Abstract
Engineered gut microbiota represents a new frontier in medicine, in part serving as a vehicle for the delivery of therapeutic biologics to treat a range of host conditions. The gut microbiota plays a significant role in blood pressure regulation; thus, manipulation of gut microbiota is a promising avenue for hypertension treatment. In this study, we tested the potential of Lactobacillus paracasei, genetically engineered to produce and deliver human angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (Lacto-hACE2), to regulate blood pressure in a rat model of hypertension with genetic ablation of endogenous Ace2 (Ace2−/− and Ace2−/y). Our findings reveal a sex-specific reduction in blood pressure in female (Ace2−/−) but not male (Ace2−/y) rats following colonization with the Lacto-hACE2. This beneficial effect of lowering blood pressure was aligned with a specific reduction in colonic angiotensin II, but not renal angiotensin II, suggesting the importance of colonic Ace2 in the regulation of blood pressure. We conclude that this approach of targeting the colon with engineered bacteria for delivery of ACE2 represents a promising new paradigm in the development of antihypertensive therapeutics.
Keywords: Bacterial engineering, human ACE2; Lactobacillus paracasei; Ace2−/−; Hypertension; Sex-specific
Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction
Hypertension is the leading cause of death globally, affecting upwards of one in every four men and one in every five women [1,2]. It affects more than 1 billion adults worldwide, and is projected to rise to 1.54–1.58 billion adults by 2025 [3]. The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is a well-established mechanism for regulating blood pressure (BP), targeted by many antihypertensive therapies to reduce the effects of angiotensin II (AngII).
Components of the RAS are found throughout the body, including in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract [4]. Enteric RAS regulates an array of GI physiologic functions, including glucose absorption and inflammation [4-6]. Recently, it has been increasingly recognized that the gut is an important, previously neglected organ that contributes to BP regulation [7-9], and the role of the gut and its resident gut microbiota in hypertension has been shown by us and others [10-12].
Supplementation with probiotics as hypertension treatment has revealed inconsistent results [13-15]. Therefore, genetically modified probiotics have a great potential as next-generation therapeutics [16, 17]. Lactobacillus, a common microbe in the healthy gut microbiota [18] is frequently used as a health-promoting probiotic in fermented foods [19-21], and is reportedly reduced in abundance in hypertensive individuals [22]. This makes Lactobacillus an ideal vehicle probiotic for delivery of engineered biologics. Indeed, such efforts are already underway for a variety of conditions including diabetic retinopathy [23-26], cancer [27,28], infection [29,30], and inflammatory bowel disease [31,32], but to our knowledge, recombinant Lactobacillus expressing human ACE2 has not been tested for hypertension. Since ACE2 is a positive modulator of BP that regulates AngII levels [33], we hypothesized that rescue of Ace2 by colonization with Lactobacillus paracasei engineered to express human ACE2 will ameliorate hypertension in rodents with genetic ablation of endogenous Ace2.
To test this hypothesis, we generated a CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited rat with targeted ablation of the endogenous Ace2 locus on the genetic background of the Dahl salt-sensitive (S) rat. Engineered Lactobacillus expressing human ACE2 (Lacto-hACE2) was administered to address if the human ACE2 can be successfully delivered by the Lactobacillus carrier to rescue hypertension. We observed a significant reduction in BP following colonization with Lacto-hACE2 but only in the females Ace2−/− and not male Ace2−/y rats. This was associated with reduction in colonic but not renal AngII, suggesting a role for colonic RAS in sex-specific regulation of BP. This is the first report demonstrating the utility of an engineered microbes in antihypertensive therapeutics.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Animals and housing conditions
The University of Toledo’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved all animal research protocols (reference numbers: 104573–19 for breeding and 108390–08 for experiments). Experiments were carried out in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, and the results were reported per the Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments Guidelines. All rats were housed in cages with Carefresh paper bedding in the Department of Laboratory Animal Resources at the University of Toledo. The animal rooms were maintained at 70 ± 2°F. The humidity in the animal rooms was maintained at 50 ± 20 %.
2.2. Generation of Ace2 Knock Out (rAce2−/− and rAce2−/y) rat model by CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing
Guide RNA (gRNA, sequence TTTTATGAAGAACAGTCCAAG, University of Michigan Transgenic core services) was designed to target the Ace2 locus of intron 1 and exon 2 with no off-target sites. Oocyte microinjections were conducted at the University of Michigan Transgenic Animal Model Core (Ann Arbor, MI). A mixture of the gRNA (2.5 ng/μl) and Cas9 mRNA (5 ng/μl) was injected into one-cell stage Dahl S rat embryos. Microinjected embryos were implanted into 6 pseudo-pregnant Sprague Dawley female rats. Tail tip biopsies of newborn pups were collected and genomic DNA was extracted. Genotyping was performed using the following primers: Forward (5’TTGGTTTCTTGCCATGCAGC3’) and Reverse (5’GACGCTTGATGGTCGCATTC3’). A potential founder rat was identified by the shorter size of DNA fragment than the non-founder (NF). The identified founder was backcrossed to the S rat, and their pups were intercrossed to obtain homozygosity of the disrupted Ace2 allele. PCR products obtained from the homozygotes were shipped to Eurofins MWG Operon (https://www.eurofinsgenomics.com/en/home.aspx), for DNA sequencing (Sequencher 5.4.6.). The heterozygotes of females were excluded for potential residual effect of endogenous Ace2; the homozygotes with fully disrupted Ace2 locus were used for subsequent phenotypic studies. The female rAce2 KO rat was designated as rAce2−/−, while the male KO rat was labeled as rAce2−/y. The control rat used in this study was the NF rats which underwent the microinjection procedure for genome editing, but retained Ace2.
2.3. Genetic engineering of recombinant Lactobacillus paracasei for delivery of human Ace2 in the GI tract
The Lactobacillus paracasei (LP), which is used as a probiotic and also a gut microbe were engineered to produce the full length human ACE2 as previously described [23]. The construct was created to express and secrete the human ACE2 protein, and given via gavage into the intestinal lumen, as described in Prasad et al.24 (Lacto-hACE2). The humanized ACE2 protein was fused with a carrier protein cleaved upon absorption to facilitate transport across the gut epithelium.
2.4. BP Measurements by radiotelemetry
Four groups of age- and sex- matched NF, rAce2−/− and rAce2−/y rats were weaned at 4 weeks onto a low salt diet (0.3 % NaCl, Harlan Teklad, TD 7034) for 11–12 weeks. Radiotelemetry transmitters (DSI, https://www.datasci.com) were implanted in all rats for continuous measurements of BP. A separate group of age-and sex-matched rAce2−/− and rAce2−/y were gavaged with either Lacto-hACE2 or Lacto-Control, starting from 12 to 13 weeks of age, three times per week for 3 weeks (600 μl, 1010 CFU/rat). BP (systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure) and heart rate were recorded in all rats continuously for 21/23 h once every week using radiotelemetry and the BP and heart rate data on week 3 were analyzed with Ponemah (DSI). All values were collected continuously and averaged every 2 h.
2.5. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction
At endpoint, all rats were euthanized by excess carbon dioxide exposure and proximal colon and kidneys were harvested for biochemical analyses. RNA was extracted from the proximal colon of animals using the TRIzol method as described [34]. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was performed to obtain cDNA using the Superscript III kit (Invitrogen). The resultant cDNA was diluted, and real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis using the SYBR Green master mix (Applied Biosystems) was done for transcripts of glucose transportation, glucose metabolism, anti-inflammatory genes, and sodium transportation. The representative transcripts evaluated including: Glut1 (glucose transporter 1), Eno1 (enolase 1), Ldha (lactate dehydrogenase A), Pgam1 (phosphoglycerate mutase 1); Il6 (interleukin 6), Il10 ((interleukin 10), Il17a ((interleukin 17A), Scnn1a (sodium channel epithelial 1 subunit alpha). Expression of these genes was quantitated for their relative expression to Gapdh using the 2−ΔCt method [35]. All primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table S1.
2.6. ACE2 activity, Ang II and glucose assays
To confirm that Ace2 gene disruption is also functional, ACE2 Activity Assay Kit (#GR3438313–1, Abcam, ab273297) and AngII Assay Kit (#EK-002–12, Phoenix) were used to measure ACE2 activity in the kidney and proximal colon of NF and KO rats, as well as the AngII protein levels in the kidney and proximal colon of Lacto-Control-treated and Lacto-hACE2-treated Ace2 KO rats.
2.7. Statistical analyses
Graph Pad Prism version 9.1.1 was used for statistical analyses. Unpaired t-test was used to compare ACE2 activity, AngII levels, and the relative genes expression levels between Lacto-Control and Lacto-hACE2-treated Ace2 KO rats for both sexes.Two-way ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) with Fisher’s LSD (Least Significant Difference) test was used for BP and heart rate comparisons between NF and KO, as well as Lacto-Control-treated and Lacto-hACE2-treated Ace2 KO rats. Statistically significant values were represented as p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**), p < 0.001 (***) and p < 0.0001 (****). All the figures with scattered dots are expressed as Mean ± SEM.
3. Results
3.1. CRISPR/Cas9-based genomic disruption of Ace2 in the hypertensive S rat reduced renal and colonic Ace2 activity
To detect Ace2 disruption, Ace2 primers were designed against the CRISPR-edited area on the Ace2 locus. Fig. 1A shows a full band in NF and a shorter band in the KO rats, confirming deletion of the Ace2 locus. In Fig. 1B, our targeted gene-editing approach resulted in a 935 base pairs deletion within the Ace2 locus (partial intron 1 and exon 2) in one of the pups, which was designated as the KO rat (the founder rat). As a result of Ace2 locus deletion, both female and male rAce2 KO rats demonstrated significantly lower renal and colonic ACE2 activity when compared to the NF rats (Fig. 1C).
Fig. 1.
Screening and characterization of rats for CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion of the rat Ace2 locus. (A) Amplification of genomic DNA from NF (left full band) and KO rat (right lower band). (B) Ace2 KO rats contained a 935-basepair deletion within the Ace2 locus. Gene ID: 302668 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/302668). (C) ACE2 protein activity in the kidney and colon of male and female NF and KO rats. NF female, n = 4, rAce2−/− female, n = 6; NF male, n = 6, rAce2−/y male, n = 6. Ace2/ACE2, angiotensin converting enzyme 2; NF, non-founder, the control rats; rAce2−/− female Ace2 KO rats; rAce2−/y, male Ace2 KO rats. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 (unpaired t test).
3.2. Disruption of Ace2 increases BP in male and female rats
As is shown in Fig. 2, compared with the NF rats, both female and male Ace2 KO rats showed significantly higher systolic BP (NF female, SBP: 165 ± 2 mmHg; rAce2−/− female, 208 ± 13 mmHg, p < 0.0001; NF male, 145 ± 3 mmHg; rAce2−/y male, 168 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.0001), diastolic BP (NF female, DBP: 115 ± 2 mmHg; rAce2−/− female, 146 ± 9 mmHg, p < 0.0001; NF male, 101 ± 2 mmHg; rAce2−/y male, 114 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and mean arterial pressure (NF female, MAP: 132 ± 2 mmHg; rAce2−/− female, 167 ± 10 mmHg, p < 0.0001; NF male, 116 ± 2 mmHg; rAce2−/y male, 132 ± 6 mmHg, p < 0.0001).
Fig. 2.
Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures in male and female rAce2 KO and NF rats. NF female, n = 7, rAce2−/− female, n = 5; NF male, n = 7, rAce2−/y male, n = 7. ****p < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA followed by LSD test). SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean atrial pressure; NF, non-founder rats; rAce2−/−, female Ace2 KO rats; rAce2−/y, male Ace2 KO rats.
3.3. Oral delivery of hACE2 via engineered Lactobacillus paracasei reduces BP in female but not male Ace2 KO rats
Male and female Ace2 KO rats were treated with genetically-engineered Lactobacillus paracasei to deliver human ACE2 (Lacto-hACE2). As shown in Fig. 3, the rAce2−/− rats gavaged with Lacto-hACE2 for 3 weeks significantly lowered diastolic (DBP, Lacto-Control, 145 ± 8 mmHg; Lacto-hACE2, 133 ± 9 mmHg, p < 0.001) and mean arterial pressure (MAP, Lacto-Control, 158 ± 7 mmHg; Lacto-hACE2, 150 ± 7 mmHg, p < 0.01) when compared to the control group gavaged with the wild-type Lactobacillus paracasei (Lacto-Control). We observed no significant effect of either bacteria on SBP in female rAce2−/− rats. Moreover, we observed no significant differences in systolic, diastolic, or mean arterial pressures in male rAce2−/y rats treated with either Lacto-hACE2 or Lacto-Control, suggesting sex-specific effects of Lacto-hACE2.
Fig. 3.
Systolic BP, diastolic BP and mean atrial pressure in male and female Ace2 KO rats following treatment with Lacto-Control and Lacto-hACE2. Lacto-Control treated female, n = 8, Lacto-hACE2 treated female, n = 7; Lacto-Control treated male, n = 6, Lacto-hACE2 treated male, n = 8. **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001 (two-way ANOVA followed by LSD test; ns, not significant). SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; Lacto-Control, wild type of Lactobacillus paracasei; Lacto-hACE2, Lactobacillus paracasei expressing the human ACE2.
3.4. Lacto-hACE2 reduces colonic but not renal AngII levels
Considering the role of ACE2 in lower BP by metabolism of AngII, we investigated AngII protein levels in the kidney and colon in Ace2 KO rats treated with Lacto-Control and Lacto-hACE2. As shown in Fig. 4A, we observed significantly reduced AngII levels in the colon (Lacto-Control, 0.025 ± 0.003 ng/mg; Lacto-hACE2, 0.0167 ± 0.001 ng/mg, p < 0.05) but not the kidney (Fig. 4B) of female rAce2−/− rats treated with Lacto-hACE2 compared to Lacto-Control. This effect was not observed in the male rAce2−/y rats. These data suggest a role for colonic AngII in regulation of BP in female rats only.
Fig. 4.
AngII protein levels in the proximal colon (A) and kidney (B) of Ace2 KO rats treated with Lacto-Control and Lacto-hACE2. Lacto-Control treated female, n = 7, Lacto-hACE2 treated female, n = 8; Lacto-Control treated male, n = 6, Lacto-hACE2 treated male, n = 7. * p < 0.05 (unpaired t-test, ns, not significant). Lacto-Control, wild type Lactobacillus paracasei; Lacto-hACE2, Lactobacillus paracasei expressing the human ACE2.
3.5. Administration of Lacto-hACE2 decreased relative expression levels of colonic glucose transport- and metabolism-related transcripts in female Ace2 KO rats
Considering the role of AngII in inflammation, glucose and sodium handling [36-40], we tested the relative expression levels of several representative genes of these pathways in the colon. We observed no effect of Lacto-Control or Lacto-hACE2 on the pro-inflammatory genes tested, including Il-6, Il-10, and Il-17α, and no effect of Lacto-Control or Lacto-hACE2 on the relative expression levels of the sodium transporter gene Scnn1a (Supplementary Fig. S1). However, as shown in Fig. 5, we observed significantly lower relative expression levels of Glut1, Eno1, Ldha, and Pgam1 in the colon of Lacto-hACE2-treated female but not male Ace2 KO rats.
Fig. 5.
Relative expression levels of genes related to glucose transport and metabolism in the colon of male and female Ace2 KO rats treated with Lacto-Control and Lacto-hACE2. Lacto-Control treated female, n = 8, Lacto-hACE2 treated female, n = 7. Lacto-Control treated male, n = 6, Lacto-hACE2 treated male, n = 7. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 (unpaired t-test). Lacto-Control, wild type Lactobacillus paracasei; Lacto-hACE2, Lactobacillus paracasei expressing the human ACE2.
4. Discussion
In this study, we investigated the effectiveness of engineered Lactobacillus paracasei bacteria to deliver an antihypertensive agent. Our results show that oral administration of Lacto-hACE2 notably lowered BP in the Ace2 KO hypertensive rat. This beneficial effect was observed only in female rats, indicating a sex-specific reduction of BP. Further analysis revealed that the BP lowering effect in females was aligned with decreased colonic AngII levels, but not renal AngII. This study is the first to demonstrate that Lacto-hACE2 can lower BP in the female rAce2 KO rats.
The Ace2 gene is located on the short arm of the X chromosome (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/302668) and has been linked to sex-specific hypertension due to its role in downregulating AngII [41, 42]. Since gut microbiota is an important regulator of hypertension [43] and colonic Ace2 expression [44], we hypothesized that disrupting Ace2 would lead to higher BP, and that administering beneficial gut microbiota (i.e. Lactobacillus paracasei) expressing ACE2 would prevent hypertension. To test this hypothesis, a novel Ace2 CRISPR/Cas9 gene-edited rat model was generated and validated. We observed decreased renal and colonic ACE2 activities in Ace2 KO rats, confirming the successful disruption of ACE2. As expected, male and female Ace2 KO rats showed elevated BP than NF rats. However, oral delivery of ACE2 via Lacto-hACE2 rescued high BP only in female rats, not male rats, and was contributed by a dip in DBP along with lowered heart rates (Supplementary Fig. S2). In humans, it has been reported that resting heart rate is positively associated with DBP [45]. Additionally, we compared the proximal colon ACE2 activity between Lacto-hACE2 treated males and females to see if females had any advantage in terms of human ACE2 expression compared to males that contributed to the sex-specific blood pressure downregulation. There was no significant difference in ACE2 expression between males and females in the colon (data not shown), however, this sex-specific BP downregulation was accompanied by specifically lower AngII levels and AngII-induced colonic glucose transport and glycolysis transcript expression in the female colon.
In recent years, there has been a growing interest in understanding sex-specific mechanisms of BP regulation. Studies have revealed sex differences in the RAS and its downstream effectors [46]. Females require higher doses of AngII to cause an increase in BP compared to males [47]. Ang1–7, a physiological protective response, is more effective in females [48,49]. Interestingly, clinical evidence shows a disparity in the prescription of anti-hypertensive therapies between males and females [50], with females less likely to be prescribed ACE inhibitors but more likely to be prescribed diuretics [51]. Taken together, these findings suggest that the activation arm of the RAS (AngII) is more important in males, while the protective arm (ACE2, Ang1–7) is more important in females. Therefore, the disruption of ACE2 resulted in more increase in BP in the female rats, and successful restoration of ACE2 rescued the high BP in the females. This could explain the sex-specific BP rescue effect observed in the Ace2 KO rats treated with Lacto-hACE2.
Interestingly, the rescued high BP in the females was associated with reduced colonic AngII, rather than the renal AngII. This may be due to the fact ACE2 expressed by Lacto-hACE2 was mainly accumulated in the gut [24]. Ang II stimulates glucose transport via glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) [38,39], and overexpression of GLUT1 has been observed in Dahl S rats [52]. Furthermore, AngII has been shown to shift energy consumption towards glucose utilization in ACE2-KO mice [53] and directly influences glycolysis [40]. In light of the significant changes in AngII levels observed in the proximal colon of Lacto-hACE2-treated female rats, we compared the Glut1 expression and found a significantly lower colonic Glut1 expression in the Ace2 KO rats treated with Lacto-hACE2. Since AngII directly influences glycolysis [40], we examined the expression of colonic glycolysis-related genes and observed inhibited expression of several transcripts, including Eno1, Ldha, and Pgam in Lacto-hACE2-treated female rats. These three genes are critical glycolytic enzymes, with Eno1 playing a crucial role in aerobic glycolysis by converting 2-phosphoglycerate into phosphoenolpyruvate [54], Ldha mediating the interconversion of pyruvate and lactate [55], and Pgam catalyzing the interconversion of 3-phosphoglycerate and 2-phosphoglycerate during glycolysis [56]. Collectively, our results suggest that Lacto-hACE2 lowered BP in female rats by targeting colonic AngII and AngII-induced glucose metabolism.
As one of the therapies targeting gut microbiota, probiotics is being investigated for hypertension [14,57]. Among them, Lactobacillus is known as a beneficial microbe that decreases BP in both rats [58] and humans [59]. Guilian Yang, et al. [60] found the recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing ACE inhibitory peptide could effectively treat hypertension in male rats. Lactobacillus was also engineered to treat diabetes. Most recently, Ram Prasad et al. [24,25] used the Lacto-hACE2 to treat diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes in mice. However, to our knowledge, recombinant Lactobacillus expressing human ACE2 has not been tested for hypertension.
Our data here provided the rationale for microbiome-based medicine against hypertension by demonstrating the efficacy of Lacto-hACE2 to ameliorate hypertension in the newly generated Ace2 KO rats.
5. Conclusions
The three main findings in this study can be summarized as: (i) the engineered commensal bacteria can effectively deliver antihypertensive biologics and reduce BP; (ii) Lactobacillus paracasei engineered to produce human ACE2 was the specific biologic that proved effective in hypertension; and (iii) the mechanism by which Lacto-ACE2 reduced BP in female rats could be due to decreased expression of colonic AngII and glucose metabolism related transcripts.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Funding from the National Institutes of Health to B. Joe (R01HL1430820), J Zubcevic (R01HL152162) and Q. Li (R01EY028858, R01EY035413), and the National Institute on Aging (R21 AG079357) to T. Yang.
Graphical abstract created with BioRender.com.
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Xue Mei: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing-Original Draft, Writing-Review & Editing. Blair Mell: Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing-Review & Editing. Sachin Aryal: Investigation, Visualization, Writing-Review & Editing. Ishan Manandhar: Investigation, Writing-Review & Editing. Ramakumar Tummala: Investigation, Writing-Review & Editing. Jasenka Zubcevic: Writing-Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. Khanh Lai: Investigation, Writing-Review & Editing. Tao Yang: Investigation, Writing - Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. Qiuhong Li: Writing - Review & Editing, Resources, Funding acquisition. Beng San Yeoh: Investigation,Visualization. Bina Joe: Conceptualization, Resources, Methodology, Writing-Review & Editing, Funding acquisition, Supervision. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Appendix A. Supporting information
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106920.
Data Availability
No data was used for the research described in the article.
References
- [1].Mills KT, Stefanescu A, He J, The global epidemiology of hypertension, Nat. Rev. Nephrol 16 (2020) 223–237, 10.1038/s41581-019-0244-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].Ramirez LA, Sullivan JC, Sex differences in hypertension: where we have been and where we are going, Am. J. Hypertens 31 (2018) 1247–1254, 10.1093/ajh/hpy148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J, Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data, Lancet 365 (2005) 217–223, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)17741-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Jaworska K, Koper M, Ufnal M, Gut microbiota and renin-angiotensin system: a complex interplay at local and systemic levels, Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol 321 (2021) G355–G366, 10.1152/ajpgi.00099.2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Obukhov AG, Stevens BR, Prasad R, Li Calzi S, Boulton ME, Raizada MK, Oudit GY, Grant MB, SARS-CoV-2 infections and ACE2: clinical outcomes linked with increased morbidity and mortality in individuals with diabetes, Diabetes 69 (2020) 1875–1886, 10.2337/dbi20-0019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Wong TP, Debnam ES, Leung PS, Involvement of an enterocyte renin-angiotensin system in the local control of SGLT1-dependent glucose uptake across the rat small intestinal brush border membrane, J. Physiol 584 (2007) 613–623, 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.138578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Li J, Yang X, Zhou X, Cai J, The role and mechanism of intestinal flora in blood pressure regulation and hypertension development, Antioxid. Redox Signal 34 (2021) 811–830, 10.1089/ars.2020.8104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Mishima E, Abe T, Role of the microbiota in hypertension and antihypertensive drug metabolism, Hypertens. Res 45 (2022) 246–253, 10.1038/S41440-021-00804-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Xiong Y, Xiong Y, Zhu P, Wang Y, Yang H, Zhou R, Shu Y, Zhou H, Li Q, The role of gut microbiota in hypertension pathogenesis and the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs, Curr. Hypertens. Rep 23 (2021) 40, 10.1007/s11906-021-01157-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Mei X, Mell B, Manandhar I, Aryal S, Tummala R, Kyoung J, Yang T, Joe B, Repurposing a drug targeting inflammatory bowel disease for lowering hypertension, J. Am. Heart Assoc 11 (2022), e027893, 10.1161/JAHA.122.027893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Yang T, Mei X, Tackie-Yarboi E, Akere MT, Kyoung J, Mell B, Yeo JY, Cheng X, Zubcevic J, Richards EM, Pepine CJ, Raizada MK, Schiefer IT, Joe B, Identification of a gut commensal that compromises the blood pressure-lowering effect of ester angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, Hypertension 79 (2022) 1591–1601, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Masenga SK, Hamooya B, Hangoma J, Hayumbu V, Ertuglu LA, Ishimwe J, Rahman S, Saleem M, Laffer CL, Elijovich F, Kirabo A, Recent advances in modulation of cardiovascular diseases by the gut microbiota, J. Hum. Hypertens 36 (2022) 952–959, 10.1038/s41371-022-00698-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Robles-Vera I, Toral M, Romero M, Jiménez R, Sánchez M, Pérez-Vizcaíno F, Duarte J, Antihypertensive effects of probiotics, Curr. Hypertens. Rep 19 (2017) 26, 10.1007/s11906-017-0723-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jayasinghe R, Effect of probiotics on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials, Hypertension 64 (2014) 897–903, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Yuan L, Li Y, Chen M, Xue L, Wang J, Ding Y, Gu Q, Zhang J, Yang R, Zhao H, Xie X, Wu Q, Effects of probiotics on hypertension, Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol 107 (2023) 1107–1117, 10.1007/s00253-023-12369-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Aggarwal N, Breedon AME, Davis CM, Hwang IY, Chang MW, Engineering probiotics for therapeutic applications: recent examples and translational outlook, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol 65 (2020) 171–179, 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.02.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Zhou Z, Chen X, Sheng H, Shen X, Sun X, Yan Y, Wang J, Yuan Q, Engineering probiotics as living diagnostics and therapeutics for improving human health, Micro Cell Fact. 19 (2020) 56, 10.1186/s12934-020-01318-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Smokvina T, Wels M, Polka J, Chervaux C, Brisse S, Boekhorst J, van Hylckama Vlieg JE, Siezen RJ, Lactobacillus paracasei comparative genomics: towards species pan-genome definition and exploitation of diversity, PLoS One 8 (2013), e68731, 10.1371/journal.pone.0068731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Soemarie YB, Milanda T, Barliana MI, Fermented foods as probiotics: a review, J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res 12 (2021)335–339, 10.4103/japtr.japtr_116_21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Lim PS, Wang HF, Lee MC, Chiu LS, Wu MY, Chang WC, Wu TK, The efficacy of lactobacillus-containing probiotic supplementation in hemodialysis patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, J. Ren. Nutr 31 (2021) 189–198, 10.1053/j.jrn.2020.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Aragon-Alegro LC, Alarcon Alegro JH, Roberta Cardarelli H, Chih Chiu M, Isay Saad SM, Potentially probiotic and synbiotic chocolate mousse, LWT - Food Sci. Technol 40 (2007) 669–675, 10.1016/j.lwt.2006.02.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Dan X, Mushi Z, Baili W, Han L, Enqi W, Huanhu Z, Shuchun L, Differential analysis of hypertension-associated intestinal microbiota, Int J. Med Sci 16 (2019) 872–881, 10.7150/ijms.29322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Verma A, Xu K, Du T, Zhu P, Liang Z, Liao S, Zhang J, Raizada MK, Grant MB, Li Q, Expression of human ACE2 in Lactobacillus and beneficial effects in diabetic retinopathy in mice, Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev 14 (2019) 161–170, 10.1016/j.omtm.2019.06.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Prasad R, Floyd JL, Dupont M, Harbour A, Adu-Agyeiwaah Y, Asare-Bediako B, Chakraborty D, Kichler K, Rohella A, Li Calzi S, Lammendella R, Wright J, Boulton ME, Oudit GY, Raizada MK, Stevens BR, Li Q, Grant MB, Maintenance of enteral ACE2 prevents diabetic retinopathy in type 1 diabetes, Circ. Res 132 (2023) e1–e21, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.322003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Prasad R, Adu-Agyeiwaah Y, Floyd JL, Asare-Bediako B, Li Calzi S, Chakraborty D, Harbour A, Rohella A, Busik JV, Li Q, Grant MB, Sustained ACE2 expression by probiotic improves integrity of intestinal lymphatics and retinopathy in type 1 diabetic model, J. Clin. Med 12 (2023) 1771, 10.3390/jcm12051771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Verma A, Zhu P, Xu K, Du T, Liao S, Liang Z, Raizada MK, Li Q, Angiotensin-(1-7) expressed from lactobacillus bacteria protect diabetic retina in mice, Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol 9 (2020) 20, 10.1167/tvst.9.13.20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Chung Y, Ryu Y, An BC, Yoon YS, Choi O, Kim TY, Yoon J, Ahn JY, Park HJ, Kwon SK, Kim JF, Chung MJ, A synthetic probiotic engineered for colorectal cancer therapy modulates gut microbiota, Microbiome 9 (2021) 122, 10.1186/s40168-021-01071-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Chen H, Li Y, Wang Y, Ning P, Shen Y, Wei X, Feng Q, Liu Y, Li Z, Xu C, Huang S, Deng C, Wang P, Cheng Y, An engineered bacteria-hybrid microrobot with the magnetothermal bioswitch for remotely collective perception and imaging-guided cancer treatment, ACS Nano 16 (4) (2022) 6118–6133, 10.1021/acsnano.1c11601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Tan L, Fu J, Feng F, Liu X, Cui Z, Li B, Han Y, Zheng Y, Yeung KWK, Li Z, Zhu S, Liang Y, Feng X, Wang X, Wu S, Engineered probiotics biofilm enhances osseointegration via immunoregulation and anti-infection, Sci. Adv 6 (46) (2020) eaba5723, 10.1126/sciadv.aba5723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Koh E, Hwang IY, Lee HL, De Sotto R, Lee JWJ, Lee YS, March JC, Chang MW, Engineering probiotics to inhibit Clostridioides difficile infection by dynamic regulation of intestinal metabolism, Nat. Commun 13 (2022) 3834, 10.1038/s41467-022-31334-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Scott BM, Gutiérrez-Vázquez C, Sanmarco LM, da Silva Pereira JA, Li Z, Plasencia A, Hewson P, Cox LM, O’Brien M, Chen SK, Moraes-Vieira PM, Chang BSW, Peisajovich SG, Quintana FJ, Self-tunable engineered yeast probiotics for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, Nat. Med 27 (2021) 1212–1222, 10.1038/s41591-021-01390-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Zou ZP, Du Y, Fang TT, Zhou Y, Ye BC, Biomarker-responsive engineered probiotic diagnoses, records, and ameliorates inflammatory bowel disease in mice, e5, Cell Host Microbe 31 (2023) 199–212, 10.1016/j.chom.2022.12.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Li Q, Grant MB, Richards EM, Raizada MK, ACE2 as therapeutic agent, Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 134 (2020) 2581–2595, 10.1042/CS20200570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Rio DC, Ares M Jr, Hannon GJ, Nilsen TW, Purification of RNA using TRIzol (TRI reagent), pdb.prot5439, Cold Spring Harb. Protoc 2010 (2010), 10.1101/pdb.prot5439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ, Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc 3 (2008) 1101–1108, 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Carey RM, Levens NR, Peach MJ, Regulation of intestinal fluid transport by angiotensin II: mechanisms and physiological significance, Trans. Am. Clin. Clim. Assoc 95 (1984) 93–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Salmenkari H, Korpela R, Vapaatalo H, Renin-angiotensin system in intestinal inflammation-Angiotensin inhibitors to treat inflammatory bowel diseases? Basic Clin. Pharm. Toxicol 129 (2021) 161–172, 10.1111/bcpt.13624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Lavrentyev EN, Estes AM, Malik KU, Mechanism of high glucose induced angiotensin II production in rat vascular smooth muscle cells, Circ. Res 101 (2007) 455–464, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.151852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Tang W, Richards EM, Raizada MK, Sumners C, Angiotensin II increases glucose uptake and glucose transporter-1 mRNA levels in astroglia, Am. J. Physiol 268 (1995) E384–E390, 10.1152/ajpendo.1995.268.3.E384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Borghi F, Morais CL, Silva C, da Silva PC, Grassi-Kassisse DM, The influence of angiotensin II and RAAS blockers on lipolytic and glycolytic activity in isolated adipocytes from Wistar, Wistar-Kyoto and spontaneously hypertensive Rats, Mol. Cell Endocrinol 520 (2021), 111086, 10.1016/j.mce.2020.111086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Hilbert P, Lindpaintner K, Beckmann JS, Serikawa T, Soubrier F, Dubay C, Cartwright P, De Gouyon B, Julier C, Takahasi S, et al. , Chromosomal mapping of two genetic loci associated with blood-pressure regulation in hereditary hypertensive rats, Nature 353 (1991) 521–529, 10.1038/353521a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Yagil C, Sapojnikov M, Kreutz R, Zürcher H, Ganten D, Yagil Y, Role of chromosome X in the Sabra rat model of salt-sensitive hypertension, Hypertension 33 (1999) 261–265, 10.1161/01.hyp.33.1.261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Mell B, Jala VR, Mathew AV, Byun J, Waghulde H, Zhang Y, Haribabu B, Vijay-Kumar M, Pennathur S, Joe B, Evidence for a link between gut microbiota and hypertension in the Dahl rat, Physiol. Genom 47 (2015) 187–197, 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00136.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [44].Yang T, Chakraborty S, Saha P, Mell B, Cheng X, Yeo JY, Mei X, Zhou G, Mandal J, Golonka R, Yeoh BS, Putluri V, Piyarathna DWB, Putluri N, McCarthy CG, Wenceslau CF, Sreekumar A, Gewirtz AT, Vijay-Kumar M, Joe B, Gnotobiotic rats reveal that gut microbiota regulates colonic mRNA of Ace2, the receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infectivity, Hypertension 76 (2020) e1–e3, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Christofaro DGD, Casonatto J, Vanderlei LCM, Cucato GG, Dias RMR, Relationship between resting heart rate, blood pressure and pulse pressure in adolescents, Arq. Bras. Cardiol 108 (2017) 405–410, 10.5935/abc.20170050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Gillis EE, Sullivan JC, Sex differences in hypertension: recent advances, Hypertension 68 (2016) 1322–1327, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.06602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Ji H, Zheng W, Wu X, Liu J, Ecelbarger CM, Watkins R, Arnold AP, Sandberg K, Sex chromosome effects unmasked in angiotensin II-induced hypertension, Hypertension 55 (5) (2010) 1275–1282, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.144949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Brown RD, Hilliard LM, Head GA, Jones ES, Widdop RE, Denton KM, Sex differences in the pressor and tubuloglomerular feedback response to angiotensin II, Hypertension 59 (2012) 129–135, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.178715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Mirabito KM, Hilliard LM, Kett MM, Brown RD, Booth SC, Widdop RE, Moritz KM, Evans RG, Denton KM, Sex- and age-related differences in the chronic pressure-natriuresis relationship: role of the angiotensin type 2 receptor, Am. J. Physiol. Ren. Physiol 307 (2014) F901–F907, 10.1152/ajprenal.00288.2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Kalibala J, Pechère-Bertschi A, Desmeules J, Gender differences in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy-the example of hypertension: a mini review, Front Pharm. 11 (2020) 564, 10.3389/fphar.2020.00564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Zhao M, Woodward M, Vaartjes I, Millett ERC, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Hyun K, Carcel C, Peters SAE, Sex differences in cardiovascular medication prescription in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Am. Heart Assoc 9 (2020), e014742, 10.1161/JAHA.119.014742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Gnudi L, Viberti G, Raij L, Rodriguez V, Burt D, Cortes P, Hartley B, Thomas S, Maestrini S, Gruden G, GLUT-1 overexpression: Link between hemodynamic and metabolic factors in glomerular injury? Hypertension 42 (2003) 19–24, 10.1161/01.HYP.0000075949.19968.EF. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Bernardi S, Tikellis C, Candido R, Tsorotes D, Pickering RJ, Bossi F, Carretta R, Fabris B, Cooper ME, Thomas MC, ACE2 deficiency shifts energy metabolism towards glucose utilization, Metabolism 64 (2015) 406–415, 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Zhou J, Zhang S, Chen Z, He Z, Xu Y, Li Z, CircRNA-ENO1 promoted glycolysis and tumor progression in lung adenocarcinoma through upregulating its host gene ENO1, Cell Death Dis. 10 (2019) 885, 10.1038/s41419-019-2127-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Jiang W, Zhou F, Li N, Li Q, Wang L, FOXM1-LDHA signaling promoted gastric cancer glycolytic phenotype and progression, Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol 8 (2015) 6756–6763. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Jiang X, Sun Q, Li H, Li K, Ren X, The role of phosphoglycerate mutase 1 in tumor aerobic glycolysis and its potential therapeutic implications, Int J. Cancer 135 (2014) 1991–1996, 10.1002/ijc.28637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Khalesi S, Sun J, Buys N, Jayasinghe R, Effect of probiotics on blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials, Hypertension 64 (2014) 897–903, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.114.03469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Furushiro M, Sawada H, Hirai K, Motoike M, Sansawa H, Kobayashi S, Watanuki M, Yokokura T, Blood pressure-lowering effect of extract from Lactobacillus casei in spontaneously hypertensive rats(SHR), Agric. Biol. Chem 54 (1990) 2193–2198, 10.1271/bbb1961.54.2193. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Jauhiainen T, Vapaatalo H, Poussa T, Kyrönpalo S, Rasmussen M, Korpela R, Lactobacillus helveticus fermented milk lowers blood pressure in hypertensive subjects in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurement, Am. J. Hypertens 18 (2005) 1600–1605, 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Yang G, Jiang Y, Yang W, Du F, Yao Y, Shi C, Wang C, Effective treatment of hypertension by recombinant Lactobacillus plantarum expressing angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitory peptide, Micro Cell Fact. 4 (2015) 202, 10.1186/s12934-015-0394-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No data was used for the research described in the article.





