Skip to main content
BMJ Case Reports logoLink to BMJ Case Reports
. 2024 Mar 25;17(3):e258741. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-258741

Functional assessment of trabecular bypass created by iStent inject using aqueous angiography

Tanuj Dada 1, Nitika Beri 1, Karthikeyan Mahalingam 1,✉, Namrata Sharma 1
PMCID: PMC10966727  PMID: 38531556

Description

A male patient in his late 50s presented with a diagnosis of moderate primary open-angle glaucoma in both eyes with the right eye (RE) having pseudophakia and the left eye (LE) having an immature senile cataract. On examination, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in the RE was 6/9, and in the LE was 6/60. On gonioscopy, the LE angle of the anterior chamber was open up to the scleral spur. LE fundus examination revealed a cup-to-disc ratio of 0.7:1 with thinning of the inferior neuroretinal rim. Intraocular pressure (IOP) in the LE was 22 mm Hg on brimonidine tartrate 0.2% and timolol maleate 0.5% which was used two times per day. Since the patient had moderate glaucoma with cataract, LE trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation (iStent inject, Glaukos, California, USA) combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation was performed under local anaesthesia. After appropriate microscope positioning, two iStent inject were placed at the nasal angle at 8 o’clock (figure 1, red asterisk) and 10 o’clock (figure 1, yellow asterisk) position via the temporal clear corneal incision. Both devices appeared to be anatomically implanted in the correct position as only the flange of the device was visible (with the thorax in trabecular meshwork (TM)). This was followed by aqueous angiography using indocyanine green dye 0.1% to confirm the passage of aqueous and assess the function of the devices.1 Adjacent to the 10 o’clock device (figure 1, yellow asterisk), collector channels were visible, identified by the continuous flow of dye (figure 1, yellow arrow) indicating optimal trabecular bypass and a functional stent. However, no collector channels were visible adjacent to the 8 o’clock device (figure 1, red asterisk), indicating no aqueous drainage through this device. Postoperatively, timolol maleate 0.5% was stopped, and only brimonidine tartrate 0.2% was continued. LE IOP was 14 mm Hg (on one glaucoma medication) at the first-month postoperative follow-up and 18 mm Hg (on one glaucoma medication) at the third-month postoperative follow-up, with a BCVA of 6/6.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

A: Intraoperative gonioscopic image showing two iStent inject implanted at 8 o’clock (red asterisk) and 10 o’clock (yellow asterisk) position of the nasal angle. B: Intraoperative aqueous angiography image showing the absence of collector channels near the 8 o’clock device (red asterisk) and visible collector channels (yellow arrow) near the 10 o’clock device (yellow asterisk).

Previous studies have reported that phacoemulsification combined with iStent inject can decrease IOP by 2.4 mm Hg to 6.1 mm Hg in the postoperative period.2 3 Implantation of iStent inject alone can decrease IOP by approximately 2.3–4.3 mm Hg in the postoperative period.4 Huang et al used aqueous angiography to assess the aqueous humour outflow after trabecular bypass surgery in glaucoma patients.1 Trabecular bypass devices were implanted in high flow region (region of increased angiographic signals) and low flow region (region of decreased angiographic signals) as per aqueous angiography. They found early angiographic signals in high flow region and new angiographic signals in low flow region. In future, performing targeted minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) in high or low flow regions based on aqueous angiography can help to improve their outcomes.1 5 6

This case highlights that anatomical implantation of iStent inject within the TM may not ensure its adequate function. This may be the reason for their poor/variable IOP lowering efficacy. Non-drainage of aqueous from the iStent inject may be due to failure in establishing a communication between the aqueous in the anterior chamber and the collector channels due to collapsed TM or Schlemm’s canal, improper placement of the device, and absence of adjacent collector channels.7 This clinical finding can encourage further study on intraoperative functional assessment of MIGS procedures by aqueous angiography and enable planning for intraoperative surgical adjustment in the same sitting, if required, to improve the outcomes of MIGS. Aqueous angiography can also aid in improving the design of trabecular bypass devices that optimise functional outcomes.

Learning points.

  • Correct anatomical placement of iStent inject within the trabecular meshwork may not ensure its optimal function.

  • Aqueous angiography can be used to assess the function of iStent inject and other minimally invasive glaucoma surgery procedures intraoperatively.

Footnotes

Contributors: The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text and editing of clinical images, and critical revision for important intellectual content: NB, KM, NS and TD was involved in performing the surgical procedure, intellectual input and approved the final manuscript.The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: TD, NB, KM and NS.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.

Competing interests: None declared.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Consent obtained directly from patient(s).

References

  • 1. Huang AS, Penteado RC, Papoyan V, et al. Aqueous angiographic outflow improvement after trabecular Microbypass in glaucoma patients. Ophthalmol Glaucoma 2019;2:11–21. 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.11.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barkander A, Economou MA, Jóhannesson G. Outcomes of iStent inject versus Kahook dual blade surgery in glaucoma patients undergoing cataract surgery. J Glaucoma 2023;32:e121–8. 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shalaby WS, Lam SS, Arbabi A, et al. iStent versus iStent inject implantation combined with Phacoemulsification in open angle glaucoma. Indian J Ophthalmol 2021;69:2488–95. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_308_21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Arnljots TS, Economou MA. Kahook dual blade Goniotomy vs iStent inject: long-term results in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Clin Ophthalmol 2021;15:541–50. 10.2147/OPTH.S284687 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Dada T, Bukke AN. Aqueous angiography guided AB Interno trabecular surgery for open-angle glaucoma. BMJ Case Rep 2022;15:e248261. 10.1136/bcr-2021-248261 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Dada T, Bukke AN, Huang AS, et al. Recruitment of temporal aqueous outflow channels after bent needle AB-Interno Goniectomy demonstrated by aqueous angiography. J Glaucoma 2023;32:e15–8. 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Gillmann K, Bravetti GE, Mermoud A, et al. A prospective analysis of iStent inject Microstent positioning: Schlemm canal dilatation and intraocular pressure correlations. J Glaucoma 2019;28:613–21. 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ Case Reports are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES