Skip to main content
International Journal of Molecular Sciences logoLink to International Journal of Molecular Sciences
. 2024 Mar 10;25(6):3191. doi: 10.3390/ijms25063191

Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 3: Unravelling Its Biological Function and Significance in Oncology

Wei-Ting Lee 1, Pei-Ying Wu 1, Ya-Min Cheng 1,2,, Yu-Fang Huang 1,*,
Editor: Lyudmila F Gulyaeva
PMCID: PMC10970424  PMID: 38542164

Abstract

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP3) is vital in regulating several biological processes. TIMP3 exerts antitumour effects via matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-dependent and MMP-independent pathways. Due to promoter methylation and miRNA binding, TIMP3 expression has been observed to decrease in various cancers. Consequently, the migration and invasion of cancer cells increases. Conflicting results have reported that expression levels of TIMP3 in primary and advanced cancers are higher than those in healthy tissues. Therefore, the role of TIMP3 in cancer biology and progression needs to be elucidated. This review provides an overview of TIMP3, from its biological function to its effects on various cancers. Moreover, gynaecological cancers are discussed in detail. TIMP3 has been associated with cervical adenocarcinoma as well as cancer development in serous ovarian cancer and breast cancer metastasis. However, the relationship between TIMP3 and endometrial cancers remains unclear. TIMP3 may be a useful biomarker for gynaecological cancers and is a potential target for future cancer therapy.

Keywords: tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3, gynaecological cancers, biomarker, cancer therapy

1. Introduction

In 2020, an estimated 10 million deaths from cancer were observed worldwide [1]. Numerous factors may contribute to the increased risk of developing cancer, including exposure to environmental hormones and pollution, smoking, unhealthy diet, infection, and ageing [2,3,4]. To identify the risk factors for cancer occurrence, predictors for early diagnosis and individualised and effective treatment are crucial for comprehensive cancer control. Developing effective screening strategies for asymptomatic cancer patients could decrease the incidence of late-stage cancer and increase the effectiveness of cancer treatment. However, the early detection of asymptomatic and developing cancers is challenging [5,6]. We are confronted with the formidable challenges of metastasis and chemoresistance, which represent crucial impediments in the landscape of cancer therapy [7,8]. Identifying the proteins involved in metastasis and chemoresistance would help identify potential strategies against cancer.

Despite developing advancements in cancer management, cancer remains a crucial public health and economic issue. For instance, epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is affecting the lives of women in Asia as the number of new cases increases [9,10]. The combination of surgical cytoreduction and chemotherapy (e.g., platinum and paclitaxel) or radiotherapy, as the standard treatment for gynaecological cancer [11,12,13], in conjunction with targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors, has been implemented in the clinic. Bevacizumab, a recombinant humanised monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), has been reported to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with gynaecological cancers [8,14,15] and overall survival (OS) in high-risk EOC populations [14,15] as well as patients with cervical cancer [16]. Pembrolizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) receptor, has been demonstrated to extend the median progression-free survival (PFS) compared to chemotherapy alone in endometrial cancer [17]. Olaparib, a poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, has been reported to extend the PFS and OS in patients with BRCA-mutated EOC [18]. Breakthrough evidence has shown that antibody–drug conjugates targeting folic acid receptor alpha (FRα) are overexpressed in gynaecological cancers [19]. Mirvetuximab soravtansine (MIRV), an antibody–drug conjugate (ADC) drug against folate receptor α (FRα), was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for FRα-positive platinum-resistant EOC because MIRV successfully prolonged PFS and OS [20].

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP3) have been demonstrated to suppress cancer progression in vitro and in vivo. The validity of this claim is still being discussed in academic circles due to varying and inconclusive findings. This study examines the role of TIMP3 in oncology, particularly in gynaecological cancers. Moreover, the biological function of TIMP3 and its effects on cancer through its regulation of TIMP3 or related molecules are discussed in this study.

2. TIMP3 Biology

TIMP3, a member of the tissue inhibitors of the metalloproteinase family, is approximately 24 kDa in size, and its glycosylated TIMP3 is approximately 27 kDa [21]. Both endogenous and exogenous molecules regulate TIMP3 expression. Leivonen et al. indicated that transforming growth factor β-1 (TGF-β1) induced TIMP3 gene expression in normal human gingival fibroblasts via Smad3/Smad4 signalling [22]. The same study indicated that p38, ERK1/2, and Smad3 synergistically mediated the upregulation of TIMP3 expression [22]. TIMP3 is known for a critical role in the regulation of extracellular matrix (ECM) stability through inhibiting various matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), A disintegrin and metalloproteases (ADAMs) as well as ADAM with thrombospondin motifs (ADAMTSs) [23]. TIMP3 binds with 1:1 stoichiometry to the target, inhibiting its activity [24]. An imbalance between TIMP3 and MMPs/ADAMs/ADAMTSs causes various diseases, including myocardial infarction, Alzheimer’s disease, intervertebral disc degeneration, impaired cognitive function, and tumour metastasis [25,26,27,28,29]. TIMP3 has been demonstrated to regulate inflammation through the inhibition of ADAM17, which indirectly decreases TNF [30]. TIMP3 promotes endothelial cell apoptosis by inhibiting matrix-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation of FAK [31]. TIMP3 has been demonstrated to inhibit cell proliferation and migration by inhibiting MMP-2 and MMP-3 inhibition [32]. TIMP3 suppresses neuronal differentiation by upregulating Notch signalling and suppressing MMPs in neural stem cells [33]. Moreover, it exerts anti-angiogenic effects by inhibiting cell proliferation and migration through inhibition of MMPs and interference with the binding of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2) [34,35]. Cruz et al. detected a hypomethylated TIMP3 promoter in the placental samples from patients with preeclampsia [36].

Furthermore, TIMP3 has been identified as a candidate biomarker for several diseases, including diabetic nephropathy, myocardial infarction, and cancer progression [37,38,39].

3. Regulation of TIMP3

Various studies showed that the TIMP3 level in different cancer types was regulated by other molecules (Figure 1), characterised by organ-specific gene expressions.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The influence of different molecules on tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP3) regulation in various cancers and its impact on patient outcomes. The symbol “” indicates upregulation, and the symbol “” indicates downregulation. The symbol “∆” indicates the controversial result. This was created with BioRender.com (accessed on 1 March 2024).

3.1. Upregulation of TIMP3

The molecules that upregulate TIMP3 expression are listed in Table 1. Oncostatin M, an Interleukin 6 (IL-6) family member, strongly activates TIMP3 mRNA expression in bovine chondrocytes [40]. Gatsios et al. found that oncostatin M decreased expression of TIMP3 mRNA in human synovial lining cells, while IL-1β upregulated TIMP3 mRNA level [41]. The expression level of TIMP3 mRNA was reduced in murine brain microvascular endothelial cells and rat astrocytes after treatment with IL-1β/tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα) and Interferon gamma (IFNγ)/TNFα, respectively [42]. The discordant results of the studies above may be due to using different cell lines. Leco et al. showed that the mRNA level of TIMP3 was upregulated by TGF-β1, phorbol ester, dexamethasone, and epidermal growth factor (EGF) in mouse fibroblast [43]. Exogenous IL-27 upregulates TIMP3 mRNA expression in prostate cancer cells [44]. MPT0G013, an arylsulfonamide-based derivative, upregulates TIMP3 in HUVEC and colon cancer cells in mouse xenograft models [45]. Another aryl sulfonamide-based derivative, MPT0B390, transcriptionally upregulates TIMP3 levels in colon cancer cell lines and HUVEC by inhibiting the expression of the enhancer of zest homolog 2 (EZH2, a histone methyltransferase) [46]. 3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNep), an EZH2 inhibitor, increased TIMP3 mRNA levels in liver cancer cells [47]. AG014699 and BSI-201, which are PARP-1 inhibitors, increased TIMP3 protein levels in hepatocellular carcinoma cells [48]. Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) increased TIMP3 expression in mouse hepatic macrophages [49]. miR-29c upregulated TIMP3 expression in breast cancer cells by downregulating DNA methyltransferase 3B (DMNT3B, a DNA methyltransferase) [50].

Table 1.

List of molecules involved in the upregulation of TIMP3 in various cancers.

Reference(s) Cells Molecules Effect
[45] Colon cancer mice model MPT0G013 Reduced tumour growth, metastasis, and angiogenesis
[46] Colon cancer cells and mice model MPT0B390 Reduced tumour growth and metastasis; increased apoptotic population
[44] Prostate cancer cells IL-27 Anti-angiogenic effect
[47] Liver cancer cells DZNep Reduced cell proliferation; increased total apoptosis
[48] Liver cancer cells AG014699 Cell proliferation and migration reduction; increased apoptotic population
BSI-201
[51] Lung cancer cells and mice model KLF4 Decreased cell migration and proliferation
[52] Lung cancer cells and mice model IL-32γ Decreased cell proliferation; increased apoptotic population
[50] Breast cancer cells miR-29c Decreased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion

DZNep, 3-Deazaneplanocin A; IL-, Interleukin-; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4.

3.2. Downregulation of TIMP3

The molecules that downregulate TIMP3 expression are listed in Table 2. Human proinsulin-connecting peptide (C-peptide), produced by pancreatic β-cell, downregulates TIMP3 gene expression and upregulates MMP9 in human endometrial stromal cells via a β-catenin-dependent pathway, which contributes to cellular migration and invasion [53]. With respect to TIMP3 downregulation, miRNA targeting and promoter methylation are the determinant factors. TIMP3 has the extended 3′-untranslated region (UTR) contained in the exon 5; hence, multiple miRNAs can target it, leading to the degradation of TIMP3 mRNA [54]. miR-21-targeted TIMP3 leads to decreased TIMP3 expression and upregulates MMP2 and MMP9, enhancing capillary network formation in HUVEC cells [55]. Additionally, exosomal miR-17-3p reduces the number of necrotic cardiomyocytes by negatively regulating the expression of TIMP3, which promotes H2O2-induced programmed necrosis in primary cardiomyocytes [56]. miR-34b-5p is associated with bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by decreasing TIMP3 expression [57]. In colon cancer cells growing in the liver, cyclin-dependent kinase 8 reduces TIMP3 expression by inducing miR-181b [58]. In contrast, miR-136 inhibits TIMP3 and protects neurocytes from hypoxia-induced apoptosis [59]. The high-mobility group box-1 protein downregulates TIMP3 through upregulating miR-206, which is involved in improving myocardial regeneration, angiogenesis, and collagenolytic activity in failing hearts [60]. Furthermore, Su et al. provided an overview of various miRNAs that target TIMP3 in cancer cells [61]. Methylation of tumour suppressor genes is a common phenomenon in cancer, which silences genes and contributes to cancer progression. TIMP3 promoter methylation is often found in various cancers, including oral, gastric, and cervical cancer [62,63,64].

Table 2.

List of molecules involved in the downregulation of TIMP3 in various cancers.

Reference(s) Cells Molecules Effect
[56] Colorectal cancer cells CDK8 Increased miR-181b and colon cancer growth in the liver
[65] NSCLC cells KDM1A Increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion
[66] NSCLC (SCC) miR-17 Linked to the angiogenesis
[66] NSCLC (SCC) miR-20a ECM deregulation
[67] Breast cancer cells miR-21 Increased cell invasion
[68] Cervical cancer cells miR-21 Increased MMP2 and MMP9
[69] Endometrial cancer cells miR-103 Increased cell growth and invasion
[70] Liver cancer cells
and mice model
miR-181b Increased cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and resistance to doxorubicin
Increased cell proliferation
[71] Endometriosis cell line
Endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer
miR-191 Increased cell proliferation and invasion
[72] Lung cancer cells miR-197-3p Increased angiogenesis
[73] Oral cancer cells miR-221 Resistance to Adriamycin
[74] Oral cancer cells miR-221 Resistance to doxorubicin
[75] Thyroid cancer miR-221/222 Increased aggressiveness
[76] Cervical cancer cells miR-221/222 Increased proliferation, migration, and invasion
[77] Breast cancer cells miR-221/222 Decreased sensitivity to tamoxifen
[78] Bone cancer cells
and model
miR-222-3p Increased proliferation and invasion
[79] Oesophagal cancer cells miR-373 Increased migration and invasion
[80] Colorectal cancer cells
and mice model
miR-937-5p Increased proliferation, migration, invasion, and angiogenesis
[81] Cervical cancer cells miR-G-10 Increased migration and invasion

CDK8, Cyclin-dependent kinase 8; ECM, extracellular matrix; MMP, matrix metalloproteinases; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma.

4. TIMP3 in Non-Gynaecological Cancers

The expression levels of TIMP3 in different non-gynaecological cancers are shown in Table 3. TIMP3 has been described as a tumour suppressor in several human malignancies, including liver, lung, thyroid, colon, and head and neck cancer. Cancer patients with decreased TIMP3 expression have poor outcomes [65,82,83,84]. The antitumour effects of TIMP3 depend on both MMP-dependent and MMP-independent pathways. MMPs released from tumour and stromal cells play vital roles in dynamic ECM processing, angiogenesis, and immune escape [85]. Cancer cells invade adjacent tissues and spread to other locations thereafter via hematogenous or lymphatic spread [86]. Reduced TIMP3 expression is thought to result from aberrant promoter hypermethylation [87,88] and miRNA regulation in several tumour types [89,90].

4.1. Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the most common cancer in the world. TIMP3 is considered an essential molecule in lung cancer. TIMP3 expression levels in different tumour stages are downregulated compared to those in the normal tissue group [66]. Mino et al. showed that patients with low TIMP3 expression exhibited increased nodal metastases and poor 5-year OS rates [91]. KDM1A directly decreases TIMP3 promoter activity, improving lung cancer progression and unfavourable outcomes [65]. The downregulation of TIMP3 expression by miRNA-197-3p promotes angiogenesis [72]. Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) is a transcription factor that facilitates the transcription of the tumour suppressor TIMP3 by directly binding to the TIMP3 promoter, inhibiting cancer progression in vitro and in vivo [51]. IL-32γ reduces lung cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting the binding of NFκB-dependent DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) to TIMP3 promoter and thus increased TIMP3 expression contributes to the inhibition of cancer growth [52].

4.2. Head and Neck Cancer

Su et al. showed that the mean plasma TIMP3 level was lower in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) than in healthy controls [39]. TIMP3 levels in the plasma of patients with OSCC are significantly associated with tumour status; however, they are not associated with lymph node status, metastasis, or cell differentiation [39]. Dressing TIMP3 by DNA methylation contributes to oral cancer metastasis [83,92]. miR-221 has been reported to increase OSCC resistance to adriamycin and doxorubicin via TIMP3 inhibition [73,74].

Nevertheless, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data show that the mRNA levels of TIMP3 do not differ between OSCC tissues and normal tissues [39]. Kornfeld et al. have demonstrated higher TIMP3 mRNA levels in the stroma of head and neck cancer cells than those in normal epithelial cells [93]. Clinically, patients with higher levels of TIMP3 mRNA in tumour-associated stromal areas have unfavourable clinical outcomes [93].

4.3. Liver Cancer

The TIMP3 mRNA level in liver cancer tissues is lower than in paired adjacent non-cancerous tissues [94]. The positive TIMP3 has been correlated with less portal vein invasion, nodal metastasis, better PFS and OS [94]. The upregulation of TIMP3 by DZNep is associated with attenuating proliferation of liver cancer cells and an increased population of apoptotic cells [47]. miR-181b decreases TIMP3 expression and promotes the tumourigenic properties of liver cancer cells in vitro and in vivo [70].

4.4. Colorectal Cancer

In colorectal cancer (especially rectal cancer), patients with high-cytoplasmic-staining levels of TIMP3 have a comparatively high 5-year survival rate [95]. Powe et al. found that the mRNA signals of TIMP3 were frequently detected in the invasive edge of moderately and poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma samples compared with well-differentiated carcinomas and paired distant stroma tissues [96]. The lack of TIMP3 may enhance the invasion ability of poorly differentiated tumours [96]. By upregulating TIMP3 expression, MPT0G013 and MPT0B390 suppress the proliferation and metastasis of colon cancer tumours in vitro and in vivo [45,46]. Although MPT0B390 has been developed for cancer therapy, its effects on gynaecological cancers have not yet been evaluated. TIMP3 also decreases the levels of CD44 and reduces the motility of colorectal cells [97]. CircFNDC3B, a circular RNA that sequesters miR-937-5p, leads to elevated expression levels of TIMP3 and inhibits mouse colorectal cancer progression [80]. Conversely, Konishi et al. indicated that the percentage of TIMP3 methylation was lower in primary colorectal cancer with liver metastases than in primary cancer without liver metastases [98].

4.5. Thyroid Cancer

The methylation of TIMP3 has commonly been found in thyroid cancer tissues and associated with extrathyroidal invasion and lymph node metastasis [99]. Yang et al. showed TIMP3 is inversely correlated with miR-221/222, and the aggressive thyroid cancer tissues have relatively low TIMP3 mRNA levels compared to non-aggressive cancer tissues [75]. According to TCGA data, the TIMP3 expression level is lower in thyroid cancer tissues than in normal tissues and is correlated with the OS of thyroid cancer patients [100]. TIMP3 reduces thyroid cancer cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of thyroid cancer [82]. Baldini et al. found that the TIMP3 mRNA signal in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma-derived cell lines (CAL-62 and 8305C) is lost [101]. Based on Anania and Baldini’s results, different cell lines show various TIMP3 mRNA levels, although these cell lines have the same histology of thyroid carcinomas [82,101].

4.6. Bone Cancer

Guo et al. found that the expression of TIMP3 mRNA significantly decreases in human osteosarcoma tissues compared to that in matched adjacent normal tissues [78]. The authors also found an inverse correlation between TIMP3 and miR-222-3p expression levels. Downregulation of TIMP3 by miR-222-3p increases proliferation and osteosarcoma cell metastasis [78]. TIMP3 overexpression improves the sensitivity of osteosarcoma cells to cisplatin by inhibiting AKT activation and IL-6 production [102].

4.7. Gastric Cancer

The promoter methylation of TIMP3 has been detected in gastric carcinoma [103]. The percentage of TIMP3 promoter methylation increases significantly among early, advanced, and metastatic gastric cancer tissues compared to normal tissues [63]. George et al. indicated that TIMP3 is consistently downregulated and hypermethylated in gastric cancer and gastric stomach tissues of Helicobacter pylori-infected patients [104]. TIMP3 methylation correlates with lymph node metastasis in patients with gastric cancer but not with OS [105]. Li et al. showed that the expression levels of TIMP3 are higher in normal tissue than in gastric cancer tissue [106]. However, they found that gastric cancer patients with relatively high levels of TIMP3 have unfavourable OS. Their results demonstrated that gastric cancer cells become less aggressive after the downregulation of TIMP3 [106].

4.8. Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women. Some reports show that TIMP3 plays a vital role in breast cancer. Breast cancer patients with relatively high levels of TIMP3 mRNA have longer disease-free survival (DFS) and better responses to tamoxifen [107,108]. Bi et al. reported that the RNA-binding protein Musashi1 (Msi1) is upregulated, and TIMP3 is downregulated in metastatic breast cancer [109]. Mechanistically, Msi1 is physically bound to 3′UTR of TIMP3, which results in TIMP3 suppression and then MMP9 upregulation [109]. The downregulation of miR-21 increases the expression level of TIMP3 and decreases cell invasion [67]. Reduced TIMP3 expression and increased CD44 expression strongly correlate with nodal involvement in breast cancer patients [110]. Downregulation of miR-221/222 correlates with increased TIMP3 expression and the sensitivity of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to tamoxifen [77]. Işeri et al. found that TIMP3 is downregulated in docetaxel- and doxorubicin-resistant MCF-7 cell lines compared to sensitive counterparts [111]. Moreover, primary breast tumour tissue shows a significantly higher proportion of TIMP3 methylation than matched normal tissue [112]. Zhou et al. showed that TIMP3 is activated by a high-mobility group (HMG) box-containing protein 1 (HBP1) and then stabilised by phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) [113]. Consequently, breast cancer becomes sensitive to radiation and hormonal therapies [113]. TIMP3 may be a useful biomarker for breast cancer prognosis and drug response. Nevertheless, transgenic mice deficient in TIMP3 show delayed breast tumour development, progression, and decreased incidence [114].

Various reports have been published regarding the effects of TIMP3 on other types of cancer. The expression levels of TIMP3 in oesophagal cancer tissues and plasma from patients are significantly lower than those in normal tissue and plasma from healthy volunteers, respectively [79]. The downregulation of TIMP3 by miR-373 also increases the proliferation of oesophagal cancer cells and metastatic ability [79]. Shen et al. noted that TIMP3 levels are lower in cisplatin-resistant laryngeal carcinoma tissues and that patients with common TIMP3 expression have unfavourable OS [115]. TIMP3 has been shown to increase prostate cancer cell sensitivity to paclitaxel via mitochondrion-mediated caspase-3 activation [116]. miR-21 has been shown to target TIMP3, is upregulated in various solid and haematological malignancies, and is linked to high cell proliferation, high invasion, anti-apoptosis, and metastatic potential by targeting the expression of several genes [117].

Although TIMP3 has tumour-suppressive potential, some studies have suggested that TIMP3 promotes carcinogenesis [92,93]. Increased TIMP3 signal intensity has been detected in pancreatic cancer tissues; however, the signal is weak in normal tissues [118]. Moreover, upregulated TIMP3 is associated with Thrombospondin 1 (THBS1) in the protein-protein interaction network, and upregulated TIMP3 may be involved in the ECM–receptor interaction signalling pathway during cancer metastasis [119,120].

Table 3.

Studies report TIMP3 expression levels in non-gynaecological cancers.

Cancer Type Reference(s) Sub-Group Case No. TIMP3 Level Method
Lung cancer [65] Normal 59 High RNA-seq (TCGA database)
T1 170 Low
T2 278 Low
T3 47 Low
T4 19 Low
[91] Normal 87 (paired) High IHC analysis
Cancer 92 Low
Head and neck cancer [39] Normal 64 11,289.9 ± 952.1 # ELISA (Plasma)
Cancer 450 3845.0 ± 167.8 #
[83] Normal 17 (paired) High Q-PCR
Cancer 17 Low
Normal 8 (paired) High Western blot
Cancer 8 Low
Liver cancer [94] Normal 20 (paired) High Q-PCR
Cancer 20 Low
Colorectal
cancer
[46] Normal 159 High GEPIA
Cancer 257 Low
Normal 3 High IHC analysis
Cancer 3 Low
Thyroid cancer [82] Normal 9 High cDNA microarray
Classical 21 Low
Tall cell 10 Lowest
[75] Non-aggressive
Aggressive
20 High Q-PCR
20 Low
Bone cancer [78] Normal 30 (paired) High Q-PCR
Cancer 30 Low
[102] Cisplatin
sensitive
Cisplatin
resistant
4 High IHC analysis
4 Low
Breast cancer [108] Normal 17 High IHC analysis
Metastatic 104 Low
Oesophagal
cancer
[79] Normal 63 (paired) High Q-PCR
(Tissues)
Cancer 63 Low
[79] Normal 39 High Q-PCR (Plasma)
Cancer 63 Low
Pancreatic cancer [118] Normal 10 8 (80.0%) positive, low IHC analysis
Cancer 75 55 (73.3%) positive, high

Only Su et al. [61] reported the number of ELISA results and showed the cutoff value. The results of IHC, Q-PCR, Western blotting, and array analyses did not show the number in the research reports. GEPIA, gene expression profiling interactive analysis; IHC, immunohistochemistry; Q-PCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; # mean ± standard deviation, the unit is pg/mL.

5. TIMP3 in Gynaecological Cancers

These studies have demonstrated the effects of TIMP3 on cancers through different mechanisms; however, discussions of TIMP3 in gynaecological cancers are rare. Table 4 shows the expression levels of TIMP3 in various gynaecological cancers.

5.1. Cervical Cancer

The incidence of cervical cancer has declined since the advancement of screening strategies and the worldwide promotion of papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening can effectively help reduce the risk of contracting cervical cancer and improve the likelihood of finding cervical cancer at an early stage, respectively [121,122]. Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma are the most common types of cervical cancer [123]. Previous studies have shown that patients with adenocarcinoma have worse OS than those with SCC [124,125,126].

The proportion of methylated TIMP3 in cervical cancer is significantly higher than that in normal cervical tissue [127,128]. Studies have reported that TIMP3 was more frequently methylated in cervical adenocarcinoma than in SCC (53.3–63.0% vs. 5.0–8.1%) [128,129,130]. However, Siegel et al. reported no significant differences in the TIMP3 methylation index between SCC and normal tissues [130]. Based on previous studies, TIMP3 methylation is a potential biomarker to distinguish cervical adenocarcinoma from SCC.

Some studies have indicated that the expression level of TIMP3 is lower in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cancer tissues than in normal samples [131,132,133,134] (Table 4). According to the TCGA data, TIMP3 expression is lower in cancer samples than in normal samples [131]. Compared to patients with lower expression levels of TIMP3 in cervical cancer tissues, those with higher TIMP3 expression correlate with a lower survival rate; however, no significance has been observed [131].

An inverse correlation between miR-21 and TIMP3 expression has been demonstrated in cervical cancer samples [134]. Moreover, Shishodia et al. reported that the expression level of miR-21 increases during the transition from low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL) to high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) and invasive cancer, corresponding to a decreased level of TIMP3 [68]. miR-221/222 have been demonstrated to target the 3′ untranslated regions (UTR) of TIMP3 in cervical cancer and lead to an increase in the levels of MMP2 and MMP9, as well as the promotion of cell migration and invasion in cervical cancer [76]. miR-G-10 represses TIMP3 expression, preventing the increased migration and invasiveness of cervical cancer cells [81].

Table 4.

The expression levels of TIMP3 in different gynaecological cancerous tissues.

Cancer Type Reference(s) Sub-Group Cases No. TIMP3 Level Method
Cervical
cancer
[130] Normal 33 High Q-PCR
CIN 23 Low
CC 8 Lowest
[134] Normal
Adjacent
non-neoplastic
CC
40 (Paired) Highest Q-PCR and
Western blot
40 High
40 Lowest
Normal 3 High Q-PCR (TCGA database)
CESC 305 Low
[132] Normal 3 High cDNA
arrays
CC 3 Low
[135] LSIL 12 Weak IHC analysis
HSIL 11 Moderate to strong
ISCC 8 Strong
Ovarian
cancer
[136] Simple cysts 30 285 (148–368) * MFBBI
(serum)
Endometrial 30 223 (143–276) *
ovarian cysts
Serous ovarian cancer 44 138 (67–198) *
[71] Healthy controls 12 High Q-PCR and Western blot
Endometriomas 12 Low
EAOC 12 Lowest
[137] Primary 419 Low mRNA microarray
(3 public datasets)
Metastatic SOC 145 High
Normal 8 Low Q-PCR
Primary SOC 30 High
Metastatic SOC 29 Highest
[138] Benign 9 Low IHC analysis
Borderline 9 High
Malignant 28 Highest
[139] Normal 22 0.13 ± 0.67 #,$ Q-PCR
Benign 21 0.85 ± 0.75 #,$
Malignant 60 0.87 ± 0.46 #,$
[140] Normal 3 Low Q-PCR
HGSOC 3 High
[141] Benign 8 Low IHC analysis
SOC 26 High
Endometrial cancer [142] Benign 1 High cDNA
expression
array
WDEAC 2 Low
[143] Adenocarcinoma 27 Strong IHC analysis
Squamous 1 Strong
Clear cell 1 Strong

Cymbaluk-Płoska et al. [136] and Hu et al. [139] presented interval data, whereas other studies have not shown quantitative data of IHC, Q-PCR, Western blotting, and array. CIN, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; CC, cervical cancer; CESC, cervical squamous cell carcinoma; LSIL, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; HSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions; ISCC, invasive squamous cell carcinoma; Q-PCR, quantitative polymerase chain reaction; IHC, immunohistochemistry; MFBBI, multiplex fluorescent bead-based immunoassays; SOC, serous ovarian cancer; EAOC, endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer (8 endometrioid and 4 clear cell tumour); HGSOC, high-grade serous ovarian cancer; * mean of the range, the unit is pg/mL; # mean ± standard deviation. $ The ratios of TIMP3/β-actin were used to represent the semiquantitative expression of TIMP3.

A study with contrasting findings has indicated that TIMP3 is upregulated in cervical cancer cell lines (HPV-related QG-U cells and HPV-negative Yumoto cells) and cervical SCC tissues [135]. Shaker et al. created a model to induce LSIL, HSIL, and invasive cervical cancer by introducing genetic material into human cervical keratinocytes (HCK). They noticed that the expression levels of TIMP3 increase during the carcinogenic process in normal cervical cells compared with parental HCK cells. Furthermore, the strong immunoreactivity of TIMP3 has been detected in both nuclear and cytoplasmic patterns in HSIL and invasive cervical cancer tissues [135].

The differences between these findings may be due to different detection methods for TIMP3 and samples. However, further studies are required to confirm the role of TIMP3 in cervical carcinogenesis and cancer progression.

5.2. Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC)

EOC is a silent killer that is difficult to recognise in its early stages and poses a global threat to women. Patients with advanced-stage EOC had significantly worse OS than those with the early-stage disease. In the United States, ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of death in female malignancies, and those with distant metastases have the worst survival rates [144]. EOC is a heterogeneous disease that manifests histologically, molecularly, and clinically. Serous carcinoma is the most common histology worldwide [145,146], whereas the proportion of clear-cell carcinomas (CCC) is relatively higher (15–20%) in Asian countries [145,147,148].

The mean concentration of the TIMP3 protein in the sera of patients with EOC is significantly lower than that in patients with benign ovarian cysts or endometrial cysts [136]. Higher TIMP3 levels are inversely correlated with ascites in patients with advanced stages of ovarian cancer [119]. Dong et al. showed that the expression level of TIMP3 is inversely correlated with miR-191 expression [71]. The expression level of TIMP3 is the highest, and miR-191 lowest in healthy control samples [71]. Patients with higher TIMP3 have an 8.9-month increase in OS compared with those with lower TIMP3 levels [136]. Hakamy et al. indicated that patients with EOC with relatively high TIMP3 expression have prolonged disease-specific survival compared to patients with common TIMP3 expression [149]. TIMP3 can be induced by physcion 8-O-β-glucopyranoside (PG) and lead to the suppression of the migration and invasion of serous EOC cells [150]. Moreover, PG induces other anti-cancer molecules. However, the precise mechanism by which TIMP3 is directly upregulated by PG is not well understood. Silencing Snail expression increases the expression level of TIMP3, leading to decreased proteolytic activity of MMP2 and MMP9, whereas normalised expression of Snail inhibits TIMP3 expression, resulting in increased activity of MMP2 and MMP9 in EOC [151]. The expression level of the TIMP3 gene can be induced in both ovarian stromal cells and cancer cells by TGFβ-1, which regulates cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation [137]. These results were consistent with the role of TIMP3 as a cancer suppressor, as mentioned earlier.

TIMP3 gene expression dynamics have been observed during the dormancy-to-recurrence transition induced by VEGF/doxycycline (DOX) or DOX in vitro and in vivo models, respectively [120]. When serous EOC cell dormancy was induced with DOX, TIMP3 expression increased in the cancer cells. After the withdrawal of DOX, the EOC cells underwent recurrent growth and an increase in the TIMP3 expression was detected in the DNA methylation [120]. In addition, the mRNA and protein levels of TIMP3 were higher in carboplatin/paclitaxel-induced senescent primary serous EOC cells than in young cells [152]. Dormancy and senescence are critical cellular stress responses that contribute to therapy resistance and tumour recurrence [153]. Thus, TIMP3 may be a key molecule in cancer cell dormancy and senescence.

Controversial results have reported that TIMP3 tends to be highly expressed in EOC patients at higher pathological stages [137,151,152,153,154,155]. Januchowski et al. reported that higher expression levels of TIMP3 were detected in cisplatin-resistant A2780 cell lines than that in their sensitive counterparts [156]. Cheon et al. showed an inverse correlation between TIMP3 expression and unfavourable outcomes in patients with serous EOC [137]. Furthermore, they also found that TIMP3 was highly enriched in metastatic tissues compared to that in primary tumours [137]. Lima et al. reported strong immunoreactive signals of TIMP3 in the EOC group compared to borderline and benign neoplasms [138]. Their patients with EOC and higher TIMP3 expression had shorter OS (94.5 months vs. 156.2 months) [138]. Hu et al. showed that malignant and benign tissues express higher levels of TIMP3 than to normal tissues [139]. Zhang et al. reported that the expression levels of TIMP3 mRNA are significantly upregulated in serous EOC samples compared with those in normal ovaries [140]. The protein levels of TIMP3 in the culture supernatants of TOV-21G (CCC histology) and TOV-112D (endometrioid histology) cells, both of which are from grade 3 tumours, were detected using a guided-mode resonance (GMR) bioassay detection system [154]. Significant upregulation of TIMP3 expression was observed in FIGO Stage III and Grade 3 EOC; however, it was not found in benign ovarian samples [141]. Methylated TIMP3 has been identified in various cancers. However, Imura et al. showed that partial methylation of TIMP3 was observed in two EOC cell lines, and the remaining 11 EOC cell lines (different types) exhibited TIMP3 demethylation [157]. TIMP3 has been identified as an ovarian cancer-specific biomarker of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) associated with cancer progression, chemoresistance, and poor prognosis by integrating several bioinformatic approaches [155].

Based on previous reports, the expression levels of TIMP3 in most serous EOC tissues are higher than in normal tissues. However, the correlation between TIMP3 expression and cancer progression in EOC remains inconsistent. Owing to the lack of investigation into TIMP3 expression in ovarian CCC, further studies are necessary.

5.3. Endometrial Cancer

Most endometrial cancers are diagnosed at the early stage (I and II) in postmenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding [142]. New endometrial cancer cases have increased worldwide since 2020 [144,145]. Few studies have focused on the role of TIMP3 in endometrial development.

Smid-Koopman et al. revealed that TIMP3 expression was downregulated in two well-differentiated endometrioid adenocarcinoma samples compared to benign human endometrial tissue [158] (Table 4). miR-103 and miR-181a have been demonstrated to repress the expression levels of TIMP3 through directly binding to TIMP3’s 3′-UTR in Ishikawa cells and HEC-1B cells [69,90]. Yu et al. reported that the proliferation and invasiveness of endometrial cancer cells are improved after transfection with anti-miR-103 [69]. In contrast, Di Nezza et al. found that all endometrial carcinoma tissues of all histological grades show strong immunoreactivity for TIMP3, and myometrial invasion is present in 78% of patients [143]. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to elucidate the role of TIMP3 in endometrial cancer.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

TIMP3 is important in ECM remodelling and involves inflammation, cardiovascular diseases, neurological disorders, and cancer progression. Most studies have shown that TIMP3 is involved in tumour inhibition in most cancer types. Higher TIMP3 levels have been detected in normal human tissues than in cancerous tissues. Cancer patients with lower TIMP3 levels have less favourable outcomes. Nevertheless, controversial results have been observed in gastric, pancreatic, cervical, and ovarian cancer. This overview provides fundamental knowledge of the biological functions of TIMP3 in cancer cells (Figure 2) and summarises the mechanical interactions between different cancers and TIMP3. However, the correlations between vaginal or vulvar cancer and TIMP3 are not included in this review because of a lack of relevant studies. The expression levels of TIMP3 in cervical cancer are lower based on in vitro and clinical studies. The expression levels of TIMP3 in serous EOC tissues are higher than those in healthy tissues; however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Only one study with a larger sample size (n = 29) indicated that higher expression levels of TIMP3 had been detected in endometrial cancer tissues [143]. TIMP3 may act as a biomarker of cancer prognosis and drug response. Reports have suggested that the threshold or cut-off value of TIMP3 levels and concentrations vary across different types of cancer. Therefore, the upcoming issues are standardising detection methods and validating the findings in more clinical samples.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The regulation and the effects of TIMP3 in cancer cells. The molecules with the green icon increased the expression levels of TIMP3, while the molecules with the brown icon decreased the levels. ADAMs, A disintegrin and metalloproteases; ADAMTSs, ADAM with thrombospondin motifs; CDK8, Cyclin-dependent kinase 8; DXMS, dexamethasone; DZNep, 3-Deazaneplanocin A; ECM, extracellular matrix; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EZH2, enhancer of zeste homolog 2; GF, growth factor; HBP1, high mobility group (HMG) box-containing protein 1; IL-, interleukin; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4; MMPs, matrix metalloproteinases; Msi1, musashi1; PG, physcion 8-O-β-glucopyranoside; PE, phorbol ester; PTEN, phosphatase and tensin homolog; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinases; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor β-1; TIMP3, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR2, VEGF receptor 2. The symbol “” indicates the signal transition or binding, and the symbol “” shows the blockage of binding or activation. The symbol “?” means the regulatory mechanism is unknown. Created with BioRender.com (accessed on 10 March 2023).

As mentioned earlier, TIMP3 has classically been considered a tumour suppressor protein. Therefore, stimulating TIMP3 expression in cancer cells may enhance therapeutic efficacy. For instance, TIMP3 may be upregulated by molecules (e.g., IL-27, DZNep and MPT0B390) or compounds from natural products. Green tea polyphenols and epigallocatechin-3-gallate elevate TIMP-3 expression by reducing the protein levels of EZH2 and class I histone deacetylases, which attenuate the migration of breast cancer cells [159]. KHBJ-9B, a butanol fraction extracted from a mixture of two oriental herbs, increases TIMP3 levels and decreases the expression of matrix proteinases in human osteoarthritic cartilage cultures [160]. The crude acetone extract of Momordica balsamina increased TIMP3 expression in colorectal cancer, reducing migration ability [161]. Purified molecules or natural products can be used as adjuvants for cancer therapy.

Nanotechnology has advanced applications in cancer diagnosis and therapy [162,163]. Nanoparticles can be modified with specific targeting molecules and loaded with specific chemicals to improve their therapeutic efficacy [164,165]. Zhou et al. developed a multifunctional nanoparticle that co-delivered a miR-221/222 inhibitor and paclitaxel to MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells [166]. The expression levels of p27Kip1 and TIMP3 are upregulated in cancer cells due to the inhibition of miR-221/222, which enhances the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel [166]. Li et al. developed copper-olsalazine (Cu-Olsa)@hyaluronic acid (HA) nanoparticles that caused COX-2 downregulation, reactive oxygen species generation, and TIMP3 upregulation in colorectal cancer cells [166]. Cu-Olsa@HA nanoparticles significantly inhibited colorectal cancer proliferation and metastasis in vitro and in vivo [167]. Hence, developing smart nanoparticles targeting TIMP3-related processes may be a strategy for efficiently treating various cancers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.-T.L. and Y.-F.H.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, W.-T.L., P.-Y.W., Y.-M.C. and Y.-F.H.; Writing—Review & Editing, Y.-M.C. and Y.-F.H.; Project Administration, Y.-M.C. and Y.-F.H.; Funding Acquisition, Y.-M.C. and Y.-F.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders played no role in the writing of the manuscript or the decision to publish the results.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by National Science and Technology Council (grant No. 111-2314-B-006-078) and the National Cheng Kung University Hospital (grant No. NCKUH-T11001005).

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization Health Topic. [(accessed on 3 February 2022)]. Cancer. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1.
  • 2.Baena Ruiz R., Salinas Hernández P. Diet and cancer: Risk factors and epidemiological evidence. Maturitas. 2014;77:202–208. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.de Groot P., Munden R.F. Lung cancer epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2012;50:863–876. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2012.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.de Martel C., Georges D., Bray F., Ferlay J., Clifford G.M. Global burden of cancer attributable to infections in 2018: A worldwide incidence analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2020;8:e180–e190. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30488-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goral V. Pancreatic cancer: Pathogenesis and diagnosis. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2015;16:5619–5624. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.14.5619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nag S., Aggarwal S., Rauthan A., Warrier N. Maintenance therapy for newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer—A review. J. Ovarian Res. 2022;15:88. doi: 10.1186/s13048-022-01020-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chaffer C.L., San Juan B.P., Lim E., Weinberg R.A. EMT, cell plasticity and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016;35:645–654. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9648-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jo Y., Choi N., Kim K., Koo H.-J., Choi J., Kim H.N. Chemoresistance of cancer cells: Requirements of tumor microenvironment-mimicking in vitro models in anti-cancer drug development. Theranostics. 2018;8:5259. doi: 10.7150/thno.29098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ministry of Health and Welfare Cancer Registry Annual Report. [(accessed on 10 November 2023)];2021 Available online: https://www.hpa.gov.tw/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=269.
  • 10.Lim M.C., Won Y.J., Ko M.J., Kim M., Shim S.H., Suh D.H., Kim J.W. Incidence of cervical, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in Korea during 1999-2015. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019;30:e38. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2019.30.e38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cortez A.J., Tudrej P., Kujawa K.A., Lisowska K.M. Advances in ovarian cancer therapy. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2018;81:17–38. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3501-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.de Boer S.M., Powell M.E., Mileshkin L., Katsaros D., Bessette P., Haie-Meder C., Ottevanger P.B., Ledermann J.A., Khaw P., Colombo A., et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): Final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:295–309. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30079-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mayadev J.S., Ke G., Mahantshetty U., Pereira M.D., Tarnawski R., Toita T. Global challenges of radiotherapy for the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2022;32:436–445. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-003001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.González Martín A., Oza A.M., Embleton A.C., Pfisterer J., Ledermann J.A., Pujade-Lauraine E., Kristensen G., Bertrand M.A., Beale P., Cervantes A., et al. Exploratory outcome analyses according to stage and/or residual disease in the ICON7 trial of carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2019;152:53–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.08.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wu P.Y., Cheng Y.M., Shen M.R., Chen Y.C., Huang Y.F., Chou C.Y. Real-World Study of Adding Bevacizumab to Chemotherapy for Ovarian, Tubal, and Peritoneal Cancer as Front-Line or Relapse Therapy (ROBOT): 8-Year Experience. Front. Oncol. 2020;10:1095. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tewari K.S., Sill M.W., Long H.J., 3rd, Penson R.T., Huang H., Ramondetta L.M., Landrum L.M., Oaknin A., Reid T.J., Leitao M.M., et al. Improved survival with bevacizumab in advanced cervical cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:734–743. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eskander R.N., Sill M.W., Beffa L., Moore R.G., Hope J.M., Musa F.B., Mannel R., Shahin M.S., Cantuaria G.H., Girda E., et al. Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Advanced Endometrial Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;388:2159–2170. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2302312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Banerjee S., Moore K.N., Colombo N., Scambia G., Kim B.G., Oaknin A., Friedlander M., Lisyanskaya A., Floquet A., Leary A., et al. Maintenance olaparib for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer and a BRCA mutation (SOLO1/GOG 3004): 5-year follow-up of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:1721–1731. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00531-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ledermann J.A., Canevari S., Thigpen T. Targeting the folate receptor: Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to personalize cancer treatments. Ann. Oncol. 2015;26:2034–2043. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Moore K.N., Angelergues A., Konecny G.E., García Y., Banerjee S., Lorusso D., Lee J.Y., Moroney J.W., Colombo N., Roszak A., et al. Mirvetuximab Soravtansine in FRα-Positive, Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2023;389:2162–2174. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2309169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lee M.H., Atkinson S., Murphy G. Identification of the extracellular matrix (ECM) binding motifs of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-3 and effective transfer to TIMP-1. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:6887–6898. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610490200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Leivonen S.K., Lazaridis K., Decock J., Chantry A., Edwards D.R., Kähäri V.M. TGF-β-elicited induction of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-3 expression in fibroblasts involves complex interplay between Smad3, p38α, and ERK1/2. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e57474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rai G.P., Baird S.K. Tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-3 has both anti-metastatic and anti-tumourigenic properties. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2020;37:69–76. doi: 10.1007/s10585-019-10017-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Jackson H.W., Defamie V., Waterhouse P., Khokha R. TIMPs: Versatile extracellular regulators in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:38–53. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2016.115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Chintalgattu V., Greenberg J., Singh S., Chiueh V., Gilbert A., O’Neill J.W., Smith S., Jackson S., Khakoo A.Y., Lee T. Utility of Glycosylated TIMP3 molecules: Inhibition of MMPs and TACE to improve cardiac function in rat myocardial infarct model. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2018;6:e00442. doi: 10.1002/prp2.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Dewing J.M., Carare R.O., Lotery A.J., Ratnayaka J.A. The Diverse Roles of TIMP-3: Insights into Degenerative Diseases of the Senescent Retina and Brain. Cells. 2019;9:39. doi: 10.3390/cells9010039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jacomasso T., Trombetta-Lima M., Sogayar M.C., Winnischofer S.M. Downregulation of reversion-inducing cysteine-rich protein with Kazal motifs in malignant melanoma: Inverse correlation with membrane-type 1-matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2. Melanoma Res. 2014;24:32–39. doi: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Li Y., Li K., Han X., Mao C., Zhang K., Zhao T., Zhao J. The imbalance between TIMP3 and matrix-degrading enzymes plays an important role in intervertebral disc degeneration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016;469:507–514. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Baba Y., Yasuda O., Takemura Y., Ishikawa Y., Ohishi M., Iwanami J., Mogi M., Doe N., Horiuchi M., Maeda N. Timp-3 deficiency impairs cognitive function in mice. Lab. Investig. 2009;89:1340–1347. doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Black R.A. TIMP3 checks inflammation. Nat. Genet. 2004;36:934–935. doi: 10.1038/ng0904-934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Qi J.H., Anand-Apte B. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP3) promotes endothelial apoptosis via a caspase-independent mechanism. Apoptosis. 2015;20:523–534. doi: 10.1007/s10495-014-1076-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhai H., Qi X., Li Z., Zhang W., Li C., Ji L., Xu K., Zhong H. TIMP-3 suppresses the proliferation and migration of SMCs from the aortic neck of atherosclerotic AAA in rabbits, via decreased MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity, and reduced TNF-α expression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:2061–2067. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fang L., Kuniya T., Harada Y., Yasuda O., Maeda N., Suzuki Y., Kawaguchi D., Gotoh Y. TIMP3 promotes the maintenance of neural stem-progenitor cells in the mouse subventricular zone. Front. Neurosci. 2023;17:1149603. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1149603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Qi J.H., Ebrahem Q., Moore N., Murphy G., Claesson-Welsh L., Bond M., Baker A., Anand-Apte B. A novel function for tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP3): Inhibition of angiogenesis by blockage of VEGF binding to VEGF receptor-2. Nat. Med. 2003;9:407–415. doi: 10.1038/nm846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cabral-Pacheco G.A., Garza-Veloz I., Castruita-De la Rosa C., Ramirez-Acuña J.M., Perez-Romero B.A., Guerrero-Rodriguez J.F., Martinez-Avila N., Martinez-Fierro M.L. The Roles of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Their Inhibitors in Human Diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:9739. doi: 10.3390/ijms21249739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Cruz J.d.O., Conceição I.M., Sandrim V.C., Luizon M.R. Comprehensive analyses of DNA methylation of the TIMP3 promoter in placentas from early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Placenta. 2022;117:118–121. doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Casagrande V., Federici M., Menghini R. TIMP3 involvement and potentiality in the diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of diabetic nephropathy. Acta Diabetol. 2021;58:1587–1594. doi: 10.1007/s00592-021-01766-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chen H., Chen S., Ye H., Guo X. Protective Effects of Circulating TIMP3 on Coronary Artery Disease and Myocardial Infarction: A Mendelian Randomization Study. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022;9:277. doi: 10.3390/jcdd9080277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Su C.W., Su B.F., Chiang W.L., Yang S.F., Chen M.K., Lin C.W. Plasma levels of the tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase-3 as a potential biomarker in oral cancer progression. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2017;14:37–44. doi: 10.7150/ijms.17024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li W.Q., Zafarullah M. Oncostatin M up-regulates tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 gene expression in articular chondrocytes via de novo transcription, protein synthesis, and tyrosine kinase- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-dependent mechanisms. J. Immunol. 1998;161:5000–5007. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gatsios P., Haubeck H.D., Van de Leur E., Frisch W., Apte S.S., Greiling H., Heinrich P.C., Graeve L. Oncostatin M differentially regulates tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases TIMP-1 and TIMP-3 gene expression in human synovial lining cells. Eur. J. Biochem. 1996;241:56–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1996.0056t.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bugno M., Witek B., Bereta J., Bereta M., Edwards D.R., Kordula T. Reprogramming of TIMP-1 and TIMP-3 expression profiles in brain microvascular endothelial cells and astrocytes in response to proinflammatory cytokines. FEBS Lett. 1999;448:9–14. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(99)00323-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Leco K.J., Khokha R., Pavloff N., Hawkes S.P., Edwards D.R. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-3 (TIMP-3) is an extracellular matrix-associated protein with a distinctive pattern of expression in mouse cells and tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:9352–9360. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)37115-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Di Carlo E., Sorrentino C., Zorzoli A., Di Meo S., Tupone M.G., Ognio E., Mincione G., Airoldi I. The antitumor potential of Interleukin-27 in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2014;5:10332–10341. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wang C.Y., Liou J.P., Tsai A.C., Lai M.J., Liu Y.M., Lee H.Y., Wang J.C., Pan S.L., Teng C.M. A novel action mechanism for MPT0G013, a derivative of arylsulfonamide, inhibits tumor angiogenesis through up-regulation of TIMP3 expression. Oncotarget. 2014;5:9838–9850. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huang H.L., Liu Y.M., Sung T.Y., Huang T.C., Cheng Y.W., Liou J.P., Pan S.L. TIMP3 expression associates with prognosis in colorectal cancer and its novel arylsulfonamide inducer, MPT0B390, inhibits tumor growth, metastasis and angiogenesis. Theranostics. 2019;9:6676–6689. doi: 10.7150/thno.34020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Özel M., Kilic E., Baskol M., Akalın H., Baskol G. The Effect of EZH2 Inhibition through DZNep on Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Mechanism. Cell Reprogram. 2021;23:139–148. doi: 10.1089/cell.2020.0073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mao X., Du S., Yang Z., Zhang L., Peng X., Jiang N., Zhou H. Inhibitors of PARP-1 exert inhibitory effects on the biological characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:208–214. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rao J., Qiu J., Ni M., Wang H., Wang P., Zhang L., Wang Z., Liu M., Cheng F., Wang X., et al. Macrophage nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 deficiency promotes innate immune activation by tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3-mediated RhoA/ROCK pathway in the ischemic liver. Hepatology. 2022;75:1429–1445. doi: 10.1002/hep.32184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Li W., Yi J., Zheng X., Liu S., Fu W., Ren L., Li L., Hoon D.S.B., Wang J., Du G. miR-29c plays a suppressive role in breast cancer by targeting the TIMP3/STAT1/FOXO1 pathway. Clin. Epigenetics. 2018;10:64. doi: 10.1186/s13148-018-0495-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang X., Xia S., Li H., Wang X., Li C., Chao Y., Zhang L., Han C. The deubiquitinase USP10 regulates KLF4 stability and suppresses lung tumorigenesis. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27:1747–1764. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0458-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yun J., Park M.H., Son D.J., Nam K.T., Moon D.B., Ju J.H., Hwang O.K., Choi J.S., Kim T.H., Jung Y.S. IL-32 gamma reduces lung tumor development through upregulation of TIMP-3 overexpression and hypomethylation. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:306. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0375-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Abdul Khaliq S., Umair Z., Baek M.O., Chon S.J., Yoon M.S. C-Peptide Promotes Cell Migration by Controlling Matrix Metallopeptidase-9 Activity Through Direct Regulation of β-Catenin in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 2022;10:800181. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.800181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Fan D., Kassiri Z. Biology of Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3), and Its Therapeutic Implications in Cardiovascular Pathology. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:661. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hu J., Ni S., Cao Y., Zhang T., Wu T., Yin X., Lang Y., Lu H. The Angiogenic Effect of microRNA-21 Targeting TIMP3 through the Regulation of MMP2 and MMP9. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0149537. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu Z., Zhu D., Yu F., Yang M., Huang D., Ji Z., Lu W., Ma G. Exosomal miR-17-3p Alleviates Programmed Necrosis in Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Regulating TIMP3 Expression. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;2022:2785113. doi: 10.1155/2022/2785113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hu R.P., Lu Y.Y., Zhang X.J. MiR-34b-5p knockdown attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis by targeting tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23:2273–2279. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201903_17276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Liang J., Chen M., Hughes D., Chumanevich A.A., Altilia S., Kaza V., Lim C.U., Kiaris H., Mythreye K., Pena M.M., et al. CDK8 Selectively Promotes the Growth of Colon Cancer Metastases in the Liver by Regulating Gene Expression of TIMP3 and Matrix Metalloproteinases. Cancer Res. 2018;78:6594–6606. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jin R., Xu S., Lin X., Shen M. MiR-136 controls neurocytes apoptosis by regulating Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-3 in spinal cord ischemic injury. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;94:47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.07.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Limana F., Esposito G., D’Arcangelo D., Di Carlo A., Romani S., Melillo G., Mangoni A., Bertolami C., Pompilio G., Germani A., et al. HMGB1 attenuates cardiac remodelling in the failing heart via enhanced cardiac regeneration and miR-206-mediated inhibition of TIMP-3. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Su C.W., Lin C.W., Yang W.E., Yang S.F. TIMP-3 as a therapeutic target for cancer. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919864247. doi: 10.1177/1758835919864247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Arantes L.M., de Carvalho A.C., Melendez M.E., Centrone C.C., Góis-Filho J.F., Toporcov T.N., Caly D.N., Tajara E.H., Goloni-Bertollo E.M., Carvalho A.L. Validation of methylation markers for diagnosis of oral cavity cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2015;51:632–641. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Guan Z., Zhang J., Song S., Dai D. Promoter methylation and expression of TIMP3 gene in gastric cancer. Diagn. Pathol. 2013;8:110. doi: 10.1186/1746-1596-8-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Jeong D.H., Youm M.Y., Kim Y.N., Lee K.B., Sung M.S., Yoon H.K., Kim K.T. Promoter methylation of p16, DAPK, CDH1, and TIMP-3 genes in cervical cancer: Correlation with clinicopathologic characteristics. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer. 2006;16:1234–1240. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200605000-00043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kong L., Zhang P., Li W., Yang Y., Tian Y., Wang X., Chen S., Yang Y., Huang T., Zhao T., et al. KDM1A promotes tumor cell invasion by silencing TIMP3 in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:27959–27974. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.8563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Czarnecka K.H., Szmyd B., Barańska M., Kaszkowiak M., Kordiak J., Antczak A., Pastuszak-Lewandoska D., Brzeziańska-Lasota E. A Strong Decrease in TIMP3 Expression Mediated by the Presence of miR-17 and 20a Enables Extracellular Matrix Remodeling in the NSCLC Lesion Surroundings. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1372. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01372. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Song B., Wang C., Liu J., Wang X., Lv L., Wei L., Xie L., Zheng Y., Song X. MicroRNA-21 regulates breast cancer invasion partly by targeting tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3 expression. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;29:29. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-29-29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Shishodia G., Shukla S., Srivastava Y., Masaldan S., Mehta S., Bhambhani S., Sharma S., Mehrotra R., Das B.C., Bharti A.C. Alterations in microRNAs miR-21 and let-7a correlate with aberrant STAT3 signaling and downstream effects during cervical carcinogenesis. Mol. Cancer. 2015;14:116. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0385-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yu D., Zhou H., Xun Q., Xu X., Ling J., Hu Y. microRNA-103 regulates the growth and invasion of endometrial cancer cells through the downregulation of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 3. Oncol. Lett. 2012;3:1221–1226. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Wang B., Hsu S.H., Majumder S., Kutay H., Huang W., Jacob S.T., Ghoshal K. TGFbeta-mediated upregulation of hepatic miR-181b promotes hepatocarcinogenesis by targeting TIMP3. Oncogene. 2010;29:1787–1797. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.468. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Dong M., Yang P., Hua F. MiR-191 modulates malignant transformation of endometriosis through regulating TIMP3. Med. Sci. Monit. 2015;21:915–920. doi: 10.12659/msm.893872. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chang R.M., Fu Y., Zeng J., Zhu X.Y., Gao Y. Cancer-derived exosomal miR-197-3p confers angiogenesis via targeting TIMP2/3 in lung adenocarcinoma metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13:1032. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-05420-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Chen D., Yan W., Liu Z., Zhang Z., Zhu L., Liu W., Ding X., Wang A., Chen Y. Downregulation of miR-221 enhances the sensitivity of human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells to Adriamycin through upregulation of TIMP3 expression. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2016;77:72–78. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2015.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Du L., Ma S., Wen X., Chai J., Zhou D. Oral squamous cell carcinoma cells are resistant to doxorubicin through upregulation of miR-221. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017;16:2659–2667. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.6915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Yang Z., Yuan Z., Fan Y., Deng X., Zheng Q. Integrated analyses of microRNA and mRNA expression profiles in aggressive papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013;8:1353–1358. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2013.1699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Fu F., Wang T., Wu Z., Feng Y., Wang W., Zhou S., Ma X., Wang S. HMGA1 exacerbates tumor growth through regulating the cell cycle and accelerates migration/invasion via targeting miR-221/222 in cervical cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:594. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0683-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Gan R., Yang Y., Yang X., Zhao L., Lu J., Meng Q.H. Downregulation of miR-221/222 enhances sensitivity of breast cancer cells to tamoxifen through upregulation of TIMP3. Cancer Gene Ther. 2014;21:290–296. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2014.29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Guo J., Liu Q., Li Z., Guo H., Bai C., Wang F. miR-222-3p promotes osteosarcoma cell migration and invasion through targeting TIMP3. Onco. Targets Ther. 2018;11:8643–8653. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S175745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Liu W., Li M., Chen X., Zhang D., Wei L., Zhang Z., Wang S., Meng L., Zhu S., Li B. Erratum: MicroRNA-373 promotes migration and invasion in human esophageal squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting TIMP3 expression. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016;6:1458–1459. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Zeng W., Liu Y., Li W.T., Li Y., Zhu J.F. CircFNDC3B sequestrates miR-937-5p to derepress TIMP3 and inhibit colorectal cancer progression. Mol. Oncol. 2020;14:2960–2984. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Sun Q., Yang Z., Li P., Wang X., Sun L., Wang S., Liu M., Tang H. A novel miRNA identified in GRSF1 complex drives the metastasis via the PIK3R3/AKT/NF-κB and TIMP3/MMP9 pathways in cervical cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:636. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1841-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 82.Anania M.C., Sensi M., Radaelli E., Miranda C., Vizioli M.G., Pagliardini S., Favini E., Cleris L., Supino R., Formelli F., et al. TIMP3 regulates migration, invasion and in vivo tumorigenicity of thyroid tumor cells. Oncogene. 2011;30:3011–3023. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Su C.W., Chang Y.C., Chien M.H., Hsieh Y.H., Chen M.K., Lin C.W., Yang S.F. Loss of TIMP3 by promoter methylation of Sp1 binding site promotes oral cancer metastasis. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:793. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-2016-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Wang J., Lin Y., Jiang T., Gao C., Wang D., Wang X., Wei Y., Liu T., Zhu L., Wang P., et al. Up-regulation of TIMP-3 and RECK decrease the invasion and metastasis ability of colon cancer. Arab J. Gastroenterol. 2019;20:127–134. doi: 10.1016/j.ajg.2019.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yoon S.O., Park S.J., Yun C.H., Chung A.S. Roles of matrix metalloproteinases in tumor metastasis and angiogenesis. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003;36:128–137. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2003.36.1.128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Leong S.P., Naxerova K., Keller L., Pantel K., Witte M. Molecular mechanisms of cancer metastasis via the lymphatic versus the blood vessels. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2022;39:159–179. doi: 10.1007/s10585-021-10120-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Lee S., Lee H.J., Kim J.H., Lee H.S., Jang J.J., Kang G.H. Aberrant CpG island hypermethylation along multistep hepatocarcinogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2003;163:1371–1378. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63495-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Ninomiya I., Kawakami K., Fushida S., Fujimura T., Funaki H., Takamura H., Kitagawa H., Nakagawara H., Tajima H., Kayahara M., et al. Quantitative detection of TIMP-3 promoter hypermethylation and its prognostic significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2008;20:1489–1495. doi: 10.3892/or_00000170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Nagao Y., Hisaoka M., Matsuyama A., Kanemitsu S., Hamada T., Fukuyama T., Nakano R., Uchiyama A., Kawamoto M., Yamaguchi K., et al. Association of microRNA-21 expression with its targets, PDCD4 and TIMP3, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Mod. Pathol. 2012;25:112–121. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.2011.142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Panda H., Chuang T.D., Luo X., Chegini N. Endometrial miR-181a and miR-98 expression is altered during transition from normal into cancerous state and target PGR, PGRMC1, CYP19A1, DDX3X, and TIMP3. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012;97:E1316–E1326. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Mino N., Takenaka K., Sonobe M., Miyahara R., Yanagihara K., Otake Y., Wada H., Tanaka F. Expression of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP-3) and its prognostic significance in resected non-small cell lung cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2007;95:250–257. doi: 10.1002/jso.20663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Strzelczyk J.K., Krakowczyk Ł., Owczarek A.J. Aberrant DNA methylation of the p16, APC, MGMT, TIMP3 and CDH1 gene promoters in tumours and the surgical margins of patients with oral cavity cancer. J. Cancer. 2018;9:1896–1904. doi: 10.7150/jca.24477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Kornfeld J.W., Meder S., Wohlberg M., Friedrich R.E., Rau T., Riethdorf L., Löning T., Pantel K., Riethdorf S. Overexpression of TACE and TIMP3 mRNA in head and neck cancer: Association with tumour development and progression. Br. J. Cancer. 2011;104:138–145. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6606017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Gu X., Fu M., Ding Y., Ni H., Zhang W., Zhu Y., Tang X., Xiong L., Li J., Qiu L., et al. TIMP-3 expression associates with malignant behaviors and predicts favorable survival in HCC. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e106161. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hilska M., Roberts P.J., Collan Y.U., Laine V.J., Kössi J., Hirsimäki P., Rahkonen O., Laato M. Prognostic significance of matrix metalloproteinases-1, -2, -7 and -13 and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases-1, -2, -3 and -4 in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2007;121:714–723. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Powe D.G., Brough J.L., Carter G.I., Bailey E.M., Stetler-Stevenson W.G., Turner D.R., Hewitt R.E. TIMP-3 mRNA expression is regionally increased in moderately and poorly differentiated colorectal adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Cancer. 1997;75:1678–1683. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Lin J., Tan X., Qiu L., Huang L., Zhou Y., Pan Z., Liu R., Chen S., Geng R., Wu J., et al. Long Noncoding RNA BC032913 as a Novel Therapeutic Target for Colorectal Cancer that Suppresses Metastasis by Upregulating TIMP3. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2017;8:469–481. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.07.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Konishi K., Watanabe Y., Shen L., Guo Y., Castoro R.J., Kondo K., Chung W., Ahmed S., Jelinek J., Boumber Y.A., et al. DNA methylation profiles of primary colorectal carcinoma and matched liver metastasis. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27889. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Hu S., Liu D., Tufano R.P., Carson K.A., Rosenbaum E., Cohen Y., Holt E.H., Kiseljak-Vassiliades K., Rhoden K.J., Tolaney S., et al. Association of aberrant methylation of tumor suppressor genes with tumor aggressiveness and BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;119:2322–2329. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Arora C., Kaur D., Naorem L.D., Raghava G.P.S. Prognostic biomarkers for predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma patients at high risk using nine genes of apoptotic pathway. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0259534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Baldini E., Toller M., Graziano F.M., Russo F.P., Pepe M., Biordi L., Marchioni E., Curcio F., Ulisse S., Ambesi-Impiombato F.S., et al. Expression of matrix metalloproteinases and their specific inhibitors in normal and different human thyroid tumor cell lines. Thyroid. 2004;14:881–888. doi: 10.1089/thy.2004.14.881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Han X.G., Mo H.M., Liu X.Q., Li Y., Du L., Qiao H., Fan Q.M., Zhao J., Zhang S.H., Tang T.T. TIMP3 Overexpression Improves the Sensitivity of Osteosarcoma to Cisplatin by Reducing IL-6 Production. Front. Genet. 2018;9:135. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cao J., Li Z., Yang L., Liu C., Luan X. Association Between Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-3 Gene Methylation and Gastric Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomark. 2016;20:427–431. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2015.0332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.George S., Lucero Y., Torres J.P., Lagomarcino A.J., O’Ryan M. Gastric Damage and Cancer-Associated Biomarkers in Helicobacter pylori-Infected Children. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:90. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Yao D., Shi J., Shi B., Wang N., Liu W., Zhang G., Ji M., Xu L., He N., Hou P. Quantitative assessment of gene methylation and their impact on clinical outcome in gastric cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2012;413:787–794. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2012.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Li Z., Jing Q., Wu L., Chen J., Huang M., Qin Y., Wang T. The prognostic and diagnostic value of tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases gene family and potential function in gastric cancer. J. Cancer. 2021;12:4086–4098. doi: 10.7150/jca.57808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kotzsch M., Farthmann J., Meye A., Fuessel S., Baretton G., Tjan-Heijnen V.C., Schmitt M., Luther T., Sweep F.C., Magdolen V., et al. Prognostic relevance of uPAR-del4/5 and TIMP-3 mRNA expression levels in breast cancer. Eur. J. Cancer. 2005;41:2760–2768. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2005.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Span P.N., Lindberg R.L., Manders P., Tjan-Heijnen V.C., Heuvel J.J., Beex L.V., Sweep C.G. Tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase expression in human breast cancer: TIMP-3 is associated with adjuvant endocrine therapy success. J. Pathol. 2004;202:395–402. doi: 10.1002/path.1528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Bi X., Lou P., Song Y., Sheng X., Liu R., Deng M., Yang X., Li G., Yuan S., Zhang H., et al. Msi1 promotes breast cancer metastasis by regulating invadopodia-mediated extracellular matrix degradation via the Timp3-Mmp9 pathway. Oncogene. 2021;40:4832–4845. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01873-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Celebiler Cavusoglu A., Kilic Y., Saydam S., Canda T., Başkan Z., Sevinc A.I., Sakizli M. Predicting invasive phenotype with CDH1, CDH13, CD44, and TIMP3 gene expression in primary breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:2341–2345. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01333.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Işeri O.D., Kars M.D., Arpaci F., Gündüz U. Gene expression analysis of drug-resistant MCF-7 cells: Implications for relation to extracellular matrix proteins. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2010;65:447–455. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-1048-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Barekati Z., Radpour R., Lu Q., Bitzer J., Zheng H., Toniolo P., Lenner P., Zhong X.Y. Methylation signature of lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:244. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Zhou Y., Zhang T., Wang S., Yang R., Jiao Z., Lu K., Li H., Jiang W., Zhang X. Targeting of HBP1/TIMP3 axis as a novel strategy against breast cancer. Pharmacol. Res. 2023;194:106846. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106846. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Jackson H.W., Hojilla C.V., Weiss A., Sanchez O.H., Wood G.A., Khokha R. Timp3 deficient mice show resistance to developing breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0120107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Shen X., Gao X., Li H., Gu Y., Wang J. TIMP-3 Increases the Chemosensitivity of Laryngeal Carcinoma to Cisplatin via Facilitating Mitochondria-Dependent Apoptosis. Oncol. Res. 2018;27:73–80. doi: 10.3727/096504018X15201099883047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Deng X., Bhagat S., Dong Z., Mullins C., Chinni S.R., Cher M. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells and confers increased sensitivity to paclitaxel. Eur. J. Cancer. 2006;42:3267–3273. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Feng Y.H., Tsao C.J. Emerging role of microRNA-21 in cancer. Biomed. Rep. 2016;5:395–402. doi: 10.3892/br.2016.747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Jones L.E., Humphreys M.J., Campbell F., Neoptolemos J.P., Boyd M.T. Comprehensive analysis of matrix metalloproteinase and tissue inhibitor expression in pancreatic cancer: Increased expression of matrix metalloproteinase-7 predicts poor survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:2832–2845. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-1157-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Elgundi Z., Papanicolaou M., Major G., Cox T.R., Melrose J., Whitelock J.M., Farrugia B.L. Cancer Metastasis: The Role of the Extracellular Matrix and the Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan Perlecan. Front. Oncol. 2019;9:1482. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Lyu T., Jia N., Wang J., Yan X., Yu Y., Lu Z., Bast R.C., Jr., Hua K., Feng W. Expression and epigenetic regulation of angiogenesis-related factors during dormancy and recurrent growth of ovarian carcinoma. Epigenetics. 2013;8:1330–1346. doi: 10.4161/epi.26675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Chen C.C., Lai C.H., Chang C.L., Cheng W.F., Pwu R.F., Tsai J., Wang P.H., Whang-Peng J., Lai G.M. Managing the transition in cervical screening methods for Taiwan: Policy recommendations and perspectives. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2023;122:1213–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2023.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Wirtz C., Mohamed Y., Engel D., Sidibe A., Holloway M., Bloem P., Kumar S., Brotherton J., Reis V., Morgan C. Integrating HPV vaccination programs with enhanced cervical cancer screening and treatment, a systematic review. Vaccine. 2022;40((Suppl. S1)):A116–A123. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Chakravarthy A., Reddin I., Henderson S., Dong C., Kirkwood N., Jeyakumar M., Rodriguez D.R., Martinez N.G., McDermott J., Su X., et al. Integrated analysis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma cohorts from three continents reveals conserved subtypes of prognostic significance. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:5818. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-33544-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Lee J.-Y., Kim Y.T., Kim S., Lee B., Lim M.C., Kim J.-W., Won Y.-J. Prognosis of cervical cancer in the era of concurrent chemoradiation from national database in Korea: A comparison between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0144887. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Yokoi E., Mabuchi S., Takahashi R., Matsumoto Y., Kuroda H., Kozasa K., Kimura T. Impact of histological subtype on survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that were treated with definitive radiotherapy: Adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017;28:e19. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2017.28.e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Liu P., Ji M., Kong Y., Huo Z., Lv Q., Xie Q., Wang D., Chen B., Wang H., Cui Z. Comparison of survival outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix after radical radiotherapy and chemotherapy. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:326. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09401-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Widschwendter A., Müller H.M., Fiegl H., Ivarsson L., Wiedemair A., Müller-Holzner E., Goebel G., Marth C., Widschwendter M. DNA methylation in serum and tumors of cervical cancer patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 2004;10:565–571. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-0825-03. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Wentzensen N., Sherman M.E., Schiffman M., Wang S.S. Utility of methylation markers in cervical cancer early detection: Appraisal of the state-of-the-science. Gynecol. Oncol. 2009;112:293–299. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.10.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kang S., Kim J.W., Kang G.H., Lee S., Park N.H., Song Y.S., Park S.Y., Kang S.B., Lee H.P. Comparison of DNA hypermethylation patterns in different types of uterine cancer: Cervical squamous cell carcinoma, cervical adenocarcinoma and endometrial adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2006;118:2168–2171. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Siegel E.M., Riggs B.M., Delmas A.L., Koch A., Hakam A., Brown K.D. Quantitative DNA methylation analysis of candidate genes in cervical cancer. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0122495. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Dudea-Simon M., Mihu D., Pop L.A., Ciortea R., Malutan A.M., Diculescu D., Ciocan C.A., Cojocneanu R.M., Simon V., Bucuri C., et al. Alteration of Gene and miRNA Expression in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Cervical Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:6054. doi: 10.3390/ijms23116054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Vazquez-Ortiz G., Pina-Sanchez P., Vazquez K., Duenas A., Taja L., Mendoza P., Garcia J.A., Salcedo M. Overexpression of cathepsin F, matrix metalloproteinases 11 and 12 in cervical cancer. BMC Cancer. 2005;5:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-5-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Yang D., Fan L., Song Z., Fang S., Huang M., Chen P. The KMT1A/TIMP3/PI3K/AKT circuit regulates tumor growth in cervical cancer. Reprod. Biol. 2022;22:100644. doi: 10.1016/j.repbio.2022.100644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Zhang Z., Wang J., Wang X., Song W., Shi Y., Zhang L. MicroRNA-21 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion of cervical cancer through targeting TIMP3. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2018;297:433–442. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4598-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Shaker M., Yokoyama Y., Mori S., Tsujimoto M., Kawaguchi N., Kiyono T., Nakano T., Matsuura N. Aberrant expression of disintegrin-metalloprotease proteins in the formation and progression of uterine cervical cancer. Pathobiology. 2011;78:149–161. doi: 10.1159/000324314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Cymbaluk-Płoska A., Chudecka-Głaz A., Pius-Sadowska E., Machaliński B., Menkiszak J., Sompolska-Rzechuła A. Suitability assessment of baseline concentration of MMP3, TIMP3, HE4 and CA125 in the serum of patients with ovarian cancer. J. Ovarian Res. 2018;11:1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13048-017-0373-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Cheon D.J., Tong Y., Sim M.S., Dering J., Berel D., Cui X., Lester J., Beach J.A., Tighiouart M., Walts A.E., et al. A collagen-remodeling gene signature regulated by TGF-β signaling is associated with metastasis and poor survival in serous ovarian cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:711–723. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Lima M.A., Dos Santos L., Turri J.A., Nonogaki S., Buim M., Lima J.F., de Jesus Viana Pinheiro J., Bueno de Toledo Osório C.A., Soares F.A., Freitas V.M. Prognostic Value of ADAMTS Proteases and Their Substrates in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. Pathobiology. 2016;83:316–326. doi: 10.1159/000446244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hu X., Li D., Zhang W., Zhou J., Tang B., Li L. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 expression correlates with prognosis and involved in ovarian cancer cell invasion. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2012;286:1537–1543. doi: 10.1007/s00404-012-2456-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zhang X., Hong S., Yu C., Shen X., Sun F., Yang J. Comparative analysis between high-grade serous ovarian cancer and healthy ovarian tissues using single-cell RNA sequencing. Front. Oncol. 2023;13:1148628. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1148628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Escalona R.M., Kannourakis G., Findlay J.K., Ahmed N. Expression of TIMPs and MMPs in Ovarian Tumors, Ascites, Ascites-Derived Cells, and Cancer Cell Lines: Characteristic Modulatory Response Before and After Chemotherapy Treatment. Front. Oncol. 2021;11:796588. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.796588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Clarke M.A., Long B.J., Del Mar Morillo A., Arbyn M., Bakkum-Gamez J.N., Wentzensen N. Association of Endometrial Cancer Risk With Postmenopausal Bleeding in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern. Med. 2018;178:1210–1222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Di Nezza L.A., Misajon A., Zhang J., Jobling T., Quinn M.A., Ostör A.G., Nie G., Lopata A., Salamonsen L.A. Presence of active gelatinases in endometrial carcinoma and correlation of matrix metalloproteinase expression with increasing tumor grade and invasion. Cancer. 2002;94:1466–1475. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Islami F., Guerra C.E., Minihan A., Yabroff K.R., Fedewa S.A., Sloan K., Wiedt T.L., Thomson B., Siegel R.L., Nargis N. American Cancer Society’s report on the status of cancer disparities in the United States, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2022;72:112–143. doi: 10.3322/caac.21703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Chou H.-H., Fereday S., DeFazio A., Chang C.-L., Bowtell D., Hsu H.-C., Traficante N., Jeong S.Y., Cheng W.-F., Ariyarantne D. Contrasting clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in women with newly diagnosed advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer in Australia, South Korea and Taiwan. J. Gynecol. Oncol. 2023;34:e3. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2023.34.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Coburn S.B., Bray F., Sherman M.E., Trabert B. International patterns and trends in ovarian cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype. Int. J. Cancer. 2017;140:2451–2460. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Kim S.I., Ha H.I., Eoh K.J., Lim J., Won Y.J., Lim M.C. Trends in the Incidence and Survival Rates of Primary Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma Compared to Ovarian Serous Carcinoma in Korea. Front. Oncol. 2022;12:874037. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.874037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Phung M.T., Pearce C.L., Meza R., Jeon J. Trends of Ovarian Cancer Incidence by Histotype and Race/Ethnicity in the United States 1992–2019. Cancer Res. Commun. 2023;3:1–8. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-22-0410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Hakamy S., Assidi M., Jafri M.A., Nedjadi T., Alkhatabi H., Al-Qahtani A., Al-Maghrabi J., Sait K., Al-Qahtani M., Buhmeida A., et al. Assessment of prognostic value of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase 3 (TIMP3) protein in ovarian cancer. Libyan J. Med. 2021;16:1937866. doi: 10.1080/19932820.2021.1937866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Xue C.-L., Liu H.-G., Li B.-Y., He S.-H., Yue Q.-F. Physcion 8-O-β-glucopyranoside exhibits anti-growth and anti-metastatic activities in ovarian cancer by downregulating miR-25. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019;23:5101–5112. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201906_18174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Jin H., Yu Y., Zhang T., Zhou X., Zhou J., Jia L., Wu Y., Zhou B.P., Feng Y. Snail is critical for tumor growth and metastasis of ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2010;126:2102–2111. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Uruski P., Sepetowska A., Konieczna C., Pakuła M., Wyrwa M., Tussupkaliyev A., Tykarski A., Mikuła-Pietrasik J., Książek K. Primary high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells are sensitive to senescence induced by carboplatin and paclitaxel in vitro. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2021;26:44. doi: 10.1186/s11658-021-00287-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Brattinga B., van Leeuwen B.L. Senescent Cells: A Potential Target for New Cancer Therapies in Older Oncologic Patients. Cancers. 2021;13:278. doi: 10.3390/cancers13020278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Kaja S., Hilgenberg J.D., Collins J.L., Shah A.A., Wawro D., Zimmerman S., Magnusson R., Koulen P. Detection of novel biomarkers for ovarian cancer with an optical nanotechnology detection system enabling label-free diagnostics. J. Biomed. Opt. 2012;17:081412. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.17.8.081412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Zeng L., Wang X., Wang F., Zhao X., Ding Y. Identification of a Gene Signature of Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts to Predict Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Genet. 2022;13:925231. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.925231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Januchowski R., Zawierucha P., Ruciński M., Nowicki M., Zabel M. Extracellular matrix proteins expression profiling in chemoresistant variants of the A2780 ovarian cancer cell line. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014;2014:365867. doi: 10.1155/2014/365867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Imura M., Yamashita S., Cai L.Y., Furuta J., Wakabayashi M., Yasugi T., Ushijima T. Methylation and expression analysis of 15 genes and three normally-methylated genes in 13 Ovarian cancer cell lines. Cancer Lett. 2006;241:213–220. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Smid-Koopman E., Blok L.J., Chadha-Ajwani S., Helmerhorst T.J., Brinkmann A.O., Huikeshoven F.J. Gene expression profiles of human endometrial cancer samples using a cDNA-expression array technique: Assessment of an analysis method. Br. J. Cancer. 2000;83:246–251. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Deb G., Thakur V.S., Limaye A.M., Gupta S. Epigenetic induction of tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-3 by green tea polyphenols in breast cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2015;54:485–499. doi: 10.1002/mc.22121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Huh J.E., Baek Y.H., Ryu S.R., Lee J.D., Choi D.Y., Park D.S. Efficacy and mechanism of action of KHBJ-9B, a new herbal medicine, and its major compound triterpenoids in human cartilage culture and in a rabbit model of collagenase-induced osteoarthritis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2009;9:230–240. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2008.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Serala K., Steenkamp P., Mampuru L., Prince S., Poopedi K., Mbazima V. In vitro antimetastatic activity of Momordica balsamina crude acetone extract in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2021;36:2196–2205. doi: 10.1002/tox.23333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Hegde M., Naliyadhara N., Unnikrishnan J., Alqahtani M.S., Abbas M., Girisa S., Sethi G., Kunnumakkara A.B. Nanoparticles in the diagnosis and treatment of cancer metastases: Current and future perspectives. Cancer Lett. 2023;556:216066. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2023.216066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Rajana N., Mounika A., Chary P.S., Bhavana V., Urati A., Khatri D., Singh S.B., Mehra N.K. Multifunctional hybrid nanoparticles in diagnosis and therapy of breast cancer. J. Control. Release. 2022;352:1024–1047. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Ho B.N., Pfeffer C.M., Singh A.T.K. Update on Nanotechnology-based Drug Delivery Systems in Cancer Treatment. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:5975–5981. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Wicki A., Witzigmann D., Balasubramanian V., Huwyler J. Nanomedicine in cancer therapy: Challenges, opportunities, and clinical applications. J. Control. Release. 2015;200:138–157. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Zhou Z., Kennell C., Lee J.Y., Leung Y.K., Tarapore P. Calcium phosphate-polymer hybrid nanoparticles for enhanced triple negative breast cancer treatment via co-delivery of paclitaxel and miR-221/222 inhibitors. Nanomedicine. 2017;13:403–410. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2016.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Li J., Zhang Z., Li J., Cun J.E., Pan Q., Gao W., Luo K., He B., Gu Z., Pu Y. Copper-olsalazine metal-organic frameworks as a nanocatalyst and epigenetic modulator for efficient inhibition of colorectal cancer growth and metastasis. Acta Biomater. 2022;152:495–506. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from International Journal of Molecular Sciences are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES