Abstract

CO2 evolution is one of the urgent global issues; meanwhile, understanding of sorptive/dynamic behavior is crucial to create next-generation encapsulant materials with stable sorbent processes. Herein, we showcase molecular CO2 storage constructed by a [60]fullerenol nanopocket. The CO2 density reaches 2.401 g/cm3 within the nanopore, showing strong intramolecular interactions, which induce nanoconfinement effects such as forbidden translation, restricted rotation, and perturbed vibration of CO2. We also disclosed an equation of state for a molecular CO2 gas, revealing a very low pressure of 3.14 rPa (1 rPa = 10–27 Pa) generated by the rotation/vibration at 300 K. Curiously enough, the CO2 capture enabled to modulate an external property of the encapulant material itself, i.e., association of the [60]fullerenol via intercage hydrogen-bonding.
Keywords: carbon dioxide, nanocarbon, single molecule, supramolecular assembly, open-[60]fullerene
Solid sorbent systems for CO2 capture/storage have been recognized as viable generators of a recyclable carbon source to tackle the global issue that plenty of CO2 has been continuously emitted and accumulated in the course of industrial and biological processes.1 As solid sorbents, porous materials such as zeolite,2 mesoporous silica,3 and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)4 have been developed in materials science, targeting efficient/selective capture and facile release of CO2 with a low energy cost. Within the sorbents, CO2 is captured by chemisorption and/or physisorption where CO2 is converted into carbamate species by a surface-functionalized interior for the former, while, in the latter case, it binds to Lewis acidic/basic sites such as metal centers and/or active ligands via weak intermolecular interactions.5
High polarizability and quadrupolar characteristics of CO2, however, cause a labyrinth of a physical picture on sorptive/dynamic behavior through a mixed interplay of dispersion forces and electrostatic interactions.6 In addition, at higher CO2 coverages, it undergoes dimerization and/or a change in coordinates from linear to bent within pores.7 These multiple factors interfere with each other, thus severely reducing opportunities to gain definitive mechanistic insights into chemisorption/physisorption as well as the physical nature of the confined CO2 gas, both of which have been poorly understood on a molecular scale.8 Hence, molecular CO2 storage that could experimentally model simple interior sorption is highly demanded for further designing pore functionalities of encapsulant materials. Herein, we focus on open-[60]fullerenols9 (Figure 1), which are suitable for exploiting the nanoconfinement effect of captured species such as the acid/base character of gaseous H2O10 and paramagnetism of NO.11 In this paper, we examined the sorptive/dynamic behavior and equation of state for a single molecule of CO2 gas as well as the nanoconfinement effect on its vibrational behavior. We also discuss a remote property modulation of the [60]fullerene container, which is caused by the internal CO2 molecule.
Figure 1.
[60]fullerene-based molecular CO2 storage.
Precursor host 1 contains water, nitrogen, and argon owing to a spontaneous encapsulation.12 To gain a reasonable occupancy of CO2 by emitting the precaptured species, CO2 insertion was performed in o-dichlorobenzene (ODCB) at 130 °C under 9000 atm (Figure 2a), while CO2 could pass through the orifice even under ambient conditions. The occupancy was determined to be >90% from a signal splitting of the addends by 1H NMR. After removing CO2 dissolved in ODCB by Ar bubbling at −10 °C, the Luche reduction was applied to afford CO2@213 and CO2@3 (Figure 2b). The occupancy for CO2@3 was enriched to be 100% from 86% by recycle HPLC. The presence of captured CO2 was confirmed by 13C NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3/CS2 (1:1)) showing its signal at δ 112.63 ppm, which was higher-field shielded, by Δδ −11.97 ppm, from free CO2 (δ 124.60 ppm), owing to the [60]fullerene aromaticity14 (Figure 2c). The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis at 100 K revealed a dimeric configuration of CO2@3 structured by multiple hydrogen bondings arranged in a chair-like shape (Figure 2d), being reminiscent of fullertubes.15 Within the crystal, the two CO2 molecules are precisely separated with a distance of 11.892(7) Å on a shared axis. Captured CO2 most likely interacts with the [60]fullerenol upon seeing close contacts with the carbon wall. The amount of adsorbed CO2 in crystal (Figure 1) was estimated to be 0.247 cm3/cm3 (1 atm, 25 °C), which is smaller than those for MOFs (90–200 cm3/cm3).16 However, the CO2 density in nanopore (ρ) is as large as 2.401 g/cm3, which exceeds the highest value reported among MOFs (0.955 g/cm3)16 and is 2-fold larger than that of liquid CO2 (1.178 g/cm3 at the triple point17), indicating a dense packing of molecular CO2 within the nanocavity. The crowded arrangement of the three hydroxy groups renders a pore volume (V = 30.4 Å3) smaller by −8.9% than 1 (33.4 Å3),12 which contributes to the dense confinement. Figure 2e illustrates a structural overlay of H2O@310 and CO2@3 obtained by XRD, unveiling the steric repulsion, which results in an extrusion of the three hydroxy groups toward the outside, by up to +4.53%, with a central focus on the oxygen atom in CO2.
Figure 2.

(a) Placing gaseous CO2 inside 1. (b) Synthesis of molecular CO2 storage. (c) 13C NMR spectra (500 MHz, CDCl3/CS2 (1:1)) of free CO2 and CO2@3. (d) Crystal structure of (CO2@3)2 showing thermal ellipsoids at 50% probability (solvent molecules are omitted for clarity). (e) Overlay of crystal structures for H2O@3 and CO2@3 with selected bond lengths. (f) Thermodynamic parameters on CO2 inside 1′, 2′, and 3′ (Ar = 2-pyridyl; B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d); ΔG‡, barriers for escape/rotation; frot, rotational frequency; ωrot, angular velocity; trot, time required for a full turn of 2π radians).
Since a release barrier of CO2 from 3′ (Ar = 2-pyridyl) was computed to be ΔG‡ + 44.7 kcal/mol at 298 K, 3 could be regarded as permanent CO2 storage, while CO2 escape is probable for 1′ (Figure 2f). Within the nanopore, CO2 rotates with an activation barrier of ΔG‡ + 20.2 kcal/mol, suggestive of a very slow rotation with rotational frequency frot (7.11 mHz) and time trot (141 s). At 100 K, a full turn requires 1.13 × 10–30 s so that the rotation of CO2 is forbidden under the XRD conditions.
Release rates k of CO2@1 were measured in CDCl3 by 1H NMR (Figure 3a), affording thermodynamic parameters: ΔG‡ + 25.1 ± 1.0 kcal/mol, ΔH‡ 22.5 ± 0.7 kcal/mol, and ΔS‡ −8.96 ± 2.24 cal/(K·mol). Upon assuming the release event being ideal fluid dynamics on an atmospheric relief of a nanoscale vessel containing a CO2 gas, we applied Bernoulli’s equation to describe the conservation of momenta:
where P is static pressure and v is velocity. Note that the second term, i.e., dynamic pressure, is zero at the initial state due to v1 = 0. The density of CO2 is defined by ρ = M/(NAV) where M is molecular weight of CO2 and NA is Avogadro’s constant. The time required for releasing a half quantity of a molecular CO2 gas (equal to 0.5V) is then expressed by
where A is the orifice area (4.09 Å2). Given that the physical event obeys a first-order reaction characterized by t1/2, which is measurable by a kinetic study on an ensemble of CO2@1 (Figure 3a), the transition state theory gives t1/2 as a function of temperature T:
where h and kB are Planck and Boltzmann constants, respectively. Since the dynamic pressure at the final state corresponds to the loss of pressure (ΔP = P1 – P2), ΔP is consequently associated with a function of T:
![]() |
Figure 3.

(a) Release rates of CO2 from 1 in CDCl3. (b) P–T curve of a single molecule of CO2 gas in 1. (c,d) IR spectra of free CO2, CO2@2, and CO2@3 (300 K). (e) Binding constants K with stabilization energy ΔΔG induced by CO2 in 3, determined by 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3, 300 K). (f) Calculated stabilization energies ΔG upon dimerization with interaction energies Σ E(2) of intermolecular hydrogen-bonding (B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d,p)). 3″ is a distorted empty cage whose coordinates originate from CO2@3′. (g) NCI map of CO2@3′. (h) BCPs and BPs with selected density values. (i,j) NBOs and interaction energies for CO2@3′. All calculations were conducted at B3LYP-D3/6-31G(d,p).
This is regarded as an equation of state for a single-molecule gas captured within the nanocavity. Figure 3b shows a P–T curve of a single molecule of CO2 gas. The dynamic pressure at 300 K was estimated to be ΔP = 3.14 rPa (1 rPa = 10–27 Pa), which is far smaller than P1 = 102 hPa. Even at 1000 K, it reaches only 3.00 mPa. This is because of a molecular vibration/rotation as a major contributor to the dynamic pressure, while the translational motion is exhaustively forbidden within the cavity. According to the equation, even under dT = dV = 0, the gaseous molecule attains an eigen pressure loss. This is in stark contrast to an ensemble whose equation of state (PV = kBT, ΔP = 0 under constant T and V) is derived from kinetic theory of gases, solely depending upon translational motion.
To further study rotational/vibrational dynamics of the confined CO2 gas, we measured IR spectra at 300 K (Figure 3c,d). Linear triatomic CO2 with a D∞h symmetry has four fundamental modes of vibration including symmetric and antisymmetric stretching (ν1 and ν3) as well as doubly degenerated bending (ν2), where only ν2 and ν3 are IR active. Whereas a band overlap in a fingerprint region was unable to discriminate ν2 from others originating from skeletal vibration of the carbon cage, ν3(12CO2) was found at 2331 cm–1 for CO2@2 and 2332 cm–1 for CO2@3 as a sharp band, which differs from atmospheric CO2 showing a broad band (2349 cm–1)6 caused by a vibration/rotation coupling (Figure 3c). Within the nanocavity, however, the rotational frequency of CO2 (10–3–10–2 Hz, Figure 2f) is rather larger than the time scale of molecular vibration (10 fs–1 ps),18 which significantly relaxes the coupling. The observed red-shift of Δν3 −17 to −18 cm–1 relative to free CO2 is comparable to those observed for CO2 in typical MOFs (ν3 2335 cm–1),7b implying the presence of interactions to a similar extent. The two bands at lower wavenumbers correspond to a hot band (ν3 + ν2 – ν2) and satellite (ν3(13CO2)).19 At a higher wavenumber, CO2@3 showed a small band (ν3′ 2351 cm–1), which is unlikely to be found for CO2@2. A metastable orientation of the three hydroxy groups in CO2@3 would be a possible explanation, as supported by computational studies (Figure S12). Importantly, a combination band (ν1 + ν3) was observed at 3680 cm–1 for CO2@2 and 3681 cm–1 for CO2@3. From the combination tone, ν1 was estimated to be ca. 1349 cm–1, which is red-shifted by Δν1 ca. −39 cm–1 relative to free CO2 (ν1 1388 cm–1).6 Though Fermi resonance might not be neglected, this value is as large as 2-fold Δν3, being suggestive of a strong nanoconfinement effect on the symmetric stretching (ν1), which offers a larger vibrational displacement than that of the antisymmetric one (ν3).
To our surprise, the captured CO2 gas enabled to modulate an external property of the encapulant material itself. The association constant of CO2@3 in CDCl3 at 300 K was measured to be K = 15.6 ± 1.6 M–1, which is 1.6-fold larger than that of empty 3 (9.73 ± 2.34 M–1) (Figure 3e). This is suggestive of the preferred association for the latter by ΔΔG −0.30 kcal/mol, being in good accordance with the calculated value of ΔΔGnet −0.52 kcal/mol (Figure 3f), which includes attractive (−0.56 kcal/mol) and repulsive (+0.04 kcal/mol) interactions mainly caused by better hydrogen-bonding (−2ΔΣE(2) −0.42 kcal/mol) and geometrical distortion upon CO2 capture (Figure 2e), respectively.
A reduced density gradient (RDG) isosurface20 was plotted for CO2@3′ (Figure 3g), showing weak noncovalent interactions (NCI), around the CO2 molecule, which were characterized by multiple bond critical points (BCPs) and bond paths (BPs) (Figure 3h).21 A positive Laplacian of electron density ∇2ρe and total electron energy density H at BCP1 and BCP2 imply pure closed-shell interactions without a covalent nature. Natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis showed interaction energies as large as E(2) 1.32 (n(CO2) → σ*(OH)) and 1.09 (π(C=C) → p(CO2)) kcal/mol, respectively (Figure 3i,j). These results are decisive of the confined CO2 molecule potentially acting as both a Lewis base and Lewis acid.
In conclusion, we designed molecular CO2 storage as the simplest experimental model for revealing clear physical pictures on the chemical/dynamic processes of a molecular CO2 gas confined within a nanoscale cavity, which are otherwise uncertain in known sorbent systems due to competing complex interactions. The combined analyses of XRD, IR, and computations demonstrated the presence of intramolecular interactions in CO2@3, which cause nanoconfinement effects on translational, vibrational, and rotational motions of captured CO2, where it acts as both a Lewis base and Lewis acid. The release event for CO2@1 revealed the equation of state for a single-molecule gas at imperceptible pressure levels. The captured CO2 gas modulated an external property of the encapulant material itself owing to the better arrangement of intermolecular hydrogen-bonding. These findings would facilitate further understandings of chemical/physical events of CO2 accommodated within a variety of sorbent materials.
Acknowledgments
Financial support was partially provided by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP23H01784 and JP22H04538, The Mazda Foundation, and Advanced Technology Institute Research Grants 2023. IR measurements were carried out at SPring-8 (BL43IR) with the approval of JASRI (2022B1138). We thank Dr. Yuka Ikemoto for the support on IR spectroscopy.
Supporting Information Available
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsphyschemau.3c00068.
Accession Codes
CCDC 2301301 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif, or by emailing data_request@ccdc.cam.ac.uk, or by contacting The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; fax: + 44 1223 336033.
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Supplementary Material
References
- Dziejarski B.; Serafin J.; Andersson K.; Krzyżyńska R. CO2 capture materials: a review of current trends and future challenges. Mater. Today Sustain. 2023, 24, 100483. 10.1016/j.mtsust.2023.100483. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boer D. G.; Langerak J.; Pescarmona P. P. Zeolites as Selective Adsorbents for CO2 Separation. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2023, 6, 2634–2656. 10.1021/acsaem.2c03605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Chen C.; Zhang S.; Row K. H.; Ahn W.-S. Amine-silica composites for CO2 capture: A short review. J. Energy Chem. 2017, 26, 868–880. 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Sumida K.; Rogow D. L.; Mason J. A.; McDonald T. M.; Bloch E. D.; Herm Z. R.; Bae T.-H.; Long J. R. Carbon Dioxide Capture in Metal-Organic Frameworks. Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 724–781. 10.1021/cr2003272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vaidhyanathan R.; Iremonger S. S.; Shimizu G. K. H.; Boyd P. G.; Alavi S.; Woo T. K. Direct Observation and Quantification of CO2 Binding Within an Amine-Functionalized Nanoporous Solid. Science 2010, 330, 650–653. 10.1126/science.1194237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vitillo J. G.; Savonnet M.; Ricchiardi G.; Bordiga S. Tailoring Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture: The Amino Effect. ChemSusChem 2011, 4, 1281–1290. 10.1002/cssc.201000458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Bonelli B.; Civalleri B.; Fubini B.; Ugliengo P.; Areán C. O.; Garrone E. Experimental and Quantum Chemical Studies on the Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide on Alkali-Metal-Exchanged ZSM-5 Zeolites. J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 10978–10988. 10.1021/jp000555g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Mihaylov M.; Chakarova K.; Andonova S.; Drenchev N.; Ivanova E.; Sabetghadam A.; Seoane B.; Gascon J.; Kapteijn F.; Hadjiivanov K. Adsorption Forms of CO2 on MIL-53(Al) and NH2-MIL-53(Al) As Revealed by FTIR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 23584–23595. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b07492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Roztocki K.; Rauche M.; Bon V.; Kaskel S.; Brunner E.; Matoga D. Combining In Situ Techniques (XRD, IR, and 13C NMR) and Gas Adsorption Measurements Reveals CO2-Induced Structural Transitions and High CO2/CH4 Selectivity for a Flexible Metal-Organic Framework JUK-8. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 28503–28513. 10.1021/acsami.1c07268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Stolte N.; Hou R.; Pan D. Nanoconfinement facilitates reactions of carbon dioxide in supercritical water. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 5932. 10.1038/s41467-022-33696-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Vougioukalakis G. C.; Roubelakis M. M.; Orfanopoulos M. Open-Cage Fullerenes: towards the Construction of Nanosized Molecular Containers. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 817–844. 10.1039/B913766A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Gao R.; Liu Z.; Liu Z.; Liang T.; Su J.; Gan L. Open-Cage Fullerene as a Selective Molecular Trap for LiF/[BeF]+. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2023, 62, e202300151 10.1002/anie.202300151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Hashikawa Y.; Murata Y. Water in Fullerenes. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2023, 96, 943–967. 10.1246/bcsj.20230135. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hashikawa Y.; Hasegawa S.; Murata Y. A Single but Hydrogen-Bonded Water Molecule Confined in an Anisotropic Subnanospace. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 13686–13689. 10.1039/C8CC07339B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hashikawa Y.; Hasegawa S.; Murata Y. Precise Fixation of an NO molecule inside Carbon Nanopores: A Long-Range Electron-Nuclear Interaction. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021, 60, 2866–2870. 10.1002/anie.202012538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Futagoishi T.; Murata M.; Wakamiya A.; Sasamori T.; Murata Y. Expansion of Orifices of Open C60 Derivatives and Formation of an Open C59S Derivative by Reaction with Sulfur. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 2750–2753. 10.1021/ol401083c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hashikawa Y.; Fujikawa N.; Okamoto S.; Murata Y. Phosphorus ylides of cage-opened sulphide [60]fullerene derivatives. Dalton Trans. 2022, 51, 17804–17808. 10.1039/D2DT03214G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Futagoishi T.; Murata M.; Wakamiya A.; Murata Y. Trapping N2 and CO2 on the Sub-Nano Scale in the Confined Internal Spaces of Open-Cage C60 Derivatives: Isolation and Structural Characterization of the Host-Guest Complexes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 14791–14794. 10.1002/anie.201507785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor R. Aromatic fullerene derivatives. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 328–331. 10.1039/B312502P. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Koenig R. M.; Tian H.-R.; Seeler T. L.; Tepper K. R.; Franklin H. M.; Chen Z.-C.; Xie S.-Y.; Stevenson S. Fullertubes: Cylindrical Carbon with Half-Fullerene End-Caps and Tubular Graphene Belts, Their Chemical Enrichment, Crystallography of Pristine C90-D5h(1) and C100-D5d(1) Fullertubes, and Isolation of C108, C120, C132, and C156 Cages of Unknown Structures. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 15614–15623. 10.1021/jacs.0c08529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ye Y.; Xiong S.; Wu X.; Zhang L.; Li Z.; Wang L.; Ma X.; Chen Q.-H.; Zhang Z.; Xiang S. Microporous Metal-Organic Framework Stabilized by Balanced Multiple Host-Couteranion Hydrogen-Bonding Interactions for High-Density CO2 Capture at Ambient Conditions. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 292–299. 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li M.; Wang G.; Sun L.; Cao X.; Ni H. A Possible Explicit Equation Fitting Method for the Gaseous Heat Capacity Near the Critical Point Based on Density and Temperature. Processes 2023, 11, 1605. 10.3390/pr11061605. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zewail A. H. Femtochemistry. Past, present, and future. Pure Appl. Chem. 2000, 72, 2219–2231. 10.1351/pac200072122219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- a Meredith J. C.; Johnston K. P.; Seminario J. M.; Kazarian S. G.; Eckert C. A. Quantitative Equilibrium Constants between CO2 and Lewis Bases from FTIR Spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 10837–1084. 10.1021/jp953161b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]; b Kim D.; Park J.; Kim Y. S.; Lah M. S. Temperature dependent CO2 behavior in microporous 1-D channels of a metal-organic framework with multiple interaction sites. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41447. 10.1038/srep41447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c Chakarova K.; Mihaylov M.; Hadjiivanov K. Can two CO2 molecules be simultaneously bound to one Na+ site in NaY zeolite? A detailed FTIR investigation. Micro. Meso. Mater. 2022, 345, 112270. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2022.112270. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Johnson E. R.; Keinan S.; Mori-Sánchez P.; Contreras-García J.; Cohen A. J.; Yang W. Revealing noncovalent interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6498–6506. 10.1021/ja100936w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- a Nakanishi W.; Hayashi S.; Narahara K. Polar Coordinate Representation of Hb(rc) versus (ℏ2/8m)∇2ρb(rc) at BCP in AIM Analysis: Classification and Evaluation of Weak to Strong Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. A 2009, 113, 10050–10057. 10.1021/jp903622a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Hashikawa Y.; Murata Y. H2O/Olefinic-π Interaction inside a Carbon Nanocage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 12928–12938. 10.1021/jacs.9b06759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


