Skip to main content
Heart Rhythm O2 logoLink to Heart Rhythm O2
. 2024 Feb 4;5(3):182–188. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.01.007

Safety of Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (SPORT S-ICD): study rationale and protocol

Ehud Chorin , Rachel Lampert , Nick R Bijsterveld , Reinoud E Knops ‡,1, Arthur AM Wilde ‡,1, Hein Heidbuchel §,‖,1, Andrew Krahn , Ilan Goldenberg ∗∗, Raphael Rosso , Dana Viskin , Shir Frydman , Lior Lupu , Sami Viskin ∗,
PMCID: PMC10980925  PMID: 38560377

Abstract

Background

Recent studies suggest that participation in recreational and even competitive sports is generally safe for patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). However, these studies included only patients with implanted transvenous ICD (TV-ICD). Nowadays, subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a safe and effective alternative and is increasingly implanted in younger ICD candidates. Data on the safety of sport participation for patients with implanted S-ICD systems is urgently needed.

Objectives

The goal of the study is to quantify the risks (or determine the safety) of sports participation for athletes with an S-ICD, which will guide shared decision making for athletes requiring an ICD and/or wishing to return to sports after implantation.

Methods

The SPORT S-ICD (Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) study is an international, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional, observational study, designed specifically to collect data on the safety of sports participation among patients with implanted S-ICD systems who regularly engage in sports activities.

Results

A total of 450 patients will undergo baseline assessment including baseline characteristics, indication for S-ICD implantation, arrhythmic history, S-ICD data and programming, and data regarding sports activities. LATITUDE Home Monitoring information will be regularly transferred to the study coordinator for analysis.

Conclusion

The results of the study will aid in shaping clinical decision making, and if the tested hypothesis will be proven, it will allow the safe continuation of sports for patients with an implanted S-ICD

Keywords: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, Subcutaneous ICD, Sports participation, Sudden cardiac death, Recreational sport, Competitive sports


Key Findings.

  • Data on the safety of sport participation for patients with implanted subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) systems are urgently needed.

  • The SPORT S-ICD (Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) study is an international, multicenter, prospective, noninterventional, observational study, designed specifically to collect data on the safety of sports participation among patients with implanted S-ICD systems.

  • The results of the study will aid in shaping clinical decision making, and if the tested hypothesis is proven, it will allow the safe continuation of sports for patients with an implanted S-ICD.

Introduction

Patients engaged in sports at the time of implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) justifiably inquire about the risks involved with continuation of eventual sportive activities after device implantation.1 Since 2015, eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular disease state that competitive sports may be considered for athletes with ICDs.2 These recommendations are based on data demonstrating that continuation of sports with an implanted ICD is generally safe. Indeed, the Multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry showed that after a median follow-up of 44 months, there were no events of death or shock-related physical injury among 440 athletes who continued organized, competitive, or high-risk sports after ICD implantation.3,4 Furthermore, a European substudy demonstrated that the risk of definite or probable lead malfunction is <9% at 10 years among patients who continued competitive or recreative sports after ICD implantation.5 Finally, sports activity, other than perhaps intense weight lifting, has not been linked to an increased risk of ICD lead fracture.6 All these data, however, relate exclusively to patients implanted with transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) systems.

Young ICD candidates, the patient subgroup more likely to engage in sports activities, are also the patient population that is most likely to receive a subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) system.7,8 This is because S-ICD systems decrease most of the long-term complications of intravenous leads.9,10 However, there are also features of the system that could impact risk of system damage in the athlete. The long path of the subcutaneous electrode, from beyond the latissimus dorsi muscle (where the S-ICD is commonly implanted) through subcutaneous tissue in the lateral and anterior chest wall, could potentially increase the risk for electrodes fracture or far-field noise detection during strenuous sport.11,12 Furthermore, sports with static and dynamic components involving chest and shoulder muscles, like weight lifting or swimming, and even sports that are traditionally considered safe for patients with heart disease and/or an implanted TV-ICD, like golf, could impose risk for patients with S-ICD because of the proximity of the active muscles to the site of S-ICD and electrode implantation. In addition, as the lead is located outside the thorax, whether the danger of lead damage from collision either with another player, or with a ball, is greater for an S-ICD than TV-ICD system is unknown.

Recent data suggest that the risk of inappropriate shocks from newer-generation S-ICD systems is very low.13,14 In fact, a recent study suggested that the risk of receiving an inappropriate shock from an S-ICD is as low as that for patients with an implanted TV-ICD, even when the latter has optimal programming.15,16 However, these recent studies did not specify the degree of sportive activities performed by S-ICD recipients, and whether failure to differentiate ventricular from supraventricular rhythm would be greater in those engaged in vigorous exercise is not known.

Clearly, data on the impact of athletic activities on the short- and long-term safety of S-ICD systems are urgently needed. This is particularly true because physicians may disfavor the selection of an S-ICD system for a young patient who intends to continue sport activities or may advise against performance of sports without data to support such recommendations. We therefore propose a multicenter observational study designed to collect data on the safety of sports activities in patients with implanted S-ICD systems.

Design

The SPORT S-ICD (Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator) study is an international, multicenter, prospective, observational study, designed to collect data on the safety of sport participation among patients with implanted S-ICD systems who regularly engage in sport activities. The study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval has been granted by the Tel Aviv Medical Center Research Ethics Committee. The study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05754138). The official website for the study is https://sport-sicd.org.

The goal of the study is to quantify the risks (or determine the safety) of sports participation for athletes with an S-ICD, which will guide shared decision making for athletes requiring an ICD and/or wishing to return to sports after implantation. The primary endpoints will include (1) arrhythmia-related primary endpoints (A: tachyarrhythmia-related death or externally resuscitated cardiac arrest due to S-ICD shock failure, incessant ventricular arrhythmia, or postshock pulseless electrical activity; B: injury requiring hospitalization, due to shock or syncopal arrhythmia; C: unexpected sudden death without arrhythmia documentation due to absence of device interrogation), and (2) S-ICD system–related primary endpoint (A: lead fracture leading to lead/device replacement; B: lead fracture/malfunction leading to S-ICD inactivation; and C: device repositioning).

The secondary endpoints will include (1) arrhythmia-related secondary endpoints (A: number of appropriate shocks [for ventricular tachyarrhythmia] and their relation to sport activity; B: number of inappropriate shocks [for supraventricular tachyarrhythmia] and their relation to sport activity; C: multiple shocks within 1 appropriate episode [ie, failure of first maximum-energy shock or recurrent arrhythmia], electrical storm (>3 events in 24 hours), or recurrent inappropriate shocks]; D: moderate injury [requiring emergency room visit] associated with a shock), 2. S-ICD–related secondary endpoints (A: inappropriate shock due to noise [and its relation to sport] leading to device reprogramming [if the inappropriate shock leads to S-ICD system (device/lead) replacement, this is a primary endpoint]; B: noise detected that does not lead to inappropriate shock but leads to device reprogramming), and (3) clinical secondary endpoint (interruption or cessation of sports for reasons other than ICD shocks or ICD related complications).

Patient recruitment

Patient recruitment is from 2 sources (Figure 1). The first is recruitment via physicians, in which physicians/medical centers taking care of patients with an implanted S-ICD proceed to screen and recruit patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria (see the following) and are willing to provide informed consent. For enrolled patients, physicians provide coded (anonymous) demographic data, clinical data, and information on sportive activities at the time of enrollment. Follow-up data, collected periodically, include clinical data, sports participation, and adverse events (see the following). Data collected during follow-up are transmitted periodically by the recruiting physician at each of the participating centers to the Study Coordinating Center directly at the Tel Aviv Medical Center. The second is direct patient recruitment, in which patients with an implanted S-ICD are approached via existing patients’ groups on social media (eg, the “Living with the S-ICD” group on Facebook [https://www.facebook.com/groups/livingwithSICD/]) and nonprofit organizations (https://sads.org/research/get-involved/sads-research-survey/). Also, physicians from participating institutions are invited to direct their patients to posted fliers advertising the study. Patients then approach the Study Coordinating Center directly. These patients are then invited by the Study Coordinating Center to participate in the screening process.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Patient recruitment strategies.

Eligibility

Inclusion and exclusion criteria are shown in Table 1. Eligible patients will provide written informed consent for participation in the study. For pediatric patients, parental consent will be obtained. The informed consent provided by the patient includes (1) permission to approach the clinical electrophysiologist taking direct care of the enrolling patient and his/her implanted device and (2) authorization (by the patient and their physician) to get access to the online data on device function and arrhythmia/noise detection that are transmitted weekly by the patient’s device via the LATITUDE Home Monitoring System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) for home monitoring. Informed consent includes agreement to provide all the following information: (1) clinical data (age, sex, clinical diagnosis, indication for S-ICD implantation, arrhythmic events since S-ICD implantation, adverse events since S-ICD implantation), (2) type and level of exercise and sport participation at the time of inclusion and during follow-up, and (3) information concerning endpoint events during follow-up; and (4) for patients recruited via the direct recruitment, patient agrees to allow direct access to the patients’ LATITUDE Home Monitoring System data, both at the time of inclusion and all weekly reports during the follow-up period, until the study ends or until the informed consent is revoked. Access to the personal LATITUDE Home Monitoring System data is in addition to the access by the primary treating physician and only for purpose of data collection for the study (Figure 2). Consent from the patient and for the primary treating physician (monitoring the patient’s LATITUDE data) are required. Once the study ends, participating patients will be notified that the study investigators are no longer monitoring their LATITUDE Home Monitoring System.

Table 1.

Patient eligibility

Inclusion criteria. All the following inclusion criteria are mandatory for inclusion:
Patient (male or female) is <75 years of age.
Patient has an implanted, new-generation, S-ICD (Boston Scientific EMBLEM, Generations 2 [model A209], 3 [A219], or newer).
Patient has a functioning LATITUDE Home Monitoring System at home, knows how to use it, and sends weekly reports via the home-monitoring system.
Patient actively participates in sport activities above a predefined level of exercise.
Patient understands that, at present, there are virtually no data on the safety of sport participation for patients with implanted S-ICD system, particularly regarding potential damage caused by sport activities to the S-ICD system, including the subcutaneous electrode.
Patient understands that the level of sport activity, type of sport, and frequency of exercise activities are entirely at their own discretion and responsibility.
Patient understands that the Sport S-ICD study investigator neither encourages nor discourages performance of any given sport.
Patient understands that the Sport S-ICD study is not liable and does assume any responsibility for any damages caused by sport participation to the implanted system or the health of patients participating in the study.
Patient is willing to provide informed consent to participate in the Sport S-ICD study.
Exclusion criteria
Subjects with an inability to communicate well with the investigators.
Subjects who are noncooperative or unwilling to sign informed consent form.
Evidence suggestive of malfunction of the implanted S-ICD system (like abnormal impedance or detected noise) at the time of screening.

S-ICD = subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; SPORT S-ICD = Sports for Patients with Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

To avoid selection bias, evidence of a previous S-ICD appropriate shock for a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia and/or evidence of previous inappropriate shock for supraventricular tachyarrhythmia or for noise does not represent an exclusion criterion

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Patient follow-up flowchart.

Study group

The study population will consist of patients who have all the following characteristics: (1) they have an implanted S-ICD; (b) they exercise regularly, or actively participate in competitive or recreational sports with a sport intensity above a predefined level (see the following); and (3) they wish to continue participating in recreational or competitive sport activities.

Definitions of type and level of exercise

According to the 2020 European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on Sports Cardiology and Exercise in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease,15 competitive athletes exercise ≥6 h/wk and recreational athletes exercise ≥4 h/wk. For the present study, the minimal level of exercise required for inclusion is (1) the equivalent of recreational sports, that is, an average exercise time of ≥4 h/wk; and (2) exercise of ≥2 h/wk if the exercise involves any of forceful and/or repetitive movements of the pectoral girdle (eg, weight lifting, “pushup,” “pullover,” or pullup” exercises), repetitive single-arm movements (like tennis or Ping-Pong) in left-handed patients (that is, repetitive arm movements in the arm at the site of S-ICD implantation, contact sports that involve substantial risk of collision (including sports like soccer or football and sports like judo or wrestling). The type of sport and the level, frequency, and intensity of sports is decided by participating individuals.

Data collection

Data collected at the time of recruitment and at every follow-up (every 3 months) are shown in Tables 2 and 3. Information that will be collected on a weekly basis via the LATITUDE Home Monitoring System is shown in Table 4. Each event will be interrogated regarding programming characteristics, circumstances (during sport or not), system position, high voltage system impedance, and management.

Table 2.

Data collected when entering the study

Gender
Date of birth
Right-handed/left-handed
Underlying heart disease
 Coronary heart disease
 Dilated cardiomyopathy
 Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
 Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy
 Long QT syndrome
 Brugada syndrome
 CPVT
 Short QT syndrome
 Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation
Indication for S-ICD implantation
 Cardiac arrest
 Syncope
 Prophylactic
Arrhythmic history
 Arrhythmias since your S-ICD implantation
 Received 1 or more S-ICD shock for ventricular arrhythmias
S-ICD data and programming
 Is this your first defibrillator?
 Any signs of S-ICD or lead malfunction in your device?
 S-ICD defibrillator model
 S-ICD defibrillator serial number
 Electrode serial number
 Programmed parameters in your S-ICD

CPVT = catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia; S-ICD = subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Table 3.

Sport activities

Select from among the sport activities shown below all the activities that you practice on a regular basis (and number of hours per week on average).You may select more than 1 activity and as many activates as you practice. Activities are listed by A-B-C and may be listed more than once.
Type of sport
Badminton Baseball Basketball
Bicycling – mountain bicycling Bicycling – road bicycling Bicycling – stationary bicycling
Bowling Cheerleading Dancing – aerobic
Dancing – ballet/cultural Dancing – ballroom Dancing – other
Exercise (see list on gym/exercise below) Fencing Football (American football)
Football (soccer) Golf Gymnastics
Gym (see list on gym/exercise below) Handball Hiking
Horseback riding Hockey Ice hockey
Ice skating Jogging Judo
Karate Kayaking Lacrosse
Martial arts Mountain climbing Racquetball
Roller skating/blading Rowing – boat Rowing – stationary
Rugby Running Scuba diving
Skiing – water skiing Skiing – snow skiing cross country Skiing – snow skiing downhill
Skateboarding Soccer Softball
Squash Surfing Swimming – freestyle or front crawl
Swimming – breaststroke Swimming – backstroke Swimming – butterfly
Tennis Water skiing Weight lifting (see next below)
Windsurfing Wrestling Yoga
Weightlifting and gym exercises
Inline graphicWeight press Inline graphicWeight lifting
Inline graphicKettlebell swing Inline graphicPullups
Inline graphicDips Inline graphicPushups
Inline graphicPulldown Inline graphicSide raise
Inline graphicPectoralis press Inline graphicAbdominals dynamic
Inline graphicAbdominals (static)

Table 4.

Information that will be collected on a weekly basis via the LATITUDE Home Monitoring System

The information will be transmitted to the study coordinator in addition to the regular transmissions to primary physician.
Parameter to be transmitted
Device/patient identification data:
  • a)

    Identification number

  • b)

    Date of birth

  • c)

    Device

  • d)

    Clinic

  • e)

    Therapy: on/off

  • f)

    Latest device transmission

  • g)

    Last office interrogation

  • h)

    Implantation date

  • i)

    Patient group

My alerts
Device status
Events since last reset
AF monitor
  • a)

    Days with measured AF

  • b)

    Estimate of measured AF

Remaining battery life
System detail: electrode impedance status
Settings
Tachytherapy settings
  • a)

    Therapy

  • b)

    Shock zone

  • c)

    Conditional shock zone

Event counts: since last reset and since implantation
  • a)

    Untreated episodes

  • b)

    Treated episodes

  • c)

    # of shocks delivered

Electrograms of arrhythmias detected, sustained, and nonsustained
Electrograms of noise events detected (triggering or not triggering shocks)

AF = atrial fibrillation.

Estimated number of participants

A total of 450 patients with an implanted S-ICD who continue to exercise after implantation is the estimated number of participants. The number of participants is not defined by risk estimation, but rather reproduces the number of patients who participated in the ICD Sports Safety Registry of athletes with TV-ICD,3 which will facilitate ultimate comparison of the data on risks of S-ICD and TV-ICD in athletes.

The study is funded by Boston Scientific, which has no role in the design of the study, analysis of the data, or drafting and submission of this or subsequent manuscripts.

Discussion

Until recently, consensus documents recommended avoidance of moderate- and high-intensity sports for athletes with ICDs because data on the safety and efficacy of ICDs during competition were unavailable, raising concerns about increased risk.17, 18, 19 In the absence of data, guideline recommendations for patients with ICDs willing to participate in sport activities were based exclusively on expert opinion. As a general rule, only those who had been free of arrhythmic events for at least 6 months were allowed to participate in competitive sports. Furthermore, participation was permitted only in sports involving low cardiovascular demands, limited chance for high-impact contact, and minimal risk for injury if syncope were to occur during play (eg, billiards, bowling, and golf).

During the last decade, growing evidence suggests that risks of sports participation for athletes with TV-ICDs may be lower than hypothesized. The Multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry followed 440 athletes with ICDs 10 to 60 years of age who participated in organized sports (in spite of the standing recommendations) for a median of 44 months.3,4 Even though appropriate and inappropriate shocks occurred during sports, there were no deaths, resuscitated arrests, or arrhythmia-related injury during sports. That study concluded that many athletes with an implanted TV-ICD can participate in vigorous or competitive sports without significantly increased risk of injury, inappropriate shocks or failure of appropriate shocks.3,4 Similarly, a European study demonstrated that the risk of definite or probable lead malfunction is <9% at 10 years’ follow-up among patients who continued competitive or recreative sports after TV-ICD implantation.5

All these data, however, relate exclusively to patients implanted with standard, TV-ICD systems. At present, there are no data regarding the safety of sports activities in patients with implanted S-ICD systems. The course of the implanted subcutaneous electrode in the S-ICD system beneath important chest muscles creates, at least in theory, a potential risk for fracture during spots involving chest musculature.

The potential benefits of physical activity and sports participation should not be underestimated including decreased risk for obesity, metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, stroke, diabetes mellitus, and cancer. Furthermore, sport participation has an undeniable positive effect on mental health, decreased risk for depression, and improvement in feelings of well-being, all of which improve overall quality of life.20 Many young patients experience decreased quality of life and distress after ICD implantation, often directly related to restriction from sports,21 and continuation of sport activities may be particularly important for them.

The SPORT S-ICD is a multicenter observational study designed specifically to collect data on the safety of sport activities in patients with implanted S-ICD systems. The results of the study will aid in shaping clinical decision making, and if the tested hypothesis is proven, it will allow the safe continuation of sports for patients with an implanted S-ICD.

Acknowledgments

Funding Sources

The SPORT S-ICD study is funded by Boston Scientific, which has no role in the design of the study, analysis of the data, or the drafting and submission of the manuscript.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Authorship

All authors attest they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.

Patient Consent

Eligible patients will provide written informed consent for participation in the study; for pediatric patients, parental consent will be obtained.

Ethics Statement

The study conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki, and ethical approval has been granted by the Tel Aviv Medical Center Research Ethics Committee.

Footnotes

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05754138.

References

  • 1.Heidbuchel H., Arbelo E., D'Ascenzi F., et al. Recommendations for participation in leisure-time physical activity and competitive sports of patients with arrhythmias and potentially arrhythmogenic conditions. Part 2: ventricular arrhythmias, channelopathies, and implantable defibrillators. Europace. 2021;23:147–148. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zipes D.P., Link M.S., Ackerman M.J., Kovacs R.J., Myerburg R.J., Estes N.A. American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee of Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in Young, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology, American College of Cardiology. Eligibility and disqualification recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities: Task Force 9: Arrhythmias and Conduction Defects: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology. Circulation. 2015;132:e315–e325. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lampert R., Olshansky B., Heidbuchel H., et al. Safety of sports for athletes with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a prospective, multinational registry. Circulation. 2013;127:2021–2030. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lampert R., Olshansky B., Heidbuchel H., et al. Safety of sports for athletes with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: long-term results of a prospective multinational registry. Circulation. 2017;135:2310–2312. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Heidbuchel H., Willems R., Jordaens L., et al. Intensive recreational athletes in the prospective multinational ICD Sports Safety Registry: results from the European cohort. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26:764–775. doi: 10.1177/2047487319834852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Link M.S., Sullivan R.M., Olshansky B., et al. Implantable cardioverter defibrillator lead survival in athletic patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14 doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gulletta S., Gasperetti A., Schiavone M., et al. Age-related differences and associated mid-term outcomes of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a propensity-matched analysis from a multicenter European registry. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1109–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tonegawa-Kuji R., Inoue Y.Y., Nakai M., et al. Current clinical practice of subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: analysis using the JROAD-DPC database. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:909–916. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Viani S., Migliore F., Ottaviano L., et al. “S-ICD Rhythm Detect” Investigators. Longevity of model 3501 subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads in clinical practice. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1206–1207. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Gold M.R., Aasbo J.D., Weiss R., et al. Infection in patients with subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: results of the S-ICD Post Approval Study. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:1993–2001. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Huynh H., Siroky G., Bisht D., Lam P., Mohammad A., Mehta D. Partial fracture of a subcutaneous ICD lead from mechanical trauma. J Clin Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;3:59. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gutleben K.J., Nelovic V., Pujdak K., Werner M., Osmani I., Kähler J. Fracture of an S-ICD lead after two prior transvenous lead-related complications with conventional defibrillators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;43:1491–1494. doi: 10.1111/pace.14101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Knops R.E., van der Stuijt W., Smeding L. Subcutaneous or transvenous defibrillator therapy. Reply. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:678–679. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2034917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jankelson L., Garber L., Sherrid M., et al. Subcutaneous versus transvenous implantable defibrillator in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19:759–767. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gold M.R., Lambiase P.D., El-Chami M.F., et al. Primary results from the Understanding Outcomes With the S-ICD in Primary Prevention Patients With Low Ejection Fraction (UNTOUCHED) trial. Circulation. 2021;143:7–17. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Al-Khatib S.M., Kusumoto F.M. Be-all end-all real-world evidence on the subcutaneous ICD. Circulation. 2021;143:18–20. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Pelliccia A., Sharma S., Gati S., et al. 2020 ESC guidelines on sports cardiology and exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:17–96. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Maron B.J., Zipes D.P. 36th Bethesda Conference: eligibility recommendations for competitive athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45:1313–1375. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pelliccia A., Fagard R., Bjørnstad H.H., et al. Study Group of Sports Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology; Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Recommendations for competitive sports participation in athletes with cardiovascular disease: a consensus document from the Study Group of Sports Cardiology of the Working Group of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology and the Working Group of Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1422–1445. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Longmuir P.E., Brothers J.A., de Ferranti S.D., et al. American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Promotion of physical activity for children and adults with congenital heart disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;127:2147–2159. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318293688f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rahman B., Macciocca I., Sahhar M., Kamberi S., Connell V., Duncan R.E. Adolescents with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: a patient and parent perspective. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012;35:62–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03229.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Heart Rhythm O2 are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES