Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301261

Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy among Chepang women and their health-seeking behavior in Ichchhakamana rural municipality of Chitwan district

Smriti Pant 1,*, Saugat Koirala 2, Anand Prasad Acharya 3, Pranil Man Singh Pradhan 1
Editor: Umesh Raj Aryal4
PMCID: PMC10977708  PMID: 38547223

Abstract

Adolescent pregnancy is a critical public health issue, particularly in developing regions like Nepal, where it poses significant risks to maternal and child health and perpetuates the cycle of poverty. This study focused on the marginalized Chepang community, which is endangered and faces unique challenges. The study aimed to explore the factors associated with adolescent pregnancy among Chepang women in Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality, Chitwan, Nepal, and also assessed their reproductive health-seeking behavior. A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted with 217 Chepang women aged 15–20 years, and data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire. The collected data was entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20. Descriptive statistical tools like frequency, and percentage were used to express the results. Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test were used for bivariate analysis to determine the presence of association between the dependent and independent variables. Binary logistic regression was used for further analysis. The prevalence of current adolescent pregnancy was 8.3%(18), while one-fourth had experienced prior pregnancies during their adolescence. Factors significantly associated with adolescent pregnancy included lack of education among the women and their mothers, as well as living in joint families. Additionally, number of antenatal visits and consumption of iron tablets seemed to be lower among Chepang women in comparison to the national data. Chepang women had high adolescent pregnancy rates, with low education level and joint family structure being important risk factors for it. They also had inadequate reproductive health seeking behavior. Addressing these problems requires strategies that prioritize education and raise awareness about reproductive health.

Introduction

Adolescence is a state of transition for 10 to 19 year olds, during which many physical and psychological developments takes place [1]. When an adolescent gets pregnant it increases the risk of maternal and child mortality [2]. It is estimated that about 21 million adolescents get pregnant each year in developing regions, among which about 57% give birth [2]. Babies born to these adolescent mothers account for nearly 11% of births worldwide with 95% of them occurring in developing countries like Nepal [3]. Two million of these births are from girls under 15 years of age [4]. Complications related to pregnancy and childbirth are the leading cause of global deaths among adolescents of reproductive age group (15–19 years) [5]. Additionally, ninety-nine percent of the maternal deaths among 15 to 49-year-old women occur in low and middle income countries [5]. Furthermore, adolescent mothers aged 10–19 years face greater possibilities of occurrence of eclampsia, puerperal endometritis and systemic infections than women aged 20–24 years [6]. Other consequences are unsafe abortion, still birth and new born deaths [2].

There are many factors and determinants associated with adolescent pregnancy, explained in many literatures [3, 7, 8]. In case of marginalized community like Chepang community, factors associated with adolescent pregnancy are household wealth index, ethnicity, religion, sex of the household head, maternal education, literacy level and occupation [8]. Chepang community is a marginalized and endangered community of Nepal. According to National Population and Housing Census 2021, there are 84,364 Chepang inhabitants in Nepal out of which 27,643 live in Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality of Chitwan district [9]. The same report showed that 15.2% of the married 15 to 19-year-old Chepang women had at least one live birth in the last year [9]. Similarly, an article about adolescent pregnancy in Chepang women in 2016 illustrated that about 58.1 percent of the participants have their first child birth in their adolescent age [10]. It also showed that complications of adolescent pregnancy among them were preterm labour, prolonged labour, miscarriage and postpartum haemorrhage [10].

According to Nepal Demographic and Health Survey (NDHS) 2022, 14% of the women aged 15–19 years were ever pregnant [11]. This survey also shows that these pregnancies occurred more commonly among Muslims (22%) and Dalits (21%) [11]. Similarly, it illustrated that prevalence of pregnancy among 15 to 19 year olds was higher amid the less educated and amongst those who fall in the second wealth quintile [11]. NDHS 2022 estimates also show that both median age at first marriage and the median age of first sexual intercourse for women was 18.3 years [11]. These are risk factors for adolescent pregnancy. A study in Korak VDC in Chitwan showed that the average age of marriage in Chepang females was 15.48 years and mean age of first child birth was 16.95 years [10]. Similarly, another study in Dhading district of Nepal illustrated that the mean age of marriage and first pregnancy was 16.7 years and 17.7 years respectively [12]. Additionally, married Chepang women also had low contraceptive prevalence rate (49.9%) [12].

Health seeking behavior during pregnancy is very important as it determines the fate of not only the mother but also the child. Antenatal care (ANC), mode of delivery and postnatal care (PNC) are important aspects of health care that is necessary for pregnant women. One of the important components of the ANC recommendations is the number of ANC visits [13]. Even though the ANC model with proposed eight contacts between the healthcare provider and pregnant women, is considered superior in terms of pregnancy outcomes, many countries still follow the focused antenatal care (FANC) model which recommends 4 ANC visits during pregnancy [13]. Studies have shown that pregnant adolescents have more difficulty in accessing health services during pregnancy [14, 15]. A study conducted in Wakiso district in Uganda showed that pregnant adolescents were less likely to complete the recommended number of ANC visits when compared to their adult counterparts [14]. Similarly another study of adolescent mothers from Nigeria showed that difficulty in obtaining permission to visit the health service provider as well as far distance of the health center from home were two important factors that discouraged utilization of antenatal care [15].

There are many strategies adopted globally and by Nepal to reduce adolescent pregnancy. A global strategy for women’s and children’s health launched by United Nations Secretary General in 2010, stresses the importance of addressing the health and welfare of adolescent girls in order to achieve the goal on maternal mortality reduction [3]. Government of Nepal endorsed the ‘National Adolescent Health and Development (NAHD) Strategy’ in 2000 and developed an ‘Implementation guideline on Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (ASRH)’ in 2007. Then in 2011, a National ASRH Program was designed and it has been slowly scaled up [16]. Nepal adopted the ’National Adolescent Development and Health Strategy 2075’ in 2019, with the aim of fostering an environment where every Nepalese adolescent can lead a healthy, and productive life by embracing a positive lifestyle by the year 2025 AD [17].

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of adolescence pregnancy among Chepang women of Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality, Chitwan and to explore the factors associated with it. It also assessed their reproductive health seeking behavior.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted in three wards of Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality, Chitwan. The data collection was done between July 2021 to October 2021. The study participants were Chepang women aged 15–20 years living at the study site.

The inclusion criteria included all Chepang women aged 15–20 years who gave consent to participate in the study while the exclusion criteria included, those who were unable to answer due to language barrier. The sample size for the study is calculated by using the formula,

Samplesizen=z2pq/d2

where, z = standard normal variable at 95% confidence level (1.96)

p = expected proportion in population based on prior studies = 0.17 i.e., 17% prevalence of teenage pregnancy [18]

q = 1-p = 1–0.17 = 0.83

d = 0.05 (5% margin of error)

hence,

n=1.962X0.17X0.83/0.052=216.8

Considering 10% non- response rate, total sample size = 216.8 / (0.9) = 240.8≈241

Therefore, the total sample size was 241.

The study started with purposive selection of Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality as the study site. The municipality consists of seven wards. At the first stage, three wards were chosen randomly for the study using lottery method. Next, the study site was visited and the proposed participants in the Chepang community were informed about the objectives of the research and its expected outcome. After getting approval for engagement, the required sample was conveniently taken from the selected three wards (80 samples each from wards 1 and 3, and 81 samples from ward 6). First house from respective ward was selected randomly and rest of the houses were selected consecutively until required sample size was reached. If more than one, participant meeting the eligibility criteria were found at selected households then all of them were interviewed.

Study variables and data collection

The dependent variable was adolescent pregnancy while independent variables included socio-demographic, sexual and reproductive characteristics of the participants and reproductive health seeking behavior (S1 Table).

Adolescent pregnancy was defined as any woman aged 15–20 years who had given birth within the last 1 year or any woman aged 15–19 years who was pregnant during the time of the study.

Reproductive health seeing behavior was defined as any action or inaction taken by pregnant adolescents for pregnancy related issues like confirming diagnosis of pregnancy, making antenatal (ANC) visits, consumption of iron and calcium tablets and undergoing various assessments (like physical examination, blood tests, urine tests and ultrasonography).

The data was collected with the help of a semi-structured questionnaire by using face to face interview technique. The questionnaire consisted of information regarding socio-demographic details, sexual and reproductive characteristics, and reproductive health seeking behavior. Related literature was reviewed for making the questionnaire [10, 12, 14, 15]. The questionnaire was shared with content experts for content validity. Face validity of the questionnaire was maintained by pretesting the questionnaire (among the population in the selected ward who do not belong to Chepang ethnicity). After pretesting, necessary modifications were made to the questions. As the questionnaire demands recalling information for the past 1 year, there is a chance of recall bias.

Statistical analysis

The collected data was entered and analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20. First of all, the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy was calculated. Descriptive statistical tools like frequency, and percentage were used to express the results. Pearson chi-square test, Fisher exact test were used for bivariate analysis to determine the presence of association between the dependent and independent variables. Crude odds ratio (COR) at 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to see the magnitude of association of adolescent pregnancy with independent variables. All the independent variables that were associated with adolescent pregnancy status with a significance level of less than 0.20 (p-value< 0.20) were included in multivariable analysis. As the dependent variable was dichotomous and independent variables were categorical, binary logistic regression was carried out to calculate corresponding adjusted odds ratio (AOR). All tests were done with the significance level set at 5% (p-value <0.05). In the assessment of multi-collinearity, the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was determined to be less than 10 (S2 Table). This confirms the absence of any interconnection among the independent variables.

Ethical consideration

Ethical approval was taken from Nepal Health Research Council (ERB Registration Number is 329/2021 P). The office of Ichchhakamana rural municipality was contacted and a letter of support for community engagement was obtained. After this, the ward chairpersons of the selected wards were contacted and permission was taken to conduct the research. Next, a written informed consent was obtained from the participants and/or their parents. If the participants were either married or of legal age at the time of interview, informed consent was obtained from the participants themselves. However, if the participants were either unmarried or minors, informed consent was obtained from the parent and assent was taken from the participant. The participants’ participation in the study was voluntary and their confidentiality was maintained. The information will be kept safely in a computer with proper password to disallow any fallacy in conduction of the study.

Inclusivity in global research

Additional information regarding the ethical, cultural, and scientific considerations specific to inclusivity in global research is included in the Supporting Information (S1 Checklist).

Results

Out of the 241 women selected, a total of 217 participants responded, yielding a response rate of 90%. The features of the participants are as follows:

Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants

They were aged between 15 to 20 years of age. Their mean age was 17.6 years with standard deviation of 1.7 years. Most of the participants were aged 18 years (19.8%) followed by 20 years of age (Table 1). Furthermore, most of the participants were Hindu (85.3%) and majority of the women had studied till primary level (67.7%) (Table 1). Similarly, 30% were involved in farming (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the participants.

Variables Frequency Percentage
Age (in years)
15 35 16.1
16 41 19.0
17 22 10.0
18 43 19.8
19 35 16.1
20 41 19.0
Total 217 100.0
Religion
Hindu 185 85.3
Christian 32 14.7
Total 217 100.0
Education
Never been to school 59 27.0
Primary Level 147 68.0
SEE pass 7 3.2
Intermediate level 4 1.8
Total 217 100.0
Occupation
Housewife 45 20.7
Farmer 70 32.3
Government Job 1 0.4
Private Job 3 1.4
Laborer 54 24.9
Student 44 20.3
Total 217 100.0
Family Type
 Nuclear 119 54.8
 Joint Family 98 45.2
 Total 217 100.0
Head of the Family
 Male 159 73.3
 Female 58 26.7
 Total 217 100.0
Mother’s educational status
Never been to school 111 51.2
 Primary Level and above 106 48.8
 Total 217 100.0
Family Income (Monthly)
Less than Rs. 15000 78 35.9
More than or equal to Rs. 15000 139 64.1
Total 217 100.0

More than half (54.8%) of the families were nuclear (Table 1). In about three quarters (73.3%) of the families, the head of the household was a male. Additionally, 64% of the families had an income of more than NRs. 15,000 (Table 1). Similarly, almost half of the participant’s mother had never been to school while the rest had studied till primary level (Table 1).

Sexual and reproductive health characteristics of the participants

Almost half (47.5%) of the participants were married and majority (28%) of them were married at 18 years of age (Table 2). The mean age of marriage was 16.84 years with standard deviation of 1.52 years. About 48% of the participants stated that they have been sexually active (Table 2). For majority of them (64.4%), the age of first sexual contact was 15 to 18 years and only about 14% had used contraceptive devices (Table 2). The most common reason behind not using contraceptive methods were its use not being feasible (42.7%), desire to get pregnant (36%) and lack of awareness (15.7%) about the methods (Table 2).

Table 2. Sexual and reproductive health characteristics.

Variables Frequency Percentage
Marital status
 Single 113 52.0
 Married 103 47.5
 Widower 1 0.5
 Total 217 100.0
Age at Marriage (in years)
 14 4 3.8
 15 25 24.0
 16 27 26.0
 17 10 9.6
 18 29 28.0
 19 4 3.8
 20 5 4.8
 Total 104 100.0
Sexual relationship status
 Had sexual relations 104 47.9
 Never had sexual relations 113 52.1
 Total 217 100.0
Age at first sexual relationship(in years)
 Less than15 25 24.0
 15 to 18 67 64.4
 More than 18 12 11.6
 Total 104 100.0
Use of contraceptive
 Ever used contraceptive 15 14.4
 Never used contraceptive 89 85.6
 Total 104 100.0
Reasons for not using contraceptives
 Not feasible 38 42.7
 Desire to get pregnant 32 36.0
 Lack of awareness 14 15.7
 Living separately from spouse 3 3.4
 Family influence 2 2.2
 Total 89 100.0

Adolescent pregnancy status

Among the 217 participants, 8.3% (18) were currently pregnant or had delivered a baby in the last one year. Almost all except one pregnancy was unplanned. But all of the pregnant women were happy about their pregnancy. Amongst the pregnant, most (44.5%) were in their second trimester. Almost a quarter (24%) of the participants had a previous pregnancy. Among them, 79% had live births and majority of them did not have any health issues among mothers (90.2%) or the neonates (82.7%) at the end of the pregnancy.

Reproductive health seeking behavior

Among those who were currently pregnant, 72% women considered amenorrhea as an indicator of pregnancy, while the rest relied on health checkup for the diagnosis of pregnancy (Table 3). Additionally, half of the pregnant women had only one antenatal (ANC) visit, while none of them had done four visits (Table 3). Furthermore, 50% of the pregnant women were taking iron tablets, but only 22% were taking calcium tablets (Table 3). Regarding the tests done during pregnancy, 83.3% of the women had physical examination,66.7% had a urine examination, 22% had an ultrasonography, 11% had done blood tests, but only 11% of them had done all of these.

Table 3. Reproductive health seeking behavior of pregnant adolescents.

Variables Frequency Percentage
Method of diagnosis of pregnancy
Amenorrhea 13 72.0
Check up at health facility 5 28.0
Total 18 100.0
ANC Visits during pregnancy
Once 9 50.0
Twice 3 16.7
Thrice 4 22.2
Never 2 11.1
Total 18 100.0
Consumption of iron during pregnancy
Yes 9 50.0
No 9 50.0
Total 18 100.0
Consumption of calcium during pregnancy
Yes 4 22.2
No 14 77.8
Total 18 100.0

Association of adolescent pregnancy with socio-demographic variables

Higher percentage of participants who were pregnant belonged to Hindu religion. But this relationship was not statistically significant (Table 4). The study showed that those adolescents who had never been to school had 2.9 times more chance of being pregnant compared to those who had been to at least primary school (COR (95%CI): 2.9[1.1–7.9]) and this relationship was statistically significant. (p <0.05) (Table 4). Similarly, those who lived in joint families had a higher chance of being pregnant compared to nuclear families (COR (95%CI): 4.8 [1.5–15.0]) and this relationship was also statistically significant (p<0.05) (Table 4). Among the pregnant adolescents most had females as head of the family and lived in families who earned less than NRs. 15,000. But these associations were not statistically significant. Furthermore, adolescents with mothers who never went to school had 3.6 times more risk of being pregnant compared to those who had primary level education (COR, 95% CI: 3.68[1.17–11.57]) and this association was statistically significant (p<0.5).

Table 4. Association of adolescent pregnancy with socio-demographic variables.

Variables Pregnant Not Pregnant Total COR[95%CI] p value AOR[95%CI] p value
Religion
Hindu 16(8.6) 169(91.4) 185(100.0) 1.4 [0.3–6.4] 1.0a - -
Christian 2(6.3) 30(93.8) 32(100.0) Ref - -
Participant’s Education level
Never been to school 9(15.3) 50(84.7) 59(100.0) 2.9 [1.1–7.9] 0.048a* 1.8[0.61–5.5] 0.28
Primary level and above 9(5.7) 149(94.3) 158(100.0) Ref
Family Type
Joint 14(14.3) 84(85.7) 98 (100.0) 4.8 [1.5–15.0] 0.004b* 3.4[1.01–11.74] 0.049*
Nuclear 4(3.4) 115(96.6) 119(100.0) Ref Ref
Head of the Family
Female 8(13.8) 50(86.2) 58(100.0) 2.38[0.89–6.37] 0.095a 0.91[0.28–2.8] 0.86
Male 10(6.3) 149 (93.7) 159(100.0) Ref Ref
Monthly Family Income
< NRs. 15,000 8(10.3) 70(89.7) 78 (100.0) 1.47[0.56–3.91] 0.43b - -
≥ NRs. 15,000 10(7.2) 129(92.8) 139 (100.0) Ref - -
Mother’s Education level
Never been to school 14(12.6) 97(84.4) 111(100.0) 3.68[1.17–11.6] 0.018b* 2.23[0.64–8.18] 0.2
Primary level and above 4(3.8) 102(96.2) 106(100.0) Ref Ref

a Fisher exact test

b Chi-square test

*statistically significant at p<0.05

After adjustment for confounders only living in joint family (AOR, 95% CI: 3.4[1.01–11.74]) was significantly associated with higher occurrence of adolescent pregnancy.(p<0.05)

Discussion

Socio-demographic characteristics

Among the 217 participants, majority of the women had studied till primary level (67.7%) while the rest had no education. This is in contrast to a study among 80 Chepang women in Dhading district of Nepal, where almost 26 percent had studied till primary level, but almost 30 percent had education of secondary level or higher [12]. Similarly another study in Korak VDC, Nepal among 148 Chepang women showed that 36.4% of the women had primary level education and almost 5% had secondary level education [10]. Furthermore, the most common occupation among the participants in our study was farming, which was similar to the study in Korak VDC but in contrast to the finding in Dhading where most of the participants were housewives [12]. In our study more than half of the families were nuclear. This finding was different than other studies conducted in Nepal [10, 12]. Additionally, in this study, most of the families had an income of more than NRs. 15,000. This was also in contrast to the findings of another study in Nepal [12].

In our study, the mean age of marriage was 16.84 years and almost half of the participants stated that they were sexually active. For majority of them (64.4%), the age of first sexual contact was 15 to 18 years. This is in contrast to the findings of NDHS 2022, according to which both the age at marriage and age at first sexual contact was 18.3 years for females [11].

Adolescent pregnancy

In our study, the prevalence of adolescents who were currently pregnant was 8.3% (18). This is in contrast to the results of a systematic review and meta-analysis conducted in Nepal which showed the prevalence to be a bit higher (13.2%) [19]. Similarly, a report by UNICEF showed that, in South Asia region adolescent marriage and pregnancy was highest among Nepalese and Bangladeshi girls [20]. Furthermore, a noteworthy finding from our study is that approximately one-fourth of the participants disclosed a history of prior pregnancies. Given the age range of our participants (15 to 20 years), this observation suggests that even the women who were not pregnant during the study duration experienced teenage pregnancies at some stage during their adolescence.

Reproductive health seeking behavior

In our study, half of the pregnant women had only one ANC visit, while none of them had gone for the recommended four ANC visits. This is in contrast to our national data of fiscal year 2078/79, which estimates that 79.4% of the women in reproductive age had four ANC visits [21]. Furthermore, 50% of the pregnant women were taking iron tablets, but only 22% were taking calcium tablets. This is in contrast to the NDHS 2022 findings, according to which 96% of the pregnant women took iron tablets or syrup in their last pregnancy [11]. These variations may be due to the fact that Chepang is a marginalized community and has less access to health services.

Association of adolescent pregnancy with socio-demographic variables

Our study showed that those adolescents who had never been to school had 2.9 times more chance of being pregnant compared to those who had been to at least primary school (COR (95%CI): 2.9[1.1–7.9]). This finding is supported by World Bank estimates which states that more education for girls can result in delayed pregnancy [22]. Similarly, several other research has illustrated that marrying at a young age and early pregnancy were both results of low level of education among the adolescent girls [20, 23, 24]. Education empowers women by providing them with knowledge about reproductive health and family planning, leading to more informed choices [25]. This may result in delayed marriages, encourage aspirations beyond early motherhood, and enhance access to resources and healthcare.

Furthermore, in our study those who lived in joint families had a higher chance of being pregnant compared to nuclear families (COR (95%CI): 4.8 [1.5–15.0]) and this relationship was also statistically significant (p<0.05) (Table 4). The higher likelihood of pregnancy in joint families can be attributed to different reasons. Residing in joint families can result in limited personal freedom and the perpetuation of traditional beliefs, often leading to early age at marriage. Additionally, if the joint family is from a low resource setting, it will have limited space and resources, which motivates the family to marry off their daughters at a very early age [26]. This ultimately leads to early childbearing among adolescents. On the contrary, joint family also offers the advantage of a larger support system and sharing of responsibilities [27], which may promote pregnancies by creating a more conducive environment for giving birth to and raising children.

Adolescents with mothers who never went to school had 3.6 times more risk of being pregnant compared to those who had at least primary level education (COR, 95% CI: 3.68[1.17–11.57]) and this association was statistically significant (p<0.5). Mothers’ education has been associated with reduced level of fertility and increased age at first birth for her offspring [28]. Hence, this heightened risk of pregnancy among the adolescents may be attributed to limited knowledge of reproductive health among the uneducated mothers.

The strength of our study lies in its community based approach, which greatly increases the likelihood of capturing the real scenario of adolescent pregnancy among the Chepang women.

Our study has some limitations. Firstly, as the participants had to recollect memories of the last one year in order to respond to the questions, recall bias may have occurred. Additionally, due to the limitation of funding only three wards were chosen from Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality. Lastly, as the sample size was small the results cannot be generalized to the whole country. Hence, a comprehensive national study, involving a representative sample, is necessary to delve deeply into the issue of adolescent pregnancy within the Chepang community.

Conclusion

Adolescent pregnancy was high among the Chepang women in Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality. Low level of education among women and their mothers, along with their family type seemed to be important risk factors for adolescent pregnancy. Similarly, the Chepang women exhibited inadequate health seeking behavior. Government should develop and implement strategies that encourage education for girls especially in marginalized communities like the Chepang, so that they are empowered to make better choices for their lives. Similarly, recognizing the pivotal role family plays in this matter, raising community awareness regarding reproductive health issues may also help address the problem of adolescent pregnancy.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Variables of the study.

(DOCX)

pone.0301261.s001.docx (13.4KB, docx)
S2 Table. Collinearity statistics.

(DOCX)

pone.0301261.s002.docx (12.5KB, docx)
S1 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

(DOCX)

pone.0301261.s003.docx (67KB, docx)
S2 Checklist. STROBE statement.

(DOCX)

pone.0301261.s004.docx (30.8KB, docx)
S1 File. Master sheet.

(XLSX)

pone.0301261.s005.xlsx (37KB, xlsx)

Acknowledgments

We wish to extend our profound appreciation to all adolescents and their families for their participation and invaluable support. Additionally, we would like to recognize the assistance rendered by the ward representatives of wards one, three, and six within the Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality. Their authorization for data collection and cooperation are highly acknowledged and appreciated.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

References

Decision Letter 0

Umesh Raj Aryal

30 Oct 2023

PONE-D-23-26050Factors Associated with Adolescent Pregnancy among Chepang Women and Their Health-Seeking Behavior in Ichchhakamana Rural Municipality of Chitwan DistrictPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pant,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 14 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Umesh Raj Aryal, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a complete copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research in your revised manuscript. Our policy for research in this area aims to improve transparency in the reporting of research performed outside of researchers’ own country or community. The policy applies to researchers who have travelled to a different country to conduct research, research with Indigenous populations or their lands, and research on cultural artefacts. The questionnaire can also be requested at the journal’s discretion for any other submissions, even if these conditions are not met.  Please find more information on the policy and a link to download a blank copy of the questionnaire here: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/best-practices-in-research-reporting. Please upload a completed version of your questionnaire as Supporting Information when you resubmit your manuscript.

3. Thank you for submitting the above manuscript to PLOS ONE. During our internal evaluation of the manuscript, we found significant text overlap between your submission and previous work in the [introduction, conclusion, etc.].

We would like to make you aware that copying extracts from previous publications, especially outside the methods section, word-for-word is unacceptable. In addition, the reproduction of text from published reports has implications for the copyright that may apply to the publications.

Please revise the manuscript to rephrase the duplicated text, cite your sources, and provide details as to how the current manuscript advances on previous work. Please note that further consideration is dependent on the submission of a manuscript that addresses these concerns about the overlap in text with published work.

[If the overlap is with the authors’ own works: Moreover, upon submission, authors must confirm that the manuscript, or any related manuscript, is not currently under consideration or accepted elsewhere. If related work has been submitted to PLOS ONE or elsewhere, authors must include a copy with the submitted article. Reviewers will be asked to comment on the overlap between related submissions (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-related-manuscripts).]

We will carefully review your manuscript upon resubmission and further consideration of the manuscript is dependent on the text overlap being addressed in full. Please ensure that your revision is thorough as failure to address the concerns to our satisfaction may result in your submission not being considered further.

4. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

5. Please include your full ethics statement in the ‘Methods’ section of your manuscript file. In your statement, please include the full name of the IRB or ethics committee who approved or waived your study, as well as whether or not you obtained informed written or verbal consent. If consent was waived for your study, please include this information in your statement as well. 

6. Please include a copy of Table 7 which you refer to in your text on page 14.

7. We are unable to open your Supporting Information file [Chepang Women 15th Aug.sav]. Please kindly revise as necessary and re-upload.

Additional Editor Comments:

Method section

The sample size calculation is not clear. Please clarify it. what about the non-response rate?

How was the sampling interval computed? Provide its details.

Clarify the adolescent pregnant definition. 15-19 and 15-20 years make confusion.

In Line 120, it should provide detailed information but not "etc".

The title of Table 1 does not match as the table is broken down into different subheadings.

Please revise it. On what basis is income divided by 15000?

"Never had a sexual relationship" how is it linked with adolescent pregnancy? it also impacts your analysis.

"extensive literature review was done for making the questionnaire". Provide reference.

How did you ensure face validity?

What did the authors do to reduce recall bias since they knew it in advance ?

Introduction

How does it lead to a vicious cycle of ill health and poverty?

Discuss a few words about the Chepang community before jumping into the factors.

Is there a reason to focus on NDHS 2016 rather than 2020?

Line 68-69 move to the method section and link with sample size calculation.

Nothing is mentioned about the health-seeking behavior of adolescent pregnancy.

Analysis

Though the author has tried to explain details about the analysis but it is unclear to readers. Therefore authors are required to provide with rationale behind it as well as a step-by-step procedure. Do not get confused with multivariable and multivariate analysis. Provide details of VIF results.

Ethics

It is not clear with whom the researchers take the assent and consent form. It needs to be discussed in detail. The next definition of parents for unmarried and married should be clarified with details.

Results

There is no table that explains the details of the crude odds ratio as the authors directly jump into table 4. So the table for bi-variate analysis is to be presented.

Most of the results of table 3 are explained in text so it is suggested to remove table 3.

Discussion

Discuss the strengths of the study prior to the limitations.

Need to revised discussion section as repeation of result section.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Introduction: The research topic is very relevant in the Nepalese context, the introduction part is well written on the basis of international, national, and local context with comparing data. The objective of the study has been included in the introduction.

Materials and Methods: The research design, study population, and sampling technique were well-explained. The sample size should be properly explained in simple manner.

Figures, tables, results:

In Table 1, there were too many rows, it could be broken into two tables (Socio-demographic and Sexual and Reproductive health characteristics).

In topic/title "Health Seeking Behaviour" is mentioned as the objective of the study but a table/figure about this is displayed.

Some sentences have been written repeatedly.

Author guidelines should be followed for writing the table's title and illustration.

Discussions: The discussions section is good, relation literature were compared and contrasted in the different scenario but some literature were repeated. The reproductive health-seeking behavior was also not discussed in the discussion section, the topic is given less priority in the study. It would be better to include the source of information regarding the RH.

Conclusions: The conclusion is well-written, try to elaborate a little.

Reviewer #2: Abstract:

• Suggest using health-seeking behavior, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, teenage pregnancy, influencing factors, and the Chepang populationas key words for the paper.

• There are some critical concerns to address. First, the age group chosen for the study, 15-20 years, seems to differ from commonly used definitions of adolescence (15-19 years), and this warrants clarification. The inclusion of women aged 20 or above in the study should be explained, or alternatively, the data analysis should be revised to maintain consistency with established age categories for adolescents.

• Additionally, while the abstract highlights the role of education as a significant factor in teenage pregnancy among the Chepang community, this point isn't adequately supported in the results and discussion section of the manuscript. It's essential to align the abstract with the study's findings and offer a brief outline of the methodology, including statistical significance.

Introduction:

• The introduction should provide a clearer and more coherent background context for the study. It currently relies on outdated data from NDHS 2016 when more recent data is available (NDHS 2021). If this study predates the NDHS 2021, considering the MICS 2019 results for the problem statement might be more appropriate. It's also suggested to offer a comparative overview of adolescent pregnancy in Nepal, supported by evidence and factors associated with it. Please refer this link https://www.prb.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/02/Adolescent_Fertility_Atlas_Nepal.pdf for getting more overview of the adolescent fertility.

• Furthermore, for the Chepang population, it is essential to verify information with the National Population and Housing Census 2021 report. The study title emphasizes health-seeking behavior, but this connection to adolescent pregnancy and relevant influencing factors needs to be more explicitly established.

Materials and Methods:

• The choice of the 15-20 age group for the study should be rationalized, and bias control strategies for age group should be explained. The significance level of p=0.17 requires clarification. The purpose of selection of the study site and the choice of only 3 wards from 7 wards should be justified.

• To enhance reader-friendliness, provide an overview of variables in table form with operational definitions for both dependent and independent variables. Clarify the criteria for defining adolescent pregnancy as “adolescent age of 15-20”, ensuring technical accuracy.

• The sample population details should specify whether only married adolescent girls were included or if unmarried individuals were considered and the reasons for this choice.

Results:

• Clarify whether the contraceptive use percentages are among married adolescent girls/women. Provide the number of adolescent pregnant individuals, which is currently absent in the table. Explain the ANC status among pregnant adolescents and relate it to national protocols on pregnancy and antenatal care indicators. This will help to relate health-seeking behaviour among the adolescent for their care and wellbeing.

• When discussing the association of adolescent pregnancy with socio-demographic and family variables, acknowledge the wider confidence intervals and the limitations caused by the small sample size, if relevant. Specify if the analysis is based solely on married participants.

• The examination of health-seeking behavior is currently missing, this should be more detailed.

Discussion:

• The discussion should offer a more in-depth analysis of the factors influencing teenage pregnancy, connecting them to previous studies. Address statistically insignificant relationships between variables and be honest to explain data, methodology limitations and recommend the need for further research. The sample size is too small to generalize the result.

• • Teenage pregnancy is often associate with the child marriage in the context like Nepal and child marriage is a result of lack of access to education, information and rights, sexual and reproductive health services etc. which influences individual behaviours. It is important to discuss why child marriage is prevalent there. How has education affected adolescent’s and their family’s health-seeking behaviour? What makes them happy to have a baby as their early age? As health-seeking behaviour is related to individual and community socio-economic and cultural factors. Also, the husband’s education, economic status affects the adolescent pregnancy and health-seeking behaviour which have not been assessed while mother's education and its association with their daughter teenage pregnancy has been briefly touched. I suggest considering all these factors to make a strong argument and scientific explanation for the recommendation. I suggest the author visit global and national report to comprehend the knowledge with the research findings. Include possible alternative explanations and elaborate on policy recommendations, as initially intended.

• Include possible alternative explanations and elaborate on policy recommendations, as initially intended.

References:

• Ensure that the citation and referencing align with the journal's requirements, preferably using the Vancouver style. Rely on more scientific articles than newspaper to strengthen the arguments and consider thorough English language editing for better comprehension and logical flow.

Reviewer #3: Dear authors,

Congratulations for the efforts of writing such an interesting topic regarding the adolescent women of Chepang community.

Some of the portion of research methodology need to be clearly explained (inclusion criteria specially) and the result section.

Suggestions have been made in the word file of the manuscript, please view it.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Adweeti Nepal

Reviewer #3: Yes: Chandra Kumari Garbuja

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Manuscript_Plos One Chepang 15th Aug.docx

pone.0301261.s006.docx (60.5KB, docx)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-26050_Comment_AN.pdf

pone.0301261.s007.pdf (867.7KB, pdf)
Attachment

Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-26050.docx

pone.0301261.s008.docx (117.9KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301261.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


31 Dec 2023

Reply to Editor’s Comments

All the journal requirements have been fulfilled:

1. The article has been revised to fulfil the journal requirements.

2. A copy of PLOS’ questionnaire on inclusivity in global research has been added to the online submission system.

3. Regarding the overlap of the text. We understand the concept of plagiarism and how important it is to cite scientific work. We have cited all our sources. We have also tried to paraphrase and not copy the information from our sources.

4. Orchid ID of the corresponding author has been updated

5. The information regarding ethical approval is in Lines 164-173. There also seemed to be confusion regarding the type of consent taken form the participants. This part has been more elaborately explained.

6. Table 7 was quoted by error. This was earlier merged into another table.

7. As the SPSS file titled ‘Chepang women.sav’ could not be opened, an excel file (Master sheet Chepang Women) with the same information has been uploaded.

Additional Editor Comments

Method section

Q1: The sample size calculation is not clear. Please clarify it. what about the non-response rate?

A1: The calculation steps have been clarified.

How was the sampling interval computed? Provide its details.

The sample size for the study is calculated by using the formula,

Sample size (n) = z2pq / d2

where,

z = standard normal variable at 95% confidence level (1.96)

p = expected proportion in population based on prior studies = 0.17 i.e., 17% prevalence of teenage pregnancy .

q = 1-p = 1-0.17 = 0.83

d = 0.05 (5% margin of error)

hence,

n = {(1.96)2 x 0.17 x 0.83}/(0.05)2

= 216.82= 217

This has been included in the paper.

Q2: Clarify the adolescent pregnant definition. 15-19 and 15-20 years make confusion.

A2: Adolescent pregnancy percentage is commonly defined as “Percentage of women aged 15-19 who have given birth or are pregnant with their first child”. As our study measures the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in the last one year, the operational definition of adolescent pregnancy for this study is as follows:

a. Women aged 15-20 years who have had a live birth within the last 1 year OR

b. Women aged 15-19 years who are pregnant with their first child during the time of the study

The reason our study considers women up to 20 years of age is as follows:

As we are measuring current age of the participants, women who were 19 years of age and delivered last year may be 20 years of age at the time of the study. To include those women, the population group has been mentioned as women aged 15 to 20 years of age. But in essence, the study will still include only adolescents as those women were 19 years old when they delivered.

Q3: In Line 120, it should provide detailed information but not "etc".

A3: The correction has been made.

Q4: The title of Table 1 does not match as the table is broken down into different subheadings.

Please revise it.

A4: The table has been broken down and the table title revised.

Q5: On what basis is income divided by 15000?

A5: During pretesting of the questionnaire the average income was found to be Rs. 15000.

Q6: "Never had a sexual relationship" how is it linked with adolescent pregnancy? it also impacts your analysis.

A6: This question was kept in order to address the sexual and reproductive characteristics of the study population, which is one of the objectives of the study.

Q7: "extensive literature review was done for making the questionnaire". Provide reference.

A7: References have been added.

Q8: How did you ensure face validity?

A8: For face validity of the questionnaire pretesting was done in 10 % of sample size (among the population in the selected ward who do not belong to Chepang ethnicity) and necessary modifications were made to the questions.

Q9: What did the authors do to reduce recall bias since they knew it in advance?

A: The authors made sure that the participants had enough time to recall their memories and also probed them by trying to link the event with the timeline of some other event that may have occurred during the same time.

Introduction

Q10. How does it lead to a vicious cycle of ill health and poverty?

A10: This portion has been removed while revising the introduction section.

Q11. Discuss a few words about the Chepang community before jumping into the factors.

A11. The text in introduction has been re-arranged to include information about Chepang people earlier.

Q12. Is there a reason to focus on NDHS 2016 rather than 2020?

The writing of the article was started before the publication of the NDHS 2022 reports. However, while revising the Introduction, new data has been added from NDHS 2022.

Q13. Line 68-69 move to the method section and link with sample size calculation.

A13. This portion has been rearranged in the introduction part in response to Q 11.

Q14.Nothing is mentioned about the health-seeking behavior of adolescent pregnancy.

A14. This portion has been added. Lines 75-88.

Analysis

Q15. Though the author has tried to explain details about the analysis but it is unclear to readers. Therefore authors are required to provide with rationale behind it as well as a step-by-step procedure. Do not get confused with multivariable and multivariate analysis. Provide details of VIF results.

A15. Changes have been made. Lines 156-162.

Ethics

Q16. It is not clear with whom the researchers take the assent and consent form. It needs to be discussed in detail. The next definition of parents for unmarried and married should be clarified with details.

A16: This has been clarified in lines 164-173.

Results

Q17: There is no table that explains the details of the crude odds ratio as the authors directly jump into table 4. So the table for bi-variate analysis is to be presented.

A17: The Crude Odds ratio (COR) and its p value has been depicted in Table 4. Since there is a limitation to the number of tables that can be incorporated in the manuscript, the information of both COR and AOR has been incorporated into one single table.

Q18: Most of the results of table 3 are explained in text so it is suggested to remove table 3.

A18: The old table 3 has been removed and replaced by another table.

Discussion

Q19. Discuss the strengths of the study prior to the limitations.

A19: This has been done.

Q20. Need to revised discussion section as repetition of result section.

A20: This has been done.

Reply to comments from Reviewer 1

I. Reply to overall comments:

Materials and Methods:

Q1: The sample size should be properly explained in simple manner.

A1: This has been explained using the formula for sample size calculation in lines 109-118.

Figures, tables, results:

Q2: In Table 1, there were too many rows, it could be broken into two tables (Socio-demographic and Sexual and Reproductive health characteristics).

A2: This has been done. The table has been broken down to two parts.

Q3: In topic/title "Health Seeking Behaviour" is mentioned as the objective of the study but a table/figure about this is displayed.

A3: The information is displayed in table 3 and a separate paragraph has been added for its description.

Q4: Some sentences have been written repeatedly.

A4: The whole text of the manuscript has been read thoroughly and revised to avoid duplication.

Q5: Author guidelines should be followed for writing the table's title and illustration.

A5: Necessary changes have been made.

Discussions:

Q6: The reproductive health-seeking behavior was also not discussed in the discussion section, the topic is given less priority in the study. It would be better to include the source of information regarding the RH.

A6: Information about Health Seeking behavior has been added. Lines 275-281.

Q7: Conclusions: The conclusion is well-written, try to elaborate a little.

A7: Conclusion section has been revised.

II. Reply to comments in word file

Introduction:

Q8. It would be better to write less study…..

A8: This line has been removed while revising the introduction part.

Q9: It seems related article

A9: Yes. It has been included as it includes information about birth among adolescents in the Chepang community.

Q10: This study is less appropriate here.

A10: This portion has been removed.

Methodology

Q11. Write in proper sentence, it would give another sense too.

A11. The sentence has been revised.

Q12. This sentence has already discussed above.

A12. This has been mentioned as an operational definition for the study.

Q13: Better to mention type of questionnaire

A13: The questionnaire was a semi-structured in nature. This has been mentioned in the text. The details of the questionnaire is described in paragraph that follows. Lines 141-144.

Q14: I think this process is understood not necessary to write here

A14: This has been mentioned to highlight the ethical aspect of the study.

Q15. Already discussed

A15: This portion has been removed.

Results:

Q16: This table is too long, too many rows it can be broken into two tables. Pls follow the guidelines of PLOS ONE while writing table title and number

A16: The table has been broken down into two parts and the tables have been labeled according to PLOS ONE guidelines.

Q17. Sources of information is equally important for health seeking behavior

A17: Separate table has been made to highlight the health seeking behavior (Table 3).

Q18: The researchers include Health-seeking Behavior in the title but could not see in any table.

A18: Separate table has been made to highlight the health seeking behavior. Table 3

Q19: Make single sentence

A19: The sentences have been merged.

Reply to comments by Reviewer 2

I. Reply to overall comments

Abstract:

Q1: Suggest using health-seeking behavior, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, teenage pregnancy, influencing factors, and the Chepang population as key words for the paper.

A1: This has been done. Lines 37-38.

Q2: The age group chosen for the study, 15-20 years, seems to differ from commonly used definitions of adolescence (15-19 years), and this warrants clarification. The inclusion of women aged 20 or above in the study should be explained, or alternatively, the data analysis should be revised to maintain consistency with established age categories for adolescents.

A2: Adolescent pregnancy percentage is defined as “Percentage of women aged 15-19 who have given birth or are pregnant with their first child”. As our study measures the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy in the last one year, the operational definition of adolescent pregnancy for this study is as follows:

a. Women aged 15-20 years who have had a live birth within the last 1 year OR

b. Women aged 15-19 years who are pregnant with their first child during the time of the study

The reason our study considers women up to 20 years of age is as follows:

As we are measuring current age of the participants, women who were 19 years of age and delivered last year may be 20 years of age at the time of the study. To include those women, the population group has been mentioned as women aged 15 to 20 years of age. But in essence, the study will still include only adolescents as those women were 19 years old when they delivered.

Q3: While the abstract highlights the role of education as a significant factor in teenage pregnancy among the Chepang community, this point isn't adequately supported in the results and discussion section of the manuscript. It's essential to align the abstract with the study's findings and offer a brief outline of the methodology, including statistical significance.

A3: Our study showed that educational status of the mother and the participant had a statistically significant relationship with adolescent pregnancy. That is why it is highlighted in the abstract. Changes have been made in the manuscript so that it is equally appreciable in the result and discussion. Methodology part has been added.

Introduction:

Q4:The introduction should provide a clearer and more coherent background context for the study. It currently relies on outdated data from NDHS 2016 when more recent data is available (NDHS 2021). If this study predates the NDHS 2021, considering the MICS 2019 results for the problem statement might be more appropriate. It's also suggested to offer a comparative overview of adolescent pregnancy in Nepal, supported by evidence and factors associated with it. Please refer this link https://www.prb.org/wpcontent/uploads/2022/02/Adolescent_Fertility_Atlas_Nepal.pdf for getting more overview of the adolescent fertility.

A4: Changes have been made and data updated using NDHS 2022.

Q5: For the Chepang population, it is essential to verify information with the National Population and Housing Census 2021 report.

A5: The data has been updated according to the recent census report 2021.

Q6: The study title emphasizes health-seeking behavior, but this connection to adolescent pregnancy and relevant influencing factors needs to be more explicitly established.

A6: Information about health seeking behavior and its importance have been added. Lines 75-88.

Materials and Methods:

Q7:The choice of the 15-20 age group for the study should be rationalized, and bias control strategies for age group should be explained.

A7: Explained in answer to Q2 above.

Q8: The significance level of p=0.17 requires clarification.

A8: This is not the p value but the prevalence for the calculation of sample size. Lines 109-118.

Q9: The purpose of selection of the study site and the choice of only 3 wards from 7 wards should be justified.

A9: It was not feasible for the researchers to do the study in all the wards due to financial restrictions. Hence we decided to choose three out of seven wards based on our convenience. However, the choice of the specific wards was based on lottery method.

Q10: To enhance reader-friendliness, provide an overview of variables in table form with operational definitions for both dependent and independent variables.

A10: A table has been added and included in supplementary files (S1 Table).

Q11: Clarify the criteria for defining adolescent pregnancy as “adolescent age of 15-20”, ensuring technical accuracy.

A11: Clarified in response to similar comment above in Q2.

Q12: The sample population details should specify whether only married adolescent girls were included or if unmarried individuals were considered and the reasons for this choice.

A12: Since we wanted to assess the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy the study sample included all the adolescents fitting the eligibility criteria (whether married or unmarried). The questionnaire later assessed their marital status and some of the further analysis were done only in married women.

Results:

Q13: Clarify whether the contraceptive use percentages are among married adolescent girls/women.

A13: Yes, the ‘contraceptive use percentages’ was assessed only among married adolescents.

Q14: Provide the number of adolescent pregnant individuals, which is currently absent in the table.

A14: Apologies for the error. The correction has been made.

Q15: Explain the ANC status among pregnant adolescents and relate it to national protocols on pregnancy and antenatal care indicators. This will help to relate health-seeking behaviour among the adolescent for their care and wellbeing.

A15: This change has been made.

Q16: When discussing the association of adolescent pregnancy with socio-demographic and family variables, acknowledge the wider confidence intervals and the limitations caused by the small sample size, if relevant.

A16: We have discussed the repercussions of smaller sample size in our limitation section.

Q17: Specify if the analysis is based solely on married participants.

A17: Since we wanted to assess the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy the study sample included all the adolescents fitting the eligibility criteria (whether married or unmarried). The questionnaire later assessed their marital status and some of the further analysis were done only in married women.

Q18: The examination of health-seeking behavior is currently missing, this should be more detailed.

A18: This component has been added. Lines 211-217.

Discussion:

Q19:The discussion should offer a more in-depth analysis of the factors influencing teenage pregnancy, connecting them to previous studies.

A19: Some additional references have been added/updated.

Q20: Address statistically insignificant relationships between variables and be honest to explain data, methodology limitations and recommend the need for further research. The sample size is too small to generalize the result.

A20: The sample size was calculated according to norm for a cross sectional study. We have mentioned the limitation of the study and recommendation for further studies. Lines 307-312.

Q21: Teenage pregnancy is often associate with the child marriage in the context like Nepal and child marriage is a result of lack of access to education, information and rights, sexual and reproductive health services etc. which influences individual behaviours. It is important to discuss why child marriage is prevalent there. How has education affected adolescent’s and their family’s health-seeking behaviour? What makes them happy to have a baby as their early age? As health-seeking behaviour is related to individual and community socio-economic and cultural factors. Also, the husband’s education, economic status affects the adolescent pregnancy and health-seeking behaviour which have not been assessed while mother's education and its association with their daughter teenage pregnancy has been briefly touched. I suggest considering all these factors to make a strong argument and scientific explanation for the recommendation. I suggest the author visit global and national report to comprehend the knowledge with the research findings. Include possible alternative explanations and elaborate on policy recommendations, as initially intended.

A21: Thank you for the suggestions. We have added some references to the discussion section in order to make it more rich. However, though the points you have made are very relevant and important in context of teenage pregnancy. I believe exploring some of them is out of scope of this paper. For example, as we have not assessed education and income of the husband in our study, hence we are unable to include this in the discussion.

Q22: Include possible alternative explanations and elaborate on policy recommendations, as initially intended.

A22: Some changes have been made in the discussion section and recommendation has been added.

References:

Q23. Ensure that the citation and referencing align with the journal's requirements, preferably using the Vancouver style. Rely on more scientific articles than newspaper to strengthen the arguments and consider thorough English language editing for better comprehension and logical flow.

A23: Necessary changes have been made.

II. Reply to comments in the pdf file

The comments in the pdf file was similar to that in the summary, so the answer to that has been covered above.

Reply to comments by Reviewer 3

I. Reply to overall comments

Q1: Some of the portion of research methodology need to be clearly explained (inclusion criteria specially) and the result section.

A1: Necessary changes have been made.

II. Reply to comments in the pdf file

Abstract:

Q2: The findings regarding the second objective-health seeking behaviours are not mentioned which need to be considered.

A2: This has been added. Lines 32-33.

Introduction:

Q3. As the recent NDHS 2022 report is readily available, it is recommended to include the most recent ones.

A3: This change has been made. We have revised the introduction using the recent data from the NDHS 2022 and National Health Census 2021.

Q4: 1. According to the title and the objectives of the study, the sample should be all the pregnant adolescent girls. Then only the factors associated for adolescent pregnancy and their health seeking behaviour could be explored.

If not, objectives need to be modified. It may be:1.to find out Prevalence of adolescence pregnancy, 2.to explore the factors associated with adolescence pregnancy and 3. their health seeking behaviour among Chepang women'

A4: In order to know the factors associated with adolescent pregnancy we needed to first find out the prevalence of adolescent pregnancy, hence we have taken adolescent females of reproductive age group for the study as a sample (regardless of pregnancy status).

Here,

Numerator will be either Women aged 15-20 years who have had a live birth within the last 1 year OR Women aged 15-19 years who are pregnant with their first child during the time of the study

Denominator: All adolescent women aged 15 to 20 years. (Reason for taking 20 years is discussed previously)

� The objectives are in fact similar to what you have mentioned. For clarity the objectives have been revised.

Q5: According to the objectives, all the adolescent girls need to be included as the sample (sample size calculation is not needed) and then the above set objectives could be explored. Using the prevalence of previous study, if sample size determination was done, there will be sample selection bias. It has to be addressed in this section how it has been controlled or minimised.

A5: Yes, it would be better to include all the adolescents of the study site rather than calculating the sample size. But this was a small study which was funded by the researchers themselves and it was not feasible for us to include all the adolescent girls in our study. Hence the sample size has been calculated.

Furthermore, the limitation of the study has been explained in lines 307-312.

Methodology

Q6: The inclusion and exclusion criteria need to be explained clearly. Only providing the operational definition of adolescent pregnancy does not suffice. It gave the information that only adolescent pregnancy (those who are pregnant and/or given birth within a year) were included in the study but the result section revealed that irrespective of their pregnant status, all the adolescent girls were included.

A6: The inclusion and external criteria is mentioned in lines 107-109.

Inclusion criteria: All Chepang women aged 15-20 years who gave consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria: The study participants who were unable to answer due to language barrier

The sentence has been revised for better understanding.

For your kind consideration, we have included all the adolescents and not pregnant adolescents.

Results

Q7: It is suggested to use a uniform word to address the sample of the study. Either respondent or participant.

A7: The change has been made to maintain uniformity. The word ‘respondent’ have been replaced by ‘participant’.

Q8: It would be better to present the data in a way that among 217 participants how many of them were the targeted participants (who meet the inclusion criteria of adolescent pregnancy) either in words or in table.

A8: All the 217 participants were adolescents in the age group 15 to 20 years of age. All of them met the inclusion criteria.

Q9: The sum is 99.8 not 100

A9: The change has been made. The total is now 100.

Q10: Total is 99.9

A10: The change has been made. The total is now 100.

Q11: Total is 100.1

A11: The change has been made. The total is now 100.

Q12: Mention whether it is per week, month or per annum.

A12: This is monthly income. The change has been made.

Q13: Is it related to health seeking behaviour then separate title can be given as it is one of the objectives?

A13: This has been done.

Q14: It would be better to operationally define what is health seeking behaviour? Because the highlighted sentence show only hospital related factors as other non-hospital related factors also could have been followed or done by them.

A14: Definition of Reproductive health seeking behavior has been operationalized. Lines 137-140.

Q15: Mention either % or percent.

A15: This change has been made.

Q16: It is suggested to mention adolescent pregnancy even in result section as they are one of the main or targeted samples among whom the objectives of the study are based on.

A16: This has been mentioned in the result section. Lines 204-209.

Q17: Write in sentence format.

A17: This change has been made.

Q18: This section need to include answers to the set objectives in a simpler sentence even a lay person can understand it. The answers to other objective of health seeking behaviour seems missing.

A18: This change has been made.

Decision Letter 1

Umesh Raj Aryal

11 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-26050R1Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy among Chepang women and their health-seeking behavior in Ichchhakamana rural municipality of Chitwan districtPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pant,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review processPlease ensure that your decision is justified on PLOS ONE’s publication criteria and not, for example, on novelty or perceived impact.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 25 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Umesh Raj Aryal, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Correct Spelling in "Fisher Exact Test". Next , VIF values should be presented in result section. Why author did not consider non-response rate in sample size?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301261.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


22 Jan 2024

Journal Requirements:

Comment1: Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Answer: I have revised the references to correct some errors in links and also ensured that the references are correct. I have also removed all the hyperlinks and edited them according to journal guidelines. Additionally, I also checked if any of the cited references were retracted. But there were no retracted manuscripts.

Additional Editor Comments:

Comment 2: Correct Spelling in "Fisher Exact Test".

Answer: The correction has been made. (Lines 26, 153,242)

Comment 3: VIF values should be presented in result section.

Answer: The table of Collinearity Statistics has been added as a table in supplementary files (S2 table).

Comment 4: Why author did not consider non-response rate in sample size?

Answer: I apologize for the error. This portion was omitted by mistake in the last revision.

The calculated sample size was 216.8

Considering 10% non- response rate, total sample size = 216.8/0.9 = 240.8≈ 241

Therefore, the total sample size was 241.

However, Out of the 241 women chosen, a total of 217 participants responded, yielding a response rate of 90%. .

According to this information, necessary change has been made in the methodology (lines 120-121, 127-128) and result section of the manuscript (Lines 180).

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0301261.s009.docx (13.3KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Umesh Raj Aryal

26 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-26050R2Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy among Chepang women and their health-seeking behavior in Ichchhakamana rural municipality of Chitwan districtPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pant,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

ACADEMIC EDITOR: Please insert comments here and delete this placeholder text when finished.Website link of reference no 17 and 27 needs to be revised.

==============================

Please submit your revised manuscript by  Apr 11 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Umesh Raj Aryal, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Web site link for reference no 17  and 27 needs to revised.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301261.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


9 Mar 2024

Response to editor:

Comment 1: Website link of reference no 17 and 27 needs to be revised.

Answer 1: Thank you for the suggestion. The correction has been made. (lines 399 and 433-434)

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer 2024.docx

pone.0301261.s010.docx (13.1KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Umesh Raj Aryal

14 Mar 2024

Factors associated with adolescent pregnancy among Chepang women and their health-seeking behavior in Ichchhakamana rural municipality of Chitwan district

PONE-D-23-26050R3

Dear Dr. Pant,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Umesh Raj Aryal, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

No

Reviewers' comments:

No

Acceptance letter

Umesh Raj Aryal

19 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-26050R3

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Pant,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Umesh Raj Aryal

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Variables of the study.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0301261.s001.docx (13.4KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Collinearity statistics.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0301261.s002.docx (12.5KB, docx)
    S1 Checklist. Inclusivity in global research.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0301261.s003.docx (67KB, docx)
    S2 Checklist. STROBE statement.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0301261.s004.docx (30.8KB, docx)
    S1 File. Master sheet.

    (XLSX)

    pone.0301261.s005.xlsx (37KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Manuscript_Plos One Chepang 15th Aug.docx

    pone.0301261.s006.docx (60.5KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-26050_Comment_AN.pdf

    pone.0301261.s007.pdf (867.7KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PONE-D-23-26050.docx

    pone.0301261.s008.docx (117.9KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0301261.s009.docx (13.3KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewer 2024.docx

    pone.0301261.s010.docx (13.1KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES