Skip to main content
JACC: Basic to Translational Science logoLink to JACC: Basic to Translational Science
. 2023 Dec 20;9(3):364–379. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2023.10.010

Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Exacerbates Cardiovascular Disease in the Presence of Low or Castrate Testosterone Levels

Wilhelmina CM Duivenvoorden a,b, David Margel c,d, Vishal Subramony Gayathri b, Emmanuelle Duceppe e,f, Sadiya Yousef b, Magda Naeim b, Mohammad Khajehei a, Sarah Hopmans a, Snezana Popovic g, Yaara Ber c, Diane Heels-Ansdell h, Philip J Devereaux e,f, Jehonathan H Pinthus a,b,
PMCID: PMC10978407  PMID: 38559622

Visual Abstract

graphic file with name ga1.jpg

Key Words: androgen-deprivation therapy, cardiovascular disease, follicle-stimulating hormone, GnRH-antagonist, prostate cancer

Highlights

  • Hypogonadism and PC are common in aging men and associate with cardiovascular disease. ADT to suppress T in PC patients also affects FSH.

  • We defined a hormonal state characterized by an elevated FSH/T ratio that correlated with the amount of aortic atherosclerotic and necrotic plaque in mice after ADT and clinically associated with the risk of developing a CVE following a stressful cardiovascular trigger.

  • ADT modalities which optimally suppress FSH (GnRH-antagonists) appear to have an inherent superior cardiovascular risk profile.

  • Larger studies that prospectively collect CVEs and serum are needed to validate our results in ADT recipients.

Summary

Low testosterone (T), common in aging men, associates with cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), which is affected by T, modulates the cardiovascular effects associated with low T or castration. FSHβ−/−:low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)−/− mice, untreated or castrated (orchiectomy, gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist), demonstrated significantly less atherogenesis compared with similarly treated LDLR−/− mice, but not following FSH delivery. Smaller plaque burden in LDLR−/− mice receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists vs agonists were nullified in FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice. Atherosclerotic and necrotic plaque size and macrophage infiltration correlated with serum FSH/T. In patients with prostate cancer, FSH/T following androgen-deprivation therapy initiation predicted cardiovascular events. FSH facilitates cardiovascular disease when T is low or eliminated.


Although cancer-specific survival is generally high, the overall survival of men with prostate cancer (PC) is often affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD). CVD is the leading cause of death in non-metastatic patients with PC and the risk of cardiovascular death is higher in men with metastatic PC compared with the age-matched population.1 The main cause of CVD, atherosclerosis, often remains asymptomatic and represents subclinical disease; however, atherosclerotic plaques can rupture or erode and lead to atherothrombosis and subsequent cardiovascular events (CVEs).

Circulating testosterone (T) levels in men decline progressively from the third decade onward, resulting in high prevalence of biochemical and clinical hypogonadism in aging men.2 Cardiovascular health in the general male population is suggested to be strongly associated with T,3, 4, 5 and preclinical models highlight similar results.6 We recently demonstrated this also in a population of newly diagnosed patients with PC, in whom the prevalence of low T is 42%. Hypotestosteronemic patients with PC have a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors that in turn may associate with a higher projected 10-year risk of CVD than men with normal T at diagnosis.7

Approximately 40% of patients with PC receive androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) within 6 months of diagnosis.8 ADT can be achieved surgically or pharmacologically, most frequently by inhibition of the hypophyseal-testicular axis using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-agonists (eg, leuprolide, goserelin)9 or antagonists (degarelix or relugolix),10 resulting in equivalent castration, but a distinctive effect on follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH)11 even though T and FSH levels are interrelated physiologically. FSH is one of the gonadotropins, hormones released from the anterior pituitary upon stimulation by GnRH. FSH, a glycoprotein heterodimer consisting of an alpha and unique beta subunit, supports spermatogenesis in the testes. Elevated FSH is also linked to progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in menopause.12,13

Clinical observations suggest that ADT in the form of GnRH-antagonist rather than the more commonly used GnRH-agonist is associated with significantly reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A recent meta-analysis found the pooled risk ratio for GnRH-antagonists compared with GnRH-agonists for CVEs to be 0.57 (95% CI: 0.39-0.81).14 Our preclinical data corroborate these findings; GnRH-antagonists lead to less aortic necrotic plaque area in low-density lipoprotein receptor knockout (LDLR−/−) mice than GnRH-agonist,15 which was confirmed by Knutsson et al16 in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice.

We hypothesized that FSH mediates the atherogenic and cardiovascular effects associated with T deficiency. Our investigations included mouse models of atherogenesis using gain and loss of FSH and ADT comparing leuprolide and degarelix, and 2 clinical studies of ADT recipients and male non-PC patients, with primary cardiovascular endpoints.

Methods

Animal studies

All protocols for animal studies were approved by the Animal Research Ethics Board of McMaster University (AUP #18-01-05). For the breeding of double-knockout (FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/−) mice, without functional FSH,17 see the Supplemental Methodology. Mice were randomly assigned to 6 groups, each with 10 to 15 male LDLR−/− mice18 or FSHβ−/−;LDLR−/− mice (5 to 6 weeks old). The groups were: 1) untreated control (vehicle treated, sham operated); 2) bilateral transscrotal orchiectomy (vehicle treated); 3) GnRH-agonist (leuprolide acetate), sham operated; 4) GnRH-antagonist (degarelix), sham operated; 5) orchiectomy with testosterone supplementation; and 6) FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice (vehicle treated, sham operated) supplemented with murine FSH. For detailed treatment methodology see the Supplemental Methodology and Hopmans et al.15 Mice were weighed weekly. Serum testosterone was monitored every 2 to 4 weeks. Mice were euthanized at 20 weeks of age, 14 weeks after surgery and start of ADT. Blood, heart, ascending aorta, and testicles were collected. Serum was prepared and frozen at −20 °C. Serum assays are described in the Supplemental Methodology. ADT mice (groups 2-4) not achieving castrate T levels were excluded. The mean with 95% CI of T levels for orchiectomized mice of each strain was determined as threshold for mice not achieving castration (T >1.31 and >0.458 nmol/L (nM) for LDLR−/− and FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice, respectively).

Histology and image analysis

Aortic tissue was processed and image analysis was performed to determine atherosclerotic and necrotic plaque size as described.15 The area of the necrotic core was quantified by cumulative acellular areas within the atherosclerotic plaque area as described in Venegas-Pino et al.19 Immunohistochemistry included heat-mediated antigen retrieval (citrate buffer pH = 6) and primary antibody incubation (see Kleinmann et al20 and Supplemental Methodology), followed by horseradish peroxidase–labeled polymer (Dako Canada Inc). Omission of primary antibody served as negative control, for positive controls see Supplemental Table 1. Aortic sections were stained for CD68 and CD3 as measures for macrophage and lymphocyte infiltration, respectively, and quantified. Immunohistochemistry for CD68 and CD3 was performed on consecutive aortic sections. Macrophage infiltration was defined as the percentage of CD68-positive cellular area per atherosclerotic plaque area in the aortic root section (see Supplemental Figure 1A). Lymphocyte infiltration was defined as the percentage of CD3-positive cellular area per total atherosclerotic plaque area in the aortic root section (see Supplemental Figure 1B).

Clinical study I: prospective cohort of PC patients

This was a randomized open-label study of the use of GnRH-antagonist compared with GnRH-agonist among men with advanced PC and preexisting CVD (Endothelial Function in Prostate Cancer Patients on Degarelix vs Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists; NCT02475057).21 The study included men with high-risk or metastatic PC scheduled to initiate ADT for at least 1 year. All patients had to have documented history of CVD and were randomized to either GnRH-antagonist (degarelix) or GnRH-agonist. FSH and T were measured in the central lab at Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, at baseline, and 3, 6, and 12 months. Patients who did not achieve castration (T >0.7 nmol/L, n = 12) were excluded. Secondary outcome of the study included the occurrence of CVEs (defined as death, myocardial infarction [MI], cerebrovascular event, transient ischemic attack, heart catheterization with or without stent insertion, and cardiac-related emergency room visits) among the 2 arms during the 12-month study period. CVEs were adjudicated by a cardiologist.21

Clinical Study II: prospective nested case-control study within VISION

The study was carried out as a nested case-control study from male patients in the VISION (Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation Study; NCT00512109) prospective cohort study. VISION investigated the development of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) in a very large international cohort.22,23 The MANAGE (Dabigatran in Patients With Myocardial Injury After Non-cardiac Surgery) trial demonstrated that MINS result in classic CVEs and death shortly after if untreated with antithrombotic medications.24 Male patients were eligible for matching if a preoperative serum sample was available. All patients with incident cases of the composite outcome were matched 1:1 with a corresponding control. Cases were patients who developed a CVE (composite of MINS, MI, stroke, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or vascular death) within 30 days after surgery and were matched to controls who did not experience a CVE by: 1) age; 2) body mass index; and 3) history of coronary artery disease.

Levels of FSH and total T in banked serum obtained preoperatively from the identified patients were measured at the Clinical Research Laboratory and Biobank (Hamilton General Hospital, Hamilton Ontario, Canada). FSH values (IU/L) were converted to nmol/L.25 The ratio of FSH/T was calculated as FSH (nmol/L)/total testosterone (nmol/L). Lab personnel had no knowledge of the study or groups of patients.

Statistical analyses

Preclinical data were not normally distributed and values are presented as median (range) or using boxplots to show the mean, median, and IQR. Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to determine significance. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were not performed; we report precise P values when <0.05. When interpreting the results, multiple comparisons need to be considered. Spearman’s correlation analyses between amount of atherogenesis (total or necrotic) or macrophage/lymphocyte infiltration and serum hormone or biomarker levels at endpoint were performed. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 27 (IBM Corporation).

Patient characteristics were compared between patients with and without CVEs (cohort of PC patients) and between cases and controls (nested case-control within VISION) using descriptive statistics including median, minimum, and maximum for continuous variables. Variables were compared between patients with and without CVEs and between cases and controls using chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables, and Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to determine the ability of FSH/T to predict CVE in the prospective PC patient cohort.

Conditional logistic regression was performed to compare the ratio of FSH/T in 424 cases with a CVE with 424 controls without CVEs. The dependent variable was a CVE and the prognostic factor of interest was the FSH/T ratio expressed as a continuous variable or, in a separate model, as binary (high or low using median FSH/T value as cutpoint). The association between the ratio of FSH/T and incident cases of CVEs is expressed as the OR with 95% CI. We explored potential confounders of the association between FSH/T ratio, as a binary variable, and CVEs using separate conditional logistic regression models (see Supplemental Methodology). In separate models, the association between serum FSH or T and incident cases of CVEs was evaluated, again as a continuous variable or binary (cutpoint median FSH or T value). Collinearity between variables was assessed using generalized variance inflation factors (>5 defined as significant collinearity). Conditional logistic regression was performed using R, version 4.1.0, and package survival 3.3-1.

Results

Animal studies

To investigate the role of FSH on CVD, we generated FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice that develop atherogenesis on normal diet. We chose the FSH−/− over the FSHR−/− model to be able to investigate FSH treatment via exogenous delivery of FSH. Both LDLR−/− and FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice express FSH receptor in macrophages (Figures 1A and 1B, respectively). In LDLR−/− mice, castration (Figure 2A) via orchiectomy, which resulted in very high FSH levels (Figure 2B), induced significant atherosclerosis, but not after concomitant T supplementation (Figure 2C). Comparatively, FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice demonstrated smaller atherosclerotic plaque sizes than LDLR−/− mice, whether untreated or orchiectomized (Figures 2 and 3). Conversely, significant atherosclerotic changes were observed in FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice following exogenous delivery of murine FSH (Figure 4). Mouse testicle sizes and weights, main physiological determinants of FSH, are shown in Supplemental Figure 2 and confirm the efficacy of FSH delivery and its functionality (Figure 4B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mouse Aortic Root Immunohistochemistry for FSH Receptor

Expression of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) receptor in plaque macrophages in aortic root cross-sections of control (A) low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)−/− and (B) FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice. Arrowheads in the magnified inserts indicate examples of FSH receptor-staining. Magnification bar = 500 μm.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of Orchiectomy With or Without T Supplementation in LDLR−/− and FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− Mice

(A) Serum testosterone (T) and (B) FSH levels at 20 weeks of age, 14 weeks after start of treatment. The dashed line indicates the limit of detection for serum FSH. (C) Atherosclerosis, (D) necrosis, (E) macrophage, and (F) lymphocyte infiltration after 14 weeks (n = 7-15/group). Control mice were vehicle treated and sham operated. Boxes represent the IQR, triangles the mean, whiskers the range. Significant P values (<0.05) obtained using Mann-Whitney U tests are indicated. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Mouse Aortic Root Histology and Immunohistochemistry

Representative hematoxylin-eosin–stained aortic root sections from untreated control (A) LDLR−/− and (B) FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice; orchiectomized (C) LDLR−/− and (D) FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice; orchiectomized and supplemented with T (E) LDLR−/− and (F) FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice after 14 weeks. The outlines of single atherosclerotic plaque areas larger than 5,000 μm2 are marked blue, with arrowheads to indicate examples of necrotic areas within these large plaques. Magnification bar = 500 μm. Immunohistochemistry for (G and H) CD68 and (I and J) CD3 on representative serial aortic root sections of (G and I) LDLR−/− and (H and J) FSHβ−/−;LDLR−/− mice, 14 weeks after orchiectomy. Arrowheads indicate examples of CD68-staining, arrows examples of CD3-staining. Magnification bar = 200 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of FSH Supplementation in FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− Mice Comparatively to Control LDLR−/− Mice

(A) Serum T and (B) FSH levels in LDLR−/− and FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice at 20 weeks of age, 14 weeks after start of treatment. The dashed line indicates the limit of detection for serum FSH. (C) Atherosclerosis, (D) necrosis, (E) macrophage, and (F) lymphocyte infiltration after 14 weeks (n = 7-11/group). Boxes represent the IQR, triangles the mean, whiskers the range. Significant P values (<0.05) obtained using Mann-Whitney U tests are indicated. Abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

ADT via bilateral orchiectomy, GnRH-agonists or -antagonists resulted in equivalent castration, but a distinctive effect on FSH (Figures 2A, 2B, 5A, and 5B). Orchiectomy leads to increased necrosis in LDLR−/− mice compared with treatment with GnRH-antagonist (P = 0.018). In FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice, however, there was no difference (Figures 2D and 5D). GnRH-antagonists vs -agonists led to significantly increased suppression of FSH (Figure 5B, Supplemental Figure 2). Treatment of LDLR−/− mice with GnRH-antagonists led to a 79% decrease in the amount of necrotic core and 41% decrease in total atherosclerotic plaque compared with GnRH-agonists (Figures 5C and 5D). Loss of FSH in the FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− model nullified these differences (Figures 5C and 5D), suggesting a role for FSH in plaque development in castrated mice. To evaluate the effects of both FSH and T, we calculated the serum FSH/T ratio. By Spearman’s correlation analysis, serum FSH/T ratio correlated significantly with atherosclerotic plaque size, necrotic core, and macrophage infiltration (Figure 6A). FSH/T did not correlate with serum 17β-estradiol or luteinizing hormone and neither did these hormones correlate with atherogenesis (Figure 6A, Supplemental Table 2). We also found a significant correlation between various inflammatory biomarkers and plaque size, necrotic and inflammatory content (Supplemental Figure 3). However, only C-C motif chemokine ligand 21 (CCL21), a homeostatic chemokine involved in inflammatory response, associated significantly with these parameters and with the FSH/T ratio (Figure 6A). Notably, the receptor for CCL21, C-C motif chemokine receptor 7, is strongly expressed in mouse macrophages (Supplemental Figures 4G and 4H).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Effect of Treatment With GnRH-Agonist or -Antagonist in FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− and LDLR−/− Mice

(A) Serum T and (B) FSH levels in LDLR−/− and FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice at 20 weeks of age, 14 weeks after start of treatment. The dashed line indicates the limit of detection for serum FSH. (C) Atherosclerosis, (D) necrosis, (E) macrophage, and (F) lymphocyte infiltration after 14 weeks (n = 7-14/group). Control mice were vehicle treated and sham operated. Boxes represent the IQR, triangles the mean, whiskers the range. Significant P values (<0.05) obtained using Mann-Whitney U tests are indicated. GnRH = gonadotropin-releasing hormone; other abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

FSH/T Associates With Atherogenesis in Mice and CVEs in PC and Male Surgery Patients

(A) FSH/T in LDLR−/− and FSHβ−/−:LDLR−/− mice (n = 62-149) correlated significantly with aortic atherosclerotic plaque, necrotic core, and inflammatory content as well as serum CCL21 levels. Spearman’s ρ correlation coefficients in bold are significant: ∗P < 0.05; ∗∗ P < 0.01. (B) FSH/T ratios at 3 and 6 months after start of ADT in a prospective cohort of PC patients (n = 63) with preexisting CVD commencing on ADT. Boxes represent the IQR, whiskers the range. (C) Receiver operator curve shows that serum FSH/T was able to predict a CVE. (D) Multivariable conditional logistic regression evaluating the association between hormone levels or ratios and a CVE in men undergoing surgery in a prospective nested case-control study. Adjusted ORs for the ratio of FSH/T (model I) dichotomized into low or high ratios and a CVE and the covariates (history of diabetes and peripheral vascular disease, reduced kidney function, and active/metastatic cancer). Adjusted ORs for FSH (in model II) and T (in model III) dichotomized into low or high hormone levels. Significant P values are indicated: ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001. ADT = androgen-deprivation therapy; aOR = adjusted OR; AUC = area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve; CCL21 = C-C motif chemokine ligand 21; CVD = cardiovascular disease; CVE = cardiovascular event; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hx = history; LH = luteinizing hormone; PC = prostate cancer; PVD = peripheral vascular disease; other abbreviations as in Figures 1 and 2.

Prospective cohort of PC patients with preexisting CVD commencing on ADT

Because CVEs appear to develop early, within 1 year following ADT initiation in PC patients with known CVD,21,26,27 it is reasonable to suspect that ADT may be a trigger for atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.28 Several, but not all,29 studies suggest that GnRH-agonists are associated with higher incidence of CVEs in PC patients with preestablished CVD compared with GnRH-antagonists.14,21,26,29,30 Given the significant differences in serum FSH/T between GnRH-agonists and -antagonists (Figure 6B), we hypothesize that FSH may mediate the effect of low T on atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability, increasing the risk of clinical CVEs. We explored the ratio of serum FSH/T in a prospective cohort of PC patients with preexisting CVD commencing on ADT.21 Patients receiving GnRH-agonist had significantly higher CVE rates (31%) compared with those receiving GnRH-antagonist (6%) (Table 1). The serum FSH/T ratio, but not FSH or T alone, at 3 and 6 months after start of ADT, was predictive of a CVE (Figure 6C): the AUC of both receiver-operating characteristics for FSH/T at 3 and 6 months amounted to 0.72 (95% CI: 0.57-0.87; P = 0.022) and 0.73 (0.60-0.86; P = 0.016), respectively.

Table 1.

Patient Population Characteristics of the Prospective Cohort of PC Patients With Preexisting CVD Commencing on ADT

Patients Receiving GnRH-Agonist (n = 29) Patients Receiving GnRH-Antagonist (n = 34) Total (N = 63) P Value
Age, y 71.4 (61.7-82.7) 72.1 (58.8-87.2) 71.8 (58.8-87.2) 0.42
BMI, kg/m2 27.4 (20.1-33.8) 28.4 (21.2-36.2) 27.5 (20.1-36.2) 0.21
Ratio FSH/T
 Baseline 3.48 (0.92-17.3) 3.20 (0.55-46.7) 3.26 (0.55-46.7) 0.34
 3 months 164 (22.7-422) 27.6 (1.39-111) 48.7 (1.39-422) <0.001
 6 months 166 (16.8-600) 37.0 (1.47-144) 67.6 (1.47-600) <0.001
Serum FSH, nM
 Baseline 30.6 (9.88-128) 43.3 (13.2-260) 37.2 (9.88-260) 0.12
 3 months 23.1 (5.17-54.1) 3.29 (0.47-18.8) 7.53 (0.47-54.1) <0.001
 6 months 24.5 (5.17-52.2) 5.22 (0.47-23.1) 8.00 (0.47-52.2) <0.001
Serum T, nM
 Baseline 12.1 (1.92-21.9) 12.6 (3.10-27.8) 12.3 (1.92-27.8) 0.16
 3 months 0.130 (0.087-0.41) 0.087 (0.087-0.67) 0.090 (0.087-0.67) 0.83
 6 months 0.090 (0.087-0.61) 0.087 (0.087-0.55) 0.087 (0.087-0.61) 0.55
Gleason score 0.36
 7 9 (31) 16 (47) 25 (40)
 8 8 (28) 9 (26) 17 (27)
 9-10 12 (41) 9 (26) 21 (33)
PSA baseline, ng/mL 13.3 (5.1-963) 13.2 (0.18-387) 13.3 (0.18-963) 0.45
History of MACE 27 (93) 32 (94) 59 (94) 0.87
History of hypertension 22 (76) 24 (71) 46 (73) 0.64
History of diabetes 9 (31) 8 (24) 17 (27) 0.50
History of renal failure 1 (3.4) 2 (5.9) 3 (4.8) 0.65
CVEa within 12 months 9 (31) 2 (6) 11 (17) 0.009

Values are median (range) or n (%). Significant P values (<0.05) are indicated in bold.

ADT = androgen-deprivation therapy; BMI = body mass index; CVD = cardiovascular disease; FSH/T = follicle-stimulating hormone/testosterone; GnRH = gonadotropin-releasing hormone; MACE = major adverse cardiovascular event; PC = prostate cancer; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.

a

CVE is defined as death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, heart catheterization and cardiac-related emergency room visits. Patients who did not reach T <0.7 nM at 3 or 6 months after start of ADT (n = 12) were excluded.

Nested case-control within VISION

Similar to ADT,28 surgical intervention can be a trigger for CVEs. The VISION study prospectively investigated the development of MINS in a large international cohort.22,23 MINS is associated with subsequent major CVEs and death31 and antithrombotic and anticoagulation therapy are beneficial,24 suggesting that MINS relates to plaque vulnerability and associated CVEs. To extend our understanding of the association of FSH/T with CVEs in the general male population, we measured the preoperative levels of FSH and T in patients who experienced an event (defined as the composite of MINS, MI, stroke, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or vascular death) within 30 days after surgery and compared them with levels in patients who did not experience an event in a nested case-control study within VISION matched for age, body mass index, and history of coronary artery disease. Baseline and operative characteristics of 848 male cases and controls are presented in Table 2. Factors that differed significantly between cases and controls were ethnicity, presence of active or metastatic cancer, a history of congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease or diabetes, kidney function, and the use of aspirin. In patients who experienced an event, the ratio of serum FSH/T was higher (median 3.41, range 0.096-545) than in matched controls (median 2.66, range 0.044-346), although not statistically significant (P = 0.056) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Baseline and Operative Patient Population Characteristics of the Nested Case-Control Study Within VISION

Controls (Patients Without Eventa)
(n = 424)
Cases (Patients With Eventa Within 30 Days)
(n = 424)
Total (N = 848) P Value
Age, y 74.2 (50.4-91.5) 72.0 (45.1-93.9) 73.3 (45.1-93.9) matched
BMI, kg/m2 27.3 (14.4-102) 27.2 (12.7-47.0) 27.2 (12.7-102) matched
Ratio FSH/T 2.66 (0.044-346) 3.41 (0.096-545) 3.04 (0.044-545) 0.056
Serum FSH, nM 36.5 (5.55-352) 39.0 (1.36-496) 38.1 (1.36-496) 0.48
Serum T, nM 13.2 (0.38-37.9) 12.7 (0.32-48.4) 13.0 (0.32-48.4) 0.11
Ethnicity 0.02
 Asian 50 (12) 62 (15) 112 (13)
 European 371 (88) 345 (81) 716 (84)
 Other 3 (1) 17 (4) 20 (2)
Patient in nursing home 1 (0) 6 (1) 7 (1) 0.13
Assistance with ADLs 9 (2) 15 (4) 24 (3) 0.30
Smoker 0.30
 Current 57 (13) 62 (15) 119 (14)
 Never 134 (32) 113 (27) 247 (29)
 Past 233 (55) 247 (59) 480 (57)
Active or metastatic cancer 77 (18) 111 (26) 188 (22) 0.006
History of coronary artery disease 138 (32) 138 (32) 276 (32) matched
History of congestive heart failure 13 (3) 26 (6) 39 (5) 0.049
History of cerebrovascular event 34 (8) 52 (12) 86 (10) 0.053
History of peripheral vascular disease 27 (6) 59 (14) 86 (10) <0.001
History of diabetes 82 (19) 134 (32) 216 (25) <0.001
History of hypertension 260 (61) 282 (667) 542 (64) 0.13
Preop systolic BP, mm Hg 145 (50-218) 145 (90-240) 145 (50-240) 0.98
Preop diastolic BP, mm Hg 80 (40-117) 78 (40-112) 80 (40-117) 0.24
Preop coronary revascularization 66 (16) 77 (18) 143 (17) 0.36
Preop eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 104 (25) 159 (38) 263 (31) <0.001
Medication
 Aspirin 117 (28) 151 (36) 268 (32) 0.017
 Nitrate 22 (5) 21 (5) 43 (5) 1
 Anticoagulant 31 (7) 25 (6) 56 (7) 0.49
 ACE inhibitor/ARB 203 (48) 194 (46) 397 (47) 0.51
 Beta-blocker 121 (29) 125 (29) 246 (29) 0.76
 Statin 209 (49) 208 (49) 417 (49) 0.95
 Plavix/ticlopidine 7 (2) 16 (4) 23 (3) 0.057
 Alpha2-agonist 1 (0) 2 (0) 3 (0) 0.56
 Rate control CCB 13 (3) 24 (6) 37 (4) 0.064
 Dihydropyridine CCB 96 (23) 83 (20) 179 (21) 0.27
 Therapeutic antithrombotic 8 (2) 6 (1) 14 (2) 0.59
Type of surgery
 Major vascular 35 (8) 42 (10) 77 (9.1) 0.40
 Major general 70 (17) 100 (24) 170 (20) 0.10
 Major thoracic 15 (4) 24 (6) 39 (4.6) 0.14
 Major urologic/gynecologic 73 (17) 64 (15) 137 (16.2) 0.40
 Major orthopedic 147 (35) 113 (27) 260 (31) 0.011
 Major neurologic 13 (3) 19 (4) 32 (3.8) 0.28
 Low-risk 79 (19) 76 (18) 155 (18) 0.79
 Urgent/emergent 3 (1) 10 (2) 13 (1.5) 0.050
Type of anesthesia
 General only 159 (38) 208 (49) 367 (43) <0.001
 Neuroaxial (spinal or epidural) 175 (41) 97 (23) 272 (32) <0.001
 General and nitrous oxide only 6 (1.4) 7 (2) 13 (1.5) 0.78
 General and thoracic epidural only 35 (8.3) 67 (16) 102 (12) <0.001
 General and nerve block only 8 (1.9) 16 (4) 24 (2.8) 0.098
 Other 41 (9.7) 29 (7) 70 (8.3) 0.13

Values are median (range) or n (%). Significant P values (<0.05) are indicated in bold.

ACE = angiotensin-converting enzyme; ADL = activities of daily living; ARB = angiotensin receptor blocker; BP = blood pressure; CCB = calcium channel blocker; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; preop = preoperative; other abbreviations as in Table 1.

a

Event is defined as myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, stroke, myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or vascular death.

To explore the relationship between the ratio FSH/T and a CVE, the baseline characteristics of the patients were stratified as high or low using the median value (3.04) of FSH/T (Table 3). Patients with a high ratio of FSH/T were significantly more likely to be older, have active or metastatic cancer, a history of congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease or diabetes, impaired kidney function, and had higher CVE rates. Furthermore, a high FSH/T ratio was significantly associated with a CVE. Conditional logistic regression showed that patients with a high FSH/T ratio had 40% increased odds of a CVE (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.03-1.90; P = 0.031) compared with patients with a low FSH/T, after adjustment for contributing covariates (Figure 6D). No collinearity between variables was observed. FSH/T as a continuous variable was, however, not significantly associated with a CVE (Supplemental Table 3). Importantly, neither FSH nor T alone was associated with the development of CVEs.

Table 3.

Patient Characteristics of the Nested Case-Control Study Within VISION Stratified by Serum FSH/T

Ratio of FSH/T
Total (N = 841) P Value
Low (n = 421) High (n = 420)
Age, y 70.2 (45.1-90.0) 75.5 (45.1-93.9) 73.3 (45.1-93.9) <0.001
BMI, kg/m2 27.1 (12.7-102) 27.4 (16.5-48.4) 27.2 (12.7-102) 0.82
Ratio FSH/T 1.68 (0.044-3.04) 6.21 (3.05-545) 3.04 (0.044-545) <0.001
Serum FSH, nM 24.2 (2.45-90.1) 68.0 (1.36-496) 38.1 (1.36-496) <0.001
Serum T, nM 15.8 (3.57-48.4) 10.3 (0.32-30.6) 13.0 (0.32-48.4) <0.001
Ethnicity 0.002
 Asian 38 (9) 73 (17) 111 (13)
 European 372 (88) 338 (80) 710 (84)
 Other 11 (3) 9 (2) 20 (2)
Patient in nursing home 1 (0) 6 (1) 7 (1) 0.057
Assistance with ADL 8 (2) 16 (4) 24 (3) 0.096
Smoker 0.076
 Current 70 (17) 47 (11) 117 (14)
 Never 120 (29) 123 (29) 243 (29)
 Past 231 (55) 248 (59) 479 (57)
Active or metastatic cancer 79 (19) 104 (25) 183 (22) 0.035
History of coronary artery disease 127 (30) 148 (35) 275 (33) 0.12
History of congestive heart failure 13 (3) 26 (6) 39 (5) 0.032
History of cerebrovascular event 35 (8) 50 (12) 85 (10) 0.084
History of peripheral vascular disease 28 (7) 57 (14) 85 (10) 0.001
History of diabetes 79 (19) 135 (32) 214 (25) <0.001
History of hypertension 249 (59) 289 (69) 538 (64) 0.004
Preop systolic BP, mm Hg 144 (50-240) 145 (90-220) 145 (50-240) 0.54
Preop diastolic BP, mm Hg 80 (43-111) 79 (40-117) 80 (40-117) 0.30
Preop coronary revascularization 40 (19) 26 (12) 142 (17) 0.23
Preop eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 102 (24) 159 (38) 261 (31) <0.001
Medication
 Aspirin 126 (30) 141 (34) 267 (32) 0.24
 Nitrate 24 (6) 19 (5) 43 (5) 0.44
 Anticoagulant 17 (4) 38 (9) 55 (7) 0.003
 ACE inhibitor/ARB 193 (46) 201 (48) 394 (47) 0.54
 Beta-blocker 115 (27) 130 (31) 245 (29) 0.25
 Statin 205 (49) 210 (50) 415 (49) 0.71
 Plavix/ticlopidine 9 (2) 14 (3) 23 (3) 0.45
 Alpha2-agonist 2 (0.5) 1 (0.2) 3 (0.4) 0.57
 Rate control CCB 19 (5) 18 (4) 37 (4) 0.87
 Dihydropyridine CCB 75 (18) 103 (25) 178 (21) 0.017
 Therapeutic antithrombotic 4 (1) 10 (2) 14 (2) 0.11
Composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, vascular death within 30 days 57 (14) 76 (18) 133 (16) 0.070
Eventa within 30 days 185 (44) 236 (56) 421 (50) <0.001

Values are median (range) or n (%). Significant P values (<0.05) are indicated in bold.

Abbreviations as in Tables 1 and 2.

a

Event is defined as myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery, stroke, myocardial infarction, nonfatal cardiac arrest, or vascular death.

Discussion

Our experimental and clinical results suggest that the adverse cardiovascular effects previously attributed to low or castrate T levels may be facilitated by FSH. Our experimental results clearly suggest a role for FSH in plaque development in castrated mice. ADT, whether delivered surgically or pharmacologically, resulted in equivalent castration, but different effects on FSH and on atherogenesis. Orchiectomy yields the highest FSH/T ratio and resulted in significantly more atherosclerotic changes in LDLR−/− mice than in untreated mice and mice treated with GnRH-agonists or -antagonists. In the absence of FSH in the FSH−/−;LDLR−/− mice, these differences were completely abolished. Moreover, GnRH-antagonists which led to significantly increased suppression of FSH compared with GnRH-agonist, led to a 79% decrease in the amount of necrotic core and 41% decrease in total atherosclerotic plaque in LDLR−/− mice compared with GnRH-agonists. Again, the loss of FSH in the FSHβ−/−;LDLR−/− model nullified these differences. Finally, delivery of exogenous FSH in FSHβ−/−;LDLR−/− mice restored the significant atherosclerotic changes seen in untreated LDLR−/− mice. These results also confirm 2 recent studies carried out on small groups of apolipoprotein E−/− mice which also showed that FSH leads to increased atherosclerosis on normal32 and high-fat high-cholesterol diets.33 However, in the latter study, serum FSH levels reached are 14.7 ng/mL (0.41 nM), at least 4-fold lower than the mean FSH levels in the orchiectomized LDLR−/− mice in our study. Moreover, the T levels after orchiectomy 32 are decreased by a mere 13% to 55 ng/mL (194 nM) hence not truly reflecting castration. Han et al32 attribute the FSH-induced increase in atherosclerosis to increased secretion of interleukin (IL)-1β by macrophages, whereas Piao et al33 implicate increased VCAM-1 expression and the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway. We achieved much larger differential serum FSH levels using murine FSH, not xenogenic human FSH, and included more adequate numbers of mice per group (n = 7 vs n = 3 to 4). We did not observe an increase in serum IL-1β (median 1.77 pg/mL [range 1.28-3.74 pg/mL] in control, 1.28 pg/mL [range 0.83-4.64 pg/mL] in FHS-treated mice). Moreover, we demonstrated a significant association between FSH/T and CCL21, a chemokine involved in inflammatory response. CCL21 increases atherosclerotic macrophage recruitment and macrophage lipid accumulation,34 and its serum levels have recently been demonstrated as a predictive marker for the development of major adverse CVEs in acute coronary syndrome patients.35 The CCL21/C-C motif chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7) axis may therefore be a potential mechanism by which FSH facilitates cardiovascular morbidity in a low/castrate T environment.

Of all ADT modalities, orchiectomy results in the highest FSH/T ratio. We demonstrated that orchiectomy results in significantly increased amounts of necrosis in LDLR−/− mice than GnRH-antagonists. Although surgical castration is no longer contemporary practice, reviews and analyses of health registries show that patients with PC who undergo orchiectomy experience significantly more CVEs than patients treated with GnRH-therapy (both GnRH-antagonist and -agonist).36 Interestingly, when only GnRH-agonists are compared with orchiectomy, there is no difference in the CVE rate,37 which is in support of our hypothesis that a higher FSH/T ratio after GnRH-agonist compared with -antagonist correlates with higher CVE rates. All related studies, however, are retrospective analyses of administrative data, with their inherent bias, and did not include serum FSH/T levels.

The clinical results support findings from other prospective studies, which compared the 1-year CVE rate between patients with PC with CVD who were randomized to receive GnRH-agonists or -antagonists and found a statistically significant lower incidence in patients receiving GnRH-antagonists.21,26,30 In contrast to these studies that showed 1-year CVE rates of 6.2% to 20.5% and 2.4% to 8.0% for GnRH-agonists and -antagonists, respectively, Lopes et al29 reported respective event rates of 4.1% and 5.5%. This suggests that, when cardiovascular prevention strategies including adequate delivery and monitoring in patients with a history of CVD are provided, as in Lopes et al,29 the CVE risk is similar in patients receiving GnRH-agonist and -antagonist. Whether such rigid cardiovascular monitoring and risk factor management29 can be routinely delivered in practice is doubtful. Nonetheless, there is a need for prospective clinical studies with CVEs as a primary endpoint. Although current clinical data in the field are conflicting, our results indicate that ADT modalities that optimally suppress FSH appear to have an inherent superior cardiovascular risk profile.

We examined the generalizability of our observation that serum FSH/T may associate with the development of CVEs in men without PC following other stressful cardiovascular triggers. Surgery has been demonstrated to be a trigger for myocardial injury22,23 leading to CVEs24 in the VISION cohort which represents the general population. Of the 848 men in our nested case-control study within VISION, 310 patients (36.6%) had low levels of T <11 nmol/L (definition by the European Male Aging Study38). Although the ratio of FSH/T as a continuous variable did not significantly associate with a CVE, we found a significant association when patients were stratified by FSH/T. Physiologically, the interplay between the effects of 2 hormones (FSH and T) is not necessarily linear, as previously suggested for T activity.39 Using the FSH/T ratio can serve as a measure for the combined effect of both hormones rather than relating to the level of each hormone separately and reduce potential effects of saturation of FSH and androgen receptors. This may support our finding of increased odds of a CVE in patients with a high FSH/T ratio.

Study Limitations

Our study has several limitations. The preclinical results were not adjusted for multiple statistical comparisons and also should be considered hypothesis-generating only. They relate to atherogenesis and characteristics of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability, not to CVEs. To our knowledge, mouse models of spontaneous CVEs do not exist. The thickness of the fibrous cap could not be included as a measure of plaque vulnerability of more advanced atherosclerotic lesions, as atherogenesis measured in our mice on a normal, not high-fat, diet, does not feature fibrous caps. Clinically, our results in ADT recipients need to be validated in larger studies that prospectively collect both serum samples and CVEs.

Conclusions

We demonstrate that the adverse cardiovascular effects previously attributed to low or castrate T levels in men may be potentiated by FSH. We defined a hormonal state characterized by an elevated FSH/T ratio in men with established CVD that associated with the risk of developing a CVE following a stressful cardiovascular trigger such as ADT or surgery. ADT using GnRH-antagonists was associated with lower necrotic plaque burden, and clinically, with significantly lower serum FSH/T levels compared with GnRH-agonists and fewer CVEs.

Perspectives.

COMPETENCY IN MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE: GnRH-antagonists, which optimally suppress FSH, appear to have an inherent superior cardiovascular risk profile and may thus be preferred in patients with PC with or at risk of CVD. Measuring the serum FSH/T ratio in patients with PC may assist in cardiovascular risk stratification during ADT, a potential cardiovascular challenging event.

TRANSLATIONAL OUTLOOK: Preclinically, a significant association between FSH/T and CCL21 existed. Therefore, the CCL21/CCR7 axis may be a potential mechanism by which FSH facilitates cardiovascular morbidity in a low/castrate T environment. Further exploration and correlation with clinical data are needed.

Funding Support and Author Disclosures

Financial support was provided by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Grant-in Aid (G-18-0022086) to Drs Pinthus and Duivenvoorden, McMaster Surgical Associates grant to Drs Pinthus and Duivenvoorden, and Ferring Pharmaceuticals through an investigator-initiated grant to Dr Pinthus. Ferring Pharmaceuticals had no involvement in study design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or the decision to submit for publication. Dr Pinthus has acted in a consulting role for Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and has received research funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals for this project. Dr Margel has received research funding from Ferring Pharmaceuticals. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

Footnotes

The authors attest they are in compliance with human studies committees and animal welfare regulations of the authors’ institutions and Food and Drug Administration guidelines, including patient consent where appropriate. For more information, visit the Author Center.

Appendix

For a Methodology section, and supplemental Figures and Tables, please see the online version of this article.

Appendix

Supplemental Material
mmc1.docx (3.6MB, docx)

References

  • 1.Weiner A.B., Li E.V., Desai A.S., Press D.J., Schaeffer E.M. Cause of death during prostate cancer survivorship: a contemporary, US population-based analysis. Cancer. 2021;127:2895–2904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kaufman J.M., Vermeulen A. The decline of androgen levels in elderly men and its clinical and therapeutic implications. Endocr Rev. 2005;26:833–876. doi: 10.1210/er.2004-0013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Araujo A.B., Dixon J.M., Suarez E.A., Murad M.H., Guey L.T., Wittert G.A. Clinical review: endogenous testosterone and mortality in men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:3007–3019. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Corona G., Rastrelli G., Monami M., et al. Hypogonadism as a risk factor for cardiovascular mortality in men: a meta-analytic study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165:687–701. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Laughlin G.A., Barrett-Connor E., Bergstrom J. Low serum testosterone and mortality in older men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93:68–75. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-1792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bourghardt J., Wilhelmson A.S., Alexanderson C., et al. Androgen receptor-dependent and independent atheroprotection by testosterone in male mice. Endocrinology. 2010;151:5428–5437. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pinthus J.H., Duivenvoorden W.C.M., Klotz L., et al. Low serum testosterone in men with newly diagnosed androgen-deprivation therapy-naive prostate cancer and its relationship to cardiovascular risk factors: a RADICAL-PC substudy. J Urol. 2022;207:1020–1028. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shahinian V.B., Kuo Y.F., Gilbert S.M. Reimbursement policy and androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1822–1832. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0910784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Borgmann V., Hardt W., Schmidt-Gollwitzer M., Adenauer H., Nagel R. Sustained suppression of testosterone production by the luteinising-hormone releasing-hormone agonist buserelin in patients with advanced prostate carcinoma. A new therapeutic approach? Lancet. 1982;1:1097–1099. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(82)92279-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Klotz L., Boccon-Gibod L., Shore N.D., et al. The efficacy and safety of degarelix: a 12-month, comparative, randomized, open-label, parallel-group phase III study in patients with prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2008;102:1531–1538. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crawford E.D., Tombal B., Keane T., et al. FSH suppression and tumour control in patients with prostate cancer during androgen deprivation with a GnRH agonist or antagonist. Scand J Urol. 2018;52:349–357. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1522372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.El Khoudary S.R., Santoro N., Chen H.Y., et al. Trajectories of estradiol and follicle-stimulating hormone over the menopause transition and early markers of atherosclerosis after menopause. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23:694–703. doi: 10.1177/2047487315607044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Munir J.A., Wu H., Bauer K., et al. The perimenopausal atherosclerosis transition: relationships between calcified and noncalcified coronary, aortic, and carotid atherosclerosis and risk factors and hormone levels. Menopause. 2012;19:10–15. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318221bc8d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cirne F., Aghel N., Petropoulos J.A., et al. The cardiovascular effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists in men with prostate cancer. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022;8:253–262. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hopmans S.N., Duivenvoorden W.C.M., Werstuck G.H., Pinthus J. GnRH antagonists associate with less weight gain and milder characteristics of the metabolic syndrome compared to orchiectomy and GnRH agonists in a preclinical mouse model. Urol Oncol. 2014;32:1126–1134. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Knutsson A., Hsiung S., Celik S., et al. Treatment with a GnRH receptor agonist, but not the GnRH receptor antagonist degarelix, induces atherosclerotic plaque instability in ApoE(−/−) mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6 doi: 10.1038/srep26220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kumar T.R., Wang Y., Lu N., Matzuk M.M. Follicle stimulating hormone is required for ovarian follicle maturation but not male fertility. Nat Genet. 1997;15:201–204. doi: 10.1038/ng0297-201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ishibashi S., Brown M.S., Goldstein J.L., Gerard R.D., Hammer R.E., Herz J. Hypercholesterolemia in low density lipoprotein receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. J Clin Invest. 1993;92:883–893. doi: 10.1172/JCI116663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Venegas-Pino D.E., Banko N., Khan M.I., Shi Y., Werstuck G.H. Quantitative analysis and characterization of atherosclerotic lesions in the murine aortic sinus. J Vis Exp. 2013;82 doi: 10.3791/50933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kleinmann N., Duivenvoorden W.C., Hopmans S.N., et al. Underactivation of the adiponectin-adiponectin receptor 1 axis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma: implications for progression. Clin Exper Metastasis. 2014;31:169–183. doi: 10.1007/s10585-013-9618-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Margel D., Peer A., Ber Y., et al. Cardiovascular morbidity in a randomized trial comparing GnRH agonist and GnRH antagonist among patients with advanced prostate cancer and preexisting cardiovascular disease. J Urol. 2019;202:1199–1208. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Vascular Events In Noncardiac Surgery Patients Cohort Evaluation (VISION) Study Investigators, Devereaux PJ, Chan MT, et al. Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2012;307:2295–2304. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Devereaux P.J., Biccard B.M., Sigamani A., et al. Association of postoperative high-sensitivity troponin levels with myocardial injury and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. JAMA. 2017;317:1642–1651. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Devereaux P.J., Duceppe E., Guyatt G., et al. Dabigatran in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MANAGE): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:2325–2334. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30832-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.World Health Organization . WHO technical report series No. 565; Geneva: 1975. WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (twenty-sixth report) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Albertsen P.C., Klotz L., Tombal B., Grady J., Olesen T.K., Nilsson J. Cardiovascular morbidity associated with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists and an antagonist. Eur Urol. 2014;65:565–573. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.O'Farrell S., Garmo H., Holmberg L., Adolfsson J., Stattin P., Van Hemelrijck M. Risk and timing of cardiovascular disease after androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:1243–1251. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.1792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bosco C., Bosnyak Z., Malmberg A., Adolfsson J., Keating N.L., Van Hemelrijck M. Quantifying observational evidence for risk of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular disease following androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2015;68:386–396. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lopes R.D., Higano C.S., Slovin S.F., et al. Cardiovascular safety of degarelix versus leuprolide in patients with prostate cancer: the primary results of the PRONOUNCE randomized trial. Circulation. 2021;144:1295–1307. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shore N.D., Saad F., Cookson M.S., et al. Oral relugolix for androgen-deprivation therapy in advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:2187–2196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Botto F., Alonso-Coello P., Chan M.T., et al. Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: a large, international, prospective cohort study establishing diagnostic criteria, characteristics, predictors, and 30-day outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2014;120:564–578. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Piao J., Yin Y., Zhao Y., et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone accelerates atherosclerosis by activating PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB pathway in mice with androgen deprivation. J Vasc Res. 2022;59:358–368. doi: 10.1159/000527239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Han J.L., Song Y.X., Yao W.J., Zhou J., Du Y., Xu T. Follicle-stimulating hormone provokes macrophages to secrete IL-1beta contributing to atherosclerosis progression. J Immunol. 2023;210:25–32. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2200475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Damas J.K., Smith C., Oie E., et al. Enhanced expression of the homeostatic chemokines CCL19 and CCL21 in clinical and experimental atherosclerosis: possible pathogenic role in plaque destabilization. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2007;27:614–620. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000255581.38523.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Caidahl K., Hartford M., Ravn-Fischer A., et al. Homeostatic chemokines and prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:774–782. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kan W.C., Hsieh K.L., Chen Y.C., et al. Comparison of surgical or medical castration-related cardiotoxicity in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2022;207:841–850. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thomsen F.B., Sandin F., Garmo H., et al. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists, orchiectomy, and risk of cardiovascular disease: semi-ecologic, nationwide, population-based study. Eur Urol. 2017;72:920–928. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.06.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wu F.C., Tajar A., Beynon J.M., et al. Identification of late-onset hypogonadism in middle-aged and elderly men. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:123–135. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Morgentaler A., Traish A.M. Shifting the paradigm of testosterone and prostate cancer: the saturation model and the limits of androgen-dependent growth. Eur Urol. 2009;55:310–320. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Material
mmc1.docx (3.6MB, docx)

Articles from JACC: Basic to Translational Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES