Abstract
Calciphylaxis is a rare and severe medical condition characterized by the calcification of small blood vessels and soft tissues, leading to tissue damage, skin ulcers, and intense pain. It most commonly affects individuals with underlying health conditions such as kidney disease, particularly end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and is associated with high mortality rates. Understanding the diagnosis and management of calciphylaxis is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Diagnosing calciphylaxis can be challenging due to its rarity and overlapping symptoms with other skin conditions. Healthcare professionals typically use a combination of clinical evaluation and diagnostic tests to reach a conclusive diagnosis.
The management of calciphylaxis is multifaceted and typically involves a collaborative effort between various healthcare specialists, including nephrologists, dermatologists, and wound care experts. The primary goals of treatment are to alleviate pain, promote wound healing, address underlying causes, and prevent further complications.
Keywords: end-stage renal disease (esrd), hemodialysis related, painful skin lesions, warfarin-induced skin necrosis, treatment of calciphylaxis
Introduction
Calciphylaxis is a severe and life-threatening arteriolopathy defined as vascular calcification resulting in the occlusion of microvessels in the subcutaneous adipose tissue and dermis, creating intensely painful, ischemic skin lesions [1,2]. It often occurs in patients with hyperparathyroidism linked to end-stage renal failure and patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) [3]. The typical clinical picture is of an indurated skin lesion resembling livedo reticularis on the lower limbs, which may progress to violaceous, painful, plaque or subcutaneous nodules, followed by ischemic/necrotic ulcers of reticular pattern with or without Eschars [4,5].
Case presentation
A 62-year-old African American woman with a history of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) due to ESRD following lupus nephritis., antiphospholipid syndrome, hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, recurrent deep venous thrombosis on Warfarin, presented with progressive leg pain that was associated with a painful necrotic lesion on the left leg about 4*7 cm in diameter surrounded by erythema with a foul smell (Figure 1). The pain was severe enough to limit her ability to ambulate. There was no associated fever, chills, chest pain, or dyspnea.
Figure 1. Left leg ulcer.
Her home medications and laboratory findings are in Tables 1, 2, respectively.
Table 1. Home medications of the patient.
| Home medications |
| Mycophenolate 360 mg twice daily |
| Hydroxychloroquine 200 mg daily |
| Warfarin 2.5 mg daily |
| Amlodipine 10 mg daily |
| Lisinopril 40 mg daily |
| Pantoprazole 40 mg daily |
| Clopidogrel 75 mg daily |
| Sertraline 25 mg daily |
| Atorvastatin 40 mg daily |
| Carvedilol 6.25 mg twice daily |
| Ergocalciferol 50000 IU weekly |
| Fluticasone -Salmeterol 250-50 mg inhaler daily |
| Folic acid 1 mg daily |
| Gabapentin 300 mg daily |
| Ipratropium 0.02 nebulizer |
| Levothyroxine 25 mcg daily |
Table 2. Laboratory findings.
| Laboratory values | Result | Reference value |
| Blood urea nitrogen | 33 mg/dL | 7-21 mg/dL |
| Potassium | 5 mmol/L | 3.5-4.7 mmol/L |
| Calcium | 7.4 mg/dL | 8.5-10.1 mg/dL |
| Phosphorous | 7.8 mg/dL | 2.5-4.9 mg/dL |
| Parathyroid hormone ( PTH) | 478 pg/mL | 18.4-80.1 pg/mL |
| Albumin | 2 g/dL | 3.4-5.0 g/dL |
| White cell count | 14.52 K/μL | 4.0-11.0 K/μL |
| Hemoglobin | 6.3 g/dL | 13.0-17.0 g/dL |
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) | >150 mm/hr | 0-20 mm/hr |
| C reactive protein (CRP) | 20.9 mg/dL | 0.3- 1.0 mg/dL |
| Cardiolipin antibodies | Positive |
The patient underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan of the lower extremity, which revealed superficial ulceration with no evidence of osteomyelitis and suspicion of subcutaneous gas-forming infection. The patient was treated with ampicillin-sulbactam and vancomycin for ten days with no clinical improvement. Skin biopsy of the ulcer showed increased uptake of Von Kossa stain for calcium, confirming the diagnosis of calciphylaxis.
Treatment with thrice weekly sodium thiosulfate 12.5 g during dialysis was initiated. During hospitalization, debridement and negative pressure wound therapy were performed for the ulcer. Additionally, cinacalcet 30 mg daily was administered to reduce her blood serum calcium and phosphate levels.
Three months later, she was hospitalized due to sepsis secondary to polymicrobial necrotizing fasciitis with signs of gas gangrene in the left big toe. Debridement and first toe resection were done, and the pathology report confirmed ischemic necrosis without osteomyelitis. The patient showed no improvement in three months of treatment with sodium thiosulfate - a new ulcer formed on the sacrum and the left foot (Figure 2). After extensive discussion, the patient opted for home hospice and palliative care with no more HD sessions.
Figure 2. Left foot ulcer.
Discussion
Calciphylaxis is a devastating occlusive blood vessel disease that results from the narrowing of the arterial lumen by calcification in the media and fibrosis underneath the intima [6]. The one-year mortality rate is 50%, and it goes up to 80% in ulcerated lesions, with sepsis the most common cause of death [7,8].
Our patient had several predisposing factors for calciphylaxis, which are ESRD, hyperparathyroidism, SLE, short bowel syndrome, and warfarin intake. Evidence suggests that warfarin has been implicated in the process of vascular calcification by inhibiting vitamin K-dependent proteins that prevent calcium depositions in arteries [9,10]. This patient was on warfarin when she had her first necrotic ulcer; warfarin was discontinued soon after admission; however, the patient continued to develop new ulcers.
Cutaneous manifestations of calciphylaxis are described as livedo reticularis-like plaques which may eventually progress to soft tissue ulceration, necrosis, and non-healing eschars. The diminished blood supply puts them at risk of infection. The most affected sites are the lower limbs and skin regions with fatty tissue [11]. Diagnosis requires high suspicion based on clinical features and can be supported by skin biopsy [12].
Our patient presents with a typical picture of calciphylaxis; however, she was on Warfarin, and to exclude warfarin-induced ulcer, a bunch biopsy was done, and it stained positive for Von Kossa stain for calcium, which confirmed the diagnosis of calciphylaxis.
The main culprit in the pathogenesis of calciphylaxis is vascular calcification; therefore, management is mainly directed toward stopping vascular calcification [13]. Treatment should utilize a multidisciplinary approach, including control of infection, correction of electrolytes, and local management of ulcers by debridement [13].
The management of calciphylaxis involves a multifaceted approach addressing various aspects of the disease process. Key components include targeting phosphorus control to maintain levels below 5.5 mg/dL, optimizing dialysis for the clearance of uremic molecules and improving bone-mineral markers, ensuring appropriate vascular access, managing phosphate levels, addressing hyperparathyroidism, and mitigating vascular calcification. Close monitoring and coordination among healthcare providers are crucial for optimizing outcomes in patients with this challenging condition [14].
Conclusions
Calcific uremic arteriopathy is a severe and often fatal condition in patients with ESRD. It involves calcification and narrowing of small blood vessels, leading to tissue damage and potential complications. Management of calciphylaxis is complex and typically involves a multidisciplinary approach, including wound care, pain management, calcium, and phosphorus control, vascular intervention such as wound debridement, sodium thiosulfate, nutritional support, and medications like bisphosphate, corticosteroid, and hyperbaric oxygen.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.A nationally representative study of calcific uremic arteriolopathy risk factors. Nigwekar SU, Zhao S, Wenger J, Hymes JL, Maddux FW, Thadhani RI, Chan KE. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;27:3421–3429. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2015091065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Survival, risk factors, and effect of treatment in 101 patients with calciphylaxis. McCarthy JT, El-Azhary RA, Patzelt MT, et al. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91:1384–1394. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Calciphylaxis presenting with various symptoms: a case report. Miura S, Takahashi K, Akasaka T. Case Rep Dermatol. 2017;9:25–29. doi: 10.1159/000456000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Calciphylaxis: calcific uremic arteriolopathy and the emerging role of sodium thiosulfate. Hayden MR, Goldsmith D, Sowers JR, Khanna R. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40:443–451. doi: 10.1007/s11255-008-9373-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Unusual causes of cutaneous ulceration. Panuncialman J, Falanga V. Surg Clin North Am. 201090;1161:1180. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2010.08.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Calciphylaxis: risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. Nigwekar SU, Kroshinsky D, Nazarian RM, et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:133–146. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.01.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Calciphylaxis: natural history, risk factor analysis, and outcome. Weenig RH, Sewell LD, Davis MD, McCarthy JT, Pittelkow MR. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:569–579. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.08.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Calciphylaxis is usually non-ulcerating: risk factors, outcome and therapy. Fine A, Zacharias J. Kidney Int. 2002;61:2210–2217. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00375.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Warfarin-induced calciphylaxis successfully treated with sodium thiosulphate. Hafiji J, Deegan P, Brais R, Norris P. Australas J Dermatol. 2013;54:133–135. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-0960.2011.00861.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Warfarin-induced calciphylaxis in a chronic hypercalcemic patient. Huang YC, Chou CY, Sue YM, Hu CH. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2013;79:135. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.104691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Dermatological disease in patients with CKD. Brewster UC. Am J Kidney Dis. 2008;51:331–344. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.09.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calciphylaxis. Nigwekar SU, Thadhani R, Brandenburg VM. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:1704–1714. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1505292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Calciphylaxis: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment. Chang JJ. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019;32:205–215. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000554443.14002.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Calciphylaxis: a long road to cure with a multidisciplinary and multimodal approach. Zoi V, Bacharaki D, Sardeli A, Karagiannis M, Lionaki S. Case Rep Nephrol. 2022;2022:3818980. doi: 10.1155/2022/3818980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


