Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Mar 26;14:7145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-57783-8

Publisher Correction: The impact of toxic trolling comments on anti-vaccine YouTube videos

Kunihiro Miyazaki 1,, Takayuki Uchiba 2, Haewoon Kwak 1, Jisun An 1, Kazutoshi Sasahara 3,
PMCID: PMC10966010  PMID: 38531997

Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-024-54925-w, published online 01 March 2024

In the original version of the Article, Figure 4 was a duplication of Figure 3. The original Figures 3 and 4 and accompanying legends appear below.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Measuring the association of toxicity of early comments with the fear in later comments. (a) Illustration of the problem setting. N comments in chronological order for a given video are divided into early and later halves, separated by k. Then, the average fear of comments in the comment range is predicted by the variables noted in Model 4 and Model 5, respectively, and the coefficients are obtained. (b) Forest plots showing the coefficients of average toxicity of comments and highly liked comments across window size k={10,20,30,40,50}. Both are positive regardless of k, but only the mean toxicity of highly liked comments is largely significant. The average toxicity of highly liked comments has a high coefficient compared to the average toxicity of all comments (1.3 times higher in the average value in the five windows).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Measuring the association of the fear of early comments with the toxicity in later comments. (a) Illustration of the problem set. N comments in chronological order for a given video are divided into early and later halves, separated by k. Then, the mean fear in comments in the comment range is inferred by the variables noted in Model 6 and Model 7, respectively, and the coefficients are obtained. (b) Forest plots showing the coefficients of the fear in comments and the fear in highly liked comments, for k={10,20,30,40,50}. Only the coefficients for fear in highly liked comments are largely significant (3 out of 5 cases).

The original Article has been corrected.

Contributor Information

Kunihiro Miyazaki, Email: kunihirom@acm.org.

Kazutoshi Sasahara, Email: sasahara.k.aa@m.titech.ac.jp.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES