Abstract
In this study, arylglyoxals, acetylacetone, and 2,6-dimethyl phenol or 2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol are combined to efficiently synthesize a series of 1-(4-(3,5-dialkylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl) ethan-1-one derivatives in excellent yields. These reactions were carried out in acetone at reflux under catalyst-free conditions in the presence of triethylamine as a base for 3 h. NMR, FT-IR, EI-MS, and elemental studies were used to characterize the products’ structural characteristics. The present study has also several benefits, such as excellent yields and the ease of workup procedure, making it an appealing, practical, and acceptable one-pot method for producing functionalized derivatives of dialkyl furan.
Keywords: One-pot reaction, furans, heterocycles, multicomponent reactions, arylglyoxals
1. Introduction
The furan ring serves as an efficient building block for many biologically active targets, as well as the central component of numerous significant polymers and natural chemicals. Several scaffolds containing furans are also preferred structures in medicinal chemistry [1–3]. Furan derivatives are natural products found in various natural sources, mostly in plants, algae, microorganisms, and structural motifs in biologically drug molecules (Figure) [4]. Furans are crucial chemical building blocks for medicines, fine chemicals, and agrochemicals due to their low viscosity and strong reactivity [5,6]. According to reports, furan derivatives exhibit a variety of biological and pharmacological actions, as well as agrochemical applications, including those for treating cancer [7], amoebic infections [8], Alzheimer’s disease [9], diabetes [10], trypanosome infections [11], malaria [12], and parasitic infections [13]. On the other hand, furans are frequently employed in organic thin-film transistors [14], organic field-effect transistors [15], organic light-emitting diodes [16], organic semiconductors [17], and luminescence [18]. These features have led to the design and development of new furan heterocycles with similar properties.
Figure.
Furan-derived natural products and drugs.
Multicomponent reactions (MCRs) are highly significant reactions in which, through a one-pot reaction, more than three different reactants are directly converted into products. This method stands out as one of the most effective ways to synthesize new heterocyclic compounds in a single step. One-pot MCRs are currently gaining traction over conventional multistep organic synthesis due to their efficiency and practicality. This is because MCRs allow for the creation of pharmacologically and medicinally active targets in a single step, thereby resulting in a wide range of molecular complexity [19–21]. These reactions provide a clean reaction profile, high yield, and atom economy while enabling the formation of new bonds in a single pot without the need for multiple stages. As a result, MCRs are becoming effective and potent instruments for both industry and academia in contemporary synthetic organic chemistry.
Considering the role of furan derivatives in the pharmaceutical industry, their synthesis has been one of the goals of chemists. Various methods for preparing dialkyl furan derivatives have been published [22–30]. However, most of these methods suffer from one or more of the following drawbacks: the use of expensive or toxic catalyst, harsh reaction condition, multistep synthesis, the requirement of advanced starting materials, high temperature, and the need for a chromatography column to purify the products. The one-pot synthesis of 1-(4-(3,5-dialkylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl) ethan-1-one derivatives (4) from the reactions between arylglyoxals (1), acetylacetone (2), and phenols (3) is reported here as a follow-up to our research on the one-pot synthesis of new functionalized furans with excellent yields (Scheme 1). In this study, we aimed to prepare dialkyl furan under more simplified conditions.
Scheme 1.
One-pot reaction for the synthesis of 1-(4-(3,5-dialkylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl) ethan-1-one derivatives 4.
2. Experimental section
2.1. General information
All the chemicals used in this study were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland) and were used without further purification. Melting points were determined using an Electrothermal 9100 apparatus. The mass spectra were obtained using a GCMS-QP5050A mass spectrometer operating at an ionization potential of 70 eV. Elemental analyses for C, H, and N were performed using a Heraeus CHN-O-Rapid analyzer. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded using a BRUKER DRX-250 AVANCE instrument with CDCl3 as the solvent and TMS as the internal standard at frequencies of 250.1 and 62.9 MHz, respectively. The IR spectra of products were measured with an FT-IR Perkin Elmer RXI.
2.2. General procedure for the synthesis of products (4a–h)
Arylglyoxal (1 mmol) and acetylacetone (1 mmol) were combined and agitated under reflux in acetone (10 mL) for 1 h. The reaction mixture was then supplemented with Et3N (1 mmol) and either 2,6-dimethyl phenol or 2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol (1 mmol) under the same conditions, and stirring was maintained for 2 h. The resulting product was a yellow solid. After the removal of the solvent, the product was rinsed with cold diethyl ether (5 mL). The residue was recrystallized from n-hexane/EtOAc 4:3 to yield 4.
1-(4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4a)
Yellow powder; yield 93%; mp: 190–192 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1716 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.25, 2.28, and 2.39 (9H, 3s, 3Me), 2.70 (3H, s, COMe), 5.30 (1H, s, OH), 6.82–7.81 (7H, m, 7Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.3, 19.1 and 19.3 (3Me), 30.2 (COMe), 119.7, 119.8, 123.4, 123.5, 125.1, 125.3, 127.2, 128.5, 128.7, 130.3, 132.1, 132.8, 137.4 and 142.6 (14Caro), 149.8 and 157.3 (2C-O), 195.4 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 320 (M+, 8), 305 (M+-Me, 92), 290 (M+-2Me, 83), 277 (M+-COMe, 66), 262 (M+-COMe and Me, 52), 243 (M+-Ph, 68), 77 (Ph, 48). Anal. Calcd. For C21H20O3 (320.39): C, 78.73; H, 6.29. Found: C, 78.69; H, 6.23.
1-(4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-(p-tolyl)furan-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4b)
Light yellow powder; yield 90%; mp: 196–198 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1717 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.19, 2.23, 2.27 and 2.41 (12H, 4s, 4Me), 2.72 (3H, s, COMe), 5.28 (1H, s, OH), 6.83–7.80 (6H, m, 6Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.7, 19.0, 19.1 and 20.2 (4Me), 30.5 (COMe), 119.4, 119.5, 124.6, 124.8, 126.3, 126.4, 127.5, 128.4, 129.5, 131.6, 134.5, 135.2, 137.7 and 143.1 (14Caro), 149.6 and 157.4 (2C-O), 195.2 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 334 (M+, 9), 319 (M+-Me, 86), 304 (M+-2Me, 64), 291 (M+-COMe, 82), 243 (M+-C7H7, 71), 228 (M+-C7H7 and Me, 57), 91 (C7H7, 43), and 43 (COMe, 39). Anal. Calcd. for C22H22O3 (334.41): C, 79.02; H, 6.63. Found: C, 78.99; H, 6.56.
1-(4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methylfuran-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4c)
Yellow powder; yield 89%; mp: 185–187 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1715 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.23, 2.28 and 2.38 (9H, 3s, 3Me), 2.75 (3H, s, COMe), 3.65 (3H, s, OMe), 5.29 (1H, s, OH), 6.78–7.82 (6H, m, 6Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 16.0, 19.3 and 19.4 (3Me), 30.1 (COMe), 53.4 (OMe), 120.2, 120.3, 124.4, 124.5, 125.8, 125.9, 127.9, 128.7, 129.3, 131.3, 133.5, 135.4, 140.2 and 143.1 (14 Caro), 148.9 and 157.6 (2C-O), 195.4 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 350 (M+, 8), 335 (M+-Me, 77), 319 (M+-OMe, 90), 307 (M+-COMe, 67), 292 (M+-COMe and Me, 59), 243 (M+-C7H7O, 63), 107 (C7H7O, 44). Anal. Calcd. for C22H22O4 (350.41): C, 75.41; H, 6.33. Found: C, 75.46; H, 6.28.
1-(4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-(4-nitrophenyl)furan-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4d)
Pale yellow powder; yield 92%; mp: 205–207 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1716 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 2.23, 2.28 and 2.38 (9H, 3s, 3Me), 2.75 (3H, s, COMe), 5.29 (1H, s, OH), 6.78–7.85 (6H, m, 6Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.7, 19.1 and 19.3 (3Me), 30.3 (COMe), 120.8, 121.0, 123.3,123.4, 126.5, 126.7, 128.7, 129.6, 132.3, 134.7, 136.3, 138.6, 141.4 and 143.7 (14 Caro), 149.6 and 158.1 (2C-O), 195.7 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 365 (M+, 7), 350 (M+-Me, 92), 322 (M+-COMe, 68), 307 (M+-COMe and Me, 79), 292 (M+-COMe and 2Me, 37), 243 (M+-C6H4NO2, 51), 122 (C6H4NO2, 33). Anal. Calcd. for C21H19NO5 (365.38): C, 69.03; H, 5.24; N, 3.83. Found: C, 68.92; H, 5.30; N, 3.88.
1-(4-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4e)
Lightyellow powder; yield 94%; mp: 194–196 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1722 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.40 and 1.42 (18H, 2s, 2CMe3), 2.40 (3H, s, Me), 2.70 (3H, s, COMe), 5.19 (1H, s, OH), 6.83–7.79 (7H, m, 7Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 14.9 (3H, s, Me), 29.4, 30.3 and 31.2 (2CMe3 and COMe), 33.8 and 34.0 (2CMe3), 121.3, 121.5, 124.2, 124.3, 125.9, 126.0,128.5, 130.7, 131.3, 135.8, 136.1, 137.9, 138.2, 140.6 and 144.5 (14 Caro), 147.8 and 157.4 (2C-O), 196.1 (C=O).MS (EI): m/z (%): 404 (M+, 8), 361 (M+-COMe, 76), 347 (M+-CMe3, 83), 332 (M+-CMe3 and Me, 55), 327 (M+-Ph, 59), 57 (CMe3, 40). Anal. Calcd. for C27H32O3 (404.55): C, 80.16; H, 7.97. Found: C, 80.10; H, 7.94.
1-(4-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl-5-(p-tolyl)furan-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4f)
Yellow powder; yield 91%; mp: 201–203 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1720 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.38 and 1.39 (18H, 2s, 2CMe3), 2.23 and 2.40 (6H, 2s, 2Me), 2.71 (3H, s, COMe), 5.22 (1H, s, OH), 6.83–7.76 (6H, m, 6Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.3 (3H, s, Me), 22.3 (Me), 29.8, 30.5 and 31.6 (2CMe3 and COMe), 33.6 and 33.7 (2CMe3), 120.2, 120.3, 123.5, 123.6, 126.1, 126.3, 127.9, 128.4, 132.1, 134.7, 136.3, 139.6, 142.2 and 144.3 (14 Caro), 147.6 and 157.5 (2C-O), 195.9 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 418 (M+, 9), 403 (M+-Me, 90), 375 (M+-COMe, 81), 360 (M+-COMe and Me, 73), 361 (M+-CMe3, 78), 346 (M+-CMe3 and Me, 58), 91 (C7H7, 42), 57 (CMe3, 44), 43 (COMe, 37). Anal. Calcd. for C28H34O3 (418.58): C, 80.35; H, 8.19. Found: C, 80.26; H, 8.19.
1-(4-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-methylfuran-3-yl)ethan-1-one(4g)
Yellow powder; yield 91%; mp: 197–199 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1723 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.36 and 1.38 (18H, 2s, 2CMe3), 2.39 (3H, s, Me), 2.69 (3H, s, COMe), 3.64 (3H, s, OMe), 5.25 (1H, s, OH), 6.81–7.82 (6H, m, 6Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.6 (3H, s, Me), 30.2, 30.5 and 31.4 (2CMe3 and COMe), 33.4 and 33.5 (2CMe3), 52.8 (OMe), 119.8, 120.0, 122.4, 122.5, 125.2, 125.3, 128.0, 132.0, 134.5, 137.7, 138.1, 141.2, 143.6, and 145.8 (14 Caro), 148.4 and 157.3 (2C-O), 196.0 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 434 (M+, 7), 419 (M+-Me, 91), 377 (M+-CMe3, 88), 360 (M+-COMe and OMe, 62), 346 (M+-CMe3 and OMe, 67), 327 (M+-C7H7O, 61), 107 (C7H7O, 42), 57 (CMe3, 48), 43 (COMe, 33). Anal. Calcd. for C28H34O4 (434.58): C, 77.39; H, 7.89. Found: C, 77.36; H, 7.84.
1-(4-(3,5-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-methyl-5-(4-nitrophenyl)furan-3-yl)ethan-1-one (4h)
Pale yellow powder; yield 93%; mp: 209–211 ºC. IR (KBr,υ, cm−1): 1723 (C=O). 1H NMR (250.1 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.39 and 1.40 (18H, 2s, 2CMe3), 2.42 (3H, s, Me), 2.73 (3H, s, COMe), 5.25 (1H, s, OH), 6.80–7.84 (6H, m, 6Ar-H). 13C NMR (62.9 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 15.9 (3H, s, Me), 30.2, 30.6, and 31.3 (2CMe3 and COMe), 33.7 and 33.8 (2CMe3), 121.6, 121.7, 123.2, 123.3, 125.8, 125.9, 128.5, 129.7, 133.9, 137.8, 140.3, 143.9, 144.4 and 146.7 (14 Caro), 148.2 and 158.1 (2C-O), 196.2 (C=O). MS (EI): m/z (%): 449 (M+, 7), 406 (M+-COMe, 83), 392 (M+-CMe3, 75), 377 (M+-CMe3 and Me, 72), 327 (M+-C6H4NO2, 84), 284 (M+-C6H4NO2 and COMe, 43), 270 (M+-C6H4NO2 and CMe3, 51), 122 (C6H4NO2, 45), 57 (CMe3, 48). Anal. Calcd. for C27H31NO5 (449.54): C, 72.14; H, 6.95; N, 3.11. Found: C, 72.27; H, 7.02; N, 3.06.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Synthesis and optimization of reaction conditions
As a model reaction for the synthesis of 1-(4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenyl furan-3-yl) ethan-1-one 4a, the one-pot reaction between arylglyoxals (1), acetylacetone (2), and 2,6-dimethylphenol (3) was selected (Table 1). The initial stages of the reaction occurred in water with one equimolar of Et3N present at room temperature. TLC was utilized to monitor the progress of the reaction. Upon compilation of the reaction, product 4a was isolated by filtration, yielding an orange powder. The reaction yield was 40%. In order to optimize the reaction conditions, the reaction was conducted in the presence of various bases and solvents. The results were presented in Table 1. As shown in Table 1, in the presence of 1,4-diazabicyclo [2.2.2] octane (DABCO), the reaction yield was 30% (Table 1, entries 1–5). The presence of KOH and K2CO3 in water resulted in poor reaction yields, and pyridine in water did not facilitate the reaction. Consequently, Et3N was selected as the proper base for this reaction. The reaction yield could not be increased when using EtOH and CH2Cl2 as solvents (Table 1, entries 6 and 7). Although the reaction yield increased in acetone, as well as in DMSO or CH3CN (Table 1, entries 8–10), the rise in acetone was more significant. Further research on the effect of temperature on reaction yield revealed that the reaction yield was higher when carried out in refluxing acetone (Table 1, entry 11). Therefore, the optimal temperature for the synthesis of 1-(4-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl) ethan-1-one 4a is determined to be refluxing. Additionally, employing more Et3N did not impact the reaction yield, indicating that one equimolar of Et3N is the ideal amount of base for this reaction (Table 1, entries 11 and 12). In this reaction, no detectable byproducts were formed. Along with the desired product, small amounts of acetone-soluble dark materials were formed, which were separated from the main product by filtration.
Table 1.
Optimization of the reaction conditions for the synthesis of compound 4a.
Entry | Solvent | Base (mol%) | T (°C) | Time (h) | Yield% of 4a[a] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | H2O | Et3N (100) | RT | 24 | 40 |
2 | H2O | KOH (100) | RT | 12 | Trace |
3 | H2O | K2CO3 (100) | RT | 12 | Trace |
4 | H2O | Pyridine (100) | RT | 12 | N.R. |
5 | H2O | DABCO (100) | RT | 12 | 30 |
6 | EtOH | Et3N (100) | RT | 24 | 40 |
7 | CH2Cl2 | Et3N (100) | RT | 24 | 20 |
8 | DMSO | Et3N (100) | RT | 24 | 33 |
9 | CH3CN | Et3N (100) | RT | 8 | 51 |
10 | Acetone | Et3N (100) | RT | 6 | 64 |
11 | Acetone | Et3N (100) | Reflux | 3 | 93 |
12 | Acetone | Et3N (150) | Reflux | 3 | 93 |
Isolated yields
RT: room temperature.
3.2. Characterization of products
The structures of products were confirmed using FT-IR, 1H- and 13C NMR spectra, elemental analysis, and mass spectroscopic data. For example, the 1H NMR spectrum of 4a exhibited five singlets at 2.25, 2.28, 2.39, and 2.70 ppm (12H, 4Me), and 5.30 ppm (1H, OH). Additionally, aromatic protons were observed as multiplets at 6.82–7.81 ppm (7Ar-H) for the phenyl and phenol moieties [31–33]. The hypothesized structure is supported by the 13C NMR spectrum of 4a, which displayed 21 different resonances. Additionally, product 4a exhibited 13C NMR resonances for the 4Me, 2C-O, and Me-C=O carbons at 15.3, 19.1, 19.3, 30.2, 149.8, and 157.3 ppm, respectively [34]. The 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra of 4b-h are similar to those of 4a. The FT-IR spectrum of compound 4a showed an absorption band attributable to the carbonyl group at 1716 cm−1. The mass spectrum of this compound displayed the molecular ion peak at 320 m/z, which is consistent with the proposed structure.
The one-pot reaction of arylglyoxals (1), acetylacetone (2), and 2,6-dimethylphenol (3) in the presence of Et3N in acetone solvent yielded compounds 4a–h. The reactions exhibited high efficiency, and within 3 h, the products 4a–h were obtained with high yields (Table 2).
Table 2.
One-pot synthesis of 1-(4-(3,5-dialkylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl) ethan-1-one derivatives 4a–h.
Entry | R | R1 | Product | Yield (%)[a] |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | H | Me |
![]() |
93 |
2 | Me | Me |
![]() |
90 |
3 | OMe | Me |
![]() |
89 |
4 | NO2 | Me |
![]() |
92 |
5 | H | tBu |
![]() |
94 |
6 | Me | tBu |
![]() |
91 |
7 | OMe | tBu |
![]() |
91 |
8 | NO2 | tBu |
![]() |
93 |
Isolated yields.
In Scheme 2, the suggested mechanism for this reaction is depicted. Although the mechanistic specifics of the reaction are unknown, a credible explanation for the generation of product can be proposed. Initially, under reflux conditions for 1 h, arylglyoxal (1) and acetylacetone (2) undergo condensation by the Knoevenagel reaction to yield intermediate (5). Next, the Michael addition of phenol (3) to the intermediate (5) produces reactive 1,4-diketone (6). Triethylamine was used as a base during this stage, and the mixture was agitated under identical conditions for 2 h. The Paal-Knorr cyclization of the given 1,4-diketone yielded (8). Ultimately, this intermediate (8) is converted into product (4) via a formal [1,5] hydrogen shift [35].
Scheme 2.
The proposed mechanism for the preparation of compounds 4a–h.
4. Conclusion
The research was one of the first to use derivatives of high-function dialkyl furan instead of diene for a simple and easy one-pot synthesis method. In this method, the reaction between arylglyoxals, acetylacetone, 2,6-dimethyl phenol, or 2,6-di-tert-butyl phenol under reflux in the presence of triethylamine was used to yield 1-(4-(3,5-dialkylphenyl)-2-methyl-5-phenylfuran-3-yl) ethan-1-one derivatives in excellent yields. The advantages of the present method include a straightforward procedure, an easy workup, a quick reaction time, readily accessible starting ingredients, and simple purification of products without using a chromatography column, which make it a new alternative route to other dialkyl furan syntheses.
Acknowledgment
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the Research Council of Chabahar Maritime University.
Funding Statement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the Research Council of Chabahar Maritime University.
Footnotes
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that there are no potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
- 1.Vranova J, Ciesarova Z. Furan in food-a review. Czech Journal of Food Sciences. 2009;27(1):1–10. doi: 10.17221/2843-CJFS. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Emektar K, Kantekin Erdogan MN, Tekin A. Furan formation in some vegetable oils during heat treatments. Food Chemistry. 2022;386(11–12):132744. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Saeed A, Ashraf S, Shabir G, Hökelek T, Floerke U, et al. Synthesis, X-Ray crystallography and HF/DFT analysis of N (diethylcarbamothioyl) furan-2-carboxamide, analyzed by experimental and theoretical methods. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2022;1268(7):133721. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2022.133721. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.(a) Ye QZ, Xie SX, Huang M, Huang WJ, Lu JP, et al. Metalloform-Selective Inhibitors of Escherichia c oli Methionine Aminopeptidase and X-ray Structure of a Mn (II)-Form Enzyme Complexed with an Inhibitor. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2004;126(43):13940–13941.. doi: 10.1021/ja045864p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Lin YL, Tsai YL, Kuo YH, Liu YH, Shiao MS. Phenolic compounds from Tournefortia sarmentosa. Journal of Natural Products. 1999;62(11):1500–1503. doi: 10.1021/np9901332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Liu J, Li F, Zheng X, Su J, Yu Y, et al. Lipase-catalyzed synthesis of polyhydroxyalkyl furans from unprotected sugars and malononitrile. Process Biochemistry. 2021;101:99–103. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.11.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Güzel E, Şaki N, Akın M, Nebioğlu M, Şişman İ, et al. Zinc and chloroindium complexes of furan-2-ylmethoxy substituted phthalocyanines: Preparation and investigation of aggregation, singlet oxygen generation, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties. Synthetic Metals. 2018;245:127–1234. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2018.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sun M, Wan Q, Ding MW. New facile synthesis of furan-2 (3H)-ones and 2, 3, 5-trisubstituted furans via intramolecular Wittig reaction of acid anhydride. Tetrahedron. 2019;75(25):3441–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2019.04.074. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ansari MF, Siddiqui SM, Ahmad K, Avecilla F, Dharavath S, et al. Synthesis, antiamoebic and molecular docking studies of furan-thiazolidinone hybrids. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2016;124:393–406. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2016.08.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kumar N, Gusain A, Kumar J, Singh R, Hota PK. Anti-oxidation properties of 2-substituted furan derivatives: A mechanistic study. Journal of Luminescence. 2021;230:117725. doi: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2020.117725. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mphahlele MJ, Choong YS, Maluleka MM, Gildenhuys S. Synthesis, in vitro evaluation and molecular docking of the 5-acetyl-2-aryl-6-hydroxybenzo [b] furans against multiple targets linked to type 2 diabetes. Biomolecules. 2020;10(3):418. doi: 10.3390/biom10030418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Albayati MR, Kansız S, Lgaz H, Kaya S, Dege N, et al. Synthesis, experimental and theoretical characterization of (E)-2-((2, 3-dimethylphenyl) amino)-N′-(furan-2-ylmethylene) benzohydrazide. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2020;1219:128518. doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128518. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Cui Z, Li Y, Ling Y, Huang J, Cui J, et al. New class of potent antitumor acylhydrazone derivatives containing furan. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2010;45(12):5576–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gomonov KA, Pelipko VV, Litvinov IA, Baichurin RI, Makarenko SV. Synthesis of substituted furan-3-carboxylates from alkyl 3-bromo-3-nitroacrylates. Mendeleev Communications. 2023;33(1):11–13. doi: 10.1021/acs.joc.8b01498. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hendsbee AD, Sun JP, McCormick TM, Hill IG, Welch GC. Unusual loss of electron mobility upon furan for thiophene substitution in a molecular semiconductor. Organic Electronics. 2015;18:118–125. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2014.12.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ando S, Nishida JI, Fujiwara E, Tada H, Inoue Y, et al. Physical properties and field-effect transistors based on novel thiazolothiazole/heterocyclic and thiazolothiazole/phenylene co-oligomers. Synthetic Metals. 2006;156(2–4):327–331. doi: 10.1039/B403699A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hao W, Zou S, Gao J, Zhang H, Chen R, et al. Organic single-crystalline transistors based on Benzo [b] thiophen-Benzo [b] furan analogues with contorted configuration. Organic Electronics. 2018;53:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.10.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kazantsev MS, Beloborodova AA, Kuimov AD, Koskin IP, Frantseva ES, et al. Synthesis, luminescence and charge transport properties of furan/phenylene co-oligomers: The study of conjugation length effect. Organic Electronics. 2018;56:208–215. doi: 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.01.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Heidari M, Anary Abbasinejad M, Ghazanfari D, Akhgar MR. Synthesis of Polyfunctionalized Furans by Three-component Reaction Between Arylglyoxals, 1, 3-Diketones and Isocyanides. Letters in Organic Chemistry. 2018;15(9):773–7. doi: 10.2174/1570178615666180102143215. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Biggs Houck JE, Younai A, Shaw JT. Recent advances in multicomponent reactions for diversity-oriented synthesis. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology. 2010;14:371–382. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Orru R, Ruijter E. Synthesis of heterocycles via multicomponent reactions I. Topics in Heterocyclic Chemistry. 2010;23 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12675-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Komogortsev AN, Lichitsky BV, Melekhina VG. Multicomponent Approach to the Synthesis of 4-(1 H-indol-3-yl)-5-(4-methoxyphenyl) furan-2 (5 H)-one. Molbank. 2021;2021(4):M1292–M1297. doi: 10.3390/M1292. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chiurchiù E, Gabrielli S, Ballini R, Palmieri A. A new valuable synthesis of polyfunctionalized furans starting from β-nitroenones and active methylene compounds. Molecules. 2019;24(24):4575–4585. doi: 10.3390/molecules24244575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Komeyama K, Ohama Y, Takaki K. Direct synthesis of highly substituted furans from acyloins and active methylene compounds catalyzed by bismuth triflate. Chemistry Letters. 2011;40(10):1103–4. doi: 10.1246/cl.2011.1103. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Doostmohammadi R, Hazeri N. Application of silica gel-supported polyphosphoric acid (PPA/SiO2) as a reusable solid acid catalyst for one-pot multi-component synthesis of 3, 4, 5-substituted furan-2 (5H)-ones. Letters in Organic Chemistry. 2013;10(3):199–203. doi: 10.2174/1570178611310030010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tekale SU, Kauthale SS, Pagore VP, Jadhav VB, Pawar RP. ZnO nanoparticle-catalyzed efficient one-pot three-component synthesis of 3, 4, 5-trisubstituted furan-2 (5H)-ones. Journal of the Iranian Chemical Society. 2013;10:1271–1277. doi: 10.1007/s13738-013-0266-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ghasemnejad Bosra H, Faraje M, Habibzadeh S, Ramzanian Lehmali F. An efficient one-pot synthesis of highly substituted furans catalyzed by N-bromosuccinimide. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society. 2010;75(3):299–305. doi: 10.2998/JSC090824025G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dehbandia B, Shafieeb S. Synthesis of functionalized furan using multicomponent reaction of isatin. Iranian Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2019;11(3):2689–93. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Wang Y, Czabala P, Raj M. Bioinspired one-pot furan-thiol-amine multicomponent reaction for making heterocycles and its applications. Nature Communications. 2023;14(1):4086–4102. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39708-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Maghsoodlou MT, Khorassani SM, Hazeri N, Heydari R, Marandi G, et al. The new γ-spiroiminolactone synthesis by reaction between alkyl or aryl isocyanides and 1, 10-phenanthroline-5, 6-dione in the presence of acetylenic esters. Journal of Chemical Research. 2006;4:220–222. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Doostmohammadi R, Maghsoodlou MT, Habibi Khorassani SM. Formic acid as an efficient catalyst for the one-pot preparation of furan-2 (5H)-ones under solvent-free condition. Iranian Journal of Organic Chemistry. 2012;4:939–942. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dehghanzadeh F, Shahrokhabadi F, Anary Abbasinejad M. A simple route for synthesis of 5-(furan-3-yl) barbiturate/thiobarbiturate derivatives via a multi-component reaction between arylglyoxals, acetylacetone and barbituric/thiobarbituric acid. Arkivoc. 2019;(part v):133–141. doi: 10.24820/ark.5550190.p010.837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Latifi M, Talebdizaeh M, Anary Abbasinejad M. Reactions of cyclohexyl isocyanide, dialkyl acetylenedicarboxylates and 1-aryl-2-ene-3-acetyl-1, 4-diketones: one-pot synthesis of highly functionalized 5-cyclohexylimino-2, 5-dihydrofurans. Arkivoc. 2018;(part vii):66–72. doi: 10.24820/ark.5550190.p010.628. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Mehrabi H, Dastouri F, Asadi S, Alizadeh Bami F, Ranjbar Karimi R. One-pot, regioselective synthesis of functionalized indole derivatives: a three-component domino reaction of arylamine, arylglyoxal, and 4-hydroxycoumarin or 4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2-pyrone. Arkivoc. 2020;(part vi):114–125. doi: 10.24820/ark.5550190.p011.151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Breitmaier E, Voelter W. Carbon-13 NMR Spectroscopy: Methods and Applications İnorganic Chemistry. 3rd edn. VCH; Weinheim: 1986. pp. 223–224.pp. 282 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yavari I, Anary Abbasinejad M, Alizadeh A. A novel approach to the synthesis of highly functionalized furans. Tetrahedron Letters. 2002;43(25):4503–5. doi: 10.1016/s0040-4039(02)00821-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]