Abstract
Background
Bacterial community found in biodynamic preparations (BD500–BD507) can help improve soil health, plant development, yield, and quality. The current work describes a metagenomic investigation of these preparations to identify the bacterial communities along with the functional diversity present within them.
Results
Metagenome sequencing was performed using the Illumina MiSeq platform, which employs next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology, to provide an understanding of the bacterial communities and their functional diversity in BD preparations. NGS data of BD preparations revealed that maximum operational taxonomic units (OTUs) of the phylum Proteobacteria were present in BD506 (23429) followed by BD505 (22712) and BD501 (21591), respectively. Moreover, unclassified phylum (16657) and genus (16657) were also highest in BD506. Maximum alpha diversity was reported in BD501 (1095 OTU) and minimum in BD507 (257 OTU). Further, the OTUs for five major metabolic functional groups viz carbohydrate metabolism, xenobiotic degradation, membrane transport functions, energy metabolism, and enzyme activities were abundant in BD506 and BD501.
Conclusion
The bacterial communities in BD506 and BD501 are found to be unique and rare; they belong to functional categories that are involved in enzyme activity, membrane transport, xenobiotic degradation, and carbohydrate metabolism. These preparations might therefore be thought to be more effective. The investigation also found a highly varied population of bacteria, which could explain why BD preparations work well in the field. In view of this, the BD preparations may be utilized for unexploited bacterial communities for sustainable agriculture production.
Keywords: Bacterial diversity, Metagenome, NGS, OTUs
1. Background
Modern farming practices require extensive use of chemical fertilizers (CF) for higher crop production, but these methods are expensive and create several enormous problems related to health and the environment1. Under these circumstances, concerns are raised against the residual effects of chemicals on fresh fruits and vegetables that are consumed every day. The use of chemicals in agriculture sectors both fertilizers and pesticides (PS) may damage soil health by reducing microbial diversity2 acidification of the soil, depleting minerals, and subsequently causing soil and water pollution3, 4.
There has been a worldwide revival of attention towards eco-friendly, and sustainable agriculture practices for better crop quality and soil health. Natural/organic nutrient management strategies which include organic farming and other quite close nature-based alternate farming systems viz Permaculture, Rishi Krishi, Panchgavya, Natueco farming (Nature ecological farming), and Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF), Biodynamic farming are considered as the potential options for CF and PS.
Permaculture is the type of agricultural system that directly uses the patterns and features found in natural ecosystems5. Rishi Krishi is a natural farming method created by farmers in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra state of India. The preparation and procedure for this approach can be found at www.rishikrishi.co.in5. Panchgavya is a mixture of five cow-based components— curd, dung, ghee, milk and urine—that are acquired from cows. The aforementioned ingredients are mixed thoroughly in the 2:1:1:2:3 ratio and subsequently fermented for seven days, with frequent stirring5, 6. Naturéco farming, also known as nature-based farming, works in synchronization with the natural world, minimizing reliance on outside inputs, and applying science to the resources found in the farm's surroundings in order to maximize benefits without endangering the ecology. The principal components of natueco are amrutmitti and amrutjal5, 7. Zero Budget Natural Farming (ZBNF) is a farming approach that relies on crops growing naturally without the use of pesticides, fertilizers, or other external substances. The term “zero budget” describes the zero net cost of production, which includes intercrops, border crops, and multi-crops. ZBNF has 4 key elements viz Bijamrit (seed treatment), Jiwamrit (microbial culture), Achhadana (mulching), and Whapasa (soil aeration)5, 8. Biodynamic (BD) farming is the agricultural system, centric to reduce the use of excessive chemicals in agriculture, besides the restoration of soil health5, 9.
BD farming is one of the oldest organized organic agriculture farming systems which enhances soil fertility and consequently improves plant growth and yield through the application of BD preparations10. Although, BD preparations do not add significant nutrients themselves, to stimulate the processes of nutrient and energy cycling, hasten decomposition, and improve soil and crop quality even by applying as few grams per ton of organic material11. There are eight BD preparations viz BD500, BD501, BD502, BD503, BD504, BD505, BD506, and BD507 which are prepared using a fermentation process and are reported to possess unique characteristics features5, 12, 13, 14. BD500 is used as a spray (25 g/acre in 13 L of water) to revive soil health and improve seed germination, and root development15. BD501 is sprayed to improve plant immunity, seed and fruit quality as well as the photosynthesis process. BD502- BD507 are utilised for BD compost preparation. BD502 has high potassium (K) and sulphur (S) content. In order to provide plants with optimal nourishment, BD502 aids plants in absorbing trace elements in extremely dilute quantities. BD503 has a high concentration of S and Calcium (Ca). BD503 stimulate plant growth by refining soil health by improving soil life and stabilising nitrogen (N) in the compost. BD504 has a considerable amount of S, K, Ca and Iron (Fe). Due to this BD504 plays a direct or indirect role in the growth and development of plants. BD505 is abundant with Ca and aids in protecting plants from various plant diseases. BD506 facilitates the uptake of silicon (Si) and potassium (K) from the soil. BD507 aids in increasing the plant's phosphorus availability5, 14, 16.
The bacterial diversity and richness in soil can positively influence plant growth, yield, quality, and soil health17, 18. Alpha diversity indices are widely used to characterize microbial communities in any ecosystem19. It has two components viz species richness and evenness indices. The quantity of distinct species found in a given niche is measured by species richness. The nonparametric abundance-based estimators viz Chaos1 and ACE are generally used to calculate species richness. Evenness, on the other hand, is a metric for the relative abundance of various species that make up a community20. Shannon-Weaver and Simpson diversity indices generally offer better insight into the composition viz diversity, rarity and evenness (commonness) of the community.
Many studies have examined the potential benefits of BD preparations for enhancing soil microbiota, soil properties, yield, and quality in a range of crop plants, including perennial fruit trees6, 21, 22, 23. It is now widely documented that only < 1 % of bacteria are culturable, whereas the rest are unculturable24, 25, 26, 27. Earlier, only the study on culturable microbiota present in BD preparations was done by many researchers28, 29, that are not reflect the actual microbial diversity and function present in BD preparations. Moreover, a preliminary investigation in our laboratory also signposted the culturable bacteria present in BD preparations30. Nevertheless, not enough research has been done to ascertain the microbial compositions and their function in the improvement of crop and soil health.
Earlier, many molecular techniques viz PCR-SSCP31, PLFA32, and DGGE33 had been developed for the exploration of microbial communities under various habitats. Since the development of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies, metagenomics has been utilized as a suitable method to comprehend the microbial diversity and linked function in any environmental sample without requiring culture. Its benefits over substitute methods include superior precision, low cost and high throughput. This technique is most frequently used to study the variety of microbial communities in various habitats, the interactions between various microorganisms, and communities' adaptation to alteration of habitats34.
The information about the principle underlying the efficacy of BD preparations is negligible. There is a lot of literature now available on the use of high-throughput sequencing techniques to study soil microorganisms, but none on the study of BD preparation. In light of the aforementioned, a metagenomic approach was followed to study the bacterial diversity and community structure in various BD preparations. In any ecosystem, bacteria are one of the important key biotic components (in the form of decomposers) and their number and diversity are always higher than other microflora. They decay the large and complex living/nonliving organic and inorganic compounds into small and simpler ones viz nitrate, phosphate, carbon dioxide, water, amino acids, simple sugars, mineral salts etc and easily make them available to plants35, 36, 37. Moreover, the different genera of bacteria also synergistically interact with plants (producers) and improve their growth directly via producing Indole (IAA, IBA), solubilizing phosphorous and other minerals, fixing environmental N in soil etc or indirectly by protecting the plants from pathogens38, 39.
2. Methods
2.1. Biodynamic preparation samples and experimental design
The BD preparation samples were procured from the leading producer of BD preparations named Supa Biotech (P) Ltd.; Nainital, Uttarakhand, India (latitude: 29.39 N, longitude: 79.46 E). The eight different types of BD preparation viz BD500, BD501, BD502, BD503, BD504, BD505, BD506, and BD507 were taken for the metagenomic study. BD500 and BD501 are prepared from fresh cow dung and silica paste incubated in cow horns, respectively. BD502, BD503, BD504, and BD506 are made from the Achillea millefolium L. (yarrow flower), Matricaria chamomilla L. (chamomile), Urtica parviflora (Himalayan stinging nettle), and Taraxacum officinale (dandelion), respectively. BD505 is made by stuffing the crushed bark of Quercus glauca (oak tree) into the skull cavity of any domestic animal whereas the extract of Valeriana officinalis L. (valerian flowers) is used for the preparation of BD5075, 14, 40, 41. After procurement, the BD preparation samples were then divided into three parts. The first portion of the sample was dried by air for physicochemical analysis. The second portion of the sample was preserved at 4 °C for microbiological analysis, while the third portion was kept in a tight-pack cryotube and stored at −80 °C for metagenomic analysis.
2.2. Isolation of bacterial genomic DNA from biodynamic preparations
The genomic DNA isolation kit (Chromos Biotech Pvt. Ltd., India) was used to isolate the DNA from BD preparations by following the given instructions by the manufacturer. The integrity of the isolated DNA was confirmed on 0.8 % agarose gel by electrophoresis in TAE buffer and further visualisation under UV in uvitec (Bangalore Genei, India). The quantitative yield and quality of the isolated DNA were then assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop ND 1000).
2.3. Amplification of 16S rRNA gene sequence
The amplification of the 16S rRNA gene from the isolated bacterial genomic DNA was performed by following the protocol described earlier42. The hyper-variable region (V3-V4) of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the modified 341F forward primer (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′) and 785R reverse primer (5′-ACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′). 25 ng of bacterial genomic DNA, 10 µM of forward and reverse primers, and KAPA HiFi HotStart Ready Mix make up the PCR reaction mixture. The PCR protocol was set up as follows: 95 °C for 5 min (initial denaturation); amplification which includes 25 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s (denaturation), 55 °C for 45 s (annealing), and 72 °C for 30 s (extension); 72 °C for 7 min (final extension); and 4 °C for an infinite period.
2.4. Amplicon purification, quality checking and library preparation
The amplicons were purified using Ampure beads to eliminate any remaining primers. Subsequently, 8 PCR cycles were run to construct the sequencing libraries with Illumina barcoded adapters. On the Illumina MiSeq platform, the library underwent further sequencing with the target of 0.5 million reads per sample using 2x 250 Paired-end (PE) chemistry. The quality of the sequence data was assessed using easily accessible online available tools viz FastQC (v0.11.7)43 and MultiQC44. The data was investigated to determine the distribution of base call quality, percentage of bases over Q20, Q30, percent GC, and contamination of sequencing adapter in the sample. The QC threshold (Q20 > 95 %) was found to be passed by every sample (Table 1).
Table 1.
Summary of raw sequence data and quality.
| Sample-ID | Number of reads | Read Length | GC% | % Bases > Q20 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD 500 | 125,546 | 301 | 53 | 99.22 |
| BD 501 | 468,524 | 301 | 53.5 | 99.05 |
| BD 502 | 334,338 | 301 | 53.5 | 98.48 |
| BD 503 | 191,948 | 301 | 53.5 | 98.88 |
| BD 504 | 506,268 | 301 | 53.5 | 99.1 |
| BD 505 | 371,382 | 301 | 53.5 | 99.03 |
| BD 506 | 504,650 | 301 | 54.5 | 99.36 |
| BD 507 | 162,446 | 301 | 54 | 98.52 |
2.5. Sequencing and metagenomic analysis
The methods previously reported were used for the 16S rRNA gene sequencing of soil bacteria45. To get rid of the degenerate primers, the readings were trimmed by 20 bp from the 5′ end. Trim Galore was used to eliminate adaptor sequences and low-quality bases from the trimmed reads46. The QC-passed reads were aligned with each other to construct contigs using Mothur software v1.39.5.0. Only contigs ranging in size from 300 bp to 532 bp were kept after being inspected for errors. Any contig that had incorrect base calls was omitted. The high-quality contigs were inspected for sequence homology and during this process, the duplicates sequences were merged in order to get the unique sequences. Despite being intended for the 16S bacterial rRNA gene, the primers used in this experiment had a good possibility to amplify the other areas non-specifically. In order to account for this, the contigs were aligned with the 16S rRNA gene of a known database. Most of the contigs were aligned to the corresponding variable region of the 16S RNA gene in the database. Contigs that aligned erratically with other database areas were removed. The UCHIME algorithm was used to eliminate the chimeric sequences47. Thereafter, the filtered contigs were processed for OTU construction. The OTU abundance in the aforementioned metagenomic sample was mined using PICRUSt software48. The inbuilt QIIME (v.1.9.0) software run on the py script was used for this purpose. The filtered sequence data were taken as input by QIIME and matched with the Greengenes reference database at a 97 % sequence similarity threshold. The UCLUST algorithm was used for cluster and OTUs assignment of similar sequences49. The various metabolic potentials among the BD preparations were investigated using PICRUSt.
2.6. Statistical analysis
The α-diversity and OTUs were examined using the online tool Microbiome Analyst (https://www.microbiomeanalyst.ca/faces/home.xhtml) that do a thorough statistical meta-analysis of output QIIME data. To assess the richness shared among sample groups. The QIIME diversity command was employed with the maximum depth parameter to compute diversity measures. The statistical analysis was done by the ‘ggpubr’ R package.
3. Results
In the new era of technology, the abundance of bacterial diversity in soil (both culturable and nonculturable) is analyzed by the metagenomics approach. In this method, the 16S rRNA genes fragment from extracted DNA of soil microbes were amplified and further analysed by various tools. This technique is cost-effective, consistently reliable, and accurate for bacterial classification. The V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA genes is frequently exploited in phylogenetic classifications such as genus or species in diverse bacterial populations. The consensus nature of the V3-V4 regions is recognised as appropriate for identifying the bacteria up to the species level.
In the present study, the hypervariable region (V3-V4) of the 16S rRNA gene of bacteria was amplified for metagenomic analysis. The basic summary statistics viz reads for samples (BD500- BD507), average read lengths for amplicon data of all the eight samples is depicted in Table 1. BD500, BD501, BD502, BD503, BD504, BD505, BD506, and BD507 yielded a total of 125546, 468524, 334338, 191948, 506268, 371382, 504650, and 162,446 reads, respectively with the average read length of 301 bp. The highest number of reads was accounted for in BD504 and the lowest in BD500.
A rarefaction curve was used to link the relationship between the number of OTUs and the number of sequences in BD preparations. It is possible to depict species richness using sample results. The plateau rarefaction curve reflects the number of newly discovered OTUs is limited with further sequences and vice-versa (Fig. 1). Among the 8 BD preparations, the maximum diversity (OTUs) was recorded in BD501 (1095 OTUs) and the minimum in BD507 (257 OTUs) (Fig. 1; Table 2). The bacterial community dynamics among BD preparations were analyzed by the Principal Component Analysis (PCoA). This plot was used to check the taxonomical distribution-based similarities among BD preparations. The PCoA plot showed that all 8 BD preparations (BD500 –BD507) were not similar to each other and had different values on axes 1 and 2. However, BD501 and BD503 were similar on axis 1 but dissimilar on axis 2; likewise, BD502, BD504, BD505, and BD506 were also relatively more similar on axis 1 but somewhat dissimilar on axis 2. The BD507 showed comparative similarities with BD501, BD504, and BD506 at axis 2, while no similarities were seen at axis 1. Among all, BD507 represented no similarities with other BD preparations (Fig. 2).
Fig. 1.
Rarefaction curve: representing number of OTUs (species richness) in different BD preparations.
Table 2.
Diversity indices as recorded in 8 BD preparations.
| S.N. | OTU's | Chao1 | se.chao1 | ACE | se.ACE | Shannon | Simpson | InvSimpson | Fisher |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD500 | 503 | 733.00 | 49.80 | 675.36 | 13.37 | 3.94 | 0.94 | 17.95 | 92.28 |
| BD501 | 1095 | 1392.31 | 49.13 | 1353.52 | 18.67 | 4.89 | 0.98 | 59.19 | 171.08 |
| BD502 | 821 | 1039.68 | 41.23 | 1007.31 | 16.06 | 4.38 | 0.96 | 27.63 | 133.67 |
| BD503 | 503 | 518.00 | 6.51 | 520.86 | 11.10 | 3.88 | 0.94 | 17.28 | 80.57 |
| BD504 | 993 | 1347.78 | 60.68 | 1257.00 | 18.04 | 4.53 | 0.97 | 32.84 | 153.25 |
| BD505 | 739 | 961.51 | 43.59 | 941.71 | 15.69 | 4.29 | 0.97 | 29.40 | 112.44 |
| BD506 | 966 | 1240.32 | 48.63 | 1197.11 | 17.56 | 4.30 | 0.96 | 23.23 | 144.79 |
| BD507 | 257 | 257.00 | 0.00 | 257.00 | 7.79 | 3.41 | 0.94 | 15.85 | 39.04 |
Fig. 2.
Interaction between the samples (BD500 –BD 507) by Principal Component Analysis.
Alpha diversity is a metric used to determine the relative abundance and richness of organisms in a sample. The different Alpha diversity indices viz Shannon, Simpson, InvSimpson, Chao1, ACE, and Fisher in different BD preparations are displayed in Fig. 3. Sample richness is shown by Chao1 and ACE, while both relative abundance and richness are specified by Shannon, Simpson, InvSimpson, and Fisher. The higher value of the aforementioned indices of BD preparation indicated higher dominance and higher richness in terms of bacterial diversity. Based on this, the BD501 and BD507 were found to be the highest and lowest diversity as well as richness, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 2).
Fig. 3.
Alpha diversity indices of different BD preparation.
The bacterial population present in the BD preparations was classified at the phylum, genus, and species levels by means of OTUs identified by Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) analysis of the sequencing data. The bacterial population in BD preparations was accounted for in the following order: BD506 > BD501 > BD504 > BD505 > BD502 > BD503 > BD507 > BD500 (Table 3 and Fig. 4). Proteobacteria was found to be the most dominant phylum in all BD preparations. Among BD preparations, the abundance of Proteobacteria was observed to be highest in BD506 (23429) and lowest in BD500 (5452). Moreover, the abundance of phylum viz Actinobacteria, TM7, and other unclassified bacteria was found to be maximum in BD506 (10549, 8651, and 16657, respectively) and minimum in BD507 (217, 62, and 659, respectively). Similarly, phylum Bacteroidetes and Verrucomicrobia were found to be most abundant in BD501 (21609 and 5550, respectively) and minimum abundance was recorded in BD500 (2260 and 496, respectively). Likewise, OD1 and Chloroflexi were found to be maximum in BD504 (11549 and 4869, respectively) and minimum in BD507 (81 and 21, respectively). The maximum richness of phylum Firmicutes and Planctomycetes was recorded in BD504 and BD505 (9295 and 15446, respectively) while the minimum was in BD500 (410 and 2210, respectively).
Table 3.
Profile of top 10 most abundant OTUs observed in 8 BD preparations at phylum, genus and species level.
| Phylum level | BD 500 | BD 501 | BD 502 | BD 503 | BD 504 | BD 505 | BD 506 | BD 507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| p_Proteobacteria | 5452 | 21,591 | 13,548 | 9754 | 20,771 | 22,712 | 23,429 | 11,985 |
| p_Planctomycetes | 2210 | 13,611 | 9442 | 3826 | 13,242 | 15,446 | 14,166 | 3467 |
| p_Bacteroidetes | 2260 | 21,609 | 6040 | 3968 | 9918 | 8739 | 14,821 | 3879 |
| p_OD1 | 4244 | 4984 | 7170 | 11,361 | 11,589 | 7790 | 8808 | 81 |
| k_Bacteria_unclassified | 1900 | 6244 | 7398 | 2486 | 9702 | 6938 | 16,657 | 659 |
| p_Actinobacteria | 956 | 7116 | 3058 | 1662 | 9823 | 2951 | 10,549 | 217 |
| p_TM7 | 1649 | 2877 | 2976 | 2544 | 3056 | 2749 | 8651 | 62 |
| p_Firmicutes | 410 | 9055 | 713 | 545 | 9295 | 531 | 2489 | 422 |
| p_Chloroflexi | 225 | 2185 | 2679 | 892 | 4869 | 3855 | 4856 | 21 |
| p_Verrucomicrobia | 496 | 5550 | 1776 | 1794 | 1031 | 1560 | 1730 | 1544 |
| Genus level | ||||||||
| k_Bacteria_unclassified | 1900 | 6244 | 7398 | 2486 | 9702 | 6938 | 16,657 | 659 |
| c_ZB2_unclassified | 3927 | 4860 | 6171 | 7350 | 10,003 | 6677 | 7629 | 51 |
| p_Bacteroidetes_unclassified | 652 | 2048 | 2549 | 1174 | 2870 | 4704 | 8925 | 74 |
| f_Pirellulaceae_unclassified | 483 | 3365 | 2687 | 1006 | 4953 | 5978 | 4038 | 27 |
| c_TM7-1_unclassifified | 1119 | 621 | 2680 | 2306 | 2682 | 2553 | 7652 | 25 |
| g_Planctomyces | 96 | 3282 | 937 | 279 | 3233 | 1647 | 1862 | 15 |
| f_Chitinophagaceae_unclassified | 1111 | 1074 | 1741 | 2353 | 368 | 1776 | 2531 | 20 |
| c_Gammaproteobacteria_unclassified | 562 | 600 | 1294 | 1225 | 2332 | 1919 | 2446 | 63 |
| o_Phycisphaerales_unclassified | 18 | 82 | 1288 | 28 | 1362 | 1195 | 4189 | 13 |
| o_WD2101_unclassified | 829 | 1134 | 2216 | 1535 | 254 | 1205 | 881 | 6 |
| Species level | ||||||||
| s_sulfuriphila | 4 | 3639 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 31 | 3 |
| s_MS3071 | 3 | 2669 | 10 | 1 | 21 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
| s_flava | 7 | 6 | 285 | 839 | 211 | 331 | 562 | 3 |
| s_lwoffii | 0 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 2213 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| s_copri | 120 | 234 | 190 | 56 | 640 | 372 | 30 | 148 |
| s_flexibilis | 5 | 1642 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 89 | 3 |
| s_olearia | 0 | 847 | 11 | 0 | 265 | 0 | 254 | 3 |
| s_maritima | 1 | 13 | 76 | 9 | 742 | 326 | 47 | 0 |
| s_soli | 1 | 765 | 3 | 0 | 114 | 5 | 12 | 0 |
| s_exiguus | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 820 |
Fig. 4.
Relative abundance of top 10 bacterial OTUs in soil at phylum level. One color represents one OTU and length of the color block presents the relative richness proportion of the phylum.
The abundance of the top 10 OTU at the genus level and their percent distribution among BD preparations are depicted in Table 3 and Fig. 5, respectively. In Fig. 5, the area of each fragment represented the abundance of one OTU at the genus level. The highest number of bacteria at the genus level was found in the k_Bacteria_unclassified. The abundance of Plancomyces accounted for the maximum in BD501, which justifies our result reported at the phylum level. At the species level, some of the OTUs were extremely dominant in particular BD preparation (Table 3 and Fig. 6). The abundant population of species sulfuriphila (Petrimonas sulfuriphila), MS3071 (Planctomycete MS3071), flexibilis (Serpens flexibilis), olearia (Muricauda olearia) and soli (Solimonas soli) were recorded in BD501 preparation. Similarly, BD504 was found to be the largest population of lwoffii (Acinetobacter lwoffii), copri (Prevotella copri) and maritime (Woodsholea maritime) species. Moreover, flava (Phaselicystis flava) and exiguous (Corallococcus exiguous) were found to be the richest in BD503 and BD507 preparation, respectively.
Fig. 5.
Relative abundance of top 10 bacterial OTUs in soil at genus level. One color represents one OTU and length of the color block presents the relative richness proportion of the genus.
Fig. 6.
Relative abundance of top 10 bacterial OTUs in soil at species level. One color represents one OTU and length of the color block presents the relative richness proportion of the species.
To examine the functional characteristics of the bacteria in BD preparations, functional analysis of metagenomic data was used. Table 4 lists the metabolic roles that various BD preparations play in terms of energy metabolism, xenobiotic degradation, membrane transport, enzyme families, and carbohydrate metabolism. In BD506, the greatest abundance of OTUs was found for the metabolism of carbohydrates (14994476), energy (8733277), enzyme families (2777826), and membrane transport (15485898). For membrane transport, BD501 (14505442) had the second-highest number of OTUs, following BD506. The largest relative abundances of OTUs associated with energy metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and enzyme activity were found in BD506 and BD501. BD506 (4484910) had the highest OTU for the biodegradation of xenobiotics, while BD500 (770577) had the lowest.
Table 4.
Functional attributes of bacterial OTUs in BD preparations.
| Functional attributes of bacteria |
No. of OTUs (In Millions) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BD 500 | BD 501 | BD 502 | BD 503 | BD 504 | BD 505 | BD 506 | BD 507 | |
| CM | 2.81 | 13.69 | 8.39 | 5.54 | 12.95 | 11.30 | 14.99 | 3.96 |
| EM | 1.70 | 7.69 | 5.08 | 3.37 | 7.32 | 7.04 | 8.73 | 2.42 |
| EF | 0.52 | 2.59 | 1.60 | 1.04 | 2.39 | 2.23 | 2.78 | 0.77 |
| MT | 2.87 | 14.51 | 8.56 | 5.53 | 14.48 | 11.06 | 15.49 | 3.27 |
| XBM | 0.77 | 3.93 | 2.34 | 1.50 | 3.73 | 3.23 | 4.48 | 1.43 |
CM, carbohydrate metabolism; EM, energy metabolism; EF, enzyme families; MT, membrane transport; XBM, xenobiotics biodegradation
4. Discussion
The organic carriers are generally rich in beneficial microbes. However, the potential of different origins of organic carriers to retain microbial richness and diversity is different. It supports to maintain the population of microbes beyond the threshold limit for a longer duration probably by providing a favourable nutritional environment50, 51. Moreover, the effective organic carrier can promote better plant growth, yields, and soil health via add of microbial richness and diversity in soil51. Similarly like other organic carriers BD preparation were also found to improve the plant growth via improving soil microbial diversity as well as soil quality52. Recently, Jayachandran and coworkers studied on physico-chemical characters of biodynamic herbal preparations (BD 502 to 507) and accounted to rich of N, K, organic C, and different other micro and macro nutrients apart from heavy microbial load53. Earlier, application of BD preparation in wheat was reported to enhanced spikelet production, seeds/ spikelet and grain yield under stress conditions54. Their study also reported that in bio-dynamically grown wheat and maize crops have better root growth, health and higher yield under stress environment apart from increased organic carbon and improved soil health. Moreover, Biodynamic preparations treated with compost was found to have enriched the nitrate content of the compost and also enhanced the microbial parameters55. In another organic farming experiments conducted by Rodas-Gaitan and coworkers at University of Bonn in Hennef, Germany accounted that the BD compost applications improved the soil properties and nitrogen status of the microbial community56. In light of aforementioned, the present experiment was conducted to explore the diversity and richness of bacteria in different BD preparations in order to their precise utilization.
Proteobacteria present in agricultural samples are involved in N-fixation and consequently improve plant growth57, 58, 59. In our study, we found that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was higher than other phylum. Our study is in line with the findings of Joel et al.60. They accounted that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria was higher in agricultural samples than in non-agricultural samples. In another study, Mhete et al. found that the abundance and diversity of Proteobacteria were maximum among different soil samples including garden soil, saline soil, and sludge-impacted soil61. They also described the existence of other groups of phylum viz Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Chloroflexi in the aforementioned soil samples; however, their abundance and diversity were comparatively less and varied from sample to sample. Huhe et al. reported that the bacteria belonging to different classes of phylum proteobacteria were found in abundance in various stages of the composting process62. In our investigation, a comparable result was observed in BD preparations. George et al. determined, via amplifying 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA), the distribution of ammonia-oxidizing members of the beta subdivision of the family Proteobacteria in a range of composting materials63. This finding supported that the abundance of Proteobacteria in BD preparation makes it stronger towards plant growth applicator.
The abundance of Bacteroidetes phylum in diverse BD preparations is not surprising because the abundance of Bacteroides in plant microbiome including phyllosphere, endosphere, and rhizosphere reported much higher than in the surrounding soils64, 65. The Bacteroidetes is the most dominant phylum accounted 5–65 % of microorganisms linked to crops and causes a great impact on plant health66, 67. Moreover, Bacteroidetes are also commonly occurring in the microflora of the gut of animals. Girija et al. reported the maximum abundance of bacteria belonging to phylum Bacteroidetes (38.3 %) followed by Firmicutes (29.8 %), Proteobacteria (21.3 %), and verrucomicrobia (2 %) in cow dung68. The abundance of the aforementioned phylum has been reported in several different ecosystems as degraders of polymeric organic matter 69, 70. Its abundance in agricultural systems is comparatively higher than in the same soil under non-disturbed conditions71.
In all the BD preparations, most of the culturable bacteria belong to the genus Bacillus which confirmed the existence of Firmicutes. Bacillus is a universal PGPR in soil that plays a key role in conferring tolerance against abiotic and biotic stress to plants via inducing systemic resistance (ISR), lipopeptide production, and biofilm formation72. Besides this, these are reported to improve plant growth and soil health and also play other beneficial roles such as remediation of metals, improving the carbon sequestration process, facilitating phosphorous uptake, acting as a potent denitrifying agent in agroecosystems, etc.73, 74, 75. The greatest number of bacteria that belong to the unclassified genus indicates that these bacteria are novel or that there isn't any sequence data available for them in databases that are available to the general public.
Metagenomic data functional analysis is a useful method for revealing the functional nature of any microbial consortia by identifying the OTUs according to their metabolic roles. Montella and coworkers accounted for the abundance of genes coding for carbohydrate-active enzymes, which are involved in the degradation, modification, or formation of glycosidic bonds during the meta-analysis of lignocellulosic biomasses76. BD preparations 502––507 are used for making BD compost which stabilizes macro and micronutrient availability to plants10. BD preparations don't offer a lot of nutrients, they do work to speed up decomposition, enhance soil quality, and increase crops even when only a few grams per tonne of compost are used11. The cellulose, lignins, and hemicelluloses that are present in carbohydrates are converted into humus with the aid of BD preparations. These degrading activities are assumed to be caused by the OTUs associated with metabolic functions linked to energy metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and enzyme families. The genes involved in membrane transport are crucial in the processes involved in nutrient uptake and exchange, as well as in preserving the mineral balance in soil77. The assertion that BD preparations aid in preserving the notable concentrations of Ca, N, K, S, Fe, magnesium (Mg), silica, phosphorus (P), and other trace elements in the soil is supported by the availability of OTUs for membrane transfer78. The soil ecosystem is severely harmed by the persistence of xenobiotic compounds, which are man-made substances with medium-to-long-term stability in the soil. The most significant process for the breakdown of xenobiotic chemicals in soil is widely believed to be microbial metabolism79. It has been possible to identify certain xenobiotic-degrading microorganisms that could aid in the breakdown of xenobiotic substances. BD preparations contain bacteria with the potential to be useful for bioremediation, which is explained by the presence of OTUs with xenobiotic degradation function. Moreover, in our earlier study, we observed the culturable bacteria present in BD preparation had plant growth attributes viz indole acetic acid (IAA), ammonia, and HCN production79. Veeresh et al also accounted for the bacterial species that had phosphate solubilization potential80. Stearn observed increased root and shoot growth in maize and soybean seedlings due to higher levels of cytokinins present in horn-based BD preparations81. Other studies conducted by Fritz and Koepke and Giannattasio et al. accounted gibberellin and auxin-like impact of BD preparations28, 82. The influence of BD preparations on crop growth, crop yields, and soil organic matter through the promotion of root production and root health is a crucial connecting factor that may explain several outcomes. Improved root growth in response to the application of BD preparations was connected with higher soil organic matter and biological activity as well as increased particle organic matter52.
5. Conclusion
To the best of my knowledge, this is the first metagenomic study of BD preparations to unlock bacterial and functional diversity. This finding elucidates the mechanism by which BD preparations aid in enhancing soil health apart from improving soil fertility. This study investigation also reveals how BD preparations in nanoscale amounts enhance plant growth and yields. The dearth of genomic data on all the unculturable bacterial species in public-domain sources makes classification difficult even while basic evidence of bacterial diversity is present. This suggests that the functional metabolic qualities and uncommon character of these bacteria may add to the preparations' effectiveness in boosting crop production and quality as well as soil health. So, this study may be helpful for researchers/farmers to exploit the functionally diversified BD preparations for the reclamation of soils as well as sustainable agricultural production through an eco-friendly approach.
Statement and declarations
Authors contribution: NG and IZ: conceived the research, and designed experiments; SV: performed the experiments and BS also help them; SV, SKS and MM analyzed the data; SV, SKS, MM and AKT prepared the MS draft; NG and SKS finally edited and prepared the final version of MS.
Funding
The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.
Consent for publication
All authors have seen the latest version of the manuscript and agree to its publication.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Supriya Vaish: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Sumit K. Soni: Data curation, Formal analysis, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Balvindra Singh: Investigation, Methodology. Neelima Garg: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Iffat Zareen Ahmad: Conceptualization. Muthukumar Manoharan: Formal analysis, Writing – original draft. Ajaya Kumar Trivedi: Writing – original draft.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
Authors are thankful to the Director, ICAR- Central Institute for Subtropical Horticulture, Lucknow (India) for providing research facilities. Authors also acknowledge the Office of Doctoral Studies and Research, Integral University, Lucknow (India) for critically reviewing the manuscript and providing the manuscript commission number (IU/R& D/2020-MCN000780).
Contributor Information
Sumit K. Soni, Email: sumit.soni@icar.gov.in.
Neelima Garg, Email: neelimagargg@gmail.com.
References
- 1.Sharma N., Singhvi R. Effects of Chemical Fertilizers and Pesticides on Human Health and Environment: A Review. Int j Agric Environ Biotechnol. 2017;10(6):675–679. doi: 10.5958/2230-732X.2017.00083.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Onwona-Kwakye M., Plants-Paris K., Keita K., et al. Pesticides Decrease Bacterial Diversity and Abundance of Irrigated Rice Fields. Microorganisms. 2020;8(3):318. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nduwumuremyi A. Soil acidification and lime quality: sources of soil acidity, effects on plant nutrients, efficiency of lime and liming requirements, Research and Reviews. J Agri Alli Sci. 2013;2:26–34. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Baweja P, Kumar S, Kumar G. Fertilizers and pesticides: their impact on soil health and environment. Soil Health. Springer, Cham. 2020; p.265–285.
- 5.Vaish S., Garg N., Ahmad I.Z. Microbial basis of organic farming systems with special reference to biodynamic preparations. Indian J Agric Sci. 2020;90(7):1219–1225. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Radha T.K., Rao D.L. Plant growth promoting bacteria from cow dung based biodynamic preparations. Indian J Microbiol. 2014;54(4):413–418. doi: 10.1007/s12088-014-0468-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nene Y.L. A critical discussion on the methods currently recommended to support organic crop farming in India. Asian Agri History. 2017;21(3):267–285. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Palekar S. The Philosophy of Spiritual Farming - Zero Budget of Natural Farming, Part 1, 2005.200 p. Publ. Amol Subhash Palekar, Chanda S Palekar Memorial Charitable Trust, Amravati, India.
- 9.Ram R.A. Central Institute of Subtropical Horticulture; Rehmankhera, Lucknow: 2013. Manual on Organic Farming in Horticulture Crops, 70. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Koepf H.H. Anthroposophic Press Hudson; New York: 1989. The Biodynamic Farm. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Koepf H.H. Bio-Dynamic Farming and Gardening Assoc. Inc.; Kimberton PA, USA: 1993. Research in biodynamic agriculture: methods and results. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Steiner R. Agriculture (English translation). 1 Aug. 2013; 1958. http://wn.rsarchive.org/Biodynamics/GA327/ English/BDA1958/Ag1958_index.html.
- 13.Proctor P, Bacchus G, Cole G et al. Grasp the Nettle: Making Biodynamic Farming & Gardening Work. Random House; 2004. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=Hw3YAQAACAAJ.
- 14.Selvaraj N, Anita B, Anusha B et al. Organic Horticulture creating a more sustainable farming. Horticultural Research Station, Udhagamandalam; 2006.
- 15.Sailaja V., Naga Ragini A., Murthy C.V.N. Application of biodynamic compost on growth and development of leafy vegetable Spinacia oleracea. Life Sci Bull. 2012;9:281–284. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Olimi E., Bickel S., Wicaksono W.A., et al. Deciphering the microbial composition of biodynamic preparations and their effects on the apple rhizosphere microbiome. Front Soil Sci. 2022;2:1020869. doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2022.1020869. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Khatoon Z., Huang S., Rafique M., et al. Unlocking the potential of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on soil health and the sustainability of agricultural systems. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;273:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shi G., Sun H., Calderón‐Urrea A., et al. Bacterial communities as indicators of soil health under a continuous cropping system. Land Degrad Dev. 2021;32(7):2393–2408. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3919. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Schloss P.D., Handelsman J. Introducing SONS, a tool for operational taxonomic unit-based comparisons of microbial community memberships and structures. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:6773–6779. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00474-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chawla A., Kumar A., Lal B., et al. Ecological characterization of high altitude Himalayan landscapes in the upper Satluj river watershed in Kinnaur, Himachal Pradesh. India. J. Indian Soc Remote Sens. 2012;40:519–539. doi: 10.1007/s12524-011-0169-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Vaitkevičienė N., Elvyra J., Reto I., et al. Effect of biodynamic preparations on the soil biological and agrochemical properties and coloured potato tubers quality. Open Agriculture. 2019;4(1):17–23. doi: 10.1515/opag-2019-0002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Juknevičienė E., Danilčenko H., Jarienė E., et al. The effect of biodynamic preparations on growth and fruit quality of giant pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima D.) Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2021;8(60) doi: 10.1186/s40538-021-00258-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rienth M., Lamy F., Chessex C., et al. Effects of biodynamic preparations 500 and 501 on vine and berry physiology, pedology and the soil microbiome. OENO One. 2023;57(1):207–216. doi: 10.20870/oeno-one.2023.57.1.7218. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chaudhary D.K., Khulan A., Kim J. Development of a novel cultivation technique for uncultured soil bacteria. Sci Rep. 2019;9:6666. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43182-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Martiny A.C. High proportions of bacteria are culturable across major biomes. ISME J. 2019;13(8):2125–2128. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0410-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bodor A., Bounedjoum N., Vincze G.E., et al. Challenges of unculturable bacteria: environmental perspectives. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol. 2020;19:1–22. doi: 10.1007/s11157-020-09522-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Molina-Menor E., Gimeno-Valero H., Pascual J., et al. High culturable bacterial diversity from a european desert: The Tabernas Desert. Front Microbiol. 2021;11 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.583120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Giannattasio M., Vendramin E., Fornasier F., et al. Microbiological features and bioactivity of a fermented manure product (preparation 500) used in biodynamic agriculture. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;23(5):644–651. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1212.12004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pathak R.K., Ram R.A., Garg N., et al. Manas Gramin Vikas Sansthan; Thane, Maharashtra: 2010. Critical review of indigeous organic farming in horticulture crops. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Vaish S., Garg N., Ahmad I.Z. Bioprospecting of microbial isolates from biodynamic preparations for PGPR and biocontrol properties. J Environ Biol. 2021;42:644–651. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kakavas V.K., Plageras P., Vlachos T.A., et al. PCR-SSCP: a method for the molecular analysis of genetic diseases. Mol Biotechnol. 2008;38(2):155–163. doi: 10.1007/s12033-007-9006-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lewe N., Hermans S., Lear G., et al. Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis as a tool to estimate absolute abundances from compositional 16S rRNA bacterial metabarcoding data. J Microbiol Methods. 2021;188 doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gelsomino A., Keijzer-Wolters A.C., CaccoG E.JD. Assessment of bacterial community structure in soil by polymerase chain reaction and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. J Microbiol Methods. 1999;38(1–2):1–15. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00054-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Handelsman J. Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2004;68(4):669–685. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.4.669-685.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Moënne-Loccoz Y., Mavingui P., Combes C., et al. Microorganisms and biotic interactions. Environm Microbiol Fundam Appl. 2014;29:395–444. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9118-2_11. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.García-Orenes F., Roldán A., Morugán-Coronado A., et al. Organic fertilization in traditional mediterranean grapevine orchards mediates changes in soil microbial community structure and enhances soil fertility. Land Degrad Dev. 2016;27:1622–1628. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2496. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Nivethadevi P, Swaminathan C, Kannan P. Soil Organic Matter Decomposition-Roles, Factors and Mechanisms. In: Latest Trends in Soil Sciences volume 1, Publisher: Integrated Publications, New Delhi. 2021;p 61-91.
- 38.Backer R., Rokem J.S., Ilangumaran G., et al. Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria: Context, Mechanisms of Action, and Roadmap to Commercialization of Biostimulants for Sustainable Agriculture. Front Plant Sci. 2018;9:1473. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Mohanty P., Singh P.K., Chakraborty D., et al. Insight Into the Role of PGPR in Sustainable Agriculture and Environment. Front Sustain Food Syst. 2021;5 doi: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.667150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Masson P. Fertilidad de la Tierra; Estella, Navarra: 2009. Biodinámica: guía práctica para agricultores y afcionados. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chalker-Scott L. The Science Behind Biodynamic Preparations: A Literature Review. HortTechnology. 2013;23(6):814–819. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klindworth A., Pruesse E., Schweer T., et al. Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:e1. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Andrews S. FastQC A Quality Control tool for High Throughput Sequence Data [Internet] http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.;2017.
- 44.Ewels P., Magnusson M., Lundin S., et al. MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Singh B., Garg N., Mathur P., et al. Production of multi enzyme preparation by Bacillus subtilis using mosambi peel as substrate. J Environ Bio. 2022;43(4):612–621. doi: 10.22438/jeb/43/4/MRN-3045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Babraham Bioinformatics. TrimGalore. 2017 https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/ trimgalore/ [Google Scholar]
- 47.Edgar R.C., Haas B.J., Clemente J.C., et al. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2194–2200. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Langille M.G.I., Zaneveld J., Caporaso J.G., et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;8:1–10. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.DeSantis T.Z., Hugenholtz P., Larsen N., et al. Greengenes, a Chimera-Checked 16S rRNA Gene Database and Workbench Compatible with ARB. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(7):5069–5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kalra A., Chandra M., Awasthi A., et al. Natural compound enhancing growth and survival of rhizobial inoculants in vermicompost based formulation. Biol Fertil Soil. 2010;46:521–524. doi: 10.1007/s00374-010-0443-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Singh R., Divya S., Awasthi A., et al. Technology for efficient and successful delivery of vermicompost colonized bioinoculants in Pogostemon cablin (patchouli) Benth. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:323–333. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0823-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Santoni M., Ferretti L., Migliorini P., et al. A review of scientifc research on biodynamic agriculture. Org Agric. 2022;12:373–396. doi: 10.1007/s13165-022-00394-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jayachandran S., Jayaraman A., Thimmaiah A. Physio-chemical and microbial characterization of organic and biodynamic manures collected from different farms in India. Int J Complement Alt Med. 2023;16(4):217–221. doi: 10.15406/ijcam.2023.16.00655. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Goldstein W.A., Koepf H.H., Koopmans C.J. Biodynamic preparations, greater root growth and health, stress resistance, and soil organic matter increases are linked. Open Agric. 2019;4(1):187–202. doi: 10.1515/opag-2019-0018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Boggs L.C., Reganold J.P., Kennedy A.C. Effects of Biodynamic Preparations on Compost Development. Biol Agric Hortic. 2000;17(4):313–328. doi: 10.1080/01448765.2000.9754852. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Rodas-Gaitan H., Fritz J., Dahn C., et al. Biodynamic compost effects on soil parameters in a 27-year long-term field experiment. Chem Biol Technol Agric. 2022;9:74. doi: 10.1186/s40538-022-00344-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kersters K, Vos P, Gillis M, Swings J, et. al.,. Introduction to the Proteobacteria. The Prokaryotes. ISBN: 978-0-387-25495-1; 2006.
- 58.Solanki M.K., Wang Z., Wang F.Y., et al. Assessment of diazotrophic proteobacteriain sugarcane rhizosphere when intercropped with legumes (peanut and soybean) in the field. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1814. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lai H., Gao F., Su H., et al. Nitrogen Distribution and Soil Microbial Community Characteristics in a Legume-Cereal Intercropping System: A Review. Agronomy. 2022;12:1900. doi: 10.3390/agronomy12081900. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Joel P.D., Valverde A., Joachim M., et al. Differences in bacterial diversity, composition and function due to long-term agriculture in soils in the eastern free state of south africa. Diversity. 2019;11:61. doi: 10.3390/d11040061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Mhete M., Eze P.N., Rahube T.O., et al. Soil properties influence bacterial abundance and diversity under different land-use regimes in semi-arid environments. Scientific African. 2020;7:e00246. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Huhe Chao J., Yanpei W.u., Yunxiang C. Bacterial and fungal communities and contribution of physicochemical factors during cattle farm waste composting. Microbiol Open. 2017;6(e518) doi: 10.1002/mbo3.518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.George A.K., Zinaida S.N., Piet J.L.D., et al. Molecular analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of the beta subdivision of the class proteobacteria in compost and composted materials. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(2):396–403. doi: 10.1128/AEM.65.2.396-403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lidbury I.D.E.A., Borsetto C., Murphy A.R.J., et al. Niche-adaptation in plant-associated Bacteroidetes favours specialisation in organic phosphorus mineralisation. ISME J. 2021;15:1040–1055. doi: 10.1038/s41396-020-00829-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ling N., Wang T., Kuzyakov Y. Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):836. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Kolton M., Erlacher A., Berg G., et al. In: Microbial Models: from Environmental to Industrial Sustainability. Castro-Sowinski S., editor. Springer Singapore; Singapore: 2016. The Flavobacterium genus in the plant holobiont: ecological, physiological, and applicative insights; pp. 189–207. [Google Scholar]
- 67.Nishioka T., Marian M., Kobayashi I., et al. Microbial basis of Fusarium wilt suppression by Allium cultivation. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1715. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37559-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Girija D., Deepa K., Xavier F., et al. Analysis of cow dung microbiota – A metagenomic approach. Indian J Biotechnol. 2013;12:372–378. [Google Scholar]
- 69.Fierer N., Bradford M.A., Jackson R.B. Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology. 2007;88(6):1354–1364. doi: 10.1890/05-1839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Fierer N., Jackson J.A., Vilgalys R., et al. The assessment of soil microbial community structure by use of taxon-specific quantitative PCR assays. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4117–4120. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4117-4120.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schellenberger S., Kolb S., Drake H.L. Metabolic responses of novel cellulolytic and saccharolytic agricultural soil bacteria to oxygen. Environ Microbiol. 2010;12(4):845–861. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02128.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Hashem A., Tabassum B., Fathi Abd Allah E. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi. J Biol Sci. 2019;26(6):1291–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Soni S.K., Singh R., Awasthi A., et al. In vitro Cr(VI) reduction by cell-free extracts of chromate-reducing bacteria isolated from tannery effluent irrigated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2013;20(3):1661–1674. doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1178-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Gomez-Ramirez L.F., Uribe-Velez D. Phosphorus Solubilizing and Mineralizing Bacillus spp. Contribute to Rice Growth Promotion Using Soil Amended with Rice Straw. Curr Microbiol. 2021;78(3):932–943. doi: 10.1007/s00284-021-02354-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mahapatra S., Yadav R., Ramakrishna W. Bacillus subtilis impact on plant growth, soil health and environment. J Appl Microbiol. 2022;132(5):3543–3562. doi: 10.1111/jam.15480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Montella S., Ventorino V., Lombard V., et al. Discovery of Genes Coding for Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme by Metagenomic Analysis of Lignocellulosic Biomasses Nature. 2017;7:42623. doi: 10.1038/srep42623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Sergey S., Bose J., Anja T.F., et al. On a quest for stress tolerance genes: membrane transporters in sensing and adapting to hostile soils. J Exp Bot. 2016;67(4):1015–1031. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Armstrong D.E., Chesters G., Harris R.F. Atrazine hydrolysis in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1967;31:61–66. [Google Scholar]
- 79.Vaish S., Garg N., Ahmad I.Z. Bio-prospecting of microbial isolates from biodynamic preparations for PGPR and Biocontrol properties. J Environ Biol. 2021;42(3):644–651. doi: 10.22438/jeb/42/3/MRN-1529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Veeresh S.J., Narayana J., da Silva J.T. Influence of jeevam rutha (biodynamic formulation) on agro-industrial waste ver micomposting. Vermitechnology. 2010;II(4):96–99. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Stearn W.C. Ohio State University; Columbus, Ohio: 1976. Efectiveness of two biodynamic preparations on higher plants and possible mechanisms for the observed response. MSc thesis. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Fritz J., Köpke U. Effects of light, manuring and biodynamic horn silica applications by dwarf beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L. var. nanus) on germination characteristics of the newly formed seeds. Pflanzenbauwissenschaften. 2005;9(2):55–60. (in German) [Google Scholar]






