Skip to main content
Behavioral Sciences logoLink to Behavioral Sciences
. 2024 Mar 7;14(3):218. doi: 10.3390/bs14030218

The Influence of Geographical Environment on Public Social Trust: What Role Do Tourism Activities Play?

Yang Gao 1, Zhenbin Zhao 1,*, Yaofeng Ma 1, Ping He 2, Yuan Li 3,*
Editors: Ciro Esposito, Immacolata Di Napoli, Fortuna Procentese, Caterina Arcidiacono
PMCID: PMC10968445  PMID: 38540521

Abstract

Social trust is derived from the interaction of environmental and social factors, which has important significance for the sustainable development of society and social governance. In particular, in the post-pandemic era, tourist activity will receive special attention in terms of its role in the development of the public’s social trust. On the basis of the sample of big data, this research takes China as an example to study the influences of different geographical and environmental elements on individuals’ social trust as well as the common role played by the tourist activity. The research showed that the geographical environment and tourism activities have interacting effects on public social trust. This influencing mechanism is specifically manifested as the rice-growing ratio and tourist reception level can have interacting effects on the social trust of the residents in a tourist destination; pathogen stress and tourist supply level can exert interacting effects on the social trust of the residents in an area from which tourists originate; and economic development and tourist reception level can have interacting effects on the social trust of the residents in a tourist destination. By doing so, this research provides theoretical support and practical suggestions for the recovery of the public’s social trust from the perspective of tourism geography in the post-pandemic era.

Keywords: social trust, tourist reception, tourist supply, rice theory, pathogen stress theory, per-capita GDP

1. Introduction

Social trust is an important research issue in the field of community psychology. It is of great significance for the good operation of society and the positive development of individuals [1,2,3,4]. Social trust can be divided into specific and generalized trust. The former refers to an individual’s familiarity with and trust in a specific person, and the latter refers to an individual’s trust in the majority of strangers [5,6]. In modern society, generalized trust is deemed more important than specified trust [7], and it is conceptualized as a type of social capital in a sense and can be used and translated into other forms of capital, such as economic and intellectual capital [8,9,10,11]. At a macro level, generalized trust is considered helpful for a range of reasons, such as improving the quality of government management, driving economic growth, and boosting an individual’s subjective well-being, social cohesion, and citizen participation [12,13,14,15]. At a micro level, generalized trust has been proven to enhance people’s sense of fairness, social relations, and positive work attitudes and behaviors [16,17].

This study chooses generalized trust as the conceptual basis. Trust can exert these significant influences for a number of reasons—it “saves” the cognitive resources of an individual, constructs mental representations of the environment for an individual, and mobilizes an individual’s willingness to cooperate with other people [18,19]. In existing studies, social trust is regarded as an important measure of community cohesion, and enables a community to thrive [20,21]. Stolle [22] distinguishes two major areas that may benefit from a high level of trust: in the social field, social trust can boost tolerance and acceptance within a group, thus enabling a more diverse community to be built; in the political field, trust can be translated into a stronger driving force for citizens to participate in political affairs. For these reasons, the question of how to promote public social trust has become an important research problem in the domain of social governance [23]. This study described in this paper uses generalized trust as its conceptual basis and aims to investigate the interacting effects of residential activities and tourism activities on public social trust. General social trust can be measured by both positive and negative dimensions. Positive dimensions focus on the question “In general, do you think that most people can be trusted?”. Negative dimensions focus on the view that “Others will find ways to take advantage of you if you are not careful” [24,25]. For the first question, if an individual’s score exceeds the median, it indicates a certain level of social trust; if it is below the median, it indicates a lack of social trust. For the second question, the opposite applies.

Through a consideration of existing literature, it can be found that there is a close logical connection between individual residential activities and tourism activities in time and space [26,27,28]. Regarding geographical factors, residential activities are those conducted by an individual in a specific space for a long period of time, while tourism activities are the activities of an individual for a short period of time [29,30,31]. In terms of time, residential activities may last as long as several years or decades, while tourism activities may last only for several days. In terms of space, residential activities are concentrated in an area defined by homes and workplaces and vary in size depending on the size of the city. Tourism activities refer to leisure activities at least 75 km away from a person’s home. From the perspective of the human–land relationship, residential activities and tourism activities repeat themselves alternately in the life of an individual.

Both residential and tourism activities have subtle effects on mentality and behavior—most significantly the level of individual social trust. Many studies have found that an individual’s geographical environment and place of residence can influence their social trust, especially the latitude [32,33,34,35,36]. For instance, the difference in climate at different latitudes has a direct influence on the mentality and behavior of an individual, but also an indirect influence through social and cultural factors such as agriculture, economy, and effect on health [37,38,39]. Many studies in the field of tourism have also found that tourism activities have an enduring and stable influence on the mentality and behavior of an individual. For example, researchers have found that tourism activities can not only drive economic growth and improve quality of life but also reinforce positive emotions and enhance national identity [39,40,41,42]. Promoting the deep involvement of tourism activities in national social governance has become a major trend in recent years.

For this study, individual residential and tourism activities are independent of each other but are connected in time and space, so cannot be simply separated. As regards their differences, tourism activities have more diverse temporal and spatial representations because of different travel times and destination choices. They also have strong situational attributes because they are not based in an individual’s area of residence [31,43]. For these reasons, it is impossible to directly draw cross-situational inferences about the mentality and behavior of individuals when they are tourists. For their connection, human mentality and behavior are consistent and durable. Although residential and tourism activities are relatively independent in time and space, individual mentality and behavior are connected in these two situations, with relative yet non-absolute inertia and stability [26,27,28].

In summary, the study of the law of individual mentality and behavior needs to take the situationality of residential and tourism activities into consideration, as simply separating them is unreasonable and inaccurate. To better study the significant theoretical problem of the factors and mechanisms influencing public social trust, this study investigated the interacting effects of residential and tourism activities on public social trust, based on a review of existing independent research on residential and tourism activities.

2. Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses

2.1. Geographical Environment and Social Trust

In recent years, the research direction of latitudinal psychology has received increasing attention. Researchers are beginning to realize that the natural environment not only affects an individual’s physical state but also has diverse effects on their psychological state. In particular, temperature, agriculture, and pathogen transmission in their geographical environment have been found to significantly affect an individual’s psychological state [39].

2.1.1. Clash (Class, Aggregation, and Self-Control in Humans) Theory

The primary natural environmental difference between different latitudes is their climate. Latitude directly influences the sunlight in different areas, leading to differences in local temperature and other aspects of climate. Researchers hold that climate is an important environmental factor that influences individual social trust [33,34,38,44,45,46]. The clash theory proposed by Van Lange et al. [39] suggests that colder winters and greater seasonal changes in temperature in high latitudes require individuals to make a more thorough annual plan. For example, people will store food and fuel for winter in advance. Thus, individuals need to employ a long-term and reasonable goal-oriented life strategy. In contrast, individuals who live in areas with more comfortable temperatures and smaller temperature differences throughout the year will pay more attention to the present in their lives and do not need to plan and prepare ahead for the rest of the year. As a result, they habitually pay less attention to self-control. This short-term, goal-oriented life strategy and the habitual lack of self-control will give rise to a more aggressive and violent social climate [33,34]. Consistent with the findings of clash theory, numerous studies have found that intra- and extra-group hostility, violent crimes, family conflicts, press suppression, political oppression, and legal discrimination reach their peaks near the equator and gradually decrease in higher latitudes [47,48,49].

2.1.2. Rice Theory

Climate conditions in different latitudes also result in differences in agriculture. In China, as the latitude increases, the rice-growing ratio shows relatively regular changes—more crops, such as wheat, are cultivated in the north, and more rice is planted in the south. The difference in farming also influences the level of social trust of individuals in different areas. The rice theory proposed by Talhelm et al. [50]. suggests that, historically, rice-growing communities have stronger reciprocity in life and work than wheat-growing communities. To manage the irrigation network, the residents of rice-growing communities must coordinate the use of water and share infrastructure. This has generated a social culture in which people are mutually dependent on a close-knit social network [51,52]. Therefore, the closeness of community relations has become a major sociocultural difference between residents in rice- and wheat-growing areas [53,54,55,56,57].

2.1.3. Pathogen Stress Theory

Different latitudes also have different epidemic infection rates because of their climates. The infection rate of epidemics, such as influenza, varies significantly by latitude. Over a long period, the incidence of epidemics has a significant influence on the level of social trust of residents. Pathogen stress theory suggests that diseases transmitted between humans manifest in the culture as, for example, collectivism, exclusivity, and ethnocentrism [58,59]. The reason behind this phenomenon is that residents in areas with high levels of pathogens try to reduce the risk of infection by reducing social interaction with strangers. Over time, such lifestyle habits may have a subtle impact on their social trust. The reason behind this phenomenon is that less social interaction in areas with a higher level of pathogen stress helps avoid infections by reducing contacts and interactions with strangers, and vice versa.

2.2. Economic Development and Social Trust

The level of economic development is a comprehensive concept, which is often uniformly measured by the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) index. The GDP index includes various measurement methods, such as regional and per-capita GDP. Because China is a collectivist country, many enterprises are wholly controlled by the government. Therefore, we believe that using the per-capita GDP indicator is more suitable for conducting individual-level research.

The relative economic development of areas in China is also conditioned by geographical environmental factors. For example, the overall population density in the southeast is greater than in the northwest, which may be related to the comfort provided by the local climate [60]. However, over the past 40 years, coastal areas have been substantially ahead of inland areas in terms of economic development because of their transport and other advantages conferred by reforms, a policy of opening up and other major national strategies. Both the direct effects of the climate and the indirect effects of population density and transport exert a comprehensive influence on economic development.

Differences in economic development influence the level of public social trust, but it is notable that the relationship between economic growth and social trust is more complicated than the other three relationships mentioned above. This is shown in inconsistencies between the findings of existing studies. For instance, many Western studies have suggested that economic development can have a positive influence on the social trust of local residents [61,62,63,64]. This is because a higher economic level can help individuals solve more difficulties in life and reduce their sensitivity to conflicts of social interest. As a result, they maintain a more peaceful relationship with others and a higher level of social trust.

However, studies against the cultural background of China are not consistent with these findings. A series of studies conducted by Xin and Liu [65] and Z. Xin and S. Xin [66] found that faster economic growth had a negative influence on the social trust of local residents. A higher degree of marketization led to more emphasis on profit, which enhanced the profit-seeking nature of individual decision-making, more selfish behavior, and less social trust [67]. While these findings may contradict each other, economic development is undoubtedly an important factor and, for this reason, we have given full consideration to the possible effects of this factor in our study.

2.3. Tourism Activities and Social Trust

2.3.1. Social Exchange Theory

Social exchange theory is currently one of the most important theoretical frameworks used worldwide to interpret the relationship between tourism activities and social trust [68,69,70]. From the perspective of social exchange theory, social interaction occurs when tourists exchange information, thoughts, and other resources in a shared space with local residents or other tourists [71,72,73]. This social interaction is the foundation of social exchange, and the interaction between residents and tourists is likely to offer an opportunity for a beneficial and gratifying exchange [73,74,75,76,77,78,79].

In general, social exchange in tourism activities includes multiple forms of resource exchange: physical, social, and psychological [80,81,82]. Tourism activities allow the social exchange of these three kinds of resources between tourists and residents, which lays a key foundation for increasing their level of social trust. Research carried out by Stolle et al. suggests that social trust is developed largely through moderately intensive social contact with different individuals [12,83,84,85,86]. Compared with the daily interactions among residents, tourism activities can accelerate the development of transitional social ties. Tourism activities serve as a social platform for strangers to interact with each other. Tourists benefit from the kindness of strangers in social interactions.

These seemingly transient interactions constitute the tourist experience, and in the long run, may have a profound influence on tourists and host communities [78,79,87,88,89]. Hence, social interactions in tourism activities are more favorable for increasing the level of social trust of residents in the tourist-generating areas and destinations.

In recent years, a growing number of studies have noticed that tourism activities not only accelerate economic growth but also play a pivotal and positive role in social governance. For example, experimental research performed by Zhou [90] found that hitchhiking remarkably enhanced the level of social trust of tourists. Zhou [90] argued that the reason behind this phenomenon was that social interaction was an important part of the hitchhiker experience since they left their familiar social environment and tried to communicate with strangers. Hitchhikers could experience strong reciprocity and gratitude through social interactions with people who offered them help and showed them kindness, and so showed a higher level of social trust and willingness to engage in pro-social behavior. Research performed by Strzelecka and Okulicz-Kozaryn [91] in a large-scale social survey also fully supported the social exchange theory, finding a positive correlation between the growth of tourism in European destinations and the social trust of the residents.

2.3.2. Embodied Cognition Theory

Social exchange theory relates to human interactions in tourism activities and interprets the direct effects of tourism activities on individual social trust. Embodied cognition theory, in contrast, starts from the perspective of person–land interaction in tourism activities and explains the indirect effects of tourism activities on individual social trust. Embodied cognition theory argues that the basic reason that tourism can exert a positive influence on individual social trust is that the environment can influence individual psychology and individual behavior [92,93,94]. The impact of the environment on an individual’s life shows two sides, that is, some environments may have a positive impact on an individual, while some environments may have a negative impact [95,96,97].

In terms of the positive aspects, various researchers found that more exposure to the natural environment can significantly enhance the quality of life, well-being, and mental health of individuals [98,99,100,101,102,103]. This is because the characteristics of the natural environment can have a strong impact on the positive mental state of an individual [104,105,106,107,108]. A large number of studies have revealed the physiological basis for this phenomenon in depth. Their research found that the natural environment and a pleasant sensory experience stimulate low-frequency alpha rhythms in the frontal lobe of the brain, reflecting a lower level of stress in the body and a state of relaxation and calm [103,109,110].

In terms of the negative aspects, staying in the city environment where one lives and works hinders an individual from maintaining a positive mental and physical state [111,112]. Halonen et al. [113]. and Orban et al. [114] found that industrial smells and noise around urban buildings exerted a negative influence on the emotional state and mental health of individuals. Research carried out by Lu, Lee, Gino, and Galinsky [115] also found that air pollution affected positive emotions and had a negative impact on individual well-being. Zheng, Wang, Sun, Zhang, and Kahn [116] suggested that a happy mood implied in the messages posted on social media declined significantly with the rise of PM2.5. Air pollution affects the expression of positive emotions and evokes more negative emotions, the most obvious one being anxiety. This is largely because air pollution has long been closely related to death anxiety, as the anxiety induced by air pollution resembles death anxiety [117,118].

Generally speaking, most tourism activities are based on moving from the cities or villages where people live and work to natural or cultural scenic spots that are more beautiful and comfortable. Tourists can temporarily escape the negative effects of their usual environment and also benefit from the restorative and positive effects of the natural environment. The facilitation effect of tourism activities on the emotions, well-being, quality of life, and mental health of individuals is the basis for the establishment of sound social trust.

2.4. Research Aims and Hypotheses

In summary, from the perspective of the relationship between the geographic environment and social trust, and the relationship between tourism activities and social trust, the long-term environment determines the mentality and behavior of people, whereas the short-term environment changes their mentality and behavior. It is notable that, on the one hand, individual behavior research is highly situational, which means cross-situational inferences cannot be drawn in relatively independent situations and specific environments. On the other hand, individual behavior is also continuous—that is, the behavioral stability of an individual will not be simply interrupted by the situation in which the individual finds themself. Given that the living environment and tourism environment are the two fundamental forms of their human–land relationship, they are connected across time and space and are part of the life-long development of an individual. They both influence an individual’s social trust. Individual behavior is characterized by both situationality and continuity. There is a complex interaction between tourism activities and the geographical environment. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the interaction mechanism between tourism activities, geographical environment, and human life [119].

Especially for China, its land area is much larger and its geographical environment is more diverse. Therefore, in the same political system and cultural environment, geography may have a more diverse influence on public psychology. In addition, tourism activities, as one of the most important large-scale spatial activities for the public, are also very popular in China. According to statistics from the National Bureau of Statistics of China, the number of domestic tourists received by each province this year reached 4.891 billion. Therefore, taking Chinese people as the research object will be more helpful in exploring how geographical environment factors and tourism activities have an interacting impact on individual psychology.

It should be noted that the impact of tourism activities includes both the impact of receiving tourists on local residents and the impact of their own travel. The former can be evaluated by the tourist reception in the destination, which means that the comprehensive statistics of local hotels, scenic spots, and transportation can roughly estimate the number of local tourists received. But the latter is often difficult to calculate. The China Tourism Academy (Data Center of the Ministry of Culture and Tourism) calculates the travel index of residents in various regions of the country every year through reverse tracing and random sampling surveys of tourist destinations. China Tourism Academy pointed out that this index is currently the only statistical basis that can relatively accurately evaluate the level of travel among residents in various regions (https://www.ctaweb.org.cn/cta/jgzz/202103/2ff33e8325264f0d88469f85f12a0dea.shtml; accessed on 19 May 2023). It is important to point out that the index is hierarchical data, not continuous data.

Based on this, this study explored whether the long-term influence of the geographical environment and the short-term influence of tourism activities would produce stable interactive effects on the level of public social trust. The influence of tourism activities on the social culture of different areas takes two specific forms—receiving tourists and supplying tourists. Our question was whether the influencing mechanism of these interactive effects on the public social trust in tourist destinations is consistent with the influencing mechanism of the interactive effects on the public social trust in tourist origin. Based on the aforesaid theoretical basis, this study proposes the following hypotheses:

H1a. 

Temperature and tourist reception affect the level of social trust of the people in a tourist destination.

H1b. 

Temperature and tourist supply affect the level of social trust in an area from which tourists originate.

H2a. 

Rice-growing and tourist reception affect the level of social trust in a tourist destination.

H2b. 

Rice-growing and tourist supply affect the level of social trust in an area from which tourists originate.

H3a. 

Pathogen stress and tourist reception affect the level of social trust in a tourist destination.

H3b. 

Pathogen stress and tourist supply affect the level of social trust in an area from which tourists originate.

H4a. 

Economic development and tourist reception affect the level of social trust in a tourist destination.

H4b. 

Economic development and tourist supply affect the level of social trust in an area from which tourists originate.

3. Method

3.1. Data Source and Sample

Data on individual respondents used in this study are from 2017 data of the China General Social Survey Database (CGSS; http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn; accessed on 3 June 2023). The database was built by the country and is the largest and highest-level social general survey database in China for now. This database was established in 2000 and is updated every 3–5 years. The data used in this study were just released in 2020, and are the latest CGSS data of 2017. The CGSS Database has been used by a great number of researches owing to its numerous merits, such as rigorous sampling and wide coverage, and has shown good results. CGSS data of 2017 used in this study included a total of 12,482 respondents, their province, gender, age, educational level, and economic income are shown in Table A1 (Appendix A).

3.2. Variable

3.2.1. Social Trust

The variable of the level of public social trust is calculated by the two items of the social trust dimension in a CGSS scale of 2017 (http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn/info/1014/1019.htm; accessed on 3 June 2023). The CGSS project is a national academic research survey conducted with the support of special funds from the Chinese government. The CGSS scale is compiled by the China Survey and Data Center, Renmin University of China. This scale consists of 783 questions, which cover a large number of research contents such as individual basic demographic variables and social psychological variables. The CGSS annual data used in the current study was collected by 40 universities across the country, and the whole research process took seven months. CGSS is open for free use by all social science researchers in China. As of the latest statistics, CGSS data has supported 2470 research publications, including 355 papers in international English journals (http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn/info/1014/1018.htm; accessed on 12 June 2023). The current study uses data from the Social Trust Scale. The scale consists of two items: (1) In general, do you agree that the vast majority of people in this society are trustworthy? (2) In general, do you agree that other people in this society will try to take advantage of you if you are careless? Item 2 is a reverse score question. The total score of these two questions represents the level of social trust of the respondents [24,25].

3.2.2. Temperature

The variable of temperature is based on the calculation model of temperature data adopted in a study by Vliert [39]. This study first collected the annual average temperature of different provinces in China from 1996 to 2017 from the Yearbook Database of the National Bureau of Statistics of China (http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/; accessed on 12 June 2023) and then calculated the difference between the annual average temperature of different provinces and 22°—the temperature most suitable for humans to live (see Table A2). The absolute value of the difference represents the degree to which the temperature throughout the year is suitable for local residents to live. The smaller the absolute value, the higher the temperature suitability, and vice versa.

3.2.3. Rice-Growing Areas

The variable of rice-growing is based on the encoding model used in research carried out by Talhelm et al. [50] This study first collected data on rice-, wheat-, and corn-growing areas in Chinese provinces from 1996 to 2017 from the Yearbook Database of the National Bureau of Statistics of China (http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/; accessed on 12 June 2023), and then obtained the rice-growing ratios of different places by calculating the rice-growing area/(wheat-growing area + corn growing area; see Table A3, Table A4 and Table A5; see the trend chart in Figure 1). According to the grouping method used by Talhelm et al. [50], the area where the growing ratio was higher than 1 was the rice-growing area, whereas the area where the growing ratio was lower than 1 was the wheat-growing area.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Comparative trend chart of the variables in the study by province. (a) Comparative trend chart of rice planting area in each province from 1996 to 2017. Unit: thousands of hectares. (b) Comparative trend chart of wheat planting area in each province from 1996 to 2017. Unit: thousands of hectares. (c) Comparative trend chart of Per capita GDP in each province from 1996 to 2017. Unit: yuan. (d) Comparative trend chart of the number and incidence of influenza in each province from 2004 to 2017. Unit: thousands of hectares. (e) Comparative trend chart of the number of domestic tourists received by each province from 2013 to 2017. Unit: 100 million person-times. (f) Comparative trend chart of travel index of each province from 2013 to 2017.

3.2.4. Pathogen Stress

The variable of pathogen stress is based on the prevalence of influenza in various areas. As the most typical and common infectious disease in the world, influenza extensively affects the daily lives of people. Hence, this study collected data on the prevalence of influenza in different provinces from 2004 to 2017 from the National Public Health Science Database of the China Population and Health Scientific Data Sharing Platform (https://www.phsciencedata.cn/Share/index.jsp; accessed on 17 June 2023; see Table A6; see Figure 1). The averages of these data reflect the chronic pathogen stress of people in different places.

3.2.5. Economic Development Level

The economic development level is measured through data on traditional per-capita GDP. The data are also from data on the average per-capita GDP of different provinces in China from 1996 to 2017 recorded in the Yearbook Database of the National Bureau of Statistics of China (http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/; accessed on 17 June 2023; see Table A7; see Figure 1). These figures reflect the differences between different places in the level of economic development.

3.2.6. Level of Tourist Reception

According to the statistical data from the China Tourism Yearbook (see Table A8; see Figure 1), this study uses the average numbers of tourists received by various provinces from 2013 to 2017 to signify the tourist reception level of each province.

3.2.7. Level of Tourist Supply

The level of tourist supply is denoted by the travel index of the residents of each province, which is calculated through annual big data related to tourism of the same year from the China National Tourism Administration (see Table A9; see Figure 1). The higher the index, the more trips are taken by the residents in this province. The variable uses the average data from 2013 to 2017 as the indicator of the level of tourist supply in each province.

Data on social trust as a dependent variable are from the 2017 CGSS Database. Data on temperature, rice-growing, and economic development as independent variables are the averages from 1996 to 2017, pathogen stress data are from 2004 to 2017. The reason for this is that we aimed to discuss the long-term effects of the living environment on the mentality of people on the one hand, but standardized and authoritative data exist only from 1996 and 2004, respectively, when China established a methodical National Statistical Yearbook System and National Public Health Science Database. Different from the aforesaid independent variables, tourism activities exert short- and medium-term effects rather than the long-term effects of residential activities. Therefore, this study used the averages over more recent years (2013 to 2017) as the indicators of tourist reception level and tourist supply level.

4. Results

All statistical analyses in this study were carried out with the use of SPSS 26.0. The dependent variable of public social trust is significantly positively correlated with the level of tourist reception, significantly negatively correlated with the level of pathogen stress, and not significantly correlated with other independent variables. In addition, the specific relationships between other independent variables are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and correlations.

Item M SD ST TR TS TE RG PS ED
ST 6.395 1.661 -
TR 3.694 1.698 0.020 * -
TS 11.929 8.112 −0.004 −0.113 ** -
TE 6.899 4.194 −0.009 −0.418 ** 0.267 ** -
RG 1.376 0.484 0.010 −0.048 ** −0.187 ** −0.673 ** -
PS 11.081 7.617 −0.029 ** −0.158 ** −0.418 ** −0.322 ** 0.198 ** -
ED 30,088.973 16,983.457 −0.009 −0.302 ** −0.825 ** −0.131 ** 0.180 ** 0.494 ** -

Note: ST = Social trust; TR = Tourist reception; TS = Tourist supply; TE = Temperature; RG = Rice-growing; PS = Pathogen stress; ED = Economic development; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.

The results of current hypothesis testing (Table 2) show that the interaction between the level of tourist reception and temperature is insignificant, and the interaction between the level of tourist supply and temperature is also insignificant. This result does not support hypotheses H1a and H1b. In other hypothesis tests, the interaction between the level of tourist reception and the level of rice-growing, the interaction between the level of tourist supply and pathogen stress, and the interaction between the level of tourist reception and the level of economic development are significant. These results support H2a, H3b, and H4a. However, H2b, H3a, and H4b, are not supported by the data. Figure 2 shows that in the interaction between the level of tourist supply and the level of rice-growing, the upward trend of rice-growing areas is significantly greater than that for wheat- and corn-growing areas; in the interaction between the level of tourist reception and pathogen stress (Figure 3), the slope of the group with a larger number of tourists is lower than that of the group with a smaller number of tourists; and in the interaction between the level of tourist reception and the level of economic development (Figure 4), the slope of the low per-capita GDP group is significantly higher than that of the high per-capita GDP group.

Table 2.

Hierarchical regression analyses predicting generalized trust.

Model B SE β R2 ΔR2 F t
Model 1a-1
TR 0.0189 0.0096 0.0194 0.0001 0.0001 2.458 1.9649 *
TE 0.0004 0.0039 0.0011 −0.1125
Model 1a-2
TR −0.0097 0.0225 −0.0099 0.001 0.0001 2.301 −0.4319
TE −0.0098 0.0077 −0.0247 −1.2721
TR × TE 0.0038 0.0027 0.0316 1.4096
Model 1b-1
TS 0.0004 0.0019 −0.0017 0.0001 0.0001 0.544 −0.1846
TE −0.0035 0.0037 −0.0087 −0.9400
Model 1b-2
TS 0.0001 0.0037 0.0001 0.0059
TE −0.0026 0.0085 −0.0065 0.0001 0.0001 0.367 −0.3006
TS × TE −0.0001 0.0005 −0.0034 −0.1162
Model 2a-1
TR 0.0206 0.0089 0.0208 0.001 0.0001 3.337 * 2.3157 *
RG 0.0386 0.0308 0.0113 1.2543
Model 2a-2
TR 0.1082 0.0270 0.1093 4.0032 ***
RG 0.2925 0.0801 0.0854 0.001 0.001 6.152 ** 3.6505 ***
TR × RG −0.0693 0.0202 −0.1168 −3.4318 ***
Model 2b-1
TS 0.0005 0.0019 −0.0024 0.0001 0.0001 0.689 −0.2586
RG 0.0337 0.0313 0.0098 1.0763
Model 2b-2
TS −0.0005 0.0057 −0.0024 −0.0886
RG 0.0336 0.0538 0.0098 0.0001 0.0001 0.459 0.6243
TS × RG 0.0001 0.0040 0.0001 0.0026
Model 3a-1
TR 0.0153 0.0089 0.0156 0.001 0.001 6.738 ** 1.7261
PS −0.0058 0.0020 −0.0265 −2.9274 *
Model 3a-2
TR 0.0325 0.0154 0.0333 2.1072 *
PS 0.0016 0.0058 0.0075 0.001 0.001 5.112 ** 0.2825
TR × PS −0.0025 0.0018 −0.0378 −1.3638
Model 3b-1
TS −0.0040 0.0020 −0.0196 0.001 0.001 7.225 ** −1.9881 **
PS 0-.0081 0.0021 −0.0372 −3.7743 ***
Model 3b-2
TS −0.0214 0.0037 −0.1047 −5.8522 ***
PS −0.0193 0.0029 −0.0886 0.004 0.004 15.644 *** −6.6366 ***
TS × PS 0.0016 0.0003 0.0939 5.6962 ***
Model 4a-1
TR 0.0185 0.0092 0.0190 0.0001 0.0001 2.496 2.0210 *
ED −0.0001 0.0001 −0.0028 −0.2987
Model 4a-2
TR 0.0851 0.0214 0.0871 3.9689 ***
ED 0.0001 0.0001 0.0593 0.001 0.001 5.597 ** 2.9101 **
TR × ED −0.0001 0.0001 −0.0830 −3.4342 ***
Model 4b-1
TS −0.0071 0.0032 −0.0348 0.0001 0.0001 2.869 −2.1949 *
ED −0.0001 0.0001 −0.0373 −2.3496 *
Model 4b-2
TS −0.0075 0.0051 −0.0366 −1.4560
ED −0.0001 0.0001 −0.0371 0.0001 0.0001 1.911 −2.3242 *
TS × ED 0.0001 0.0001 0.0021 0.0929

Note: TR = Tourist reception; TS = Tourist supply; TE = Temperature; RG = Rice-growing; PS = Pathogen stress; ED = Economic development; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The interaction between tourist reception and rice-growing on social trust.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The interaction between pathogen stress and tourist supply on social trust.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The interaction between tourist reception and economic development on social trust.

5. Discussion

Our analysis shows that public social trust is significantly correlated with the level of local tourist reception but is not directly connected with the level of tourist supply. For tourism activities, receiving and supplying tourists have different effects on local social culture. Receiving tourists has a direct effect with the larger the number of tourists received in an area, the higher the level of public social trust. Although supplying tourists does not have direct effects on the level of social trust of the local residents, it may have indirect effects by moderating the intensity of the influence of other factors on social trust. Therefore, this study also concentrates on testing and comparing how the level of social trust is influenced by residents in destinations and tourist-generating areas, respectively. We did not find a significant correlation between temperature and the level of social trust of local residents. This is inconsistent with previous findings [34,35,38,45,46]. We also found that there was no interaction between temperature and the level of tourist reception or the level of tourist supply. This result indicates that temperature does not exert any direct influence on public social trust nor has an indirect influence on it together with tourism activities. In our opinion, the inconsistency between findings based on different cultures may be caused by regional factors. A major difference between this study and previous studies is that we explored the effects on Chinese people. As one of the few socialist countries in the world, China is different from other countries in many ways. Since the founding of New China, the country has developed a residential guarantee strategy of unified heat supply for 4–6 months every year in most areas north of the Qinling Mountains, and supplies heat or stops it according to the specific temperature changes in different provinces each year. Subsidized by central financing, the heating fee for each household is only 5.6 yuan/square meter/month. As a result, the cost of heating is not an economic burden and temperature-induced survival pressures do not exist. Therefore, temperature, has no further influence on the social trust of the local residents, nor will it further interact with tourism activities to have an impact.

Through testing the interaction between rice-growing and tourist reception level or tourist supply level, we found that, on one hand, rice-growing did not show a significant correlation with the social trust level of local residents. On the other hand, we found that the rice-growing ratio and the level of tourist reception have interacting effects on the social trust of the local residents. Although an increase in the number of tourists received helps boost the social trust of local residents, this influence is not consistent in all parts of the country, as it is moderated by the farming culture stressed in the rice theory. Specifically, the abovementioned interacting effects are that for the people in the wheat and corn-growing areas with a low rice-growing ratio, tourist reception activities can boost the level of public social trust more significantly. This influence is weak in rice-growing areas with a high rice-growing ratio. In other words, for the same level of tourist reception activities, its effect of improving social trust in wheat-growing areas is markedly better than that in rice-growing areas. The possible reason behind this phenomenon is that, according to the rice theory, the rice-growing culture itself shapes a social culture of closer local community ties, whereas the wheat-growing culture gives rise to weak distant- and extra-community relations. Therefore, compared with the positive effects of the rice-growing culture, the effects of wheat-growing activities on the society, culture, and mentality of the local residents are slightly negative and have greater potential for improvement. This finding is to some extent consistent with previous studies [50,51,52,53,54,55,56]. We further found that, on the basis of traditional rice theory, this study revealed two new social phenomena: first, the sociocultural impact of rice-growing activities has a direct and independent impact (as found in previous studies), as well as an indirect impact. Our study found that the rice-growing ratio moderates the influence of the level of tourist reception on the social trust of the local residents; second, the rice-growing ratio has interacting effects only with the level of tourist reception and has no interacting effect with the level of tourist supply.

Our findings on the influence of pathogen stress and tourism activities on public social trust found a close relationship between the level of pathogen stress and the social trust level of local residents. This result is completely consistent with the prediction of the pathogen stress theory [58,59], in that the incidence of epidemics in the place of residence not only influences the health of people, but also influences the level of social trust. In addition, we found that pathogen stress can directly influence public social trust as well as exert interacting effects on the level of tourist supply. Although pathogen stress has a negative influence on public social trust, this influence varies in different areas. This negative influence is weaker in areas with a higher level of tourist supply and is stronger in areas with a lower level of tourist supply. This shows that tourism activities can mitigate the negative influence caused by pathogen stress. It is worth mentioning that, at present, this influence is only found in tourist-generating areas, not in destinations. This also suggests that transporting tourists and receiving tourists have different influences on local society and culture.

We also found that there are interacting effects of economic development level and tourism activities on public social trust. We did not find a direct connection between the level of local economic development and the level of public social trust in the correlation analysis. However, we found that the level of economic development moderated the influence of the level of tourist reception on the social trust of local residents. In other words, it does not come into play independently but rather interacts with tourism activities to influence public social trust. This interaction is manifested in the fact that in more economically developed areas with lower per-capita GDP, tourist reception activities had a greater influence on improving the social trust level of the local residents. These positive effects also existed in economically developed areas with higher per-capita GDP, but the level was lower. Irrespective of the level of economic development of an area, tourist reception activities can exert a high level of positive effects on local society and culture. A more important finding of this study was that, for less economically developed areas, actively developing tourism is a strategy that brings double benefits. It stimulates the growth of the local economy and facilitates the improvement of social trust.

5.1. Theoretical Contribution

This study brings a new way of thinking to theories in the field in that it explores the interacting effects of geographical environmental factors in residential activities and tourism activities on public social trust. It reveals the differentiated influence of these interacting effects on the social trust of residents in destinations and tourist-generating areas in more depth. China covers a vast territory with a large population. The findings of this study have added value to previous studies on the relationships between geographical environment, tourism activities, and public social trust, and provided cultural research evidence from China. The study has also, for the first time, revealed interacting effect mechanisms on public social trust from the perspective of the cross-over study of geographical environment and tourism activities. In view of the multifold advantages of this study, including wide sampling distribution, highly rigorous sampling, and the reasoned choice of variables and calculation methods, the findings are highly representative and valuable. In addition, the findings of this study have certain social and practical significance. In the current era, global epidemics are frequent, which can have a negative impact on interactions between cities. Therefore, it is important for countries around the world to recover tourism after every pandemic. This significance is not limited to the contribution of tourism to the national economy, but more importantly, to the direct and indirect enhancement of public social trust. Helping the public rebuild social trust does more good for the recovery of the market economy, for accelerating the restoration of normal social order, and for exerting a more extensive, positive, and persistent influence. In brief, this study hopes to urge the country to attach more importance to tourism development and research in the field of tourism through the abovementioned findings, thus helping tourism research contribute to the improvement of national social governance in a more effective way.

5.2. Limitations and Future Research Directions

Although current research focuses on promoting the development of existing theories, it still has the following limitations: (1) the current research is still a variable-centered research rather than an individual-centered research. Therefore, there is a lack of exploration of deeper individual-level characteristics; (2) the samples for the current study were all from China. Although to a certain extent, this avoids the influence of political system and cultural background, the current conclusions also lack a cross-cultural adaptability test; (3) the current study lacks evidence of long-term longitudinal tracking data. Although it is difficult to carry out, longitudinal research plays an important role in delving deeper into the interacting impact mechanism of geographical environment and tourism activities on public social trust. We believe that this is also an urgent need to be carried out in the future.

6. Conclusions

The main conclusion drawn by this study includes the following aspects: (1) the direct effect of pathogen stress and tourism activities on public social trust is much higher than that of temperature, rice-growing, and economic development; (2) geographical environment and tourism activities have interacting effects on public social trust. This influencing mechanism is specifically manifested as rice-growing and tourist reception levels can have interacting effects on the social trust of the residents in a tourist destination. That is to say, for the people in the wheat- and corn-growing areas with a low rice-growing ratio, tourist reception activities can boost the level of public social trust more significantly; (3) pathogen stress and tourist supply level can exert interacting effects on the social trust of the residents in an area from which tourists originate. In areas with a higher level of tourist supply, this negative influence of pathogen stress is weaker; (4) economic development and tourist reception can have interacting effects on the social trust of the residents in a tourist destination. This interaction is that in more economically developed areas with lower per-capita GDP, tourist reception activities had a greater influence on improving the public social trust.

Appendix A

Appendix A in this study includes Table A1, Table A2, Table A3, Table A4, Table A5, Table A6, Table A7, Table A8 and Table A9.

Table A1.

Demographic information of participants.

Item Category Frequency Percentage
Shanghai 991 7.9%
Yunnan 418 3.3%
Beijing 1082 8.7%
Jilin 504 4.0%
Sichuan 606 4.9%
Tianjin 400 3.2%
Ningxia 100 0.8%
Anhui 418 3.3%
Shandong 600 4.8%
Shanxi 303 2.4%
Guangdong 575 4.6%
Guangxi 398 3.2%
Jiangsu 498 4.0%
Province Jiangxi 503 4.0%
Hebei 295 2.4%
Henan 600 4.8%
Zhejiang 496 4.0%
Hubei 605 4.8%
Hunan 501 4.0%
Gansu 200 1.6%
Fujian 299 2.4%
Guizhou 300 2.4%
Liaoning 406 3.3%
Chongqing 300 2.4%
Shanxi 397 3.2%
Qinghai 100 0.8%
Heilongjiang 587 4.7%
Gender Male 5894 47.2%
Female 6588 52.8%
15–24 810 6.5%
25–34 1719 13.8%
35–44 1901 15.2%
Age (years) 45–54 2656 21.3%
55–64 2437 19.5%
65–74 1917 15.4%
75–84 875 7%
85 and above 167 1.3%
No education 1510 12.1%
Private schools and literacy classes 91 0.7%
Primary school 2686 21.5%
Junior middle school 3483 27.9%
Vocational high school 163 1.3%
Ordinary high school 1468 11.8%
Educational level Secondary specialized school 539 4.3%
Technical school 72 0.6%
College (adult higher education) 378 3.0%
College (formal higher education) 672 5.4%
Undergraduate (adult higher education) 299 2.4%
Undergraduate (formal higher education) 948 7.6%
Graduate and above 173 1.4%
10,000 and below 4686 37.5%
10,001–20,000 1424 11.4%
20,001–40,000 3265 26.2%
40,001–60,000 1589 12.7%
60,001–80,000 492 3.9%
Income (yuan) 80,001–100,000 470 3.8%
100,001–120,000 114 0.9%
120,001–140,000 28 0.2%
140,001–160,000 102 0.8%
160,001–180,000 19 0.2%
180,001–200,000 119 1%
200,001 and above 174 1.4%

Table A2.

The average temperature of each province from 1996 to 2017 (unit: °C).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Beijing 14.2 13.8 13.7 14.1 12.8 12.9 13.4 12.6 13.3 13.4 14.0
Tianjin 14.2 13.8 13.7 14.0 12.8 12.5 12.9 12.2 12.9 13.3 13.6
Hebei 15.0 14.6 14.6 14.9 13.8 14.0 14.2 14.0 14.4 14.6 14.9
Shanxi 11.5 11.2 11.3 10.9 11.2 10.7 10.8 11.3 11.1 10.9 11.4
Liaoning 9.3 8.8 9.0 9.2 7.9 7.4 7.7 7.2 7.7 8.6 9.0
Jilin 7.0 6.6 7.2 7.1 5.6 5.2 5.9 5.2 6.1 7.2 7.7
Heilongjiang 5.1 5.0 5.6 5.1 4.3 4.6 5.2 4.5 5.0 6.6 6.7
Shanghai 17.7 17.6 17.0 17.0 17.6 16.9 16.9 17.2 17.4 17.2 18.2
Jiangsu 17.0 16.8 16.4 16.4 16.8 16.0 16.1 16.2 16.4 16.1 17.3
Zhejiang 18.3 18.2 17.5 17.5 18.0 17.1 17.2 17.4 17.8 17.5 18.4
Anhui 17.1 17.0 16.7 16.5 17.0 16.5 16.3 16.4 16.7 16.4 17.3
Fujian 21.2 21.0 20.7 20.8 20.4 20.2 20.2 20.4 20.7 20.4 21.0
Jiangxi 19.2 19.0 18.7 18.8 19.0 18.0 18.4 18.5 18.8 18.5 19.2
Shandong 15.7 15.4 15.0 15.4 14.7 14.3 14.1 14.3 14.8 14.6 15.0
Henan 16.8 16.4 15.9 16.3 16.1 15.5 15.1 15.6 15.5 15.6 15.9
Hubei 17.3 17.3 16.8 16.7 17.1 16.4 16.3 16.6 17.9 17.6 18.5
Hunan 17.7 17.5 17.4 18.6 19.2 17.6 17.9 18.2 18.5 18.3 18.8
Guangdong 22.1 21.9 22.3 21.7 21.5 21.7 21.4 22.5 23.0 22.4 23.2
Guangxi 21.9 22.3 22.2 21.6 21.6 21.4 20.7 21.8 22.2 20.8 21.7
Chongqing 19.4 19.5 19.6 18.6 19.8 18.3 18.8 18.6 19.0 18.5 19.0
Sichuan 16.6 16.8 16.8 16.0 16.9 15.9 15.9 16.0 16.8 16.3 16.8
Guizhou 15.2 15.3 15.2 14.7 15.1 13.7 14.0 14.6 14.9 14.1 14.9
Yunnan 15.7 15.8 16.2 16.4 16.0 16.3 15.5 16.7 16.6 15.4 15.6
Shaanxi 15.6 15.8 15.2 15.2 15.8 14.2 14.1 14.6 15.1 14.9 15.6
Gansu 8.0 8.2 8.3 7.7 8.3 7.5 7.7 7.9 8.0 10.6 11.1
Qinghai 6.3 6.6 6.4 5.7 6.1 5.2 5.7 6.4 6.2 5.7 6.1
Ningxia 11.0 10.7 10.7 10.7 11.2 9.8 9.9 10.3 10.5 9.9 10.4
Province 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Beijing 13.4 13.2 13.5 12.8 13.1 12.9 12.8 13.1 13.1 13.1 12.7
Tianjin 13.2 12.9 13.2 12.7 13.2 13.0 12.9 13.1 13.4 13.1 12.2
Hebei 14.6 14.3 14.3 13.6 14.4 14.4 13.9 14.7 15.0 14.4 13.5
Shanxi 11.8 10.9 10.9 10.1 10.9 11.0 10.7 11.5 11.5 10.1 9.8
Liaoning 8.3 8.0 9.6 9.0 9.2 8.4 8.3 8.9 9.7 8.8 8.1
Jilin 6.6 5.6 7.1 7.0 6.8 6.1 5.6 6.0 7.4 6.7 5.9
Heilongjiang 5.3 4.7 5.8 5.9 5.4 4.8 4.6 4.8 5.5 5.7 5.0
Shanghai 17.9 17.1 17.5 17.0 17.5 17.2 17.2 16.6 17.8 16.9 16.2
Jiangsu 16.9 16.3 16.9 16.0 16.6 16.6 16.4 15.7 16.7 16.2 15.4
Zhejiang 18.2 17.5 17.8 17.4 17.4 17.3 17.2 16.7 17.9 17.1 16.5
Anhui 17.0 16.2 16.6 16.3 17.2 16.8 16.7 16.3 17.1 16.7 15.8
Fujian 20.8 20.3 20.8 20.9 20.9 20.6 20.5 20.4 21.1 20.1 19.9
Jiangxi 18.6 18.2 18.8 18.5 18.3 18.2 17.9 18.1 18.8 17.8 17.6
Shandong 15.3 14.4 14.8 13.8 15.0 14.6 14.5 15.1 16.0 15.4 14.7
Henan 15.8 14.9 15.5 14.4 15.4 15.1 15.0 15.4 15.5 14.9 14.2
Hubei 18.3 17.8 18.3 17.4 17.9 18.0 17.7 17.5 18.2 17.5 16.8
Hunan 18.5 17.7 18.3 17.6 17.7 17.6 17.1 17.2 18.1 17.2 16.8
Guangdong 23.2 22.8 22.8 22.9 22.9 22.5 22.5 22.4 22.8 22.0 21.6
Guangxi 22.0 21.4 21.5 22.0 21.7 21.3 21.5 21.7 23.0 22.2 21.7
Chongqing 19.2 18.6 18.4 18.8 18.7 18.8 18.2 18.4 19.2 18.5 17.7
Sichuan 16.9 16.2 16.2 17.2 17.4 17.3 16.6 16.7 17.4 16.8 16.0
Guizhou 14.8 14.1 14.6 14.8 14.6 14.5 13.8 15.9 17.3 15.4 15.0
Yunnan 16.4 16.7 15.6 16.4 16.1 16.0 15.6 16.3 16.5 15.4 15.6
Shaanxi 15.2 15.0 15.4 14.3 15.4 15.0 14.5 15.0 15.0 14.8 13.7
Gansu 8.5 7.2 10.9 10.8 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.1 11.4 10.9 9.6
Qinghai 6.4 5.8 5.8 6.0 6.1 6.0 5.8 6.1 6.3 5.5 4.9
Ningxia 10.9 10.1 10.3 9.7 10.0 10.1 9.6 9.5 10.5 10.2 9.6

Table A3.

Rice planting area in each province from 1996 to 2017 (unit: thousands of hectares).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Beijing 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5
Tianjin 30.5 26.5 22.2 22.3 22.3 18.6 17.4 17.9 18.1 16.3 14.9
Hebei 75.0 76.3 79.9 80.5 82.9 82.6 80.3 77.6 83.4 80.5 84.0
Shanxi 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.5
Liaoning 492.7 476.4 469.2 492.1 577.9 599.0 607.0 633.9 624.8 637.2 649.7
Jilin 820.8 800.2 778.8 757.0 739.4 711.6 697.7 680.2 667.6 665.5 671.6
Heilongjiang 3948.9 3925.3 3918.4 3968.5 3860.8 3630.7 3437.3 3139.4 2695.4 2629.2 2287.8
Shanghai 104.1 106.3 110.2 111.3 114.8 117.6 118.6 120.5 120.5 115.0 115.0
Jiangsu 2237.7 2256.3 2250.3 2236.7 2229.9 2228.9 2227.7 2224.9 2223.8 2222.6 2220.8
Zhejiang 620.7 613.1 634.2 654.2 677.1 700.1 774.5 822.5 860.8 884.9 927.1
Anhui 2605.2 2537.4 2476.4 2422.0 2320.9 2333.6 2333.9 2338.6 2356.5 2254.2 2205.6
Fujian 628.6 630.9 659.9 686.4 711.5 734.7 765.5 789.6 814.6 827.7 851.6
Jiangxi 3504.7 3527.1 3541.3 3522.6 3501.9 3476.5 3441.3 3410.4 3344.2 3313.1 3245.6
Shandong 108.9 106.7 117.2 123.2 123.9 124.5 125.1 128.7 135.0 130.9 130.6
Henan 615.0 614.1 616.4 614.7 611.0 621.8 616.3 610.8 598.7 596.4 595.9
Hubei 2368.1 2358.7 2383.4 2201.8 2202.6 2086.4 2081.1 2087.8 2093.6 1956.9 2027.2
Hunan 4238.7 4277.6 4287.8 4275.0 4218.5 4209.6 4160.8 4105.3 4103.4 3968.3 3915.2
Guangdong 1805.4 1806.0 1804.8 1826.8 1850.0 1898.2 1898.0 1918.1 1933.6 1930.7 1930.4
Guangxi 1801.7 1836.7 1871.4 1923.8 1955.8 1979.0 2012.2 2040.8 2084.0 2091.9 2112.9
Chongqing 658.9 660.9 647.1 650.8 652.4 654.8 656.8 658.1 661.2 658.9 644.3
Sichuan 1874.9 1874.0 1878.7 1892.4 1905.4 1929.8 1943.2 1966.9 1990.9 2011.6 2024.0
Guizhou 700.5 714.3 711.1 714.1 712.6 707.0 701.4 712.0 710.4 699.2 680.1
Yunnan 870.6 881.4 909.3 942.2 979.7 943.9 966.5 933.1 978.5 977.0 969.9
Shaanxi 105.6 107.4 107.5 108.7 114.3 113.9 113.1 115.3 121.8 121.4 113.8
Gansu 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.7 4.9 5.2 5.3 5.6 5.5 5.4 5.2
Qinghai 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ningxia 81.1 80.9 74.3 78.1 82.1 84.3 83.9 83.2 78.3 80.3 77.0
Province 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Beijing 0.7 0.8 0.8 1.6 4.5 6.8 14.1 19.2 19.4 23.2 23.1
Tianjin 14.1 16.7 13.7 7.0 14.9 11.4 35.4 61.1 54.4 66.4 61.7
Hebei 88.7 87.7 83.5 75.6 111.0 94.1 143.9 154.7 153.2 155.3 141.8
Shanxi 1.5 2.7 2.6 3.1 3.5 5.1 4.5 5.9 6.1 6.1 5.8
Liaoning 624.9 568.4 544.2 500.6 556.4 515.5 489.7 501.5 496.0 491.7 478.1
Jilin 656.3 654.0 600.1 541.0 666.1 686.9 584.8 465.2 459.0 453.1 434.1
Heilongjiang 1992.2 1650.3 1587.8 1290.9 1564.4 1567.0 1605.9 1614.9 1566.7 1396.9 1107.5
Shanghai 110.6 112.7 111.8 106.2 133.1 153.9 176.1 200.8 203.3 208.4 210.5
Jiangsu 2216.0 2209.3 2112.9 1840.9 1982.1 2010.3 2203.5 2398.5 2369.7 2377.6 2335.9
Zhejiang 994.5 1028.5 1028.1 979.4 1172.3 1340.0 1598.0 1940.4 2007.9 2085.9 2138.2
Anhui 2207.7 2149.1 2129.7 1972.4 2044.1 1950.1 2236.7 2145.5 2158.3 2212.1 2238.5
Fujian 890.6 951.6 985.1 962.6 1082.9 1156.5 1222.3 1373.2 1387.9 1401.6 1405.2
Jiangxi 3239.3 3129.0 3029.7 2685.3 2786.6 2808.3 2832.0 3050.0 2900.8 3063.5 3052.6
Shandong 127.3 119.8 124.4 112.6 155.3 173.6 176.8 195.8 157.6 164.7 151.6
Henan 571.3 511.1 508.5 503.0 469.4 415.9 459.6 508.5 498.4 489.5 479.9
Hubei 1975.1 2077.4 1989.6 1805.1 1932.0 1987.9 1995.3 2285.0 2239.3 2466.0 2448.6
Hunan 3931.7 3795.2 3716.8 3410.0 3541.5 3691.6 3896.1 3984.5 3976.4 4075.8 4064.1
Guangdong 1941.9 2137.6 2139.0 2130.6 2195.5 2369.3 2467.4 2557.5 2686.0 2704.1 2713.4
Guangxi 2238.1 2360.4 2356.0 2356.3 2412.6 2423.6 2301.6 2388.7 2433.5 2434.3 2430.8
Chongqing 672.3 748.0 749.3 750.5 755.2 764.0 776.6 788.6 794.7 803.9 795.7
Sichuan 2081.9 2087.5 2063.8 2040.3 2076.1 2093.1 2123.8 2176.0 2167.4 2196.1 3020.1
Guizhou 679.6 721.7 716.5 720.5 734.6 750.0 750.5 748.0 746.8 742.9 741.3
Yunnan 1029.7 1049.3 1086.2 1043.1 1083.0 1100.3 1073.6 903.0 919.6 921.2 939.2
Shaanxi 120.9 147.1 145.8 139.5 130.5 140.8 144.8 154.6 160.0 153.9 156.9
Gansu 5.3 5.1 4.9 4.8 6.3 7.1 7.2 7.0 8.4 6.8 6.7
Qinghai 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Ningxia 88.3 71.3 64.4 46.7 76.4 74.2 76.7 71.0 66.5 67.2 64.0

Table A4.

Wheat planting area in each province from 1996 to 2017 (unit: thousands of hectares).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Beijing 11.3 15.9 20.8 23.6 36.2 52.2 58.1 61.6 60.6 63.9 41.4
Tianjin 108.8 107.3 106.0 108.0 107.8 110.9 110.4 109.3 109.1 107.0 104.5
Hebei 2373.4 2389.8 2394.2 2404.0 2432.0 2457.1 2435.0 2451.4 2397.8 2431.8 2420.2
Shanxi 560.5 564.0 575.9 585.1 598.7 619.7 650.1 678.8 689.9 673.2 699.8
Liaoning 3.6 2.9 3.0 3.3 3.5 4.5 4.9 5.7 7.2 9.0 11.6
Jilin 2.4 0.4 0.4 4.0 0.0 4.1 3.9 4.2 4.6 6.2 5.6
Heilongjiang 101.8 78.6 70.1 144.0 131.7 208.2 295.7 278.4 291.8 238.1 232.7
Shanghai 21.0 35.6 47.3 46.7 46.6 58.0 62.9 52.7 62.5 45.9 39.5
Jiangsu 2412.8 2436.8 2410.7 2374.1 2344.3 2304.4 2245.8 2200.2 2145.2 2117.0 2039.3
Zhejiang 103.7 85.3 99.0 89.5 81.5 79.5 76.7 69.1 62.4 55.5 49.8
Anhui 2822.8 2887.6 2858.0 2802.5 2801.2 2733.9 2681.1 2619.2 2605.8 2484.4 2448.0
Fujian 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.5 1.9 2.8 3.6
Jiangxi 14.5 14.4 12.9 12.7 12.6 12.7 11.5 10.8 10.0 10.2 11.0
Shandong 4083.9 4068.0 4034.8 3924.8 3831.4 3759.3 3703.4 3648.7 3609.8 3567.9 3540.3
Henan 5714.6 5704.9 5623.1 5581.2 5518.0 5468.8 5430.1 5364.6 5326.4 5302.0 5234.1
Hubei 1153.2 1140.7 1122.2 1099.4 1117.1 1084.1 1028.3 1011.7 1002.0 1006.4 1099.4
Hunan 28.3 22.8 34.1 34.9 36.2 38.9 43.8 41.9 29.8 14.1 13.8
Guangdong 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0
Guangxi 3.1 3.2 2.7 0.8 1.1 1.0 1.1 3.2 3.3 3.2 3.6
Chongqing 30.1 34.3 41.1 52.0 64.7 78.8 90.5 104.5 125.8 154.4 178.3
Sichuan 652.7 684.0 746.9 814.3 878.7 934.1 998.5 1051.2 1111.5 1172.5 1257.1
Guizhou 156.0 169.2 180.4 189.1 196.2 209.7 215.5 226.1 236.2 244.4 234.2
Yunnan 343.7 344.2 356.6 369.4 391.7 403.2 417.3 416.8 423.6 420.2 423.0
Shaanxi 963.2 980.8 1002.6 1000.6 1021.7 1078.7 1089.2 1119.7 1119.2 1117.7 1133.4
Gansu 766.5 774.7 806.4 802.8 820.9 842.0 868.6 885.3 968.5 906.4 983.7
Qinghai 82.6 84.7 82.8 80.2 84.7 86.1 90.9 96.0 95.7 98.4 99.6
Ningxia 123.1 117.3 122.5 127.5 148.8 179.0 202.1 211.4 218.5 204.3 233.7
Province 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Beijing 63.1 53.3 39.2 35.8 47.4 72.6 121.7 168.0 171.2 171.3 171.2
Tianjin 103.4 98.9 79.0 78.3 95.9 106.7 121.7 143.2 153.4 151.1 147.6
Hebei 2504.5 2377.1 2161.5 2192.9 2449.6 2579.8 2678.8 2729.9 2764.0 2720.7 2591.2
Shanxi 659.6 721.0 648.9 720.6 798.1 820.6 893.2 919.2 963.4 951.2 940.4
Liaoning 8.0 22.3 20.6 20.1 49.8 98.8 117.6 153.0 150.2 167.9 177.9
Jilin 1.1 9.5 11.4 22.1 23.0 53.8 77.3 67.5 74.5 63.5 76.6
Heilongjiang 243.5 248.5 255.0 229.6 260.8 423.3 590.2 953.4 961.4 1074.4 1231.4
Shanghai 31.4 29.9 21.9 21.7 31.4 32.0 57.1 97.2 103.9 83.3 65.3
Jiangsu 1912.7 1684.4 1601.2 1620.5 1715.9 1712.8 1954.6 2251.7 2315.0 2341.4 2216.3
Zhejiang 45.4 67.1 59.5 71.5 94.2 121.4 177.6 257.9 255.1 245.2 222.3
Anhui 2307.8 2108.3 2059.9 2012.0 2056.9 1961.2 2126.4 2057.1 2095.0 2137.6 2065.8
Fujian 4.9 5.9 6.2 8.8 23.5 30.4 38.7 50.2 55.0 60.3 64.1
Jiangxi 11.8 15.9 19.1 20.6 28.5 38.3 51.4 61.5 65.8 73.5 72.0
Shandong 3556.6 3278.7 2968.2 3105.1 3397.5 3545.8 3748.2 4006.8 3982.0 4037.6 4031.6
Henan 5208.5 4962.7 4856.0 4804.6 4855.7 4801.6 4922.3 4884.6 4964.0 4927.3 4868.2
Hubei 1016.9 716.2 602.9 603.2 700.1 735.9 845.1 1074.4 1211.2 1276.5 1230.1
Hunan 13.5 65.7 76.2 86.3 99.8 110.0 118.6 129.7 144.6 163.1 170.4
Guangdong 1.2 6.5 6.0 5.8 10.7 11.2 13.7 15.2 17.8 19.4 22.5
Guangxi 3.9 10.7 11.7 12.3 12.8 14.7 19.5 19.8 25.5 31.9 25.2
Chongqing 164.8 279.7 280.5 322.7 388.2 422.1 466.2 531.6 548.2 556.3 545.4
Sichuan 1287.2 1262.3 1255.7 1318.7 1456.9 1498.6 1605.0 1818.3 1864.6 1824.5 2364.9
Guizhou 243.9 410.6 429.2 474.3 498.4 520.5 567.4 596.3 604.5 596.6 584.2
Yunnan 437.7 532.3 543.3 567.4 604.2 640.7 645.6 724.9 706.8 697.5 664.3
Shaanxi 1159.3 1211.5 1152.7 1233.3 1356.7 1424.2 1537.2 1589.5 1610.5 1602.8 1597.8
Gansu 958.5 1000.8 933.5 961.3 1080.0 1124.0 1192.2 1222.7 1323.5 1320.1 1352.4
Qinghai 151.8 96.8 102.2 107.0 142.5 156.2 165.6 182.9 211.9 213.5 210.6
Ningxia 250.3 276.0 279.0 319.3 370.8 299.3 292.6 267.5 316.8 312.2 313.9

Table A5.

Corn planting area in each province from 1996 to 2017 (unit: thousands of hectares).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Beijing 49.7 64.3 76.3 88.6 114.5 132.0 140.5 149.8 150.8 146.2 139.0
Tianjin 201.4 219.5 215.7 203.6 192.3 179.9 169.4 169.3 166.2 159.9 162.3
Hebei 3544.1 3696.1 3654.4 3542.1 3428.5 3323.2 3264.7 3191.0 3080.4 2885.5 2903.2
Shanxi 1806.9 1860.7 1894.5 1868.6 1836.3 1810.4 1762.2 1635.3 1511.5 1416.4 1287.8
Liaoning 2692.0 2789.8 2922.4 2758.7 2603.1 2504.6 2372.2 2277.4 2092.5 1966.2 2041.2
Jilin 4164.0 4242.0 4251.1 4062.6 3808.2 3534.2 3340.2 3215.0 3029.5 2987.6 2885.4
Heilongjiang 5862.8 6528.4 7361.2 6707.8 6571.2 6100.5 5179.7 4756.2 4361.6 3849.4 4055.4
Shanghai 3.0 4.0 4.3 4.9 4.4 4.5 4.8 4.9 4.5 3.8 4.0
Jiangsu 543.2 540.2 541.0 519.7 467.5 453.9 448.2 439.6 433.8 432.7 393.1
Zhejiang 51.9 49.9 51.6 51.1 50.3 50.8 26.2 23.9 24.5 24.3 22.9
Anhui 1160.1 1203.3 1206.3 1098.7 1045.3 975.0 952.9 864.1 803.7 731.3 733.3
Fujian 26.8 26.2 27.8 28.6 29.7 30.1 30.2 30.5 30.8 32.2 32.4
Jiangxi 35.7 35.6 31.8 28.2 26.0 25.4 24.3 24.1 21.0 16.0 14.6
Shandong 4000.1 4059.3 3943.8 3828.6 3663.1 3476.6 3370.6 3247.5 3131.1 3013.0 2855.6
Henan 3998.9 4210.5 4189.9 4009.4 3823.6 3564.7 3398.4 3233.5 3104.9 2954.4 2844.7
Hubei 794.8 797.3 813.5 745.7 653.4 663.6 603.4 572.5 536.5 488.2 444.6
Hunan 365.8 370.5 366.9 361.9 358.4 354.0 336.6 299.8 286.9 244.1 221.5
Guangdong 121.0 123.8 127.2 130.8 135.4 137.4 143.2 139.4 148.8 132.9 127.9
Guangxi 591.2 603.3 617.0 579.3 583.5 577.0 563.0 536.5 533.0 488.7 490.0
Chongqing 447.3 453.9 451.9 450.8 451.7 457.5 455.8 452.9 452.3 451.0 451.4
Sichuan 1863.9 1866.0 1816.9 1739.1 1685.8 1629.8 1574.3 1520.9 1454.8 1402.3 1369.4
Guizhou 1006.4 1041.6 1037.8 1034.8 988.5 951.4 934.5 895.5 832.6 786.6 756.6
Yunnan 1763.8 1784.8 1762.6 1745.8 1703.5 1623.1 1559.3 1527.5 1444.8 1384.7 1309.6
Shaanxi 1196.9 1341.8 1203.9 1212.8 1226.0 1241.6 1252.7 1257.5 1219.1 1193.8 1171.9
Gansu 1041.0 1056.7 1065.0 1045.4 1014.0 932.6 861.8 853.9 668.6 563.3 494.7
Qinghai 18.9 20.1 21.3 21.5 19.1 19.3 17.8 11.0 4.8 2.0 0.8
Ningxia 306.3 313.2 301.8 288.8 262.0 245.9 231.1 223.4 215.1 208.5 206.0
Province 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Beijing 135.8 119.7 93.5 75.2 87.2 100.1 135.8 198.1 207.7 206.3 207.8
Tianjin 150.9 138.8 134.8 124.9 146.5 140.9 131.2 168.6 163.0 152.2 162.9
Hebei 2799.9 2677.4 2630.6 2488.8 2577.4 2543.4 2478.6 2663.8 2581.0 2425.9 2524.9
Shanxi 1260.4 1183.7 1125.6 915.5 891.0 837.8 793.7 923.0 886.6 822.8 836.6
Liaoning 1983.1 1792.5 1598.8 1434.9 1431.6 1566.8 1422.5 1677.8 1638.0 1573.4 1576.7
Jilin 2880.7 2775.2 2901.5 2627.2 2579.5 2609.5 2197.3 2375.5 2421.3 2454.2 2481.3
Heilongjiang 3305.1 2220.2 2179.5 2053.8 2285.6 2132.7 1801.3 2651.9 2487.2 2544.8 2663.7
Shanghai 3.9 4.3 4.2 4.6 4.5 5.2 5.2 7.3 7.3 6.8 8.3
Jiangsu 378.2 370.2 389.1 451.9 436.5 429.8 423.2 454.3 473.5 439.0 467.8
Zhejiang 22.0 62.9 54.5 51.9 52.2 51.8 52.2 46.8 43.8 42.1 38.8
Anhui 623.2 670.2 662.3 627.4 651.4 589.3 485.9 588.5 570.3 512.2 614.8
Fujian 33.3 39.1 37.8 36.9 36.2 35.4 36.8 36.7 35.5 32.7 31.6
Jiangxi 14.8 16.5 14.4 17.5 16.8 19.9 25.3 27.3 32.7 31.0 40.2
Shandong 2844.4 2731.4 2455.1 2405.9 2530.1 2505.2 2413.9 2768.2 2781.9 2626.8 2826.7
Henan 2751.7 2508.3 2420.0 2386.7 2319.9 2200.0 2201.3 2193.7 2152.7 1952.4 2150.2
Hubei 431.9 389.6 357.5 341.1 390.8 400.9 424.1 460.8 440.9 399.8 405.1
Hunan 196.1 277.3 276.5 289.8 272.9 269.8 278.5 280.1 221.8 171.8 163.3
Guangdong 118.8 136.7 137.9 135.7 141.9 164.6 189.3 177.7 156.1 133.6 103.7
Guangxi 516.3 575.7 586.6 531.1 520.3 556.9 610.7 594.0 578.7 561.1 558.5
Chongqing 440.5 460.3 460.4 455.5 476.9 489.9 500.6 519.9 526.1 513.2 519.7
Sichuan 1291.7 1196.6 1172.6 1161.3 1207.9 1200.8 1235.5 1359.2 1364.8 1290.4 1762.1
Guizhou 734.9 719.5 706.5 686.3 703.8 721.8 727.3 725.6 728.8 629.5 636.0
Yunnan 1251.2 1182.6 1111.1 1066.9 1128.9 1138.1 1129.7 1159.6 1095.7 979.5 993.8
Shaanxi 1129.8 1097.1 1047.4 948.3 999.9 1005.1 1057.0 1123.4 1065.2 915.9 1087.4
Gansu 517.7 484.8 487.7 490.5 503.5 467.1 464.4 531.2 511.7 486.2 430.5
Qinghai 1.9 1.1 1.6 0 1.8 2.3 2.1 2.5 2.3 0 0
Ningxia 182.5 178.3 187.9 176.3 155.1 147.8 131.1 162.7 143.2 131.8 121.5

Table A6.

The number and incidence of influenza in each province from 2004 to 2017 (unit: thousands of hectares).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011
N I N I N I N I N I N I N I
Beijing 37,439 172.2997 20,279 93.4301 3439 15.9835 10,376 49.0637 2368 11.4435 1003 4.9688 391 1.9936
Tianjin 6149 39.3632 2387 15.4304 1001 6.5994 2313 15.7111 631 4.4652 1004 7.4119 415 3.2075
Hebei 39,054 52.2752 28,814 38.8072 22,537 30.5224 25,054 34.1679 21,082 28.9289 20,734 28.6361 16,423 22.8559
Shanxi 7463 20.2709 7484 20.4251 6232 17.0835 8109 22.3401 5954 16.4893 6209 17.2795 1584 4.4355
Liaoning 2031 4.6393 2026 4.623 1498 3.4115 1751 3.9886 1313 2.9916 898 2.0488 242 0.5532
Jilin 997 3.648 878 3.1889 645 2.3434 1063 3.8637 584 2.1233 886 3.2225 266 0.9686
Heilongjiang 1318 3.4693 1052 2.7597 431 1.1244 796 2.0756 154 0.4017 454 1.1841 267 0.6969
Shanghai 6215 25.685 4771 19.7535 6031 24.8631 4872 20.1727 2120 8.9060 4034 17.1845 1315 5.7126
Jiangsu 10,113 12.6435 5218 6.5419 4102 5.1532 3998 5.0356 2450 3.0934 2809 3.5562 1006 1.2789
Zhejiang 30,434 54.4437 14,394 25.9866 7970 14.4699 9700 17.6428 3302 6.0288 2903 5.3139 1995 3.6655
Anhui 19,572 31.5904 14,451 23.522 11,256 18.5043 9652 16.0072 5983 9.9917 5660 9.4839 3264 5.4857
Fujian 9625 24.8451 10,332 26.9133 8236 21.6395 8503 22.5305 4775 12.7401 4571 12.2876 2278 6.1744
Jiangxi 12,868 28.0211 9462 20.7245 8377 18.4428 8036 17.7703 5773 12.8178 5222 11.6344 3845 8.6273
Shandong 11,200 11.2601 7187 7.2986 4919 5.0248 6153 6.3215 3877 4.0032 4148 4.3041 2313 2.4146
Henan 20,418 21.4196 22,148 23.3629 17,522 18.5693 15,639 16.6136 13,505 14.3579 11,018 11.7363 6262 6.6595
Hubei 35,767 60.7766 11,610 19.8411 9201 15.8202 5065 8.7343 3469 6.0028 5474 9.5068 3113 5.4387
Hunan 27,597 40.4529 15,874 23.4289 8705 12.9207 10,617 15.8685 8136 12.2550 6593 9.9961 5256 8.0020
Guangdong 110,879 100.8084 84,209 77.6189 46,219 43.0987 50,788 47.7151 17,327 16.3555 12,947 12.3246 4599 4.4093
Guangxi 19,633 40.5818 8595 17.9212 4464 9.3900 5438 11.5236 3043 6.4994 2474 5.3262 1241 2.6963
Chongqing 5434 17.8256 3152 10.449 2357 7.8793 2084 7.0168 1966 6.6757 2560 8.7701 1152 3.9936
Sichuan 7104 8.5984 3991 4.8647 2543 3.1240 2171 2.6779 1971 2.4405 2455 3.0497 1467 1.8242
Guizhou 3946 11.0999 3419 9.6869 3329 9.4897 2274 6.493 2781 7.9822 1834 5.2868 878 2.5269
Yunnan 3496 7.3276 2656 5.6012 1958 4.1537 1736 3.7042 2839 6.0936 2071 4.4720 971 2.1124
Shaanxi 12,076 31.6695 5975 15.7532 3592 9.5149 5344 14.1977 4936 13.1518 4218 11.2702 1348 3.6113
Gansu 7296 27.954 8479 32.6172 5056 19.5154 6344 24.5684 4916 19.0724 5194 20.2559 2724 10.6509
Qinghai 1226 20.6746 767 13.0347 276 4.7307 707 12.2363 487 8.4966 254 4.4705 148 2.6303
Ningxia 1475 21.8551 1434 21.4709 925 13.9825 1469 22.4553 1030 15.9150 1416 22.1440 444 7.0461
Province 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004
N I N I N I N I N I N I N I
Beijing 830 4.7293 5147 30.3658 335 2.0514 221 1.3978 290 1.8855 120 0.7811 8 0.0540
Tianjin 523 4.2584 707 6.0119 597 5.3542 831 7.7302 1676 16.0690 377 3.6197 13 0.1399
Hebei 13,679 19.4459 15,081 21.5786 11,615 16.7291 8679 12.5819 7117 10.3883 3916 5.7508 1923 2.8283
Shanxi 787 2.2962 2456 7.2011 172 0.5069 265 0.7852 721 2.1490 79 0.2369 57 0.1720
Liaoning 1240 2.8710 775 1.7962 62 0.1443 129 0.3020 89 0.2109 66 0.1565 4 0.0096
Jilin 717 2.6172 343 1.2546 149 0.5458 167 0.6133 50 0.1841 30 0.1107 4 0.0150
Heilongjiang 537 1.4036 1407 3.6785 84 0.2197 52 0.1360 24 0.0628 65 0.1706 17 0.0453
Shanghai 2429 12.6444 1391 7.3658 269 1.4478 404 2.2259 77 0.4331 8 0.0450 15 0.1121
Jiangsu 2267 2.9346 5255 6.8449 575 0.7541 1969 2.6079 4658 6.2314 1028 1.3783 370 0.4889
Zhejiang 3257 6.2876 7288 14.2344 894 1.7668 936 1.8795 4298 8.7750 1998 4.0997 3780 8.0430
Anhui 2664 4.3451 3490 5.6887 675 1.1033 925 1.5139 1431 2.3382 1097 1.8036 744 1.1547
Fujian 2101 5.7927 6041 16.6301 884 2.4686 361 1.0146 614 1.7369 477 1.3574 685 1.9051
Jiangxi 2550 5.7534 6257 14.2205 1680 3.8461 1093 2.5189 2039 4.7298 1266 2.9597 1497 3.4948
Shandong 3075 3.2470 4559 4.8411 429 0.4580 292 0.3137 163 0.1763 96 0.1044 157 0.1712
Henan 3936 4.1488 8849 9.3849 3594 3.8397 2710 2.8854 2991 3.1887 1885 2.0201 772 0.7965
Hubei 1994 3.4860 15,444 27.0425 1834 3.2181 1802 3.1653 1565 2.7408 1205 2.1168 159 0.2646
Hunan 4390 6.8529 19,514 30.5633 3621 5.6979 1918 3.0243 894 1.4132 664 1.0550 1010 1.5121
Guangdong 5957 6.1807 20,155 21.1180 3334 3.5284 2800 3.0095 8070 8.7775 5913 6.4765 4973 6.2520
Guangxi 1233 2.5391 11,969 24.8526 955 2.0029 931 1.9729 1999 4.2897 3234 6.9965 8605 17.7209
Chongqing 960 3.3578 11,640 41.0004 1787 6.3459 669 2.3825 1161 4.1494 2343 8.3989 3351 10.7057
Sichuan 1530 1.8693 9517 11.6308 1707 2.1004 1732 2.1202 2054 2.5012 5157 6.2981 12,560 14.4138
Guizhou 1256 3.3070 10,472 27.6398 1612 4.2850 1063 2.8293 1764 4.7292 6838 18.4677 5583 14.6039
Yunnan 723 1.5817 7664 16.8699 395 0.8751 435 0.9703 4487 10.0833 3753 8.5011 3 0.0069
Shaanxi 640 1.6967 6287 16.7119 346 0.9232 348 0.9317 354 0.9516 342 0.9230 1050 2.8703
Gansu 2276 8.6361 7966 30.3106 2522 9.6369 3689 14.1557 4212 16.2374 1110 4.3049 978 3.7416
Qinghai 97 1.7405 211 3.8066 47 0.8515 103 1.8796 177 3.2597 190 3.5323 230 4.2627
Ningxia 1348 21.5610 2870 47.3922 684 11.2132 547 9.0563 315 5.2852 265 4.4951 193 3.3051

Note: N = Number; I = Incidence.

Table A7.

Per capita GDP of each province from 1996 to 2017 (unit: yuan).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
Beijing 137,596 124,516 114,662 107,472 101,023 93,078 86,365 78,307 71,059 68,541 63,629
Tianjin 79,837 73,830 71,021 71,198 68,937 65,346 61,137 54,053 47,497 45,242 37,976
Hebei 40,883 38,233 35,653 34,260 33,187 31,770 29,631 25,308 21,831 20,385 17,561
Shanxi 39,232 32,526 32,375 33,237 33,111 32,435 30,400 25,434 20,906 21,234 17,542
Liaoning 49,603 46,557 46,069 45,608 43,758 40,694 37,350 31,888 29,611 28,185 24,022
Jilin 40,077 38,011 36,391 36,218 34,273 31,558 28,146 23,370 19,858 17,696 14,966
Heilongjiang 32,454 31,258 30,583 31,744 30,901 28,732 25,915 21,694 18,871 18,654 16,023
Shanghai 13,6109 12,3628 11,1081 10,4402 96,773 90,127 86,061 79,396 72,363 69,154 63,951
Jiangsu 10,7150 96,840 89,426 81,550 74,844 67,896 61,947 52,787 44,272 39,967 33,798
Zhejiang 93,186 84,921 78,768 72,730 68,036 62,856 58,398 51,110 43,543 41,061 36,454
Anhui 47,671 42,641 38,983 37,184 34,256 30,683 27,314 21,923 17,715 15,535 12,989
Fujian 86,943 76,778 70,162 65,810 59,835 54,073 48,341 40,773 33,999 30,153 25,915
Jiangxi 43,868 40,159 36,850 34,571 31,686 28,486 25,885 21,099 17,277 15,816 13,270
Shandong 63,162 59,375 56,312 52,016 48,763 44,464 40,639 35,599 31,282 28,861 24,329
Henan 46,959 42,341 39,209 36,686 33,618 30,820 28,009 23,984 20,280 18,879 15,811
Hubei 63,180 56,836 52,015 48,630 43,838 39,163 34,738 28,359 23,081 20,153 16,593
Hunan 49,448 45,356 42,216 38,549 35,328 32,048 28,734 24,005 19,979 17,758 14,626
Guangdong 82,686 75,213 69,283 63,809 58,860 54,038 50,676 44,669 39,418 37,543 33,236
Guangxi 36,595 33,458 30,990 28,687 26,483 24,238 22,258 18,070 14,708 13,471 11,542
Chongqing 65,538 59,433 53,398 49,062 44,049 39,548 35,017 28,084 23,346 20,865 16,966
Sichuan 45,768 40,251 37,129 35,565 32,772 29,669 26,163 21,230 17,387 15,685 12,963
Guizhou 38,137 33,291 29,956 26,171 22,825 19,394 16,165 12,882 10,814 9697 7778
Yunnan 38,629 34,416 31,642 29,874 27,447 23,891 20,629 16,866 14,427 13,286 11,287
Shaanxi 56,154 50,081 47,301 46,167 42,318 37,733 32,562 26,388 21,485 19,331 15,342
Gansu 28,026 26,520 25,264 25,202 23,313 20,978 18,801 15,421 12,802 12,048 10,501
Qinghai 41,366 38,213 34,322 31,824 29,772 26,784 24,220 20,418 16,907 16,220 13,100
Ningxia 47,177 41,427 38,805 37,605 35,772 33,125 30,365 24,984 20,382 18,554 14,458
Province 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 1996
Beijing 53,438 47,182 42,402 36,583 32,231 28,097 25,014 22,054 19,625 16,949 14,495
Tianjin 33,411 30,567 25,761 22,371 19,161 17,523 16,236 14,985 14,086 13,142 11,734
Hebei 14,609 12,845 11,178 9380 8216 7572 6966 6310 5994 5615 4950
Shanxi 14,008 12,195 10,515 8639 7082 6226 5722 5230 5104 4724 4178
Liaoning 19,760 17,210 15,355 14,041 13,000 12,015 11,177 10,086 9415 8725 7730
Jilin 11,864 10,237 9073 7925 7581 7076 6646 6311 5983 5591 5178
Heilongjiang 13,947 12,456 10,836 9464 8507 7990 7515 6707 6566 6412 5755
Shanghai 54,996 49,377 44,998 39,117 34,277 32,089 30,307 27,293 25,405 23,573 20,808
Jiangsu 27,868 23,984 19,790 16,743 14,369 12,879 11,765 10,695 10,049 9371 8471
Zhejiang 30,415 26,277 23,476 20,249 16,918 14,726 13,467 12,229 11,395 10,615 9534
Anhui 10,630 9193 8279 7001 6238 5732 5147 4819 4516 4160 3703
Fujian 20,915 18,107 16,248 14,330 12,910 11,883 11,194 10,323 9603 8775 7658
Jiangxi 10,859 9172 7960 6636 5829 5221 4851 4402 4124 3890 3452
Shandong 20,443 17,308 14,540 11,977 11,120 10,063 9260 8483 7968 7461 6746
Henan 12,761 10,978 9047 7376 6487 5959 5450 4832 4643 4389 3978
Hubei 13,210 11,342 9746 8378 7437 6866 6121 5452 5287 4884 4311
Hunan 11,733 10,200 9004 7589 6734 6120 5590 4933 4667 4420 3963
Guangdong 27,861 23,997 20,647 17,950 15,478 13,952 12,817 11,463 10,850 10,154 9157
Guangxi 9421 8069 7182 6120 5559 5058 4652 4444 4346 3928 3706
Chongqing 13,915 12,335 10,934 9311 8079 7096 6383 5890 5649 5306 4613
Sichuan 10,371 8828 7751 6565 5890 5376 4956 4540 4294 4032 3550
Guizhou 6103 5218 4244 3708 3257 3000 2759 2545 2364 2250 2048
Yunnan 9158 7890 7136 6048 5472 5063 4814 4558 4446 4121 3779
Shaanxi 12,439 10,357 8545 7057 6161 5511 4968 4415 4070 3834 3446
Gansu 8653 7332 6512 5525 4875 4467 4163 3778 3541 3199 2946
Qinghai 10,728 9233 8275 7248 6478 5774 5138 4728 4425 4122 3799
Ningxia 11,389 9796 8904 7686 6647 6039 5376 4900 4607 4277 3926

Table A8.

The number of domestic tourists received by each province from 2013 to 2017 (unit: 100 million person-times).

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Beijing 2.9 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.5
Shanghai 1.55 1.47 1.39 1.3 1.13
Guangdong 4.07 3.62 3.28 2.93 2.67
Tianjin 2 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.36
Jiangsu 7.43 6.78 6.19 5.7 5.2
Zhejiang 6.4 5.73 5.25 4.79 4.34
Liaoning 5.03 4.49 3.97 4.59 4.04
Shandong 7.7 7 6.5 5.9 5.4
Fujian 3.75 3.09 2.61 2.29 1.95
Sichuan 6.7 6.3 5.9 5.4 4.9
Hebei 5.7 4.7 3.7 3.1 2.7
Hubei 6.39 5.73 5.07 4.69 4.06
Henan 6.6 5.8 5.1 4.5 4
Hunan 6.7 5.6 4.7 4.1 3.6
Heilongjiang 1.63 1.44 1.3 1.05 2.9
Chongqing 5.2 4.5 3.9 3.4 2.9
Jilin 0.5 0.43 0.38 0.32 0.27
Jiangxi 5.7 4.6 3.8 3.1 2.4
Shanxi 5.6 4.4 3.6 3 2.5
Shaanxi 5.19 4.46 3.83 3.29 2.82
Anhui 6.26 5.22 4.44 3.8 3.36
Yunnan 5.67 4.25 3.23 2.81 2.4
Guangxi 5.18 4 3.3 2.8 2.4
Gansu 2.38 1.9 1.56 1.26 1
Guizhou 6.7 5.3 3.75 3.2 2.6
Ningxia 0.3 0.2 0.18 0.16 0.18
Qinghai 0.34 0.28 0.23 0.2 0.18

Table A9.

Travel index of each province in 2013–2017.

Province 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Jiangsu 3 4 4 4 3
Guangdong 4 3 3 2 4
Zhejiang 5 5 5 5 5
Shanghai 1 1 2 3 2
Shandong 6 6 7 6 6
Beijing 2 2 1 1 1
Henan 10 13 12 12 11
Sichuan 14 15 14 15 12
Fujian 7 8 9 9 9
Anhui 16 16 17 13 16
Hunan 9 10 13 14 14
Hebei 12 9 11 11 13
Shaanxi 17 17 15 16 15
Hubei 11 12 10 10 10
Liaoning 13 11 8 8 8
Chongqing 15 14 16 19 17
Tianjin 8 7 6 7 7
Heilongjiang 21 18 18 18 18
Shanxi 18 19 19 23 19
Yunnan 22 24 26 26 25
Jiangxi 20 22 21 20 21
Guangxi 25 25 24 24 24
Jilin 23 20 20 22 20
Guizhou 26 26 29 29 30
Gansu 28 28 28 28 28
Ningxia 29 29 27 27 27
Qinghai 30 30 30 30 29

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.G. and Y.L.; methodology, Y.L.; formal analysis, Y.L.; data curation, Y.G. and Y.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.G.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z., Y.M. and Y.L.; supervision, Z.Z., P.H. and Y.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board (or Ethics Committee) of Shaanxi Normal University (Number: HR2023-03-010; Date: 7 March 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 42201245); China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant number 2022M711998, 2023T160403); the Science and Technology Plan Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Province (grant number 2023-YBSF-029, 2021SF-481); and Shaanxi Teacher Development Research Institute “Teacher Development Research Project” (Youth) (grant number SJS2022ZQ010).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Anderson M.R. Community psychology, political efficacy, and trust. Polit. Psychol. 2010;31:59–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00734.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arcidiacono C., Di Napoli I., Esposito C., Procentese F. The Routledge International Handbook of Community Psychology. Routledge; London, UK: 2022. Community trust and community psychology interventions. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jason L.A., Stevens E., Light J.M. The relationship of sense of community and trust to hope. J. Community Psychol. 2016;44:334–341. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Procentese F., Di Napoli I., Esposito C., Gatti F. Individual and community-related paths to civic engagement: A multiple mediation model deepening the role of Sense of responsible togetherness, community trust, and hope. Community Psychol. Glob. Perspect. 2023;9:64–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McEvily B., Perrone V., Zaheer A. Trust as an organizing principle. Organ. Sci. 2003;14:91–103. doi: 10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kong D.T. A gene-dependent climatoeconomic model of generalized trust. J. World Bus. 2016;51:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Delhey J., Newton K., Welzel C. How general is trust in ‘‘most people’’? Solving the radius of trust problem. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2011;76:786–807. doi: 10.1177/0003122411420817. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Granovetter M. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econ. Perspect. 2005;19:33–50. doi: 10.1257/0895330053147958. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Glanville J.L., Paxton P. How do we learn to trust? A confirmatory tetrad analysis of the sources of generalized trust. Soc. Psychol. Q. 2007;70:230–242. doi: 10.1177/019027250707000303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Freitag M., Traunmüller R. Spheres of trust: An empirical analysis of the foundations of particularised and generalised trust. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 2009;48:782–803. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.00849.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Robbins B.G. Institutional quality and generalized trust: A nonrecursive causal model. Soc. Indic. Res. 2012;107:235–258. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9838-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Putnam R.D. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster; New York, NY, USA: 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Covey S.M.R., Merrill R.R. The Speed of Trust: The One Thing that Changes Everything. Simon & Schuster; New York, NY, USA: 2006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bjørnskov C. How does social trust affect economic growth? South. Econ. J. 2012;78:1346–1368. doi: 10.4284/0038-4038-78.4.1346. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kong D.T., Dirks K.T., Ferrin D.L. Interpersonal trust within negotiations: Meta-analytic evidence, critical contingencies, and directions for future research. Acad. Manag. J. 2014;57:1235–1255. doi: 10.5465/amj.2012.0461. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Bianchi E.C., Brockner J. In the eyes of the beholder? The role of dispositional trust in judgments of procedural and interactional fairness. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2012;118:46–59. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Muethel M., Bond M.H. National context and individual employees’ trust of the out-group: The role of societal trust. J. Int. Bus. Stud. 2013;44:312–333. doi: 10.1057/jibs.2013.9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ferrin D.L., Gillespie N. Trust differences across national-societal cultures: Much to do, or much ado about nothing? In: Saunders M., Skinner D., Dietz G., Gillespie N., Lewicki R.J., editors. Trust Across Cultures: Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, UK: 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colquitt J.A., LePine J.A., Zapata C.P., Wild R.E. Trust in typical and high-reliability contexts: Building and reacting to trust among firefighters. Acad. Manag. J. 2011;54:999–1015. doi: 10.5465/amj.2006.0241. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dinesen P.T. Does generalized (dis)trust travel? Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination-country environment on trust of immigrants. Polit. Psychol. 2012;33:495–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00886.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kong D.T. Examining a climate economic contextualization of generalized social trust mediated by uncertainty avoidance. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2013;44:574–588. doi: 10.1177/0022022112466700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stolle D. Trusting strangers–the concept of generalized trust in perspective. Austrian J. Polit. Sci. 2002;31:397–412. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Moscardo G., Konovalov E., Murphy L., McGehee N. Mobilities, community wellbeing and sustainable tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2013;21:532–556. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2013.785556. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Xu H., Zhang C., Huang Y. Social trust, social capital, and subjective well-being of rural residents: Micro-empirical evidence based on the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS) Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun. 2023;10:49. doi: 10.1057/s41599-023-01532-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Deng X., Yu M. Scale of cities and social trust: Evidence from China. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2021;76:215–228. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2021.06.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cloke P., Jones O. Dwelling, place, and landscape: An orchard in Somerset. Environ. Plan. A. 2001;33:649–666. doi: 10.1068/a3383. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pons P.O. Being-on-holiday tourist dwelling, bodies and place. Tour. Stud. 2003;3:47–66. doi: 10.1177/1468797603040530. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Todres L., Galvin K. “Dwelling-mobility”: An existential theory of well-being. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-Being. 2010;5:5444. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v5i3.5444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Steiner C.J., Reisinger Y. Understanding existential authenticity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2006;33:299–318. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2005.08.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hall C.M. Response to Yeoman et al.: The fakery of “The authentic tourist”. Tour. Manag. 2007;28:1139–1140. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brown L. Tourism: A catalyst for existential authenticity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2013;40:176–190. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2012.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Van de Vliert E. Human cultures as niche constructions within the solar system. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2015;47:21–27. doi: 10.1177/0022022115615963. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Van Lange P.A.M., Rinderu M.I., Bushman B.J. Aggression and violence around the world: A model of Climate, Aggression, and Self-control in Humans (CLASH) Behav. Brain Sci. 2016;40:1–63. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16000406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Van Lange P.A.M., Rinderu M.I., Bushman B.J. The logic of climate and culture: Evolutionary and psychological aspects of CLASH. Behav. Brain Sci. 2017;40:1–58. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16001564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wei W., Lu J.G., Galinsky A.D., Wu H., Gosling S.D., Rentfrow P.J., Yuan W., Zhang Q., Guo Y., Zhang M., et al. Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality. Nat. Human Behav. 2017;1:890–895. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0240-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Van Lange P.A.M., Joireman J., Milinski M. Climate change: What psychology can offer in terms of insights and solutions. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2018;27:269–274. doi: 10.1177/0963721417753945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.León F.R., Burga-León A. How geography influences complex cognitive ability. Intelligence. 2015;50:221–227. doi: 10.1016/j.intell.2015.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Van de Vliert E., Welzel C., Shcherbak A., Fischer R., Alexander A.C. Got Milk? How freedoms evolved from dairying climates. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2018;49:1048–1065. doi: 10.1177/0022022118778336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Van de Vliert E., Van Lange P.A.M. Latitudinal psychology: An ecological perspective on creativity, aggression, happiness, and beyond. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2019;14:860–884. doi: 10.1177/1745691619858067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Uysal M., Sirgy M.J., Woo E., Kim H. Quality of life (QOL) and well-being research in tourism. Tour. Manag. 2016;53:244–261. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2015.07.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Fu X., Ridderstaat J., Jia H. Are all tourism markets equal? Linkages between market-based tourism demand, quality of life, and economic development in Hong Kong. Tour. Manag. 2020;77:104015. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang I.C.M., French J.A., Lee C., Watabe M. The symbolism of international tourism in national identity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020;83:102966. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2020.102966. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jansen-Verbeke M. The territoriality paradigm in cultural tourism. Tourism. 2009;19:25–31. doi: 10.2478/V10106-009-0003-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Smith E.K., Mayer A.A. Social trap for the climate? Collective action, trust and climate change risk perception in 35 countries. Glob. Environ. Change-Human Policy Dimens. 2018;49:140–153. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.02.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Van de Vliert E. Climato-economic habitats support patterns of human needs, stresses, and freedoms. Behav. Brain Sci. 2012;36:465–480. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X12002828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Van de Vliert E. Climatic imprints on personality. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2017;1:864–865. doi: 10.1038/s41562-017-0246-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Burke M., Hsiang S.M., Miguel E. Climate and conflict. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2015;7:577–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080614-115430. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Van de Vliert E., Daan S. Hell on earth? Equatorial peaks of heat, poverty, and aggression. Behav. Brain Sci. 2017;40:36–37. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X16001114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Van de Vliert E., Conway L.G. Northerners and southerners differ in conflict culture. Negot. Confl. Manag. Res. 2018;12:256–277. doi: 10.1111/ncmr.12138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Talhelm T., Zhang X., Oishi S., Shimin C., Duan D., Lan X., Kitayama S. Large-Scale psychological differences within china explained by rice versus wheat agriculture. Science. 2014;344:603–608. doi: 10.1126/science.1246850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Talhelm T., Zhang X., Oishi S. Moving chairs in Starbucks: Observational studies find rice-wheat cultural differences in daily life in China. Sci. Adv. 2018;4:eaap8469. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aap8469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Talhelm T. Emerging evidence of cultural differences linked to rice versus wheat agriculture. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2020;32:81–88. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Dong X., Talhelm T., Ren X. Teens in rice county are more interdependent and think more holistically than nearby wheat county. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2018;10:966–976. doi: 10.1177/1948550618808868. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Thomson R., Yuki M., Talhelm T., Schug J., Kito M., Ayanian A.H., Becker J.C., Becker M., Chiu C.-Y., Choi H.-S., et al. Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:7521–7526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1713191115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Liu S.S., Morris M.W., Talhelm T., Yang Q. Ingroup vigilance in collectivistic cultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:14538–14546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1817588116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Talhelm T., English A.S. Historically rice-farming societies have tighter social norms in China and worldwide. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2020;117:19816–19824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909909117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Zhu C., Talhelm T., Li Y., Chen G., Wang J. Relationship between rice farming and polygenic scores potentially linked to agriculture in China. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2021;8:210382. doi: 10.1098/rsos.210382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fincher C.L., Thornhill R., Murray D.R., Schaller M. Pathogen prevalence predicts human cross-cultural variability in individualism/collectivism. Proc. R. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2018;275:1279–1285. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fincher C.L., Thornhill R. Parasite-stress promotes in-group assortative sociality: The cases of strong family ties and heightened religiosity. Behav. Brain Sci. 2012;35:61–79. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X11000021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Hu Z.C., Wang Y.L., Liu Y.S., Long H.L., Peng J. Spatiotemporal patterns of urban-rural development and transformation in east of the “Hu Huanyong Line”, China. ISPRS Int. J. Geo.-Inf. 2016;5:24. doi: 10.3390/ijgi5030024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Henrich J., Boyd R., Bowles S., Camerer C., Fehr E., Gintis H., McElreath R. In search of homo-economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 2001;91:73–78. doi: 10.1257/aer.91.2.73. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Herrmann B., Thöni C., Gächter S. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science. 2018;319:1362–1367. doi: 10.1126/science.1153808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Henrich J., Ensminger J., McElreath R., Barr A., Barrett C., Bolyanatz A., Ziker J. Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science. 2010;327:1480–1484. doi: 10.1126/science.1182238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Al-Ubaydli O., Houser D., Nye J., Paganelli M.P., Pan X.S. The causal effect of market priming on trust: An experimental investigation using randomized control. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e55968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Xin Z.Q., Liu G.F. Homo economics belief inhibits trust. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e76671. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Xin Z., Xin S. Marketization process predicts trust decline in China. J. Econ. Psychol. 2017;62:120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2017.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cohn A., Fehr E., Maréchal M.A. Business culture and dishonesty in the banking industry. Nature. 2014;516:86–89. doi: 10.1038/nature13977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Perdue R.R., Long P.T., Allen L. Resident support for tourism development. Ann. Tour. Res. 1990;17:586–599. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(90)90029-Q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Ap J. Residents’ perceptions on tourism impacts. Ann. Tour. Res. 1992;19:665–690. doi: 10.1016/0160-7383(92)90060-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Sharpley R. Host perceptions of tourism: A review of the research. Tour. Manag. 2014;42:37–49. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kastenholz E., Carneiro M.J.C., Eusébio C., Figueiredo E. Host-guest relationships in rural tourism: Evidence from two Portuguese villages. Anatolia. 2013;24:367–380. doi: 10.1080/13032917.2013.769016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Giovanardi M., Lucarelli A., Decosta P.L. Co-performing tourism places: The “Pink Night” festival. Ann. Tour. Res. 2014;44:102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2013.09.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Filep S., Macnaughton J., Glover T. Tourism and gratitude: Valuing acts of kindness. Ann. Tour. Res. 2017;66:26–36. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.05.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Reisinger Y., Turner L.W. Cross-Cultural Behavior in Tourism. Elsevier Butterworth Heinemann; Oxford, UK: 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Heimtun B. Depathologizing the tourist syndrome: Tourism as social capital production. Tour. Stud. 2007;7:271–293. doi: 10.1177/1468797608092513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.White N.R., White P.B. Travel as interaction: Encountering place and others. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2008;15:42–48. doi: 10.1375/jhtm.15.1.42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Nunkoo R., Ramkissoon H. Developing a community support model for tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2011;38:964–988. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2011.01.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Boley B.B., McGehee N.G. Measuring empowerment: Developing and validating the resident empowerment through tourism scale (RETS) Tour. Manag. 2014;45:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2014.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Strzelecka M., Boley B.B., Strzelecka C. Empowerment and resident support for tourism in rural Central and Eastern Europe (CEE): The case of Pomerania, Poland. J. Sustain. Tour. 2016;25:554–572. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2016.1224891. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Jurowski C., Gursoy R. Distance effects on residents’ attitudes toward tourism. Ann. Touris Res. 2004;31:296–312. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2003.12.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Choi Y., Kim M., Chun C. Measurement of occupants’ stress based on electroencephalograms (EEG) in twelve combined environments. Build. Environ. 2015;88:65–72. doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Kai C.C. The affecting tourism development attitudes based on the social exchange theory and the social network theory. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2021;26:167–182. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2018.1540438. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Powers S.L., Webster N., Agans J.P., Graefe A.R., Mowen A.J. The power of parks: How interracial contact in urban parks can support prejudice reduction, interracial trust, and civic engagement for social justice. Cities. 2022;131:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.104032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Larsen L., Harlan S.L., Bolin B., Hackett E.J., Hope D., Kirby A., Nelson A., Rex T.R., Wolf S. Bonding and bridging: Understanding the relationship between social capital and civic action. J. Plan. Educ. Res. 2004;24:64–77. doi: 10.1177/0739456X04267181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Strzelecka M., Wicks B.E. Engaging residents in planning for sustainable rural-nature tourism in post-communist Poland. Community Dev. 2010;41:370–384. doi: 10.1080/15575330903359614. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Martínez-Garcia E., Raya J.M., Majó J. Differences in residents’ attitudes towards tourism among mass tourism destinations. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2017;19:535–545. doi: 10.1002/jtr.2126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Levi M. A state of trust. In: Braithvaite V., Levi M., editors. Trust and Governance. Russell Sage Foundation; New York, NY, USA: 1998. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Nunkoo R., Ramkissoon H., Gursoy D. Public trust in tourism institutions. Ann. Tour. Res. 2012;39:1538–1564. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2012.04.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Strzelecka M., Wicks B. Community participation and empowerment in rural postcommunist societies: Lessons from the leader approach in Pomerania, Poland. Tour. Plan. Dev. 2015;12:381–397. doi: 10.1080/21568316.2015.1013564. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Zhou L. Hitchhiking tourism and social trust: Exploring Chinese experiences through travel blogs. Ann. Tour. Res. 2020;81:102853. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.102853. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Strzelecka M., Okulicz-Kozaryn A. Is tourism conducive to residents’ social trust? Evidence form large-scale social surveys. Tour. Rev. 2018;73:1–27. doi: 10.1108/TR-05-2017-0091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Kiverstein J. The meaning of Embodiment. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2012;4:740–758. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01219.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Meier B.P., Schnall S., Schwarz N., Bargh J.A. Embodiment in social psychology. Top. Cogn. Sci. 2012;4:705–716. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Aschwanden C. Where is thought? Discover. 2013;34:28–29. [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Norwood M.F., Lakhani A., Maujean A., Zeeman H., Creux O., Kendall E. Brain activity, underlying mood and the environment: A systematic review. J. Environ. Psychol. 2019;65:101321. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101321. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lehrner J., Eckersberger C., Walla P., Ptsch G., Deecke L. Ambient odor of orange in a dental office reduces anxiety and improves mood in female patients. Physiol. Behav. 2000;71:83–86. doi: 10.1016/S0031-9384(00)00308-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Rind B., Strohmetz D. Effect of beliefs about future weather conditions on restaurant tipping. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2001;31:2160–2164. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb00168.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Keller M.C., Fredrickson B.L., Ybarra O., Côté S., Johnson K., Mikels J., Conway A., Wager T. A warm heart and a clear head: The contingent effects of weather on mood and cognition. Psychol. Sci. 2005;16:724–731. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Brown S.C., Mason C.A., Perrino T., Lombard J.L., Martinez F., Plater-Zyberk E., Spokane A.R., Szapocznik J. Built environment and physical functioning in hispanic elders: The role of “eyes on the street”. Environ. Health Perspect. 2008;116:1300–1307. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Trasande L., Cronk C., Durkin M., Weiss M., Schoeller D.A., Gall E.A., Hewitt J.B., Carrel A.L., Landrigan P.J., Gillman M.W. Environment and obesity in the National Children’s study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009;117:159–166. doi: 10.1289/ehp.11839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Triguero-Mas M., Dadvand P., Cirach M., Martínez D., Medina A., Mompart A., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. Natural outdoor environments and mental and physical health: Relationships and mechanisms. Environ. Int. 2015;77:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Dadvand P., Bartoll X., Basagaña X., Dalmau-Bueno A., Martinez D., Ambros A., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J. Green spaces and general health: Roles of mental health status, social support, and physical activity. Environ. Int. 2016;91:161–167. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Bailey A.W., Allen G., Herndon J., Demastus C. Cognitive benefits of walking in natural versus built environments. World Leis. J. 2018;60:293–305. doi: 10.1080/16078055.2018.1445025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Vries S.D., Verheij R.A., Groenewegen P.P., Spreeuwenberg P. Natural environments-healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health. Environ. Plan. A. 2003;35:1717–1731. doi: 10.1068/a35111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gaoua N., Grantham J., Racinais S., El Massioui F. Sensory displeasure reduces complex cognitive performance in the heat. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012;32:158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.01.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Beukeboom C.J., Langeveld D., Tanja-Dijkstra K. Stress-reducing effects of real and artificial nature in a hospital waiting room. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2012;18:329–333. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Lee K.E., Williams K.J.H., Sargent L.D., Williams N.S.G., Johnson K.A. 40-second green roof views sustain attention: The role of micro-breaks in attention restoration. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015;42:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Brown K.M. The haptic pleasures of ground-feel: The role of textured terrain in motivating regular exercise. Health Place. 2017;46:307–314. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chiang Y.C., Li D., Jane H.A. Wild or tended nature? The effects of landscape location and vegetation density on physiological and psychological responses. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2017;167:72–83. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.06.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Shin Y.B., Woo S.H., Kim D.H., Kim J., Kim J.J., Park J.Y. The effect on emotions and brain activity by the direct/indirect lighting in the residential environment. Neurosci. Lett. 2015;584:28–32. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.09.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Kim G., Jeong G. Brain activation patterns associated with the human comfortability of residential environments: 3.0-T functional MRI. NeuroReport. 2014;25:915–920. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Kim T.-H., Jeong G.-W., Baek H.-S., Kim G.-W., Sundaram T., Kang H.-K., Lee S.-W., Kim H.-J., Song J.-K. Human brain activation in response to visual stimulation with rural and urban scenery pictures: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Sci. Total Environ. 2010;408:2600–2607. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Halonen J.I., Vahtera J., Stansfeld S., Yli-Tuomi T., Salo P., Pentti J., Kivimäki M., Lanki T. Associations between nighttime traffic noise and sleep: The finnish public sector study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2012;120:1391–1396. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Orban E., McDonald K., Sutcliffe R., Hoffmann B., Fuks K.B., Dragano N., Moebus S. Residential road traffic noise and high depressive symptoms after five years of follow-up: Results from the heinz nixdorf recall study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016;124:578–585. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1409400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Lu J.G., Lee J.J., Gino F., Galinsky A.D. Polluted morality: Air pollution predicts criminal activity and unethical behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2018;29:340–355. doi: 10.1177/0956797617735807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zheng S., Wang J., Sun C., Zhang X., Kahn M.E. Air pollution lowers Chinese urbanites’ expressed happiness on social media. Nat. Human Behav. 2019;3:237–243. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0521-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Greenberg J., Martens A., Jonas E., Eisenstadt D., Pyszczynski T., Solomon S. Psychological defense in anticipation of anxiety. Psychol. Sci. 2003;14:516–519. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.03454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kouchaki M., Desai S.D. Anxious, threatened, and also unethical: How anxiety makes individuals feel threatened and commit unethical acts. J. Appl. Psychol. 2015;100:360–375. doi: 10.1037/a0037796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Tamara G., Larisa A.M., Marko D.P., Victor A.B., Anna V.K., Narine L.W. Travelers’ (in)Resilience to environmental risks emphasized in the media and their redirecting to medical destinations: Enhancing sustainability. Sustainability. 2023;15:15297. doi: 10.3390/su152115297. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.


Articles from Behavioral Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES