouse model.

NRG1 is a repressor of both filamentation and hypha-associated gene expression in C. albicans, and its deletion in SC5314 derivatives leads to constitutive pseudohyphae formation under non-inducing conditions in vitro (10, 11). At the initiation of normal in vitro filamentation, NRG1 expression is reduced, and its gene product, Nrg1, is degraded (12). This inhibition of Nrg1 function is correlated with the expression of hypha-specific genes, many of which appear to be direct Nrg1 binding targets (11). In contrast, constitutive expression of NRG1 blocks in vitro and in vivo filamentation and prevents the development of disease, but not organ infection, in a mouse model of disseminated infection (13). In contrast, reduced expression of NRG1 leads to increases in in vitro and in vivo filamentation and disease in the mouse model.

Because of its profound effects on filamentation and virulence in the SC5314 background, we were interested to explore the effect of strain background on NRG1 function. To do so, we deleted NRG1 in four poorly filamenting clinical isolates and examined the effect of those mutations on in vitro and in vivo filamentations and gene expression, as well as on virulence in the mouse disseminated candidiasis model. Although nrg1∆∆ mutants have relatively similar phenotypes and effects on gene expression in vitro across these strains, there are profound strain-based differences during mammalian infection.

RESULTS

NRG1 deletion mutants in poorly filamenting clinical isolates establish infection, but their effect on virulence is isolate dependent

We selected four C. albicans clinical isolates [94015 (a/a), 57055 (a/α), 78048 (α/α), and 78042 (a/α)] that showed very low levels of filamentation after induction with Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium at 37°C as reported by Hirakawa et al. (4). Relative to SC5314 and its derivatives, all four strains were also shown previously to have reduced virulence in the mouse model of disseminated candidiasis (7). Hirakawa et al. found that 94015 contains a loss of function mutation in EFG1, which accounts for, at least part of, its reduced filamentation and virulence (7). None of the other three strains were found to have obvious loss of function mutations in other well-characterized regulators of filamentation (7). As expected, the NRG1 deletion mutant in SN250 forms predominantly pseudohyphae in non-filament-inducing conditions (Fig. 1A and B). In contrast, the nrg1∆∆ mutants derived from the four clinical isolates are predominately in yeast phase in rich medium cultures at 30°C (Fig. 1A and B) and form approximately 20% pseudohyphae. On solid YPD medium at 30°C, the colony formed by the nrg1∆∆-SN250 mutant is wrinkled extensively, while nrg1∆∆ mutants in the other strains are much less wrinkled (Fig. S2A). Colony wrinkling generally correlates with pseudohypha formation.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Morphology of NRG1 deletion mutants in non-hypha-inducing conditions. (A) Representative images of nrg1∆∆ mutants in the indicated strain background after growth in yeast peptone dextrose medium in 30°C and calcofluor white staining. (B) Quantitation the yeast and pseudohyphal forms in the nrg1∆∆ mutants in the indicated strain backgrounds. The bars indicate the mean of three independent experiments with at least 100 cells counted in multiple microscopy fields. Error bars are standard deviations.

We inoculated outbred CD-1 mice with each of the four clinical isolates and their corresponding nrg1∆∆ mutants and determined the kidney fungal burden at post-infection day 3. No mortality was observed prior to harvest, and all four parental strains established infections with between 105 and 106 colony-forming units (CFU)/mL of kidney homogenate (Fig. 2A through D). The corresponding nrg1∆∆ mutants also established infections. Mice infected with nrg1∆∆ mutants in the 94015 (Fig. 2A), 57055 (Fig. 2B), and 78042 (Fig. 2C) backgrounds showed no statistically significant difference in kidney burden relative to the parental strains (Student’s t-test of the log10-transformed data, P > 0.05), whereas mice infected with the nrg1∆∆−78048 strain showed reduced fungal burden relative to the parental stain (Fig. 2D). We did not test the SN250-derived nrg1∆∆ mutant because the extent of pseudohyphae formation precludes accurate inoculum quantitation.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

(A) nrg1∆∆ mutation has strain-dependent effects on infectivity and virulence. Kidney fungal burden 3 days post-infection for the indicated clinical strains (A–D) by tail vein and its corresponding nrg1∆∆ mutant (n = 5 mice per group) by tail-vein injection. Bars indicate mean of log10 fungal burden (CFU/mL) with individual mice shown as points and error bars indicating standard deviations. Differences between groups were analyzed by Student’s t test. ns indicates P > 0.05. *P < 0.05. Survival curves are shown for mice infected with the indicated clinical strains (E–H) and their corresponding nrg1∆∆ mutant (n = 10 mice per group) by tail-vein injection. The curves indicate survival defined as time to moribundity. P values are for log-rank (Mantel-Cox) analysis with statistical significance defined as P < 0.05. ns, not significant.

Having confirmed that the parental strains and their corresponding nrg1∆∆ mutants established infection in the mouse model of disseminated candidiasis, we next compared their effect on virulence (Fig. 2E through G). Importantly, all clinical isolates caused some level of disease, with 57055 and 78042 causing moribundity [median survival times: 9 days (57055) and 7 days (78048)] comparable to previously reported data for SN250 in the same mouse strain background [median survival time: 6 days (SN250) (14)]. The strain lacking a functional allele of EFG1 (4), 94015, was the least virulent, with only 40% moribundity 4 weeks post-infection (Fig. 2E; median survival time: undefinable); 78042 also showed low virulence with 80% moribundity at 4 weeks, which did not increase further over an additional 3 weeks (Fig. 2F). Despite the poor filamentation of these strains in vitro, they were able to cause disease but, as previously described (7), to differing extent.

Based on the behavior of conditionally regulated NRG1 derivative SC5314 (13), we hypothesized that the nrg1∆∆ mutants might increase the virulence of the poorly filamenting strains by promoting filamentation or hypha-associated gene expression. This hypothesis appears to be partially correct. Deletion of NRG1 in the least virulent 94015 strain did not affect virulence in a statistically significant manner, although there was a trend toward increased virulence (Fig. 2E). We examined the fungal burden of four surviving animals from both groups and found that the 94015 strain had been cleared in three of four animals, while all four of the surviving animals infected with nrg1∆∆−94015 had robust kidney fungal burden (Fig. S1A). Consistent with our initial hypothesis, the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain had a modest increase in virulence relative to the parental strain (Fig. 2G).

