Abstract

The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is important for alternative energy and industrial oxidation processes. Herein, an iminium-based organoelectrocatalyst (im+) for the ORR with trifluoroacetic acid as a proton source in acetonitrile solution under both electrochemical and spectrochemical conditions using decamethylferrocene as a chemical reductant is reported. Under spectrochemical conditions, H2O2 is the primary reaction product, while under electrochemical conditions H2O is produced. This difference in selectivity is attributed to the interception of the free superoxide intermediate under electrochemical conditions by the reduced catalyst, accessing an alternate inner-sphere pathway.
The increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration has had detrimental impacts on our environment and creates a drastic need for alternative energy processes. The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is important in fuel cells and alternative energy devices such as zinc-air batteries, in addition to a green alternative for H2O2 production.1,2 Researchers have focused on open-shell transition-metal complexes as catalysts for this reaction due to their often facile reactivity with the triplet ground state of dioxygen (O2). There has also been some advancement in the development of carbon-based catalysts for the ORR.2−8 Comparatively, the use of homogeneous organic molecules for catalytic ORR has been less widely studied since reduced oxygen species (ROSs) formed as intermediates (e.g., superoxide O2•–) can degrade organic molecules.
In 2020, Karimi et al. reported the ORR activity of carbenium dications using decamethylferrocene (Cp*2Fe) as a chemical reductant with methanesulfonic acid as a proton source (Figure 1).9 The reduced carbene radicals were found to rapidly react via an inner-sphere mechanism to form an intermediate peroxide, which is protonated to release H2O2. Recently, Tanjedrew et al.reported imidazole-benzimidazole electrocatalysts for ORR under aqueous conditions.10 They proposed that O2 binds to the reduced catalyst to form a superoxide species, which is further reduced and protonated to produce H2O2. Homogeneous organic species have also been shown to be active for the outer-sphere reduction of O2, with free O2•– as an intermediate. Electrocatalytic ORR by an outer-sphere mechanism was first reported in 1985 by Andrieux et al. using methylviologen to generate H2O2 in acidic dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO).11 Outer-sphere electron transfer to generate O2•– was followed by protonation to HO2•, which was subsequently reduced by the regenerated methyl viologen monocation to HO2– and then protonated to form H2O2. Following this, a 1993 study by Audebert and Hapiot found that substituted 9-(4-X-phenyl)-N-methylacridinium salts in acidic DMSO also effectively reduce O2 to H2O2 via an analogous mechanism.12
Figure 1.

Summary of previously reported organic-based catalysts for the ORR and the catalyst (im+) described here.
Previously, 3,4-dihydro-2,4,4-trimethyl-1-(trifluoromethyl)isoquinolinium tetrafluoroborate (im+, Figure 1) was reported to be a hydroxylation catalyst with H2O2 as an oxidant.13,14 It was hypothesized that this iminium could mediate outer-sphere O2 reduction similar to related organic cations and that its intrinsic stability to H2O2 would be beneficial to catalyst stability.15 Catalytic and mechanistic experiments reveal that the iminium salt is an efficient catalyst for ORR to H2O and H2O2 in acetonitrile (MeCN) with trifluoroacetic acid (TFAH) as the proton source. Under spectrochemical conditions with Cp*2Fe as a chemical reductant in solution, O2 is quantitatively reduced via an outer-sphere mechanism to H2O2. Under electrochemical conditions, O2•– is intercepted by the reduced iminium in solution, accessing an inner-sphere mechanism to quantitatively produce H2O. The difference in selectivity is proposed to be regulated by the simultaneous availability of O2•– and the reduced iminium in higher concentrations in the reaction-diffusion layer.
Im+ was analyzed by cyclic voltammetry (CV) with tetrabutylammonium hexafluorophosphate (TBAPF6) as the supporting electrolyte in MeCN (Figure 2). Under Ar saturation conditions, there is a diffusion-limited irreversible reduction feature, which is attributed to the reduction of the iminium to a carbon-based radical species (im0, see below) at Ep = −0.82 V vs Fc+/Fc. Due to irreversibility at scan rates below 2 V/s, the E1/2 was estimated to be −0.77 V vs Fc+/Fc by taking the first derivative of the current density (Figures S1 & S5).16 This irreversible feature is consistent with a radical–radical dimerization (RRD) mechanism occurring between two equivalents of im0, as evidenced by an evaluation of peak potential dependence on both scan rate and concentration (Figures S1 & S2).17 Upon saturation of the solution with O2, there is an observed 150 mV positive potential shift of the irreversible reduction feature to Ep = −0.67 V vs Fc+/Fc, suggestive of a strong binding interaction. Interestingly, variable concentration and scan rate studies suggested a shift to a radical-substrate dimerization (RSD) mechanism, based on the observed dependence of Ep on scan rate and concentration under these conditions (Figures S3 & S4). This observation is proposed to correlate to a favorable interaction between im0 and O2•– at reducing potentials.17 Addition of TFAH (pKa(MeCN) = 12.65)18 as a proton source under Ar saturation conditions resulted in an increase in current (Figures 2 & S5); the dependence of Ep on scan rate and concentration suggests an RSD mechanism, implying that a reaction with TFAH precedes the dimerization of the im0 radical (Figures S6 & S7). However, under O2 saturation in the presence of TFAH, a large increase in current density is again observed 150 mV positive of the Faradaic response, consistent with catalytic O2 reduction, implying that dimerization is not relevant under these conditions. A CV rinse test and control experiments demonstrated that the observed catalytic response of im+ is homogeneous (Figure S8).
Figure 2.

CVs of im+ under Ar and O2 saturation conditions with and without acid. Conditions: 1.3 mM im+, 0.1 M TBAPF6/MeCN; glassy carbon working electrode, glassy carbon counter electrode, Ag/AgCl pseudoreference electrode; 100 mV/s scan rate.
Independently varying the concentrations of im+, O2 and TFAH revealed a first-order concentration dependence on im+, O2, and TFAH in the current response (eq 1, Figures S9–S11). As the concentration of im+ decreases, there is an observed negative potential shift (Figure S9), which conforms to the behavior expected for an outer-sphere electron transfer followed by rapid catalytic reaction steps.11 As the concentration of O2 decreases, a decrease in the catalytic wave at Ep = −0.67 V vs Fc+/Fc is observed, as well as the recovery of the im+/im0 redox feature at Ep = −0.82 V vs Fc+/Fc. The reappearance of the intrinsic redox feature suggests the system is operating under total catalysis conditions, where O2 is rapidly consumed within the reaction-diffusion layer and excess im+ is available for reduction at more negative potentials. The recovery of the Faradaic redox response has also been observed for ORR mediated by methyl viologen and phenylacridinium salts, which are proposed to have an outer-sphere mechanism.11,12
| 1 |
Rotating ring-disk electrode (RRDE) methods with a glassy carbon disk and roughened gold ring19 were used to determine the selectivity of ORR by im+ under electrochemical conditions. Under air saturation, this system was found to be 92.6 ± 1.3% selective for H2O (see Supporting Information, Figures S14–S16). Control CV studies with added urea·H2O2 showed a slight decrease in current density (Figures S12 & S13) under Ar saturation conditions without a shift to positive potentials, which suggests a relatively slower reaction between im0 and H2O2. Consistent with this, under O2 saturation the catalytic current density is recovered, as is the shift to more positive potentials, confirming that im0 preferably reacts with O2 over H2O2.
Catalytic ORR activity of im+ was then studied by stopped-flow UV–vis methods using Cp*2Fe as a chemical reductant and TFAH as the proton source. The growth of the spectral handle of [Cp*2Fe]+ at 780 nm was monitored to extract the kinetic parameters for the reaction (Figure 3). The rate law under these conditions (eq 2) was determined by independently varying the concentration of im+, TFAH, O2, and Cp*2Fe (Figures S18–S21). These studies revealed that ORR shows a first-order concentration dependence on [im+] and is independent of TFAH, O2, and Cp*2Fe concentration, indicative of saturation kinetics at low catalyst concentration (4 μM). A Ti(O)SO4 colorimetric assay was used to determine the selectivity of ORR by im+ under spectrochemical conditions, finding that this system is 102 ± 8.4% selective for H2O2 (ncat = 2; Figure S22), in contrast to the electrochemical studies. Additional control testing showed no degradation of H2O2 by disproportionation or catalytic H2O2 reduction with Cp*2Fe as the reductant (Figures S23 & S24). Therefore, based on the apparent rate law, the slope of variable [im+] studies (Figure S18) could be used to estimate an apparent TOF of 6.66 × 103 s–1.
| 2 |
Figure 3.

Formation of [Cp*2Fe]+ at 780 nm from the ORR catalyzed by im+ (red trace) and control (black trace). Concentrations: im+ = 4 μM, TFAH = 25 mM, O2 = 4.05 mM, Cp*2Fe = 1 mM; control: no im+.
To evaluate the thermodynamics of the reaction, computational studies of likely intermediates during O2 reduction were undertaken (see Supporting Information). Evaluation of spin density showed that the radical character of im0 is localized on the imine C atom with some electron density shared by the N atom (Figure S25). Positioning the neutral radical and O2 within a sufficient radius for a covalent interaction did not result in bond formation; however, electron transfer between the two occurred resulting in the formation of superoxide O2•– and im+, although free energy of the reaction was endergonic overall (+8.8 kcal/mol). In the presence of TFAH (and considering the exergonicity of homoconjugation between TFAH and trifluoroacetate), the formation of protonated superoxide HO2• is favorable by −33.2 kcal/mol. Subsequent disproportionation of two equiv of HO2• to form O2 and H2O2 is comparably favorable at −33.1 kcal/mol. The reduction potential of HO2• is estimated to be 0.58 V negative of the im+/0 couple, excluding outer-sphere reduction.
Since the minimal electrocatalytic current observed with H2O2 in comparison to that with O2 and im+ was not observed to reduce H2O2 under spectrochemical conditions (Figure S24), subsequent calculations focused on alternative pathways to produce water. The reaction between 1 equiv of im0 and O2•– to produce a monoanionic C-bound end-on peroxide species is exergonic by −21.7 kcal/mol. Protonation by TFAH to generate a neutral hydroperoxide is further downhill by −42.0 kcal/mol, considering homoconjugation. The alternative generation of this intermediate by the reaction of im0 and HO2• is favorable by −30.6 kcal/mol.
Protonation of the hydroperoxide to generate an oxaziridinium with water coproduct is downhill by an additional −18.2 kcal/mol. The reduction potential of the oxaziridinium is calculated to be approximately 0.21 V more negative than im+/0; however, subsequent protonation to produce a cationic C–OH is favorable by −49.0 kcal/mol. Given the rate of catalysis observed electrochemically, it is probable that these steps occur as a single-proton-coupled electron transfer step, which would be favored overall by −44.2 kcal/mol (+1.92 V vs Fc+/Fc). Reduction of this cationic species is expected to be facile, with a calculated reduction potential of +1.34 V versus Fc+/0 (Figure S26). The protonation of the resultant neutral C–OH group to generate water and reform im+ is then favorable, with an estimated free energy change of −10.4 kcal/mol.
Based on electrochemical, spectrochemical, and computation analyses, separate cycles for the reduction of dioxygen by im+ under electrochemical and spectrochemical conditions can be proposed (Scheme 1). Starting at i, an electron transfer to form carbon-centered radical species, ii, which reacts with O2 to reform i and an equivalent of O2•–. The product O2•– is then protonated by TFAH to form two equivalents of HO2•, which favorably disproportionate to one equiv each of O2 and H2O2.20 Under spectroscopic conditions, the catalytic cycle closes here, as supported by the observed quantitative selectivity for H2O2 (Figures S22 & S27). Under electrochemical conditions, control experiments show that reactivity with H2O2 is slow relative to that with O2, suggesting that these conditions have a divergent mechanistic pathway. Instead, it is proposed that under electrochemical conditions, the neutral radical ii is available in sufficient concentrations in the reaction-diffusion layer to bind available O2•–, which is supported by the RSD pathway observed in electrochemical studies (Figures S3 & S4). Based on these data and the empirically determined rate law, it is likely that species iv represents the resting state of the catalytic cycle, with the protonation reaction to generate v representing the rate-determining step (Figure S28).
Scheme 1. Proposed Catalytic Cycle for ORR by im+.

The change in accessible pathways can then be ascribed to the concentration differences under each reaction condition. The reaction-diffusion layer during electrochemical experiments is likely to contain both an excess of im0 because of rapid consumption of O2 and suitable concentrations of superoxide from rapid outer-sphere reduction. Comparatively, under spectrochemical conditions, the relative concentrations of im0 and O2•– are significantly more dilute, allowing thermodynamically viable disproportionation pathways to generate H2O2. Outer-sphere reduction of HO2• by im0 is excluded based on the difference in calculated reduction potentials.
Here, catalytic ORR conditions for H2O or H2O2 production with an iminium-based catalyst have been reported. The difference in accessible reaction pathways under electrochemical and spectrochemical conditions, where the primary product shifts from H2O to H2O2, respectively, is the result of the relative available concentrations of the key im0 and O2•– intermediates available under the respective reaction conditions. Since catalysis is initiated by an outer-sphere electron transfer, the O2/O2•– reduction potential of −1.29 vs Fc+/Fc in MeCN defines the overall ORR reaction mediated by im+.21 However, the favorable pre-equilibrium reaction between im0 and O2•– causes a positive potential shift from this redox couple, indicating that further optimization of the operating potential could be possible.22 The work described here reports a novel mechanism whereby the electrocatalytic reduction of O2 occurs via both an inner-sphere and outer-sphere mechanism, resulting in product selectivity being controlled by the nature of electron delivery. Given that there are few known organoelectrocatalysts for the ORR,23 mechanistic understanding will enable the development of additional examples as well as inform the development of new classes of doped carbons as heterogeneous catalysts.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the University of Virginia for infrastructural support. E.N.C. and C.W.M. acknowledge NSF CHE-2102156 for financial support; A.E.D. and M.K.H. acknowledge NSF CAREER 1845219 for financial support. E.N.C. acknowledges the Jefferson Scholars Foundation for support from a Jefferson Arts and Sciences Dissertation Year Fellowship.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.3c14549.
Author Contributions
All authors have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Campos-Martin J. M.; Blanco-Brieva G.; Fierro J. L. G. Hydrogen peroxide synthesis: An outlook beyond the anthraquinone process. Angewandte Chemie - International Edition 2006, 45 (42), 6962–6984. 10.1002/anie.200503779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pegis M. L.; Wise C. F.; Martin D. J.; Mayer J. M. Oxygen Reduction by Homogeneous Molecular Catalysts and Electrocatalysts. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (5), 2340–2391. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dai L.; Xue Y.; Qu L.; Choi H.-J.; Baek J.-B. Metal-Free Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (11), 4823–4892. 10.1021/cr5003563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhai Q.; Pan Y.; Dai L. Carbon-Based Metal-Free Electrocatalysts: Past, Present, and Future. Accounts of Materials Research 2021, 2 (12), 1239–1250. 10.1021/accountsmr.1c00190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Trojánek A.; Langmaier J.; Šebera J.; Záliš S.; Barbe J.-M.; Girault H. H.; Samec Z. Fine tuning of the catalytic effect of a metal-free porphyrin on the homogeneous oxygenreduction. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47 (19), 5446–5448. 10.1039/C1CC11075F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Payattikul L.; Chen C.-Y.; Chen Y.-S.; Raja Pugalenthi M.; Punyawudho K. Recent Advances and Synergistic Effects of Non-Precious Carbon-Based Nanomaterials as ORR Electrocatalysts: A Review. Molecules 2023, 28, 7751. 10.3390/molecules28237751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huang X.; Shen T.; Sun S.; Hou Y. Synergistic Modulation of Carbon-Based, Precious-Metal-Free Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (6), 6989–7003. 10.1021/acsami.0c19922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ma R.; Lin G.; Zhou Y.; Liu Q.; Zhang T.; Shan G.; Yang M.; Wang J. A review of oxygen reduction mechanisms for metal-free carbon-based electrocatalysts. npj Computational Materials 2019, 5 (1), 78. 10.1038/s41524-019-0210-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Karimi M.; Borthakur R.; Dorsey C. L.; Chen C.-H.; Lajeune S.; Gabbaï F. P. Bifunctional Carbenium Dications as Metal-Free Catalysts for the Reduction of Oxygen. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142 (32), 13651–13656. 10.1021/jacs.0c04841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tanjedrew N.; Thammanatpong K.; Surawatanawong P.; Chakthranont P.; Chantarojsiri T.; Unjarern T.; Kiatisevi S. Tunable Metal-free Imidazole-Benzimidazole Electrocatalysts for Oxygen Reduction in Aqueous Solutions. Chem.-Eur. J. 2024, 30 (5), e202302854 10.1002/chem.202302854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrieux C. P.; Hapiot P.; Sa Véant J. M. Electron transfer coupling of diffusional pathways. Homogeneous redox catalysis of dioxygen reduction by the methylviologen cation radical in acidic dimethylsulfoxide. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry 1985, 189 (1), 121–133. 10.1016/0368-1874(85)85630-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Audebert P.; Hapiot P. Preparation and electrochemistry of several substituted 9-(4-R-phenyl)-N-methylacridinium salts.: Kinetic analysis of the O2 catalytic reduction in acidic dimethylsulfoxide and in hydrophobic Nafion® gels. J. Electroanal. Chem. 1993, 361 (1), 177–183. 10.1016/0022-0728(93)87052-W. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang D.; Shuler W. G.; Pierce C. J.; Hilinski M. K. An Iminium Salt Organocatalyst for Selective Aliphatic C-H Hydroxylation. Org. Lett. 2016, 18 (15), 3826–3829. 10.1021/acs.orglett.6b01832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dyer R. M. B.; Hahn P. L.; Hilinski M. K. Selective Heteroaryl N-Oxidation of Amine-Containing Molecules. Org. Lett. 2018, 20 (7), 2011–2014. 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b00558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang R.; Okajima T.; Kitamura F.; Kawauchi S.; Matsumoto N.; Thiemann T.; Mataka S.; Ohsaka T. Catalytic Reduction of O2 by Pyrazine Derivatives. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108 (11), 1891–1899. 10.1021/jp036024k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Espinoza E. M.; Clark J. A.; Soliman J.; Derr J. B.; Morales M.; Vullev V. I. Practical Aspects of Cyclic Voltammetry: How to Estimate Reduction Potentials When Irreversibility Prevails. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166 (5), H3175. 10.1149/2.0241905jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Costentin C.; Savéant J.-M. Coupling of Electrode Electron Transfers with Homogeneous Chemical Reactions. Elements of Molecular and Biomolecular Electrochemistry 2019, 81–181. 10.1002/9781119292364.ch2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- McCarthy B. D.; Martin D. J.; Rountree E. S.; Ullman A. C.; Dempsey J. L. Electrochemical reduction of brønsted acids by glassy carbon in acetonitrile-implications for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53 (16), 8350–8361. 10.1021/ic500770k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harraz D. M.; Weng S.; Surendranath Y. Electrochemically Quantifying Oxygen Reduction Selectivity in Nonaqueous Electrolytes. ACS Catal. 2023, 13 (2), 1462–1469. 10.1021/acscatal.2c04564. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Savéant J.-M. Molecular Catalysis of Electrochemical Reactions. Mechanistic Aspects. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108 (7), 2348–2378. 10.1021/cr068079z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Singh P. S.; Evans D. H. Study of the Electrochemical Reduction of Dioxygen in Acetonitrile in the Presence of Weak Acids. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110 (1), 637–644. 10.1021/jp055296f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pattanayak S.; Berben L. A. Pre-Equilibrium Reaction Mechanism as a Strategy to Enhance Rate and Lower Overpotential in Electrocatalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023, 145 (6), 3419–3426. 10.1021/jacs.2c10942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murray A. T.; Voskian S.; Schreier M.; Hatton T. A.; Surendranath Y. Electrosynthesis of Hydrogen Peroxide by Phase-Transfer Catalysis. Joule 2019, 3, 2942–2954. 10.1016/j.joule.2019.09.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
