Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurotoxicology. 2024 Jan 23;101:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2024.01.003

Maternal Seafood Consumption is Associated with Improved Selenium Status: Implications for Child Health

Nicholas VC Ralston a,*, Laura J Raymond b, Christy L Gilman c, Reni Soon d, Lucia A Seale e, Marla J Berry e
PMCID: PMC10978253  NIHMSID: NIHMS1963662  PMID: 38272071

Abstract

Selenium (Se) is required for synthesis of selenocysteine (Sec), an amino acid expressed in the active sites of Se-dependent enzymes (selenoenzymes), including forms with essential functions in fetal development, brain activities, thyroid hormone metabolism, calcium regulation, and to prevent or reverse oxidative damage. Homeostatic mechanisms normally ensure the brain is preferentially supplied with Se to maintain selenoenzymes, but high methylmercury (CH3Hg) exposures irreversibly inhibit their activities and impair Sec synthesis. Due to Hgs high affinity for sulfur, CH3Hg initially binds with the cysteine (Cys) moieties of thiomolecules which are selenoenzyme substrates. These CH3Hg-Cys adducts enter selenoenzyme active sites and transfer CH3Hg to Sec, thus irreversibly inhibiting their activities. High CH3Hg exposures are uniquely able to induce a conditioned Se-deficiency that impairs synthesis of brain selenoenzymes. Since the fetal brain lacks Se reserves, it is far more vulnerable to CH3Hg exposures than adult brains. This prompted concerns that maternal exposures to CH3Hg present in seafood might impair child neurodevelopment. However, typical varieties of ocean fish contain far more Se than CH3Hg. Therefore, eating them should augment Se-status and thus prevent Hg-dependent loss of fetal selenoenzyme activities. To assess this hypothesis, umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples were collected following delivery of a cohort of 100 babies born on Oahu, Hawaii. Dietary food frequency surveys of the mother’s last month of pregnancy identified groups with no (0 g/wk), low (0-12 g/wk), or high (12+ g/wk) levels of ocean fish consumption. Maternal seafood consumption increased Hg contents in fetal tissues and resulted in ~34% of cord blood samples exceeding the EPA Hg reference level of 5.8 ppb (0.029 μM). However, Se concentrations in these tissues were orders of magnitude higher and ocean fish consumption caused cord blood Se to increase ~9.4 times faster than Hg. Therefore, this study supports the hypothesis that maternal consumption of typical varieties of ocean fish provides substantial amounts of Se that protect against Hg-dependent losses in Se bioavailability. Recognizing the pivotal nature of the Hg:Se relationship provides a consilient perspective of seafood benefits vs. risks and clarifies the reasons for the contrasting findings of certain early studies.

Keywords: Selenium, mercury, cord blood, placenta, pregnancy, seafood, ocean fish

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1963662-f0001.jpg

1. Introduction

The toxicity of mercury (Hg) has been recognized for millennia (Krebs, 2006), but its mechanisms of action, the brain tissue specificity of its effects, prolonged latency, differences in maternal vs. fetal vulnerability, and contrasting outcomes observed in different study populations were poorly understood. These aspects were particularly challenging because the metabolic pathways affected by Hg were unknown to earlier toxicologists. While they were aware that supplemental dietary selenium (Se) prevented or ameliorated the toxic effects of high Hg exposures (Pařízek and Oštádalová, 1967), they imagined Ses high binding affinity with Hg (Dyrssen and Wedborg, 1991) protected the brain from harm by forming insoluble HgSe precipitates that immobilized Hg. Before the importance of Se physiology in the brain was recognized (Chen and Berry, 2003; Reeves and Hoffman, 2009; Nicholson et al., 2022), it was impossible to realize that Se-dependent enzymes (selenoenzymes) of the brain were the molecular target of Hg toxicity and that supplemental dietary Se simply enabled these normal enzyme activities to continue without interruption (Ralston and Raymond, 2018; Raymond and Ralston, 2020; Spiller et al., 2018).

All vertebrate cells express selenoenzymes which incorporate selenocysteine (Sec), the 21st genetically encoded amino acid (Turanov et al., 2011). Selenoenzymes demonstrate tissue-specific patterns of expression and abundance, and high conservation in expression and function across vertebrate species (Santesmasses et al., 2020; Mariotti et al., 2012). The human genome includes 25 genes for selenoproteins that incorporate Sec as the catalytic mediator of their enzyme activities (Hatfield and Gladyshev, 2002; Hatfield et al., 2006) with almost half of these are involved in control, prevention, or reversal of oxidative damage, while others perform further vital functions such as controlling thyroid hormone metabolism and regulating calcium (Ralston, 2021). The selenol of Sec is the most powerful intracellular nucleophile identified to date and its high reduction potential makes it more efficient in catalyzing redox reactions than analogous Cys containing enzymes. (Arnér, 2009). Due to the brain’s high metabolic rate, spontaneously generated reactive oxygen species (ROS) and various byproducts of respiration would cause damage and death in these tissues if specific selenoenzymes were absent (Behne et al., 2000; Chen and Berry, 2003; Reeves and Hoffman, 2009; Nicholson et al., 2022, Pillai et al., 2014; Schweizer and Fabiano, 2022). The cerebral cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, and olfactory bulb have exceptional selenoprotein expression patterns (Zhang et al., 2008). In addition to neurons, the glial cells, parvalbumin-expressing interneurons, and cerebellar Purkinje cells also rely on selenoproteins during development (Schweizer and Fabiano, 2022).

Severe or prolonged shortfalls in dietary Se intakes do not diminish essential selenoenzyme activities in brain, placenta, or endocrine tissues. This is due to expression of LDL Receptor-related Protein 8 (LRP8) on their cell surfaces which selectively bind and internalize selenoprotein P (SELENOP), the plasma Se-transporter (Dlugosz and Nimpf, 2018). SELENOP possesses 10 Sec residues in its primary structure and thus efficiently delivers Se to LRP8 expressing tissues to ensure they are preferentially supplied with the Se they need (Burk et al., 2007; Burk et al., 2014). Mice with Selenop or Lrp8 genetic deletions experience sensorimotor dysfunctions, degeneration of brain tissues, and death unless Se-enriched diets are provided to preserve their brain selenoenzyme activities (Burk et al., 2007). LRP8 expression is also regulated by developmental stage since its constitutive mRNA expression by fetal brain is over 9 times greater than in adult brains (Burk et al., 2014; Pitts et al., 2012). Although dietary Se deficiency in laboratory animals rapidly depletes liver, muscle, and blood Se contents to ~ 2% of normal (Prohaska and Ganther, 1977; Behne et al., 2000), SELENOP-LRP8 homeostatic mechanism redistributes Se from somatic reservoirs to ensure placenta, brain, and endocrine tissues are supplied. As a result, even animals continuously fed Se-deficient laboratory diets for several generations are able to maintain brain Se at ~60% of normal in their offspring (Behne et al., 2000) and thus preserve brain selenoenzyme activities at near normal levels. Mice with genetic deletion of LRP8 suffer severe neurodegeneration in brain regions associated with auditory and motor functions (Burk et al., 2014) exhibiting pathologies similar to that observed following high methyl-Hg (CH3Hg) exposures. While the loss of coordination (ataxia) and cerebellar damage that occurs as a result of genetic deletion of LRP8 could involve additional causes, the loss of selenoenzyme activities is clearly pivotal since supplemental dietary Se prevents these consequences. Postmortem examination of the brains of victims of CH3Hg poisoning show similar patterns of neuronal cell loss in the sensory regions of the cortex, cerebellar granular cells, and primary motor cortex (Castoldi et al., 2003). Regardless of the proximal cause, once selenoenzyme activities falter, damage from spontaneous production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) will begin to accumulate and lead to cytotoxicity and apoptosis as noted in Hg toxicity (Sarafian and Verity, 1991: Clarkson and Magos, 2006) as ferroptosis of neurons and astrocytes is accompanied by precipitates of HgSe which accumulate and demonstrate long term retention in brain parenchyma (Korbas et al., 2010). Mercury toxicity can result in progressive development of neurofunctional deficits, sensory dysfunctions, and further consequences that can lead to permanent disability or death. However, if sufficient Se is provided soon enough, impaired motor, sensory, and cognitive functions are able to recover (Spiller et al., 2017; Spiller et al., 2021), .

CH3Hg in fish and tissues is primarily bound with cysteine (Cys) as CH3Hg-Cys (Harris et al., 2003), a molecular mimic of methionine that is readily absorbed and selectively transported across cell membranes (Aschner and Clarkson, 1989). This enables it to bypass placental and blood-brain barriers and preferentially distribute into rapidly growing tissue compartments where it may impair the synthesis and activities of selenoenzymes (Watanabe et al., 1999a; 1999b). Since the Cys moieties of many cellular antioxidants are substrates for selenoenzymes, these thiomolecules can function as suicide substrates by delivering CH3Hg in the proper orientation to bring Hg into close proximity with the Se of the active site Sec. While Hg has a high affinity for the sulfur of Cys, its affinity for the Se of Sec is orders of magnitude higher (Dyrssen and Wedborg, 1991). As a result, Hg transfers its association from Cys to form CH3Hg-Sec (Raymond and Ralston 2004; Ralston and Raymond, 2018; Ralston, 2021a), thus inactivating the enzyme. The CH3Hg-Sec eventually degrades to form insoluble HgSe precipitates that permanently retire Se from further participation in selenoenzyme synthesis. Therefore, by biochemical definition, CH3Hg is a highly specific irreversible selenoenzyme inhibitor that can directly induce a localized Se-deficiency and prevent selenoenzyme synthesis in brain tissues (Ralston et al., 2008; Ralston 2021a). High Hg exposures cause Se attrition and if Hg-dependent depletion rates exceed dietary Se intakes, may deprive the brain of biologically available Se. While other electrophile exposures can impair selenoenzyme activities in other tissues (Ozoani et al., 2023;), a high CH3Hg exposure is the only environmental insult known to deprive the brain of Se and seriously impair selenoenzyme synthesis and activities (Ralston and Raymond, 2015; ).

To characterize risks of Hg-dependent depletion of placental and fetal Se in association with maternal consumption of ocean fish, Hg must be assessed in relation to tissue Se. Based on the high Se contents of ocean fish from Hawaii (Kaneko and Ralston, 2007; Ralston et al., 2019) and elsewhere (Robinson and Schroff, 2004; Burger and Gochfeld, 2013), we hypothesize that increasing maternal consumption of ocean fish will improve rather than diminish Se-status in fetal tissues. If so, ocean fish consumption would prevent instead of increase risks of Hg-dependent diminishments in Se-availability. To evaluate this hypothesis, this study examined the effects of maternal ocean fish consumption on fetal Hg and Se as reflected in cord blood and placental tissues.

2. Methods

This study was approved by the Western Institutional Review Board and informed consent was obtained from all participants and all data depersonalized. Methods used in this study were fully described in Gilman et al., (2015), but are briefly stated below.

2.1. Subject enrollment

Pregnant women who presented to the Kapiolani Medical Center Labor and delivery suite between June 2010 and March 2011 were approached about participating in this study and assessed for eligibility to participate. Eligibility criteria included: age 18 to 45 years old, arriving in labor with a full-term singleton fetus, gestational age ≥ 37 weeks at the Kapiolani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu, Hawaii, with no chronic medical conditions, no tobacco, alcohol, or illicit drug use. The first 100 eligible participants to consent were included in this cohort. Participants completed a questionnaire that recorded demographic information and a dietary survey of seafood consumption during their last month of pregnancy. Participants reported their ethnicity and quantified their seafood intakes. Seafood consumption was calculated by multiplying the number of times they reported eating specific varieties in the past month by the amount they typically ate per meal. Seafood consumption was almost exclusively ocean fish with only 5 individuals reporting an occasional meal that included either lobster, crab, shrimp, mussel, squid, or octopus. Seafood consumption rates were used to separate subjects into three groups that ate either: no (0 oz/wk), 0-12 oz/wk, or 12 or more oz/wk of seafood in the past month.

2.2. Sample Collection

A whole blood sample (~14 mL in standard EDTA anticoagulated vacutainer) was collected post-delivery from the umbilical cord. Within two hours of delivery, 2 mL aliquots were stored at −25°C until shipping for elemental analysis. Placental tissue samples were collected from regions proximal and peripheral to the umbilical cord within 2 hours of delivery, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until shipping for elemental analysis.

2.3. Selenium and Mercury Analysis

Umbilical cord blood and placental tissue samples were shipped to the University of North Dakota for elemental analysis. Individual (~0.25 g) samples of blood and placental tissue were weighed into single-use, trace element-free 50-mL digestion tubes (Environmental Express, Mt. Pleasant, SC) prepared in a series of digestion sets along with analysis blanks, certified reference materials (UTAK) and quality control samples. Samples (and identically treated controls) were treated with 5 mL of HNO3 (Fisher Trace Metal Grade, Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA), capped, and heated at 85°C in deep cell hot blocks (Environmental Express) for 24 hours. Samples were cooled, then 1.5 mL of 30% H2O2 (Fisher Certified A.C.S., Fisher Scientific) was added prior to returning to the dry block at 85°C for 8 hours. Samples were cooled, treated with 15 mL of 12 N HCl (Fisher Trace Metal Grade, Fisher Scientific) and heated at 90°C for 90 minutes to reduce SeVI to SeIV. Samples were cooled and diluted to 25 mL with double-distilled water. Digested and diluted samples were analyzed for total Hg by cold-vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry using a CETAC M-6000A (CETAC Technologies, Omaha, NE). Total Se was analyzed by hydride generation atomic absorption spectroscopy using a PS Analytical Dual Millennium Excalibur (PS Analytical, Deerfield Beach, FL). Analytical blanks and whole blood controls (UTAK Laboratories, Valencia CA) for mercury and selenium were digested and run alongside samples in all batches. The certified values and expected ranges for Hg (14.7 ± 2.2 μg/kg) and Se (214 ±32 μg/kg) for UTAK 2 coincided well with the observed values: 13.6 ± 1.1 μg Hg/kg and 202 ± 13.1 μg Se/kg, respectively.

Upon confirming analytical quality control results were consistent with expectations, the data from each digestion batch were qualified for inclusion in the database. Mass concentrations in samples in μg/kg were converted to molar concentrations (μM) using 1.06 g/mL as a density correction for umbilical cord blood and 1.05 g/mL for placental tissues. Descriptive statistics and data distributions for mass and molar concentrations of Hg and Se were calculated and graphed in relation to relative fish consumption as described above. Elemental concentration results in cord blood and placental samples were segregated into groups based on maternal fish consumption levels as shown in Table 1. To conform with the Standard International system and for clarity of understanding of biochemical interactions, concentrations were preferentially reported in molar units, but since mass concentration units are commonly used, those are shown for comparison. Molar concentrations of Hg and Se were uniformly plotted in log-log scale graphs for cord blood (Figure 1) and placental samples (Figure 2). The Benchmark Dose lower confidence limit (BMDL) level of 58 ppb Hg (~0.29 μM) and cord blood Hg reference level (National Research Council, 2000) of 5.8 ppb (~0.029 μM) corresponding to the US EPA 0.1 μg Hg/kg/bw reference dose (RfD) regulatory criteria are shown for comparison in Figure 1.

Table 1.

Fish consumption effects on mass and molar concentrations of Hg and Se in fetal tissues*

Cord Blood
Fish Intake
n μg Hg/kg μg Se/kg μM Hg μM Se
No Fish 14 2.32 ± 1.81a 142.87 ± 37.20 0.011 ± 0.008a 1.707 ± 0.444
Low Fish 76 5.54 ± 3.84b 153.91 ± 27.00 0.026 ± 0.018b 1.839 ± 0.323
High Fish 10 6.24 ± 3.15b 165.08 ± 25.04 0.029 ± 0.015b 1.972 ± 0.299
Placenta
Fish Intake
n μg Hg/kg μg Se/kg μM Hg μM Se
No Fish 14 3.50 ± 3.11a 246.18 ± 29.84 0.017 ± 0.015a 2.969 ± 0.360
Low Fish 76 6.99 ± 4.76b 257.27 ± 32.66 0.033 ± 0.023b 3.102 ± 0.394
High Fish 10 7.84 ± 3.92b 238.34 ± 29.11 0.037 ± 0.019b 2.875 ± 0.051
*

Fish consumption histories were assessed in participating mothers for partitioning into groups with either no (0 oz/wk), low (0-12 oz/wk), or high (12+oz/wk) ocean fish intakes. Means and standard deviations are shown. Statistically significant differences (p<0.05) as established by unpaired Student’s t-test are indicated by different superscripts.

Fig 1.

Fig 1.

Molar concentrations of Hg and Se in umbilical cord blood samples from the current study are shown in relation to umbilical cord blood data reported in the Faroe Islands. Data from the Faroe Islands was acquired from graphs in Choi et al. (2008), using Image J (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) as described in Ralston et al. (2015). The dashed line indicates the benchmark dose lower confidence limit (BMDL = 58 ppb, ≈ 0.29 μM) established using data from the Faroe’s Study and the dotted line shows the reference cord blood Hg level = 5.8 ppb, (≈ 0.029 μM) associated with the US EPA Hg RfD of 0.1 μg/kg-bw/d after the 10-fold uncertainty factor had been applied. For reference purposes, the diagonal line indicates the equimolar Hg:Se stoichiometry.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Concentrations of Hg and Se in placenta samples from Hawaii did not approach equimolar stoichiometry and were not correlated. Elemental concentrations observed in placenta samples reported from the Genoa study (Capelli and Minganti, 1986) are shown for comparison.

Comparison data from previous studies were examined to provide context. Umbilical cord blood Hg and Se concentrations from the Faroe Islands study were acquired from graphs shown in Choi et al. (2008), using Image J (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) particle recognition software to identify x and y coordinates (See Ralston et al., 2015) and displayed for comparison with data in Figure 1. Placental Hg and Se from Genoa (Capelli and Minganti, 1986) were adjusted from dry to wet weight values and converted to molar concentrations.

2.4. Statistical analysis

A standard unpaired Student’s T-test was used for comparisons of seafood consumption-dependent differences as indicated in the accompanying table and figure legends. Differences with p values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Regressions were performed to assess relationships between Hg and Se in cord blood and placenta. If significant linear relationships (p < 0.05) were noted between their elemental concentrations, the slope, intercept, and trendlines for the data were calculated and reported in comparison to reference data. To facilitate comparisons of Hg and Se molar concentrations observed in cord blood and placental tissues, the observed and reference data sets were plotted using log-scale graphs which included an index indicating the 1:1 molar ratio.

3. Results

3.1. Umbilical cord blood Hg and Se concentrations

Umbilical cord blood and placental Se concentrations were in substantial excess of Hg in all samples from the Hawaii cohort (Table 1). The cord blood Se concentration of 1.707 ± 0.444 μM observed in the group whose mothers did not eat ocean fish and the regression intercept for cord blood Se of 1.703 μM (see Figure 1) indicates Se status among this cohort in Hawaii is adequate even without seafood consumption. Average cord blood Hg rose from 0.011 among those whose mothers consumed no ocean fish to 0.029 μM in babies whose mothers consumed more than the recommended amount. The Hg contents of all but one cord blood sample were under 0.100 μM while all but one Se concentration was in excess of 1.000 μM. The Se concentrations in these samples were orders of magnitude higher, respectively averaging 1.707 and 1.972 μM in these groups. Maternal seafood consumption increased placental Hg accumulation but did not affect placental Se. Between groups with no vs high fish consumption, placental Hg concentrations doubled from 0.017 to 0.037 μM. Placental Se was not affected by maternal seafood intakes but was approximately 2 orders of magnitude higher (~3 μM) than the Hg levels from mothers with high fish consumptions.

Cord blood Hg and Se data had been requested from the Faroe Islands but was not made available. In lieu of having the data provided, the x and y coordinate data was acquired from graphs in Choi et al. (2008) using Image J (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) particle recognition software to identify Hg and Se elemental concentrations as described in Ralston et al. (2015). Cord blood Se status was higher in the Hawaiian cohort (1.703 μM) than in the Faroe Islands (1.374 μM), but increased in direct relation (p<0.0001) with Hg in both cohorts (See Figure 1). However, Se contents increased >9 μM for every μM of increase in cord blood Hg in samples from Hawaii, but rose less than 0.5 μM per μM increase in Hg in cord bloods from the Faroe Island’s cohort. Therefore, predicted trends for Hg:Se molar ratios among samples from Hawaii do not intersect the 1:1 molar ratio associated with increasing risk. However, in the Faroes, cord blood Hg rose in relation to Se and approached/exceeded equimolar stoichiometries at the higher levels of exposure.

3.2. Placental Hg and Se concentrations

Placental Hg concentrations were significantly (p < 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.280) associated with cord blood Hg contents: y = 0.672x + 0.014 and placental Se was significantly (p < 0.001, adjusted R2 = 0.113) related to cord blood Se: y = 0.398x + 2.334. The Hg contents of all but one placenta sample were under 0.100 μM while all placental Se concentrations were in excess of 2.000 μM. While maternal seafood consumption resulted in an increase of ~0.020 μM Hg in placental tissues from this cohort, their Se contents averaged ~3.232 ± 0.417 μM and did not show any tendency to increase as Hg concentration rose. The average Se concentrations in placentas from the Genoa study were lower (~1.54 ± 0.33 μM), as were their Hg contents (0.06 ± 0.04 Hg μM). In contrast to cord blood, no correlation between Se and Hg was observed in placenta. The highest placental Hg observed in the Hawaiian cohort was just over 0.100 μM, but since the Se in that sample was ~3.000 μM, there little risk of its availability being compromised. Although placental Se contents were considerably lower in samples from the Genoa Study, their Hg contents were similarly unlikely to diminish Se bioavailability.

4. Discussion

4.1. Key findings

The concentrations of Se in fetal tissues from the Hawaii cohort are substantially higher than Hg levels regardless of the amount of ocean fish mothers consumed. Since ocean fish generally contain far more Se than Hg, maternal seafood consumption resulted in fetal cord blood Se increasing ~10 times faster than Hg. Therefore, instead of increasing risks of Hg-dependent diminishments of Se availability, ocean fish consumption protects against loss of selenoenzyme activities. While seafood consumption is accompanied by small increases in cord blood Hg relative to Se and resulted in ~34% of cord blood samples in this cohort exceeding the EPA reference level of 5.8 ppb (0.029 μM), even the highest level of Hg measured in these samples (0.112 μM Hg) would have negligible effects on availability of the 3.227 μM Se present in that sample. Likewise, even the highest Hg level observed in placenta tissues (0.100 μM) would hardly diminish availability of the 4.015 μM Se present. Unlike umbilical cord blood, placental Se is not correlated with Hg, possibly reflecting maintenance of adequate Se levels by high LRP8 expression augmenting SELENOP uptake. Similar homeostatic mechanisms would be expected to maintain optimal Se in fetal brain and endocrine tissues.

4.2. The biochemical context of CH3Hg-dependent inhibition of brain selenoenzyme activities

Due to the high affinities of thiols for Hg and the high tissue concentrations of Cys, CH3Hg initially forms CH3Hg-Cys. Since thiomolecules are cofactors and/or substrates for selenoenzymes such as glutathione peroxidases and thioredoxin reductases, CH3Hg bound to these forms function as suicide substrates that directly deliver Hg into selenoenzyme active sites in the proper orientation and proximity to react with the active site Sec. The greater affinity of Hg for Se and the additional potentiation of reactivity afforded by coordinated actions within the tertiary structure of the enzyme itself result in CH3Hg transferring its covalent association from Cys to Sec. Since CH3Hg is selectively delivered into the active site where it directly binds to the primary catalytic mediator, it is by definition a highly specific irreversible inhibitor. But in contrast to all other irreversible inhibitors in which the inhibitor is eventually released, Hg binding to Se is unique in that the bond that is formed is truly irreversible. Once HgSe forms, aqua regia is the only acid that can decompose it. Much of the HgSe that forms is deposited in cellular lysosomes where crystalline precipitates accumulate and demonstrate long term retention.

Because Hgs affinity for Se orders of magnitude higher than its affinity for thiols, it might be expected that CH3Hg would sequester equimolar amounts at equilibrium, but this is not the case. Although Hgs affinity for Se is far greater, its affinity for thiols is still very high and their intracellular concentrations of ~300 mM are ~five orders of magnitude higher than the ~1 μM concentrations of Se. Therefore, thermodynamics compete with mass action effects to result in Hg being almost equally distributed between cellular Se and thiols at equilibrium. Since the approach to equilibrium is very slow under these conditions, the majority of Hg which enters the body will exit without binding Se.

Selenocysteine is unique among genetically encoded amino acids in that it is not reused in subsequent cycles of selenoprotein synthesis. Instead, each cycle of their synthesis requires a sequence of steps in which existing Sec residues are degraded to release inorganic Se in preparation for de-novo Sec synthesis concurrent with its incorporation in the primary structure of the selenoprotein being expressed (Berry et al., 2001; Xu et al., 2006; Labunskyy et al., 2014; Ha et al., 2019). As Se is transported through maternal, placental, and fetal tissue compartments, this sequence of Sec degradation and resynthesis may be repeated many times. Selenium from dietary sources or residing in maternal tissues is used to create SELENOP which is carried in the plasma until it is acquired by the LRP8 expressed by the placenta and selectively internalized. The SELNOP eventually enters the fetal cord blood where it is taken up by tissues which express LRP8 (e.g., fetal brain) to ensure the Se needs of these rapidly growing tissues are met. Any interruption of selenoenzyme synthesis would leave these tissues without the essential functions they require (e.g., preventing and/or reversing oxidative damage). In contrast, adult brain tissues have endogenous reserves of Se and do not create new cells at the same rate as fetal brain. Therefore, Hg exposures that cause serious impairments in fetal brain selenoenzymes will often leave the maternal brain unaffected (Watanabe 1999a; Watanabe 1999b).

An important aspect of CH3Hg exposures is its ability to severely diminish Se distribution through the placenta (Pařízek et al., 1971) and its unique capacity to cross placental and blood-brain barriers (Aschner and Clarkson, 1989) that enable it to impair selenoenzyme activities in fetal brain tissues (Watanabe 1999a; Watanabe 1999b). Other than genetic knockouts of LRP8 or SELENOP, toxic CH3Hg exposures are the only environmental insult capable of inducing a Se-deficiency in the brain. Genetic knockouts and high CH3Hg exposures both reduce the activities of key brain selenoenzymes such as glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and thioredoxin reductase (TXNRD), jeopardizing their ability to prevent and reverse oxidative damage. Impaired Se distribution to the brain arising from either cause will result in Se-deficiencies in brain tissues which cannot survive without selenoenzyme protection. The loss of brain selenoenzyme activities result in adverse effects including sensorimotor dysfunctions, neurological damage, and cell death. Providing supplemental dietary Se is able to prevent these consequences in genetic knockout (Burk et al., 2007; Burk et al., 2014) as well as CH3Hg toxicity models (Ralston & Raymond, 2015; Stringari et al., 2008; Watanabe et al., 1999a). Supplemental Se was recently applied to successfully treat a patient hospitalized with severe health effects as a result of a sustained high exposure to elemental Hg (Spiller et al., 2017). The patient responded rapidly and recovered completely.

Evidence supporting the “Se-sequestration mechanism of Hg toxicity” has developed through the past 50+ years and has become increasingly well established (Watanabe et al., 1999a; 1999b Seppänen et al., 2004; Stringari et al., 2008; Ralston et al., 2007; Ralston et al., 2008; Ralston and Raymond, 2015). While it had earlier been assumed that Hg caused oxidative damage through direct reactions with biomolecules, this was disproven by Seppänen et al. (2004) who demonstrated Hg-dependent oxidative damage was the result of Hg-inhibition if the activities of selenoenzymes that prevent and reverse oxidation caused by ROS and related products of normal respiration. Soon afterwards, Carvalho et al. (2008) demonstrated CH3Hg potently inhibited TXNRD activities (IC50 of ~19.7 nM) and numerous in vitro and in vivo studies have since confirmed these findings (Carvalho et al. 2011; Usuki et al., 2011; Branco et al., 2014; 2017; Ralston & Raymond, 2015; Rodrigues et al., 2015; Branco et al., 2022).

Therefore, high CH3Hg exposures during pregnancy are a significant concern if dietary Se intakes are too low to offset losses due to Hg sequestration. Homeostatic mechanisms readily mobilize Se from tissue reserves as well as from dietary Se intakes to continuously ensure the brain is provided with adequate Se. This controlled redistribution of Se to supply the brain reveals the biochemical basis for the previously inexplicable latency period (Weiss et al., 2002) between Hg exposure and the onset of signs and symptoms of toxicity.

Biochemical interactions between certain nutrients are already well described and synergistic effects are likely. For example, docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a fatty acid which is essential in the brain. Since DHA possesses 6 unsaturated double bonds which are vulnerable to oxidation, tissues with high DHA contents are highly dependent on selenoenzymes that prevent and reverse oxidative damage which spontaneously arises due to ROS and other reactive products of normal cell respiration. Similarly, Ses vital role in deiodinase enzymes suggest iodine from seafoods may assist in ensuring healthy thyroid hormone balance is maintained during fetal growth. Another Se-containing nutrient, selenoneine, is a novel molecular form of Se whose abundance in ocean fish was discovered just over a decade ago (Yamashita et al., 2010). Its physiology and roles in counteracting Hg toxicity (Usuki et al., 2011) are being studied, but if its beneficial effects arise independently or if they occur through selenoenzyme metabolism remains unknown. It may be that degradation pathways release inorganic Se for Sec synthesis in a pathway analogous to selenomethionine. Since the nutritional benefits of ocean fish consumption are substantial, there is a need to establish whether these effects are due to individual nutrients in ocean fish or are the aggregate effects of the total package of nutrients that ocean fish consumption provides (Liu and Ralston 2021).

4.3. The selenium perspective reveals the underlying consistency of otherwise “conflicting” study findings

Mercury toxicity associated with Hg:Se exceeding equimolar stoichiometries is clearly observed in the umbilical cords saved from births occurring in the years before and during the Minamata poisoning incident as reported by Nishigaki and Harada, (1975). Samples collected prior to the poisoning incident had Hg:Se molar ratios averaging 0.03:1.00, but those born during the peak Hg exposure period contained ~4.66 μM, nearly 5 times more than their Se contents (0.97 μM). Such high Hg exposures would have retired tissue Se as HgSe and greatly reduced the availability of Se required for selenoenzyme synthesis and activities. The effects of Hg exposures in Minamata caused concern regarding exposures from other seafoods, so studies were initiated in sentinel populations with high Hg intakes in New Zealand, the Faroe Islands, and the Seychelle Islands.

High maternal Hg exposures from eating great white shark meat prepared as fish and chips (Mitchell et al., 1982) in New Zealand occurred at a time when its population had notably low Se-status (Thomson and Robinson, 1980). This would have enhanced their vulnerability to the effects of high exposures to Hg and other persistent bioaccumulative toxicants PBTs that accumulate in great white shark meats (Crump et al., 1998). Similarly high exposures to Hg along with other PBTs arose from maternal consumption of pilot whale blubber, muscle, and organ meats in the Faroe Islands (Grandjean et al., 1997; Grandjean et al., 1998). Subtle diminishments in child performance outcomes (Debes et al., 2006) were noted in association with increasing Hg, but it important to note that cord blood Hg in the Faroe Islands approached equimolar stoichiometries with Se (See Fig 1). While dietary Se intakes in the Faroes were better than in New Zealand at the time of their seafood consumption study, both are poor compared to the United States where the RDA of 50 μg Se/day (~633 μmol Se/day) is typically met and usually exceeded, even by consumers that do not eat Se-rich ocean fish. The US EPA advisory is based on findings in the Faroe Islands, but it is important to note that pilot whale blubber, muscle, and liver provided 3.6, 68.9, and 69.6 μM Hg/day, resulted in ~85% of their total Hg exposures with only ~15% arising from ocean fish (Ralston et al., 2015). However, the ocean fish they ate provided over 80% of their total Se intake from seafood.

Pilot whales are apex marine predators that live 40-60 years and reach body weights of 5,000 pounds (~2,300 kg) at maturity (NOAA, 2023). Eating them not only results in high exposures to Hg, but also PCBs, dioxins, cadmium (Cd), and all other PBTs which accumulate in their tissues. Since Cd is also a soft electrophile that inhibits selenoenzymes (Splittgerber and Tappel, 1979; Ralston 2021b), it is worth noting that pilot whale blubber, muscle, liver, and kidney respectively contained: 7.1, 9.8, 106.8, and 55.1 μM Cd (Julshamn et al., 1987). These are in molar excess of Se in all tissues except liver. It should be noted that the Hg, Cd, and related PBT exposures among pilot whale consumers in the Faroes are among the highest measured in any human population (Sharma et al., 2015; Anderson et al., 1987; Undeman, et al., 2018).

Since the biochemical mechanism of Hg toxicity had not been identified, the BMDL for Hg (58 ppb ≈ 0.29 μM) was based on data (Budtz-Jorgensen et al., 2000) which omitted consideration of Se. At the time, it was unclear whether the risks of Hg exposures from whale meat were any different from eating ocean fish so the unexplained reasons for the contrasting findings of the major studies caused concern. In recognition of the numerous unknown aspects of the Hg issue, a 10-fold uncertainty factor was applied to the BMDL as a precaution to ensure adequate protection of vulnerable subpopulations (National Research Council, 2000). The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) established 5.8 μg Hg/L as the reference level and pregnant and nursing mothers and young children were encouraged to eat no more than 12 oz (340 g) of ocean fish per week. While well intentioned, this warning has caused widespread anxiety regarding risks associated with eating ocean fish and diminished seafood consumption during pregnancy (Oken et al., 2003, Bloomingdale et al., 2010).

4.4. The Health Benefit Value in relation to mercury risk assessments

The need to provide a more reliably accurate and easy to interpret index of risk associated with Hg exposures prompted development of the Health Benefit Value (HBV). The molar concentrations of Hg and Se in samples are used to determine the HBV using the equation reported in Ralston and Raymond (2016):

HBV=((SeHg)Se)(Se+Hg) (Equation 1)

Apex marine predators such as great white sharks, mako sharks, and pilot whales accumulate Hg and other PBTs throughout their long lives and are among the rare types of “seafood” which contain more Hg than Se (Ralston et al., 2019) as shown in Figure 3. These species have HBVs that become increasingly negative as they grow older and larger, and they should be avoided during pregnancy. While these seafoods have not been shown to have adverse effects on adults, their PBT burdens are notably high so consistent consumption of these forms is inadvisable. In contrast, the majority of ocean fish are considerably smaller, have shorter lives, and contain far more Se than Hg (see examples shown in Figure 3), and therefore have uniformly positive HBVs. It should also be noted that not all sharks have negative HBVs since less predatory shark varieties such as threshers do not accumulate Hg in excess of Se and therefore have positive HBVs.

Fig 3.

Fig 3.

Molar relationships between Hg and Se in various seafood types. The fish data represent varieties of commonly consumed fish collected from Hawaii fisheries (Kaneko and Ralston, 2007; Ralston et al., 2019) and pilot whale data are from Julshamn et al., (1987) collected around the time of the Faroes Study. The diagonal line indicates the 1:1 Hg:Se molar ratio. (Note: 1 mg Se/kg = ~12.6 μM Se and 1 mg Hg/kg = ~5 μM Hg).

The Se-perspective explains why maternal consumption of ocean fish with positive HBVs are associated with beneficial outcomes while eating seafoods with negative HBVs has been consistently associated with Hg-dependent risks. The HBVs of great white sharks (HBV=-120) eaten in New Zealand or the pilot whales (HBV=-80) eaten in the Faroe Islands explain the adverse effects observed in those early studies. Although the average Hg exposures reported in the Seychelles study (Myers and Davidson, 1998; Davidson et al., 2011; van Wijngaarden et al., 2013; van Wijngaarden et al., 2017) were higher than in the Faroes, beneficial effects were associated with increasing seafood intakes. Since nearly all of the ocean fish eaten in the Seychelles contain far more Se than Hg (Robinson and Schroff, 2004) and thus have positive HBVs, their findings are consistent with expectations.

Increasing maternal consumption of typical Se-rich varieties of ocean fish which are also notable sources of omega-3 fatty acids and other nutrients is associated with substantial improvements in neurodevelopmental outcomes (Myers and Davidson, 1998; Hibbeln et al., 2007; Hibbeln et al., 2019; Davidson et al., 2011; Julvez et al., 2016; Llop et al., 2017; Golding et al., 2017; van Wijngaarden et al., 2013; van Wijngaarden et al., 2017). Reviews of multiple large scale epidemiological studies have shown that increasing ocean fish consumption during pregnancy is associated with improvements in child IQs, scholastic abilities, and social skills (Avella-Garcia and Julvez, 2014; Starling et al., 2015; Spiller et al., 2019; Hibbeln, et al., 2019; Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee, 2020). The most recent review of the effects of maternal fish consumption on child neurodevelopment describes findings from over 200,000 mother-child pairs which collectively report 51 beneficial associations with neurodevelopmental outcomes (Spiller et al., 2023).

Many health agencies continue to warn against Hg-exposure risks from eating typical varieties of ocean fish based on the outcomes of studies involving great white shark and pilot whale consumption, seafoods which never were available to most consumers. Just as great white sharks are no longer commonly consumed in New Zealand (Shark Facts, 2023), pilot whale meats are no longer consumed by pregnant women in the Faroe Islands (Weihe and Grandjean, 2012). However, consumers continue to face uncertainty and confusion arising from unclear and contradictory advice because of findings based on their consumption. This misattribution error contributes to confusion among health advisors and maternal avoidance of seafood during pregnancy (Oken et al., 2003, Bloomingdale et al., 2010) even though studies performed in the Seychelles and elsewhere (Myers and Davidson, 1998; Hibbeln et al., 2007; Davidson et al., 2011; Julvez et al., 2016; Llop et al., 2017; Golding et al., 2017; van Wijngaarden et al., 2013; van Wijngaarden et al., 2017) confirm ocean fish consumption is beneficial to child outcomes. To remedy these misattribution errors and the misplaced restrictions imposed by the current advisory, there is an urgent need to update maternal seafood consumption advisories to ensure future generations will benefit from improved prenatal access to essential nutrients provided by ocean fish.

4.5. Conclusions

This study confirms the hypothesis that maternal ocean fish consumption provides substantial amounts of Se to protect against the risk of Hg exposure diminishing fetal Se bioavailability and selenoenzyme activities. The effects high Hg exposures on Se metabolism provide a consilient perspective of the seafood Hg issue that explains the contrasting findings of previous studies. Since eating ocean fish will prevent rather than cause Hg-dependent diminishments in fetal Se availability, maternal concerns regarding supposed risks associated with seafood consumption can be alleviated. However, in Se-poor regions where exposures to Hg and other electrophiles from freshwater fish are likely to pose greater risks, they may currently be unheeded and contribute to pathologies which may not be adequately considered (Ralston, 2023).

The 10-fold uncertainty factor applied to findings from the Faroes study which appeared justified by the multiple unknowns regarding Hgs mechanism of toxicity is no longer required now that its effects on normal Se physiology in brain health and fetal development are understood. Furthermore, now that it is clear that studies indicating maternal Hg exposures from eating pilot whale meats provide appropriate guidance for protecting whale eating populations, but do not apply to populations which eat ocean fish, it is time to revise public health policies to ensure future generations benefit from the essential nutrients which ocean fish provide.

Highlights:

  • Selenium-dependent enzymes prevent and reverse oxidative damage in the brain and other tissues.

  • Mercury inhibits selenium-dependent enzymes, resulting in neurological damage and dysfunction.

  • Consumption of certain seafoods which contain more mercury than selenium may harm child health.

  • Ocean fish consumption caused cord blood selenium to increase ~10 times faster than mercury.

  • Therefore, eating selenium-rich ocean fish will directly counteract mercury toxicity.

Acknowledgements:

M.J.B. received financial support from National Institutes of Health grants P20-GM139753 from the NIGMS, G12-MD007601 and U54-MD007584 from the NIMHD and R01DK47320 from the NIDDK L.A.S. research is funded by grants R01DK128390 from the NIDDK and MedRes_2023_00002973 from the Ingeborg V.F. McKee Fund from the Hawaii Community Foundation. N.V.C.R. and L.J.R.’s mercury-selenium research was funded by grant NA09NMF4520172 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) National Center for Science to Achieve Results (STAR) grant RD834792-01: Fish Selenium Health Benefit Values in Mercury Risk Management, with a small amount of additional funding provided by Seafood Industry Research Fund (SIRF).

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could influence the work reported in this paper. NVCR had travel costs covered by Conxemar Seafoods to present related findings at an international conference arranged for the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FOA). NVCR and LJR had their travel costs covered by FOA and World Health Organization (WHO) to provide expert consultation on related subject matter. N.V.C.R. and L.J.R.’s mercury-selenium research was funded by grant NA09NMF4520172 from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) National Center for Science to Achieve Results (STAR) grant RD834792-01: Fish Selenium Health Benefit Values in Mercury Risk Management, with a small additional amount provided by the Seafood Industry Research Fund (SIRF). The funding agencies had no role in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of the work and had no input on the decision to submit this article for publication. This article has not been reviewed by the funding agencies and no official endorsements should be inferred.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References:

  1. Anderson A, Julshamn K, Ringdal O, Morkore J, 1987. Trace elements intake in the Faroe Islands II. Intake of mercury and other elements by consumption of pilot whales (Globicephalus meleanus). Sci. Total Environ 65, 63–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnér ESJ, 2009. Focus on mammalian thioredoxin reductases – Important selenoproteins with versatile functions. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta – General Subjects, 1790, 495–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Aschner M, Clarkson TW, 1989. Methyl mercury uptake across bovine brain capillary endothelial cells in vitro: The role of amino acids. Pharmacol. Toxicol 64, 293–297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Avella-Garcia CB, Julvez J, 2014. Seafood Intake and Neurodevelopment: A Systematic Review. Curr. Environ. Health Rpt 1, 46–77. doi. 10.1007/s40572-013-0006-4 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Behne D, Pfeifer H, Rothlein D, Kyriakopoulos A, 2000. Cellular and subcellular distribution of selenium and selenium-containing proteins in the rat. In: Roussel AM, Favier AE, Anderson RA, (Eds), Trace Elements in Man and Animals 10:29–34. Kluwer Academic Plenum Publishers, New York. [Google Scholar]
  6. Berry MJ, Tujebajeva RM, Copeland PR, Xu XM, Carlson BA, Martin III GW, Low SC, Mansell JB, Grundner-Culemann E, Harney JW, Driscoll DM, Hatfield DL, 2001. Selenocysteine incorporation directed from the 3′UTR: characterization of eukaryotic Efsec and mechanistic implications, Biofactors 14 (1-4):17–24. 10.1002/biof.5520140104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bloomingdale A, Guthrie LB, Price S, Wright RO, Platek D, Haines J, Oken E, 2010. A qualitative study of fish consumption during pregnancy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 92(5):1234–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Branco V, Santos AG, Rodrigues J, Gonçalves J, Lu J, Holmgren A, Carvalho C, 2014. Mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase inhibition, selenium status and Nrf-2 activation are determinant factors modulating the toxicity of mercury compounds. Free Radical Biol. Med 73, 95–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Branco V, Coppo L, Solá S, Rodrigues C, Lu J, Holmgren A, Carvalho C, 2017. Impaired cross-talk between the thioredoxin and glutathione systems is related to ASK-1 mediated apoptosis in neuronal cells exposed to mercury. Redox. Biol 13, 278–287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Branco V, Carvalho L, Barboza C, Mendes E, Cavaco A, Carvalho C, 2022. Selenium and Redox Enzyme Activity in Pregnant Women Exposed to Methylmercury. Antioxidants (Basel). 11(11):2291. doi. 10.3390/antiox11112291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Burger J, Gochfeld M, 2013. Selenium/mercury molar ratios in freshwater, marine, and commercial fish from the USA: variation, risk, and health management. Rev. Environ. Health 28(2-3):129–43. doi. 10.1515/reveh-2013-0010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Budtz-Jorgensen E, Grandjean P, Keiding N, White RF, Weihe P, 2000. Benchmark dose calculations of methylmercury-associated neurobehavioural deficits. Toxicol. Lett 112-113:193–9. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(99)00283-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Burk RF, Hill KE, Olson GE, Weeber EJ, Motley AK, Winfrey VP, Austin LM, 2007. Deletion of apolipoprotein E receptor-2 in mice lowers brain selenium and causes severe neurological dysfunction and death when a low selenium diet is fed. J. Neurosci 27(23):6207–6211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Burk RF, Hill KE, Motley AK, Winfrey VP, Kurokawa S, Mitchell SL, Zhang M, 2014. Selenoprotein P and apolipoprotein E receptor-2 interact at the blood-brain barrier and also within the brain to maintain an essential selenium pool that protects against neurodegeneration. FASEB J. 28, 3579–3588. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Capelli R, Minganti V, Semino G, Bertarini W, 1986. The presence of mercury (total and organic) and selenium in human placentae. Sci. Total Environ 48(1-2):69–79. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(86)90154-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Carvalho CM, Chew EH, Hashemy SI, Lu J, Holmgren A, 2008. Inhibition of the human thioredoxin system. A molecular mechanism of mercury toxicity. J. Biol. Chem 283(18), 11913–11923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Carvalho CM, Lu J, Zhang X, Arnér ESJ, Holmgren A, 2011. Effects of selenite and chelating agents on mammalian thioredoxin reductase inhibited by mercury: Implications for treatment of mercury poisoning. FASEB J. 25(1), 370–381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Castoldi AF, Coccini T Manzo L, 2003. Neurotoxic and molecular effects of methylmercury in humans. Rev. Environ. Health, 18(1), 19–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen J, Berry MJ, 2003. Selenium and selenoproteins in the brain and brain diseases. J. Neurochem 86, 1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Choi AL, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Jørgensen PJ, Steuerwald U, Debes F, Weihe P, Grandjean P, 2008. Selenium as a potential protective factor against mercury developmental neurotoxicity. Environ. Res 107, 45–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Clarkson TW, Magos L, 2006. The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol 36, 608–662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Crump KS, Kjellstrom T, Shipp AM, Silvers A, Stewart A, 1998. Influence of prenatal mercury exposure upon scholastic and psychological test performance: Benchmark analysis of a New Zealand cohort. Risk Anal. 18, 701–713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Davidson PW, Cory-Slechta DA, Thurston SW, Huang LS, Shamlaye CF, Gunzler D, Watson G, van Wijngaarden E, Zareba G, Klein JD, Clarkson TW, Strain JJ, Myers GJ, 2011. Fish consumption and prenatal methylmercury exposure: Cognitive and behavioral outcomes in the main cohort at 17 years from the Seychelles child development study. Neurotoxicology, 32, 711–717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Debes F, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Weihe P, White RF, Grandjean P, 2006. Impact of prenatal methylmercury exposure on neurobehavioral function at age 14 years. Neurotox. Teratol 28, 363–375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC) 2020. Scientific report of the 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee. https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov/2020-advisorycommittee-report.
  26. Dlugosz P, Nimpf J, 2018. The Reelin Receptors Apolipoprotein E receptor 2 (ApoER2) and VLDL Receptor. Int. J. Mol. Sci 19(10), 3090. Doi. 10.3390/ijms19103090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Dyrssen D, Wedborg M, 1991. The sulfur-mercury (II) system in natural waters. Water, Air, Soil Poll., 56, 507–519. [Google Scholar]
  28. Gilman CL, Soon R, Sauvage L, Ralston NV, Berry MJ, 2015. Umbilical cord blood and placental mercury, selenium and selenoprotein expression in relation to maternal fish consumption. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol 30, 17–24. doi. 10.1016/j.jtemb.2015.01.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Golding J, Hibbeln JR, Gregory SM, Iles-Caven Y, Emond A, Taylor CM, 2017. Maternal prenatal blood mercury is not adversely associated with offspring IQ at 8 years provided the mother eats fish: A British prebirth cohort study. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 220, 1161–1167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Murata K, Sørensen N, Dahl R, Jørgensen PJ, 1997. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotox. Teratol 19, 417–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, 1998. Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed to “safe” levels of methylmercury. Environ. Res 77, 165–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Ha HY, Alfulaij N, Berry MJ, Seale LA, 2019. From Selenium Absorption to Selenoprotein Degradation. Biol. Trace Elem. Res 192(1):26–37. doi. 10.1007/s12011-019-01771-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Harris HH, Pickering IJ, George GN, 2003. The chemical form of mercury in fish. Science, 301(5637), 1203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hatfield DL, Carlson BA, Xu X, Mix H, Gladyshev VN, 2006. Selenocysteine incorporation machinery and the role of selenoproteins in development and health. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol 81, 7–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hatfield DL, Gladyshev VN, 2002. How selenium has altered our understanding of the genetic code. Mol. Cell Biol 22(11), 3565–3576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Hibbeln JR, Davis JM, Steer C, Emmett P, Rogers I, Williams C, Golding J, 2007. Maternal seafood consumption in pregnancy and neurodevelopmental outcomes in childhood (ALSPAC study): An observational cohort study. Lancet. 369, 578–585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hibbeln JR, Spiller P, Brenna JT, Golding J, Holub BJ, Harris WS, 2019. Relationships between seafood consumption during pregnancy and childhood and neurocognitive development: Two systematic reviews. Prost. Leuk. Ess. Fatty Acids, 151, 14–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Julshamn K, Andersen A, Ringdal O, Morkore J, 1987. Trace Elements Intake in the Faroe Islands. I. Element Levels in Edible Parts of Pilot Whales (Globicephalus meleanus). Sci. Total Environ 65, 53–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Julvez J, Méndez M, Fernandez-Barres S, Romaguera D, Vioque J, Llop S, Ibarluzea J, Guxens M, Avella-Garcia C, Tardón A, Riaóo I, Andiarena A, Robinson O, Arija V, Esnaola M, Ballester F, Sunyer J, 2016. Maternal consumption of seafood in pregnancy and child neuropsychological development: A longitudinal study based on a population with high consumption levels. Am. J. Epidemiol 183, 169–182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kaneko JJ, Ralston NVC, 2007. Selenium and mercury in pelagic fish in the central north pacific near Hawaii. Biol. Trace Elem. Res 119:242–254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Korbas M, O'Donoghue JL, Watson GE, Pickering IJ, Singh SP, Myers GJ, Clarkson TW, George GN, 2010. The chemical nature of mercury in human brain following poisoning or environmental exposure. ACS Chem. Neurosci 1(12):810–818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Krebs RE, 2006. The history and use of our earth’s chemical elements: A reference guide (2nd ed.). Westport CT: Greenwood Press; (Chapter 1). [Google Scholar]
  43. Labunskyy VM, Hatfield DL, Gladyshev VN, 2014. Selenoproteins: molecular pathways and physiological roles. Physiol. Rev 94(3):739–77. doi. 10.1152/physrev.00039.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu C, Ralston NVC, 2021. Seafood and Health: What You Need to Know. In “Advances in Food and Nutrition Research Volume 97” Elsevier. Doi. 10.1016/bs.afnr.2021.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Llop S, Ballester F, Murcia M, Forns J, Tardon A, Andiarena A, Vioque J, Ibarluzea J, Fernández-Somoano A, Sunyer J, Julvez J, Rebagliato M, Lopez-Espinosa MJ, 2017. Prenatal exposure to mercury and neuropsychological development in young children: The role of fish consumption. Int. J. Epidemiol 46, 827–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Mariotti M, Ridge PG, Zhang Y, Lobanov AV, Pringle TH, Guigo R, Hatfield DL, Gladyshev VN, 2012. Composition and evolution of the vertebrate and mammalian selenoproteomes. PLoS One. 7(3):e33066. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Mitchell JW, Kjellstrom TE, Reeves RL, 1982. Mercury in takeaway fish in New Zealand. N. Z. Med. J 95:112–114. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Myers GJ, Davidson PW, 1998. Prenatal methylmercury exposure and children: Neurologic, developmental, and behavioral research. Environ. Health Perspect 106, 841–847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. National Research Council (U.S.) Committee on the Toxicological Effects of Methylmercury. 2000. Toxicological effects of methylmercury. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US). [Google Scholar]
  50. Nicholson JL, Toh P, Alfulaij N, Berry MJ, Torres DJ, 2022. New insights on selenoproteins and neuronal function. Free Radic. Biol. Med 190:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.07.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Nishigaki S, Harada M, 1975. Methylmercury and selenium in umbilical cords of inhabitants of the Minamata area. Nature. 258, 324–325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. NOAA, 2023. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/species/long-finned-pilot-whale, (Accessed August 2023).
  53. Oken E, Kleinman KP, Berland BE, Simon SR, Rich-Edwards JW, Gillman MW, 2003. Decline in fish consumption among pregnant women after a national mercury advisory. Obstetr. Gynecol 102(2):346–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Ozoani H, Ezejiofor AN, Okolo KO, Orish CN, Cirovic A, Cirovic A, Orisakwe OE, 2023. Selenium and zinc alleviate hepatotoxicity induced by heavy metal mixture (cadmium, mercury, lead and arsenic) via attenuation of inflammo-oxidant pathways. Environ Toxicol. doi: 10.1002/tox.23966. Online ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pařízek J, Ošt’ádalová I, 1967. The protective effect of small amounts of selenite in sublimate intoxication, Experiential, 23(2):142–143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pařízek J, Ošt’ádalová I, Kalouskove J, Babicky A, Pavlik J, Bibr B, 1971. Effect of mercuric compounds on the maternal transmission of selenium in the pregnant and lactating rat. J. Reprod. Fert 25:157–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Pillai R, Uyehara-Lock JH, Bellinger FP, 2014. Selenium and selenoprotein function in brain disorders. IUBMB Life. 66(4):229–39. doi: 10.1002/iub.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Pitts MW, Raman AV, Hashimoto AC, Todorovic C, Nichols RA, Berry MJ, 2012. Deletion of selenoprotein P results in impaired function of parvalbumin interneurons and alterations in fear learning and sensorimotor gating. Neuroscience. 208, 58–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Prohaska JR, Ganther H, 1977. Interactions between selenium and methylmercury in rat brain. Chemico-Biol Interact, 16(2), 155–167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Ralston NVC, 2021a. Mercury’s Neurotoxic Effects on Brain Selenoenzymes. In Handbook of Neurotoxicity. Kostrzewa RM (Ed.), Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  61. Ralston NVC, 2021b. Neurotoxic Effects of Electrophile Interactions with Brain Selenoenzymes. In “Handbook of Neurotoxicity” Kostrzewa RM. Editor, Springer-Verlag. [Google Scholar]
  62. Ralston NVC, 2023. Concomitant Selenoenzyme Inhibitor Exposures as Etiologic Contributors to Disease: Implications for Preventative Medicine. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 733:109469. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2022.109469 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Ralston NVC, Raymond LJ, 2015. Functional deletion of brain selenoenzymes by methylmercury. In Banuelos GS, & Lin Z-Q (Eds.), Selenium in the environment and human health, UK: London. Pp. 71–72. [Google Scholar]
  64. Ralston NVC, Raymond LJ, 2018. Mercury’s neurotoxicity is characterized by its disruption of selenium biochemistry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1862, 2405–2416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ralston NVC, Blackwell JL, Raymond LJ, 2007. Importance of molar ratios in selenium-dependent protection against methylmercury toxicity. Biol. Trace Elem. Res 119: 255–268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ralston NVC, Ralston CR, Blackwell JL III, Raymond LJ, 2008. Dietary and tissue selenium in relation to methylmercury toxicity. Neurotoxicology. 29(5), 802–811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Ralston NVC, Azenkeng A, Ralston CR, Raymond LJ, 2015. Selenium health benefit values as seafood safety criteria. In: Kim S-K (Ed.), Seafood science: Advances in chemistry, technology, and applications. Florida: CRC Press. (Chapter 19). [Google Scholar]
  68. Ralston NVC, Kaneko JJ, Raymond LJ, 2019. Selenium Health Benefit Values: A More Reliable Index of Seafood Benefits vs. Risks. J. Trace Elem. Biol. Med 55, 50–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Ralston NVC, Ralston CR, Raymond LJ, 2016. Selenium health benefit values: Updated criteria for mercury risk assessments. Biol. Trace Elem. Res 171, 262–269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Raymond LJ, Ralston NVC, 2004. Mercury:Selenium Interactions and Health Implications. Seychelles Med. Dent. J 7(1):72–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Raymond LJ, Ralston NVC, 2020. Mercury:Selenium Interactions and Health Implications. Neurotoxicology. 81:294–299. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2020.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Reeves MA, Hoffmann PR, 2009. The human selenoproteome: recent insights into functions and regulation. Cell. Mol. Life Sci 66(15), 2457–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Robinson J, Shroff J, 2004. Observations on the levels of total mercury (Hg) and selenium (Se) in species common to the artisanal fisheries of Seychelles. Seychelles Med. Dent. J 7(1), 56–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rodrigues J, Branco V, Lu J, Holmgren A, Carvalho C, 2015. Toxicological effects of thiomersal and ethylmercury: Inhibition on thioredoxin system and NADP+-dependent dehydrogenases of the pentose phosphate pathway. Toxicol. App. Pharm 286, 216–223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Seppanen K, Soininen P, Salonen JT, Lotjonen S, Laatikainen R, 2004. Does mercury promote lipid peroxidation? An in vitro study concerning mercury, copper, and iron in peroxidation of low-density lipoprotein. Biol. Trace Elem. Res 101, 117–132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Santesmasses D, Mariotti M, Gladyshev VN, 2020. Bioinformatics of Selenoproteins. Antioxid. Redox. Signal 33(7):525–536. doi. 10.1089/ars.2020.8044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sarafian T, Verity MA, 1991. Oxidative mechanisms underlying methyl mercury neurotoxicity. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci 9(2), 147–53. doi. 10.1016/0736-5748(91)90005-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schweizer U, Fabiano M, 2022. Selenoproteins in brain development and function. Free Radic. Biol. Med 190:105–115. doi. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Shark Facts, 2023. https://sharkfacts.org/great-white-shark-facts/ (accessed Sept. 2023).
  80. Sharma BM, Sáňka O, Kalina J, Scheringer M, 2019. An overview of worldwide and regional time trends in total mercury levels in human blood and breast milk from 1966 to 2015 and their associations with health effects. Environ. Int 125:300–319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Spiller HA, 2018. Rethinking mercury: The role of selenium in the pathophysiology of mercury toxicity. Clin. Toxicol. (Philadelphia, Pa.), 56, 313–326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Spiller HA, Hays HL, Burns G, Casavant MJ, 2017. Severe elemental mercury poisoning managed with selenium and N-acetylcysteine administration. Toxicol. Comm 1(1), 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  83. Spiller HA, Hays HL, Casavant MJ, 2021. Rethinking treatment of mercury poisoning: the roles of selenium, acetylcysteine, and thiol chelators in the treatment of mercury poisoning: a narrative review, Toxicology Communications, 5:1, 19–59, DOI: 10.1080/24734306.2020.1870077 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Spiller P, Hibbeln JR, Myers G, Vannice G, Golding J, Crawford M,A, Strain JJ, Connor SL, Brenna J,T, Kris-Etherton P, Holub BJ, Harris WS, Lands B, McNamara RK, Tlusty MF, Salem N Jr., Carlson SE, 2019. An abundance of seafood consumption studies presents new opportunities to evaluate effects on neurocognitive development. Prost. Leuk. Ess. Fatty Acids 151:8–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Spiller P, van Wijngaarden E, Adams HR, Strain JJ, McSorley EM, Mulhern MS, Conway MC, Yeates AJ, Carrington C, Bolger PM, Morgan KM, Taylor CM, Ralston NVC, Crawford MA, Hibbeln JR, Brenna JT, Myers GM, 2023. Net effects explains the benefits to children from maternal fish consumption despite methylmercury in fish. Neurotoxicology. 99:195–205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Splittgerber AG, Tappel AL, 1979. Inhibition of glutathione peroxidase by cadmium and other metal ions. Arch. Biochem. Biophys 197(2):534–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Starling P, Charlton K, McMahon AT, Lucas C, 2015. Fish intake during pregnancy and foetal development-a systematic review of the evidence. Nutrients. 7:2001–2004. doi. 10.3390/nu7032001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Stringari J, Nunes AKC, Franco JL, Bohrer D, Garcia SC, Dafre AL, Milatovic D, Souza DO, Rocha JBT, Aschner M, Farina M, 2008. Prenatal methylmercury exposure hampers glutathione antioxidant system ontogenesis and causes long-lasting oxidative stress in the mouse brain. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol 227, 147–154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Thomson CD, Robinson MF, 1980. Selenium in human health and disease with emphasis on those aspects peculiar to New Zealand. Am, J, Clin, Nutr 33(2):303–23. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/33.2.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Turanov AA, Xu X,M, Carlson BA, Yoo M,H, Gladyshev V,N, Hatfield DL, 2011. Biosynthesis of Selenocysteine, the 21st Amino Acid in the Genetic Code, and a Novel Pathway for Cysteine Biosynthesis. Adv. Nutr 2(2):122–128. doi. 10.3945/an.110.000265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Undeman E, Brown TN, McLachlan MS, Wania F, 2018. Who in the world is most exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls? Using models to identify highly exposed populations. Environ. Res. Lett 13 064036. doi. 10.1088/1748-9326/aac5fe [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Usuki F, Yamashita A, Fujimura M, 2011. Post-transcriptional Defects of Antioxidant Selenoenzymes Cause Oxidative Stress under Methylmercury Exposure. J. Biol. Chem 286(8), 6641–6649. doi. 10.1074/jbc.M110.168872 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. van Wijngaarden E, Thurston SW, Myers GJ, Strain JJ, Weiss B, Zarcone T, Watson GE, Zareba EM, McSorley EM, Mulhern MS, Yeates AJ, Henderson J, Gedeon J, Shamlaye CF, Davidson PW, 2013. Prenatal methyl mercury exposure in relation to neurodevelopment and behavior at 19 years of age in the Seychelles child development study. Neurotox. Teratol 39, 19–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. van Wijngaarden E, Thurston SW, Myers GJ, Harrington D, Cory-Slechta DA, Strain JJ, Watson GE, Zareba G, Love T, Henderson J, Shamlaye CF, Davidson PW, 2017. Methyl mercury exposure and neurodevelopmental outcomes in the Seychelles Child Development Study Main cohort at age 22 and 24 years. Neurotoxicol. Teratol 59:35–42. doi. 10.1016/j.ntt.2016.10.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Watanabe C, Yin K, Kasanuma Y, Satoh H, 1999a. In utero exposure to methylmercury and selenium deficiency converge on the neurobehavioral outcome in mice. Neurotoxicol. Teratol 21:83–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Watanabe C, Yoshida K, Kasanuma Y, Kun Y, Satoh H, 1999b. In utero methylmercury exposure differentially affects the activities of selenoenzymes in the fetal mouse brain. Environ. Res 80(3):208–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Weihe P, Grandjean P, 2012. Cohort studies of Faroese children concerning potential adverse health effects after the mothers’ exposure to marine contaminants during pregnancy. Acta Vet Scand. 54(Suppl 1):S7. doi. 10.1186/1751-0147-54-S1-S7 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Weiss B, Clarkson TW, Simon W, 2002. Silent latency periods in methylmercury poisoning and in neurodegenerative disease. Environ. Health Persp 110(Suppl. 5), 851–854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Xu XM, Carlson BA, Mix H, Zhang Y, Saira K, Glass RS, Berry MJ, Gladyshev VN, Hatfield DL, 2006. Biosynthesis of selenocysteine on its tRNA in eukaryotes, PloS Biol. 5 (1) () e4. 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0050004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Yamashita Y, Yabu T, Yamashita M, 2010. Discovery of the strong antioxidant selenoneine in tuna and selenium redox metabolism. World J. Biol. Chem May 26;1(5):144–50. doi. 10.4331/wjbc.v1.i5.144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Schweizer U, Savaskan NE, Hua D, Kipnis J, Hatfield DL, Gladyshev VN, 2008. Comparative analysis of selenocysteine machinery and selenoproteome gene expression in mouse brain identifies neurons as key functional sites of selenium in mammals. J. Biol. Chem 283(4), 2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES