Skip to main content
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology logoLink to Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
. 2023 Jan 19;52(8):20220164.c. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20220164.c

Correction to the effect of imaging modality on the evaluation of the outcome of endodontic surgery

PMCID: PMC10968757  PMID: 36655784

The authors of this paper have informed us that this paper was published with several references missing from the References section. The references missing are as follows:

48. Setzer FC, Kohli MR, Shah SB, Karabucak B, Kim S. Outcome of endodontic surgery: a meta-analysis of the literature--Part 2: Comparison of endodontic microsurgical techniques with and without the use of higher magnification. J Endod 2012;38(1):1-10.

49. Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S. Endodontic therapy using magnification devices: a systematic review. J Dent 2010;38(4):269-275.

50. Taschieri S, Weinstein T, Tsesis I, Bortolin M, Del Fabbro M. Magnifying loupes versus surgical microscope in endodontic surgery: a four-year retrospective study. Aust Endod J 2013;39(2):78-80.

51. Glossary of evidence-based terms. J Evid Base Dent Pract 2007(7):45–49.

52. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. Bmj 1997;315(7121):1533-1537.

53. Mead C, Javidan-Nejad S, Mego ME, Nash B, Torabinejad M. Levels of evidence for the outcome of endodontic surgery. J Endod 2005;31(1):19-24.

54. J.P.T Higgins DGA, J.A.C Sterne Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: J.P.T Higgins SG, editor. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. The Cochran collaboration; 2011.

55. Halse A, Molven O, Grung B. Follow-Up after periapical surgery: the value of the one-year control. Endod Dent Traumatol 1991;7(6):246–250.

56. Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Wenzel A, Vaeth M, Kirkevang LL. Impact of cone beam computed tomography on periapical assessment and treatment planning five to eleven years after surgical endodontic retreatment. Int Endod J 2018;51(7):729–737.

57. Bossuyt PM, Leeflang MM. Chapter 6: Developing Criteria for Including Studies. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy 2008;Sect.

58. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography-Part 1: pre-operative status. Int Endod J 2012;45(8):702–710.

59. Uraba S, Ebihara A, Komatsu K, Ohbayashi N, Okiji T. Ability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography to Detect Periapical Lesions That Were Not Detected by Periapical Radiography: A Retrospective Assessment According to Tooth Group. J Endod 2016;42(8):1186–1190.

60. Kruse C, Spin-Neto R, Reibel J, Wenzel A, Kirkevang LL. Diagnostic validity of periapical radiography and CBCT for assessing periapical lesions that persist after endodontic surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2017;46(7):20170210.

61. Moynihan R, Henry D, Moons KGM. Using evidence to combat overdiagnosis and overtreatment: evaluating treatments, tests, and disease definitions in the time of too much. PLoS Med 2014;11(7):e1001655.

These references have now been added to the online version of the paper. The authors and the BIR apologise for the error.


Articles from Dentomaxillofacial Radiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES