Abstract
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health established a surveillance system to identify complicated (advanced human immunodeficiency virus [HIV] or hospitalized) mpox cases. From 1 August to 30 November 2022, we identified 1581 mpox cases, of which 134 (8.5%) were complicated. A subset of 8 cases did not recover after either initiating or completing a course of oral tecovirimat. All 8 patients were HIV positive and had advanced HIV (CD4 count <200 cells/μL). We identified 8 distinct mutations previously associated with tecovirimat resistance in specimens collected from 6 patients. Ongoing surveillance of viral evolution requires close coordination between health departments and frontline providers.
Keywords: mpox, advanced HIV, tecovirimat, drug resistance, surveillance
Mpox (formerly recognized as monkeypox) is an orthopoxvirus that primarily had occurred from sporadic zoonotic spillovers in West and Central Africa [1]. Aside from a large outbreak in 2003 in the United States (US) from imported small mammals from West Africa and in cases of returned travelers, the disease was rarely seen elsewhere prior to the 2022 mpox virus (MPXV) outbreak. Transmission between humans is primarily through close skin-to-skin contact, while treatment was limited to supportive care prior to the recent outbreak. Scientists had predicted a potential mpox epidemic given the end of routine smallpox vaccination in the 1980s, which was thought to provide cross-protective serologic immunity. The 2022 MPXV outbreak was the first time this disease caused a pandemic and one of the first outbreaks in which sexual contact was implicated as the primary mode of spread [2].
During the 2022 MPXV outbreak, cases were largely confined to men who have sex with men, a population with high rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS [2]. Of all US states, California reported the highest case count at 5800 cases as of July 2023 [3]. Within California, Los Angeles County reported the highest burden with 2488 cases, including 2 mpox deaths, both occurring among patients with poorly controlled HIV/AIDS [4, 5].
Currently, there are no approved treatments for mpox. However, the US Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have provided medical countermeasures under expanded-access Investigational New Drug (IND) protocols for smallpox treatments. These include tecovirimat and brincidofovir, as well as intravenous vaccinia immunoglobulin (VIGIV), and mpox vaccinations [6].
Tecovirimat is an antiviral compound that targets VP37, a highly conserved envelope protein used for extracellular virus particle formation [6–8]. By inhibiting VP37, the drug slows viral replication and dissemination, although it is not viricidal. In vitro data suggest that tecovirimat is efficacious at stopping replication of the 2022 MPXV clade IIb strain [7]. However, in vitro studies also suggest that tecovirimat has a low barrier to antiviral resistance [7]. Resistance mutations to tecovirimat have previously been described in MPXV and other orthopoxviruses, including the current outbreak where phenotypic resistance was confirmed [5, 8, 9].
In patient populations that are immunocompromised, such as those with poorly controlled HIV, viral clearance may be delayed, presenting a greater risk for the development of mpox mutations conferring antiviral resistance. In addition, patients with poorly controlled HIV often face comorbid mental health issues, substance abuse disorder, and housing instability, which can contribute to challenges with medication adherence. Given the spread of mpox in populations with advanced HIV during this outbreak, antiviral resistance represents an urgent concern [10].
OBJECTIVES
The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH) implemented a supplementary surveillance system for complicated mpox cases in August 2022. Complicated cases were defined as MPXV infections in patients with HIV and CD4 counts <200 cells/μL, and all cases hospitalized for MPXV infection. We describe a subset of cases identified through this surveillance who completed partial or full courses of oral tecovirimat without complete recovery. We describe the development of our surveillance system, characterize clinical and social factors common among this case subset, identify challenges in both surveillance and clinical management, and summarize key lessons that can inform future surveillance efforts for mpox outbreaks.
METHODS
Our target population in this study was all reported mpox cases in Los Angeles County. Our study population was composed of complicated cases among all confirmed MPXV infections reported to LACDPH during 1 August–30 November 2022. The study sample included a subset of complicated cases with persistent lesions who had been prescribed a full course of tecovirimat, regardless of adherence.
A confirmed mpox case was defined using the CDC case definition: demonstration of the presence of MPXV DNA by polymerase chain reaction testing or next-generation sequencing of a clinical specimen or isolation of MPXV in culture from a clinical specimen [9, 11].
Los Angeles County Public Health Surveillance
LACDPH began supplemental monitoring of all complicated cases of mpox in August 2022, after the first severe case of mpox with antiviral resistance had been identified in a patient with advanced HIV who ultimately died [5]. The goal was to identify patients with a higher risk of progression to severe disease who may need further investigation and consultation for treatment options.
All identified mpox cases were matched to an HIV case registry maintained by the LACDPH Division of HIV and Sexually Transmitted Diseases multiple times per week to identify patients with concurrent mpox, HIV, and CD4 count <200 cells/μL. All hospitalized cases were identified through provider or facility report to the health department, or self-report by the case during initial interview or follow-up contacts.
We reviewed public health nursing notes for all mpox cases with low CD4 counts and all mpox cases who were hospitalized to identify cases. We also attempted to contact the providers of all hospitalized cases who had not been discharged. Among hospitalized cases, we discussed case details and conducted clinical chart reviews. We provided clinical consultation to providers managing complicated cases and facilitated CDC consultation when needed.
For cases whose lesions worsened or failed to improve despite initiating or completing treatment with tecovirimat, we either collected or obtained multiple lesion swabs and performed whole genome sequencing in the LACDPH laboratories over the course of treatment. Detailed methods and findings from genomic investigation are available in a separate publication [9].
Approvals
This study was deemed not to constitute human subjects research by the LACDPH institutional review board.
RESULTS
Surveillance
Between 1 August and 30 November 2022, we identified 1581 confirmed mpox cases (Figure 1). Of these, 739 had HIV coinfection and 60 had low CD4 count (<200 cells/μL). Ninety-five cases were hospitalized. Among confirmed cases, 134 were complicated cases (ie, hospitalized and/or low CD4 count).
Figure 1.
Flowchart of mpox cases in Los Angeles County, 2022. Abbreviation: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
Of the hospitalized cases, 71 had HIV coinfection, and 21 had low CD4 counts. Of complicated cases, 8 cases met the inclusion criteria of persistent lesions despite initiation or completion of tecovirimat for the subset of interest. A summary of the clinical characteristics and treatment challenges of these cases is presented in Table 1.
Table 1.
Patient Clinical Background, Treatment and Challenges, and Outcomes
| Case | Age, y, Gender | Medical History | CD4 Count, Cells/μL | HIV Viral Load, Copies/mL | Treatment | Treatment Challenges | Clinical Outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30, Transgender female | HIV/AIDS, methamphetamine use disorder, late latent syphilis | <35 | 130 565 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV), VIGIV, ART | Did not complete full oral courses; refused IV access; left against medical advice before completing treatment | Deceased |
| 2 | 43, male | HIV/AIDS | 73 | <20 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV), VIGIV, brincidofovir, ART | Difficulty with swallowing due to oral pain | Recovering at discharge; lost to follow-up, seen in emergency room without mpox lesions noted (7 mo postdischarge) |
| 3 | 34, Male | HIV/AIDS (new diagnosis), HSV-2, Shigella bacteremia | 136 | 178 982 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV), VIGIV, ART | Bloody diarrhea during follow-up hospital course; unclear PO dosing during initial tecovirimat treatment course | Followed up in outpatient clinic with ongoing lesions (3 wk postdischarge) |
| 4 | 32, Male | HIV/AIDS | <35 | 26 724 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV) | Difficulty with oral administration due to pain; agitated and combative with staff | Full resolution of skin lesions with reepithelialization (10 wk postdischarge) |
| 5 | 41, Male | HIV/AIDS, neurosyphilis, ulcerative colitis, CMV viremia | 96 | 2620 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV), cidofovir; VIGIV, ART | Presumed ulcerative colitis flare with diarrhea | Followed up in outpatient ID clinic with full resolution of mpox lesions (4 mo postdischarge) |
| 6 | 36, Male | HIV/AIDS | 191 | 606 | Tecovirimat (PO), ART | Refused brincidofovir and VIGIV | Ongoing skin lesions without full recovery and with fungating appearance (11 mo postdischarge) |
| 7 | 40, Male | HIV/AIDS, cryptococcal meningitis, gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis, HSV-2, Enterococcus faecalis bacteremia | <35 | 113 944 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV), ART | Inconsistent outpatient oral tecovirimat adherence | Followed up in ID clinic with most lesions healed and no new lesions (4 wk postdischarge) |
| 8 | 54, Transgender female | HIV/AIDS, late latent syphilis, Cryptosporidium | 54 | 485 298 | Tecovirimat (PO, IV), ART | Profuse watery diarrhea (Cryptosporidium positive); left against medical advice before completing treatment; refused treatment and IV lines during admissions | Ongoing skin lesions without full recovery (7 wk postdischarge) |
Abbreviations: ART, antiretroviral therapy; CMV, cytomegalovirus; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; HSV-2, herpes simplex virus type 2; ID, infectious disease; IV, intravenous; PO, oral; VIGIV, intravenous vaccinia immunoglobulin.
Description of Cases of Interest
The median age was 38 years (range, 30–54 years); 6 identified as male and 2 as transgender females; all patients had HIV, and median CD4 count was 63.5 cells/μL.
Five of 8 patients had 1 or more concurrent comorbidities including STIs (syphilis, gonorrhea, chlamydia), substance use disorders, or psychiatric disorders and/or were experiencing homelessness. Extended courses of tecovirimat were given in all cases, and 4 patients received additional therapeutics including VIGIV, cidofovir, and brincidofovir. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) was restarted in 7 of 8 cases. One case died, 3 had full recovery, and 4 had ongoing lesions at last follow-up with varying degrees of improvement.
A detailed description of cases can be found in the Supplementary Material. A detailed description of tecovirimat resistance mutations identified through our surveillance system can be found in the Supplementary Material and Garrigues et al [9], including all GenBank, sequence read archive, and global initiative on sharing all influenza data identification numbers for the relevant sequences. These cases of interest were not known to be epidemiologically linked to each other based on case interviews.
DISCUSSION
We describe a surveillance system for complicated mpox cases. Surveillance of complicated mpox cases required close coordination between health departments and their providers. Through this effort we defined and identified complicated patients; facilitated appropriate clinical care, including provision of IND therapeutics; and ensured that isolates with high pretest probability for resistance were further evaluated.
Many infections during the 2022 outbreak occurred in immunocompromised hosts, especially those living with HIV, in whom viral clearance can be more difficult, increasing the risk of developing drug resistance. The emergence of and ability to detect new mutations associated with resistance depends on numerous factors, including the size and density of sexual networks, distributions of immunocompromised hosts, the mutation rate of the strain, and drug selection pressure. We targeted our resources by focusing sequencing efforts on isolates with a higher pretest probability such as mpox cases not responding to oral tecovirimat.
We identified multiple single-amino-acid substitutions that have been previously noted to confer high-level phenotypic resistance against tecovirimat in other orthopoxviruses in 6 of the 8 identified cases (full results available in Garrigues et al [9]). In 1 case, resistance mutations were identified after tecovirimat exposure but not before, suggesting that resistance developed during treatment [9]. The mutations identified may have resulted from a combination of selection pressure due to inadequate levels secondary to adherence or malabsorption and host immunosuppression.
Continued sequencing of MPXV specimens will be important to monitor the evolution of circulating strains, including recently reported reinfections [12]. Plasticity of the genomic termini in orthopoxviruses allows for host adaptation via gene deletion [13]. Through whole genome sequencing, identification of gene deletions that impacted accuracy of diagnostic assays were identified during this outbreak [14]. Phylogenetic analysis early in the outbreak found multiple-fold more single-nucleotide polymorphism differences between observed strains versus what would be expected compared to genomes of circulating strains from the Nigerian 2018–2019 outbreak, suggesting potentially accelerated evolution or ongoing, cryptic transmission for several years [15].
In the subset of cases who did not recover despite initiation of tecovirimat, we helped assess the appropriateness of additional therapeutics with distinct viral targets (brincidofovir, VIGIV) based on experience, first principles, and interim treatment guidelines when available [6]. While a recent case series identifying immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) in a high proportion of mpox cases with advanced HIV has been reported, we have not observed this phenomenon in our review of complicated cases [10]. Regardless of the risk of IRIS, immune reconstitution is critical for clearing the virus in patients with advanced HIV, and ART should be initiated early. Although the role of steroids is still unclear, there have been case reports in which steroid use has reportedly been associated with recovery from inflammatory pathogenesis [16].
In our case series, patient adherence to full courses of oral tecovirimat was often inconsistent due to psychosocial challenges, including lack of housing, mental health issues, and lack of regular access to food, consistent with findings from larger case series [2, 10]. In multiple hospitalized cases, we found that patient adherence to therapies posed challenges, especially without adequate intravenous access. In 1 patient, this was likely a contributing factor in the patient's death as we were unable to initiate therapies against the patient's will. In some cases, even provision of housing facilitated by our health department did not lead to complete medication adherence. In cases where tecovirimat adherence is challenging in both oral and intravenous formulations, the weekly administration of brincidofovir, an oral prodrug of cidofovir that targets viral DNA polymerase, may be particularly helpful.
The same factors that are associated with incomplete adherence to ART regimens also serve as obstacles to adherence for mpox antiviral regimens. These overlapping challenges have contributed to difficulties with completing full 14-day courses of tecovirimat, which requires coadministration with a high-fat meal for optimal absorption and at least 2 weeks of twice-daily medication administration [6, 8]. For patients who are experiencing homelessness, regular daily meals are not always available. Ensuring that these cases have safe discharge plans, including attention to social and structural challenges that they may face outside of the hospital, will be essential in complete recovery.
While resistance mutations were identified in our subset of cases and in the first US mpox death reported from our department, we do not know the prevalence of these mutations among all mpox patients with advanced HIV [5]. Other reports of tecovirimat resistance testing, including isolates from patients with HIV, have not described associated mutations [17].
CONCLUSIONS
During the 2022 mpox outbreak, active public health surveillance identified complicated mpox cases. Among these complicated cases, selective sequencing of at-risk cases successfully identified tecovirimat-resistant isolates from patients with advanced HIV. Among cases with resistance including the first US death, fatality was high (2/7). Close monitoring in immunocompromised patients is essential, and coordination between public health departments and clinicians can improve surveillance for resistance as well as care coordination for patients facing psychosocial challenges that may impede adherence to HIV and mpox therapeutics.
Supplementary Data
Supplementary materials are available at The Journal of Infectious Diseases online (http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/). Supplementary materials consist of data provided by the author that are published to benefit the reader. The posted materials are not copyedited. The contents of all supplementary data are the sole responsibility of the authors. Questions or messages regarding errors should be addressed to the author.
Supplementary Material
Contributor Information
Abraar Karan, Division of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Naman Shah, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Jacob M Garrigues, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Jemma Alarcόn, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Peera Hemarajata, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Lauren E Finn, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Kathleen Poortinga, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Phoebe Danza, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Sonali Kulkarni, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Moon Kim, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Dawn Terashita, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Nicole M Green, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Sharon Balter, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health, Los Angeles, California.
Notes
Disclaimer. The contents of this work are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Financial support. A. K. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (grant number 2T32AI052073-16A1, Global Infectious Disease Epidemiology Training Grant, Stanford University). This publication was supported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (grant/cooperative agreement number 6 NU50CK000498-04-03).
Supplement sponsorship. This article appears as part of the supplement “Mpox: Challenges and Opportunities Following the Global 2022 Outbreak,” sponsored by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA).
References
- 1. Petersen BW, Damon IK, Mandela JE, Mandela JE. In: Mandela JE, eds. Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett's principles and practice of infectious diseases. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2020:1814–7. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Thornhill JP, Barkati S, Walmsley S, et al. Monkeypox virus infection in humans across 16 countries—April–June 2022. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:679–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . 2022 US map and case count. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/response/2022/us-map.html. Accessed 20 January 2023.
- 4. US Food and Drug Administration . LA County mpox daily case update. http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/media/monkeypox/data/index.htm. Accessed 20 January 2023.
- 5. Alarcón J, Kim M, Terashita D, et al. An mpox-related death in the United States. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:1246–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rao AK, Schrodt CA, Minhaj FS, et al. Interim clinical treatment considerations for severe manifestations of mpox—United States, February 2023. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2023; 72:232–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Frenois-Veyrat G, Gallardo F, Gorgé O, et al. Tecovirimat is effective against human monkeypox virus in vitro at nanomolar concentrations. Nat Microbiol 2022; 7:1951–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. US Food and Drug Administration . FDA mpox response. Table: orthopoxvirus VP37 amino acid substitutions associated with tecovirimat resistance. https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-issues/fda-monkeypox-response. Accessed 29 November 2022.
- 9. Garrigues JM, Hemarajata P, Karan A, et al. Identification of tecovirimat resistance-associated mutations in human monkeypox virus—Los Angeles County. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023; 67:e0056823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Mitjà O, Alemany A, Marks M, et al. ; SHARE-NET Writing Group. Mpox in people with advanced HIV infection: a global case series. Lancet 2023; 401:939–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . Case definitions for use in the 2022 mpox response. https://www.cdc.gov/poxvirus/monkeypox/clinicians/case-definition.html. Accessed 15 December 2022.
- 12. Musumeci S, Najjar I, Amari EBE, et al. A case of mpox reinfection. Clin Infect Dis 2023; 77:135–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Pfaff F, Hoffmann D, Beer M. Monkeypox genomic surveillance will challenge lessons learned from SARS-CoV-2. Lancet 2022; 400:22–3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Garrigues JM, Hemarajata P, Lucero B, et al. Identification of human monkeypox virus genome deletions that impact diagnostic assays. J Clin Microbiol 2022; 60:e0165522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Isidro J, Borges V, Pinto M, et al. Phylogenomic characterization and signs of microevolution in the 2022 multi-country outbreak of monkeypox virus. Nat Med 2022; 28:1569–72. Erratum in: Nat Med 2022; 28:2220–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Arias CA, Miller WR, Olsen R, Gollihar J, Armstrong A. The response of mpox-associated inflammatory syndrome to steroid therapy. Lancet Infect Dis 2023; 23:e323–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bojkova D, Bechtel M, Rothenburger T, et al. Drug sensitivity of currently circulating mpox viruses. N Engl J Med 2023; 388:279–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