In contrast, deletion of NRG1 in the two more virulent strains, 57055 and 78048, reduced virulence substantially in both strains (Fig. 2F and H). The NRG1 mutants of both strains caused reduced fungal burden at day 3, with the difference between the nrg1∆∆−78048 and 78048 being statistically significant (Fig. 2B and D). Thus, it is possible that the reduced initial fungal burden of these mutants contributes to their lower virulence relative to the corresponding parental strains. Interestingly, the fungal burden of the kidneys of surviving mice infected with either nrg1∆∆−57055 or nrg1∆∆−78048 was 105 and 106 CFU/mL, respectively (Fig. S1B and C). The reduced virulence of these two strains, therefore, is not due to clearance of the fungus. This indicates that loss of NRG1 function does not drive increased virulence in all strains.

Deletion of NRG1 in poorly filamenting clinical isolates increases pseudohypha formation in vitro

Hirakawa et al. had found that none of the four clinical isolates formed significant filaments when induced with RPMI tissue culture medium for 6 h at 37°C (4). We tested their ability to filament in RPMI + 10% bovine calf serum (BCS) at 37°C for 4 h to determine if the addition of serum increased their filamentation. For all strains, yeast remained the predominant morphology under these conditions (Fig. 3A and B). All strains formed some filamentous forms with pseudohyphae outnumbering true hyphae and 94015 forming very low numbers of pseudohyphae (Fig. 3A and B). Thus, the addition of serum did not greatly affect the in vitro phenotypes and did not provide insights into differences in virulence between the different strains.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Clinical strains show low rates of filamentation in vitro, and deletion of NRG1 leads to increased pseudohyphae. (A) Representative images of indicated strains after incubation in RPMI + 10% bovine calf serum for 4 h at 37°C and calcofluor white staining. (B) Quantitation the yeast, pseudohyphal, and hyphal forms in the nrg1∆∆ mutants in the indicated strain backgrounds. The bars indicate the mean of three independent experiments with at least 100 cells counted in multiple microscopy fields. Error bars are standard deviations. (C) Representative images of nrg1∆∆ mutants in the indicated strain background after incubation in RPMI + 10% bovine calf serum for 4 h at 37°C and calcofluor white staining. (D) Quantitation the yeast, pseudohyphal, and hyphal forms in the nrg1∆∆ mutants in the indicated strain backgrounds. The bars indicate the mean of three independent experiments with at least 100 cells counted in multiple microscopy fields. Error bars are standard deviations.

Exposure of the nrg1∆∆ mutants to filament-inducing conditions led to pseudohypha formation in all strain backgrounds (Fig. 3C and D). The 94015-nrg1∆∆ and 57055-nrg1∆∆ mutants formed ~2:1 ratio of yeast to pseudohyphae with no hyphae observed. The 78042-nrg1∆∆ mutant formed a 1:1 ratio of yeast to pseudohyphae, while the 78048-nrg1∆∆ mutant formed predominantly pseudohyphae with a small number of true hyphae observable. The predominance of pseudohyphae in these nrg1∆∆ mutants is distinct from the SN250-nrg1∆∆ mutant, which forms 80% hyphae (Fig. 3D). Although deletion of the repressor of filamentation NRG1 in these low filamenting clinical isolates increases filamentation relative to their parental strains under inducing conditions, the strains form pseudohyphae instead of true hyphae, indicating that their inability to form true hyphae is unlikely to be due to a failure to inhibit Nrg1 repression under filament-inducing conditions.

We also examined the filamentation phenotypes of the clinical isolates and their corresponding NRG1 deletion mutants on solid media (RPMI and RPMI + 10% BCS). The only two parental strains that showed significant filamentation at either 30°C or 37°C were SN250 and 78048 (Fig. S2B and C, respectively). In all strains, the NRG1 deletion mutants formed highly wrinkled colonies at both 30°C and 37°C in both serum-free and serum-containing media (Fig. S2B). Peripheral invasion was evident at 30°C for all mutants in RPMI (but not RPMI + 10% BCS) and was robust in the SN250 and 78048 derivatives; however, this invasion was lost in all but the SN250- and 78048-nrg1∆∆ mutants at 37°C. Thus, during filamentation on solid medium, the colony morphology phenotypes of nrg1∆∆ mutants are reasonably consistent across this set of four strain backgrounds.

Taken together, the in vitro filamentation phenotypes of both the parental and the nrg1∆∆ mutants are fairly consistent across the four clinical isolates. Thus, it is not possible to explain the differences in virulence of either the parental or nrg1∆∆ mutants using these phenotypes. It is, however, very clear that, in contrast to nrg1∆∆-SN250, the clinical isolate-derived nrg1∆∆ mutants form pseudohyphae rather than hyphae under inducing conditions. It appears that Nrg1 suppresses filamentation in these clinical isolates but that the formation of hyphae is dependent upon additional factors that are absent or are not responsive to in vitro filamentation cues in the poorly filamenting clinical isolates relative to SN250.

In vivo filamentation phenotypes of the clinical isolates and their nrg1∆∆ mutants are strain dependent

We next asked if the virulence properties of the clinical isolates correlated with their ability to filament in vivo. To do so, we used our in vivo imaging model of C. albicans filamentation (9). In this model, fluorescently labeled C. albicans spp. are directly injected into the subdermal tissue of the mouse ear and quantitatively characterize the morphology of the cells using confocal microscopy at 24 h. In a previous publication, we reported that 94015 failed to undergo filamentation in vivo (15), while 50755 formed filaments to an extent similar to SN250 and SC5314 despite having reduced filamentation under a variety of in vitro conditions [Fig. 3A and B (9)]. Therefore, poor in vivo filamentation of 94015 correlates with its low virulence, and robust in vivo filamentation correlates with the ability of 57055 to cause disease. To further test this correlation, we examined the in vivo filamentation phenotypes of 78042 and 78048. Consistent with the phenotypes for 50755 and 94015, the low-virulence 78042 strain forms essentially no filaments in vivo (Fig. 4A), while the virulent 78048 forms filaments (68%, Fig. 4C) at a rate similar to that previously observed for 50755 and SN250 (15). Thus, the in vivo filamentation phenotypes of these strains correlate well with their virulence, while the in vitro filamentation phenotypes do not.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Effect of NRG1 deletion on in vivo filamentation in clinical strains 78042 and 78048. The indicated strains were injected into the subdermal ear tissue of DBA/7 mice and observed 24 h post-infection by confocal microscopy. Representative images for mNEON-78042 (A), iRFP-nrg1∆∆−78042 (B), mNEON-78048 (C), and iRFP-nrg1∆∆−78048 (D) taken 24 h post-infection of ear tissue as described in Materials and Methods. For strain 78042, no filamentous cells were observed as indicated by the 0% in the image. (E) Quantitation of % filamentous cells for strain 78048 using the scoring criteria described in Materials and Methods. The bars indicate at least two independent replicates with standard deviation indicated by error bars. *P < 0.05 by Student’s t-test. (F) Filament length for the 78048 strain dots indicate individual filaments with data pooled from two independent infections. ****P < 0.00001 by Mann-Whitney U test.

We focused our in vivo filamentation analysis of the nrg1∆∆ mutants on 78042, a poorly filamenting strain in vivo, and 78048, a robustly filamenting strain in vivo. Despite showing increased virulence relative to its parental strain, the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain remained in the yeast morphology in vivo with no clearly filamentous forms identified (Fig. 4B). Strikingly, the nrg1∆∆−78048 strain showed a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of filaments and a significant shortening of the filament lengths relative to its parental strain (Fig. 4D through F). Although it is not possible to conclusively distinguish hyphae and pseudohyphae with this in vivo imaging assay, pseudohyphae have shorter filament lengths. Thus, the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant may be forming more pseudohyphae relative to the parental strain or may be forming shorter hyphae, a feature also correlated with reduced virulence (15). Therefore, the reduced virulence observed for the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant may be due in part to reduced filamentation. On the other hand, the increased virulence of the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain cannot be attributed to increased filamentation.

In vitro expression of hypha-associated genes is reduced in poorly filamenting clinical isolates relative to SN250 and increases in their NRG1 deletion mutants

A well-characterized set of hypha-associated genes is induced during filamentation, and some directly contribute to virulence (e.g., ECE1). Thus, changes in the expression of hypha-associated genes could contribute to differences in virulence for the clinical isolates and their respective nrg1∆∆ mutants. To explore this further, we first characterized the expression profile of the clinical isolates by NanoString under in vitro induction and compared the profiles to the strongly filamenting SC5314-derivative SN250. The probe set contains 186 environmentally responsive genes including 57 hypha-associated transcripts (see Table S1 for complete gene list); as this is not a genome-wide set of genes, this limits our conclusions to a focused set of genes related to the function of Nrg1 during filamentation and, thus, not to its other functions. Volcano plots showing the fold change (FC) in expression relative to SN250 for each clinical strain are shown in Fig. 5A; the numbers of differentially expressed genes [DEGs; log2 FC ± 1 with a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.1; Benjamini-Hochberg procedure] for each clinical isolate were 94015 (42 up, 63 down); 57055 (18 up, 35 down); 78042 (17 up, 42 down); and 78048 (20 up, 37 down).

Fig 5.

Fig 5

Poor filamenting clinical isolates show reduced expression of hypha-specific genes in vitro. (A) Volcano plots of gene expression of a set of 185 genes as characterized by NanoString nCounter. The expression was normalized to the strongly filamenting reference strain SN250. The horizontal bar indicates an FDR of 0.1 (Benjamini-Hochberg), and the vertical line indicates log2 = 1 of the fold change, which is the cutoff value for the definition of differentially expressed genes. (B) Network diagram showing differentially expressed genes that are unique or common between the different clinical strains. The size of the hubs for each clinical isolate is proportional to the number of differentially expressed genes relative to SN250. (C) Expression of representative hypha-induced genes for the indicated strains normalized to expression in SN250. Bars indicate the mean fold change of three independent replicates, and error bars indicate standard deviations. (D) Log2 fold change for the expression of the indicated hypha-associated transcription factors in the four clinical isolates normalized to SN250.

As shown in Fig. 5B, 94015 had the largest set uniquely downregulated genes, which is likely related to its lack of a functional Efg1 allele (4). In contrast, the other three strains had very similar sets of downregulated genes. Twenty-three genes were downregulated in all four strains and included hypha-associated genes; representative examples of these are shown in Fig. 5C. Finally, YWP1 is expressed during yeast phase growth and is repressed during hyphal growth (16); all clinical strains showed increased expression of YWP1 relative to SN250 (Table S1). Thus, the expression profile of the poorly filamenting strains is consistent with their in vitro filamentation phenotype.

Lack of a functional EFG1 allele provides a mechanism for the inability of 94015 to undergo filamentation (4). Therefore, one possible mechanism for the reduced filamentation of the other strains is reduced expression of the other transcription factors (TFs) that are required for in vitro filamentation relative to SN250. With the exception of 94015, the expression of BRG1, EFG1, NDT80, RIM101, ROB1, and TEC1 did not differ significantly from SN250 (Fig. 5D). Efg1 activates the expression of BRG1 and TEC1 during filamentation (15), and these TF genes were expressed at much lower levels in 94015. UME6 is a TF required for the maintenance phase of filamentation as well as a marker of the filament expression program because it is not expressed at appreciable levels until filamentation is initiated (17). UME6 expression is undetectable in yeast and remains so in 94015 as well as in 78042 during in vitro filamentation (Fig. 5D); consistent with this observation, these two strains form almost no hyphae or pseudohyphae. In contrast, UME6 expression is expressed at levels near that of SN250 in 57055 and 78048, the two strains which form the highest levels of filaments in vitro; however, SN250 forms hyphae, while 57055 and 78048 form pseudohyphae. This suggests that UME6 expression is not sufficient to drive hyphae formation in these strains and that alteration in other aspects of the hyphal program is likely responsible for the lack of hyphae formation in 57055 and 78048.

We also generated NanoString expression profiles for the nrg1∆∆ deletion mutants during in vitro filament induction (see Fig. S3A through D for volcano plots for each mutant compared to its parental strain with the number of differentially expressed genes shown in each figure; see Table S1 for raw, processed, and FC values along with FDR for each comparison). Although the clinical strain-derived nrg1∆∆ mutants do not form true hyphae like the SN250-derived mutants, we expected they might express hypha-associated genes at higher levels. The total numbers of DEGs in the nrg1∆∆ deletion mutants of the clinical strains were 49015 (total 96: 56 up, 34 down); 57055 (total 62: 39 up, 23 down); 78042 (total 39: 30 up, 9 down); and 78048 (total 33: 25 up, 8 down).

Thirty-five genes are differentially expressed in a concordant manner in all four nrg1∆∆ mutants (Fig. 6A). This set includes hypha-associated genes that are upregulated in all backgrounds as shown in Fig. 6B. We previously found that deletion of NRG1 in an efg1∆∆ mutant (SN250 background) restored expression of hypha-associated genes in vivo and in vitro (15). Consistent with the previous observations, hypha-specific gene expression is increased nrg1∆∆−94015 (Fig. 6B), even though the strain does not form hyphae in vitro (Fig. 3C). The nrg1∆∆−94015 strain has the largest set of unique differentially expressed genes among the four strains. The sets of differentially expressed in the nrg1∆∆−78042 and nrg1∆∆−78048 are almost completely shared with each other and the other two NRG1 mutants (Fig. 6A). These data are consistent with results from the Mitchell lab, indicating that the effect of transcriptional regulators on gene expression shows both similarities and distinctions across different strain backgrounds (5, 6).

Fig 6.

Fig 6

Deletion of NRG1 increases expression of hypha-associated genes in the clinical isolate backgrounds in vitro. (A) Network diagram showing differentially expressed genes in the nrg1∆∆ mutants relative to the corresponding parental strains. The size of the hubs for each clinical isolate is proportional to the number of differentially expressed genes in the nrg1∆∆ relative to its parent. (B) Expression of representative hypha-induced genes for the nrg1∆∆ mutant normalized to expression in its corresponding parental strain. Bars indicate the mean fold change of three independent replicates, and error bars indicate standard deviations.

Strain-dependent differential expression of hypha-associated in vivo correlates with the effect of nrg1∆∆ mutation on virulence of 78042 and 78048 strains

To determine if alterations in in vivo gene expression could contribute to, or partially explain, the virulence phenotypes observed with these strains and their nrg1∆∆ mutants, we performed NanoString analysis of ear tissue 24 h post-infection with 78042, 78048, and their corresponding nrg1∆∆ mutants (see Fig. S3A through D for volcano plots for each mutant compared to its parental strain; see Table S2 for raw, processed, and FC values along with FDR for each comparison). Compared to SN250 (15), the expression of some hypha-associated genes was reduced in 78042 and 78048 in vivo (Fig. 7A). Consistent with 78042 forming very few, if any, filaments, the expression of hypha-associated genes was reduced compared to the robustly filamentous 78048. In contrast, 78048 forms the same proportion of filaments as SN250 in vivo [Fig. 4 (15)], but the expression of hypha-associated genes is significantly reduced, indicating that a similar level of hyphal morphogenesis does not result in similar levels of hypha-associated gene expression in vivo. For example, the expression of candidalysin (ECE1), a key virulence-associated toxin (18), is 10-fold lower in 78048 compared to SN250 (Fig. 7A), but the strain has a median survival time and fungal burden similar to those of SN250 [Fig. 2D and H (14)].

Fig 7.

Fig 7

In vivo expression profiles of clinical isolates 78042 and 78048 as well as their respective nrg1∆∆ mutants 24 h post-infection in an ear model. (A) The expression for six hypha-associated genes in vivo in 78042 and 78048 compared to the strongly filamentous strain SN250 in the ear model. Bars indicate FC relative to SN250 for three independent replicates. RNA was harvested as described in Materials and Methods 24 h post-infection. *Statistically significant change relative to SN250 (±2-fold change in expression, FDR <0.1). (B) Venn diagram of genes upregulated during infection in nrg1∆∆−78042 relative to 78042 and nrg1∆∆−78048 relative to 78048. See Tables S1 and S2 for FC data and significance data. (C) Expression of the indicated hypha-associated genes in nrg1∆∆−78042 and nrg1∆∆−78048 normalized to expression in the parental strain. Bars indicate FC relative in the nrg1∆∆ mutant relative to the parental strains for three independent replicates. RNA was harvested as described in Materials and Methods 24 h post-infection. *Statistically significant change relative to the parental change (±2-fold change in expression, FDR <0.1).

Next, we compared the in vivo expression profiles of the nrg1∆∆ mutants to the 78042 and 78048 parental strains (see Fig. S4A and B for volcano plots and Table S2 for raw and processed data). As shown in the Venn diagram in Fig. 7B, the sets of upregulated genes in the two nrg1∆∆ mutants were remarkably different. Surprisingly, only a single gene was upregulated in both nrg1∆∆−78042 and nrg1∆∆−78048 strains in vivo. Furthermore, the set of upregulated genes in the nrg1∆∆−78048 strain contained no hypha-associated genes, while multiple key hypha-associated genes were upregulated in the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain including the positive transcriptional regulators of hyphae morphogenesis AHR1, EFG1, TEC1, and UME6 (Fig. 7B; Table S2). The expressions of selected hypha-associated genes in nrg1∆∆−78042 and nrg1∆∆−78048 are shown in Fig. 7C.

Notably, upregulation of these positive regulators of in vivo and in vitro morphogenesis does not lead to significant changes in the amount of in vivo filamentation observed in the nrg1∆∆−78042 mutant relative to its parental strain. Loss of NRG1 does, however, trigger the increased expression of multiple hypha-associated genes including ECE1, HWP1, and HYR1 (Fig. 7C). Consistent with the upregulation of hypha-associated genes in the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain, the yeast-associated gene YWP1 is downregulated eighfold relative to 78042 (Table S2). Consequently, loss of NRG1 in 78042 de-represses the expression of hypha-associated genes but does not lead to a corresponding increase in filamentation. The expression data further suggest that the increase in virulence observed for the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain relative to 78042 may be due to increased expression of hypha/virulence-associated genes such as ECE1 or HWP1.

In contrast, deletion of NRG1 in 78048 does not increase the expression of hypha-associated genes and, in fact, leads to the reduced expression of two canonical hypha-associated genes, ECE1 and ALS3 (Fig. 7C). Again, this observation fits with the reduced filamentation of the nrg1∆∆−78048 strain in vivo. ECE1 expression is reduced 6-fold in 78048 compared to SN250 and is further reduced by 16-fold in the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant. Thus, it seems possible that the dramatically reduced expression of ECE1 in the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant may also contribute to its reduced virulence (19), although reduced filamentation or reduced expression of other genes could also play a role.

DISCUSSION

Using a set of clinical isolates with relatively poor in vitro filamentation, we explored the relationship between in vitro and in vivo filamentation and virulence. From this analysis, we can draw three conclusions. First, in vitro filamentation phenotypes using standard conditions, including host-like conditions, correlate with neither infectivity nor virulence in the four isolates that we examined. This supports the conclusion of a previous study using historical virulence data (4, 7). Second, the two isolates (94015 and 78042) that do not filament in vivo are less virulent than the two strains (57055 and 78048) that filament in vivo. These findings suggest that at least some of the discordance between in vitro filamentation phenotypes and in vivo virulence is due to the fact that the infection environment drives filamentation in some strains that do not undergo filamentation well in vitro. Third, C. albicans strains that are unable to filament in vitro or in vivo (94015 and 78042) are still able to establish infection in the kidney, the major target organ of this model. This is consistent with previous observations that yeast-locked mutants of SC5314 also establish kidney infection (13).

At the outset of the project, we somewhat naively hypothesized that deletion of NRG1 would increase the filamentation of these poorly filamenting strains and potentially increase their virulence as well. In vitro, deletion of NRG1 leads to a consistent phenotype in which the strains show increased pseudohypha formation and increased expression of hypha-associated genes. Although there are some strain-specific distinctions in the DEG sets, these are generally minor with the exception of nrg1∆∆−94015, which lacks Efg1. Thus, at a broad level, the in vitro function of Nrg1 is consistent across multiple clinical strains.

There are, however, phenotypic differences between nrg1∆∆-mutants in the clinical isolates and the SN250-derived mutant. First, as previously described by many others (10, 11), deletion of NRG1 in SC5314-derivatives leads to constitutive pseudohypha formation in the absence of hypha-inducing stimuli, whereas the yeast morphology is predominant in nrg1∆∆ mutants generated in the four poorly filamenting strains. However, this phenotype is one of degree rather than a simple binary state because all four poorly filamenting do form pseudohyphae in non-inducing conditions. Thus, additional factors must be present in SN250 that mediates the strong constitutive pseudohyphal phenotype; the poor filamenting strains apparently lack these factors. Second, upon in vitro induction, the nrg1∆∆-SN250 forms predominately hyphae, while the clinical isolate-derived nrg1∆∆ mutants generate a mixture of yeast and pseudohyphae with almost no true hyphae observed. This further suggests that the mechanisms which make SC5314 and its derivatives robustly filamentous and that are lacking in the clinical isolates operate downstream of the relief of Nrg1 repression step.

It is unclear what genes or pathways drive the robust filamentation of SC5314, although we have recently found that a gain-of-function SNP present in the transcription factor Rob1 contributes to the strong filamentation of SC5314; we have not identified this SNP in any other sequenced strain (14); deletion of NRG1 in a SC5314-derived mutant with only the more prevalent ROB1 allele did not block hyphae formation (Wakade and Krysan, unpublished), indicating that this cannot explain the differential effect of NRG1 deletion between these strains and SC5314. On the other hand, it is still possible that strain-specific alterations in the function of positive regulators of filamentation may be present in these strains. However, an examination of the mutations in 78042 and 78048 (relative to SC5314) did not reveal any obvious alterations in key hypha-related regulators (4). Thus, additional studies will be required to identify the hypha-associated pathways that are lacking in these strains. The increasing availability of diverse C. albicans clinical isolates should facilitate that search.

Whereas the in vitro phenotypes and expression profiles of the four clinical isolate-derived nrg1∆∆ mutants are fairly consistent, they show phenotypic heterogeneity in vivo. We initially hypothesized that deletion of NRG1 would increase virulence in general. However, this hypothesis was confirmed conclusively for only one of the four strains. Strikingly, the increased virulence of the nrg1∆∆−78042 strain was not due to increased filamentation but can be explained, at least in part, by the increased expression of hypha-associated genes such as ECE1 in cells that remained in yeast morphology in vivo. Contrary to our hypothesis, deletion of NRG1 led to reduced virulence in the two most virulent of our four strains (57055 and 78048). This difference was not due to a failure to establish initial infection or due to clearance of the mutants from the kidneys.

In the case of the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant, the reduced virulence is likely to be due to multiple factors including altered extent of filamentation, filament length, and non-filamentation-associated factors. Most notable, however, is the reduced expression of the toxin ECE1 in the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant relative to the parental strain. In vitro and in vivo, deletion of NRG1 increases the expression of ECE1 in a multiple strain background. In vitro, the nrg1∆∆−78048 mutant has increased expression of ECE1, but in vivo, it is reduced by 16-fold. These results indicate that, under some conditions and in some strains, the loss of the repressor Nrg1 leads to decreased expression of some of its canonical targets. These seemingly paradoxical findings are consistent with a similar strain-dependent effect of the NRG1 deletion reported by the Mitchell lab and highlight the complexity and plasticity of transcriptional networks across different C. albicans strains (6).

Finally, 78048 is an α/α strain and could, in principle, switch in vivo from white to opaque, leading to either differences in regulation of filamentation or non-filamentation-based virulence traits. Our NanoString probe set contains WH11, a gene expressed in white cells; the in vivo expression of WH11 is increased threefold (FDR 0.005, Table S2) in the nrg1∆∆−78048 relative to the 78048 parental strain, suggesting that it is remaining in the white phase in vivo. It is, of course, important to keep in mind that Nrg1 affects the expression of non-filament-associated genes, and it is possible, and indeed likely, that such affects may also contribute to differences in virulence.

Our characterization of the in vivo filamentation and virulence phenotypes of the four parental strains also provides some explanations for the discordance between in vitro filamentation and virulence. Specifically, the ability of some strains to undergo filamentation in vivo but not in vitro is likely to explain some of the phenotypic contradictions. Since some strains that cannot undergo filamentation in vivo are less virulent than those that do, we propose that filamentation remains a general virulence trait for C. albicans. However, our data also suggest that alteration in the expression of hypha/virulence-associated genes in the absence of strong changes in filamentation is also likely to contribute. It is important to consider that even the strain lacking a functional allele of the master virulence and filamentation regulator Efg1 caused disease in these models and, since it was isolated from the blood of a patient, in humans to some extent. As such, we cannot forget the role of the host and the reasons or risk factors that predisposed them to invasive candidiasis.

One of the questions that motivated this set of experiments was “is deletion of the filament repressor NRG1 sufficient to increase filamentation in clinical isolates with low rates of filamentation?” Our results clearly show that, for some strains, this is not sufficient and that additional factors are required for robust filamentation such as is observed for the reference strain SC5314. C. albicans is a commensal of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in humans, and strains with reduced filamentation are more successful colonizers of the GI tract (20). Thus, one advantage of low-filamenting C. albicans strains is increased fitness as a colonizer of the GI tract. In principle, a strain could become a more successful colonizer by maintaining Nrg1 repression or limiting its de-repression. If this were the primary mechanism for the reduced filamentation of some of the strains we studied, then deletion of NRG1 would restore filamentation. Indeed, this was observed by Lemberg et al. in the case of oral isolate 101, indicating that this successful colonizer may have reduced Nrg1 de-repression (21). Our data, however, indicate that strains with reduced filamentation and virulence also arise through variation in the activation of filamentation pathways downstream of Nrg1. C. albicans appears to employ a variety of genetic strategies as it adapts to niches in the human host.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains, cultivation conditions, and media

The C. albicans clinical isolate strains (94015, 57055, 78042, and 78048) used in this study were obtained from the Soll laboratory (7). Standard recipes were used to prepare yeast peptone dextrose (YPD) (22), and all C. albicans strains were precultured overnight in YPD medium at 30°C. RPMI medium was purchased and supplemented with bovine serum (10%, vol/vol). For in vitro hyphal induction in liquid media, C. albicans strains were incubated overnight at 30°C in YPD media, harvested, and diluted into RPMI + 10% serum at a 1:50 ratio and incubated at 37°C for 4 h (9). For plate-based filamentation assays, the precultured strains were diluted to 0.1 Optical Density (OD600) in water and spotted (5 µL) on YPD or RPMI + 10% BCS agar plates. The plates were dried, incubated at either 30°C or 37°C for 3 days, and photographed. Images are representative of two independent replicates.

Strain construction

C. albicans transformation was performed using the standard lithium acetate transformation method (23). The homozygous mutant strains of C. albicans were constructed using the transient CRISPR/Cas9 method (23). Oligonucleotides and plasmids used to generate the mutant strains in this study are listed in Table S3. The NAT1-Clox system (24) was used to generate the NRG1 KO strains. Briefly, both copies of the NRG1 were deleted by amplifying NAT1-Clox cassette from NAT1-Clox plasmid with primer pairs NRG1.P1 and NRG1.P2 and by using sgRNA targeting both alleles of the NRG1 gene. The resultant transformants were selected on YPD containing 2.5-mM methionine and 2.5-mM cysteine, along with 200-µg/mL nourseothricin (Werner Bioagents, Jena, Germany). The correct transformants were confirmed by standard PCR methods with primer pairs NRG1.P5 and NRG1.P6. Oligonucleotide sequences are provided in Table S3.

Fluorescently labeled strains were generated by using pENO1-NEON-NAT1 and pENO1-iRFP-NAT1 plasmids as previously described (9), and the resultant transformants were selected on YPD containing 200-µg/mL nourseothricin (Werner Bioagents). The reference strain was tagged with green fluorescent protein (NEON), whereas the mutant strains were tagged with iRFP.

In vitro characterization of C. albicans morphology

Induced cells were fixed with 1% (vol/vol) formaldehyde. Fixed cells were then imaged using the Echo Rebel upright microscope with a ×60 objective. The assays were conducted in triplicate on different days to confirm reproducibility.

Mouse model of disseminated candidiasis

Five- to six-week-old female CD1 mice (Envigo) were inoculated with 1 × 106 CFU (200 µL) of reference or mutant strain by lateral tail-vein injection. A group of five mice was used to assess the kidney fungal burden. Mice were monitored daily and were sacrificed 3 days after infection as per the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines to determine the kidney fungal burden. Two kidneys were homogenized together in 1-mL sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS); 10 µL of 10-fold serial dilutions of kidney extracts was spotted on to the YPD plates; and fungal burden was determined with unpaired t-test.

To determine the virulence of the reference or mutant strains, 10 female CD1 mice per group were inoculated with the 1 × 106 CFU (200 µL) by lateral tail-vein injection. Mice were monitored daily. When a mouse exhibited any signs of extreme morbidity such as hunched back, head tilt or tremors, the mouse was euthanized as per the IACUC guidelines. Survival curves were plotted on a Kaplan-Meier curve, and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test was used to determine the statistical difference of the curves (GraphPad Prism).

In vitro and in vivo RNA extraction

RNA extractions for the in vitro and in vivo samples were carried our as described previously (15). Briefly, for in vitro RNA extractions, three independent samples were grown in YPD at 30°C, washed twice in the PBS, diluted at 1:50 ratios in the RPMI + 10% serum, and incubated at 37°C for 4 h. Cells were collected, centrifuged for 2 min at 11,000 rpm at room temperature (RT) and RNA was extracted as per the manufacturer protocol (MasterPure Yeast RNA Purification Kit, Cat. No. MPY03199). Extraction of RNA from mouse ear (two to three biological replicates) was carried out as described previously (15). Briefly, 24 h post-infection, the mouse was euthanized following the protocol approved by the University of Iowa IACUC. The C. albicans injected mouse ear was excised and placed in an ice-cold RNAlater solution. Subsequently, the ear was transferred to a mortar, flash-frozen using liquid nitrogen, and ground to a fine powder. The powder was collected into a 5-mL centrifuge tube, and 1 mL of ice-cold Trizol was added. The samples were placed on a rocker at RT for 15 min and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The cleared Trizol was then collected without dislodging the pellet into a 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube, and 200 µL of RNase free chloroform was added. The tubes were shaken vigorously for 10–15 s and kept at RT for 5 min. Furthermore, the samples were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The cleared aqueous layer was then collected to a new 1.5-mL RNAase-free Eppendorf tube, and RNA was further extracted using the Qiagen RNeasy kit protocol.

NanoString analysis of gene expression in vitro and in vivo

NanoString analysis was carried out as described previously (15). Briefly, in total, 80 ng of in vitro or 400 ng of in vivo RNA was added to a NanoString codeset mix and incubated at 65° C for 18 h. After hybridization reaction, samples were processed using an nCounter prep station and were scanned on an nCounter digital analyzer. nCounter .RCC files for each sample were imported into nSolver software to determine the quality control metrics. Using the negative control probes, we defined the background values and used these as a background threshold, and this value was subtracted from the raw counts. The resulting background subtracted total raw RNA counts were first normalized against the highest total counts from the biological triplicates (two to three for all experiments) and then to the highest total counts for the samples. The statistical significance of changes in gene expression was determined using the Benjamini-Hochberg method at an FDR of 0.1. The raw, normalized, and analyzed expression data are provided in Tables S1 and S2. The data sets were deposited at the NCI GEO repository under accession number GSE253732.

In vivo imaging and filamentation scoring

The inoculation and imaging of mice ear were carried out as described previously (9, 15, 25). Acquired multiple Z stacks (minimum 15) were used to score the yeast vs filamentous ratio. The cells were considered as a “yeast” if the cells were round and/or budded. Furthermore, yeast cells were required not to project through multiple Z stacks. The cells were considered as “filamentous” if the cells contain intact mother and filamentous which was at least twice the length of the mother body. A minimum of 100 cells from multiple fields were scored. Paired Student’s t-test with Welch’s correction (P > 0.05) was used to define the statistical significance, which was carried out using GraphPad Prism software. The filament lengths of the in vivo samples were measured as described previously (15, 23). Briefly, a Z stack image of the reference or mutant strain was opened in an ImageJ software, and the distance between the mother neck to the tip of the filament was measured. At least 50 cells per strain from multiple fields were measured. Statistical significance was determined by Mann-Whitney U test (P > 0.05).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant R01AI133409, D.J.K.). We thank Aaron Mitchell (Georgia) for communicating results prior to publication. We also thank Scott Filler (UCLA) for suggestions and discussion.

Conceptualization: D.J.K.; formal analysis: R.S.W., M.W., and D.J.K.; investigation: R.S.W.; methodology: R.S.W. and M.W.; supervision: M.W. and D.J.K.; writing (original draft): D.J.K.; writing (review and editing): D.J.K. and R.S.W.

Contributor Information

Damian J. Krysan, Email: damian-krysan@uiowa.edu.

J. Andrew Alspaugh, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00785-23.

Fig. S1. msphere.00785-23-s0001.tif.

Kidney fungal burden.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF1
Fig. S2. msphere.00785-23-s0002.tif.

Solid agar plate filamentation.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF2
Fig. S3. msphere.00785-23-s0003.tif.

Volcano plots for in vivo expression data.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF3
Fig. S4. msphere.00785-23-s0004.tif.

Volcano plots for nrg1 mutants in vivo.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF4
Legends. msphere.00785-23-s0005.docx.

Captions for supplemental figures and tables.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF5
Table S1. msphere.00785-23-s0006.xlsx.

In vitro expression data.

msphere.00785-23-s0006.xlsx (380.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF6
Table S2. msphere.00785-23-s0007.xlsx.

In vivo expression data.

msphere.00785-23-s0007.xlsx (230.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF7
Table S3. msphere.00785-23-s0008.xlsx.

Oligonucleotides.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF8

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Proctor DM, Drummond RA, Lionakis MS, Segre JA. 2023. One population, multiple lifestyles: commensalism and pathogenesis in the human mycobiome. Cell Host Microbe 31:539–553. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2023.02.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Sudbery PE. 2011. Growth of Candida albicans hyphae. Nat Rev Microbiol 9:737–748. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Villa S, Hamideh M, Weinstock A, Qasim MN, Hazbun TR, Sellam A, Hernday AD, Thangamani S. 2020. Transcriptional control of hyphal morphogenesis in Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res 20:foaa005. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foaa005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Hirakawa MP, Martinez DA, Sakthikumar S, Anderson MZ, Berlin A, Gujja S, Zeng Q, Zisson E, Wang JM, Greenberg JM, Berman J, Bennett RJ, Cuomo CA. 2015. Genetic and phenotypic intra-species variation in Candida albicans. Genome Res 25:413–425. doi: 10.1101/gr.174623.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Huang MY, Woolford CA, May G, McManus CJ, Mitchell AP. 2019. Circuit diversification in a biofilm regulatory network. PLoS Pathog 15:e1007787. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007787 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Do E, Cravener MV, Huang MY, May G, McManus CJ, Mitchell AP. 2022. Collaboration between antagonistic cell type regulators governs natural variation in the Candida albicans biofilm and hyphal gene expression network. mBio 13:e0193722. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01937-22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wu W, Lockhart SR, Pujol C, Srikantha T, Soll DR. 2007. Heterozygosity of genes on the sex chromosome regulates Candida albicans virulence. Mol Microbiol 64:1587–1604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05759.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Anderson FM, Visser ND, Amses KR, Hodgins-Davis A, Weber AM, Metzner KM, McFadden MJ, Mills RE, O’Meara MJ, James TY, O’Meara TR. 2023. Candida albicans selection for human commensalism results in substantial within-host diversity without decreasing fitness for invasive disease. PLoS Biol 21:e3001822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Wakade RS, Huang M, Mitchell AP, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2021. Intravital imaging of Candida albicans identifies differential in vitro and in vivo filamentation phenotypes for transcription factor deletion mutants. mSphere 6:e0043621. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00436-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Braun BR, Kadosh D, Johnson AD. 2001. NRG1, a repressor of filamentous growth in C.albicans, is down-regulated during filament induction. EMBO J 20:4753–4761. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Murad AM, Leng P, Straffon M, Wishart J, Macaskill S, MacCallum D, Schnell N, Talibi D, Marechal D, Tekaia F, d’Enfert C, Gaillardin C, Odds FC, Brown AJ. 2001. NRG1 represses yeast-hypha morphogenesis and hypha-specific gene expression in Candida albicans. EMBO J 20:4742–4752. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4742 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Lu Y, Su C, Liu H. 2012. A GATA transcription factor recruits Hda1 in response to reduced Tor1 signaling to establish a hyphal chromatin state in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002663. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002663 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Saville SP, Lazzell AL, Monteagudo C, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2003. Engineered control of cell morphology in vivo reveals distinct roles for yeast and filamentous forms of Candida albicans during infection. Eukaryot Cell 2:1053–1060. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.5.1053-1060.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Glazier VE, Kramara J, Ollinger T, Solis NV, Zarnowski R, Wakade RS, Kim MJ, Weigel GJ, Liang SH, Bennett RJ, Wellington M, Andes DR, Stamnes MA, Filler SG, Krysan DJ. 2023. The Candida albicans reference strain SC5314 contains a rare, dominant allele of the transcription factor Rob1 that modulates filamentation, biofilm formation, and oral commensalism. mBio 14:e0152123. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01521-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wakade RS, Ristow LC, Wellington M, Krysan DJ. 2023. Intravital imaging-based genetic screen reveals the transcriptional network governing Candida albicans filamentation during mammalian infection. Elife 12:e85114. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Granger BL, Flenniken ML, Davis DA, Mitchell AP, Cutler JE. 2005. Yeast wall protein 1 of Candida albicans. Microbiology (Reading) 151:1631–1644. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27663-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Banerjee M, Thompson DS, Lazzell A, Carlisle PL, Pierce C, Monteagudo C, López-Ribot JL, Kadosh D. 2008. UME6, a novel filament-specific regulator of Candida albicans hyphal extension and virulence. Mol Biol Cell 19:1354–1365. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-11-1110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Moyes DL, Wilson D, Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Tang SX, Wernecke J, Höfs S, Gratacap RL, Robbins J, Runglall M, et al. 2016. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532:64–68. doi: 10.1038/nature17625 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Swidergall M, Khalaji M, Solis NV, Moyes DL, Drummond RA, Hube B, Lionakis MS, Murdoch C, Filler SG, Naglik JR. 2019. Candidalysin is required for neutrophil recruitment and virulence during systemic Candida albicans infection. J Infect Dis 220:1477–1488. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiz322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Witchley JN, Penumetcha P, Abon NV, Woolford CA, Mitchell AP, Noble SM. 2019. Candida albicans morphogenesis programs control the balance between gut commensalism and invasive infection. Cell Host Microbe 25:432–443. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.02.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lemberg C, Martinez de San Vicente K, Fróis-Martins R, Altmeier S, Tran VDT, Mertens S, Amorim-Vaz S, Rai LS, d’Enfert C, Pagni M, Sanglard D, LeibundGut-Landmann S. 2022. Candida albicans commensalism in the oral mucosa is favoured by limited virulence and metabolic adaptation. PLoS Pathog 18:e1010012. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1010012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Homann OR, Dea J, Noble SM, Johnson AD. 2009. A phenotypic profile of the Candida albicans regulatory network. PLoS Genet 5:e1000783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000783 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Min K, Ichikawa Y, Woolford CA, Mitchell AP, Imperiale MJ. 2016. Candida albicans gene deletion with a transient CRISPR-Cas9 system. mSphere 1:e00130-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00130-16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Shahana S, Childers DS, Ballou ER, Bohovych I, Odds FC, Gow NAR, Brown AJP. 2014. New clox systems for rapid and efficient gene disruption in Candida albicans. PLoS One 9:e100390. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0100390 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Wakade RS, Krysan DJ, Wellington M. 2022. Use of in vivo imaging to screen for morphogenesis phenotypes in Candida albicans mutant strains during active infection in a mammalian host model. J Vis Exp 12. doi: 10.3791/64258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Fig. S1. msphere.00785-23-s0001.tif.

Kidney fungal burden.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF1
Fig. S2. msphere.00785-23-s0002.tif.

Solid agar plate filamentation.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF2
Fig. S3. msphere.00785-23-s0003.tif.

Volcano plots for in vivo expression data.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF3
Fig. S4. msphere.00785-23-s0004.tif.

Volcano plots for nrg1 mutants in vivo.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF4
Legends. msphere.00785-23-s0005.docx.

Captions for supplemental figures and tables.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF5
Table S1. msphere.00785-23-s0006.xlsx.

In vitro expression data.

msphere.00785-23-s0006.xlsx (380.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF6
Table S2. msphere.00785-23-s0007.xlsx.

In vivo expression data.

msphere.00785-23-s0007.xlsx (230.9KB, xlsx)
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF7
Table S3. msphere.00785-23-s0008.xlsx.

Oligonucleotides.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00785-23.SuF8

Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES