Skip to main content
mSphere logoLink to mSphere
. 2024 Feb 29;9(3):e00814-23. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00814-23

Cutaneous Leishmania mexicana infections in the United States: defining strains through endemic human pediatric cases in northern Texas

Binita Nepal 1,2, Clare McCormick-Baw 3, Karisma Patel 1, Sarah Firmani 1, Dawn M Wetzel 1,2,
Editor: Ira J Blader4
PMCID: PMC10964424  PMID: 38421172

ABSTRACT

Over a 6-month span, three patients under 5 years old with cutaneous leishmaniasis presented to the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center/Children’s Health Dallas. None had traveled outside of northern Texas/southern Oklahoma; all had Leishmania mexicana infections confirmed by PCR. We provide case descriptions and images to increase the awareness of this disease among United States (US) physicians and scientists. Two patients responded to fluconazole, but the youngest required topical paromomycin. Combining these cases with guidelines and our literature review, we suggest that (i) higher doses (10–12 mg/kg/day) of fluconazole should be considered in young children to maximize likelihood and rapidity of response and (ii) patients should transition to alternate agents if they do not respond to high-dose fluconazole within 6 weeks. Furthermore, and of particular interest to the broad microbiology community, we used samples from these cases as a proof of concept to propose a mechanism to strain-type US-endemic L. mexicana. For our analysis, we sequenced three housekeeping genes and the internal transcribed sequence 2 of the ribosomal RNA gene. We identified genetic changes that not only allow us to distinguish US-based L. mexicana strains from strains found in other areas of the Americas but also establish polymorphisms that differ between US isolates. These techniques will allow documentation of genetic changes in this parasite as its range expands. Hence, our cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis provide significant evolutionary, treatment, and public health implications as climate change increases exposure to formerly tropical diseases in previously non-endemic areas.

IMPORTANCE

Leishmaniasis is a parasitic disease that typically affects tropical regions worldwide. However, the vector that carries Leishmania is spreading northward into the United States (US). Within a 6-month period, three young cutaneous leishmaniasis patients were seen at the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center/Children's Health Dallas. None had traveled outside of northern Texas and southern Oklahoma. We document their presentations, treatments, and outcomes and compare their management to clinical practice guidelines for leishmaniasis. We also analyzed the sequences of three critical genes in Leishmania mexicana isolated from these patients. We found changes that not only distinguish US-based strains from strains found elsewhere but also differ between US isolates. Monitoring these sequences will allow tracking of genetic changes in parasites over time. Our findings have significant US public health implications as people are increasingly likely to be exposed to what were once tropical diseases.

KEYWORDS: cutaneous, Leishmania mexicana, leishmaniasis, pediatrics, parasitology, Texas

OBSERVATION

Leishmaniasis is caused by obligate intracellular parasites of the genus Leishmania, which are spread by Lutzomyia and Phlebotomus sand flies. A spectrum of human illness results including cutaneous, mucocutaneous, and visceral disease. Disease manifestations are governed by the infecting parasite species and host immune status (1).

Generations of medical providers and infectious diseases (ID) specialists have been taught that leishmaniasis occurs in tropical and subtropical regions and not the United States (US). Such viewpoints are reflected in published distributions of leishmaniasis (2). However, over time, the sand fly vector’s distribution has expanded into previously non-endemic areas (3), and leishmaniasis currently is well-documented in US animals (4). In addition, multiple articles have described human acquisition of cutaneous leishmaniasis within Oklahoma and Texas, where leishmaniasis is now a reportable disease (5). In fact, a cross-sectional observational study indicated that 41/69 cases (59%) of cutaneous leishmaniasis diagnosed from 2007 to 2017 in Texas were acquired locally rather than from travel (6). Nevertheless, it is common for US providers to contemplate a leishmaniasis diagnosis only if patients have a history of foreign birth, travel, or military service, which in turn often excludes pediatric patients from consideration.

Within a 6-month period, three patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis presented to the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (UTSW)/Children’s Medical Center/Children’s Health Dallas. These cases reflect this disease’s changing epidemiology, since clinical isolates from these patients had genetic polymorphisms that have been documented in Texan strains of Leishmania mexicana. Furthermore, we sequenced three Leishmania housekeeping genes and identified significant differences between our clinical isolates, providing us with a potential mechanism to type L. mexicana strains. Monitoring these sequences could permit documentation of genetic variation among Leishmania isolates as this parasite expands its geographic range in the US.

Patient presentations

Three cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis acquired in Texas were referred to the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic at UTSW/Children’s Medical Center/Children’s Health Dallas between October 2018 and April 2019 by their treating dermatologists. Interestingly, none of these patients’ family members had lesions. Descriptions of these cases follow (Fig. 1).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Clinical features of patients presented. (A–D) Clinical and histopathological evaluation of patient 2. (A) Approximately 2.5 cm lesion on the left arm clinically consistent with cutaneous leishmaniasis. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Granulomatous inflammation with numerous histiocytes (100× magnification; H&E). Sample shared from Sagis Diagnostics, Houston, TX. (C) Small, round amastigotes are visible within histiocytes in the reticular dermis (500× magnification; H&E). (D) Amastigotes within histiocytes with visible kinetoplasts at arrowheads (1,000× magnification; oil immersion, H&E). (E) Patient demographics, signs and symptoms, and laboratory findings. *, normal studies in case 2 included CBC, remainder of differential, C-reactive protein, and chemistries including liver function panel. Normal studies in case 3 included CBC, remainder of differential, C-reactive protein, chemistries including liver function panel, IgA, IgM, and IgE. All laboratory abnormalities resolved after treatment. ANC, absolute neutrophil count. AEC, absolute eosinophil count.

Case 1

A 2-year-old girl from Ellis County, TX, reported a non-healing nodular lesion on her right jawline that had been present for months. She had not traveled outside north Texas. The lesion had not responded to antibiotic therapy and worsened with steroids. A biopsy showed a granulomatous infiltrate within the dermis, with amastigotes observed inside histiocytes, diagnostic of cutaneous leishmaniasis, leading to referral to our ID clinic. Genetic analysis performed at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) demonstrated L. mexicana infection. She was started on 6 mg/kg/day of fluconazole and, with 6 weeks of treatment, the lesion essentially resolved.

Case 2

A few months later, a 3-year-old boy from Ellis County, TX, who lived 9 miles from case 1 and also had no travel history, developed a non-healing nodular lesion on his left arm. It did not respond to antibiotics and ulcerated after steroids were administered. He was seen in the ID clinic and had a nearly 2.5-cm-diameter ulcer (Fig. 1A). Biopsy demonstrated granulomatous inflammation with innumerable amastigotes within histiocytes (Fig. 1B through D). PCR amplification of parasite DNA performed through the CDC detected L. mexicana. He received 6 mg/kg/day of fluconazole and required 10 weeks of therapy for lesion resolution.

Case 3

A 6-month-old boy from Grayson County, TX, developed a nodular facial lesion at 2 months old that did not improve with antibiotics and worsened with steroids. He had never traveled outside northern Texas/southern Oklahoma; however, his parents took him for daily walks in his stroller at sunset at a lake near his home. A biopsy and antileishmanial PCR performed at the CDC demonstrated L. mexicana infection, leading to ID referral. He was treated with fluconazole at 6 mg/kg/day, which was increased to 12 mg/kg/day after minimal clinical response. When his lesion failed to improve on fluconazole, he was given topical paromomycin, compounded as in Fig. 1E (7). After several months, his lesion resolved.

Genetic sequencing of patient isolates

Since there appeared to be an elevated incidence of local Leishmania infections, we explored whether there was genetic variability in parasites from clinical samples. With permission from patients 2 and 3, we obtained DNA from lesions for molecular testing (termed Tx2 and Tx3; Fig. 2; Supplemental Material). Unfortunately, a sample from the initial patient (patient 1) was not available for further study. We then proceeded with molecular testing as follows.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Genetic analysis of clinical isolates. (A) Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) reported after multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). The nonsynonymous SNPs are in bold. (B) Venn diagram showing SNPs reported on genes analyzed by MLSA.

ITS2 sequencing

The CDC sequences the ribosomal RNA-internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region to identify the infecting Leishmania species, since having this information is needed for appropriate therapeutic decisions (7). Texas-specific ITS2 polymorphisms in L. mexicana have been described, specifically A → C647 and T → C649 (8). Our sequence analysis confirmed that these ITS2 polymorphisms were seen in both of our isolates (Supplemental Figure and Table).

Multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA)

We next explored whether there was intraspecies variation among isolates using multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). We selected a small panel of three housekeeping genes: mannose phosphate isomerase (MPI), malate dehydrogenase (MDH), and 6 phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD). We used gene-specific primers for amplification and Sanger sequencing to identify synonymous/nonsynonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in coding regions. Of note, our primers did not amplify genetic material from uninfected human samples.

We found that 6PGD was the most conserved gene, with the least number of SNPs in both isolates. Interestingly, the MDH and MPI genes of Tx2 had significantly diverged from reference strains. In fact, the MDH enzyme in Tx2 was prematurely truncated (by 9 aa at the C terminus) due to transversion 922 (A → T) (Fig. 2; Supplemental Table). Tx3 also had several SNPs in the MDH and MPI genes that did not match reference strains (Fig. 2; Supplemental Table). Hence, MLSA of these three metabolic genes may provide a unique molecular epidemiological mechanism to study genetic divergence in L. mexicana.

Discussion

Here, we have documented three recent cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to L. mexicana acquired by pediatric patients within northern Texas. Since our described patients did not have infected family members, we believe that they were individually exposed to sand flies outside their homes. Our patients also appeared to have normal immune systems. Despite their relatively small number, our cases have significant bearing on US public health initiatives, as the likelihood of US patient exposure to what were formerly geographically constrained tropical diseases will likely continue to increase as shifting vector distribution and other drivers endure (3). In addition, we have provided a simple means to begin to type strains of L. mexicana endemic to the US. We propose that our methodology can be used or expanded to monitor genetic changes in Leishmania as the range of this parasite grows.

Our cases provide multiple therapeutic imputations for treating physicians in the US. Per Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines, treating single lesions from non-disseminating cutaneous species is optional, even in pediatric patients (7). We treated our patients for cosmetic reasons, since each had facial or large lesions. The referring dermatologists were hesitant to utilize local cryotherapy or brachytherapy (standard for single L. mexicana-induced lesions) due to patient age. However, IDSA guidelines indicate that employing fluconazole is reasonable for US pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis patients (7). Therefore, our patients were initially treated with oral fluconazole, which has an ~50% success rate among all species (9, 10); two of our patients responded. Fluconazole is generally well-tolerated, has good oral bioavailability, and achieves epidermis/dermis concentrations above plasma levels (11, 12). A dose of 6 mg/kg typically is recommended for pediatric cutaneous leishmaniasis (7). Nonetheless, for serious fungal infections, many authors recommend higher doses (12 mg/kg) in children based on fluconazole’s lower half-life, higher volume of distribution, more rapid clearance, and minimal side effect profile in pediatric patients, to prevent treatment failure or relapse (13, 14). Combining this literature with our experience, initiating higher doses (10–12 mg/kg/day [15]) in younger (<5-year-old) pediatric leishmaniasis patients may be worthwhile to maximize likelihood and rapidity of response. Furthermore, we note that our youngest patient did not respond to months of fluconazole therapy. Consistent with IDSA guidelines, we propose that pediatric leishmaniasis patients be transitioned to alternate agents if they do not begin to respond to high-dose fluconazole in 4–6 weeks (7). Of note, the topical paromomycin employed in patient 3 can be difficult to acquire in the US, as it requires compounding by a willing pharmacy and investigational drug applications, so we did not use it initially in our patients.

We also determined that our patients’ Leishmania isolates have undergone significant genetic changes that may offer insights into this parasite’s evolutionary biology. Notably, it is now more common for patients in Texas to acquire leishmaniasis locally than from travel (5, 6). The CDC has described a specific polymorphism in the ITS2 sequence of L. mexicana in Texas-endemic strains; we replicated these results in our patients’ isolates. Furthermore, we provide a mechanism for beginning to strain-type isolates of this newly endemic parasite using three metabolic genes. Our results demonstrate the power of MLSA as a simple yet important molecular epidemiological tool to study Leishmania genetic divergence within the US. Since clusters of leishmaniasis cases have been described, this technique could potentially be used to characterize outbreaks. The large number of genetic changes that we found using a limited number of isolates and genes suggests that Texas-specific strains of L. mexicana may be under significant evolutionary selection pressure, which in turn may lead to novel mutations. We plan to continue to monitor available isolates for this possibility over time.

Although cases of leishmaniasis certainly have been described in the US, our case discussions have typically been met with surprise from clinicians and scientists alike. One factor that may lead to this underappreciation of endemicity is that leishmaniasis is a reportable disease in Texas, but not in other states (6). We would argue that leishmaniasis should be a reportable disease nationwide so that its incidence and distribution can be monitored by public health officials. Furthermore, we propose that such information could be collected in conjunction with our strain-typing techniques to characterize ongoing genetic variation in this parasite as its endemic area expands. Hence, the cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis described here have significant microbiological, treatment, and public health implications.

Materials and methods

Molecular analysis/strain typing

For patient 2 in this report, a clinical sample (termed Tx2) was obtained and briefly cultured at UTSW as promastigotes in Schneider’s Insect cell media (Sigma; S9895) supplemented with 20% FBS (GeminiBio; 100-106) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma; P4333). Time in culture was limited to minimize genetic changes in vitro. DNA was extracted using the DNAeasy Blood and tissue Kit (Qiagen; 69504) according to manufacturer’s instructions. For patient 3 (Tx3), we received extracted DNA from the CDC (thanks to Yvonne Qvarnstrom; CDC), which had been generated in a similar manner to Tx2. Extracted DNA was used to amplify the rRNA-ITS2 region for species identification (Supplemental Figure) and three housekeeping genes: MPI, MDH, and 6PGD with gene specific primers for L. mexicana. Sequences for all primers are in the Supplemental Table. The CDS region for these genes was then used for MLSA to explore genetic variation among isolates. Briefly, each gene was amplified with high-fidelity DNA polymerase Primestar Max (Takara Bio; RO45A) using forward and reverse primers binding in upstream and downstream coding regions, respectively. PCR-amplified fragments were Sanger sequenced in the UTSW McDermott Center Sequencing Core facility using Life Technologies Dye Terminator 3.1 chemistry and 3730XL Genetic Analyzers.

SNP analysis

Each gene was sequenced bidirectionally using two sets of forward (ExtF and IntF) and reverse (ExtR and IntR) primers. ExtF and ExtR bind outside of the coding region and IntF and IntR bind in the coding region. Due to the sequence variability found in the Tx2 MPI gene, multiple internal primers were used. SNP analysis was performed using the sequence alignment tools EMBOSS needle and Clustal Omega (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to staff members in the UTSW/Children’s Medical Center/Children's Health Dallas Pediatric Infectious Diseases Clinic for their flexibility in patient scheduling to ensure that these leishmaniasis patients saw Dr. Wetzel. We thank the Texas Department of Health for discussing these cases with us when we reported them, members of the UTSW and global parasitology communities for their support and interest in this experience, and the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Division at UTSW for providing helpful advice. We also thank Dr. Yvonne Qvarnstrom at the CDC for assisting us with acquiring leishmanial DNA from patient 3.

Dr. Nepal is funded by American Heart Association Postdoctoral Fellowship 916875. Dr. Wetzel was supported by a Children’s Clinical Research Advisory Committee Early Investigator Award, a 2019 Harrington Scholar-Innovator Award, NIH R01 AI146349, a Welch Grant for Chemistry (I-2086), and funds from the UTSW Department of Pediatrics. The funders did not play a role in the writing of the manuscript.

Footnotes

Presented at: This work was presented at the American Society of Microbiology Microbe meeting in 2023 in Houston, TX, as a "Track Hub," and an anonymized preprint of the manuscript was posted on medRxiv (16).

Contributor Information

Dawn M. Wetzel, Email: dawn.wetzel@utsouthwestern.edu.

Ira J. Blader, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA

DATA AVAILABILITY

Sequences described in this paper have been deposited at NCBI GenBank. Accession numbers are as follows: ITS2, Tx2 PP352525 (sequence ID LM.TX2.ITS2) and Tx3 PP352526 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.ITS2); MDH, Tx2 PP386546 (sequence ID LM.Tx2.MDH) and Tx3 PP386547 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.MDH); PGD, Tx2 PP386548 (sequence ID LM.Tx2.PGD) and Tx3 PP386549 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.PGD); MPI, Tx2 PP386550 (sequence ID LM.Tx2.MPI) and Tx3 PP386551 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.MPI).

ETHICS APPROVAL

Reporting of this small case series (<3 patients) was exempt from UTSW/Children’s Medical Center/Children's Health Dallas-IRB approval. However, the patients in this study provided permission for images to be used and for clinical samples to be taken; these activities were approved by the IRBs at both UTSW and Children’s Health (STU-2019-0754).

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msphere.00814-23.

Supplemental materials. msphere.00814-23-s0001.pdf.

Supplemental text, figure, and table.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00814-23.SuF1

ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wetzel DM, Phillips MA. 2023. Chapter 67: Chemotherapy of protozoal infections: Amebiasis, giardiasis, trichomoniasis, trypanosomiasis, leishmaniasis, and other protozoal infections, p 1309–1324. In Brunton L (ed), Goodman and Gilman’s the pharmacological basis of Therapeutics, 14th ed. McGraw-Hill Medical, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. 2023. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/dpdx/leishmaniasis/index.html
  • 3. Gonzalez C, Wang O, Strutz SE, Gonzalez-Salazar C, Sanchez-Cordero V, Sarkar S. 2010. Climate change and risk of leishmaniasis in North America: predictions from ecological niche models of vector and reservoir species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Petersen CA. 2009. Leishmaniasis, an emerging disease found in companion animals in the United States. Top Companion Anim Med 24:182–188. doi: 10.1053/j.tcam.2009.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Wright NA, Davis LE, Aftergut KS, Parrish CA, Cockerell CJ. 2008. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Texas: a northern spread of endemic areas. J Am Acad Dermatol 58:650–652. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. McIlwee BE, Weis SE, Hosler GA. 2018. Incidence of endemic human cutaneous leishmaniasis in the United States. JAMA Dermatol 154:1032–1039. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.2133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Aronson N, Herwaldt BL, Libman M, Pearson R, Lopez-Velez R, Weina P, Carvalho E, Ephros M, Jeronimo S, Magill A. 2016. Diagnosis and treatment of leishmaniasis: clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH). Am J Trop Med Hyg 96:24–45. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-84256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. de Almeida ME, Steurer FJ, Koru O, Herwaldt BL, Pieniazek NJ, da Silva AJ. 2011. Identification of Leishmania spp. by molecular amplification and DNA sequencing analysis of a fragment of rRNA internal transcribed spacer 2. J Clin Microbiol 49:3143–3149. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01177-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Prates FV, Dourado MEF, Silva SC, Schriefer A, Guimarães LH, Brito MD, Almeida J, Carvalho EM, Machado PRL. 2017. Fluconazole in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 64:67–71. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Alrajhi AA, Ibrahim EA, De Vol EB, Khairat M, Faris RM, Maguire JH. 2002. Fluconazole for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania major. N Engl J Med 346:891–895. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Faergemann J. 1999. Pharmacokinetics of fluconazole in skin and nails. J Am Acad Dermatol 40:S14–S20. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70393-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Faergemann J, Laufen H. 1993. Levels of fluconazole in serum, stratum corneum, epidermis-dermis (without stratum corneum) and eccrine sweat. Clin Exp Dermatol 18:102–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1993.tb00987.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Pacifici GM. 2020. Clinical pharmacology of fluconazole in infants and children. Clin Med Invest 5:10.15761. doi: 10.15761/CMI.1000213 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Watt K, Benjamin DK, Jr, Cohen-Wolkowiez M. 2011. Pharmacokinetics of antifungal agents in children. Early Hum Dev 87:S61–S65. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2011.01.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Wade KC, Benjamin DK, Kaufman DA, Ward RM, Smith PB, Jayaraman B, Adamson PC, Gastonguay MR, Barrett JS. 2009. Fluconazole dosing for the prevention or treatment of invasive candidiasis in young infants. Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:717–723. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819f1f50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Nepal B, McCormick-Baw C, Patel K, Firmani S, Wetzel DM. 2024. Cutaneous Leishmania Mexicana infections in the United States: defining strains through endemic human pediatric cases in Northern Texas. medRxiv:2024.01.11.23300611. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.11.23300611 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental materials. msphere.00814-23-s0001.pdf.

Supplemental text, figure, and table.

DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00814-23.SuF1

Data Availability Statement

Sequences described in this paper have been deposited at NCBI GenBank. Accession numbers are as follows: ITS2, Tx2 PP352525 (sequence ID LM.TX2.ITS2) and Tx3 PP352526 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.ITS2); MDH, Tx2 PP386546 (sequence ID LM.Tx2.MDH) and Tx3 PP386547 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.MDH); PGD, Tx2 PP386548 (sequence ID LM.Tx2.PGD) and Tx3 PP386549 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.PGD); MPI, Tx2 PP386550 (sequence ID LM.Tx2.MPI) and Tx3 PP386551 (sequence ID LM.Tx3.MPI).


Articles from mSphere are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES