Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299286

The network characteristics of classic red tourist attractions in Shaanxi province, China

Feng Yuxin 1,2, Tian Yunxia 1,*, Lv Xiaoyu 1
Editor: Tinggui Chen3
PMCID: PMC10980247  PMID: 38551967

Abstract

Red tourism is a distinctive form of tourism in China. Its network attention serves as a typical indicator to measure the level of promotion and publicity for red tourism, as well as an important reflection of its influence. Understanding the network structure of red tourism is of significant importance for optimizing the spatial pattern of tourism and promoting the development of the tourism industry. Based on this, this study takes the classic red tourism attractions in Shaanxi province, China as an example and constructs a multi-source data network attention evaluation index. Additionally, it employs social network theory to explore the network attention and tourist flow characteristics of the case study area. Research shows that: (1) Overall, the network attention to case-based destinations is relatively low, and there are significant differences in network attention among different attractions. Spatially, the distribution of network attention is uneven. This is manifested by higher network attention to attractions in Yan’an city and lower network attention to attractions in other regions. (2) There are differences in the network attention of different types of attractions. High-level attractions have a higher level of online attention, while low-level attractions have a lower level of network attention. Additionally, archaeological sites tend to receive a higher level of online attention. (3) The network density of tourist flow is low, and the tourism connections between nodes are not closely linked. The linkage between core nodes and edge nodes in tourism is poor. Developed tourism routes only exist in core nodes. (4) Nodes such as Zaoyuan revolution site, Yangjialing revolution site, and Wangjiaping revolution site have a significant influence in the network structure. In addition, the integration and development between red nodes and non-red nodes have been achieved. (5) There is a correlation between network attention and tourist flow, as well as a ‘misplacement’ feature. Based on the characteristics of attractions, they can be divided into four types: bright-star attractions, cash-cow attractions, thin-dog attractions, and question attractions. Based on the above conclusions, this study proposes targeted development recommendations.

Introduction

Under the guidance of the government, red tourism has rapidly developed, which has sparked scholarly research on red tourism. In China, red tourism generally refers to themed tourism activities that revolve around revolutionary commemorative sites and landmarks, with a focus on the history, events, and spirit of the revolution [1]. Red tourism, unlike other types of tourism, serves as a significant avenue for promoting revolutionary culture. The Chinese government attaches great importance to the development of red tourism, resulting in a strong market demand and promising future prospects for red tourism in China. In recent years, red tourism has experienced rapid growth under the government’s promotion. On March 23, 2021, People’s Daily pointed out that from 2004 to 2019, China’s red tourism resources have been continuously expanding, and the red tourism market has become increasingly active. The ‘Report on the development of China’s red tourism (2022)’ states that in 2022, the cumulative number of tourists received in China’s red tourism reached 3.478 billion, with a comprehensive income of 929.5 billion yuan. Red tourism has gradually become an important driving force for China’s tourism development.

Literature review

Red tourism

Red tourism is an important component of the tourism industry. Currently, research on red tourism, both domestically and internationally, focuses on the value of red tourism, the spatial characteristics of red tourism, and its influencing factors.

In terms of the value of red tourism, scholars believe that it not only brings significant economic benefits, but also serves as an important form of disseminating advanced culture and conducting ideological education [24]. In the context of the new era, red tourism bears the historical mission of disseminating red culture and enhancing national identity [5, 6]. In addition, red tourism also possesses profound cultural connotations and contemporary values, serving as a significant driving force for enhancing cultural self-confidence [7]. In terms of spatial characteristics of red tourism, scholars often employ social network theory and spatial structure theory to investigate the spatial features of red tourism. For instance, Cong Li et al. (2021) conducted a study on the network structure of red tourism flow using online data [8]. Scholars have pointed out that important factors influencing red tourism include economic development, information technology, transportation conditions, and geographical distance [9]. Climate conditions and the holiday system also have a significant impact on the spatial distribution of red tourism [10]. Red resources and red culture form the foundation of red tourism. Promoting the integration of red culture and tourism is an important measure to facilitate the development of the tourism industry [11, 12].

Tourist flow

Tourist flow connect the origin and destination and serve as the foundation for the development of the tourism industry [13]. Its spatial pattern not only represents the movement of tourists but also reveals the diversity of tourism resources, making it an important tool for studying tourism phenomena. In recent years, with the rise of tourism big data, the academic community has conducted an increasing number of studies on tourist flow, with most of them focusing on the spatial characteristics of tourist flow, their influencing factors, and their correlations.

The spatial structure of tourism refers to the spatial scale and degree of aggregation formed by the interaction of tourism objects [14]. This spatial scale and degree of aggregation can reflect the spatial attributes and interrelationships of tourism activities, providing guidance for the spatial planning of tourist attractions. Based on this, scholars have conducted extensive research on the spatial characteristics of tourist flow. From the perspective of research methods, most studies utilize digital footprints of tourism, such as online texts and images, as data [15]. Spatial analysis and social network analysis are employed to analyze the spatial characteristics of tourism flows. The scale of the research subject includes multiple levels, such as scenic spots [16, 17], cities [18], provinces [19], and city clusters [20]. Based on this, scholars have further analyzed the influencing factors of tourist flow, pointing out that the spatial structure of tourist flow is closely related to factors such as tourism resource endowment, transportation level, and distance [2123]. In addition, Yang Li et al. (2023) found that the total volume of telecommunications services, the number of employees in the tourism industry, the number of accommodation enterprises, the number of corporate legal entities, and the total amount of government investment in the tourism industry are important factors influencing the flow of tourist information [24]. In terms of the correlation of tourism flow, most scholars have studied the coupling relationship between tourist flow and transportation based on the perspective of coupling [25]. Some scholars have also focused on other related studies of tourist flow [26], such as the relationship between tourist flow and the tourism environment [27], and the degree of coupling between tourism and the economy [28]. A few scholars have also investigated the impacts of haze [29], traffic [30], policies [31], language [32], natural disasters, and trade openness [33, 34] on tourist flow.

Network attention

The internet provides an important channel for tourists to obtain travel information. When tourists collect and browse travel information on the internet, they leave behind their browsing history, which is referred to as tourism network attention. Tourism network attention can reflect the level of public interest in tourist destinations, as well as reveal the characteristics of public needs and behavioral intentions [35]. Therefore, scholars have focused on studying network attention in the field of tourism.

Currently, there are two main methods for measuring network attention: one is based on Baidu index, and the other is based on constructing a network attention index using multiple sources of data. Reviewing relevant literature reveals that most studies use Baidu index as the platform and obtain raw data on tourism network attention through keyword searches. Additionally, many studies utilize spatial analysis methods to explore the spatiotemporal characteristics of different research subjects [36, 37]. For example, Shu Li et al. (2020) investigated the characteristics of online attention to sports tourism in China using Baidu Index as the dataset [38]. Subsequently, there has been an increasing number of studies focusing on online attention. However, when the research area includes multiple tourism resources, it is difficult to obtain comprehensive and effective data using Baidu index as an indicator [39]. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a network attention using multiple sources of data. For example, some scholars have used the network attention of websites such as Qunar, Ctrip, and Dianping as data to study the coupling between network attention and scenic attraction [40]. At the same time, scholars have also paid attention to the influencing factors of tourism online attention [41]. Research has found that important factors influencing online attention include economic level, population size, distance, climate, and transportation [42]. In addition, special events [43], negative information [44], policies [45], and other factors also have a significant impact on the online attention. Some scholars have also studied the correlation between online attention and tourist volume [46], as well as the correlation with tourism attractiveness [47]. This greatly enriches the research on online attention and provides a good reference for this study.

In addition, scholars have proposed methods for converting network attention into tourist flow from the perspective of measures and suggestions. As tourism network attention has predictive significance, most scholars believe that, on one hand, scenic areas should promptly pay attention to network attention information (such as online searches, browsing, ticket purchases, etc.) and prepare for tourism reception in advance. On the other hand, scenic areas should attach importance to the dissemination and marketing role of the internet in order to attract tourists. Furthermore, Lan Xue et al. (2023) constructed an index for the conversion of network attention into tourist flow, and proposed a quantitative measurement method [48], further deepening the study of the relationship between network attention and tourist flow.

In summary, it can be concluded that the network attention reflects the overall perception of tourists towards a destination from a spatial perspective [49]. It serves as a mapping of the potential demands of the public and also has a predictive effect on actual tourist flow [50]. Therefore, there is a close relationship between network attention and tourist flow. In recent years, with the development of the digital economy, the ‘internet +’ model has played an important role in the development of red tourism, providing new impetus for its upgrading. Based on this, this study selects the classic red tourism attractions in Shaanxi province, China as a case study to explore the characteristics of network attention and tourist flow. This has important academic value for deepening the theoretical understanding of their relationship.

Research methods and data sources

Overview of the research area

Shaanxi possesses relatively abundant red tourism resources. In recent years, the ‘Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia red tourism zone’ and the ‘Sichuan-Shaanxi-Chongqing red tourism zone’ have been included among the 12 key red tourism zones cultivated in China. Shaanxi province has three routes included in the top 100 red tourism routes. The province has developed over 150 red tourism scenic areas, with 13 of them being listed in the ‘2016–2020 national red tourism development plan outline’. The red tourism development potential in Shaanxi is significant. According to the ‘Big data report on red tourism consumption in China (2021)’, Xi’an and Yan’an in Shaanxi province have been selected as the top 10 popular cities for red tourism in 2021. Based on the demand for the transformation and upgrading of the cultural and tourism industry, the province has currently developed a comprehensive and distinctive red tourism route covering the entire region, with Yan’an in northern Shaanxi as the leader, Xi’an as the key city, and the southern Shaanxi region as an extension [51].

Using Baidu coordinate picking tool, the longitude and latitude of the case study site were obtained to create a spatial distribution map of the red tourism classic attractions in Shaanxi province (Fig 1). (The Baidu coordinate system picking tool (http://api.map.baidu.com/lbsapi/getpoint/index.html) is a tool used for obtaining geographical location information of tourist destinations, including the latitude and longitude coordinates of scenic spots.)

Fig 1. Distribution map of classic red tourism attractions in Shaanxi province.

Fig 1

Note: This map is drawn based on the standard map of the ministry of natural resources of China (surveying and mapping approval No. GS(2019)1822), and the base map remains unaltered. The same applies to Fig 2.

Data source

Based on the previous analysis, there are primarily two research methods for studying network attention. The first method is based on Baidu index, while the second method involves constructing network attention using multiple sources of data. However, when the research area encompasses multiple tourism resources, it is difficult to obtain comprehensive and reliable data solely through Baidu index. Moreover, due to the multitude of tourism resources in this study, the reliability and accuracy of using a single data source are relatively low. Therefore, it is necessary to construct a network attention index for case studies. Based on the reference to previous research and considering the comprehensiveness, accuracy, and availability of data, this study selected five Chinese social platforms, namely Ctrip, WeChat, Baidu, 360, and Mafengwo, as the sources of network attention data (all data were collected until January 1, 2023.). The specific steps are as follows: firstly, data collection is conducted using range retrieval methods on various platforms to establish a retrieval database (Table 1). Finally, the collected data is organized and categorized to obtain the raw data of network attention. The data on tourist flow is sourced from Mafengwo and Qunar platforms (all data retrieved as of January 1, 2023.). Building upon existing research [39], to ensure the integrity of the tourist flow network structure, non-red attractions in the tourist flow routes were retained, and the aforementioned data was transformed into directed flow data between attractions. Ultimately, 468 valid origin-destination (O-D) data were obtained.

Table 1. Examples of the classic red tourism attractions in Shaanxi province.

Attractions The number of attractions Search example
Red tourism attractions in Xi’an city 2 Eighth route army’s memorial hall, Xi’an incident memorial hall
Red tourism attractions in Yulin city 3 Yangjiagou revolution site, Shenquan fort memorial hall, Suide revolutionary history museum
Red tourism attractions in Fuping county 4 Youth education base, Anti-Japanese memorial site of the 120th red army, Revolution site of the traffic liaison station, Martyrs cemetery of Kangzhuang battle
Yan’an revolution memorial site scenic area in Yan’an city 17 Yan’an revolution memorial hall, Zaoyuan revolution site, Yangjialing revolution site, Wangjiaping revolution site, Phoenix mountain revolution site, Qingliang mountain revolution site,"48" martyrs’ cemetery, Luochuan conference memorial hall, Wayao fortress conference site, Baota mount, Qiaoergou revolution site, Nanniwan revolution site, Revolution site of the northwest bureau, Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia region government site, Baoan revolution site, Wuqi town revolution site, Memorial hall of the Chinese people’s anti-Japanese

Research methods

Method of network attention

First, the entropy method is used to calculate the weight of each indicator. Finally, using the model of network attention to calculate network attention of the attractions in the case, the specific steps are as follows:

First step, the data are processed in dimensionless. Due to the different magnitudes of each platform and index, to ensure the accuracy of the data, it is necessary to perform dimensionless processing on each data one by one. All indicators are positive and the calculation formula is as follows:

Pij=Pijmin{Pj}max{Pj}min{Pj}+0.0001 (1)

Second step, calculating the proportion of the weight:

Qij=Piji=1mPij (2)

Third step, the information entropy value of the j indicator is calculated:

ej=ki=1m(Qij×lnQij) (3)

Fourth step is to calculate the redundancy of the information entropy:

dj=1ej (4)

Fifth step is to calculate the weight value of the j indicator:

Wi=djj=1ndj (5)

Sixth step is to calculate the single indicator:

Sij=Wi×Pij (6)

Seventh step is to calculate the overall network attention:

D=S1+S2+S3+S4 (7)

In the formula: Pij denotes the value of the j-th evaluation indicator for the i-th data, min{Pj} and max{Pj} are the minimum and maximum values of the j-th evaluation index in all data, k = 1/lnm, where m is the number of evaluation rows and n is the number of indicators, D is the network attention, S1 is the network review index, S2 is the network travel index, S3 is the social media index and S4 is the search engine index (Table 2). Index weights are calculated using the entropy method and retaining 6 digits of data after the decimal point.

Table 2. Evaluation indicators of network attention.
Index Weights Data sources Total number Indicator processing
S1: network review index 0.251704 Ctrip 36296 Taking the total number of reviews as an index, processing the data dimensionless one by one.
Mafengwo 4833
S2: network travel index 0.245730 Mafengwo 8148544 Taking the total number of likes, comments, and views on each platform as the index, the data processing is the same as S1.
S3: social media index 0.250862 WeChat 7934362 Taking the total number of articles, videos, and the total number of readings as indicators, the data processing is the same as S1.
S4: search engine index 0.251704 Baidu 114830760 Taking the total number of searches on the platform as the index, and the data processing is the same as S1.
360 3366518

Method of tourist flow

Social network theory posits that social groups are interconnected networks in which actors (nodes) mutually influence each other. This theory assesses the importance of nodes in the network from a relational perspective and analyzes the significance of both individual nodes and the overall network based on the characteristics of the network structure [52]. It has been widely applied in tourism research. This study adopt indicators such as size and density, core-edge, and node weighted degree to analyze the characteristics of tourist flow, drawing on this theory. Size and density represent the connections between nodes in the network. A larger value indicates closer connections between nodes, and vice versa. Node weighted degree reflects the diffusion and aggregation capacity of nodes. A higher value indicates greater capacity of the node. Core-edge is used to analyze the importance of individual nodes in the network.

Results analysis

Analysis of network attention

Spatial characteristics

The network attention is an important measurement indicator for attractions in terms of online promotion, marketing, and attractiveness, and it has significant implications for the construction of attraction platforms and precision marketing. According to Formula (7), the mean value of network attention is 0.340238677. This value is relatively small, indicating that the overall network attention of the case study site is low, and the promotion and publicity capabilities of the attractions’ online platform need to be improved urgently. In addition, there are 8 attractions with a network attention degree ranging from 0.50000 to 1.00000, accounting for only 20% of the total number of attractions. On the other hand, there are 25 attractions with a network attention degree lower than the average, accounting for a high proportion of 62.5%. This indicates significant differences in network attention degree among the case study sites, with the majority of attractions having a relatively low network attention degree (Table 3). It is recommended that these types of attractions should focus on improving their network attention by increasing publicity and marketing efforts, in order to attract attention from visitors and cultivate potential tourists for the attractions.

Table 3. Network attention of attractions.
Network attention The number of attractions Percentage
(%)
Representative attractions
0.000000–0.100000 2 5 Wuqi town revolution site, Weihua uprising memorial hall
0.100001–0.200000 12 30 Memorial hall of the Chinese people’s anti-Japanese, Zhaojin revolution site
0.200001–0.300000 5 12.5 Niutuiling battle site, Qingliang mountain revolution site
0.300001–0.400000 9 22.5 Phoenix mountain revolution site, Qianpoling battle site
0.400001–0.500000 4 10 Xi’an incident memorial hall, Malan revolution site
0.500001–0.600000 5 12.5 Xiahe conference site, Zaoyuan revolution site
0.600001–1.000000 3 7.5 Nanniwan revolution site, Yan’an revolution memorial hall

From the perspective of spatial distribution (Fig 2), tourist attractions in Yan’an city have a higher level of network attention, while attractions in other regions have a lower level of network attention. As shown in Table 3, the top three attractions are all located in Yan’an city. Among them, Nanniwan revolution site ranks first, and Yan’an revolution memorial hall ranks second. However, the network attention for attractions in Yulin and Baoji regions is relatively low, indicating a significant gap compared to Yan’an city. This also suggests, to some extent, that the abundance of resources, quality, and reputation of scenic areas are closely related to network attention.

Fig 2. Distribution of network attention.

Fig 2

Differences in types of attractions

The network attention of different types of attractions varies. In terms of attraction level, attractions with higher levels tend to receive more network attention. The main representative attraction is Yan’an revolution memorial hall, with a network attention score of 0.831570, ranking second (S1 Table). This attraction belongs to China’s 5A-level tourist attractions, which are well-known and widely recognized by the public, leading to a higher level of attention. Additionally, some high-level attractions have relatively low network attention, such as Fumei battle memorial hall (4A). These types of attractions need to further leverage the Internet’s utility to increase their exposure. In terms of attraction types, archaeological sites receive higher network attention. Among the top 20 attractions in terms of network attention, 15 of them are archaeological sites. This indicates that the public has differences in selecting attractions, and tourists’ preferences have a certain influence on network attention.

Analysis of tourist flow

Size and density

By organizing and selecting data, a 93×93 attraction matrix is obtained, and a tourist flow network (Fig 3) is constructed. Overall, the network density of tourist flow is 0.023, indicating a low density in the network structure and a lack of close tourism connections between nodes. From the network structure, it can be inferred that there is a weak connection between core nodes and edge nodes, resulting in poor interconnectivity of tourism routes. Developed tourism routes only exist among core tourism nodes.

Fig 3. The network structure of tourism flow (S2 Table).

Fig 3

(Note: Larger nodes in the graph indicate greater importance of the corresponding nodes. Thicker lines represent denser tourism flows between nodes).

Core-edge

According to Table 4, Zaoyuan revolution site, Yan’an revolution memorial hall, Wangjiaping revolution site, Yangjialing revolution site, and Baota mount are located at the core positions of the network. This indicates that these nodes have strong aggregation and diffusion capabilities, making them core nodes. The density of the core nodes is 0.095, which is relatively small, indicating that the tourist flow between core nodes is not closely connected (Table 5). There are a large number of edge nodes in the network, scattered throughout Shaanxi province. Representative nodes include Anwuqing training revolution site. The density between edge nodes is 0.004, indicating a significant hierarchical differentiation in the structure of the tourist flow network. The density between the core and edge regions is 0.008, and the density between the edge and core regions is 0.005. This indicates that the core nodes hold an advantageous position in the exchange relationship with edge nodes, and the tourism development capacity of edge nodes needs to be improved.

Table 4. Example of core-edge results (N = 93).
Core nodes Edge nodes
Core nodes Zaoyuan revolution site, Yan’an revolution memorial hall, Wangjiaping revolution site, Yangjialing revolution site, Baota mount, Xi’an incident memorial hall Chenghuang temple
, Yuanjia village
, Zhi Yuan
Edge nodes Qin terracotta army,
Daming palace national park
Anwuqing training revolution site, Yonglezhai
Table 5. Density of core-edge.
Density of core regions Density of edge regions
Density of core regions 0.095 0.008
Density of edge regions 0.005 0.004

Node weighted degree

The higher the weighted degree value of a node, the greater its influence in the tourist flow network. Based on this, this study summarizes the top 20 ranked nodes. According to Table 6, nodes such as Zaoyuan revolution site, Yangjialing revolution site, and Wangjiaping revolution site have high weighted degrees, indicating their significant influence in the network. The low weighted degree of nodes such as Qiaoergou revolution site, and Phoenix mountain revolution site indicates their relatively small influence in the network structure, suggesting that their tourism impact needs to be enhanced. Furthermore, among the top 20 nodes, 7 nodes are non-red nodes, accounting for 35% of the total. Examples include Hukou waterfall, and Drum tower. This suggests that non-red nodes play important roles in the network structure, and that red tourism often combines with non-red tourism resources for mutual development.

Table 6. Example of node weighted degree (N = 93).
Number Node Node weighted
degree
Whether it is
a red node
1 Zaoyuan revolution site 107 yes
2 Yangjialing revolution site 87 yes
3 Wangjiaping revolution site 87 yes
4 Yan’an revolution memorial hall 85 yes
5 Baota mount 68 yes
6 Xi’an incident memorial hall 46 yes
7 Nanniwan revolution site 41 yes
8 Qingliang mountain revolution site 35 yes
9 Hukou waterfall 27 no
10 Eighth route army’s memorial hall 18 yes
11 Yan’an 1938 15 no
12 Revolution site of the northwest bureau 12 yes
13 Phoenix mountain revolution site 11 yes
14 Memorial hall of the Chinese people’s anti-Japanese 10 yes
15 Drum tower 9 no
16 Wave valley 7 no
17 Xi’an wall 7 no
18 Qiaoergou revolution site 6 yes
19 Yier street 3 no
20 Liuzhidan martyrs’ cemetery 3 no

Analysis of network attention and tourist flow

The Boston matrix, also known as the market growth rate-relative market share matrix [53], suggests that under the interaction of market growth rate and relative market share, there are four different types of products: bright-star products (high sales growth rate, high market share), thin-dog products (low sales growth rate, low market share), question products (high sales growth rate, low market share), and cash-cow products (low sales growth rate, high market share). Based on the Boston matrix, Li Jingyi et al. (2002) creatively constructed a model that reflects the tourism market [54], which has been widely applied in tourism research. Currently, this method has been extensively adopted by scholars in the field of tourism research. Based on the analysis in the previous section, it can be concluded that there is a correlation between network attention and tourist flow. Therefore, this study draws on the division method of the Boston matrix and relevant tourism research [55, 56] to determine the criteria for dividing tourist attractions based on network attention and node weighted degree. Similarly, tourist attractions are divided into bright-star attractions, cash-cow attractions, thin-dog attractions, and question attractions. The division of each type of attraction is shown in Table 7.

Table 7. Features of network attention and node weighted degree (example).

Bright-star attractions Cash-cow attractions Thin-dog attractions Question attractions
Zaoyuan revolution site,
Wangjiaping revolution site,
Yan’an revolution memorial hall
Yangjialing revolution site,
Baota mount
Xi’an incident memorial hall,
Nanniwan revolution site
Qingliang mountain revolution site,
Revolution site of the northwest bureau, Phoenix mountain revolution site, Qiaoergou revolution site

According to Table 7, it can be observed that there is a correlation between tourist flow and network attention, but they also exhibit a ‘misplacement’ characteristic. Specifically, in terms of bright-star attractions: this type of attraction has a high level of network attention and node weighted degree. The main representative attractions are Zaoyuan revolution site, Wangjiaping revolution site, and Yan’an revolution memorial hall. This category already possesses significant online influence and should be further leveraged to drive synergistic effects among these attractions in the future. Cash-cow attractions: this type of attraction is characterized by high network attention and low node weighted degree. The representative attractions are Yangjialing revolution site and Baota mount. This category attracts a considerable number of potential tourists, and therefore, it is necessary to enhance the tourism reception capacity of such attractions in the future. Thin-dog attractions: this type of attraction is characterized by low network attention and high node weighted degree. Representative attractions include Xi’an incident memorial hall and Nanniwan revolution site. In the future, innovative marketing and promotional methods need to be implemented to enhance their tourism influence. Question attractions: this type of attraction has both low network attention and node weighted degree, encompassing most of the attractions in the case study area. Representative attractions include Qingliang mountain revolution site, and Qiaoergou revolution site. It is urgent to develop multidimensional tourism development measures for these attractions.

Conclusion and discussion

Conclusion

This study investigates the characteristics of network attention and tourist flow in the classic red tourism attractions in Shaanxi province, China, using social network theory and other methods. The findings are as follows:

  1. (1) The network attention to the case study sites is relatively low (with a mean value of 0.340238677), and there is a significant difference in network attention among different attractions. The promotional and advertising capabilities of attractions on the internet need to be improved urgently. In terms of spatial distribution, the network attention is unevenly distributed. This is mainly reflected in the higher network attention of attractions in Yan’an city, while the network attention of attractions in other regions is relatively low. The abundance of tourism resources, level, and popularity of scenic areas are closely related to network attention. (2) There are variations in the network attention received by different types of attractions. Attractions with higher rankings tend to receive higher network attention, while those with lower rankings tend to receive lower network attention. Additionally, archaeological sites exhibit higher network attention, indicating that tourists’ preferences have a certain influence on the network attention received. (3) The network density of tourist flow in the case study area is low (0.023), indicating a lack of close tourism connections between nodes. The interconnectivity between core and edge nodes is poor. Developed tourist routes are only present among the core tourism nodes. Edge nodes are in a disadvantaged position within the network structure, and their tourism capacity needs improvement. (4) Zaoyuan revolution site, Yangjialing revolution site, Wangjiaping revolution site, and other nodes have a significant influence in the network structure. The connection between non-red nodes and red nodes is relatively close, playing an important role in the network structure. (5) There is a correlation between network attention and tourist flow, as well as a ‘misplacement’ feature. Based on the Boston matrix, attractions can be divided into bright-star attractions, cash-cow attractions, thin-dog attractions, and question attractions.

Suggestions

Based on the above analysis, it can be concluded that the network attention to the classic red tourism attractions in Shaanxi province is relatively low, and there are significant differences in network attention among different types of attractions (Fig 2). Based on this, this study proposes the following suggestions from both macro and micro perspectives. On the macro level, on one hand, it is necessary to continuously increase investment and construction of high-level attractions, and continuously leverage the key role of red heritage sites. On the other hand, attention should be paid to the development of small and medium-sized attractions, with increased promotion to enhance their visibility and influence. At the micro level, based on the attributes of tourist flows such as network density, core-periphery structure, and node weighted degree, suitable development strategies are formulated for four types of tourist attractions, as follows:

  1. (1) Bright-star attractions: leveraging synergies to create a tourism growth pole. This type of attraction has a strong appeal and significant market influence. In the future, it is necessary to further enhance the development level of these attractions and leverage their synergistic effects. On one hand, based on the traffic advantage of tourism resources, continue to innovate offline tourism products, and expand the market scale by combining online network advantages. On the other hand, leverage the radiating and driving effect of these attractions to create specialized and high-quality tourism routes that combine with red attractions (such as Zaoyuan revolution site and Yan’an revolution memorial hall) and non-red attractions (Yellow emperor mausoleum). (2) Cash-cow attractions: optimizing product supply and improving service quality. This type of attraction already has a considerable number of potential tourists. In the future, it should improve the basic tourism infrastructure of the attraction and strengthen the standardization of tourism services. For example, leveraging the network influence advantages of Yangjialing revolution site, Baota mount, and other attractions, based on the characteristics of these resources, interactive activities such as red knowledge competitions and agricultural experiences should be carried out to further enhance tourism attractiveness and continue to enhance the reputation and visibility of the attractions. (3) Thin-dog attractions: innovative marketing and promotional methods to enhance tourism appeal. This type of attraction has relatively prominent characteristics in the tourist flow, but low network attention. In the future, marketing and promotional methods for this type of attraction should be improved, online tourism promotion should be strengthened, and network attention should be enhanced. For example, through platforms such as Douyin, Xiaohongshu, and Weibo, adopting O2O three-dimensional, live streaming, and other marketing methods, innovative marketing and promotional methods for Xi’an incident memorial hall, and other attractions should be implemented to enhance the online influence of the attractions and cultivate potential tourists. (4) Question attractions: enhancing the online visibility of tourist attractions to comprehensively improve the level of tourism products and services. The online visibility and level of tourism development of these attractions are relatively low, and it is necessary to comprehensively and multidimensionally enhance the development level of these attractions in the future. This can be achieved by increasing traditional media marketing such as television, radio, newspapers, and magazines, as well as actively engaging in new media marketing. At the same time, it is important to further improve the level of tourist services, enhance reception capacity, promote the integration of culture and tourism, and expand the scope of revolutionary education, red-themed festivals, educational tourism, and other content to create diversified tourism products.

Discussion

In the context of the internet, various social platforms have provided new channels for tourists to obtain travel information, which has also brought new opportunities and challenges to the development of red tourism scenic spots. Network attention, as an important indicator of the promotion and publicity capability of tourist attractions on the internet, should be given due attention. Currently, there are various channels for promoting tourist attractions, such as websites and software, which provide convenience for this purpose. The measurement of network attention should be conducted from multiple perspectives. Therefore, this study has constructed a dataset of network attention from multiple sources. Based on this background, this study analyzes the network attention and tourist flow characteristics of red tourism classic attractions in Shaanxi province, China, in order to promote the high-quality development of red tourism under the ‘internet+’ background.

Research has revealed significant variations in the development of network attention for red tourism destinations. Non-red tourism destinations exhibit a closer tourism connection with red tourism destinations, which brings forth new insights for the development of these destinations. The study also found that there is a certain relationship between network attention and tourist flow. This relationship is mainly manifested in scenic spots that are of high level, good quality, and high popularity, as they tend to attract more network attention. Although previous studies have shown a significant positive correlation between network attention and visitor traffic [57], there is also a distinct ‘mismatch’ characteristic between network attention and tourist flow. This study found that high network attention does not necessarily result in high tourist flow in scenic areas. Specifically, there are numerous factors influencing network attention. Red tourism receives significant attention from Chinese government departments, leading to extensive online promotion and a substantial impact on the network attention of scenic areas. On the other hand, tourist flow is influenced by various factors such as resource endowment, transportation level, distance, and preferences [2123]. Therefore, there is both correlation and dislocation between network attention and tourist flow. In the context of ‘Internet+’, scenic spots should not only focus on the effect of online promotion but also take into account the ‘mismatch’ of network attention, promoting the transformation and upgrading of tourist attractions comprehensively and from multiple perspectives.

In addition, due to objective constraints such as data availability and completeness, the author only obtained network data from six platforms. In the future, a quantitative model can be constructed to select comprehensive indicators. Additionally, the formation mechanism of network attention and the characteristics of tourist flow misplacement are also important research directions of concern.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Network attention of scenic spots.

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s001.docx (14.7KB, docx)
S2 Table. Data processing.

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s002.docx (21.3KB, docx)
S1 File

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s003.docx (13.6KB, docx)
S2 File

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s004.docx (14.9KB, docx)
S3 File

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s005.docx (68KB, docx)
S4 File

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s006.docx (16.6KB, docx)
S5 File

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s007.docx (306.8KB, docx)
S6 File

(DOCX)

pone.0299286.s008.docx (55.9KB, docx)
S7 File

(XLS)

pone.0299286.s009.xls (77.5KB, xls)

Acknowledgments

Sincere gratitude is extended to the anonymous expert reviewers for their time and effort invested in the paper review process. The valuable suggestions provided by the reviewers regarding the research framework, method selection, and result analysis have greatly benefited this study.

Data Availability

All data collected and analyzed in this study could be downloaded from public databases including Ctrip, WeChat, Baidu, 360, Mafengwo, and Qunar. Ctrip: https://www.ctrip.com/ Baidu: https://www.baidu.com 360: https://www.so.com/ Mafengwo: https://www.mafengwo.cn/ Qunar: https://www.qunar.com/ WeChat: https://weixin.sogou.com/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bvq83bkgn.

Funding Statement

National natural science foundation of China ‘Research on accurate identification of rural tourism poverty alleviation in ethical areas by combining rough set and fuzzy set’ (41661107). The phased achievement of the project ‘Research on the construction of iconic long march projects within Gansu province’ funded by the Gansu Great Wall Long March National Cultural Park Construction and Development Research Center (001053108). The 2023 graduate teaching case library construction project of Northwest Normal University: silk road China section cultural and tourism integration case library (2023YAL005). The funder had an important role in study analysis, decision to publish, and preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Xin Y, Wang LC, Liu HY. Centenary of the party: The temporal and spatial changes of national patriotic education bases. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2021,35(12):177–187. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.343 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hou HL, Zhang QR, Jiang YJ, Wang FY. Can red tourism lead to spiritual transformation? Evidence from tourists visiting the red army long march Xiangjiang battle memorial park. PloS one,2023,18(7): e0280920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Wang R. On the application of ‘red culture’ in urban parks. Open Journal of Applied Sciences,2023,13(07):1104–1110. doi: 10.4236/OJAPPS.2023.137088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ho JK. The effect of red tourism on the balanced development of the regional economy in China. Korean Journal of Hospitality Tourism,2018,27(6):225–241. doi: 10.24992/kjht.2018.08.27.06.225 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hung TC. Communist tradition and market forces: Red tourism and politics in contemporary China. Journal of Contemporary China,2018,27(114):902–923. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2018.1488105 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wall G, Zhao RN. China’s red tourism: communist heritage, politics and identity in a party-state. International Journal of Tourism Cities,2017,3(3):305–320. doi: 10.1108/IJTC-03-2017-0017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shao MH, Yang TT. Scene-empowered red culture tourism development: Theoretical logic and multidimensional paths. Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences),2022,50(06):95–104. doi: 10.13885/j.issn.1000-2804.2022.06.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cong L, Li SY, Hong JX, Zhang WH. The spatial network structure of tourist flows for national red tourism attractions. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2021,35(12):188–194. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2021.344 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jiao SS, Li M, Tian FJ, Wu RL, Yang QQ. Distribution pattern and driving mechanism of network attention of Chinese red tourism classic scenic spots. Economic Geography, 2022,42 (01):211–220. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2022.01.025 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Xu JW, Wang W, Du J. Temporal-spatial characteristics of red tourism network attention and its influencing factors in six provinces of central China. Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition),2023(2):82–96. doi: 10.11835/j.issn.1008-5831.jg.2023.02.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Zhao S, Timothy JD. Tourists’ consumption and perceptions of red heritage. Annals of Tourism Research,2017,6397–111. doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2017.01.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ren J. Research on the development of red tourism resources in Yan’an, China. Cross-Cultural Communication,2018,14(3):22–27. doi: 10.3968/10502 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Liu HM, Hu J, Lv L, Zhang HH, Cao TT. Impact of COVID-19 on spatio-temporal pattern of tourism in Wuhan: A network attention based study. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2023,37(02):194–202. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2023.052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zhang YD, Li C, Chen Y, Guan SH. The community organization model and hierarchy in Xinjiang’s tourism flow network. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2023,43(9):1619–1628. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2023.09.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qin XH, Li Xing M, Chen W, Tan HL, Luo L, Xu XH. Tourists’ digital footprint: the spatial patterns and development models of rural tourism flows network in Guilin, China. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research,2022,27(12):1336–1354. doi: 10.1080/10941665.2023.2166420 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ji XF, Huang HQ, Chen F, Li MJ. Spatial differentiation characteristics of regional self-driving tourism flow: A case study of central Yunnan urban agglomeration. Heliyon,2023,9(11): e21814–e21814. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21814 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Xiao Y, Wang H, Miao SY, Xie B. A complex network analysis of local and non-local tourist flows in Beijing through mobile phone data. Transactions in Planning and Urban Research,2023,2(2–3):217–235. doi: 10.1177/27541223231183114 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Hu MX, Xu FF, Wang JL, Zheng JM, Han B, Wang H. The communities detection of the tourist flow network using mobile signaling data in Nanjing, China. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy,2023,16(4):1517–1540. doi: 10.1007/S12061-023-09529-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ji XF, Ge YC, Chen F. Spatial and temporal differentiation characteristics of holiday tourism flow based on highway traffic flow big data: A case study of 7 holidays in 2017 in Yunnan province. Tourism Tribune,2019,34(6),37–47. doi: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2019.06.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhu HZ, Cao FD. Tourist flow network structure characteristics and its flow pattern based on geo-tagged photos: Taking the Yangtze river city group as an example. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29 (11): 2374–2383. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj202011005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Li LN, Chen X, Zhang LY, Li Q, Yang Y, Chen J. Space-time tourist flow patterns in community-based tourism: an application of the empirical orthogonal function to Wi-Fi data. Current Issues in Tourism,2023,26(18):3004–3022. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2106826 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu LP, Zhang J. A study on the supply factors and mechanism of the inter-regional diffusion and transfer of inbound tourism flow. Current Issues in Tourism,2023,26(3):392–406. doi: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2128995 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Xiao G, Li WM, Zhang C. Study on spatial structure and influencing factors of Jiangxi tourism route network. Areal Research and Development,2020,39(05): 88–92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2020.05.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang L, Fu YH, Wang JJ. Spatiotemporal distribution patterns and driving factors of tourism information flow in Chinese provinces along the Belt and Road. Arid Land Geography,2023,46(10):1714–1722. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2022.614 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu TZ, Luo F, He JW. Evolution of Spatial Structure of Tourist Flows for a Domestic Destination: A Case Study of Zhangjiajie, China. Sustainability,2023,15(4):3271–3271. doi: 10.3390/SU15043271 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Alexandre G, Samuel F, Sofia G, João R. The effect of virtual proximity and digital adoption on international tourism flows to Southern Europe. Tourism Economics,2023,29(6):1643–1661. doi: 10.1177/13548166221116704 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Cheng Z, Jia TF. Study on the coupling and coordination relationship between the structure of tourism flow and tourism environment in Shanghai. Study of Modern Cities, 2020,(03): 106–112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2020.02.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang Z, Li T. Spatiotemporal coupling analysis of Chin’s inbound tourism ditributive superiority and tourism economic efficiency. Human Geography,2021,36(05):157–166. doi: 10.13959/j.issn.1003-2398.2021.05.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu D, Huang ZF, Huang R. The spatial effects of haze on tourism flows of Chinese cities: Empirical research based on the spatial panel econometric model. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2019, 74 (04): 814–830. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201904014 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Liu S, Zhang J, Liu PX, Xu YF, Xu L, Zhang HL. Discovering spatial patterns of tourist flow with multi-layer transport networks. Tourism Geographies,2023,25(1):113–135. doi: 10.1080/14616688.2020.1850849 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Usman K, Emeka L O, Katarzyna B. Do regional trade agreements enhance international tourism flows? Evidence from a cross-country analysis. Journal of Travel Research,2022,61(6):1391–1408. doi: 10.1177/00472875211028321 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Usman K, Emeka L O, Idris OS. Exploring diverse sources of linguistic influence on international tourism flows. Journal of Travel Research,2022,61(3):696–714. doi: 10.1177/0047287520988909 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Emeka LO, Ogechi A, Oludele F. Natural disasters, trade openness and international tourism: the role of income levels across countries. Tourism Recreation Research,2023,48(1):60–78. doi: 10.1080/02508281.2021.1891740 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ibitoye J O, Kleynhans P E. Influence of institutional quality, foreign direct investment and international trade on tourism inflow, South Africa[J]. Acta Commercii,2023,23(1): e1–e12. doi: 10.4102/AC.V23I1.1111 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wan TH, Zhang ZR, Li SL, Liang RQ. Research on the temporal and spatial distribution of the attention to rural tourism on domestic network. Journal of Southwest University (Natural Science Edition),2022,44(06):138–149. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2022.06.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zhang Y, Jin X, Wang YW, Liu RT, Jing Y. Characterizing spatial-temporal variation of cultural tourism internet attention in western triangle economic zone, China. Land,2022,11(12):2221–2221. doi: 10.3390/LAND11122221 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang GH, Yuan HY. Spatio-temporal evolution characteristics and spatial differences in urban tourism network attention in China: Based on the Baidu index. Sustainability,2022,14(20):13252–13252. doi: 10.3390/SU142013252 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Shu L, Zhang K, Wang XQ, Chen H, Tao YL. Network attention of China’s sports tourism based on Baidu index. Journal of Beijing Sport University,2020,43(06):110–122. doi: 10.19582/j.cnki.11-3785/g8.2020.06.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Li L, Tao ZM, Lai ZC, Li T, Ju SL. Analysis of the Internet attention and tourism flow network structure of red tourism resources in Long March National Cultural Park. Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(07):1811–1824. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20210713 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ju SL, Tao ZM, Hang YL. Coupling coordination degree between rural scenic tourist network attention and gravity in Nanjing city. Economic Geography,2017,37(11):220–228. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2017.11.027 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hou XS. Tourism network attention variation of Chinese cities under the COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability,2022,14(9):5131–5131. doi: 10.3390/SU14095131 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ding X, Wang JQ, Li YQ. Study on characteristics and influencing factors of network attention degree of tourist destination based on Baidu index: A case of Xiamen city. Resource Development & Market,2018,34(05):709–714. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.05.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen JH, Hu YM. Online public opinion of cross-border tourism: A case study of the shipwreck in Phuket Island. Journal of Huaqiao University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2020,(03):68–79. doi: 10.16067/j.cnki.35-1049/c.2020.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhang M, Huang LY. Tourism development and public attention to negative online information: Based on the spatial correlations of tourism demand. Tourism Tribune,2021,36(07):81–91. doi: 10.19765/j.cnki.1002-5006.2021.07.011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dai L, Bai CQ, Liang LW. Spatial spillover effect of the red tourism policy on public online attention in China: An empirical study based on semantic analysis and spatial econometric model. Journal of Natural Resources,2021,36(11):2778–2796. doi: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20211105 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Fang YL, Cheng XL, Huang ZF, Guo BB. The dislocation characteristics and mechanism of network attention and tourists about Chinese national scenic spots. Economic Geography,2020,40(04):204–213. doi: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2020.04.023 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wang QL, Yang X, Fang Y. A Research on the spatial mismatch evolution and influencing factors of tourism resource abundance and tourism network attention in Sichuan province. Tourism Science,2023,37(01):43–58. doi: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.20220516.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Lan X, Zhang H, Zhang XY, Zhou LH. Does ‘heartbeat’ mean ‘actions’?-The construction and application of market conversion rate indicators for the network attention of tourist attractions. Tourism Science,2023,37(05):37–60. doi: 10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.2023.05.005 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Lu LJ, Dai XY. Research on the tourist network attention and spatial pattern of tourist destination cities in Hunan based on the Baidu index. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin,2020,29(04):836–849. doi: 10.11870/cjlyzyyhj2020040 5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Liu HM, Hu J, Lv L, Zhang HH, Cao TT. Impact of COVID-19 on spatio-temporal pattern of tourism in Wuhan: A network attention based study. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment,2023,37(02):194–202. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2023.052 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Chen YY. The promotion of the tourist attraction of red learning tourism production in Shaanxi province. Journal of Shaanxi Xueqian Normal University,2019,35(03):121–125. doi: 10.11995/j.issn.2095-770X.2019.03.024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Yuan WY. Research on the spatiotemporal behavior characteristics of tourists in rural tourism destinations based on digital footprints -taking Wuyuan as an example. Central China Normal University,2023. doi: 10.27159/d.cnki.ghzsu.2022.002465 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li CX, Jiang L, Deng Y, Zhang Y. The dynamic market competition state of inbound tourists in USA from 1990–2014. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition),2020,48(04):36–45. doi: 10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2020.04.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Li JY, Gan ZM, Xu CD. The analysis of the market competitive state and its transference of the entry tourism. Journal of Baoji College of Arts and Sciences (Natural Science Edition),2002(03):209–212. doi: 10.13467/j.cnki.jbuns.2002.03.019 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Sun GX. Inbound tourism market in Jilin province based on the tourism market competitive state. Scientia Geographica Sinica,2020,40(6):973–979. doi: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2020.06.013 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Kang L, Li ZT, Li WR. The Q-Q model analysis of China’s provincial inbound tourism market structure. Journal of Shaanxi Normal University (Natural Science Edition),2020,48(04):20–27. doi: 10.15983/j.cnki.jsnu.2020.04.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wang LX, Yang M. Study on the relationship between tourism network attention and tourist flow in Chongqing based on Baidu index. Journal of Green Science and Technology,2023,25(11):219–225. doi: 10.16663/j.cnki.lskj.2023.11.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Tinggui Chen

25 Sep 2023

PONE-D-23-23730Research on the Network Attention and its Characteristics of Tourism Flow Network Structure of Red Tourist Attractions in Shaanxi, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Tian,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Nov 09 2023 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tinggui Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

3. PLOS requires an ORCID iD for the corresponding author in Editorial Manager on papers submitted after December 6th, 2016. Please ensure that you have an ORCID iD and that it is validated in Editorial Manager. To do this, go to ‘Update my Information’ (in the upper left-hand corner of the main menu), and click on the Fetch/Validate link next to the ORCID field. This will take you to the ORCID site and allow you to create a new iD or authenticate a pre-existing iD in Editorial Manager. Please see the following video for instructions on linking an ORCID iD to your Editorial Manager account: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xcclfuvtxQ

4.Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This study received guidance from Professor Feng Yuxin and project support. The project is: National Natural Science Foundation of China "Research on Accurate Identification of Rural Tourism Poverty Alleviation in Ethical Areas by Combining Rough Set and Fuzzy Set" (41661107); The Gansu Provincial Social Science Planning Commission Project "Research on the Evaluation System of Cultural Strong Province Construction Indicators" (2021WT008); 2022 Gansu Great Wall Long March National Cultural Park Construction Special Project (Long March Project)."

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript."

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. We note that Figures 1 and 2 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

1.) You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1 and 2 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

2.) If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE.

I have completed my evaluation of your manuscript. The reviewers recommend reconsideration of your manuscript following major revision. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing the comments below.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

Reviewer #3: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this manuscript, the authors clarified the relationship between network attention and tourist flow based on the social network theory. The research aim was clear. Major conclusions were valuable. Especially, conclusion 3 and 4 were innovative enough with high application values. However, I have several major concerns, and found some logical contradictions and many expression problems. I would like to suggest a major revision decision.

I have three major concerns need to be addressed:

(1) Scientific issues still need to be concise, such as focusing on coupling network attention and tourism flow network structure, so as to provide theoretical support for evaluating actual destination activities. Is there any probability to extend the conclusions and suggestions to other red tourism places in China.

(2) There was problem of data resource overlaps for the data collection section. Both tourist flow and network attention data sources have Mafengwo and Qunar, therefore the reliability analysis and logical analysis of the data source should be supplemented. Please revise or give some explanations.

(3) I suggest you refine data screening. You selected travel notes published by tourism websites as data sources, which is innovative. Big data have great advantages in recording, but data quality need to be ensured.

I have the following minor problems regarding to the expressions or figure and table formats:

(1) In abstract and discussion section, data processing is more noteworthy than software, such as social network theory.

(2) The database establishment should not be combined with red tourist attractions’ spatial layout in 3.1. They were two different things.

(3) Figure1lacks elevation legend, and coordinates should be added.

(4) Horizontal lines should be added to Table 1.

(5) Network attention index selection. The weights of the four selected indexes with strong collinearity are close, so it is better to employ all.

(6) Figure 2 also had format problems. Table 3 could be deleted or be placed in supplement.

(7) Maybe there are other better expressions for current Figure 4.

(8) Check the format of references.

Reviewer #2: Dear Author

The manuscript entitled Research on the Network Attention and Its Characteristics of Tourism Flow Network Structure of Red Tourist Attraction in Shaanxi, China requires major revision. The things that need to be done to improve the quality of this scientific paper are: please complete the problem statement, clarify the research problem, and mention the research method in connection with statistical analysis in the abstract section. The problem formulation, research objectives, and research problems in the introduction need to be added. Make sure the font size and font type are the same for each paragraph. Theoretical analysis with the help of secondary data on research results needs to be added to research results, especially the analysis of spatial layout characteristics. Include numerical information in the conclusion. Clarify the source of the photo data again. In the Methods chapter, it is necessary to mention the type of statistical analysis, clarify the population size and sample size, clarify the primary data collection techniques and data collection tools, and clarify the secondary data collection techniques. These are the suggestions that can be conveyed; hopefully it will be useful.

PLOS ONE Reviewer

Reviewer #3: Dear Author,

I have carefully reviewed the paper titled "Research on the Network Attention and its Characteristics of Tourism Flow

Network Structure of Red Tourist Attractions in Shaanxi, China" I appreciate the author's effort in examining the crucial connection between network attention and tourism flow, and recognize its significance in the realm of tourism studies.

Data Sources and Platform Selection:

The paper would benefit from a more comprehensive approach to data collection, particularly with regard to network attention and tourism flow. It is important to diversify data sources and choose representative platforms. Consider including supplementary data from platforms like Weibo and railway 12306.

Aesthetic Improvement of Figures:

Figures 1 and 2 require aesthetic adjustments to enhance their visual appeal and effectiveness in conveying the intended information. Please revise them accordingly for better clarity and presentation.

Analysis of Discrepancy between Network Attention and Tourism Flow:

While the research method is appropriate, it is essential to delve deeper into analyzing the reasons for the observed differences between network attention and tourism flow. This addition will provide a more insightful and holistic view of the study.

Conclusion and Correlation:

The conclusion rightly highlights that the correlation between network attention and tourism flow appears to be inconspicuous, suggesting that the influence of network attention on tourism flow might not be substantial. This observation is noteworthy and should be emphasized in the conclusion.

Language and Grammar Corrections:

The following word and grammar corrections should be made for improved readability and accuracy:

" which is the cente of nerve and the nexus of the tourism system-->which is the centre of nerves and the nexus of the tourism system"

"and has become one of the core issues of the tourism geography-->and has become one of the core issues of tourism geography"

"and provided a new method for assessing the imapct of tourism on a multitemporal and spatial scale-->and provided a new method for assessing the impact of tourism on a multi-temporal and spatial scale"

"while the tourism flows responds to the movement of tourists-->while the tourism flows respond to the movement of tourists"

"calculating the proportion of the weight of the j-th indicator in the i samplee-->calculating the proportion of the weight of the j-th indicator in the i sample"

"to explore the characteristicsof the network attention and tourism flow of 13 classic red tourism scenic areas-->to explore the characteristics of the network attention and tourism flow of 13 classic red tourism scenic areas"

"and the tourism development capacity must beurgently improved-->and the tourism development capacity must be urgently improved"

"the tourism infrastructure of attractions should be improved to improve the capacity to tourism reception-->the tourism infrastructure of attractions should be improved to improve the capacity for tourism reception"

"and developing digital experience products online.-->and developing digital experience products online."

"and enhancing influence of the network-->and enhancing the influence of the network,ect."

Overall, with these suggested improvements and corrections, the paper will be strengthened in terms of data comprehensiveness, visual presentation, analytical depth, and language accuracy.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Gede Yoga Kharisma Pradana

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299286.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


15 Nov 2023

Dear editors and reviewers of PLOS ONE:

Hello!Thank you very much for your valuable suggestions for the paper! Your rigorous academic attitude and scientific research spirit have greatly inspired and benefited me. In the process of revising the paper, I have gained a profound understanding of the pertinence and guidance of the suggestions provided. The reviewer's comments are of great significance for further improvement and enhancement of the paper. In response to your comments and suggestions, the following comprehensive modifications have been made to the paper.For details, please refer to "Respond to Reviewers".

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0299286.s010.docx (915.2KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Tinggui Chen

11 Dec 2023

PONE-D-23-23730R1Research on the network attention and its characteristics of tourism flow network structure of classic red tourism scenic areas in Shaanxi, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. tian,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 25 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tinggui Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE.

I have completed my evaluation of your manuscript. The reviewers recommend reconsideration of your manuscript following major revision. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing the comments below.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #6: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Partly

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: There are still many shortcomings that need to be improved before publication.

In general, the authors should tell us the reason why the research was analyzed from the perspective of tourism flow, the research contribution from tourism flow and its impact on the conclusions. The innovation in academic viewpoints of the conclusion is insufficient. Only the tourism network and its characteristics were described, but the influencing mechanism and spatial characteristics distribution law were not summarized. In my opinion, the research significance, especially the regional planning reference for tourism development should be added. The following are specific suggestions:

1. The title is of Chinese style and not so good. It is suggested to change the title to "The network characteristics of classic red tourist attractions in Shaanxi province, China".

2. In abstract, the description of virtual and reality is misleading and inaccurate.

3. The concept of red tourism needs professional explanation and literature support. Why China attaches great importance to the development of red tourism? How is it different from other types of tourism?

4. In introduction, the first paragraph introduces the red tourism, and the second paragraph introduces the tourist flow, but there is no transition between the two paragraphs. It is suggested that the introduction part focus on the development of the red tourism scenic spots, and the tourism flow should be moved to the literature review part.

5. I am not sure why the classic red scenic spot in Shaanxi Province were selected instead of other provinces in China.

6. The manuscript mentioned that "In terms of network attention and tourism flow adaptation relationship, there are fewer studies on the integration and development of the two". At present, there are a lot of researches on the adoption of big data to analyze tourism flow, so it is suggested to remove the sentence.

7. Why has the network structure of tourism flow become one of the main directions of tourism flow research, and what is the research purpose of the network structure?

8. The literature review on the evolution of spatial structure of tourism flows and its influencing factors is too simple and lacks in-depth discussion.

9. It is necessary to add the current research methods, the network attention and the transformation methods of tourism flow in international research.

10. This is an international journal, so the research area in Figure 1 needs to supplement the location of Shaanxi Province in China, and it needs to be added the basic information including specific names and types of red tourist attractions.

11. There are over 150 red tourism areas in Shanxi province, why only 40 classic red tourism areas were selected?

12. It is recommended to provide additional explanations on technologies such as Baidu coordinate system picking tool for international readers.

13. There are many professional terms of tourist attractions in Table 1. It is recommended to check the English expression.

14. The figure of spatial distribution of Internet attention of tourist attractions needs to be added.

15. In Figure 2, it is difficult to clearly distinguish the relationship between 40 tourist attractions, especially the nodes level and position in tourist attraction network.

16. For the comparison of core and edge nodes in the network structure, it is recommended to add core-edge analysis.

17. Why are 96 nodes (divided into 8 groups) composed of small-world phenomenon?

18. What is the basis for excluding small worlds with a total number of nodes less than 5?

19. Table 4 has shown the characteristics of the small world, so it is suggested to be deleted: " According to Table 4, it can be seen that the core nodes are mostly located in Yan’an City. Among them, ..., Additionally, it can be observed that non-red nodes (Yan’an 1938, Hukou Waterfall, etc.) and red nodes jointly construct the overall network structure, exerting a significant influence within the network structure."

20. The correlation needs to be verified by continuous data, rather than by observing only three data.

21. What is the basis of the group division in Table 6?

22. The discussion on the four types of scenic spots is not supported by literature, and the relationship between discussion and the conclusion is not very close, and the reasons for the formation of the four types were not be analyzed.

Reviewer #5: This paper studies the relationship between the network attention and its characteristics of tourism flow network structure of classic red tourism scenic areas in Shaanxi Province, and obtains some valuable conclusions. The authors made changes based on the reviewers' suggestions and basically responded to the reviewers' comments. However, there are still some questions with this article.

(1) This paper is a typical case study, and the research conclusions have certain practical value for the development of red tourism in Shaanxi Province. However, the article does not seem to present any lessons and conclusions that can be generalized, which makes the actual contribution of the article very limited.

(2) Some of the specific contents of the article are not clear, which makes people very confused.

For example: In the page 9, the author said:“ To ensure the integrity of the travel flow network structure, non-red attractions are retained in the travel routes. The travel route ‘Nanniwan→Wangjiaping→Zaoyuan’ is split into ‘Nanniwan→Wangjiaping’ and ‘Wangjiaping→Zaoyuan’, resulting in 468 valid O-D data. ”

Here, the explanation of the data processing method is very sloppy, and it is impossible to understand the true intention of the author, and it cannot be assumed that all readers understand the research methods used by the author.

Another example: In the page 16, the author said:“By sorting and selecting data, a 92×92 attraction matrix was obtained.”

Why is it that there are only 13 red tourist attractions and 40 red tourist attractions, but a matrix of 92 attractions can be constructed (Figure 2). Where does the extra part come from? What is their relationship with red tourist attractions?

(3) The author lacks a discussion of the limitations of the article.

(4) The content, structure and presentation of all images in the article need to be further optimized.

Reviewer #6: The paper concerns a tourism flow as a significant tourism phenomenon based on a case study in Shaanxi province. The Authors analyse red tourism and attractions related to them. They use the softwares, such as ArcGIS, Gephi, and Origin to study the characteristics of the structure of the network attention and tourism flow network of the case sites and explore the adaptation relationship between them.

The paper needs some revisions and improvement before be published.

a) The theoretical framework has only been mentioned without any additional explanations (e.g. why and for which reasons the Authors used the theory of social network analysis

b) Please give the definition of the “red tourism.”

c) I’m not sure if the data of tourist traffic are correct: I do not understand “the annual number of participants in red tourism has increased from 140 million to 1.41 billion”

d) In many parts of the article, we can find some repetitions. The text should be cut.

e) Probably the most important value of the paper is their methodological aspect(s). Please try to develop this part and give some conclusions in the final subchapter. The Authors can use some other paper on the problems with traffic (flow) research published in last years, e.g. https://www.geographiapolonica.pl/article/item/13268.html

e) transportation conditions [31-32], and accessibility which is one of the most important part of relationships between tourism and transport (please see https://sciendo.com/pl/article/10.1515/mgr-2015-0002 or other papers of the same Authors)

d) Some figures are not readable, especially fig. 3

e) Conclusions are very narrow and related only to the case study. There is no any discussion to other research, results etc. Some results are very basic such as “The case sites have formed a spatial layout of the ‘dense in the north and sparse in the south’.”

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

Reviewer #6: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299286.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


19 Dec 2023

Dear editors and reviewers of PLOS ONE:

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit a revised draft of the manuscript ‘Research on the network attention and its characteristics of tourism flow network structure of classic red tourism scenic areas in Shaanxi, China’ for publication in the Journal of PLOS ONE. We appreciate the time and effort that you and the reviewers dedicated to providing feedback on our manuscript and are grateful for the insightful comments on and valuable improvements to our paper. We have incorporated most of the suggestions made by the reviewers. Those changes are highlighted in the manuscript. Please see below, in blue, for a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns. All page numbers refer to the revised manuscript file with tracked changes.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0299286.s011.docx (881KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Tinggui Chen

2 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-23730R2The network characteristics of classic red tourist attractions in Shaanxi province, ChinaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. tian,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 16 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Tinggui Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE.

I have completed my evaluation of your manuscript. The reviewers recommend reconsideration of your manuscript following major revision. I invite you to resubmit your manuscript after addressing the comments below. In addition, one reviewer thought that the research idea of this article was mainly based on reference [23], which was published in a core journal in China in 2021. Unfortunately, this study seemed to have no new discoveries other than changing the case study location, and no effective extension of reference [23]. Furthermore, the article directly quoted some important viewpoints from reference [23], such as the four development modes of high-high, high-low, low-high, and low-low proposed in the discussion section of this article, which is one of the most crucial conclusions of this study. In fact, the reviewer had already proposed this in reference [23]. ([23] Li L,Tao ZM,Lai ZC,Li T,Ju SL. Analysis of the Internet attention and tourism flow network structure of red tourism resources in Long March National Cultural Park. Journal of Natural Resources, 2021, 36 (07): 1811-1824. DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20210713.)

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #6: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Partly

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: Yes

Reviewer #6: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: After the revision, the manuscript has been greatly improved. The authors responded well to the reviewer's comments, but some problems were not effectively solved.

1. Although this study modified the abstract, the abstract lacks research background, framework, significance and innovative conclusions, and some sentences are unclear. For example, non-red nodes play an important role in the network structure. What role does it play?

2. Due to the lack of data in some tourist sites and the lack of data validity, I doubt that this will affect your research conclusions.

3. The reason why the 96 nodes are divided into 8 groups needs to be explained in detail, Why is the software analysis can divide nodes into 8 groups by default?

4. A ternary closure forms a minimal stable structure: a Loop containing three nodes.

5. The group classification can be well explained by the Boston matrix. However, the limitations of this method should also be noted, and it is difficult to balance two or more conditions at the same time.

6. The manuscript has been revised a lot. It is suggested to readjust the logic between the paragraphs and check the English editing.

Reviewer #5: The authors have made changes to the article based on the reviewers' comments. But I still have two small suggestions for the author's reference.

(1) In the data part, the author only introduces the data of network attention, and does not introduce the data of tourism flow, which is obviously inappropriate. Therefore, I suggest that the author add a description of the tourist flow data.

(2) The references of the article need to be adjusted somewhat. At present, most of the references in the article are from Chinese journals, and there is no good academic dialogue with English journals. In fact, there are quite a lot of international studies on red tourism, tourism flow, and tourism network attention, and the authors should make appropriate adjustments to the literature.

Reviewer #6: The new version of the revised paper is better than previous one. The Author(s) has/have changed many parts of the article significantly.

Some of the changes may still be questionable. Overall, the article is China-centric and, in my opinion, the lack of reference to global literature on the subject is a mistake.

In my opinion, the discussion still has some limitations and is poorly anchored in international circulation and literature. This can significantly reduce the scope of the article's importance.

You need to be careful with the definitions, for example the revised one regarding red tourism. This is not a concept that only applies to this type of tourism in China. It is more a term for communist or socialist elements that occur in many countries.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

Reviewer #6: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0299286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299286.r006

Author response to Decision Letter 2


27 Jan 2024

Dear editors and reviewers of PLOS ONE:

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to submit a revised draft of the manuscript ‘The network characteristics of classic red tourist attractions in Shaanxi province, China ’ for publication in the Journal of PLOS ONE. We appreciate the time and effort that you and the reviewers dedicated to providing feedback on our manuscript and are grateful for the insightful comments on and valuable improvements to our paper. We have incorporated most of the suggestions made by the reviewers. Those changes are highlighted in the manuscript. Please see below, in blue, for a point-by-point response to the reviewers’ comments and concerns. All page numbers refer to the revised manuscript file with tracked changes.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0299286.s012.docx (23.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 3

Tinggui Chen

9 Feb 2024

The network characteristics of classic red tourist attractions in Shaanxi province, China

PONE-D-23-23730R3

Dear Dr. tian,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Tinggui Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #4: (No Response)

Reviewer #5: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #4: Yes

Reviewer #5: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #4: After careful reading and evaluation, I believe that the authors have adequately addressed the concerns I raised previously. Therefore, I support the publication of this article. I look forward to seeing more excellent research from the authors in the future.

Reviewer #5: (No Response)

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #4: No

Reviewer #5: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Tinggui Chen

21 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-23730R3

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Yunxia,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Tinggui Chen

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Network attention of scenic spots.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s001.docx (14.7KB, docx)
    S2 Table. Data processing.

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s002.docx (21.3KB, docx)
    S1 File

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s003.docx (13.6KB, docx)
    S2 File

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s004.docx (14.9KB, docx)
    S3 File

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s005.docx (68KB, docx)
    S4 File

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s006.docx (16.6KB, docx)
    S5 File

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s007.docx (306.8KB, docx)
    S6 File

    (DOCX)

    pone.0299286.s008.docx (55.9KB, docx)
    S7 File

    (XLS)

    pone.0299286.s009.xls (77.5KB, xls)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0299286.s010.docx (915.2KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0299286.s011.docx (881KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0299286.s012.docx (23.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All data collected and analyzed in this study could be downloaded from public databases including Ctrip, WeChat, Baidu, 360, Mafengwo, and Qunar. Ctrip: https://www.ctrip.com/ Baidu: https://www.baidu.com 360: https://www.so.com/ Mafengwo: https://www.mafengwo.cn/ Qunar: https://www.qunar.com/ WeChat: https://weixin.sogou.com/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.bvq83bkgn.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES