Abstract
Biological parts (BioParts) are modular and standardized DNA sequences that encode biological functions and contribute to the efficient biological engineering of complex systems. Here, we characterize a short BioPart (P flp-17 , 300 bp) for bright multicopy and single-copy BAG-specific expression starting from the gastrula stage in hermaphrodite and male C. elegans . We have generated standardized P flp-17 cloning vectors for BAG-specific gfp and mScarlet expression compatible with extra-chromosomal arrays and for single-copy transgene insertion. The short P flp-17 promoter is easy to generate by gene synthesis and has been incorporated into our online transgene design tool (www.wormbuilder.org/transgenebuilder ) .
Figure 1. Expression and Characterization of P flp-17 in BAG Neurons of C. elegans .
A . In hermaphrodites (top panel) and males (bottom panel) a P flp-17 :: mScarlet transgene is expressed exclusively in BAG neurons (20x magnification, scale bars = 100 µm). B . Single-copy P flp-17 :: mScarlet expression in a hermaphrodite (20x magnification, scale bar = 20 µm). C . flp-17 promoter characteristics. CenGEN data from https://cengen.shinyapps.io/CengenApp/ and https://cengen.textpressolab.com/. D . Schematic of standard mScarlet and gfp vectors for BAG-specific expression and identification. Bsa I restriction sites allow exchanging the fluorescent reporter for a gene of interest by Golden Gate Assembly; Apa I (N-terminal) and Sma I (C-terminal) allow fluorophore fusions. The vectors are compatible with single-copy insertions (MosTI) and expression from extra-chromosomal arrays. E . Illustration of the transgenebuilder workflow. The short 300 bp P flp-17 was added as a standard promoter in our online tool for optimizing transgene design and gene synthesis (www.wormbuilder.org/transgenebuilder).
Description
Biological parts (BioParts), such as promoters, 3' UTRs, and protein-coding sequences, refer to DNA sequences that encode well-defined biological functions. Compatible, well-characterized BioParts can benefit the engineering of biological systems by enhancing reliability and reproducibility across laboratories (Shetty et al., 2008) . In E. coli and S. cerevisiae , substantial effort has been put into developing standardized biological parts and toolkits (Malcı et al., 2022; Moore et al., 2016). In C. elegans , the Fire lab vector kits are an early example of the benefits derived from the wide adoption of standardized reagents, and latter examples include comprehensive genome-wide BioPart collections, such as the promoterome (Dupuy et al., 2004) , the ORFeome (Lamesch et al., 2004) , the 3' UTRome (Steber et al., 2019) , and the bacterial RNAi library (Kamath et al., 2003) , which collectively serve as standard reagent platforms and toolkits for the community.
A collection of BioParts encoding promoters that are specific to individual classes of neurons is potentially useful for understanding and controlling the relatively simple C. elegans neuronal network consisting of 302 neurons belonging to 118 distinct neuronal classes (White et al., 1986) . For example, neuron-specific expression enables optogenetic recording and manipulation of cellular activity (Suzuki et al., 2003) and genetic screens to identify factors required for neuronal specification (Hobert, 2021) . Many studies have identified individual neuron-specific promoters (e.g., Inada et al., 2006; Sengupta et al., 1996; Yu et al., 1997), and there have been several large-scale efforts to comprehensively identify promoters expressed in single neurons (e.g., Dupuy et al., 2004; Hunt-Newbury et al., 2007). Furthermore, single-cell RNA expression data makes it increasingly feasible to test the expression of promoters from putative cell-specific transcripts (Lorenzo et al., 2020; Nava et al., 2023; Taylor et al., 2021) . We have recently begun an effort to characterize and generate standardized reagents for neuron-specific expression, with a particular emphasis on identifying short promoters that are amenable to gene synthesis (AlHarbi & Frøkjær-Jensen, 2023). The C. elegans genome is relatively compact (Cutter et al., 2009) , and several cell-specific neuronal promoter elements are located within the 300 bp of the start codon (e.g., Etchberger et al., 2007; Froehlich & Rajewsky, 2023; Stefanakis et al., 2015; Wenick & Hobert, 2004), suggesting that it may be possible to identify a comprehensive collection of compact promoters. Here, we describe a short promoter for specific expression in BAG neurons, which are involved in sensing oxygen (Zimmer et al., 2009) and carbon dioxide (Bretscher et al., 2011) .
To characterize a 300 bp shortened BAG-specific promoter (Brandt et al., 2012) , P flp-17 , we generated a fluorescent reporter construct (P flp-17 ::mScarlet:: tbb-2 3'UTR ) by gene synthesis. As part of the standardization, we removed Apa I, Sma I, and Bsa I restriction sites to generate standardized reagents, added a standard start sequence ("aaaaATG"), and removed homopolymer runs, which interfere with gene synthesis. To determine expression, we generated transgenic animals with extrachromosomal arrays that carry many copies of the mScarlet reporter construct. We also included a piRNA interference (piRNAi) fragment targeting him-5 (Priyadarshini et al., 2022) to induce males in transgenic animals. We imaged hermaphrodite and male transgenic worms and observed fluorescence starting at the gastrula stage with highly specific red fluorescence in two bilaterally symmetric neurons at the L4 stage that are consistent with the position and morphology of BAG neurons ( Figure 1A ). Expression was also readily visible from a single-copy transgene inserted by modular safe-harbor transgene insertion (MosTI) (El Mouridi et al., 2022) ( Figure 1B ), demonstrating that the short P flp -17 is relatively strong. We have developed a semi-quantitative visual score for expression strength (AlHarbi & Frøkjær-Jensen, 2023) (see methods), and the multicopy arrays scored 5 out of 6, and the single-copy insertion also scored 5 out of 6. The characteristics of the flp-17 promoter are summarized in Figure 1C .
To enable easy use of the P flp-17 BioPart we have generated standardized expression vectors containing red ( mScarlet , pJRM3) and green ( gfp , pJRM4) fluorophores in a plasmid backbone that is compatible with single-copy insertion and multi-copy extra-chromosomal arrays ( Figure 1D ). The plasmids include restriction sites for N-terminal ( Apa I) and C-terminal ( Sma I) transgene fusions, sites for fluorophore exchange ( Bsa I), and a 5' decoy sequence to diminish misexpression (A. Fire, Fire lab kit). The plasmid design is identical to vectors for PVQ-specific expression (AlHarbi & Frøkjær-Jensen, 2023), and the plasmids are available from Addgene. Finally, the short P flp-17 promoter is amenable to gene synthesis, and we have included the promoter in an online transgene design app (www.wormbuilder.org/transgenebuilder) ( Figure 1E ).
In conclusion, our ongoing efforts aim to develop a comprehensive collection of promoter BioParts for neuron-specific transgene expression. These design principles and reagents represent the initial steps towards establishing such a system. We aim to generate and characterize a complete collection of neuron-specific BioParts to advance our understanding of the nervous system and potentially encode novel circuits.
Methods
Molecular biology
We generated non-clonal synthetic transgenes by gene synthesis (Twist Bioscience, CA, USA) and clonal plasmids by Golden-Gate cloning (Engler et al., 2008) using Esp 3I (New England Biolabs). We validated clonal plasmids by restriction digest. We shortened the flp-17 promoter tested by Lorenzo et al., (2020) to 300 base pairs and removed Bsa I, Esp 3I, Apa I, Sma I, and Eco RV, as well as homopolymer runs. We changed the last four basepairs of the promoter to the consensus start site (aaaaATG).
Promoter strength quantification and expression onset determination
We quantified the fluorescence intensity of mScarlet reporter constructs using a scheme first described by Alharbi and Frøkjær-Jensen (2023). Transgenic animals with stable extra-chromosomal arrays under a dissection stereo microscope (ZEISS, Olympus SZX2-FOF) or an upright compound microscope (LEICA DM2500 LED), objectives 1x and 10x using an mTomato filter set and an LED light (X-Cite XYLIS, XT720L) with 40x oil immersion objective, a Rhodamine filter set (LEICA 11504205), and a mercury metal halide bulb (LEICA EL6000). We quantified fluorescence intensity visually in ten L4 animals at different magnifications. We performed the quantification by eye and scored on a scale from 1 to 6, with 1 being the dimmest and 6 being the brightest. We used the following scoring criteria. Dissection microscope . Score = 6: fluorescence visible with 1x objective and zoom = 1 (lowest). Score = 5: fluorescence visible with 1x objective and zoom = 8 (highest). Score = 4: fluorescence visible with 10x objective and zoom = 1. Score = 3: fluorescence visible with 10x objective and zoom = 8. Compound microscope . Score = 2: fluorescence visible with 20x air objective. Score = 1: fluorescence visible with 40x oil immersion objective. Score = 0: fluorescence not visible at 40x oil immersion objective. We screened 15 embryos from transgenic animals at various stages (gastrula, comma, 1.5-fold, 2-fold, and 3-fold) on NGM plates for the first visible expression.
Microscopy We anesthetized transgenic animals on 2% agarose pads with a 50 mM sodium-azide M9 solution. Extra-chromosomal array animals were imaged with a Leica THUNDER Imaging System, equipped with a 20× oil immersion objective, and captured four image stacks—two for hermaphrodites and two for males. The images show a maximum intensity projection generated with the Leica LAS X software. Animals with single-copy insertions were imaged on a LEICA DM2500 LED using a 42x oil immersion objective.
Transgenic animals
To generate extrachromosomal arrays animals, we injected the injection mix composed of 10 ng·µL -1 non-clonal P flp-17 ::mScarlet:: tbb-2 3' UTR dsDNA fragment, 10 ng·µL -1 pCFJ108 ( unc-119 rescue, linearized by Apa LI), 10 ng·µL -1 pCFJ782 (HygroR, linearized by Eco RV), 10 ng·µL -1 pMNK54 (piRNAi him-5 , linearized by Apa LI), and 60 ng·µL -1 GeneRuler 1 kb plus DNA ladder (ThermoFisher SM1331) for a final concentration of 100 ng·µL -1 , into CFJ42 animals (MosTI II, unc-119 ( ed3 ) III). We kept injected animals at 25℃ and added hygromycin to the plates on day 3. We identified transgenic animals with extrachromosomal arrays based on unc-119 rescue and antibiotic resistance.
Single-copy transgenes with pJRM3 (P flp-17 :: mScarlet :: tbb-2 3' UTR) were inserted by MosTI into a landing site on Chr II ( CFJ42 , ttTi5605 site) following standard protocols (El Mouridi et al., 2022) . The injection mix was comprised of 20 ng·µL -1 pJRM3 (P flp-17 :: mScarlet ) MosTI targeting vector, 15 ng·µL -1 pSEM318 (MosTI sgRNA, linearized by Nde I), 10 ng·µL -1 pSEM231 (P mlc-1 :: gfp , co-injection marker, linearized by Nde I) (El Mouridi et al., 2020) , 15 ng·µL -1 pCFJ782 (hygromycin resistance, linearized by Eco RI) (Radman et al., 2013) , 25 ng·µL -1 pMDJ231 (heat-shock Cas9, linearized by Apa LI), and 15 ng·µL -1 GeneRuler 1 kb plus DNA ladder (ThermoFisher SM1331) for a final concentration of 100 ng·µL -1 . We kept injected animals at 25℃ and added hygromycin to the plates on day 3. When the bacterial lawn was nearly exhausted, we heat-shocked the plates with transgenic animals in a 30℃ air incubator for 20 hours and kept animals at 20℃ for four days. We identified transgenic animals with a single-copy insertion four days after the heat shock based on unc-119 rescue and the absence of green co-injection markers.
Software
We performed in silico design with “A plasmid Editor” (ApE) (Davis & Jorgensen, 2022) , and generated the figure with Adobe Illustrator (v28.2).
A frozen version of the transgenebuilder software was described in Alharbi & Frøkjær-Jensen (2023) and is available at https://doi.org/10.22002/qs7eh-g0669.
Reagents
Plasmids
pJRM3 - P flp-17 ::mScarlet:: tbb-2 3' UTR (MosTI compatible) (Addgene #204616)
pJRM4 - P flp-17 ::gfp:: tbb-2 3' UTR (MosTI compatible) (Addgene #204617)
pMNK54 - him-5 piRNAi fragment (Addgene #159818) (Priyadarshini et al., 2022)
pCFJ108 - cbr- unc-119 (Addgene #200367)
pSEM231 - mlc-1 p:: gfp :: cbr- tbb-2 (Addgene # 159897) (El Mouridi et al., 2020)
pSEM318 - rpr-1 p::sgRNA targeting the ttTi5605 location Chr. II (Addgene # 159822)
pMDJ231 – hsp-16.41 p:: cas9 :: gpd-2 :: tagRFP-t :: smu -1 (Addgene # 191382)
pCFJ782 - P rps-0 ::hygromycinR:: rps-27 3' UTR (Addgene #190933) (Radman et al., 2013) .
Strains
N2 – (wildtype)
CFJ42 – kstSi42 [ unc-119 (p1, spc2)(-)] II; unc-119 ( ed3 ) III (available from CGC)
Promoter sequence
|
WormBase ID |
Gene Name |
Promoter Sequence (modifications in upper case, consensus start site in bold) |
|
WBGene00001460 |
tttctcagaagcctctaagtttcccgtgctttcttgtcaaattgattaggaaatgattcggattttctgaatttttgaaa gatttttcggttttttcagtgatttcaatcggaaattcggagccggaaatgcattaggaaggggctaatagctataa attgacacgggaaattcagatttttcattcatttttcacacattttctgttactttttctcaatgatttttttgtgtttccat tttttttcctttaaaaaaattctgtgtggaaatattttccgCaaaactttatttttaaaaagagacc aaaaATG |
Acknowledgments
Acknowledgments
We thank WormBase (supported by grant P41-HG02223 from the US National Human Genome Research Institute and the British Medical Research Council). Some strains were provided by the CGC, which is funded by NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (P40 OD010440). We thank all Frøkjær-Jensen lab members for discussions.
Funding Statement
<p>This work was funded by a competitive research grant from the KAUST Office of Research Administration (CRG9 URF/1/4388-01-01).</p>
References
- AlHarbi S, Frøkjær-Jensen C. Characterizing a standardized BioPart for PVQ-specific expression in C. elegans. MicroPubl Biol. 2023 Jun 22;2023 doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Brandt JP, Aziz-Zaman S, Juozaityte V, Martinez-Velazquez LA, Petersen JG, Pocock R, Ringstad N. A single gene target of an ETS-family transcription factor determines neuronal CO2-chemosensitivity. PLoS One. 2012 Mar 29;7(3):e34014–e34014. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bretscher AJ, Kodama-Namba E, Busch KE, Murphy RJ, Soltesz Z, Laurent P, de Bono M. Temperature, oxygen, and salt-sensing neurons in C. elegans are carbon dioxide sensors that control avoidance behavior. Neuron. 2011 Mar 24;69(6):1099–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.02.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cutter AD, Dey A, Murray RL. Evolution of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome. Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Mar 16;26(6):1199–1234. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msp048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis MW, Jorgensen EM. ApE, A Plasmid Editor: A Freely Available DNA Manipulation and Visualization Program. Front Bioinform. 2022 Feb 4;2:818619–818619. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.818619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dupuy D, Li QR, Deplancke B, Boxem M, Hao T, Lamesch P, Sequerra R, Bosak S, Doucette-Stamm L, Hope IA, Hill DE, Walhout AJ, Vidal M. A first version of the Caenorhabditis elegans Promoterome. Genome Res. 2004 Oct 1;14(10B):2169–2175. doi: 10.1101/gr.2497604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Mouridi S, Alkhaldi F, Frøkjær-Jensen C. Modular safe-harbor transgene insertion for targeted single-copy and extrachromosomal array integration in Caenorhabditis elegans. G3 (Bethesda) 2022 Aug 25;12(9) doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Mouridi S, Peng Y, Frøkjær-Jensen C. Characterizing a strong pan-muscular promoter (P mlc-1 ) as a fluorescent co-injection marker to select for single-copy insertions. . MicroPubl Biol. 2020 Sep 3;2020 doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Engler C, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S. A one pot, one step, precision cloning method with high throughput capability. PLoS One. 2008 Nov 5;3(11):e3647–e3647. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Etchberger JF, Lorch A, Sleumer MC, Zapf R, Jones SJ, Marra MA, Holt RA, Moerman DG, Hobert O. The molecular signature and cis-regulatory architecture of a C. elegans gustatory neuron. Genes Dev. 2007 Jul 1;21(13):1653–1674. doi: 10.1101/gad.1560107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Froehlich JJ, Rajewsky N. C. elegans Gene Regulatory Alleles and Reporter Bashing Studies. MicroPubl Biol. 2023 Jan 20;2023 doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hobert O. Homeobox genes and the specification of neuronal identity. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Aug 26;22(10):627–636. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00497-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hunt-Newbury R, Viveiros R, Johnsen R, Mah A, Anastas D, Fang L, Halfnight E, Lee D, Lin J, Lorch A, McKay S, Okada HM, Pan J, Schulz AK, Tu D, Wong K, Zhao Z, Alexeyenko A, Burglin T, Sonnhammer E, Schnabel R, Jones SJ, Marra MA, Baillie DL, Moerman DG. High-throughput in vivo analysis of gene expression in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Biol. 2007 Sep 1;5(9):e237–e237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Inada H, Ito H, Satterlee J, Sengupta P, Matsumoto K, Mori I. Identification of guanylyl cyclases that function in thermosensory neurons of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2006 Jan 16;172(4):2239–2252. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.050013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, Gotta M, Kanapin A, Le Bot N, Moreno S, Sohrmann M, Welchman DP, Zipperlen P, Ahringer J. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):231–237. doi: 10.1038/nature01278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lamesch P, Milstein S, Hao T, Rosenberg J, Li N, Sequerra R, Bosak S, Doucette-Stamm L, Vandenhaute J, Hill DE, Vidal M. C. elegans ORFeome version 3.1: increasing the coverage of ORFeome resources with improved gene predictions. Genome Res. 2004 Oct 1;14(10B):2064–2069. doi: 10.1101/gr.2496804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzo R, Onizuka M, Defrance M, Laurent P. Combining single-cell RNA-sequencing with a molecular atlas unveils new markers for Caenorhabditis elegans neuron classes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020 Jul 27;48(13):7119–7134. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Malcı K, Watts E, Roberts TM, Auxillos JY, Nowrouzi B, Boll HO, Nascimento CZSD, Andreou A, Vegh P, Donovan S, Fragkoudis R, Panke S, Wallace E, Elfick A, Rios-Solis L. Standardization of Synthetic Biology Tools and Assembly Methods for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Emerging Yeast Species. ACS Synth Biol. 2022 Aug 8;11(8):2527–2547. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.1c00442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moore SJ, Lai HE, Kelwick RJ, Chee SM, Bell DJ, Polizzi KM, Freemont PS. EcoFlex: A Multifunctional MoClo Kit for E. coli Synthetic Biology. ACS Synth Biol. 2016 May 2;5(10):1059–1069. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.6b00031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nava S, Palma W, Wan X, Oh JY, Gharib S, Wang H, Revanna JS, Tan M, Zhang M, Liu J, Chen CH, Lee JS, Perry B, Sternberg PW. A cGAL-UAS bipartite expression toolkit for Caenorhabditis elegans sensory neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Dec 14;120(51):e2221680120–e2221680120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2221680120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Priyadarshini M, Ni JZ, Vargas-Velazquez AM, Gu SG, Frøkjær-Jensen C. Reprogramming the piRNA pathway for multiplexed and transgenerational gene silencing in C. elegans. Nat Methods. 2022 Feb 3;19(2):187–194. doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01369-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Radman I, Greiss S, Chin JW. Efficient and rapid C. elegans transgenesis by bombardment and hygromycin B selection. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e76019–e76019. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sengupta P, Chou JH, Bargmann CI. odr-10 encodes a seven transmembrane domain olfactory receptor required for responses to the odorant diacetyl. Cell. 1996 Mar 22;84(6):899–909. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81068-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shetty RP, Endy D, Knight TF Jr. Engineering BioBrick vectors from BioBrick parts. J Biol Eng. 2008 Apr 14;2:5–5. doi: 10.1186/1754-1611-2-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Steber HS, Gallante C, O'Brien S, Chiu PL, Mangone M. The C. elegans 3' UTRome v2 resource for studying mRNA cleavage and polyadenylation, 3'-UTR biology, and miRNA targeting. Genome Res. 2019 Nov 19;29(12):2104–2116. doi: 10.1101/gr.254839.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stefanakis N, Carrera I, Hobert O. Regulatory Logic of Pan-Neuronal Gene Expression in C. elegans. Neuron. 2015 Aug 19;87(4):733–750. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki H, Kerr R, Bianchi L, Frøkjaer-Jensen C, Slone D, Xue J, Gerstbrein B, Driscoll M, Schafer WR. In vivo imaging of C. elegans mechanosensory neurons demonstrates a specific role for the MEC-4 channel in the process of gentle touch sensation. Neuron. 2003 Sep 11;39(6):1005–1017. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2003.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor SR, Santpere G, Weinreb A, Barrett A, Reilly MB, Xu C, Varol E, Oikonomou P, Glenwinkel L, McWhirter R, Poff A, Basavaraju M, Rafi I, Yemini E, Cook SJ, Abrams A, Vidal B, Cros C, Tavazoie S, Sestan N, Hammarlund M, Hobert O, Miller DM 3rd. Molecular topography of an entire nervous system. Cell. 2021 Jul 7;184(16):4329–4347.e23. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.06.023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wenick AS, Hobert O. Genomic cis-regulatory architecture and trans-acting regulators of a single interneuron-specific gene battery in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2004 Jun 1;6(6):757–770. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2004.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, Brenner S. The structure of the nervous system of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1986 Nov 12;314(1165):1–340. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1986.0056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yu S, Avery L, Baude E, Garbers DL. Guanylyl cyclase expression in specific sensory neurons: a new family of chemosensory receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 1;94(7):3384–3387. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.3384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zimmer M, Gray JM, Pokala N, Chang AJ, Karow DS, Marletta MA, Hudson ML, Morton DB, Chronis N, Bargmann CI. Neurons detect increases and decreases in oxygen levels using distinct guanylate cyclases. Neuron. 2009 Mar 26;61(6):865–879. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

