Skip to main content
Genes logoLink to Genes
. 2024 Mar 13;15(3):357. doi: 10.3390/genes15030357

Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Reveals Novel Sex-Specific Gene Variants in Non-Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (MASH)

Jing Wei 1, Boyang Jason Wu 1, Sayed S Daoud 1,*
Editors: Shun-Fa Yang1, Shih-Chi Su1
PMCID: PMC10969913  PMID: 38540416

Abstract

Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH, also known as MASH) is a severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD, also known as MASLD). Emerging data indicate that the progression of the disease to MASH is higher in postmenopausal women and that genetic susceptibility increases the risk of MASH-related cirrhosis. This study aimed to investigate the association between genetic polymorphisms in MASH and sexual dimorphism. We applied whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify gene variants in 8 age-adjusted matched pairs of livers from both male and female patients. Sequencing alignment, variant calling, and annotation were performed using standard methods. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) coupled with Sanger sequencing and immunoblot analysis were used to validate specific gene variants. cBioPortal and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) were used for actionable target analysis. We identified 148,881 gene variants, representing 57,121 and 50,150 variants in the female and male cohorts, respectively, of which 251 were highly significant and MASH sex-specific (p < 0.0286). Polymorphisms in CAPN14, SLC37A3, BAZ1A, SRP54, MYH11, ABCC1, and RNFT1 were highly expressed in male liver samples. In female samples, Polymorphisms in RGSL1, SLC17A2, HFE, NLRC5, ACTN4, SBF1, and ALPK2 were identified. A heterozygous variant 1151G>T located on 18q21.32 for ALPK2 (rs3809983) was validated by Sanger sequencing and expressed only in female samples. Immunoblot analysis confirmed that the protein level of β-catenin in female samples was 2-fold higher than normal, whereas ALPK2 expression was 0.5-fold lower than normal. No changes in the protein levels of either ALPK2 or β-catenin were observed in male samples. Our study suggests that the perturbation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling observed in postmenopausal women with MASH could be the result of polymorphisms in ALPK2.

Keywords: MASLD, MASH, sexual dimorphism, Wnt/β-catenin, ALPK2 polymorphisms

1. Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (also known as metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease, MAFLD) is the leading cause of chronic liver disease, affecting 25% of the US population [1,2]. It is commonly associated with obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome but can also affect non-obese individuals. The disease spectrum ranges from bland steatosis with or without inflammation (non-alcoholic fatty liver, NAFL) to steatosis with inflammation and hepatocellular injury (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, NASH) (also known as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, MASH), fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma [3]. Owing to the lack of reliable noninvasive predictive biomarkers, the diagnosis of MASH is mainly limited to the histopathological evaluation of liver samples defined by liver-biopsy-proven hepatocellular steatosis, lobular inflammation, and evidence of hepatocyte injury such as ballooning degeneration [4]. A large body of evidence strongly supports the idea that MASLD susceptibility and progression to MASH are sex specific. Several studies conducted in single centers or in specific populations have suggested that women have a 19% lower risk of MASLD than men in the general population. However, once MASLD has become established, women have a 37% higher risk of advanced fibrosis than men [5]. Among individuals with established MASLD who are older than 50 years, women have a 17% greater risk for MASH and a 56% greater risk for advanced fibrosis than men [5,6]. Although it has been established that the prevalence of risk factors such as age, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), atherogenic dyslipidemia, and clinical outcomes of MASLD differs between sexes, the molecular mechanisms by which sex modulates the pathogenesis and clinical outcomes of MASLD progression are poorly defined. Therefore, to understand the potential mechanisms underlying this sexual dimorphism in MASLD prevalence, we recently used a multiomics approach with archived liver samples from both sexes to study the biological basis of the observed sexual dimorphism. Our study suggests (for the first time) that the activation of canonical Wnt signaling could be one of the main pathways associated with sexual dimorphism in MASLD and MASH [7].

Two different Wnt signaling pathways, canonical and non-canonical, have their own influence on MASLD and MASH. The non-canonical pathway is involved in the accumulation of fat, inflammation, and lipids, which promote MASH formation. The canonical pathway involving β-catenin functions as an anti-inflammatory, anti-lipid accretion, and adipocyte differentiation pathway [8]. Hence, the inhibition or downregulation of the classical Wnt/β-catenin pathway contributes to the onset and progression of MASLD. For example, MASLD is inhibited by the upregulation of peroxisome proliferator activated receptor γ (PPAR-γ), a downstream target of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling that promotes preadipocyte differentiation, adipogenesis, the absorption of free fatty acids (FFA), and the suppression of inflammation [9]. Polymorphisms in low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-6 (LRP6) are a major cause of MASLD [10]. Although it is well documented that MASLD progression is attributed to dynamic interactions between genetic and environmental factors [11], there is still limited information on how canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling is involved in MASLD/MASH disease progression. Therefore, we hypothesized that gene variants in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway could be associated with the observed sexual dimorphism in MASH, as suggested by our recent study [7].

To test this hypothesis, we used whole-exome sequencing (WES) to identify potential gene variants implicated in MASH using 16 archived frozen liver samples from paired males and females. Here, we report the identification of α protein kinase 2 (ALPK2) gene variants (rs3809981and rs3809983) as female-specific single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the postmenopausal livers of women with MASH.

2. Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Washington State University (WSU) approved the protocol of the current study. Sixteen paired matched snap-frozen tissue samples were obtained from the IRB-approved University of Minnesota Liver Tissue Cell Distribution System (LTCDS). All specimens with anonymized identifiers were histopathologically confirmed by a pathologist (Table S1; Supplemental Digital Content).

2.2. DNA Extraction and Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES-Seq)

Genomic DNA was extracted from 16 frozen liver tissue samples (4 matched pairs of both sexes) using a Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit (A1120, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA concentration was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The extracted DNA (50 ng/uL/sample) was shipped to LC Sciences (Houston, TX, USA) for exome sequencing (100× coverage). Two hundred nanograms of genomic DNA (200 ng) from each subject’s MASH-normal paired samples, which were fragmented by sonication, were subjected to library preparation using the Agilent SureSelect Human All Exon V6 kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) following the vendor’s recommended protocol. DNA libraries were hybridized and captured using SureSelect. Following hybridization, the captured libraries were purified according to the manufacturer’s instructions and amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Normalized libraries were pooled, and DNA was subjected to paired-end sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq X Ten platform with a 150-bp paired-end sequencing mode.

2.3. WES Data Processing

Raw sequence reads were trimmed to remove low-quality sequences and then aligned to the human reference genome (hg19) using the Burrows–Wheeler alignment tool [12]. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and small insertions/deletions were identified in individual samples using the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK Mutect2 4.0.4.0) with the default setting [13]. ANNOVAR was then used to annotate the VCF files using the gene region and several filters from other databases [14]. Finally, we used the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) Bioinformatics Resource 6.7 (https://David-d.ncifcrf.gov, accessed on 22 July 2023) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GESA) [15] to identify significantly altered biological processes and pathways in 16 liver tissue samples.

2.4. PCR and Sanger Sequencing

To validate the ALPK2 polymorphisms, we used PCR and Sanger sequencing from Azenta Life Sciences (Burlington, MA, USA). Specific PCR primers for ALPK2, F: TGCTGTCTATCAAATCTCGGCT and R: GAGCACTCAACCTCAACGGA were used. Primers were designed using Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/, accessed on 22 July 2023). The products were directly sequenced using the ABI PRISM BigDye Kit on an ABI 3130 DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sequencing results were analyzed using A Plasmid Editor [16].

2.5. Western Blot Analysis

Frozen liver tissue samples (n = 12) were homogenized in ice-cold lysis buffer containing a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail and centrifuged at 12,000× g at 4 °C for 15 min. Protein samples were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. After blocking in 5% non-fat milk at 37 °C for 1 h, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against ALPK2 (ab111909, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), β-catenin (8480S, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), or GAPDH (sc-47724, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Following incubation with the secondary antibody, immunoreactive proteins were visualized using the ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad). Protein bands were quantified using the ImageJ 1.53k.

2.6. Statistical Analysis of Western Blot

The data were expressed as the mean ± SEM (n = 3/phenotype/sex) and Student’s t-test was used to analyze statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed, and graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). ** p < 0.01 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population

Sixteen snap-frozen liver tissue samples (normal and MASH) from white non-Hispanic populations of both sexes were used in this study. The median age (range) of patients was 54 to 59 years old. In general, the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with MASH (steatosis, steatohepatitis, ballooning, and portal inflammation) were higher in women than in men. Detailed clinicopathological information is summarized in Supplemental Table S1.

3.2. WES, Data Filtering and Mutation Landscape of Liver Tissue Samples

As shown in Figure 1, using the WES approach we identified 148,881 gene variants in 16 liver tissue samples, representing 57,121 and 50,150 gene variants in female and male cohorts, respectively. For SNVs, 35,000 (27%) were exonic and 79,259 (59%) were intronic (Table 1). For InDels, 13,925 were identified and 10,837 (78%) were intronic, as shown in Table 1. Our analysis detected no differences in SNPs, InDel distribution, or mutation type between sexes (Supplemental Figures S1 and S2). By contrast, FACETS analysis [17] revealed that copy number variants (CNVs) in female cohorts differed from those in male cohorts. As shown in Figure 2A, many gene variants (female cases), such as SLC17A2 (Table 2), were clustered around chromosome 6 (as represented by allele-specific log-odd-ratio data), whereas in male cases (Figure 2B), many gene variants such as CAPN14 (Table 3) were clustered around chromosome 11. Collectively, these observations suggest that copy-number alterations (CNAs) of these genes are different in the two cohorts and could play an important role in the sexual dimorphism of MASH.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Illustration of WES workflow from frozen liver tissue samples of male and female patients to MASH sex-specific gene variants. Pipeline of bioinformatics analysis adapted in the WES results of gene variants.

Table 1.

Statistics of somatic SNV and InDels in position.

Type SNV InDels
Counts
Percent
Counts
Percent
Downstream 580
0.4
72
0.5
Exonic 35,000
27
733
5
Exonic; splicing 17
0
4
0
Intergenic 3941
3
371
3
Intronic 79,259
59
10,837
78
ncRNA_exonic 3011
2
252
2
ncRNA_intronic 4444
3
550
4
ncRNA_splicing 8
0
0
0
Splicing 111
0.1
47
0.3
Upstream 1228
1
115
1
Upstream; downstream 115
0.1
5
0
UTR3 4504
3
687
5
UTR5 2730
2
247
2
UTR5; UTR3 13
0
5
0
All 134,961
100
13,925
100

SNV = s ingle nucleotide variant; InDels = insertion/deletion mutations.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Figure 2

A representative integrated visualization of FACETS analysis of WES data for (A) female and (B) male total copy number variants (CNVs). The top panel displays total copy number log-ratio (logR), and the second panel displays allele-specific log-odds-ratio data (logOR) with chromosomes alternating in blue and gray. The third panel plots the corresponding integer (total, minor) copy number calls. The overall ploidy and purity for female patients in this case are 2.03 and 0.65, respectively, and 2.05 and 0.63 for male patients. The estimated cellular fraction (cf) profile is plotted at the bottom, revealing the aggregate of variants at each chromosome.

Table 2.

Female common uniquely significant annotated variants.

#CHR
OM
POS Gene_ID Gene_Name CytoBand Avsnp150 Category REF ALT Gene_Full_Name p-Value
chr1 17085589 ENSG00000186715 MST1L 1p36.13 rs3863807 upstream_gene_variant AGC
GCTG
A macrophage stimulating 1-like 0.0286
chr1 26487940 ENSG00000197245 FAM110D 1p36.11 rs3748856 missense_variant A G family with sequence similarity 110 member D 0.0286
chr1 26496455 ENSG00000142684 ZNF593 1p36.11 rs2232648 5_prime_UTR_premature
_start_codon_gain_variant
C T zinc finger protein 593 0.0286
chr1 154941593 ENSG00000160691 SHC1 1q21.3 rs4845401 upstream_gene_variant C G SHC (Src homology 2 domain containing) transforming protein 1 0.0286
chr1 182509292 ENSG00000121446 RGSL1 1q25.3 rs266531 intron_variant A G regulator of G-protein signaling like 1 0.0286
chr1 182509617 ENSG00000121446 RGSL1 1q25.3 rs3911280 intron_variant C A regulator of G-protein signaling like 1 0.0286
chr1 182517357 ENSG00000121446 RGSL1 1q25.3 rs6657620 intron_variant G C regulator of G-protein signaling like 1 0.0286
chr1 232172374 ENSG00000162946 DISC1 1q42.2 rs17773715 intron_variant G A TSNAX-DISC1 readthrough (NMD candidate) 0.0286
chr2 55176112 ENSG00000214595 EML6 2p16.1 rs13394146 intron_variant C T echinoderm microtubule associated protein like 6 0.0286
chr2 84668155 ENSG00000163541 SUCLG1 2p11.2 rs115384987 downstream_gene_variant T C succinate-CoA ligase, α subunit 0.0286
chr2 127808226 ENSG00000136717 BIN1 2q14.3 rs2071270 intron_variant A T bridging integrator 1 0.0286
chr2 127821085 ENSG00000136717 BIN1 2q14.3 rs2071268 intron_variant C T bridging integrator 1 0.0286
chr2 202526366 ENSG00000082126 MPP4 2q33.1 rs62193397 downstream_gene_variant G A membrane protein, palmitoylated 4 0.0286
chr3 32933360 ENSG00000206557 TRIM71 3p22.3 rs372794141 3_prime_UTR_variant C T,CTT tripartite motif containing 71, E3 ubiquitin protein ligase 0.0286
chr3 57431721 ENSG00000559559 DNAH12 3p14.3 rs372891308 missense_variant AAAAT A dynein axonemal heavy chain 12 0.0286
chr4 110896050 ENSG00000138798 EGF 4q25 rs2067004 sequence_feature A C epidermal growth factor 0.0286
chr5 40980086 ENSG00000112936 C7 5p13.1 rs1450664 splice_region_variant
and intron_variant
T C complement component 7 0.0286
chr5 40981689 ENSG00000112936 C7 5p13.1 rs1061429 3_prime_UTR_variant C A complement component 7 0.0286
chr6 25914801 ENSG00000112337 SLC17A2 6p22.2 rs62394272 missense_variant G A solute carrier family 17 member 2 0.0286
chr6 25914901 ENSG00000112337 SLC17A2 6p22.2 rs2071298 splice_region_variant
and intron_variant
G A solute carrier family 17 member 2 0.0286
chr6 25916979 ENSG00000112337 SLC17A2 6p22.2 rs1865760 synonymous_variant C T solute carrier family 17 member 2 0.0286
chr6 25918688 ENSG00000112337 SLC17A2 6p22.2 rs1865760 intron_variant G A solute carrier family 17 member 2 0.0286
chr6 25924158 ENSG00000112337 SLC17A2 6p22.2 rs1540273 intron_variant T C solute carrier family 17 member 2 0.0286
chr6 25925823 ENSG00000112337 SLC17A2 6p22.2 rs7770139 intron_variant A G solute carrier family 17 member 2 0.0286
chr6 26027135 ENSG00000124529 HIST1H4B 6p22.2 rs3752420 3_prime_UTR_variant G A histone cluster 1, H4b 0.0286
chr6 26027433 ENSG00000124529 HIST1H4B 6p22.2 rs3752419 synonymous_variant G A histone cluster 1, H4b 0.0286
chr6 26087856 ENSG00000010704 HFE 6p22.2 rs2858993 intron_variant T A homeostatic iron regulator 0.0286
chr6 71011831 ENSG00000112280 COL9A1 6q13 rs2242589 intron_variant C T collagen type IX α 1 0.0286
chr6 99819556 ENSG00000132423 COQ3 6q16.2 rs4574651 downstream_gene_variant C T coenzyme Q3 methyltransferase 0.0286
chr6 152679729 ENSG00000131018 SYNE1 6q25.2 rs9478326 intron_variant G A spectrin repeat containing nuclear envelope 1 0.0286
chr7 142498813 ENSG00000211772 TRBC2 7q34 rs1042955 synonymous_variant G A T cell receptor β constant 2 0.0286
chr8 103301555 ENSG00000104517 UBR5 8q22.3 rs2168689 intron_variant T C ubiquitin protein ligase E3 component n-recognin 5 0.0286
chr9 107593182 ENSG00000165029 ABCA1 9q31.1 rs4743763 intron_variant A T ATP binding cassette subfamily A member 1 0.0286
chr10 47701275 ENSG00000198250 ANTXRL 10q11.22 rs10906952 synonymous SNV G A anthrax toxin receptor-like 0.0286
chr10 126480381 ENSG00000203791 METTL10 10q26.13 rs965484 missense_variant C T EEF1A lysine methyltransferase 2 0.0286
chr11 72309540 ENSG00000186642 PDE2A 11q13.4 rs4943939 upstream_gene_variant C T phosphodiesterase 2A 0.0286
chr12 9750669 ENSG00000111796 KLRB1 12p13.31 rs1135816 nonsynonymous SNV A G killer cell lectin like receptor B1 0.0286
chr12 53880122 ENSG00000139625 MAP3K12 12q13.13 rs3816806 upstream_gene_variant T C mitogen-activated protein kinase 12 0.0286
chr12 53896984 ENSG00000139546 TARBP2 12q13.13 rs2280448 3_prime_UTR_variant G A TAR (HIV-1) RNA binding protein 2 0.0286
chr12 56865338 ENSG00000135423 GLS2 12q13.3 rs2657879 nonsynonymous SNV A G glutaminase 2 0.0286
chr12 56866334 ENSG00000135517 MIP 12q13.3 rs2657880 upstream_gene_variant T A major intrinsic factor of lens fiber 0.0286
chr12 88448328 ENSG00000133641 C12orf29 12q21.32 rs17418744 downstream_gene_variant T A centrosomal protein 290kDa 0.0286
chr12 119419632 ENSG00000139767 SRRM4 12q24.23 rs1568924 5_prime_UTR_variant C T serine/arginine repetitive matrix 4 0.0286
chr14 65414976 ENSG00000139998 RAB15 14q23.3 rs11540871 3_prime_UTR_variant C T RAB15, member RAS oncogene family 0.0286
chr14 71215822 ENSG00000006432 MAP3K9 14q24.2 rs79518608 downstream_gene_variant T C mitogen-activated protein kinase 9 0.0286
chr14 105268104 ENSG00000179627 ZBTB42 14q32.33 rs10141867 synonymous_variant G A zinc finger and BTB domain containing 42 0.0286
chr14 107211211 ENSG00000211976 IGHV3-73 14q32.33 rs2073668 synonymous_variant G A immunoglobulin heavy variable 3-73 0.0286
chr16 57075379 ENSG00000140853 NLRC5 16q13 rs35622257 missense_variant G GT NLR family, CARD domain containing 5 0.0286
chr16 57080528 ENSG00000140853 NLRC5 16q13 rs289723 nonsynonymous SNV C A NLR family, CARD domain containing 5 0.0286
chr17 12832063 ENSG00000006740 ARHGAP44 17p12 rs1317990 intron_variant G T Rho GTPase activating protein 44 0.0286
chr17 76867017 ENSG00000035862 TIMP2 17q25.3 rs2277698 synonymous_variant C T TIMP metallopeptidase inhibitor 2 0.0286
chr18 56202768 ENSG00000198796 ALPK2 18q21.32 rs3809983 nonsynonymous SNV C A α kinase 2 0.0286
chr18 56203120 ENSG00000198796 ALPK2 18q21.32 rs3809981 synonymous_variant C T α kinase 2 0.0286
chr18 77724726 ENSG00000226742 HSBP1L1 18q23 rs8095764 5_prime_UTR_variant A C heat shock factor binding protein 1-like 1 0.0286
chr19 17091368 ENSG00000160111 CPAMD8 19p13.11 rs8103646 synonymous_variant T G C3- and PZP-like, α-2-macroglobulin domain containing 8 0.0286
chr19 39138608 ENSG00000130402 ACTN4 19q13.2 rs2303040 upstream_gene_variant T C actinin α 4 0.0286
chr19 39196745 ENSG00000130402 ACTN4 19q13.2 rs3745859 synonymous SNV C T actinin α 4 0.0286
chr19 39215333 ENSG00000130402 ACTN4 19q13.2 rs3786851 upstream_gene_variant C T actinin α 4 0.0286
chr19 55644442 ENSG00000105048 TNNT1 19q13.42 rs891186 downstream_gene_variant G A troponin T1, slow skeletal type 0.0286
chr20 1617069 ENSG00000089012 SIRPG 20p13 rs2277761 synonymous_variant A G signal regulatory protein γ 0.0286
chr22 29834766 ENSG00000128250 RFPL1 22q12.2 rs465736 5_prime_UTR_variant A G RFPL1 antisense RNA 1 0.0286
chr22 50906518 ENSG00000100241 SBF1 22q13.33 rs1983679 upstream_gene_variant G A SET binding factor 1 0.0286
chr22 50906917 ENSG00000100241 SBF1 22q13.33 rs9616852 upstream_gene_variant C A SET binding factor 1 0.0286
chrX 149937404 ENSG00000102181 CD99L2 Xq28 rs41311690 3_prime_UTR_variant T C CD99 molecule-like 2 0.0286

Table 3.

Male common uniquely significant annotated variants.

#CHR
OM
POS Gene_ID Gene_Name CytoBand Avsnp150 Category REF ALT Gene_Full_Name p-Value
chr1 114515717 ENSG00000163349 HIPK1 1p13.2 rs2358996 synonymous_variant G A homeodomain interacting
protein kinase 1
0.0286
chr1 234573357 ENSG00000059588 TARBP1 1q42.2 rs2273875 intron_variant G C TAR (HIV-1) RNA binding protein 1 0.0286
chr1 237817784 ENSG00000198626 RYR2 1q43 rs669375 intron_variant A G ryanodine receptor 2 0.0286
chr2 31397696 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs10180369 intron_variant G C calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31397727 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs10180369 intron_variant T C calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31399659 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs6720151 intron_variant T C calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31399751 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs6720254 intron_variant T G calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31399988 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs4592896 non-synonymous SNV C T calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31400039 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs4516476 intron_variant A G calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31400502 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs13421721 intron_variant A C calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31400510 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs1443707 intron_variant G A calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31400722 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs1443706 intron_variant G A calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31400867 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs1373216 intron_variant T C calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31401499 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs28684727 intron_variant G A calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 31403947 ENSG00000214711 CAPN14 2p23.1 rs2028678 intron_variant G A calpain 14 0.0286
chr2 174946760 ENSG00000138430 OLA1 2q31.1 rs11558990 non-synonymous SNV T C Obg-like ATPase 1 0.0286
chr2 174988189 ENSG00000138430 OLA1 2q31.1 rs10930639 intron_variant C T Obg-like ATPase 1 0.0286
chr2 175199895 ENSG00000231453 AC018470.4 2q31.1 rs3856434 downstream_gene_variant G A Sp9 transcription factor 0.0286
chr3 42772038 ENSG00000244607 CCDC13 3p22.1 rs12495805 non-synonymous SNV A T coiled-coil domain containing 13 0.0286
chr3 124646594 ENSG00000173702 MUC13 3q21.2 rs4679394 non-synonymous SNV A G mucin 13, cell-surface-associated 0.0286
chr3 190967779 ENSG00000188729 OSTN 3q28 rs2034771 intron_variant A G osteocrin 0.0286
chr4 91645179 ENSG00000184305 CCSER1 4q22.1 rs62314447 intron_variant A T multimerin 1 0.0286
chr6 47253631 ENSG00000146072 TNFRSF21 6p12.3 rs11758366 intron_variant A G tumor necrosis factor receptor
superfamily member 21
0.0286
chr7 3861353 ENSG00000146555 SDK1 7p22.2 rs6943646 intron_variant C G sidekick cell adhesion molecule 1 0.0286
chr7 72396170 ENSG00000196313 POM121 7q11.23 rs782134793 intron_variant GCGCCGCG
CTCCCCAC
G POM121 transmembrane nucleoporin 0.0286
chr7 140036999 ENSG00000157800 SLC37A3 7q34 rs4332050 intron_variant G A solute carrier family 37 member 3 0.0286
chr7 140044979 ENSG00000157800 SLC37A3 7q34 rs6974016 upstream_gene_variant C T solute carrier family 37 member 3 0.0286
chr9 100889340 ENSG00000106789 CORO2A 9q22.33 rs942165 intron_variant G T coronin 2A 0.0286
chr10 51549314 ENSG00000138294 MSMB 10q11.23 rs12770171 upstream_gene_variant C T translocase of inner mitochondrial
membrane 23 homolog B
0.0286
chr10 129179426 ENSG00000150760 DOCK1 10q26.2 rs7099958 intron_variant T C dedicator of cytokinesis 1 0.0286
chr11 3078536 ENSG00000110619 CARS 11p15.4 rs4758463 intron_variant C G cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase 0.0286
chr12 122079189 ENSG00000182500 ORAI1 12q24.31 rs3741595 synonymous_variant C T ORAI calcium release-activated calcium
modulator 1
0.0286
chr12 131623850 ENSG00000111452 ADGRD1 12q24.33 rs35160436 non-synonymous SNV A AC adhesion G protein-coupled receptor D1 0.0286
chr13 113793849 ENSG00000126218 F10 13q34 rs3211770 upstream_gene_variant G A coagulation factor X 0.0286
chr14 35228090 ENSG00000198604 BAZ1A 14q13.1 rs61981202 intron_variant G A bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger
domain 1A
0.0286
chr14 35237874 ENSG00000198604 BAZ1A 14q13.1 rs61981228 downstream_gene_variant C A bromodomain adjacent to zinc finger
domain 1A
0.0286
chr14 35483882 ENSG00000100883 SRP54 14q13.2 rs13379372 sequence_feature A C signal recognition particle 54kDa 0.0286
chr14 35492299 ENSG00000100883 SRP54 14q13.2 rs4982254 upstream_gene_variant AG A signal recognition particle 54kDa 0.0286
chr14 35492301 ENSG00000100883 SRP54 14q13.2 rs80306194 upstream_gene_variant CTTGTTATT
AGTTAACAG
C signal recognition particle 54kDa 0.0286
chr14 35497285 ENSG00000100883 SRP54 14q13.2 rs78609489 intron_variant T C signal recognition particle 54kDa 0.0286
chr16 2906934 ENSG00000263325 LA16c-325D7.1 16p13.3 rs732532 upstream_gene_variant G A protease, serine 22 0.0286
chr16 3021417 ENSG00000127564 PKMYT1 16p13.3 rs79505645 upstream_gene_variant G T progestin and adipoQ receptor family
member IV
0.0286
chr16 15126890 ENSG00000179889 PDXDC1 16p13.11 rs12926897 upstream_gene_variant C T pyridoxal-dependent decarboxylase
domain containing 1
0.0286
chr16 15850204 ENSG00000133392 MYH11 16p13.11 rs2272554 synonymous_variant A G myosin, heavy chain 11, smooth muscle 0.0286
chr16 15853596 ENSG00000133392 MYH11 16p13.11 rs2280764 intron_variant C G myosin, heavy chain 11, smooth muscle 0.0286
chr16 16138322 ENSG00000103222 ABCC1 16p13.11 rs246221 synonymous_variant T C ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1 0.0286
chr16 16139714 ENSG00000103222 ABCC1 16p13.11 rs35587 synonymous_variant T C ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1 0.0286
chr16 16139878 ENSG00000103222 ABCC1 16p13.11 rs35588 splice_region_variant
and intron_variant
A G ATP binding cassette subfamily C member 1 0.0286
chr17 57951973 ENSG00000108423 TUBD1 17q23.1 rs2250526 synonymous_variant G A tubulin delta 1 0.0286
chr17 57992145 ENSG00000241913 RP5-1073F15.1 17q23.1 rs3066247 downstream_gene_variant TATC T ribosomal protein S6 kinase B1 0.0286
chr17 58037374 ENSG00000189050 RNFT1 17q23.1 rs12600680 upstream_gene_variant T C ring finger protein, transmembrane 1 0.0286
chr17 58042126 ENSG00000189050 RNFT1 17q23.1 rs76419616 upstream_gene_variant T C TBC1D3P1-DHX40P1 readthrough,
transcribed pseudogene
0.0286
chr19 33882222 ENSG00000124299 PEPD 19q13.11 rs17569 synonymous_variant G A peptidase D 0.0286
chr22 23487533 ENSG00000100228 RAB36 22q11.22 rs1476441 5_prime_UTR_variant C T RAB36, member RAS oncogene family 0.0286

3.3. WES Identifies ALPK2 Variant in Female Cases

To further analyze our gene variant data, statistical significance was first determined via a hypothetical Fisher’s exact test (Figure 1); with four male samples vs. four females, a polymorphism was considered significant if it existed in all female samples but none of the male samples (or if a polymorphism existed in all male samples but none of the female samples). The corresponding p-value for this assumption was 0.0286. We merged and filtered the vcf files of individual samples and searched for polymorphisms that met the above criteria. Polymorphisms that passed the criteria were then annotated with the Var2GO tool [18], using GRCh37 as a reference, given that the original analysis was performed using the hg19 genome. A total of 251 highly significant sex-specific MASH gene variants (p < 0.0286) were identified. A total of 63 MASH female-specific gene variants were identified, as shown in Table 2, whereas 54 gene variants were identified in males (Table 3). Among the 54 male variants, we found polymorphisms in CPN14 (12 intronic variants), SRP54 (four intronic and upstream gene variants), ABCC1 (three synonymous and intronic gene variants), RNFT1 (two upstream gene variants), SLC37A3 (two intronic and upstream gene variants), obg-like ATPase 1 (OLA1) (two intronic and non-synonymous variants), BAZ1A (two intronic and downstream gene variants), and MYH11 (two intronic and synonymous variants).

Of the 63 female variants (Table 2), we identified SCL17A (six intronic and synonymous variants), RGSL1 (three intronic variants), ACTN4 (three synonymous and upstream gene variants), NLRC5 (two synonymous and non-synonymous variants), BIN1 (two intronic variants), C7 (two intronic and downstream gene variants), HIST1H4B (synonymous and downstream gene variants), SBF1 (two upstream gene variants), and ALPK2 (two synonymous and non-synonymous variants). In this study, we validated α Protein Kinase 2 (ALPK2) as a novel genetic variant associated with MASH in a female cohort.

3.4. Validation of the ALPK2 Variant

To identify the biological pathways associated with ALPK2, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) [15] using a TCGA liver cancer patient cohort from the cBioPortal database. As shown in Table 4, Wnt gene signatures, including canonical/β-catenin-mediated pathways, were negatively enriched in ALPK2-high (FDR q-val = 0.036 to 0.003) vs. ALPK2-low samples (FDR q-val = 0.105 to 0.544), which is consistent with a previous report showing ALPK2 as a negative regulator of canonical Wnt signaling [19]. These data also confirmed that ALPK2 is associated with β-catenin-mediated pathways in women with MASH, as we previously reported [7].

Table 4.

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) for ALPK2.

GeneSets NES NOM p-val FDR q-val
Reactome WNT Ligand Biogenesis and Trafficking 1.41 0.110 0.398
PID WNT Signaling Pathway 1.40 0.104 0.221
WNT Up.V1 Up 1.15 0.249 0.356
WNT Up.V1 DN 0.90 0.566 0.582
Reactome Beta Catenin Independent WNT Signaling −3.18 0.000 0.000
Reactome Signaling By WNT −3.07 0.000 0.000
WP WNT Signaling Pathway −2.07 0.004 0.014
Hallmark WNT Beta Catenin Signaling −2.06 0.004 0.012
PID WNT Canonical Pathway −1.97 0.010 0.014
Biocarta WNT Pathway −1.74 0.023 0.043
PID WNT Noncanonical Pathway −1.70 0.025 0.045
KEGG WNT Signaling Pathway −1.54 0.050 0.081
WP WNT Signaling −1.26 0.185 0.235
WNT Signaling −1.21 0.241 0.257
Reactome Signaling by WNT In Cancer −1.20 0.242 0.241
GOCC Catenin Complex 1.82 0.012 0.066
GOMF WNT Protein Binding 0.90 0.586 0.736
GOBP Cell Cell Signaling By WNT −2.61 0.000 0.000
GOBP Regulation of WNT Signaling Pathway −2.24 0.000 0.003
HP Downturned Corners of Mouth −2.17 0.000 0.005
GOBP Positive Regulation of WNT Signaling Pathway −2.06 0.000 0.009
GOBP Canonical WNT Signaling Pathway −2.05 0.000 0.010
GOBP Negative Regulation of Canonical WNT Signaling Pathway −1.94 0.008 0.017
GOBP Negative Regulation of WNT Signaling Pathway −1.80 0.011 0.032
GOBP Positive Regulation of Canonical WNT Signaling Pathway −1.77 0.021 0.036
GOMF Beta Catenin Binding −1.55 0.057 0.090
GOBP Non-canonical WNT Signaling Pathway −1.51 0.063 0.105
GOBP Regulation of Non-canonical WNT Signaling Pathway −1.25 0.195 0.253
GOMF WNT Receptor Activity −1.17 0.237 0.315
GOBP Regulation of WNT Signaling Pathway Planner Cell Polarity Pathway 0.96 0.487 0.544

NES = Normalized enriched score; NOM p-val = Sta:s:cally significant pathways p < 0.05; FDR qval = FDR adjusted p-value < 0.05.

Next, we validated the ALPK2 mutation by PCR testing coupled with Sanger sequencing. As shown in Figure 3, the normal, healthy sample HH1202 was used as a reference for comparison with the two female MASH samples (UMN1535 and UMN1259). A clear single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is highlighted with a black box in the MASH samples in Figure 3A,B. The identified SNP (p.Ala1551Ser) resulted in nsSNV (rs3809983), as shown in Table 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Figure 3

Representative of Sanger sequence alignment (A) and chromatograms (B) of ALPK2 in normal and MASH female livers. Sequencing alignment was performed using a plasmid editor. A normal representative liver sample with no SNPs (HH1202) was used as a reference for comparison against two MASH-related samples (UMN1535 and UMN1259). A clear SNP is highlighted with a black box. The SNP leads to a substitution mutation from a hydrophobic alanine (A) at the 1151 position to a polar serine (S). No SNPs were observed in MASH-related samples of male patients.

Since ALPK2 was shown to be involved in the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Table 4), we measured the protein expression of both ALPK2 and β-catenin in both male and female liver tissue samples using immunoblot analysis. As shown in Figure 4A,B, the protein expression of β-catenin in female samples was 2-fold higher than that in normal samples, whereas ALPK2 expression was 0.5-fold lower than that in normal samples. No change in the expression of either ALPK2 or β-catenin was observed in male samples (Figure 4C,D).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Immunoblot analysis of ALPK2 and β-catenin in female (A,B) and male (C,D) liver tissue samples. ALPK2 and β-catenin protein band intensity results were normalized to GAPDH and quantitatively analyzed with ImageJ 1.53k.. The ratio of target protein to GAPDH in individual normal groups was set as 1. Data represent the mean ± SEM. ** p < 0.01; ns, not significant; n = 3 samples/phenotype/sex.

4. Discussion

Genetics play a key role in MASLD pathogenesis [20,21]. Variations in genes such as patatin-like phospholipase domain-containing protein 3 (PNPLA3), transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2), membrane-bound O-acyltransferase domain-containing 7 (MBOAT7), glucokinase regulator (GCKR), and hydroxysteroid 17-β dehydrogenase-13 (HSD17B13) have emerged as reproducibly and robustly predisposing individuals to the development of MASH [22,23]. However, despite these discoveries, some unexplained variance remains, indicating that additional genetic associations with MASLD/MASH may be revealed using multi-omics analyses.

Although sex differences exist in the prevalence, risk factors, fibrosis, and clinical outcomes of MASLD/MASH, our understanding of the genetic basis of sexual dimorphism remains limited. Therefore, in this study, we performed WES analyses of paired-matched liver tissue samples from male and female MASH patients (Table S1) to elucidate sex-specific gene variants associated with this disease. As shown in Figure 1, we identified 63 gene variants that were specific to the female and 54 male-specific variants (Fisher’s exact test p < 0.0286). Interestingly, a significant number of these gene variants have been identified with respect to the sexual dimorphism of MASLD/MASH, whereas others have been previously reported to be involved in the pathogenesis of the disease. For example, in male-specific variants (Table 3), we identified CAPN14 as encoding a calcium-regulated non-lysosomal thiol-protease (Calpain) as a top gene variant that is known to be involved in a variety of cellular processes including apoptosis, cell division, the modulation of integrin–cytoskeletal interactions, and synaptic plasticity [24]. Recently, calpains have been shown to be associated with hepatocyte death in MASH and the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [25,26]. Regarding chr2 (2p23.1), we found that OLA1 encodes a member of the GTPase protein family. It interacts with breast-cancer-associated gene 1 (BRCA1) and BRCA1-associated RING domain protein (BRAD1) and is involved in centrosome regulation [27]. OLA1 has been shown to be associated with hereditary breast and ovarian cancers as well as with a poor prognosis of HCC [28,29]. Polymorphisms were also found in other canonical cancer-related genes, including SLC37A3, BAZ1A, SRP54, MYH1 and ABCC1 [30,31,32,33], but were not directly involved in MASLD pathogenesis. As shown in Table 3, we also identified a SNP (synonymous variant) in ORAI1 (ORAI calcium release-activated calcium modulator 1), which encodes a membrane calcium channel subunit activated by the calcium sensor STIM1 when calcium stores are depleted [34]. ORAI polymorphisms have been shown to be associated with non-canonical Wnt signaling, MASLD progression, and HCC [35,36].

For female-specific gene variants (Table 2), we identified six loci of SLC17A2 on chr6 (6p22.2), encoding proteins belonging to sodium-dependent phosphate transporters. A recent study reported that SLC17A2 variants were associated with MASLD in lean individuals [37]. In the present study, SLC17A2 was specifically identified in female MASH patients. For the same chr6 (6p22.2), we also established that HFE encodes a transmembrane protein that regulates iron absorption by regulating the interaction of the transferrin receptor with transferrin associated with MASLD in lean individuals along with SLC17A2 (37). For chr16 (16q13), we identified two loci NLRC5 that encode members of the caspase recruitment domain of the NLR family. This gene plays a major role in the regulation of the NF-kappa B and interferon signaling pathways [38]. Polymorphisms in NLRC5 are associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and MASLD [39] and limit the NF-kB signaling pathway [40].

In the present study, we identified rs3809983 ALPK2 as a novel gene variant associated with MASH in female liver samples. ALPK2 mapped to 18q21.32 encodes a serine/threonine kinase protein that is involved in several processes, including epicardium morphogenesis and heart development, and is a negative regulator of Wnt signaling [19]. Recent studies by McIntosh et al. [41] showed that ALPK2 rs3809973 (not ALPK2 rs3809983, identified in this study) is associated with an increased risk of liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV co-infected women. This may be the initial indication linking the ALPK2 variant to the pathological liver phenotype in women. Furthermore, Lawrence et al. [42] found that ALPK2 is a novel polymorphic gene in human cancers in a large-scale genomic analysis of 4742 human neoplasms and their matched normal tissue samples. In mouse xenograft models, the knockdown of ALPK2 inhibits the development and progression of ovarian cancer [43] and renal cancer cells [44], thus supporting its relevance not only in cancer initiation and development but also in the pathogenesis of liver disease.

To validate the ALPK2 polymorphism, we used PCR coupled with Sanger sequencing and found that ALPK2 rs3809983 was associated with MASH in the female patient samples (Figure 3). This association was further confirmed by immunoblot analysis (Figure 4), suggesting that the ALPK2 polymorphism was linked to defective canonical Wnt signal transduction only in female samples. ALPK2 polymorphisms cause inappropriate levels of β-catenin and thus a perturbation of the Wnt signaling pathway in female patients with MASH, as we previously reported [7]. These observations thus agree with the cBioPortal analysis (Table 4), suggesting a good correlation between ALPK2 loss/decreased function and the loss of its negative regulatory activity in the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.

Despite the important findings of this study, it has some limitations. These limitations are primarily associated with the availability of paired matched MASLD/MASH liver samples from the male and female cohorts. Although the present study was limited by the relatively small number of available samples, the data presented here showed a clear and robust distinction between female and male patients with respect to gene variants associated with MASH livers compared with normal livers. We hypothesize that future efforts should be made to increase the sample size while improving the selection of extreme phenotypes to maximize the power of this strategy. Demographic variables such as ethnic background should be considered in future studies. Owing to sample availability, the individuals included in our study were mainly of Caucasian origin, which may limit the applicability of our findings to other ethnic populations. These limitations highlight the critical need to improve research in this area, especially in clinically relevant conditions associated with MASLD and MASH such as inter-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma and celiac disease [45,46]. Further studies are also needed to elucidate the cellular and molecular basis on how ALPK2 variants may impact the sexual dimorphism of MASLD/MASH disease progression.

In summary, this study provides evidence that MASLD-related sexual dimorphism is influenced by genetic variants. We used WES of the liver tissue samples to identify sex-specific gene polymorphisms associated with MASH. Our study further provides evidence that polymorphisms in ALPK2 are associated with postmenopausal women compared to men and that the activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway previously reported [7] could be the result of ALPK2 polymorphisms. Other (downstream) members of the Wnt signaling pathway could also be associated with MASH severity in postmenopausal women compared to men.

Acknowledgments

Human liver specimens were obtained using the Liver Tissue Cell Distribution System (Minneapolis, MN), which is funded by the National Institute of Health Contract No. N01-DK-7-0004/HHSN267200700004C. The authors would like to thank Phillip Wibisono for his valuable input in sequencing data analysis.

Abbreviations

NAFLD: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; NASH, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis; MASLD, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease; MASH, metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease; WES, whole-exome sequencing; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; nsSNV, non-synonymous single nucleotide variant; InDels, insertions and deletions; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ALPK2, α kinase 2; GSEA, gene set enrichment analysis; FACETS, fraction and allele-specific copy number estimates from tumor sequencing; PCR, polymerase chain rection.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/genes15030357/s1.

genes-15-00357-s001.zip (580.4KB, zip)

Author Contributions

Conception and design of the experiments: S.S.D. and B.J.W. Performing the experiments: J.W. Analysis of the data: J.W. and S.S.D. Contributing reagents/materials/analysis tools: B.J.W. and S.S.D. Writing of the paper: S.S.D. and B.J.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Washington State University (WSU) Office of Research Assurances has found that the study is exempt from the need for Institutional Research Board (IRB) approval. Sixteen snap-frozen tissue samples were obtained from the IRB-approved University of Minnesota Liver Tissue Cell Distribution System (Minneapolis, MN). All specimens with anonymized identifiers were histopathologically confirmed by a pathologist.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by CPPS-WSU (17A-2957-9838) to SSD, and NIH/NCI grants R37CA233658 and R01CA258634, and CPPS-WSU start-up funding to BJW.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.Younossi Z., Anstee Q.M., Marietti M., Hardy T., Henry L., Eslam M., George J., Bugianesi E. Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018;15:11–20. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chalasani N., Younossi Z., LaVine J.E., Charlton M., Cusi K., Rinella M., Harrison S.A., Brunt E.M., Sanyal A.J. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Practice guidance from the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67:328–357. doi: 10.1002/hep.29367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Araujo A.R., Rosso N., Bedogni G., Tiribelli C., Bellentani S. Global epidemiology of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: What we are need in the future. Liver Int. 2017;38:47–51. doi: 10.1111/liv.13643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Koch L.K., Yeh M.M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD): Diagnosis, pitfalls, and staging. Ann. Diagn. Pathol. 2018;37:83–90. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Balakrishnan M., Patel P., Dunn-Valadez S., Dao C., Khan V., Ali H., El-Serag L., Hernaez R., Sisson A., Thrift A.P., et al. Women have a lower risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease but higher risk of progression vs men: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2021;19:61–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.04.067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Burra P., Bizzaro D., Gonta A., Shalaby S., Gambato M., Morelli M.C., Trapani S., Floreani A., Marra F., Brunetto M.R., et al. Clinical impact of sexual dimorphism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) Liver Int. 2021;41:1713–1733. doi: 10.1111/liv.14943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yeh M.M., Shi X., Yang J., Li M., Fung K.M., Daoud S.S. Perturbation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and sexual dimorphism in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatol. Res. 2022;52:433–448. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ackers I., Malgor R. Interrelationship of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways in chronic metabolic diseases. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2018;15:3–13. doi: 10.1177/1479164117738442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wang X.M., Wang X.Y., Huang Y.M., Chen X., Lü M.H., Shi L., Li C.P. Role and mechanisms of action of microRNA21 as regards the regulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2019;44:2201–2212. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2019.4375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Go G.W. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related 6 (LRP6) is a novel nutritional therapeutic target for hyperlipidemia, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and atherosclerosis. Nutrients. 2015;7:4453–4464. doi: 10.3390/nu7064453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Albhaisi S., Sanyal A. Gene-environmental interactions as metabolic drivers of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Front. Endocrinol. 2021;12:665987. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.665987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Büchler T., Ohlebusch E. An improved encoding of genetic variations in a Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2020;36:1413–1419. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ulintz P.J., Wu W., Gates C.M. Bioinformatics analysis of whole exome sequencing data. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019;1881:277–318. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8876-1_21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang H., Wang K. Genomic variant annotation, and prioritization with ANNOVAR and wANNOVAR. Nat. Protoc. 2015;10:1556–1566. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2015.105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zito A., Lualdi M., Granata P., Cocciadiferro D., Novelli A., Alberio T., Casalone R., Fasano M. Gene set enrichment analysis of interaction networks weighted by node centrality. Front. Genet. 2021;12:577623. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.577623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Davis M.W., Jorgensen E.M. ApE, A Plasmid Editor: A freely available DNA manipulation and visualization program. Front. Bioinform. 2022;2:818619. doi: 10.3389/fbinf.2022.818619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Shen R., Seshan V.E. FACETS: Allele-specific copy number and clonal heterogeneity analysis tool for high-throughput DNA sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:e131. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Granata I., Sangiovanni M., Maiorano F., Miele M., Guarracino M.R. Var2GO: A web-based tool for gene variants selection. BMC Bioinform. 2016;11:376–382. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1197-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hofsteen P., Robitaille A.M., Strash N., Palpant N., Moon R.T., Pabon L., Murry C.E. ALPK2 promotes cardiogenesis in Zebrafish and human pluripotent stem cells. iScience. 2018;2:88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Eslam M., George J. Genetic contribution to NAFLD: Leveraging shared genetics to uncover system biology. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;17:40–52. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0212-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sookoian S., Pirola C.J. Genetic predisposition in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Mol. Hepatol. 2017;23:1–12. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2016.0109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Luukkonen P.K., Qadri S., Ahlholm N., Porthan K., Männistö V., Sammalkorpi H., Penttilä A.K., Hakkarainen A., Lehtimäki T.E., Gaggini M., et al. Distinct contributions of metabolic dysfunction and genetic risk factors in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Hepatol. 2022;76:526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Carlsson B., Lindén D., Brolén G., Liljeblad M., Bjursell M., Romeo S., Loomba R. The emerging role of genetics in precision medicine for patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020;51:1305–1320. doi: 10.1111/apt.15738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ma X.-L., Zhu K.-Y., Chen Y.-D., Tang W.-G., Xie S.-H., Zheng H., Tong Y., Wang Y.-C., Ren N., Guo L., et al. Identification of a novel Calpain-2-SRC feed-back loop as necessity for β-Catenin accumulation and signaling activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2022;41:3554–3569. doi: 10.1038/s41388-022-02367-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Seike T., Boontem P., Yanagi M., Li S., Kido H., Yamamiya D., Nakagawa H., Okada H., Yamashita T., Harada K., et al. Hydroxynonenal causes hepatocyte death by disrupting lysosomal integrity in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell. Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;14:925–944. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2022.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dai D., Wu D., Ni R., Li P., Tian Z., Shui Y., Hu H., Wei Q. Novel insights into the progression and prognosis of the calpain family members in hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive integrated analysis. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2023;10:1162409–1162422. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1162409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Matsuzawa A., Kanno S.I., Nakayama M., Mochiduki H., Wei L., Shimaoka T., Furukawa Y., Kato K., Shibata S., Yasui A., et al. The BRCA1/BARD1-interacting protein OLA1 functions in centrosome regulation. Mol. Cell. 2014;53:101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Takahashi M., Chiba N., Shimodaira H., Yoshino Y., Mori T., Sumii M., Nomizu T., Ishioka C. OLA1 gene sequencing in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation negative suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Breast Cancer. 2017;24:336–340. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0709-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Huang S., Zhang C., Sun C., Hou Y., Zhang Y., Tam N.L., Wang Z., Yu J., Huang B., Zhuang H., et al. Obg-like ATPase 1 (OLA1) overexpression predicts poor prognosis and promotes tumor progression by regulating P21/CDK2 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging. 2020;12:3025–3041. doi: 10.18632/aging.102797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Meng Z., Geng X., Lin X., Wang Z., Chen D., Liang H., Zhu Y., Sui Y. A prospective diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma that functions in glucose metabolism regulation: Solute carrier family 37 member 3. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2023;1868:166661. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2023.166661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Millo T., Rivera A., Obolensky A., Marks-Ohana D., Xu M., Li Y., Wilhelm E., Gopalakrishnan P., Gross M., Rosin B., et al. Identification of autosomal recessive novel genes and retinal phenotypes in members of the solute carrier (SLC) superfamily. Genet. Med. 2022;24:1523–1535. doi: 10.1016/j.gim.2022.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ishikawa Y., Kawashima N., Atsuta Y., Sugiura I., Sawa M., Dobashi N., Yokoyama H., Doki N., Tomita A., Kiguchi T., et al. Prospective evaluation of prognostic impact of KIT mutations on acute myeloid leukemia with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 and CBFB-MYH11. Blood Adv. 2020;4:66–75. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kadioglu O., Saeed M., Munder M., Spuller A., Greten H.J., Efferth T. Identification of novel ABCC1 transporter mutations in tumor biopsies of cancer patients. Cells. 2020;9:299. doi: 10.3390/cells9020299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Michelucci A., Garcia-Castaneda M., Boncompagni S., Kirksen R.T. Role of STIM1/ORAI1-mediated store-operated Ca2+ entry in skeletal muscle physiology and disease. Cell Calcium. 2018;76:101–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ceca.2018.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Ali E.S., Rychkov G., Barritt G. Metabolic disorders, and cancer: Hepatocyte store operated Ca2+ channels in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017;993:595–621. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57732-6_30. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Petko J., Thileepan M., Sargen M., Canfield V., Levenson R. Alternative splicing of the Wnt trafficking protein, Wntless and its effects on protein-protein interactions. BMC Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:22–31. doi: 10.1186/s12860-019-0208-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Sun Z., Pan X., Tian A., Surakka I., Wang T., Jiao X., He S., Song J., Tian X., Tong D., et al. Genetic variants in HFE are associated with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals. JHEP Rep. 2023;5:100744. doi: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li Y.Y., Chung G.T., Lui V.W., To K.F., Ma B.B., Chow C., Woo J.K.S., Yip K.Y., Seo J., Hui E.P., et al. Exome and genome sequencing of nasopharynx cancer identifies NF-kB pathway activating mutations. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:14121–14131. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Bauer S., Hezinger L., Rexhepi F., Ramanathan S., Kufer T.A. NOD-like receptors-emerging links to obesity and associated morbidities. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:8595. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chang G., Liu X., Ma T., Xu L., Wang H., Li Z., Guo X., Xu Q., Chen G. A mutation in the NLRC5 promoter limits NF-kB signaling after Salmonella Enteritidis infection in the spleen of young chickens. Gene. 2015;568:117–123. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McIntosh A.T., Wei R., Ahn J., Aouizerat B.E., Kassaye S.G., Augenbraun M.H., Price J.C., French A.L., Gange S.J., Anastos K.M., et al. A genomic variant of ALPK2 is associated with increased liver fibrosis risk in HIV/HCV coinfected women. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0247277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lawrence M.S., Stojanov P., Mermel C.H., Robinson J.T., Garraway L.A., Golub T.R., Meyerson M., Gabriel S.B., Lander E.S., Getz G. Discovery and saturation analysis of cancer genes across 21 tumor types. Nature. 2014;505:495–501. doi: 10.1038/nature12912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhu X., Yan S., Xiao S., Xue M. Knockdown of ALPK2 inhibits the development and progression of ovarian cancer. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:267–277. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01347-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Jiang J., Han P., Qian J., Zhang S., Wang S., Cao Q., Shao P. Knockdown of ALPK2 blocks development and progression of renal cell carcinoma. Exp. Cell Res. 2020;392:112029. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2020.112029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.De Lorenzo S., Tovoli F., Mazzotta A., Vasuri F., Edeline J., Malvi D., Boudjema K., Renzulli M., Jeddou H., D’errico A., et al. Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis as a risk factor for interhepatic cholangiocarcinoma and its prognostic role. Cancers. 2020;12:3182. doi: 10.3390/cancers12113182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tovoli F., Negrini G., Farì R., Guidetti E., Faggiano C., Napoli L., Bolondi L., Granito A. Increased risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with coelic disease on a gluten-free diet: Beyond traditional metabolic factor. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2018;48:538–546. doi: 10.1111/apt.14910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

genes-15-00357-s001.zip (580.4KB, zip)

Data Availability Statement

Data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.


Articles from Genes are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES