Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2024 Mar 27;75(7):1791–1795. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae049

NACs strike again: NOR-like1 is responsible for cuticle development in tomato fruit

Nigel E Gapper 1,
PMCID: PMC10967241  PMID: 38534188

Abstract

This article comments on:

Liu G-S, Huang H, Grierson D, Gao Y, Ji X, Peng Z-Z, Li H-L, Niu X-L, Jia W, He J-L, Xiang L-T, Gao H-Y, Qu G-Q, Zhu H-L, Zhu B-Z, Luo Y-B, Fu D-Q. 2024. NAC transcription factor SlNOR-like1 plays a dual regulatory role in tomato fruit cuticle formation. Journal of Experimental Botany 75, 1903–1918.

Keywords: Cuticle, cuticular wax, cutin, fruit development, NAC transcription factors, tomato


NAC domain proteins are plant-specific transcription factors (TFs) that have diverged into one of the largest TF families ( Mathew and Agarwal, 2018 ). They are critical regulators of many aspects of plant stress response and growth, including fruit development, maturation, and ripening, yet many of the NAC TFs encoded in sequenced plant genomes have not been functionally characterized. Understanding the function of these ‘orphan’ NAC TFs in crop plants is important to improve the genetic background of crops, or horticultural practices. In this issue Liu et al. (2024) describe an additional function for the NAC TF SlNOR-like1 that was previously reported to positively regulate fruit ripening and negatively regulate fruit size in tomato ( Gao et al., 2018 ). This new research demonstrates a dual function for SlNOR-like1 in cuticle development, through promotion of cutin deposition by activating the transcription of cutin synthesis genes, resulting in cuticle thickening in the outer layer of fruit, and also inhibition of wax accumulation by acting as a transcriptional repressor to key wax biosynthesis- and transport-related genes. These new findings provide a new model for cuticle development in fruit, an important trait that traditional plant breeding and biotechnology approaches can target.

The cuticle is important for fruit quality

Fruit are an essential nutritional component of the human diet and are an integral part of the world economy. Consequently, a clear understanding of fruit development is critical for optimization of fruit quality, yield, and post-harvest storage. Fruit skin composition varies widely among species. Most fleshy fruit have a live skin enveloped by a cuticle comprising cutin, a stable and insoluble polyester of primarily long chain hydroxy fatty acids (Fich et al., 2016; Macnee et al., 2021). The cuticle can also contain hydrophobic compounds collectively referred to as waxes, as well as cell wall polysaccharides and sometimes a saponification-resistant fraction called cutan (Nip et al., 1986). The specific make up of this cuticle layer is dependent on the organ and species of origin, and serves three main functions: (i) a barrier to prevent water loss to aerial plant organs; (ii) a physical barrier to prevent pathogen infection and (iii) organogenesis and a matrix for biomechanical stability, for example to inhibit fruit cracking (Fich et al., 2016). From a post-harvest perspective, a well-developed cuticle is essential for managing water loss, which is a key driver of fruit softening, for example in apples and other fruit during storage. Soft apples are not only undesirable for eating, but also susceptible to both physiological storage disorders and opportunistic pathogenic diseases. Hence, there is growing interest in post-harvest research into cuticle development and how this new knowledge can be applied in our fruit supply chains.

Cuticle development in fruit

Although the structure of cutin polymers is still not well understood, the biosynthesis of the cuticle in plants is well established, mainly through genetic studies in Arabidopsis (Fich et al., 2016; Lara et al., 2019). Most fruit-focused work on cuticle deposition and development has been done in tomato (López-Casado et al., 2007; Girard et al., 2012; Petit et al., 2016; Segado et al., 2020; Reynoud et al., 2022). However, there has been some wider interest in other important fruiting crops given its biological importance in fruit quality maintenance. In citrus, it was found that cutin was formed before wax accumulation during cell expansion, providing the scaffold for wax assembly during fruit maturation (Wang et al., 2016). Additionally, Wang et al. (2016) observed that a MYB TF, GL1-like, and abscisic acid (ABA) were predicted to regulate wax synthesis during fruit development. In apple, a well-developed cuticle inhibits microcracking of the epidermis which can result in disorders such as russeting or susceptibility to fungal infections such as rust (Zhang et al., 2020). Furthermore, an underdeveloped cuticle can lead to a number of age-related physiological disorders. Structural studies of the apple cuticle showed that the incorporation of [14C]oleic acid (C18) was significantly higher than that of [14C]palmitic acid (C16), and the incorporation in the cutin fraction exceeded that in the wax fraction (Si et al., 2021). Moreover, the make-up of the cuticle can vary markedly depending on the variety (Leide et al., 2018). To better understand russeting of fruit, microscopy, transcriptomics, and targeted metabolomic profiling were used, focusing on triterpene chemistry in russeted and non-russeted closely related ‘Golden Delicious’ clones (Falginella et al., 2021). These authors showed that a MYB TF, MYB66, was able to bind the promoter of the oxidosqualene cyclase OSC5, to drive the production of lupeol derivatives. Their results provide insights into the breakdown of cuticle integrity leading to russet and how this drives MYB-regulated changes to triterpene biosynthesis. A genetic study in kiwifruit revealed three separate quantitative trait loci (QTLs) responsible for the russeting phenotype (Macnee et al., 2021), highlighting the polygenic nature of cuticle development regulation in fruit.

Box 1. Plant life cycle regulated by NAC transcription factors.

The sequenced tomato genome (Sato et al., 2012) provides a resource for predicting and identifying gene families in a crop that produces fleshy fruit, something that the plant model Arabidopsis lacks. Bioinformatic analysis of the tomato genome has revealed as many as 104 SlNACs mapped to all 12 chromosomes (Sakuraba et al., 2015). Yet many of these SlNACs are not yet functionally characterized. The life cycle of plants and diversity of regulatory function of the NAC TFs in tomato and other species is depicted in Fig. 1. The following processes are all regulated by NAC TFs: seed development and germination (Verza et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2014; Mathew et al., 2016; Song et al., 2022); secondary cell wall development (Hussey et al., 2011; Chai et al., 2015; Matias Hurtado et al., 2020; Sun et al., 2020); root development (Montiel et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2022); floral development (Sablowski and Meyerowitz, 1998; Yoo et al., 2007; Zhong et al., 2016; Zong et al., 2020); fruit development, maturation, and ripening (for recent review articles, see Forlani et al., 2021; Kou et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2022, 2023); leaf senescence (Guo and Gan, 2006; Yang et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2015; Ma et al., 2018); temperature stress (Zhou et al., 2011; Guan et al., 2014; Liu et al., 2019; Yong et al., 2019); drought stress (Sosa-Valencia et al., 2017; Selote et al., 2018; Sakuraba et al., 2020); and biotic stress (Shan et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

NAC TFs have been shown to regulate key aspects of plant growth, development, and stress response throughout a plant’s life cycle (tomato depicted as an example), see Box 1 for details and references. BioRender was used for graphics (https://www.biorender.com).

NAC TFs regulate fruit development, maturation, and ripening

It is well documented that fruit development, maturation, and ripening are regulated by NAC TFs (for recent review articles, see Forlani et al., 2021; Kou et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2022, 2023). NAC-NOR, the NAC TF encoded by the non-ripening (nor) mutant in tomato, is the longest studied NAC TF involved in fruit ripening. It regulates multiple ripening pathways by activating the transcription of SlACS2, SlGgpps2, and SlPL, which are involved in ethylene biosynthesis, carotenoid production, and fruit softening, respectively (Gao et al., 2020). In addition, NAC-NOR binds to the promoter of SlDML2, a DNA demethylase-encoding gene, activating its expression to enhance fruit ripening (Gao et al., 2022). SlDML2 demethylates the promoter regions of important ripening genes, allowing TFs such as NAC-NOR to bind and activate transcription. NAC-NOR is also a target itself of this demethylation (Zhong et al., 2013). Further, SlNAM1 accelerates ripening when overexpressed, and delays the process in CRISPR/Cas9 [clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein9]-generated mutants (Gao et al., 2021). These authors also observed that SlNAM1 promoted ethylene biosynthesis through activation of SlACS2 and SlACS4, the two main ACC synthase genes expressed in tomato fruit during ripening.

A third NAC TF has also been found to regulate fruit ripening in tomato, SlNOR-like1, which acts similarly to NAC-NOR by activating multiple aspects of fruit ripening (Gao et al., 2018). In addition, SlNOR-like1 can control fruit size by negatively regulating cell layer number and cell area (Peng et al., 2023). Liu et al. (2024) observed that these CRISPR/Cas9-generated mutant lines (nor-like1) had a micro-cracking phenotype which prompted a more in-depth study of these lines. They found that the micro-cracking phenotype resulted from reduced cutin deposition and cuticle thickness as well as increased wax accumulation. SlNOR-like1 binds to the promoter of glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase6 (SlGPAT6), a key step in cutin monomer production, and CUTIN DEFICIENT2 (SlCD2) a positive regulator of cutin production. On binding SlNOR-like1, these genes are transcriptionally activated. Conversely, the authors of this study found that SlNOR-like1 acts as a transcriptional repressor for wax biosynthesis- and transport-related genes 3-ketoacyl-CoA synthase1 (SlKCS1), ECERIFERUM 1–2 (SlCER1–2), SlWAX2, and glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored lipid transfer protein1-like (SlLTPG1-like). These findings illustrate yet another important role for NAC TFs in plant growth and development, and provide a new model for the transcriptional regulation of the fruit cuticle.

The biological significance of cuticle development in fruit is far reaching, and these novel findings therefore provide new targets for biotechnological approaches to improve fruit quality and storability, accelerating traditional breeding efforts or through gene editing approaches. Moreover, these results illustrate the importance of the continued efforts to characterize the remaining ‘orphan’ NAC TF family members to assign biological function. Undoubtedly, there is plenty of biology left to discover from this important class of regulatory TFs.

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Drs Donald Hunter and Ian Hallett from the New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited for providing feedback on the content of this paper prior to publishing.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no known conflicting financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. Chai M, Bellizzi M, Wan C, Cui Z, Li Y, Wang G-L.. 2015. The NAC transcription factor OsSWN1 regulates secondary cell wall development in Oryza sativa. Journal of Plant Biology 58, 44–51. doi: 10.1007/s12374-014-0400-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Falginella L, Andre CM, Legay S, et al. 2021. Differential regulation of triterpene biosynthesis induced by an early failure in cuticle formation in apple. Horticulture Research 8, 75. doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00511-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fan K, Bibi N, Gan S, Li F, Yuan S, Ni M, Wang M, Shen H, Wang X.. 2015. A novel NAP member GhNAP is involved in leaf senescence in Gossypium hirsutum. Journal of Experimental Botany 66, 4669–4682. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fich EA, Segerson NA, Rose JK.. 2016. The plant polyester cutin: biosynthesis, structure, and biological roles. Annual Review of Plant Biology 67, 207–233. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Forlani S, Mizzotti C, Masiero S.. 2021. The NAC side of the fruit: tuning of fruit development and maturation. BMC Plant Biology 21, 238. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03029-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gao Y, Fan Z-Q, Zhang Q, et al. 2021. A tomato NAC transcription factor, SlNAM1, positively regulates ethylene biosynthesis and the onset of tomato fruit ripening. The Plant Journal 108, 1317–1331. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15512 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao Y, Lin Y, Xu M, et al. 2022. The role and interaction between transcription factor NAC-NOR and DNA demethylase SlDML2 in the biosynthesis of tomato fruit flavor volatiles. New Phytologist 235, 1913–1926. doi: 10.1111/nph.18301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gao Y, Wei W, Fan Z, et al. 2020. Re-evaluation of the nor mutation and the role of the NAC-NOR transcription factor in tomato fruit ripening. Journal of Experimental Botany 71, 3560–3574. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gao Y, Wei W, Zhao X, et al. 2018. A NAC transcription factor, NOR-like1, is a new positive regulator of tomato fruit ripening. Horticulture Research 5, 75. doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0111-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Girard A-L, Mounet F, Lemaire-Chamley M, et al. 2012. Tomato GDSL1 is required for cutin deposition in the fruit cuticle. The Plant Cell 24, 3119–3134. doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.101055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Guan Q, Yue X, Zeng H, Zhu J.. 2014. The protein phosphatase RCF2 and its interacting partner NAC019 are critical for heat stress-responsive gene regulation and thermotolerance in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26, 438–453. doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.118927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo T, Mao X, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Fu M, Sun Z, Kuai P, Lou Y, Fang Y.. 2017. Lamin-like proteins negatively regulate plant immunity through NAC WITH TRANSMEMBRANE MOTIF1-LIKE9 and NONEXPRESSOR OF PR GENES1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant 10, 1334–1348. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Guo Y, Gan S.. 2006. AtNAP, a NAC family transcription factor, has an important role in leaf senescence. The Plant Journal 46, 601–612. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02723.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hussey SG, Mizrachi E, Spokevicius AV, Bossinger G, Berger DK, Myburg AA.. 2011. SND2, a NAC transcription factor gene, regulates genes involved in secondary cell wall development in Arabidopsis fibres and increases fibre cell area in Eucalyptus. BMC Plant Biology 11, 173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-11-173 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kou X, Zhou J, Wu CE, Yang S, Liu Y, Chai L, Xue Z.. 2021. The interplay between ABA/ethylene and NAC TFs in tomato fruit ripening: a review. Plant Molecular Biology 106, 223–238. doi: 10.1007/s11103-021-01128-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lara I, Heredia A, Domínguez E.. 2019. Shelf life potential and the fruit cuticle: the unexpected player. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 770. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Leide J, Xavier de Souza A, Papp I, Riederer M.. 2018. Specific characteristics of the apple fruit cuticle: investigation of early and late season cultivars ‘Prima’ and ‘Florina’ (Malus domestica Borkh.). Scientia Horticulturae 229, 137–147. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li T, Cheng X, Wang X, et al. 2021. Glyoxalase I-4 functions downstream of NAC72 to modulate downy mildew resistance in grapevine. The Plant Journal 108, 394–410. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15447 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Liu C, Ma H, Zhou J, Li Z, Peng Z, Guo F, Zhang J.. 2019. TsHD1 and TsNAC1 cooperatively play roles in plant growth and abiotic stress resistance of Thellungiella halophile. The Plant Journal 99, 81–97. doi: 10.1111/tpj.14310 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu G-S, Huang H, Grierson D, et al. 2024. NAC transcription factor SlNOR-like1 plays a dual regulatory role in tomato fruit cuticle formation. Journal of Experimental Botany 75, 1903–1918. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad410 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu G-S, Li H-L, Grierson D, Fu D-Q.. 2022. NAC transcription factor family regulation of fruit ripening and quality: a review. Cells 11, 525. doi: 10.3390/cells11030525 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu J, Qiao Y, Li C, Hou B.. 2023. The NAC transcription factors play core roles in flowering and ripening fundamental to fruit yield and quality. Frontiers in Plant Science 14, 1095967. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1095967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. López-Casado G, Matas AJ, Domínguez E, Cuartero J, Heredia A.. 2007. Biomechanics of isolated tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) fruit cuticles: the role of the cutin matrix and polysaccharides. Journal of Experimental Botany 58, 3875–3883. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma X, Zhang Y, Turečková V, Xue G-P, Fernie AR, Mueller-Roeber B, Balazadeh S.. 2018. The NAC transcription factor SlNAP2 regulates leaf senescence and fruit yield in tomato. Plant Physiology 177, 1286–1302. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00292 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Macnee N, Hilario E, Tahir J, Currie A, Warren B, Rebstock R, Hallett IC, Chagné D, Schaffer RJ, Bulley SM.. 2021. Peridermal fruit skin formation in Actinidia sp. (kiwifruit) is associated with genetic loci controlling russeting and cuticle formation. BMC Plant Biology 21, 334. doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03025-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Mathew IE, Agarwal P.. 2018. May the fittest protein evolve: favoring the plant-specific origin and expansion of NAC transcription factors. Bioessays 40, 1800018. doi: 10.1002/bies.201800018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Mathew IE, Das S, Mahto A, Agarwal P.. 2016. Three rice NAC transcription factors heteromerize and are associated with seed size. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 1638. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Matias Hurtado FM, Pinto MD, Oliveira PN, Riaño-Pachón DM, Inocente LB, Carrer H.. 2020. Analysis of NAC domain transcription factor genes of Tectona grandis L.f. involved in secondary cell wall deposition. Genes 11, 20. doi: 10.3390/genes11010020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Montiel G, Gantet P, Jay-Allemand C, Breton C.. 2004. Transcription factor networks. pathways to the knowledge of root development. Plant Physiology 136, 3478–3485. doi: 10.1104/pp.104.051029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Nip M, Tegelaar E, De Leeuw J, Schenck P, Holloway P.. 1986. A new non-saponifiable highly aliphatic and resistant biopolymer in plant cuticles: evidence from pyrolysis and 13 C-NMR analysis of present-day and fossil plants. Naturwissenschaften 73, 579–585. doi: 10.1007/BF00368768 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Peng Z, Li H, Liu G, Jia W, Fu D.. 2023. NAC transcription factor NOR-like1 regulates tomato fruit size. Planta 258, 9. doi: 10.1007/s00425-023-04166-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Petit J, Bres C, Mauxion J-P, Tai FWJ, Martin LBB, Fich EA, Joubès J, Rose JKC, Domergue F, Rothan C.. 2016. The glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase GPAT6 from tomato plays a central role in fruit cutin biosynthesis. Plant Physiology 171, 894–913. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00409 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Reynoud N, Geneix N, Petit J, D’Orlando A, Fanuel M, Marion D, Rothan C, Lahaye M, Bakan B.. 2022. The cutin polymer matrix undergoes a fine architectural tuning from early tomato fruit development to ripening. Plant Physiology 190, 1821–1840. doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Sablowski RW, Meyerowitz EM.. 1998. A homolog of NO APICAL MERISTEM is an immediate target of the floral homeotic genes APETALA3/PISTILLATA. Cell 92, 93–103. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80902-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sakuraba Y, Kim D, Han S-H, Kim S-H, Piao W, Yanagisawa S, An G, Paek N-C.. 2020. Multilayered regulation of membrane-bound ONAC054 is essential for abscisic acid-induced leaf senescence in rice. The Plant Cell 32, 630–649. doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sakuraba Y, Kim Y-S, Han S-H, Lee B-D, Paek N-C.. 2015. The Arabidopsis transcription factor NAC016 promotes drought stress responses by repressing AREB1 transcription through a trifurcate feed-forward regulatory loop involving NAP. The Plant Cell 27, 1771–1787. doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sato S, Tabata S, Hirakawa H, et al. 2012. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485, 635–641. doi: 10.1038/nature11119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Segado P, Heredia-Guerrero JA, Heredia A, Domínguez E.. 2020. Cutinsomes and CUTIN SYNTHASE1 function sequentially in tomato fruit cutin deposition. Plant Physiology 183, 1622–1637. doi: 10.1104/pp.20.00516 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Selote D, Matthiadis A, Gillikin JW, Sato MH, Long TA.. 2018. The E3 ligase BRUTUS facilitates degradation of VOZ1/2 transcription factors. Plant, Cell & Environment 41, 2463–2474. doi: 10.1111/pce.13363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Shan W, Chen J-y, Kuang J-f, Lu W-j.. 2016. Banana fruit NAC transcription factor MaNAC5 cooperates with MaWRKYs to enhance the expression of pathogenesis-related genes against Colletotrichum musae. Molecular Plant Pathology 17, 330–338. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Si Y, Khanal BP, Sauheitl L, Knoche M.. 2021. Cutin synthesis in developing, field-grown apple fruit examined by external feeding of labelled precursors. Plants 10, 497. doi: 10.3390/plants10030497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Song S, Willems LAJ, Jiao A, Zhao T, Eric Schranz M, Bentsink L.. 2022. The membrane associated NAC transcription factors ANAC060 and ANAC040 are functionally redundant in the inhibition of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 5514–5528. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sosa-Valencia G, Palomar M, Covarrubias AA, Reyes JL.. 2017. The legume miR1514a modulates a NAC transcription factor transcript to trigger phasiRNA formation in response to drought. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 2013–2026. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erw380 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sun Q, Huang J, Guo Y, Yang M, Guo Y, Li J, Zhang J, Xu W.. 2020. A cotton NAC domain transcription factor, GhFSN5, negatively regulates secondary cell wall biosynthesis and anther development in transgenic Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 146, 303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Verza NC, Figueira TRS, Sousa SM, Arruda P.. 2011. Transcription factor profiling identifies an aleurone-preferred NAC family member involved in maize seed development. Annals of Applied Biology 158, 115–129. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00447.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Wang J, Sun L, Xie L, et al. 2016. Regulation of cuticle formation during fruit development and ripening in ‘Newhall’ navel orange (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) revealed by transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling. Plant Science 243, 131–144. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Wang J, Zheng C, Shao X, Hu Z, Li J, Wang P, Wang A, Yu J, Shi K.. 2020. Transcriptomic and genetic approaches reveal an essential role of the NAC transcription factor SlNAP1 in the growth and defense response of tomato. Horticulture Research 7, 209. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00442-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang W, Xu M, Wang Y, Jamil M.. 2014. Basal transcription factor 3 plays an important role in seed germination and seedling growth of rice. Biomedical Research International 2014, 465739. doi: 10.1155/2014/465739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu P, Ma W, Hu J, Cai W.. 2022. The nitrate-inducible NAC transcription factor NAC056 controls nitrate assimilation and promotes lateral root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 18, e1010090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Yang J, Worley E, Udvardi M.. 2014. A NAP–AAO3 regulatory module promotes chlorophyll degradation via ABA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis leaves. The Plant Cell 26, 4862–4874. doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.133769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Yong Y, Zhang Y, Lyu Y.. 2019. A stress-responsive NAC transcription factor from tiger lily (LlNAC2) interacts with LlDREB1 and LlZHFD4 and enhances various abiotic stress tolerance in Arabidopsis. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20, 3225. doi: 10.3390/ijms20133225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Yoo SY, Kim Y, Kim SY, Lee JS, Ahn JH.. 2007. Control of flowering time and cold response by a NAC-domain protein in Arabidopsis. PLoS One 2, e642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhang L, Yao L, Zhang N, Yang J, Zhu X, Tang X, Calderón-Urrea A, Si H.. 2018. Lateral root development in potato is mediated by Stu-mi164 regulation of NAC transcription factor. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 383. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang Y-L, You C-X, Li Y-Y, Hao Y-J.. 2020. Advances in biosynthesis, regulation, and function of apple cuticular wax. Frontiers in Plant Science 11, 1165. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhong J, Powell S, Preston JC.. 2016. Organ boundary NAC-domain transcription factors are implicated in the evolution of petal fusion. Plant Biology 18, 893–902. doi: 10.1111/plb.12493 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen Y-R, et al. 2013. Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nature Biotechnology 31, 154–159. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Zhou MQ, Shen C, Wu LH, Tang KX, Lin J.. 2011. CBF-dependent signaling pathway: a key responder to low temperature stress in plants. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 31, 186–192. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2010.505910 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zong X, Yan Q, Wu F, Ma Q, Zhang J.. 2020. Genome-wide analysis of the role of NAC family in flower development and abiotic stress responses in Cleistogenes songorica. Genes 11, 927. doi: 10.3390/genes11080927 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES