Abstract
Scalidophoran worms represent common infaunal components of early and middle Cambrian Burgess Shale-type fossil biotas. Early scalidophorans resemble extant priapulids based on overall morphology, but the genus Selkirkia represents the earliest record of tube dwelling for the group. Despite its ubiquitous presence in exceptional marine deposits, whether the exclusively Cambrian occurrence of Selkirkia reflects its entire evolutionary history or is affected by taphonomic biases remains unresolved. Here, we demonstrate the post-Cambrian survival of Selkirkia based on new material from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale biota of Morocco. The discovery of Selkirkia in the Fezouata Shale extends the biostratigraphic range of the genus by 25 million years and its palaeobiogeographic occurrence to the high latitudes of Gondwana, strengthens the evolutionary links between Cambrian and Ordovician Burgess Shale-type biotas and increases scalidophoran diversity for the Fezouata Shale biota otherwise consisting exclusively of the palaeoscolecid Palaeoscolex? tenensis. The tube of Selkirkia underwent negligible external change for over 40 million years, indicating a high degree of morphological stasis during the Early Palaeozoic. A tubicolous mode of life is rare among extant priapulids and expressed only in Maccabeus, which forms a delicate tube from agglutinated plant debris, unlike the macroscopic secreted cuticular tube of Selkirkia.
Keywords: Fezouata Shale, Lower Ordovician, Morocco, Burgess Shale-type biota, exceptional preservation, Maccabeus
1. Introduction
Burgess Shale-type (BST) biotas fundamentally inform the biodiversity of animal-dominated communities during the early stages of the Phanerozoic. These extraordinary deposits contain diverse non-biomineralized organisms that would normally be absent from the shelly fossil record, offer insights into the ancestral morphology of extant groups, and illuminate the autecology of the earliest complex animals [1–3]. Cambrian BST biotas indicate that the scalidophorans, vermiform organisms characterized by the presence of an eversible introvert lined with pharyngeal teeth and cuticular specializations known as scalids with diverse morphologies, were some of the most diverse and common infaunal elements in early marine animal-dominated communities as carnivorous predators and scavengers [4–6]. Although Cambrian scalidophorans are mostly known from exceptionally preserved cuticular macrofossils [4,7–9], their microfossil record includes spectacular instances of phosphatized (e.g. armored kinorhych-like species from South China [10], Markuelia from Cambrian sites in Siberia, North America, Australia and China [11]) and even carbonaceous remains (e.g. small carbonaceous fossils pharyngeal teeth [6], complete loriciferans [12]). Critically, exceptionally preserved microfossils from the Kuanchuanpu Formation biota in south China capture the stratigraphically oldest record of scalidophorans during the Fortunian (ca 535 Ma) [10,13]. Cambrian scalidophorans had a similar degree of overall morphological disparity relative to their extant representatives [14,15], which include priapulids, kinorhynchs and loriciferans, but some of these early representatives featured anatomical adaptations and modes of life that are rarer, even absent, in modern counterparts. For instance, selkirkiid scalidophorans are spatiotemporally widespread in the Cambrian, with records from BST biotas in North America and South China ranging from Stage 3 (e.g. Chengjiang, Xiaoshiba, Buen Formation), to Wuliuan (e.g. Burgess Shale, Kaili, Spence Shale) and Guzhangian (e.g. Weeks, Pika) (electronic supplementary material, table S1). Selkirkiids feature a secreted ornamented tube around the body, an eversible scalid-bearing introvert, and a simple gut. By contrast, tube dwelling is only expressed in the small bodied (less than 3 mm in length) genus Maccabeus among extant priapulids [16,17], although in this case the tube is extremely delicate and the result of agglutinated plant debris rather than being secreted by the organism itself. Some larval priapulids and loriciferans bear a lorica [12,16,17], which consists of a series of cuticular sheaths for protection, but these structures do not form an enclosed tube proper.
Selkirkiids comprise two genera, Selkirkia which embodies most of the diversity and spatio-temporal distribution of the group [4,18,19], and the controversial Sullulika that is only known from Greenland's Stage 3 Buen Formation [20]. Although selkirkiids represent common infaunal components of BST biotas during the Cambrian thanks to the preservation potential of their robust secreted tubes, these organisms have not been recorded from younger deposits with soft tissue preservation that have produced evidence for scalidophoran macrofossils [21–23]. Whether the absence of post-Cambrian tube forming scalidophorans is a legitimate or a taphonomic bias remains unresolved. Here, we describe a new species of Selkirkia from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale biota of Morocco [24,25] that demonstrates the post-Cambrian survival of tubicolous scalidophorans and significantly expands the distribution of the genus both in terms of its biostratigraphic and palaeobiogeographic occurrence during the Early Palaeozoic.
2. Systematic palaeontology
Scalidophora Lemburg, 1995
Phylum Priapulida Delage & Herouard, 1897
Order Selkirkiimorpha Adrianov & Malakhov, 1995
Family Selkirkiidae Conway-Morris, 1977
(a) . Genus
Selkirkia Walcott, 1911
Selkirkia tsering nov.
Zoobank identifier B523E00B-59BF-4BC0-9D05-FB62474CB64F
(i) . Etymology
Derived from the Tibetan word ‘tsering’ meaning ‘long life'.
(ii) . Type material
Holotype (MCZ.IP.201003). Paratypes (MCZ.IP.201004, MCZ.IP.201005, MCZ.IP.202502). Other material (YPM.IP.521504, YPM.IP.521909, YPM.IP.524887). All studied and figured material is deposited at the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at the Museum of Comparative Zoology (MCZ.IP), Harvard University (Cambridge, USA), and the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History (YPM.IP), Yale University (New Haven, USA).
(iii) . Locality and age
Lower Fezouata Shale Formation in the Draa Valley, Zagora region of Morocco. Georeferenced sub-locality information is curated with the specimens in their respective collections. The co-occurrence of the planktic graptolites Kiaerograptus and Tetragraptus from the same sub-locality as Selkirkia tsering indicate a late Tremadocian age as part of the Araneograptus murrayi biozone [26].
(iv) . Diagnosis
Medium-sized Selkirkia (27.9 mm average tube length) with tube bearing evenly spaced transverse ornamentation with a density of six annulations per millimetre. Tube with low opening angle conveying a sub-parallel outline that gently tapers posteriorly to a blunt termination.
(v) . Description
The studied specimens (n = 7) consist of cone-shaped tubes with a low opening angle that conveys a sub-parallel appearance throughout (figure 1), with complete specimens ranging in length from 19.95 to 34.24 mm, and maximum width from 2.73 to 3.8 mm measured at the anterior opening (electronic supplementary material, table S2). The orientation of the specimens does not allow us to evaluate whether the posterior end is open, but most of the studied tubes are complete and show a blunt posterior termination (figure 1). The tubes are ornamented with highly regular transverse annulations, with a density of six annulations per millimetre measured at the level of the mid length where the ornamentation is best expressed (figure 2g). The holotype (MCZ.IP.201003) preserves evidence of soft tissues in the form of a partially everted subtriangular introvert that is found extending forward from the anterior tube margin (figures 1d,e and 2a,b). The paratype (MCZ.IP.201005) also preserves soft tissues anteriorly, possibly remains of the introvert, as well as elongate morphological structures within the tube walls with a slightly darker coloration in a more posterior position within the trunk (figures 1a and 2d–f). The fact that these structures show a slight degree of three-dimensionality relative to the rest of the fossil specimen suggests that they might have been robust and possibly sclerotized, which would be consistent with their interpretation as pharyngeal teeth based on their similar position to the pharyngeal teeth of extant priapulids when the introvert is retraced [16,17,27]. The everted introvert has a broadly subtriangular tapering appearance (figure 2a,b), and although finer details such as the teeth circlets are not well preserved, it is similar in size and shape to that observed in the early Cambrian Selkirkia sinica from Chengjiang and Xiaoshiba [4,18,28] and the mid-Cambrian Burgess Shale S. columbia (figure 2c) [6]. MCZ.IP.201003 also shows evidence of a long and simple gut tract consistent with other Cambrian Selkirkia species (figure 2a–e). The Fezouata Shale specimens consistently show an enlarged anterior area of the gut tract within the tube walls defined by the selective accumulation of yellow to bright orange iron oxides (figure 2a,b,d–f); we interpret this as a specialization of the gut tract, possibly the pharynx based on its position and shape, that might have been involved in digestion and formation of faecal pellets, as also observed in well preserved specimens of S. sinica from Chengjiang and Xiaoshiba [4,18].
Figure 1.

The tubicolous scalidophoran Selkirkia tsering nov. from the Lower Ordovician (Tremadocian) Lower Fezouata Shale of Morocco. (a) Paratype MCZ.IP.201005, complete individual with preserved soft tissues and transverse tube annulations. (b) Paratype MCZ.IP.201004a, part, complete tube with well-preserved transverse annulations. (c) Paratype MCZ.IP.201004b, counterpart. (d) Holotype MCZ.IP.201003a, part, fragmentary individual with remains of introvert and well-preserved transverse tube annulations. (e) Holotype MCZ.IP.201003b, counterpart, complete individual. (f) YPM.IP.521909, isolated tube with transverse annulations. (g) YPM.IP.524887a, isolated tube. (h) YPM.IP.524887b, counterpart. (i) Paratype, MCZ.IP.202502, isolated tube with transverse annulations.
Figure 2.

Morphological comparison of Cambrian and Ordovician selkirkiid scalidophorans. (a) Selkirkia tsering sp. nov. (holotype MCZ-IP-201003) from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale with well-preserved annulated tube, gut tract, and outstretched introvert. (b) Interpretative diagram of MCZ-IP-201003. (c) Selkirkia columbia (ROMIP 63195) from the mid-Cambrian Burgess Shale with well-preserved annulated tube, gut tract and outstretched introvert. (d) Selkirkia tsering sp. nov. (MCZ-IP-201005) from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Shale with retracted the introvert. (e) Interpretative diagram of MCZ-IP-201005. (f) Close-up of pharyngeal teeth-like impressions in MCZ-IP-201005. (g) Close up of well-preserved tube annulations in MCZ-IP-201005. (h) Close up of the tube annulations in Selkirkia transita from the early Cambrian Chengjiang (ELI-0000604). g, gut; int, introvert; ph, pharynx.
(vi) . Remarks
Selkirkia tsering bears the greatest resemblance to the Chengjiang S. transita in terms of overall tube size and annulation density [4]. However, the tube of the Fezouata Shale species differs from S. transita and other selkirkiids in having a lower opening angle that tapers posteriorly more gently, conveying an almost parallel-sided appearance. Selkirkia tsering also shows a more consistent ornamentation pattern consisting of six annulations per millimetre measured at the mid-length of the tube (figure 2g), whereas there is some variability in other taxa (see [4]). Although the information on the introvert structure in S. tsering is not well preserved which hampers detailed morphological comparisons with S. transita, we consider that the status of the former as a new and distinct species could be partly justified given the considerable age gap (ca 40 million years) and palaeobiogeographic distance (low versus high palaeolatitudes) between the Chengjiang and Fezouata Shale biotas. Selkirkia tsering is morphologically distinguished from S. sinica (Chengjiang and Xiaoshiba in South China) by its larger average size (S. sinica tube size between 8 to 19 mm) and lower annulation density (8 to 14 annulations/mm in S. sinica) [4,18]. We also distinguish S. tsering from S. columbia (Burgess Shale, Wheeler) by its smaller average size (S. columbia tube size between 20 to 50 mm) and lower annulation density (40 annulations/mm in S. columbia) [4,29]. Comparisons with other Selkirkia species are more challenging due to poor preservation of the tube ornamentation, but S. tsering is larger than S. willoughbyi (16 mm average length) from the Marjum and Wheeler Formations in Utah [7,30], but smaller than S. spencei (at least 73 mm length) from the Spence Shale [7]. Comparisons with other putative Selkirkia from Laurentia are not possible as they consist of broken isolated tubes without clearly preserved ornamentation (electronic supplementary material, table S1).
We can confidently rule out alternative phylogenetic affinities for S. tsering through comparisons with cone-shaped taxa from the Fezouata Shale and other Lower Palaeozoic deposits. The new material is readily distinguished from Fezouata Shale hyoliths with soft tissues [31] based on the more elongate shape of the tube in S. tsering, presence of an introvert and straight gut tract. Furthermore, our material lacks evidence of an operculum or helens, despite its good preservation quality. Similar arguments apply to cnidarians that are relatively common in the Fezouata Shale Formation, such as Sphenothallus and conulariids [32]. Sphenothallus has a stronger tapering profile, a curved median axis and outline, as well as lateral tube wall reinforcements, all of which are missing in S. tsering. Likewise, Fezouata conulariids have a much higher width to length ratio, higher opening angle, and feature axial longitudinal keel-like structures that are not observed in any of the specimens of S. tsering (figure 1). Similar arguments apply to comparisons with other Lower Palaeozoic cnidarians that have a tube-like habitus and transverse ornamentations, such as Cambrian and Ordovician species of Byronia [33,34] or the recently redescribed Gangtoucunia from the Stage 4 Guanshan biota in South China [35]. Despite the presence of transverse annulations, the growth pattern of these cnidarians does not consistently produce a tube with a straight median axis, but instead results in a gently curving or meandering overall morphology. Coupled with the preservation of a straight gut tract, introvert and possibly pharyngeal teeth in the studied material of S. tsering (figure 2), we consider that an alternative phylogenetic hypothesis as a cnidarian is unlikely.
3. Discussion
(a) . Selkirkiid fossil record and spatio-temporal distribution
The discovery of Selkirkia tsering from the Fezouata Shale carries several implications for early scalidophoran evolution. Scalidophorans are known from several early to mid-Cambrian sites with exceptional preservation with a circum-equatorial distribution in Laurentia and South China (figure 3; electronic supplementary material, table S1), represented by soft-bodied macrofossils [4,7,30] and either phosphatized [10,11] or carbonaceous microfossils [6,12]. Selkirkia tsering is the only selkirkiid reported from a post-Cambrian deposit to date, expanding the macroscopic stratigraphic range of the genus by approximately 25 million years, and represents the first record of these organisms from the high latitudes of Gondwana (figure 3; electronic supplementary material, table S1), similarly to other typically Cambrian organisms recovered from the Fezouata Shale [24,25]. Thus, Selkirkia had a significantly more widespread geographical distribution overall in the context of its entire evolutionary history, implying substantial dispersal capabilities greater than those suggested by Cambrian sites of exceptional preservation alone, all of which are restricted to low palaeolatitudes. However, the paucity of additional occurrences does not allow us to conclusively determine whether Selkirkia was also distributed in high palaeolatitudes during the Cambrian, or if this pattern is exclusive to younger Ordovician deposits. New discoveries of scalidophoran macrofossils from post-Cambrian marine sites of exceptional preservation, such as those from the Ordovician of Morocco [21,22], China [36–38], Wales [23,39,40], Czech Republic [41], and North America [42] are needed to answer this question. The fact that no other selkirkiids have been discovered from these multitude of Ordovician sites with soft tissue preservation worldwide, despite their durable tube construction, suggests that the polar distribution of S. tsering might be legitimate rather than a preservation artefact. We hypothesize that selkirkiids might have shrunk their Cambrian low latitude worldwide distribution into a single high latitude Ordovician refuge as a consequence of the increased ecological pressure during the initial series of Early Ordovician radiations preceding the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event [43,44]. Palaeoscolecids appear to have been much less affected by comparison based on their much broader palaeobiogeographic distribution during the Ordovician including Gondwana [21,22,41], Laurentia [42], South China [36–38] and Avalonia [23,39,40], which suggests a degree of ecological selectivity in the survival of Early Palaeozoic scalidophorans. It is also possible that the evolutionary trade-off of living in a protective tube but at the cost of greatly reduced motility [4] was a compounding factor for the highly restricted distribution of Ordovician selkirkiids, and possibly even the demise of this mode of life for macroscopic scalidophorans among modern representatives.
Figure 3.

Spatio-temporal distribution of selkirkiid scalidophorans. SCF, small carbonaceous fossils. See electronic supplementary material, table S1 for detailed biostratigraphic occurrence data.
(b) . Ecological implications
Our results highlight the marked rarity of scalidophorans in the Fezouata Shale biota. Both the palaeoscolecid Palaeoscolex? tenensis [21] and Selkirkia tsering have been recovered from the late Tremadocian Araneograptus murrayi biozone [26], and thus appear to be highly localized in terms of their biostratigraphic distribution within the Fezouata Shale Formation. Given the fossilization potential of both selkirkiid tubes and palaeoscolecid phosphatized sclerites coupled with the good representation of diverse ecological modes of life in the Fezouata Shale biota [45], we regard the paucity of infaunal scalidophorans as an authentic biological signal. Although some degree of taphonomic bias cannot be completely ruled out, we consider that a combination of the recalcitrant nature of selkirkiid tubes and palaeoscolecid sclerites and the availability and examination of thousands of fossils from the Fezouata Shale (from the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at MCZ and YPM) support the interpretation that their rarity is legitimate rather than solely an artefact of preservation. The low scalidophoran species diversity of the Fezouata Shale biota is a stark contrast with the higher biodiversity and abundance of these organisms in Cambrian BST deposits in Laurentia and South China, which in addition to several palaeoscolecid and selkirkiid species also includes diverse archeopriapulids such as Ottoia [5–9,46]. The rarity of infaunal scalidophorans in the Fezouata Shale likely reflects a combination of its shallower depositional environment and some degree of decay prior to final burial that typifies this exceptional site [45]. Critically, the fact that the distribution of exceptionally well-preserved fossils in the Fezouata Shale is partly controlled by tempestites (i.e. storm deposits) [47], likely negatively impacted the ability of infaunal scalidophorans to settle and proliferate more broadly within this marine deposit located below storm-wave base.
A possible counterpoint to this ecological interpretation is the fact that, unlike the strictly open marine conditions that typify Cambrian BST sites that have yielded infaunal scalidophorans [1–7,9,18,20,28–30], the Ordovician Period boasts several biotas with exceptional preservation that reflect a broader range of marine depositional environments. Examples include the near shore coarse sandstones of the Llandegley Rocks [48], cases of lagoonal or embayment deposits such as Winneshiek [49] and the Soom Shale [50], the deep-water mudstones of Beecher's Bed [51] and Llanfallteg [40], or the distal ramp carbonates of the Walcott-Rust Quarry [52]. It is conceivable that selkirkiids and other scalidophorans might have also inhabited at least some of these environments, but that the peculiarities of these deposits would not record the presence of these organisms relative to the more favourable conditions for their fossilization during the Cambrian. Alternatively, this observation might point to the fact that Early Palaeozoic scalidophorans preferentially inhabited open marine conditions at variable depths (e.g. storm-wave base to deep marine), and that the occurrence of extant scalidophorans in shallower and marginal environments today represents a more recent event in their evolutionary history [53].
(c) . Tubicolous scalidophoran evolution
Selkirkia tsering demonstrates that the construction of the secreted tube in this tubicolous scalidophoran underwent negligible macroevolutionary change over its 40-million-year history considering its first appearance in the Stage 3 Chengjiang biota (ca 518 million years ago; [4]) and its extension into the late Tremadocian (ca 475 million years ago) (figure 3). Selkirkia joins the roster of ‘Cambrian survivors’ that persisted into the Ordovician as informed by the Fezouata Shale biota [24,25] and other sites around the world [21,22,36–42] (e.g. radiodonts, artiopods, lobopodians), and demonstrates the ecological success and stability of the tubicolous mode of life for scalidophorans during the Early Palaeozoic. By contrast, tube-dwelling is comparatively much rarer in extant priapulids, being only known in the genus Maccabeus, which contains only two described species [16,17,54]. The ecological similarities between Selkirkia and Maccabeus are only superficial, however, as these taxa differ in several key aspects that affect their mode of life. First, the tube of Selkirkia was entirely secreted by the animal during growth, and likely entirely replaced during ecdysis [4], whereas the tube of Maccabeus consists of agglutinated plant debris from the environment that is encased in a longitudinal pattern thanks to secretions of the glandular spines [16,17]. Second, whereas there is interspecific and ontogenetic variation in size in Selkirkia species ranging from 3 to 75 mm in body length, Maccabeus is diminutive with an adult body length below 3 mm. These differences in body size would directly impact their mode of life, as Selkirkia would be capable of carnivory and/or scavenging of larger food items as evidenced by the presence of gut pellets in Cambrian specimens [4,18], whereas Maccabeus is restricted to a specialized type of ‘trap-feeding’ of meiofaunal or microscopic organisms. Finally, Selkirkia bore differentiated circlets of pharyngeal teeth and scalids on the introvert [6], whereas the mouthparts of Maccabeus consist of sets of elongate oral spines involved in the trap-feeding strategy [16]. Taken together, although both the Cambro-Ordovician Selkirkia and extant Maccabeus broadly represent cases of tube-dwelling scalidophorans, the precise adaptations to this mode of life differ substantially between these taxa. Although some extant scalidophorans bear a cuticular lorica composed of several articulating sheets that have a protective role similar to that of the tube in Selkirkia [12,16,17], this adaptation is also only expressed in small meiofaunal organisms (loriciferans) or during the early larval stages of otherwise macroscopic organisms (priapulids). Thus, Selkirkia demonstrates that macroscopic tube building was an effective strategy during the Cambrian that appears to have become much more palaeobiogeographically restricted during the Ordovician based on the available fossil data from the Fezouata Shale and the growing number of Ordovician sites with soft tissue preservation around the world [21,22,36–42]. While the protection conveyed by tube-dwelling likely facilitated the Cambrian diversity and worldwide distribution of selkirkiids (figure 3; electronic supplementary material, table S1), the downside caused by the loss of motility might have negatively affected their evolutionary and ecological success during the Ordovician, particularly when compared with palaeoscolecids with a vagrant mode of life. By contrast, tube dwelling in extant scalidophorans represents a highly restricted, and most likely convergent, strategy that is only known from meiofaunal Maccabeus species, and which are only found in the Mediterranean Sea and the Indian Ocean [16,54].
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the key role of Mohamed ‘Ou Said’ Ben Moula and the Ben Moula Family in the discovery, collection and characterization of the studied fossil material and their contributions towards facilitating access the scientific study of the Fezouata Shale biota of Morocco. Thanks to Allison Daley (University of Lausanne), Peter Van Roy (Ghent University) and Stephen Pates (University of Cambridge) for their assistance recording field data. Thanks to MCZ Invertebrate Paleontology staff Jessica Cundiff, and Mark Renczkowski for their help facilitating curation of the collections, Cyrus Green for manual preparation of fossil specimens, and Jared C. Richards for help with the identification and cataloguing fossil specimens. Thanks to YPM Invertebrate Paleontology staff Jessica Utrup for facilitating access to fossil specimens for their study at Yale University. Thanks to Jean-Bernard Caron (University of Toronto and Royal Ontario Museum) for sharing photographs of Selkirkia columbia, and Deng Wang (Northwest University) for sharing photographs of Selkirkia transita. Thanks to Jean Vannier, Thomas Farrell, Jakob Vinther and an anonymous reviewer for their commentary that helped us improve this manuscript.
Ethics
The specimens are part of a larger collection produced by Mohammed ‘Ou Said’ Ben Moula from the Draa Valley in the Zagora region of Morocco, purchased in 2019 from Lahcen Ben Moula (address in Morocco: Ksar Taichouta, Alnif, Tinghuir), and exported by Brahim Tahiri (108 Cite Essalem, Erfoud, Morocco) with the approval of the Ministry of Mines in Rabat (invoice no. 92/E/21).
Data accessibility
All studied and figured material is deposited and publicly accessible at the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University (MCZ.IP, Cambridge, USA), and the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University (YPM.IP, New Haven, USA).
Supplementary material is available online [55].
Declaration of AI use
We have not used AI-assisted technologies in creating this article.
Authors' contributions
K.N.: conceptualization, investigation, writing—original draft; J.O.-H.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.
All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.
Conflict of interest declaration
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
This work is funded by NSF CAREER award (grant no. 2047192) ‘Ecological turnover at the dawn of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event—quantifying the Cambro-Ordovician transition through the lens of exceptional preservation’.
References
- 1.Nanglu K, Caron JB, Gaines RR. 2020. The Burgess Shale paleocommunity with new insights from Marble Canyon, British Columbia. Paleobiology 46, 58-81. ( 10.1017/pab.2019.42) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Nanglu K, Caron JB, Conway Morris S, Cameron CB. 2016. Cambrian suspension-feeding tubicolous hemichordates. BMC Biol. 14, 1-9. ( 10.1186/s12915-016-0271-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nanglu K, Caron JB. 2021. Symbiosis in the Cambrian: enteropneust tubes from the Burgess Shale co-inhabited by commensal polychaetes. Proc. R. Soc. B 288, 20210061. ( 10.1098/rspb.2021.0061) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang D, Vannier J, Aria C, Sun J, Han J. 2021. Tube-dwelling in early animals exemplified by Cambrian scalidophoran worms. BMC Biol. 19, 1-20. ( 10.1186/s12915-020-00927-9) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dornbos SQ, Chen JY. 2008. Community palaeoecology of the early Cambrian Maotianshan Shale biota: ecological dominance of priapulid worms. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 258, 200-212. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.05.022) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Smith MR, Harvey TH, Butterfield NJ. 2015. The macro-and microfossil record of the Cambrian priapulid Ottoia. Palaeontology 58, 705-721. ( 10.1111/pala.12168) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Conway Morris S, Robison RA. 1986. Middle Cambrian priapulids and other soft-bodied fossils from Utah and Spain. Paleontol. Contrib. 117, 1-22. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Huang D, Vannier J, Chen J. 2004. Recent Priapulidae and their Early Cambrian ancestors: comparisons and evolutionary significance. Geobios 37, 217-228. ( 10.1016/j.geobios.2003.04.004) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leibach W, Lerosey-Aubril R, Whitaker A, Schiffbauer J, Kimmig J. 2021. First palaeoscolecid from the Cambrian (Miaolingian, Drumian) Marjum formation of western Utah. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 66, 663-678. ( 10.4202/app.00875.2021) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang H, Xiao S, Liu Y, Yuan X, Wan B, Muscente AD, Shao T, Gong H, Cao G. 2015. Armored kinorhynch-like scalidophoran animals from the early Cambrian. Sci. Rep. 5, 16521. ( 10.1038/srep16521) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dong XP, et al. 2010. The anatomy, taphonomy, taxonomy and systematic affinity of Markuelia: Early Cambrian to Early Ordovician scalidophorans. Palaeontology 53, 1291-1314. ( 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2010.01006.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Harvey TH, Butterfield NJ. 2017. Exceptionally preserved Cambrian loriciferans and the early animal invasion of the meiobenthos. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0022. ( 10.1038/s41559-016-0022) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Liu Y, Xiao S, Shao T, Broce J, Zhang H. 2014. The oldest known priapulid-like scalidophoran animal and its implications for the early evolution of cycloneuralians and ecdysozoans. Evol. Dev. 16, 155-165. ( 10.1111/ede.12076) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Wills MA. 1998. Cambrian and recent disparity: the picture from priapulids. Paleobiology 24, 177-199. ( 10.1666/0094-8373(1998)024[0177:CARDTP]2.3.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wills MA, Gerber S, Ruta M, Hughes M. 2012. The disparity of priapulid, archaeopriapulid and palaeoscolecid worms in the light of new data. J. Evol. Biol. 25, 2056-2076. ( 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02586.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Por FD, Bromley HJ. 1974. Morphology and anatomy of Maccabeus tentaculatus (Priapulida: Seticoronaria). J. Zool. 173, 173-197. ( 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1974.tb03125.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Por FD. 1983. Class Seticoronaria and phylogeny of the phylum Priapulida. Zool. Scripta 12, 267-272. ( 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1983.tb00510.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tian L, Jie Y, Jin-Bo H, Xi-Guang Z. 2015. The feeding behaviour of the Cambrian tubiculous priapulid Selkirkia. Lethaia 48, 125-132. ( 10.1111/let.12093) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Conway Morris S, Robison RA. 1988. More soft-bodied animals and algae from the Middle Cambrian of Utah and British Columbia. Paleontol. Contrib. 122, 1-48. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Peel JS, Willman S. 2018. The Buen Formation (Cambrian Series 2) biota of North Greenland. Papers Palaeontol. 4, 381-432. ( 10.1002/spp2.1112) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Martin EL, Lerosey-Aubril R, Vannier J. 2016. Palaeoscolecid worms from the Lower Ordovician Fezouata Lagerstätte, Morocco: palaeoecological and palaeogeographical implications. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 130-141. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.009) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.García-Bellido DC, Gutiérrez-Marco JC. 2022. Polar gigantism and remarkable taxonomic longevity in new palaeoscolecid worms from the Late Ordovician Tafilalt Lagerstätte of Morocco. Hist. Biol. 35, 1-11. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Botting JP, Muir LA, Pates S, McCobb LM, Wallet E, Willman S, Zhang Y, Ma J. 2023. A Middle Ordovician Burgess Shale-type fauna from Castle Bank, Wales (UK). Nat. Ecol. Evol. 7, 666-674. ( 10.1038/s41559-023-02038-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Van Roy P, Briggs DE, Gaines RR. 2015. The Fezouata fossils of Morocco; an extraordinary record of marine life in the Early Ordovician. J. Geol. Soc. 172, 541-549. ( 10.1144/jgs2015-017) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Van Roy P, Orr PJ, Botting JP, Muir LA, Vinther J, Lefebvre B, Hariri KE, Briggs DE. 2010. Ordovician faunas of Burgess Shale type. Nature 465, 215-218. ( 10.1038/nature09038) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gutiérrez-Marco JC, Martin EL. 2016. Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of Lower Ordovician graptolites from the Fezouata Shale (Moroccan Anti-Atlas). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 35-49. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.07.026) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vannier J. 2012. Gut contents as direct indicators for trophic relationships in the Cambrian marine ecosystem. PloS One 7, e52200. ( 10.1371/journal.pone.0052200) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Yang XY, Vannier J, Yang J, Wang D, Zhang XG. 2021. Priapulid worms from the Cambrian of China shed light on reproduction in early animals. Geosci. Front. 12, 101234. ( 10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101234) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Conway Morris S. 1977. Fossil priapulid worms. Special Pap. Palaeontol. 20, 1-95. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Foster JR, Sroka SD, Howells TF, Cothren HR, Dehler CM, Hagadorn JW. 2022. New Cambrian vermiform organisms from Burgess Shale-type deposits of the western United States. Bull. Geosci. 97, 269-288. ( 10.3140/bull.geosci.1858) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mus MM. 2016. A hyolithid with preserved soft parts from the Ordovician Fezouata Konservat-Lagerstätte of Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 122-129. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.04.048) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Van Iten H, Muir L, Simões MG, Leme JM, Marques AC, Yoder N. 2016. Palaeobiogeography, palaeoecology and evolution of Lower Ordovician conulariids and Sphenothallus (Medusozoa, Cnidaria), with emphasis on the Fezouata Shale of southeastern Morocco. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 170-178. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.03.008) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhu MY, Van Iten H, Cox RS, Zhao YL, Erdtmann BD. 2000. Occurrence of Byronia Matthew and Sphenothallus Hall in the Lower Cambrian of China. PalZ 74, 227-238. ( 10.1007/BF02988098) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Vinn O, Kirsimäe K, Parry LA, Toom U. 2016. A new Byronia species from the Late Ordovician of Estonia. Estonian J. Earth Sci. 65, 201. ( 10.3176/earth.2016.01) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang G, Parry LA, Vinther J, Ma X. 2022. Exceptional soft tissue preservation reveals a cnidarian affinity for a Cambrian phosphatic tubicolous enigma. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20221623. ( 10.1098/rspb.2022.1623) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wang W, Muir LA, Botting JP, Feng H, Servais T, Li L. 2014. A Tremadocian (Early Ordovician) palaeoscolecidan worm from graptolitic shales in Hunan Province, South China. Palaeontology 57, 657-671. ( 10.1111/pala.12083) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Muir LA, Ng TW, Li XF, Zhang YD, Lin JP. 2014. Palaeoscolecidan worms and a possible nematode from the Early Ordovician of South China. Palaeoworld 23, 15-24. ( 10.1016/j.palwor.2013.06.003) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Fang X, et al. 2022. The Liexi fauna: a new Lagerstätte from the Lower Ordovician of South China. Proc. R. Soc. B 289, 20221027. ( 10.1098/rspb.2022.1027) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Botting JP, Muir LA, Van Roy P, Bates D, Upton C. 2012. Diverse middle Ordovician palaeoscolecidan worms from the Builth-Llandrindod Inlier of central Wales. Palaeontology 55, 501-528. ( 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01135.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hearing TW, Legg DA, Botting JP, Muir LA, McDermott P, Faulkner S, Taylor AC, Brasier MD. 2016. Survival of Burgess Shale-type animals in a Middle Ordovician deep-water setting. J. Geol. Soc. 173, 628-633. ( 10.1144/jgs2015-131) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Kraft P, Mergl M. 1989. Worm-like fossils (Paleoscolecida; ?Chaetognatha) from the Lower Ordovician of Bohemia. Sborník geologickćh věd. Paleontologie 30, 9-36. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Lehnert O, Kraft P. 2006. Manitouscolex, a new palaeoscolecidan genus from the Lower Ordovician of Colorado. J. Paleontol. 80, 386-391. ( 10.1666/0022-3360(2006)080[0386:MANPGF]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Servais T, Owen AW, Harper DA, Kröger B, Munnecke A. 2010. The Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event (GOBE): the palaeoecological dimension. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 294, 99-119. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2010.05.031) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Stigall AL, Freeman RL, Edwards CT, Rasmussen CM. 2020. A multidisciplinary perspective on the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event and the development of the early Paleozoic world. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 543, 109521. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2019.109521) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Saleh F, et al. 2021. A novel tool to untangle the ecology and fossil preservation knot in exceptionally preserved biotas. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 569, 117061. ( 10.1016/j.epsl.2021.117061) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ma X, Hou X, Baines D. 2010. Phylogeny and evolutionary significance of vermiform animals from the Early Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte. Sci. China Earth Sci. 53, 1774-1783. ( 10.1007/s11430-010-4084-y) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Vaucher R, Martin EL, Hormière H, Pittet B. 2016. A genetic link between Konzentrat- and Konservat-Lagerstätten in the Fezouata Shale (Lower Ordovician, Morocco). Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 460, 24-34. ( 10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.05.020) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Botting JP. 2005. Exceptionally well-preserved Middle Ordovician sponges from the Llandegley Rocks Lagerstätte, Wales. Palaeontology 48, 577-617. ( 10.1111/j.1475-4983.2005.00470.x) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Briggs DE, Liu HP, McKay RM, Witzke BJ. 2018. The Winneshiek biota: exceptionally well-preserved fossils in a Middle Ordovician impact crater. J. Geol. Soc. 175, 865-874. ( 10.1144/jgs2018-101) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gabbott SE, Browning C, Theron JN, Whittle RJ. 2017. The late Ordovician Soom Shale Lagerstätte: an extraordinary post-glacial fossil and sedimentary record. J. Geol. Soc. 174, 1-9. ( 10.1144/jgs2016-076) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Farrell UC, Martin MJ, Hagadorn JW, Whiteley T, Briggs DE. 2009. Beyond Beecher's Trilobite Bed: widespread pyritization of soft tissues in the Late Ordovician Taconic foreland basin. Geology 37, 907-910. ( 10.1130/G30177A.1) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Losso SR, Thines JE, Ortega-Hernández J. 2023. Taphonomy of non-biomineralized trilobite tissues preserved as calcite casts from the Ordovician Walcott-Rust Quarry, USA . Commun. Earth Environ. 4, 330. ( 10.1038/s43247-023-00981-5) [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Van der Land J. 1970. Systematics, zoogeography, and ecology of the Priapulida. Zoologische Verhandelingen 112, 1-118. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Malakhov VV. 1979. A new representative of sedentary priapulid Chaetostephanus cirratus sp. n. Zool. Zhurnal 58, 1410-1412. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Nanglu K, Ortega-Hernández J. 2024. Post-Cambrian survival of the tubicolous scalidophoran Selkirkia. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7130009) [DOI] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
Data Availability Statement
All studied and figured material is deposited and publicly accessible at the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University (MCZ.IP, Cambridge, USA), and the Invertebrate Paleontology collections at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University (YPM.IP, New Haven, USA).
Supplementary material is available online [55].
