Abstract
Molten gallium trichloride emerges as a promising solvent for oxidative metal recycling. The use of supercritical fluid enhances the performance and kinetics of metal dissolution due to significantly lower viscosity in the reaction media. Additionally, the dual molecular nature of gallium trichloride, existing as edge-sharing ES-Ga2Cl6 dimers at low temperatures and high pressure, or flat trigonal GaCl3 monomers in the vicinity of the critical point and low pressures, creates the possibility to tailor the chemical geometry to a particular metallic species. Nevertheless, the mechanism of dimer dissociation, local structure, and atomic dynamics in supercritical gallium trichloride fluids are not known. Using first-principles molecular dynamics, validated by comparison with our high-energy X-ray diffraction results, we illustrate the elementary steps in dimer dissociation. These include the formation of intermediate corner-sharing CS-Ga2Cl6 dimers, the partial disproportionation of GaCl3 monomers at high temperatures and low pressures, changes in the local environment of molecular entities, and unusual atomic dynamics in supercritical fluids.
Keywords: supercritical gallium trichloride, dimer dissociation mechanism, first-principles molecular dynamics
1. Introduction
Molten gallium trichloride appears to be a promising oxidative solvent for the recycling of metals, including rare earth elements, platinum and transuranium group metals, and heavy pnictogens and chalcogens [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The use of supercritical fluid additionally yields a much lower viscosity in the reaction media, higher diffusion coefficients, and favorable kinetics. Supercritical solvents, particularly carbon dioxide fluid, have already been successfully used for the oxidative dissolution of copper and zinc in the microelectronic industry (see, for example, Ref. [7] and references therein). Supercritical CO2 possesses high surface wetting, extremely low viscosity, low surface tension, and a low dielectric constant, which are beneficial for metal recycling. The dual molecular form of gallium trichloride, existing as edge-sharing tetrahedral dimers ES-Ga2Cl6 or flat trigonal GaCl3 monomers, creates the possibility to adjust the chemical geometry to a particular metal species. This is achieved by choosing either a tetrahedral chlorinated agent [1,2] or a planar molecular shape with an easily accessible gallium counterpart, facilitating the creation of a metal–gallium bond [3]. The dimer dissociation, Ga2Cl6 ⇌ 2GaCl3, basically depends on temperature and pressure [8,9]. Unsaturated gallium trichloride vapor primarily transforms from its dimeric form at low temperatures to a monomeric gas above 700 K (see the inset in Figure 1a). However, the monomeric fraction decreases with increasing pressure and appears to be ≈ 0.20 at the critical temperature = 694 K and pressure = 6.11 MPa [10], Figure 1b. Further increasing the pressure () leads to a monotonic decrease in . These trends are supported by Raman and diffraction studies of unsaturated vapors and experiments conducted under high-pressure conditions [11,12,13,14]. In addition, a small fraction of Ga3Cl9 trimers (2–3%) was found in a low-temperature vapor, disappearing above 600 K [15].
Figure 1.
Calculating the parameters of the dissociation reaction Ga2Cl6 ⇌ 2GaCl3 using the reported total and partial vapor pressures of Ga2Cl6 and GaCl3 [16]: (a) the dissociation constant as a function of temperature and (b) the molar fraction as a function of temperature under different pressure conditions. The insert in (a) represents one of the pressure measurement experiments [16]. The calculation details are given in the Supporting Information.
Clear thermodynamic results do not unveil the exact microscopic mechanism of the dimer dissociation on an atomic scale. We have used first-principles molecular dynamics (FPMD) above the critical point to identify the elementary steps of the dissociation reaction and associated structural changes. The quality of FPMD modeling was validated using high-energy X-ray diffraction results of normal gallium trichloride liquid and supercritical fluid, reported elsewhere [14].
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Validation of the FPMD Modeling by High-Energy X-ray Diffraction
The FPMD modeling, employing the general gradient approximation and PBE exchange–correlation functional (GGA/PBE), used a simulation box of 800 atoms (200 Ga + 600 Cl). The box size was chosen to match the experimental number density. The simulations reveal good agreement with HE-XRD results below and above the critical point, Figure 2. In supercritical gallium trichloride fluid, a strong small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is observed, attributed to mesoscopic voids and cavities. Despite the insufficient size of the FPMD box, a distinct SAXS signature of mesoscopic voids is clearly reproduced in -space, emphasizing the high quality of the first-principles simulations.
Figure 2.
FPMD-derived X-ray interference functions for molten GaCl3 at (a) 400 K and (b) 750 K, compared to experimental data at comparable temperatures; FPMD and experimental X-ray total correlation functions at (c) 400 K and (d) 750 K. The solid lines represent FPMD results, and the solid squares denote experimental data. The difference in the level at higher between the experimental and FPMD results is caused by variations in number density, with a significantly smaller value at 750 K (0.00902 atoms Å−3) compared to 723 K (0.013 atoms Å−3).
The real-space functions mimic asymmetric Ga-Cl nearest-neighbors (NNs), which are related to terminal Ga-Cl() and bridging Ga-Cl() contributions in ES-Ga2Cl6 dimers at 2.12 and 2.31 Å, respectively. These two populations are rather well resolved in normal liquids but overlap in supercritical fluids. The multimodal second neighbor features include Ga-Ga, multiple Cl()-Cl(), Cl()-Cl(), and Cl()-Cl() correlations between 3 and 4 Å, as well as more distant Ga-Cl() second neighbor contacts at 5 Å. A broad unresolved feature, roughly centered at approximately 7 Å, represents a center–center correlation distance between Ga2Cl6 dimers. This separation is easily distinguished in normal liquids but becomes flat and essentially invisible in supercritical fluids.
2.2. Dimer Dissociation in Supercritical Fluid
Our HE-XRD measurements were carried out under high-pressure conditions due to the small volume of the sealed silica tube containing gallium trichloride. At the critical temperature = 694 K and above, the estimated pressure was significantly higher than the critical pressure , with ≳ 3.6. The experimental and FPMD-derived monomeric fractions ( ≈ 0.12 at 723 K and = 0.15 at 800 K, Figure 3a) are reasonably consistent with and the thermodynamic approach, as shown in Figure 1b.
Figure 3.
Experimental (magenta) and FPMD-derived (purple) monomeric fraction in liquid and supercritical gallium trichloride as a function of (a) temperature, and (b) relative pressure ; population of CS-Ga2Cl6 dimers as a function of (c) temperature, and (d) relative pressure .
Further increase in at 800 K was achieved by enlarging the simulation box, thereby decreasing the pressure to = 2.85 and 2.1. The reduced pressure raised the monomeric fraction by nearly a factor of three, reaching = 0.43 at = 2.1 (Figure 3b). In addition, an approximate extrapolation to = 0 yields ≈ 1.0. These results appear consistent with the thermodynamic model, which predicts = 0.96 for unsaturated vapor at 800 K.
Moreover, the partial pair-distribution functions at 800 K and reduced pressure ( = 2.1) show particularly interesting results (Figure 4a). The Ga-Ga partial function at higher pressure and lower temperatures typically reveals a single predominant peak at 3.2 Å, corresponding to short Ga-Ga second neighbor distances in ES-dimers, see the insert in Figure 4b. This single peak transforms into a bimodal feature with decreasing . The high- counterpart at 3.8 Å indicates a significant fraction of corner-sharing CS-Ga2Cl6 dimers (the insert in Figure 4a), which are formed after breaking one Ga-Cl() bond in ES-dimers. The CS-entities seem to be intermediate varieties in the ES-dimer dissociation process.
Figure 4.
FPMD-derived partial pair-distribution functions at (a) 800 K ( = 2.1) and (b) 800 K ( = 3.6); (c) fitting the Ga-Ga partial correlation function at different temperatures and pressures; short Ga-Ga second neighbor contacts at 3.2 Å correspond to edge-sharing ES-Ga2Cl6 dimers (the insert in (b)), and long Ga-Ga contacts at 3.8 Å correspond to corner-sharing CS-Ga2Cl6 dimers (the insert in (a)). The Cl-Cl and Ga-Ga nearest neighbors (NNs) at 2.0 and 2.4 Å, respectively, indicate a partial disproportionation of GaCl3 monomers (GaCl3 ⇌ GaCl + Cl2) above the critical temperature and at lower pressure ( = 2.1).
However, a close inspection of partials over the available - and -ranges shows that a small population of CS-Ga2Cl6 also exists at lower temperatures and higher pressures. The fitting (Figure 4c) allows for a quantitative analysis of the CS-population. The fitting results, shown in Figure 3c, reveal a weak temperature dependence of the CS-population at high and a sudden rise in at reduced pressure (Figure 3d). The observed similarity between and suggests that the transformation ES-Ga2Cl6 → CS-Ga2Cl6 is a first elementary step in the dimer dissociation process.
As a result of dissociation, the shape of the asymmetric Ga-Cl NN peak changes with increasing temperature and reducing pressure. The fraction of Ga-Cl() pairs at 2.12 Å increases, while the population of Ga-Cl() at 2.31 Å decreases.
We should also note the emergence of a small but distinct fraction of Ga-Ga (2.45 Å) and Cl-Cl homopolar bonds (2.01 Å) at 800 K and = 2.1, Figure 4a. The Cl-Cl bonds are associated with molecular chlorine formed in the supercritical fluid resulting from the monomer disproportionation: GaCl3 ⇌ GaCl + Cl2. Gallium monochloride is typically observed at high temperatures, becoming predominant above 1100 K [17,18]. In our case, GaCl remains elusive, either forming intermediate species via homopolar Ga-Ga and heteropolar Ga-Cl bonding or persisting as diatomic molecules (with a residual 50% occurrence in the latter two cases). Schematics of the dissociation and disproportionation reactions are summarized in Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Schematics of ① ES-Ga2Cl6 dimer dissociation and ② GaCl3 monomer disproportionation.
2.3. Local Geometry of Tetrahedral and Trigonal Units
The local geometry of tetrahedral dimers depends on temperature and pressure. Figure 6a reveals the contrasting Cl-Ga-Cl bond angle distributions for normal gallium trichloride liquid at 400 K and supercritical fluid at 800 K with reduced . The function at 400 K exhibits a well-resolved, slightly asymmetric bimodal distribution centered at 89° and 111°. The tetrahedral angular contribution is related to Cl-Ga-Cl triplets involving terminal Cl() species, with a low- minority corresponding to a nearly square ring of the ES-dimer. The Ga-Cl()-Ga counterpart of the ring, , is centered at 88° (Figure 6c), reflecting its folded non-planar nature. In contrast, the bimodal distribution for remaining tetrahedra in the supercritical fluid at reduced pressure is poorly resolved, with a significantly diminished low- angular part of the central Ga-Cl()-Ga-Cl() ring due to a partial ES-CS conversion. Additionally, the tetrahedra become less distorted, with the major tetrahedral contribution centered at 109°. The ES-CS conversion becomes clearly illustrated by the function at 800 K and reduced pressure (Figure 6c). A previously symmetric transforms into a bimodal angular distribution. The emerging high- angular population centered at 112° is associated with CS-connectivity in partially transformed Ga2Cl6 dimers.
Figure 6.
FPMD-derived bond angle distributions: for (a) four-fold Ga4F and (b) three-fold Ga3F coordinated gallium species at different temperatures; (c) for Ga4F atoms at 400, 750, and 800 K; and (d) at 800 K ( = 2.1). The insert in d shows a transient species GaCl3 + GaCl. See the text for further details.
The trigonal GaCl3 units are primarily flat and possess approximate symmetry. The broadened function is centered at 119° and essentially remains intact as a function of temperature and pressure (Figure 6b). Nevertheless, a weak population (≈4%) of distorted trigonal units appears at 800 K and reduced pressure, revealing a low- component centered at 87 ± 4°.
The geometry of GaCl diatomic entities, interacting with trigonal monomers or CS-dimers through the formation of Ga-Ga homopolar bonds (see Figure 5 and the insert in Figure 6d), is characterized by Ga-Ga-Cl bond angles. The distribution is essentially centered at 109° (Figure 6d), indicating a tetrahedral geometry of the arising transient units. Additionally, there is a small population of highly distorted species with peaked at 52°.
Complementary information on local geometry yields the orientation order parameter [19,20]:
| (1) |
where is the Cl-Ga-Cl angle of a tetrahedral ( = 4) or trigonal ( = 3) unit. The average value of changes between 0 for an ideal gas and = 1 for a regular tetrahedral network.
The GaCl4 tetrahedra are strongly distorted in ES-Ga2Cl6 dimers, revealing two different Ga-Cl() and Ga-Cl() bond lengths and a bimodal angular distribution. As a consequence, the order parameter exhibits an asymmetric probability function, centered at = 0.93 (Figure 7a). Nevertheless, a non-tetrahedral geometry at < 0.8 [21,22] is basically missing, as well as regular tetrahedral units with ≈ 1. The tetrahedral function in supercritical fluid at reduced pressure becomes strongly broadened; however, the maximum is slightly shifted to a higher , and the high- tail extends up to = 1. On the other hand, a larger fraction of regular tetrahedra is compensated by a higher population of strongly distorted entities and even non-tetrahedral species (4.6%).
Figure 7.
Orientational order parameter for 4-fold Ga4F and 3-fold Ga3F coordinated Ga-Cl entities: (a) Ga4F at 400 K, (b) Ga3F at 750 K, (c) Ga4F at 800 K ( = 2.1), and (d) Ga3F at 800 K ( = 2.1). The inserts show typical Ga-Cl units of different symmetry. See the text for further details.
The shape of the trigonal function, peaked at = 0.97, remains essentially intact in supercritical fluids (Figure 7b,d), indicating the relative stability of the trigonal geometry. GaCl3 monomers of symmetry are consistent with this maximum. Symmetric (umbrella-type) or asymmetric bending temporarily alters the Cl-Ga-Cl bond angles, reducing the symmetry to or lower, mostly explaining the shape. However, a small fraction (2.3%) of highly distorted pyramids with ranging between 0.70 ≤ ≤ 0.82 exists at 800 K and reduced pressure. Considering the small population of Cl-Ga-Cl angles at about 90° (Figure 6b), these GaCl3 units could have symmetry, including T-shaped planar entities (, = ¾), as shown in the insert of Figure 7d.
2.4. Dynamics in Supercritical Fluid
The much lower viscosity of supercritical fluids compared to normal liquids significantly accelerates the rate of chemical processes involving supercritical solvent [7,23], emphasizing the importance of understanding atomic dynamics in supercritical gallium trichloride for practical applications. The mean-square displacements (MSD) of Ga and Cl, , were utilized for diffusion calculations.
| (2) |
where and are the positions of particle at time and the initial time, respectively; represents the total number of particles in the simulation box, and the angle brackets denote the average over initial times.
Typical gallium and chlorine MSD in supercritical fluid at 800 K and different pressure ( = 2.1 and 3.6) are shown in Figure 8a on a log–log scale. They differ significantly from the MSDs for normal liquid (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information), which exhibit two distinct regimes: (i) below 30 fs and (ii) above 1 ps. The ballistic regime (i) is characterized by a power-law dependence, , with the power-law exponent = 2 [24]. The diffusion regime (ii) reveals a linear dependence of as a function of time , that is, = 1. These two regimes are schematically shown in Figure 8a. In contrast, the supercritical fluid does not exhibit the diffusion regime. Instead, the slope decreases slightly above 1 ps but remains considerably higher than = 1.
Figure 8.
Gallium and chlorine mean-square displacements on (a) log–log and (b) linear scales; (c) experimental GaCl3 viscosity at ambient pressure between 340 and 363 K [25], and DFT-derived viscosity at 800 K and different pressure (2.1 ≤ ≤ 3.6) (this work). See the text for further details.
The gallium and chlorine diffusion coefficients were derived from and using the Einstein relation.
| (3) |
While the supercritical fluid does not exhibit the diffusion regime, the function is not linear on a linear scale and displays an upward curvature. Therefore, the derived diffusion coefficients are only approximate.
The effective diffusion coefficient was defined as and used for viscosity calculation applying the Stokes–Einstein relation.
| (4) |
where is the effective hydrodynamic radius, and and have their usual meanings. For the viscosity calculations, a constant value of 3.65 Å, corresponding to the intramolecular distance Cl()−Cl(), was chosen as . The choice yielded good agreement with experimental viscosity data [25] for normal liquid gallium trichloride (Figure S2).
The derived viscosity for supercritical GaCl3 at 800 K and different pressure, shown in Figure 8c, slightly decreases as a function of pressure between 2.1 ≤ ≤ 3.6 and appears to be comparable with the viscosities of supercritical molecular solvents and gases [26,27,28,29]. As expected, the supercritical = 10−5 Pa s is approximately 200 times lower than the viscosity of normal gallium trichloride liquid, also plotted in Figure 8c.
3. Simulation Details
First-principles molecular dynamics (FPMD), implemented within the CP2K package [30], was used to investigate the local structure and atomic dynamics in molten and supercritical GaCl3. The generalized gradient approximation (GGA) and the PBE [31] exchange–correlation functional, along with Grimme dispersion corrections D3BJ [32], were utilized. The initial atomic configuration was generated using Empirical Potential Structure Refinement (EPSR) program [33,34]. The Lennard–Jones potential well depth ε = 1.0 kJ mol−1 and length σ = 2.5 Å were initially set for both gallium and chlorine. Following the preliminary equilibration, the empirical potential was introduced to start the refinement against the X-ray data until achieving internal energy stabilization. The cubic simulation box, containing 800 atoms (200 Ga and 600 Cl), was sized to match the experimental density. Subsequent optimization was conducted using density functional theory, employing the molecularly optimized correlation-consistent polarized triple-zeta valence basis set and norm-conserving relativistic Goedecker–Teter–Hutter-type pseudopotentials [35]. FPMD simulations were carried out using a canonical NVT ensemble with a Nosé–Hoover [36,37] thermostat. The simulation boxes underwent heating and cooling cycles from 300 K to 800 K using 50 or 100 K steps for duration of 30–45 ps each. The connectivity, ring statistics, and bond angle distributions were analyzed using the R. I. N. G. S. package [38] and a modified connectivity program [39].
4. Conclusions
First-principles simulations of supercritical gallium trichloride fluid at different pressures reveal the elementary steps of edge-sharing ES-Ga2Cl6 dimer dissociation. First, the ES-dimers convert into intermediate corner-sharing CS-Ga2Cl6 entities before further splitting into GaCl3 monomers. A small fraction of monomers disproportionates into molecular chlorine and gallium monochloride: GaCl3 → GaCl + Cl2. Gallium monochloride exhibits elusive behavior, forming transient species with GaCl3 monomers or CS-dimers via Ga-Ga homopolar or Ga-Cl heteropolar bonds (approximately 50% of the total population). The remaining 50% of the population exists as diatomic molecules.
Local tetrahedral geometry in dimers and trigonal geometry in monomers behave differently as a function of temperature and pressure. In normal liquids, the GaCl4 tetrahedra are strongly distorted, showing different Ga-Cl() (2.12 Å) and Ga-Cl() (2.31 Å) interatomic distances and a bimodal bond angle distribution. Two competitive processes appear in supercritical fluids: the ES-CS conversion yields more regular tetrahedra, while temperature-induced enhanced dynamical distortion partly leads to a small fraction of non-tetrahedral geometry. Flat trigonal monomers of approximate symmetry remain essentially intact, with symmetric and asymmetric bending vibrations temporarily decreasing the local symmetry to . A very small fraction (2.3%) of GaCl3 units is strongly distorted, possessing and/or symmetry.
In contrast to normal liquids, the atomic dynamics in supercritical fluids do not exhibit the diffusion regime, i.e., the mean-square displacements , where = 1. Instead, the power-low exponent appears to be intermediate between the ballistic ( = 2) and diffusion regimes, 2 < < 1. Consequently, the diffusion coefficients calculated using the Einstein relation are only approximate. The derived viscosity at constant temperature (800 K) is nearly invariant over the studied pressure range (2.1 ≤ ≤ 3.6, where = 6.11 MPa is the critical pressure). The calculated value = 10−5 Pa s is typical for supercritical molecular solvents and gases and is 200 times lower that the viscosity of normal gallium trichloride liquid.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules29061358/s1, Dissociation Reaction: Calculation Details; Figure S1: Mean-square displacements in normal liquid GaCl3 at 400 K; Figure S2: Experimental and FPMD-derived viscosity for molten GaCl3.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, E.B. and A.T.; HE-XRD, T.U.; synthesis, M.K. (Mohammad Kassem) and M.B.; FPMD, EPSR, and statistics, M.K. (Maxim Khomenko), A.S. and M.B.; thermodynamic modeling, A.T.; paper writing, E.B. with the help of all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the Région Hauts de France and the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche (CPER ECRIN), as well as by the European Fund for Regional Economic Development. The experiments at SPring-8 were approved by the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (proposal nos. 2018B1339 and 2020A1229) and supported by the Centre for Advanced Science and Technology (Japan). M.K.’s (Maxim Khomenko) work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education within the state assignment of the NRC “Kurchatov Institute”. The FPMD simulations were carried out using the HPC computing resources at Lomonosov Moscow State University. This work was also granted access to the HPC resources of IDRIS (France) under the allocation 2023-A0150910639 made by Grand Equipement National de Calcul Intensif (GENCI) and to use the CALCULCO computing platform, supported by Service COmmun du Système d’Information de l’Université du Littoral Côte d’Opale (SCoSI/ULCO).
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Fetrow T.V., Cashman B.K., Carpenter S.H., Janicke M.T., Anderson N.H., Klamm B.E., Mason H.E., Tondreau A.M. Oxidative Dissolution of Lanthanide Metals Ce and Ho in Molten GaCl3. Inorg. Chem. 2023 doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c02774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Carpenter S.H., Klamm B.E., Fetrow T.V., Scott B.L., Gaunt A.J., Anderson N.H., Tondreau A.M. Chlorination of Pu and U Metal Using GaCl3. Inorg. Chem. 2023;62:8462–8466. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Braunschweig H., Gruss K., Radacki K. Reactivity of Pt0 Complexes toward Gallium(III) Halides: Synthesis of a Platinum Gallane Complex and Oxidative Addition of Gallium Halides to Pt0. Inorg. Chem. 2008;47:8595–8597. doi: 10.1021/ic801293e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Freudenmann D., Feldmann C. [Bi3GaS5]2[Ga3Cl10]2[GaCl4]2·S8 Containing Heterocubane-Type [Bi3GaS5]2+, Star-Shaped [Ga3Cl10]−, Monomeric [GaCl4]− and Crown-Like S8. Dalton Trans. 2011;40:452–456. doi: 10.1039/C0DT00985G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Eich A., Schnakenburg G., Beck J. Ga2SbCl7O − A Molecular Gallium Antimony Chloride Oxide Synthesized from a GaCl3 Melt. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014;640:2431–2434. doi: 10.1002/zaac.201400260. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eich A., Hoffbauer W., Schnakenburg G., Bredow T., Daniels J., Beck J. Double-Cube-Shaped Mixed Chalcogen/Pentele Clusters from GaCl3 Melts. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014;2014:3043–3052. doi: 10.1002/ejic.201402230. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Li X., Binnemans K. Oxidative Dissolution of Metals in Organic Solvents. Chem. Rev. 2021;121:4506–4530. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Chusova T.P., Zelenina L.N., Yu G., Stenin Y.G., Semenova Z.I., Titov V.A. Thermodynamics of Vaporization of Gallium Trichloride. Rus. Chem. Bull. 2007;56:1313–1317. doi: 10.1007/s11172-007-0200-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Brunetti B., Piacente V., Scardala P. Vapor Pressures of Gallium Trifluoride, Trichloride, and Triiodide and Their Standard Sublimation Enthalpies. J. Chem. Eng. Data. 2010;55:98–102. doi: 10.1021/je900276q. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Morachevskii A.G., Sladkov I.B. Physico-Chemical Properties of Molecular Inorganic Compounds: Experimental Data and Calculation Methods. Khimiya; St. Petersburg, FL, USA: 1996. p. 109. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Haaland A., Hammel A., Martinsen K.-G., Tremmel J., Volden H.V. Molecular Structures of Monomeric Gallium Trichloride, Indium Trichloride and Lead Tetrachloride by Gas Electron Diffraction. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1992:2209–2214. doi: 10.1039/dt9920002209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Petrov V.M., Giricheva N.I., Girichev G.V., Titov V.A., Chusova T.P. Electron Diffraction Study of Saturated Vapor of Gallium Trichloride: Vapor Composition and Structure of Molecular Species. J. Struct. Chem. 1992;32:498–502. doi: 10.1007/BF00753028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Salyulev A.B., Zakiryanova I.D. Raman Spectra of Solid, Molten, and Gaseous Gallium Trichloride. Russ. Metall. 2010;2010:108–111. doi: 10.1134/S0036029510020060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Usuki T., Bokova M., Kassem M., Ohara K., Hannon A.C., Bychkov E. Dimeric Molecular Structure of Molten Gallium Trichloride and a Hidden Evolution toward a Possible Liquid–Liquid Transition. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2019;123:10260–10266. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b08307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tsirelnikov V.I., Lokshin B.V., Melnikov P., Nascimento V.A. On the Existence of the Trimer of Gallium Trichloride in the Gaseous Phase. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2012;638:2335–2339. doi: 10.1002/zaac.201200282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fischer W., Jübermann O. Über thermische Eigenschaften von Halogeniden. 10. Dampfdrucke und Dampfdichten von Gallium III—Halogeniden. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1936;227:227–236. doi: 10.1002/zaac.19362270303. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hillel R., Ait-Hou A., Berthet M.P., Bouix J. Le Système Gazeux Gallium-Chlore: Etude par Spectrométrie Raman. J. Raman Spectrosc. 1987;18:259–264. doi: 10.1002/jrs.1250180406. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bernard C., Chatillon C. Thermodynamics of (Gallium + Chlorine) (g) I. Vapour-Pressure Measurements and Thermodynamic Stability of GaCl(g), GaCl2(g), GaCl3(g), Ga2Cl2(g), Ga2Cl4(g), and Ga2Cl6(g) J. Chem. Thermodynamics. 1988;20:129–141. doi: 10.1016/0021-9614(88)90148-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chau P.-L., Hardwick A.J. A New Order Parameter for Tetrahedral Configurations. Mol. Phys. 1998;93:511–518. doi: 10.1080/002689798169195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Errington J.R., Debenedetti P.G. Relationship between Structural Order and the Anomalies of Liquid Water. Nature. 2001;409:318–321. doi: 10.1038/35053024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Caravati S., Bernasconi M., Kühne T.D., Krack M., Parrinello M. Coexistence of Tetrahedral- and Octahedral-like Sites in Amorphous Phase Change Materials. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2007;91:171906. doi: 10.1063/1.2801626. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tverjanovich A., Khomenko M., Benmore C.J., Bokova M., Sokolov A., Fontanari D., Kassem M., Usuki T., Bychkov E. Bulk Glassy GeTe2: A Missing Member of the tetrahedral GeX2 Family and a Precursor for the Next Generation of Phase-Change Materials. Chem. Mater. 2021;33:1031–1045. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.0c04409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Visintin P.M., Bessel C.A., White P.S., Schauer C.K., DeSimone J.M. Oxidative Dissolution of Copper and Zinc Metal in Carbon Dioxide with Tert-Butyl Peracetate and a β-Diketone Chelating Agent. Inorg. Chem. 2005;44:316–324. doi: 10.1021/ic049765o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang R., Chavez I., Taute K.M., Lukić B., Jeney S., Raizen M.G., Florin E.-L. Direct Observation of the Full Transition from Ballistic to Diffusive Brownian Motion in a Liquid. Nat. Phys. 2011;7:576–580. doi: 10.1038/nphys1953. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Greenwood N.N., Wade K. Some Physical Properties of Molten and Supercooled Gallium Trichloride. J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 1957;3:349–356. doi: 10.1016/0022-1902(57)80040-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Watson J.T.R., Basu R.S., Sengers J.V. An Improved Representative Equation for the Dynamic Viscosity of Water Substance. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data. 1980;9:1255–1290. doi: 10.1063/1.555631. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Dalin G.A., West J.R. The Viscosity of Sulfur Vapor. J. Phys. Chem. 1950;54:1215–1221. doi: 10.1021/j150482a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lemmon E.W., Jacobsen R.T. Viscosity and Thermal Conductivity Equations for Nitrogen, Oxygen, Argon, and Air. Intern. J. Thermophys. 2004;25:21–69. doi: 10.1023/B:IJOT.0000022327.04529.f3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Dhanuskodi R., Arunagiri A., Anantharaman N. Analysis of Variation in Properties and its Impact on Heat Transfer in Sub and Supercritical Conditions of Water/Steam. Intern. J. Chem. Eng. Appl. 2011;2:320–325. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kühne T.D., Iannuzzi M., Del Ben M., Rybkin V.V., Seewald P., Stein F., Laino T., Khaliullin R.Z., Schütt O., Schiffmann F., et al. CP2K: An Electronic Structure and Molecular Dynamics Software Package—Quickstep: Efficient and Accurate Electronic Structure Calculations. J. Chem. Phys. 2020;152:194103. doi: 10.1063/5.0007045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Perdew J.P., Burke K., Ernzerhof M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996;77:3865–3868. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Grimme S., Ehrlich S., Goerigk L. Effect of the Damping Function in Dispersion Corrected Density Functional Theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2011;32:1456–1465. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Soper A.K. Partial Structure Factors from Disordered Materials Diffraction Data: An Approach using Empirical Potential Structure Refinement. Phys. Rev. B. 2005;72:104204. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.104204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Soper A.K. Computer Simulation as a Tool for the Interpretation of Total Scattering Data from Glasses and Liquids. Mol. Simul. 2012;38:1171–1185. doi: 10.1080/08927022.2012.732222. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Goedecker S., Teter M., Hutter J. Separable Dual-Space Gaussian Pseudopotentials. Phys. Rev. B. 1996;54:1703–1710. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nosé S. A Molecular Dynamics Method for Simulations in the Canonical Ensemble. Mol. Phys. 1984;52:255–268. doi: 10.1080/00268978400101201. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hoover W.G. Canonical Dynamics: Equilibrium Phase-Space Distributions. Phys. Rev. A. 1985;31:1695–1697. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Le Roux S., Jund P. Ring Statistics Analysis of Topological Networks: New Approach and Application to Amorphous GeS2 and SiO2 Systems. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2010;49:70–83. doi: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.04.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kohara S., Ohno H., Tabaka M., Usuki T., Morita H., Suzuya K., Akola J., Pusztai L. Lead Silicate Glasses: Binary Network-Former Glasses with Large Amounts of Free Volume. Phys. Rev. B. 2010;82:134209. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.134209. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.








