Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2024 Mar 27;28(8):e18196. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18196

Hepatoprotective activity of Lactéol® forte and quercetin dihydrate against thioacetamide‐induced hepatic cirrhosis in male albino rats

Hebatallah M Saad 1,, Samah S Oda 2, Athanasios Alexiou 3,4,5,6, Marios Papadakis 7,, Mohamed H Mahmoud 8, Gaber El‐Saber Batiha 9, Eman Khalifa 10
PMCID: PMC10967145  PMID: 38534093

Abstract

Liver cirrhosis is a silent disease in humans and is experimentally induced by many drugs and toxins as thioacetamide (TAA) in particular, which is the typical model for experimental induction of hepatic fibrosis. Thus, the objective of the present study was to elucidate the possible protective effects of lactéol® forte (LF) and quercetin dihydrate (QD) against TAA‐induced hepatic damage in male albino rats. Induction of hepatotoxicity was performed by TAA injection (200 mg/kg I/P, twice/ week) in rats. LF (1 × 109 CFU/rat 5 times/week) and QD (50 mg/kg 5 times/week) treated groups were administered concurrently with TAA injection (200 mg/kg I/P, twice/ week). The experimental treatments were conducted for 12 weeks. Hepatotoxicity was evaluated biochemically by measuring alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) in the serum and histopathologically with the scoring of histopathological changes besides histochemical assessment of collagen by Masson's trichrome and immunohistochemical analysis for α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA), Ki67 and caspase‐3 expression in liver sections. Our results indicated that LF and QD attenuated some biochemical changes and histochemical markers in TAA‐mediated hepatotoxicity in rats by amelioration of biochemical markers and collagen, α‐SMA, Ki67 and caspase3 Immunoexpression. Additionally, LF and QD supplementation downregulated the proliferative, necrotic, fibroblastic changes, eosinophilic intranuclear inclusions, hyaline globules and Mallory‐like bodies that were detected histopathologically in the TAA group. In conclusion, LF showed better hepatic protection than QD against TAA‐induced hepatotoxicity in rats by inhibiting inflammatory reactions with the improvement of some serum hepatic transaminases, histopathological picture and immunohistochemical markers.

Keywords: histopathology, Lactéol® forte, liver, quercetin dihydrate, rats, Thioacetamide

1. INTRODUCTION

The liver is an important organ of the body that has an essential role in the metabolic process. Over the past few decades, morbidity and mortality rates of various types of liver disease have increased all over the world. Liver cirrhosis is a silent disease in which 40% of patients haven't had any symptoms over extended times until the development of the decompensated phase, and when the complications appear, a gradual deterioration happens with the result of death, unless the patient is exposed to final therapy, which is hepatic transplantation. 1 Thioacetamide (TAA) was first used as a fungicide in orange groves and banned in 1960 due to its hepatotoxic effect. Since then, it has been used for the induction of hepatic failure and carcinogenesis in experimental animals. 2 TAA injection encouraged the development of periportal fibrosis quickly with larger cirrhotic nodules that are similar to human cirrhosis. 3

Probiotics are described as live microbes that are improving the health once they are given in sufficient quantities. In most cases, the strain of Lactobacillus species has been illustrated to improve liver diseases as probiotics. 4 Lactéol® forte (LF) is a commercial probiotic and pharmabiotic that consists of Lactobacillus boucard (L. fermentum and L. delbrueckii). Interestingly, new research that worked on the human gut microbiota proved the novel therapeutic effect of microbiota. 5 , 6

Currently, a great concern of scientific studies has been directed towards the exploration of phytochemical properties, involving several flavonoids, in the food of curative herbs against acute and chronic diseases. 7 Quercetin (Qu) (3‐, 5‐, 7‐, 3‐, 4‐pentahydroxyflavone) is one natural flavonoid that accounts for about 75% of human total flavonol consumption and is ubiquitously present in different plants. Qu is reported to have anti‐oxidant, anti‐inflammatory, anti‐fibrotic and anti‐carcinogenic properties. 8 Additionally, Qu has gotten a lot of concern because of its hepatoprotective properties on alcoholic or non‐alcoholic steatohepatitis by monitoring the genes that are related to fat metabolism and the release of an inflammatory substance, which appeared as decreasing the hepatic lipids accumulation, modulating inflammatory stimuli and preventing liver collagen accumulation and the development of liver cirrhosis. 9 , 10 , 11

Despite the many studies conducted on hepatic cirrhosis and disorders, it is important to discover the benefits of natural products that may decrease the signs and death rate in patients with liver failure. From this point of view, this experimental study was conducted to investigate the possible protective effect of LF and Qu against the hepatic injury induced by TAA injection in rats.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Chemicals and drugs

Thioacetamide (TAA) was obtained from LOBA Chemie, Mumbai, India, as creamy white crystals freely soluble in water. It was freshly prepared as a solution in distilled water and stirred well until crystals were dissolved. Lactéol fort (Lactobacillus LB) sachets, 10 billion (1010 CFU) and Spent culture medium, 160 mg, were obtained from Rameda‐pharmaceuticals Company, Egypt. Each sachet contains L. LB corresponding to L. delbrueckii and L. fermentum. QD was manufactured by SDFCL, India, in the form of yellow powder, which was dissolved in corn oil 12 and stirred well until the complete dissolution of powder.

2.2. Animals, experimental design and sample collection

Thirty healthy adult male albino rats with an initial weight of 100 ± 10 g were purchased from a closed random‐bred colony at the Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University and kept in the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Matrouh University, Egypt. All animals were acclimatised 2 weeks before the beginning of the study for adaptation and to ensure normal growth and behaviour. Rats were housed in separate clean, disinfected and well‐ventilated polycarbonate cages (5 rats /cage) at a constant room temperature of 25 ± 2°C, relative humidity of 50% ± 5% and at a light/dark cycle of 12 h throughout the experimental period. The animals were given ad libitum access to a standard rodent diet and water. All the mentioned care and experimental design strictly follow the standard roles described by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC), Alexanderia University, and the approval number is QRA/0304108/17/2017.

Rats were randomly allocated into six groups (five rats each): Control group: I/P injected with 2 mL/kg BW normal saline twice/week and orally administrated 2 mL distilled water five times/week. TAA group: I/P injected with TAA at a dose of 200 mg/kg BW twice/week as described by Al‐Gayyar et al. 13 LF group: Orally administrated with lactéol® forte at 1 × 109 CFU/rat five times/week as described by Ghazy et al. 14 QD group: Orally administrated QD at a dose of 50 mg/kg dissolved in corn oil five times/week as described by Gelen et al. 12 TAA+ LF treated group: I/P injected with TAA (200 mg/kg BW) simultaneously with lactéal fort that was given orally (1 × 109 CFU/rat). TAA + QD treated group: I/P injected with TAA 200 at a dose of mg/kg BW twice/week concurrently with oral administration of QD at a dose of 50 mg/kg dissolved in corn oil five times/week. Clinical signs and body weights were recorded throughout the experiment. Rats were maintained in their respective groups for 12 weeks. At the end of the 12th week post‐treatment, individual blood samples were collected from the retro‐orbital venous plexus. Blood samples were placed in plain centrifuge tubes, left in slope position at room temperature to clot and centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min for serum separation. The clear serum was carefully separated by automatic micropipette then transferred into clean dry Eppendorf and preserved at −20°C until transferred to lab for biochemical analysis. After euthanasia, livers were carefully excised and washed with the ice‐cold saline buffer to remove the blood then blotted with filter papers then weighed. Livers' weights were recorded, and relative liver weight (RLW) was calculated as follows: RLW = liver weight (g)/final BW (g) × 100.

2.3. Biochemical assays

Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT) were measured according to the manufacturer's instructions using commercial kits provided by bio‐diagnostic Company (Vitro Scient Co., Egypt).

2.4. Histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluations

Three liver tissue specimens from each rat were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin for at least 24 h and then prepared by paraffine embedding technique 15 for studying histopathological changes. A semiquantitative lesion score was estimated to show the prevalence and the degree of severity of different hepatic histopathological changes between groups. Five fields of each liver section from each rat/group were randomly examined at ×100 using a light microscope. Then the following scores were used: (−) absence of lesion, (+) mild = 5%–25%, (++) moderate = 26%–50% and (+++) severe = > 50% of examined liver section. For examination of connective tissue, liver sections were processed down to distilled water, mordant in Bouin's solution and stained with Masson's trichrome stain. 16

For immunohistochemical staining, deparaffinized sections were obtained on positive slides and then hydrated in a graded series of alcohol solutions. Sections were incubated in antigen retrieval (boiling the sections at 98°C for 20 min in 10 mmol/L sodium citrate buffer, pH (6.0) then treated with 3% H2O2 to block endogenous peroxidase). Monoclonal antibodies for Ki67, α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) and caspase3 (DAKO Corp.) were applied to the slides and incubated in the humid chamber overnight at 4°C. Secondary biotinylated antibody was then applied, followed by incubation with streptavidin peroxidase. Sections were washed with phosphate buffer saline three times after each step. Sections were stained with diaminobenzidine chromogen solution and counterstained with Mayer's haematoxylin. 17

2.5. Histomorphometry assessment

For histomorphometric quantitative analysis, ten original random micrographs have been captured at a magnification of ×100 per group to calculate the mean area % of the collagen in Masson's trichrome‐stained sections. Also, ten fields at a magnification of ×400 were captured per group to calculate % of diaminobenzidine (DAB)‐stained areas for α‐SMA, ki67 and caspases 3. The digital images were analysed by Image analysis software (Fiji Image J, 1.51n, NIH, USA) according to the method described by Crowe and Yue. 18

2.6. Statistical analysis

Data of biochemical results and image analysis results were analysed by one‐way analysis (ANOVA) with the aid of statistical analysis system software (Version 9.30, User's Guide, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The significance between different groups was assessed by Duncan. Levels were considered significant at p < 0.05. The results are expressed as mean values with their corresponding standard errors. Additionally, we used Shapiro–Wilk test to check the normality and homogeneity of variance.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Clinical signs and mortalities

No clinical signs were observed in the control and LF groups. While in the QD group, rats showed anorexia and lethargy. The rats in the TAA‐treated group exhibited depression and loss of appetite, and the group TAA + LF showed mild anorexia. Rats of the TAA + QD‐treated group revealed clinical signs identical to those described in the TAA‐treated group. No mortalities were recorded in all groups except TAA‐treated group, which showed one mortality.

3.2. Effect on body weight and relative liver weight ratio (RLW)

As noticed in Table 1, the treatment of male albino rats with TAA led to a significant decrease in the BW and a significant elevation in the RLW as opposed to control rats. While LF and QD‐treated rats showed non‐significant alteration in the BW and RLW as compared to control rats. There was a significant reduction in BW and a non‐significant change in RLW in TAA + LF and TAA + QD treated groups compared to control and TAA‐treated rats.

TABLE 1.

Effect of thioacetamide (TAA), lactéol® forte (LF) and quercetin dehydrate (QD) alone or in combination for 12 weeks on body weight (BW), relative liver weight (RLW) and serum liver enzymes (ALT, AST and GGT) in male albino rats.

Groups BW (g) RLW (%) ALT (U/L) AST (U/L) GGT (U/L)
CTR 259.67 ± 7.97a 3.10 ± 0.31b 57.80 ± 1.62ab 137.00 ± 16.17a 1.86 ± 0.20b
TAA 182.25 ± 17.03b 3.78 ± 0.13a 86.00 ± 5.20a 180.20 ± 19.79a 3.91 ± 0.48a
LF 249.33 ± 11.05a 3.08 ± 0.26b 54.30 ± 5.35b 140.83 ± 23.14a 1.65 ± 0.19b
QD 259.00 ± 8.37a 3.09 ± 0.12 b 55.58 ± 3.83b 136.52 ± 16.77a 1.95 ± 0.13b
TAA + LF 188.00 ± 7.11b 3.20 ± 0.17ab 51.31 ± 16.86b 161.00 ± 24.37a 3.25 ± 1.60ab
TAA + QD 185.20 ± 14.43b 3.48 ± 0.19ab 62.23 ± 0.62ab 167.25 ± 21.39a 3.08 ± 0.27ab

Note: Mean ± standard errors. Means bearing different letters within the same column are significant at (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CTR, control group; GGT, gamma glutamyl transferase.

3.3. Effect on the serum liver enzymes activity (ALT, AST and GGT)

As shown in Table 1, there was no significant changes in serum levels of ALT and AST in all treated groups compared to the control group. Regarding serum levels of GGT, there was a significant elevation in the TAA‐treated group compared to the control group. The remaining groups did not show any significant changes in serum levels of GGT compared to the control group.

3.4. Necropsy results

Rats' livers of the TAA group had diffused multi‐nodular surface (cirrhotic nodules) and a hard consistency, which decreased in the TAA + LF group more than TAA + QD group (Figure 1). Livers of the LF group resembled the control, but with slight congestion. Livers of most rats in the QD group were enlarged and diffusely pale with a finely reticulated surface in some areas and congestion in another area.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Livers from thioacetamide (TAA) group: Irregular nodular surface; TAA + Lactéol® forte group: Slightly congested liver, smooth surface and focal necrosis; TAA + Quercetin dihydrate group: Pale liver with irregular surface.

3.5. Histopathological examination

Microscopic pictures of haematoxylin and eosin (HE)‐stained liver sections of the control group showed normal hepatic architecture with radially arranged hepatic cords around central veins and normal portal triads (Figure 2A). In the TAA group, there was severe disorganization of hepatic parenchyma with the extension of fibrous tissue proliferation resulting in the formation of parenchymal pseudolobules (Figure 2B). Inside these pseudolobules, hepatocytes showed severe vacuolar degeneration, severe degrees of necrosis and apoptosis associated with the absence of the central vein and with the presence of golden‐brown hemosiderin pigment and mononuclear cell infiltration (Figure 2C). Also, cirrhotic nodules were surrounded by hyperplastic regenerative oval cells, some collagen bundles and lymphocytic infiltrations besides hyperplasia of biliary epithelium and formation of newly formed bile ductules (Figure 2D). Macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis were also observed (Figure 2E). In addition, intracellular eosinophilic hyaline globules (Figure 2F) as well as eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusions (Mallory‐like bodies) were viewed (Figure 2G). Livers of rats in LF group were similar to those of the control group except for mild hepatocellular vacuolation and mild congestion (Figure 3A). In QD‐treated group, there was moderate vacuolar degeneration, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis (Figure 3B) and portal lymphocytic infiltrates. Also, few eosinophilic apoptotic bodies and sporadic hepatocellular necrosis were observed. In TAA + LF‐treated group, the recorded lesions were nearly similar to those observed in the TAA‐treated rats but less in severity (Table 2). Most of the hepatic parenchyma showed pseudolobulation with the disappearance of the central vein (Figure 3C), moderate hepatocellular necrosis, moderate cytoplasmic vacuolation of hydropic type (Figure 3D) and periportal necrosis and fibrosis with mononuclear inflammatory cells (Figure 3E). Necrotic cholangitis, hyperplasia of regenerative oval cells, formation of nonfunctional bile ductules, mild hemosiderosis and vacuolation were noticed (Figure 3F). In the TAA + QD‐treated group, the liver of euthanized rats showed fewer lesions than those of the TAA‐treated rats but more severe lesions than those reported in the TAA + LF‐treated group (Table 2). Wherein, hepatic dissociation and expansion of fibrous tissue into hepatic lobules forming pseudolobules were marked, besides moderate lymphocytic infiltrates and multiple apoptotic bodies inside cirrhotic nodules with multifocal hepatic necrosis (Figure 3G). Also, hepatocytic vacuolation, moderate steatosis and moderate ductular reaction were observed (Figure 3H). Regenerating hepatic plates were noticed besides chronic inflammatory cells, the proliferation of hepatic stellate cells and anisokaryosis with chromatin dispersion in some hepatocytes (Figure 3I).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Micrographs of HE stained liver sections from control group (A) Normal hepatic architecture with radially arranged hepatic cords around central veins and normal portal traids, Thioacetamide group (B–G), (B) Disorganization of hepatic parenchyma with extension of fibrous tissue proliferation with formation of parenchymal pseudolobules, (C) Hepatocytes showing variable degrees of necrosis and apoptosis with presence of golden brown hemosiderin pigment and mononuclear cells infiltration, (D) Hyperplastic regenerative oval cells, some collagen bundles and lymphocytic infiltrations besides hyperplasia of biliary epithelium and formation of newly formed bile ductules, (E) Macrovesicular (*) and microvesicular steatosis (arrowheads), (F) Intracellular eosinophilic hyaline globules (arrowheads), (G) Eosinophilic intracytoplasmic inclusions (Mallory‐ like bodies) (arrowheads). Scale bar = 100 μm for (A, B). Scale bar = 50 μm for (C–G).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Micrographs of HE stained liver sections from Lactéol® forte group (A, B), (A) Mild hepatocellular vacuolation and mild congestion, (B) Moderate vacuolar degeneration, macrovesicular and microvesicular steatosis, Thioacetamide (TAA) + Lactéol® forte group (C–F), (C) Pseudolobulation with disappearance of central vein, (D) Hepatocellular necrosis (arrowheads) and cytoplasmic vacuolation of hydropic type, (E) Periportal necrosis and fibrosis with mononuclear inflammatory cells, (F) Necrotic cholangitis (arrows), hyperplastic oval cells with formation of nonfunctional bile ductules (arrowheads), mild hemosiderosis and vacuolation, TAA + Quercetin dihydrate group (G–I), (G) Multiple apoptotic bodies (arrows) and multifocal hepatic necrosis (arrowheads), (H) Hepatocytic vacuolation, moderate steatosis and moderate ductular reaction, (I) Regenerating hepatic plates (arrows) besides chronic inflammatory cells, proliferation of stellate cells and anisokaryosis with chromatin dispersion in some hepatocytes (arrowheads). Scale bar = 100 μm for (A–H). Scale bar = 50 μm for (F, I).

TABLE 2.

Histopathological scoring for hepatic lesions recorded in male albino rats treated with thioacetamide (TAA), lactéol® forte (LF) and quercetin dehydrate (QD) alone or in combination.

Groups Lesions
Vacuolar degeneration Steatosis Necrosis Apoptosis Fibroplasia Ductular reaction
Control
TAA +++ +++ +++ +++ +++ +++
LF +
QD + ++ + +
TAA + LF ++ + ++ ++ ++ ++
TAA + QD ++ ++ ++ +++ ++ ++

Note: Lesion score: (−) absence of lesion, (+) mild = 5%–25%, (++) moderate = 26%–50% and (+++) severe = >50% of examined liver section.

Masson's trichrome‐stained liver sections of control (Figure 4A), LF (Figure 4B) and QD (Figure 4C)‐treated rats showed normal distribution of green collagen fibres around central veins, portal area and sinusoids. While the TAA‐treated group exhibited marked thickening of portal areas with green‐stained collagen fibres extended to infiltrate the surrounding hepatic parenchyma, forming pseudolobules and bridges to central and portal veins (Figure 4D). Also, pericellular hepatic fibrosis was noticed. Compared to the TAA‐treated group, collagen deposition was decreased in the TAA + LF (Figure 4E) than the TAA + QD (Figure 4F) treated group. Quantitative analysis displays that LF and QD groups showed non‐significant alterations, and the group revealed a significant elevation in area % of Masson's trichrome staining when matched to the control group (Table 3, Figure 4G). Regarding to TAA + LF and TAA + QD groups, area % of Masson's trichrome staining was significantly reduced compared to the TAA group (Table 3, Figure 4G).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Masson's trichrome stained hepatic sections. (A) Control; (B) Lactéol® forte (LF); (C) Quercetin dehydrate (QD) groups: Normal distribution of green collagen fibres; (D) Thioacetamide (TAA) group: Marked thickening of portal areas with green stained collagen fibres extended to infiltrate the surrounding hepatic parenchyma (bridging fibrosis); (E) TAA + LF; (F) TAA + QD groups: Decreased fibroplasia; (G) Quantitative image analysis of the average area % for Masson's trichrome in different treated groups compared to control one. Columns are group means. Means without a common letter differ significantly (p < 0.05). Scale bar = 100 μm.

TABLE 3.

Effect of thioacetamide (TAA), lactéol® forte (LF) and quercetin dehydrate (QD) alone or in combination for 12 weeks on the average area % of histochemical stains expression in male albino rats.

Groups Masson's trichrome α‐SMA Ki67 Caspase3
CTR 2.28 ± 0.25c 0.96 ± 0.12b 0.10 ± 0.04c 0.07 ± 0.02c
TAA 37.75 ± 2.60a 9.20 ± 1.25a 25.08 ± 4.57a 31.15 ± 2.99a
LF 2.14 ± 0.34c 0.90 ± 0.17b 0.20 ± 0.03c 0.06 ± 0.02c
QD 2.08 ± 0.24c 0.61 ± 0.26b 3.32 ± 0.92c 6.62 ± 2.18c
TAA + LF 29.75 ± 2.80b 7.71 ± 0.52a 14.78 ± 2.71b 23.08 ± 2.80b
TAA + QD 29.69 ± 1.92b 8.92 ± 1.09a 20.81 ± 2.55ab 34.44 ± 2.84a

Note: Mean ± standard errors. Means bearing different letters within the same column are significant at (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: α‐SMA, α‐smooth muscle actin; CTR, control group.

3.6. Immunohistochemistry analysis

Livers of control (Figure 5A), LF (Figure 5B) and QD (Figure 5C) rats showed slight normal expression of α‐SMA expressed as brown staining around the portal and central veins where myofibroblasts were present. While the liver of TAA‐treated rats showed intense brown immunoexpression of α‐SMA‐stained myofibroblasts, which were highly detected alongside the fibrous septa, portal areas and perisinusoidal spaces (Figure 5D). Furthermore, α‐SMA‐positive immunostaining was less expressed in TAA + LF (Figure 5E) than TAA + QD (Figure 5F)‐treated rats. Statistically, the area % of α‐SMA positive immunoexpression in LF and QD groups showed a non‐significant elevation compared to control rats, while the TAA group revealed a significant elevation in area % of α‐SMA positive immunoexpression (Table 3, Figure 5G). In addition, no significant difference was noticed in the TAA + LF and TAA + QD groups compared to the TAA group (Table 3, Figure 5G).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

α‐SMA immunohistochemical analysis of rats' livers. (A) Control; (B) Lactéol® forte (LF); (C) Quercetin dehydrate (QD) groups: Normal minimal brown staining; (D) Thioacetamide (TAA) group: Marked brown immunostaining for myofibroblasts, inset showing portal and periductal positive brown staining of activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs); (E) TAA + LF group: Decreased expression of activated HSCs, inset: Perisinusoidal positive brown staining (F) TAA + QD group: Decreased expression of activated HSCs; (G) Quantitative image analysis of the average area % for α‐SMA immunoexpression in different treated groups compared to control one. Columns are group means. Means without a common letter differ significantly (p < 0.05). Scale bar = 100 μm for (A–F), Scale bar = 50 μm for (inset D, E).

Livers of control (Figure 6A) and LF (Figure 6B) rats showed minimal Ki67 immunoexpression in the cytoplasm and nuclear membrane of a few hepatocytes. Regarding to QD‐treated group, ki67 was moderately expressed as brown immunostaining in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes in QD‐treated group (Figure 6C). In contrast, strong Ki67 expression in the TAA group mostly in hepatocytes cytoplasm and fewer in nuclear membrane (Figure 6D) was observed. Additionally, Ki67 was less expressed in TAA + LF (Figure 6E) than in TAA + QD (Figure 6F)‐treated rats. Quantitative analysis of the area% of Ki67 immunoexpression revealed a non‐significant elevation in LF and QD groups and a significant rise in the TAA‐group compared to the control group (Table 3, Figure 6G). Compared to the TAA group, the TAA + LF group exhibited a significant reduction in the area% of Ki67 immunoexpression, while QD group showed a non‐significant decrease (Table 3, Figure 6G).

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Ki67 immunohistochemical analysis of rats' livers. (A) Control; (B) Lactéol® forte (LF); (C) Quercetin dehydrate (QD) groups: Minimal to moderate brown immunostaining; (D) Thioacetamide (TAA) group: Marked brown immunostaining, inset: Brown immunostaining of hepatocytes cytoplasm; (E) TAA + LF; (F) TAA + QD groups: Decreased Ki 67 immunoexpression, inset: Perisinusoidal positive brown staining; (G) Quantitative image analysis of the average area % for Ki67 immunoexpression in different treated groups compared to control one. Columns are group means. Means without a common letter differ significantly (p < 0.05). Scale bar = 100 μm for (A, B, D, F) and scale bar = 50 μm for (C, E, inset D, F).

Regarding immunohistochemical analysis for caspase 3 in the control (Figure 7A) and LF (Figure 7B) rats group, no brown positive reaction was detected either in the cytoplasm or nucleus (Figure 7A) while QD‐treated group, caspase 3 was faintly expressed in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes (Figure 7C). In the TAA group, a strong positive reaction in the cytoplasm of hepatocytes was recorded (Figure 7D). The LF‐treated group showed immunoexpression similar to that detected in the control group. In addition, caspase 3 was less expressed in TAA + LF treated rats (Figure 7E) while QD treatment did not reverse the caspase 3 expression (Figure 7F) when compared with the TAA group. Compared to the TAA group, the TAA + LF group exhibited a significant reduction in the area% of caspase 3 immunoexpression, while the TAA + QD group showed a non‐significant change (Table 3 and Figure 7G).

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Caspase 3 immunohistochemical analysis of rats' livers. (A) Control; (B) Lactéol® forte (LF) groups: Negative antibody reaction; (C) Quercetin dehydrate (QD) group: Minimal brown immunostaining; (D) Thioacetamide (TAA) group: Diffuse brown hepatocellular staining, inset: Portal multifocal brown cytoplasmic staining; (E) TAA + LF group: Decreased expression of Caspase 3, inset: Minimal portal hepatocellular cytoplasmic staining; (F) TAA + QD group: Multifocal hepatocellular cytoplasmic staining (arrows); (G) Quantitative image analysis of the average area % for caspase 3 immunoexpression in different treated groups compared to control one. Columns are group means. Means without a common letter differ significantly (p < 0.05). Scale bar = 100 μm for (A–E), Scale bar = 50 μm for (F, inset D, E).

4. DISCUSSION

The induction of hepatic damage through TAA injection is one of the experimental methods widely used to identify hepatoprotective agents due to its outstanding solubility in the water, and a prolonged injury and recovery pattern, giving significant time to study mechanisms. 19 TAA‐induced liver cirrhosis is considered to be a typical model because it mimics many aspects of the human disease that lead to the development of fibrosis, cirrhosis and liver cancer in rats. 20 , 21 Qu is a member of the flavonoid family and more specifically a subclass called flavonol and is widely distributed in the plant kingdom. In the mouth, Qu released from the food can interact with salivary protein and form soluble Qu‐protein binary aggregates. 22 In the stomach, Qu is exposed to the strong acidic condition and may be degraded to phenolic acids by bacterial ring fission, leading to the breakdown of Qu. 23 In the small intestine, there is efficient glucuronidation of Qu by the action of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases and extensive O‐methylation of Qu by the action of catechol‐O‐methyltransferase. 24 After absorption, it reaches the peaks at approximately 30 min before its metabolized by glucuronidation and sulfation. 25 Subsequently, those Qu and Qu derivatives are transported by the hepatic portal vein to the liver, where they are further metabolised, including O‐methylation, sulfation and glucuronidation. 26 The conjugation of Qu with sulfate is carried out by sulfotransferases. When Qu is O‐methylated, its major products are 30‐O‐methylquercetin (isorhamnetin) and 40‐O‐methylquercetin (tamaraxetin) to a lesser extent. The resulted Qu is released into blood circulation via the portal vein of the liver. 25 The kidney is a major organ of excretion, and perhaps benzoic acid derivatives are a common metabolite of Qu. 27 Thus, our study aimed to illustrate the possible protective efficiency of LF and Qu against the hepatocellular injury induced by TAA injection in rat model.

Our results showed a significant decrease in body weight with a significant increase in the RLW ratio week in TAA‐treated group. This may be attributed to TAA causing marked toxicity in rats, which interferes with the body weight gain. Previous studies attributed the same outcome to lower levels of nutrient absorption and metabolic efficiency after exposure to TAA. 28 , 29 Furthermore, TAA + LF and TAA + QD showed non‐significant differences in body weight as compared to TAA‐treated rats. Also, one mortality has been recorded in the TAA group, and this finding is parallel to previous research. 3 In our results, despite the induced hepatic cirrhosis in animals of group II, the level of serum ALT and AST showed a non‐significant increase from the control value. Also, the same result was obtained by Palacios et al. 30 after 16 weeks of TAA injection in C3H/He mice. On the contrary, Salama et al., 31 Đurašević et al. 32 and Ayoub et al. 33 found a significant increase in serum ALT after injection of TAA. Additionally, Ogaly et al. 34 and Abdel‐Rahman et al. 35 showed a substantial increment in the serum levels of ALT and AST after intraperitoneal injection of TAA at a dose of 100 mg/kg 3 times for 2 weeks. Additionally, Abdel‐Rahman et al. 36 detected a substantial increment in activities of AST and ALT with a reduction in albumin and total protein levels after TAA injection for 14 days (5 or 10 mg/kg, orally). This variation may be due to the strain of animals, the dose of TAA and/or conditions of the experiment. While serum levels of GGT were significantly increased as compared to the control group. These results were in agreement with Salama et al., 31 El‐Gendy et al. 37 and Ayoub et al. 33 The combined administration of TAA with LF and QD showed a non‐significant decrease in serum hepatic enzymes indicating that both may have a protective effect against TAA hepatotoxicity. The downregulating effect of LF and QD against serum‐level enzymes was reported by Bahr et al. 38 and Afifi et al., 39 respectively. Our necropsy results of the TAA‐treated group revealed diffuse, multinodular (cirrhotic nodules) and hard inconsistency. The same results were obtained by Gao et al., 40 De Souza et al. 41 and Shaban et al. 2 Additionally, Ayoub et al. 33 showed that the administration of TAA at a dose of 100 mg/kg for 8 weeks resulted in marked hepatocellular necrosis, intense inflammatory cell proliferation and portal fibroplasia with pseudo‐lobulation. Furthermore, the liver of TAA + LF or TAA + QD‐treated rats was less cirrhotic. Microscopic observations indicated severe hepatocellular vacuolation and centrilobular necrosis and fibrosis that progressed into bridging fibrosis then cirrhotic nodules of different sizes with intense mononuclear inflammatory cells, marked oval cells hyperplasia and ductular reaction. Cytoplasmic Mallory bodies were seen inside the cytoplasm of most hepatocytes as also described by Roomi et al. 42 According to previous studies, CYP2E1 is a major contributor to TAA bioactivation and toxicity, which leads to the generation of sulfine and sulfone metabolites. 43 TASO (sulfine) is responsible for karyomegally, changing cell permeability and increasing intracellular Ca levels that initiate apoptosis. Furthermore, TASO2 binds to hepatic macromolecules as proteins and lipid‐producing centrilobular necrosis so that TAA, unlike most hepatotoxins that produce periportal hepatocellular necrosis. The histopathological changes were in harmony with Al‐Attar and Al‐Rethea, 24 Shareef et al. 21 and Abdel‐Rahman et al. 35 , 36 Lesions in TAA + QD‐treated group were lesser in the extent than those of the TAA‐treated rats but most severe than those reported in the TAA + LF‐treated group. The findings of QD treatment came in accordance with Afifi et al. 39 and Salama et al. 31 In the present work, the administration of LF resulted in the improvement of the histoarchitecture of the liver with increasing the reactivity of inflammatory and immune cells against TAA‐harmful effects as documented previously by Bahr et al. 38 Moreover, Moro‐García et al. 44 and Garcia‐Castillo et al. 45 showed the immunostimulant effect of L. delbrueckii and L. fermentum, respectively.

The process of extracellular matrix (ECM) production is initiated by the activation and transformation of quiescent hepatic mesenchymal cells (as hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) and portal fibroblasts) into myofibroblasts that express α‐SMA. 46 HSCs are found in space of Disse under certain cytokine‐mediated pathways that undergo principle morphologic changes involving the loss of lipid vacuoles and are transformed into a spindle‐shaped myofibroblast that replicates at the site of injury to produce collagen and other ECM component as proteoglycans, fibronectin and hyaluronan and thus propagate fibrosis. 47 Moreover, fibrosis in the portal tracts is primarily generated by portal fibroblasts rather than HSCs. 48 In our study, TAA‐treated group showed marked upregulation of fibrotic markers (collagen by Masson's trichrome and α‐SMA expression) in comparison to the control rats. The same result was obtained by Đurašević et al. 32 and El‐Gendy et al. 37 Furthermore, Abdel‐Rahman et al. 35 showed that the intraperitoneal injection of TAA (100 mg/kg) for 2 weeks resulted in a substantial increment in hepatic fibrosis markers as TGF‐β1, collagen I, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and α‐SMA. LF showed antifibrotic activity as demonstrated by the down‐regulation of α‐SMA‐stained myofibroblast and collagen expression by Masson's trichrome. 38 Also, QD decreased the increment of collagen deposition and α‐SMA expression by TAA, but its effect was lower than LF. The anti‐fibrotic effect of QD is reported by Wang et al. 49 and Li et al. 50

Ki67 is a nuclear protein antigen and is widely used as a proliferative marker for the growth and proliferation of cancer cells so it is important for cancer grading and prognostic evaluation. 51 Ki67 is associated with active cell proliferation and expressed in all phases of the cell cycle (G1, S, G2 and M phases), except in resting cells (G0), with a sharp decrease after mitosis. 52 In the present study, the cytoplasmic and nuclear staining of Ki67 was markedly increased in the TAA‐treated group as compared to the control group. Similar findings were documented by Köhn‐Gaone et al. 53 and Salama et al. 31 Ki67 expression in the cytoplasm and cell membrane of an unknown mechanism was reported in breast cancer by Faratian et al., 54 in mice after fumonisin toxicosis by Sozmen et al. 55 and in Wistar rats after malathion toxicity by Baiomy et al. 56 The present study showed that LF can counteract the TAA‐induced increment in ki67 expression. These results agree with Kahouli et al. 57 who reported a decrease in Ki67 expression in L. fermentum and L. acidophilus probiotic mixture against colorectal cancer in mice as well as with Aindelis and Chlichlia 58 who documented the anti‐proliferative effect of probiotic in which Lactobacillus decreased expression of Ki67. Furthermore, TAA + QD‐treated group showed a non‐significant decrease in the Ki67 immunoexpression as compared to TAA‐treated group. Lu et al. 59 reported that quercetin reduced Ki67 expression significantly, and the combination with docetaxel, a chemotherapy agent, showed the strongest inhibitory effect on tumour cell proliferation in docetaxel‐resistant prostate cancer.

The apoptosis pathway induced by TAA depends on the activation of caspase 3. 60 In our study, the high rate of apoptosis detected in the TAA group is supported by previous studies. 31 , 61 Moreover, caspase 3 was less expressed in TAA + LF‐treated rats when compared with the TAA group. Our findings come in line with Chen et al. 62 who reported that Lactobacillus restored the increased expression of caspase‐3‐positive hepatocytes. Conversely, QD treatment did not reverse the caspase‐3 expression when compared with the TAA group. In parallel, Choi and Kim 63 stated that oral administration of quercetin (100 and 250 mg/kg BW for 18 days) in mice leads to its accumulation in the liver with subsequent apoptotic body formation, which is evidenced by increased caspase‐3 expression. Additionally, Wang et al. 64 observed that quercetin sensitises doxorubicin‐induced apoptosis in liver cancer cells mainly triggered by increasing the loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential, indicating the increase in the mitochondrial breakdown, that enhanced release of cytochrome c and the increase in caspase 3 subsequently. Quercetin has pro‐apoptotic potential through diverse mechanisms via its antioxidant properties and the inhibition of the p53 gene and BCL‐2 protein. 65 Additionally, Thangasamy et al. 66 showed that the administration of quercetin in the diet of a rat model demonstrated a decrease in the occurrence of mammary tumour initiation by carcinogens. The capacity of quercetin to inhibit tumour growth exhibits a dose‐dependent impact, whereby lower concentrations provide chemopreventive effects while higher concentrations possess pro‐oxidant properties or potential direct therapeutic attributes. Furthermore, Spencer et al. 67 showed that quercetin and its O‐methylated metabolites induced neuronal death by inhibiting Akt/PKB and ERK survival pathway and activating the c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase death pathway.

5. CONCLUSION

Overall, our data suggest that TAA intoxication induced deleterious effects on body weight, biochemical parameters and histopathological and immunohistochemical pictures of the liver of male albino rats which can be ameliorated by LF or QD. LF showed better hepatic protection than QD against TAA toxicity in the improvement of some serum hepatic transaminases, histopathological picture and immunohistochemical markers. Hence, LF can be used as a promising candidate to protect against fibrosis. Also, because of the discrepancy in different studies, further research work is required to better understand the potential risk or safety of dietary QD.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Hebatallah M. Saad: Conceptualization (equal); methodology (equal); writing – original draft (equal); writing – review and editing (equal). Samah S. Oda: Writing – original draft (equal). Athanasios Alexiou: Visualization (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Marios Papadakis: Resources (equal); validation (equal); visualization (equal). Mohamed H. Mahmoud: Writing – review and editing (equal). Gaber El‐Saber Batiha: Writing – original draft (equal). Eman Khalifa: Methodology (equal); supervision (equal).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

There is no conflict of interest.

ARRIVE GUIDELINES

The authors confirm that the study was carried out in compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to extend their gratitude to King Saud University (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia) for funding this research through Researchers supporting Project number (RSP‐2024‐R406). Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the University of Witten‐Herdecke Germany.

Saad HM, Oda SS, Alexiou A, et al. Hepatoprotective activity of Lactéol® forte and quercetin dihydrate against thioacetamide‐induced hepatic cirrhosis in male albino rats. J Cell Mol Med. 2024;28:e18196. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.18196

Hebatallah M. Saad and Samah S. Oda are equally contributed to this work.

Contributor Information

Hebatallah M. Saad, Email: heba.magdy@mau.edu.eg.

Marios Papadakis, Email: drmariospapadakis@gmail.com.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data generated and analysed during our study are included in this article.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Pimpin L, Cortez‐Pinto H, Negro F, et al. Burden of liver disease in Europe: epidemiology and analysis of risk factors to identify prevention policies. J Hepatol. 2018;69(3):718‐735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Shaban NZ, Zaki MM, Koutb F, Abdul‐Aziz AA, Elshehawy AA‐H, Mehany H. Protective and therapeutic role of mango pulp and eprosartan drug and their anti‐synergistic effects against thioacetamide‐induced hepatotoxicity in male rats. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2022;29(34):51427‐51441. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19383-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Li X, Benjamin IS, Alexander B. Reproducible production of thioacetamide‐induced macronodular cirrhosis in the rat with no mortality. J Hepatol. 2002;36(4):488‐493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Arora S, Kaur IP, Chopra K, Rishi P. Efficiency of double layered microencapsulated probiotic to modulate proinflammatory molecular markers for the management of alcoholic liver disease. Mediators Inflamm. 2014;2014:1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kang Y, Kang X, Cai Y. The gut microbiome as a target for adjuvant therapy in insomnia disorder. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2022;46(1):101834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Schupack DA, Mars RAT, Voelker DH, Abeykoon JP, Kashyap PC. The promise of the gut microbiome as part of individualized treatment strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022;19(1):7‐25. doi: 10.1038/s41575-021-00499-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. D'Andrea G. Quercetin: a flavonol with multifaceted therapeutic applications? Fitoterapia. 2015;106:256‐271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Ramachandran B, Jeyarajpandian C, Jeyaseelan JM, et al. Quercetin‐induced apoptosis in HepG2 cells and identification of quercetin derivatives as potent inhibitors for Caspase‐3 through computational methods. Struct Chem. 2022;1‐27:1867‐1893. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Dibal NI, Garba SH, Jacks TW. Onion Peel quercetin attenuates ethanol‐induced liver injury in mice by preventing oxidative stress and steatosis. Biomed Res Ther. 2022;9(6):5101‐5111. [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aslam A, Sheikh N, Shahzad M, Saeed G, Fatima N, Akhtar T. Quercetin ameliorates thioacetamide‐induced hepatic fibrosis and oxidative stress by antagonizing the hedgehog signaling pathway. J Cell Biochem. 2022;123:1356‐1365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Zhang Y, Jin Q, Li X, et al. Amelioration of alcoholic liver steatosis by dihydroquercetin through the modulation of AMPK‐dependent lipogenesis mediated by P2X7R–NLRP3‐inflammasome activation. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(19):4862‐4871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Gelen V, Şengül E, Gedikli S, Gür C, Özkanlar S. Therapeutic effect of quercetin on renal function and tissue damage in the obesity induced rats. Biomed Pharmacother. 2017;100(89):524‐528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Al‐Gayyar MM, Bagalagel A, Noor AO, Almasri DM, Diri R. The therapeutic effects of nicotinamide in hepatocellular carcinoma through blocking IGF‐1 and effecting the balance between Nrf2 and PKB. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;112:108653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Ghazy EW, Mokhbatly A‐AA, Keniber SS, Shoghy KM. Synergistic ameliorative effect Of Lactobacillus and Spirulina platensis against expermintal colitis In albinorats: antioxidant, histopathological and molecular studies. Slov Vet Res. 2019;56. 10.26873/SVR-793-2019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Suvarna KS, Layton C, Bancroft JD. Bancroft's Theory and Practice of Histological Techniques E‐Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Van De Vlekkert D, Machado E, d'Azzo A. Analysis of generalized fibrosis in mouse tissue sections with Masson's trichrome staining. Bio‐Protocol. 2020;10(10):e3629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Dabbs DJ. Diagnostic Immunohistochemistry E‐Book: Theranostic and Genomic Applications. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Crowe AR, Yue W. Semi‐quantitative determination of protein expression using immunohistochemistry staining and analysis: an integrated protocol. Bio‐Protocol. 2019;9(24):e3465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Apte UM, Limaye PB, Ramaiah SK, et al. Upregulated promitogenic signaling via cytokines and growth factors: potential mechanism of robust liver tissue repair in calorie‐restricted rats upon toxic challenge. Toxicol Sci. 2002;69(2):448‐459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Gratte FD, Pasic S, Bakar NDBA, et al. Previous liver regeneration induces fibro‐protective mechanisms during thioacetamide‐induced chronic liver injury. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2021;134:105933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Shareef SH, Ibrahim IAA, Alzahrani AR, Al‐Medhtiy MH, Abdulla MA. Hepatoprotective effects of methanolic extract of green tea against Thioacetamide‐induced liver injury in Sprague Dawley rats. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2022;29(1):564‐573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Rémésy C, Jiménez L. Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79:727‐747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Weldin J, Jack R, Dugaw K, Kapur RP. Quercetin, an over‐the‐counter supplement, causes neuroblastoma‐like elevation of plasma homovanillic acid. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6(6):547‐551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Németh K, Plumb GW, Berrin J‐G, et al. Deglycosylation by small intestinal epithelial cell β‐glucosidases is a critical step in the absorption and metabolism of dietary flavonoid glycosides in humans. Eur J Nutr. 2003;42(1):29‐42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Murota K, Terao J. Quercetin appears in the lymph of unanesthetized rats as its phase II metabolites after administered into the stomach. FEBS Lett. 2005;579(24):5343‐5346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Oliveira EJ, Watson DG. In vitro glucuronidation of kaempferol and quercetin by human UGT‐1A9 microsomes. FEBS Lett. 2000;471(1):1‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Graefe EU, Derendorf H, Veit M. Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of the flavonol quercetin in humans. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999;37(5):219‐233. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Al‐Attar AM, Al‐Rethea HA. Chemoprotective effect of omega‐3 fatty acids on thioacetamide induced hepatic fibrosis in male rats. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2017;24(4):956‐965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Woo M, Noh JS, Kim MJ, Song YO, Lee H. Magma seawater inhibits hepatic lipid accumulation through suppression of lipogenic enzymes regulated by srebps in thioacetamide‐injected rats. Mar Drugs. 2019;17(6):317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Salguero Palacios R, Roderfeld M, Hemmann S, et al. Activation of hepatic stellate cells is associated with cytokine expression in thioacetamide‐induced hepatic fibrosis in mice. Lab Invest. 2008;88(11):1192‐1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Salama YA, El‐Karef A, El Gayyar AM, Abdel‐Rahman N. Beyond its antioxidant properties: quercetin targets multiple signalling pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma in rats. Life Sci. 2019;236:116933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Đurašević S, Pejić S, Grigorov I, et al. Effects of C60 fullerene on thioacetamide‐induced rat liver toxicity and gut microbiome changes. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(6):911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ayoub IM, El‐Baset MA, Elghonemy MM, et al. Chemical profile of Cyperus laevigatus and its protective effects against thioacetamide‐induced hepatorenal toxicity in rats. Molecules. 2022;27(19):6470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Ogaly HA, Abdel‐Rahman RF, Mohamed MAE, Ahmed‐Farid O, Khattab MS, Abd‐Elsalam RM. Thymol ameliorated neurotoxicity and cognitive deterioration in a thioacetamide‐induced hepatic encephalopathy rat model; involvement of the BDNF/CREB signaling pathway. Food Funct. 2022;13(11):6180‐6194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Abdel‐Rahman RF, Fayed HM, Asaad GF, et al. The involvement of TGF‐β1/FAK/α‐SMA pathway in the antifibrotic impact of rice bran oil on thioacetamide‐induced liver fibrosis in rats. PloS One. 2021;16(12):e0260130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Abdel‐Rahman RF, Fayed HM, Mohamed MA, et al. Apigenin role against thioacetamide‐triggered liver fibrosis: deciphering the PPARγ/TGF‐β1/NF‐κB and the HIF/FAK/AKT pathways. J Herbmed Pharmacol. 2023;12(2):202‐213. [Google Scholar]
  • 37. El‐Gendy Z, Ramadan A, El‐Batran S, et al. Carvacrol hinders the progression of hepatic fibrosis via targeting autotaxin and thioredoxin in thioacetamide‐induced liver fibrosis in rat. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2021;40(12):2188‐2201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Bahr HI, Hamad R, Ismail SA. The impact of lactobacillus acidophilus on hepatic and colonic fibrosis induced by ethephon in a rat model. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019;22(8):956‐962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Afifi NA, Ibrahim MA, Galal MK. Hepatoprotective influence of quercetin and ellagic acid on thioacetamide‐induced hepatotoxicity in rats. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2018;96(6):624‐629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Gao J‐H, Wen S‐L, Feng S, et al. Celecoxib and octreotide synergistically ameliorate portal hypertension via inhibition of angiogenesis in cirrhotic rats. Angiogenesis. 2016;19(4):501‐511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. de Souza SLB, Mota GAF, Gregolin CS, et al. Exercise training attenuates cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2021;14(4):674‐684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Roomi MW, Gaal K, Yuan QX, et al. Preneoplastic liver cell foci expansion induced by thioacetamide toxicity in drug‐primed mice. Exp Mol Pathol. 2006;81(1):8‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Hajovsky H, Hu G, Koen Y, et al. Metabolism and toxicity of thioacetamide and thioacetamide S‐oxide in rat hepatocytes. Chem Res Toxicol. 2012;25(9):1955‐1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Moro‐García MA, Alonso‐Arias R, Baltadjieva M, et al. Oral supplementation with lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus 8481 enhances systemic immunity in elderly subjects. Age. 2013;35(4):1311‐1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Garcia‐Castillo V, Komatsu R, Clua P, et al. Evaluation of the immunomodulatory activities of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus fermentum UCO‐979C. Front Immunol. 2019;10:1376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Zhou WC, Zhang QB, Qiao L. Pathogenesis of liver cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(23):7312‐7324. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Gao J, Wei B, de Assuncao TM, et al. Hepatic stellate cell autophagy inhibits extracellular vesicle release to attenuate liver fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2020;73(5):1144‐1154. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Cullen JM, Stalker MJ. Liver and biliary system. Jubb, Kennedy & Palmer's Pathology of Domestic Animals: Volume 2. Elsevier; 2016:258‐352.e1. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7020-5318-4.00008-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Wang R, Zhang H, Wang Y, Song F, Yuan Y. Inhibitory effects of quercetin on the progression of liver fibrosis through the regulation of NF‐кB/IкBα, p38 MAPK, and Bcl‐2/Bax signaling. Int Immunopharmacol. 2017;47:126‐133. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.03.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Li X, Jin Q, Yao Q, et al. The flavonoid quercetin ameliorates liver inflammation and fibrosis by regulating hepatic macrophages activation and polarization in mice. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:72. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Li LT, Jiang G, Chen Q, Zheng JN. Ki67 is a promising molecular target in the diagnosis of cancer (review). Mol Med Rep. 2015;11(3):1566‐1572. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2014.2914 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Scholzen T, Gerdes J. The Ki‐67 protein: from the known and the unknown. J Cell Physiol. 2000;182(3):311‐322. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Köhn‐Gaone J, Dwyer BJ, Grzelak CA, et al. Divergent inflammatory, Fibrogenic, and liver progenitor cell dynamics in two common mouse models of chronic liver injury. Am J Pathol. 2016;186(7):1762‐1774. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Faratian D, Munro A, Twelves C, Bartlett JM. Membranous and cytoplasmic staining of Ki67 is associated with HER2 and ER status in invasive breast carcinoma. Histopathology. 2009;54(2):254‐257. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03191.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sozmen M, Devrim AK, Tunca R, Bayezit M, Dag S, Essiz D. Protective effects of silymarin on fumonisin B₁‐induced hepatotoxicity in mice. J Vet Sci. 2014;15(1):51‐60. doi: 10.4142/jvs.2014.15.1.51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Baiomy AA, Attia HF, Soliman MM, Makrum O. Protective effect of ginger and zinc chloride mixture on the liver and kidney alterations induced by malathion toxicity. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2015;28(1):122‐128. doi: 10.1177/0394632015572083 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Kahouli I, Malhotra M, Westfall S, Alaoui‐Jamali MA, Prakash S. Design and validation of an orally administrated active L. fermentumL. acidophilus probiotic formulation using colorectal cancer Apc (min/+) mouse model. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2017;101(5):1999‐2019. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7885-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Aindelis G, Chlichlia K. Modulation of Anti‐Tumour Immune Responses by Probiotic Bacteria. Vaccines (Basel). 2020;8(2):329. doi: 10.3390/vaccines8020329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Lu X, Yang F, Chen D, et al. Quercetin reverses docetaxel resistance in prostate cancer via androgen receptor and PI3K/Akt signaling pathways. Int J Biol Sci. 2020;16(7):1121‐1134. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.41686 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Chen LH, Hsu CY, Weng CF. Involvement of P53 and Bax/bad triggering apoptosis in thioacetamide‐induced hepatic epithelial cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(32):5175‐5181. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i32.5175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. El Awdan SA, Amin MM, Hassan A. Cilostazol attenuates indices of liver damage induced by thioacetamide in albino rats through regulating inflammatory cytokines and apoptotic biomarkers. Eur J Pharmacol. 2018;822:168‐176. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Chen X, Zhang J, Yi R, Mu J, Zhao X, Yang Z. Hepatoprotective effects of lactobacillus on carbon tetrachloride‐induced acute liver injury in mice. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(8):2212. doi: 10.3390/ijms19082212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Choi EJ, Kim GH. Quercetin accumulation by chronic administration causes the caspase‐3 activation in liver and brain of mice. Biofactors. 2010;36(3):216‐221. doi: 10.1002/biof.94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Wang G, Zhang J, Liu L, Sharma S, Dong Q. Quercetin potentiates doxorubicin mediated antitumor effects against liver cancer through p53/Bcl‐xl. PloS One. 2012;7(12):e51764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051764 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Hsu CL, Yen GC. Phenolic compounds: evidence for inhibitory effects against obesity and their underlying molecular signaling mechanisms. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52(1):53‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Thangasamy T, Sittadjody S, Burd R. Chapter 27 – quercetin: a potential complementary and alternative cancer therapy. In: Watson RR, ed. Complementary and Alternative Therapies and the Aging Population. Academic Press; 2009:563‐584. [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Spencer JP, Rice‐Evans C, Williams RJ. Modulation of pro‐survival Akt/protein kinase B and ERK1/2 signaling cascades by quercetin and its in vivo metabolites underlie their action on neuronal viability. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(37):34783‐34793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated and analysed during our study are included in this article.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES