Skip to main content
Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery logoLink to Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery
. 2024 Feb 2;30(2):107–113. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.66059

Evaluating emergency department visits for spontaneous and traumatic pneumomediastinum: a retrospective analysis

Nurullah İshak Işık 1,, Gülhan Kurtoğlu Çelik 2, Bahattin Işık 3
PMCID: PMC10977508  PMID: 38305659

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pneumomediastinum signifies the accumulation of air within the mediastinum. This condition can develop spontaneously or as a secondary condition due to trauma or iatrogenic causes. Although rare, it is part of a wide differential diagnosis scale due to its most common presenting symptoms: chest pain and shortness of breath.

METHODS:

Our study is a retrospective, observational, and cohort investigation. It included patients who presented to the emergency department and were diagnosed with pneumomediastinum through computed tomography. The study evaluated patients’ sociodemographic features, methods of presentation, chest tube insertion, other surgical procedures, outcomes, and patient dispositions. The primary outcome of the study focused on the results of traumatic and spontaneous pneumomediastinum: hospital admission, the necessity for thoracostomy tube insertion, requirement for surgical procedures, and mortality. The secondary aim was to determine the relationship between other clinical features and laboratory parameters and their impact on the outcomes.

RESULTS:

The study comprised 67 cases. The average age of the cases was 44.89±2.41 years. Of the cases, 67.2% (n=45) were male. In terms of development, 40.3% (n=27) of cases were classified as spontaneous, and 59.7% (n=40) were post-trauma pneumomediastinum diagnoses. Among symptoms, 50.7% (n=34) of patients experienced dyspnea, and 49.3% (n=33) presented with chest pain, while symptoms like cough, fever, nausea, vomiting, and swallowing difficulty were reported in varying proportions. Among the patients, 9.0% (n=6) had lung disease, 29.9% (n=20) had comorbidities, 3.0% (n=2) had a history of substance use, 14.9% (n=10) underwent thoracostomy tube insertion, and 20.9% (n=14) required surgical procedures. While 35.8% (n=24) of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, 13.4% (n=9) died. The mean total hospital stay was calculated as 8.68±1.12 days. No statistically significant relationship was found between the development of pneumomediastinum and hospital admission (p=0.507).

CONCLUSION:

Upon examining the causes of pneumomediastinum cases, it was observed that patients with a history of trauma required thoracostomy tube insertion and surgical intervention more frequently. However, when classified as spontaneous or traumatic, both groups exhibited similar clinical courses and outcomes. Both groups demonstrated favorable clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Pneumomediastinum, spontaneous, traumatic, emergency department

INTRODUCTION

“Pneumomediastinum” is the term used to describe the presence of air in the mediastinum.[1] This condition can develop either as spontaneous or secondary (due to trauma or iatrogenic causes). In primary cases, even though there might be an underlying predisposing condition (such as smoking, asthma, pneumonia, etc.), they are termed spontaneous due to the manner in which they develop. Secondary pneumomediastinum, on the other hand, is generally described in the literature as trauma-induced, including iatrogenic pneumomediastinum, and is referred to as traumatic pneumomediastinum.[2] The entry of air into the mediastinum occurs as a result of damage to mediastinal-associated structures (such as alveolar rupture) or traumas that disrupt the integrity of the wall. The mechanism most commonly implicated in spontaneous occurrences is the Macklin phenomenon.[2]

Patients may present with symptoms such as shortness of breath, chest pain, difficulty swallowing, neck pain, odynophagia, etc.[1] As part of the initial diagnostic approach, obtaining a chest X-ray is generally recommended.[3] Chest X-rays yield accurate results in up to 90% of cases; however, a lung computed tomography (CT) scan is the most accurate test for definitive exclusion and diagnosis.[4]

The reported prevalence of pneumomediastinum is approximately around 0.002%.[2] The most common presenting symptoms are chest pain and shortness of breath. This renders pneumomediastinum a small component within a broad differential diagnosis spectrum. Therefore, although obtaining a CT scan might seem excessive, it can often preempt unnecessary hospitalization and healthcare expenditures for pneumomediastinum, which is typically considered a self-limiting benign clinical condition.

The presence of air in the mediastinum is generally perceived as secondary to an underlying cause and is evaluated more as a reflection of a clinical picture rather than an illness. Most cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum follow a benign course, and even traumatic cases, while often associated with the severity of the trauma, generally tend to have a favorable prognosis. Treatment typically involves conservative monitoring and observation, with surgical intervention and treatment planned for fewer cases.[5] Despite all this information, pneumomediastinum continues to be a feared condition due to its low prevalence. Additionally, concerns related to traumatic pneumomediastinum have diminished in the current literature, but the condition still remains a source of fear.[6]

In our research, we aimed to investigate the emergency department presentations of definitively diagnosed spontaneous and traumatic pneumomediastinum. Our objectives included examining how patients presented, any accompanying pathologies, surgical interventions performed, length of hospital stays, and disease-related mortality rates. By doing so, we aimed to contribute to the understanding of the presentation, patient outcomes, and risk factors related to pneumomediastinum, in addition to existing data. We also sought to raise awareness among emergency department physicians regarding this condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our study is a retrospective, observational, and cohort study. After obtaining ethical approval, we initiated the study to identify patients who presented to the emergency department between 01/02/2019 and 01/02/2022 and were diagnosed with pneumomediastinum via computed tomography. We aimed to include patients who sought emergency care within the specified dates and underwent thoracic CT scans, which contained the terms ’pneumomediastinum’ or ’air in the mediastinum’ in their radiology reports. Patients with missing data, those diagnosed with mediastinal lesions but not ultimately diagnosed with pneumomediastinum, and those under 18 years old were excluded from the study.

As patient data, we recorded age, gender, presenting complaints, presence of known lung diseases (such as asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), emphysema, etc.), presence of comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, hypertension, coronary artery disease, malignancy, etc.), the development of pneumomediastinum (spontaneous or traumatic), the presence of additional systemic trauma in patients presenting with trauma-related chest trauma, the need for hospital admission, and the length of stay for admitted patients. Other recorded factors included the application of a chest tube, surgical procedures performed apart from chest tube insertion, mortality, and blood parameters (pH, HCO3, lactate, troponin I).

The presenting complaints included symptoms recorded in the patient’s history. The development of pneumomediastinum was classified into traumatic and spontaneous categories. Patients with trauma exposure and those who developed iatrogenic pneumomediastinum as a result of procedures (such as endoscopy, central catheters, etc.) were included in the traumatic group. Patients without a history of trauma and without traumatic findings were considered to have spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Additional diseases included all conditions other than chronic lung diseases (such as hypertension, diabetes, etc.). In-hospital mortality was calculated.

The application of a chest tube was documented. Chest tubes were initially inserted by emergency medicine or chest surgery specialists based on urgency and were subsequently reviewed by chest surgeons. All surgical procedures performed during the patient’s hospital stay were meticulously recorded as a requirement for surgical intervention.

Additional trauma, which encompassed injuries beyond pneumomediastinum such as external injuries, was recorded exclusively in the traumatic group. Among the blood parameters, pH, bicarbonate, and lactate were recorded for assessing mediastinal tamponade and the development of shock during the acute phase. Troponin I was recorded for myocardial damage that might occur due to mediastinal trauma and compression.

The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the outcomes in terms of hospital admission, chest tube insertion, need for surgical intervention, and mortality in both traumatic and spontaneous pneumomediastinum cases. The secondary endpoints aimed to establish the relationship between other clinical features and laboratory parameters with patient outcomes.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of the data was performed using Statistical Package For Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 22.0 software. Descriptive statistics, including mean, standard error, median, and Q25-Q75 (first and third quartiles), were calculated for continuous variables, while frequency and percentage were provided for categorical data. Normality assumptions were evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests. For statistical significance, the chi-square and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare qualitative data, and the independent samples t-test and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) were employed for normally distributed quantitative data. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for non-normally distributed data in binary and multiple groups, respectively. The post-hoc Tukey test was used to evaluate significance in cases of group differences. Spearman and Pearson correlation analyses were used for analyzing relationships between continuous variables. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Following a system survey, 74 cases had a preliminary diagnosis of pneumomediastinum. However, 7 patients were excluded due to missing data or not having a definitive diagnosis of pneumomediastinum, resulting in a completed study with a total of 67 cases aged 18 and above.

The average age of the cases was found to be 44.89 ± 2.41 years. According to the World Health Organization’s age classification, 55.2% (n=37) of the cases were in the 18-45 age range, 26.9% (n=18) were in the 45-65 age range, 13.4% (n=9) were in the 65-80 age range, and 4.5% (n=3) were 80 years or older. 67.2% (n=45) of the cases were male. When evaluating the mode of development, 40.3% (n=27) were spontaneous, while 59.7% (n=40) occurred post-trauma.

In 50.7% (n=34) of the patients, dyspnea was present, while 49.3% (n=33) reported pronounced pain. Cough, fever, nausea, vomiting, and difficulty swallowing were reported at varying rates. Among the patients, 9.0% (n=6) had lung disease, 29.9% (n=20) had comorbidities, 3.0% (n=2) had a history of substance use, 14.9% (n=10) underwent chest tube insertion, and 20.9% (n=14) underwent surgery. Out of the 40 patients in the traumatic group, 37 had additional trauma.

Of the performed surgical procedures, 4.4% (n=3) were conducted by general surgery, 2.9% (n=2) by thoracic surgery, 2.9% (n=2) by otorhinolaryngology, 2.9% (n=2) by cardiovascular surgery, and 7.4% (n=5) by orthopedic clinics. Among these procedures, 8.9% (n=6) were directly related to pneumomediastinum treatment, while the remaining 11.9% (n=8) were associated with additional traumas. 35.8% (n=24) of the patients were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 13.4% (n=9) died.

Among the deceased patients, 2.9% (n=2) underwent surgery due to additional traumas, and 1.4% (n=1) received chest tube insertion. All deceased patients in the trauma group had additional traumas. While only one patient had isolated thoracic trauma (multiple rib fractures and hemopneumothorax), the other six had multiple systemic traumas. In the spontaneous pneumomediastinum group, one of the two deceased patients had end-stage pancreatic malignancy. The average total hospital stay duration was found to be 8.68±1.12 days. Sociodemographic characteristics and study parameters are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Evaluation of sociodemographic characteristics and study parameters

n %
Sex
 Female 22 32.8
 Male 45 67.2
Age Total
 Mean±SE 44.89±2.41 100
 18-45 years 37 55.2
 45-65 years 18 26.9
 65-80 years 9 13.4
 Over 80 years 3 4.5
Mechanism
 Spontaneous 27 40.3
 Traumatic 40 59.7
Presenting Complaint
 Dyspnea 34 50.7
 Chest Pain 33 49.3
 Cough 6 9.0
 Fever 4 5.9
 Nausea-Vomiting 2 3.0
 Dysphagia 2 3.0
Lung Disease
 Yes 6 9.0
 No 61 91.0
Comorbidity
 Yes 20 29.9
 No 47 70.1
Chest Tube
 Yes 10 14.9
 No 57 85.1
Surgical Procedure
 Yes 14 20.9
 No 53 79.1
Hospitalization
 No 15 22.4
 Ward Admission 28 41.8
 Intensive Care Unit 24 35.8
Mortality
 Yes 9 13.4
 No 58 86.6

SE: Standard Error.

The average age of the patients was 41, and this was categorized based on the median value. Due to the uneven distribution of cases according to the World Health Organization’s age classification, a median value was utilized to enable a more parametric distribution for optimal assessment. Patients above the age of 41 had a higher rate of intensive care unit admissions compared to regular ward admissions (p=0.001). Pain complaints were more prevalent in cases caused by traumatic factors (p<0.001). Patients with comorbidities had a higher rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission compared to regular ward admission (p=0.026). The probability of spontaneous occurrence was higher in patients with lung disease (p=0.024). In the presence of comorbidities, there was a higher and statistically significant difference in the rate of ICU admissions (p=0.026). The rate of chest tube application was higher in cases of traumatic pneumomediastinum, while the rate of additional surgical procedures was lower in spontaneous cases (p=0.009). Among patients requiring ICU admission, the rate of additional surgical procedures was higher (p=0.004). For patients requiring regular ward admission, the death rate was found to be lower compared to other groups (p=0.021) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Comparison of sociodemographic characteristics and study parameters by onset type and hospitalization status

n (%) Mechanism No Hospitalization


Spontaneous Traumatic P Ward Admission ICU P
Sex
 Female 8 (36.4) 14 (63.6) 0.646 4 (18.2) 6 (27.3) 12 (54.5) 0.077
 Male 19 (42.2) 26 (57.8) 11 (24.4) 22 (48.9) 12 (26.7)
Age
 41 years and below 15 (42.9) 20 (57.1) 0.655 5 (14.3) 22 (62.9) 8 (22.9) 0.001
 41 years and above 12 (37.5) 20 (62.5) 10 (31.3) 6 (18.8) 16 (50.0)
Presenting Complaint
 Dyspnea 23 (67.6) 11 (32.4) <0.001 8 (23.5) 11 (32.4) 15 (44.1) 0.242
 Chest Pain 4 (12.1) 29 (87.9) 7 (21.2) 17 (51.5) 9 (27.3)
Lung Disease
 Yes 5 (83.3) 1 (16.7) 0.024* 0 (0.0) 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0) 0.377
 No 22 (36.1) 39 (63.9) 15 (24.6) 25 (41.0) 21 (34.4)
Comorbidities
 Yes 11 (55.0) 9 (45.0) 0.110 3 (15.0) 5 (25.0) 12 (60.0) 0.026
 No 16 (34.0) 31 (66.0) 12 (25.5) 23 (48.9) 12 (25.5)
Chest Tube
 Yes 1 (10.0) 9 (90.0) 0.034 2 (20.0) 4 (40.0) 4 (40.0) 0.953
 No 26 (45.6) 31 (54.4) 13 (22.8) 24 (42.1) 20 (35.1)
Surgical Procedure
 Yes 1 (7.1) 13 (92.9) 0.004 0 (0.0) 4 (28.6) 10 (71.4) 0.004
 No 26 (49.1) 27 (50.9) 15 (28.3) 24 (45.3) 14 (26.4)
Mortality
 Yes 2 (22.2) 7 (77.8) 0.235 4 (44.4) 0 (0.0) 5 (55.6) 0.021
 No 25 (43.1) 33 (56.9) 11 (19.0) 28 (48.3) 19 (32.8)

The p-value was calculated using the Chi-Square analysis.

*

Fisher’s Exact Test. ICU: Intensive Care Unit.

Patients above the age of 41 exhibited higher levels of lactate and troponin (p=0.035, p=0.010). In cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum, patients were younger, while in traumatic pneumomediastinum cases, troponin levels were higher (p=0.030, p<0.001). Patients presenting with pain complaints were younger and had shorter hospital stays (p=0.006, p=0.037). The ages of patients admitted to regular wards were younger compared to those in the ICU (p<0.001). Patients requiring ICU admission had longer hospital stays compared to those admitted to regular wards (p=0.022). Patients with comorbidities were older and had longer hospital stays (p<0.001, p=0.031). Deceased patients were older and had higher levels of lactate and troponin, but lower levels of pH and HCO3 (p=0.008, p=0.001, p=0.022, p<0.001, p=0.045) (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparison of age, length of hospital stay, pH, HCO3, lactate, and troponin values by sociodemographic characteristics and study parameters

Mean±SE Age (years) Hospital Stay (days) pH HCO3 (mEq/L) Lactate (mmol/L) Troponin (ng/mL) Median (25%-75%)
Sex
 Female 51.5±4.65 10.84±1.96 7.29±0.03 21.99±1.06 3.88±0.56 33.3 (12-33.3)
 Male 41.66±2.69 7.54±1.35 7.32±0.01 20.66±0.66 2.83±0.23 33.3 (7-33.3)
 P 0.145 0.421 0.755 0.603 0.105 0.609b
Age
 41 years and below 28.68±1.18 8.43±1.53 7.33±0.01 20.64±0.66 2.68±0.13 33.3 (2-33.3)
 41 years and above 62.62±2.21 9.02±1.69 7.30±0.02 21.59±0.94 3.72±0.48 33.3 (16.5-51)
 P <0.001 0.798 0.457 0.406 0.035 0.010b
Mechanism
 Spontaneous 44.74±4.29 8.03±1.66 7.35±0.03 21.20±1.14 2.53±0.25 7 (2-33.3)
 Traumatic 45.0±2.87 9.21±1.55 7.30±0.02 21.03±0.57 3.62±0.37 33.3 (33.3-33.3)
 P 0.030 0.416 0.993 0.096 0.234 <0.001b
Presenting Complaint
 Dyspnea 51.29±3.85 11.02±1.92 7.29±0.02 20.59±1.06 3.20±0.42 27.5 (7-33.3)
 Chest Pain 38.30±2.44 6.34±1.02 7.34±0.01 21.62±0.33 3.16±0.25 33.3 (22-33.3)
 P 0.006 0.037 0.181 0.362 0.932 0.473b
Hospitalization
 No 49.93±5.24 - 7.29±0.04 20.81±1.02 3.82±0.57 33.3 (7-95)
 Ward Admission 33.18±2.34 6.32±1.38 7.35±0.01 21.74±0.55 2.64±0.16 33.3 (2-33.3)
 ICU 55.42±4.04 11.44±1.70 7.30±0.04 20.54±1.31 3.41±0.55 33.3 (13.5-33.6)
 P <0.001a 0.022a 0.231a 0.630a 0.152a 0.151c
Surgery
 Yes 44.28±4.09 9.92±2.05 7.34±0.01 22.01±0.65 3.04±0.30 33.3 (33.3-33.3)
 No 45.05±2.87 8.22±1.35 7.31±0.02 20.85±0.69 3.21±0.30 33.3 (5-33.3)
 P 0.898 0.508 0.362 0.411 0.781 0.128b
Mortality
 Yes 61.0±5.59 4.80±2.15 7.16±0.09 18.23±2.54 5.18±0.91 33.3 (33.3-131)
 No 42.39±2.51 9.09±1.21 7.34±0.01 21.54±0.51 2.87±0.22 33.3 (5-33.3)
 P 0.008 0.265 <0.001 0.045 0.001 0.022b

The p-values were calculated using the Independent Samples T-Test for parametric data. For non-parametric data, the following tests were used:

a

One-way ANOVA test;

b

Mann-Whitney U test;

c

Kruskal-Wallis H test were used. ICU: Intensive Care Unit; SE: Standard Error; Q25-Q75: 1st and 3rd quartile values.

No statistically significant relationship was found between admission status and mode of occurrence (p=0.507). In cases of traumatic pneumomediastinum, four deceased patients were included in the non-admitted category as they died in the emergency department (Table 4).

Table 4.

Relationship between hospitalization status and occurrence mode

Hospitalization Traumatic, n (%) Spontaneous, n (%) P value
Intensive Care Unit 12 (32.4%) 10 (40.0%) 0.507
Ward Admission 18 (48.6%) 12 (48.0%)
No 7 (18.9%) 3 (12.0%)

Chi-Square Test; **p<0.01.

DISCUSSION

Pneumomediastinum is a rare condition. In our study, we included patients diagnosed with pneumomediastinum (both traumatic and spontaneous) who presented to our hospital. Our research constitutes one of the largest series in the literature in terms of patient numbers.

When examining the distribution of age and gender, we observed that the gender distribution for cases classified as spontaneous and traumatic was similar to that reported in the literature, while the age distribution was found to be higher.[7-8-9-10] We believe this could be related to the location of our study, as the hospital is the highest-level center in the province for patient admissions.

One of the outcomes from our research was that chest pain was more dominant in traumatic cases, while dyspnea was more predominant in spontaneous cases. Chest pain is a known common and critical issue in thoracic traumas, necessitating effective management. New modalities for pain control are being explored.[9] While the literature often highlights chest pain as the predominant symptom in spontaneous pneumomediastinum, our study found dyspnea to be more prevalent.[10-11] We speculate that this may be due to the higher average age observed in our study. Decreased lung reserve and cardiac capacity with advancing age might have contributed to dyspnea becoming the predominant symptom.[12]

Underlying lung diseases are recognized as one of the risk factors for spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Our study revealed a higher incidence of lung disease in cases of spontaneous pneumomediastinum, aligning with findings reported in the literature.[11] Additionally, although crack cocaine use has been identified as a risk factor for pneumomediastinum, a comparative analysis between groups could not be performed due to its detection in only two patients in the spontaneous group.[13]

According to our study’s results, cases of traumatic pneumomediastinum more frequently required surgical intervention and chest tubes. Despite these increased procedural needs, similar rates of hospital admissions, intensive care needs, and mortality were observed.

Among our findings, patients with traumatic cases exhibited higher ages and troponin levels. In older patients, higher levels of troponin and lactate, along with low pH and bicarbonate levels, were associated with increased mortality. These findings were independent of the mechanism of occurrence. Moreover, among deceased patients, all patients in the trauma group had additional trauma, whereas in the spontaneous group, one patient had end-stage pancreatic malignancy. The conclusion was that the mode of occurrence (traumatic or spontaneous) had no association with mortality. Similar findings were observed in the literature.[5,14]

It was observed that patients presenting with dyspnea as the predominant symptom had a higher average age and longer hospital stays compared to those presenting with chest pain. We noticed that the longer hospital stays associated with dyspnea were likely due to the higher average age of these patients.

When examining hospital admission status based on the mechanism of occurrence, no statistical difference was observed. However, in the traumatic group, four patients died in the emergency department and were recorded as non-admitted.

While this comparison and population may seem limited, we consider it important as it is one of the few studies comparing secondary pneumomediastinum with spontaneous pneumomediastinum. The results we obtained are similar in nature to those found by Sapmaz and colleagues, yet were derived from a broader population.[14] One limitation of our study is the absence of data for discharged patients who may have sought care at another center. Another limitation is the retrospective nature of the study. The recording of patient admissions and parameters, such as predominant clinical symptoms, is physician-dependent and subjective, which we consider a limitation. Another limitation of our study is the lack of recorded data on the current clinical status of patients. Such information could be necessary for additional etiopathogenetic analyses, including factors like pneumonia, tooth extraction, etc.[15-16]

CONCLUSION

In our examination of the causes of pneumomediastinum cases, we observed that patients with a history of trauma more frequently required chest tube and surgical intervention. However, when classified as either spontaneous or traumatic cases, both groups demonstrated a similar clinical course and outcome, with both presenting favorable clinical outcomes.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: This study was approved by the Ankara City Hospital Ethics Committee (Date: 13.04.2022, Decision No: E2-22-1675).

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Authorship Contributions: Concept: N.İ.I.; Design: G.K.Ç.; Supervision: N.İ.I.; Resource: B.I.; Materials: N.İ.I.; Data collection and/or processing: N.İ.I.; Analysis and/or interpretation: G.K.Ç.; Literature search: G.K.Ç., B.I.; Writing: N.İ.I.; Critical review: G.K.Ç., B.I.

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Financial Disclosure: The author declared that this study has received no financial support.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Iteen AJ, Bianchi W, Sharman T. In:StatPearls [Internet] Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Jan–, Pneumomediastinum. 2023. May 1. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sahni S, Verma S, Grullon J, Esquire A, Patel P, Talwar A. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum:time for consensus. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5:460–4. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.117296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zachariah S, Gharahbaghian L, Perera P, Joshi N. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum on bedside ultrasound:case report and review of the literature. West J Emerg Med. 2015;16:321–4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Okada M, Adachi H, Shibuya Y, Ishikawa S, Hamabe Y. Diagnosis and treatment of patients with spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Respir Investig. 2014;52:36–40. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2013.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Banki F, Estrera AL, Harrison RG, Miller CC 3rd, Leake SS, Mitchell KG, et al. Pneumomediastinum:etiology and a guide to diagnosis and treatment. Am J Surg. 2013;206:1001–6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.009. discussion 1006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Muckart DJJ, Hardcastle TC, Skinner DL. Pneumomediastinum and pneumopericardium following blunt thoracic trauma:much ado about nothing? Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019;45:927–31. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-0960-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Al-Mufarrej F, Badar J, Gharagozloo F, Tempesta B, Strother E, Margolis M. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum:diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;3:59. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-3-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Iyer VN, Joshi AY, Ryu JH. Spontaneous pneumomediastinum:analysis of 62 consecutive adult patients. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84:417–21. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60560-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matthees NG, Mankin JA, Trahan AM, Israr S, Jones MD, Dameworth JL, et al. Pneumomediastinum in blunt trauma:If aerodigestive injury is not seen on CT, invasive workup is not indicated. Am J Surg. 2019;217:1047–50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chouliaras K, Bench E, Talving P, Strumwasser A, Benjamin E, Lam L, et al. Pneumomediastinum following blunt trauma:Worth an exhaustive workup? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79:188–92. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000714. discussion 192–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dönmez S, Erdem AB, Şener A, Altas F, Mutlu Rİ. Placebo-controlled randomized double-blind comparison of the analgesic efficacy of lidocaine spray and etofenamate spray in pain control of rib fractures. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2023;29:929–34. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2023.40652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kouritas VK, Papagiannopoulos K, Lazaridis G, Baka S, Mpoukovinas I, Karavasilis V, et al. Pneumomediastinum. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7:S44–9. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caceres M, Ali SZ, Braud R, Weiman D, Garrett HE., Jr Spontaneous pneumomediastinum:a comparative study and review of the literature. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:962–6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.04.067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cho SJ, Stout-Delgado HW. Aging and Lung Disease. Annual Rev Physiology. 2020;82:433–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perna V, Vilà E, Guelbenzu JJ, Amat I. Pneumomediastinum:is this really a benign entity?When it can be considered as spontaneous?Our experience in 47 adult patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2010;37:573–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sapmaz E, Işık H, Doğan D, Kavaklı K, Çaylak H. A comparative study of pneumomediastinums based on clinical experience. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2019;25:497–502. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.03161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Büyükkarabacak Y, Pirzirenli MG, Gurz S, Abacı H, Taslak Şengül A, Çelik B, et al. COVID-19 and pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, subcutaneous emphysema:Analysis of risk factors. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2023;31:69–77. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2023.23081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Işık H, Sapmaz E, Özbey M, Çaylak H, Şengül İnan M. A rare cause of pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema:Tooth extraction. Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2020;28:390–3. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2020.17807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Turkish Journal of Trauma & Emergency Surgery are provided here courtesy of Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery

RESOURCES