Abstract
This research investigates the physico-chemical, mineralogical and geochemical attributes of alluvial clayey sediments in the Nkoteng-Mbandjock regions of the Sanaga valley, Cameroon. The primary objective is to elucidate the source area-weathering and provenance of these sediments. Grain size distribution analyses were conducted using the Robinson-Kӧln's pipetting method. The physico-chemical parameters were evaluated by an HACH-HQ11d brand electric pH meter, while the mineralogical compositions were determined by X-ray Diffraction. Major and trace element concentrations were measured employing X-ray Fluorescence and Inductively Coupled Plasmas-Mass Spectrometry. Textural classification identified the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits as predominantly silty clayey and clayey muddy. Geochemical classification diagram positioned them in the shale and Fe-shale fields. Weathering indices of alteration exhibited a consistent trend indicating a high degree of weathering in the source rock. A low Na2O/K2O ratio (average 0.18) and a high Index of Compositional Variability (ICV; average 2.29) suggested immature sediments. Additionally, low SiO2/Al2O3 ratio (average 3.93) implied an origin from stable settings with recycled inputs. These characteristics were further supported by elemental ratios such as Zr/Sc (average 47.12), U/Th (average 0.24) and Th/Sc (average 1.48). Furthermore, indicators like V/Cr (average 1.17), U/Th (average 0.24) and authigenic U (average −1.67) values suggested the deposition of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay under oxic conditions. The collective analysis of major and trace element distribution revealed felsic sources with minimal contributions from mafic rocks. These findings contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the geological processes and conditions influencing the composition and characteristics of the studied alluvial clay deposits in the Sanaga valley.
Keywords: Shale, Source area-weathering, Immature sediment, Oxic environment, Felsic source, Sanaga valley
Highlights
-
•
We characterize alluvial clays from Sanaga valley deposits in Central Africa.
-
•
These sediments result from complete weathering of felsic and mafic rock sources.
-
•
They show high concentrations in Si, Al, Fe, Ba, Zr with negative Eu-anomalies.
-
•
The deposition of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay occurred under oxic condition.
1. Introduction
The geochemical features of clastic sediments are influenced by various factors, including the composition of source material, (palaeo)weathering, (palaeo)climate, transportation, provenance, and tectonics [[1], [2], [3]]. Fine-grained fluvial sediments transported by large rivers such as Sanaga in Central Cameroon offer valuable chemical insights into terrestrial materials, weathering processes, provenance, sorting mechanisms, erosion patterns, and the depositional history of sediments [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. Geochemical analyses of fine-grained sediments consistently reveal elevated concentrations of SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O3. Additionally, these sediments consist of secondary and accessory primary minerals capable of hosting significant quantities of immobile elements, including Ti, Al, Th, Zr, and Rare Earth Elements (REEs). Notably, these elements are predominantly present in the suspended load of the river and subsequently deposited as fine-grained overbank sediments [1, 9].
Clay materials, derived from geological sources, represent a commonly exploited resource for human well-being. Morphological, mineralogical and geochemical characterizations of these materials provide valuable insights into sedimentological processes and offer crucial information for their industrial applications. The grain size distribution and major element geochemistry of clay materials contribute to a robust classification of fine sediments [10,11]. The distribution patterns of major and trace elements serve as valuable indicators for determining weathering conditions and discerning the origin of source materials [12,13].
The Sanaga River, boasting a length of 918 km, stands as the longest river in Cameroon. The Sanaga basin harbors source rocks of diverse nature and expose sediments to varying climatic and weathering influences. This study delves into specific characteristics of alluvial clays in the Nkoteng-Mbandjock areas, aiming to facilitate a reasoned discourse on the deposition and provenance of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits.
2. Geography and geology
The Nkoteng-Mbandjock areas are situated in the expansive peneplain that extends across South and Central Cameroon in Central Africa. Specifically, Mbandjock is positioned between 4°21′0'' and 4°34′30'' North latitude and 11°51′0'' and 12°0′0'' East longitude, while Nkoteng is located between 04°30 ′00'' and 04°36′00'' North latitude and 11°56′28'' and 12°03′90'' East longitude. The prevailing climate in this region is of the equatorial transitional type, characterized by two dry and two rainy seasons of unequal duration [14]. The average annual rainfall is recorded at 1495 mm, with a mean temperature of approximately 25 °C. Relative humidity ranges from 70 to 80%, varying across different locations. The dominant vegetation comprises savannah intersected by gallery forests, incorporating residual islands and semi-deciduous forest. The Sanaga basin, where the study area is located, falls in the "African Surface I" which spans almost the entire Central and South Cameroon [15]. This surface exhibits a gently undulating peneplain with altitudes ranging from 600 to 1000 m. The Sanaga River, the longest river in Cameroon at 918 km, irrigates an area of approximately 140,000 km2. Originating from the Adamawa plateau, it flows southwestward before discharging into the Atlantic Ocean. The environmental conditions in the region favor the development of ferralitic and hydromorphic soils in the flood plains.
The Sanaga River flows along a SSW-NNE fault which occurred in the Proterozoic during the Pan-African orogeny [56]. It flows predominantly over metasediments (2.1 Ga), Paleoproterozoic amphibolites and orthogneisses, granitoids from the Adamawa-Yade batholith (AYB), sedimentary clastic rocks of Cretaceous age, and Cenozoic rocks of the Cameroon Volcanic Line [16]. Meta-igneous unit predominantly comprises garnet gneisses, micaschists and pyroxenites. This unit occurs with the meta-sedimentary unit, which is characterized by variable gneissose rocks [17]. Low grade Panafrican metamorphic rocks (phyllites, shales, and siliceous facies represented by quartzites generally interbedded in shales) of the Lom series at the northeastern extremity of the Sanaga River basin and the medium to high-grade gneissic rocks of the Yaounde group [16,56]. Granitic gneisses are typical of the Panafrican basement of West Cameroon and Adamawa parts of the Sanaga river basin. The study area comprises diverse lithologies, including gneisses, quartzites, micashists, migmatites, granites, and amphibolites (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Geological map and location of the study area with the inset showing the general map of Cameroon.
3. Methodology
3.1. Sampling
A total of sixteen bulk clay samples, each weighing approximately 2 kg, were systematically collected from vertical sections of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits in manually excavated pits. The samples were designated using a two-digit nomenclature: the first digit denotes the pit number, and the second digit signifies the layer, with "1" representing the upper layer and "2" indicating the bottom layer. The dimensions and characteristics of each layer are detailed in Table 1. Each excavation pit covered a surface area of 1 m × 1 m, with the depth varying based on the thickness of the clay deposits.
Table 1.
Color, particle size distribution, texture, pH, Eh and EC of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays.
|
Pits |
Mbandjock site |
Nkoteng site |
||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profile ME 1 | Profile ME 4 | Profile ME 5 | Profile ME 6 | Av. | Profile NM 1 | Profile NM 3 | Profile NM 5 | Profile NM 7 | Av. | |||||||||
| Samples | ME 11 | ME 12 | ME 41 | ME 42 | ME 51 | ME 52 | ME 61 | ME 62 | – | NM 11 | NM 12 | NM 31 | NM 32 | NM 51 | NM 52 | NM 71 | NM 72 | – |
| Depth (cm) | 5–90 | 90–200 | 7–55 | 55–195 | 5–150 | 150–205 | 5–30 | 30–140 | – | 10–120 | 120–250 | 5–100 | 100–150 | 5–100 | 100–150 | 5–40 | 40–70 | – |
| Munsell color | White (N8/) | Light red (2.5YR7/6) | Yellowish red (5YR5/6) | Reddish brown (2.5YR5/6) | Light gray (10YR7/2) | Light reddish gray (2.5YR7/1) | White (N8/) | Light bluish gray (5PB8/1) | – | Brownish yellow (10YR6/6) | Gray (10Y5/1) | Pale yellow (2.5Y8/3) | Light gray (2.5YR7/1) | Very dark gray (2.5YR3/1) | Dark brown (7.5YR3/3) | Light gray (2.5Y7/1) | Pale yellow (2.5Y7/3) | – |
| Clay (%) | 60.60 | 65.72 | 39.28 | 33.02 | 48.21 | 71.17 | 44.14 | 54.29 | 52.05 | 32.00 | 56.96 | 41.77 | 36.97 | 40.71 | 39.04 | 50.65 | 42.24 | 42.54 |
| Silt (%) | 12.49 | 25.19 | 33.98 | 35.53 | 31.03 | 16.62 | 12.29 | 17.80 | 23.12 | 24.91 | 25.12 | 27.85 | 30.43 | 52.28 | 41.66 | 28.88 | 19.79 | 31.37 |
| Sand (%) | 26.89 | 9.07 | 26.74 | 31.45 | 20.74 | 12.19 | 43.56 | 27.90 | 24.82 | 42.56 | 17.91 | 5.80 | 32.57 | 7.00 | 19.30 | 20.14 | 37.96 | 22.91 |
| pH | 4.24 | 4.34 | 5.77 | 5.10 | 5.02 | 4.60 | 4.57 | 4.44 | 4.76 | 5.33 | 5.45 | 4.84 | 5.17 | 5.55 | 5.42 | 5.27 | 5.14 | 5.27 |
| Eh (mV) | 111.80 | 81.10 | 36.30 | −1.00 | 29.80 | 12.60 | 42.40 | 70.20 | 44.90 | 44.70 | 24.60 | 21.40 | 37.90 | −4.30 | 93.10 | 99.30 | 11.50 | 41.03 |
| EC (dS/cm) | 413.00 | 315.00 | 100.70 | 85.10 | 141.30 | 245.00 | 144.30 | 147.50 | 198.99 | 93.90 | 77.90 | 108.30 | 253.00 | 182.60 | 129.00 | 98.80 | 27.80 | 121.41 |
3.2. Analytical procedures
The colors attributed to the diverse clay samples, as outlined in Table 1, were determined using the Munsell color chart. Grain size distribution analyses were conducted utilizing the Robinson-Kӧln's pipetting method [18]. The physico-chemical attributes of the clay samples were assessed following the methodology elucidated by Sababa et al. [19] at the University of Yaoundé I (Cameroon). Specifically, 10 g of each sample were weighed and introduced in 100 mL beakers, which were subsequently filled with distilled water and homogenized for a period ranging from 15 to 30 min. The pH (0–14) and redox potential (Eh) were then measured using an electric pH meter from HACH-HQ11d. Electrical conductivity (EC) was determined using a conductivity meter from HACH brand.
Mineralogical and geochemical analyses were done at the Geoscience Laboratories of Sudbury (Canada) after sample preparation at the Department of Earth Sciences (University of Yaoundé I, Cameroon). The analytical methodologies for determining mineralogical and geochemical composition were previously documented in previous studies [19,20]. Mineralogical compositions were elucidated through X-ray Diffraction (XRD) using a PAN Analytical X’PERT PRO diffractometer coupled with a monochromator. The quantitative assessment of minerals in the various samples employed the Profex 4.3.6 software, which utilizes the Rietveld method. This method employs a least squares approach to refine a theoretical line profile until it matches the measured profile, accounting for instrumental broadening, wavelength dispersion, specimen function, and background function. Standards, with error margins between 5 and 10%, were used.
To determine the loss on ignition (LOI), samples underwent heating to 105 °C for water removal and 1000 °C to eliminate volatiles and oxidize iron. Following ignition, major element contents were assessed using a Rigaku RIX-3000 wavelength-dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometer. Concentrations of trace elements were determined through Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) following acid digestion in closed beakers. The PerkinElmer 5000 ICP-MS spectrometer was employed for this purpose, with instrument precision ranging between 5 and 8.5% based on element contents.
3.3. Calculation of some alteration indices
Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA = [Al2O3/(Al2O3 + Na2O + CaO* + K2O)] × 100) is calculated with the molecular contents of oxides. It quantifies weathering processes of source rocks [21]. CaO* is the CaO content of silicate minerals in sample which is the lower value between Na2O and [CaO-(10/3)P2O5] molar contents [22]. The CIA is considered as the ratio of the most mobile elements to the least mobile elements. Low CIA is associated with low degree of weathering. Fresh rocks should have a CIA value of about 50% or less. The removal of all mobile cations (K+, Na+ and Ca2+) compared to relatively stable Al3+ in supergene environments is associated with a value of 100% [22].
Plagioclase index of alteration (PIA) is also used to assess the weathering degree of the source rocks [23]. It is calculated (PIA = [(Al2O3 - K2O)/(Al2O3 + CaO* + Na2O - K2O)] × 100; [24]) with oxides molar contents and use CaO* like CIA calculation. According to Bhaskar et al. [23], the minimum value of PIA is about 50%, as a result of low plagioclase weathering. Its highest value is 100% which indicates complete hydrolysis of plagioclase.
3.4. Assessment of rare earth element fractionation
The total rare earth elements (REE: La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu), light rare earth elements (LREE: La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm and Eu) and heavy rare earth elements (HREE: Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb and Lu) were systematically calculated. In order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the rare earth elements' behavior in the investigated materials, calculations pertaining to specific fractionation degrees [[25], [26], [27]] were conducted. Notably, the data for chondrite were referenced from Pourmand et al. [28].
The following equations have been used:
-
(1)
Ce anomaly: Ce/Ce*= (Cesample/Cechondrite)/(Lasample/Lachondrite)1/2(Prsample/Prchondrite)1/2;
-
(2)
Eu anomaly: Eu/Eu*= (Eusample/Euchondrite)/(Smsample/Smchondrite)1/2(Gdsample/Gdchondrite)1/2;
-
(3)
REE fractionation: (La/Yb)N= (Lasample/Lachondrite)/(Ybsample/Ybchondrite);
-
(4)
LREE fractionation: (La/Sm)N=(Lasample/Lachondrite)/(Smsample/Smchondrite);
-
(5)
HREE fractionation: (Gd/Yb)N=(Gdsample/Gdchondrite)/(Ybsample/Ybchondrite)
4. Results
4.1. Morphology, physico-chemistry and mineralogy
Table 1 provides a concise summary of the detailed morphology and physico-chemistry of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits. The primary distinguishing factor between the two layers in each pit is their color, exhibiting both vertical and horizontal variations. Pit depths range from 70 to 250 cm (see Table 1). Beneath the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits lies a layer of silty sand enriched in organic matter, with a lower stratum composed of whitish brown sand. Grain size distribution analysis reveals a variable composition, with approximately 50% clay (<2 μm). Notably, samples from Mbandjock exhibit a higher clay content compared to those from Nkoteng, which are proportionally richer in silt (2–60 μm) (Table 1). According to Picard's (1971) textural classification, the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits primarily fall into the categories of silty clayey and clayey muddy (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2.
Plots of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays in the clay-sand-silt diagram for characterization of texture. Circles represent samples from Mbandjock and squares represent samples from Nkoteng.
The Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits exhibit a moderate acidity, with samples from Mbandjock (average pH 4.76) displaying greater acidity than those from Nkoteng (average pH 5.27). Additionally, the samples present variable values of redox potential (Eh) and Electrical Conductivity (EC). The pH vs. Eh plot indicates that the current conditions of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits are characterized by acidity and reducing conditions (Fig. 3). Based on EC values, the alluvial clay deposits in the Sanaga valley are classified as strongly saline materials.
Fig. 3.
Eh-pH diagram [49] of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays. Triangles represent samples from Mbandjock and squares represent samples from Nkoteng.
The mineralogical composition is predominantly comprised of kaolinite, quartz, illite, gibbsite, rutile and goethite/hematite (Fig. 4). Kaolinite (47–71%), quartz (12–41%), illite (6-13), and rutile (1–5%) exhibit similar contents in both study sites (Table 2). Goethite (Fig. 4A) is notably more abundant in the Mbandjock site (average 3%), while hematite (Fig. 4B) is associated with samples from Nkoteng (average 1%) (Table 2). Smectite is present in trace amounts in select samples from both sites (Fig. 4; Table 2). The observed variation in color may be linked to the diverse composition of clay minerals (kaolinite and illite), as well as the presence of iron oxides and hydroxides.
Fig. 4.
X-ray diffraction patterns of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays: A) Samples from Mbadjock; B) Samples from Nkoteng.
Table 2.
Mineralogical composition (in %) of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays.
| Mbandjock site |
Nkoteng site |
Statistical data |
|||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ME11 | ME12 | ME41 | ME42 | ME51 | ME52 | ME61 | ME62 | Av. | NM11 | NM12 | NM31 | NM32 | NM51 | NM52 | NM71 | NM72 | Av. | Min. | Max. | Av. | |
| Quartz | 41 | 18 | 30 | 35 | 22 | 12 | 22 | 21 | 25 | 28 | 13 | 26 | 28 | 18 | 30 | 22 | 25 | 24 | 12 | 41 | 24 |
| Illite | 6 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 11 | 13 | 7 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 13 | 8 |
| Kaolinite | 49 | 66 | 52 | 45 | 64 | 71 | 63 | 63 | 60 | 54 | 65 | 58 | 56 | 60 | 51 | 61 | 59 | 59 | 47 | 71 | 59 |
| Smectite | – | – | 3 | 4 | – | – | – | – | 4 | – | – | 1 | – | 3 | 2 | – | – | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 |
| Hematite | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Goethite | 2 | 7 | 4 | 3 | – | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| Gibbsite | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 7 | 5 |
| Rutile | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | – | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | – | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | – | – | – | – |
4.2. Geochemistry
4.2.1. Major elements
The major elements in the alluvial clays from the Sanaga valley have wide range concentrations, as delineated in Table 3. Silica (SiO2) content spans a wide range (50–77 wt%), with an average value of 65 wt%. Alumina (Al2O3) follows as the second most abundant element, ranging from 11 to 25 wt% and averaging 16 wt%. The concentration of iron oxide (Fe2O3) varies between 1 and 10 wt%, with samples from the Mbandjock site displaying the highest average Al2O3 and Fe2O3 contents (19 wt% and 5 wt%, respectively). TiO2 concentrations range from 1 to 3 wt%. Most samples from both Mbandjock and Nkoteng sites exhibit K2O values exceeding 1 wt%, while the contents of other oxides (MgO, CaO, Na2O, and MnO) are predominantly below 1 wt% (Table 3). Loss on ignition (LOI) varies from 3 to 12 wt% with an average content of 8 wt%. The lowest LOI average value is recorded in the sample from the Nkoteng site. The mean values of SiO2/Al2O3 (3.93), Al2O3/TiO2 (10.05), and notably Al2O3/Na2O (111.40) ratios are elevated, whereas Na2O/K2O ratios are low, averaging 0.18 (Table 3).
Table 3.
Distribution of major elements (wt.%) in the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays.
| Mbandjock site |
Nkoteng site |
Statistical data |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dl | ME11 | ME12 | ME41 | ME42 | ME51 | ME52 | ME61 | ME62 | Av. | NM11 | NM12 | NM31 | NM32 | NM51 | NM52 | NM71 | NM72 | Av. | Min. | Max. | Av. | |
| SiO2 | 0.04 | 67.43 | 50.90 | 57.58 | 64.80 | 67.42 | 51.69 | 71.59 | 67.39 | 62.35 | 74.31 | 61.25 | 65.63 | 77.18 | 57.16 | 64.41 | 66.81 | 75.88 | 67.83 | 50.90 | 77.18 | 64.93 |
| Al2O3 | 0.02 | 17.03 | 23.40 | 18.89 | 15.64 | 16.64 | 24.85 | 16.50 | 16.95 | 18.74 | 13.57 | 21.77 | 16.55 | 11.51 | 20.48 | 15.68 | 17.30 | 12.80 | 16.21 | 11.51 | 24.85 | 17.55 |
| Fe2O3(t) | 0.01 | 3.45 | 9.51 | 7.56 | 5.94 | 2.69 | 7.46 | 1.73 | 4.26 | 5.33 | 2.42 | 2.07 | 4.48 | 1.86 | 6.20 | 6.21 | 2.22 | 1.84 | 3.41 | 1.73 | 9.51 | 4.43 |
| MgO | 0.01 | 0.18 | 0.27 | 0.59 | 0.57 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 0.16 | 0.17 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 0.32 | 0.42 | 0.26 | 0.56 | 0.55 | 0.27 | 0.18 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 0.59 | 0.33 |
| K2O | 0.01 | 1.48 | 0.91 | 1.94 | 2.39 | 0.81 | 0.78 | 0.37 | 0.46 | 1.14 | 1.36 | 1.34 | 2.10 | 2.24 | 2.01 | 2.38 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 2.39 | 1.41 |
| Na2O | 0.02 | 0.27 | 0.10 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.11 | 0.10 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.49 | 0.39 | 0.60 | 0.14 | 0.14 | 0.33 | 0.07 | 0.60 | 0.27 |
| CaO | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.11 | 0.11 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.16 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 0.26 | 0.29 | 0.32 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.18 |
| TiO2 | 0.01 | 1.45 | 1.91 | 1.81 | 1.72 | 2.70 | 1.63 | 1.58 | 2.05 | 1.86 | 1.93 | 1.81 | 1.58 | 1.10 | 1.70 | 1.62 | 2.22 | 1.75 | 1.71 | 1.10 | 2.70 | 1.79 |
| MnO | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| P2O5 | – | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.20 | 0.09 |
| LOI | – | 7.24 | 11.89 | 9.24 | 6.58 | 7.97 | 11.94 | 7.90 | 8.44 | 8.90 | 5.57 | 9.66 | 7.42 | 3.99 | 10.19 | 7.77 | 8.17 | 5.64 | 7.30 | 3.99 | 11.94 | 8.15 |
| Total | – | 98.69 | 99.02 | 98.62 | 98.9 | 98.76 | 98.93 | 99.98 | 99.9 | 99.12 | 99.81 | 98.65 | 98.94 | 99.01 | 99.25 | 99.91 | 98.57 | 99.4 | 99.18 | – | – | – |
| SiO2/Al2O3 | – | 3.96 | 2.18 | 3.05 | 4.14 | 4.05 | 2.08 | 4.34 | 3.98 | 3.47 | 5.48 | 2.81 | 3.97 | 6.71 | 2.79 | 4.11 | 3.86 | 5.93 | 4.46 | 2.08 | 6.71 | 3.93 |
| Na2O/K2O | – | 0.18 | 0.11 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.14 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.15 | 0.17 | 0.20 | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 0.11 | 0.25 | 0.18 |
| Al2O3/TiO2 | – | 11.74 | 12.25 | 10.44 | 9.09 | 6.16 | 15.25 | 10.44 | 8.27 | 10.46 | 7.03 | 12.03 | 10.47 | 10.46 | 12.05 | 9.68 | 7.79 | 7.31 | 9.60 | 6.16 | 15.25 | 10.05 |
| Al2O3/Na2O | – | 63.07 | 234.00 | 42.93 | 26.07 | 151.27 | 248.50 | 235.71 | 242.14 | 155.46 | 50.26 | 83.73 | 43.55 | 23.49 | 52.51 | 26.13 | 123.57 | 91.43 | 61.83 | 23.49 | 248.50 | 111.40 |
| ICV | – | 2.45 | 1.83 | 1.48 | 1.33 | 2.50 | 2.40 | 4.18 | 2.40 | 2.32 | 2.15 | 3.69 | 1.79 | 1.84 | 1.83 | 1.32 | 2.80 | 2.55 | 2.25 | 1.32 | 4.18 | 2.29 |
| CIA (%) | – | 88.30 | 95.00 | 84.40 | 77.90 | 93.10 | 95.50 | 96.70 | 96.10 | 90.80 | 86.90 | 91.40 | 83.10 | 75.40 | 85.80 | 77.90 | 90.90 | 89.70 | 85.14 | 75.40 | 96.70 | 88.18 |
| PIA (%) | – | 95.90 | 98.90 | 92.40 | 87.50 | 97.80 | 98.60 | 99.00 | 99.00 | 96.14 | 95.50 | 97.20 | 92.9 | 87.20 | 93.70 | 87.60 | 97.50 | 96.90 | 93.50 | 87.20 | 99.00 | 94.93 |
d.l.: detection limit.
LOI: loss on ignition.
CIA = [Al2O3/(Al2O3 + CaO∗ + Na2O + K2O)]*100 from Nesbitt and Young (1982).
ICV (Fe2O3 + K2O + Na2O + CaO + MgO + TiO2)/Al2O3 from Cox et al. (1995).
PIA (%) = [(Al2O3 - K2O)/(Al2O3 + CaO + Na2O - K2O)] × 100 from Fedo et al. (1995).
MIA = 100 x [(Al2O3 + Fe2O3)/(Al2O3 + Fe2O3 + MgO + CaO* + Na2O + K2O)] from Babechuk et al. (2014).
4.2.2. Trace elements
The concentration of trace elements in the alluvial clays from the Sanaga valley is shown in Table 4. Barium exhibits the highest content, ranging from 175 to 944 ppm, with a mean value of 597 ppm. Zirconium follows as the second most abundant element, varying between 304 and 775 ppm, with an average content of 556 ppm. Mean values for V (116 ppm), Sr (101 ppm), and Cr (100 ppm) are lower than those observed for the aforementioned trace elements. The samples from the Nkoteng site display the highest mean values for Ba, Zr, and Sr, while the Mbandjock site registers the highest average contents for V and Cr (Table 4). Considerable variations are also noted for Zn (34–88 ppm), Rb (17–63 ppm), Nb (57–723 ppm), and Ni (19–47 ppm) (Table 4). Notably, the Cr/V, Y/Ni, Rb/Sr, and U/Th values are exceptionally low (Table 4). Ratios such as Ni/Co, Zr/Sc, and to a lesser extent Th/Sc suggest that Zr, Ni, and Th are likely less mobile compared to Sc and Co in these environments (Table 4).
Table 4.
Distribution of trace elements (ppm) in the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays.
| Mbandjock site |
Nkoteng site |
Statistical data |
||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d.l. | ME 11 | ME 12 | ME 41 | ME 42 | ME 51 | ME 52 | ME 61 | ME 62 | Av. | NM 11 | NM 12 | NM 31 | NM 32 | NM 51 | NM 52 | NM 71 | NM 72 | Av. | Min. | Max. | Av. | |
| Ba | 1.30 | 707.00 | 483.00 | 768.20 | 922.70 | 385.70 | 423.00 | 186.10 | 175.30 | 506.38 | 541.60 | 463.40 | 814.10 | 901.00 | 840.60 | 943.70 | 575.40 | 505.00 | 698.10 | 175.30 | 943.70 | 596.60 |
| Sr | 1.30 | 102.60 | 67.90 | 139.40 | 179.70 | 78.90 | 57.30 | 27.20 | 26.20 | 84.90 | 78.50 | 54.40 | 146.50 | 172.70 | 137.30 | 183.90 | 92.20 | 85.20 | 118.84 | 26.20 | 183.90 | 100.87 |
| Li | 0.24 | 22.20 | 26.50 | 20.10 | 15.00 | 21.10 | 32.90 | 22.90 | 22.90 | 22.95 | 30.90 | 54.70 | 19.80 | 17.10 | 25.60 | 16.90 | 28.50 | 26.40 | 27.49 | 15.00 | 54.70 | 25.09 |
| Rb | 0.15 | 35.22 | 26.58 | 41.96 | 46.47 | 30.04 | 17.47 | 24.24 | 25.41 | 30.92 | 58.75 | 26.29 | 46.37 | 59.72 | 63.26 | 55.67 | 55.28 | 50.22 | 51.95 | 17.47 | 63.26 | 40.82 |
| Th | 0.01 | 15.13 | 17.61 | 18.79 | 16.12 | 18.22 | 16.69 | 15.88 | 19.59 | 17.25 | 20.40 | 20.27 | 15.44 | 18.98 | 19.68 | 18.34 | 19.67 | 14.35 | 18.39 | 14.35 | 20.40 | 17.79 |
| Zr | 4.00 | 473.00 | 330.00 | 562.00 | 775.00 | 575.00 | 304.00 | 525.00 | 620.00 | 520.50 | 645.00 | 418.00 | 631.00 | 658.00 | 666.00 | 729.00 | 497.00 | 518.00 | 595.25 | 304.00 | 775.00 | 555.68 |
| Nb | 0.05 | 30.47 | 41.08 | 39.62 | 36.73 | 57.11 | 34.11 | 37.62 | 42.65 | 39.92 | 41.84 | 40.07 | 33.26 | 23.20 | 37.76 | 32.34 | 46.74 | 42.56 | 37.22 | 23.20 | 57.11 | 38.65 |
| U | 0.01 | 3.49 | 4.11 | 4.72 | 4.41 | 4.83 | 4.13 | 2.73 | 3.46 | 3.98 | 4.51 | 4.29 | 4.63 | 4.06 | 5.50 | 4.43 | 5.44 | 3.69 | 4.57 | 2.73 | 5.50 | 4.26 |
| Hf | 0.09 | 12.28 | 9.05 | 15.08 | 18.93 | 13.88 | 8.01 | 12.32 | 14.92 | 13.06 | 16.53 | 10.63 | 15.84 | 16.57 | 15.59 | 17.08 | 12.42 | 11.77 | 14.55 | 8.01 | 18.93 | 13.76 |
| Cr | 2.90 | 84.00 | 115.00 | 107.00 | 103.00 | 102.00 | 117.00 | 90.00 | 109.00 | 103.38 | 79.00 | 110.00 | 89.00 | 58.00 | 110.00 | 89.00 | 107.00 | 93.00 | 91.88 | 58.00 | 117.00 | 97.96 |
| V | 0.40 | 99.70 | 163.10 | 127.00 | 113.70 | 131.40 | 161.20 | 75.90 | 110.20 | 122.78 | 99.40 | 125.80 | 108.30 | 59.80 | 154.00 | 110.70 | 106.50 | 93.60 | 107.26 | 59.80 | 163.10 | 115.48 |
| Ni | 0.60 | 31.60 | 36.30 | 40.10 | 32.90 | 26.50 | 46.80 | 34.20 | 35.80 | 35.53 | 19.40 | 38.30 | 29.60 | 19.50 | 43.70 | 30.50 | 33.20 | 26.60 | 30.10 | 19.40 | 46.80 | 32.97 |
| Zn | 2.00 | 36.10 | 47.80 | 68.80 | 62.50 | 37.90 | 53.20 | 34.10 | 38.50 | 47.36 | 61.40 | 88.30 | 52.10 | 38.00 | 88.30 | 66.30 | 49.50 | 40.50 | 60.55 | 34.10 | 88.30 | 53.57 |
| Cu | 0.40 | 12.60 | 17.10 | 19.50 | 17.50 | 13.50 | 22.80 | 16.60 | 20.20 | 17.48 | 13.60 | 20.30 | 16.80 | 11.10 | 29.70 | 18.40 | 16.70 | 13.80 | 17.55 | 11.10 | 29.70 | 17.51 |
| Co | 0.09 | 8.79 | 10.18 | 17.32 | 15.99 | 7.03 | 13.20 | 7.34 | 7.71 | 10.95 | 4.80 | 9.20 | 7.78 | 5.14 | 14.61 | 13.57 | 9.08 | 7.40 | 8.95 | 4.80 | 17.32 | 10.01 |
| Sc | 0.17 | 11.20 | 13.40 | 12.10 | 10.40 | 12.70 | 14.30 | 13.00 | 14.20 | 12.66 | 9.20 | 13.90 | 10.60 | 8.40 | 17.70 | 11.20 | 14.20 | 11.60 | 12.10 | 8.40 | 17.70 | 12.40 |
| Y | 0.09 | 14.35 | 14.92 | 22.79 | 26.64 | 25.37 | 13.03 | 25.66 | 29.99 | 21.59 | 19.74 | 31.39 | 25.26 | 32.03 | 41.62 | 31.41 | 36.96 | 28.77 | 30.90 | 13.03 | 41.62 | 25.97 |
| Ga | 0.04 | 22.00 | 31.43 | 25.83 | 21.34 | 23.39 | 33.46 | 22.24 | 24.22 | 25.49 | 19.39 | 31.25 | 22.73 | 15.54 | 31.02 | 21.02 | 24.32 | 19.19 | 23.06 | 15.54 | 33.46 | 24.34 |
| Pb | 0.29 | 23.75 | 37.84 | 31.75 | 27.00 | 35.98 | 30.59 | 22.62 | 24.08 | 29.20 | 22.66 | 30.15 | 30.48 | 22.58 | 35.39 | 27.32 | 36.75 | 28.46 | 29.22 | 22.58 | 37.84 | 29.21 |
| Zr/Sc | – | 42.23 | 24.63 | 46.45 | 74.52 | 45.28 | 21.26 | 40.38 | 43.66 | 42.30 | 70.11 | 30.07 | 59.53 | 78.33 | 37.63 | 65.09 | 35.00 | 44.66 | 52.55 | 21.26 | 78.33 | 47.12 |
| Th/Sc | – | 1.35 | 1.31 | 1.55 | 1.55 | 1.43 | 1.17 | 1.22 | 1.38 | 1.37 | 2.22 | 1.46 | 1.46 | 2.26 | 1.11 | 1.64 | 1.38 | 1.24 | 1.60 | 1.11 | 2.26 | 1.48 |
| Cr/V | – | 0.84 | 0.71 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.78 | 0.73 | 1.19 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.79 | 0.87 | 0.82 | 0.97 | 0.71 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.71 | 1.19 | 0.87 |
| Y/Ni | – | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.57 | 0.81 | 0.96 | 0.28 | 0.75 | 0.84 | 0.63 | 1.02 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 1.64 | 0.95 | 1.03 | 1.11 | 1.08 | 1.06 | 0.28 | 1.64 | 0.84 |
| Rb/Sr | – | 0.34 | 0.39 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.89 | 0.97 | 0.48 | 0.75 | 0.48 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.26 | 0.97 | 0.48 |
| U/Th | – | 0.23 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.18 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.21 | 0.30 | 0.21 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.25 | 0.17 | 0.30 | 0.24 |
| V/Cr | – | 1.19 | 1.42 | 1.19 | 1.10 | 1.29 | 1.38 | 0.84 | 1.01 | 1.18 | 1.26 | 1.14 | 1.22 | 1.03 | 1.40 | 1.24 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 1.16 | 0.84 | 1.42 | 1.17 |
| Ni/Co | – | 3.59 | 3.57 | 2.32 | 2.06 | 3.77 | 3.55 | 4.66 | 4.64 | 3.52 | 4.04 | 4.16 | 3.80 | 3.79 | 2.99 | 2.25 | 3.66 | 3.59 | 3.54 | 2.06 | 4.66 | 3.53 |
| AU | – | −1.55 | −1.76 | −1.55 | −0.96 | −1.25 | −1.43 | −2.57 | −3.07 | −1.77 | −2.29 | −2.47 | −0.52 | −2.26 | −1.06 | −1.68 | −1.11 | −1.09 | −1.56 | −3.07 | −0.52 | −1.67 |
d.l.: detection limits.AU = XU-(YTh)/3. XU and YTh represent the contents of U and Th respectively (Wignall and Myers 1988).
4.2.3. Rare earth elements
The concentrations of rare earth elements (REE) in the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits exhibit a range from 73 to 288 ppm with a mean value of 191 ppm (Table 5). The Nkoteng site displays slightly higher REE contents than those observed at the Mbandjock site. The alluvial clay deposits in the Sanaga valley are notably characterized by Light Rare Earth Element (LREE) enrichment, with an average of 173 ppm, in comparison to Heavy Rare Earth Element (HREE) with an average of 17 ppm across both sites. The LREE/HREE values span from 7 to 13, with a mean value of 10. Normalized patterns relative to chondrite [28] unveil negative anomalies in Eu for most samples from both sites (Fig. 5A and B), with an average Eu/Eu* ratio of 0.63 (Table 5). Slight negative and positive anomalies are also evident in Ce (Ce/Ce* ranging from 0.8 to 1.17) (Table 5). Ratios such as (La/Yb)N, (La/Sm)N, and (Gd/Yb)N (Table 5) indicate low fractionation, especially for HREE as confirmed by the REE patterns (Fig. 5).
Table 5.
Distribution of rare earth elements (ppm) in the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays.
| Mbandjock site | Nkoteng site | Statistical data | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| dl | ME 11 | ME 12 | ME 41 | ME 42 | ME 51 | ME 52 | ME 61 | ME 62 | Av. | NM 11 | NM 12 | NM 31 | NM 32 | NM 51 | NM 52 | NM 71 | NM 72 | Av. | Min. | Max. | Av. | |
| La | 0.09 | 28.00 | 29.10 | 36.30 | 35.60 | 50.70 | 17.50 | 49.90 | 53.90 | 37.63 | 52.70 | 32.70 | 42.80 | 48.20 | 50.20 | 42.40 | 64.00 | 51.20 | 48.03 | 17.50 | 64.00 | 42.52 |
| Ce | 0.17 | 48.82 | 43.02 | 67.48 | 76.47 | 72.39 | 28.86 | 101.63 | 105.97 | 68.08 | 92.13 | 63.32 | 80.79 | 104.85 | 115.32 | 93.66 | 119.53 | 91.64 | 95.16 | 28.86 | 119.53 | 80.82 |
| Pr | 0.02 | 5.73 | 5.83 | 8.27 | 8.62 | 9.18 | 3.46 | 8.98 | 9.98 | 7.51 | 11.20 | 7.70 | 9.73 | 12.13 | 12.60 | 10.40 | 14.43 | 10.67 | 11.11 | 3.46 | 14.43 | 9.20 |
| Nd | 0.11 | 21.41 | 20.61 | 31.06 | 33.50 | 31.87 | 12.06 | 29.89 | 33.95 | 26.79 | 40.02 | 28.49 | 35.52 | 46.52 | 47.29 | 37.90 | 51.41 | 37.75 | 40.61 | 12.06 | 51.41 | 33.30 |
| Sm | 0.05 | 3.76 | 3.69 | 5.96 | 6.30 | 5.70 | 2.25 | 4.86 | 5.54 | 4.76 | 7.29 | 5.56 | 6.47 | 8.59 | 9.31 | 7.30 | 9.85 | 6.94 | 7.66 | 2.25 | 9.85 | 6.12 |
| Eu | 0.01 | 0.68 | 0.79 | 1.34 | 1.42 | 1.20 | 0.52 | 1.01 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.23 | 1.14 | 1.42 | 1.78 | 2.02 | 1.74 | 2.09 | 1.49 | 1.61 | 0.52 | 2.09 | 1.29 |
| Gd | 0.04 | 2.84 | 3.02 | 4.92 | 5.16 | 4.61 | 2.18 | 4.17 | 4.92 | 3.98 | 5.27 | 5.15 | 5.20 | 6.78 | 7.49 | 6.23 | 8.06 | 5.51 | 6.21 | 2.18 | 8.06 | 5.03 |
| Tb | 0.01 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.73 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.64 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.69 | 0.84 | 0.79 | 0.95 | 1.14 | 0.90 | 1.19 | 0.83 | 0.92 | 0.36 | 1.19 | 0.76 |
| Dy | 0.04 | 2.63 | 3.06 | 4.57 | 4.92 | 4.58 | 2.38 | 3.92 | 4.71 | 3.85 | 3.86 | 5.32 | 4.62 | 5.78 | 6.92 | 5.53 | 7.26 | 4.90 | 5.52 | 2.38 | 7.26 | 4.64 |
| Ho | 0.01 | 0.52 | 0.59 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.90 | 0.50 | 0.81 | 0.98 | 0.76 | 0.72 | 1.06 | 0.93 | 1.12 | 1.38 | 1.08 | 1.40 | 0.97 | 1.08 | 0.50 | 1.40 | 0.91 |
| Er | 0.04 | 1.62 | 1.77 | 2.52 | 2.74 | 2.81 | 1.52 | 2.43 | 2.95 | 2.29 | 2.09 | 3.04 | 2.70 | 3.37 | 4.18 | 3.31 | 4.13 | 2.82 | 3.21 | 1.52 | 4.18 | 2.72 |
| Tm | 0.01 | 0.24 | 0.25 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.34 | 0.41 | 0.33 | 0.31 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.49 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.59 | 0.40 | 0.46 | 0.23 | 0.59 | 0.39 |
| Yb | 0.01 | 1.75 | 1.78 | 2.68 | 2.81 | 2.84 | 1.54 | 2.18 | 2.74 | 2.29 | 2.11 | 2.69 | 2.65 | 3.21 | 3.93 | 3.18 | 3.81 | 2.65 | 3.03 | 1.54 | 3.93 | 2.64 |
| Lu | 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.26 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.24 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.34 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.50 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.55 | 0.39 | 0.46 | 0.24 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| REE | 118.71 | 114.24 | 167.50 | 180.04 | 188.36 | 73.61 | 211.08 | 228.30 | 160.23 | 219.94 | 157.83 | 194.42 | 244.26 | 262.97 | 214.60 | 288.30 | 218.15 | 225.06 | 73.61 | 288.30 | 190.74 | |
| LREE | 108.40 | 103.04 | 150.41 | 161.91 | 171.04 | 64.65 | 196.27 | 210.44 | 145.77 | 204.57 | 138.91 | 176.73 | 222.07 | 236.75 | 193.40 | 261.31 | 199.68 | 204.18 | 64.65 | 261.31 | 173.25 | |
| HREE | 10.32 | 11.20 | 17.10 | 18.14 | 17.33 | 8.96 | 14.82 | 17.86 | 14.46 | 15.38 | 18.93 | 17.69 | 22.19 | 26.22 | 21.20 | 26.99 | 18.46 | 20.88 | 8.96 | 26.99 | 17.48 | |
| LREE/HREE | 10.51 | 9.20 | 8.80 | 8.93 | 9.87 | 7.22 | 13.25 | 11.78 | 9.94 | 13.30 | 7.34 | 9.99 | 10.01 | 9.03 | 9.12 | 9.68 | 10.81 | 9.91 | 7.22 | 13.30 | 9.93 | |
| Ce/Ce* | 0.94 | 0.80 | 0.95 | 1.06 | 0.82 | 0.90 | 1.17 | 1.11 | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 1.06 | 1.12 | 1.09 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 0.80 | 1.17 | 0.94 | |
| Eu/Eu* | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.70 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.69 | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.44 | 0.48 | 0.43 | 0.42 | 0.42 | 0.33 | 0.75 | 0.63 | |
| (La/Yb)N | 10.98 | 11.25 | 9.28 | 8.70 | 12.24 | 7.78 | 15.73 | 13.50 | 11.18 | 17.11 | 8.33 | 11.06 | 10.32 | 8.77 | 9.16 | 11.54 | 13.28 | 11.20 | 7.78 | 17.11 | 10.98 | |
| (La/Sm)N | 4.69 | 4.97 | 3.84 | 3.56 | 5.61 | 4.89 | 6.47 | 6.13 | 5.02 | 4.56 | 3.71 | 4.17 | 3.54 | 3.40 | 3.66 | 4.09 | 4.65 | 3.97 | 3.40 | 6.47 | 4.69 | |
| (Gd/Yb)N | 1.31 | 1.38 | 1.48 | 1.49 | 1.31 | 1.14 | 1.55 | 1.45 | 1.39 | 2.02 | 1.55 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.54 | 1.59 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.67 | 1.14 | 2.02 | 1.31 | |
d.l.: detection limits.
Ce/Ce*= (Cesample/Cechondrite)/(Lasample/Lachondrite)1/2(Prsample/Prchondrite)1/2.
Eu/Eu*= (Eusample/Euchondrite)/(Smsample/Smchondrite)1/2(Gdsample/Gdchondrite)1/2.
(La/Yb)N= (Lasample/Lachondrite)/(Ybsample/Ybchondrite).
(La/Sm)N= (Lasample/Lachondrite)/(Smsample/Smchondrite).
(Gd/Yb)N= (Gdsample/Gdchondrite)/(Ybsample/Ybchondrite).
Fig. 5.
Chondrite-normalized REE patterns [28] for the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays: A) Samples from Mbandjock and B) Samples from Nkoteng.
4.2.4. Correlations
The Pearson's correlation matrix provides insights into the behavior of chemical elements in the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits (Table 6). Correlations are deemed strong when the coefficient exceeds 0.70 in absolute value. Positive values indicate elements associated in similar processes, while negative coefficients suggest different enrichment processes. Apart from REE, SiO2 exhibits negative correlations with several elements (e.g., Al2O3, Fe2O3, LOI, Cr, V, Ni, Ga). Conversely, Al2O3 is strongly correlated with multiple elements (LOI, Cr, V, Ni, Sc, and Ga), indicative of potential associations in the clay fraction [2, 29]. Fe2O3 is linked to V and Co, while K2O is associated with Ba, Sr, and Rb. The notable correlation between TiO2 and Nb suggests the potential for rutile to contain a significant amount of Nb. Loss on ignition (LOI), which increases with the degree of weathering due to clay minerals formation, exhibits a strong affinity with V, Cr, Ni, and Ga. Among the trace elements suite: (1) Ba is correlated with Sr and Rb; (2) positive correlation is observed for Cr with V, Ni, Sc, and Ga; (3) V is linked to Ni, Ga, and Pb; (4) Cu is positively correlated with Sc and Ga; (5) positive correlations exist between Sr and Rb, Th and Hf, Sc and Ga. As anticipated, strong positive correlations are evident among rare earth elements. Additionally, Rb and Y are correlated with rare earth elements.
Table 6.
Pearson's correlation matrix for major, trace and rare earth elements of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays.
| SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | K2O | TiO2 | LOI | Ba | Sr | Li | Rb | Th | Zr | Nb | U | Hf | Cr | V | Ni | Zn | Cu | Co | Sc | Y | Ga | Pb | REE | LREE | HREE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SiO2 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Al2O3 | −0.93 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fe2O3 | −0.85 | 0.63 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| K2O | 0.02 | −0.28 | 0.20 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| TiO2 | −0.13 | 0.16 | −0.04 | −0.45 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| LOI | −0.93 | 0.97 | 0.68 | −0.33 | 0.26 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ba | −0.02 | −0.25 | 0.25 | 0.98 | −0.46 | −0.29 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sr | 0.06 | −0.36 | 0.22 | 0.96 | −0.40 | −0.37 | 0.97 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Li | −0.23 | 0.49 | −0.20 | −0.35 | 0.15 | 0.38 | −0.40 | −0.55 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Rb | 0.40 | −0.59 | −0.18 | 0.70 | −0.22 | −0.57 | 0.71 | 0.70 | −0.33 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||||
| Th | −0.11 | 0.12 | −0.03 | 0.06 | 0.31 | 0.13 | −0.03 | −0.06 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||||
| Zr | 0.47 | −0.68 | −0.17 | 0.63 | −0.10 | −0.63 | 0.54 | 0.65 | −0.58 | 0.67 | 0.13 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||||
| Nb | −0.06 | 0.13 | −0.12 | −0.53 | 0.97 | 0.22 | −0.54 | −0.48 | 0.21 | −0.22 | 0.23 | −0.15 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||||
| U | −0.31 | 0.16 | 0.22 | 0.48 | 0.37 | 0.17 | 0.49 | 0.45 | 0.04 | 0.54 | 0.49 | 0.22 | 0.28 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||||
| Hf | 0.43 | −0.66 | −0.11 | 0.68 | −0.13 | −0.62 | 0.59 | 0.69 | −0.59 | 0.67 | 0.18 | 0.98 | −0.19 | 0.26 | 1.00 | |||||||||||||
| Cr | −0.79 | 0.81 | 0.54 | −0.36 | 0.52 | 0.86 | −0.35 | −0.39 | 0.37 | −0.50 | 0.12 | −0.45 | 0.52 | 0.26 | −0.47 | 1.00 | ||||||||||||
| V | −0.91 | 0.86 | 0.75 | −0.12 | 0.38 | 0.88 | −0.07 | −0.15 | 0.29 | −0.34 | 0.16 | −0.43 | 0.33 | 0.43 | −0.42 | 0.83 | 1.00 | |||||||||||
| Ni | −0.84 | 0.86 | 0.60 | −0.17 | 0.03 | 0.87 | −0.16 | −0.23 | 0.30 | −0.46 | 0.03 | −0.44 | 0.03 | 0.11 | −0.46 | 0.82 | 0.72 | 1.00 | ||||||||||
| Zn | −0.46 | 0.39 | 0.31 | 0.48 | −0.03 | 0.35 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.49 | 0.15 | −0.04 | 0.58 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 1.00 | |||||||||
| Cu | −0.68 | 0.65 | 0.51 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.69 | 0.02 | −0.04 | 0.26 | −0.07 | 0.30 | −0.05 | 0.02 | 0.36 | −0.10 | 0.68 | 0.66 | 0.84 | 0.68 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| Co | −0.68 | 0.47 | 0.73 | 0.42 | −0.07 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 0.42 | −0.15 | 0.02 | −0.01 | 0.10 | −0.10 | 0.35 | 0.12 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.69 | 0.57 | 0.64 | 1.00 | |||||||
| Sc | −0.60 | 0.70 | 0.28 | −0.38 | 0.35 | 0.76 | −0.36 | −0.42 | 0.37 | −0.29 | 0.24 | −0.37 | 0.37 | 0.25 | −0.45 | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.80 | 0.35 | 0.81 | 0.35 | 1.00 | ||||||
| Y | 0.26 | −0.29 | −0.34 | 0.30 | 0.06 | −0.23 | 0.23 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.56 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.09 | 0.43 | 0.43 | −0.04 | −0.22 | −0.04 | 0.36 | 0.33 | 0.04 | 0.31 | 1.00 | |||||
| Ga | −0.90 | 0.98 | 0.57 | −0.28 | 0.22 | 0.96 | −0.26 | −0.38 | 0.56 | −0.51 | 0.20 | −0.63 | 0.21 | 0.24 | −0.62 | 0.85 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.49 | 0.75 | 0.46 | 0.79 | −0.14 | 1.00 | ||||
| Pb | −0.64 | 0.57 | 0.43 | −0.04 | 0.55 | 0.63 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.17 | −0.05 | 0.16 | −0.35 | 0.53 | 0.68 | −0.35 | 0.67 | 0.73 | 0.43 | 0.30 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.58 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 1.00 | |||
| REE | 0.57 | −0.61 | −0.50 | 0.20 | 0.11 | −0.51 | 0.15 | 0.22 | −0.22 | 0.70 | 0.38 | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.55 | −0.32 | −0.49 | −0.39 | 0.04 | −0.01 | −0.25 | 0.02 | 0.85 | −0.48 | −0.06 | 1.00 | ||
| LREE | 0.59 | −0.62 | −0.51 | 0.17 | 0.11 | −0.53 | 0.12 | 0.20 | −0.23 | 0.69 | 0.37 | 0.62 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.55 | −0.34 | −0.51 | −0.41 | 0.01 | −0.03 | −0.27 | 0.00 | 0.83 | −0.50 | −0.08 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |
| HREE | 0.27 | −0.35 | −0.30 | 0.42 | 0.10 | −0.29 | 0.37 | 0.41 | −0.08 | 0.70 | 0.47 | 0.55 | 0.09 | 0.59 | 0.49 | −0.10 | −0.22 | −0.14 | 0.36 | 0.22 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.96 | −0.21 | 0.22 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 1.00 |
5. Discussion
5.1. Source weathering conditions
Strong relationships exist between weathering intensities and the chemical dynamics of the upper crust. Throughout the weathering process, highly mobile elements such as Na and K tend to exit sediments, while the least mobile elements, such as Fe and Al, remain in the residual sediments. High loss on ignition (LOI) value is generally stemmed from abundant volatile losses during heating. The moderate Al2O3 contents, coupled with high LOI and Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) values in the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits, can be attributed to the prevalence of clay minerals [21], indicative of a high degree of weathering.
In a broader context, fresh rocks typically exhibit alteration indices (CIA and PIA) values of about 50%, potentially escalating to 100% after undergoing weathering. Low values indicate inactive chemical reactions, often associated with weak weathering under cold or arid conditions [24]. Conversely, high values reflect active chemical reactions linked to robust weathering conditions in warmer environments. The calculated CIA values in the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits showcase a considerable range (76–97%), with a mean value of 88% (Table 3). Sediments originating from the Mbandjock site (average 91%) exhibit a higher degree of weathering compared to those from Nkoteng (average 88%). It is noteworthy that while both CIA and PIA values demonstrate a similar trend, the indices collectively indicate a high degree of weathering, corroborated by the plot of Index of Compositional Variability (ICV) vs. CIA (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6.
Geochemical diagrams of Index of Compositional Variability (ICV) vs Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA) of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays [50].
5.2. Classification and maturity
The Herron diagram, utilizing the logarithmic ratios of four major elements (Fe, Al, Si, and K) as proposed by Herron [11], emerges as a reliable tool for sediment classification. The logarithmic ratios, specifically Log SiO2/Al2O3 vs. Log Fe2O3/K2O, provide a comprehensive framework. In this diagram, the majority of samples from the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits fall in the field of shale and Fe-shale composition, as illustrated in Fig. 7. Notably, a single sample from Nkoteng diverges into the arkose field. The low Na2O/K2O values observed in the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits are indicative of immature sediments. This immaturity is further confirmed by the Index of Compositional Variability (ICV) and their SiO2/Al2O3 ratios, both falling below 5 [30]. Such samples are likely sourced from stable settings [2]. According to Cullers and Podkovyrov [31], an ICV>1 indicates an immature composition with no recycled inputs. The calculated Chemical Index of Alteration (CIA), Plagioclase Index of Alteration (PIA), and mineralogical composition collectively suggest intense weathering of source materials. This observed behavior aligns with the humid and warm tropical climate prevailing in the Sanaga basin [32].
Fig. 7.
Geochemical classification diagram of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays using log ratios of SiO2/Al2O3–Fe2O3/K2O [11]. Triangles represent samples from Mbandjock and squares represent samples from Nkoteng.
The Th/U values portray a contrasting composition and further indicate the complete weathering of source rocks (see Fig. 8A). Positively correlated between Zr/Sc and Th/Sc ratios, along with the gradual increase in Zr/Sc values, suggest a scenario of sediment recycling (refer to Fig. 8B). Indeed, sediment reworking typically leads to a rapid increase in Zr/Sc ratios [33].
Fig. 8.
Discrimination bivariate plots illustrating weathering and sediment recycling: A) Th/U vs Th plot; B) Th/Sc vs Zr/Sc plot [33] of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays. Triangles represent samples from Mbandjock and squares represent samples from Nkoteng.
5.3. Depositional environment
Trace element ratios, such as V/Cr, U/Th, and the authigenic U index (AU = XU-(YTh)/3; Table 4), serve as valuable tools for discussing the paleoenvironment prevailing during deposition. Specifically, U/Th ratios greater than 1.25 and V/Cr ratios exceeding 4.5 are indicative of an anoxic environment, while U/Th ratios below 0.75 and V/Cr ratios less than 2 suggest oxic conditions [34,35]. The deposition of the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits is established to have occurred under oxic conditions, with an average U/Th ratio of 0.24 and V/Cr ratio of 1.17 (Table 3). This oxic depositional environment is further corroborated by the low authigenic U values, averaging −1.67 (Table 3). According to Jones and Manning [34], low authigenic U values (<5) signify an oxic depositional condition, whereas higher values (>5) suggest anoxic conditions.
Despite the generally consistent geochemical behavior of Rare Earth Elements (REE) and their low solubility in natural conditions, Ce is influenced by variations in redox potential (Eh) and can serve as an indicator of oxidizing conditions during deposition. Cerium exists in the Ce3+ form, similar to other REE, and as Ce4+ in oxidizing environments in the supergene environment [36]. The Ce4+ state remains more stable, forming cerianite (CeO2) or on the surfaces of Fe- and Mg-oxihydroxides, generating positive Ce-anomalies. The Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits show both negative and positive Ce-anomaly. This indicates oxidizing and reducing depositional conditions in the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits. This divergent behavior of Ce may be attributed to post-depositional solutions and solids, which can generate negative Ce-anomalies at specific levels in the deposit [37]. The regular flooding observed in the lowlands of the Sanaga basin could be potentially responsible for these post-depositional changes. This can also be explained by a variation of depositional environment in time as revealed by the vertical color variation of the different layers of the deposits.
5.4. Provenance
Geochemical elements play a pivotal role in identifying sedimentary provenances as they faithfully reflect the compositions of source rocks [38,39]. Aluminum (Al) and titanium (Ti) oxides, being less fractionated during surface processes such as weathering, transport, and diagenesis, provide valuable insight into sediment provenances through Al2O3/TiO2 ratios [40]. These ratios increase progressively from mafic (Al2O3/TiO2 = 3–8; SiO2 = 45–52 wt%) to intermediate (Al2O3/TiO2 = 8–21; SiO2 = 53–66 wt%) and felsic (Al2O3/TiO2 = 21–70; SiO2 = 66–76 wt%) rocks [40]. In this study, Al2O3/TiO2 values range from 6 to 15 (average 10), accompanied by elevated SiO2 contents (51–77 wt% with an average of 65 wt%), indicative of felsic and intermediate sources. The discriminant plot, based on elemental contents, reveals that the samples from the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits fall into two mixed provenances-mafic and especially quartzose recycled areas (Fig. 9A). The K2O–Rb plot places the samples predominantly in the acid and intermediate source fields near the trend of differentiated magmatic suites (K2O/Rb = 230) (Fig. 9B). The Zr vs. TiO2 diagram also positions the deposits in two mixed provenances-intermediate and felsic igneous rocks (Fig. 9C). The influence of mafic and intermediate rocks may be attributed to the presence of small mafic rocks in the Sanaga basin, such as amphibolites and micaschists.
Fig. 9.
Bivariate plots for provenance of the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays: (A) Major element provenance discriminant plot [41]; (B): K2O vs Rb [42] with K/Rb ratio = 230 (main trend of Shaw [43]); (C) Zr vsTiO2 [51]; (D) Cr/V vs Y/Ni plot [13, 33].
The transportation, pre- and post-depositional weathering processes can alter the major element contents of the source rocks [44]. Sediments resulting from high post-depositional chemical weathering tend to concentrate residual stable minerals during surface processes [45,55]. Immobile trace elements associated with mafic (Co, Cr, Sc, and Ni) and felsic (La, Y, Th, Zr, and REE) sediment compositions prove to be effective tools in discerning the nature of the source rock [[45], [46], [47], [48]]. For fine sediments in this study, the contents in Th and Zr are high (synonym of zircon heavy mineral) just like the concentrations in Sc [55]. Elemental ratios such as Th/Sc, Ni/Co, and Zr/Sc exhibit high values (>1), while Cr/V, Y/Ni, and U/Th ratios display low values (<1). These ratios collectively suggest that the Sanaga valley alluvial clay deposits originate from felsic sources, a conclusion supported by the high LREE/HREE ratios and negative europium anomaly [38,55].
Furthermore, the Cr/Y vs. Y/Ni plot confirms the felsic sources, as indicated by their relatively low Cr/V values and high Y/Ni ratios (Fig. 9D). This aligns with the geological setting, which predominantly features felsic rocks in the Sanaga basin (Fig. 1). The regional geology serves as a crucial and reliable tool for discriminating source rocks in provenance studies [20]. Comparisons of sediment compositions with those of regional rocks place the data close to the compositions of gneiss, granite, and micaschist in the Th/Sc vs. Zr/Sc distribution diagram (Fig. 10), affirming the felsic source of the sediments with a contribution from mafic rocks, as indicated by other discriminant plots (Fig. 9).
Fig. 10.
Th/Sc–Zr/Sc plot for geochemical characterization of rock sources with (1) average upper continental crust (UCC, [52]), (2) micaschist, (3) gneiss, (4) granite [53] and (5) mylonite [54].
6. Conclusions
Based on the comprehensive analysis of mineralogical and geochemical data from the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays in the Sanaga valley deposits (Central Africa), the following key conclusions are drawn:
-
a.
The clayey alluvial sediments in the Nkoteng-Mbandjock areas predominantly consist of quartz, kaolinite, gibbsite, goethite/hematite, illite, and rutile;
-
b.
These sediments are the result of extensive weathering of felsic and mafic source rocks, exhibiting a composition akin to shale, Fe-shale, and wacke;
-
c.
The sediments are classified as immature, and suggest a depositional environment of recycled inputs in stable settings under oxic conditions;
-
d.
Post-depositional activities have led to modifications in the oxidizing conditions at certain levels in the deposit, reflecting dynamic environmental influences over time.
These conclusions provide valuable insights into the geological history and environmental conditions that shaped the Nkoteng-Mbandjock alluvial clays in the Sanaga valley, contributing to our understanding of sediment weathering, provenance and depositional processes in this region of Central Africa.
Data availability statement
Data obtained during the study are included in the manuscript.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Elisé Sababa: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Natanael Tehna: Writing – original draft, Formal analysis. Beyanu Anehumbu Aye: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Funding acquisition. Morine-Majolie Manfotang Chiozem: Writing – original draft, Data curation. Armel Zacharie Ekoa Bessa: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Methodology, Data curation, Conceptualization. Ehbeudeu Kanewene: Writing – original draft, Methodology. Njilah Isaac Konfor: Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Conceptualization.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Mr Tchop Joseph Legrang for field work facilities and Mrs Njimanu Njong Vanisa for English editing. We are also grateful to the Editor and two anonymous reviewers for improving the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Tian D.Z., Leng B.C., Zhang X.C. Provenance and tectonic setting of the Neoproterozoic meta-sedimentary rocks at southeastern Tibetan Plateau: implications for the tectonic affinity of Yidun terrane. Precambrian Res. 2020;344 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huyan Y., Yao W., Xie X., Wang L. Provenance, source weathering, and tectonics of the Yarlung Zangbo River overbank sediments in Tibetan Plateau, China, using major, trace, and rare earth elements. Geol. J. 2021;57:37–51. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Mbog M.B., Ngon Ngon G.F., Tassongwa B., Tehna N., Lotse Tedontsah V.P., Etame J. Clay deposits of Ngoma (Douala sedimentary subbasin Cameroon, Central Africa): a provenance study. Arab. J. Geosci. 2022;15:1122. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lupker M., France-Lanord C., Galy V., Lave J., Gaillardet J., Gajurel A.P.…Sinha R. Predominant floodplain over mountain weathering of Himalayan sediments (Ganga Basin) Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2012;84:410–432. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Su N., Yang S.Y., Guo Y.L., Yue W., Wang X.D., Yin P., Huang X.T. Revisit of rare earth element fractionation during chemical weathering and river sediment transport. Geochem. Geophys. 2017;18:935–955. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Guo Y.L., Yang S.Y., Su N., Li C., Yin P., Wang Z.B. Revisiting the effects of hydrodynamic sorting and sedimentary recycling on chemical weathering indices. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2018;227:63–83. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lenard S.J.P., Lavé J., Lanord C.F., Aumaître G., Didier L., Bourlès D.L., Keddadouche K. Steady erosion rates in the Himalayas through late Cenozoic climatic changes. Nat. Geosci. 2020;13:448–452. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sonfack A.N., Ngueutchoua G., Kontvhipe Y.S.N., Sopie F.T., Nkouathio D.G., Wouatong A.S.L.…Njanko T. Mineralogical and geochemical signatures of surface stream sediments from Dibamba River basin, SW Cameroon: implications for provenance, weathering, and tectonic setting. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 2021;181 [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ndjigui P.-D., Ebah Abeng S.A., Ekomane E., Nzeukou N.A., Ngo Mandeng F.S., Lindjeck M.M. Mineralogy and geochemistry of spseudogley soils and recent alluvial clastic sediments in the Ngog-Lituba region, Southern Cameroon: an implication to their genesis. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 2015;108:1–14. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Picard M.D. Classification of fine-grained sedimentary rocks. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1971;41:179–195. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Herron M.M. Geochemical classification of terrigenous sands and shales from core or log data. J. Sediment. Petrol. 1988;58:820–829. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Garzanti E., Wang J.G., Vezzoli G., Limonta M. Tracing provenance and sediment flfluxes in the Irrawaddy River basin (Myanmar) Chem. Geol. 2016;440:73–90. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hossain H.M.Z., Kawahata H., Roser B.P., Sampei Y., Manaka T., Otani S. Geochemical characteristics of modern river sediments in Myanmar and Thailand: implications for provenance and weathering. Chemistry. 2017;77:443–458. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Suchel J.B. Les climats du Cameroun. Thèse de doctorat d’état. Université Bordeaux. 1987;III. 4:1186. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ségalen P.M.D. ORSTOM; 1966. Notice explicative. Carte pédologique du Cameroun oriental au 1/1000000. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Toteu S.F., Van Schmus W.R., Penaye J., Michard A. New U-Pb and Sm-Nd data from north-central Cameroon and its bearing on the pre-Pan African history of central Africa. Precambrian Res. 2001;108:45–73. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Nzenti J.P., Barbey P., Macaudiere J., Soba D. Origin and evolution of late Precambrian high-grade Yaounde gneisses (Cameroon) Precambrian Res. 1988;32:91–109. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Singer J.K., Anderson J.B., Ledbetter M.T., McCave L.N., Jones K.P.N., Wright R. An assessment of analytical techniques for the size analysis of fine-grained sediments. J. Sedim. Petrol. 1988;58(3):534–543. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sababa E., Essomba Owona L.G., Temga J.P., Ndjigui P.-D. Petrology of weathering materials developed on granites in Biou area, North-Cameroon: implication for rare-earth elements (REE) exploration in semi-arid regions. Heliyon. 2021;7 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sababa E., Mbesse C.O., Wandji Mouko C.N., Ekoa Bessa A.Z., Ndjigui P.-D. Geochemistry of stream sediments from Eséka area (SW Cameroon): implications for surface process assessment and precious metals (Au, Pd, and Pt) exploration. J. Sediment. Environ. 2022;7:43–66. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Nesbitt H.W., Young G.M. Early Proterozoic climates and plate motions inferred from major element chemistry of lutites. Nature. 1982;279:715–717. [Google Scholar]
- 22.McLennan S.M. Weathering and global denudation. J. Geol. 1993;101:295–303. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bhaskar J.S., Satya R.G., Borthakur R., Indu B.R., Rashmi R.B. Spectroscopic characterization and quantitative estimation of natural weathering of silicates in sediments of Dikrong River, India. J. Modern Phys. 2015;6:1631–1641. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fedo C.M., Nesbitt H.W., Young G.M. Unraveling the effect of potassium metasomatism in sedimentary rocks and paleosols, with implications for paleoweathering conditions and provenance. Geology. 1995;23:921–924. [Google Scholar]
- 25.De Baar H.J.W., German C.R., Elderfield H., Van Gaans P. Rare earth element distributions in anoxic waters of the Cariaco Trench. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1988;52:1203–1219. [Google Scholar]
- 26.German C.R., Elderfield H. Application of the Ce anomaly as a paleoredox indicator: the ground rules. Paleoceanography. 1989;5:823–833. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bau M. Rare-earth element mobility during hydrothermal and metamorphic fluid– rock interaction and the significance of the oxidation state of europium. Chem. Geol. 1991;93:219–230. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Pourmand A., Dauphas N., Ireland T.J. A novel extraction chromatography and MC-ICP-MS technique for rapid analysis of REE, Sc and Y: Revising CI-chondrite and Post-Archean Australian Shale (PAAS) abundances. Chem. Geol. 2012;291:38–54. [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hossain H.M.Z., Roser B.P., Kimura J.I. Petrography and whole-rock geochemistry of the Tertiary Sylhet succession, northeastern Bengal Basin, Bangladesh: provenance and source area weathering. Sediment. Geol. 2010;228:171–183. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Roser B.P., Cooper R.A., Nathan S., Tulloch A.J. Reconnaissance sandstone geochemistry, provenance and tectonic setting of the lower Paleozoic terranes of the West Coast and Nelson, New Zealand. New Zealand. J. Geol. Geophys. 1996;39:1–16. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cullers R.L., Podkovyrov V.N. Geochemistry of the Mesoproterozoic Lakhanda shales in southeastern Yakutia, Russia: implications for mineralogical and provenance control, and recycling. Precambrian Res. 2000;104:77–93. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kessoum Adamou J.-M., Noa Tang S.D., Sababa E., Onana V.L. Weathering profiles developed on gneisses from Batchenga and Doua areas, central Cameroon: climate and topography controls. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 2021;184 [Google Scholar]
- 33.McLennan S.M., Hemming S., McDaniel D.K., Hanson G.N. Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics. Geology. 1993;284:21–40. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Jones B., Manning D.C. Comparison of geochemical indices used for the interpretation of paleo-redox conditions in ancient mudstones. Chem. Geol. 1994;111:111–129. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Armstrong-Altrin J.S., Machain-Castillo M.L., Rosales-Hoz L., Carranza-Edwards A., Sanchez-Cabeza J.A., Ruíz-Fernandez A.C. Provenance and depositional history of continental slope sediments in the Southwestern Gulf of Mexico unraveled by geochemical analysis, Continent. Shelf Res. 2015;95:15–26. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Braun J.J., Pagel M., Muller J.P., Bilong P., Michard A., Guillet B. Cerium anomalies in lateritic profiles. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 1990;51:597–605. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bourman R.P., Ollier C.D. A critique of the Schellmann definition and classification of ‘laterite’. Catena. 2002;47:117–131. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cullers R.L., Barrett T., Carlson R., Robinson B. Rare-earth element and mineralogic changes in Holocene soil and stream sediment: A case study in the Wet Mountains, Colorado, U.S.A. Chem. Geol. 1987;63:275–297. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Jafarzadeh M., Harami R.M., Friis H., Amini A., Mahboubi A., Lenaz D. Provenance of the Oligocene-Miocene Zivah Formation, NW Iran, assessed using heavy mineral assemblage and detrital clinopyroxene and detrital apatite analyses. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 2014;89:56–71. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Nagarajan R., Armstrong-Altrin J.S., Kessler F.L., Hidalgo-Moral E.L., Dodge-Wan D., Taib N.I. Provenance and tectonic setting of Miocene siliciclastic sediments, Sibuti Formation, northwestern Borneo. Arab. J. Geosci. 2015;8(10):8549–8565. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Roser B.P., Korsch R.J. Provenance signatures of sandstone-mudstone suites determined using discriminant function analysis of major-element data. Chem. Geol. 1988;67:119–139. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Floyd P.A., Leveridge B.E. Tectonic environments of the Devonian Gramscatho basin, south Cornwall: Framework mode and geochemical evidence from turbidite sandstones. J. Geol. Soc. London. 1987;144:531–542. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Shaw D.M. A review of K-Rb fractionation trends by covariance analysis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1968;32:573–602. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Nesbitt H.W., Young G.M. Prediction of some weathering trends of plutonic and volcanic rocks based on thermodynamic and kinetic considerations. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1984;48:1523–1534. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Mbanga Nyobe J., Sababa E., Bayiga E.C., Ndjigui P.-D. Geochemistry and provenance of rutile-bearing fine-grained sediments in the Lobo watershed from the Neoproterozoic Pan-African belt, Southern Cameroon. CR Geoscience. 2018;350:119–129. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Armstrong-Altrin J.S., Lee Y.I., Verma S.P., Ramasamy S. Geochemistry of sandstones from the upper Miocene Kudankulam formation, southern India: Implications for provenance, weathering, and tectonic setting. J. Sediment. Res. 2004;74(2):285–297. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bracciali L., Marroni M., Pandolfi L., Rocchi S., Arribas J., Critelli S., Johnsson M.J. vol. 420. Special Papers-Geological Society of America; 2007. p. 73. (Geochemistry and Petrography of Western Tethys Cretaceous Sedimentary Covers (Corsica and Northern Apennines): from Source Areas to Configuration of Margins). [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bolarinwa A.T., Idakwo S.O., Bish D.L. Rare-earth and trace elements and hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions of Cretaceous kaolinitic sediments from the Lower Benue Trough, Nigeria: Provenance and paleoclimatic significance. Acta Geochim. 2019;38(3):350–363. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Garrels R.M., Christ C.L. Harper and Row; New York: 1965. Solutions, Minerals, and Equilibria. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Long X.P., Yuan C., Sun M., Xiao W.J., Wang Y.J., Cai K.D., Jiang Y.D. Geochemistry and Nd isotopic composition of the Early Paleozoic flysch sequence in the Chinese Altai, Central Asia: Evidence for a northward-derived mafic source and insight into Nd model ages in accretionary orogen. Gondwana Res. 2012;22:554–566. [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hayashi K., Fujisawa H., Holland H.D., Ohmoto H. Geochemistry of 1.9 Ga sedimentary rocks from northeastern Labrador, Canada. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1997;61:4115–4137. doi: 10.1016/s0016-7037(97)00214-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gaschnig R.M., Rudnick R.L., McDonough W.F., Kaufman A.J., Valley J., Hu Z., Gao S., Beck M.L. Compositional evolution of the upper continental crust through time, as constrained by ancient glacial diamictites. Geochem. Cosmochim. Acta. 2016;186:316–343. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Tchaptchet T.W., Tematio P., Guimapi T.N., Happi E., Tiomo I., Momo N.M. Geological Society, London, Special Publications; 2020. Morphological, Mineral and Geochemical Characterization of Soil Profiles in Meïganga as Tools for Rock Weathering Intensity and Trend Evaluation and Residual Ore Deposit Prospection in the Mineralized Domain of Central Cameroon; p. 502. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Happi F.D., Tematio P., Tiomo I.F., Tsabze Guimapi N., Tchaptchet Tchaptchet C.W., Nguemezi C. Evolution of weathering products over mylonites of the Lom series at Kissi (Bétaré-Oya Gold District, East-Cameroon): Morphological, mineralogical and geochemical mechanisms for trace and rare earth elements enrichment. J. Afr. Earth Sc. 2023;208 [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cox R., Lowe D.R., Cullers R.L. The influence of sediment recycling and basement composition on evolution of mudrock chemistry in the southwestern United States. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 1995;59:2919–2940. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Moussango I.A.P., Mvondo Owono F., Njom B.S.P., Mbog Bassong J.P., Sep Nlomngan, Owona S., Ekodeck G.E. Sanaga fault: evidence of Neotectonics and Landscape Evolution in Edéa Region (Cameroon, Centre-Africa) J. Geogr. Geol. 2018;10(3):57–79. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Data obtained during the study are included in the manuscript.










