Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 Feb 28;16(2):e55142. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55142

Prenatal Identification of a Missense Mutation of the L1CAM Gene Associated With Hydrocephalus Using Next-Generation Sequencing

Sotirios Sotiriou 1, Athina A Samara 1,, Eleftherios Anastasakis 1, Athanasios Zikopoulos 1, Ioannis Papoulidis 2, Emmanouil Manolakos 2, Efterpi Pavlidou 3, Chara Skentou 4
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC10979761  PMID: 38558627

Abstract

We present the case of a 35-year-old pregnant woman who visited our department for a routine ultrasonography screening scan for fetus anatomy during the 22nd week of gestation. Our report revealed a male fetus with marked hydrocephalus and severe intrauterine growth retardation. After extensive counseling, the couple decided to proceed with an invasive diagnosis via amniocentesis. The cytogenetic analysis showed findings related to clinical history and ultrasound findings related to the presence of a nucleotide change in c.578T>C with an amino acid change in p.Leu198Pro of the L1CAM gene. The result was reported as a hemizygote missense L1CAM gene variant of unknown significance. After extensive parental counseling, the couple decided on pregnancy termination. We report the present case of L1CAM mutation in p.Leu198Pro to add to the limited knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of mutations of the L1CAM gene with emphasis on prenatal diagnosis.

Keywords: next-generation sequencing (ngs), corpus callosum (cc) agenesia, iugr, hydrocephalus, l1cam gene

Introduction

Mutations of the L1 cell adhesion molecule (L1CAM) gene can be detected in approximately 1 in 30,000 male births. L1CAM mutations are associated with clinical features of partial agenesis of the corpus callosum [1-4], hydrocephalus due to aqueductal stenosis [5-9], hydrocephalus with Hirschsprung’s disease [10], as well as MASA (mental retardation, aphasia, shuffling gait, and adducted thumbs) [11-13] and CRASH (corpus callosum hypoplasia, retardation, adducted thumbs, spastic paraparesis, and hydrocephalus) [14] syndromes. The L1CAM gene follows a sex-linked mode of inheritance, and the clinical manifestations usually involve the male gender [15-20]. Μutations of the L1CAM gene are rare chromosomal aberrations [21-23].

Most cases are described with the term L1 syndrome, including a group of X-linked recessive disorders with a common genetic basis and clinical presentation ranging from mild to severe [24]. Spastic paraplegia, MASA syndrome, X-linked complicated corpus callosum dysgenesis, and X-linked hydrocephalus with stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius are common disorders of L1 syndrome [1]. In the current literature, L1 syndrome can be found as L1CAM syndrome, named after the causative gene, or as CRASH syndrome, an acronym for its primary clinical features, i.e., corpus callosum hypoplasia, intellectual disability, adducted thumbs, spasticity, and hydrocephalus [2-4]. The clinical manifestation of L1CAM differs from intellectual disability to aphasia and spasticity. A diagnosis can be made with a genetic test after birth or prenatally through an invasive procedure such as amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling [6,7].

Most cases arise from different variants in the L1CAM gene [24]. The L1CAM gene consists of 29 exons and the producing protein, a transmembrane neuron surface glycoprotein that has 1,257 amino acids and is responsible for the creation of neural synapses [25]. This protein is essential for correct brain structural development and, by extension, is necessary for proper brain function. To date, 169 different L1CAM mutations have been reported [24].

Here, we report an interesting case of an L1CAM mutation in p.Leu198Pro in a male fetus with marked hydrocephalus, suspected partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, and severe intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR). The present report aims to add to the limited knowledge regarding the clinical presentation of mutations of the L1CAM gene with an emphasis on the importance of prenatal diagnosis.

Case presentation

A 35-year-old pregnant woman (gravida 2, para 1) visited the prenatal ultrasound department of our hospital for a routine ultrasonography screening scan for fetus anatomy during the 22nd week of gestation. The woman had experienced an uneventful pregnancy up to that point. Moreover, the maternal and paternal medical and family history were unremarkable. The ultrasound examination revealed a male fetus with marked hydrocephalus, suspected partial agenesis of the corpus callosum, and severe IUGR. The measurements of the anterior and posterior ventricles were 13.5 mm and 17.7 mm, respectively (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Ultrasound of the fetal head depicting ventriculomegaly.

Figure 1

Figure 2 depicts other findings related to the fetal head. More specifically, other possible congenital anatomical hydrocephalus causes were not identified based on the normal posterior brain fossa and fetal spine ultrasound appearance. Furthermore, other anatomical abnormalities were not identified. The estimated fetal weight was below the fifth centile for the specific week of pregnancy based on biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, and femur length measurements, and the diagnosis of IUGR was established.

Figure 2. Fetal head images and cerebral measurements.

Figure 2

After extensive counseling for possible hydrocephalus causes, the couple decided to proceed with an invasive diagnosis via amniocentesis, and a whole DNA sample was isolated. Amplification of the under-examined regions was performed using the Ion AmpliSeq Exome RDY kit, followed by nucleotide sequencing using the Ion Chef Instrument in combination with the Ion GeneStudio S5 System.

Whole exosome sequencing analysis was performed on 4,432 genes that are known to be associated with genetic diseases, and syndromes with clinical significance were analyzed. The genes analyzed were based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) consensus. The evaluation and interpretation of the data were based on the clinical phenotype. Analysis was performed using bioinformatics analysis systems Alamut Visual and VarSome Clinical (Saphetor) a CE IVD-certified and HIPAA-compliant platform. All findings resulting from the above analysis were evaluated based on the international literature and the guidelines of the ACMG [26].

The criteria for evaluating and reporting findings include nucleotide changes that are evaluated with the currently available data as non-pathogenic or possibly non-pathogenic. These are not reported, whereas pathogenic or possibly pathogenic mutations are related to the clinical criteria of the referral case.

The cytogenetic analysis showed a 46, XY karyotype. Findings related to the clinical history and ultrasound were related to the presence of a nucleotide change in c.578T>C with an amino acid change in p.Leu198Pro of the L1CAM gene. The result was reported as a hemizygote missense L1CAM gene variant of unknown significance (Figure 3).

Figure 3. Sanger sequencing results of the fetus showing the presence of the hemizygous c.578T>C mutation in the L1CAM gene.

Figure 3

Maternal testing was recommended to clarify whether the nucleotide change of p.Leu198Pro had been inherited from the mother or whether it had arisen de novo. Sanger sequencing of the gene segment containing the specific nucleotide change of p.Leu198Pro was performed using maternal blood (Figure 4).

Figure 4. Sanger sequencing results of the mother showing the presence of the heterozygous c.578T>C mutation in the L1CAM gene.

Figure 4

Results revealed that the mother carried the specific change in heterozygosity, indicating its maternal origin in the fetus. Screening of other potentially affected male family members was also recommended. After extensive parental counseling, the couple decided on pregnancy termination.

Discussion

The severity of symptoms and functional impairment of a patient with L1 syndrome is directly related to the type and severity of the L1CAM variant causing the disorder [6,7]. There is no cure for L1 syndrome, and the prognosis is often poor [8,9]. Life expectancy for people with L1 syndrome depends on the clinical severity of the disease, varying dramatically from dying shortly after birth to reaching adulthood [2]. Treatment strategies mainly consist of supportive care, which aims to improve the quality of life of these patients and minimize functional impairment [3,10].

The L1 cell adhesion molecule, a member of the immunoglobulin adhesion protein superfamily, is composed of six immunoglobulin-like domains and fibronectin type III-like repeats in the extracellular region and a short cytoplasmic tail [27,28]. Most reported mutations include missense, nonsense, small insertions, or deletions and splice-site alterations that are distributed throughout the large extracellular domain of the L1 gene. The nonsense and frameshift variants lead to truncation of the L1 protein. Missense mutations account for over one-third of pathological L1 mutations described [29]. Our case provides a novel insight because the nucleotide change of c.578T>C with an amino acid change of p.Leu198Pro to the L1CAM gene has not been reported, so our findings on the disease spectrum linked to this specific mutation and its prenatal diagnosis are new. Using next-generation sequencing analysis, this study revealed a new hemizygote missense L1CAM gene mutation, thus expanding the disease spectrum of L1 syndrome. The clinical importance of this mutation needs to be verified by analyzing a larger number of samples.

Findings that cannot be interpreted because they have not been reported to date in the international literature, i.e., variants of unknown significance, only refer to genes related to the possible specific indications of the reference case. Regarding the clinical interpretation of our case, based on the cytogenetic analysis results, the nucleotide change to c.578T>C with an amino acid change to p.Leu198Pro of the L1CAM gene has not been reported in the ClinVar and Decipher databases nor has it been reported until now in the international literature. According to the ACMG/AMP guidelines [26], the amino acid change in p.Leu198Pro is listed as a gene mutation of unknown significance (Table 1).

Table 1. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of the p.Leu193Pro variant.

Standards and guidelines
PM1 Pathogenic Moderate: UniProt protein L1CAM_HUMAN domain ‘Ig-like C2-type 2’ has 15 non-VUS missense/in-frame/non-synonymous, variants (15 pathogenic and 0 benign), pathogenicity = 100.0% which is more than threshold 50.0%
PM1 Pathogenic Moderate: Variant not found in gnomAD exomes (good gnomAD exomes coverage = 87.1). Variant not found in gnomAD genomes (good gnomAD genomes coverage = 22.1)
PP3 Pathogenic Supporting: Pathogenic computational verdict based on pathogenic predictions from BayesDel_addAF, CADD, DANN, DEOGEN2, FATHMM-MKL, MCAP, MVP, MutationAssessor, MutationTaster, Polyphen2-HVAR, PrimateAI, REVEL and SIFT vs 1 benign prediction from LIST-S2

In the present report, we describe the first prenatally diagnosed case of a missense mutation of the L1CAM gene associated with hydrocephalus, IUGR, and possible partial agenesis of the corpus callosum using next-generation sequencing. This missense mutation of the L1CAM gene, as indicated by our findings, appears to be involved in abnormal brain clinical features contributing to the expansion of the L1 syndrome spectrum associated with these pathologies.

Conclusions

The L1 syndrome should be considered in male fetuses with hydrocephalus and abnormal brain ultrasound findings related to an abnormal corpus callosum appearance when other possible ventriculomegaly causes have been excluded. Our case suggests that pathogenic missense mutations affecting key amino acid residues are most likely to lead to a severe phenotype based on the severity of the ultrasound features. Additional studies are needed to investigate the pathogenicity of this mutation and its definite association with fetal hydrocephalus. We report the present case of L1CAM mutation in p.Leu198Pro to add to the limited knowledge about the clinical presentation of mutations of the L1CAM gene with emphasis on prenatal diagnosis.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Athina A. Samara, Sotirios Sotiriou, Chara Skentou

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Athina A. Samara, Eleftherios Anastasakis, Athanasios Zikopoulos, Ioannis Papoulidis, Emmanouil Manolakos, Efterpi Pavlidou

Drafting of the manuscript:  Athina A. Samara, Sotirios Sotiriou

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Eleftherios Anastasakis, Athanasios Zikopoulos, Ioannis Papoulidis, Emmanouil Manolakos, Efterpi Pavlidou, Chara Skentou

Supervision:  Chara Skentou

Human Ethics

Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study

References

  • 1.Hereditary partial agenesis of corpus callosum; biochemical and pathological studies. Menkes JH, Philippart M, Clark DB. Arch Neurol. 1964;11:198–208. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1964.00460200094009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Expanding the phenotypic spectrum of L1CAM-associated disease. Basel-Vanagaite L, Straussberg R, Friez MJ, Inbar D, Korenreich L, Shohat M, Schwartz CE. Clin Genet. 2006;69:414–419. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00607.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.X-linked recessive inheritance of dysgenesis of corpus callosum in a Chinese family. Kang WM, Huang CC, Lin SJ. Am J Med Genet. 1992;44:619–623. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320440518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.X linked recessive inheritance of agenesis of the corpus callosum. Kaplan P. J Med Genet. 1983;20:122–124. doi: 10.1136/jmg.20.2.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.X-linked hydrocephalus, with aqueductal stenosis, mental retardation, and adduction-flexion deformity of the thumbs. Report of a family. Faivre J, Lemarec B, Bretagne J, Pecker J. Childs Brain. 1976;2:226–233. doi: 10.1159/000119619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.X linked complicated spastic paraplegia, MASA syndrome, and X linked hydrocephalus owing to congenital stenosis of the aqueduct of Sylvius: variable expression of the same mutation at Xq28. Fryns JP, Spaepen A, Cassiman JJ, van den Berghe H. J Med Genet. 1991;28:429–431. doi: 10.1136/jmg.28.6.429-a. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Congenital hydrocephalus internus and aqueduct stenosis: aetiology and implications for genetic counselling. Haverkamp F, Wölfle J, Aretz M, Krämer A, Höhmann B, Fahnenstich H, Zerres K. Eur J Pediatr. 1999;158:474–478. doi: 10.1007/s004310051123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.X-linked aqueductal stenosis: clinical and neuropathological findings in two families. Holmes LB, Nash A, ZuRhein GM, Levin M, Opitz JM. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4121400/ Pediatrics. 1973;51:697–704. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.A family study of hydrocephalus resulting from aqueduct stenosis. Howard FM, Till K, Carter CO. J Med Genet. 1981;18:252–255. doi: 10.1136/jmg.18.4.252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hydrocephalus and Hirschsprung's disease in a patient with a mutation of L1CAM. Okamoto N, Wada Y, Goto M. J Med Genet. 1997;34:670–671. doi: 10.1136/jmg.34.8.670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mutations in L1-CAM in two families with X linked complicated spastic paraplegia, MASA syndrome, and HSAS. Ruiz JC, Cuppens H, Legius E, Fryns JP, Glover T, Marynen P, Cassiman JJ. J Med Genet. 1995;32:549–552. doi: 10.1136/jmg.32.7.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Spectrum of X-linked hydrocephalus (HSAS), MASA syndrome, and complicated spastic paraplegia (SPG1): clinical review with six additional families. Schrander-Stumpel C, Höweler C, Jones M, et al. Am J Med Genet. 1995;57:107–116. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320570122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.MASA syndrome: new clinical features and linkage analysis using DNA probes. Schrander-Stumpel C, Legius E, Fryns JP, Cassiman JJ. J Med Genet. 1990;27:688–692. doi: 10.1136/jmg.27.11.688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.CRASH syndrome: mutations in L1CAM correlate with severity of the disease. Yamasaki M, Thompson P, Lemmon V. Neuropediatrics. 1997;28:175–178. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-973696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sex-linked hydrocephalus. Jansen J. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1975.tb03532.x. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1975;17:633–640. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1975.tb03532.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.X-linked recessive aqueductal stenosis without macrocephaly. Kelley RI, Mennuti MT, Hickey WF, Zackai EH. Clin Genet. 1988;33:390–394. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb03467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Aqueductal stenosis in X-linked hydrocephalus: a secondary phenomenon? Landrieu P, Ninane J, Ferrière G, Lyon G. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1979;21:637–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1979.tb01678.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Genetic heterogeneity in X-linked hydrocephalus: linkage to markers within Xq27.3. Strain L, Gosden CM, Brock DJ, Bonthron DT. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1918160/ Am J Hum Genet. 1994;54:236–243. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.X-linked hydrocephalus. Shannon MW, Nadler HL. J Med Genet. 1968;5:326–328. doi: 10.1136/jmg.5.4.326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.X-linked aqueductal stenosis. Sovik O, van der Hagen B, Loken AC. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/301802/ Clin Genet. 1977;11:416–420. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.L1-associated diseases: clinical geneticists divide, molecular geneticists unite. Fransen E, Van Camp G, Vits L, Willems PJ. Hum Mol Genet. 1997;6:1625–1632. doi: 10.1093/hmg/6.10.1625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Novel missense mutation in the L1 gene in a child with corpus callosum agenesis, retardation, adducted thumbs, spastic paraparesis, and hydrocephalus. Sztriha L, Frossard P, Hofstra RM, Verlind E, Nork M. J Child Neurol. 2000;15:239–243. doi: 10.1177/088307380001500407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Genetic and clinical aspects of X-linked hydrocephalus (L1 disease): mutations in the L1CAM gene. Weller S, Gärtner J. Hum Mutat. 2001;18:1–12. doi: 10.1002/humu.1144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Genotype-phenotype correlations in L1 syndrome: a guide for genetic counselling and mutation analysis. Vos YJ, de Walle HE, Bos KK, et al. J Med Genet. 2010;47:169–175. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.071688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Axonal synapse sorting in medial entorhinal cortex. Schmidt H, Gour A, Straehle J, Boergens KM, Brecht M, Helmstaedter M. Nature. 2017;549:469–475. doi: 10.1038/nature24005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, et al. Genet Med. 2015;17:405–424. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Infantile hydrocephalus: a review of epidemiology, classification and causes. Tully HM, Dobyns WB. Eur J Med Genet. 2014;57:359–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2014.06.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.The role of L1cam in murine corticogenesis, and the pathogenesis of hydrocephalus. Itoh K, Fushiki S. Pathol Int. 2015;65:58–66. doi: 10.1111/pin.12245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Severe phenotype in patients with X-linked hydrocephalus caused by a missense mutation in L1CAM. Tüysüz B, Ercan-Sençicek AG, Özer E, Göç N, Yalçınkaya C, Bilguvar K. Turk Arch Pediatr. 2022;57:521–525. doi: 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2022.22070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES