Skip to main content
PLOS Global Public Health logoLink to PLOS Global Public Health
. 2024 Mar 29;4(3):e0003062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003062

Prevalence and predictors of anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya: A cross-sectional study

Joyce Mwakishalua 1,*, Simon Karanja 1, Raphael Lihana 2, Collins Okoyo 3,4, Nicole Stoffel 5, Michael Zimmermann 6
Editor: Aditi Apte7
PMCID: PMC10980238  PMID: 38551905

Abstract

Anemia is a significant public health problem among children worldwide. The etiology of anemia is multifactorial but iron deficiency (ID) is the most common cause of anemia in low- and middle-income countries. ID and anemia in infancy can impair growth and cognitive development. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and predictors of anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya. This cross-sectional study included 424 mother-infant pairs. Structured questionnaires were administered to the mothers to obtain information on socio-demographic variables, maternal characteristics and birth information. Anthropometric data was collected for each child. A heel prick was done to measure hemoglobin and zinc protoporphyrin concentration levels. Chi-square test, bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were done to determine factors associated with anemia. The prevalence of ID, anemia and IDA was 60.4% (95%CI: 55.9–65.2), 21.0% (95%CI: 17.5–25.2) and 15.8% (95%CI: 12.7–19.7) respectively. Bivariate analysis showed that the risk of anemia was significantly higher among male infants (odds ratio (OR) = 2.20 (95%CI: 1.33–3.63), p = 0.002), iron deficient infants (OR = 2.35 (95%CI: 1.39–3.99), p = 0.001) and infants from Msambweni Sub-County (OR = 2.80 (95%CI: 1.40–4.62), p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that odds of anemia were significantly higher in infants born to mothers who did not use iron supplements during pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 74.01 (95%CI: 2.45–2238.21), p = 0.013 and significantly lower in infants born to mothers with parity ≥ 4 (aOR = 0.05 ((95%CI: 0.00–0.77), p = 0.024). In six-week-old infants in rural Kenya, anemia prevalence was 21.0% with ID accounting for 75.3% of anemia cases. Given the physical and cognitive impairments associated with ID and anemia in early infancy, it may be prudent to re-evaluate the current Kenyan pediatric protocols to include anemia screening and potential treatment of infants less than 6-months of age.

Introduction

Anemia continues to be a significant public health problem affecting over a third of the global population with a worldwide prevalence of 22.8% across all ages [1] causing 68 million disability adjusted life years (DALYS) [2]. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 42% of children < 5 years of age and 40% of pregnant women worldwide are anemic [3]. Regional estimates show that Sub-Saharan Africa bears the highest burden of anemia with prevalence of 62% [3]. Children under five years have the highest burden of anemia, predominantly in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) and iron deficiency (ID) is the most common cause of anemia in this age group, accounting for ≥60% of the cases of anemia [2]. A higher anemia prevalence of 78.4% was found in Ghanaian children under five years of age [4]. In Kenya, anemia is already common in infants < 1 year of age e.g., 70% of 6-month-old infants in south coastal Kenya are anemic [5].

Anemia of any etiology is associated with increased risks for child mortality and morbidity [6]. More specifically, iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in early infancy may result in irreversible impaired cognitive development and reduce growth [7]. Although the cause of immune deficits in malnutrition are poorly understood, ID may impair adaptive immunity and thereby reduce efficacy of vaccines in early infancy [8, 9]. As a result, IDA reduces the productivity of these infants as they grow through adolescence into adulthood due to impaired cognitive ability and reduced physical development [10]. Other risk factors associated with anemia in the developing countries include: thalassemia and hemoglobinopathies, hemolysis or blood loss due to parasitic infections especially in malaria endemic areas, and other nutritional deficiencies including folate and vitamin A, C and B12 deficiencies [11]. Moreover, postnatal factors such as frequent illnesses like pneumonia, early introduction of low-iron-content cereal-based complimentary foods, rapid postnatal growth rate, low birth weight as well as infectious diseases like malaria, increase the likelihood of infants developing ID early, irrespective of whether they were born at term or not [12].

In Kenya, the nationwide prevalence of anemia in children under one year is 39.5% [13]. A study among 6 to 9-month-old infants in Keiyo sub-County reported an anemia prevalence of 21.7% [14]. A study in Kwale County among infants aged 3–6 months found the prevalence of ID, anemia and IDA to be 69%,52% and 38% respectively [15]; but the study was small (n = 25) and non-representative.

During early life, there is a critical timeframe for implementing health interventions, like routine childhood interventions. If these interventions are delayed beyond this point, they may become ineffective and lead to resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases. Additionally, delayed interventions could contribute to poor growth, cognitive impairment, and potentially irreversible health issues in the future [15, 16]. In addition, ID may also be a previously unrecognized contributor to the reduced efficacy of vaccines in Sub-Saharan Africa [9]. Hence, it is crucial to assess the impact of anemia in early infancy as a factor contributing to elevated rates of child mortality and morbidity in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Provision of iron supplements to infants and children 6–24 months of age is recommended in areas where anemia is a severe public health problem i.e., prevalence ≥40% [17]. However, infants below six months of age have been exempted from many recommendations targeting prevention and treatment of ID and anemia in highly prevalent anemia regions. This is because it has generally been assumed that infants during their first six months of life are protected from IDA. This assumption stems from the general belief that infants build sufficient iron stores in their bodies during fetal development, providing protection against IDA in the first six months after birth and that anemia is not of concern during early stages of life [18]. However, this may not be the case in sub-Saharan Africa because sufficient iron is passed from the mother to the fetus only if the mother has adequate iron stores during pregnancy and most pregnant women in their third trimester in Africa are anemic and iron deficient [2]. Although delayed cord clamping has recently been proposed to prevent ID and the resulting anemia in infants, it has been difficult to implement in sub-Saharan Africa because of under-developed healthcare systems and busy maternity wards [19].

Despite broad knowledge on anemia and ID in children, researchers point out that there is much that remains unknown about this problem in early infancy. Previous studies on anemia in Kenya have been restricted to infants above six months of age [5, 13, 14]. Furthermore, previous studies on anemia in LMIC with high malaria prevalence, where younger children bear the greatest burden of anemia, have not taken into account geographical factors when examining the connections between these outcomes and ecological or geographic factors [20]. The aim of this study therefore, was to determine the prevalence of anemia and ID and associated predictors among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The approval for the study was sought from the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) and the JKUAT Institutional Ethics review Committee, approval number; JKU/IERC/02316/0052. Additional approval was provided by the Kwale County health authorities. Written participant consent was obtained from the mothers.

Study design and setting

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in Msambweni County Referral Hospital and Kwale Sub-County Hospital in Kwale County. The study was nested within a randomized clinical trial (RCT) [21]. The primary objective of the RCT was to determine whether detecting and correcting ID and IDA using well absorbed iron improves efficacy of vaccines and to define the specific immune mechanisms underlying this effect.

Kwale County is located in south coast of Kenya at Coordinates: 4°10′S 39°27′E) bordering the Republic of Tanzania to the South West, Indian Ocean to the East, Taita-Taveta County to the West, Kilifi County to the North and Mombasa County to the North East. It has an estimated population of 866,820 [22].

Msambweni County Referral Hospital is a Level 5 government health facility. It offers both inpatient and outpatient medical services and has a bed capacity of 155. Being a referral hospital, it receives several cases from different areas within the county and therefore a good representative of the county population.

Kwale Sub-County Hospital is a high-volume level 4 government health facility within Matuga Sub-County. It has a bed capacity of 62 and offers both inpatient and outpatient medical services.

Sample size determination

Sample size was calculated using Fisher’s formula [23]; n = (z2pq)/e2; where Z is the value from standard normal distribution corresponding to 95% confidence level (Z = 1.96), p is the estimated prevalence of anemia among infants in Kwale County (assumed as 50%), q is the proportion of infants without anemia (1-p), e is the margin of error assumed as 5%. The final sample size was thus calculated as 424 mother-infant pairs after factoring in a 10% non-response rate. Simple random sampling was used to select the final sample size from the total number of mother-infant pairs who were eligible to be enrolled in the study. The participants were randomly sampled from the number of mother-infant pairs that came for screening for the RCT.

Survey procedures

The study was carried out between January and April 2023. During recruitment, the study purpose was explained to the mothers and those who were willing to participate were scheduled for a screening date at the hospital when their child would be exactly 6 weeks old ± 3 days. On the day of screening, the study aim was explained again in detail to the mothers who signed consent forms both in English and Swahili and each mother-infant pair was given a unique identification number. A screening form was programmed onto redcap and administered using tablets. The study included HIV negative mothers above 15 years of age with infant aged 6 weeks ± 3 days, born via vaginal delivery, full-time breastfed, not having received any vaccine beyond the birth dose of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), and with no medical condition that precluded study involvement. The study excluded infants with conditions that might have affected participation such as hematological and non-hematological malignancies, chronic kidney disease, diabetes and inability to provide maternal informed consent. Mother-infant pairs who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled into the study.

Data collection

An interviewer administered questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic and maternal characteristics. Date of birth, maternal age, hemoglobin (Hb) level during last antenatal care (ANC) visit and parity and other factors were subsequently confirmed from the mother-child ANC booklet or immunization card or exercise book. A standardized SECA 813 digital measurement scale was used to measure infant’s body weight to the nearest 0.01kg. A standard measurement board from UNICEF was used to measure infants’ length/height to the nearest 0.5cm. A heel prick was done using single use sterile lancet and Hb concentration measured on capillary blood using a Hemocue 301 system device (Hemocue, Sweden). ZnPP concentration was measured on capillary blood using iCheck Anemia device (Bioanalyt, Germany). The device uses photometric determination of ZnPP by auto-florescence. Both machines have quality controls (two levels; high and low) which were performed prior to measuring samples during screening.

Data management and analysis

The WHO anthropometrics software was used to calculate infant Z-scores for weight for length (WLZ) which indicates wasting, weight for age (WAZ) which indicates underweight and length for age (LAZ) which indicates stunting. Both questionnaires and laboratory diary information were programmed into tablets then used to capture data electronically on Redcap (Vanderbilt University) which had inbuilt data quality checks to reduce errors during the data entry process. Collected data was sent to the server daily. Stata version 16 (StataCorp) was used for statistical analyses. Chi square test was used to show association between predictor variables and anemia status.

Both maternal and infant factors related to anemia were analyzed by bivariate analysis and strength of association reported as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Variable multicollinearity was assessed to identify variables that were strongly correlated. To select variables for multivariate analysis an inclusion criterion of p-value <0.5 was used in a stepwise variable selection method. A multivariate analysis was done using the selected variables and strength of association reported as adjusted OR (aOR) with 95% CI.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants

Overall, 424 mother-infant pairs were enrolled in the study; 211 from Matuga sub-County and 213 from Msambweni sub-County. Of the 211 participants from Matuga sub-County, 82 (19.3%) were from Mkongani location, 117(27.6%) from Tsimba Golini location and 12 (2.8%) from Waa location. Of the 213 participants from Msambweni sub-County, 13 (3.1%) were from Kinondo location, 74 (17.5%) from Ramisi location, 100 (23.6%) from Ukunda location, and 26 (6.1%) from Gombato location (Table 1).

Table 1. Socio-demographic and health information of the mothers and infants surveyed in Kwale County, Kenya.

Factor Kwale (n = 211) Msambweni (n = 213) Overall (n = 424)
Location:
    Mkongani 82 (19.3%) - 82 (19.3%)
    Tsimba Golini 117 (27.6%) - 117 (27.6%)
    Waa 12 (2.8%) - 12 (2.8%)
    Kinondo - 13 (3.1%) 13 (3.1%)
    Ramisi - 74 (17.5%) 74 (17.5%)
    Ukunda - 100 (23.6%) 100 (23.6%)
    Gombato - 26 (6.1%) 26 (6.1%)
Mother details:
Age (in years); [mean (min-max)] 27.6 (16–45) 27.8 (18–47) 27.7 (16–47)
Level of education
    None 8 (10.5%) 2 (2.5%) 10 (6.4%)
    Primary 41 (54.0%) 44 (54.3%) 85 (54.1%)
    Secondary 12 (15.8%) 22 (27.2%) 34 (21.7%)
    Post-secondary 15 (19.7%) 13 (16.1%) 28 (17.8%)
Parity; [median (min-max)] 3 (1–11) 3 (1–8) 3 (1–11)
Haemoglobin (g/dl); [mean (min-max) 10.8(7.7–15.0) 10.8 (7.0–14.0) 10.8 (7.0–15.0)
Weight (in kg); [mean (min-max) 58.2 (39.4–95.2) 61.5 (35–112) 59.5 (35–112)
Use iron supplement
    Yes 75 (98.7%) 79 (97.5%) 154 (98.1%)
    No 1 (1.3%) 2 (2.5%) 3 (2%)
Number of ANC visits; [mean (min-max)] 4 (2–8) 5 (2–9) 5 (2–9)
Had twin pregnancy
    Yes 1 (1.3%) 2 (2.5%) 3 (2.0%)
    No 75 (98.7%) 79 (97.5%) 154 (98.1%)
Household water source
    Improved 50 (65.8%) 59 (72.3%) 109 (69.4%)
    Unimproved 26 (34.2%) 22 (27.2%) 48 (30.6%)
Cost of travel to the nearest health facility (Ksh); [median (min-max)] 126 (50–300) 117 (50–500) 122 (50–500)
Infant details:
Gender
    Male 108 (51.4%) 124 (58.5%) 232 (55%)
    Female 102 (48.6%) 88 (41.5%) 190 (45%)
Weight at birth (in kg); [mean (min-max)] 3.1 (2.1–5.2) 3.1 (2.0–4.9) 3.10 (2–5.2)
Weight at 6 weeks (in kg); [mean (min-max)] 4.6 (3.5–6.1) 4.7 (3.4–6.5) 4.7 (3.4–6.5)
Gestation (in weeks); [mean (min-max)] 37.9 (34–40) 37.7 (32–42) 37.8 (32–42)
Height (in cm); [mean (min-max)] 54.7 (48–60.3) 54.7(48.5–61.4) 54.7 (48–61.4)
Head circumference (in cm); [mean (min-max)] 38.1 (35–49) 37.8(35–54.4) 37.9 (35–54.4)
Wasting
    Not wasted 204 (96.7%) 207 (99%) 411 (97.9%)
    Wasted 7 (3.3%) 2 (1%) 9 (2.1%)
Underweight
    Not underweight 210 (99.5%) 209 (100%) 419 (99.8%)
    Underweight 1 (0.5%) 0 1 (0.2%)
Stunting
    Not stunted 202 (95.7%) 192 (91.9%) 394 (93.8%)
    Stunted 9 (4.3%) 17 (8.1%) 26 (6.2%)
Haemoglobin; [mean (min-max) 125.6 (95–162) 118.6 (87–170) 122.1 (87–170)
Zinc protoprophyrin; [mean (min-max) 42.6 (19–125) 45.4 (16–90) 44 (16–125)

All infants in the study were aged 6 weeks (± 3 days) old. 55% of the infants were male while 45% were female. The mean (SD) birth weight of the infants was 3.10 (0.5) kg. Mean (SD) weight of the infants was 4.7 (0.6) kg and mean (SD) height was 54.7 (2.1) cm. Mean (SD) head circumference was 37.9 (1.6) cm and mean (SD) gestational weeks at birth was 37 (1) weeks. Mean (SD) Hb concentration of the infants was 12.3 (1.5) g/dl. Mean (SD) ZnPP concentration of the infants was 44.0 (13.1) μmol/mol Hb.

Mean (SD) age of mothers in the study was 27.7 (6.1) years. Mean (SD) weight of the mothers was 59.8 (12.3) kg. The median number of children per mother was 3 with a minimum of 1 child and a maximum of 11 children. Mean (SD) Hb concentration of the mothers during the last ANC visit was 10.8 (1.4) g/dl. Maternal information on education level and use of iron supplements during pregnancy was available for 157 mothers of whom 98.1% reported to having used iron supplements during pregnancy while 2% reported to not have used iron supplements during pregnancy. 17.8% of mothers had attained a post-secondary level of education, 21.7% had attained a secondary education level, 54.1% had attained a primary education level and 6.4% had no education level.

Nutritional outcomes in infants

The overall prevalence of ID, anemia and IDA among infants in Kwale county was 60.4% (95%CI: 55.9–65.2), 21.0% (95%CI: 17.5–25.2) and 15.8% (95%CI: 12.7–19.7) respectively. The prevalence of wasting, underweight and stunting was 2.1% (95%CI: 1.1–4.1), 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0–1.7) and 6.2% (95%CI: 4.3–9.0) respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. Nutritional outcomes in infants.

Nutritional conditions Wasting % (95%CI) Underweight % (95%CI) Stunting % (95%CI) Iron deficient % (95%CI) Anaemic % (95%CI) Iron deficiency Anemia % (95%CI)
Overall 2.1% (1.1–4.1); n = 9 0.2% (0.0–1.7); n = 1 6.2% (4.3–9.0); n = 26 60.4% (55.9–65.2); n = 256 21.0% (17.5–25.2); n = 89 15.8% (12.7–19.7); n = 67
SubCounty
    Kwale 3.3% (1.6–6.9); n = 7 0.5% (0.1–3.4); n = 1 4.3% (2.3–8.1); n = 9 55.1% (49.1–62.6); n = 117 12.8% (9.0–18.2); n = 27 9.5% (6.2–14.4); n = 20
    Msambweni 1.0% (0.2–3.8); n = 2 0% 8.1% (5.2–12.8); n = 17 65.3% (59.2–72.0); n = 139 29.1% (23.6–35.9); n = 62 22.1% (17.1–28.4); n = 47
Location:
    Mkongani 2.4% (0.6–9.6); n = 2 0% 4.9% (1.9–12.7); n = 4 59.6% (50.0–71.4); n = 49 14.6% (8.7–24.7); n = 12 9.8% (5.1–18.8); n = 8
    Tsimba Golini 4.3% (1.8–10.1); n = 5 0.9% (0.1–6.0); n = 1 4.3% (1.8–10.1); n = 5 50.4% (42.1–60.4); n = 59 12.8% (8.0–20.6); n = 15 10.3% (6.0–17.5); n = 12
    Waa 0% 0% 0% 75.0% (51.1–104); n = 9 0% 0%
    Kinondo 0% 0% 0% 61.5% (40.0–94.6); n = 8 50.8% (13.6–69.5); n = 4 15.4% (4.3–55); n = 2
    Ramisi 2.7% (0.7–10.7); n = 2 0% 11.0% (5.7–21.1); n = 8 66.2% (56.3–78); n = 49 27.0% (18.6–39.3) 24.3% (16.3–36.4); n = 18
    Ukunda 0% 0% 7.1% (3.5–14.6); n = 7 62.0% (53.2–72.3); n = 62 27.0% (19.6–37.3); n = 27 18.0% (11.8–27.3); n = 18
    Gombato 0% 0% 7.7% (2.0–29.1); n = 2 77.0% (62.3–94.9); n = 20 42.3% (27.0–66.3); n = 11 34.6% (20.4–58.7); n = 9
Age of the mother
    ≤20 0% 2.1% (0.3–14.8); n = 1 6.4% (2.1–19.1); n = 3 72.3% (60.6–86.3); n = 34 19.1% (10.6–34.5); n = 9 17.0% (9.1–32.0); n = 8
    21–30 2.1% (0.9–4.9); n = 5 0% 5.8% (3.5–9.6); n = 14 61.9% (56.1–68.3); n = 151 20.5% (16.0–26.2); n = 50 14.8% (10.9–19.-9); n = 36
    31–40 3.4% (1.3–9.0); n = 4 0% 6.0% (2.9–12.3); n = 7 52.1% (43.9–61.9); n = 62 24.4% (17.8–33.4); n = 29 18.5% (12.7–27.0); n = 22
    >40 0% 0% 16.7% (4.7–59.1); n = 2 75.0% (54.104); n = 9 8.3% (1.3–54.4); n = 1 8.3% (1.3–54.4); n = 1
Mother’s level of education
    None 0% 0% 0% 60.0% (36.2–99.5); n = 6 10.0% (1.6–64.2); n = 1 10.0% (1.6–64.2); n = 1
    Primary 2.4% (0.6–9.3); n = 2 0% 3.5% (1.2–10.7); n = 3 62.4% (52.9–73.6); n = 53 22.4% (15.0–33.2); n = 19 14.1% (8.4–23.8); n = 12
    Secondary 0% 0% 0% 50% (35.7–70); n = 17 11.8% (4.7–29.5); n = 4 8.8% (3.0–26.0); n = 3
    Post-secondary 11.5% (4.0–33.4); n = 3 0% 15.5% (6.2–37.9); n = 4 64.3% (48.8–84.7); n = 18 21.4% (10.5–43.6); n = 6 17.9% (8.1–39.5); n = 5
Parity
1 2.2% (0.6–8.7); n = 2 1.1% (0.2–7.7); n = 1 8.8% (4.5–17); n = 8 61.3% (52.1–72.0); n = 57 23.7% (16.4–34.1); n = 22 18.3% (11.9–28.1); n = 17
    2 2.7% (0.9–8.2); n = 3 0% 3.6% (1.4–9.3); n = 4 60.7% (52.3–70.5); n = 68 18.8% (12.8–27.6); n = 21 12.5% (7.7–20.4); n = 14
    3 1.1% (0.2–7.9); n = 1 0% 5.6% (2.4–13.2); n = 5 62.9% (53.6–73.8); n = 56 21.3% (14.3–31.8); n = 19 19.1% (12.5–29.3); n = 17
    ≥4 2.4% (0.8–7.4); n = 3 0% 5.6% (2.7–11.6); n = 7 60.0% (52.-69.2); n = 75 21.6% (15.5–30.2); n = 27 15.2% (10.0–23.0); n = 19
Mother anemic
    Yes 2.9% (1.2–7.0); n = 5 0.6% (0.1–4.2%); n = 1 6.5% (3.7–11.5); n = 11 63.0% (56.2–70.6); n = 109 22.0% (16.6–29.1); n = 38 17.9% (13.0–24.7); n = 31
    No 1.2% (0.3–4.9); n = 2 0% 6.8% (3.9–12.1); n = 11 67.1% (60.2–74.7); n = 108 21.7% (16.2–29.1); n = 35 16.2% (11.4–23.0); n = 26
Weight of the mother
    <50 1.0% (0.1–7.2); n = 1 0% 5.1% (2.2–12.0); n = 5 61.2% (52.3–71.7); n = 60 17.3% (11.3–26.7); n = 17 14.3% (8.8–23.2); n = 14
    50–59 0.7% (0.1–4.9); n = 1 0% 4.9% (2.4–10.1); n = 7 58.2% (50.7–66.8); n = 85 26% (19.8–34.2); n = 38 19.2% (13.8–26.8); n = 28
    60–69 3.1% (1.0–9.3); n = 3 1% (0.1–7.2); n = 1 8.2% (4.2–15.9); n = 8 56.1% (47.1–66.9); n = 55 20.4% (13.8–30.2); n = 20 16.3% (10.4–25.6); n = 16
    70–79 4.3% (1.1–16.5); n = 2 0% 6.4% (2.1–19.1); n = 3 68.1% (56.0–82.8); n = 32 25.5% (15.7–41.6); n = 12 14.9% (7.5–29.5); n = 7
    >80 5.9% (1.5–22.6); n = 2 0% 8.8% (3.0–26); n = 3 70.6% (56.8–87.8); n = 24 5.9% (1.5–22.6); n = 2 5.9% (1.5–22.6); n = 2
Mother uses iron supplement
Yes 3.3% (1.3–7.8); n = 5 0% 4.6% (2.2–9.5); n = 7 60.4% (53.1–68.6); n = 93 18.2% (13.0–25.4); n = 28 13.6% (9.2–20.3); n = 21
No 0% 0% 0% 33.3% (6.7–165.1); n = 1 66.7% (30.0–148.4); n = 2 0%
Infant gender
    Male 3.9% (2.1–7.5); n = 9 0.4% (0.1–3.1); n = 1 5.7% (3.3–9.6); n = 13 64.2% (58.3–70.7); n = 149 26.7% (21.6–33.1); n = 62 20.3% (15.7–26.2); n = 47
    Female 0% 0% 6.8% (4.0–11.6); n = 13 56.3% (49.7–63.8); n = 107 14.2% (10.0–20.2); n = 27 10.5% (7.0–15.9); n = 20
Infant weight at birth
    <2.5 3.2% (0.5–22.2); n = 1 0% 32.3% (19.4–53.7); n = 10 71% (56.7–88.9); n = 22 29% (16.7–50.3); n = 9 22.3% (11.8–43.3); n = 7
    ≥2.5 2.1% (1.0–4.1); n = 8 0.3% (0.0–1.8); n = 1 4.2% (2.6–6.7); n = 16 59.4% (54.7–64.5); n = 230 20.2% (16.5–24.6); n = 78 15% (11.8–19.0); n = 58
Infant weight at 6 weeks
    <5.0 3.0% (1.6–5.8); n = 9 0.3% (0.0–2.4); n = 1 8.8% (6.1–12.7); n = 26 59.3% (53.9–65.1); n = 176 19.9% (15.8–25); n = 59 16.2% (12.5–20.9); n = 48
    ≥5.0 0% 0% 0% 63.5% (55.6–72.5); n = 80 23.8% (17.4–32.5); n = 30 15.1% (1–22.8); n = 19
Gestational weeks
    <37 2.0% (0.3–13.6); n = 1 0% 2.0% (0.3–13.7); n = 1 60.4% (48.5–75.1); n = 32 24.5% (15.3–39.3); n = 13 18.9% (10.8–33.0); n = 10
    ≥37 2.2% (1.1–4.3); n = 8 0.3% (0.0–1.9); n = 1 6.6% (4.5–9.7); n = 24 60.9% (56.1–66.1); n = 223 20.5% (16.7–25.1); n = 75 15.6% (12.3–19.8); n = 57
Infant’s height (cm)
    <55 0.5% (0.1–3.5); n = 1 0.5% (0.1–3.5); n = 1 13.1% (9.1–18.7); n = 26 59.5% (53.1–66.7); n = 119 22.0% (16.9–28.6); n = 44 17.0% (12.5–23.1); n = 34
    ≥55 3.6% (1.8–7.1); n = 8 0% 0% 61.4% (55.4–68.2); n = 137 20.2% (15.5–26.2); n = 45 14.8% (10.8–20.3); n = 33
Infant’s head circumference
    <38 2.2% (1.0–4.9); n = 6 0.4% (0.1–2.6); n = 1 9.3% (6.4–13.5); n = 25 63.5% (58.0–69.5); n = 172 20.3% (16.0–25.7); n = 55 15.9% (12.1–20.9); n = 43
    ≥38 2.0% (0.6–6.1); n = 3 0% 0.7% (0.1–4.7); n = 1 55.3% (47.9–63.8); n = 84 22.4% (16.6–30.1); n = 34 15.8% (10.9–22.8); n = 24

Msambweni Sub-County had a higher prevalence of anemia 29.1% (95%CI:23.6–35.9) compared to Matuga Sub-County 12.8% (95%CI:9–18.2). Kinondo location in Msambweni Sub-County had the highest proportion of infants with anemia 50.4% (95%CI: 13.6–69.5) followed by Gombato Location 42.3% (95%CI:27.0–66.3) while Waa Location in Matuga Sub-County had no cases of anemia (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Prevalence of ID, anemia and IDA among six-week-old infants by locations in Kwale County, Kenya.

Fig 1

Male infants exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of anemia at 26.7% (95%CI:21.6–33.1) compared female infants, who had a prevalence of 14.2% (95%CI:10.0–20.2). Furthermore, infants with low birthweight had a significantly higher prevalence of anemia at 29% (95%CI:16.7–50.3) compared to infants with a birthweight of ≥ 2.5 kg, where the prevalence of anemia was 20.2% (95%CI:16.5–24.6). Infants weighing weighed < 5.0 kg had a lower anemia prevalence at 19.9% (95%CI: 15.8–25) compared to infants weighing ≥5.0 kg, with a prevalence 23.8% (95%CI:17.4–32.5). Similarly, infants with a head circumference <38.0 cm had a lower anemia prevalence at 20.3% (95%CI: 16.0–25.7) compared to infants with a head circumference of ≥38.0 cm, where the prevalence of anemia was 22.4% (95%CI:16.6–30.1). Based on gestational age at birth, infants born at <37 weeks gestation had a higher anemia prevalence at 24.5% (95%CI:15.3–39.3) compared to infants born at ≥ 37 weeks gestation, where the prevalence of anemia was 20.5% (95%CI:16.7–25.1). Additionally, based on infants’ height, those with a height <55.0 cm had a higher prevalence of anemia at 22.0% (95%CI: 16.9–28.6) compared to infants with a height ≥55.0 kg, with a prevalence of 20.2% (95%CI:15.5–26.2).

Regarding mothers age, infants born to mothers aged 31–40 years had the highest prevalence of anemia at 24.4% (95%CI:17.8–33.4) and those born to mothers aged >40 years, had the least anemia prevalence at 8.3% (95%CI: 1.3–54.4). In terms of education level, infants of mothers with primary education had the highest prevalence of anemia at 22.4% (95%CI: 15.0–33.2) and infants of mothers with no formal education, had the lowest anemia prevalence at 10.0% (95%CI: 1.6–64.2). Infants born to mothers with parity one had the highest prevalence of anemia at 23.7% (95%CI: 16.4–34.1) and infants born of mothers with parity two, had the least prevalence of anemia at 18.8% (95%CI: 12.8–27.6). Concerning maternal anemia status during the last ANC visit, mothers who were anemic had a slightly higher proportion of infants with anemia 22.0% (95%CI: 16.6–29.1) compared to mothers who were not anemic during the last ANC visit, with a prevalence of 21.7% (95%CI: 16.2–19.1). The highest proportion of anemia in infants of 26.0% (95%CI:19.8–34.2) was in the category of mothers weighing 50–59 kgs while the least proportion of anemia in infants of 5.9% (95%CI: 1.5–22.6) was in the category of mothers weighing >80 kgs. Infants born of mothers who reported to have used iron supplements during pregnancy had an anemia prevalence of 18.2% (95%CI:13.0–25.4), whereas infants born of mothers who did not use iron supplements during pregnancy had a higher anemia prevalence at 66.7% (95%CI:30.0–148.8).

Chi square analysis of factors associated with anaemia

Infants from Msambweni Sub-County had a significantly higher prevalence of anemia (χ2 = 17.0, df = 1, p<0.001) compared to infants from Matuga Sub-County.

Infant gender was significantly associated with anemia status (χ2 = 9.83, df = 1, p = 0.002). Infants iron deficiency status was significantly associated with anemia status (χ2 = 10.46, df = 1, p = 0.001).

Use of iron supplements during pregnancy was significantly associated with infants’ anemia status (χ2 = 4.48, df = 1, p = 0.034) (Table 3).

Table 3. Chi-square association of anaemia with selected predictors among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya.

Selected predictors Iron deficient Anaemic Iron deficiency anemia
Yes No Yes No Yes No
SubCounty
    Kwale 117 94 27 184 20 191
    Msambweni 139 74 62 151 47 166
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 4.26, df = 1, p = 0.039* χ2 = 17.00, df = 1, p = 0.000* χ2 = 12.62, df = 1, p = 0.000*
Age of the mother
    ≤20 34 13 9 38 8 39
    21–30 151 93 50 194 36 208
    31–40 62 57 29 90 22 97
    >40 9 3 1 11 1 11
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 7.53, df = 3, p = 0.057 χ2 = 2.10, df = 3, p = 0.552 χ2 = 1.40, df = 3, p = 0.707
Mother’s level of education
    None 6 4 1 9 1 9
    Primary 53 32 19 66 12 73
    Secondary 17 17 4 30 3 31
    Post-secondary 18 10 6 22 5 23
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 1.82, df = 3, p = 0.610 χ2 = 2.40, df = 3, p = 0.494 χ2 = 1.23, df = 3, p = 0.745
Parity
    1 57 36 22 71 17 76
    2 68 44 21 91 14 98
    3 56 33 19 70 17 72
    ≥4 75 40 27 98 19 106
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 0.20, df = 3, p = 0.978 χ2 = 0.75, df = 3, p = 0.861 χ2 = 2.08, df = 3, p = 0.556
Mother anemic
    Yes 109 64 38 135 31 142
    No 108 53 35 126 26 135
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 0.61, df = 1, p = 0.435 χ2 = 0.0025, df = 1, p = 0.960 χ2 = 0.18, df = 1, p = 0.667
Mother uses iron supplement
Yes 93 61 28 126 21 133
No 1 2 2 1 0 3
χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 0.90, df = 1, p = 0.344 χ2 = 4.48, df = 1, p = 0.034* χ2 = 0.47, df = 1, p = 0.492
Infant gender
    Male 149 83 62 170 47 185
    Female 107 83 27 163 20 170
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 2.74, df = 1, p = 0.098 χ2 = 9.83, df = 1, p = 0.002* χ2 = 7.41, df = 1, p = 0.006*
Infant weight at birth
    <2.5 22 9 9 22 7 24
    ≥2.5 230 157 78 309 58 329
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 1.60, df = 1, p = 0.207 χ2 = 1.37, df = 1, p = 0.241 χ2 = 1.26, df = 1, p = 0.262
Gestational weeks
    <37 32 21 13 40 10 43
    ≥37 223 143 75 291 57 309
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) χ2 = 0.01, df = 1, p = 0.939 χ2 = 0.45, df = 1, p = 0.500 χ2 = 0.37, df = 1, p = 0.541
Iron deficient
    Yes Not applicable Not applicable 67 189 67 189
    No Not applicable Not applicable 22 146 0 168
    χ2(test statistic, p-value) Not applicable χ2 = 10.46, df = 1, p = 0.001* χ2 = 52.22, df = 1, p = 0.000*

Bivariate analysis of factors associated with anaemia

Overall, infants in Msambweni Sub-County were 2.8 times, [OR = 2.80 (95%CI: 1.70–4.62, p<0.001)] more likely to be anemic compared to infants in Matuga Sub-County.

Male infants had significantly higher odds of anemia compared to female infants, OR = 2.20 (95%CI:1.33–3.63, p = 0.002). Similarly, iron deficient infants also had significantly higher odds of anemia than iron replete infants, OR = 2.35, (95%CI: 1.39–3.99, p = 0.001).

Mothers who did not use iron supplements during pregnancy had marginally significant higher odds of having infants with anemia than mothers who used iron supplements during pregnancy, OR = 9.0 (95%CI:0.79–102.8, p = 0.077) (Table 4).

Table 4. Bivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya.

Factors N (%) Odds Ratio (95% CI) P-value
Infant’s factors:
Gestation weeks
    <37 weeks 1.26 (0.64–2.48) 0.501
    ≥37 weeks Reference
Gender
    Male 2.20 (1.33–3.63) 0.002 *
    Female Reference
Birth weight
    <2.5kg 1.62 (0.72–3.66) 0.245
    ≥2.5kg Reference
Wasted
    < 2.0 SD 9 (2.1%) Insufficient observations -
    ≥2.0 SD 411 (97.9%) Reference
Underweight
    <2.0 SD 1 (0.2%) Insufficient observations -
    ≥2.0SD 419 (99.8%) Reference
Stunted
    < 2.0 SD 26 (6.2%) 1.16 (0.45–2.98) 0.759
    ≥2.0 SD 394 (93.8%) Reference
Weight at 6 weeks
    <5.0kg 0.79 (0.48–1.31) 0.363
    ≥5.0kg SD Reference
Height at 6 weeks
<55 1.12 (0.70–1.78) 0.647
≥55 Reference
Head circumference
    <38 0.88 (0.56–1.43) 0.616
    ≥38 Reference
Iron deficient
    Yes 2.35 (1.39–3.99) 0.001 *
    No Reference
Maternal factors:
Anemic
    Yes 1.01 (0.60–1.70) 0.960
    No Reference
Use of iron supplements
    Yes Reference
    No 9.0 (0.79–102.8) 0.077
Age
≤20 Reference
    21–30 1.09 (0.49–2.40) 0.834
    31–40 1.36 (0.59–3.15) 0.472
    >40 0.38 (0.04–3.37) 0.388
Weight
    <50 Reference
    50–59 1.68 (0.88–3.18) 0.114
    60–69 1.22 (0.60–2.50) 0.584
    70–79 1.63 (0.71–3.78) 0.251
    ≥80 0.30 (0.07–1.36) 0.119
Parity
    1 Reference
    2 0.74 (0.4–1.5) 0.391
    3 0.88 (0.4–1.8) 0.710
    ≥4 0.89 (0.47–1.69) 0.719
Education
    None Reference
    Primary 2.59 (0.31–25.8) 0.381
    Secondary 1.19 (0.12–12.14) 0.877
    Post-secondary 2.45 (0.26–25.39) 0.435
Sub-County:
Kwale Reference
Msambweni 2.80 (1.70–4.62) <0.001 *

*Indicates statistically significant factors (p<0.05)

Multivariate analysis of factors associated with anaemia

Pairwise correlation of variables in the bivariate analysis was used to assess for correlation (Table 5). Stepwise variable selection with an inclusion criterion of p-value<0.5 was then done which included variables such as parity, birthweight, gender, age of the mother, use of iron supplements, education level and iron deficiency in the multivariate analysis model.

Table 5. Pairwise correlation coefficients of factors associated with anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya.

ANM GES PAR BW GEN IDA WAS UWT STU AMO UIS AGM WOM EDS WOC HOC HCC
ANM 1.0000
GES 0.0329 1.0000
PAR -0.0329 -0.0571 1.0000
BW 0.0573 -0.0234 0.0068 1.0000
GEN -0.1526 0.0602 -0.0360 0.1107 1.0000
IDA 0.1571 -0.0038 -0.0145 0.0618 -0.0805 1.0000
WAS -0.0756 -0.0052 0.0114 0.0206 -0.1350 -0.0493 1.0000
UWT 0.0956 -0.0183 -0.0624 -0.0140 -0.0446 0.0393 -0.0072 1.0000
STU 0.0150 -0.0637 -0.0276 0.3048 0.0240 0.0448 0.0302 0.1902 1.0000
AMO 0.0027 -0.0582 0.0449 0.0552 0.0148 -0.0427 0.0590 0.0536 -0.0073 1.0000
UIS 0.1688 -0.0571 0.1548 -0.0404 -0.1347 -0.0756 -0.0256 . -0.0306 -0.1686 1.0000
AGM 0.0151 -0.0536 0.6186 -0.0289 0.0064 -0.0880 0.0483 -0.0887 0.0318 0.0245 0.0054 1.0000
WOM -0.0401 -0.0040 0.0803 -0.1243 0.0573 0.0503 0.1074 0.0218 0.0486 -0.1651 -0.0279 0.1856 1.0000
EDS -0.0054 0.1213 -0.3322 0.0237 0.0377 -0.0136 0.1533 . 0.1679 -0.1685 -0.0287 0.0161 0.2331 1.0000
WOC -0.0443 0.0460 0.0334 0.1427 0.1741 -0.0396 0.0958 0.0316 0.1663 0.0824 -0.1319 -0.0486 -0.1808 -0.0788 1.0000
HOC -0.0223 -0.0318 -0.0289 -0.2055 -0.1808 0.0198 0.1075 -0.0515 -0.2707 -0.0393 -0.0583 0.0511 0.1698 0.0699 -0.4408 1.0000
HCC 0.0244 -0.0930 -0.0441 -0.1344 -0.1532 -0.0805 -0.0081 -0.0366 -0.1719 -0.0333 0.0124 0.0414 0.0810 -0.0398 -0.2771 0.3244 1.0000

ANM: Anemia, GES: Gestational weeks, PAR: Parity, BW: Birth weight, GEN: Gender, IDA: Iron deficient anemia, WAS: Wasting, UWT: Underweight, STU: Stunted, AMO: Anemic mother, UIS: Use of iron supplements, AGM: Age of the mother, WOM: Weight of the mother, EDS: Education level, WOC: Weight of the child, HOC: Height of the child, HCC: Head circumference of the child.

Significantly higher odds of anemia were seen infants born of mothers who did not use iron supplements during pregnancy, aOR = 74.01 (95%CI: 2.45–2238.21, p = 0.013). Mothers with parity ≥ 4 had significantly lower odds of having infants with anemia aOR = 0.05 (95%CI:0.00–0.77, p = 0.024) (Table 6).

Table 6. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of factors associated with anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya.

Factors Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI) P-Value
Infant’s factors:
Gestation weeks
    <37 weeks 0.65 (0.15–2.82) 0.562
    ≥37 weeks Reference
Gender
    Male 1.92 (0.66–5.54) 0.229
    Female Reference
Birth weight
    <2.5kg 1.28 (0.20–8.25) 0.798
    ≥2.5kg Reference
Stunted
    < 2.0 SD 0.20 (0.01–3.86) 0.285
    ≥2.0 SD Reference
Weight at 6 weeks
    <5.0kg 1.14 (0.31–4.19) 0.844
    ≥5.0kg Reference
Height at 6 weeks
    <55 1.31 (0.41–4.22) 0.652
    ≥55 Reference
Head circumference
    <38 0.76 (0.25–2.36) 0.639
    ≥38 Reference
Iron deficient
    Yes 2.15(0.68–6.81) 0.192
    No Reference
Maternal factors:
Use of iron supplements
    Yes Reference
    No 74.01(2.45–2238.21) 0.013 *
Age
    ≤20 Reference
    21–30 1.65(0.19–14.36) 0.649
    31–40 11.37(0.69–186.86) 0.089
    >40
Weight
    <50 Reference
    50–59 1.80(0.39–8.43) 0.454
    60–69 1.81(0.37–8.88) 0.463
    70–79 1.05(0.16–6.93) 0.963
    ≥80 0.24(0.01–4.14) 0.330
Parity
    1 Reference
    2 0.52(0.09–3.03) 0.464
    3 0.38(0.05–2.57) 0.318
    ≥4 0.06(0.00–0.69) 0.024 *
Education
    None Reference
    Primary 3.10(0.28–34.02) 0.354
    Secondary 0.53(0.04–7.88) 0.646
    Post-secondary 2.82(0.17–47.02) 0.470
Subcounty:
Kwale Reference
Msambweni 2.28(0.78–6.62) 0.129

*Indicates statistically significant factors (p<0.005)

Discussion

This study among six-week-old infants in south Kenya found the prevalence of anemia, ID and IDA to be 21.0%, 60.4% and 15.8% respectively. Significant factors associated with anemia were infant iron deficiency status, gender, maternal use of iron supplements during pregnancy and the sub-County of residence. On multivariate analysis, factors that remained significant were use of iron supplements during pregnancy and parity of ≥4.

Anemia prevalence in this study is slightly lower than the global anemia prevalence of 22.8% across all ages [24] and 42% in children < 5 years of age [3]. Similarly, anemia prevalence in this study is lower than the prevalence in older Kenyan infants where 70% of infants at 6-months of age are anemic [5] and the nationwide anemia prevalence in Kenyan children under one year of 39.5% [13]. In addition, this prevalence is also lower compared to a prevalence of 69% in a recent non-representative (including infants in Msambweni Sub-County only) study in the same area of Kenya among infants aged 6–10 months [24]. This is not surprising as younger infants generally have high hemoglobin (Hb) levels in the first few weeks after birth due to high levels of circulating fetal hemoglobin (HbF); these levels decrease progressively over the first 6-months as HbF is replaced by adult hemoglobin (HbA) [25]. According to WHO categorization of anemia (severe; ≥40%, moderate; 20.0%-39.9%, mild; 5.0%-19.9% and normal ≤4.9%), the 21.0% anemia prevalence is of moderate public health significance [26].

Prevalence of ID and IDA in this study was 60.4% and 15.8% respectively. This means ID accounted for 75.3% of the total anemia cases in this study. This agrees with documented global anemia burden where ID accounted for ≥60% of the cases of anemia in children <5 years in LMIC who predominantly have the highest burden of anemia [2].

Infant gender significantly predicted anemia status with male infants having an increased risk of anemia compared to female infants. Few studies have been done to address the question of gender differences on anemia and iron status in early infancy. Some studies have reported higher anemia prevalence in boys compared to girls [5, 27]. These differences may reflect increased cases of ID in boys and a potential contribution of genetics [28]. In one study anemia in infancy was associated with alterations in systemic metabolism dependent on gender with male infants having higher prevalence of anemia and ID due to greater oxidative stress and microbial dysfunction compared to female infants [29].

In this study, the use of iron supplementation emerged as a significant predictor of infants’ anemia status. Infants born to mothers who did not report to using iron supplements during pregnancy exhibited an elevated risk of anemia compared to infants born to mothers who reported using iron supplements during pregnancy. This is in agreement with other clinical trials studies on effect of daily iron supplementation in conjunction with folic acid and other vitamins and minerals for pregnant women as an intervention in antenatal care, which showed that supplementation with iron reduced the risk of ID and maternal anemia [30]. During pregnancy, iron supplementation produces more benefits to both the mother and the baby by promoting fetal health, preparing the fetus with adequate iron stores to be used during early postnatal stages of life as well as reducing maternal morbidity [32].

In this study, infants in Msambweni Sub-County had significantly higher risk of anemia compared to infants in Matuga Sub-County. While there was no direct measure of diet or other factors leading to this, evidence shows that low diet quality, inadequate dietary diversity and consumption of monotonous diets in Africa among poor populations are important predictors of maternal anemia and poor birth outcomes [31]. The 2017 Kwale County Maternal Infant and Young Child Nutrition (MIYCN) Knowledge, Attitude and Practices (KAP) survey report states that the minimum dietary diversity for women of reproductive age is 45.2%, suggesting a low-quality diet [32]. The report notes that factors influencing maternal nutrition were consistent across various sub-Counties. The primary reasons identified included limited purchasing power to acquire adequate food, food insecurity and cultural factors impacting the diet choices of certain women during pregnancy in specific communities [32]. A meta-analysis on dietary diversity among pregnant and lactating women in Ethiopia showed that only 41% of pregnant women and 50% of lactating women had adequate dietary diversity with factors leading to this including wealth index level of household, maternal education and nutritional information [33]. These findings suggest that there is need to improve maternal and child nutrition services particularly on nutrition education on the selection and diversification of meals.

In this study, infants of mothers with parity of four or more were significantly less likely to be anemic compared to infants born of mothers with parity of one. This is in contrast to other studies where higher maternal parity was associated with greater risk for childhood anemia [27]. However, these studies examined older infants and having many children in the family may reduce the ability to feed them appropriately. The contrast in our study could be because mothers who have more than one child are more likely to comply and adhere to the guidelines and instructions on daily usage of iron and folic acid supplements given during pregnancy through education and sensitization in previous pregnancies from health experts.

Whilst our study did not show any significant association between gestational age, birth weight and maternal anemia with infants’ anemia status, other studies have shown significant associations. Preterm and low birthweight infants have a higher risk of developing ID and IDA because of higher iron requirements compared to term and normal birth weight infants due to increased post-natal growth rate [34]. A study conducted in Bangladesh found a significant association between maternal anemia and occurrence of childhood anemia; the prevalence of anemia among children born to anemic mothers was notably higher at (62%) compared to those born to non-anemic mothers [35].

Study strengths and limitations

One significant strength of this study lies in the recruitment of infants from villages surrounding hospitals, maternity wards, well-baby clinics and vaccination clinics. This approach enhances the likelihood of a more representative sample from the study area population. Furthermore, besides gathering information related to infants, maternal data was also collected to assess its association with infants’ anemia status.

However, it is important to acknowledge several limitations in this study. Firstly, being nested within a parent study, it exclusively included infants meeting the inclusion criteria for that specific study. The reliance on mother-child health booklets for maternal information posed a limitation, as these booklets were unavailable for some mothers. Additionally, the accuracy of information regarding use of iron supplements during pregnancy depended on mothers’ ability to recall and honestly disclose the information. This study also lacked data on mother’ blood samples and dietary information. Notably, participants were not recruited at the household level but were mobilized to a central recruitment point within the County such as hospitals, well-baby clinics and maternity wards.

Conclusion

Our study findings indicate that in rural Kenya, anemia in early infancy affects 21% of infants, with iron deficiency accounting for 75.3% of these anemia cases. Furthermore, the study highlights the use maternal iron supplements as a crucial factor in reducing the risk of infants developing anemia. Addressing the issue of iron deficiency during early childhood is essential to enhance hemoglobin levels in early infancy, and in the long term prevent physical and cognitive impairments associated with iron deficiency during this crucial developmental stage. It may be advisable to revisit the current recommendations that target screening and provision of iron supplements only to infants aged 6–24 months given the, given the high prevalence of iron deficiency in this study.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Minimal anonymized dataset of six-week-old infants (infant-mother pairs) surveyed in Kwale County, Kenya.

(XLSX)

pgph.0003062.s001.xlsx (140.2KB, xlsx)

Data Availability

The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is included as a supplementary file.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Gardner W and Kassebaum N. Global, Regional, and National Prevalence of Anemia and Its Causes in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019. Current Developments in Nutrition, vol. 4, no. Suppl 2, p. 830, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1093/CDN/NZAA053_035 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kassebaum N, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi M, Wulf S, Johns N, Lozano R et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood, the journal of the American Society of Haematology. vol. 123, no. 5. 2014. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO. Global Anaemia Estimates 2021 [cited 24th January 2023]. Available from: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/anaemia_in_women_and_children.
  • 4.Ewusie J, Ahiadeke C, Beyene J, Hamid J. Prevalence of anemia among under-5 children in the Ghanaian population: estimates from the Ghana demographic and health survey. BMC Public Health, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 626, Jun. 2014, doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jaeggi T, Moretti D, Kvalsvig J, Holding P, Tjalsman H, Kortman G et al. Iron Status and Systemic Inflammation, but Not Gut Inflammation, Strongly Predict Gender-Specific Concentrations of Serum Hepcidin in Infants in Rural Kenya. PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 2, 2013, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Brabin B, Premji Z, Verhoeff F. An analysis of anemia and child mortality. Journal of Nutrition, American Institute of Nutrition, 2001. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.2.636S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lozoff B, Beard J, J. Connor J, Felt B, Georgieff M, Schallert T. Long-lasting neural and behavioral effects of iron deficiency in infancy. Nutrition Reviews, vol. 64, no. 5 SUPPL. 1. 2006. doi: 10.1301/nr.2006.may.s34-s43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Savy M, Edmund K, Fine P, Hall A, Hennig B, Moore S et al. Landscape analysis of interactions between nutrition and vaccine responses in children. Journal of Nutrition, vol. 139, no. 11, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.3945/jn.109.105312 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Prendergast A. Malnutrition and vaccination in developing countries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, vol. 370, no. 1671, p. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0141 , Jun. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Haas J, Brownlie IV T. Iron deficiency and reduced work capacity: A critical review of the research to determine a causal relationship. Journal of Nutrition, vol. 131, no. 2 SUPPL. 2, 2001, doi: 10.1093/jn/131.2.676S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO. Anaemia 2022 [cited 5th February 2024]. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/anaemia#tab=tab_1
  • 12.Zlotkin S, Davidsson L, anLozoff B. Balancing the Benefits and Risks of Iron Fortification in Resource-Constrained Settings. The Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 167, no. 4, pp. S26–S30, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.07.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ngesa O, aMwambi H. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Anaemia among Children Aged between 6 Months and 14 Years in Kenya. PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 11, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113756 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Onyangore F, Were G, and Mwamburi L. Prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia and dietary iron intake among infants aged six to nine months in Keiyo South Sub County, Kenya. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development, vol. 16, no. 2, 2016, doi: 10.18697/ajfand.74.15285 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gruber J, Gruber L, Weber R, Becker-Dreps S, Funk M. Rotavirus Vaccine Schedules and Vaccine Response Among Infants in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Open Forum Infect Diseases, vol. 4, no. 2, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx066 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lukowski A. F., Koss M., Burden M., Jonides J., Nelson C., Kaciroti N. et al. , “Iron Deficiency in Infancy and Neurocognitive Functioning at 19 Years: Evidence of Long-Term Deficits in Executive Function and Recognition Memory,” Nutr Neurosci, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 54, 2010, doi: 10.1179/147683010X12611460763689 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.WHO. Guideline. Daily iron supplementation in infants and children 2016. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549523 [PubMed]
  • 18.Moraleda C, Rabinovich R, Menéndez C. Are infants less than 6 months of age a neglected group for anemia prevention in low-income countries? American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 98, no. 3. 2018. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Qian Y, Ying X, Wang P, Lu Z, Hua Y. Early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 300, no. 3. Springer Verlag, pp. 531–543, Sep. 01, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s00404-019-05215-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Aimone A, Perumal N, and Cole D. A systematic review of the application and utility of geographical information systems for exploring disease-disease relationships in paediatric global health research: the case of anaemia and malaria. International Journal of Health Geographics, vol. 12, p. 1, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-12-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Zürich Nicole Stoffel E., Stoffel D., Menozzi M., Schmitt AGU Zürich Michael Siegrist K.-U., and Taylor W. R., “EK 2020-N-108: Effects of iron supplementation on pediatric vaccine response,” 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.KNBS. 2019 Kenya Population and Housing Census Reports–CAHF | Centre for Affordable Housing Finance Africa, KNBS Report. Accessed: Oct. 10, 2022. Available from: https://housingfinanceafrica.org/documents/2019-kenya-population-and-housing-census-reports/
  • 23.Fisher LD, Belle G Van. Biostatistics: A methodology for the health sciences. pp. 991–991, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Nyilima S Karanja S, Magu D, Zimmerman M. Correlates of anemia among infants aged 6–10 months attending Msambweni County Referral Hospital, Kwale County Kenya. Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies (JAIS), vol. 5, 2021. Available from: https://kenyasocialscienceforum.files.wordpress.com/2021/11/pdf-nyilima-et-al-prevalence-and-maternal-correlates-of-anemia-among-infants-1.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lorenz L, Peter A, Poets C, Franz A. E-Mail A Review of Cord Blood Concentrations of Iron Status Parameters to Define Reference Ranges for Preterm Infants. Neonatology, vol. 104, pp. 194–202, 2013, doi: 10.1159/000353161 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.WHO. Anaemia. 2008 Available from: https://www.who.int/data/nutrition/nlis/info/anaemia
  • 27.Kuziga F, Adoke Y, Wanyenze R. Prevalence and factors associated with anaemia among children aged 6 to 59 months in Namutumba district, Uganda: a cross- sectional study. BMC Pediatrics, vol. 17, no. 1, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1186/S12887-017-0782-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Domellöf M, Lönnerdal B,Dewey K, Cohen R, Landa Rivera R, Hernell O. Sex differences in iron status during infancy. Pediatrics, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 545–552, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.545 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McClorry S, Zavaleta N, Llanos A, Casapía M, Lönnerdal B, Slupsky C. Anemia in infancy is associated with alterations in systemic metabolism and microbial structure and function in a sex-specific manner: an observational study. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 1238–1248, Dec. 2018, doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Peña-Rosas J, De-Regil L, Garcia-Casal M, Dowswell T. Daily oral iron supplementation during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Systematic Reviews, vol. 2015, no. 7, pp. 1–527, 2015, doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004736.PUB5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Seid A, Dugassa Fufa D, Weldeyohannes M, Tadesse Z, Fenta S, Bitew Z et al. Inadequate dietary diversity during pregnancy increases the risk of maternal anemia and low birth weight in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Food Science and Nutrition, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 3706–3717, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1002/fsn3.3388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Sophie Ochola. Maternal Infant and Young Child Nutrition (MIYCN) Knowledge, Attitudes, Beliefs and Prectices (KABP) Survey Report Kwale County Kenya. 2017. Available from: https://www.nutritionhealth.or.ke/Kwale County MIYCN KAP Report—December 2017.pdf
  • 33.Azene A, Aragaw A, Wubetie H, Wassie G, Tsegaye G, Derebe M et al. Dietary diversity among pregnant women and associated factors in Ethiopia: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 6, p. e0251906, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251906 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Moreno-Fernandez J, Ochoa J, Latunde-Dada G, Diaz-Castro J. Iron Deficiency and Iron Homeostasis in Low-Birth-Weight Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review. Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 5, May 2019, doi: 10.3390/nu11051090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khan J, Awan N, Misu F. Determinants of anemia among 6–59 months aged children in Bangladesh: evidence from nationally representative data. BMC Pediatrics, vol. 16, no. 1, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1186/s12887-015-0536-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003062.r001

Decision Letter 0

Aditi Apte

18 Jan 2024

PGPH-D-23-01767

Prevalence and predictors of anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya: A cross-sectional study

PLOS Global Public Health

Dear Dr.Mwakishalua ,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS Global Public Health. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 30, 2024. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at globalpubhealth@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pgph/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Aditi Apte, MD PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Does this manuscript meet PLOS Global Public Health’s publication criteria? Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe methodologically and ethically rigorous research with conclusions that are appropriately drawn based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: I don't know

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available (please refer to the Data Availability Statement at the start of the manuscript PDF file)?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception. The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS Global Public Health does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Firstly, I would congratulate the authors for studying an important issue of public health relevance. There are very few treatment regimens and recommendations in the under 6 months age group, hence the authors have tried throwing light on the gaps in this area. The findings will be very valuable for policy and action.

The authors have done good job of extracting maximum information for this nested study from the parent study. However I feel that the paper would benefit from minor editing.

Minor edits need to be done as follows:

General comments: The references in the text need to mentioned by their number rather than the authors. This uniformity needs to be maintained throughout the manuscript. All the significant values in the tale need to be highlighted for easier reading.

Specific comments:

Introduction:

Line number 71, 72 the reference number needs to be mentioned rather than the author names, similarly at line number 101, 102, 125, 126

Materials and methods:

Line 137 reference of the RCT needs to be mentioned

Results:

It has been mentioned in the methods as well as the results that the Hemoglobin at the mother’s last ANC visit was recorded and that value is used in all the analysis. I would add more value if you could mention the average weeks at this visit or at what weeks this last ANC visit was.

This study is a nested study and there was no maternal blood sample but certainly if instead of just recorded values of Hemoglobin if there was a maternal blood sample available it would have added value to this study

Line 281, 282 you have mentioned that mothers weighing 50-59 kg had higher proportion of anaemic infants than mothers weighing >80kg so does that mean that the in between range of weight the relation was not significant? Need to clarify

Line 288,289 There is a difference between the 2 counties’, is there any specific reason which can be identified, is the diet different in these 2 counties? There is no direct measure of diet in this study which also is one of the drawbacks as diet plays a important role in anaemia. Some measure of diet or some general information collected through and Focus Group Discussion would have given clarity on whether there were any major differences in the diet.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript was decently written. However, there are places that can be improved before moving forward -

1) For statistical analysis, there are confidence intervals with very wide bounds which usually indicate problems with the models. The authors need to scrutinize them in revision.

2) For data availability, it seems the raw dataset used for the analysis has not been uploaded. To improve reproducibility, the authors can consider providing it.

Other comments, along with their corresponding sections highlighted, are in the uploaded attachment.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: PGPH-D-23-01767_reviewer.pdf

pgph.0003062.s002.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
PLOS Glob Public Health. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003062.r003

Decision Letter 1

Aditi Apte

6 Mar 2024

Prevalence and predictors of anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya: A cross-sectional study

PGPH-D-23-01767R1

Dear Dr Mwakishalua,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Prevalence and predictors of anemia among six-week-old infants in Kwale County, Kenya: A cross-sectional study' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Global Public Health.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact globalpubhealth@plos.org.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Global Public Health.

Best regards,

Aditi Apte, MD PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS Global Public Health

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Minimal anonymized dataset of six-week-old infants (infant-mother pairs) surveyed in Kwale County, Kenya.

    (XLSX)

    pgph.0003062.s001.xlsx (140.2KB, xlsx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: PGPH-D-23-01767_reviewer.pdf

    pgph.0003062.s002.pdf (1.3MB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers.docx

    pgph.0003062.s003.docx (15.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    The dataset supporting the conclusion of this article is included as a supplementary file.


    Articles from PLOS Global Public Health are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES