Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0294939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294939

Developing a competency assessment framework for medical laboratory technologists in primary healthcare settings in India

Sanjeev Kumar 1,*, Gaurav Chhabra 2, Kaptan Singh Sehrawat 3,4, Malkit Singh 5
Editor: Susan Horton6
PMCID: PMC10984544  PMID: 38557682

Abstract

Medical Laboratory Technologists play a significant role in delivering quality laboratory Services. The competency assessment of MLTs is a critical driver for enhancing primary healthcare performance. While several countries have developed competency frameworks for MLTs in primary care, such frameworks are lacking in the Indian context. This study aimed to create a competency assessment framework to assess the competencies of MLTs (Medical Laboratory Technologists) working in Indian public primary healthcare facilities. The research followed a five-step process, starting with a review of existing literature on MLTs’ competencies in primary healthcare. Expert consultations were then conducted to establish a consensus on these competencies. Following this, assessment tools were developed based on the literature review and expert input. Another round of expert consultations was held to ensure agreement on the assessment tools. Finally, the developed tools were tested in a public primary healthcare facility. The literature review identified 86 competencies across 11 domains: safe work practices, data/ sample collection, specimen preparation equipment instruments and regiments, assessment and analysis, recording and reporting, infection control, quality management, critical thinking, communication and interaction, and professional practice. Expert consultations resulted in the consensus on ninety-five competencies in ten domains of MLTs in primary healthcare settings. Competencies for each domain were discussed and agreed upon. A competency assessment tool was finalized after unanimous agreement among experts. The competency assessment tool was later finalized after pre-testing on MLTs in a clinical laboratory part of a public primary health care facility. This study successfully developed a competency assessment framework for in-service MLTs in Indian public primary healthcare settings. The framework encompasses ninety-five competencies covering ten domains of MLT responsibilities. It provides a comprehensive tool for assessing MLT’s competencies and identifying competency gaps. The framework can be used to capacitate MLTs, improve their performance in primary healthcare settings, and enhance the delivery of healthcare services in India. It bridges a critical gap in the existing literature and can aid as a valuable resource for policymakers, educators, and healthcare professionals involved in practicing medical laboratory Services in primary healthcare settings.

Introduction

The laboratories at the primary health centre play a critical role in improving patient survival. It is because laboratory services support clinicians in providing quality medical care by performing tests and developing evidence-based laboratory diagnosis and screening for diseases [1, 2]. Clinical laboratory tests are crucial in diagnosing the disease, but many tests are of prognostic value, which helps the physician understand whether the patient is responding to the treatment [3]. Relying solely on clinical diagnosis without confirming it through laboratory testing can result in misdiagnosis in many patients. It can also lead to increased mortality and morbidity [4]. Considering the importance of laboratories in primary health Care, at the 32nd World Health Assembly 1979, it was emphasized to give due consideration to laboratory services with appropriate technology. In 1996, the World Health Organization hosted a consultation in South Africa in which the experts reviewed and finalized the minimum list of tests that should be available for primary healthcare in developing countries based on four basic principles [2]. These are.

  • A. Tests that are clinically useful in influencing diagnosis and management

  • B. One test rather than two or more tests where one selected test can provide adequate information.

  • C. Tests that can be performed easily, quickly, and with cheaper reagents, but without compromising reliability, rather than those that need more sophisticated equipment.

  • D. Screening sets of tests (Profile testing) or only individually specified tests

Precisely, tests or sets of tests for any clinical categories should be considered in terms of clinical utility, technical reliability, and implications for laboratory organization and management.

International Health Regulation (IHR) 2005 lists laboratory services as a core function of health systems [5]. The health system must have integrated lab Services at primary health centers, like- Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) advocate having integrated laboratory services in primary healthcare to provide universal health care services [6].

In 2008, the World Health Organization (WHO) regional office for Africa organized a consensus meeting in Maputo, Mozambique, focused on harmonizing and standardizing clinical laboratory testing. This meeting led to the establishment of the Maputo Declaration on laboratory systems, which aimed to tackle the challenges in laboratory services that had hindered their expansion [7]. Despite these global efforts, in most countries, laboratory services in primary care are poor [8]. Availability of effective laboratory Services at primary health centers increase the service utilization [9]. Lab workforce competency is one of the key determinants to ensure effective and efficient laboratory services in any settings. Laboratory workforce competencies improve the workforce by providing a guiding framework for producing education and training programs, identifying worker roles and job responsibilities, and assessing individual performance and organizational capacity [10].

Competency is the ability of personnel to apply skill, knowledge, and experience to perform their laboratory duties correctly [11]. Competency assessment is used to certify that laboratory personnel are satisfying their obligations. In the United States, for example, it is required by federal regulations. The following six procedures are the minimal regulatory requirements for the assessment of competency for all personnel performing laboratory testing [12]:

  1. Observing the regular performance of tests on patients, including preparation if necessary.

  2. Overseeing the handling, processing, and testing of specimens and monitoring the recording and communication of test results.

  3. Examining intermediate test results, quality control records, proficiency testing outcomes, and preventative maintenance records.

  4. Directly observing the performance of instrument maintenance and functional checks.

  5. Evaluating test performance by analyzing previously tested specimens, conducting blind internal tests, or using External Quality Assessment Schemes (EQAS).

  6. Assessing problem-solving abilities.

Each test approved by the laboratory director must undergo all six of these procedures for the competency assessment of testing personnel.

In Australia, the Australian training authority has developed training packages for laboratory operations under which competency standards have been prepared [13]. In this competency’s standards, there are seven domains broadly listed as collecting and analyzing data; communicating ideas and Information; planning and organizing activities; working with others and teams; using mathematical ideas and techniques, problem solving; and using technology.

Similarly, the Canadian Society for Medical Laboratory Science(CSMLS) has developed a competency profile for general medical laboratory technologist [14]. This profile has identified eight categories: safe work practices; data and specimen collection and handling; analytical processes; interpretation and reporting of results; quality management; critical thinking; communication and interaction; and professional practice.

In 2012, the Government of India provisioned laboratory services at primary health centers [15], in which 13 tests were included under the essential and desirable category). The Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) 2019 proposed to the Government of India to revise the test list for primary health centers and health and wellness centers at the helm of the comprehensive primary care rollout, which the Government of India accepted and provisioned in 2022 [16]. The revised list provisions sixty-four tests under seven categories, like hematology; clinical pathology; biochemistry; microbiology; specific diseases; other diagnostic tests; radiology.

MLTs are crucial in conducting tests at primary health centers, which are only available in 35.80% of primary health centers in India [17]. The competence of MLTs is essential for the overall performance of these centers, as laboratory services contribute significantly.

Due to the double burden of disease and increasing susceptibility to infections, most countries have adopted comprehensive primary care service packages, which include laboratory and diagnostic Services. Workforce competency is the driver of ensured efficiency and quality of the services. Competency assessment is the first step to improving the degree of workforce competency. There is no competency assessment framework for MLT’s competency in the Indian primary healthcare setting. Hence, this study will help in bridging this gap.

Study objective

The objective of this study was "to develop the competency assessment framework to assess the in-service Medical Laboratory Technologist’s competency in primary healthcare Settings." The specific objective of this study was to identify the Medical Laboratory Technologists’ competencies and to develop competency assessment tools for in-service MLTs in primary healthcare settings.

Methods

Study design

We used a five-stage consultative approach (Fig 1) to develop the MLTs competency assessment framework. Stage-by-stage specifics are as follows.

Fig 1. Study stages.

Fig 1

Stage 1 desk review

In this stage, we reviewed the global and Indian literature and identified 12 publications, including four from India, for detailed review. All these publications were applicable to primary healthcare settings across the globe.

Stage 2 expert consultation

In the second stage, we organized expert consultation to build consensus among MLT domains and competencies. This consultation was held on 7th april 2022.

Stage 3 Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) development

In this stage, we developed the instruments to assess the competencies in terms of knowledge, attitude, and skills.

Stage 4 expert consultation

In this phase, we organized an expert consultation on 18th November 2022 to build consensus among experts on the developed CAT.

Stage 5 CAT pre-testing

We converted the final version of the Competency Assessment Tool into bilingual language, i.e., English and Odia (local language). Afterward, we pre-tested CAT inone of the public primary health care facilities in Odisha, on 13th January 2023.

Experts

During two rounds of expert consultations, 18 experts participated. All the experts were trained in medical laboratory science/pathology/laboratory medicine and have been involved in delivering medical laboratory services or as academia in medical laboratory science or involved in the process of policymaking as a multi-lateral organization representative or professional body representative or policy maker with over 20 Years of experience.

Results

Stage-1 competencies identification

Through the literature review, we identified 86 Medical Laboratory Technologist’s competencies under 11 domains Table 1. These domains are safe work practices, data collection and specimen procurement/ receipt, specimen preparation and pre-analytical processing, equipment, instruments and reagents, assessment and analysis, recording and reporting, infection control, quality management, critical thinking, communication and interaction, and professional practice. Further, to refer to the detailed domain-wise competencies list, please refer to the S1 File.

Table 1. MLTs’ competency domains.

Domains References
Safe Work Practices [2, 13, 1827]
Data Collection and Specimen Procurement/ Receipt [13, 23, 24, 26]
Specimen Preparation and Pre-analytical Processing [13, 20, 2224]
Equipment, Instruments, and Reagents [2, 13, 18, 20, 2227]
Assessment and Analysis [13, 18, 2224]
Recording and Reporting [2, 13, 18, 2025, 27]
Infection Control [13, 2225]
Quality Management [2, 13, 1827]
Critical Thinking [24]
Communication and Interaction [13, 2127]
Professional Practice [13, 2224, 26, 27]

Stage-2 expert consultation

The virtual expert consultation was organized to build consensus among experts on MLTs’ domains and their competencies. During the consultation, consensus was achieved on ten domains of MLTs in primary healthcare settings, Table 2. After that, competencies were discussed, and a consensus was made among the experts, S2 File.

Table 2. MLTs’ competency domains.

Medical Laboratory Technologist’s Domains in Indian Primary Health Care Setting
 1. Human Values and Professional Ethics
 2. Quality Management
 3. Communication
 4. Critical Thinking
 5. Equipment Instruments and Consumables
 6. Test Requisitions Data and Sample Collection
 7. Specimen Preparation
 8. Assessment & Analysis
 9. Recording and Reporting
 10. Laboratory Safety and Laboratory-Acquired Infection Control

Domain-1. Human values and professional ethics

In this domain, the experts arrived at a consensus on nine competencies Table 3. For complying with human values and professional ethics, one of the MLT’s vital competencies is understanding the human values and ethics in a clinical laboratory. Apart from maintaining the confidentiality of health care information, MLTs must be able to demonstrate responsibilities towards patients, their attendants, regulatory bodies, and the profession. Respecting the diversity, dignity, and values of patients/clients and colleagues, contributing towards continual improvement in professional services, and complying with legislation governing medical laboratories at the state and national level are essential competencies for MLTs. For professionals, it is also critical to recognize their own competency limitations and seek action to resolve those. In the laboratory setting, obtaining informed consent before the procedure wherever required and respecting patients’ right to refuse is critical. Continuing education and training is one of the vital competencies for the MLTs’ to learn and improve the quality of services offered at work environment.

Table 3. Human values and professional ethics- competencies.
1. Able to understand the human values and ethics in a clinical laboratory.
2. Able to maintain the confidentiality of healthcare information.
3. Able to demonstrate their responsibilities towards patients, their attendants (public), regulatory bodies, the profession, and himself/herself as expected from medical laboratory professionals
4. Respect the diversity, dignity, values, and beliefs of patients/clients and colleagues.
5. Able to contribute towards continual improvement in the professional services, focussing on essential aspects like quality of work.
6. Able to comply with legislation that governs medical laboratory technology at local, state, or national levels as applicable.
7. Able to recognize limitations of own competency and seek action to resolve.
8. Able to obtain informed consent before the procedure wherever required and respect a patient’s right to refuse.
9. Able to develop his/ her interest to participate in continuing education and training–Interest to learn and improve the quality of the work environment.

Domain-2 quality management

Consensus was reached among experts on seven competencies, Table 4. Understanding and demonstrating the concept of quality management system including quality control, quality assurance, quality improvement, consistency, reproducibility, turn around time, and understanding the concept of corrective actions, root cause analysis, and preventive actions in case of any incidents/accidents and observable quality degradation during the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phase of testing are critical competencies for MLTs. For ensuring quality, it is critical to follow the established protocols as defined in the quality policy, process, and procedure manuals, and it is equally important that MLTs should be able to use simple mathematics to monitor and track the acceptability of quality control results and identifies documents, and reports deficiencies that may affect the testing quality and the generated test reports. Laboratory instruments are the backbone of any laboratory; hence, MLTs must understand and perform preventive maintenance and calibration of those instruments referring to established protocols. To ensure quality in the laboratory, it is also important for MLTs to demonstrate knowledge about inventory control by adopting the First In and First Out (FIFO) method and participating in quality assurance activities, internal and external, like audits and accreditation.

Table 4. Quality management.
1. Able to understand and demonstrate the concepts of the quality management system, including quality control, quality assurance, quality improvement, consistency, reproducibility, turn around time, etc.,
2. Able to understand corrective actions, root cause analysis, and preventive actions in case of any incidents/accidents and observable quality degradation during the pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical phases of testing.
3. Able to follow established protocols as defined in the quality policy, process, and procedure manuals.
4. Able to use simple mathematics to monitor and track the acceptability of quality control results. Identifies, documents, and reports deficiencies that may affect the testing quality and the generated test report.
5. Able to understand and perform preventive maintenance and calibration of Laboratory instruments according to established protocols.
6. Able to participate in internal and external quality assurance activities, e.g., audits accreditation.
7. Able to demonstrate knowledge of inventory control by adopting FIFO (First in and First Out)

Domain-3 communication

Experts in this domain agreed on five competencies, Table 5. For delivering effective quality laboratory services, MLTS need to communicate effectively with patients/clients, colleagues, and other health care professionals in local or regional language with respect to: active listening; verbal communication; non-verbal communication; written communication; conflict management; identifying barriers to effective communication; using technology appropriately to facilitate communication. In medical laboratory functioning, medical terminologies are being used; hence MLTS need to understand the medical terminologies and the abbreviations used. Delivering health services is teamwork, where MLTs need to demonstrate effective interdisciplinary /intra-professional team skills through communication, collaboration, and role clarification. Demonstration of adaptive skills during interacting with patients is also an important competency for MLTs.

Table 5. Communication.
1. Able to communicate effectively with patients/clients, colleagues, and other health care professionals in local or regional language with respect to:
 a. Active listening
 b. Verbal communication
 c. Non-verbal communication
 d. Written communication
 e. Conflict management
 f. Identifying barriers to effective communication
 g. Using technology appropriately to facilitate communication.
2. Able to understand medical terminology used at least related to the functioning of medical laboratories
3. Able to understand and use the abbreviations commonly used in medical terminology.
4. Able to demonstrate effective interdisciplinary/intra-professional team skills through:
  (i) Communication
  (ii) Collaboration
  (iii) Role clarification
5. Able to demonstrate adaptive skills when interacting with patients

Domain 4. Critical thinking

In this domain, consensus among experts was reached on four competencies,Table 6. For MLTs, it is important to engage in reflective practice; consciously analyses, make decisions, and draw conclusions to improve future practice. It is important for MLTs to accommodate valid priorities and ensure efficient use of 4 M (Money, Man, Material, and Minutes). For delivering efficient laboratory services, it is also critical for MLTs to demonstrate effective problem-solving/trouble-shooting strategies and initiate the appropriate follow-up.

Table 6. Critical thinking.
1. Able to engage in reflective practice; consciously analyses, makes decisions and draws conclusions to improve future practice.
2. Able to organize work to accommodate valid priorities.
3. Able to ensure efficient use of 4 M (Money, Man, Material, and Minutes).
4. Able to demonstrate effective problem-solving/trouble-shooting strategies and initiate the appropriate follow-up.

Domain 5. Equipment/instruments and consumables

Experts were in consensus for 13 competencies in this domain, Table 7. Under the equipment/instruments and consumables domain, one of the competencies is to prepare reagents, calibrators/standards, and quality control materials and to demonstrate the shelf life of ready-to-use commercially procured and in-house prepared materials and reagents and check the functional quality of all reagents / diagnostic kits/cards/ chemicals used. For any laboratory, it is critical to use positive and negative control for all tests; hence, one of the critical competencies for MLTs is to demonstrate positive and negative control in all tests. For optimum use of laboratory instruments/equipment, it is important for MLTs to demonstrate the work principles of instruments. It is equally important for the laboratory professional to perform risk assessment while using any laboratory instruments. Knowledge about the calibration concepts of equipment and its importance in laboratory services and maintenance for equipment working and its integrity through regular maintenance are vital competencies. Labeling the equipment/instrument with their respective unique I.D.s, date of purchase, date of installation, date of putting into service, date of the last calibration, and name & contact of mechanic whom to inform in case of emergency and its maintenance of recording of all equipment from time to time is also important for MLTs. It is also important for the laboratory professional to demonstrate functional quality checks of all the available equipment/instruments. It is also important for the laboratory professional to prepare and demonstrate SOPs for using all equipment/instruments, test procedures, and their display on workbenches.

Table 7. Equipment instruments and consumables.
1. Able to prepare reagents, calibrators, standards, and quality control materials.
2. Able to demonstrate the shelf life of ready-to-use commercially procured and in-house prepared materials and reagents.
3. Able to check the functional quality of all reagents / diagnostic kits/cards/ chemicals used in the laboratory.
4. Able to use/demonstrate positive and negative controls in all tests.
5. Able to demonstrate the work principles of all the laboratory instruments/equipment.
6. Able to perform risk assessment while using any equipment.
7. Knowledgeable about the calibration concepts of equipment and its importance in laboratory services.
8. Able to maintain equipment working and its integrity by its regular maintenance.
9. Able to inform competent authorities if the equipment has gone out of order.
10. Able to maintain maintenance records of all equipment from time to time.
11. Able to demonstrate functional quality checks of all the available equipment/instruments.
12. Able to label the equipment/instrument with their respective unique I.D.s, date of purchase, date of installation, date of putting into service, date of the last calibration, and name and contact of address mechanic whom to inform in case of emergency.
13. Able to prepare and demonstrate SOPs for the use of all equipment/instruments, test procedures, and their display on workbenches

Domain 6. Test requisition data and sample collection

In this domain, consensus was reached on ten competencies among experts, Table 8. Understanding the relevant information provided for test requests on requisition forms, mainly patient identification, and performing venepuncture and capillary blood collection to obtain appropriate samples for laboratory analysis are critical competencies for MLTs. Apart from patient counselling/ preparation for the collection of clinical samples, lab professionals must provide all relevant information about precautions on specimen collection, transportation, and storage to the patients/clients wherever required. Demonstrating types and using of procedures or tools for sample collection and sample type that needs to be collected for a required test, like serum plasma or whole blood, etc., are vital competencies for MLTs. Professionals should also know about the anticoagulants used for blood or other samples if required. For laboratory professionals, it is also important to demonstrate skin disinfection procedures that are used before taking any blood sample and should be able to perform the sample collection for tests done at primary health centres and chain of custody procedures relating to specimens as per requirements of the test procedure. Professionals should also be able to pack the samples safely and transport clinical samples to higher competent laboratories for advanced testing or any other purpose, considering all sample and environmental safety requirements.

Table 8. Test requisition data and sample collection.
1. Able to understand relevant information provided for test requests on requisition forms, which is essential for the interpretation of results or critical alerts or recording purposes.
2. Able to confirm the identity of the patient and perform venipuncture and capillary blood collection to obtain appropriate samples for laboratory analysis.
3. Able to provide all relevant information about specimen collection, transportation, and storage precautions to the patients/clients wherever required.
4. Able to perform patient counseling/preparation for collection of clinical samples.
5. Able to demonstrate the types and use of procedures or tools for sample collection, like vacutainers for blood samples.
6. Able to demonstrate what type of sample is to be collected for a required test like serum plasma or whole blood, etc.
7. Should know what types of anticoagulants are to be used for blood or other samples if required.
8. Able to demonstrate skin disinfection procedures before taking any blood sample or otherwise wherever required.
9. Able to perform the sample collection for tests routinely done at PHCs and chain of custody procedures relating to specimens as per requirements of the test procedure.
10. Able to pack the samples safely and transport clinical samples to higher competent laboratories for advanced testing or any other purpose, keeping in view all sample and environmental safety requirements

Domain 7. Specimen preparation

Experts arrived at a consensus on three competencies in this domain, Table 9. Processing specimens considering identified priority and verifying that the pertinent specimen data and test requisition form are critical competencies for laboratory professionals. It is also important for the professional to assess the specimen’s suitability for testing and prepare specimens for analysis like blood, body fluids, and other clinical specimens for any examination, including microscopic.

Table 9. Specimen preparation.
1. Able to identify and process specimens considering priority and able to verify the pertinent data on the specimen and test requisition form.
2. Able to assess the specimen’s suitability for testing.
3. Able to prepare specimens for analysis like blood, body fluids, and other clinical specimens for any examination, including microscopic.

Domain 8 assessment and analysis

In this domain, consensus arrived for 14 competencies among the experts, Table 10. For MLT, following the test/equipment’s SOPs properly and understanding their importance is important. For staining, it is critical for laboratory professional to apply the physical and chemical principles of staining and the quality of staining and initiates corrective action. Microscopy is one of the procedures widely used in primary health care settings; hence, lab professionals need to be able to apply routine microscopy and to be able to apply the principles of light measuring systems used in common instruments: reflectometry turbidometry. For test result assessment and analysis, it is important for the professional to be capable of assessing results, identifying sources of interference, and initiating corrective action. Considering the usage of point-of-care tests, it is also important for lab professionals to perform card-based immunoassay tests using commercially available ready-to-use kits for tests done at PHCs with Knowledge of all the precautions affecting the test results. For using analyzers/ semi-auto analyzers, MLTs should be able to apply the principles of commonly used analyzers/ semi-auto analyzers for hematology and biochemistry. Manual counting procedures using cell counters professionals should certainly be able to perform. It is also important for MLTs to apply the principles of hemostasis to perform coagulation testing. For tests under biochemistry, professionals should be able to perform through manual methods, too. While in microscopy, he/she should be able to identify and evaluate the morphology of cellular and non-cellular elements in microscopic preparations. Understanding the differentiation between clinically significant and insignificant findings in the test done at the laboratory is one of the critical competencies for professionals. For MLTs, performing the point of care testing and assessing results is also important. While performing laboratory processes for any tests, the professional should adhere to guidelines for specimen retention, storage, transportation, and disposal.

Table 10. Assessment and analysis.
1. Able to follow the test/equipment SOPs properly and understand their importance.
2. Able to apply the physical and chemical principles of staining and the quality of staining and initiate corrective action.
3. Able to apply the principles of routine microscopy.
4. Able to apply the principles of light measuring systems used in common instruments: reflectometry turbidometry.
5. Able to assess results, identify sources of interference, and initiate corrective action.
6. Able to perform card-based immunoassay tests and tests using commercially available ready-to-use kits for tests done at PHCs with Knowledge of all the precautions affecting the test results.
7. Able to apply principles of commonly used analyzers/ semi-auto analyzers for hematology and biochemistry if available at respective PHC.
8. Able to perform manual counting procedures using cell counters, etc.
9. Able to apply the principles of hemostasis to perform coagulation testing.
10. Able to perform some common biochemistry tests using manual methods.
11. Able to Identify and evaluate the morphology of cellular and non-cellular elements in microscopic preparations.
12. Able to differentiate between clinically significant and insignificant findings to the test done at the laboratory.
13. Able to perform point-of-care testing and assess results.
14. Able to adhere to guidelines for specimen retention, storage, transportation, and disposal

Domain 9. Recording and reporting

In this domain, experts arrived at the consensus for nine competencies,Table 11. For MLTs, It is a critical competency to report results of all types of tests done in PHCs based on manual reporting like; microscopy, colourimetry, strip tests/ card tests, etc., meeting quality control criteria. For reporting results, it is also essential to understand the standard units used in test reports as agreed between laboratory professionals and clinicians. Results comparison with positive and negative control improves the report quality. When referring to any preliminary report on the same test on the same patient, the professional should understand its importance. Recording test results is critical; hence, the professional must know how to feed results data into the laboratory information system or on registers, as applicable. In the case of registers, it is one of the MLT’s responsibilities to keep records in safe custody. It is also vitally important for the professional to recognize and act on critical values by timely communicating the critical reports to the concerned physician. Releasing the test report within the established turn around time is essential for the professional, and they also need to confirm that the laboratory’s report distribution/delivery system is efficient and that the report reaches the clinician or patient confidentially on time.

Table 11. Recording and reporting.
1. Able to report results of all types of tests done in PHCs based on manual reporting like microscopy, colorimetry, strip tests/ card tests, etc., meeting quality control criteria.
2. Able to understand the standard units used in test reports as agreed between laboratory professionals and clinicians.
3. Should know the importance of referring to any preliminary report of the same test on the same patient.
4. Able to compare the results with positive and negative controls.
5. Able to record the test results in the Laboratory Information System or on registers as applicable.
6. Able to keep records/reporting data in safe custody.
7. Able to recognize and act on critical values by timely communicating the critical reports to the concerned physician.
8. Able to release a report within established TAT (Turn Around Time)
9. Able to confirm that the laboratory’s report distribution/delivery system is efficient and that the report reaches the clinician or patient confidentially and on time

Domain 10. Laboratory safety and laboratory-acquired infection control

Experts agreed on 19 competencies in this domain, Table 12. For MLTs, it is one of the critical competencies to demonstrate the general and specific safety precautions of clinical laboratories. Apart from demonstrating the general and specific, it is also important for them to know about laboratory hygiene and infection control practices /policies and to use personal protective equipment appropriately, e.g., gloves, gowns, masks, face shields, and aprons. Professionals should also be able to use laboratory safety devices, e.g., safety pipetting devices, safety containers, and carriers, and be able to minimize possible dangers from biological specimens and use biosafety equipment. Labeling date, handle, store, and dispose of chemicals, dyes, reagents, and solutions according to legislation, e.g., Master Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) and handling and disposing of sharps, particularly syringes and needles, MLTs should essentially be competent. In complying with biomedical waste management policy, professionals should be able to store, handle, transport, and dispose of biological and other hazardous materials, select appropriate disinfectants, and use disinfection and sterilization methods to disinfect materials. The efficacy of sterilizer play a significant role in complying with quality compliance; hence, efficacy testing for sterilizer, professional should undoubtedly be handy. In the laboratory, it is not uncommon to experience needle stick injury; hence, documenting all the incidents related to safety and personal injury like needle stick injury is essentially warranted by laboratory professionals. Even in the case of infection or contamination, the laboratory professional must minimize contamination of materials, equipment, instruments, and environment by aerosol and splatter. In between, it is essentially warranted in the laboratory to follow protocols for care following exposure to blood or other body fluids as required. It is important for MLTs to apply standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection as per organization requirements / local rules and different rules as applicable. Appropriate signage is critical for any laboratory; hence, the professional must ensure the appropriate signage wherever and whenever required, e.g., hazardous, flammable, restricted entry, containment zone etc., in the laboratory. In the event of sharp cuts and abrasions, professionals should be competent to deal with them. Hand hygiene is one of the critical practices that need to be followed in the laboratory; hence, professionals should maintain hand hygiene by washing hands before and after patient contact and after any activity likely to cause contamination. In the case of a soap supply shortage, S/he should use alcohol-based hand sanitizers.

Table 12. Laboratory safety and laboratory-acquired infection control.
1. Able to demonstrate general and specific safety precautions of clinical laboratory
2. Able to use personal protective equipment appropriately, e.g., gloves, gowns, masks, face shields, and aprons.
3. Able to know about laboratory hygiene and infection control practices / Policies.
4. Able to minimize possible dangers from biological specimens and use biosafety equipment.
5. Able to use laboratory safety devices, e.g., safety pipetting devices, safety containers, and carriers.
6. Able to label, date, handle, store, and dispose of chemicals, dyes, reagents, and solutions according to legislation, e.g., Master Safety Data Sheet (MSDS)
7. Able to handle and disposes of sharps (Bio-medical waste policy) with special references to syringes and their needles.
8. Able to store, handle, transport, and dispose of biological and other hazardous materials according to the Bio-medical waste policy
9. Able to use disinfection and sterilization methods to disinfect materials to be used or disposed of.
10. Able to select disinfectant as required.
11. Able to test the efficacy of Sterilizers.
12. Able to document all incidents related to safety and personal injury like Needle Stick Injury
13. Able to apply the standard precautions to prevent the spread of infection as per organization requirements / local rules and other rules as applicable.
14. Able to minimize contamination of materials, equipment, instruments, and environment by aerosol and splatter.
15. Able to follow protocols for care following exposure to blood or other body fluids as required.
16. Able to place appropriate signs wherever and whenever required, e.g., hazardous, flammable, restricted entry, containment zone etc.
17. Able to maintain hand hygiene by washing hands before and after patient contact and after any activity likely to cause contamination.
18. Able to use alcohol-based hand sanitizers, if justified, e.g., soap and water are unavailable or any other such barrier.
19. Able to deal with sharp cuts and abrasions

Based on the experts inputs during the consultation 11 domains were restructured into 10. For example Safe work practices and infection control is considered as single domain. Under assessment and analysis, several competencies were removed as they are not applicable in the primary healthcare settings in India (Refer S2 File).

Stage-3 Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) development

Based on the literature, we developed a Competency Assessment Tool, S3 File, to assess Medical Laboratory Technologist’s competency in terms of knowledge, attitude, and skills. To assess knowledge and attitude, we developed a questionnaire in which 138 questions were constructed, Table 13. Of these, 89 questions were for knowledge, and the remaining 49 were for attitude. Further, we used three instruments to assess MLTs skills: observational, mini clinical laboratory evaluation, and case studies [28, 29]. Under observation, we identified 56 skills, 13 skills under mini-clinical exercises, and five as case study exercises. We developed the tracer elements for observation and mini-clinical evaluation exercises for all the skills and listed those tracer elements under means of verification. Further, we developed the standard score based on means for verification for the skills under observation and mini-clinical evaluation exercises; we developed the standard score definition,Table 14. Please refer S3 File for this version of CAT.

Table 13. Competency assessment tool-instrument details.

Competency Elements Instruments Number of Questions/ Skills
Pre-Consultation Post Consultation
Knowledge Questionnaire 89 53
Attitude Questionnaire 49 23
Skills Observational Checklist 56 26
Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercises 13 4
Case Study Exercises 5 4

Table 14. Score definition.

Score Definition
A. None—No demonstrated skills at all/does not perform the task(s) completely.
B. Limited Demonstrated very limited strengths/skills in this area.
C. Some—Demonstrated some ability/skills in this area.
D. Strong—Demonstrated strong skills/strength in this area.
E. Excellent—Demonstrated excellent skills/strength in this area.
F. Not applicable
G. Don’t know- Not even heard about that skill.
H. Skill limitation is related to resource limitations.

Stage 4 expert consultation

In this stage, to develop a consensus among experts on the MLT’s competency assessment tool, we organized an expert consultation on 18th November 2022 in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. The consensus among experts arrived at 76 questions, of which 53 were for knowledge and the rest 23 were for attitude. Under skill assessment, consensus was achieved among experts for 26 skills under Observational exercises, four for mini-clinical, and four for case studies, Table 14. Please refer the S4 File for this version of CAT.

Stage-5 CAT pre-testing

In this stage, we converted the English version of CAT into a bilingual format in English and Odia (vernacular language). After that, we administered the bilingual CAT with one of the Medical Laboratory Technologist in one of the public primary health care facilities in Khorda district, Odisha, India. Based on the pre-testing learnings, we improvised the CAT and finalized it as a bilingual Competency Assessment Tool, supporting information file. For section-wise learning details, please refer to Table 15.

Table 15. Pre-testing learning.

CAT Section Sr. No. Learnings
C1. Questionnaire (Knowledge and Attitude) 4 Respondents were not clear with the word critical components. So, to improve the clarity, we gave some examples for the critical component, like addressing the complaints and feedback from Patients, Physicians, and Staff and learnings from accidents/ Incidents.
45 Respondents were not very clear with the term-transcript check. To improve clarity, we extended the question with one example for transcript check as—One should check and observe whether the rough data of results, the data entered into the lab register or on LIS, and the report data entered into the final report format to be given to the patient are same.
C2. Observational Tools 6 We realized the unavailability of the listed equipments for efficacy testing. Hence, to accommodate this resource limitation, we extended the list of equipment to any other instruments/equipment used in the laboratory.
7 First Entry and First Out (FEFO) is equally important as First in and First Out. So, we extended FI-FO with FEFO.

Three assessors, all graduates in medical laboratory science, took part in the pre-testing. One assessor focused on establishing a rapport with the facility administrator and assessing skills through observation. Meanwhile, the other two assessors evaluated knowledge, attitude, and skills through mini clinical evaluation exercises and case study exercises. The average time spent on administering the questionnaire, observational checklist, mini clinical exercises, and case studies was 1.5 minutes, 3 minutes, 10 minutes, and 3 minutes, respectively (Table 16). Mainly, assessments were conducted verbally, except for observation and mini clinical exercises.

Table 16. CAT section wise average time and asssessment mode.

Competency Elements Instruments Numbers Average time Assessment Mode
Knowledge Questionnaire 53 1.5 Min. Verbal
Attitude Questionnaire 23 1.5 Mins. Verbal
Skills Observational Checklist 26 3 Mins Observation
Mini Clinical Evaluation Exercises 4 10 Mins Observation and Verbal
Case Study Exercises 4 3 Mins Verbal

Discussion

We developed the competency assessment framework for In-Service Medical Laboratory Technologists in primary healthcare settings. Under this, we identified the MLTs’ role-based domains and their competencies. Along with the domains and their competencies, we developed the Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) to assess the level of competencies among in-service MLTs. As CAT will help identify the competency gap, this framework will help the policymakers and implementers design solutions to bridge the competency gap among the in-service MLTs in primary healthcare settings. It will further lead to improved MLT performance in primary healthcare.

Factors influencing MLTs competency

Pre-Service Education influences the MLTs’ competency the most. It is facing multi-pronged challenges even though entry-level qualifications are different at different levels; there is no uniformity in training periods and no standard curriculum [30]. Apart from these, another pressing challenge for teaching institutions is the shortage of qualified faculty. In India, MLTs and other allied health professionals are still not regulated. However, In 2021, the Government of India came up with the National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act to regulate and maintain allied health professional’s education standards and services, which is yet to be implemented in most states [31, 32].

In the Indian public health system, the union and state governments have made the limited efforts to capacitate the Medical Laboratory Technologists. Government agencies efforts are primarily fragmented in building LTs capacity under the Revised National Tuberculosis Control Program, National Leprosy Eradication Programme, and others [33, 34].

Importance of competency assessment framework in developing competency-based training for medical laboratory technologists

It is evident that the Competency framework for training helps improve MLTs performance irrespective of the type of settings [35]. In India, there are lacunae in providing training to the in-service workforce. Competency-based Training (CBT), a structured training and assessment system that allows individuals to acquire skills and knowledge to perform work activities to a specified standard, is a globally accepted solution to capacitate the in-service professional [36]. The competencies and the competency assessment tool will play a foundational role in developing the Competency-based training manual and other resource materials for MLTs in primary healthcare Settings.

Strengths and limitations

The strength of this study is the consultative approach through which this MLT competency assessment framework has been developed. Eighteen experts in medical laboratory science participated in this process. These experts have over 20 Years of experience in teaching, policymaking, and practice from teaching institutions, union, state governments, professional bodies, and private and public laboratory service providers. In both consultations, 18 experts participated; hence, we recognize that the experts who participated in this study cannot be considered the complete representation of all the stakeholders for the in-service MLTs competency development initiative.

Apart from that, we did not use any tool to check the validity of the score definition for Skills assessment (observation and mini clinical exercises). We also understand that we pre-tested CAT in only one public facility in Odisha, India, and did not use any quantitative tool to check its validity. Another limitation is the variety of regional languages, which necessitates pre-testing the CAT in the regional language in order to adapt it to the specific requirements of the region/state.

The developed competency assessment framework is comprehensive. Hence, administering CAT to assess in-service MLT competency is time-consuming. As the role of medical laboratory professionals evolves based on advancement in medical laboratory science, this competency assessment framework would also need periodic review and updating.

Conclusion

The framework for MLTs competency assessment aims to pinpoint the training requirements for MLTs working in primary health care settings. Its implementation can assist in creating competency-based training programs in primary healthcare facilities, leading to the upskilling of MLTs and the enhancement of laboratory service quality in Indian primary healthcare.

Practice implication

The MLTs competency assessment framework enables health system implementers to identify gaps in the competencies of MLTs working in primary health care settings. Subsequently, they can create and design competency-based training programs to enhance their skills and abilities. It can also contribute to developing the curriculum and pedagogy of education of MLTs.

The indian public health systems have a structured framework in place to strengthen the skills of in-service personnel, including MLTs. The allocated resources for this capacity-building initiative can be utilized to cover the expenses associated with assessments and the development of competencies.

Supporting information

S1 File. Literature based medical laboratory technologist’s competencies.

(PDF)

pone.0294939.s001.pdf (154.2KB, pdf)
S2 File. Competencies for medical laboratory technicians in primary health care setting.

(PDF)

pone.0294939.s002.pdf (183.1KB, pdf)
S3 File. Competency assessment tool-medical laboratory technologist-lit based.

(PDF)

pone.0294939.s003.Pdf (492.8KB, Pdf)
S4 File. Competency assessment tool-medical laboratory technician-post consultation.

(PDF)

pone.0294939.s004.pdf (322.5KB, pdf)
S5 File. Competency assessment tool-medical laboratory technician-bilingual.

(PDF)

pone.0294939.s005.pdf (740.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Mr. Rajeev Sadanandan, Dr. Kumaravel Ilangovan, from HSTP and Mrs. Shivangini Kar Dave from Novo Nordisk Foundation for their useful suggestions on development of this paper. We also recognize the contributions of the experts who participated in the consultations during the study.

List of abbreviations

LMIC

Low- and Middle-Income Countries

MLT

Medical Laboratory Technologists

PHC

Primary health care

WHO

World Health Organization

CAT

Competency Assessment Tool

CBT

Competency-based Training

HSTP

Health Systems Transformation Platform

MSDS

Master Safety Data Sheet

TAT

Turn Around Time

BMW

Bio-Medical Waste

4 M

Money, Man, Material, and Minutes

SOP

Standard of Procedures

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was supported by the Health Systems Transformation Platform, New Delhi. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Toni B, Tadeu M, Geelhoed D. "This thing of testing our blood is really very important": a qualitative study of primary care laboratory services in Tete Province, Mozambique. Int J Equity Health [Internet]. 2016;1–11. Available from: 10.1186/s12939-016-0418-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Oragnization WH. Laboratory Services for Primary Health Care: Requirement for Essential Clinical Laboratory Tests. 1998.
  • 3.Kos FT, Hocazade C, Kos M, Uncu D, Karakas E, Dogan M, et al. Assessment of prognostic value of "neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio" and "prognostic nutritional index" as a sytemic inflammatory marker in non-small cell lung cancer. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(9):3997–4002. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.9.3997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Petti CA, Polage CR, Quinn TC, Ronald AR, Sande MA. Laboratory Medicine in Africa: A Barrier to Effective Health Care. Clin Infect Dis [Internet]. 2006. [cited 2021 Oct 27];42:377–82. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/42/3/377/378561 doi: 10.1086/499363 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kamradt-Scott A. The International Health Regulations (2005). Int Organ Law Rev. 2019;16(2):242–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Nations U. 70/1. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Preamble. 2030;
  • 7.Declaration TM. The Maputo Declaration The Maputo Declaration on Strengthening of Laboratory Systems. 2008;(104):2007–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Yadav H, Shah D, Sayed S, Horton S, Schroeder LF. Availability of essential diagnostics in ten low-income and middle-income countries: results from national health facility surveys. Lancet Glob Heal [Internet]. 2021. [cited 2021 Nov 22];9:e1553–60. Available from: www.thelancet.com/lancetgh doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00442-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dacombe RJ, Squire SB, Ramsay AR, Banda HT, Bates I. Essential medical laboratory services: their role in delivering equitable health care in Malawi. Vol. 18, Malawi Medical Journal. 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koo D, Miner K. Outcome-Based Workforce Development and Education in Public Health. Annu Rev Public Heal [Internet]. 2010. [cited 2021 Nov 22];31:253–69. Available from: www.annualreviews.org doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809.103705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wodruffe C. What Is Meant by a Competency? Leadersh Organ Dev J. 1993;14(1):29–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Medicaid C for M and. What Do I Need to Do to Assess Personnel Competency? GENERAL. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CLIA/CLIA_Brochures.html
  • 13.Authority ANT. Laboratory Operations Training Package. 2004;1. Available from: https://training.gov.au/TrainingComponentFiles/NTIS/PML04_2.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Canadian Society for Medical Laboratory Science. Competency Profile: General Medical Labroatory Technologists. 2005;(June).
  • 15.Services DG of H, India M of H& FWG of. Indian Public Health Standards Guidelines for Phc. Dir Gen Heal Serv Minist Heal Fam Welf Gov India. 2009;144:15–20.
  • 16.National Essential Diagnostics List [Internet]. New Delhi, India: Indian Council of Medical Research; 2019 p. 47. Available from: https://main.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/guidelines/NEDL_2019.pdf
  • 17.Jain R, Rao B. Role of laboratory services in primary health center (PHC) outpatient department performance: an Indian case study. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019. Jul 16;20:e112. doi: 10.1017/S1463423619000537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kasvosve I, Ledikwe JH, Phumaphi O, Mpofu M, Nyangah R, Motswaledi MS, et al. Continuing professional development training needs of medical laboratory personnel in Botswana. Hum Resour Health. 2014;12(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-12-46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Nemenqani DM, Tekian A, Park YS. Competency assessment in laboratory medicine: Standardization and utility for technical staff assessment and recertification in Saudi Arabia. Med Teach. 2017;39(November):S63–74. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2016.1254751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.National AIDS Control Organization. Training of Laboratory Technicians to Deliver STI/RTI Services-Facilitators Guide. Vol. 3, Government of India. 2011.
  • 21.World Health Organization. Laboratory leadership competency framework [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 [cited 2024 Mar 19]. 55 p. Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/311445
  • 22.National Skill Development G of I. Model Curriculum-Medical Laboratory Technician [Internet]. Encyclopedia of Community Policing and Problem Solving. 2013. Available from: https://www.healthcare-ssc.in/images/qp/model-curriulumn/Medical-Laboratory-Technician.pdf
  • 23.The Ministry of Health and Family Welfare G of I. Model Curriculum Handbook Medical Laboratory Science [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2023 Jul 31]. Available from: https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/Model Curriculum Handbook-Medical lab sciences.pdf
  • 24.Health Sector Skill Council. Qualification Pack-Occupational Standards for Allied Healthcare [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.healthcare-ssc.in/pdf/RTT.pdf
  • 25.Tashkandi SA, Alenezi A, Bakhsh I, Aljuryyan A, Alshehry ZH, Alrashdi S, et al. Clinical laboratory services for primary healthcare centers in urban cities: a pilot ACO model of ten primary healthcare centers. BMC Fam Pract [Internet]. 2021; Available from: 10.1186/s12875-021-01449-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Division of Programme Support and Management. Laboratory Services in UNHCR-Supported Primary Health Care Facilities [Internet]. Geneva; 2011. Available from: https://www.unhcr.org/sites/default/files/legacy-pdf/4f707fd49.pdf
  • 27.Ned-Sykes R, Johnson C, Ridderhof JC, Perlman E, Pollock A, DeBoy JM. Competency Guidelines for Public Health Laboratory Professionals: CDC and the Association of Public Health Laboratories. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2015;64(1):1–81. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Batra P, Batra R, Verma N, Bokariya P, Garg S, Yadav S. Mini clinical evaluation exercise (Mini-CEX): A tool for assessment of residents in department of surgery. J Educ Health Promot [Internet]. 2022. Aug 1 [cited 2023 Jul 24];11(1):253. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC9621368/ doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1600_21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Organization WH. Global Competency and Outcomes Framework for Universal Health Coverage [Internet]. 2022. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240034662
  • 30.Rawekar A, Gotarkar S, Patond S, Dakhode S. Challenges of allied healthcare professionals in india–establishing the council is need of the hour. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(4):9231–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.MoHFW. National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021. The Gazette of India Extraordinary [Internet]. 2021;(Dl):1–29. Available from: https://egazette.nic.in/WriteReadData/2021/226213.pdf
  • 32.Babu G. Health ministry again extends timeline for states to constitute allied and healthcare councils by six months [Internet]. Pharmabiz.com. 2023. [cited 2023 Aug 8]. Available from: http://www.pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=158270&sid=1 [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Central TB Division Directorate General of Health Services, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare G of I. Module for Laboratory Technicians [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://tbcindia.nic.in/pdfs/Module for Laboratory Technician.pdf
  • 34.Training Manual for Laboratory Technicians [Internet]. Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Government of India f; Available from: https://cltri.gov.in/LT%20Training%20Manual.pdf
  • 35.Roegiers X. A Conceptual Framework for Competencies Assessment | International Bureau of Education. Unesco [Internet]. 2016;(4):44. Available from: http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/document/conceptual-framework-competencies-assessment [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Organization IL. Competency-Based Training (CBT): An Introductory Manual for Practitioners [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2023 Mar 28]. Available from: www.ilo.org/publns.

Decision Letter 0

Susan Horton

28 Dec 2023

PONE-D-23-32693Developing a Competency Assessment Framework for Medical Laboratory Technologists in Primary Health Care Settings in IndiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please respond to the helpful comments the reviewers have made. If there has not been as yet any implementation of this framework, please comment based on previous experience elsewhere, or experience with implementing other frameworks in India.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 11 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Susan Horton

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please include a caption for figure 1.

3. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments:

Please consider the comments made by the reviewers. It may not be easy to discuss the experience of implementation of the framework if it has not yet been implemented, but please comment based on any experience that is available.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: This is a detailed report of the steps taken to create a comprehensive competency assessment framework for medical laboratory techologists working in primary healthcare settings in India. It would be good if the authors analyse and report its robustness when applied on the ground.

Reviewer #2: The manuscript presents a meaningful project to develop a Competency Assessment Tool (CAT) for MLT in public primary health care settings in India. Please address the following issues:

• Results and Discussion should include examples on objections or matters of concern raised against the competencies that have been proposed but did not reach unanimous consensus.

• Is there record regarding the (average) time spent on completing various parts of the CAT listed in Additional file 3, such as time spent on each questionnaire and each observational assessment? How many assessors were assigned on Observational Tools (Skills) and Mini Clinical Laboratory Skills? How are the case studies conducted, verbally or written?

• While such professional assessment is usually conducted by nominees working on voluntary basis, the exercise will still incur financial commitments. Please suggest plans for such financial support.

• What is the plan of implementing the CAT studied and will it become mandatory for MLT license or practise? Please also recommend if such assessment will be conducted regularly and the frequency if applicable.

• In addition to the limitations discussed near the end of the manuscript, are there other hurdles that the authors anticipate in the implementation of CAT established in this exercise? For instance, will the diversity of local languages be a problem? The CAT needs to be improvised when the bilingual version is finalized as described under Stage 5 Pre-testing.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 1;19(4):e0294939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294939.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


20 Jan 2024

01 Please consider the comments made by the reviewers. It may not be easy to discuss the experience of implementation of the framework if it has not yet been implemented, but please comment based on any experience that is available.

Res- Thank you for your suggestions/comments. We have made the necessary changes.

02 Results and Discussion should include examples on objections or matters of concern raised against the competencies that have been proposed but did not reach unanimous consensus. Res-Thank you for your comments. We have made the necessary changes in the results. Please refer Page 20 and Line number 408 to 411.

03 Is there record regarding the (average) time spent on completing various parts of the CAT listed in Additional file 3, such as time spent on each questionnaire and each observational assessment? How many assessors were assigned on Observational Tools (Skills) and Mini Clinical Laboratory Skills? How are the case studies conducted, verbally or written?

Res-Thank you. We have addressed your comments. Please refer Page 23 and Line number 448 to 457.

04 While such professional assessment is usually conducted by nominees working on voluntary basis, the exercise will still incur financial commitments. Please suggest plans for such financial support.

Res- Thank you. We have addressed your comments. Please refer Page 26, Line No. 523 to 526

05 What is the plan of implementing the CAT studied and will it become mandatory for MLT license or practise? Please also recommend if such assessment will be conducted regularly and the frequency if applicable.

Res- Thank you for the valid question. Policymakers have yet to make this policy decision to implement this framework.

06 In addition to the limitations discussed near the end of the manuscript, are there other hurdles that the authors anticipate in implementing CAT established in this exercise? For instance, will the diversity of local languages be a problem? The CAT needs to be improvised when the bilingual version is finalized as described under Stage 5 Pre-testing.

Res- Thank you. We have addressed your comments. Please refer Page 25 and Line Number 505 to 507

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.pdf

pone.0294939.s006.pdf (72.4KB, pdf)

Decision Letter 1

Susan Horton

24 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-32693R1Developing a Competency Assessment Framework for Medical Laboratory Technologists in Primary Health Care Settings in IndiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. The manuscript needs to be thoroughly proofread such that it is professional in style. See specific suggestions below.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Mar 09 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Susan Horton

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

I am satisfied with the response to the reviewers' comments. I am requesting that you carefully proofread the manuscript such that it is in professional form. Here are suggestions:

Line 72 (and elsewhere) – it is unusual to capitalize Clinically. Similarly, throughout the manuscript I think it is inconsistent to capitalize Competencies in some places but not others, unless referring to Competency Assessment Tool. Similarly Primary Care is not usually capitalized (throughout).

Lines 118-121: it would be better to either remove the capitalization on the various terms (or else to add capitals to planning (line 119) - consistency is important

Line 171: need space after “CAT” and before “in” and remove comma after “in”

Line 174: Medical Laboratory Services and Pathology are capitalized, but not laboratory science – be consistent! This inconsistency exists in several other places in the text where a list is provided, with some (but not all) of the items capitalized. In many cases, they would be better not capitalized unless referring to a proper noun.

Line 183: spelling of “domains”, and leave a space after “domains” and before “Table”

Line 390: spelling of “domains”

Line 392: suggest “they are” in place of “its is”

Line 424: remove space before “ .” and also add a space after “,”

P23, table 15: “list of equipment” not “equipments”

Line 476: delete “Care” after “healthcare”

Line 479: add space before “Eighteen”

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 2

Susan Horton

30 Jan 2024

Developing a Competency Assessment Framework for Medical Laboratory Technologists in Primary Health Care Settings in India

PONE-D-23-32693R2

Dear Dr. Kumar,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Susan Horton

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thanks for proofreading the manuscript. I have four small suggestions.

line 123: please retain the capitalization on Canadian Society for Medical Science - this is the proper name of the society

Line 131 - I think it is more appropriate to retain capitalization on Government of India

line 143: no need to capitalize Care

line 151 - can abbreviate MLT

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Susan Horton

20 Mar 2024

PONE-D-23-32693R2

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Kumar,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Susan Horton

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Literature based medical laboratory technologist’s competencies.

    (PDF)

    pone.0294939.s001.pdf (154.2KB, pdf)
    S2 File. Competencies for medical laboratory technicians in primary health care setting.

    (PDF)

    pone.0294939.s002.pdf (183.1KB, pdf)
    S3 File. Competency assessment tool-medical laboratory technologist-lit based.

    (PDF)

    pone.0294939.s003.Pdf (492.8KB, Pdf)
    S4 File. Competency assessment tool-medical laboratory technician-post consultation.

    (PDF)

    pone.0294939.s004.pdf (322.5KB, pdf)
    S5 File. Competency assessment tool-medical laboratory technician-bilingual.

    (PDF)

    pone.0294939.s005.pdf (740.8KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.pdf

    pone.0294939.s006.pdf (72.4KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter.pdf

    pone.0294939.s007.pdf (72.4KB, pdf)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES