Skip to main content
Genes & Diseases logoLink to Genes & Diseases
. 2023 Jul 7;11(4):101019. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2023.04.039

Advances in the application of hydrogel-based scaffolds for tendon repair

Renqiang Chen b, Fanglin Chen b, Kenian Chen b, Jian Xu a,
PMCID: PMC10978548  PMID: 38560496

Abstract

Tendon injuries often lead to joint dysfunction due to the limited self-regeneration capacity of tendons. Repairing tendons is a major challenge for surgeons and imposes a significant financial burden on society. Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop effective strategies for repairing injured tendons. Tendon tissue engineering using hydrogels has emerged as a promising approach that has attracted considerable interest. Hydrogels possess excellent biocompatibility and biodegradability, enabling them to create an extracellular matrix-like growth environment for cells. They can also serve as a carrier for cells or other substances to accelerate tendon repair. In the past decade, numerous studies have made significant progress in the preparation of hydrogel scaffolds for tendon healing. This review aims to provide an overview of recent research on the materials of hydrogel-based scaffolds used for tendon tissue engineering and discusses the delivery systems based on them.

Keywords: Application, Hydrogel-based, Repair scaffolds, Review, Tendon injury, Tissue engineering

Introduction

Tendons play a crucial role in the musculoskeletal system by connecting muscles to bones and transmitting the forces generated by muscle movement to bone tissue.1,2 As a result, tendons are subjected to substantial tensile forces and act as a buffer to avoid stress concentration, making them vulnerable to damage.3 The native tendon is formed by the aggregation of aligned tropocollagen (1.5 nm) into increasingly complex structures, such as microfibrils (10 nm), fibrils (50–500 nm), fibers (10–50 μm), fascicles (50–300 μm), and tendons (1–10 mm) successively.3, 4, 5 Fascicles and their inferior units are surrounded by the endotenon,5,6 connecting with the epitenon, which covers the tendon and minimizes friction with a protective membrane (Fig. 1).7 Histological sections show that the extracellular matrix (ECM) of tendons is rich in type I collagen and a small number of cells are present.6 Tenocytes, the primary cells residing in the fascicles and periphery, synthesize ECM components and regulate the development and maturation of tendons via various signaling pathways, including TGF β-Smad2/3 and ERK1/2.4,5,7, 8, 9 More in detail, the TGF β-Smad2/3 signaling pathway can up-regulate scleraxis (Scx), tenomodulin (Tnmd), and other tenogenic markers. Tendon healing occurs naturally via intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms. Intrinsic healing refers to the proliferation of tendon cells and ECM formation, while extrinsic healing occurs via the invasion of fibroblasts from the surrounding tissues.8 Due to the relatively low number of tendon cells and the low activity of growth factors, tendon healing is primarily extrinsic. Furthermore, the poor vascularization of tendons exacerbates their limited intrinsic repair ability after injury.6,9 In the rotator cuff, there are four different zones in the tendon-to-bone interface (TBI): ligament tissue, unmineralized fibrocartilage, mineralized fibrocartilage, and bone tissue, which are difficult to reconstruct.10,11

Figure 1.

Fig. 1

Anatomy of the native tendon.

As fitness exercises become more popular among citizens, tendon injuries (TI) have become increasingly common. Surveys have shown that TI is among the 15 most prevalent diseases in the United States.12 Traditional treatment options for TI include conservative treatments and surgical interventions, such as sutures and autografts, which are associated with potential problems.13, 14, 15, 16 For example, latissimus dorsi transfer and pectoralis major transfer for rotator cuff tear (RCT) often fail as a result of mismatched mechanical properties and anatomical damage at the surgery site.13 The disease transmission and donor site morbidity are associated with tendon grafting.17 Difficulties in restoring the structure and function of injured tendons make tendon repair a major challenge in sports medicine today.18 Strategies to engineer tendon tissue have gained substantial attention to overcome these shortcomings along with the use of hydrogel-based scaffolds.

Tendon tissue engineering has emerged as a promising approach to regenerating tendon tissue that functions similarly to natural tendons. This involves loading cells or other substances onto scaffolds that can integrate with surrounding tissues.17 Scaffolds can create a three-dimensional (3D) environment that resembles ECM to support the proliferation and differentiation of cells.19 Hydrogels and synthetic polymers are the most used materials for scaffold fabrication. As extremely hydrophilic and cross-linked network materials, hydrogels possess high water content, elasticity, and bioactivity,16,20,21 beneficial for the penetration of nutrients and biofactors,22 and act as carriers for cells and drugs with minimal immune reactivity.16 However, a majority of traditional hydrogels are inferior to synthetic materials in mechanical properties and controllability.17 Thus, hydrogel-based scaffolds, containing hydrogels with/without synthetic polymers, are developed in the delivery systems of tendon tissue engineering (Table 1, Table 2).

Table 1.

Materials used for tendon tissue engineering.

Hydrogels Advantages Disadvantages References
Natural hydrogels
Gelatin Sustainable release, simple and economical manufacture ion, and hydrophilicity Risk of disease transfer and poor mechanical property 17,26,40,54,57
Hyaluronic acid Viscoelasticity and hydrophilicity Local reaction, poor mechanical properties, and biocompatibility problems in synthesis 22,29,63,64
Fibrin Easy availability, low cost, and suitable for tenogenic differentiation Rapid degradation and poor mechanical properties 48,63,67,68,123
Chitosan Biocompatibility, adhesive capacity, and anti-peritendinous adhesion Poor mechanical property and inflammation reaction with highly acetylated chitosan 80,85
Alginate Injectability, self-healing, and bio-degradability Must be modified by oxidation to degrade; no intrinsic cell binding parts and poor mechanical property 2,27,88,91
Collagen Low immunogenicity and bio-degradability Poor physicochemical plasticity, low denaturing temperature, and fast degradation rate 25,81,93,95,124,125
tHGs Biocompatibility and specific elements for tendon regeneration Disease transmission, heavy cost, ethical issues, and poor mechanical property 38,108,109
Synthetic polymers
Polyglycolic acid Absorbability and rapid degradation Relatively poor mechanical property of unwoven polyglycolic acid 11,31,114
Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid Biodegradability, biocompatibility, and proper mechanical properties Poor osteoinductivity ability 23,45,118,121
Polycaprolactone Biodegradability, biocompatibility, and strong mechanical strength Not conducive to cell adhesion, slow degradation rate, and low biological activity 41,56,110, 111, 112, 113
Poly-l-lactic acid Biodegradability and biocompatibility Accumulated acid production by the degradation and obvious inflammation, poor osteoinductivity ability 10,120,121

Table 2.

The comparison of different delivery cells.

Loaded cells Strengths Weaknesses References
Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells Pluripotent potential and great proliferative capacity Differentiation uncertainty, scarcity, donor-site morbidity, and high cost 31,33,116,129,134,138
Adipose-derived stem cells Accessible harvest and expansion, abundant availability, and immunomodulatory effect Differentiation uncertainty and short survival time in vivo 31,104,128,129,134
Tendon-derived stem cells Pluripotent and clonogenic potential and self-renewal Slow proliferation and mutation 18,130,139,140
Dermal fibroblasts Easy availability and similarity with tenocytes Inferior quality of the forming tendon 104,133, 134, 135
Tenocytes The inherent cells of the tendon and being robust within the tendon Few sources, losing phenotype at in vivo expansion, and donor-site morbidity 104,133,134

Although hydrogel-based scaffolds composed of various materials have been used to regenerate tendons, there is still a need for an ideal biodegradable scaffold that can mimic the architecture of the native tendon ECM. Specifically, except for the necessary properties of non-toxicity and degradation in accordance with the formation of the new tissue, the ideal scaffold should be designed with mechanical strength to stimulate the tenogenic expression of cells, sustain the release of biofactors or drugs while degrading, and have a versatile structure for cell adherence and nutrition exchange. Furthermore, to minimize inflammatory response while withstanding the intense pressure exerted by muscles and joints, it needs to maintain its integrity.

Properties of scaffolds

Biocompatibility and biodegradability

As the graft is transplanted into the body, scaffolds ought to possess superior compatibility and degradability.23,24 Synthetic polymers tend to cause foreign body reactions, induce synovitis, and have insufficient biocompatibility,25 as compared to natural materials like gelatin26 and alginate.27 For instance, an implanted sheet of poly-l-lactate-epsilon-caprolactone (PLC) for treating rotator cuff defects, resulted in numerous multinuclear cells around the remaining sheet 16 weeks post-implantation,11 indicating a lack of biocompatibility. Therefore, to ensure biocompatibility and degradability, toxic side products should not be produced while manufacturing scaffolds. Scaffolds made from hyaluronic acid (HA) hydrogels, containing methacrylate (HA-ME) fabricated by photopolymerization, are more toxic than catechol-functionalized hyaluronic acid (HA-CA), produced by oxidative cross-linking.22,28 Park et al compared the viability of adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) cultured in both HA-ME and HA-CA and reported that approximately 93% of ASCs in HA-CA were active during seven days of culture, significantly higher than those in HA-ME (P < 0.01).22 As scaffolds degrade, they lose their mechanical properties and components. Therefore, the rate of degradation should be in concordance with the regeneration rate of the tendon tissue.29

Mechanical property

It is widely accepted that tendons function within a dynamic environment and bear strong force in vivo.30 The mechanical properties of a scaffold has a significant impact on the formation and maturation of engineered tendon tissue.31 Mechanical stress induces the expression of proteoglycan and versican, which are critical proteins for the niche composition and matrix maturation of tendon-derived stem cells (TDSCs).32 Ciardulli et al demonstrated that the expression of Scx in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) was up-regulated up to 1600-fold in dynamic conditions (culturing in cyclic strain stimulation) compared with just 800-fold in static conditions, emphasizing the importance of mechanical stimuli in tissue engineering.33 Consequently, scaffolds are required to deliver strain or compression inputs to the loaded cells. To fabricate scaffolds with anisotropic mechanics, electrospinning had been successfully attempted.30,34,35 Previous publications had shown that scaffolds supplemented with bioactive ions showed remarkable promotion in mechanical tests.24 Ma et al manufactured composite hydrogels of calcium silicate (CS) nanowires/alginate using the 3D printing method, which significantly increased the tensile strength and Young's modulus of the composite hydrogels.36 Additionally, the relation between them was positive.

Structure

A porous structure with a high surface-to-volume ratio can facilitate the process of cell adherence, proliferation, and differentiation into tenocytes because the properties prompt oxygen and nutrient diffusion in case the vascularization is poor.19,37,38 Lyophilized tendon-based hydrogels demonstrated superior cell proliferation and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) activation compared to fresh tendon hydrogels due to high porosity and greater exposure of collagen I after lyophilization.38 Once the tendon sheath is destroyed, extrinsic fibroblasts invade the injured sites, resulting in peri-tendinous adhesions.39 To prevent exogenous fibroblast invasion, scaffolds mimicking the function of the tendon sheath must be equipped with a small pore size to block cell migration and ensure nutrient exchange simultaneously.7

To enhance cell adherence, the surfaces of scaffolds should be relatively rough and not too hydrophilic.10,29 The hydrophobic nature of polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds leads to insufficient cell attachment and tissue integration.40,41 Lv et al demonstrated that supplementation of hydroxyapatite (HAP) enhanced the roughness and hydrophilicity of the poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) nanofibrous membrane, improving cell attachment.10 Using the technology of electrospinning, composite scaffolds with tendon-like tissues possessing aligned topography were successfully produced,30,37 contributing to the elongation of cell shape and inducing tenogenic differentiation.10,30,37,42,43 Aligned and dense fibers are equipped with mechanical properties resembling that of the native tendons.44 Moreover, for scaffolds of aligned fibers, microscaled-aligned topography is more conducive to inducing tenogenic differentiation compared to the nanoscaled topography,43 facilitating better cell adhesion and elongation.45 Furthermore, studies have shown that aligned scaffolds are instrumental in the modulating inflammatory response, promoting the shift of macrophage subpopulations from M1 to M2.45,46 The pro-inflammatory phenotype of M1 macrophages initiates inflammation while M2 subpopulations play an anti-inflammatory role in the immune system.45,47

Injectability and self-healing property

Tendons are essential for transferring strength from muscle to bone,1 and the force between tendons and peri-tendinous tissues remains remarkably strong,1,48 reminiscent of the possibility of scaffold's destruction. Once broken, the debris can induce an inflammatory reaction, impeding tissue repair. The self-healing property of scaffolds refers to their ability to recover their shape and function through the internal covalent bonds after they are destroyed (Fig. 2). These covalent bonds, such as disulfide, imine, and hydrazine bonds, exist in the crosslinking of functionalized polymers during scaffold fabrication.48 Wang et al developed an imine bond-based self-healing scaffold that returned to its original shape after being cut without external stimulation.49 Dynamic Schiff base bonds, formed by amino groups and aldehyde groups, also provide scaffolds with favorable self-healing and injectability properties.24,50,51 Unfortunately, chemical crosslinking with covalent bonds can lead to the production of toxic substances. Double network scaffolds via dual physical crosslinking not only eliminate the use of toxic chemicals but also display visible self-healing behavior.52 Injectability is crucial for filling irregularly shaped repair sites, where scaffolds can easily fill the sites appropriately.24,48 Traditionally, the direct injection of cells can cause cell loss due to penetration into surrounding tissues,14 or cell death due to the shear stress during the injection.53 As a result, incorporating cells, bioactive factors, or drugs into injectable hydrogels is a suitable option for patients who prefer less invasive treatments.

Figure 2.

Fig. 2

The self-healing property of hydrogel. (A) The effect of self-healing hydrogel under tissue compression. The self-healing hydrogel keeps its shape, while the traditional one is broken into pieces, inducing a severe inflammatory reaction. (BD) The macroscopic shape of the electrospun nanofibers post-implantation in vivo. The self-healing hydrogel attached to the electrospun nanofibers keeps its integrity, but the non-self-healing hydrogel is destroyed. Reprinted with permission.48 Copyright 2021, John Wiley and Sons.

Material categories of hydrogel base scaffolds

Natural hydrogels

Gelatin

Gelatin, a hydrolyzed product of collagen, possesses favorable characteristics for tissue engineering such as high hydrophilicity, biocompatibility, and low manufacturing cost.17,40,54 The amino acid sequence of gelatin, Arg-Gly-Asp acid (RGD), enhances cell attachment to the scaffold by interacting with cell integrins.17,54, 55, 56 Gelatin can take various forms in vitro, such as sheets, microspheres, and sponges; however, it undergoes enzymatic degradation in vivo to produce a water-soluble fragment that facilitates the sustainable and stable release of drugs or active factors.26,57 Taking advantage of this property, Zhang et al loaded PRP in a porous gelatin sponge (GS).26 They found that GS was sufficiently stable to sustain the bioactivity of PRP, with the release kinetics corresponding with the degrading curve. Tokunaga et al used gelatin hydrogel as the carrier of fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and observed a persistent release for two weeks with the degradation of gelatin.58 The study also discerned repairing the rotator cuff in rabbits with gelatin alone had no promotion effects. Porous and injectable gelatin microcryogels have also been created to enhance cell-to-cell interactions with a biomimetic 3D structure, which provides more surfaces for cell attachment than 2D structures.56 Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA), derived from gelatin by photocuring, has lower antigenicity than collagen hydrogels.59, 60, 61 GelMA can be cross-linked rapidly when fabricating and fills the irregular shape better and thus is widely applied in the delivery system in RCT repair.59,62

Hyaluronic acid

HA is a natural glycosaminoglycan that is widely present in human connective tissues, synthesized by synoviocytes and fibroblasts.1,63 A study showed that HA enhances TDSC viability and type I collagen expression in a dose-dependent manner, independent of its molecular weight.64 Fabrication of HA hydrogel using methacrylate, aldehyde, and other functional groups causes biocompatibility problems, whereas catechol-functionalized HA manufactured by oxidative cross-linking is less toxic.22 Cai et al synthesized self-healing HA using oxidative HA, which incorporated aldehyde groups (HA-CHO), and adipic acid dihydrazide-modified HA (HA-ADH).48 These modified HAs sustained their self-healing property even after degradation testing due to rebuilding the dynamic covalent bond inside HA. Scaffolds coated with HA effectively inhibit tissue adhesion because of the small pore size and heavy hydrophilicity of HA coating, which hinders cell immigration.29 As the carrier, HA hydrogel not only releases drugs sustainably but also shows anti-inflammatory effects.65,66

Fibrin

Fibrin is a natural scaffold for human tissue after injury, which plays a vital role in initiating hemostasis and promoting cellular activity.67 The raw materials required to form fibrin can be extracted from a patient's plasma, making it reliable and biocompatible.67, 68, 69 In a study comparing fibrin and collagen, tendon progenitor cells cultured in fibrin gels up-regulated the expression of Scx and Tnmd significantly on the 14th day, resulting in a more aligned ECM being produced.70 This finding is consistent with a study by Bottagisio et al, who observed higher tenogenic gene expression in fibrin-based scaffold compared to other mediums.71 Sustained release of biofactors in vivo can be achieved in fibrin-based delivery carriers with proper concentrations of fibrinogen and thrombin as opposed to the explosive effect of PRP.72, 73, 74 Although fibrin has poor mechanical properties, it can be improved through crosslinking protocols.68,69

Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is a concentrate of platelets that contains a substantial number of growth factors and has a porous microstructure.75 When implanted into the body, PRF can increase the viability of tenocytes and promote the formation of a mineralization gradient in TBI, which plays an important role in TBI healing.75,76 The degree of the tenocyte's proliferation depended on the PRF dose.77 PRF derived from bone marrow could further augment the healing of TBI, due to its higher concentration of growth factors and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).78 Nonetheless, when PRF and tenocytes were cultivated in a system of small diameter well, adverse factors, including adhesive and fibrinolytic factors, were produced as a result of the gelling effect.79

Chitosan

Structurally similar to HA hydrogels, chitosan is biodegradable and can modulate inflammation and adhesion.19,80, 81, 82 It had been proven to prevent the adhesion of flexor tendons and decreased the apoptosis of tenocytes by activating the sirtuin 1 signaling pathway.83 Incorporating chitosan into scaffolds can promote the chondrogenesis and osteogenesis of MSCs,81 which is suitable for the regeneration of RCT with a multi-organization structure. Chen and colleagues fabricated a chitosan scaffold with an asymmetrical structure consisting of a dense membrane to prevent extrinsic fibroblast invasion and a porous sponge for cell growth.84 The outcomes suggested that TDSCs loaded in the scaffold expressed high levels of Scx and Tnmd, with low adhesion scores post-implantation. The inflammatory reaction is a significant challenge in the design of biomaterials for tendon repair. Chitosan with high acetylation tends to result in intense inflammation from M1 macrophages, but low-acetylated chitosan is characterized by a large number of M2 macrophages and anti-inflammatory factors.85 Due to the natural origin of chitosan, delivery systems modified by chitosan accelerate the adherence of cytokines and cells.19,82,86,87

Alginate

Alginate is a heteropolysaccharide derived from brown sea algae, possessing unique properties such as injectability, self-healing, and biodegradability.2,27,88 In the presence of divalent cations, ionic crosslinking between cations and the carboxyl functional group of alginate results in the stable formation of alginate hydrogels.16,89 Alginate microsphere provides a 3D structure that resembles the native ECM, facilitating the encapsulation of both cells and biofactors.27,89,90 However, there are no intrinsic integrin-binding domains in alginate, which can hinder the adhesion of cells,91 and prevent peri-tendinous adhesion if used as the outer layer of scaffolds.80 The addition of RGD covalently enhances the interaction between MSCs and alginate, boosting cell attachment and the availability of nutrients or growth factors.2,89,91,92 While the mechanical property of alginate is inferior, it can be strengthened by adding bioactive irons.36,89 To note, the degradation of alginate hydrogels is dependent on the oxidation level and does not affect the compatibility of the scaffolds and cell proliferation.89

Collagen

Collagen is the main component of the ECM and comprises approximately one-third of the total proteins in vertebrate animals.93 As a natural biological macromolecule, collagen has low immunogenicity compared to synthetic materials.17,94 However, the denaturing temperature for collagen is approximately 38–45 °C,95 making it unsuitable for thermal preconditioning in tissue engineering.69,96 Research has shown that adding keratin improves the thermal stability of type I collagen hydrogels, maintaining their shape at 47 °C for over an hour.95 Generally, porcine collagen has a higher denaturation temperature and lower mechanical properties than bovine collagen.25,97 Although collagen molecules can self-assemble into fibrils, the collagen hydrogels that are ultimately extracted have randomized organization and poor mechanical stability.44,93 Combining collagen with polyglycolic acid (PGA) not only improves the mechanical properties of the collagen sponge,98 but also reduces its shrinkage, facilitating the diffusion of oxygen and nutrients.94 To meet ethical and mechanical requirements, marine collagen scaffolds can also be considered.99

Maeda et al proposed a novel method for fabricating a tendon-like collagen hydrogel that simultaneously realizes fiber alignment and crosslinking,100 which are typically performed separately in routine procedures. This method imposed mechanical loading on the collagen gel after polymerizing in the presence of genipin, the agent of chemical crosslinking. The aligned dense collagen scaffolds were produced using the gel aspiration-ejection technique,53 which quickly densified and realigned the fibril.44 However, these technologies fail to form the topography that resembles ECM in situ. To address this, Wright et al developed a non-invasive protocol for remotely controlling the topographical cue.101 By incorporating iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles into collagen hydrogels and imposing a magnetic field, a fiber-like architecture was observed, and the effect depended on the dose of magnetic nanoparticles.

Hydrogels acted on tendon extracellular matrix

Scaffolds based on ECM maintain the native morphology and biological features that are required for cellular proliferation.102 Though it is stated in the previous context that ECM of tendons is mainly composed of type I collagen,6 the hydrogels based on tendon ECM (tHGs) are not equal to collagen hydrogels as the elements of tHGs are tailored to their physiological and functional requirements, leading to tenogenic differentiation.103,104 Ning et al conducted a comparative study between collagen hydrogels and tHGs,105 revealing that some inherent ingredients of native tendon ECM were retained in tHGs, including stromal cell-derived factor-1 and fibromodulin, even though the microstructure of both hydrogels was similar. Furthermore, fibroblasts cultured in tHGs expressed higher levels of paxillin protein, an essential factor for cell attachment and proliferation, compared to those grown in the hydrogels made of type I collagen.106 Therefore, tHGs have garnered significant attention in the field of tissue engineering in recent years.

The tHGs are structural and functional protein complexes obtained through decellularization that are biocompatible and capable of forming a gel under body temperature, with an internal porous 3D network structure.38,103,107 A combination of repeated freeze/thaw processes and nuclease treatment is a more effective method of decellularization than chemical decellularization, which can damage the tendon ECM.105 Kaizawa and colleagues found that injecting tHGs after suture repair improved the TBI healing biomechanically of chronic rotator cuff injuries significantly better than repair alone,107 which aligned with their previous report.103 There are many potential mechanisms concerning the therapeutic effects of tHGs. Franklin et al observed that tHGs augmented acute or chronic healing by attracting systemic ASCs.108 Moreover, Ning et al showed that tHGs significantly increased the tenogenic differentiation and migration of TDSCs when cultured in tHGs.105 Additionally, lyophilized tHGs exhibit a higher capacity to activate cell proliferation and PRP than do the fresh tHGs.38 Using human tHGs is always associated with cost and ethical issues,109 which need to be addressed in future research.

Synthetic polymers

Despite availability and biocompatibility, natural hydrogels have poor mechanical properties and degrade rapidly,17 which limits their practical applications. In contrast, synthetic polymers possess excellent mechanical properties and can be produced in large quantities, making them an attractive option for clinical use. To achieve optimal clinical outcomes, a combination of natural and synthetic hydrogels is typically utilized.

PCL is an absorbable and biocompatible polymer and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for clinical use40; however, its limitations, including hydrophobicity, slow degradation rate, and poor cell adhesion, suggest that it should be modified.41,110, 111, 112, 113 Blending PCL with natural hydrogels has been proven to improve these properties, such as gelatin61 and alginate.16 Specifically, the hydrophobicity and cell adherence of the PCL is enhanced because of the hydrophilic groups and the RGD sequence of natural hydrogels.17 PCL modified with chitosan demonstrates improved cytocompatibility, reduced rolling leukocytes, and more apparent vascularization after implantation compared to the PCL control group.112 In preventing tendon adhesion, PCL nanofibrous membranes prepared via electrospinning can act as a physical barrier to block fibroblast migration from the peri-tendinous tissues.113 The PCL nanofibrous membranes fabricated by Domingos et al not only provided mechanical stability but had a small pore size (0.70 μm), while the average diameter of fibroblasts was nearly 10 μm.7

PGA is composed of absorbable components and degrades relatively quickly.11,94,114 A patch graft of PGA was utilized in a retrospective study to treat irreparable RCTs, which contributed to no local inflammation or subacromial adhesions by the one-year follow-up.114 Aligned scaffolds of PGA also promote the tenogenic expression of stem cells by inducing cell elongation.43,115 It is generally accepted that the Achilles tendon withstands the largest mechanical loading from the body and the unwoven PGA had relatively poor mechanical properties when compared with that of the Achilles tendon. To improve this, Deng et al fabricated a composite scaffold comprising unwoven PGA fibers as the inter part, wrapped in a net knitted with PGA and polylactide fibers as the outer part, to provide adequate tensile strength for the repair of Achilles tendon defects.31 Additionally, in contrast to the unwoven nanofibrous scaffolds, the woven scaffolds accelerate cell proliferation with a larger pore size between nanofibers, promoting nutrient diffusion.30 The versatile co-polyester of PGA, poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), can be used to fabricate a 3D microstructure that resembles the native tendon ECM,23,116 except for the necessary properties of PGA. Wrapping PLGA nanofibers around tendon defects has been shown to reduce the formation of tendon adhesion.117 Previous findings suggested that aligned PLGA microfiber fleece with a smaller parameter (1.27 μm) resulted in higher expression of Tnmd and lower IL-12 to IL-10 ratio, indicative of better tenogenesis property and immune regulation.45 The form of PLGA may also potentially affect its degradation. As the PLGA scaffolds loaded with ibuprofen showed a linear release profile in in vitro PBS, a fast burst release occurred when it was implanted into in vivo environment or in vitro serum.118 There are some acidic by-products during the degradation of PLGA, for instance, the olic acid and lactic acid,117 which are difficult to metabolize rapidly in vivo when achieving high concentrations.119

Like the other synthetic hydrogels discussed above, poly-l-lactic acid (PLLA) is biodegradable and can be adjusted in molecular weight to vary the degradation time.10,120 An electrospun membrane made of PLLA and gelatin exhibited remarkable cytocompatibility to fibroblasts and enhanced the formation of aligned collagen fibers.54 For the TBI repair, osteoinductivity of the scaffolds plays an important role that is insufficient in PLLA unexpectedly.121 The PLLA-HAP nanofibrous membrane designed by Lv et al not only induced more osteogenesis differentiation of BMSCs but decreased the hydrophobicity of PLLA by the hydrophilic groups of HAP.10 Similarly, PLLA scaffolds coated with chondroitin sulfate and collagen improved the hydrophilicity of PLLA.42 Aligned PPLLA-based scaffolds improve drug release by sustaining their release in comparison with random PLLA scaffolds,122 correlated with the crystallinity improvement of the polymer scaffold.

Delivery systems for tendon repair

Cell-loaded delivery system

Delivering cells to targeted tissue sites through scaffolds offers several advantages: i) it provides a biomimetic microenvironment for the cells, enabling them to function optimally; ii) scaffolds also protect cells from mechanical damage that may occur during the implantation procedure; iii) it facilitates the maintenance of locally high concentration of cells, further enhancing their therapeutic potential. Given these benefits, numerous types of stem cells and fibroblasts have been utilized in this system.

As pluripotent stem cells, BMSCs can differentiate into adipocytes, chondrocytes, and tenocytes under specific conditions.33 There are several methods for inducing the tenogenesis of BMSCs, including mechanical stimulation, co-culture with tendon cells, and the utilization of bioactive factors.126 An investigation by Bottagisio et al found that fibrin-based scaffolds significantly increased the collagen production of BMSCs, particularly when combined with bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP-14), transforming growth factor β3 (TGF-β3), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).71 In the collagen sponge constructs of Zhang et al, the combination of cyclic stretch and TGF-β1 improved the expression of tendon-relative genes of BMSCs and Young's modulus of the scaffold by decreasing its porosity.124 In comparison to tHGs and fibrin scaffolds, BMSCs cultured in demineralized bone matrix exhibited better adherence when exposed to water pressure during arthroscopic repair of RCT.127 Additionally, the implantation of BMSCs loaded in PLGA scaffolds, which had a structure similar to native ECM, enhanced the mechanical property of regenerative tissues in rabbit RCT models.116 To better meet the structure demand of the native TBI of rotator cuffs, Cao et al invented a multiphasic scaffold through 3D printing that could deliver different cells with PCL and GelMA in a layered manner including tendon fibroblasts, BMSCs, and osteoblasts (Fig. 3).59 The cells were simultaneously loaded onto the scaffold and rapidly crosslinked with GelMA to provide better scaffold stability and cell viability.

Figure 3.

Fig. 3

The preparation of multiphasic scaffold. Suspended in GelMA, tendon fibroblasts (FBs) and osteoblasts (OBs) were loaded in the PCL phase and PCL/tricalcium phosphate (TCP) phase respectively, and BMSCs were injected into the ducts between the two phases. Reprinted with permission.59 Copyright 2020, Elsevier.

ASCs, in contrast to BMSCs, are more easily accessible for harvesting and expansion, and they have a reduced osteogenic tendency.31 ASCs have been shown to modulate the inflammatory response during the early stage of TI.128 By activating the FAK-ERK1/2 and YAP/TAZ signaling pathways, aligned PLLA nanofibrous scaffolds stimulate the immunomodulatory functions of ASCs.46 However, the effectiveness of ASCs in promoting RCT healing remains controversial. Kaizawa et al found that there was no significant difference between ASCs-seeded tHGs and tHGs-alone group,107 while Kim et al reported that ASCs loaded in fibrin glue decreased the retear rate of RCT after repair.129 For Achilles tendon repair, ASCs delivered by porous gelatin microcryogels improved the stiffness and tear resistance of the engineered tissue,14 and the ASCs in composite scaffolds of PGA and polylactide fibers showed similar results.31

TDSCs are MSCs found in tendons, with self-regenerative and multi-differentiation potential.130,131 Scaffolds made of tHGs induce tenogenic differentiation and suppress the osteogenesis of TDSCs.132 The expression of Scx and Tnmd is up-regulated in TDSCs when cultured in tHGs, facilitating their migration movement simultaneously.105 Xu et al compared the capability of TDSCs for repairing Achilles tendon rupture in collagen hydrogels and collagen hydrogels enhanced by PRP.9 They demonstrated that under the activation of PRP, TDSCs accelerated DNA synthesis and cell proliferation. On the contrary, injecting TDSCs alone had no meaningful treatment effect.18 When delivering TDSCs to the TI sites with scaffolds, the seeding density should be considered because the high density of TDSCs enhances the elongated morphology and the expression of tendon-related genes.131

Despite their differentiation potential, stem cells may cause ectopic ossification due to the mal-differentiation after implantation. As an alternative, dermal fibroblasts and tenocytes have been used to treat TI. Both originate from the mesoderm and share similarities in morphology and functions for tendon healing.133 Dermal fibroblasts using fibrin as the carrier resulted in more regular and denser collagen fibers in the rabbit RCT healing,133,134 better than fibrin loaded with PRP.134 Moreover, Chattopadhyay et al indicated that tHGs delivering dermal fibroblasts had a more desirable therapeutic effect for tendon healing than ASCs in the same carrier, owing to the short survival time of ASCs in vivo.104 Additionally, apart from supporting fibroblast infiltration and viability, researchers also attempted to enhance the mechanical property of scaffolds. Araque et al invented a hybrid scaffold, consisting of a hollow braid of polylactide and microspheres of PLLA and HA inside the braid, coating HA as the outer layer.29 The hollow braid of polylactide functioned as the load-bearing component, while the microspheres acted as the fibroblasts carrier, preventing peri-tendinous adhesion with HA coating. Sensini et al fabricated a delivery system based on PLLA and collagen through crosslinking using EDC/NHS reagents to maintain the collagen and mechanical property.135 Their results indicated that fibrous morphology was reserved better because of dissolving EDC/NHS in ethanol.

Compared with dermal fibroblasts, tenocytes require extraction from the autologous tendon,134 associated with high donor-site morbidity and limited availability, thereby limiting its application. Due to the scarcity of tenocytes, the process of tendon healing tends to be stagnated. To address this, a hybrid interpenetrating system based on alginate hydrogel has been developed, allowing the bidirectional migration of tenocytes, with the seeded tenocytes moving towards the TI sides and the host tenocytes infiltrating the scaffold.136 Deepthi et al also designed a biomimetic scaffold in which chitosan-collagen hydrogel was layered on aligned PLLA nanofibers and coated with alginate in the outer layer.80 Tenocytes could attach and infiltrate well in this scaffold, and it showed sufficient mechanical property for the flexor tendon healing under immobilization. However, the contraction behavior of tenocytes is prone to destroy the anisotropy of scaffolds and the alignment of tenocytes. Grier et al demonstrated that scaffolds with high crosslinking density and small pore size reduced cell contraction, thus improving the viability of tenocytes.137

Cytokine-loaded delivery system

Cytokines are glycoprotein or peptide molecules that influence cell proliferation and differentiation, for instance, TGF-β, VEGF, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), and platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF). Obviously, the effectiveness of cytokines can be compromised if they are degraded through proteolysis and not delivered to their intended target through a scaffold.17 Most cytokines tend to have a short lifespan and are typically unstable in vivo,57,141 and as a result, the development of novel strategies to enhance the maintenance and delivery of cytokines has become a key focus in the field of tendon repair engineering.

Incorporating cytokines into scaffolds can be a challenging task, due to the lack of binding domains within the cytokines, despite the intermolecular interactions they form. Researchers have utilized various techniques to effectively incorporate cytokines into scaffolds. For example, acid gelatin has been shown to bind to bFGF through ionic interaction, allowing for the promotion of vascularization and tendon and cartilage regeneration when combined with PRP and bFGF.142 In another study, a PCL/gelatin composite was loaded with more VEGF by absorbing a 12 amino acid peptide (DRVQRQTTTVVA) onto its surface.141 Heparin is known for its ability not just in anti-coagulation, but the combination with cytokines and other proteins. In the hybrid gelatin/PCL/heparin scaffold, the incorporation of heparin helped to deliver bFGF in a stable manner over a period of 31 days.17 This delivery of bFGF prolonged the bioactivity of the protein and improve the gene expression of tenocytes.

RCT involves inducing cells towards various differentiations, which has prompted the development of delivery systems for multiple bioactive factors. One such system designed by Min et al involved a delivery system using PDGF-BB and BMP-2 distributed in an inverse gradient based on PCL and Pluronic F127 (Fig. 4).143 Their in vitro analysis showed that a concentration with high levels of PDGF-BB and low levels of BMP-2 induced the tenogenesis of ASCs, while the reverse concentration promoted osteogenic differentiation. Kartogenin (KGN), a small molecule compound, was also utilized to promote the chondrogenic differentiation of MSCs. Researchers found that incorporating it into fibrin glue accelerated the production of fibrocartilage and improved tissue quality in the TBI of rotator cuffs.73 Huang et al also loaded KGN into porous GelMA scaffolds that controlled the release of KGN.62 Combining this scaffold with bone marrow stimulation resulted in boosted cartilage regeneration in rotator cuff repair post-implantation.

Figure 4.

Fig. 4

The PCL/PF scaffold with inverse gradients of PDGF-BB and BMP-2. The PDGF-BB and BMP-2 were connected by the hydrogen bonding between heparin and PF, and the ionic interaction between heparin and the two cytokines. Reprinted with permission.143 Copyright 2014, Elsevier.

PRP is a platelet aggregate obtained via blood centrifugation, which contains high levels of growth factors.9 A meta-analysis by Li et al investigated the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff with PRP or PRF and showed that the repair group enhanced by PRP had a lower re-tear rate and better pain relief than with PRF.144 However, direct injection of PRP into the repairing sites may fail to function in the long term or releases biofactors too quickly. The mRNA of type I collagen in PRP loaded into the gelatin sponge was observed to be higher compared to pure PRP, which is attributed to the sustained stimulation of cytokines.26 One study by Xu et al demonstrated that PRP delivered in a collagen scaffold induced maturation of tissue in Achilles tendons, despite the depletion of bioactive factors after three weeks.9 The chitosan/PRP construct released more cytokines than PRP clots owing to the activation of chitosan and prolonged the bioactivity of PRP in vivo,87 resulting in improved radiographic and histological outcomes for the rotator cuff healing of sheep.82

Small molecular inhibitors-loaded delivery system

The formation of adhesive tissues impedes tendon sliding due to the dominance of extrinsic healing and the inflammatory reactions after TI.39,84 Inhibiting the bioactivity of fibroblasts from surrounding tissues or relieving inflammation pharmacologically provides a therapeutic direction for promoting tendon healing. However, the short half-lives of some medications make them unsuitable for treating tendon injuries that require several weeks to heal.66 Secondly, the side effects of drugs are multiplied if oral medication is implemented in most cases, such as liver and kidney lesions. While loading medications onto scaffolds enables the consistent delivery of suitable drug concentration to the injury site. Therefore, a basic requirement for the drug carrier is that it should not degrade quickly, which can lead to high drug concentrations that hinder tendon healing.120

Researchers have explored drug delivery methods to restrain extrinsic fibroblasts without affecting intrinsic healing. Mitomycin-C (MMC) is a water-soluble drug that inhibits fibroblast proliferation and collagen synthesis. Zhao et al loaded MMC in the PLLA fibrous membranes through HA micro-sol electrospinning, resulting in the sustained release of MMC in a core–shell structure (Fig. 5).120 Results showed that tendon healing was not impaired since only a small amount of MMC was present, suppressing the formation of adhesive tissues. Rhynchophylline (Rhy), a Chinese traditional medication, is also known to prevent adhesion. Nonetheless, Yang et al showed that delivering Rhy with HA hydrogel promoted the expression of tendon-related genes and suppressed the formation of adhesions simultaneously,66 though the detailed mechanism was not fully understood.

Figure 5.

Fig. 5

The preparation of PLLA fibrous membranes loading MMC via HA micro-sol electrospinning. The PLLA-MMC membrane acted as the drug carrier and physical barrier to prevent exogenous cell invasion. Reprinted with permission.120 Copyright 2015, Elsevier.

Besides, inhibiting oxidative stress and inflammation in tendon repair can also accelerate TI healing. Melatonin (MLT) had been incorporated into PCL/alginate scaffolds to reduce oxidative damage for tenocytes.16 In vitro, it was conceived that MLT was released faster during the first five days when oxidative damage increased, reducing reactive oxygen species. Although curcumin has great anti-inflammatory efficacy, its oral bioavailability is inferior. For the named Cur&Mg-QCS/PF scaffold, curcumin was released in a controllable and sustainable manner, augmenting the formation of fibrocartilage in TBI with Mg2+ synergistically (Fig. 6).24 The scaffold was synthesized through the Schiff base bond between quaternized chitosan (QCS) and benzaldehyde-terminated PF. It was injectable and self-healing, and the addition of curcumin and Mg2+ resulted in slower degradation of the scaffold. Non-steroidal drugs such as celecoxib could down-regulate the TI inflammation gene expression. Celecoxib loaded in a composite hydrogel of gelatin and Fe3O4 particles were released further under the magnetic field because of the movement of Fe3O4 particles, which produced heat and loosened gelatin hydrogel.12 Farnesol is a sesquiterpene compound extracted from bacteria and fruits, having an impact on the reduction of inflammatory cytokines and collagen synthesis. A hydrogel membrane composed of gellan gum, HA, and farnesol exhibited slow degradation and rapid swelling, serving as both the physical barrier and farnesol reservoir.123 During the RCT repair operation, the malleability of the membrane made it better to fix the sites of TI and improved its clinical effects.

Figure 6.

Fig. 6

The Cur&Mg-QCS/PF scaffold released curcumin and Mg2+ controllably and sustainably. (A) The preparation of Cur&Mg-QCS/PF scaffold. (B) The therapy mechanism of the scaffold in vivo. Reprinted with permission.24 Copyright 2021, Theranostics.

Bioactive ions-loaded delivery system

The mechanical strength in natural TBI increases gradually from the tendon to bone in view of the four different structures of it, which cannot be achieved with scar formation. While the delivery of cytokines or cells by scaffolds has shown successful tissue regeneration in TBI, there are still some shortcomings, such as rapid diffusing of cytokines,145 unstable activity,57 and the potential for stem cells to undergo maldifferentiation.134 Thus, delivering bioactive ions provides a new strategy to promote TBI healing, as bioactive ions possess multiple potentials in tendon tissue engineering.

HAP, capable of forming a mineral gradient that guarantees the mechanical stimulation required for cell differentiation,146 possesses osteoconductivity, and induces osteogenesis in TBI.147 Qiu et al achieved a gradient by creating a composite film composed of PCL and HAP with the graded distribution.146 They found that the alkaline phosphatase, an osteogenesis symbol, of ASCs in the scaffold exhibited a graded expression in accordance with the content of HAP at day 14, similar to the outcome seen with HAP loaded in PLLA.10 Yea et al also created a density gradient of HAP in the ECM scaffold from adipose tissues,148 showing that the MSCs seeding on it synthesized specific matrices with respect to the distribution of HAP. However, studies have suggested that HAP is inferior to calcium phosphate silicate materials in terms of osteogenic activity and TBI repair.149,150

Copper ions are important for osteo-stimulation and antibacterial properties, as well as improved vascularization and expression of VEGF.151 Scaffold incorporation of copper ions can lead to the regeneration of cartilage and polarization of macrophages to the M2 phenotype.152 Zinc ions can also promote the proliferation of tendon tissue via TGF β-Smad2/3 signaling pathway, except for the favorable antibacterial property.152 Yang et al designed a bimetallic ion hydrogel with zinc and copper ions by crosslinking with the sulfhydryl groups of gelatin, achieving a sustainable release of the metal ions.152 Under the effect of different gradients of the two ions, the fibrocartilage penetration in TBI insertion and the regeneration of bone and tendon was augmented synchronously. As a critical element inside the body, magnesium affects the metabolism of both bone and fibrocartilage in TBI,24,153 involving over 300 enzymatic reactions.153 Magnesium ions can induce the osteogenic expression of stem cells, and accelerate the integration between tendon graft and bone.154 High concentration of magnesium ions suppresses the ECM calcification.155 which is responsible for the tendonitis after TI. It has been demonstrated in the upper context that the stable release of magnesium ions was attained when delivered by Mg-QCS/PF scaffold, boosting the adhesion and accumulation of BMSCs.24

Summary and outlook

Tendon injuries are common problems, and the current pharmacological and surgical treatments for promoting tendon regeneration have proven to be ineffective. Fortunately, the rapid development of tendon tissue engineering is leading to new treatment options. This manuscript reviews the advances of hydrogel-based scaffolds for repairing TI, including their properties, material categories, and delivery system. Natural hydrogels are considered to have excellent immunogenicity and biodegradability; however, they are often limited by their poor mechanical properties, which are complementary to synthetic materials, making hydrogel-based scaffolds a dominant trend. Scaffolds encapsulating cells, cytokines, and drugs offer a promising approach to improving the tendon microenvironment in a way that increases tenogenic expression or prevents adhesion. The repair mechanisms involve several signaling pathways, such as TGF β-Smad2/3 and ERK1/2 that regulate cell differentiation and inflammatory reactions. The MSC delivery to targeted tissues is attached to extensive attention to their pluripotent differentiation, which is further facilitated by cytokines or mechanical stimulation. Nonetheless, whether the treatment outcomes are ascribed to MSCs loaded in scaffolds remains uncertain, as Franklin et al indicated that homing the host stem cells to the repair sites was a mechanism for the effect of tHGs.108 Thus, the distribution of MSCs after being transplanted into injury sites and the homing effects on the host stem cells of various scaffolds need to be explored. The application of MSCs also poses challenges such as phenotype drift during preparation and ectopic ossification.134,156 Exosomes, used for cell-free therapy, are focused increasingly because of their biocompatibility, low immunogenicity, and similarity with MSCs in functions.157 The delivery of exosomes with hydrogel scaffolds prolongs their retention and releases them sustainably after transplantation,49,158 but loading them into scaffolds to treat TI is relatively uncommon. Several challenges associated with exosomes require further exploration: i) the comparison in therapeutic effect between exosomes from different MSCs when loaded in scaffolds and between exosomes and MSCs,156 ii) strategies to improve the endocytosis by the targeted cells after delivering exosomes to TI sides,49 iii) the efficacy of diverse hydrogel scaffolds in the delivery of exosomes.

Conditions for successful tendon regeneration are complicated, including vascularization to provide nutrients, mechanical support, and suitable fibrosis without adhesion. Additionally, there are four different tissues in the rotator cuff, necessitating the regeneration of multiple tissues in its repair. The ideal microenvironment of tendon cells requires not only the proper biochemical stimulation but also tendon-like structures to induce tenogenic differentiation. Therefore, these conditions should be taken into consideration when designing the structures and functions of scaffolds in fabrication. For better TBI healing, some strategies have been attempted, including multiphasic scaffold delivering diverse cells,59 scaffold equipped with inverse gradients of growth factors,143 and scaffold with a gradient of bioactive ions.159 Of these strategies, scaffolds delivering bioactive ions with gradient are more attractive, though comparison studies among them have not been accomplished. For one thing, the promotion of both tenogenesis and osteogenesis is acquired in scaffolds of bioactive ions. Their mechanical property caused by the density of bioactive ions, for another thing, stimulates different cell phenotypes in a controllable manner and enables a smooth transition of mechanical strength between the bone and the repaired tendons with the newly formed hierarchical structures.159

Self-healing hydrogels can restore the original shape and function even after being broken, making them excellent for preventing peri-tendinous adhesions resulting from the destruction of the synovial sheath of tendons. They can act as a physical barrier to block the invasion of fibroblasts during extrinsic healing or as a membrane to create a smooth surface that reduces friction during tendon movement.7,48 The injectability of hydrogels makes them advantageous for filling irregularly repaired parts with minimal invasion and makes them suitable for use as carriers of drugs or cytokines.24 However, the considerable force between tendon and bone can disrupt the integrity of hydrogels, leading to the rapid diffusion of drugs or cytokines.48 With the popularity of enhanced recovery after surgery, patients are required to finish early movement after operation. Therefore, hydrogels used for repairing TI in the future should take the self-healing property into account when designing the parameter of hydrogels. The combination of self-healing and injectability of hydrogel realizes the sustainable release of substances and certainly maximizes their clinical effects of them. Functionalizing hydrogels with self-healing properties involves the use of covalent bonds, including disulfide, imine, and hydrazine bonds.48,52 However, toxic byproducts are produced during the crosslinking process, and measures must be taken to eliminate these toxic chemicals, such as changing the crosslinking agents,22 or replacing them with physical cross-linking methods.52 With respect to carriers, hydrogels in the form of microspheres improve the loading property and culturing microenvironment, which prevents damage to cells when implanted.29 Some binding sequences, such as RGD or pDA immobilization, can also be used to modify scaffolds to enhance their loading efficacy, facilitating the adhesion of cells to scaffolds.17,160

Taken together, hydrogel-based scaffolds show promise as an alternative approach for accelerating tendon healing. The selection of hydrogel materials should be based on the specific characteristics of tendons and the feasibility of delivering targeted substances at high local concentrations and sustainable existence. To regenerate TBI, it is necessary to satisfy the demands for synchronous regeneration of different tissues, from mechanical stimulation to nutrition supply. While many hydrogel materials have shown potential as cell carriers, it is still unclear which materials are the most effective for repairing TI. Some experiments have only been conducted only in animal models, so their efficacy and safety in humans need to be further investigated. Tissue adhesion can hinder the sliding of tendons, and future research should aim to combine scaffolds acting as barriers with cytokines and drugs to prevent adhesion formation comprehensively.

Author contributions

RC and JX conceived the idea and wrote the manuscript. FC and KC searched and selected the qualified articles. JX revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Funding

This study was supported by the Guangxi Natural Science Foundation (No. 2020GXNSFBA297089), Youth and Talent Research Project of Guangxi Science and Technology (China) (No. AD21220065), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82102632 and 82160412), and Liuzhou Science and Technology Project (No. 2021CBB0106 and 2021CBB0108).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of Chongqing Medical University.

References

  • 1.Liu R., Zhang S., Chen X. Injectable hydrogels for tendon and ligament tissue engineering. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2020;14(9):1333–1348. doi: 10.1002/term.3078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moshaverinia A., Xu X., Chen C., et al. Application of stem cells derived from the periodontal ligament or gingival tissue sources for tendon tissue regeneration. Biomaterials. 2014;35(9):2642–2650. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Walden G., Liao X., Donell S., Raxworthy M.J., Riley G.P., Saeed A. A clinical, biological, and biomaterials perspective into tendon injuries and regeneration. Tissue Eng B Rev. 2017;23(1):44–58. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2016.0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Voleti P.B., Buckley M.R., Soslowsky L.J. Tendon healing: repair and regeneration. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14:47–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thorpe C.T., Screen H.R.C. Tendon structure and composition. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;920:3–10. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-33943-6_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ruiz-Alonso S., Lafuente-Merchan M., Ciriza J., Saenz-del-Burgo L., Pedraz J.L. Tendon tissue engineering: cells, growth factors, scaffolds and production techniques. J Contr Release. 2021;333:448–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Imere A., Ligorio C., O'Brien M., Wong J.K.F., Domingos M., Cartmell S.H. Engineering a cell-hydrogel-fibre composite to mimic the structure and function of the tendon synovial sheath. Acta Biomater. 2021;119:140–154. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.11.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Legrand A., Kaufman Y., Long C., Fox P.M. Molecular biology of flexor tendon healing in relation to reduction of tendon adhesions. J Hand Surg. 2017;42(9):722–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xu K., Al-Ani M.K., Sun Y., et al. Platelet-rich plasma activates tendon-derived stem cells to promote regeneration of Achilles tendon rupture in rats. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017;11(4):1173–1184. doi: 10.1002/term.2020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lv Y., Sang X., Tian Z., et al. Electrospun hydroxyapatite loaded L-polylactic acid aligned nanofibrous membrane patch for rotator cuff repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;217:180–187. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.07.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yokoya S., Mochizuki Y., Nagata Y., Deie M., Ochi M. Tendon-bone insertion repair and regeneration using polyglycolic acid sheet in the rabbit rotator cuff injury model. Am J Sports Med. 2008;36(7):1298–1309. doi: 10.1177/0363546508314416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang J., Wang L., Gao Y., et al. Synergistic therapy of celecoxib-loaded magnetism-responsive hydrogel for tendon tissue injuries. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.592068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jiang X., Wu S., Kuss M., et al. 3D printing of multilayered scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon regeneration. Bioact Mater. 2020;5(3):636–643. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yang X., Meng H., Peng J., et al. Construction of microunits by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells laden with porous microcryogels for repairing an acute Achilles tendon rupture in a rat model. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:7155–7171. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S238399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dang R., Chen L., Sefat F., et al. A natural hydrogel with prohealing properties enhances tendon regeneration. Small. 2022;18(36) doi: 10.1002/smll.202105255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yao Z., Qian Y., Jin Y., et al. Biomimetic multilayer polycaprolactone/sodium alginate hydrogel scaffolds loaded with melatonin facilitate tendon regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;277 doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118865. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.T G.D., Chen C.H., Kuo C.Y., et al. Development of high resilience spiral wound suture-embedded gelatin/PCL/heparin nanofiber membrane scaffolds for tendon tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2022;221:314–333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yang Z., Cao H., Gao S., Yang M., Lyu J., Tang K. Effect of tendon stem cells in chitosan/β-glycerophosphate/collagen hydrogel on Achilles tendon healing in a rat model. Med Sci Mon Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2017;23:4633–4643. doi: 10.12659/MSM.906747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Khalaji S., Golshan Ebrahimi N., Hosseinkhani H. Enhancement of biocompatibility of PVA/HTCC blend polymer with collagen for skin care application. Int J Polym Mater Polym Biomater. 2021;70(7):459–468. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Yan Z., Yin H., Nerlich M., Pfeifer C.G., Docheva D. Boosting tendon repair: interplay of cells, growth factors and scaffold-free and gel-based carriers. J Exp Orthop. 2018;5(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s40634-017-0117-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zhang X., Zhang W., Yang M. Application of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering. Curr Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018;13(7):497–516. doi: 10.2174/1574888X12666171017160323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Park H.J., Jin Y., Shin J., et al. Catechol-functionalized hyaluronic acid hydrogels enhance angiogenesis and osteogenesis of human adipose-derived stem cells in critical tissue defects. Biomacromolecules. 2016;17(6):1939–1948. doi: 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Chen P., Cui L., Chen G., et al. The application of BMP-12-overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells loaded 3D-printed PLGA scaffolds in rabbit rotator cuff repair. Int J Biol Macromol. 2019;138:79–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.07.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Chen B., Liang Y., Zhang J., et al. Synergistic enhancement of tendon-to-bone healing via anti-inflammatory and pro-differentiation effects caused by sustained release of Mg2+/curcumin from injectable self-healing hydrogels. Theranostics. 2021;11(12):5911–5925. doi: 10.7150/thno.56266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gabler C., Spohn J., Tischer T., Bader R. Biomechanical, biochemical, and cell biological evaluation of different collagen scaffolds for tendon augmentation. BioMed Res Int. 2018;2018 doi: 10.1155/2018/7246716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang M., Zhen J., Zhang X., et al. Effect of autologous platelet-rich plasma and gelatin sponge for tendon-to-bone healing after rabbit anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(5):1486–1497. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Moshaverinia A., Ansari S., Chen C., et al. Co-encapsulation of anti-BMP2 monoclonal antibody and mesenchymal stem cells in alginate microspheres for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2013;34(28):6572–6579. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.05.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Khunmanee S., Jeong Y., Park H. Crosslinking method of hyaluronic-based hydrogel for biomedical applications. J Tissue Eng. 2017;8 doi: 10.1177/2041731417726464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Araque-Monrós M.C., García-Cruz D.M., Escobar-Ivirico J.L., Gil-Santos L., Monleón-Pradas M., Más-Estellés J. Regenerative and resorbable PLA/HA hybrid construct for tendon/ligament tissue engineering. Ann Biomed Eng. 2020;48(2):757–767. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02403-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wu S., Wang Y., Streubel P.N., Duan B. Living nanofiber yarn-based woven biotextiles for tendon tissue engineering using cell tri-culture and mechanical stimulation. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:102–115. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Deng D., Wang W., Wang B., et al. Repair of Achilles tendon defect with autologous ASCs engineered tendon in a rabbit model. Biomaterials. 2014;35(31):8801–8809. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.06.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Popov C., Burggraf M., Kreja L., Ignatius A., Schieker M., Docheva D. Mechanical stimulation of human tendon stem/progenitor cells results in upregulation of matrix proteins, integrins and MMPs, and activation of p38 and ERK1/2 kinases. BMC Mol Biol. 2015;16:6. doi: 10.1186/s12867-015-0036-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ciardulli M.C., Marino L., Lovecchio J., et al. Tendon and cytokine marker expression by human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in a hyaluronate/poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA)/fibrin three-dimensional (3D) scaffold. Cells. 2020;9(5):E1268. doi: 10.3390/cells9051268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rinoldi C., Fallahi A., Yazdi I.K., et al. Mechanical and biochemical stimulation of 3D multilayered scaffolds for tendon tissue engineering. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(6):2953–2964. doi: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Xu Y., Dong S., Zhou Q., et al. The effect of mechanical stimulation on the maturation of TDSCs-poly(L-lactide-co-e-caprolactone)/collagen scaffold constructs for tendon tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2014;35(9):2760–2772. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.12.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ma H., Yang C., Ma Z., et al. Multiscale hierarchical architecture-based bioactive scaffolds for versatile tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(13) doi: 10.1002/adhm.202102837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wu S., Peng H., Li X., Streubel P.N., Liu Y., Duan B. Effect of scaffold morphology and cell co-culture on tenogenic differentiation of HADMSC on centrifugal melt electrospun poly (L-lactic acid) fibrous meshes. Biofabrication. 2017;9(4) doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/aa8fb8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Crowe C.S., Chattopadhyay A., McGoldrick R., Chiou G., Pham H., Chang J. Characteristics of reconstituted lyophilized tendon hydrogel: an injectable scaffold for tendon regeneration. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(3):843–851. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000480012.41411.7c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Jiang S., Yan H., Fan D., Song J., Fan C. Multi-layer electrospun membrane mimicking tendon sheath for prevention of tendon adhesions. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(4):6932–6944. doi: 10.3390/ijms16046932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Yang G., Lin H., Rothrauff B.B., Yu S., Tuan R.S. Multilayered polycaprolactone/gelatin fiber-hydrogel composite for tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2016;35:68–76. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sheng D., Li J., Ai C., et al. Electrospun PCL/Gel-aligned scaffolds enhance the biomechanical strength in tendon repair. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(31):4801–4810. doi: 10.1039/c9tb00837c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yuan H., Li X., Lee M.S., et al. Collagen and chondroitin sulfate functionalized bioinspired fibers for tendon tissue engineering application. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021;170:248–260. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zhou K., Feng B., Wang W., et al. Nanoscaled and microscaled parallel topography promotes tenogenic differentiation of ASC and neotendon formation in vitro. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13:3867–3881. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S161423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Park H., Nazhat S.N., Rosenzweig D.H. Mechanical activation drives tenogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in aligned dense collagen hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2022;286 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.El Khatib M., Mauro A., di Mattia M., et al. Electrospun PLGA fiber diameter and alignment of tendon biomimetic fleece potentiate tenogenic differentiation and immunomodulatory function of amniotic epithelial stem cells. Cells. 2020;9(5):1207. doi: 10.3390/cells9051207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wan S., Fu X., Ji Y., Li M., Shi X., Wang Y. FAK- and YAP/TAZ dependent mechanotransduction pathways are required for enhanced immunomodulatory properties of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells induced by aligned fibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2018;171:107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.04.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhu K., Dong L., Wang J., et al. Enhancing the functional output of transplanted islets in diabetic mice using a drug-eluting scaffold. J Biol Eng. 2018;12:5. doi: 10.1186/s13036-018-0098-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Cai C., Zhang X., Li Y., et al. Self-healing hydrogel embodied with macrophage-regulation and responsive-gene-silencing properties for synergistic prevention of peritendinous adhesion. Adv Mater. 2022;34(5) doi: 10.1002/adma.202106564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wang L., Wang J., Zhou X., et al. A new self-healing hydrogel containing hucMSC-derived exosomes promotes bone regeneration. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;8 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.564731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen B., Liang Y., Bai L., et al. Sustained release of magnesium ions mediated by injectable self-healing adhesive hydrogel promotes fibrocartilaginous interface regeneration in the rabbit rotator cuff tear model. Chem Eng J. 2020;396 [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wei Z., Lewis D.M., Xu Y., Gerecht S. Dual cross-linked biofunctional and self-healing networks to generate user-defined modular gradient hydrogel constructs. Adv Healthc Mater. 2017;6(16) doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deng Y., Huang M., Sun D., et al. Dual physically cross-linked κ-carrageenan-based double network hydrogels with superior self-healing performance for biomedical application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(43):37544–37554. doi: 10.1021/acsami.8b15385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Marelli B., Ghezzi C.E., James-Bhasin M., Nazhat S.N. Fabrication of injectable, cellular, anisotropic collagen tissue equivalents with modular fibrillar densities. Biomaterials. 2015;37:183–193. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Liu C., Jiang S., Wu Y., et al. The regenerative role of gelatin in PLLA electrospun membranes for the treatment of chronic massive rotator cuff injuries. Macromol Biosci. 2022;22(1) doi: 10.1002/mabi.202100281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Yanez K.J., Alatorre J.A. Structural effect of different EDC crosslinker concentration in gelatin- hyaluronic acid scaffolds. J Bioeng Biomed Sci. 2016;2016(2) [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hosseinkhani H., Hong P.D., Yu D.S. Self-assembled proteins and peptides for regenerative medicine. Chem Rev. 2013;113(7):4837–4861. doi: 10.1021/cr300131h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Kabuto Y., Morihara T., Sukenari T., et al. Stimulation of rotator cuff repair by sustained release of bone morphogenetic protein-7 using a gelatin hydrogel sheet. Tissue Eng. 2015;21(13–14):2025–2033. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tokunaga T., Karasugi T., Arimura H., et al. Enhancement of rotator cuff tendon-bone healing with fibroblast growth factor 2 impregnated in gelatin hydrogel sheets in a rabbit model. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(10):1708–1717. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cao Y., Yang S., Zhao D., et al. Three-dimensional printed multiphasic scaffolds with stratified cell-laden gelatin methacrylate hydrogels for biomimetic tendon-to-bone interface engineering. J Orthop Translat. 2020;23:89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Xue Y., Kim H.J., Lee J., et al. Co-electrospun silk fibroin and gelatin methacryloyl sheet seeded with mesenchymal stem cells for tendon regeneration. Small. 2022;18(21) doi: 10.1002/smll.202107714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Calejo I., Costa-Almeida R., Reis R.L., Gomes M.E. A textile platform using continuous aligned and textured composite microfibers to engineer tendon-to-bone interface gradient scaffolds. Adv Healthc Mater. 2019;8(15) doi: 10.1002/adhm.201900200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Huang C., Zhang X., Luo H., et al. Effect of kartogenin-loaded gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel scaffold with bone marrow stimulation for enthesis healing in rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021;30(3):544–553. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Gupta R.C., Lall R., Srivastava A., Sinha A. Hyaluronic acid: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic trajectory. Front Vet Sci. 2019;6:192. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2019.00192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Osti L., Berardocco M., di Giacomo V., Di Bernardo G., Oliva F., Berardi A.C. Hyaluronic acid increases tendon derived cell viability and collagen type I expression in vitro: comparative study of four different Hyaluronic acid preparations by molecular weight. BMC Muscoskel Disord. 2015;16:284. doi: 10.1186/s12891-015-0735-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hsiao M.Y., Lin A.C., Liao W.H., et al. Drug-loaded hyaluronic acid hydrogel as a sustained-release regimen with dual effects in early intervention of tendinopathy. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4784. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41410-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Yang Q.Q., Zhang L., Ju F., Zhou Y.L. Sustained-release hydrogel-based rhynchophylline delivery system improved injured tendon repair. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2021;205 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Noori A., Ashrafi S.J., Vaez-Ghaemi R., Hatamian-Zaremi A., Webster T.J. A review of fibrin and fibrin composites for bone tissue engineering. Int J Nanomed. 2017;12:4937–4961. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S124671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.González-Quevedo D., Díaz-Ramos M., Chato-Astrain J., et al. Improving the regenerative microenvironment during tendon healing by using nanostructured fibrin/agarose-based hydrogels in a rat Achilles tendon injury model. Bone Joint Lett J. 2020;102-B(8):1095–1106. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2019-1143.R2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.González-Quevedo D., Sánchez-Porras D., García-García Ó.D., et al. Nanostructured fibrin-based hydrogel membranes for use as an augmentation strategy in Achilles tendon surgical repair in rats. Eur Cell Mater. 2022;43:162–178. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v043a13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Breidenbach A.P., Dyment N.A., Lu Y., et al. Fibrin gels exhibit improved biological, structural, and mechanical properties compared with collagen gels in cell-based tendon tissue-engineered constructs. Tissue Eng. 2015;21(3–4):438–450. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2013.0768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bottagisio M., Lopa S., Granata V., et al. Different combinations of growth factors for the tenogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in monolayer culture and in fibrin-based three-dimensional constructs. Differentiation. 2017;95:44–53. doi: 10.1016/j.diff.2017.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Chen Y., Xu Y., Dai G., Shi Q., Duan C. Enhanced repaired enthesis using tenogenically differentiated adipose-derived stem cells in a murine rotator cuff injury model. Stem Cell Int. 2022;2022 doi: 10.1155/2022/1309684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhu J., Shao J., Chen Y., et al. Fibrin glue-kartogenin complex promotes the regeneration of the tendon-bone interface in rotator cuff injury. Stem Cell Int. 2021;2021 doi: 10.1155/2021/6640424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Zhao T., Qi Y., Xiao S., et al. Integration of mesenchymal stem cell sheet and bFGF-loaded fibrin gel in knitted PLGA scaffolds favorable for tendon repair. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(13):2201–2211. doi: 10.1039/c8tb02759e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Wong C.C., Yeh Y.Y., Yang T.L., Tsuang Y.H., Chen C.H. Augmentation of tendon graft-bone tunnel interface healing by use of bioactive platelet-rich fibrin scaffolds. Am J Sports Med. 2020;48(6):1379–1388. doi: 10.1177/0363546520908849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Han L., Hu Y.G., Jin B., Xu S.C., Zheng X., Fang W.L. Sustained BMP-2 release and platelet rich fibrin synergistically promote tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in rat. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(20):8705–8712. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201910_19264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Wong C.C., Huang Y.M., Chen C.H., Lin F.H., Yeh Y.Y., Bai M.Y. Cytokine and growth factor delivery from implanted platelet-rich fibrin enhances rabbit Achilles tendon healing. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(9):3221. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Uno T., Maruyama M., Satake H., et al. Effectiveness of bone marrow-derived platelet-rich fibrin on rotator cuff healing in a rabbit degenerative model. Am J Sports Med. 2022;50(12):3341–3354. doi: 10.1177/03635465221116084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Chiu C.H., Chen P., Yeh W.L., et al. The gelling effect of platelet-rich fibrin matrix when exposed to human tenocytes from the rotator cuff in small-diameter culture wells and the design of a co-culture device to overcome this phenomenon. Bone Joint Res. 2019;8(5):216–223. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.85.BJR-2018-0258.R1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Deepthi S., Nivedhitha Sundaram M., Deepti Kadavan J., Jayakumar R. Layered chitosan-collagen hydrogel/aligned PLLA nanofiber construct for flexor tendon regeneration. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;153:492–500. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.07.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Raftery R.M., Woods B., Marques A.L.P., et al. Multifunctional biomaterials from the sea: assessing the effects of chitosan incorporation into collagen scaffolds on mechanical and biological functionality. Acta Biomater. 2016;43:160–169. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Chevrier A., Hurtig M.B., Lavertu M. Chitosan-platelet-rich plasma implants improve rotator cuff repair in a large animal model: pivotal study. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(11):1955. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Chen Q., Lu H., Yang H. Chitosan prevents adhesion during rabbit flexor tendon repair via the sirtuin 1 signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2015;12(3):4598–4603. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Chen E., Yang L., Ye C., et al. An asymmetric chitosan scaffold for tendon tissue engineering: In vitro and in vivo evaluation with rat tendon stem/progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:377–387. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Vasconcelos D.P., Fonseca A.C., Costa M., et al. Macrophage polarization following chitosan implantation. Biomaterials. 2013;34(38):9952–9959. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Reifenrath J., Wellmann M., Kempfert M., et al. TGF-β3 loaded electrospun polycaprolacton fibre scaffolds for rotator cuff tear repair: an in vivo study in rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(3):1046. doi: 10.3390/ijms21031046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Deprés-Tremblay G., Chevrier A., Tran-Khanh N., Nelea M., Buschmann M.D. Chitosan inhibits platelet-mediated clot retraction, increases platelet-derived growth factor release, and increases residence time and bioactivity of platelet-rich plasma in vivo. Biomed Mater. 2017;13(1) doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa8469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Darnell M.C., Sun J.Y., Mehta M., et al. Performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels. Biomaterials. 2013;34(33):8042–8048. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Moshaverinia A., Chen C., Akiyama K., et al. Alginate hydrogel as a promising scaffold for dental-derived stem cells: an in vitro study. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(12):3041–3051. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4759-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bian L., Zhai D.Y., Tous E., Rai R., Mauck R.L., Burdick J.A. Enhanced MSC chondrogenesis following delivery of TGF-β3 from alginate microspheres within hyaluronic acid hydrogels in vitro and in vivo. Biomaterials. 2011;32(27):6425–6434. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Chaudhuri O., Gu L., Klumpers D., et al. Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater. 2016;15(3):326–334. doi: 10.1038/nmat4489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Marturano J.E., Schiele N.R., Schiller Z.A., Galassi T.V., Stoppato M., Kuo C.K. Embryonically inspired scaffolds regulate tenogenically differentiating cells. J Biomech. 2016;49(14):3281–3288. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Gu L., Shan T., Ma Y.X., Tay F.R., Niu L. Novel biomedical applications of crosslinked collagen. Trends Biotechnol. 2019;37(5):464–491. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Toosi S., Naderi-Meshkin H., Kalalinia F., et al. PGA-incorporated collagen: toward a biodegradable composite scaffold for bone-tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res. 2016;104(8):2020–2028. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.35736. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Zuniga K., Gadde M., Scheftel J., et al. Collagen/kerateine multi-protein hydrogels as a thermally stable extracellular matrix for 3D in vitro models. Int J Hyperther. 2021;38(1):830–845. doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1930202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Ozcelikkale A., Han B. Thermal destabilization of collagen matrix hierarchical structure by freeze/thaw. PLoS One. 2016;11(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Sorushanova A., Skoufos I., Tzora A., Mullen A.M., Zeugolis D.I. The influence of animal species, gender and tissue on the structural, biophysical, biochemical and biological properties of collagen sponges. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021;32(1):12. doi: 10.1007/s10856-020-06485-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Toosi S., Naderi-Meshkin H., Kalalinia F., et al. Bone defect healing is induced by collagen sponge/polyglycolic acid. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(3):33. doi: 10.1007/s10856-019-6235-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Benayahu D., Pomeraniec L., Shemesh S., et al. Biocompatibility of a marine collagen-based scaffold in vitro and in vivo. Mar Drugs. 2020;18(8):420. doi: 10.3390/md18080420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Maeda E., Kawamura R., Suzuki T., Matsumoto T. Rapid fabrication of tendon-like collagen gel via simultaneous fibre alignment and intermolecular cross-linking under mechanical loading. Biomed Mater. 2022;17(4) doi: 10.1088/1748-605X/ac7305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Wright A.L., Righelli L., Broomhall T.J., Lamont H.C., El Haj A.J. Magnetic nanoparticle-mediated orientation of collagen hydrogels for engineering of tendon-mimetic constructs. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.797437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Yu H., Chen Y., Kong H., et al. The rat pancreatic body tail as a source of a novel extracellular matrix scaffold for endocrine pancreas bioengineering. J Biol Eng. 2018;12:6. doi: 10.1186/s13036-018-0096-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Kaizawa Y., Leyden J., Behn A.W., et al. Human tendon-derived collagen hydrogel significantly improves biomechanical properties of the tendon-bone interface in a chronic rotator cuff injury model. J Hand Surg. 2019;44(10):899.e1–899.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chattopadhyay A., Galvez M.G., Bachmann M., et al. Tendon regeneration with tendon hydrogel-based cell delivery: a comparison of fibroblasts and adipose-derived stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;138(3):617–626. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Ning L.J., Zhang Y.J., Zhang Y.J., et al. Enhancement of migration and tenogenic differentiation of Macaca mulatta tendon-derived stem cells by decellularized tendon hydrogel. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.651583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gaffney L.S., Davis Z.G., Mora-Navarro C., Fisher M.B., Freytes D.O. Extracellular matrix hydrogels promote expression of muscle-tendon junction proteins. Tissue Eng. 2022;28(5–6):270–282. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2021.0070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kaizawa Y., Franklin A., Leyden J., et al. Augmentation of chronic rotator cuff healing using adipose-derived stem cell-seeded human tendon-derived hydrogel. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(4):877–886. doi: 10.1002/jor.24250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Franklin A., Gi Min J., Oda H., et al. Homing of adipose-derived stem cells to a tendon-derived hydrogel: a potential mechanism for improved tendon-bone interface and tendon healing. J Hand Surg Am. 2020;45(12):1180.e1–1180.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Crowe C.S., Chiou G., McGoldrick R., et al. In vitro characteristics of porcine tendon hydrogel for tendon regeneration. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;77(1):47–53. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Ji T.J., Feng B., Shen J., et al. An avascular niche created by axitinib-loaded PCL/collagen nanofibrous membrane stabilized subcutaneous chondrogenesis of mesenchymal stromal cells. Adv Sci. 2021;8(20) doi: 10.1002/advs.202100351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Chen C.H., Chen S.H., Kuo C.Y., Li M.L., Chen J.P. Response of dermal fibroblasts to biochemical and physical cues in aligned polycaprolactone/silk fibroin nanofiber scaffolds for application in tendon tissue engineering. Nanomaterials. 2017;7(8):E219. doi: 10.3390/nano7080219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Gniesmer S., Brehm R., Hoffmann A., et al. Vascularization and biocompatibility of poly(ε-caprolactone) fiber mats for rotator cuff tear repair. PLoS One. 2020;15(1) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Liu C., Tian S., Bai J., et al. Regulation of ERK1/2 and SMAD2/3 pathways by using multi-layered electrospun PCL-amnion nanofibrous membranes for the prevention of post-surgical tendon adhesion. Int J Nanomed. 2020;15:927–942. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S231538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Mochizuki Y., Ochi M. Clinical results of arthroscopic polyglycolic acid sheet patch graft for irreparable rotator cuff tears. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2015;2(1):31–35. doi: 10.1016/j.asmart.2014.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Chen Y.Y., He S.T., Yan F.H., et al. Dental pulp stem cells express tendon markers under mechanical loading and are a potential cell source for tissue engineering of tendon-like tissue. Int J Oral Sci. 2016;8(4):213–222. doi: 10.1038/ijos.2016.33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Chen P., Cui L., Fu S.C., et al. The 3D-printed PLGA scaffolds loaded with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells augment the healing of rotator cuff repair in the rabbits. Cell Transplant. 2020;29 doi: 10.1177/0963689720973647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Uyanik O., Pekkoc-Uyanik K.C., Findik S., Avci A., Altuntas Z. Prevention of peritendinous adhesions with electrospun poly (lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) bioabsorbable nanofiber: an experimental study. Colloids Surf, B. 2022;209 doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Riggin C.N., Qu F., Kim D.H., et al. Electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffolds release ibuprofen faster and degrade slower after in vivo implantation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2017;45(10):2348–2359. doi: 10.1007/s10439-017-1876-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.El Khatib M., Russo V., Prencipe G., et al. Amniotic epithelial stem cells counteract acidic degradation by-products of electrospun PLGA scaffold by improving their immunomodulatory profile in vitro. Cells. 2021;10(11):3221. doi: 10.3390/cells10113221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Zhao X., Jiang S., Liu S., et al. Optimization of intrinsic and extrinsic tendon healing through controllable water-soluble mitomycin-C release from electrospun fibers by mediating adhesion-related gene expression. Biomaterials. 2015;61:61–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Su W., Wang Z., Jiang J., Liu X., Zhao J., Zhang Z. Promoting tendon to bone integration using graphene oxide-doped electrospun poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanofibrous membrane. Int J Nanomed. 2019;14:1835–1847. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S183842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Zhang C., Wang X., Zhang E., et al. An epigenetic bioactive composite scaffold with well-aligned nanofibers for functional tendon tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2018;66:141–156. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.09.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Lin Y.H., Lee S.I., Lin F.H., Wu G.X., Wu C.S., Kuo S.M. Enhancement of rotator cuff healing with farnesol-impregnated gellan gum/hyaluronic acid hydrogel membranes in a rabbit model. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(7):944. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13070944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Zhang B., Luo Q., Deng B., Morita Y., Ju Y., Song G. Construction of tendon replacement tissue based on collagen sponge and mesenchymal stem cells by coupled mechano-chemical induction and evaluation of its tendon repair abilities. Acta Biomater. 2018;74:247–259. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.04.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Copes F., Pien N., van Vlierberghe S., Boccafoschi F., Mantovani D. Collagen-based tissue engineering strategies for vascular medicine. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2019;7:166. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Yin Z., Guo J., Wu T.Y., et al. Stepwise differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells augments tendon-like tissue formation and defect repair in vivo. STEM CELLS Transl Med. 2016;5(8):1106–1116. doi: 10.5966/sctm.2015-0215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hoberman A.R., Cirino C., McCarthy M.B., et al. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells enhanced by platelet-rich plasma maintain adhesion to scaffolds in arthroscopic simulation. Arthroscopy. 2018;34(3):872–881. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2017.08.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kokubu S., Inaki R., Hoshi K., Hikita A. Adipose-derived stem cells improve tendon repair and prevent ectopic ossification in tendinopathy by inhibiting inflammation and inducing neovascularization in the early stage of tendon healing. Regen Ther. 2020;14:103–110. doi: 10.1016/j.reth.2019.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Kim Y.S., Sung C.H., Chung S.H., Kwak S.J., Koh Y.G. Does an injection of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells loaded in fibrin glue influence rotator cuff repair outcomes? A clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(9):2010–2018. doi: 10.1177/0363546517702863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Wang Y., Jin S., Luo D., et al. Functional regeneration and repair of tendons using biomimetic scaffolds loaded with recombinant periostin. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1293. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21545-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Perucca Orfei C., Bowles A.C., Kouroupis D., et al. Human tendon stem/progenitor cell features and functionality are highly influenced by in vitro culture conditions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.711964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Yin Z., Chen X., Zhu T., et al. The effect of decellularized matrices on human tendon stem/progenitor cell differentiation and tendon repair. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(12):9317–9329. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.07.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Kwon J., Kim Y.H., Rhee S.M., et al. Effects of allogenic dermal fibroblasts on rotator cuff healing in a rabbit model of chronic tear. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46(8):1901–1908. doi: 10.1177/0363546518770428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Rhee S.M., Kim Y.H., Park J.H., et al. Allogeneic dermal fibroblasts improve tendon-to-bone healing in a rabbit model of chronic rotator cuff tear compared with platelet-rich plasma. Arthroscopy. 2022;38(7):2118–2128. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Sensini A., Gualandi C., Zucchelli A., et al. Tendon fascicle-inspired nanofibrous scaffold of polylactic acid/collagen with enhanced 3D-structure and biomechanical properties. Sci Rep. 2018;8 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35536-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Thankam F.G., Diaz C., Chandra I., et al. Hybrid interpenetrating hydrogel network favoring the bidirectional migration of tenocytes for rotator cuff tendon regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2022;110(2):467–477. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Grier W.K., Iyoha E.M., Harley B.A.C. The influence of pore size and stiffness on tenocyte bioactivity and transcriptomic stability in collagen-GAG scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;65:295–305. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.08.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Teng C., Zhou C., Xu D., Bi F. Combination of platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells enhances tendon-bone healing in a rabbit model of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s13018-016-0433-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Yin H., Strunz F., Yan Z., et al. Three-dimensional self-assembling nanofiber matrix rejuvenates aged/degenerative human tendon stem/progenitor cells. Biomaterials. 2020;236 doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Manning C.N., Schwartz A.G., Liu W., et al. Controlled delivery of mesenchymal stem cells and growth factors using a nanofiber scaffold for tendon repair. Acta Biomater. 2013;9(6):6905–6914. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.02.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Yuan Z., Sheng D., Jiang L., et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-capturing aligned electrospun polycaprolactone/gelatin nanofibers promote patellar ligament regeneration. Acta Biomater. 2022;140:233–246. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.11.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Kataoka T., Mifune Y., Inui A., et al. Combined therapy of platelet-rich plasma and basic fibroblast growth factor using gelatin-hydrogel sheet for rotator cuff healing in rat models. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):605. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02771-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Min H.K., Oh S.H., Lee J.M., Im G.I., Lee J.H. Porous membrane with reverse gradients of PDGF-BB and BMP-2 for tendon-to-bone repair: In vitro evaluation on adipose-derived stem cell differentiation. Acta Biomater. 2014;10(3):1272–1279. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Li Y., Li T., Li J., Tang X., Li R., Xiong Y. Platelet-rich plasma has better results for retear rate, pain, and outcome than platelet-rich fibrin after rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy. 2022;38(2):539–550. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Bi F., Chen Y., Liu J., Wang Y., Xu D., Tian K. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a rabbit model using a silk-collagen scaffold modified by hydroxyapatite at both ends: a histological and biomechanical study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02281-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Qiu J., Ahn J., Qin D., Thomopoulos S., Xia Y. Biomimetic scaffolds with a mineral gradient and funnel-shaped channels for spatially controllable osteogenesis. Adv Healthc Mater. 2022;11(9) doi: 10.1002/adhm.202100828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Jiang Q., Wang L., Liu Z., et al. Canine ACL reconstruction with an injectable hydroxyapatite/collagen paste for accelerated healing of tendon-bone interface. Bioact Mater. 2023;20:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.05.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Yea J.H., Bae T.S., Kim B.J., Cho Y.W., Jo C.H. Regeneration of the rotator cuff tendon-to-bone interface using umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells and gradient extracellular matrix scaffolds from adipose tissue in a rat model. Acta Biomater. 2020;114:104–116. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.07.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Zhao S., Peng L., Xie G., Li D., Zhao J., Ning C. Effect of the interposition of calcium phosphate materials on tendon-bone healing during repair of chronic rotator cuff tear. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(8):1920–1929. doi: 10.1177/0363546514532781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Guo J., Ning C., Liu X. Bioactive calcium phosphate silicate ceramic surface-modified PLGA for tendon-to-bone healing. Colloids Surf, B. 2018;164:388–395. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Wu C., Zhou Y., Xu M., et al. Copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with multifunctional properties of angiogenesis capacity, osteostimulation and antibacterial activity. Biomaterials. 2013;34(2):422–433. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.09.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Lin R., Deng C., Li X., et al. Copper-incorporated bioactive glass-ceramics inducing anti-inflammatory phenotype and regeneration of cartilage/bone interface. Theranostics. 2019;9(21):6300–6313. doi: 10.7150/thno.36120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Chen Y., Sun Y., Wu X., Lou J., Zhang X., Peng Z. Rotator cuff repair with biodegradable high-purity magnesium suture anchor in sheep model. J Orthop Transl. 2022;35:62–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Shang Z., Li D., Chen J., et al. The role of biodegradable magnesium and its alloys in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on animal studies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021;9 doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.789498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Yue J., Jin S., Gu S., Sun R., Liang Q. High concentration magnesium inhibits extracellular matrix calcification and protects articular cartilage via Erk/autophagy pathway. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(12):23190–23201. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28885. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Yu H., Cheng J., Shi W., et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes promote tendon regeneration by facilitating the proliferation and migration of endogenous tendon stem/progenitor cells. Acta Biomater. 2020;106:328–341. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.01.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Shi Y., Kang X., Wang Y., et al. Exosomes derived from bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) enhance tendon-bone healing by regulating macrophage polarization. Med Sci Mon Int Med J Exp Clin Res. 2020;26 doi: 10.12659/MSM.923328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Cai J., Xu J., Ye Z., et al. Exosomes derived from kartogenin-preconditioned mesenchymal stem cells promote cartilage formation and collagen maturation for enthesis regeneration in a rat model of chronic rotator cuff tear. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(5):1267–1276. doi: 10.1177/03635465231155927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Yang R., Li G., Zhuang C., et al. Gradient bimetallic ion-based hydrogels for tissue microstructure reconstruction of tendon-to-bone insertion. Sci Adv. 2021;7(26) doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abg3816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Zhou S., Chang Q., Lu F., Xing M. Injectable mussel-inspired immobilization of platelet-rich plasma on microspheres bridging adipose micro-tissues to improve autologous fat transplantation by controlling release of PDGF and VEGF, angiogenesis, stem cell migration. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2017;6(22) doi: 10.1002/adhm.201700131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genes & Diseases are provided here courtesy of Chongqing Medical University

RESOURCES