Skip to main content
Data in Brief logoLink to Data in Brief
. 2024 Mar 16;54:110322. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110322

Geotechnical data compilation for evaporitic rocks in Abu Dhabi, UAE: A resource for engineers

Hasan Arman a,, Ahmed Gad a,b, Osman Abdelghany a,b, Bahaa Mahmoud a, Ala Aldahan a, Safwan Paramban a, Mahmoud Abu Saima a,b
PMCID: PMC10973577  PMID: 38550238

Abstract

The durability and degradability of evaporitic rocks are always a critical concern in geological, civil, and geotechnical engineering applications, necessitating careful consideration for reliable, secure, and sustainable construction. This dataset is based on a comprehensive collection of geotechnical data involving both mechanical and physical properties as well as geochemical analyses for the evaporitic rocks in Abu Dhabi and its vicinity. The purpose of this dataset is to be an important source for construction professionals, engineers, and decision-makers in the region by providing basic insights into the challenges associated with building projects on and in evaporitic rocks. This data is obtained from extensive field investigations and laboratory analyses and will help to ensure that construction activities are carried out safely and efficiently when dealing with evaporitic rock formations. The prevalence of evaporitic rocks in Abu Dhabi highlights the importance of this geotechnical data compilation in facilitating informed decision-making and supporting safe construction.

Keywords: Evaporites, Geoengineering properties, Degradability, Rock strength, Foundation instability, Sustainable development


Specifications Table

Subject Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology.
Specific subject area Mechanical and physical properties and geochemical composition of evaporitic Rocks
Type of data Table
Data collection The studied evaporitic rock blocks were collected during extensive field investigations in Abu Dhabi and its vicinity, UAE. Laboratory tests of mechanical (Uniaxial Compressive Strength, Point Load Index, Indirect Tensile Strength, Schmidt Hardness Value, Sonic Wave Velocity, and Slake Durability Index) and physical (Density, Unit Weight, Specific Gravity, Water Content, Porosity, and Void Ratio) were conducted on the rock blocks and cores with specified dimensions, following procedures and utilizing equipment exclusively adopted in international standard methods (further information is included in the Experimental Design, Materials, and Methods section).
Data source location Region: Middle East
Country: United Arab Emirates
City: Abu Dhabi (24° 0ʹ - 24° 40ʹ N and 54° 0ʹ - 55° 0ʹ E)
The studied evaporitic rock blocks were collected from Abu Dhabi and its vicinity. The coordinates and location of each sampling site are included in Fig. 1 and Table 1. The samples are stored and analyzed at the Geosciences Department, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates.
Data accessibility Repository name: Comprehensive Analysis of Mechanical, Physical, and Geochemical Properties of Evaporitic Rocks in Abu Dhabi, UAE. [1]
Data identification number: 10.17632/z7t3c2dmpz.1
Direct URL to data: https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/z7t3c2dmpz/1

1. Value of the Data

  • In Abu Dhabi, a rapidly developing region with extensive infrastructure projects where evaporitic rocks are prevalent, their study provides a significant contribution to the region. The unique challenges posed by evaporitic rocks in Abu Dhabi, such as their easily degradable nature leading to surface subsidence, sinkhole formation, and landslides. Construction businesses, engineers, and decision-makers can benefit greatly from the insights gained, particularly in addressing foundation issues at construction sites.

  • Raw datasets obtained from extensive field investigations and laboratory analyses are presented on geotechnical (mechanical and physical) properties and geochemical composition measured in evaporitic rocks from Abu Dhabi and its vicinity, UAE. This data will help to ensure that construction activities are carried out safely and efficiently when dealing with evaporitic rock formations.

  • The geotechnical data presented in this dataset will be essential tools for navigating the difficulties of construction in Abu Dhabi and its vicinity.

  • This geotechnical data compilation for evaporitic rocks emerges not only as a scholarly endeavor but as a feasible resource for informed decision-making in the engineering and construction sectors in this region.

  • As urban areas expand, this compilation is a valuable resource for construction businesses, engineers, and decision-makers in Abu Dhabi, providing essential information for safe and effective construction practices in the presence of evaporitic rocks.

  • The presented dataset can be freely and easily used by interested readers. The geochemical data can potentially be correlated with geotechnical parameters. This correlation can be utilized to predict certain geotechnical properties of evaporitic rocks, such as strength, durability, and rock-water interaction, which are crucial for engineering design.

2. Background

In arid regions, the investigation of evaporitic rocks provides useful information due to their complexity and diverse geological, environmental, and geotechnical contributions [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. This distinction points out the need for a comprehensive study that not only addresses origin and paleoenvironmental conditions but also addresses engineering issues, particularly in construction [6], [7], [8].

The importance of understanding the mechanical and physical properties of evaporitic rocks is important for engineers and construction professionals [9,10]. Geotechnical data facilitates quantitative analysis, providing insights into long-term behavior, stability, and resource management [11,12]. These implications extend beyond the immediate regions, resulting in a better understanding of evaporite sequences worldwide [13]. The examination of geotechnical data is a key factor in determining the durability of subsurface evaporitic rocks and underground structures. This knowledge provides the basis for comprehensive risk assessment and early risk mitigation [2,[14], [15], [16]]. Furthermore, examining the geotechnical aspects of evaporitic rocks sheds light on their stability over geological time, aqueous geochemistry, water-rock interactions, and stress redistribution during excavation [17], [18], [19]. These aspects are important to understand the geotechnical properties of the surrounding rocks, thus influencing construction practices.

3. Data Description

The dataset [1] encompasses a wide array of mechanical properties, including Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS), Point Load Index (PLI), Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS), Schmidt Hardness Value (SHV), Sonic Wave Velocity (SWV), and Slake Durability Index (SDI). These properties provide essential insights into the strength, durability, and deformation characteristics of the evaporitic rocks, forming the basis for engineering design and risk assessment. In addition to the mechanical properties, the dataset examines key physical attributes, such as Density (ρ), Unit Weight (γ), Specific Gravity (Gs), Water Content (Wc), Porosity (n), and Void Ratio (e). These parameters offer a comprehensive understanding of the rock's mass, volume, and water-related characteristics, contributing to the assessment of resistance, permeability, and overall geological stability. These data were modeled and validated using HYFIS vs FMR, LWR, and Least squares regression methods [20]. Furthermore, the geochemical composition (major elements) of the investigated evaporitic rocks is presented. The geochemical composition of these rocks provides important information about their chemical characteristics, which is required to assess their suitability for various geotechnical applications by predicting any potential reactions or alterations to determine their environmental stability under specific conditions.

The data obtained from each analysis are presented and described in dataset Tables 1–3 [1]. The dataset directory structure is as follows:

  • -

    Table 1.xlsx: A file representing the mechanical parameters test results of evaporitic rocks, Abu Dhabi.

  • -

    Table 2. xlsx: A file representing the physical parameters test results of evaporitic rocks, Abu Dhabi.

  • -

    Table 3. xlsx: A file representing the concentration of major elements (oxides%) of evaporitic rocks, Abu Dhabi.

4. Experimental Design, Materials and Methods

4.1. The study area and field sampling

The land surface of Abu Dhabi and its vicinity is predominantly composed of a 1–2 m thick gypcrete soil derived from recent eolian. The soil is covered by approximately 2 m of dune sand. The gypcrete soils are underlined by a sequence of Lower Miocene evaporitic rocks (18–20 m thick) [6,8].

Detailed field investigations of evaporite rocks were conducted at twenty-seven different locations in Abu Dhabi (L1-L27) (Fig. 1a and Table 1). 149 representative evaporitic rock blocks were collected from temporary excavations and boreholes that reached depths of up to 20 m (Fig. 1b, c). Evaporitic rock blocks were carefully inspected and those without visible defects such as cracks, fractures or alteration zones were transported to a laboratory and stored under laboratory conditions (Fig. 1d-f).

Fig. 1.

Fig 1

(a) Geological map of Abu Dhabi and sampling locations; (b) and (c) temporary excavations and boreholes; (d) and (e) rock block samples; (f) transportation of rock block samples to the laboratory.

Table 1.

Sampling sites and the tested rock blocks from each site.

Sampling sites Coordinates
Tested Rock Blocks
Long. Lat.
L1 E 54° 30.255′ N 24° 18.767′ 1
L2 E 54° 28.777′ N 24° 14.580′ 6
L3 E 54° 27.659′ N 24° 12.076′ 1
L4 E 54° 27.659′ N 24° 12.076′ 1
L5 E 54° 07.994′ N 24° 05.272′ 6
L6 E 54° 23.128′ N 24° 11.369′ 3
L7 E 54° 15.979′ N 24° 14.033′ 1
L8 E 54° 41.116′ N 24° 33.829′ 40
L9 E 54° 40.622′ N 24° 33.087 14
L10 E 54° 40.624′ N 24° 33.103′ 9
L11 E 54° 40.666′ N 24° 33.521′ 11
L12 E 54° 40.684′ N 24° 33.614′ 2
L13 E 54° 40. 675′ N 24° 33. 545′ 3
L14 E 54° 36.737′ N 24° 21.338′ 3
L15 E 54° 36.508′ N 24° 21.552′ 10
L16 E 54° 36.490′ N 24° 22.347′ 2
L17 E 54° 37.785′ N 24° 23.252′ 1
L18 E 54° 37.010′ N 24° 23.185′ 1
L19 E 54° 40.706′ N 24° 33.848′ 4
L20 E 54° 34.302′ N 24° 21.176′ 3
L21 E 54° 34.495′ N 24° 21.591′ 3
L22 E 54° 35.053′ N 24° 25.128′ 5
L23 E 54° 35.020′ N 24° 21.417′ 7
L24 E 54° 38.969′ N 24° 17.606′ 4
L25 E 54° 34.518′ N 24° 19.585′ 4
L26 E 54° 07.710′ N 24° 06.185′ 2
L27 E 54° 04.979′ N 24° 08.870′ 2
Total 149

4.2. Experiments

Evaporite rock blocks without major macroflaws were transported to the laboratory for the preparation of NX-size cores (54 mm). Following the coring process, core samples were trimmed on both sides, considering the available core length and maintaining a length-to-diameter ratio of approximately 2:1 for subsequent geotechnical measurements. It was ensured that both sides of each sample were identical within the specified limits. Before testing, the diameter and length of each sample were measured, the samples were weighed, and all relevant data was thoroughly recorded in a datasheet. A considerable number of samples were tested in accordance with relevant standards [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28] to determine the mechanical and physical properties of the collected evaporitic rocks (Table 2 and Figs. 2 and 3). During the SHRRB measurements, maximum precautions were taken to avoid any influence from obvious fractures, discontinuities, or proximity to edges, as these factors could influence the results. The SDI tests were conducted applying both distilled water and sea water as the slaking fluid and classified based on Franklin and Chandra [29] from the 1st cycle to the 4th cycle (Id1–Id4) [1]. Density (ρ) and Unit Weight (γ) were measured for natural, dry, and water-saturated samples.

Table 2.

Number of evaporitic rock blocks, mechanical and physical tests.

Parameters Test type Instrument/Formula Number of rock blocks Number of tests Standard
Mechanical Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) (MPa) Matest-Cyber Plus Compression Machine (GM19554) 108 260 (C) ASTM D2938–95 [21]
Point Load Index
(PLI) (MPa)
Matest-Digital Point Load Testers, Set of two spare conical points (A125N, A125–01) 138 357 (C) ASTM D5731–16 [22]
Indirect Tensile Strength
(ITS) (MPa)
Matest-Digital Point Load Testers, Upper and lower plate with seat ball (A125NA, 125–02) 132 327 (C) ASTM D3967–08 [23]
Slake Durability Index
(SDI) (%)
Matest-Slake Durability Apparatus (A130) 146 146 (RL) ASTM D4644–16 [24]
Schmidt Hardness Value
(SHVRB) (N)
Proceq Digital Schmidt Rebound Hammer (SH01–009–0081) 137 137 (B) ASTM D5873–95 [35]
Sonic Wave Velocity
(SWV) (km/s)
Proceq Pundit Lab+ UPV Instrument (CT-133) 115 497 (C) ASTM D2845–08 [36]
Physical Natural Density
n) (g/cm3)
Natural Weight/Volume 144 989 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Dry Density
d) (g/cm3)
Dry Weight/Volume 138 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Saturated Density
s) (g/cm3)
Saturated Weight/Volume 138 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Natural Unit Weight
n) (kg/m3)
ρn * 9.81 * 102 145 989 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Dry Unit Weight
d) (kg/m3)
ρd * 9.81 * 102 138 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Saturated Unit Weight
s) (kg/m3)
ρs * 9.81 * 102 138 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Water Content
(Wc) (%)
(Total Weight-Dry Weight)/ Dry Weight * 100 149 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Porosity
(n) (%)
(Volume of Void/Volume) * 100 138 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Specific Gravity for Cores
(Gs)
Liya-Specific Gravity Test Set (LT-C0066) 144 988 (C) ASTM C97–02 [28]
Void Ratio
(e)
n/(100- n) 138 355 (C) ISRM Standard-1981 [27]
Geochemical X-ray fluorescence
(XRF)
PANaLytical X-Ray Diffraction (X'Pert Pro) 29 29 Buhrke et al. [30]

C = Core; RL = Rock Lumps; B= Block.

Fig. 2.

Fig 2

(a) Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) test on the core sample; (b) Point Load Index (PLI) test on the core sample; (c) Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) test on the core sample; (d) Schmidt Hammer test on the rock block sample (SHVRB) with a natural surface (NS) and saw-cut surface (SS).

Fig. 3.

Fig 3

(a) Slake Durability Index (SDI) test on rock lumps; (b) Sonic Wave Velocity (SWV) test on block (B) and core (C) samples.

X-ray fluorescence (XRF) elemental analysis was conducted for powder (<74 μm) samples (PW 2404 with five analyzing crystals). With an accuracy of 99.99 % and a confidence limit of 96.7 %, the software programs Super Q and Semi Q were used to calculate the concentrations of the tested major elements (oxides in wt.%) [30].

Limitations

While this dataset provides valuable information on the mechanical, physical, and geochemical properties of evaporitic rocks, its practical application in engineering decisions should carefully consider site-specific variables, project requirements, and environmental considerations such as climate, groundwater conditions, and human activities. Moreover, it focuses on evaporite rocks in Abu Dhabi and its vicinity, which does not reflect the diverse geologic setting of this area; in this context, similar results are crucial for other rock types, particularly carbonate rocks.

Ethics Statement

The authors have read and follow the ethical requirements for publication in Data in Brief and confirming that the current work does not involve human subjects, animal experiments, or any data collected from social media platforms.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Hasan Arman: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Ahmed Gad: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Osman Abdelghany: Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Bahaa Mahmoud: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Ala Aldahan: Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Safwan Paramban: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation. Mahmoud Abu Saima: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the United Arab Emirates University, Research Affairs, National Water and Energy Center (NWEC) under the title of NWEC-4-2018-31R193. Article publishing charge for open access supported by a grant from the United Arab Emirates University, Research Affairs, under the title of UPAR-12S163.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability

References

  • 1.Arman H., Gad A., Abdelghany O., Mahmoud B., Aldahan A., Paramban S., Abu Saima M. Comprehensive analysis of mechanical, physical, and geochemical properties of evaporitic rocks in Abu Dhabi, UAE. Mendeley Data. 2024:V1. doi: 10.17632/z7t3c2dmpz.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Arman H., Abdelghany O., Mahmoud B., Aldahan A., Paramban S., Gad A., Abu Saima M. Effects of groundwater and distilled water on the durability of evaporitic rocks. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:5667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32836-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Güngör Yeşilova P., Baran O. Origin and paleoenvironmental conditions of the Köprüağzı Evaporites (Eastern Anatolia, Turkey): sedimentological, mineralogical and geochemical constraints. Minerals. 2023;13:282. doi: 10.3390/min13020282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abu Seif E.S. Geotechnical characteristics of Anhydrite/Gypsum transformation in the Middle Miocene Evaporites, Red Sea Coast, Egypt. Arab J. Sci. Eng. 2014;39:247–260. doi: 10.1007/s13369-013-0857-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Court W., Paul A., Lokier S. The preservation potential of environmentally diagnostic sedimentary structures from a coastal Sabkha. Mar. Geol. 2017;386:1–18. doi: 10.1016/J.MARGEO.2017.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Arman H., Abdelghany O., Abu Saima M., Aldahan A., Paramban S. Petrographical and geoengineering characteristics of evaporitic rocks (Abu Dhabi city vicinity, United Arab Emirates) Arab. J. Geosci. 2021;14:1964. doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-08318-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Caselle C., Bonetto S., Colombero C., Comina C. Mechanical properties of microcrystalline branching selenite gypsum samples and influence of constituting factors. J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng. 2019;11(2):228–241. doi: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.09.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gad A., Abdelghany O., Arman H., Mahmoud B., Aldahan A., Paramban S., Abu Saima M. Geochemistry and Sr, S, and O stable isotopes of Miocene Abu Dhabi evaporites, United Arab Emirates. Heliyon. 2023;9(5):e16033. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Arman H., Abdelghany O., Aldahan A., Abu Saima M., Mahmoud B., Hussein S., Fowler A., AlRashdi S. Strength estimation of evaporitic rocks using different testing methods. Arab. J. Geosci. 2019;12:721. doi: 10.1007/s12517-019-4916-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Giambastiani M. In: Soft Rock Mechanics and Engineering. Kanji M., He M., Ribeiro e Sousa L., editors. Springer; Cham: 2020. Geomechanical characterization of evaporitic rocks; pp. 129–161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Gschwandtner G., Galler R. Long-term behaviour of complex underground structures in evaporitic rock mass – Experiences gained from calculations and geotechnical observations. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018;78:159–167. doi: 10.1016/J.TUST.2018.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Arman H., Paramban S. Evaporitic rocks disintegration under various pH levels as slaking fluid. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2024;49:815–825. doi: 10.1007/s13369-023-08002-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Teixeira L., Lupinacci W., Maul A. Quantitative seismic-stratigraphic interpretation of the evaporite sequence in the Santos Basin. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2020;122 doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104690. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Calligaris C., Ghezzi L., Petrini R., Lenaz D., Zini L. Evaporite dissolution rate through an on-site experiment into piezometric tubes applied to the real case-study of Quinis (NE Italy) Geosciences. 2019;9:298. doi: 10.3390/geosciences9070298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ito M., Azam S. Estimation of hydraulic properties of evaporitic rocks in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2021;80:8677–8691. doi: 10.1007/s10064-021-02404-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Laouafa F., Guo J., Quintard M. Modelling and applications of dissolution of rocks in geoengineering. J. Zhejiang Univ. 2023;24:20–36. doi: 10.1631/jzus.A2200169. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lambert S. Geochemistry of the waste isolation pilot plant (WIPP) site, Southestern New Mexico. U.S.A. Appl. Geochem. 1992;7:513–531. doi: 10.1016/0883-2927(92)90068-E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Menéndez Pidal I., Mancebo Piqueras J.A., Sanz Pérez E., Sáenz Sanz C. Influence of hydrogeochemistry on tunnel drainage in evaporitic formations: el Regajal Tunnel Case Study (Aranjuez, Spain) Sustainability. 2021;13:1505. doi: 10.3390/su13031505. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gschwandtner G.G., Galler R. Long-term behaviour of complex underground structures in evaporitic rock mass – experiences gained from calculations and geotechnical observations. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2018;78:159–167. doi: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.04.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hassan M.Y., Arman H. HYFIS vs FMR, LWR and Least squares regression methods in estimating uniaxial compressive strength of evaporitic rocks. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:14101. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-41349-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.ASTM D2938–95 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 1995. Standard Test Method For Unconfined Compressive Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.ASTM D5731-16 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2016. Standard Test Method For Determination of the Point Load Strength Index of Rock and Application to Rock Strength Classifications. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.ASTM D 3967–08 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2008. Standard Test Method For Splitting Tensile Strength of Intact Rock Core Specimens. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.ASTM D4644–16 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2016. Standard Test Method For Slake Durability of Shales and Other Similar Weak Rocks. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.ASTM D5873-95 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 1995. Standard Test Method For Determination of Rock Hardness By Rebound Hammer Method. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.ASTM D2845-08 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA, USA: 2008. Standard Test Method For Laboratory Determination of Pulse Velocities and Ultrasonic Elastic Constants of Rock. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.ISRM . In: International Society of Rock Mechanics. Brown E.T., editor. Pergamon Press; Oxford, England: 1981. (International Society for Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering) Suggested Methods. Rock characterization testing and monitoring. Commission on Testing Methods. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.ASTM C97–02 (American Society for Testing and Materials) ASTM International; West Conshohocken, PA: 2002. Standard Test Method For Absorption and Bulk Specific Gravity of Dimension Stone. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Franklin J.A., Chandra R. The slake-durability test. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 1972;9:325–328. doi: 10.1016/0148-9062(72)90001-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Buhrke V., Jenkins R., Smith D. Wiley-VCH; New York, USA: 1998. A Practical Guide For the Preparation of Specimens for X-ray Fluorescence and X-ray Diffraction Analysis. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement


Articles from Data in Brief are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES