Skip to main content
Annals of Family Medicine logoLink to Annals of Family Medicine
. 2023 Nov;21(Suppl 3):5587. doi: 10.1370/afm.22.s1.5587

A standardized osteopathic manipulative technique for the treatment of chronic migraine headaches

Kyle Burke, Joshua Blaker, Aleksandra Zgierska, Robert Lennon
PMCID: PMC10983313

Abstract

Context:

In the US, 40 million people suffer from migraines; 8% have debilitating chronic migraines (CM). Standard care such as topiramate, onabotulinumtoxin A, and calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies are not universally effective and cause adverse effects (AE). Non-pharmacologic treatments such as osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) are reported effective and may minimize AEs but current studies are limited by non-uniformity of treatment protocols.

Objective:

To evaluate the feasibility of a standardized OMT procedure for CM and gather preliminary data on its effectiveness in a primary care setting.

Study Design & Analysis:

Prospective, single-arm feasibility study. Changes were evaluated using MANOVA to 95% confidence with f distribution for effect size.

Setting:

Outpatient clinical research center.

Population Studied:

Adults aged 18 to 60 seen within the last three years for chronic migraine (ICD 10 code G43.709) with no recent or ongoing treatment with topiramate or onabotulinumtoxin A.

Intervention/Instrument:

Participants received up to 5 biweekly treatments (minimum 3) of five 1-minute standardized myofascial release movements and completed 1- and 3-month post-treatment assessments.

Outcome Measures:

Primary: study completion rate and treatment satisfaction. Secondary: changes between baseline and 1-month, and baseline and 3-month scores on: Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and the Migraine Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ); changes between baseline and 3-month score on the Migraine Disability Assessment Test (MIDAS).

Results:

All 11 participants (mean age 47 years; 10 female, 1 male) completed the baseline, 1-, and 3-month assessments and ≥3 treatments. Treatment satisfaction was high (4.7/5). Improvements between baseline and 1-month were: HIT-6: 3.4->3.1 (p<.05, ηp2=0.16 (large effect)); MSQ: 2.9->2.2 (p=.087, ηp2=0.12 (medium effect)). Improvements between baseline and 3-month were: HIT-6: 3.4->2.9 (p=.074, ηp2=0.13 (medium effect)); MSQ: 2.9->2.0 (p=0.39, ηp2=0.09 (medium effect)); MIDAS: 9.1->5.6 (p<.05, ηp2=0.19 (large effect)).

Conclusions:

A standardized OMT protocol is feasible for chronic migraine treatment, with significant large effect size improvements on HIT-6 and MIDAS scores, and non-significant but medium effect size improvement on the MSQ. Improvements on the HIT-6 and MSQ wane over time. Further studies are warranted to confirm generalizability and characterize the extinction coefficient of efficacy.


Articles from Annals of Family Medicine are provided here courtesy of Annals of Family Medicine, Inc.

RESOURCES