Abstract
Nuclear factor erythroid 2 like (Nfe2l) gene family members 1-3 mediate cellular response to oxidative stress, including in the central nervous system (CNS). However, neuronal functions of Nfe2l3 are unknown. Here, we comparatively evaluated expression of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 in singe cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq)-profiled cortical and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) CNS projection neurons, investigated whether Nfe2l3 regulates neuroprotection and axon regeneration after CNS injury in vivo, and characterized a gene network associated with Nfe2l3 in neurons. We showed that, Nfe2l3 expression transiently peaks in developing immature cortical and RGC projection neurons, but is nearly abolished in adult neurons and is not upregulated after injury. Furthermore, within the retina, Nfe2l3 is enriched in RGCs, primarily neonatally, and not upregulated in injured RGCs, whereas Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 are expressed robustly in other retinal cell types as well and are upregulated in injured RGCs. We also found that, expressing Nfe2l3 in injured RGCs through localized intralocular viral vector delivery promotes neuroprotection and long-distance axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in vivo. Moreover, Nfe2l3 provided a similar extent of neuroprotection and axon regeneration as viral vector-targeting of Pten and Klf9, which are prominent regulators of neuroprotection and long-distance axon regeneration. Finally, we bioinformatically characterized a gene network associated with Nfe2l3 in neurons, which predicted the association of Nfe2l3 with established mechanisms of neuroprotection and axon regeneration. Thus, Nfe2l3 is a novel neuroprotection and axon regeneration-promoting factor with a therapeutic potential for treating CNS injury and disease.
INTRODUCTION
Nfe2l3 (also known as Nrf3) belongs to the Cap’n’collar (Cnc) family of proteins, along with Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2, which regulate several physiological and pathophysiological processes, including cellular response to oxidative stress1,2. Nfe2l3 itself is involved in antioxidant response, lipid metabolism, proliferation, and oligodendrocyte differentiation1-6. Multiple factors upstream and downstream of Nfe2l3 also have been identified2,5,7. Nfe2l3 knockout (KO) mice develop without overt abnormalities, presumably due to redundancy with Nfe2l1 or Nfe2l2 members of the same protein family8. However, Nfe2l3 KO mice challenged with pulmonary injury lose weight9, and when challenged with carcinogens produce lymphoblasts10. In the adult central nervous system (CNS), based on single cell transcriptomics, Nfe2l3 is expressed primarily in oligodendrocytes, but not expressed meaningfully in neurons11. Nevertheless, at least embryonically and neonatally, Nfe2l3 was associated with the development of cortical layer 5 pyramidal near-projecting and corticothalamic projection neurons, respectively12,13, in which its expression declined during maturation and was silenced by adult age14. Because in the CNS neuronal intrinsic axon growth capacity declines during developmental maturation15,16, it is possible that Nfe2l3, whose expression declines during maturation in subsets of cortical projection neurons, may play a role in developmental axon growth of certain types of neurons. Although Nfe2l3 KO mice appear to develop normally (which could be due to compensatory redundancy with Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2), Nfe2l3 KO mice exhibit phenotypes when challenged9,10. Thus, we hypothesized that the Nfe2l3 may exhibit axon growth phenotype when challenged by injury. Because oxidative stress is one of the earliest pathological intracellular events in RGCs after axonal optic nerve crush (ONC) injury17, whereas Nfe2l3 is associated with antioxidant response1-3, we selected ONC as a challenge for investigating Nfe2l3’s potential neuronal functions in vivo. First, we asked whether Nfe2l3 expression is associated with development of other cortical and retinal ganglion cell (RGC) CNS projection neurons. Then, we tested whether expressing Nfe2l3 in RGCs would elicit neuroprotection and/or promote axon regeneration after challenge by ONC injury, and compared the effects to targeting of prominent regulators of long-distance axon regeneration, Pten and Klf918-21. Finally, we characterized gene network associated with Nfe2l3 in neonatal RGCs (before its expression declines during maturation), which provided insights into the potential molecular mechanisms of Nfe2l3 functions in neurons.
RESULTS
Using previously published scRNA-seq datasets of various subdivisions of cortex11,22,23 (from which we selected cortical projection neurons based on markers, as described below), we analyzed expression of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 in cortical projection neurons from different stages of development (embryonic days 14-1522, postnatal day 023, and adult11), integrated for visualization of cell clusters using a UMAP (Fig. 1A). Cortical projection neurons were selected based on co-expression of neuronal markers (Rbfox3/NeuN24 and Gap4325,26) (Fig. 1B-C), expression of glutamatergic (Vglut127 or Vglut227) and absence of interneuron (Sst28 and Pvalb28) markers (Fig. 1D-F), and co-expression of cortical projection neuron markers (Uchl129 and L1cam30) (Fig. 1G-H). Adult cortical layers 5/6 projection neuron markers (Foxp228, Ctip2/Bcl11b27, Fezf227) also were enriched in subsets of neurons (Fig. 1I-K). We then found that, whereas Nfe2l1 was expressed robustly in all stages of cortical neuron development, Nfe2l2 was nearly not expressed, bordering noise (Fig. 1L-M). Nfe2l3 expression in cortical neurons, however, peaked only neonatally but declined by adult age (Fig. 1N), which is consistent with Nfe2l3 being previously associated with neonatal development of cortical layer 5 pyramidal near-projecting and corticothalamic projection neurons and then being downregulated by adult age12,13 14.
Figure 1. Expression of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 genes in scRNA-seq-profiled cortical projection neurons at different developmental stages.
(A) UMAP of cortical projection neurons, showing cell clusters corresponding to 14-E15 (embryonic), P0 (postnatal), and adult stages of development, as marked (see Methods for details). Immature (embryonic and postnatal) cortical projection neurons are outlined with a dashed-line oval.
(B-N) UMAPs showing gene expression of: neuronal markers Rbfox3/NeuN and Gap43 (B-C), glutamatergic neuron markers Vglut1 and Vglut2 (D), negative for interneuron markers Sst and Pvalb (E-F), cortical projection neuron markers Uchl1 and L1cam (G-H), adult cortical layers 5/6 projection neuron markers, which were enriched in subsets of neurons, Foxp2, Ctip2/Bcl11b27, and Fezf2 (I-K), and Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 genes (L-N), in clusters of cortical projection neurons from different stages of development (clusters’ developmental ages are indicated in panel A). Nfe2l3 expression in immature cortical neurons overlapped with expression of adult layer 5 projection neuron markers Bcl11b and Fezf2, as indicated by a dashed red oval line outlining respective cluster in panels J-K and N. Color-coded scale bars, normalized gene expression (NE).
Next, we analyzed expression of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 in scRNA-seq-profiled retinal cell types from different stages of development (using previously published datasets31-33). The differentiated retinal cells (excluding undifferentiated progenitor cells) from various ages retinas (embryonic day 16, postnatal day 0, adult, and ONC-injured) were integrated for visualization of cell type clusters using a UMAP (Fig. 2A). We found that only Nfe2l3 was enriched specifically in the RGCs, whereas Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 were enriched in non-RGC retinal cell types but also expressed in RGCs (Fig. 2B-D). Next, we analyzed average expression of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 in scRNA-seq-profiled RGCs from different stages of development and after injury (2 weeks post-ONC). In contrast to higher expression of Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 in the adult RGCs, which was further upregulated after injury, expression of Nfe2l3 peaked in early development, declined during maturation, and after injury decreased to levels bordering noise (Fig. 2E-G). Further analysis did not find Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, or Nfe2l3 to be RGC subtype-specific, although there was modest subtype-to-subtype variability in expression within uninjured and within injured adult RGC subtypes (Fig. 2H-J). We also characterized Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 protein coding transcript isoforms expressed in RGCs, using bulk-RNA-seq of RGCs purified from neonatal (postnatal day 5; see Methods) retinas (around the time when Nfe2l3 expression transiently peaks during RGC development). We identified two Nfe2l1 protein coding transcripts that are robustly expressed in RGCs, one protein coding Nfe2l2 transcript that was moderately expressed in RGCs, and two protein coding Nfe2l3 transcripts that were also moderately expressed in RGCs (Fig. 2K-M). These data show that, in contrast to Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2, Nfe2l3 is enriched in RGCs within the retina, transiently expressed in early development, downregulated during maturation, and is nearly silenced after injury.
Figure 2. Expression of Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 genes in scRNA-seq-profiled retinal cell types and in RGC projection neurons at different developmental stages.
(A) UMAP of cell type clusters from E16, P0, adult uninjured, and adult injured (2 weeks post-ONC) retinas, as marked. RGC cluster is outlined by a dashed line. Because except for RGC most retinal cell types are not yet born in the embryonic retina, adult retina dataset was used for other retinal cell types and included proportionately fewer adult RGCs. Thus, most RGCs in the UMAP are from E16 and P0 datasets (see Methods for details).
(B-D) UMAPs showing gene expression of Nfe2l1 (B), Nfe2l2 (C) and Nfe2l3 (D) in clusters of retinal cell types (per annotation in panel A). RGC cluster (comprised mostly from neonatal RGCs, as detailed in A) is outlined by a dashed line. Color-coded scale bars, normalized gene expression (NE).
(E-G) Line plots of Nfe2l1 (E), Nfe2l2 (F) and Nfe2l3 (G) gene expression in scRNA-seq-profiled RGCs at different ages/conditions, as marked. Mean ± SEM of NE values are shown (see Methods for details).
(H-J) Barplots showing subtype-specific expression of Nfe2l1 (H), Nfe2l2 (I), and Nfe2l3 (J) genes in uninjured and injured (2 weeks post-ONC) scRNA-seq-profiled adult RGCs. Asterisk indicates RGC clusters which did not survive 2 weeks after ONC. Mean ± SEM of NE values are shown.
(K-M) Purified postnatal (P5) RGC bulk-RNA-seq reads alignment to gene loci of Nfe2l1 (K), Nfe2l2 (L), and Nfe2l3 (M), along with specific transcripts isoforms assembled by Cufflinks, respectively, and annotated with Ensembl transcript IDs (shown on the left side of the panels). Visualization with IGV viewer.
Because we found that Nfe2l3 is downregulated in RGCs during maturation and further after ONC injury, its antioxidant properties3 would not be available to protect RGCs from ONC-induced oxidative stress17. Therefore, we tested whether experimentally expressing Nfe2l3 in ONC-challenged RGCs would promote their survival and axon regeneration. In order to address this question, we selected from the transcript-specific bulk-RNA-seq-profiled RGC dataset an open reading frame (ORF) of the more highly expressed Nfe2l3 transcript (Fig. 2M) for functional testing in an axon regeneration assay (see Methods for details). To validate AAV2 vectors (which selectively transduce RGCs within the retina) expression in injured RGCs, a Myc-reporter was added to the N-terminus of Nfe2l3 ORF. For negative control, mCherry-expressing AAV2 vector was used. For positive control, established axon regeneration-promoting AAV2 vectors, expressing shRNAs to knockdown (KD) expression of Pten or Klf9, respectively, and co-expressing an mCherry reporter, were used19-21,34,35. The viruses were injected intravitreally in adult mice, and 2 weeks later ONC injury was performed. AAV2 pre-treatment achieved approximately 30% transduction efficiency (see Methods for details). Immunostaining the retinas from uninjured and injured conditions with antibodies for Nfe2l3 and βIII-Tubulin or Myc-reporter confirmed downregulation of Nfe2l3 after ONC in injured RGCs, relative to already modest expression in uninjured RGCs. However, Nfe2l3 upregulation was robust in the injured Nfe2l3 AAV2-treated RGCs (Fig. 3A-C). Also, mCherry reporter-labeled injured RGCs confirmed transduction and expression of the established AAV2 vectors, used here for negative (scrambled shRNA) and positive (anti-Pten and anti-Klf9 shRNAs) controls (Fig. 3D-E).
Figure 3. Validation of Nfe2l3 expression and AAV2 vectors transduction in RGCs.
(A) Representative confocal images of the retinal flatmounts’ ganglion cell layer horizontal sections from adult (10 weeks old) mice co-immunostained for Nfe2l3 and βIII-Tubulin (Tuj1; an RGC marker within the retina), and counterstained with DAPI (to label nuclei), show modest Nfe2l3 signal in uninjured Tuj1+/DAPI+ RGCs.
(B-F) Mice (8 weeks old) were pre-treated with AAV2 vectors (which selectively transduce the RGCs within the retina) expressing mCherry (control), myc-tagged Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, or anti-Klf9 shRNA. ONC injury was performed 2 weeks later. Animals were sacrificed for histological analysis 2 weeks after ONC. Representative confocal images of the retinal flatmounts’ horizontal sections co-immunostained for Myc reporter and Nfe2l3 or Tuj1, and counterstained with DAPI, show marginal Nfe2l3 signal in the injured control mCherry+/DAPI+ RGCs (B), which also became punctate relative to the diffuse RGC soma labeling in the uninjured condition (shown in A). However, Nfe2l3 signal in the injured Nfe2l3-treated Myc+/DAPI+ RGCs is robust (C). A subset of the Tuj1+/DAPI+ RGCs are also mCherry reporter+, in the AAV2 mCherry (control), anti-Pten shRNA, and anti-Klf9 shRNA-treated conditions, as marked (D-F). OE = Overexpression; KD = Knockdown. Confocal microscopy, 63x Oil objective; Scale bar, 20 μm.
Then, we tested whether expression of Nfe2l3 in injured RGCs, which otherwise do not express it (except for bordering noise levels), would be sufficient to promote RGC survival and axon regeneration after being challenged by ONC injury, and how would possible neuroprotection compare to the effects of established axon regeneration-promoting treatments, which knockdown expression of Pten or Klf9. We used an established 2-weeks after ONC axon regeneration assay18,21,34-36, in which the optic nerve is injured by crush in order to sever all RGC axons, and RGC survival and axon regeneration are assayed at 2 weeks after injury. AAV2 vectors expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control, were injected intravitreally in adult mice, and 2 weeks later ONC was performed. To visualize the regenerating axons or their absence, axonal tracer CTB was injected 1 day prior to sacrifice at 2 weeks after ONC. The number of regenerating axons was quantified in longitudinal sections of the optic nerve (no spared axons were detected in either group), and RGC survival was quantified in retinal flatmounts (see Methods for details; experimental timeline in Fig. 4A). We found that Nfe2l3 expression promoted RGC survival by approximately 20%, which is a similar extent of neuroprotection as with anti-Pten shRNA and anti-Klf9 shRNA AAV2 treatments by 2 weeks post-ONC, compared to RGC survival in the injured control group (Fig. 4B-D). Although given that over 80% of RGCs die by 2 weeks after ONC37-39 a 20% increase in survival is a modest gain, as only about 4% less of RGCs died, if experimental neuroprotection persists permanently this would be meaningful, because without a treatment all the RGCs eventually die. Remarkably, relative to only minor axonal sprouting past the injury site detected in control animals (as expected), Nfe2l3 expression promoted long-distance axon regeneration approximately 3 mm past the injury site, which is comparable to the extent of axon regeneration achieved by anti-Pten shRNA and anti-Klf9 shRNA AAV2 treatments (Fig. 5A-D).
Figure 4. Nfe2l3 promotes RGC survival after optic nerve injury.
(A) Experimental timeline: 8 weeks old mice were pre-treated with AAV2 vectors expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control. ONC injury was performed 2 weeks later. Animals were sacrificed for histological analysis 2 weeks after ONC. Axonal tracer CTB was injected intravitreally prior to sacrifice.
(B) Representative images of the retinal flatmounts immunostained for an RGC marker βIII-Tubulin (Tuj1 antibody) at 2 weeks after ONC, pre-treated with AAV2 expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control, as marked. OE = Overexpression; KD = Knockdown. Scale bar, 20 μm.
(C-D) Quantitation of RGC survival in retinal flatmounts immunostained for an RGC marker βIII-Tubulin (Tuj1 antibody) at 2 weeks after ONC, pre-treated with AAV2 expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control, as marked (C). Data analyzed using ANOVA, overall F = 1017.9, p < 0.001, with p-values of pairwise comparisons determined by posthoc LSD. Significant difference (p < 0.05) indicated by an asterisk * (D). Mean ± SEM shown, n = 4 retinas per group.
Figure 5. Nfe2l3 promotes robust axon regeneration after optic nerve injury.
(A-B) Representative images of the optic nerve longitudinal sections with CTB-labeled axons at 2 weeks after ONC from the animals pre-treated with expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control, as marked (A). Insets: Representative images of the optic nerve regions proximal and distal to the injury site are magnified for better visualization of the axons or their absence (B). The edges of the tissue were optically trimmed (i.e., cropped-out) due to artefactual autofluorescence that is common at tissue edges (see Methods). OE = Overexpression; KD = Knockdown. Scale bars, 500 μm (main panels), 50 μm (insets).
(C-D) Quantitation of CTB-labeled regenerating axons at 2 weeks after ONC, at increasing distances from the injury site, after pre-treatment with AAV2 expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control, as marked (C). Data analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA, sphericity assumed, overall F = 13.2, p < 0.01, with p-values of pairwise comparisons determined by posthoc LSD shown in the inset table, and significant differences (p < 0.05) indicated by an asterisk * (D). Mean ± SEM shown; n = 4 optic nerves per group.
To gain insight into the mechanisms through which Nfe2l3 could promote neuroprotection and axon regeneration, we selected the genes that are associated with Nfe2l3 based on gene-ontology (GO) and are expressed in neonatal RGCs (before Nfe2l3 expression declines during maturation). Next, we identified GO biological processes (GO:BP) and GO molecular functions (GO:MF), which were enriched amongst these Nfe2l3-associated genes expressed in Nfe2l3+ neonatal RGCs relative to all genes expressed in neonatal RGCs. The top enriched GO: BP and GO:MF were both related to RNA-associated processes involved in gene expression/translation (Fig. 6A). We then analyzed the relationship between the genes comprising these top enriched gene expression/translation-associated GO:BP and GO:MF, and presented them as a gene network plot (Fig. 6B). Amongst the identified genes were numerous ribosomal proteins, including Rpl7 and Rpl7A, which we recently showed promote axon regeneration40. Other identified axon regeneration-prompting genes included Klf7, Sox11, 14-3-3 adaptors (Ywha-x genes), and Atp5g116,41-44. Axon regeneration-suppressing genes, Set and Gsk3b, were also identified in the gene network plot45,46. Gsk3b is developmentally downregulated in RGCs but is upregulated after ONC (Fig. 6C). Thus, although Gsk3b-mediated degradation of Nfe2l1-3 proteins is established47-49, experimentally-upregulated Nfe2l3 protein may compensate and thereby promote neuroprotection and axon regeneration. The most prominent Pten KO-activated mTOR pathway of axon regeneration18 was not detected by the gene network analysis, but a recent report demonstrated that Nfe2l3 directly activates the mTOR pathway through mTorc150. Mtor gene, which encodes mTorc1, is substantially downregulated but not completely silenced in injured RGCs (Fig. 6D). Thus, mTorc1 may also be associated with Nfe2l3’s effect on neuroprotection and axon regeneration51,52. To explore this possibility, we tested whether phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (p-S6), a downstream marker of the mTOR pathway activation18, is enriched in the surviving Nfe2l3-treated, compared to control, RGCs. Using phospho-S6-specific antibody, we quantified Nfe2l3 and mCherry-treated surviving RGCs that were also p-S6 immunopositive, but did not find a significant difference between the percent of Myc+/p-S6+ relative to all Myc+ RGCs (in the experimental condition) and the percent of mCherry+/p-S6+ relative to all mCherry+ RGCs (in the control condition) (Fig. 7A-E). These data suggest that, Nfe2l3 promotes RGC survival and axon regeneration through a different pathway downstream of mTOR or through a different mechanism. Taken together, these bioinformatic analyses predicted the association of Nfe2l3 with several established mechanisms of neuroprotection and axon regeneration, whereas the extent of their cooperation with, and dependency on, each other in regulating neuroprotection and axon regeneration is an important direction for future research.
Figure 6. Nfe2l3-associated gene ontology enriched in Nfe2l3-expressing RGCs.
(A) Barplots showing gene ontology (GO) annotations for biological process (BP; left) and molecular function (MF; right), which were enriched within the Nfe2l3-associated genes meaningfully expressed (>= 1 NE) in Nfe2l3+ neonatal RGCs relative to all genes expressed (>= 0.1 NE) in all neonatal RGCs (FC > 0.25-fold, p < 0.05), ordered by adjusted p-values (shown on x-axis in −log10; determined by the R packages gprofiler2 and enrichplot), with terms in the upper rows corresponding to the most significant enrichment (indicated by the lower adjusted p-value; up to top 5 shown, and only 4 were significant for MF). Color-coded scale bar indicates GO terms’ fold-change (FC) enrichment. See methods for more details.
(B) Gene-Concept Network Plot of genes associated with the top GO:BP and GO:MF terms by p-value significance. GO terms shown as gray circles (i.e., nodes), with circle size (per scale on the side) indicating the number of genes within that node. Color-coded scale bar indicates each gene’s normalized expression (NE) in neonatal RGCs (see Methods for details). Nfe2l3 and Gsk3b genes are outlined by dashed line boxes.
(C-D) Line plots of Gsk3b (C) and Mtor (Mtorc1) (D) gene expression in scRNA-seq-profiled RGCs at different ages/conditions, as marked. Mean ± SEM of normalized expression (NE) values are shown (see Methods for details).
Figure 7. Experimental upregulation of Nfe2l3 does not significantly alter levels of p-S6 in injured RGCs.
(A-B) Representative confocal images of the retinal flatmounts’ ganglion cell layer horizontal sections 2 weeks after ONC injury from animals pre-treated with control AAV2 expressing mCherry reporter, immunostained for p-S6, and counterstained with DAPI (A). Inset from A shown enlarged for better visualization of subsets of mCherry+/p-S6+ and mCherry+/p-S6- RGCs (B).
(C-D) Representative confocal images of the retinal flatmounts’ ganglion cell layer horizontal sections 2 weeks after ONC injury from animals pre-treated with AAV2 expressing myc-tagged Nfe2l3, immunostained for p-S6, and counterstained with DAPI (C). Inset from C shown enlarged for better visualization of subsets of Myc+/p-S6+ and Myc+/p-S6- RGCs (D). OE = Overexpression. Scale bars, 25 μm (main panels), 6.5 μm (insets).
(E) Quantification of the percent of p-S6+/mCherry+ of the total mCherry+ RGCs per retina, at 2 weeks after ONC, compared to the percent of p-S6+/Myc+ of the total Myc+ RGCs per retina, did not show a significant difference between the mCherry control or Nfe2l3 transduced conditions (mean ± SEM shown, n = 3 retinas per group; *p = 0.86 by independent samples t-test, 2-tailed). N.S. = Not significant.
DISCUSSION
The Nfe2l1, Nfe2l2, and Nfe2l3 family of proteins regulate various cellular processes, including response to oxidative stress1-7,53. Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 were also shown to play roles in neurodegeneration and neuroprotection54-57. Although in the adult CNS Nfe2l3 is expressed primarily in oligodendrocytes11, transient expression of Nfe2l3 during early development of a subset of cortical projection neurons12-14 suggested that it may also be involved in neuronal development. Indeed, we showed that Nfe2l3 expression also transiently peaks in subsets of developing immature cortical and RGC projection neurons. Furthermore, we showed that within the retina, only Nfe2l3 is enriched in RGC neurons, whereas Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 are expressed robustly in other retinal cell types as well. One of the features of immature CNS neurons is axon growth capacity, which declines during maturation15,16. However, potential roles of Nfe2l3 in axon growth or neuroprotection were unknown. Although Nfe2l3 KO mice develop normally8, they exhibit phenotypes when challenged9,10. Because Nfe2l3 is involved in antioxidant response1-3, whereas axonal ONC injury induces oxidative stress in RGCs17, we challenged RGCs by ONC injury in order to test whether Nfe2l3 regulates neuroprotection and axon regeneration in vivo. We found that experimental expression of Nfe2l3 in injured RGCs, through locally-delivered AAV2 gene therapy vector, promoted neuroprotection and long-distance axon regeneration. Remarkably, the extent of neuroprotection and axon regeneration was similar to the effect of AAV2-targeting Pten and Klf9 genes, which are potent regulators of neuroprotection and long-distance axon regeneration18-21 (although conditional genetic knockout of Pten in RGCs leads to more axon regeneration than AAV2-mediated knockdown of Pten, we used the same viral vector delivery method for all conditions in order to enable more appropriate comparison of the treatments per se). However, because cellular context is different between immature neonatal and mature adult RGCs, it remains to be investigated whether Nfe2l3 also plays a role in developmental axon growth of a subset of immature neurons which express Nfe2l3 neonatally. Thus, Nfe2l3 is an important neuroprotection and axon regeneration-promoting factor, and as such holds promise for development of a novel therapeutic approach to treat CNS injury and disease, whereas its potential role in developing neurons needs to be investigated in future studies.
We also utilized bioinformatics-based predictions to provide insights into the molecular mechanisms through which Nfe2l3 could elicit neuroprotection and promote axon regeneration. Analysis of the genes which are co-expressed, and also associated based on gene ontology, with Nfe2l3 in neonatal RGCs (before its expression declined during maturation), identified enriched RNA-associated biological processes involved in gene expression/translation. The identified genes included ribosomal proteins, such as axon regeneration-promoting Rpl7 and Rpl7a40, as well as axon regeneration-prompting Klf7, Sox11, 14-3-3 adaptors (Ywha-x genes), and Atp5g116,41-44. Axon regeneration-suppressing Set and Gsk3b were also amongst the identified genes45,46. Gsk3b inhibits axon regeneration and its KO is neuroprotective46,58,59. Gsk3b is upregulated in injured RGCs, and although Gsk3b-mediated degradation of Nfe2l1-3 proteins is established47-49, experimental upregulation of the Nfe2l3 protein may compensate and thereby promote neuroprotection and axon regeneration. Another implication of this hypothesis is that, Gsk3b KO may be promoting neuroprotection and axon regeneration due to rescue of the antioxidant response mediated by Nfe2l1 and Nfe2l2 proteins. Although Nfe2l2 also upregulates Klf9 suppressor of axon regeneration20,21,60, overexpressing Nfe2l2 in RGCs at least promoted survival after ONC injury57, while knocking-out Nfe2l2 hindered Pten KO-promoted neuroprotection61. Pharmacological activation of Nfe2l1 is also neuroprotective in an animal model of neurodegeneration56, whereas Nfe2l1 KO contributes to neuordegenration54,55, although no axon regeneration in vivo through Nfe2l1 was reported despite it being the most widely studied member of this protein family. However, we showed that Nfe2l3 promotes both neuroprotection and axon regeneration, and is therefore the most promising for therapeutic purposes. In addition, a recent report demonstrated that Nfe2l3 directly activates the mTOR pathway through mTorc150, and Gsk3b also was reported to regulate mTOR pathway62,63, raising a possibility that Nfe2l3-promoted neuroprotection and axon regeneration may involve the mTOR pathway, which is the most widely studied mechanism of axon regeneration18. Although we did not find that the mTOR pathway downstream marker pS6 was enriched by the Nfe2l3 treatment amongst the surviving RGCs, other mTOR downstream effectors may still be involved. Future studies need to test whether Pten KO or Gsk3b KO would enhance Nfe2l3-promoted neuroprotection and axon regeneration.
Furthermore, even if Nfe2l3 is involved in the Gsk3b and/or Pten pathways, it may still be a more potent regulator of these pathways in relation to neuroprotection and axon regeneration, or it may also recruit another relevant known or novel pathway. These possibilities need to be investigated in future studies, along with the identification of the effector genes regulated by Nfe2l3, and its binding partner proteins, specifically in the CNS projection neurons. Testing in comparison to, and combination with, other established regulators of neuroprotection and axon regeneration (e.g., AAV2 CNTF64,65) also will be important. Although Nfe2l3-promoted gain in RGC survival by 2 weeks after ONC was modest, if it persists permanently this would be meaningful, because without a treatment all the RGCs eventually die37-39. Thus, future studies over long-term are needed, using a variety of RGC survival markers66, and comparing to uninjured RGCs by assessing only the transduced RGCs (e.g., Myc+/Tuj1+ cells), in order to further characterize Nfe2l3’s neuroprotective potential. In addition, as Nfe2l3 is associated with several established regulators of neuroprotection and axon regeneration, the extent of their cooperation with, and dependency on, each other in promoting neuroprotection and axon regeneration also needs to be investigated in future studies.
METHODS
Animal use, surgeries, intraocular injections.
All animal studies were performed at the University of Connecticut Health Center with approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and of the Institutional Biosafety Committee, and performed in accordance with the ARVO Statement for the Use of Animals in Ophthalmic and Visual Research. Mice were housed in the animal facility with a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle (lights on from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM) and a maximum of five adult mice per cage. The study used wild-type 129S1/SvImJ mice (The Jackson Laboratory). Optic nerve surgeries and intravitreal injections, were carried out on mice of both sexes 8-12 weeks of age (average body weight 20-26 g) under general anesthesia, as described previously21,35,36,67. The viruses included AAV2 vectors expressing Nfe2l3 (ORF of ENSMUST00000005103), anti-Pten shRNAs (target sequences: 5′-GCAGAAACAAAAGGAGATATCA-3′, 5′-GATGATGTTTGAAACTATTCCA-3′, 5′-GTAGAGTTCTTCCACAAACAGA-3′, and 5′-GATGAAGATCAGCATTCACAAA-3′), anti-Klf9 shRNAs (target sequences: 5′-GGAGGCGCTGCCGGTTACGTA-3′, 5′-TGGCTGCCCAGTGTCTGGTTT-3′, 5′-CGGGGGACACCTGGAAGGATT-3′, and 5′-GCAAATAAATGCTTTTGGTAC-3′), and mCherry alone for control (titers ~1 × 1012 GC/mL; VectorBuilder, Inc.). Nfe2l3 ORF and mCherry ORF had an N-terminally fused myc-tag reporter. Vectors expressing anti-Pten or anti-Klf9 shRNAs, also co-expressed an mCherry reporter. Viruses (2 μl per eye) were injected intravitreally, avoiding injury to the lens, in 8-week-old mice, which were randomly assigned to experimental or control conditions, 2 weeks prior to ONC surgery. This lead time allowed for sufficient transduction and expression of the transgenes in RGCs at the time of ONC. Transduction efficiency was approximately 30%, which is comparable to prior reports that also used AAV2 to target the RGCs21,34-36,40,45. Cholera toxin subunit B (CTB) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 dye (C34775, ThermoFisher Scientific) was injected (1% in 3 μl PBS) intravitreally one day prior to sacrifice, at 2 weeks after ONC, in order to visualize the regenerating axons.
Tissue processing and immunostaining.
Standard histological procedures were used, as described previously21,35,36,67,68. Briefly, anesthetized mice were transcardially perfused with isotonic saline followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA), the eyes and optic nerves were dissected, postfixed 2 hours, the retinas were dissected-out, and optic nerves were transferred to 30% sucrose overnight at 4 °C. The optic nerves were then embedded in OCT Tissue Tek Medium (Sakura Finetek), frozen, cryosectioned longitudinally at 14 μm, and then mounted for imaging on coated glass slides. For analyzing RGC survival, resected (into PBS at 4 °C) free-floating retinas were immunostained in 24-well plate wells and, after making 4 symmetrical slits, flat-mounted on coated glass slides for imaging. For analyzing Nfe2l3 transgene expression in AAV2-transduced RGCs, the flattened retinas were embedded in OCT Tissue Tek Medium (Sakura Finetek), frozen, and cryosectioned at 14 μm horizontality (capturing the ganglion cell layer of the whole retina), and then immunostained and mounted on coated glass slides for imaging using a confocal microscope (see below). For immunostaining, the tissues were blocked with appropriate sera, incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, βIII-Tubulin (1:500; rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, Ab18207), Myc (1:400; mouse monoclonal, SC-40 SCBT), Nfe2l3 (1:100; rabbit polyclonal, Biorbyt, Orb312344), p-S6 (1:200; rabbit, CTS, 2211S), and counterstained with DAPI (1:5000; Thermo Fisher Scientific) to label nuclei, then washed 3 times, incubated with appropriate fluorescent dye-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; IgG H+L or IgG 2a Alexa Fluor, Thermo Fisher Scientific) overnight at 4 °C, washed 3 times again, and mounted for imaging. Nfe2l3 immunostaining required optimization, which included the addition of 2% Triton X-100 to the blocking and primary antibody buffer solutions.
Quantification of regenerated axons, RGC survival, and p-S6+ RGCs.
To visualize the regenerating axons or their absence after treating with the AAV2 vectors expressing Nfe2l3, anti-Pten shRNA, anti-Klf9 shRNA, or mCherry control, axonal tracer (Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated CTB 1% in 3 μl PBS) was intravitreally injected one day before animals were euthanized 2 weeks following ONC. Longitudinal sections of the optic nerve were examined for possible axon sparing35. No spared axons were found in control, and no evidence of axon sparing was found in experimental conditions (i.e., at 2 weeks after injury, no axons were found at the most distal from the injury region of the optic nerve). Regenerated axons (defined as continuous fibers, which are absent in controls and are discernible from background puncta and artefactual structures) were counted manually using a fluorescent microscope (40x/1.2 C-Apochromat W; AxioObserver.Z1, Zeiss) in at least 4 longitudinal sections per optic nerve at 0.5 mm, 1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2 mm, and 3 mm distances from the injury site (identified by the abrupt disruption of the densely packed axons near the optic nerve head, as marked by a rhombus in Fig. 5A), and these values were used to estimate the total number of regenerating axons per nerve, as described21,35,36,40,67. For representative images, serial fields of view along the longitudinal optic nerve tissue section were imaged as above; z-stacks with 5 planes at 0.5 μm intervals were deconvoluted, merged, and stitched (ZEN software, Zeiss). Then, processed images of 3 tissue sections from the same optic nerve were superimposed over each other and merged using Photoshop CS6 (Adobe), shown as representative images. RGC survival was quantified in retinal flatmounts as described21,35,36,40,67,68, by immunostaining with an antibody to βIII-Tubulin (neuronal marker Tuj1), taking advantage of the selective expression (within the retina) of βIII-tubulin in RGCs. ImageJ software Cell Counter Plugin was used to count βIII-Tubulin positive cells from images acquired (using a fluorescent microscope, 20x LD; Zeiss, AxioObserver.Z1, Zeiss) at 1 mm and at 2 mm from the optic nerve head in four directions, then averaged to estimate overall RGC survival per mm2 of the retina. In order to determine whether p-S6 marker was enriched amongst the surviving RGCs in the experimentally-treated condition, p-S6+/Myc+ cells were quantified (using ImageJ software Cell Counter Plugin) as a percent of total Myc+ RGCs in the experimental condition, and p-S6+/mCherry+ cells were quantified as a percent of total mCherry+ RGCs in the control condition, from images acquired using a confocal microscope (63x Oil; LSM800, Zeiss) at 3 randomly sampled regions per retina, which were then averaged (at least 3 retinas per condition were analyzed). Representative images of RGCs in the horizontality cryosectioned flattened retinas’ ganglion cell layer immunostained for Nfe2l3, Tuj1, Myc, and p-S6 (where applicable) were imaged, along with mCherry reporter (where applicable), using a confocal microscope (63x Oil; LSM800, Zeiss). Investigators performing the surgeries and quantifications were masked to the group identity by another researcher until the end of the experiment.
Statistical analyses.
All tissue processing, quantification, and data analysis were done masked throughout the study. Sample sizes were based on accepted standards in the literature and our prior experiences. Sample size (n) represents total number of biological replicates in each condition. All experiments included appropriate controls. No cases were excluded in our data analysis, although a few animals that developed a cataract in the injured eye were excluded from the study, and their tissues were not processed. The data are presented as means ± SEM, and was analyzed (as specified in the applicable Figure legends) by ANOVA with or without Repeated Measures, and a posthoc LSD test (SPSS). All differences were considered significant at p < 0.05.
RGC scRNA-seq and bulk-RNA-seq datasets.
Normalized matrices and cell metadata (e.g., type assignment) for embryonic E14, embryonic E15, postnatal P0, and adult cortical neurons, are available from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) accession numbers GSE143949, GSE123335, and GSE11647011,22,23. Seurat v4.3.069,70 was used to merge and normalize the datasets mapped to the mm10 genome. Projection cortical neurons that passed scRNA-seq QCs were identified based on co-expression of neuronal markers, Rbfox3 (NeuN)24 and Gap4325,26, along with cortical projection neuron markers, L1cam30 and Uchl129. Normalized matrices and cell metadata (e.g., type assignment) for embryonic E13, embryonic E14, embryonic E16, postnatal P0, adult uninjured, and adult injured (2 weeks post-crush) RGCs, as well as for adult uninjured and injured (2 weeks post-crush) retinas, are available from the GEO accession numbers GSE18567131, GSE13740032, and GSE19931733. Seurat v4.3.069,70 was used to merge and normalize the datasets mapped to the mm10 genome. Datasets were batch adjusted and integrated using Harmony71. Cell type identity of cells that passed scRNA-seq QCs was confirmed based on established retinal cell type markers; retinal progenitor cells were excluded. RGC cell identity was confirmed based on co-expression of pan-RGC markers (Rbpms, Slc17a6, Sncg, and Tubb3). Barplots (in Fig. 2H-J) with normalized expression (mean ± standard error of the mean) for RGC subtypes were generated using the R packages Seurat and ggplot269. Bulk-RNA-seq samples from postnatal day 5 RGCs were purified by immunopanning for Thy1 (after immunopanning depletion of macrophages). RNA with RNA Integrity Number (RIN) ≥ 9 (by Bioanalyzer 2100 using the Nano 6000 kit, Agilent) was extracted using Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep kit (R2050, Zymo Research). The RNA was processed and cDNA libraries were prepared using RiboZero and ScriptSeq v2 kit (Epicentre) which depletes rRNAs. Paired reads were sequenced in a DNA-strand-specific manner, 100 bp from each end, on HiSeq 2000 Sequencer (Illumina), passed QC filters, mapped to the mm10 genome and transcriptome by Hisat2, and analyzed by Cufflinks/CuffDiff, as we previously described72,73. Transcript isoforms expressed > 0.1 FPKM were retained and visualized using IGV browser74.
Data availability.
The scRNA-seq processed datasets, normalized matrices, and integrated data-frame we generated for this study are available through the NCBI GEO accession number GSE253840. P5 RGC bulk-RNA-seq raw reads and processed data for alternative transcripts isoforms from the Nfe2l(1-3)-family genes loci analyzed in this study are available through the NCBI GEO under accession number GSE253840.
Gene-concept network and expression plots.
Genes expressed moderately or above (>= 1 normalized expression) in Nfe2l3-positive (i.e., expressing Nfe2l3 >= 1 normalized expression) RGCs were analyzed using the R package gprofiler2, using all genes expressed in RGCs as background (normalized expression >= 0.01). False discovery rate (FDR) was used for multiple testing correction, and a minimum p-value of 0.05 was set as cutoff for significance of GO terms enrichment. GO: BP/GO:MF terms were rank ordered by decreasing significance (FDR adjusted p-value). Fold enrichment was calculated as the DEG ratio divided by the background ratio75. The top GO:BP and top GO:MF pathways (p-value < 0.05) containing Nfe2l3 were plotted in a Gene-Concept Network Plot using the clusterProfiler and enrichplot R packages76.
Highlights.
Novel role for neuronal Nfe2l3 in promoting neuroprotection and long-distance axonal regeneration after CNS injury in vivo.
Viral vector expression of Nfe2l3 in the adult retinal ganglion cells provides a similar extent of neuroprotection and axon regeneration as viral vector shRNA knockdown of Pten or Klf9.
Nfe2l3 is not meaningfully expressed in the adult retinal ganglion cells before or after optic nerve injury.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grant R01-EY029739, to E.F.T.). Portions of this research were conducted at the High Performance Computing Facility, University of Connecticut. We are grateful to Bill Flynn (The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT) for Single Cell RNA-Sequencing service, Sophan Iv and Vijender Singh (Research IT Services, University of Connecticut), and Stephen King (High Performance Computing Facility, University of Connecticut) for assistance with bioinformatics tools. We thank Ashiti Damania and Anja Kearney (University of Connecticut) for technical assistance.
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
DECLARATION OF INTERESTS
The authors declare no competing interests.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sykiotis GP, Bohmann D. Stress-activated cap'n'collar transcription factors in aging and human disease. Sci Signal. Mar 09 2010;3(112):re3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.3112re3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu P, Kerins MJ, Tian W, Neupane D, Zhang DD, Ooi A. Differential and overlapping targets of the transcriptional regulators NRF1, NRF2, and NRF3 in human cells. J Biol Chem. November 29 2019;294(48):18131–18149. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA119.009591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sankaranarayanan K, Jaiswal AK. Nrf3 negatively regulates antioxidant-response element-mediated expression and antioxidant induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase1 gene. J Biol Chem. Dec 03 2004;279(49):50810–7. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404984200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Waku T, Hagiwara T, Tamura N, et al. NRF3 upregulates gene expression in SREBP2-dependent mevalonate pathway with cholesterol uptake and lipogenesis inhibition. iScience. Oct 22 2021;24(10):103180. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chowdhury AMMA, Katoh H, Hatanaka A, et al. Multiple regulatory mechanisms of the biological function of NRF3 (NFE2L3) control cancer cell proliferation. Sci Rep. October 02 2017;7(1):12494. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12675-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zilkha-Falb R, Gurevich M, Hanael E, Achiron A. Prickle1 as positive regulator of oligodendrocyte differentiation. Neuroscience. Nov 19 2017;364:107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.09.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wang M, Qiu L, Ru X, Song Y, Zhang Y. Distinct isoforms of Nrf1 diversely regulate different subsets of its cognate target genes. Sci Rep. February 27 2019;9(1):2960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39536-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Derjuga A, Gourley TS, Holm TM, et al. Complexity of CNC transcription factors as revealed by gene targeting of the Nrf3 locus. Mol Cell Biol. Apr 2004;24(8):3286–94. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3286-3294.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chevillard G, Nouhi Z, Anna D, Paquet M, Blank V. Nrf3-deficient mice are not protected against acute lung and adipose tissue damages induced by butylated hydroxytoluene. FEBS Lett. Mar 05 2010;584(5):923–8. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2010.01.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Chevillard G, Paquet M, Blank V. Nfe2l3 (Nrf3) deficiency predisposes mice to T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Blood. Feb 10 2011;117(6):2005–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-02-271460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saunders A, Macosko EZ, Wysoker A, et al. Molecular Diversity and Specializations among the Cells of the Adult Mouse Brain. Cell. August 09 2018;174(4):1015–1030.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Munz M, Bharioke A, Kosche G, et al. Pyramidal neurons form active, transient, multilayered circuits perturbed by autism-associated mutations at the inception of neocortex. Cell. Apr 27 2023; 186(9):1930–1949.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.03.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Galazo MJ, Emsley JG, Macklis JD. Corticothalamic Projection Neuron Development beyond Subtype Specification: Fog2 and Intersectional Controls Regulate Intraclass Neuronal Diversity. Neuron. July 06 2016;91(1):90–106. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clark EA, Rutlin M, Capano L, et al. Cortical RORβ is required for layer 4 transcriptional identity and barrel integrity. Elite. August 27 2020;9doi: 10.7554/eLife.52370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Goldberg JL, Klassen MP, Hua Y, Barres BA. Amacrine-signaled loss of intrinsic axon growth ability by retinal ganglion cells. Science. Jun 2002;296(5574):1860–4. doi: 10.1126/science.1068428 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Moore DL, Blackmore MG, Hu Y, et al. KLF family members regulate intrinsic axon regeneration ability. Science. Oct 9 2009;326(5950):298–301. doi: 10.1126/science.1175737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kanamori A, Catrinescu MM, Kanamori N, Mears KA, Beaubien R, Levin LA. Superoxide is an associated signal for apoptosis in axonal injury. Brain. Sep 2010;133(9):2612–25. doi: 10.1093/brain/awq105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park KK, Liu K, Hu Y, et al. Promoting axon regeneration in the adult CNS by modulation of the PTEN/mTOR pathway. Science. Nov 7 2008;322(5903):963–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rheaume BA, Xing J, Lukomska A, et al. Pten inhibition dedifferentiates long-distance axon-regenerating intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells and upregulates mitochondria-associated Dynlt1a and Lars2. Development. Apr 15 2023;150(8)doi: 10.1242/dev.201644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Apara A, Galvao J, Wang Y, et al. KLF9 and JNK3 Interact to Suppress Axon Regeneration in the Adult CNS. J Neurosci. Oct 2017;37(40):9632–9644. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0643-16.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Trakhtenberg EF, Li Y, Feng Q, et al. Zinc chelation and Klf9 knockdown cooperatively promote axon regeneration after optic nerve injury. Exp Neurol. February 2018;300:22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.10.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Li Z, Tyler WA, Zeldich E, et al. Transcriptional priming as a conserved mechanism of lineage diversification in the developing mouse and human neocortex. Sci Adv. Nov 2020;6(45)doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd2068 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Loo L, Simon JM, Xing L, et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis of mouse neocortical development. Nat Commun. Jan 11 2019;10(1):134. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08079-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Duan W, Zhang YP, Hou Z, et al. Novel Insights into NeuN: from Neuronal Marker to Splicing Regulator. Mol Neurobiol. Apr 2016;53(3):1637–1647. doi: 10.1007/s12035-015-9122-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dani JW, Armstrong DM, Benowitz LI. Mapping the development of the rat brain by GAP-43 immunocytochemistry. Neuroscience. 1991;40(1):277–87. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(91)90190-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Benowitz LI, Apostolides PJ, Perrone-Bizzozero N, Finklestein SP, Zwiers H. Anatomical distribution of the growth-associated protein GAP-43/B-50 in the adult rat brain. J Neurosci. Jan 1988;8(1):339–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lui JH, Nguyen ND, Grutzner SM, et al. Differential encoding in prefrontal cortex projection neuron classes across cognitive tasks. Cell. Jan 21 2021;184(2):489–506.e26. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tasic B, Yao Z, Graybuck LT, et al. Shared and distinct transcriptomic cell types across neocortical areas. Nature. Nov 2018;563(7729):72–78. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0654-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Genç B, Jara JH, Sanchez SS, et al. Upper motor neurons are a target for gene therapy and UCHL1 is necessary and sufficient to improve cellular integrity of diseased upper motor neurons. Gene Ther. Apr 2022;29(3-4):178–192. doi: 10.1038/s41434-021-00303-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Samata B, Takaichi R, Ishii Y, et al. L1CAM Is a Marker for Enriching Corticospinal Motor Neurons in the Developing Brain. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:31. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Shekhar K, Whitney IE, Butrus S, Peng YR, Sanes JR. Diversification of multipotential postmitotic mouse retinal ganglion cell precursors into discrete types. Elife. Feb 22 2022;11doi: 10.7554/eLife.73809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tran NM, Shekhar K, Whitney IE, et al. Single-Cell Profiles of Retinal Ganglion Cells Differing in Resilience to Injury Reveal Neuroprotective Genes. Neuron. December 2019;104(6):1039–1055.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Benhar I, Ding J, Yan W, et al. Temporal single-cell atlas of non-neuronal retinal cells reveals dynamic, coordinated multicellular responses to central nervous system injury. Nat Immunol. Apr 2023;24(4):700–713. doi: 10.1038/s41590-023-01437-w [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yungher BJ, Luo X, Salgueiro Y, Blackmore MG, Park KK. Viral vector-based improvement of optic nerve regeneration: characterization of individual axons' growth patterns and synaptogenesis in a visual target. Gene Ther. Oct 2015;22(10):811–21. doi: 10.1038/gt.2015.51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kim J, Sajid MS, Trakhtenberg EF. The extent of extra-axonal tissue damage determines the levels of CSPG upregulation and the success of experimental axon regeneration in the CNS. Sci Rep. Jun 2018;8(1):9839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-28209-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lukomska A, Kim J, Rheaume BA, et al. Developmentally upregulated Transcriptional Elongation Factor A like 3 suppresses axon regeneration after optic nerve injury. Neurosci Lett. Sep 21 2021:136260. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2021.136260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mead B, Tomarev S. Evaluating retinal ganglion cell loss and dysfunction. Exp Eye Res. Oct 2016;151:96–106. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.08.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nadal-Nicolás FM, Sobrado-Calvo P, Jiménez-López M, Vidal-Sanz M, Agudo-Barriuso M. Long-Term Effect of Optic Nerve Axotomy on the Retinal Ganglion Cell Layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. Sep 2015;56(10):6095–112. doi: 10.1167/iovs.15-17195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Vidal-Sanz M, Galindo-Romero C, Valiente-Soriano FJ, et al. Shared and Differential Retinal Responses against Optic Nerve Injury and Ocular Hypertension. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:235. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Xing J, Theune WC, Lukomska A, Frost MP, Damania A, Trakhtenberg EF. Experimental upregulation of developmentally downregulated ribosomal protein large subunits 7 and 7A promotes axon regeneration after injury in vivo. Exp Neurol. Aug 24 2023:114510. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Blackmore MG, Wang Z, Lerch JK, et al. Krüppel-like Factor 7 engineered for transcriptional activation promotes axon regeneration in the adult corticospinal tract. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 2012;109(19):7517–22. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120684109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Norsworthy MW, Bei F, Kawaguchi R, et al. Sox11 Expression Promotes Regeneration of Some Retinal Ganglion Cell Types but Kills Others. Neuron. Jun 2017;94(6):1112–1120.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kaplan A, Morquette B, Kroner A, et al. Small-Molecule Stabilization of 14-3-3 Protein-Protein Interactions Stimulates Axon Regeneration. Neuron. Mar 08 2017;93(5):1082–1093.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.02.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Natera-Naranjo O, Kar AN, Aschrafi A, et al. Local translation of ATP synthase subunit 9 mRNA alters ATP levels and the production of ROS in the axon. Mol Cell Neurosci. Mar 2012;49(3):263–70. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2011.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Trakhtenberg EF, Wang Y, Morkin MI, et al. Regulating Set-β's Subcellular Localization Toggles Its Function between Inhibiting and Promoting Axon Growth and Regeneration. J Neurosci. May 2014;34(21):7361–74. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3658-13.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Guo X, Snider WD, Chen B. GSK3β regulates AKT-induced central nervous system axon regeneration via an eIF2Bε-dependent, mTORC1-independent pathway. Elife. Mar 2016;5:e11903. doi: 10.7554/eLife.11903 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Biswas M, Kwong EK, Park E, Nagra P, Chan JY. Glycogen synthase kinase 3 regulates expression of nuclear factor-erythroid-2 related transcription factor-1 (Nrf1) and inhibits pro-survival function of Nrf1. Exp Cell Res. Aug 01 2013;319(13):1922–1931. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.04.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kannan MB, Dodard-Friedman I, Blank V. Stringent Control of NFE2L3 (Nuclear Factor, Erythroid 2-Like 3; NRF3) Protein Degradation by FBW7 (F-box/WD Repeat-containing Protein 7) and Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 (GSK3). J Biol Chem. Oct 23 2015;290(43):26292–302. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.666446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rada P, Rojo AI, Chowdhry S, McMahon M, Hayes JD, Cuadrado A. SCF/{beta}-TrCP promotes glycogen synthase kinase 3-dependent degradation of the Nrf2 transcription factor in a Keap1-independent manner. Mol Cell Biol. Mar 2011;31(6):1121–33. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01204-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hirose S, Waku T, Tani M, et al. NRF3 activates mTORC1 arginine-dependently for cancer cell viability. iScience. Feb 17 2023;26(2):106045. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Switon K, Kotulska K, Janusz-Kaminska A, Zmorzynska J, Jaworski J. Molecular neurobiology of mTOR. Neuroscience. January 2017;341:112–153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Laplante M, Sabatini DM. mTOR signaling in growth control and disease. Cell. Apr 13 2012;149(2):274–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Boas SM, Joyce KL, Cowell RM. The NRF2-Dependent Transcriptional Regulation of Antioxidant Defense Pathways: Relevance for Cell Type-Specific Vulnerability to Neurodegeneration and Therapeutic Intervention. Antioxidants (Basel). Dec 21 2021;11(1)doi: 10.3390/antiox11010008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lee CS, Lee C, Hu T, et al. Loss of nuclear factor E2-related factor 1 in the brain leads to dysregulation of proteasome gene expression and neurodegeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 17 2011;108(20):8408–13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1019209108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Taniguchi H, Okamuro S, Koji M, et al. Possible roles of the transcription factor Nrf1 (NFE2L1) in neural homeostasis by regulating the gene expression of deubiquitinating enzymes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. Feb 26 2017;484(1):176–183. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.01.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bott LC, Badders NM, Chen KL, et al. A small-molecule Nrf1 and Nrf2 activator mitigates polyglutamine toxicity in spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy. Hum Mol Genet. May 15 2016;25(10):1979–1989. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xiong W, MacColl Garfinkel AE, Li Y, Benowitz LI, Cepko CL. NRF2 promotes neuronal survival in neurodegeneration and acute nerve damage. J Clin Invest. Apr 2015;125(4):1433–45. doi: 10.1172/JCI79735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Huang H, Miao L, Yang L, et al. AKT-dependent and -independent pathways mediate PTEN deletion-induced CNS axon regeneration. Cell Death Dis. Feb 27 2019;10(3):203. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1289-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Leibinger M, Andreadaki A, Golla R, et al. Boosting CNS axon regeneration by harnessing antagonistic effects of GSK3 activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jul 03 2017;114(27):E5454–E5463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1621225114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zucker SN, Fink EE, Bagati A, et al. Nrf2 amplifies oxidative stress via induction of Klf9. Mol Cell. Mar 20 2014;53(6):916–928. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.01.033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kim HJ, Saikia JM, Monte KMA, et al. Deep scRNA sequencing reveals a broadly applicable Regeneration Classifier and implicates antioxidant response in corticospinal axon regeneration. Neuron. Dec 20 2023;111(24):3953–3969.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Stretton C, Hoffmann TM, Munson MJ, et al. GSK3-mediated raptor phosphorylation supports amino-acid-dependent mTORC1-directed signalling. Biochem J. Sep 01 2015;470(2):207–21. doi: 10.1042/BJ20150404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chen CH, Shaikenov T, Peterson TR, et al. ER stress inhibits mTORC2 and Akt signaling through GSK-3β-mediated phosphorylation of rictor. Sci Signal. Feb 22 2011;4(161):ra10. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.200173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Xie L, Yin Y, Benowitz L. Chemokine CCL5 promotes robust optic nerve regeneration and mediates many of the effects of CNTF gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Mar 02 2021;118(9)doi: 10.1073/pnas.2017282118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Liu X, Hao F, Hao P, et al. Regeneration and functional recovery of the completely transected optic nerve in adult rats by CNTF-chitosan. Signal Transduct Target Ther. Feb 27 2023;8(1):81. doi: 10.1038/s41392-022-01289-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Nadal-Nicolás FM, Galindo-Romero C, Lucas-Ruiz F, et al. Pan-retinal ganglion cell markers in mice, rats, and rhesus macaques. Zool Res. Jan 18 2023;44(1):226–248. doi: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2022.308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.de Lima S, Koriyama Y, Kurimoto T, et al. Full-length axon regeneration in the adult mouse optic nerve and partial recovery of simple visual behaviors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Jun 2012;109(23):9149–54. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119449109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kurimoto T, Yin Y, Omura K, et al. Long-distance axon regeneration in the mature optic nerve: contributions of oncomodulin, cAMP, and pten gene deletion. J Neurosci. Nov 2010;30(46):15654–63. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4340-10.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, et al. Comprehensive Integration of Single-Cell Data. Cell. June 2019;177(7):1888–1902.e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.05.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hao Y, Hao S, Andersen-Nissen E, et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell. June 24 2021;184(13):3573–3587.e29. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.048 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Korsunsky I, Millard N, Fan J, et al. Fast, sensitive and accurate integration of single-cell data with Harmony. Nat Methods. Dec 2019;16(12):1289–1296. doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0619-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Trakhtenberg EF, Pho N, Holton KM, Chittenden TW, Goldberg JL, Dong L. Cell types differ in global coordination of splicing and proportion of highly expressed genes. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32249. doi: 10.1038/srep32249 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Rheaume BA, Jereen A, Bolisetty M, et al. Single cell transcriptome profiling of retinal ganglion cells identifies cellular subtypes. Nat Commun. Jul 2018;9(1):2759. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05134-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol. Jan 2011;29(1):24–6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Mi H, Muruganujan A, Casagrande JT, Thomas PD. Large-scale gene function analysis with the PANTHER classification system. Nat Protoc. Aug 2013;8(8):1551–66. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2013.092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). Aug 28 2021;2(3):100141. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The scRNA-seq processed datasets, normalized matrices, and integrated data-frame we generated for this study are available through the NCBI GEO accession number GSE253840. P5 RGC bulk-RNA-seq raw reads and processed data for alternative transcripts isoforms from the Nfe2l(1-3)-family genes loci analyzed in this study are available through the NCBI GEO under accession number GSE253840.







