Abstract
Management of cancer during pregnancy requires careful consideration of risks and benefits from maternal and fetal perspectives. For advanced lung adenocarcinomas, with no targetable driver mutations, there is evidence-based guidance on the use of carboplatin–paclitaxel chemotherapy after first trimester. In contrast, for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated or anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged metastatic lung adenocarcinomas, there is a paucity of clinical data on the safety of EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors to mother and fetus for official guidelines to recommend the use of these otherwise-first-line therapies in pregnancy. Considering this knowledge gap, we present a case of a young gravida 1 para 0 (G1P0) woman who continued alectinib 300 mg oral two times per day for ALK-rearranged metastatic lung adenocarcinoma throughout all 36 weeks of her pregnancy and delivered a healthy baby at term via caesarean section (C-section).
Keywords: Lung cancer (oncology), Drugs: obstetrics and gynaecology, Safety, Pregnancy, ALK
Background
Cancer during pregnancy is uncommon—with estimated incidence rates of about 1 in every 1000–4000 pregnant women.1–3 The more common cancer diagnoses during pregnancy include breast cancers (40%), lymphomas and leukaemias (20%), gynaecological cancers (17%), and melanoma (5%). In comparison, lung cancers in pregnancy are rare (<1%),3 4 and there is comparably scant literature to guide management strategies for these patients. Since pregnant patients are almost invariably excluded from clinical trials, safety data regarding the placental-to-fetal transfer, teratogenicity and embryotoxicity of cancer drugs is largely based on animal studies, ex vivo studies (eg, measuring fetal transfer rates using human perfused cotyledon models) or clinical case reports (eg, comparing in vivo concentrations of drug in maternal serum, placental tissue, cord blood and amniotic fluid).4
Currently, the published guidance on the prepartum use of chemotherapies is clearer than for targeted agents including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in all cancer types.2 Cytotoxic chemotherapies in general are contraindicated until after first trimester, with fetal malformation risks dropping from 10%–20% in first trimester to 1.3% in third trimester.1 For advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) specifically, combination of carboplatin–paclitaxel chemotherapy can be used after first trimester, while TKIs including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are currently discouraged throughout pregnancy given the lack of supporting data.1 4 For pregnant patients diagnosed with advanced lung adenocarcinomas with targetable EGFR mutations or ALK fusions—for which there is clinical trial evidence showing superior survival outcomes with TKIs compared with chemotherapy5–10—this creates pressure to choose induced prematurity in order to expedite postpartum first-line TKI therapy, or choose inferior chemotherapy as first-line therapy until delivery.
Case presentation
A young woman presented with progressive fatigue, dry cough, pleurisy and haemoptysis. She was found to have a 5.3 cm left hilar mass that invaded her left lower lobe (LLL) pulmonary artery and encased her LLL bronchus with 75% narrowing. At the time of diagnosis, she had a malignant left-sided pleural effusion, mediastinal lymphadenopathy, a solitary liver metastasis and bony metastases. Biopsy of the hilar mass showed ALK-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma. She was started on first-line crizotinib therapy.
She remained on crizotinib for 17 months, before she had radiological progression with asymptomatic brain metastases. She was switched to second-line alectinib at 600 mg orally two times per day, which led to a complete radiological response (figure 1A,B). She later required a dose reduction to 300 mg orally two times per day due to hyperbilirubinaemia (common terminology criteria for adverse events, grade 2), with ongoing intracranial disease control (figure 1C).
Figure 1.
Serial imaging showing response of brain metastases to alectinib, achieved prior to pregnancy (A, B) and maintained throughout pregnancy (C, D). MP-RAGE GAD, Magnetization Prepared - RApid Gradient Echo with gadolinium.
After 49 months on alectinib, she was unexpectedly found to be pregnant. She was seen in consultation by the maternal fetal medicine team. The risks of alectinib in pregnancy for mother and fetus remain largely unknown, with a literature review done at the time yielding only preclinical studies showing possible fetal loss with no confirmed mechanism of teratogenicity, while a single clinical case report11 described good fetal outcome. After weighing uncertain risks against expected benefits, the patient and her medical team decided to continue alectinib treatment, at the 300 mg orally two times er day dose, to preserve her state of cancer remission. On alectinib, she did not experience radiological or clinical recurrence of brain metastases until after her pregnancy (figure 1C,D).
Outcome and follow-up
During her pregnancy, she had two episodes of recurrent haemoptysis at 17+4 gestational age (GA) and at 24+1 GA, attributed to bronchial artery hypertrophy and increased blood volume from pregnancy. The second episode was significant enough that required inpatient monitoring in a high acuity unit. Left-sided bronchial artery embolisation was considered, but ultimately, she was treated conservatively and had no recurrence of haemoptysis in her third trimester.
Her fetal anatomy ultrasound at 20 weeks+0 days GA showed no abnormalities. Obstetrical ultrasounds showed normal placenta, amniotic fluid, fetal movements, umbilical artery Doppler, fetal anatomy, fetal growth (between 92% and 97% percentile from 29+3 to 36+0 GA) and 8/8 biophysical profiles.
She was planned for an elective C-section at 38+6 GA, but experienced term premature rupture of membranes and, therefore, underwent an emergency primary lower-segment C-section at 37+0 GA. Birth weight was 3610 g and Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration score was 8 and 9. Pathological exam of placenta showed focal chronic lymphohistiocytic villitis, with no evidence of metastasis.
Currently, the baby is healthy and meeting 26-month developmental milestones.
Discussion
To our knowledge, there are only three other published case reports of women receiving lengthy courses (>30 weeks) of alectinib treatment for ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC during pregnancy. The first published case from Italy involved a similar duration of in utero exposure of alectinib (35 weeks and 5 days).11 Another case from Belgium reported a shorter 32 weeks of in utero exposure of alectinib.12 A third case from France involved a very short duration of in utero exposure of alectinib (22 days only).13 Boudy et al 13 also identified three additional cases where patients received short courses (3–5 weeks) of first-generation ALK inhibitors (crizotinib or ceritinib) for ALK-rearranged metastatic NSCLC during pregnancy.13–15 In contrast, at least eight published case reports identified by Boudy et al 13 involved expediting delivery, sometimes with induced premature delivery, to allow initiation of indicated TKI therapy in the postpartum setting.12
In table 1, we compare our case against those six published case reports.11–15 Only one of these prior cases had a comparably lengthy in utero exposure to alectinib of about 36 weeks. In our case, C-section was prompted by term premature rupture of membranes, while the case reported by Scarfone et al 11 was complicated by fetal acute respiratory distress syndrome. The other four cases had shorter in utero drug exposure—less than 4 weeks in four cases13–15 and 32 weeks in De Smedt et al 12 where alectinib was stopped about 5 weeks prior to delivery after weighing disease stability against unknown effects on fetal development. Reassuringly, circulating TKI concentrations in cord blood and amniotic fluid has been reported to be <9% of that in maternal blood.11 13 Collectively, child development has been noted to be within normal range at 10–29 months postpartum follow-up. Ongoing follow-up will be required to rule out long-term effects of in utero exposure of ALK inhibitors.
Table 1.
Case reports of lung cancer treated with ALK inhibitors during pregnancy
| Case | Current case report | De Smedt et al 2023 12 | Boudy et al 2021 Case 113 | Boudy et al 2021 Case 313 | Scarfone et al 202111 | Padrão et al 201814 | Jensen et al 201915 |
| Non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis | Adenocarcinoma with ALK rearrangement, metastatic to pleura, liver and bone. | NSCLC with ALK translocation, metastatic to axilla and subdiaphragmatic nodes. | Muco-epidermoid carcinoma, EML4-ALK fusion, metastatic to liver and bone. | Adenocarcinoma, with ALK rearrangement, metastatic to brain and breast. | Adenocarcinoma, with EML4-ALK fusion, metastatic (not otherwise specified). | Adenocarcinoma, with EML4-ALK fusion, metastatic with pleural effusion. | Adenocarcinoma, with EML4-ALK fusion, metastatic to bone, mediastinum, liver. |
| ALK TKI treatment | 2L Alectinib 300 mg orally two times per day (started years before conception) | 1L Alectinib 600 mg orally two times per day (started months before conception, stopped at 32 GA) | 2L Alectinib 600 mg orally two times per day (started at 33 GA, post-1L cisplatin–paclitaxel) | 2L Ceritinib 450 mg orally once a day (started at 31 GA, post-1L Crizotinib) | 1L Alectinib 600 mg orally two times per day (started 12 weeks pre-conception) | 1L Crizotinib 250 mg orally once a day (started at 26 GA) | 1L Crizotinib 250 mg orally once a day (started at 23 GA) |
| Antepartum | 36 weeks | 32 weeks | 22 days | 35 days | 35 weeks 5 days | ~4 weeks | ~3 weeks |
| Post partum | Continued till 2 months pp (with PD, switched to brigatinib). | Restarted | Continued | Continued till 18 pp (with PD, switched to lorlatinib). | Continued | Continued till 15 days pp (with PD, switched to chemotherapy). | Continued |
| Concentration of TKI at delivery | |||||||
| Maternal blood | – | – | 482 ng/mL | – | 259 ng/mL | – | – |
| Cord blood | – | – | 40 ng/mL | – | 18 ng/mL | – | 4 ng/mL |
| Amniotic fluid | – | – | – | – | 23 ng/mL | – | – |
| Delivery | C-section at 36 GA (term PROM) | Induced at 36+6 GA | C-section at 36 GA (thrombocytopenia) | C-section at 36 GA (elective) | C-section at 35+5 GA | C-section at 30 GA (cancer progression) | C-section at 26+2 GA (HELLP syndrome) |
| Birth weight | 3610 g | Eutrophic | 2150 g (7th percentile) | 2950 g (60th percentile) | – | – | 700 g (−28th percentile) |
| APGAR | 8/9 | 7/10 | 10/10/10 | – | – | 5/9/10 | |
| Fetal anomalies and Complications | |||||||
| Prenatal | None | None. Fetal MRI brain normal. | None | None | None | None | unknown |
| Peridelivery | None | None. No malignant cells in placenta. | None. No malignant cells in placenta. | Familial hexadactyly. | ARDS requiring NIV and surfactant. No malignant cells in placenta. | Adenocarcinoma cells identified in placenta. | Adenocarcinoma cells identified in placenta. |
| Postnatal | Normal development at 20 months | Normal development at 1 year. | Normal development at 11 months. | Normal development at 30 months. | Small laterocervical fistula at 3 months, treated conservatively. Normal development at 20 months. |
Regular development at 29 months. | Regular development at 18 months. |
ALK, anaplastic lymphoma kinase; APGAR, Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration score; ARDS, acute respiratory distress syndrome; ELM4, Echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4; GA, gestational age; HELLP syndrome, haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelets syndrome; NIV, non-invasive ventilatory support; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD, progressive disease; pp, post partum; PROM, premature rupture of membranes; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.
In conclusion, pregnant patients with ALK-rearranged advanced lung adenocarcinomas face a clinical dilemma. From a maternal perspective, targeted therapy in the form of ALK inhibitors is associated with superior survival outcomes compared with chemotherapy; but from a fetal perspective, there is a lack of safety data in terms of teratogenicity and embryotoxicity from in utero exposure. With this case report, we present our experience balancing these expected benefits against unknown risks. Our patient continued alectinib treatment at 300 mg orally two times per day, already dose-reduced for hepatotoxicity prior to conception, throughout all 36 weeks of her pregnancy. She delivered a healthy baby at term, who continues to meet developmental milestones as a 26-month-old.
Learning points.
There are currently no clinical practice guidelines or consensus on whether it is safe from a fetal perspective to treat a pregnant woman with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged lung cancer with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (eg, alectinib) in the prepartum setting.
Here, we present a case where lung cancer stability was achieved with 36 weeks of prepartum alectinib therapy, with normal child development at 10 months post partum.
Until there are larger cohort data to firmly establish safety to fetus, our case report suggests that it may be safe to cautiously proceed with first-line ALK TKI therapy, if the unknown risks and expected benefits are acceptable to the patient, with multidisciplinary guidance from fetal–maternal medicine.
Footnotes
Contributors: The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms, and critical revision for important intellectual content: FW, RR, KL and CH. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: FW, RR, KL and CH.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: all authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organisation for the submitted work. Financial relationships: CH has received honoraria paid to self from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Eisai, EMD Serono, Sanofi, Janssen, Jazz, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda and has research grants paid to institution from AstraZeneca and Roche. RR has received honoraria paid to self from AstraZeneca and has research grants from AstraZeneca. FW has received an honorarium from BMS. Other relationships: all authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Consent obtained directly from patient(s).
References
- 1. Zagouri F, Dimitrakakis C, Marinopoulos S, et al. Cancer in pregnancy: disentangling treatment modalities. ESMO Open 2016;1:e000016. 10.1136/esmoopen-2015-000016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Silverstein J, Post AL, Chien AJ, et al. Multidisciplinary management of cancer during pregnancy. JCO Oncol Pract 2020;16:545–57. 10.1200/OP.20.00077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Maggen C, Wolters VERA, Cardonick E, et al. Pregnancy and cancer: the INCIP project. Curr Oncol Rep 2020;22:17. 10.1007/s11912-020-0862-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Benoit L, Mir O, Vialard F, et al. Cancer during pregnancy: A review of Preclinical and clinical Transplacental transfer of anticancer agents. Cancers (Basel) 2021;13:1238. 10.3390/cancers13061238 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Mok TS, Wu Y-L, Thongprasert S, et al. Gefitinib or carboplatin–paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. N Engl J Med 2009;361:947–57. 10.1056/NEJMoa0810699 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Rosell R, Carcereny E, Gervais R, et al. Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR Mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a Multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2012;13:239–46. 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70393-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, et al. Overall survival with Osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-Mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med 2020;382:41–50. 10.1056/NEJMoa1913662 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Solomon BJ, Mok T, Kim D-W, et al. First-line Crizotinib versus chemotherapy in ALK-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med 2014;371:2167–77. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Soria J-C, Tan DSW, Chiari R, et al. First-line Ceritinib versus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (ASCEND-4): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2017;389:917–29. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30123-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Mok T, Camidge DR, Gadgeel SM, et al. Updated overall survival and final progression-free survival data for patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in the ALEX study. Ann Oncol 2020;31:1056–64. 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.04.478 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Scarfone G, Fumagalli M, Imbimbo M, et al. First case report of pregnancy on Alectinib in a woman with metastatic ALK-rearranged lung cancer: A case report. J Thorac Oncol 2021;16:873–7. 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. De Smedt F, Dessy F, Carestia L, et al. A pregnant patient with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with Alectinib: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett 2023;25:54. 10.3892/ol.2022.13640 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Boudy A-S, Grausz N, Selleret L, et al. Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors during pregnancy for Oncogenic-driven advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma. Lung Cancer 2021;161:68–75. 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Padrão E, Melo C, Fernandes G, et al. Lung cancer in pregnancy – report of a case treated with Crizotinib. Pulmonology 2018;24:205–7. 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2018.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jensen KH, Persson G, Storgaard L, et al. Antineoplastic treatment with Crizotinib during pregnancy: a case report) antineoplastic treatment with Crizotinib during pregnancy: a case report. Acta Oncol (Madr) 2019;58:121–2. 10.1080/0284186X.2018.1497302 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

